HomeMy WebLinkAbout07 JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT NOISE ABATEMENT QUARTERLY REPORT091__�N
Agenda Item _ 7
to
AGENDA REPORT Reviewed:
City Manager
Finance Director N/A
MEETING DATE: JUNE 6, 2017
TO: JEFFREY C. PARKER, CITY MANAGER
FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT NOISE ABATEMENT QUARTERLY REPORT
SUMMARY:
This agenda report transmits the John Wayne Airport (JWA) Noise Abatement Quarterly
Report for the fourth quarter of 2016. The average noise level measured at Tustin's
monitoring station (NMS 10N), located at Columbus Tustin Middle School on Beneta Way
(Figure 1), remained consistent with prior quarters during this fourth quarter reporting
period. Average noise levels during the fourth quarter remained well below the City,
County, and State criteria of 65 dB Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) for
residential uses.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council receive and file this report.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No fiscal impact.
Figure 1
JWA Noise Report
June 6, 2017
Page 2
CORRELATION TO THE STRATEGIC PLAN:
Staff's analysis and report of the quarterly JWA Noise Abatement Report falls under Goal
D of the Strategic Plan pertaining to strong community and regional relationships. The
City of Tustin strives to work collaboratively with agencies both within and outside Tustin
on issues of mutual interest and concern, and in this instance, on matters of airport traffic
and noise.
DISCUSSION:
Following the conclusion of each calendar quarter, JWA staff prepares a Noise
Abatement Program Quarterly Report and posts a copy of the report on their website.
Attached is the quarterly report for the fourth quarter of 2016, which includes the months
of October through December. An overview of the information contained within the JWA
Noise Report includes measured noise levels, and an analysis of noise complaints.
Measured Noise Levels
Aircraft noise is most noticeable during airplane takeoffs and landings, primarily due to
engine noise. Although engines produce a significant amount of aircraft noise, many other
factors may influence the perception of noise including: proximity; weather — in bad
weather, engine noise is reflected off of the atmosphere making jets appear louder than
on clear days; routes; non-scheduled operations which could include military or private
aircraft; emergencies; and, weight — a heavier load may affect an aircraft's rate of ascent.
During the fourth quarter of 2016, the average CNEL at Tustin's monitoring station on
Beneta Way was 55.5 dB. This is 1.1 dB lower than the average of the previous quarter
(Q-36: July — September 2016). The average noise level for this quarter is very similar to
the average from the previous four quarters which is 56.4 dB. Figure 2 provides a
visualization of Tustin's CNEL levels for each month during the fourth quarter of 2016.
70
60
50
> 40
w
J
J
W
30
20
10
Daily Community Noise Equivalent Levels (CNEL) in
Tustin - October - December 2016
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31
Date
October
-November
- December
-Noise Impact Area Level (65 dB)
JWA Noise Report
June 6, 2017
Page 2
Noise Complaints Figure 2
The Airport's Access and Noise Office receives and investigates noise calls and
complaints from local citizens and other sources. Throughout all of the Orange County
monitoring area, noise complaints increased during the fourth quarter of 2016 in
comparison to the second quarter. It should be noted that several of the complaints were
made from one (1) household in Irvine, and one (1) household in San Juan Capistrano.
During the fourth quarter of 2016, there were nine (9) Tustin area complaint calls, which
is two (2) more complaints than the previous quarter. Tustin staff has outreached to JWA
staff to gather further details on the nature of the complaints, and to understand how JWA
staff responds to each complainant. The breakdown of the nine (9) complaints is as
follows: four (4) were received regarding departure noise; three (3) were received
regarding low-flying aircraft; one (1) was received regarding arrival noise; and, one (1)
was received regarding general aircraft noise. JWA staff replied to the concerns via phone
or e-mail, and one call regarding the low-flying aircraft was referred to the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) for further action. Two (2) of the concerns were left with no response
requested by the complainant.
To provide an understanding of the trend in Tustin area complaints throughout the years,
a chart displaying the number of noise complaints for the past five (5) years is displayed
below (Figure 3). Generally, there is a noticeable increase in noise complaints during the
second and third quarters of the year, which further supports the theory that an increase
in complaints tends to occur during the warmer months of spring and summer. Overall,
the number of complaints has not reached more than twelve (12) complaints in a single
quarter during this five-year reporting period.
Figure 3
Noise Complaints - Tustin
14
—
12
-
e
10
a
E
u
$
16
d
6
.n
E
0
Z
4
2
0
1� 1y 1y ,ro •,(o
A��O1~��
p�ro ti�ti�•tiO
n�\•y`o
P\1O~A
1��Oyd \�OtiP
tiO,~ ���
ti\~y '.y� A��O
(P
C
dti��O4�O6n\ryOo- C1��d 6Q��O
o3�0Cb��O
p d O d O d 6 0-.1\11,11
C O
Quarter/Year
Figure 3
JWA Noise Report
June 6, 2017
Page 2
Since noise issues are of considerable importance to the City of Tustin, the Community
Development Department will continue to monitor operations at JWA unless otherwise
directed by the City Council. The public are additionally welcome to participate in JWA's
Quarterly meetings held by the Access and Noise Office. The next quarterly meeting will
be held on June 14, 2017, at 2:00 p.m. in the Eddie Martin Administration Building located
at 3160 Airway Avenue in Costa Mesa.
Adrianne DiLeva-Johnson
Management Analyst
PAA
Sw,rEI abeth A. Binsack
Director of Community Development
Attachment:
John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Quarterly Report for October 1, 2016, through December 31, 2016.
ATTACHMENT
John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Quarterly Report for
October 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (Fourth Quarter)
NOISE ABATEMENT PROGRAM
QUARTERLY REPORT
For the period:
October 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016
Prepared in accordance with:
AIRPORT NOISE STANDARD
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
California Administrative Code Title 21,
Chapter 2.5, Subchapter 6:
Division of Aeronautics
Noise Standards
Submitted by:
Barry A. Rondinella, A.A.E./C.A.E.
Airport Director
John Wayne Airport, Orange County
INTRODUCTION
This is the 176th Quarterly Report submitted by the County of Orange in accordance with the
requirements of the California Airport Noise Standards (California Administrative Code Title 21, Chapter
2.5, SubChapter 6: Division of Aeronautics Noise Standards). Effective January 1, 1986, the criteria for
defining "Noise Impact Area" was changed from 70 dB to 65 dB Community Noise Equivalent Level
(CNEL). Under this criteria, John Wayne Airport currently has a "Noise Impact Area."
NOISE IMPACT SUMMARY
Caltrans' Aeronautics Program has established guidelines in the California State Noise Standard to control
residential area noise levels produced by aircraft operations using the State's airports. Under those
guidelines, residential noise sensitive areas exposed to an average Community Noise Equivalent Level
(CNEL) of more than 65 dB define the "Noise Impact Area." John Wayne Airport uses ten permanent
remote noise monitoring stations (NMS) located in Newport Beach, Santa Ana, Tustin and Irvine to
measure noise levels, at the following locations:
MONITOR STATIONS
NMS -1 S: Golf Course, 3100 Irvine Ave., Newport Beach NMS -6S: 1912 Santiago, Newport Beach
NMS -2S: 20162 S.W. Birch St., Newport Beach NMS -7S: 1131 Back Bay Drive, Newport Beach
NMS -3S: 2139 Anniversary Lane, Newport Beach NMS -8N: 17372 Eastman Street, Irvine
NMS -4S: 2338 Tustin Ave., Newport Beach NMS -9N: 1300 S. Grand Avenue, Santa Ana
NMS -5S: 324'/2 Vista Madera, Newport Beach NMS -ION: 17952 Beneta Way, Tustin
The map in Figure 1 shows the general location of each permanent remote monitor station.
Figure 2 shows the Airport's "Noise Impact Area" for the previous year (January 1, 2016 - December 31,
2016). The Figure 2 information was developed by Landrum & Brown, in consultation with John Wayne
Airport. CNEL values measured for the period and current digitized land use information were utilized to
calculate the land area acreages, number of residences and estimated number of people within the "Noise
Impact Area".
- 1 -
Figure 1
Wil
AIRCRAFT TRAFFIC SUMMARY
The Airport traffic summary for this quarter is shown in Table 1 below. Air Carrier operational count
histories and average daily departure counts are illustrated in Tables 9 & 11.
TABLE 1
LANDING AND TAKEOFF OPERATIONS
October - December 2016
Period
Air Carriers
GA Jet (1)
Total
Operations (2)
Average Daily
Jet Operations
Jet
Prop
October
7,815
122
3,064
23,128
351
November
7,501
120
2,837
21,927
345
December
7,555
1161
2,667
21,266
330
Fourth Quarter
22,871
358
8,568
66,321
342
Twelve Months
01/01/16 - 12/31/16
91,366
1,156
33,526
284,246
341
NOTE: (1) GA Jet figures include a 5% factor for operations not identified by the JWA noise monitor
stations.
(2) Counts in this column are based upon records provided by the local FAA representatives.
COMMUNITY NOISE EQUIVALENT LEVELS
The monthly, quarterly and twelve month Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) average values for
each monitor station are shown in Table 2, while daily CNEL values are shown in Tables 3 through 5.
Insufficient data is indicated by "#N/A" entries in each table. Also, "*#N/A" entries in each table indicate
there were no aircraft -related noise events.
Average Single Event Noise Exposure Level (SENEL) values for Air Carrier and General Aviation Jet
aircraft are shown in Tables 6 through 8 -GA.
ACOUSTICAL INSULATION PROGRAM
Four hundred eighteen residences in the Santa Ana Heights area have been sound attenuated and an avigation
easement reserved through the County's Acoustical Insulation Program, which closed in December 2009.
The County has also acquired 46 residences as part of the Purchase Assurance Program, many of which were
acoustically insulated, an avigation easement reserved and then resold. Among these County acquired
homes, those located within areas designated for Business Park uses were razed, avigation easements were
reserved, and the land resold for compatible Business Park uses. A total of 464 residences in the Santa Ana
Heights area have been purchased or otherwise made compatible through the County's Purchase Assurance
and Acoustical Insulation Programs. Seventy-seven dwelling units in Santa Ana Heights remain in the
"Noise Impacted Area" (within 65 dB CNEL contour).
COMPLAINT TOTALS (October 1, 2016 - December 31, 2016)
The Airport's Access and Noise Office receives and investigates noise complaints from local citizens and all
other sources. During October 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, the Office received 375 complaints
from local citizens. This is a 63.8% decrease from the 1,036 complaints received last quarter. It is a 7.4%
increase from the 349 complaints received during the same quarter last year. Figure 3 shows the distribution
of the quarterly complaints from local communities.
-4-
r!,
E
E
0
U
Note:
Anaheim Hills
Arch Beach Heights
Balboa Island
Bay Shoms
Cameo Shares
Corona del Mai -
Costa Mesa
Coto de Caza
Dana Point
Dovei, Shores
Eastbluff
Hai,boi, Cove
Huntington Beach
Irvine
Laden Ranch
Laguna Beach
Laguna Hills
Laguna Niguel
Lake Forest
Lido Isle
Long Beach
Newport Beach
Newport Coast
North Tustin
Orange
Panorama Heights
San Juan Capisti,ano
Santa Ana
Santa Ana Heights
Tustin
W[nown
Westcliff
FIGURE 3
HISTOGRAM BY COMMUNITY
3
5
7
21
30
16
76
1
20
§17
10
31
71
7
7
15
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80
Number of Complaints
0 87% of the complaints from the "Irvine" category were from one household.
0 96% of the complaints from the "San Juan Capistrano" category were from one household.
WE
TABLE 2
LONG TERM MEASURED LEVELS
Aircraft CNEL from 01/01/16 through 12/31/16
Values in db at Each Site
Period
NMS Site
1S
2S
3S
4S
5S
6S
7S
8N
9N
ION
Jan 2016
67.5
66.5
65.8
59.4
58.7
59.6
55.9
67.6
44.0
56.6
# Days
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
27
31
Feb 2016
67.1
66.1
66.1
58.6
57.8
59.8
55.0
66.4
43.5
54.4
# Days
291
29
29
291
29
291
29
29
281
29
Mar 2016
67.7
66.9
66.3
59.7
59.2
60.1
56.3
68.1
43.7
56.8
# Days
31
31
31
31
31
311i
31
31
29
31
Q-12016
67.4
66.5
66.1
59.2
58.6
59.8
55.8
67.4
43.7
56.1
# Days
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
84
91
Apr 2016
67.7
66.6
66.1
59.6
58.9
59.7
56.3
67.8
43.5
56.5
# Days
30
27
30
30
30
30
30
30
26
30
May 2016
68.1
#N/A
66.5
60.4
59.4
60.3
56.8
68.3
43.5
57.7
# Days
31
0
31
31
31
31
31
31
28
31
Jun 2016
68.3
67.3
66.7
60.2
58.7
59.9
55.9
' 68.2
45.2
57.1
# Days
30
7
30
30
30
30
30
30
29
30
Q-2 2016
68.
66.8
66.4
60.1
59.0
60.
56.3
68.1
44.2
57.2
# Days
91
34
91
91
91
91
91
91
83
91
Ju12016
68.2
67.1
66.6
59.9
58.8
59.5
55.8
67.9
42.8
56.4
# Days
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
27
31
Aug 2016
68.5
67.5
67.0
60.1
59.2
59.5
56.2
68.1
42.1
56.9
# Days
31
31
31
31
31
30
29
31
25
31
Sep 2016
67.7
66.7
66.3
59.5
58.7
58.8
56.0
67.8
43.6
56.5
# Days
30
25
30
30
30
30
30
30
23
30
Q-3 2016
68.1
67.1
66.6
59.8
58.
59.3
56.0
67.9
42.8
56.
# Days
92
87
92
92
92
91
90
92
75
92
Oct 2016
67.8
66.8
66.5
59.5
59.0
60.0
56.1
67.7
42.9
56.1
# Days
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
27
31
NR ov 2016
67.5
66.5
66.2
59.3
58.7
59.8
55.7
67.2
44.2
55.1
# Days
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
Dec 2016
67.1
66.3
66.9
59.4
58.9
61.3
55.8
67.4
45.6
55.3
# Days
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
29
31
Q4 2016
67.5
66.5
66.5
59.4
58.9
60.4
55.9
67.4
44.4
55.
# Days
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
86
92
Q-12016 thru Q-4 2016
Total
67.8
66.7
66.4
59.
58.
59.
56.0
67.
43.
56.4
# Days
3
304
366
366
366
365
364
366
328
366
Q4 2015 thru Q-3 2016 (Previous 4 Quarters)
Total
67.
66.7
66.3
59.5
58.7
59.
55.
67..
43.
56.5
# Days
3
303
3651
360
361
360
3591
364
316
354
Change from Previous 4 Quarters
0.01
0.01
0.11
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.1
-0.11
0.2
-0.1
-6-
TABLE 3
DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION
October 2016
Date
1S
2S
3S
4S
NMS Site
5S 6S
7S
8N
9N
ION
1
65.4
64.7
64.4
57.9
56.5
57.4
53.5
65.4
39.9
53.5
2
67.8
66.5
66.0
60.2
58.9
60.1
56.3
68.5
39.7
58.2
3
68.0
66.9
66.3
60.0
60.0
60.7
57.6
68.2
32.4
56.5
4
67.5
66.4
65.7
60.2
58.9
59.9
56.0
68.1
38.7
58.0
5
67.8
66.6
66.2
60.2
59.5
60.5
56.4
68.3
37.3
57.1
6
68.5
67.4
67.0
60.0
59.3
60.5
56.5
68.4
32.6
56.3
7
68.3
67.1
66.5
58.5
57.9
58.9
55.0
67.7
46.2
54.2
8
65.8
64.8
63.7
56.1
55.9
56.51
52.6
64.3
*#N/Aj
51.9
9
66.9
66.1
65.2
57.7
57.8
58.4
54.7
67.
*#N/A
56.4
10
68.0
67.2
66.7
59.5
59.4
60.3
56.6
68.1
41.3
56.5
11
67.7
67.2
66.1
59.3
59.5
60.2
56.1
68.4
36.5
57.4
12
68.1
67.4
66.9
60.4
59.9
61.0
57.3
68.4
47.4
57.2
13
68.5
67.8
67.2
60.2
60.0
60.9
57.1
68.6
49.11
56.6
14
68.8
67.9
67.6
60.1
59.7
61.0
56.6
68.6
46.9
57.0
15
66.4
65.3
65.0
58.4
57.9
58.7
54.9
65.6
*#N/A
54.4
16
67.8
67.4
66.8
59.4
60.0
60.6
57.0
68.6
42.7
57.5
17
68.4
67.4
66.8
60.2
59.9
60.4
57.0
68.9
28.3
58.
18
68.3
67.4
66.8
60.1
59.7
60.7
57.4
67.8
37.2
56.3
19
68.1
66.3
68.5
58.9
58.0
62.6
55.7
64.8
*#N/A
50.
20
67.7
66.3
66.1
57.1
57.3
57.9
54.0
66.6
40.5
51.
21
67.5
65.9
66.0
57.9
57.4
58.9
55.0
67.4
40.2
55.
22
66.0
64.6
64.0
57.8
56.0
57.1
53.2
64.6
42.7
52.3
23
68.3
67.0
66.4
60.2
58.6
59.8
55.2
68.6
30.3
56.6
24
69.2
67.4
67.7
61.0
60.5
61.1
57.4
68.7
48.6
57.
25
68.3
67.6
67.0
60.0
60.1
60.9
57.0
68.0
44.2
55.8
26
68.5
67.2
67.2
60.1
60.0
60.8
57.1
67.9
38.5
55.
27
69.1
67.6
67.9
60.3
60.3
61.0
57.3
68.7
36.5
56.8
28
69.0
68.2
67.9
60.3
60.3
61.0
57.4
68.3
45.1
56.3
29
66.1
65.3
64.9
57.8
57.3
58.0
54.3
'64.3
39.3
52.3
30
67.5
66.6
66.3
60.1
59.4
60.1
56.4
68.5
42.1
56.8
31
66.4
65.9
65.0
59.1
58.7
59.0
55.7
66.3
41.3
55.4
Days
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
27
31
En. Avd
67.81
66.8
66.51
59.5
59.1
60.1
56.1
67.7
42.9
56.1
#N/A indicates insufficient data.
*#N/A indicates no aircraft -related noise events.
-7-
TABLE 4
DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION
November 2016
Date
1S
2S
3S
4S
NMS Site
5S 6S
7S
8N
9N
ION
1
67.5
66.8
66.2
59.7
59.6
60.1
56.6
67.6
38.3
56.5
2
67.6
66.8
66.6
58.9
58.9
60.0
56.2
67.0
47.5
53.3
3
67.7
66.6
65.4
58.7
58.3
59.1
55.7
67.6
48.2
55.0
4
67.9
66.9
66.4
59.4
58.7
59.6
56.2
67.6
40.7
55.3
5
65.9
65.4
64.4
57.9
57.0
57.7
54.1
64.1
31.4
52.5
6
68.0
67.1
66.6
59.9
59.2
60.1
56.1
67.9
43.1
56.3
7
68.0
67.1
66.8
59.4
59.2
59.8
56.0
67.2
43.6
55.5
8
67.2
66.1
66.0
56.9
57.4
58.6
54.6
65.5
44.41
52.7
9
66.4
65.1
65.2
57.5
56.2
59.1
53.5
66.6
44.41
53.3
10
67.5
66.3
66.1
58.1
57.3
59.1
54.8
66.3
38.6
53.
11
67.2
66.3
65.7
59.3
58.0
59.1
55.2
67.1
37.0
53.6
12
65.9
64.9
64.4
57.6
56.8
58.1
54.0
64.1
41.9
51.5
13
67.5
66.6
66.0
58.2
58.4
58.9
55.3
66.8
40.8
53.7
14
68.2
67.3
66.6
59.1
58.6
59.4
55.7
67.6
42.5
54.5
15
67.6
66.9
66.0
59.4
58.8
59.2
54.7
67.8
36.7
55.6
16
67.9
67.2
66.8
60.8
59.9
60.81
57.2
68.1
45.5
57.1
17
68.5
67.2
66.7
60.6
59.2
60.7
56.4
67.5
34.5
52.9
18
66.5
65.3
64.8
58.0
56.1
57.3
52.7
66.5
43.4
52.3
19
67.1
66.4
65.8
59.6
57.8
58.8
54.0
66.7
47.21
53.9
20
67.8
66.9
66.2
60.8
59.2
60.2
56.4
68.3
49.9
57.3
21
68.2
67.5
66.7
60.3
60.1
60.31
57.3
68.3
43.9
56.8
22
68.7
67.9
67.3
61.0
60.9
61.1
57.9
68.6
48.4
56.8
23
68.5
67.7
67.5
60.9
60.6
61.0
57.7
68.4
30.7
56.7
24
63.8
62.6
62.8
55.5
54.6
56.1
51.1
62.5
38.91
47.7
25
65.8
64.7
63.7
57.1
55.7
56.3
51.8
65.8
34.5
52.
26
68.0
67.1
66.2
60.5
60.2
60.4
57.1
68.8
38.6
58.3
27
69.1
68.4
67.6
60.4
61.2
60.8
57.9
69.3
41.2
58.3
28
69.1
67.9
67.5
61.4
60.8
61.3
58.2
68.7
50.7
57.2
29
60.2
58.2
67.5
49.9
51.3
63.3
42.0
63.9
40.11
45.
30
66.9
66.1
65.4
59.1
58.7
58.9
55.2
66.9
42.2
55.4
Days
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
En. Avg,67.5
66.51
66.21
59.31
58.7
59.8
55.71
67.2
44.2
5 5. 1
#N/A indicates insufficient data.
*#N/A indicates no aircraft -related noise events.
-8-
TABLE 5
DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION
December 2016
Date
1S I
2S
3S
4S
NMS Site
5S 6S
7S
8N
9N
ION
1
68.3
67.4
66.7
61.0
60.2
60.7
57.6
67.8
45.2
56.9
2
58.6
56.2
67.5
50.4
50.3
64.1
42.5
62.3
42.0
46.7
3
59.9
59.3
61.3
51.1
50.4
56.2
46.0
63.6
41.3
45.3
4
67.5
66.5
65.9
59.2
58.3
59.0
54.9
67.8
53.6
54.4
5
68.31
67.2
66.9
61.3
59.7
61.0
57.3
68.7
41.6
56.9
6
67.5
66.4
65.8
60.5
59.2
59.9
56.7
67.6
42.7
56.8
7
68.2
67.4
67.4
61.3
60.4
61.4
57.6
67.3
36.2
55.7
8
68.6
68.1
67.6
60.6
60.6
61.3
57.7
67.8
42.0
56.4
9
68.5
68.1
67.4
60.4
60.5
60.9
57.7
68.5
44.4
57.1
10
66.0
65.3
64.3
58.3
57.6
58.1
54.0
65.6
47.5
54.2
11
67.4
66.6
66.0
60.4
59.4
60.4
56.8
68.4
38.7
57.0
12
67.9
67.4
66.7
60.7
60.0
60.71
57.2
68.3
46.91
56.7
13
67.2
66.7
66.2
60.0
59.6
60.2
56.8
67.6
46.7
55.8
14
67.8
67.4
66.7
60.1
59.7
60.3
56.8
67.8
41.6
56.2
15
69.2
68.4
68.2
61.8
60.3
61.5
57.7
69.3
42.9
58.2
16
68.2
68.8
66.6
59.5
61.9
60.8
58.2
69.6
29.5
58.6
17
66.7
65.8
66.0
59.1
58.5
60.3
55.3
66.1
35.91
53.1
18
64.7
62.4
69.3
55.9
54.8
64.3
51.9
62.5
41.5
42.2
19
62.3
60.8
66.1
52.0
51.8
60.4
46.9
63.4
*#N/A
41.1
20
66.7
65.5
65.1
58.2
57.4
58.1
54.5
67.7
49.2
53.0
21
65.2
63.6
70.3
57.7
58.2
66.2
51.8
66.3
48.7
51.5
22
64.3
61.9
69.6
55.8
56.9
65.2
50.0
67.3
50.61
53.2
23
69.2
67.5
66.8
62.1
60.0
60.9
57.3
71.2
*#N/A
60.0
24
65.6
65.5
63.9
56.7
58.4
58.2
55.7
65.2
32.7
52.9
25
65.8
64.7
64.1
58.7
57.7
58.0
54.5
65.7
49.3
52.9
26
66.1
64.3
68.6
57.7
57.6
63.5
53.6
65.2
36.6
50.7
27
68.5
67.5
66.7
60.6
60.0
60.4
56.8
67.8
47.7
54.8
28
68.1
67.1
66.4
59.8
59.2
59.7
56.1
67.6
42.5
54.0
29
67.3
66.6
65.9
59.2
58.5
59.2
55.5
67.4
38.9
54.5
30
68.3
67.6
67.4
60.2
60.4
61.5
58.2
68.8
32.7
57.1
31
66.2
65.3
64.5
58.5
58.5
58.4
53.3
66.1
44.31
54.
Days
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
29
31
En. Av
67.1
66.3
66.
59.
58.
61.3
55.8
67.4
45.6
55.3
#N/A indicates insufficient data.
*#N/A indicates no aircraft -related noise events.
-9-
TABLE 6
MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS
Commercial Class A
October - December 2016
Carrier
AC Type
# Deps
NMS Site
1S
2S
3S
4S
5S
6S
7S
8N
9N
10N
Alaska Air
B734
11
Average
97.9
96.0
97.5
91.4
89.2
91.5
87.3
#N/A
#N/
#N/
Count
(11)
(10)
(11)
(11)
(11)
(11)
(11)
(0)
(0)
(0)
B737
738
Average
95.8
94.9
94.5
89.6
88.0
88.6
83.9
91.5
82.8
80.6
Count
(671)
(657)
(669)
(667)
(675)
(661)
(647)
(59)
(5)
(16)
B738
209
Average
98.6
97.1
97.4
90.1
88.5
89.3
85.4
93.4
79.2
87.8
Count
(204)
(201)
(200)
(199)
(204)
(197)
(201)
(4)
(1)
(3)
American
A320
35
Average
94.8
94.1
92.7
85.4
85.1
86.3
84.7
#N/
#N/
#N/A
Count
(35)
(35)
(34)
(34)
(35)
(35)
(33)
(0)
(0)
(0)
A321
3
Average
98.0
97.4
95.8
87.5
85.4
84.5
80.8
88.8
#N/
#N/
Count
(2)
(2)
(2)
(2)
(2)
(2)
(2)
(1)
(0)
(0)
B738
1462
Average
98.8
97.4
97.2
89.2
89.1
89.4
86.4
93.1
80.5
82.2
Count
(1331)
(1298
(1326)
(1318
(1337)
(1307)
(1314)
(115)
(17)
(46)
Compass
E170
39
Average
95.0
94.1
95.2
89.0
87.9
88.2
84.4
89.9
#N/
#N/
Count
(38)
(37)
(38)
(38)
(38)
(37)
(35)
(1)
(0)
(0)
E175
286
Average
95.7
95.0
96.3
89.5
89.1
89.0
85.1
92.9
#N/
83.1
Count
(263)
(249)
(263)
(261)
(264)
(254)
(255)
(20)
(0)
(1)
Delta
A319
476
Average
95.3
94.6
94.2
87.8
86.9
87.1
83.1
91.1
80.2
80.6
Count
(419)
(407)
(422)
(423)
(421)
(414)
(408)
(51)
(4)
(6)
A320
8
Average
96.1
94.9
94.9
88.6
87.0
88.1
83.7
#N/
#N/
#N/A
Count
(8)
(8)
(8)
(8)
(8)
(7)
(7)
(0)
(0)
(0)
B752
273
Average
96.3
95.4
95.5
88.6
87.7
87.8
84.3
92.9
81.2
82.1
Count
(238)
(229)
(238)
(237)
(239)
(237)
(232)
(30)
(3)
(7)
FedEx
A306
63
Average
98.1
97.8
95.4
89.1
88.6
89.5
86.2
93.6
82.1
83.2
Count
(58)
(56)
(56)
(57)
(58)
(58)
(55)
(5)
(1)
(2)
Frontier Airlines
A319
61
Average
94.3
93.5
93.2
87.1
86.3
86.6
82.6
89.9
#N/A
78.4
Count
(57)
(56
(56)
(57)
(57)
(56)
(55)
(4)
(0)
(1)
A320
100
Average
95.5
95.1
93.5
86.9
86.1
86.5
83.8
91.2
81.1
83.8
Count
(92)
(91)
(91)
(92)
(91)
(90)
(88)
(8)
(1)
(3)
A321
1
Average
98.9
99.2
98.3
92.3
88.3
86.7
81.9
#N/
#N/
#N/
Count
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(0)
(0)
(0)
A32N
6
Average
88.6
87.9
87.0
81.3
80.5
80.7
79.
#N/A
#N/
#N/
Count
(6)
(5)
(6)
(5)
(3)
(4)
(3)
(0)
(0)
(0)
Horizon Air
DHBD
179
Average
83.
84.5
84.9
78.1
78.3
79.2
79.8
81.
78.5
#N/
Count
(168)
(159)
(166)
(52)
(54)
(88)
(7)
(10)
(4)
(0)
Southwest
B737
2001
Average
93.3
92.6
89.6
83.7
84.0
84.7
81.7
91.3
79.8
80.7
Count
(1863)
(1806)
(1863)
(1848)
(1855)
(1843)
(1765
(118)
(9)
(25)
B738
16
Average
93.8
93.4
90.7
85.5
85.7
86.2
84.
#N/
#N/
#N/
Count
(16)
(16)
(16)
(15
(16)
(14)
(15)
(0)
(0)
(0)
United
A320
637
Average
94.1
93.2
92.1
86.3
85.6
87.7
85.9
92.7
79.4
81.6
Count
(549)
(528)
(546)
(542)
(543)
(539)
(539)
(83)
(5)
(22)
B737
620
Average
96.0
94.6
95.9
89.2
89.7
90.2
85.8
93.1
81.6
81.0
Count
(569)
(553)
(571)
(565)
(573)
(566)
(564)
(42)
(6)
(12)
B738
139
Average
98.1
96.6
96.2
89.6
89.2
90.3
86.4
93.4
83.3
83.8
Count
(127)
(123)
(126)
(127)
(127)
(124)
(123)
(12
(2)
(4)
UPS
A306
26
Average
98.6
98.6
98.5
91.3
89.9
89.7
86.4
94.2
81.6
78.7
Count
(21)
(20
(21)
(21)
(21)
(21)
(20)
(5)
(2)
(1)
B752
28
Average
96.2
96.0
94.9
86.3
86.5
86.5
83.1
#N/
#N/
#N/
Count
(28)
(27)
(27)
(28)
(28)
(28)
(28
(0)
(0)
(0)
WestJet
B736
6
Average
94.4
93.7
93.7
88.5
88.0
87.
83.7
#N/
#N/
#N/
Count
(6)
(6)
(6)
(6)
(6)
(6)
(4)
(0)
(0)
(0)
B737
7
Average
94.8
93.6
94.3
89.
88.4
89.7
84.
92.
79.8
82.0
Count
(71)
(69)
(71)
(69
(72)
(72)
(68
(4)
(1)
(1)
-10-
TABLE 7
MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS
Commercial Class E
October - December 2016
Carrier
AC Type
# Deps
NMS Site
1S
2S
3S
4S
5S
6S
7S
8N
9N
ION
SkyWest Coml.
CRJ9
181
Average
Count
91.3
(167)
89.6
(163)
89.5
(164)
80.2
(41)
83.2
(159)
81.3
(139)
79.9
(119)
91.0
(12)
80.2
(1)
#N/
(0)
E175
547
Average
Count
90.3
(502)
90.2
(486)
88.8
(501)
83.5
(497)
84.7
(502)
84.9
(489)
83.1
(482)
90.2
(42)
77.8
(1)
81.1
(10)
Southwest
B737
3258
Average
Count
91.0
(2994)
90.9
(2887)
87.7
(2994)
83.2
(2953)
82.5
(2937)
83.3
(2928)
80.4
(2734)
90.7
(237)
81.4
(18)
80.7
(45)
TABLE 8
MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS
Commuter
October - December 2016
Carrier
AC Type
# Deps
NMS Site
is
2S
3S
4S
5S
6S
7S
8N
9N
ION
SkyWest
CRJ7
120
Average
Count
88.7
(109)
88.2
(108)
87.3
(110)
81.
(86)
80.3
(58)
82.2
(103)
79.0
(84)
89.5
(9)
#N/
(0)
#N/A
(0)
TABLE 8 -GA
MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS
General Aviation
October - December 2016
Carrier
AC Type
# Deps
NMS Site
is
2S
3S
4S
5S
6S
7S
8N
9N
ION
General Aviation
Jet
4080
Average
Count
88.2
(3654)
87.5
(3483
89.11
(3601)
83.3
(2068
82.71
(1554)
83.8
(2087)
82.11
(894)
86.7
(192)
82.1
(18)
85.1
(7)
-11-
TABLE 9
AIR CARRIER OPERATIONAL HISTORY
Carrier
AC Type
2012
2013
Year
2014
2015
2016
Alaska Air
AS
B734
84
73
89
80
7
B737 6,238 5,673 4,381 2,666
3,258
B738 942 1,162 2,486 4,590
4,439
American
AA
A319
42
178
A320 344
868
A321 326
563
B738 7,667 8,658 9,339 9,090
10,538
B752 911 4 22
7
MD82
Compass
CP
E170
152
E175 1,352
1,669
Delta
DL
A319
3,436
3,354
3,290
3,352
3,444
A320 31 21 142 162
16
B737 1,860 11
B738 55 14 41 4
B739 2
B752 1,073 2,21 2,196 2,130
2,128
FedEx
FM
A306
508
506
508
508
51
A310 2 2
Frontier Airlines
F9
A318
369
1
A319 2,368 2,278 2,3811 1,497
646
A320 2 154
7401
A321
2
A32N
1
Horizon Air
QX
DHBD
1,15
Intedet
40
A320
346
1,490
428
Mesa Airlines
YV
CRJ9
626
418
SkyWest Coml.
SC
CRJ9
584
2,034
2,007
1,922
1,899
E175
3,55
Southwest
WN
B733
21
2
B737 33,49 35,234 33,490 37,101
41,806
B738 132 391 1,3851 2,586
1,144
United
UA
A319
2,133
2,453
1,926
1,393
1,99
A320 1 4,554 4,229 2,774 3,207
2,6701
B735 1
B737 3,786 3,83 4,436 4,523
5,246
B738 1,407 1,305 1,748 1,853
1,252
B739 2
B752 1,039 1,557 237 44
UPS
5X
A306
52
521
B752 414 412 414 366
37
US Airways
AW
A319
2,442
1,997
808
240
A320 1,485 888 1,426 1,476
A321 247 860 934 74
B752 8 22 46 98
WesUet
WS
1
321
B737 1,093 730 728 718
642
Total
80,691 1
81,841
77,615
81,288
91,279
-12-
TABLE 10
AIRCRAFT OPERATIONAL HISTORY
Aircraft
2012
2013
Year
2014
2015
2016
A306
508
506
508
560
562
A310
2
2
2
A318
369
17
A319
10,379
10,082
8,405
6,524
6,267
A320
6,418
6,628
4,770
5,343
4,438
A321
247
860
934
1,066
565
A32N
12
B733
2
2
B734
84
73
89
80
7
B735
1
B736
4
32
B737
46,467
45,484
43,035
45,008
50,952
B738
10,203
11,530
14,962
18,123
17,373
B739
2
2
B752
3,445
4,205
2,897
2,660
2,572
CRJ9
1,210
2,452
2,007
1,922
1,899
DHBD
1,156
E170
152
E175
1,352
1
5,2231
MD82
4
Total
8001
81,841
77,615
81,288
91,279
-13-
TABLE I1
AIR CARRIER AVERAGE DAILY DEPARTURE HISTORY
Carrier
AC Type
2012
2013
Year
2014
2015
2016
Alaska Air
AS
B734
.115
.101
.121
.110
.104
B737 8.527 7.775 6.000 3.652
4.451
B738 1.284 1.586 3.408 6.288
6.066
American
AA
A319
.058
.243
A320 .471
1.186
A321 .447
.77
B738 10.484 11.860 12.792 12.452
14.402
B752 1.235 .005 .030
.101
MD82 .005
Compass
CP
E170
.208
E175 1.847
2.279
Delta
DL
A319
4.699
4.597
4.507
4.592
4.705
A320 .041 .027 .195 .222
.21
B737 2.538 .016
B738 .07 .019 .005 .005
B739 .003
B752 1.462 3.033 3.008 2.918
2.9101
FedEx
FM
A306
.69
.693
.696
.696
.69
A310 .003 .003 .003
Frontier Airlines
F9
A318
.503
.025
A319 3.235 3.121 3.2601 2.052
.883
A320 .003 .211
1.011
A321
.003
A32N
.01
Horizon Air
QX
DHBD
1.57
Intedet
40
A320
.473
2.041
.58
Mesa Airlines
YV
CRJ9
.855
.573
SkyWest Coml.
SC
CRJ9
.801
2.786
2.748
2.6331
2.593
E175 1
4.855
Southwest
WN
B733
.003
.003
B737 45.770 48.268 45.874 50.819
57.104
B738 .18 .537 1.901 3.542
1.563
United
UA
A319
2.910
3.364
2.636
1.910
2.73
A320 6.240 5.797 3.803 4.395
3.648
B735
B737 5.178 5.249 6.077 6.195
7.16
B738 1.921 1.792 2.395 2.537
1.71
B739 .003
B752 1.418 2.132 .32 .060
UPS
5X
A306
.071
.071
B752 .5 .564 .56 .501
.505
US Airways
AW
A319
3.331
2.732
1.10
.329
A320 2.025 1.219 1.953 2.022
A321 .344 1.181 1.279 1.01
B752 .011 .03 .063 .13
WestJet
WS
B736
.005
.044
B737 1.49 1. .99 .9
.8771
Total
110.270 1
112.126 1
106.321
Ill.
124.699
-14-
QUARTERLY NOISE MEETING
Date: December 14, 2016
Time: 2:00 PM
Place: Eddie Martin Building
ITEMS DISCUSSED
Balboa Island residents Nancy and Sherman Stacey discussed their concerns about air traffic
and associated noise over their area as well as inquiring about the FAA's NextGen program.
On the topic of aircraft noise, Ms. Stacey explained that she believes the situation has gotten
much worse during the last two years. Mr. Stacey asked if any carriers still do the "steep
takeoffs" that have been used in the past. Nikolas Gaskins explained that some carriers do
use Noise Abatement Departure Procedures (NADPs), but that the Airport does not and
cannot require carriers to use specific operational procedures. Mr. Stacey asked for advice
regarding acoustical insulation; Mr. Gaskins offered to put him in touch with an acoustical
consulting firm who could advise them.
Regarding the FAA's NextGen project, Mr. Stacey asked if the County of Orange was going
to join the Newport Beach lawsuit against the FAA. Mr. Gaskins explained that, as of the
meeting date, the County of Orange had filed a petition to join the lawsuit, but that the
process was not yet final. Mr. Stacey said he had been unable to find out who at the FAA
makes the decisions regarding NextGen routing and stated that he wanted to talk to that
person directly.
-15-
QUARTERLY NOISE MEETING ROSTER
December 14, 2016
NAME ORGANIZATION
Nancy S. Stacey Ruby/Diamond Community, Balboa Island
Sherman Stacey Ruby/Diamond Community, Balboa Island
Nikolas Gaskins John Wayne Airport
Anthony Cangey John Wayne Airport
Bonnie Frisch John Wayne Airport
Beatrice Siercke John Wayne Airport
-16-
SNA/John Wayne Airport
SUMMARY OF STATISTICAL INFORMATION
FOR
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Size of Noise Impact Area as defined in the Noise Standards (California Code of Regulations, Title 21,
chapter 2.5, Subchapter 6):
8.35 acres (or 0.013 square miles)
2. Estimated Number of dwelling units included in the Noise Impact Area as defined in the Noise Standards:
77 dwelling.units
3. Estimated number of people residing within the Noise Impact Area as defined in the Noise Standards:
193 (based on 2.5 people per dwelling unit)
4. Identification of aircraft of type having highest takeoff noise level operating at this airport together with
estimated number of operations by this aircraft type during the calendar quarter reporting period:
B737-800 — 3,653 ops (arrivals + departures)
Total number of aircraft operations during the calendar quarter:
66,321
6. Number of Air Carrier operations during the calendar quarter:
(Not mandatory)
23,229
7. Percentage of Air Carrier operations by aircraft certified under Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR). Part
36, Stage III:
(Not mandatory)
100%
8. Estimated number of operations by General Aviation aircraft during the calendar quarter:
(Not mandatory)
42,956
9. Estimated number of operations by Military aircraft during the calendar quarter:
(Not mandatory)
136
NY,
:. Owl
rr
Va.UR
Ac
.�," -6 J,
I.�: . �+'•''� r1!a►��i•" ` *
so
uC�r _.►��' .'NdF ♦��=■er, iiJ1 ��iti *!j e. yu i ♦ •' rs
.•-t.�,,
Tit,
• Y ,'�, 32 -• �:5. �i-. .. �{_ �.• tq �! � . `/���—[sib.
t�{ ': +.• r a t .,'.. LINA' .,{�. r� ♦t t-0
111M 0 141
� .. Y � N 1 S � i" ^moi 6'' • %
/��ry.p„��f-y",�'t �(�'���,�t�ts••.;t �a, 3'S �• a?-.`•�� sem`
ff 3M•Irr i -3r j;,t € }'• i , '` �+ ,,� F
•' -R.r=
AS'
e'yt��4•'+r: ^'��+
5s
65
_,� -_ •1Y ` f l �t _fM� •M 3•" t ♦ .: i s lI .�'' �� "[A ; �
,,,7 ,r � r ,��� ~�1.;, �,L.�•(�,�J�}� , -;� � Ir �,r,��' C � � L �3f-jam '�r. 1 ��`
146 + `! ♦fes" S,icb# 2R=y�•'. 1 ' is r
• `*V +"�',oj• k .+ � 'YL`?ri '�1 4 • 'Sii � I �- 44 ;rya •�.. S �� r r i
7 Rn 154- mi tS -ft-
NO
`w�Y 'i'. Ja���V' f `K'S{ i !/��+� �t y�/r�.� Y.�'"�!.. %Srt �. `� •�* R � _w .� � ...w',G�/- •� •/ •.a
'• tr'Y�9SY� ,,.' J`. �' fti �/. �S•� • - T'1 \ y ��r v4x.,' +•'