Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
05 APPROVE THE ANNUAL MEASURE M2 ELIGIBILITY SUBMITTAL PACKAGE, FY 2017-18
AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: JUNE 20, 2017 TO: JEFFREY C. PARKER, CITY MANAGER Agenda Item 5 Reviewed: City Manager FROM: DOUGLAS S. STACK, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER SUBJECT: APPROVE THE ANNUAL MEASURE M2 ELIGIBILITY SUBMITTAL PACKAGE, FISCAL YEAR 2017-2018 SUMMARY In order to maintain eligibility for funding under the Orange County Measure M2 Program, the City is required to annually submit a compliance package to the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council take the following actions: 1. Adopt the attached draft Measure M2 Seven -Year Capital Improvement Program (Fiscal Year (FY) 2017-2018 through FY 2023-2024); 2. Approve the City's Resolution for the Circulation Element, Local Signal Synchronization Program (LSSP), Mitigation Fee Program, and Pavement Management Plan (PMP); and 3. Authorize the Director of Public Works/City Engineer to submit the City of Tustin's Measure M2 eligibility package to OCTA. FISCAL IMPACT Presently, the City has secured $23,316,002 in Comprehensive Transportation Funding Program (CTFP) competitive funds under the current Measure M2 Program. In addition, the City's annual local jurisdiction apportionment, known as "Fair Share" under Measure M2, is estimated at $1,540,000 for FY 2017-2018. BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION Since the inception of Measure M in 1991, the City has submitted annual documentation to the OCTA in order to maintain eligibility for competitive and Local Fair Share (LFS) funding. In November 2006, the voters of Orange County approved Renewed Measure M (M2), a 30 -year extension of the original 20 -year Measure M program which had established a one-half (1/2) cent sales tax for local and regional transportation improvements throughout Orange County. The Measure M2 program that took effect April 1, 2011, provides for a new slate of projects and planned programs. These include improvements to the Orange County freeway system and road network, expansion of the Metrolink system, more transit services for seniors and the disabled, funding for the cleanup of roadway storm water runoff, and funding for local traffic signal synchronization programs. Annual Measure M2 Eligibility Submittal June 20, 2017 Page 2 The funds awarded through the CTFP, the competitive funding component of Measure M2, combined with the LFS have enabled the City to undertake significant capital projects that improve the transportation and circulation system in Tustin. This year's eligibility package includes the following documentation: • The City's Measure M2 Draft Seven -Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget in the required OCTA format beginning in FY 2017-2018 through FY 2023-2024 (Attachment "A"). The finalized seven-year CIP will be forwarded to OCTA when the budget has been adopted by the City Council. • Draft copy of the City's CIP Budget sections (Attachment "B"), beginning with FY 2017/18, that are related to Measure M2 funding • City Resolution (Attachment "C") for the Circulation Element, LSSP, Mitigation Fee Program and PMP • Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Report Form (Attachment "D"), plus a statement certifying that the City of Tustin has budgeted and will meet its MOE requirement for FY 2017-18. The City of Tustin's General Fund — CIP Account (Fund Number 200), will fund all projects listed under the MOE documentation. • A copy of the City's annual roadway and public infrastructure maintenance program 70016 Exhibit (Attachment "E") • Arterial Highway Plan of City's Circulation Element (Attachment "F") • Measure M Eligibility Checklist for FY 2017-18 (Attachment "G") • Congestion Management Program (CMP) Checklist (Attachment "H") • Arterial Highway Mileage Change Report (Attachment "I") • Mitigation Fee Program - The Measure M2 Ordinance requires local agencies to assess traffic impacts of new development and require new development to pay a fair share of necessary transportation improvements attributable to the new development. The City currently has a defined development impact mitigation fee program in place. The components of this program, including an associated nexus study, were previously submitted to the OCTA. The latest Transportation Corridor Agencies (TCA) Major Thoroughfare and Bridge Fee Program included in Attachment "J" satisfies this requirement. • The City, through its General Plan, considers land use planning strategies that accommodate transit and non -motorized transportation. A letter documenting these strategies is included in Attachment "K". • The LSSP is a planning document that helps guide traffic signal synchronization and capital investment. Measure M2 includes a robust funding program to aid in regional signal synchronization. The City's LSSP is required to be consistent with OCTA's Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan. A copy of the City's 2017 LSSP Update and Consistency Review Checklist (Attachment "L") is attached. • The PMP is a plan to manage the preservation, rehabilitation, and maintenance of paved roads by analyzing pavement life cycles, assessing overall system performance costs, and determining alternative strategies and costs necessary to improve paved roads. The City is required to adopt the PMP every two years that is consistent with the OCTA Measure M2 S:\City Council Items\2017 Council Items\06-20-2017\Annual M2 Eligibility\OApprove Annual M2 Eligibility Submittal for FY 2017-18 Draft CC Rpt.docx Annual Measure M2 Eligibility Submittal June 20, 2017 Page 3 Ordinance and Countywide PMP Guidelines. The Local PMP and certification form certifying conformance with OCTA requirements (Attachment "M") is attached. These items demonstrate to OCTA that Tustin has been and will continue to fulfill its responsibility to implement the requirements of Measure M2. Moreover, compliance with the requirements of Measure M2 will ensure the City's continued eligibility for the various Fair Share and competitive program funds. , Doug /Stack, P.E. DirerPublic Works/City Engineer Attachments 1. Attachment "A" Seven Year CIP (OCTA format) 2. Attachment "B" Excerpts from City's Seven Year CIP Budget (FY 2017-18) 3. Attachment "C" City Resolution 4. Attachment "D" Maintenance of Effort Reporting Form 5. Attachment "E" Annual Roadway and Public Infrastructure Maintenance Program Exhibit 6. Attachment "F" Arterial Highway Plan of City's Circulation Element 7. Attachment "G" Measure M Eligibility Checklist 8. Attachment "H" Congestion Management Program (CMP) Checklist 9. Attachment "I" Arterial Highway Mileage Change Report 10. Attachment "J" TCA Major Thoroughfare and Bridge Fee Program Rates 11. Attachment "K" Transit - Non -Motorized Land Use Planning Strategies Letter 12. Attachment "L" Local Signal Synchronization Plan and Consistency Review Checklist 13. Attachment "M" Local PMP Plan and PMP Certification Form SACity Council Items\2017 Council Items\06-20-2017\Annual M2 Eligibility\OApprove Annual M2 Eligibility Submittal Por FY 2017-18 Draft CC Rpt.doex Attachment "A" Seven -Year CIP (OCTA Format) O O O O O O O U) LO r lU) O N ON (R E , (ia (R (sa O 0 p O O 0 O N f- lU) O N O N (R (ia (fa (fa ER N 0) t 05 0- Q U U Y O Y O O M C '6 O N � m N t 0) 05 d N a U t a viW a w Fo U Y z � (w7 F y O U 0 W04 N F N U N m o 0000 LU 00 V V (O Oo c Y)Lq W 64 ita 64 64 O a 0 O o O O (D O (c O Lo O M F O V W W � tR � � � � � 6 O O O (�N 2 O F O 00 O o(nLO Z 0) w � W O TL° 1 m °' d I- V (sa LL a In N O O O O O LL ER ER (R (R EA E O W d U t O (i 'Eo U O) 05 &a U) va Z w c LL O O O O O a 0 0 � (fa (fa (fa (fa N W N O m N '00 F 3 -O 05 05 (` O 0) _0 O O O U Q O U C O U z 3 0) Y '6 N a O F y C 05U 05 O N cu 0 C O C � cu 05 U E 01 N C 0) 05 y U -0 = -0 D 05 N Wo Uo 0 0 0 0 ; ._ cu E (6 ' O O O In OU c O L r w Q a.� o z a64 o (n C o O � Z J E ita � 64 Q U U N Z U N N N N O^O O N 2: O N D a a` 0 0 3 � N � a w F p w a` > O N U CO O p N a0 0 �O m 0 0 0 0F L V co I- C11 T6 O ( W 6 va C� (R 0) 'F L 2 pp 3 � O F N_ Z c� O u (0 C r O > N W a In N O E2 Q m E N (6 --� . U Q U) (6 LL W U t LL i co zx m m } o�m Zw w a0 c� � > N O) C � o m W O E: — `� C" N O d U 0 Q U(O Q� m�`+ > i ON NO '� U Q C 05 � Cu�).� a 05 3 UO O Ua) 05 a M0 C N > O 0 0 OO 03YU C 05 U O Oa) 05 C U ?� y C', i 0) (0 N2 -2 u) C 0) N Q .O� cu C 0 N C C -O 05 U j 0) �_ p 03 C N O C a' cu 05 .= U'� 05 0' 05 7 '0 N ?i 0- -0 C Q a) Q2 U Z of o m U E E a N N E O Z J n E 3 C O d C o d Q O U N Z y N N O^ N O N N O > U a w p w o N F a` N U) O O O O O O O U) LO r lU) O N ON (R E , (ia (R (sa O 0 p O O 0 O N f- lU) O N O N (R (ia (fa (fa ER N 0) t 05 0- Q U U Y O Y O O M C '6 O N � m N t 0) 05 d N a U t a viW a w Fo U Y z � (w7 F y O U 0 W04 N F N U N m o 0000 LU 00 V V (O Oo c Y)Lq W 64 ita 64 64 O a 0 O o O O (D O (c O Lo O M F O V W W � tR � � � � � 6 O O O (�N 2 O F O 00 m o(nLO Z 0) w � W N ON O TL° 1 m °' d I- V (sa W N a In N O O O O O ER ER (R (R EA W d U t (i 'Eo i O) 05 &a Z w c LL O O O O O a 0 0 � (fa (fa (fa (fa Va N O O O O 010 (R (R (R (R EA O O O 01. (R (R (R (R EA O O 00 O O O O NLO 0 04 0 04 f� 6 LQ va va va . (sa ; O O O (�N 2 O W O 00 m o(nLO NU m 0) w � N ON O TL° 1 m °' d 0 (sa O (p is C 2 N U 0) 'Q 05 O N .i Q U N p Q N O C 'Eo O) 05 &a N.� C U rO 7 oC T 0) .md (6'- N N N 2> Y T N O m N -O 05 05 (` O 0) _0 O O O U Q O U C T O 3 0) Y '6 N a O C 05U 05 0 N cu 0 C O C � cu 05 E 01 N C 0) 05 y U -0 = -0 C C 05 U U cu .0. 05 7 Q ; ._ cu Q U Z of w Q a.� o N N E n 3 C O C o O � Z J E d d Q U U N Z y N N N O^O O N 2: N D N D a a` 0 0 3 a w F p w a` ; O O O (�N LO O W O 00 m o(nLO EA 0) O 0j � N ON O N d 64 va va va (sa v N O O O O O M va va va o (sa N O O O 010 (R (R (R (R EA O O O O I O (R (R (R (R EA O O O 010 (R (R (R (R EA O O O 0 UO 0 _O O O O m o m EA O- N Cl) � (j (fa (fa (fa (fa v N O O O O O M va va va o (sa N O O O 010 (R (R (R (R EA O O O O I O (R (R (R (R EA O O O 010 (R (R (R (R EA O O O O O N N O O N O N ER ER (R "I EA �o O O 00 O O I� N O O O N (R (R (R ER (sa N N E m Z U N O N O N M O O � N O (n L 7 C� O L pp N� O Cc c N N N � E o > N O �n Q m E N (6 Q U M U `m O C N I- z Z W W O 0 0 0 a0 O O O Z 0 W Z - 0 N N N N Z > t t t LLD O O O m U d O U C O N 0) C O U y N o N N C = O m C O N T N N E . 0) ON 0) 3 N C ¢C Q N 0- E O _ W (6 _ t � Q U U C CO c 0) E o o p J X O a) Q a N Q N Ec" W w O C O N U) U d Q N Q y C (6 (6 2.�-°O wLL fn -0 O O Q C O U w W x X W 0-54--, OIcu N O N uW LL LL > O fn fn N N C N N N> 0) V) .O ; Z za U �� �: F E O w z E E < J 3 N O N d a a Q O U Z U y N O N O^O N U! U O > U >N D O a` w 0)- 0)� j cu.0. 2 — C U'C j d .. w U .c o .c w N ?: N ?i 3 (6 t E O -c.2 0' 3 0'0 2 O Q aa64 N 0> H md' mm Z 64 � � � F N E NE n 2: y E O w � z O E E J O a a Q U U U y N N D N O N U W a a` 0 0 3 F a w F p w a` F W � � � � � z Z W W O 0 0 0 a0 O O O Z 0 W Z - 0 N N N N Z > t t t LLD O O O m U d O U C O N 0) C O U y N (6 o N N C = O m C O m N N E . 0) ON d C O N C ¢C Q N 0- E 0'0 _ W (6 _ O N 0)C _0 U U C CO c Q (6 Q o o p O U ,•�—• COE a) Q a N Q N Ec" ONO N 3� C O N N ._ (6 .0 O C C O 0 Q U y E xZ o n C (6 (6 2.�-°O wLL t m E U 0 N �U w rn� C C C C O Ea > > W O 0-54--, OIcu N C U ' U y C C C i N O cLL C Oi c " N N LL cu 'IT C a) .— N O — T (6 U) 7 i Ei Q N N C N N N> 0) V) .O (6 (6 Q m Q LL Z Z Z D Q U) .� Q N N C E w �: E O E O w z E E < J 3 N O N d a a Q O U Z U y N N N O^O N U! O > U >N F O a` O O O 010 6�, v) v) v) 61� O O O O o va vs vs vs v� � � � � � O O O O O 6c� 6c� 6c� 6c� 643 O O O O O 6c� 6c� 6c� 6c� 643 O O O O o vs vs vs vs v� O O O O O 6cT 6cT 6cT 6cT Vi O O O O O 6c� 6c� 6c� 6c� 643 � � � � 613 U LL C N W d U Z7 F O U D w W N N O 04 w (oo w a va v� F y O U D W F O O o O 0 0 W W a ; d O U o C E N o N O O m N ON d C O U 10 0- ° _ W (6 _ _0 U U C CO c d m O o o 2 y 0 a) d � W C O O C C O 0 Q U Q o (6 U N C -6-2 y W y i 6 0) (6 p C Q (6 O N 0 U N Q N U cu O 3 N O N d 0 > >N O C w C .� 0)- 0)� j cu.0. 2 — C U'C j d .. w .c o .c N ?: N ?i 3 (6 t E O -c.2 0' 3 0'0 2 O Q O N 0> H md' mm Z d' w d' am.`-, N E NE n 2: E O w � z O E E J a a Q U U U Z y N N O^ N O N U a a` 0 0 3 a w F p w a` ; O U N o N Cl! N ON N O N 10 0- V; ; O U _0 O O d m O O O O o o 0 0 0 v) � v) � W v) c N O O O O O M o N O O O 010 6�1 6c, 6c, 6c, 613 O O O O I O 6�1 6c, 6c, 6c, 613 O O O 010 va 6c,6c,6c,61� 0 0 c O O_ O o NLr) CF) 1) ER ER ER Hi a1 O O O O O ER ER ER ER 'A co 0 0 0 0 M 0 O U 0 N U N � r m - C O 0) O 2 OO N O a0 r a » v> va vs _ o . u .� m 3 N LL C 0 a5 LL .S E -0 U d � N O i m Q a U C y C N ._ C E N C d O) -6 w o NI a Q Q � O as w C aa))Ea -C y y a3 090 i y E 1L � Q U O O U) ZU p m _0 C O U Q a E cu i F y N a) a) N N p O a) O O m U Q 59 U D a w Of.=E N N E n w co O C o O � Z J E E LUO M00 c r� Q U U a Z y z as 00 O^ a O al al I6" � 61) 0 0 3 U N (L w F p w (L` O N y > O N U M 0 W O p N �0 o v (n �..� V coN O N O 00 p) co 00 'IT C� (E6 O pl ate-+ L 2 pp N O N_ z Z C> C E O O U co 0) > N w I� a N ao o E2 am E m U Q N M N U �� � z i p � }3 o z LL N U- � 0 O N 0 Q a) O U a 3 O O C N 0 U -O > C O C a5 a5 m a5 C i N C -C U m O y N 0 U 3 C d Q CU .5 Q N C 0 m a5 N U S m C U ma) �� cugyp+ N a5 C N ,S O U C N 0 a) E U O C d O —N C -= 7 O E _n 'N O H > Z W Q N 0 N E O Z N E E J 3 C O d C o T, Q O al U Z y N N O^ al O a a a a` o O > >0 U a w � o o N o. F a` N LO 12 O 00 00 O O � r 00 ao O ER c00 ER � v ER 0 0 04 04 OD 00 MIC14����I� I m����I� I O O O OI 0 1 va 6c,6c,6c,61� of ���.Ia I ■V O O N O N 6, 6 6,V3 �vovoC14 N ovI� O WC F a5 zLL0 F y O U D w r F N UI- r- W Orn m N N a va <n F y O U O a O O O O F 00 00 cli CIFW z Z W 0 W O Waw W �LL z� Z Z � LL (m9 N 0 O U 0 N U N � r m - C O 0) O 2 OO N O O C a » v> va vs _ o . u .� m 3 N 0 C 0 a5 E -0 U � ����W O i m Q C y C N ._ C E N C a5 y a5N � O Q i N O as �m C aa))Ea asp 090 i O O U) p m _0 C O U O w N U N a E cu i i 0 U N a) a) N N p a) O O m Q 59 U z a w Of.=E N N E n 3 C O C o O � Z J E d d Q U U a Z y N N O^ a O al al a (L 0 0 3 (L w F p w (L` N 0 O U 0 N U N � r m - It O 0) O 2 OO N O N a » v> va vs O o . 0 U O 0 C 0 E c � ����W O 0 O O 00 61) 61) 61)61)� O C W I� O O O a ER ER ER ER � 0 C 0 C O O � O 0 0 N M O O V O It N 0 O O N O 6 O o . O O O 0 O O 00 61) 61) 61)61)� O C W I� O O O a ER ER ER ER � 0 C O O � O a 6 0 0 O O N O 6 O 0 O O 00 61) 61) 61)61)� O C W I� O O O a ER ER ER ER � v I- U r O LL N E O t O a U 0 Y O O O O L) W m a0 LLL N M co Q � U c° N m 0 H y W E LL U E W � Z U 2 F O U D w F U W W1064 ova ova °En F y O U D W F F F W 0 0 W ao 0 W Z U z� w N LLO 5; nl � v) v) v) I 61� MC14I v, v, v, v, l � I woo 0010 I ; NJ 00001.1 M6A 6c, 6c, 6A I v, I 4 v1 v, v, v, l � I �I v1 v, v, v, l � I �:I v, v, v, v, l 6a I m N O O O O O U v3 v3 v3 C O NN T CU ao LO O 00 w C O u O 0 Lo & N E � O L) LL vs EA vs 2, U U cu a5 m ° O N c O O O O o O C C 0- .20 a) as � � o � w mU m O1 as cu U = N N6 Q U) E t a) cu d Y N U Q O n a5 i cu > N o oaCU N� >. J = 2 (? U m U -O �O a5 C r0 �m Q� .E cu N ` n cu E m LL W d U > r N �g ON FL E t �sw 3 H (6 d M c a) w y .O+ i N n 2: ?� U C � �� U O E w 0 0 ow C a; N E " Z � E O E O w < z E J a E O a a Q O U Z y N N 2 a O^O O N 2� al D al D a a` o O > U a F p v a` nl � v) v) v) I 61� MC14I v, v, v, v, l � I woo 0010 I ; NJ 00001.1 M6A 6c, 6c, 6A I v, I 4 v1 v, v, v, l � I �I v1 v, v, v, l � I �:I v, v, v, v, l 6a I c N O O O O O M o N M N O O O O N O v3 v3 v3 v3 EA N m N O O O O O U v3 v3 v3 m � NN m Q 7 ao LO O 00 w C O Q O 0 Lo & N Q '6.Oct E a)-2 L) LL vs EA vs 2, N N .� O a)cu ° Q O t d O O O O o O U UU N a) as � � o � w Q �°- n m O 0. — C a5 CU o cu d Y N °Q ° as 0 —deo -O ° m U o a ° m'- 0.2 N 3 -0. C cu C _ ° U -O �O a5 C °E _ cu Q� .E cu N ` O 0) Q i C a) CU d U > r N cua5 Q t E°O= 3 H 'p O N WLL' m Z O LL a) w a) d U U) LL m 2 E a; NE E n 2: E O w < z E J O E a a Q U U a Z y N N O^ a O a a a a` 0 0 3 a w o F p w o a` c N O O O O O M o N M N O O O O N O v3 v3 v3 v3 EA N N O O O O O U v3 v3 v3 v3 NN W ao LO O 00 C O O O 0 Lo & E LO O V O L) LL vs EA vs 2, ; O U ° O d O O O O o O oLoi � � o � w 6" 6" c N O O O O O M o N M N O O O O N O v3 v3 v3 v3 EA N N 6 v3 v3 v3 v3 'A O a0 izz 0 0 0 01- 1 VEl VEl VEl VEl v3 N O O O O O v3 v3 v3 v3 NN O O 00 C O O _ N ll0 O V O 0 0 0 Lo v3 v3 R N N 6 v3 v3 v3 v3 'A O a0 izz 0 0 0 01- 1 VEl VEl VEl VEl v3 LO N Z U N O N O N M O O N O (n L 7 C� O L pp N� O Cc c N N N � a)o > N O O Q m E N } k6 Q U M U � `m N C N N I- E O O w a U C O U cq 01 co 0 U H O C O C (6 N p _ m E a` N o O U U O N N O C O V N 01 7 N 'p N i �. N � Q a.N U C 0 0 N N 3 � N � NOQ � Q N C O C a) NN 01 .9 O Q ~i J to (A (A (A Vl W O Q T d .� O i 00 () z U U U LL m �a Ucq rn a` w F N C C OU M 7 O �y coO C (6 -C o LL co >,N E N N N N 01 > H Q C Q LLN Z O U 3 C Q O U N Oi NS N N O U D U E N O E .N 01 C OI.N .,'�- W .- N 01� Q 0-5 7 'O > -O 3 (O wco w O 2 o 0 wNU N N E 3 W C o O Z E E � J E 0 d M Q U U Z U Cl) a (A O O (A (A <n F y N D U D O O > U U F p v a` 0 U! W 0 3 F O a w F p O) M M M W EA O O EA EA F Z W O O aoo OO O a� 0 0 C O U U C O N U C O.E 01 co 0 C O C (6 N p _ U N O C d C N Q N zE'� U O N U) Q N C LL v> (A iA (A E 7 N 'p N i �. > N > O N E a.N U C 0 0 N N 0 E.O NOQ Cl) (O O O C a) O E -od cu Q E N N O O N to (A (A (A C Qw oCOy 00 () N m LL m �a Ucq rn w d w EU�� N C C OU M 7 O �y N C C (6 -C o LL co >,N E N N N N 01 > H Q C Q LLN Z O C 3 C Q O U N Oi NS N N O U U U E N O E .N 01 C OI.N .,'�- O .- N 01� Q 0-5 7 'O > -O 3 (O wco w O 2 o 0 wNU N N E 3 C O C o O Z E E � J E 0 d d Q U U Z U y N N ^ N OO N O 2� N D U D a a` o O > U a F p v a` o � rn � M 0 0 0 to 0 O O O m M M V4, V4, V4, ;; �; � � � � � O O O O O 6c� 6c� 6c� 6c� 643 O O O O O 6c� 6c� 6c� 6c� 643 O O O O O 6c� 6c� 6c� 6c� 643 O O O O O (A (A (A (A EA O O O O O 6c� 6c� 6c� 6c� 643 O) T M M_ v) v) v) � V; W a a 0 U_ D N N LLD 2 c N O O O O O M o N M N O O O O N O ER ER ER ER EA N N N O O O O O � � � V3 N RO O O O I O (A (A (A (A EA N 6 � � � � 'A O O) W O O O O O V�l V�l V�l 613 C') (MO (O O M M I� O O O EA EA EA EA O U U C O U Ocu N O N U m Cl) Q N LJ W C O U N O C d - U O N 2 N Q LL v> (A iA (A N O N E N N n° O Cl) (O ° E Cl) E -od cu O N to (A (A (A 61� N �N 00 () N m O C Q O Eu) w U E �y O O C C O E� w 3 O N U Q U N o y N N C O C O w � Z J E a a Q OU U Z y N N O^ N O N U! 0 3 a w F p w a` c N O O O O O M o N M N O O O O N O ER ER ER ER EA N N N O O O O O � � � V3 N RO O O O I O (A (A (A (A EA N 6 � � � � 'A O O) W O O O O O V�l V�l V�l 613 C') (MO (O O M M I� O O O EA EA EA EA O U rn m Cl) 2 O O O LL v> (A iA (A ; O U 0) yM N O Cl) (O E ( Cl) N O O O W to (A (A (A 61� c N O O O O O M o N M N O O O O N O ER ER ER ER EA N N N O O O O O � � � V3 N RO O O O I O (A (A (A (A EA N 6 � � � � 'A O O) W O O O O O V�l V�l V�l 613 C') (MO (O O M M I� O O O EA EA EA EA I- W d a� z o .cu z LL N LL5; �6�, v) v) � I 613 MIC14����I� I r����l� I -NJ 00001.1 M ����I� I �����I� I (6 a fi O _ LL w U O C N U CO U U N01U O W O O O O O c N O '0 N N (6 (6 N_ 0 � � N Q LL v> va va va O N N N 0O E_�� N U O O a� N Q d T U N >O mu Do) N % 0 W N N c O N N E 01 O J N 0 C p 0 Q C 01C O N t Q N N Q N Q (6 C O 0-0 TH N i N Q N U N ww i 01 0) U) C u 0)0 O N ,E U O Q N W C N t U '�Z- 0 '� E .�. E y O Oi t m V N N • U ::o N C U '2,R LL �LL E.E (6 U J cu 01 U 3 OE (6 01 N C 'N y C C dU LL iq c E U U d m -0 E t E O (6 N N Q i 0 Q N NU i QC V,•�.. H i ii a` ii z m a . U)i -2 C w < N NC E :La z i J E �: O a C O a Q U U U Z y N N N O^O O 2� N D N U! a a` 0 0 3 O > U w F p w a` F a` �6�, v) v) � I 613 MIC14����I� I r����l� I -NJ 00001.1 M ����I� I �����I� I (6 a fi O _ LL w U O N N U O 66 N01U W O O O O O .E N N (6 (6 N_ 0 i H O LL v> va va va N N N N O U N N U O d X N Q d T U N N 0 W W v N N U Q O N N E O J N p 0 Q C Q N Q O u) O w TH N i N ww i 01 E°� �a N t Q Oi N w U '2,R �LL E.E (6 U J y '5 N may N N C CO chi LL V O1 >0 v 7 O (6 N N Q N N N O' 00 LL CO Q� Z Z Z O. a N N E 2: E O C O w � n z E E a J a Q U U Z U y N N O^ N ON O 2� N D U D a a` 0 0 3 a w F p w a` N N U � � � � 66 O) W O O O O O N M00 r O O O O 0 O O O O O LL v> va va va N O U d m E 0 W 60 c N O O O O O M o N �����I�I M����I�I �����I�I O N � � � � 66 O) W O O O O O M00 r O O O O O ER ER ER ER LL, U O I- W d a� z� Q .cu z LL N LL5; ����taI� MC14I v, v, v, v, l � I �I vvvvl�l v, v� v� v� 1 0 1 izzl v, v, v, v, l � I (6 a fi O - a w U O Z� z w LLT N N O O O O O U N v3 v3 v3 v3 � N C O Cl) 0 C N O 0 _O O Q 0 0 N O C C U 3 O O N o C\[ C 01 N O O d v> v3 i» v3 '6 Il (6 - N FO N 0 O Or E d N O 7 Q r. H 0 0 c U ' C fn N O �a M co O O w v> vs in v3 Uo m d He o a E O0�o m m U mcd mU > w c E d Q Q c �w u d cu 0 �� .o E cu rn N ?i (p d � C V O S E co,NO U O O N .: U O O U O O N O U 3 O3 U C N E O d O O cq E O O N d� E j N E E O - -o i 0- cu d cd� Q Z (6 d S m - (6 CU a. N E> C O E N E " Z E J a E � 0 C O d C O d Q O U U Z y N N 3 H O^ N O N O 2� N D U D a a` o O > U w < Z E J a F O v a` ����taI� MC14I v, v, v, v, l � I �I vvvvl�l v, v� v� v� 1 0 1 izzl v, v, v, v, l � I (6 a fi O - a w U O Z� z w LLT N O N O O O O O U N v3 v3 v3 v3 N � N C O Cl) 0 oO) C 0 � 0 0 N o OM ? N o C\[ O O N O O d v> v3 i» v3 N N O UO 0 _O N O 0 0 c cuO d M N O O w v> vs in v3 u O ¢w d' C '6 t O O �U m > T T 'Q .a E0 E U cu E0i >O acu - O w U O C (6 N U O U 1) O a-N O N N N c 0 U C 6 (6 C O �a O O Q (6 m �_ m o a (6 C (6 .y - NU O O QU N -O N O N U_ N N Q d 3 H N CO CO Z O of O w O d cu of m E N E n 3 CO C o w < Z E J E a a Q UU U Z y N N O^ N O N U! 0 3 a w O w F a` N O N O O O O O U N v3 v3 v3 v3 v3 N O (M) Cl) 0 oO) O 0 0 0 N o OM ? N o C\[ O O N O O d v> v3 i» v3 N N O UO 0 _O 0 o O 0 0 c o 0 M N O O w v> vs in v3 "Ti N O O O O O M o N M O N O O O O O N v3 v3 v3 v3 v3 N O 0 0 o O 0 0 0 c N o C\[ �? N O O N N O O O O O p v3 v3 v3 v3 v3 N O N rn 0 0 0 0 0 V3 v3 v3 v3 'A 00 � � � � � 1 (6 a fi O - � a w Of U O 00 � o O � O (�) O O r O� V O N O n EA EA EA EA N N O N t N Q � N O N O N (h to V o" U LL � o �O 04O 0 7 O 0 O U W O N O O 0 -o O O C o U n rn (6 O O O O Q N N 0 0 cuo C o � ULL � � � � C ,� W af Q V% O N N U N ON C CU (6 U z0 D p C — O (6 ?: C N N C U N co y N mZ -1 0 m m O` O O d' U O U Ncu C O O 01 0 C D M C OLL N (6 N U — O N U N �.0 y j Q N jn N U M M r C N N E a 0 LQ L C O C O w z E E J Z a Q U U Z y N N a iA iA 2: N 0 U! 0 n (L o U N 3 a w O O o F a` � N � > O N U Cl) � O LLJ 0 0 0 � N zCO O U s �0 � o 00 w EA EA 64 C� (E6 O L 2 pp N O y N Z z !> ami I E V O O O O > N a LO LO O E2 am E } (6 Q CO-) M .L w U m � z 0 d Z > 3 LLD 7 N N U of t 6 C 0) C N (6 (6 of N C 0 of N 3 H Q u cu N af C C N T .co N Q O N ~ 01 C 'E N O r t (6 6 U) O ?i N n NE x C .m .E '6 J 'O y 01 N N N o.4 O E 2 NE d U d J N _ (O Nt N y 0 0 oU o N Q Z Q t N r E -o E Q U N N 'O x N N 6 m �Z Z of Q _ -C E N E w z E Jtz, E E 3 C O a C o a Q O U U! Z y N N O^ N O N U O > >0 U r n w w o N F a` N U) U � � o O � O (�) O O r O� V O N O n EA EA EA EA M � U O0O o O U C 0 o O v N O N O N (h to V o" (6 7 � �O 04O O O O O I O to to to to 613 pl 6�1 6c, 6c, 6c, I V3 O)I EA EA EA EAI EA I �j EA EA EA EAI � I co w F O z z Z �0 0 aN ui w d c a z z 0 CU Z > LL N U-0 2 O O3 O U C C "t O v N O N O N (h to V N (6 7 � C 0 7 O 0 O O O O O O O O I O to to to to 613 pl 6�1 6c, 6c, 6c, I V3 O)I EA EA EA EAI EA I �j EA EA EA EAI � I co w F O z z Z �0 0 aN ui w d c a z z 0 CU Z > LL N U-0 2 N U_ N O U O 0 0 � � H N O (6 7 � C 0 7 C 0 -o O O (6 O O O O Q N N 0 0 cuo � � � C ,� W af O N U N (6 C(6 CU (6 U N p C — O (6 ?: C N N C U N N mZ -1 0 m m O` O d' U O of Ncu C O O 01 0 C U M C OLL N (6 N U — O N U N �.0 y j Q N jn N 3 H Jfn �Q C N N E a C O C O w z E E J a a Q U U Z y N N 2 N O^O O N 2: N 0 U! 0 n (L o o 3 a w O w o o F a` N O U O 0 0 c 2 O� O � O LL v> EA EA EA 0 -o O O d m O O O O o O 0 0 0 � � � � W EA "Ti N O O O O O M to N R O O O to to to O to V3 N N O O O O O to to to V3 N RO O O O I O EA EA EA EA EA O N 6 to to to to Hi OO O O O to to to to V3 O O O 00 O O O � v>»»» LI) 010 rn O O N 0 M 021 O 0 � O- 00 O r 2O Cl) EA 00 wcu C 0) 0) c 6 M ; U) O O C pa N E O tl O (n LL Q E O 0 E d U 0 a) C O U Y m d N N d N 0) �� O m > U 0 Q W a Cl) o- O O ¢ o E W y U U N > Q (q O t wr N 3 E V N U) d O Z a d cu m U)J CO O'O =i N o 3 o W za Z U LL c U 0) 0) Q N Q 0) U U y W z2 _0 4--N m O d d 0 y 0 m a) rn U O N D C C' CU w y 0 U w 2 2U Z O rn m 0 D N E rn o r": C O C O O w F E J CF)ao N o m Q O w N 00 M a » EA v> O <n F it a` 0 zO O a w o F O a va <n U U N O ~ I- � N � O r > O N U rn 1- 0) o M 0 W O V 00 EA N N EA M 00 EA CO CO EA O � N � W 0 0 C� O L 00 N O cc z cN C �_ O U E O > N ao O (p Q m E N } (6 Q U m LL U � z N D� Z a0 w O U O U) > O 6 O Q > N Q cu O L v U w O O U 0) 0) N > Q C01!- E d O� Oi 0) 0) n X i o d C; ; .NN E T N U.-.0 o i6.2 >. CO O U N.� yL w mp C i E a X _; o o y o U (CIL, °�C6 -0� d' d' 'U d N 0 N 0) w > > (6 C C U) 0) d� d Z Z Z N NC C E O Z � J w E �: O d C O d Q U U U Z y N N N O^O N D U) D n a` o O > >0 U r a w w o N F (L N LO O O O OI O EA v> 6c,6c,EA O O O 01. EA v> 6c,6c,61� 0 1 �> to 6c,6c,I EA O O O 010 6�1 6c, 6c, 6c, 613 O O O O I O 6�1 6c, 6c, 6c, 613 O O O 010 va 6c,6c,6c,61� O O O 010 6�1 6c, 6c, 6c, 613 O O O 01. 6�1 6c, 6c, 6c, 613 0 1 � 6c, 6c, 6c,I 613 z Z W O M r W I� O a O N M N W d N z (o m U 'm Z N m Q LL 7m D 2 N LLQ U U 2 O O N 0 M 021 O 0 � O- 00 O r 2O Cl) EA 00 wcu C 0) 0) c 6 M ; U) 0) O C pa N E O tl O (n LL Q O 0 E d U 0 a) C O Q U Y m d N N d N 0) �� O m > w Q W a Cl) o- O O ¢ o N O O W y U U N > Q O t wr N 3 E O N U) d O Z a d 6 O'O =i N o 3 o za Z U LL c U 0) 0) Q N Q 0) U U y W � m _0 4--N m O d d 0 0 m a) rn U O N D C C' CU w y 0 C N w 2 2U Z O rn m 0 w N E rn o r": C O C O O Z E J CF)ao N o m Q O 00 N 00 M a » EA v> va <n F it a` 0 0 y a w o F O w o a` U ~ I- O � O r U rn 1- 0) o r U) M WEA O V 00 EA N N EA M 00 EA CO CO EA z Z W O M r W I� O a O N M N W d N z (o m U 'm Z N m Q LL 7m D 2 N LLQ U U 2 ; O O O U0 0 M 021 O 0 U C O- 00 O w Cl) EA i wcu C 0) 0) c 6 M ; 0) O C pa N 0-v> va va va tl O (n LL Q N y N 0 E d U 0 a) C m 06 d mm m Q Cl) N � 0) Q N O O t U U > Q O t N O N d O Z a w n C =i N 3 Ec '� Y_ E Z " N > .° m N U 0) 0) Q N Q 0) U U W � m _0 4--N m d d 0 0 m a) rn O N 'U)CU C C' CU w y 0 C N 2 2U Z (n m 2 E� C N E L a C O C O O � Z E J d d Q U U U Z y NN O^ N O N O N U it a` 0 0 3 a w o F p w o a` ; O O O U0 0 M 021 O 0 0 O- 0 Cl) EA 0 a) 00 0) c 2 O- O M O M 0-v> va va va 0 U O 0 0 0 a) 0 06 06 o G m ����w Cl) v N O O O O O (v) o N M N O O O O N O EA EA EA EA EA N N N O O O O O � � � V3 N RO O O O I O v> vs vs vs 'A N 6 � � � � 'A O d) O O O O O V�l V�l V�l V3 O O O O 00 0 M 021 O 0 00 m O- Izz O O EA EA EA EA Cl) EA A N E m Z U N O N O N M O O � N O cd O L pp N� O Cc c N N N � NO > N O N Q m E N } (6 Q U (6 U)U LL `m N C N N I- � O U N c 01 N 0 01 U C N O.o a5 N C O r N z m O 2 'O d ° d (s> (n (n (n > 0 co co E N d Z O U LL L w LL m w w w p ao E E U Ez � W O O cu N Q M — O w O w U O 4 >- C W 6 ° 0 LO 0 LO a5 J C Q N a5 t U U Q W 7 LL � 6c� M 3 0(6 p 3 3 U w p X I- LL z U a a c E N N m 4-0 2>M O ° -° `m O U 2c O a) U as a) 16 1mE as U Q— W N a5 'E >0 - E o D C Oi N ,O m U N O- w O o w 0 0 O c 0o Oa0 0 0 C O v_ O Z 0 0 0 d a (n (n (n <n F O^ al O y al a a` 2- 0 O a w F U w a` D W F O O O O O O 00 o0 0 v_ t~i10 w (A (n (n o (n <n z Z W w O O O O W o u0) u 0 ) o LL, d a H t x cu pU m Z W N LLn 04 CU 04 a) t 0 ° O ° O ° O ° O ° � � � O 0 0 0 0 0 c v_ O O O (A (A iA (A �; � � � � °61� O O O O O 6c� 6c� 6c� 6c� 643 O O O O O 6c� 6c� 6c� 6c� 643 O O O O O 6c� 6c� 6c� 6c� 643 O O O O O 6c� 6c� 6c� 6c� 643 O O O O O EA EA EA EA v> O O C C "t v EA EA EA EA EA O U N c 01 0 U 01 U C N O.o a5 N C O O N z m N C 2 'O d ° d (s> (n (n (n > 0 O M O U N r Z 0 E C'0) a m U LL m U U o-,E� ao cu cu d O ° Ez � C O cu Q 3 U N (6 d ° O 4 >- C OENc,w LL J C Q N a5 t U U Q t U�� C 2 Olaf O a) Oi Omo 3 Qm O Q= w p X I- LL C N c E N N m 4-0 2>M O ° -° `m O U 2c a) U as a) 16 1mE as cu Q— W N a5 'E >0 - E o C C Oi N ,O m U N O- .Z-(0 N N .— a) a5 N 0 a5 H <> aO > w O QU-O.0 t ami m E C E N " a � C O C O O Z E E J 0 d d Q O al U Z y N N O^ al O al al a a` 2- 0 3 a w F O w a` 0 ° O ° O ° O ° O ° � � � O 0 0 0 0 0 c v_ O O O (A (A iA (A �; � � � � °61� O O O O O 6c� 6c� 6c� 6c� 643 O O O O O 6c� 6c� 6c� 6c� 643 O O O O O 6c� 6c� 6c� 6c� 643 O O O O O 6c� 6c� 6c� 6c� 643 O O O O O EA EA EA EA v> O O C C "t v EA EA EA EA EA N O U N c 01 N w cu m N C 2 'O d ° d (s> (n (n (n LL ° N O O U N E 4c -o-t 0 E o-. w U W -° U m O m cu cu d O ° a°i J d Q 0.9,6 a5 Q d ° � -0 CU LL J C Q N O Oi Omo U CU id 3 w p X I- LL N N O CN w E O ° -° `m O j 3 w y a) _0_0 >. j U a5 (u U) C Q a)3 CO LL N ,O m U N O- N NO -O E H �d �Q Z Z Z �J Ew E N E n 3 C O C o w � Z E E J a a Q U 5 Z a y N N O^ a O N O a a a a` 0 0 3 a w F O w a` N U N m 2 O O O O ° d (s> (n (n (n N O U d E c N O O O O O M O N M N O O O O N O ER ER ER ER EA N N N O O O O O � � � V3 N RO O O O I O EA EA EA EA EA N 6 � � � � 'A O O) O O O O O EA EA EA EA v> Ma0 � EAEA0 0 EA E0 1 - I A EA O O O 010 EA EA EA EA EA O O O 01. to to to to 613 EF> EA EA EAI v, I O O O 010 to to to to 613 O O O O I O to to to to 613 O O 0010 to to to to 613 O O O 010 to to to to 613 O O O 01. to to to to 613 EA EA EA EAI EA I F LQ Cl) N N 00 LO L2 a EA EA F y O U 0 0 O F O O O O F cov) 61� z Z W 0 U W a� W a U o c o Cl) LO N N 7 N O O) O) O O O V r- r N 7 O U U > > Q � y = N Q 0 0 O 6 N N > C N 01 m U (6 E N r 7 y O C 0 O O O 6 U C J U 3 Q N U 01 > _ Q� O O O ° O O Q w 3 d Zr N 0 O U N 0 0 0 (h to to V N O> O Z O 0 C � N (6 O O N3� N 64 to Efl 64 V3 N N `E O O O 0 O 0 0 >C N N C Q 0 O .2r. M N '� � U Q N >-=.> U 0 O W do U N �rny>° F y O O zN �-O i� =0 cU 0 >my O r- U O N N 3t m 2) E C Q O U 0 CO C O'H N =i N w 2i 2i O+ N _O E .01 (6 H O F z z z W 3w d w � W L E J n E 2i C O a (6 0 U U U Z y z w O O O^O N a EA EA U! a a` U 0 3 N a w F p w a` O N y O N U M 0 W O p N � � � F W OEA � C� O L 2 pp 30- O F cc N U EE�o 0 > N a0 o EE2 Q m E } (6 Q CO-) M .L w U z o� Z U-O N cn N N a N N 0>°� O C > O N N N N 7 O O N Q NN —_ N y E > (6 Q N U N � d o Y O (6 O w 01 C N OO U E O > ?� Ow Oft w V Q 5 Q C ON O N >. UU U d m O .�? U y d E U N O X O w r w � O O C N Q U -o0 U O cu (6 r 01 C w > w > LL (\I �� U) 0 cu 0 c Q N N N U t 20 20 Z Z Z 0 N N C E " � E O C O a w z E E < J a a Q U U Z U y N N O^ N O N U O > U r a w p w o N F a` N U) O O O 010 EA EA EA EA EA O O O 01. to to to to 613 EF> EA EA EAI v, I O O O 010 to to to to 613 O O O O I O to to to to 613 O O 0010 to to to to 613 O O O 010 to to to to 613 O O O 01. to to to to 613 EA EA EA EAI EA I F LQ Cl) N N 00 LO L2 a EA EA F y O U 0 0 O F O O O O F cov) 61� z Z W 0 U W a� W a RO O O O I O EA EA EA EA EA O N 6 OEA OEA OEA OEA 'A 0 � toto0 0 to to EA0 1 - I U o c o Cl) LO N N 7 N O O) O) 7 C O O V r- r N 7 O U > > Q � y = N Q 0 0 O 6 N N > C N 01 m 0 C E N r 7 y O C 0 O O O 6 U V O U 3 Q N U 01 > _ Q� O O O ° O O Q w 3 d Zr N 0 O N 0 0 0 (h to to V N O> O Z O 0 C N C 012 U O O N3� N 64 to Efl 64 V3 N N `E O O O 0 O 0 0 >C N N C Q 0 O .2r. M N '� Q N >-=.> U 0 O W do E N �rny>° 7� dd y O O zN �-O i� =0 cU 0 >my ._ r- O N N 3t m 2) E C Q O U LL CO C O'H N =i N Q 2i 2i O+ N _O E .01 (6 H zd U- z z z W 3w d w � N E z L E J n E 2i C O a C o a Q U U U Z y N N O^O N N U! a a` 0 0 3 a w F p w a` RO O O O I O EA EA EA EA EA O N 6 OEA OEA OEA OEA 'A 0 � toto0 0 to to EA0 1 - I U o c o Cl) LO O O) O) N O V r- r o LLO 0 0»- � N O U 0 0 O 6 o 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 C 0 0 O O O N V O W EA EA EA EA EA O O O o O O 0 O 0 O N 0 0 0 (h to to V N O O O 0 O O M N O O O O O N 64 to Efl 64 V3 N O 0 0 0 0 N O 0 O N O O O N RO O O O I O EA EA EA EA EA O N 6 OEA OEA OEA OEA 'A 0 � toto0 0 to to EA0 1 - I N N E m Z U N O N O � N M O O 0 N O (n L 7 C� O 0)- 2 )—O2 00 N O Cc N N N � NO > N O am E } k6 Q U M U � `m m C N N I- z Z W co U� 00 Wa o W a � c Q Z w D (6 C LLD 7 0 o O nN 0 0 ( O 2 O O O vs o 0 0 0 112,��1Sol MI v, v, v, v, l � I r����1� I ; NJ 00001.1 . ����I-I 0 v3 6c3 6c3 6c3 N 10 O U O p 0) _ O v3 v3 v3 v3 vio O O (O O O O O O O O I� O O O O � ; O O U C -0 O O ;> m LO o o (� � o_ 0 0 N U Y d o v3 613 613 64� U m N N Q m =i a 00 = N NQ O Q'U Q O N � O O (6 E a) y ,U Q Q (6 Ucu C N U 0) N 0 O L? U w 0 y N C — a) cu T 0 U 0) cu °� cu dLL t . 3 L O dEN O N Q a)O cu N o•m > > Q0 Q U N C N U 0 �O m Q w 0 d 0 r > > '0 (6 0 nUQ Q Q a) «S E N (6 t C Z N w d' .: N N E n C .Z- 0 3 0- 1 0 0- O '6 Q N E Y) ?i N ?i Q m t 'N > H Z Q Z Z 0 of a)d of CU fA o a N E N n 3 C O C o O � Z J E w a` d d Q U U! U Z y N N O^ N O N U O > U F a` 0 o O nN 0 0 ( O 2 O O O vs o 0 0 0 112,��1Sol MI v, v, v, v, l � I r����1� I ; NJ 00001.1 . ����I-I 0 v3 6c3 6c3 6c3 N 10 O U O p O O O o0 O O v3 v3 v3 v3 vio O O (O O E O O O O O I� O O O O � d N a U 0) C U w N � W -C 'c: Ow z= � O U D w V(0 c o () N Oo M a a (A (A <n F y O U D W F O O O O O p co O 0 O W z" v3 v3 z Z W U N W V W a ; N N O U 0 63 63 63 63 � 6 O p 00 ON Cl! O O (O O E M N O (2 O (O O 0Z U O Co ; O O U C -0 O O ;> m (6 o o (� � o_ 0 0 Y d o v3 613 613 64� cu U N N Q Q N NQ O O N � O O (6 E Q Q Ucu T >i U 0) N t >i U (0') N C cu d Q dLL UN . 3 L O O O Q i r n N o•m > > Q0 Q N C N U 0 �O N Q w 0 d 0 r 3 0- C 0' 0> 0 Q '0 (6 0 Q U 7 O a) «S E N H Z Q Z Z of w d' .: N N E n 3 C O C o O Z J E d d Q U U U Z y N N O^ N O N U! a a` 0 0 3 a w F p w a` ; N O U 0 63 63 63 63 66 O p 00 ON Cl! O O (O O O (O M N O (2 O (O O r O O ; O O U O -0 O O ;> m O O O O o o o_ 0 0 v3 W v3 613 613 64� "Ti N O O O O O M o N M N O O O O N O v3 v3 v3 v3 EA N N N O O O O O N RO O O O I O v3 v3 v3 v3 EA 0 N 0 63 63 63 63 66 O p O O O (O O O (O v3 v3 v3 v3 vi O O � O O O I� O O O O �; M _0 cu O� O O O O N C 6�1 6c� 6c� 6 of O O O O 2 .o N O 00 0 0 cu m 0 E E otf a O 3 -C H c 0 U O O cu m d C C N U ` N N M 3 w U E = U 0 C maa))N N 3 � � � i N N W Q S 3 p O T `o_ U E N - U C icu O O Q 0 -0 N (L a d z a n w < ai NC E n z E E J 2: C O O a a Q 0 y NN O^ a O N O a a m CU 0 3 a w o F 0 N C6 Op N N V w F LL O N H N i Z >. F y O U D w N E U W) O z a0 0 0 U N O N y O N U M 0 W O O N F W o (A 0 C� (EO 6 d 6) L pp N L O F cc cN C E0 U w o 0 > N ao 0 o am E } (6 M U Q U)_ M a) � t z N z a }N z LL H o U-2 N N N r � a U O O J z s C 0= d U o -aoN m C O N 0 7 Q U � O � N 'N E O OQ Uw 2 t 3 ~ U m O U 4:5 '6 U E ?i 0 O O C Oo V V% U O CU d t >a a 0EQ _ co cn .S (O w d 200 a) a) M O EOONU 0 C C d N 0) 0 aZ , cu 1 co O > > H 0 E`—° Ta > (� C N Q N C 0- 00 N 0-U U N 0 U =p m 0) 0�.- 0 cu 7 O Z� ZQ H O U a) >N '= a5 i 0< E > ai C E � z NC 7L a w E E J � O .71 E O a Q U a 5 Z y N N O^O a al D al D a a` o O > >0 U a w o N F a` N LO O O O 010 (A (n (n (n EA O O O O I O (A (n (n (n v> 0 1 �> to (A (A I (A O O O 010 6�1 6c, 6c, 6c, 613 O O O O I O 6�1 6c, 6c, 6c, 613 OO O O I O (A (A (A EA a O O O 010 (A (A (A (A EA O O O 01. 6�1 6c, 6c, 6c, 613 (A (A (A (A I EA F o o O U o 0 O o o o w —7 N M a (A (n v> F y O U W O O O a o o O �0 0 0 �O O o Lu M W EA; ENA EA z Z EL' M (00 w z z z � � L O ; _0 cu O� O O O O N C 6�1 6c� 6c� 6 of O O O O C C a5 O O N O 00 0 0 cu m 0 E E N O 3 -C H c 0 U U) a) a5 C 0 cu m d C C N U ` N N M 3 U N O E = U 0 C maa))N N 3 � � � i N N W Q S 3 p O d d C O C> E N - U C icu N-0 O Q 0 -0 N (L a d z of o w < ai NC E n z E E J 2: C O O a a Q U U Z a y NN O^ a O N O a a a a` 0 0 3 a w o F p w o a` ; O� O O O O O 6�1 6c� 6c� 6 O O O O O 0 O O 0 00 0 0 o o O M 0 U o O 0 C C 0 E o C 0 � � � � W v N O O O O O M o N M N O O O O N O EA EA EA EA EA N N N O O O O O � � � V3 N RO O O O I O (A (A (A (A EA N 6 � � � � 'A 0 O) O� O O O O O 6�1 6c� 6c� 6 V3 O O O O O o O O O 00 0 0 o EA (A (A (A EA v I- w w O Z co F O U D w W O O wU) Lo a EA EA F y O U 0 W F O O � O O coco 0 0 W U) F Z W O U4 W o a� W d a� Z� Q 'm Z LL N LL5; J20 O O o 0 0 c°� 0 0 O Jo - o»- � o» 1 0 0 0 1 2, ��1� MI EA EA EA EAI EA I r����I� I ; NJ 00001.1 OI EA EA EA EAI 61T I WIO O O O _ N 65 EA EA EA EA EA C O O (� Q U V 0 0 65 C 65 d �- N � � O C-1 .� C N Q 2 O a J N y M O O E'� E ; n cu O U E o rn co 3 C C 65 C 01� N Q N i N N <a J O Q 3 (6 65 U 6s U � � � � � C cu U zea -FOU FO O) N o ('6U.� � J U �)o C N o N C Z 65 rn y0 7 o > ani W r- N t C 00 .2 U N i U U N Q C .3 Y N O E Q N U N y y cu cu 65 U U Q N N j�` as S z Sm E N N E n 3 C O C o O Z J E N T d d Q U U U! Z y N N d O^ N Q O N U N N O^O O N O > U a a` 0 a F O v a` J20 O O o 0 0 c°� 0 0 O Jo - o»- � o» 1 0 0 0 1 2, ��1� MI EA EA EA EAI EA I r����I� I ; NJ 00001.1 OI EA EA EA EAI 61T I WIO O O O O EA EA EA EA EA O O O V 0 0 0 r Q LL U r N N t LL U U m � � o U) 3 N t W U N ¢I E cm 0- � O LL � U LL W U d U Z F O U D w F U W aa64 � � F y O U D W F F W � � � F Z W W0a 0 o 0 W Z U Z Q d N t LL2 O c N O O O O O M to N M N O O O O N O to to to to EA N N N O O O O O N RO O O O I O EA EA EA EA EA O N rn O O O O O EA EA EA EA EA O U V d O C-1 .� C N Q 2 O a O y M O O E'� E ; n cu O U E o rn co C 01� N U N 01 O C N m O Q O) 0 N C U 01 N w U � � � � � W zea cu< o ('6U.� �)o C o o�a 01 �w m QUO v ani W r- N t C 00 N i U U N Q W U O E Q N C E N 6s = =W 6s m E N -O r OI U) .2 0) i H m CU Q N T N N E n 3 C O C o O Z E J d d Q U U Z U y N N N O^O O N 2� N D U D a a` 0 0 3 a w F O w a` c N O O O O O M to N M N O O O O N O to to to to EA N N N O O O O O N RO O O O I O EA EA EA EA EA O N rn O O O O O EA EA EA EA EA O U d fi d 2 00 0 0 O LL 6s, EA En EA ; O U y 6s E � � � � � W c N O O O O O M to N M N O O O O N O to to to to EA N N N O O O O O N RO O O O I O EA EA EA EA EA O N rn O O O O O EA EA EA EA EA N E m Z U N O N O N M O O 0 N O (n L 0) 7 C� O 0)- 2 )-O2 pp N O Cc N N N � NO > N O Q m E N } k6 Q U m L U � `m N C N N I- N N f0 O(`') N LO O M O '* EA EA EA EA OO I O to to to to O O O 010 to to to to 613 O O O O I O to to to to 613 0 0 O O O O M O M to to V3 0 6A EAO EAO EOA EA O O O 01. to to to to 613 EA EA EA EAI EA I CD C U w C cn N W F N O z coco O U D w F WM r w co Lo a EA EA F y O U D W F O O g O O U) W U) z Z W O U4 W O a� c (6 O O U N 3 O � 7 m Lo p EA EA EA EA w C O N -O O (h O r-(66 0 (6 (6 L,)LL v> EA EA EA EU C 7 ; N O U 3 O t N > -OO C N ;> Ntll O > aU a mQ o O Q 3 o oLo d m QQt d Q j W EA EA EA EA O ~ ° O C m O C i O C'0 (6 cu O r Q i ,Q i N Q N ; N U -25 N N U U — O' w O Q U C N d'O Q N U O Q aa)) _ N C N ° �� >Q Q N > (6 .0• °) O O O E — ¢ N — � O 3 N O O V) O > N O d Q CU O N U -O -o 7 N N> Q CIS O 2 N N d N U O cd < 3 C O cuN O � N E n 3 C O C o O � Z E J y d d Q U U Z U! y N N O^ N O N U! a O > U F a` N N f0 O(`') N LO O M O '* EA EA EA EA OO I O to to to to O O O 010 to to to to 613 O O O O I O to to to to 613 0 0 O O O O M O M to to V3 0 6A EAO EAO EOA EA O O O 01. to to to to 613 EA EA EA EAI EA I CD C U w C cn N W F N O z coco O U D w F WM r w co Lo a EA EA F y O U D W F O O g O O U) W U) z Z W O U4 W O a� ; O O U O O _ N O O Lo O Lo p EA EA EA EA U cu N O (h Ycu 0 N L,)LL v> EA EA EA ; O U (6 -OO N > Q ;> U > 01 N (6 .� o O Q 3 o oLo 0 Q Q O W EA EA EA EA (6 Q O O N O N -C 4�U O N U O O O d' Q U O N O U o Q m N O N C > w U .0 U — � O d O d Q CU E N H of (6 W LL Z of w of (6 d N N E n 3 C O C o O � Z E J d d Q O U Z U y N N O^ N O N U! a a` 0 0 3 a w F p w a` ; O O U O O _ N O O Lo O Lo p EA EA EA EA fi N O (h Cl) 00 0 V) O lM O L,)LL v> EA EA EA ; O U -OO O ;> O O O o O o oLo � W EA EA EA EA c N O O O O O M to N M N O O O O N O to to to to EA N N N O O O O O to to to V3 N O O O NLr) 6) EA to to to � O) W O O O O O to to to 613 00 EA EA EA 0 EA EA O 0 O O _ N O O Lo O Lo p EA EA EA EA N O O O NLr) 6) EA to to to � O) W O O O O O to to to 613 00 EA EA EA 0 EA EA I- i 1 1 N O OD LO O G LQ OD 04 N O M Cl! o _ N 7 p) O V�l V�l V�l ul N U C O U _T O cu O O O O O O O U o N O N 04 O O_ W O 0) y w v> va va va > O oN t 6 N 016 O � O U c 2 N O 0) Ooo 0) > N 0) �o_O$ ( U) 0 n U) N T0) > i N v� U O C N N N O_ m E a) (0 E E y m d) �O � 0'(p w 01 XO 01 0 �N C E N N > NSU d d t N _ 0 _ N NI tf N 0 v)2 = N = t 6 U N N U b-0'5 Q N _0 d 3 C of of w Z of cA-0 N N E 3 C O C o O � Z E E E J 0 d d Q O U Z U) y N N w < N O^O O N 2� N D U) D Q a a` o O > U a F p v a` N O OD LO O G LQ OD 04 N O M Cl! o _ N 7 p) O V�l V�l V�l ul N O U E O -0 d O O O O O O O m O O O o Q N O O N 04 O O_ W O y O p r LL w v> va va va v� 0 0 0 0 0 O O O o0 000 N( 00 O � 6�1 �a O O O 010 6�1 6c, 6c, 6c, 613 O O O O I O 6�1 6c, 6c, 6c, 613 O O O 010 6�1 6c, 6c, 6c, 613 O O O O I O � 6c, 6c, 6c, V3 O O O 01. EA EA EA EA v> oEA oEA oEA 6c, I0 1 EA w Y O 0 U m_ X M 0) � NLL '0 LL d M m M t M (a EA LL t O � Lu U LL EU — 00 NI � U � F y O U a W F co O ^z�M N N In co M W fA 61)'A F Z � cep M aN W a Z m w D N N LLD 2 N O UO E _ > C Q Q N O y O p r LL 0) p QE t t (6 C Q cu N 016 O � O U o d O O m Ooo O Cl! �o_O$ ( U) 0 n U) O O 0EUo i E v� za2om d' O O Om t N z m z Z U) N d N O (6 J. --- iL 1n U) w � aS) o p_ U w= �FZ W ° v°)yUw �N C N N > NSU 00 (0 0 CO o< >� 3 M N NI tf N 0 v)2 of >cU C r>� 0 O U _ t .2aa5 :2).,) 0) � O � C 0) N >O 0 (6 O O_ cp Z Q ?i O HN co O) E m E U o 06 U 0) N o -t�� 2-2 (0 ZQ Q LL� N N E n 3 C O C o w < Z E J a a Q OU Z U y N N O^ N O N U) 0 3 a w o F p w o a` N O UO N U) 0) � CO 040 0o» d v> v3 iA N O U o d O O m Ooo Cl! E ( Lo U) O O i va va va 64 v� c N O O O O O M o N O O O 010 6�1 6c, 6c, 6c, 613 O O O O I O 6�1 6c, 6c, 6c, 613 RO O O O I O EA EA EA EA EA d) O O O O O 0 0 0 0 v> o cop Ooo 1 N 00 r" Lo 00 N I� O O � I- U) O U t O 0 T (6 Q E U 00) O a) N C a) N E T 0) i 9 O r- 0- 0 0 T Y C N m va 2 a) coF O U D w ')0 0 O O G a vs va <; z Z W O O O W 00 O Wa — O W d � as t Z.2 in z LL (n D N N LL2 5; ,604 604 604 (111; MIC14����I� I woo 0010 I �I �A �A �A 6A l v> I M6A 6c,6c,. I a I WIO O O O O U a) V3 o0 0) N C C J O O O O 0 0 0 ;;V; O O 0 W O o Q 2 O O O N 0-, LL 64 LL U d o d > 0 C t rn y -U cd (6 C 0 t E N U a) Q N N N .. O � U E E O 3 O ac) O O c � O w 3 0 O U V U m >. O LL .O OI N N O _0- (� U O N C U t w C y J � ''C r -.y t C — U O Wd N N O O N N d m M 6 c n o .o N E_ w O fn fn LL N 0) N co U Q t t fn ~ a) N 0, 0 O O C d C d2) in m C a) U) °�a)2�a) C U U 'p p) O S co o O 4-- m .N N a (A� (AQ H U Q(A U coiH N E N n 3 C O C o O � Z E J d d Q O al U Z y N N O O^ al O a a n a a` o O > U J E F d a` ,604 604 604 (111; MIC14����I� I woo 0010 I �I �A �A �A 6A l v> I M6A 6c,6c,. I a I WIO O O O O ... V3 o0 0 C C O O O O O 0 0 0 ;;V; O O N 3 N U)� W 0O OLL z0 F O U Q w O �o U 0 O O O w a.1 va <n F U) O U Qo a O O O O z Z W O O W O a— W �LL a z� o� z� m LL 0 N X 0 0 0 0 O U o0 0 3 O O O 0 O O W O m izz o o O 2 O O O LL 64 Q d O 0 C t rn y Z a)o 0 t E N 0 N O O O W d U m w 3 O E . LL N Q 0N O U) J t C — U O a) w Q N OT) J N N � m a H o J d � r - N Q > 7 U 3 U Z O O O U N N E N n 3 C O C o O Z J E d d Q O a U Z y N N O^O a O N 2� al D a D a (L 0 0 3 (L w p w o o F a` N X 0 0 0 0 O U o0 0 O O O O 0 O O W O O izz o o O 2 O O O LL 64 N O U O 0 C 0 y a)o 0 E 0 N O O O W to fA fA fA c N O O O O O M o N M N O O O O N O ER ER ER ER EA N N N O O O O O N RO O O O I O EA EA EA EA EA O N 6 � � � � 'A O) X 0 0 0 0 o 61) 6 V3 O O O O O O W O O izz o o O 6�1 6c� 6c� M M 00 00m L co O O W O 00 EA EA EA EA � 0 1 2, �6�I601 MIC14����I� I O O O O O 6�1 6c� 6c� 6 V3 O .Q 0 0 0 0 O O O O O T `o 2 N O IL v> va va va Q E O 0 O O O O � O U 0 y O 0 U N O O O 61) 6 V3 O 0 O) 1 '0 O N f0 EA v) EA v) EA = w N iA N O O O (p I� O O O f0 W -0 pp F 3 � > O 0 Z n F y E'� o N (6 d r1 O N r Q d 0 O _0m LL U U O (6 D M m y0 N >1 O N W U N3 C 'r- W� m .N�� (6 z wa66 E C � (U.0 -N cu U N O N EO O C O � N � E J E 0 d > O N U U U U Z y M 0 W O^ N O O N �0 0 U! a a` (n 0) O O co O O 3 C� (E6 O W w F p w a` 0) 'F L pp NO F c3 N Z y a> I U o Eo W0 > N a� o E2 Q m E } t6 M Q U U)_ U N �-C N }D 0 Z lL N a N � 3 � O m -CE E U N 7 m O �� o c N o1y p1 N0 U O Q C O C N t N 01 U N O N N E m Ct mw _Q N (� � SO W N U N 0,0 0 00 o N O N d _rn U m N U o oU 01 Q Q N 0, C N 7 d> 01 E 01 (6 fn N NQ C U 1� (n U N N E N N N a .O N Q 4-- Q 013 F- H� >y z H 7 asi N E E E O Z E J 3 EO O d C o d Q U U Z U! y N N O^ N O N U O > >0 U r a w w o N F a` (0 N U) M M 00 00m L co O O W O 00 EA EA EA EA � 0 1 2, �6�I601 MIC14����I� I O O O O O 6�1 6c� 6c� 6 V3 O .Q 0 0 0 0 O O O O O 61) 61) 2 N O IL v> va va va 0 0 O O O O � 00 U 0 y O 0 O 0 N O O O 61) 6 V3 O 0 O) 1 '0 O O O O f0 EA v) EA v) EA = w N O O O O (p I� O O O f0 U (6 LL E E O U N � Y U) d � O Y V M � � H m 3 co U LLco U) W H E [-,: O (66 — — w > o� Z w ~ D (p N U- 0 2 ; O U O .Q N d O 2 O O O O O IL v> va va va 0 U U 0 y m w ) w �t_ C 1 '0 = w N 7 (6 -C > N 3 U n E'� o N (6 d r1 N r Q d 0 O _0m LL 0 U O (6 M m y0 N >1 O N U U N3 C 'r- N E -E .N�� E C (U.0 -N cu N N EO O C O O Z E J E 0 d d Q U U U Z y N N O^ N O N U! a a` 0 0 3 a w F p w a` ; O U N d 2 O O O O O IL v> va va va 0 U y m v N O O O O O M 0 N M N O O O O N O ER ER ER ER EA N N N O O O O O N RO O O O I O EA EA EA EA EA O N O) O O O O O EA EA EA EA EA W Of U O 8 I- F Z W O O O W 0 O O a� O O U W d � m rn Q -C LL ¢ Z ` d Q LL ~ 0 LL2 2 ¢ 0 O U O U O U LL � � 0 U ~ o w m c a` U o N O T U (s> (n (n (n O N 0 0) ?i O Z d' O N M m 0) (6 2 m 6 2 a ¢ d Q U_ 0 jE O N Vl ~ O E 0) J M O > O W 71 O d Q y N O^ N O N O N 2� D (L a` o O z C\1 6,) HU U coco O E o > U 0- m16 c D w _a N a) -CO O m N N O d C X N W O O O co 0 ¢2 00 O a0 (n O (n O (n v> F y m O C C (6 O ; d' -2-0-2.2 -0 m U N LE -0� 2 t N d U 3 M m > m M X¢ >W Z 0 W ¢ O1 m E.S'm> E F O O O o O � Z E J d O M UU U Z Y O W (H O (H O (H 61� F Z W O O O W 0 O O a� O O U W d � m rn Q -C LL ¢ Z ` d Q LL ~ 0 LL2 2 ¢ m m N S) -'E oaf H (6 C (6 Qj N EN i 3 O Q O 0.N > N m m O 0'- O m U '- U N y E m N T N 1 �2>,m U m N C N E m N�ofEy 3 O O N E of 2 - IL 0- 0 O d N D ; O O U O U U 2 m 3 0 H E N E 0 O (6 m 0) U w pp O N OO O ¢ O m m U E U N N O N 3 (s> (n (n (n o m � O N ?i N N 0 0E N Z d' O N M m 0) m U UO co N O N m m a �T m > 6 2 of M Z (A c m N N > N N m of U_ 0 jE O O U r U > O O Ol Z J j 71 O d Q U U Z U y N O^ N O N O N 2� D (L a` o O (L w a � m m N S) -'E oaf H (6 C (6 Qj N EN i 3 O Q O 0.N > N m m O 0'- O m U '- U N y E m N T N 1 �2>,m U m N C N E m N�ofEy 3 O O N E of 2 - IL 0- 0 O d N D ; O O U O U Lo 0 2 o 0 N 0 O O 00 O_ pp O N OO O N 0 O do»- 64 6 i» (s> (n (n (n ; O 0 O U Lo 0 2 -0 O M N O m O o o 00 O_ pp O N OO O r W U3 ER ER v) EA � � � � � O O O O o 6c� 6c� 6c� 6c� 643 O O O O O 6c� 6c� 6c� 6c� 643 O O O O o (n (n (n (n v> O O O O O 6c� 6c� 6c� 6c� 643 O O O O O (n (n (n (n v, O O 0 0 6c� 6c� 6c� 6c� 613 W a ; O 0 O Lo 0 2 U > ¢ M M N �� N r 0 r 2 E N LL (s> (n (n (n O U m m Z > 'p N.mr go N C N OQ m �> N.V Zi N O c N Z O U) N N` O U -0 0) Z C N E o > 0- m16 c _a N a) -CO O m N N O d C X N U)N-O 2= (6 SCS O 'I U N ¢2 ¢ d a) 3 U 6Z m -0 C m O C C (6 _0)Om) m ; d' -2-0-2.2 -0 m N -0 '0 N LE -0� 2 t N d U 3 M m > m M X¢ >W Z O of ¢ O1 m E.S'm> E n 3 O o O � Z E J d d Q UU U Z Y N N O^ N O N U! a a` 0 0 3 a w o F p w o (L ; O 0 O Lo 0 LO U 00 WV M M O W 00 N N 0 N V r 2 M N M O � LL (s> (n (n (n 0 O UO O 0 _0 0 O O O 0 c O 0 0 0 c M 0 O O � � � W � O O O O 0 c O 0 O N O O (`)O (v) 0 M N O p O o O O O O O N O O N 6613 O O O 010 O (n (n (n (n v> O) O O O O O (n (n (n (n v, o i::z o o o 01- 1 V�, V�, V�, V�, V3 O N N m Z U N O N O N M O O 0 N O (n L 7 C� O L pp NO Cc c N N N � NO > N O Ln Q m E N } m Q U M U � `m m C N N I- O O U U O) OO O of + m H y N 7O - sWt N � 0 C N U (6 w w N E � N .� O N � O N 3 � O �6 U Q > Q Q C doQ 'o °U.� �rnE�m OD O Q O O) ' > ¢ U) ~ O -O C < w s LLQ U - _ O) r E m (6- Q `p O) Q O ¢ N Car) O _° H Q W LLQ p U C y0 O > O) > oti ¢ EQ Q ° 0 ° 2 -p z U N y p N O C 'O 0-0 ' cu mON O y .0 C °�'Q C d' N wo N O C �` � �` 7 LL V U V) °a >U ° >Q Z z a) z D N C E w Z N a E E J 0 C O a W F O U Z y � W � W W a U D a a` o O m Orn (0 rn Cl) 1'- w C o w < Z E J E a64 � � � F Z y N y O^ N O N O O U a a` 0 U 3 Q w o F O w o a` O F M V O OO OO ? Q W M F 0) (0 (0 0)r W � � � Cl) z z W (NO In M O a� > Q O U N O) fn O) OO O of m H y O 7O - sWt d 0 4-- N U (6 LL v> va va va E N E O U N .� E 3 O O W wumo O of Q_ N C'V Q� O > La o - > Q d U) doQ 'o °U.� �rnE�m W � Q O O) ' > ¢ U) ~ O -O C r U C U a) d' - _ O) O) =i3 E- N w O) =i (6- C O ¢ N Car) O _° Q C' C N p >. C y0 O > O) > oti ¢ EQ ym w ° m `=omT -p -p U N y p N O C 'O 0-0 ' cu mON O y .0 C °�'Q C d' N wo N NS O) -'- C �` � �` 7 LL V m E COT OF (6 C V) °a >U ° >Q Z z a) z S; _0 �Q-`p�w N C E w Z N a E E J 0 C O a C O a Q U U U Z y N N ^ O N O N O 2� N D U D a a` o O > U a F p v a` co O W M OD� � M M r rn O (6O Cl) 6�16"6c� 6c� v� co m OD 0 Cl) M r 0) O M O M � 61) 61)61� � � � � °61� O O O O O 6c� 6c� 6c� 6c� 613 O O O O O 6c� 6c� 6c� 6c� 613 O O O O O 6c� 6c� 6c� 6c� 613 O O O O O EA EA EA EA EA O O O O O EA EA EA EA EA OD m o vOo OD V M OD M r 6c� 6c� 6c� 6c� U C t H Q U O) cn w� z 0 O U D W F U w z0 O a va <n F Cl) O U Q W F F W � °EA c N O O O O O M o N M N O O O O N O ER ER ER ER EA N N N O O O O O � � � V3 N RO O O O I O EA EA EA EA EA N 6 � � � � 'A O O) W O O O O O EA EA EA EA11 " W � V�,V�, � 0 1 - I � 63 0 0 O U OO O of N C 7O - sWt d 0 4-- N U (6 LL v> va va va ; O U 0 C T O of N N U C O ._ C U c cu O) m ,C O - - Q U) 0 W 60 w H tN 2 U) ~ O -O U (6 N O) -O t != 01 N O) ?i C (6- C 'o'. j O) N .� w p +' t O 3 O)t U i 0) U N y U2 `° m p C -50 -° 'y d W"2 O) C w (6 co O) (6 3 9 C C y Q C 3 moo C Q O N N N N 7.0 N Q U Q d y mt w Z ¢ DUH N E E n 3 C O C o w < Z E J E a a Q U U U Z y N N O^ N O N O N U a a` 0 0 3 a w o F O w o a` c N O O O O O M o N M N O O O O N O ER ER ER ER EA N N N O O O O O � � � V3 N RO O O O I O EA EA EA EA EA N 6 � � � � 'A O O) W O O O O O EA EA EA EA11 " W � V�,V�, � 0 1 - I � 63 0 0 O U N d 0 o o o o ° LL v> va va va ; O U d 0 W 60 c N O O O O O M o N M N O O O O N O ER ER ER ER EA N N N O O O O O � � � V3 N RO O O O I O EA EA EA EA EA N 6 � � � � 'A O O) W O O O O O EA EA EA EA11 " W � V�,V�, � 0 1 - I � 63 0 0 Attachment "B" Excerpts from City's Seven -Year CIP Budget (2017-18) K � k � § � § m Cl) cc cc Lo / CL �a. ta 4.1w / / LL_ _ C14 cq }/] L</ _ 6,3 fAl y y \ \ � \ k � \ \ § \ Q Q E Q U) k § § m m m k § \ / w A � � k { F \ \ \ \ k J Ja. J r \ \ \ 2 § 2 2 E k k k � a) 4] § 0 2 2 B } } \ } 0 ) � ® e Cl) }}/ CIF 11 11 11 11 11 11 lo Im _ ) ) ƒ ƒ % §ry- -- y# \ \\ \7 \7 \\ \\ � f )} )\ )\ )\ )\ w U ry Baa p ITT, III U Q K U t i U U Q Q - _ U -21U U Q £ U U }}/ lw 1. lw lw 16 ml Im 44 c4 m 6 OL \} ( } \ # ! . \ \ , \ \ \ \ E ( .2o. -o o § ƒ !/ .21 to- / { \ & \_ � oo § \ \k \§ � � - - Im f) %A | _ - _ !i )o Zy ; ; ! ; ■ � ■ ; G � }}/ 0 0 } } 77 \ clL Lq ! o ` § § ; \ ) |w. f 0 ! ! % % 7 Eo- ~ FU!� ) k - » k k k k ) �� k f_ - o lw -! \ .2 - _ 'C',_w |§o ` - Ik Ik w f( f( |] |J !! |2 |{ kJ || o. ki kE t� t� )\ )� \{ \� - �{ _ \� \} \} �o \ �\ �} {� {/ �] \) )} ® lo j \ \QQQQ IN \ o f z I I{ - \} \ \ \ \ \\ \ } - Eo _;; _ | /ƒ 12�:lo EL EL QQ cL \\�� ±cLq \(k#5§ / / / / \ �� \} 12 12 \ §fi4 4;§! f f Biy 74§! §!2§!§ \\\\ §§§§ § § §§§ 2222 §§§§§§ 12 \ v /}lo } /mw lo - _ ( f� ] NQ o -- _12\) -`ol \ \ () \ \ \ \ \ QQ \(( QQ cT Is Is B!! B!! 2! B2 2 4;!§i A QQAlo ml ml 11 11 Nm } \} E « ! lo _ \& \e \E \[ \\ -> ■§ ■P _ �# \( 12 \\ `- \ // \ / o: vE \\ \\ (( \\ \ !Im o - | _ Em /k E \} \ \} {( \} mm o_ 2| [, RESOLUTION NO. 17-33 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN CONCERNING THE STATUS AND UPDATE OF THE CIRCULATION ELEMENT, LOCAL SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PLAN, MITIGATION FEE PROGRAM, AND PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE MEASURE M (M2) PROGRAM WHEREAS, the City of Tustin desires to maintain and improve the streets within its jurisdiction, including those arterials contained in the Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) and WHEREAS, the City of Tustin had endorsed a definition of and process for, determining consistency of the City's Traffic Circulation Plan with the MPAH, and WHEREAS, the City has adopted a General Plan Circulation Element which does not preclude implementation of the MPAH within its jurisdiction, and WHEREAS, the City is required to adopt a resolution biennially informing the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) that the City's Circulation Element is in conformance with the MPAH and whether any changes to any arterial highways of said Circulation Element have been adopted by the City during Fiscal Years (FY) 2015-16 and FY 2016-17, and WHEREAS, the City is required to send biennially to the OCTA all recommended changes to the City Circulation Element and the MPAH for the purposes of re -qualifying for participation in the Comprehensive Transportation Funding Program; WHEREAS, the Orange County Transportation Authority has developed the Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan to identify traffic signal synchronization street routes and traffic signals within and across jurisdictional boundaries, and defines the means of implementing the Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program; and WHEREAS, the Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program requires that local agencies adopt a Local Signal Synchronization Plan consistent with the Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan as a key component of local agencies' efforts to synchronizing traffic signals across local agencies' boundaries; and WHEREAS, the Local Signal Synchronization Plan must be updated by June 30, 2017, to continue to be eligible to receive Net Revenues as part of Measure M2; WHEREAS, the City is required to adopt a resolution biennially certifying that the City has an existing Mitigation Fee Program that assesses traffic impacts of new development and requires new development to pay a fair share of necessary transportation improvements attributable to the new development; WHEREAS, the City is required to adopt and update a Pavement Management Plan regarding the status of road pavement conditions and implementation of the Pavement Management Plan on a biennial basis; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council for the City of Tustin, does hereby inform OCTA that: a) The arterial highway portion of the City Circulation Element of the City is in conformance with the MPAH. b) The City attests that no unilateral reduction in through lanes has been made on any MPAH arterials during FY 2015-16 and FY 2016-17. c) The City adopts and maintains a Local Signal Synchronization Plan which includes goals that are consistent with those outlined as part of the Regional Signal Synchronization Master Plan, including signal synchronization across jurisdictions. d) The Local Signal Synchronization Plan identifies traffic signal synchronization street routes, including all elements of the Regional Signal Synchronization Network located within the City. e) The Local Signal Synchronization Plan includes the traffic signal inventory for all traffic signal synchronization street routes. f) The Local Signal Synchronization Plan includes a three-year plan showing capital, operations, and maintenance of signal synchronization along the traffic signal synchronization street routes and traffic signals. g) The Local Signal Synchronization Plan includes an update on the status and performance of traffic signal synchronization activities. h) The Local Signal Synchronization Plan includes a discussion on the review and revision, as may be necessary, on the timing of traffic signals on the traffic signal synchronization street routes. The City reaffirms that Council concurs with the existing Mitigation Fee Program. j) The City adopts a Pavement Management Plan and has provided an updated Pavement Management Plan report to Orange County Transportation Authority. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Tustin held on the 20th day of June, 2017. Dr. Allan Bernstein, Mayor ATTEST: Erica N. Rabe City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS CITY OF TUSTIN ) I, Erica N. Rabe, City Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of the members of the City Council is five; that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 17-33 was duly and regularly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 20th day of June, 2017, by the following vote: COUNCILMEMBER AYES: COUNCILMEMBER NOES: COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT: Erica N. Rabe City Clerk Attachment "D" Maintenance of Effort Reporting Form APPENDIX I OCTA Maintenance of Effort Reporting Form Jurisdiction: City of Tustin Type of GENERAL FUND Transportation Expenditures: Please attach supporting budget documentation for each line item listed below. MAINTENANCE Total Expenditure Annual Roadway Maintenance and Public Infrastructure Maintenance Program [CIP No. 70016] - Citywide various locations. $ 2,571,000.00 Subtotal Maintenance 1 $ 2,571,000.00 CONSTRUCTION Total Expenditure Subtotal Construction $ - ADMINISTRATIVE/OTHER Total Expenditure Subtotal Administration/Other $ - Total General Fund Transportation Expenditures (Less Total MOE Exclusions*) MOE Expenditures MOE Benchmark Requirement (Shortfall) / Surplus I $ $ $ $ $ 2,571,000.00 1,115,000.00 1,456,000.00 1,455,691.00 309.00 Certification: I hereby certify that the City of Tustin has budgeted and will meet the Maintenance of Effort requirement for Fiscal Year Signature 2017/18 John A. Buchanan Director of Economic Development /Acting Director of Finance *Funding sources include Measure M, federal, state, redevelopment, and bond financing. 6, l /? - ?o /I Date O C 0 W a` � t0 U O E 9 d o E o � D m E j O a` o 3 o i .� 7 cn N � o m r N N O p O O '00 O Ci Ci O F ffu o0 (O 0�'S a o IL N r M N d M C N C m o m In IiL d r y a N C N rn C N N LL U d N d � C N C N LL d N d O C N C N LL d N d Oi C C N LL d i IL C d o 0 y 0-000 OO o O rg j 3 d o a LL Z p' M i r d > O f0 N A O O N d d y O O O m d a o 0 O LL O a x w O O N N d 0 0 o 00 O 0 m LL N O N Q d C M a0 c x o F W OM M OM ON M 4C LL ON cn a In u H LL H U LL > > (� N (3 LL N O LL N N Y N F T N C O C o m In r y a K rn 0 U In N � a E m o m f0o�-m O Y O U O U a y N t0 � O � N 3a aU" _-moo n 2 . v E a a fY mE 3 0 s_ ~ d N t0 fY X sN E y C O N N O Ip U C x'30 O c 12 E _ N E 0 d �?y nam E y a 0 0 m E 41 � U jf0 m -O f0 N N f0 � O H N N --� N 4 N -T O cn o m m s 6 o O 6? ' 3 N F E t0 E 0- 0 0 0 `o x Ta � and a�nsYm U o O � 0 N n N N Y O N o U y a O C O N C N O o N fY N N O N N N o N N EL) N N E U > m N a s LU C N m� m E t0 N N N w N ; Attachment "E" Annual Roadway and Public Infrastructure Maintenance Program Exhibit K � k � § � § m Cl) cc cc Lo / CL �a. ta 4.1w / / LL_ _ C14 cq }/] L</ _ 6,3 fAl y y \ \ � \ k � \ \ § \ Q Q E Q U) k § § m m m k § \ / w A � � k { F \ \ \ \ k J Ja. J r \ \ \ 2 § 2 2 E k k k � a) 4] § 0 2 2 B } } \ } 0 ) � ® e Cl) 0 E£ Ems! )\j ;G k 2.0 �\ \\ ` \ 0 k Attachment "F" Arterial Highway Plan of City's Circulation Element T NOPTH not to scale SOURCE: Austin -Foust Associates, Imo. TUSTIN Figure C-2 Arterial Highway Plan Updated November 20, 2012 Attachment "G" Measure M Eligibility Checklist APPENDIX D OCTA Eligibility Checklist Jurisdiction: City of Tustin Capital Improvement Program (CIP) YES N/A 1. Did you submit your draft Measure MZ seven-year CIP to OCTA by June 30? Q■ ❑ a. Did you utilize the required OCTA CIP database? 0 ❑ b. Have you indicated what percentage of funding will come from each source for each of the projects? ❑ c. Have you listed projects in current year dollars? Q■ ❑ d. Did you include all projects that are partially, fully, or potentially funded by Measure MZ net revenues? ❑ e. The council approval date* to adopt the final 7 -Year CIP is: June 20, 2017 *Must be prior to July 31 Maintenance of Effort (MOE) YES NO Z. Did you submit the MOE certification form (Appendix I) to OCTA by June 30? Q■ ❑ a. Did you provide supporting budget documentation? Q■ ❑ b. Has the MOE Reporting form been signed by the Finance Director or appropriate designee? ❑ Pavement Management Program (PMP) YES N/A 3. Are you required to submit a PMP update to OCTA for this eligibility cycle? If you are not 0 ❑ required to submit a PMP update, check N/A. Refer to Exhibit 3 for local agency PMP Q■ ❑ submittal schedule. a. If yes, did you use the current PMP Certification form (Appendix F)? 0 ❑ b. If yes, is the adopted PMP consistent with the OCTA Countywide Pavement ❑ Management Program? 4. If you answered "N/A" to question 3, did you submit a PMP Update to OCTA through the ❑ ❑ previous eligibility cycle by June 30? Resolution of Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) Consistency YES N/A 5. Did you submit a resolution demonstrating consistency with the MPAH? Q■ ❑ a. Have you enclosed a figure representing your most current circulation element? Q■ ❑ Local Signal Synchronization Plan (LSSP) YES N/A 6. Did you adopt and submit an update to the LSSP as part of the current cycle? Q■ ❑ a. Is your LSSP consistent with the Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan? ❑ m APPENDIX D OCTA Eligibility Checklist Time Limits for Use of Net Revenues YES NO 7. Has your jurisdiction complied with the three year time limit for the use of net revenues ❑ ❑ 10. over the last year per the requirements outlined in the ordinance? ❑ 12. a. If no, has a time extension been requested through the semi-annual review ❑ ❑ process for funds subject to expiration? ❑ ■� Supplanting of Developer Commitments YES NO 8. Has your jurisdiction ensured they have not supplanted developer commitments for transportation projects and funding with Measure M2 funds? ❑ ❑ Mitigation Fee Program YES N/A 9. Does your jurisdiction currently have a defined development impact mitigation fee program in place? ❑ ❑ 10. Has your jurisdiction submitted a copy of the current mitigation fee program?■❑ ❑ 12. a. Have you included a copy of your current impact fee schedule; or ❑ b. Have you provided OCTA with a copy of your mitigation fee nexus study; or ❑ ■� c. Have you included a copy of your council approved policy; or ❑ ❑� d. Have you provided OCTA with a copy of your council resolution approving the mitigation fee program? ❑ Planning Strategies YES NO 11. Does your jurisdiction consider as part of its General Plan, land use planning strategies ❑ ❑ that accommodate transit and non -motorized transportation? 12. Have you provided a letter identifying land use planning strategies that accommodate ❑ transit and non -motorized transportation consideration in the general plan? Traffic Forums YES NO 13. Did representatives of your jurisdiction participate in the regional traffic forum(s)? ❑ ❑ a. If you answered yes, provide date of attendance: 09/29/2016 & 02/07/2017 Congestion Management Program (CMP) YES N/A 14. Has your jurisdiction completed the required CMP checklist? (Appendix C)0 ❑ ys Saldivar kkl� �j 27 Name (Print) Signature Date Attachment "H" Congestion Management Program (CMP) Checklist APPENDIX C OCTA Congestion Management Program (CMP) Jurisdiction: City of Tustin CMP Monitoring Checklist: Level of Service CMP Checklist YES NO N/A 1. Check "Yes" if either of the following apply: ❑� ❑ • There are no CMP intersections in your jurisdiction. • Factoring out statutorily -exempt activities', all CMP intersections within your jurisdiction are operating at LOS E (or the baseline level, if worse than E) or better. NOTE: ONLY THOSE AGENCIES THAT CHECKED "NO" FOR QUESTION 1 NEED TO ANSWER THE REMAINING QUESTIONS. 2. If any, please list those intersections that are not operating at the CMP LOS standards. ❑ 3. Will deficient intersections, if any, be improved by mitigation measures to be implemented in the next 18 months or improvements programmed in the first year of any recent funding program (i.e., local agency CIP, CMP CIP, Measure M CIP)? ❑ ❑ ❑ a. If not, has a deficiency plan been developed for each intersection that will be operating below the CMP LOS standards? ❑ ❑ ❑ Additional Comments: I certify that the information contained in this checklist is true. Krys Saldivar Public Works Manager Name (Print) Title o Signature 11A ! Date `The following activities are statutorily -exempt from deficiency determinations: interregional travel, traffic generated by the provision of low and very low income housing, construction rehabilitation or maintenance of facilities that impact the system, freeway ramp metering, traffic signal coordination by the state or multi - jurisdictional agencies, traffic generated by high-density residential development within 1/4 mile of a fixed -rail passenger station, traffic generated by mixed-use residential development within 1/4 mile of a fixed -rail passenger station. ocTa APPENDIX C Congestion Management Program (CMP) Jurisdiction: City Of Tustin CMP Monitoring Checklist: Deficiency Plans CMP Checklist YES NO N/A 1. Check "Yes" if either of the following apply: ❑� ❑ • There are no CMP intersections in your jurisdiction. • Factoring out statutorily -exempt activitiesZ, all CMPHS intersections within your jurisdiction are operating at LOS E (or the baseline level, if worse than E) or better. NOTE: ONLY THOSE AGENCIES THAT CHECKED "NO" FOR QUESTION 1 NEED TO ANSWER THE REMAINING QUESTIONS. Z. If any, please list those intersections found to not meet the CMP LOS standards. ❑ 3. Are there improvements to bring these intersections to the CMP LOS standard scheduled ❑ ❑ ❑ for completion during the next 18 months or programmed in the first year of the CIP? NOTE: ONLY THOSE AGENCIES THAT CHECKED "NO" FOR QUESTION 3 NEED TO ANSWER THE REMAINING QUESTIONS. 4. Has a deficiency plan or a schedule for preparing a deficiency plan been submitted to ❑ ❑ ❑ OCTA? 5. Does the deficiency plan fulfill the following statutory requirements: a. Include an analysis of the causes of the deficiency? ❑ ❑ ❑ b. Include a list of improvements necessary to maintain minimum LOS ❑ ❑ ❑ standards on the CMPHS and the estimated costs of the improvements? c. Include a list of improvements, programs, or actions, and estimates of their ❑ ❑ ❑ costs, which will improve LOS on the CMPHS and improve air quality? i. Do the improvements, programs, or actions meet the criteria established ❑ ❑ ❑ by SCAQMD (see the CMP Preparation Manual)? `The following activities are statutorily -exempt from deficiency determinations: interregional travel, traffic generated by the provision of low and very low income housing, construction rehabilitation or maintenance of facilities that impact the system, freeway ramp metering, traffic signal coordination by the state or multi - jurisdictional agencies, traffic generated by high-density residential development within 1/4 mile of a fixed -rail passenger station, traffic generated by mixed-use residential development within 1/4 mile of a fixed -rail passenger station. APPENDIX C OCTA Congestion Management Program (CMP) Jurisdiction: City of Tustin CMP Monitoring Checklist: Deficiency Plans (cont.) CMP Checklist YES NO N/A 6. Are the capital improvements identified in the deficiency plan programmed in your seven-year CMP CIP? ❑ ❑ ❑ 7. Does the deficiency plan include a monitoring program that will ensure its implementation? ❑ ❑ ❑ 8. Does the deficiency plan include a process to allow some level of development to proceed pending correction of the deficiency? ❑ ❑ ❑ 9. Has necessary inter -jurisdictional coordination occurred? ❑ ❑ ❑ 10. Please describe any innovative programs, if any, included in the deficiency plan: ❑ Additional Comments: I certify that the information contained in this checklist is true. Krys Saldivar Public Works Manager ZC Name (Print) Title Signature 4VA717 Date OCTA Jurisdiction: City Of Tustin APPENDIX C Congestion Management Program (CMP) CMP Monitoring Checklist: Land Use Coordination CMP Checklist YES NO N/A 1. Have you maintained the CMP traffic impact analysis (TIA) process you selected for the ❑ previous CMP? a. If not, have you submitted the revised TIA approach and methodology to OCTA ❑ ❑ ❑ for review and approval? 2. Did any development projects require a CMP TIA during this CMP cycle?3 ❑❑ NOTE: ONLY THOSE AGENCIES THAT CHECKED "YES" FOR QUESTION 2 NEED TO ANSWER THE REMAINING QUESTIONS. 3. If so, how many? 4. Please list any CMPHS links & intersections that were projected to not meet the CMP LOS standards (indicate whether any are outside of your jurisdiction). ❑ a. Were mitigation measures and costs identified for each and included in your ❑ ❑ ❑ seven-year CIP? b. If any impacted links & intersections were outside your jurisdiction, did your ❑ ❑ ❑ agency coordinate with other jurisdictions to develop a mitigation strategy? 5. If a local traffic model was/will be used, did you follow the data and modeling ❑ ❑ ❑ consistency requirements as described in the CMP Preparation Manual (available online at http://www.octa.net/pdf/cmpprepmanual.pdf)? Additional Comments: I certify that the information contained in this checklist is true. Krys Saldivar Public Works Manager—�'�'��� Name (Print) Title Signature Date 'Exemptions include: any development generating less than 2,400 daily trips, any development generating less than 1,600 daily trips (if it directly accesses a CMP highway), final tract and parcel maps, issuance of building permits, issuance of certificate of use and occupancy, and minor modifications to approved developments where the location and intensity of project uses have been approved through previous and separate local government actions prior to January 1, 1992. APPENDIX C OCTA Congestion Management Program (CMP) Jurisdiction: City of Tustin CMP Monitoring Checklist: Capital Improvement Program CMP Checklist YES NO N/A 1. Did you submit a seven-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) to OCTA by June 30? ❑ ❑ 2. Does the CIP include projects to maintain or improve the performance of the CMPHS (including capacity expansion, safety, maintenance, and rehabilitation)? ❑ ❑ 3. Is it consistent with air quality mitigation measures for transportation- related vehicle emissions? ❑ ❑ 4. Was the Web Smart CIP provided by the OCTA used to prepare the CMP CIP? ❑ ❑ Additional Comments: I certify that the information contained in this checklist is true. Krys Saldivar Public Works Manaqer Name (Print) Title Signature Date Attachment "I" Arterial Highway Mileage Change Report c rw H =a v 0 n V- 0■ a� 4� L L0 4� cc r � G U N � L C U a� � L c N U a� � L C U vi R O 3 O ii � � ra � N _0 N 4� (0 -0 � Q a� ra Z a U) Attachment "J" Current Impact Fee Schedule: TCA Major Thoroughfare and Bridge Fee Program Rates San Joaquin Hills Foothill/Eastern Transportation Transportation Corridor Agency Corridor Agency Transportation Corridor Agencies MAJOR THOROUGHFARE AND BRIDGE FEE PROGRAM FY 2018 RATES EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2017 — JUNE 30, 2018 SAN JOAQUIN HILLS TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR AGENCY ZONE A: ZONE B: Single Family $5,446/unit Multi -Family $3,171/unit Non -Residential $7.30/sq. ft. Single Family $4,219/unit Multi -Family $2,462/unit Non -Residential $5.39/sq. ft. FOOTHILL/EASTERN TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR AGENCY ZONE A: ZONE B: Single Family $5,672/unit Multi -Family $3,312/unit Non -Residential $7.89 sq. ft. Single Family $4,037/unit Multi -Family $2,354/unit Non -Residential $4.57/sq. ft. On July 1 of each year, the fee rate schedule will increase by: San Joaquin Hills TCA 2.667% Foothill/Eastern TCA 2.206% 125 Pacifica, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92618-3304 • (949) 754-3400 Fax (949) 754-3467 TheTollRoads.com Members: Aliso Viejo • Anaheim • Costa Mesa -County of Orange • Dana Point • Irvine • Laguna Hills • Laguna Niguel • Laguna Woods • Lake Forest Mission Viejo • Newport Beach • Orange • Rancho Santa Margarita • Santa Ana • San Clemente • San Juan Capistrano • Tustin • Yorba Linda Attachment "K" Transit — Non -Motorized Land Use Planning Strategies Letter Department of Public Works Douglas S. Stack, P.E. Director June 27, 2017 Ms. Sam Kaur Section Manager III, Measure M Local Programs Orange County Transportation Authority 550 S. Main St., P.O. Box 14184 Orange, CA 92863-1584 Attention: Ms. May Hout, Senior Transportation Funding Analyst Subject: City of Tustin's General Plan Consistency Regarding Land Use Strategies Accommodating Transit and Non -Motorized Transportation Dear Ms. Kaur: As part of the Renewed Measure M (M2) Eligibility package, the City of Tustin is pleased to provide our land use strategies, which accommodate transit and non -motorized transportation. The City of Tustin's General Plan incorporates all of the following elements: Land Use, Housing, Conservation/Open Space/Recreation, Noise, Circulation, Public Safety and a locally mandated element, Growth Management. In particular, it is the Circulation Element which incorporates the land use strategies to accommodate transit and non -motorized transportation. The Land Use Element identifies the present and planned land use activity; the general distribution and location of residential and non-residential land uses; and density and building intensity. The Land Use Element constitutes official City policy for the location of various land uses and provides guidance to ensure orderly growth and development. Transit and non - motorized transportation are addressed in this element in a broad manner with expanded detail covered in the subsequent elements. The following is a listing of the applicable Land Use Element goals, which are expanded upon in the Circulation Element: GOAL 1: Provide for a well balanced land use pattern that accommodates existing and future needs for housing, commercial and industrial land, open space and community facilities and services, while maintaining a healthy, diversified economy adequate to provide future City services. GOAL 3: Ensure that new development is compatible with surrounding land uses in the community, the City's circulation network, availability of public facilities, existing development constraints and the City's unique characteristics and resources. GOAL 10: Improve and strengthen the Tustin Old Town/First Street area with a unique pedestrian environment and diverse mix of goods, services, and uses. The Circulation Element guides the development of the City's circulation system by providing adequate capacity for future land uses and provides for a safe, efficient, and adequate circulation 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, CA 92780 • P: (714) 573-3150 • F: (714) 734-8991 • www.tustinca.org Ms. Sam Kaur Land Use Strategies Accommodating Transit and Non -Motorized Transportation June 27, 2017 Page 2 system for the City. The Element establishes a hierarchy of transportation routes with specific development standards described for each category of roadway. The following subjects are included in the Circulation Element: streets and highways, transportation corridors, transportation system management, transportation demand management, transit, rapid transit, railroads, paratransit (e.g. carpooling, vanpooling and taxi service), bicycle, pedestrian facilities, commercial, general, and military airports. The following is a listing of the applicable Circulation Element goals and implementation measures: GOAL 1: Provide a system of streets that meets the needs of current and future inhabitants and facilitates the safe and efficient movement of people and goods throughout the City consistent with the City's ability to finance and maintain such a system. GOAL 4: Maximize the efficiency of the circulation system through the use of transportation system management and demand management strategies. GOAL 5: Support development of a public transportation system that provides mobility to all City inhabitants and encourages use of public transportation as an alternative to automobile travel. GOAL 6: Increase the use of non -motorized modes of transportation. Implementation Measures are as follows: • New Development: Require new development to dedicate land and fund improvement of bicycle, pedestrian and equestrian facilities, where deemed necessary to meet public needs arising in conjunction with development. • Bus Service: The City works closely with the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) to provide local and express bus service to the community. The City continued a cooperative effort with designs to enhance access to bus stops that are compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). • Bus Shelters and Bus Bench Program: The City has implemented a bus shelter and bus bench program and installs these facilities as opportunities become available for their implementation. • Bus Turnouts: The City reviews development plans and identifies locations for the installation of bus turnouts on arterial roadways. It also ensures bus turnouts are included where applicable on new roadway construction and widening. The City continues to coordinate the design and implementation of new bus turnout locations at Tustin Legacy with OCTA and the development community. • Regional Hiking and Biking Trail System: The City supports and promotes the safety of pedestrians and bicyclists by complying with uniform standards and practices, including designation of bicycle lanes, off-road bicycle trails, proper signage, and adequate sidewalks, bicycle lanes, and off-road bicycle trail widths. • Orange County Master Plan of Bikeways: The City supports and coordinates the development and maintenance of bikeways in conjunction with the Orange County Master Plan of County Bikeways. The City continues to coordinate with OCTA to identify bicycle Ms. Sam Kaur Land Use Strategies Accommodating Transit and Non -Motorized Transportation June 27, 2017 Page 3 corridors that enhance regional connectivity within the County. The City's construction project to close the gap along the Peters Canyon Channel between the railroad tracks and Warner Avenue is anticipated to begin Fall 2017. Construction of the Class I trail on Barranca Parkway between Tustin Ranch Road and Red Hill Avenue was recently completed. Pedestrian Path between Dow Avenue and Metrolink Station: The pedestrian path connects the industrial business complex near Dow Avenue to the Metrolink Station, which was designed and constructed by the Orange County Transportation Authority. The path features new LED street lighting. GOAL 7: Provide for well-designed and convenient parking facilities. Implementation Measures are as follows: Parking Facilities: Tustin encourages the efficient use of existing parking facilities, including provisions for shared use of facilities and other provisions to improve the effectiveness of City parking codes and ordinances. Additionally, the City provides for common parking facilities in the Old Town area to provide convenient access to public and private facilities. In cooperation with the City, OCTA constructed a parking structure at the Metrolink Commuter Rail Station to accommodate parking demands as MetroLink service expands. Development Review and Parking Requirements: The City monitors development to ensure sufficient off-street parking for all land use decisions. I trust this information will be helpful in documenting how the City of Tustin addresses transit and non -motorized transportation through its General Plan. Please feel free to contact me at (714) 573-3172 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Krys Saldivar Public Works Manager—Traffic/Transportation Attachment: City of Tustin — General Plan Excerpts Copy: Douglas S. Stack, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Ken Nishikawa, Deputy Director of Public Works/Engineering Doug Anderson, Traffic Consultant S:\OCTA\Measure M2 2017-2018\K Land UseStrategies Letter rev.docx l 1 664.03 1 Land Use Element 1 GENERALPLAN l balance between the City's revenue generation needs and service provision responsibilities. GOAL 1: Provide for a well balanced land use pattern that accommodates existing and future needs for housing, commercial and industrial land, open space and community facilities and services, while maintaining a healthy, diversified economy adequate to provide future City services. Policy 1.1: Preserve the low-density quality of Tustin's existing single-family neighborhoods while permitting compatible multi -family development to meet regional housing needs where best suited from the standpoint of current development, accessibility, transportation and public facilities. Policy 1.2: Provide for and encourage the development of neighborhood -serving commercial uses in areas of Tustin presently underserved by such uses. Encourage the integration of retail or service commercial uses on the street level of office projects. Policy 1.3: Facilitate the development of vacant and underutilized freeway parcels with commercial uses where appropriate and compatible with surrounding uses to capitalize on their freeway access and visibility. Policy 1.4: Consider modification of present City boundaries in unincorporated areas within the City of Tustin's sphere where they are irregular and create inefficiencies. Policy 1.5: Encourage compatible and complementary infill of previously by-passed parcels in areas already predominately developed. Policy 1.6: Ensure an adequate supply of commercial and industrial land within the City of Tustin for potential commercial and industrial expansion and development. Policy 1.7: As part of the City's attraction to business and industry, provide adequate sites to house future employees. CITY OF TUSTIN LAND USE ELEMENT GENERAL PLAN 13 NOVEMBER 20, 2012 Policy 1.8: Provide incentives to encourage lot consolidation and parcel assemblage to provide expanded opportunities for coordinated development and redevelopment. Policy 1.9: Provide development of light industrial and business park uses under strict performance development standards. Encourage industrial and business parks as the preferred method of accommodating industrial growth. Policy 1.10: Ensure that the distribution and intensity of land uses are consistent with the Land Use Plan and classification system. Policy 1.11: Where feasible, increase the amount and network of public and private open space and recreational facilities which will be adequate in size and location to be useable for active or passive recreation as well as for visual relief. Policy 1.12: Evaluate all future annexation proposals within the City's sphere of influence for their potential financial, social and environmental impacts on the City of Tustin. The analysis of financial impacts shall include preparation of a fiscal impact report which provides an analysis of impacts on operating costs and costs associated with needed short and long term capital improvements. Policy 1.13: Preserve the existing low density character of North Tustin single family zoned neighborhoods. GOAL 2: Ensure that future land use decisions are the result of sound and comprehensive planning. Policy 2.1: Consider all General Plan goals and policies, including those in other General Plan elements, in evaluating proposed development projects for General Plan consistency. Policy 2.2: Maintain consistency between the Land Use Element, Zoning Ordinances, and other City ordinances, regulations and standards. Policy 2.3: Endeavor to promote public interest in, and understanding of, the General Plan and regulations relating to it. CITY OF TUSTIN LAND USE ELEMENT GENERAL PLAN 14 NOVEMBER 20, 2012 Policy 2.4: Encourage citizen participation in planning and development of land use programs. Policy 2.5: Foster inter -governmental cooperation and coordination in order to maximize the effectiveness of land use policies. Policy 2.6: Maintain consistency with the Airport Environs Land Use Plan (AELUP) for John Wayne Airport in terms of maximum allowable building height, noise levels, safety areas, and other applicable standards. COMPATIBLE AND COMPLEMENTARY DEVELOPMENT Intermixing of different land uses can result in incompatibilities attributable to differences in traffic levels, noise levels, physical scale, and hours of operation. Incompatibility can also occur when the characteristics of a specific land use do not match the physical characteristics of available land (such as intensive development in hillside areas). GOAL 3: Ensure that new development is compatible with surrounding land uses in the community, the City's circulation network, availability of public facilities, existing development constraints and the City's unique characteristics and resources. Policy 3.1: Coordinate and monitor the impact and intensity of land uses in adjacent jurisdictions on Tustin's transportation and circulation systems to provide for the efficient movement of people and goods with the least interference. Policy 3.2: Locate major commercial uses in areas that are easily accessible to major transportation facilities. Policy 3.3: Allow development clustering in hillside areas when this method will better preserve the natural terrain and open character of the City. Policy 3.4: In designing hillside development, give particular attention to maximizing view opportunities, minimizing dangers of geologic and soil hazards, minimizing adverse visual impact on surrounding CITY OF TUSTIN LAND USE ELEMENT GENERAL PLAN 15 NOVEMBER 20, 2012 Policy 9.9: Site buildings and align roadways to maximize public visual exposure to the north -south Peters Canyon ridgeline, the redwood/cedar grove, the knoll and major tree stands. DEVELOPMENT CHARACTER IN OLD TOWN/FIRST STREET AREA The development character of Old Town and the First Street area can be significantly enhanced by greater integration of residential uses and thriving commercial uses and physical renovations to existing buildings and street frontages which promote a pedestrian orientation. GOAL 10: Improve and strengthen the Tustin Old Town/First Street area with a unique pedestrian environment and diverse mix of goods, services, and uses. Policy 10.1: Improve the Old Town District's identity as the City's historical and architectural focus and its contribution to the City's economic base. Policy 10.2: Review and consider the possible development of residential uses in the Old Town area both as individual residential projects, and integrated above ground floor retail and office uses. Policy 10.3: Encourage outdoor pedestrian spaces, such as courtyards, arcades and open landscaped passages, to be integrated into new development. Encourage high-quality pedestrian -oriented building frontages which open onto these pedestrian spaces and public sidewalks. Policy 10.4: Develop and use signage to promote a district parking concept that emphasizes shared parking facilities. Promote improvements which will upgrade circulation and access in the Old Town District. Policy 10.5: Study the potential expansion of the Cultural Resources Overlay District north of First Street to Irvine Boulevard. CITY OF TUSTIN LAND USE ELEMENT GENERAL PLAN 23 NOVEMBER 20, 2012 Policy 10.6: Encourage the integration of retail or service commercial uses on the street level of office projects through flexibility in site development standards. Policy 10.7: Encourage the consolidation of individual parcels/ consolidated site planning and parking and access along First Street and in Old Town through utilization of development incentives such as reduced parking, height bonus, lot coverage relaxation, allowance for secondary uses, fee waivers, and/or financial assistance in land acquisition and/or infrastructure improvements. Policy 10.8: Encourage rehabilitation of existing facades and signage to comply with First Street Specific Plan guidelines and any future design guidelines for Old Town. Policy 10.9: Allow existing single family residential uses/structures listed within the City's official historic survey to be preserved and used as a residence, or preserved and used as a commercial use consistent with the City's Cultural District Residential Design Guidelines and the Secretary of Interiors Standards for Rehabilitation. DEVELOPMENT CHARACTER IN THE PACIFIC CENTER EAST AREA The future image of the Pacific Center East area will consist of a more intensive and integrated business park environment. The area's distinct location adjacent to SR 55 creates a significant opportunity to capitalize on its freeway orientation to achieve regional recognition. GOAL 11: Provide for an integrated business park environment in the Pacific Center East Area which both capitalizes on market opportunities and is compatible with adjacent developed land uses. Policy 11.1: Provide a wide range of uses and intensities which meet the City's future needs for mixed land uses and for a variety of facilities and services in the project area, and which capitalize on visibility and access of freeway interchange locations. Policy 11.2: Create a cohesive architectural image and attractive streetscape through implementation of development standards and design guidelines to unify the area. CITY OF TUSTIN LAND USE ELEMENT GENERAL PLAN 24 NOVEMBER 20, 2012 Circulation Element GENERALPLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT GOALS AND POLICIES The following goals and policies form the basis for providing a circulation system which adequately serves the development intensity anticipated in the Land Use Element. They are designed to reflect and support the Citywide goals of the General Plan, and acknowledge the changing economic and environmental conditions in the City and surrounding regions. LOCAL THOROUGHFARES AND TRANSPORTATION ROUTES A well-planned street system provides safe and convenient access to land use development in the City and serves the primary mobility needs of the community. To provide such a system, the Circulation Element includes a planned hierarchy of arterial roadways, each roadway serving a specific function and carrying a portion of the anticipated traffic demands. GOAL 1: Provide a system of streets that meets the needs of current and future inhabitants and facilitates the safe and efficient movement of people and goods throughout the City consistent with the City's ability to finance and maintain such a system. Policy 1.1: Develop and maintain a circulation system that is based upon and is in balance with the Land Use Element of the General Plan. Policy 1.2: Develop and implement circulation system standards for roadway and intersection classifications, right-of-way width, pavement width, design speed, warrant requirements, capacity, maximum grades and associated features such as medians and bicycle lanes or trails that are adjacent or off-road. Policy 1.3: Coordinate roadway improvements with applicable regional, state and federal transportation plans and proposals. Policy 1.4: Develop and implement thresholds and performance standards for acceptable levels of service. CITY OF TUSTIN CIRCULATION ELEMENT GENERAL PLAN 10 JUNE 17, 2008 Policy 1.5: Develop a program to identify, monitor and make recommendations for improvements to roadways and intersections that are approaching, or have approached, unacceptable levels of service or experiencing higher than expected accident rates. Policy 1.6: Develop and improve the City's transportation network consistent with available funding; scheduling shall be coordinated with land use plans to ensure the orderly extension of facilities and to preserve a free-flowing circulation system. Policy 1.7: Provide for and work with responsible agencies regarding the safe and expeditious transport of hazardous materials. Policy 1.8: Limit driveway access on arterial streets to maintain a desired quality of flow. Policy 1.9: Design local and collector streets to discourage their use as alternate through routes to secondary, primary, and major streets. Policy 1.10: Require that proposals for major new developments include a future traffic impact analysis which identifies measures to mitigate any identified project impacts. Policy 1.11: Encourage new development which facilitates transit services, provides for non -vehicular circulation and minimizes vehicle miles traveled. Policy 1.12: Minimize pedestrian and vehicular conflicts through street design and well -marked pedestrian crossings. Policy 1.13: Minimize effects of transportation noise wherever possible so as to comply with the Noise Element. Policy 1.14: Enhance the important role that streetscapes play in defining the character of the City by expanding street planning and design procedure to include aesthetic and environmental concerns, as well as traffic considerations. Develop a circulation system which highlights environmental amenities and scenic areas. Policy 1.15: Ensure construction of existing roadways to planned widths, as new developments are constructed. CITY OF TUSTIN CIRCULATION ELEMENT GENERAL PLAN 11 JUNE 17, 2008 Policy 1.16: Continue to require dedication of right-of-way and construction of required public improvements on streets adjacent to construction projects at the developer's expense. Policy 1.17: Direct existing through traffic from local streets to collector, secondary, and arterials to reduce traffic on local streets, improve neighborhood safety and environmental quality. Policy 1.18: Assist and develop safe school routes in conjunction with the Tustin Unified School District. GOAL 2: Provide for a truck circulation system that provides for the effective transport of commodities while minimizing the negative impacts throughout the City. Policy 2.1: Provide primary truck routes and describe such routes on selected arterial streets to minimize the impacts of truck traffic on residential areas. Policy 2.2: Provide appropriately designed and maintained roadways for the primary truck routes. Policy 2.3: Provide loading areas and accessways that are designed and located so as to avoid conflicts with efficient traffic circulation. Policy 2.4: Consider safety regulations addressing trucks hauling materials within the City. Policy 2.5: Discourage on -street loading and unloading of commercial and industrial products. INTERCITY AND REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION The Circulation Element is set in a regional context which recognizes the related transportation needs and planning activities of the surrounding County, Region, and State. GOAL 3: Support development of a network of regional transportation facilities which ensure the safe and efficient CITY OF TUSTIN CIRCULATION ELEMENT GENERAL PLAN 12 JUNE 17, 2008 efficiency of the transportation system and reduce vehicular demands, thereby reducing the impacts of future development. GOAL 4: Maximize the efficiency of the circulation system through the use of transportation system management and demand management strategies. Policy 4.1: Implement traffic signal coordination on arterial streets to the maximum extent practical, consistent with financial resources, integrate signal coordination efforts with those of adjacent jurisdictions, and implement other operational measures where possible to maximize the efficiency of the existing circulation system and to minimize delay and congestion. Policy 4.2: Implement intersection capacity improvements where feasible. Policy 4.3: Encourage the implementation of employer Transportation Demand Management (TDM) requirements, which were included in the Southern California Air Quality Management District's Regulation 2202 of the 1997 Air Quality Management Plan and as required by Proposition 111 as part of the Congestion Management Program (CMP) and participate in regional efforts to implement TDM requirements. Policy 4.4: Require that proposals for major new non-residential developments include submission of a TDM plan to the City, including monitoring and enforcement provisions. Policy 4.5: Encourage the development of additional regional public transportation services and support facilities including park-and-ride lots near the SR -55 and I-5 freeways. Policy 4.6: Encourage the promotion of ridesharing through publicity and provision of information to the public. GOAL 5: Support development of a public transportation system that provides mobility to all City inhabitants and encourages use of public transportation as an alternative to automobile travel. Policy 5.1: Support the efforts of the appropriate transportation agencies to provide additional local and express bus service to the CITY OF TUSTIN CIRCULATION ELEMENT GENERAL PLAN 14 JUNE 17, 2008 Tustin community, and to provide park-and-ride lots near the SR -55 and I-5 freeways. Policy 5.2: Require new development to fund transit facilities, such as bus shelters and turn -outs, where deemed necessary to meet public needs arising in conjunction with development. Policy 5.3: Ensure accessibility of public transportation for elderly and disabled persons, consistent with City responsibilities for accessibility. Policy 5.4: Encourage employers to reduce vehicular trips by offering employee incentives, such as subsidized bus passes and vanpool/carpool programs. Policy 5.5: Promote new development that is designed in a manner which facilitates provision or expansion of transit service, and provides non -automobile circulation within the development. Policy 5.6: Encourage developers to work with agencies providing transit service with the objective of maximizing the potential for transit use by residents and/or employees. Policy 5.7: Promote the provision of safe transit stops and shelters. TRANSIT, BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN AND EQUESTRIAN FACILITIES Non -vehicular modes of travel serve certain mobility needs and also provide recreational opportunities. Where possible, the Element provides for these modes of travel by separate trails, walkways and bike lanes. GOAL 6: Increase the use of non -motorized modes of transportation. Policy 6.1: Promote the safety of pedestrians and bicyclists by adhering to uniform standards and practices, including designation of bicycle lanes, off-road bicycle trails, proper signage, and adequate sidewalk, bicycle lane, and off-road bicycle trail widths. CITY OF TUSTIN CIRCULATION ELEMENT GENERAL PLAN 15 JUNE 17, 2008 Policy 6.2: Maintain existing pedestrian facilities and require new development to provide pedestrian walkways between developments, schools and public facilities. Policy 6.3: Ensure accessibility of pedestrian facilities to the elderly and disabled. Policy 6A Support and coordinate the development and maintenance of bikeways in conjunction with the County of Orange Master Plan of Countywide Bikeways to assure that local bicycle routes will be compatible with routes of neighboring jurisdictions. Policy 6.5: Require the provision of showers and an accessible and secure area for bicycle storage on certain size non-residential developments as required by the City's TDM ordinance. Policy 6.6: Develop programs that encourage the safe utilization of easements and/or rights-of-way along flood control channels, public utility rights-of-way, and street rights-of-way wherever possible for the use of bicycles and/or pedestrian/ equestrian trails. Policy 6.7: Ensure link -up of trails within the City to the regional trail system. Policy 6.8: Support retrofit installation of sidewalks in industrial districts and Planned Community Business Parks as development occurs. Policy 6.9: Support and coordinate the development and maintenance of bikeways and trails in conjunction with the master plans of the appropriate agencies. Policy 6.10: Encourage safe biking by supporting safety clinics/ courses sponsored by various local and state agencies. Policy 6.11: Consider the provision of unique transportation methods, such as shuttle buses from outlying parking areas, for special events. Policy 6.12: Provide for a non -vehicular circulation system that encourages bicycle transportation and pedestrian circulation. CITY OF TUSTIN CIRCULATION ELEMENT GENERAL PLAN 16 JUNE 17, 2008 PARKING Policy 6.13: Maintain a City of Tustin Bikeway Plan (that complements and is coordinated with the County's Plan as well as neighborhood jurisdictions) which will identify existing and future routes within the City to accommodate such uses. Policy 6.14: Require new development to dedicate land and fund improvement of bicycle, pedestrian and equestrian facilities, where deemed necessary to meet public needs arising in conjunction with development. Adequate and convenient parking facilities are an important part of the transportation amenities provided by a City. The Circulation Element therefore contains policies which ensure the provision of such amenities. GOAL 7: Provide for well-designed and convenient parking facilities. Policy 7.1: Consolidate parking, where appropriate, to eliminate the number of ingress and egress points onto arterials. Policy 7.2: Provide sufficient off-street parking for all land uses. Policy 7.3: Encourage the efficient use of parking facilities, including provisions for shared use of facilities, smaller vehicles and other provisions to improve the effectiveness of City codes and ordinances. Policy 7.4: Reduce use of arterial streets for on -street parking in an effort to maximize traffic flow characteristics of roadways. ALTERNATIVE FINANCING Implementation of the Circulation Element requires an adequate source of funding for the improvements that will be required. The goal and policies which follow emphasize the importance of this aspect of the Element. CITY OF TUSTIN CIRCULATION ELEMENT GENERAL PLAN 17 JUNE 17, 2008 the Tustin community and to provide Park and Ride lots near the freeways. o Require new development to participate in transit amenities, such as bus shelters, turn -outs, landing pads and similar items. o Coordinate roadway improvements with transit service so that where applicable, special features, such as bus turn -outs, can be provided in the improvement program. Responsible Agency/Department: Engineering Division, Community Development Funding Source: Developer exactions, Measure "M", Proposition 111 Time Frame: On-going Related Circulation Element Policies: 3.7, 3.8, 4.14.6, 5.1-5.7 BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN AND EQUESTRIAN FACILITIES 11. Alternative Transportation Modes: These components of the General Plan Circulation Element provide alternative modes of transportation (in the case of bicycle), and recreation -related facilities (in the case of bicycle, pedestrian, and equestrian). Implementing actions are as follows: o Provide uniform standards and practices for the safety of pedestrians and bicyclists by providing adequate sidewalks, bicycle lanes, and off-road bicycle trails and requiring dedication and improvement of these facilities where deemed necessary to meet public needs arising as a result of development. o Include pedestrian walkway standards as requirements on new development. o Coordinate the development and maintenance of bikeways with the work carried out by the County of Orange for the Master Plan of Countywide Bikeways. CITY OF TUSTIN CIRCULATION ELEMENT GENERAL PLAN 53 JUNE 17, 2008 PARKING o Encourage City-wide development to participate in transit amenities, such as bus shelters, turn -outs, and similar facilities. Responsible Agency/Department: Community Development, Public Works Funding Source: Developer exactions, Federal and State grants, City General Fund Time Frame: On-going Related Circulation Element Policies: 6.1-6.13 12. Sidewalks in Industrial Areas: Continue to study and implement, if feasible, the creation of an assessment district for sidewalk construction within each industrial area which would spread the cost of said sidewalk construction and administrative district costs over a multi-year payoff period or 10 or 20 years. Responsible Agency/Department: Public Works Department Funding Source: Assessment District Time Frame: 1993/1994 Related Circulation Element Policies: 1. 12, 1.16, 6.1, 6.2 and 6.8 13. Parking Ordinance Study: The City shall complete a Parking Ordinance study which will include issues such as guest parking standards, shared use of parking facilities, parking for smaller vehicles and necessary changes to City codes and regulations. Responsible Agency/Department: Community Development Department Funding Source: City General Fund Time Frame: 1993 CITY OF TUSTIN CIRCULATION ELEMENT GENERAL PLAN 54 JUNE 17, 2008 Attachment "L" Local Signal Synchronization Plan (LSSP) and Consistency Review Checklist Department Douglas S. Stack, P.E. Director June 27, 2017 of Public Works Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) ATTN: Mr. Anup Kulkarni Regional Modeling and Traffic Operations Planning Division P.O. Box 14184 Orange, CA 92863-1584 Subject: Local Signal Synchronization Plan Submittal as Part of the Measure M2 Eligibility Process Dear Mr. Kulkarni: The City of Tustin is pleased to submit its Local Signal Synchronization Plan as part of the Measure M2 eligibility process. The submittal includes the following components: 1. A completed "Local Signal Synchronization Plan Consistency Review Checklist" form establishing consistency between the Local Signal Synchronization Plan and the Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan; and 2. An updated Local Signal Synchronization Plan for Fiscal Years 2017/2018 to 2019/20, including all required elements identified in the "Guidelines for the Preparation of Local Signal Synchronization Plans." The City of Tustin looks forward to continuing the implementation of the beneficial programs and construction projects required and made possible by Measure M2. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me at (714) 573- 3172. Sincerely, /<C"%t.fCG V Krys Saldivar Public Works Manager-Traffic/Transportation Enclosures: A. Local Signal Synchronization Plan Consistency Review Checklist B. Local Signal Synchronization Plan Copy: Douglas S. Stack, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Ken Nishikawa, Deputy Director of Public Works/Engineering Doug Anderson, Traffic Consultant 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, CA 92780 • P: (714) 573-3150 • F: (714) 734-8991 • www.tustinca.org LOCAL SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PLAN CONSISTENCY REVIEW CHECKLIST The Local Agency Name: City of Tustin Plan Date: June 30, 2017 Local agencies must submit a copy of the Local Signal Synchronization Plan, a completed consistency review checklist, and any supporting documentation. Complete the form below. Check the appropriate: Adopting an initial plan X Updating or maintaining a previously adopted plan; previous plan adoption/revision date: June 23, 2014 I certify that the above statements are true to the best of my knowledge. Signature Date 1�/l /�W? Stack, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Tustin, CA Section(s) in Local Agency Statement Local Signal Provided or N/A Synchronization Plan Section 1) Signal synchronization goals of the agency are consistent with those outlined as part of the Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan. Include information on how the Pages Provided traffic signal synchronization street routes and traffic signals may 1-2 be coordinated with traffic signals on the street routes in adjoining jurisdictions. Section 2) Traffic signal synchronization street routes are Pages identified, including all corridors along the regional signal 3-5 Provided synchronization network located within the local agency. Section 3) Traffic signal inventory for all traffic signal Pages Provided synchronization street routes. 6-11 Section 4) Three-year plan separately showing costs, available funding, and phasing for capital, operations, and maintenance of pages signal synchronization along the traffic signal synchronization 12-15 Provided street routes and traffic signals. Include a separate planning level estimate of complete system implementation cost. Section 5) Signal synchronization review, revision, and Pages assessment of synchronization activities along the traffic signal 16-20 Provided synchronization street routes and traffic signals. I certify that the above statements are true to the best of my knowledge. Signature Date 1�/l /�W? Stack, P.E. Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Tustin, CA LOCAL SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PLAN FOR FISCAL YEARS 2017/2018 THROUGH 2019/2020 JUNE 30, 2017 SECTION ONE TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION GOALS, POLICIES AND OBJECTIVES TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION GOALS, POLICIES AND OBJECTIVES The goal of the City of Tustin's Local Traffic Signal Synchronization Plan (LSSP) is to implement and maintain coordination of traffic signals within the City of Tustin and beyond its borders in order to help maintain efficient flow of vehicular traffic on a regional basis. By allowing movement of people and goods with the least amount of delay air quality is also improved with the reduction of vehicle emissions. In addition, the LSSP assists the City of Tustin in meeting the goals and objectives of the Circulation Element of the General Plan. Just as the Circulation Element conforms to the Orange County Master Plan of Arterial Highways, the LSSP conforms to the OCTA Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan. Synchronization along corridors favors traffic movement within those corridors. However, while providing coordination along corridors in its effort to move regional traffic in a safe and efficient manner, the City also endeavors to minimize side street delays. This is the balancing act all local agencies must perform in order to address regional goals while serving constituents in a reasonable manner. By participating in Measure M2 Project P the City is benefitting from upgrades in traffic signal and interconnect equipment. The introduction of equipment with new technology helps the City of Tustin to reduce delay in the movement of traffic. The City monitors timing of traffic signals on a bi-monthly basis, thereby helping to assure operation of coordinated systems. Project P also provides the opportunity to work with neighboring agencies in accomplishing mutual goals. For this reason, it is the City's desire to continue participating in Project P. Keeping these goals and objectives in mind, the City of Tustin acknowledges the Measure M2 Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan goals and supports a multi -agency corridor -based approach that optimizes traffic signals based on existing traffic patterns. The City supports local agency responsibility for traffic signal timing and working with neighboring agencies to develop synchronization timing. 2 SECTION TWO TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION STREET ROUTES (EXISTING AND PLANNED) LOCAL SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION STREET ROUTES Priority Corridor Network a. Edinger Avenue, from Newport Avenue to Harvard Avenue b. Irvine Boulevard, from Newport Avenue to Jamboree Road c. Jamboree Road, from Tustin Ranch Road to Michelle Drive d. Seventeenth Street, from Yorba Street to Prospect Avenue e. Warner Avenue, from Pullman Street to Red Hill Avenue Local Signal Synchronization Network a. Armstrong Avenue, from Barranca Parkway to Valencia Street b. Bryan Avenue, from Red Hill Ave to Jamboree Rd c. EI Camino Real, from Tustin Ranch Road to Jamboree Road d. First Street, from Tustin Ave to Newport Ave e. Main Street/Bryan Avenue, from Pacific to Jamboree Road f. McFadden Avenue, from Ritchey Street to Newport Ave g. Newport Avenue, from Sycamore Ave to Valencia Ave h. Tustin Ranch Road, from Walnut Ave to Barranca Parkway i. Walnut Avenue, from Oxford Avenue to Jamboree Road j. Warner Avenue, from Red Hill Avenue to Tustin Ranch Road Signal Synchronization Network a. Fourth Street/Irvine Boulevard, from Tustin Ave to Newport Ave b. Newport Avenue, from Old Irvine Boulevard to Sycamore Avenue c. Red Hill Avenue, from Irvine Boulevard to Barranca Parkway d. Tustin Ranch Road, from Jamboree Rd to Walnut Ave Street Segments to be Added to Synchronization Network a. Walnut Avenue, from McFadden Ave to Oxford Ave (Local) 12 SII ePy�P, �b�c4 'J33N0/d PIONEER � x z CI J z J =O W � Z z � o z = O U Q wr z mow mo w w o oo m�`J` a cD c>k' z LD X > N W bn Rp,Nl.�N6S .b z� O SHIP DRIVE o � TOWN � z co �02� Gpv�P �Otis �S� �Oti J '♦ = d G s 447 A� Obi '♦♦ Od, � J,`p ,ldp ojbbyJ � ♦♦' �a y1�y��� Z E� P 3nN3AV 1lOH b ��� ��• ° `y0 �'b c 3NVl NOIHSV3 = �P� �_� US J� Zw m m INNIN30: � b g 'AV i: 08d wLLJ N �55 v, ��y ♦♦♦♦♦ z 1332115 L 8„LLJ CO ♦` G � S w_ .1S 5y `R 0 133815 V880) 01310Vd Z = M) v AV VN3OVSVd d c 10 3f1N3AV NI1Sfl1 30VllIA NI1Sfll ^ ')\M 30VIIIA w SSV10 b w m -3NO1S o w i� L " pdb Ob021 'y � 6 yOs bdd41, b dd�y� ' '' • � �,�Y-ddb •���.��!'♦''•,• 6 �� o d0yy0 O.S. SngWd�d 2v U SG ybd �Q 0a �bg• � OYDb J • * � o Q 31 � b F- Jcv �°J �°� ,�°• e � J.OVO3l �� ��G,P ,•� SG�p b yds d—,P P� ,,� • ..`♦' ONO i3&fu �b OF�P� Off'• • s �s��b -1 2 ° SECTION THREE TRAFFIC SIGNAL INVENTORY CITY OF TUSTIN - TRAFFIC SYNCHRONIZATION LIST Corridor Cross -street Intersection Cycle Length Controller Type Maintenance Responsibility AM MD PM WKND Bryan Avenue Red Hill Ave 90 Free 90 Free ASC/2S City of Tustin Farmington Rd 90 Free 90 Free ASC/3 City of Tustin Browning Ave 90 Free 90 Free ASC/3 City of Tustin Tustin Ranch Rd 90 Free 90 Free ASC/2S City of Tustin Market St 90 Free 90 Free ASC/2S City of Tustin Myford Rd 90 Free 90 Free ASC/3 City of Tustin EI Camino Real Auto Center Dr Free Free Free Free ASC/8000 City of Tustin Myford Rd Free Free Free Free ASC/8000 City of Tustin West Dr Free Free Free Free ASC/2S City of Tustin East Dr 120 110 120 110 ASC/2S City of Tustin Jamboree Rd 120 110 120 110 ASC/3 City of Tustin Edinger Ave SR -55 SB Ramps 90 Free 90 Free 170 Caltrans Newport Ave 90 Free 90 Free ASC/2S City of Tustin Del Amo Ave 90 Free 90 Free ASC/2S City of Tustin AT&T Drwy 90 Free 90 Free ASC/2S City of Tustin Red Hill Ave Flow Circuit from Red Hill Ave ASC/3 City of Tustin Parkway Loop Flow Circuit from Red Hill Ave ASC/2S City of Tustin Kensington Park Dr Free Free Free Free ASC/2S City of Tustin Jamboree Plaza Flow Circuit from Jamboree Rd ASC/3 City of Tustin Jamboree Rd Free Free Free Free ASC/3 City of Tustin Aviator Ln Flow Circuit from Jamboree Rd ASC/2S City of Tustin First Street Tustin Av 120 120 120 120 ASC/3 City of Tustin Pacific StNorba St 120 120 120 120 ASC/3 City of Tustin B St 60 60 60 60 ASC/3 City of Tustin EI Camino Real 60 60 60 60 ASC/3 City of Tustin Prospect Av 120 120 120 120 ASC/3 City of Tustin Centennial Way 60 60 60 60 ASC/3 City of Tustin Central System (Indicate if multiple systems in use): ECONOLITE ARIES Controller Operating System: ECONOLITE (NEMA) CITY OF TUSTIN - TRAFFIC SYNCHRONIZATION LIST Corridor Cross -street Intersection Cycle Length Controller Type Maintenance Responsibility AM MD PM WKND Irvine Boulevard SR -55 SB Ramp 130 90 130 90 2070 Caltrans SR -55 NB Ramps 130 90 130 90 2070 Caltrans Yorba St 130 90 130 90 ASC/2S City of Tustin B St 120 Free 120 Free ASC/3 City of Tustin Prospect Av 120 Free 120 Free ASC/3 City of Tustin Fashion Ln 120 Free 120 Free ASC/3 City of Tustin Holt Av 120 120 120 100 ASC/2S City of Tustin Newport Av 120 120 120 100 ASC/2S City of Tustin Old Irvine Blvd 120 120 120 Free ASC/2S City of Tustin Charloma Dr 120 120 120 Free ASC/3 City of Tustin Red Hill Av 120 120 120 Free ASC/3 City of Tustin Browning Av 120 Free 120 Free ASC/3 City of Tustin Tustin Ranch Rd 120 Free 120 Free ASC/3 City of Tustin Robinson Dr 120 Free 120 Free ASC/2S City of Tustin Myford Rd 120 Free 120 Free ASC/3 City of Tustin Jamboree Rd 120 110 120 120 ASC/2S City of Tustin Jamboree Road Pioneer Rd Free Free Free Free ASC/2S City of Tustin Patriot Way Free Free Free Free ASC/2S City of Tustin Tustin Ranch Rd Free Free Free Free ASC/2S City of Tustin Portola Pkwy Free Free Free Free ASC/2S City of Tustin Champion Way Free Free Free Free ASC/2S City of Tustin Trevino Dr Free Free Free Free ASC/2S City of Tustin Robinson Dr Free Free Free Free ASC/2S City of Tustin Irvine BI 120 110 120 120 ASC/2S City of Tustin Tustin Ranch Plaza 120 110 120 120 ASC/2S City of Tustin Bryan Ave 120 110 120 120 ASC/2S City of Tustin West Dr 120 110 120 120 ASC/2S City of Tustin EI Camino Real 120 110 120 120 ASC/3 City of Tustin I-5 NB Ramp 120 110 120 120 2070 Caltrans I-5 SB Ramp 120 110 120 120 2070 Caltrans Central System (Indicate if multiple systems in use): ECONOLITE ARIES Controller Operating System: ECONOLITE (NEMA) CITY OF TUSTIN - TRAFFIC SYNCHRONIZATION LIST Corridor Cross -street Intersection Cycle Length Controller Type Maintenance Responsibility AM MD PM WKND Main Street Williams Free Free Free Free ASC/2S City of Tustin Pacific St Free Free Free Free ASC/8000 City of Tustin B St Free Free Free Free ASC/8000 City of Tustin EI Camino Real Free Free Free Free ASC/8000 City of Tustin McFadden Ave Ritchey St 100 Free 100 Free ASC/2S City of Tustin Williams St 100 Free 100 Free ASC/3 City of Tustin Tustin Village Wy 100 Free 100 Free ASC/2S City of Tustin Pasadena Av 100 Free 100 Free ASC/2S City of Tustin Walnut Av 100 Free 100 Free ASC/2S City of Tustin Newport Av (N) Old Irvine Blvd 120 Free 120 Free ASC/2S City of Tustin Irvine Blvd 120 120 120 120 ASC/2S City of Tustin Holt Ave 120 120 120 120 ASC/2S City of Tustin First St 120 120 120 120 ASC/2S City of Tustin Bryan Ave 120 120 120 120 ASC/2S City of Tustin Main St 120 120 120 120 ASC/2S City of Tustin 6 St/Walnut St 120 120 120 120 ASC/2S City of Tustin EI Camino Real 120 120 120 120 ASC/2S City of Tustin 1-5 SB Off ramp 120 120 120 120 2070 Caltrans Mitchell Ave 120 Free 120 Free ASC/2S City of Tustin McFadden Ave 120 Free 120 Free ASC/3 City of Tustin Walnut Ave 120 Free 120 Free ASC/2S City of Tustin Sycamore Ave Free Free Free Free ASC/3 City of Tustin Newport Av (S) Hotel DW Free Free Free Free ASC/3 City of Tustin SR -55 NB On/Off Ramp Free Free Free Free 170 Caltrans Valencia Ave Free Free Free Free ASC/2S City of Tustin Central System (Indicate if multiple systems in use): ECONOLITE ARIES Controller Operating System: ECONOLITE (NEMA) CITY OF TUSTIN - TRAFFIC SYNCHRONIZATION LIST Corridor Cross -street Intersection Cycle Length Controller Type Maintenance Responsibility AM MD PM WKND Red Hill Avenue Bryan Ave 90 Free 90 Free ASC/2S City of Tustin San Juan St Free Free 100 Free ASC/2S City of Tustin EI Camino Real 100 100 100 100 ASC/2S City of Tustin 1-5 NB Ramp 100 100 100 100 170 Caltrans 1-5 SB Ramp 100 100 100 100 170 Caltrans Nisson Rd 100 100 100 100 ASC/2S City of Tustin Mitchell Ave 100 Free 100 Free ASC/2S City of Tustin Walnut Ave 100 Free 100 Free ASC/2S City of Tustin Sycamore Ave 100 Free 100 Free ASC/2S City of Tustin Service Rd 100 Free 100 Free ASC/3 City of Tustin R/R Q Cutter Free Free Free Free ASC/3 City of Tustin Edinger Ave Free Free Free Free ASC/3 City of Tustin Industrial Dr Flow Circuit from Edinger Ave. ASC/2S City of Tustin Valencia Ave Free Free Free Free ASC/2S City of Tustin Warner Ave Free Free Free Free ASC/3 City of Tustin Carnegie Ave Free Free Free Free ASC/2S City of Tustin Seventeenth St SR -55 NB Ramps "Y" Coord from Yorba (S). 170 Caltrans Carroll Wy/Yorba S 110 100 110 100 ASC/2S City of Tustin Yorba (N) / Enderle Ctr Dr 110 100 110 100 ASC/2S City of Tustin Central System (Indicate if multiple systems in use): ECONOLITE ARIES Controller Operating System: ECONOLITE (NEMA) 10 CITY OF TUSTIN - TRAFFIC SYNCHRONIZATION LIST Corridor Cross -street Intersection Cycle Length Controller Type Maintenance Responsibility AM MD PM WKND Tustin Ranch Rd Pioneer Way Free Free Free Free ASC/2S City of Tustin Portola Pkwy Free Free Free Free ASC/2S City of Tustin Rawlings Way Free Free Free Free ASC/3 City of Tustin Township Dr Free Free Free Free ASC/8000 City of Tustin La Colina Dr Free Free Free Free ASC/2S City of Tustin Greenway/Adams Flow Circuit from Irvine Blvd. ASC/3 City of Tustin Heritage Way 90 Free 90 Free ASC/3 City of Tustin Bryan Ave 90 Free 90 Free ASC/2S City of Tustin EI Camino Real 90 Free 90 Free ASC/3 City of Tustin Auto Center Dr 90 Free 90 Free ASC/3 City of Tustin 1-5 NB Ramps Free Free Free Free 170 Caltrans 1-5 SB Ramps Free Free Free Free 170 Caltrans Walnut Ave Free Free Free Free ASC/3 City of Tustin Valencia Ave Free Free Free Free ASC/3 City of Tustin Legacy Dr Free Free Free Free ASC/3 City of Tustin Warner Ave (N) Free Free Free Free ASC/3 City of Tustin Warner Ave (S) Free Free Free Free ASC/3 City of Tustin Park Ave Free Free Free Free ASC/3 City of Tustin Walnut Avenue Oxford Ave Free Free Free Free ASC/8000 City of Tustin Browning Ave Free Free Free Free ASC/2S City of Tustin Cherrywood Ln Free Free Free Free ASC/3 City of Tustin Franklin Ave Free Free Free Free ASC/3 City of Tustin Central System (Indicate if multiple systems in use): ECONOLITE ARIES Controller Operating System: ECONOLITE (NEMA) 11 SECTION FOUR TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION SYSTEM AND THREE YEAR PLAN 12 3 -YEAR OUTLOOK TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYCHRONIZATION Funding Needs for Synchronized Operation (Constrained) Reporting Jurisdiction Expenditures: City of Tustin Type of Traffic Signal Synchronization Expenditures in Year of Expenditure Dollars MAINTENANCE PROJECT FY17/18 FY18/19 FY19/20 TOTAL Signal System Maintenance * $290,000 $0 $0 $290,000 Interconnect Construction on First St. and Newport Ave TLSP's $78,000 $0 $0 $78,000 Westminster Ave/17th Street TSSP $38,500 $0 $0 $38,500 Edinger Ave/Irvine Center Dr TSSP $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 Subtotal Maintenance $290,000 $0 $0 $290,000 * Signal system maintenance is performed on a citywide basis, rather than corridor -by -corridor in order to allow all streets to flow efficiently into synchronized corridors. PROJECT FY17/18 FY18/19 FY19/20 TOTAL Controller, Detector & Cabinet Upgrades on First St, EI Camino Real, Walnut Ave, Main St, Myford Rd, and Yorba St $305,000 $0 $0 $305,000 Interconnect Construction on First St. and Newport Ave TLSP's $78,000 $0 $0 $78,000 Westminster Ave/17th Street TSSP $38,500 $0 $0 $38,500 Edinger Ave/Irvine Center Dr TSSP $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 Tustin Ranch Rd/Von Karman Ave TSSP $0 $235,000 $0 $235,000 Subtotal Construction $421,500 $355,000 $0 $776,500 OPERATIONS PROJECT FY17/18 FY18/19 FY19/20 TOTAL Citywide Signal Timing/Operations Monitoring $92,000 $0 $0 $92,000 Subtotal Operations $92,000 $0 $0 $92,000 GRAND TOTAL $803,500 1 $355,000 $0 $1,158,500 13 3 -YEAR OUTLOOK TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYCHRONIZATION Funding Needs for Synchronized Operation (Unconstrained) Reporting Jurisdiction Expenditures: City of Tustin Type of Traffic Signal Synchronization Expenditures in Year of Expenditure Dollars MAINTENANCE PROJECT FY17/18 FY18/19 FY19/20 TOTAL Signal System Maintenance * $290,000 $320,000 $350,000 $960,000 Future Controller Upgrades $0 $100,000 $100,000 $200,000 Interconnect Construction on First St. and Newport Ave. TLSP's $78,000 $0 $0 $78,000 Subtotal Maintenance $290,000 $320,000 $350,000 $960,000 * Signal system maintenance is performed on a citywide basis, rather than corridor -by -corridor in order to allow all streets to flow efficiently into synchronized corridors. PROJECT FY17/18 FY18/19 FY19/20 TOTAL Controller, Detector & Cabinet Upgrades on First St, EI Camino Real, Walnut Ave, Main St, Myford Rd, and Yorba St $305,000 $0 $0 $305,000 Future Controller Upgrades $0 $100,000 $100,000 $200,000 Interconnect Construction on First St. and Newport Ave. TLSP's $78,000 $0 $0 $78,000 Future Interconnect Construction $0 $230,000 $230,000 $460,000 Westminster Ave/17th Street TSSP $38,500 $0 $0 $38,500 Edinger Ave/Irvine Center Dr TSSP $0 $120,000 $0 $120,000 Tustin Ranch Rd/Von Karman Ave TSSP $0 $235,000 $0 $235,000 Subtotal Construction 1 $421,500 1 $685,000 1 $330,000 1 $11,436,5_0011 OPERATIONS PROJECT FY17/18 FY18/19 FY19/20 TOTAL Citywide Signal Timing/Operations Monitoring $92,000 $101,000 $111,000 $304,000 Subtotal Operations 1 $92,000 1 $101,000 I $111,000 $304,000 GRAND TOTAL $803,500 1 $1,106,000 1 $791,000 1 $2,700,500 14 LSSP IMPLEMENTATION - CANDIDATE SIGNAL SYNCHORNIZATION PROJECTS WITH ESTIMATED COSTS Reporting Jurisdiction Expenditures: City of Tustin Following are corridor improvements, with a summary description and cost, which are considered candidate projects that the City of Tustin desires to pursue upon available funding: CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY ESTIMATED COST Upgrade to ATC controllers. Upgrade Red Hill Avenue: communication equipment to Ethernet. Carnegie Ave to Irvine Integrate into new Centracs Central $550,000.00 Blvd Management System. Install interconnect conduit and cable. Upgrade to ATC controllers. Upgrade Newport Avenue: communication equipment to Ethernet. Sycamore Ave to Old Integrate into new Centracs Central $450,000.00 Irvine Blvd Management System. Install interconnect conduit and cable. Upgrade to ATC controllers. Upgrade Irvine Boulevard: communication equipment to Ethernet. Yorba St to Jamboree Integrate into new Centracs Central $550,000.00 Rd Management System. Install interconnect conduit and cable. Total Estimated Cost $1,550,000.00 15 SECTION FIVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION ASSESSMENT REVIEW AND REVISE, AS MAY BE NECESSARY, THE TIMING OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS Significant timing plan updates and projects completed FY 2014/2015 through 2016/2017 16 ASSESSMENT OCTA's current 2016 Corridor Synchronization Performance Index (CSPI) map for the City of Tustin corridors shows the following signal synchronization results: • 1 st Street / Bolsa Avenue • 4t" Street / Irvine Boulevard • Edinger Road/Irvine Boulevard • Jamboree Road • Main Street/Bryan Avenue • McFadden Avenue/Walnut Avenue • Newport Avenue • Red Hill Avenue • Seventeenth Street • Tustin Avenue/Rose Drive • Tustin Ranch Road • Warner Avenue Tier III (60 — 70) CSPI — Limited Progression Tier III (60 — 70) CSPI — Limited Progression Tier III (60 — 70) CSPI — Limited Progression Tier II (70 — 80) CSPI — Good Progression No Data No Data Tier II (70 — 80) CSPI — Good Progression Tier IV (50 — 60) CSPI — Limited Progression Tier IV (50 — 60) CSPI — Limited Progression Tier IV (50 — 60) CSPI — Limited Progression Tier III (60 — 70) CSPI — Fair Progression Tier III (60 — 70) CSPI — Fair Progression The City of Tustin recently participated in, and completed, three (3) Traffic Signal Synchronization Projects, administered by OCTA in cooperation with our neighboring cities including: 1) First Street / Bolsa Avenue 2) Tustin Avenue / Rose Drive 3) Warner Avenue The implemented synchronized corridors now effectively move vehicles between and among the City of Tustin and its adjacent jurisdictions with minimum stops and delays (and improved CSPI results). Not only did the corridors benefit through overall synchronization, they were also improved with traffic signal and interconnect equipment upgrades allowing for signal timing efficiencies and optimization of operations. Specific Corridor Project Assessment As mentioned, the City of Tustin participated in two Traffic Signal Synchronization Projects, in cooperation with our neighboring cities. The two completed corridors with specific CSPI results include the following: First Street / Bolsa Avenue: Before After • CSPI score for this corridor (PM Peak) 57 72 Tustin Avenue / Rose Drive: Before After • CSPI score for this corridor (PM Peak) 58 84 Warner Avenue: Before After • CSPI score for this corridor (PM Peak) 70.1 78.4 17 The First Street/Bolsa Avenue and Warner Avenue CSPI After scores represent good synchronization (Tier 11). The Tustin Ave/Rose Dr CSPI After score represents very good synchronization (Tier 1). The overall corridor final report results are tabulated in Table 5 (next page). Table 6 (following) presents the timing revisions information in the requested tabular format. As shown, there have been no other significant timing plan updates over the past three years. PRIORITIES, APPROACH AND SYSTEM PLAN It is important to note that for several years the City has implemented and maintained corridor -based signal coordination timing by monitoring daily traffic signal operations. This constant monitoring is performed through consultant review of the City's Aries traffic signal management system, including review of detector and communication events. These events are immediately forwarded to the City's traffic signal maintenance company for trouble shooting and repair. The City strives to move traffic regionally in a safe manner along our corridors, thereby reducing commuter travel times and stops while minimizing side -street delays. These support services include daily review of all coordination timing with every arterial driven bi- monthly. Through these support services the City assures that the signal timing is maintained on a daily basis, thereby allowing the CSPI's to remain at the highest levels possible within City boundaries. The system is periodically evaluated and fine-tuned in response to changing traffic volumes and patterns. The review of other consultants' signal synchronization timing is also included, as needed. In the past three years the City has included systematic upgrades to older traffic signal controllers and cabinets. This contributes to the upkeep of the City's signal system as discussed above. im z O w z a w w z CW 'C V/ 'W v I a z O N_ z O 2 U J a z v I U LL LL L ti GGo a 0 Q Uo ti ao W) W) �a m g g oCL L Q z z N a CL �N — a (2) g g ;ACL m z z �a N N N ^ J E Q �a co Ma D C/) W Q N O Q M It LC LU y m N a a N a Q 0 W)0. 11-0.Ur Qm L N �-- N �-- N �-- z H Q o It0. N O C;0.�0. N N a N a m (� W z H 25 Q ch ch ch CYa oLUD o z a L O w cc z3: >- �w cc � a •L � > c}i w ON d c� o > QO > L U cc O c}n N L_ L Q O y N y N y N y N y N y N y N y N y N 3 i 3 i 3 i 3 i 3 i 3 i 3 i 3 i 3 i N fC N fC N fC N fC N fC N� N� N fC N fC /�� LU J- O O O O O O O O O LV HZ HZ HZ HZ HZ HZ HZ HZ HZ J U F- LU LU w U > O > a> m a> O j O O 7 O i N O U d o L m d Q > m O > LU ' y z O n w U - CL 0 N \ 2 o / 2 G o o G 2 o) � ®Ej \ + / 7 G o§§ k 3 ! 2 5 % « G § §] / cn | | | 0 ® 3 - 6E 2 2]! / '» e= 2 = 3: e ® , 2 « / ƒ e p p ® LLI IL , \¥ @ � \ © \ \ / ! \ 6 — \ ±gy ; n \ 4 \ z S o y ¢s ( [ 2 \ M & ) « 3G,! « , ( i�O ga m, »am+» aaa ƒ \)) \ ~ i . $ Nusni e )z ) x+ aao my [ 7 ■ U) \ ® ` , y , w . e » aae % < +,NVi e e w z y(j ? / ) a o f k �� %« NI a_me y ^LU W § a a ,LU LLJ} \ / �_o ) _ ° ; U) §e \§ ATTACHMENT A FIRST STREET / BOLSA AVENUE TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PROJECT CORRIDOR SYNCHRONIZATION PERFORMANCE INDEX (CSPI) RESULTS Before and After Studies Bolsa Avenue /First Street Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project Table 5-1: Before and After Study Results Time Period Average of Eastbound and Westbound & Direction Figure 5-3: Travel Time Reduction Measures of AM MD PM Weekend Before After Before After Before After Before After Effectiveness Travel Time (min) 32.3 29.6 30.3 27.0 34.7 29.6 33.1 30.4 Percent Improvement 8% 11% 15% 8% Number of Stops 16.7 13.3 15.7 12.0 21.1 14.4 19.0 14.2 Percent Improvement 20% 24% 32% 25% Average Spe e d (mph) 21.6 23.7 23.0 25.9 20.1 23.6 21.0 22.9 Percent Improvement 10% 13% 18% 9% Delay (sec) 699.8 541.2 547.2 391.0 777.7 485.6 692.2 562.3 Percent Improvement 23% 29% 38% 19% Albert Grover & Associates Bolsa Avery u / First Street RTSSP Figure 5-3: Travel Time Reduction (Bidirectional Average) 35 r � 30 25 c 20 15 m 10 5 0 AM MD PM Weekend ON (11%) (15%) (S%) F- Before _ AfteEl Percent Reduction Albert Grover & Associates Before and After Studies Reductions in fuel consumption and the associated vehicular emissions (carbon dioxide, reactive organic gases, nitrogen oxides, particulate matter, and carbon monoxide) were analyzed as part of a project benefit/cost analysis, discussed in Chapter 6. Detailed fuel consumption and emissions data by floating -car run are given in Appendix B2. A Corridor Synchronization Performance Index (CSPI) analysis (Table 5-2) was also conducted based on the average speed, number of greens per red, and number of stops per mile. The average CSPI was 56 before project implementation and 72 after project implementation, indicating an improvement in traffic operations. For detailed results, see Appendix B3. Bolsa Avenue /First Street Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project Table 5-2: Corridor Synchronization Performance Index Albert Grover & Associates Before After Time Period EB WB Average EB WB Average AM 56.7 61.5 59 68.6 73.6 71 MD 63.8 62.6 63 87.6 70.6 79 PM 53.3 52.6 53 77.3 63.4 70 Weekend 54.1 54.1 54 70.1 68.3 69 CSPI Before Project Average Score 57 After Project Average Score 72 Level Tier Level Tier Albert Grover & Associates ATTACHMENT B TUSTIN AVENUE / ROSE DRIVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PROJECT CORRIDOR SYNCHRONIZATION PERFORMANCE INDEX (CSPI) RESULTS Before and After Studies Tables 5-4, 5-5, and 5-6 summarize the improvements in travel time, number of stops, and average speed by direction for the Tustin Avenue / Rose Drive corridor. Figures 5-6, 5-7, and 5-8 graphically display the comparisons for the entire corridor. Direction and Travel Time (min) AM MD PM Weekend Time Period Northbound Southbound Northbound Southbound Northbound Southbound Northbound Southbound Lto Before After Before After Before After Before After Before After Before After Before After Before After Before After Yorba Linda Blvd Area - SR -91 Fwy rA 5.4 3.2 4.4 4.0 4.0 1.6 5.8 2.8 3.8 2.4 3.0 3.2 6.0 2.8 Before After Before After Before After Before After Before After Before After Before After Before After Yorba Linda Blvd Area - SR -91 Fwy 8.5 6.7 8.0 6.2 7.4 6.9 6.9 5.9 9.1 7.6 7.8 6.2 6.7 6.1 7.0 5.9 Lincoln Avenue - Founth Street 15.1 13.7 17.1 16.1 11.5 10.8 12.4 11.4 17.1 15.0 16.1 13.6 16.9 11.6 14.8 12.0 Total Travel Times (Min) 23.6 20.4 25.1 22.2 18.9 17.7 19.3 17.2 26.3 22.5 24.0: 19.8 23.6 17.7 21.8 17.8 PercentImprovement 14% 11% 6% 11% 14% 17% 25% 18% Table 5-4: Before and After Study Results - Travel Time by Direction Direction and Number of Stops AM MD PM Weekend Time Period >to Northbound Southbound Northbound Southbound Northbound Southbound Northbound Southbound Before After Before After Before After Before After Before After Before After Before After Before After Before After Yorba Linda Blvd Area - SR -91 Fwy rA 5.4 3.2 4.4 4.0 4.0 1.6 5.8 2.8 3.8 2.4 3.0 3.2 6.0 2.8 Lincoln Avenue - Founth Street Lincoln Avenue - Founth Street 9.0 7.2 4.8 2.4 5.4 4.8 9.0 6.4 10.0 4.8 10.4 4.2 9.8 6.0 Total Number of Stops 12.8 9.4 14.4 10.4 9.2 6.4 9.4 6.4 14.8 9.2 13.8 7.2 13.4 7.4 15.8 8.8 PercentImprovement 27% 28% 30% 32% 38% 48% 45% 44% Table 5-5: Before and After Study Results - Number of Stops by Direction Direction and Average Speed (mph) AM MD PM Weekend Time Period >to Northbound Southbound Northbound Southbound Northbound Southbound Northbound Southbound Before After Before After Before After Before After Before After Before After Before After Before After Yorba Linda Blvd Area - SR -91 Fwy 19.7 25.1 20.9 27.1 22.6 24.2 24.4 28.5 18.3 22.1 21.3 26.9 24.9 27.4 24.0 28.5 Lincoln Avenue - Founth Street 23.9 26.2 21.0 22.4 27.1 28.8 25.1 27.4 21.0 24.1 22.3 26.4 18.5 26.8 21.0 26.1 Average Speed (mph) 22.4 25.9 21.0 23.7 25.4 27.0 24.8 27.8 20.1 23.4 22.0 26.5 20.3 27.0 22.0 26.8 PercentImprovement 16% 13% 7% 12% 17% 21% 33% 22% Table 5-6: Before and After Study Results - Average Speed by Direction Albert Grover & Associates 0 0 Before and After Studies Reductions in fuel consumption and the associated vehicular emissions (carbon dioxide, reactive organic gases, nitrogen oxides, particulate matter, and carbon monoxide) were analyzed as part of a project benefit/cost analysis, discussed in Chapter 6. Details of the fuel consumption and emissions data by floating -car run are given in Appendix B2. A Corridor Synchronization Performance Index (CSPI) analysis (Table 5-7) was also conducted based on the average speed, number of greens per red, and number of stops per mile. The average CSPI was 58 before and 84 after project implementation, indicating an improvement in traffic operations. For detailed results, see Appendix B3. Tustin Avenue /Rose Drive Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project Table 5-7: Corridor Synchronization Performance Index Time Period Tustin Avenue /Rose Drive Corridor Before After NB SB Average NB SB Average AM MD PM 59.0 54.1 72.9 72.1 50.8 56.4 57 73 54 77.8 71.4 93.5 95.0 75.1 92.7 75 94 84 Weekend 50.8 47.6 49 86.1 78.5 82 CSPI Before Project Average Score 58 After Project Average Score 84 Level Tier 4 Level Tier 1 Albert Grover & Associates ATTACHMENT C WARNER AVENUE TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PROJECT CORRIDOR SYNCHRONIZATION PERFORMANCE INDEX (CSPI) RESULTS PROJECT REPORT I Version 1.0 TABLE 14: WEEKDAY AM PEAK OCTA CSPI INDEX TABLE 15: WEEKDAY MD OCTA CSPI INDEX TABLE 16: WEEKDAY PM OCTA CSPI INDEX Page Orange County Transportation Authority ITERIS' 30 Warner Avenue TSS Project PROJECT REPORT I Version 1.0 TABLE 17: WEEKEND PEAK OCTA CSPI INDEX In order to better compare the CSPI index using the new performance criteria, Table 18, below, summarizes the score and performance level for each direction forthe study peaks. The "Before" performance levels are displayed in red while the "After" performance levels are displayed in green. TABLE 18: OCTA CSPI SCORE INDEX Page Orange County Transportation Authority 31 Warner Avenue TSS Project ITEMS` DIRECTIONPEAK • •N CSPI SCORE PERFORMANCE AM EBAfter Before 83.2 Tier 1 89.6 Tier 1 WB Before 72.7 Tier 2 After 91.5 Tier 1 Before 99.3 Tier 1 EB After 109.0 Tier 1 MD Before 94.2 Tier 1 WB After 98.0 Tier 1 PM EB Before 77.4 Tier 2 After 82.5 Tier 1 Before 62.8 Tier 3 WB After 74.2 Tier 2 Before 83.1 Tier 1 EB After 105.8 Tier 1 WKND Before 85.7 Tier 1 WB After 97.0 Tier 2 Page Orange County Transportation Authority 31 Warner Avenue TSS Project ITEMS` Attachment "M" Local Pavement Management Program (PMP) Plan and PMP Certification FINAL REPORT UPDATED CITYWIDE PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN MEASURE M2 2017-2024 TUSTIN Submitted to: City of Tustin, CA April 20, 2017 r17INFRAS WRUCTYR� April 20, 2017 Mr. Douglas S. Stack, P.E. Director of Public Works CITY OF TUSTIN 300 Centennial Way Tustin, CA 92780 Subject: City of Tustin —OCTA Pavement Management Compliance Report 2017 Dear Doug: As part of the 2017 Update of the Pavement Management Plan (PMP) for the City of Tustin, Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc. is pleased to submit the PMP reporting required by the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). This data/report will be submitted to OCTA as part of the City's required biennial PMP prior to June 2017. The information contained in this report was used to develop the recommended improvement program for the pavement network. The report covers the following categories: • Pavement Management Plan Certification • Quality Assurance/ Quality Control (QA/QC) Plan • Pavement Management Data Files (electronic Tustin.e70 file format) • Pavement Management Plan that includes the following: • Average Pavement Conditions For Each Segment in the Network (PCI Report) The Pavement Condition Index report shows the present condition of each street in the pavement network (MPAH and Locals). In addition, the report shows the basic geometry of each street segment. BUCKNAM INFRASTRUCTURE GROUD, INC. 35485eagate Way, Suite 234 Qceanside, CA 92656 T. 76{}.216,6529 F. 760.216.6549 www,bucknam-inc.mm 4 • Seven-year Projected PCI Under Existing Funding Levels This report identifies the projected PCI's based on the local agencies current funding programs. This report details the PCI projects for the entire network, MPAH roadways and Local streets. • Seven-year Plan for Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation (Forecasted Maintenance Report) The Forecasted Maintenance Report projects the street maintenance activities required for the next seven years, broken down to show maintenance levels for all streets. This includes all scheduled projects provided by the City for fiscal years 2017 through 2024. • Alternative Funding Levels OCTA has requested two reports indicating the necessary funding to maintain the City's current weighted average PCI as well as the necessary funding to improve the weighted average PCI by one PCI point over the next seven years. • Backlog by Fiscal Year (re: unfunded restoration, rehabilitation and reconstruction) All comments received from the City have been incorporated in the reports that follow. All of the City's issues and needs that were brought to our attention are included in the report. It has been a pleasure working with you and the City on updating your Pavement Management Plan. We look forward to the continued success of this project and future teamwork with City staff. Sincerely, Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc. Peter J. Bucknam Project Manager Infrastructure Management — GIS Services City of Tustin, CA Page i 2017 Citywide Pavement Management Plan - OCTA Submittal Final Report - April 20, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS OCTA Chapter 3 Reports, "Countywide PMP Guidelines Manual - Citywide Report Executive Summary • Pavement Management Plan Certification • Quality Assurance/ Quality Control (QA/QC) Plan • Pavement Management Data Files (electronic Tustin.e70 file format) • Pavement Management Plan that includes the following: * Seven-year Projected PCI Under Existing Funding Levels This report identifies the projected PCI's based on the local agencies current funding programs. This report details the PCI projects for the entire network, MPAH roadways and Local streets. * Seven-year Plan for Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation (Forecasted Maintenance Report) The Forecasted Maintenance Report projects the street maintenance activities required for the next seven years, broken down to show maintenance levels for all streets. This includes all scheduled projects provided by the City for fiscal years 2017-18 through 2023-24. * Alternative Funding Levels OCTA has requested two reports indicating the necessary funding to maintain the City's current weighted average PCI as well as the necessary funding to improve the weighted average PCI by one PCI point over the next seven years. * Backlog by Fiscal Year (re: unfunded restoration, rehabilitation and reconstruction) * Centerline mileage for MPRH, Local streets and total network * Percentage of total network in each of the five condition categories based on centerline mileage City of Tustin, CA Page ii 2017 Citywide Pavement Management Plan - OCTA Submittal Final Report - April 20, 2017 • Local Match Reduction Reporting In order to be eligible for Local Match Reduction of 10%, the following must be submitted: o Measurable improvement of paved road conditions during the previous reporting period defined as an overall weighted (by area) average system improvement of one PCI point. o No reduction in the overall weighted (by area) average PCI in the MPAH or local street categories -or— o Have road pavement conditions, for the overall network, during the previous reporting period within the highest twenty (20%) of the scale for road pavement conditions in conformance with OCTA Ordinance No. 3, defined as a PCI of 75 or higher, otherwise defined as in "good condition". • Appendix A —Pavement Management Program Agency Submittal Checklist These reports will be submitted to the City of Tustin as part of the biennial Pavement Management Plan that is due prior to June 2017. These reports will be packaged in a way that it will be easy for staff to review (Section report within the City's final PMP report). Staff can then pull the necessary documentation and provide OCTA with the Chapter 3 — Agency Submittal information. W_ City of Tustin, CA Page 1 2017 Citywide Pavement Management Plan - OCTA Submittal Final Report - April 20, 2017 CITYWIDE OCTA SUBMITTAL - part of - COUNTYWIDE PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN GUIDELINES (Chapter 3) City of Tustin, CA Page 2 2017 Citywide Pavement Management Plan - OCTA Submittal Final Report - April 20, 2017 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2016-17 UPDATE OF PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN (PMP) As the City of Tustin continues to show growth with its population, demographics, infrastructure, and maintenance needs, the street network has been running parallel as new developments increase the size of Tustin's pavement infrastructure. As growth continues within the City and regionally, wear and tear on the infrastructure will occur at an ever increasing rate. Pavement aging through annual weathering and increased usage, compounded with the increased cost of performing maintenance add to the yearly operational maintenance of the pavement network. System sustainability can only be achieved through proactive scheduling and the implementation of cost-efficient pavement applications. In the upcoming years as the City continues to build upon this study through future inspections and maintenance efforts, Tustin pavement data will continue to provide reliable data to enhance the PMP through detailed Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Measure M2 funding analysis, City specific budgetary reporting and level of service reporting. The Tustin PMP has been developed to assist City personnel by providing current data on the City's street network and to develop cost-effective maintenance strategies to maintain a desirable level of pavement performance on a network scale, while optimizing the expenditure of limited fiscal resources. The project consisted of analyzing the City's 2015 dataset for quality and usability. In doing this, we were tasked to generate an updated Capital Improvement Program report that identified recommendations and deficiencies in the current operating and maintenance efforts put forth by the City. We surveyed all designated arterial and collector (MPAH) routes this past winter to assist the City in being consistent with OCTA - Measure M2 January 2016 guidelines. Additionally, we updated the City's unique Pavement Management — GIS layer that will continue to assist the City in analyzing pavement conditions and other attribute information through the use of ESRI ArcMap. Bucknam Infrastructure Group reviewed the City's previous maintenance efforts and the current 2017-18 proposed street improvements for pertinent pavement information in order to generate a CIP report that identified recommendations and opportunities for improvement in the current operating and maintenance efforts put forth by the City. The result of these work efforts is this report. Specifically, our findings and recommendations provide Public Works administrators, managers and field personnel with: • PMP report consistent with OCTA Measure M2 guidelines • the present condition status of the pavement network (arterial, collector, residential and industrial streets), as a whole and of any grouping or individual component within the City; • a ranked list of all streets, or segments of streets, by condition within the network; • rehabilitation/maintenance needs of each street segment by year; • an optimized priority maintenance and rehabilitation program based on cost/benefit analysis City of Tustin, CA Page 3 2017 Citywide Pavement Management Plan - OCTA Submittal Final Report - April 20, 2017 and various levels of funding; • optimum annual pavement expenditure levels for pavement maintenance for the next seven (7) years; • prediction of the life -cycle performance of the City's pavement network and each individual street section; • updated PMP data to assist the City with GASB 34 reporting; and • pavement condition data and analysis presented in GIS through ESR/ ArcMap Pavement is a dynamic structure where deterioration is constantly occurring; thus the pavement management system needs to be updated on a regular basis to reflect these changes in pavement conditions, pavement maintenance histories, and maintenance strategies based upon budgetary constraints. This report reflects our findings and recommendations for the PMP and the current state of the City's pavement network. Furthermore, we have recommended detailed funding and maintenance strategies for the arterial/collector and residential networks for next seven (7) years. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Through our assessment of historical maintenance performed within the City and through our discussions with City staff the conditional data found across the network clearly shows that the City has applied strong, preventative maintenance strategies over the past decade. We continue to see an annual conditional increase within the Arterial and Local street programs. Pavement management involves frequent preventative maintenance; as pavement deteriorates through heavy traffic impacts, weathering and time, preventative maintenances (such as slurry seal, stop gap, etc.) have limited benefits. More aggressive maintenance applications have to be used. Our study has shown that key overlay projects will be needed over the next seven years to maintain the network's high level of condition. Currently, the City's MPAH network holds a very high weighted PCI value compared to the Local network; it is our recommendation that a more aggressive overlay program be applied to the Locals. We have found and recommend the following detailed items which should be reviewed and considered for a proactive approach to the future management of the PMP: ARTERIAL/ COLLECTOR (MPAH) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The actual workload requirements identified indicate that the Arterial (MPAH) street network is currently in "very good" condition. To maintain this condition, it is critical that preventive maintenance and overlay activities are funded at the levels identified on page 16 and the reports in Section 4 (internal City Report) to maintain a "very good" network weighted average PCI value. Our MPAH findings for conditional data and recommendations for revenue expenditures are shown below: 0 The MPAH network has a weighted PCI of 88.2 City of Tustin, CA Page 4 2017 Citywide Pavement Management Plan - OCTA Submittal Final Report - April 20, 2017 • The MPAH network consists of 67.9 section miles and 16,602,663 SF of pavement; • Currently, 4% of the MPAH network (2.7 section miles) qualify for rehabilitation/reconstruction maintenance; • MPAH maintenance projects should focus on the maintaining the current PCI above a weighted average of 75 over the next 7 years; • Develop a proactive fiscal and planned approach to identify MPAH overlay projects based on the deterioration modeling within MicroPAVER; • Maintain the MPAH revenues at the $2,041,400/yr level for the term of the CIP to generate the results identified on page 15; and • Perform pavement inspections on the MPAH network every two years to build a solid planning model within MicroPAVER to track PCI deterioration; also follows new OCTA guidelines for Measure M2. LOCAL FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The actual workload requirements identified indicate that the Local street network is currently in "good" condition. To maintain this condition, it is critical that preventive maintenance and overlay activities are funded at the levels identified on page 16 and the reports in Section 4 (internal City Report) to maintain a "good" network weighted average PCI value. Our Local network findings for conditional data and recommendations for revenue expenditures are shown below: • The Local network has a weighted PCI of 85.6; • The Local network consists of 67.7 section miles and 14,288,526 SF of pavement; • Currently, 9% of the Local network (5.9 section miles) qualify for rehabilitation/reconstruction maintenance; • Local maintenance projects should focus on the maintaining the current PCI above a weighted average of 75 over the next 7 years; • Develop a proactive fiscal and planned approach to identify arterial overlay projects based on the deterioration modeling within MicroPAVER; • Maintain the Local revenues at the $1,452,900/yr level for the term of the CIP to generate the results identified on page 15; and • Perform pavement inspections on the Local network every six years to build a solid planning model within MicroPAVER to track PCI deterioration; also follows new OCTA guidelines for Measure M2. city of Tustin, CA 2017 Citywide Pavement !Management Plan -- OCTA Submittal Final Report - April 20, 2017 Pavement Management Plan Certification Appendix 6 Page 5 ;D`iTA The City of Tustin, CA certifies that is has a Pavement Management Plan in conformance with the criteria stated in the Orange County Transportation Authority Ordinance No. 3. This ordinance requires that a Pavement Management Plan be in place and maintained to qualify for allocation of revenues generated from renewed Measure M (M2). The plan was developed by Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc. using MicroPAVER, a pavement management system conforming to American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard ❑6433, and contains, ata minimum, the Fallowing elements: ■ Inventory of MPAH and Local routes reviewed and updated biennially. The last update of the inventory was completed on March, 2017 for the Arterial (MPAH) and March 2017 for the Local streets ■ Assessment of the pavement condition for all routes in the system, updated biennially. The last field review of the pavement condition was completed in March, 2017. • Percentage of all section of pavement needing: o Preventive Maintenance = 23%, Rehabilitation = 11%, Reconstruction = 1% ■ Budget needs for preventive maintenance, rehabilitation and/or reconstruction of deficient sections of pavement for: o Current biennial period 8,850,000 Following biennial period 54,400,000 • Funds budgeted or available for Preventive Maintenance, Rehabilitation and/or Reconstruction. o Current biennial period $8,850,000 Following biennial period $3,400,000 • Backlog by year of unfunded rehabilitation, restoration and reconstruction needs (See page 50) in The Pavement Management Plan is consistent with countywide pavement condition assessment standards as described in the OCTA Countywide Pavement Management Plan Guidelines adopted by the OCTA Board of Directors. � An electronic copy of the Pavement Management Plan with Micro PAVER or StreetSaver compatible files has been or will be submitted with the certification statement. A copy of this certification is being provided to the ❑range County Transportatlon Authority. Submitted by: Douglas S. Stack P.E Name (Print] Si>lne D�4ctd'r Public Works/City, Engineer Title City of Tustin turisdicti n Date City of Tustin, CA Page 6 2017 Citywide Pavement Management Plan — OCTA Submittal Final Report — April 20, 2017 Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QA/QC) Plan As required by the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), the City of Tustin must prepare and implement a quality assurance / quality control (QA/QC) plan regarding pavement management inspection as they pertain to MicroPAVER. For the purposes of this report, Bucknam has demonstrated below how our project team implemented QA/QC procedures during the project. Our QA/QC plan focuses on the how each pavement inspection is performed, what distresses are collected and ensures that it complies with the OCTA guidelines defined within the "Countywide Pavement Management Plan Guidelines (CPMPG)". As shown within the OCTA (CPMPG), our staff followed and delivered on the requirements stated on Section 2.4, page 8 which require specific QA/QC data (Items A through G). Additionally, Chapter 3 requires numerous data/deliverables from local agencies for Measure M2 eligibility. All general PCI budgetary report submittals will follow the Chapter 3 guidelines. In conjunction with the outlined items within the CPMPG Section 2.4 we have summarized our QA/QC procedures below: Descriptions of condition survey - Our staff follows the required Condition Survey Protocols (CPMPG, Section 2.1); our staff assesses each pavement section for the minimum distresses outlined within Section 2.1. Additionally, based on the pavement conditions found, we collect all MicroPAVER Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) distresses, if found within the sample sections; for example, if slippage cracking, potholes, etc. are found our survey technicians record the proper information. How data was collected - Our surveys follow the OCTA accepted windshield/walking requirements. All sections that our staff surveys are performed through the walking/windshield method, approximately 30% of all sections surveyed were complemented with walking surveys based on unique conditions found. Our staff physically measures the width of every section as well as measure for any square footage adjustment that need to be added or taken away from a sections "true area" (i.e. cul-de-sac, bus pads, street width variances, etc.). Accuracy required for data collection - We use a statistical sampling approach for measuring the quality of our field technician's work. In this manner, 10 percent of the original surveys are re- surveyed by a different survey crew than the original, supervised by a field supervisor, and the results are compared to the original surveys. Our QC process involves checking the field crews' work in a "blind study" fashion. Quality control checks are performed at the end of each survey week. This ensures that all field personnel are properly collecting section samples, distress types and distress severities for all street segments. When QA/QC issues are found, our staff documents the issues within MicroPAVER's user interface. If distress types found are not within the 97% accuracy our QA/QC is expanded beyond our minimum 10% resurvey to 20% of the original survey d. Data check for accuracy by agency— As described above our staff re -inspects, as a minimum, 10% of the original survey (OCTA only requires 5%). Per the agencies requests, our staff will submit PCI reports to the agency as project status reports for their review. Agencies will typically review City of Tustin, CA Page 7 2017 Citywide Pavement Management Plan - OCTA Submittal Final Report - April 20, 2017 specific pavement sections for PCI accuracy based on recent overlay or slurry seal maintenance; this serves as an initial accuracy check on our surveys (outside Bucknam QC efforts). Additionally, our staff performs "ride -a -long" surveys with local agency staff to build consensus on how our MicroPAVER ACOE surveys are performed, recorded and reported on. e. PCI Comparison with Past Surveys - if previous inspection data is available, new PCI's calculated through the most recent inspections will be compared to previous PCI's. If the variance in PCI is greater than +/- 10 PCI points, these sections will be flagged for further investigation and/or re- inspection (CPMPG guidelines are followed). Schedule of data submittal — Pending on the City's last major PMP submittal, Bucknam will assist the agency in submitting the following: Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) routes will be surveyed and reported on at least once every two years 1/3 of Local streets will be surveyed and reported on every two years; all streets will be surveyed within the six year requirement Corresponding MPAH and local PCI reporting and budgetary reporting will be submitted every two years g. Experience of Inspectors — Bucknam staff have been trained on the use of MicroPAVER and the ACOE MicroPAVER segment calibration and inspection practices. Mr. Peter Bucknam (Project Manager) and Mr. Patrick Mullen (GIS Planner) have completed the MicroPAVER Certification of Professional Development courses. All Bucknam field technicians are trained using the ACOE survey methodologies and have passed OCTA's prequalification testing. h. Field data collection safety procedures — Bucknam field survey techniques utilize the following procedures: All vehicles are properly marked or flagged with appropriate sign markings indicating that a "PAVEMENT SURVEY IS IN PROGRESS" All vehicles have the proper flashing amber light beacons placed on the top of the vehicle to allow for proper visibility and line -of -site warning Large MPAH routes are surveyed using two field technicians to increase traffic control warning and safety While parking or stopping along the survey route, vehicles legally park within the right- of-way or use a parking lot All field technicians wear fluorescent vests to warn traffic and pedestrians City of Tustin, CA Page 8 2017 Citywide Pavement Management Plan - OCTA Submittal Final Report - April 20, 2017 On a case-by-case basis, if our staff was responsible for converting a previous PMP database to Micro PAVER/StreetSaver this will be properly notated within our reporting. Our staff will provide examples of how the previous inspections were performed compared to the most recent Micro PAVER/StreetSaver based surveys. Bucknam will provide the local agency a copy of our QA/QC plan prior to any pavement inspection work. With approval, our staff will begin the Micro PAVER/StreetSaver ACOE based inspections. City of Tustin, CA Page 9 2017 Citywide Pavement Management Plan — OCTA Submittal Final Report — April 20, 2017 Pavement Management Data Files The City of Tustin MicroPAVER database (.e70 file) has been enclosed for City and OCTA use. This data and the associated reporting data includes: • Street names and limits for the City's public streets • Street identifiers (Branch ID, Section ID) • Direction • Begin and end of section • Length, width and true areas • Functional Classification (MPAH, Local) • Number of travel lanes • Pavement Condition Index (PCI) and date of inspection • Type of recommended treatment • Cost of recommended treatment City of Tustin, CA Page 10 2017 Citywide Pavement Management Plan — OCTA Submittal Final Report — April 20, 2017 Pavement Management Plan Bucknam Infrastructure Group has enclosed the required PMP reports that assist the City of Tustin in compliance with the OCTA requirements outlined in Chapter 3 of the Countywide Pavement Management Plan Guidelines. Weighted Average Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Reports o PCI Map o PCI Report - A to Z Order ■ Entire Network ■ MPAH roadways ■ Local streets Projected PCI Under Existing Funding Levels (next seven -years) ■ Entire Network ■ MPAH roadways ■ Local streets Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Projections (Seven -Yr Projection) o Based on current and projected budget o Includes all line items within Chapter 3 requirements (Chapter 3, page 16) Alternative Funding Levels required to: o Maintain Existing Average Network PCI o To Improve Average Network PCI Backlog by Fiscal Year (re: restoration, rehabilitation and reconstruction) Centerline mileage for MPAH, Local streets, and total network o See Pavement Condition Index Reporting (page 13) Percentage of total network in each of the five condition categories based on centerline mileage City of Tustin, CA Page 11 2017 Citywide Pavement Management Plan - OCTA Submittal Final Report - April 20, 2017 Cit} of Tustin, CA Pavement Condition 20.17 309 ��II�If MrHM IL }lin �4 Y t- PCI RANGES - 86 - 1 O0 (Very Go od - 75 - 85 (Good) [[ - 6D - 74 i Fair) f�Rs 1 -41-5B(Poor) s 2,5J0 5,00'-0-40(Very Poor) Fae: I. Bucknarn InrraMatur9 Group City of Tustin, CA Nay2917 _ Psvernar�t Condition 20-17 source: city ar Tuatln GIS Cenkarllne ms'e-d In ArDQS 10.4 City of Tustin, CA Page 12 2017 Citywide Pavement Management Plan - OCTA Submittal Final Report - April 20, 2017 PAVEMENT CONDTION INDEX REPORTING We have included below the average weighted PCI (by area) for: o PCI Report - A to Z Order ■ Entire Network ■ MPAH roadways ■ Local streets Additionally, we have included a PCI map for the City's use (previous page). For the City of Tustin the weighted pavement condition index (PCI) for the entire network is 87.1; for the MPAH designated streets the PCI is 88.2; for the Local streets the PCI is 85.6. Very Good(86-100) ...................................¢...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................., 54.2 37.0 88-1 65% 57% Good(75-85) ..................................................................................................................................................... 13,3 18.3 31.6 23% .......................................................... 27% Fair ...................................¢..........................................................................,.......................................,................�...................................�............................. (60-74) 3.7 10-9 14.5 1196 ................... 1496 Poor s .................................... (41-59) ...................................... 0.7 0.6 ,......................................¢................................................................................................................... 1 .................................... Very Poor '. f0-401 0.0 0.1 0.1 096 096 Current Pavement Conditions for Entire Network (Section Miles) Pavement Network Totals for the Citv Additionally, based upon the City's GIS streetHistorical Tustin PCI Trends (FY 2012-2017) centerline, Tustin has 135.0 miles of public streets 920 89.9 (66.8 MPAH miles; 68.2 Local miles). Variance 88.2 90.0 between Section Mileage and Centerline Mileage 85.9 - 85.6 990 83.6 86.0 - The total mileages within the tables are based 84.0 upon LF measurements from the PMP sections 80.2 815 81.1 820 which generate "section mileage"; the total 800 78.0 centerline mileage will vary due to the fact that 76.0 centerline nodes go from the middle of one 740 WegFrted PCI 2012 WegFrted PCI 2013 WegFrted PCI 2015 WegFrted PCI 2017 intersection to another intersection. Sectionprte ial tLocal mileage does not follow centerline nodes, for example the length of a northbound pavement section WILL include the total length of an intersection while the eastbound pavement section will stop its measurement at the curb returns to ensure that the intersection LF is not duplicated. We have enclosed a Pavement Condition Index (PCI) report on the following pages which demonstrates specific PCI values, inspection dates, section measurements, functional classifications, etc. City of Tustin, CA Page 13 2017 Citywide Pavement Management Plan — OCTA Submittal Final Report — April 20, 2017 PROJECTED PCI UNDER EXISTING FUNDING LEVELS (SEVEN-YEAR PROJECTION) Based on the current funding that the City has identified, we have weighted this funding against the conditions found on the network from the most recent survey. We have included summary tables below to demonstrate our PCI findings. 2017-18 ...........................:.......................................... 87.1 2018-1988.7 ..........................;.......................................... 88.2 2019-2087.4 ...........................:.......................................... 201&-195,5 .......................... a........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 242421: .......................... a.......................................... 86.2 2021-22 ...........................:.......................................... 85.1 2022-2384-0 .......................... a.......................................... 2023-24 83.6 Projected PCI Under Existing Funding (Seven -Yr Prosection) 2017-1853,300,000 ...........................:.......................................................................:.......................................................................:.......................................................................:.......................................... 87.1 88.2 85.6 201&-195,5 .......................... a........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 50,00499-7 89,3 86.0 2019-2051,800,000 ...........................:.......................................................................:.......................................................................:.......................................................................:.......................................... 87.4 89.0 85.5 2020-21$2,600,000 .......................... a........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 86.2 87.2 85.1 2021-22$2,800,000 ...........................:.......................................................................:.......................................................................:.......................................................................:.......................................... 85.1 86.9 84.5 2022-23 .......................... a......................................................................;......................................................................;......................................................................;......................................... 52,800,000 84.0 86.0 83.4 2023-24 52.800.000 83.6 85.9 83.2 Projected Network & Rank PCI Based on Actual Funding (Seven -Yr Prosection) City of Tustin, CA Page 14 2017 Citywide Pavement Management Plan — OCTA Submittal Final Report — April 20, 2017 ROAD MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION PROJECTIONS (SEVEN -YR) This report is a section -by -section listing of recommended maintenance and rehabilitation projects laid out by fiscal year. This is a seven-year projection which includes the MPAH and Local street programs. City of Tustin, CA Page 15 2017 Citywide Pavement Management Plan — OCTA Submittal Final Report — April 20, 2017 ALTERNATIVE FUNDING LEVELS SEVEN-YEAR ANNUAL WORK PROGRAM PROJECTIONS By using the City of Tustin's current budgets and maintenance practices the system will develop "section unique" improvements and strategies. Each segment will be tied to a specific fiscal year. As shown in the following pages, we have assessed the budgets that have been projected to meet the maintenance and rehabilitations needed to maximize the City's return on investment. The budget forecasting goal for the Arterial and Local networks focused on: Establishing a proactive 7 -year Maintenance & Rehabilitation Program; Identify what funding levels are necessary to maintain and/or improve the networks PCI Selecting the most cost effective repairs based on City strategies ALTERNATIVE FUNDING — MAINTAIN EXISTING AVERAGE NETWORK PCI 2017-1887.1 .......................... ;...................................................................... $ 2,000,000 ...................................................................... $1,30 ................................... 20181988.8 ...........................:.................................................................................................................................................................................. $"4,250,000 $1,30 2019-2087-5 .......................... a......................................................................;......................................................................;................................... $ 500,00o" 1,30 2420-2186.3" ........................... :....................................................................... 1,300,000 ....................................................................... $1,30 ................................... . 2021-2286-7 .......................... a............................................................................................................................................................................... $ 2,100,000" 2022-2387.0 ...........................:.................................................................................................................................................................................. $2,025,000 $ 1,59 2023-24 87.4 S2-115-000 51.7 2 CITYWIDE FUNDING NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN CURRENT PCI City of Tustin, CA Page 16 2017 Citywide Pavement Management Plan - OCTA Submittal Final Report - April 20, 2017 ALTERNATIVE FUNDING - TO IMPROVE AVERAGE NETWORK PCI 2017-1897-1 ................................................................................................ . $ 2.000.000 ...................................................................... ...................................................................... ............................... 2018-1999-9 ........................... ....................................................................... $4,250,000 ....................................................................... $1,300,000 ....................................................................... $5,5 ................................ 2019-2097.5 ........................... ...................................................................... $500.000 ...................................................................... $1,3wow ... ................................ -21 ........................... ....................................................................... 97-9 $1,983,0002024 ....................................................................... ....................................................................... $3,5 ................................ 2021-2299-2 ........................... ...................................................................... $2.100.1300 ...................................................................... $1,6!50,00D ... $3,7 ................................ 2022-23 ........................... ....................................................................... 99-3 $2,025,000 ....................................................................... ....................................................................... $3,6 ................................ 2023-24 99-3 $2.115.000 $1.725,000 $3,8 CITYWIDE FUNDING NECESSARYTO INCREASE CURRENT PCI City of Tustin, CA Page 17 2017 Citywide Pavement Management Plan — OCTA Submittal Final Report — April 20, 2017 BACKLOG BY YEAR OF UNFUNDED PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, RESTORATION AND RECONSTRUCTION NEEDS OCTA requires within its PMP Agency Submittal Checklist that a "backlog by year of unfunded pavement rehabilitation, restoration, reconstruction and maintenance needs" be identified. Delaying repairs on streets where pavement conditions indicate a need generates deferred maintenance or "backlog". Deferred maintenance is work that is postponed to a future budget cycle, or until funds are available. As maintenance is deferred, the opportunity to apply preventive, life extending pavement treatments is forfeited and the ultimate cost of rehabilitation multiplies (i.e. slurry seal costs to overlay costs). By using the City's pavement maintenance applications and their associated unit costs, when a budgetary model is exercised within the PMP software the amount of deferred maintenance is calculated. Based upon the available budget applied to the model, deferred maintenance will increase or decrease. 2017-18$2,850,6UD ............................... a......................................:............ 2018-191,86,000 ...............................:.................................................... 2019-20$1,974,000 ...............................;................................................... 2020-21 ...............................:.................................................... $1,844,600 2021-22 ............................... a................................................... $2,186,500 2022-23 ...............................:.................................................... $2,335,000 2023-24 52.780.400 $1,864,000 ............................................. $1,844,600 ............................................. $1,605,400 ............................................. 51.774.800 $ 2,850,600 ......................................... $1,974,000 ......................................... $1,639,500 ........................................ $1,504,700 ......................................... 51.475,3W BACKLOG BY FISCAL YEAR (RE: RESTORATION, REHABILITATION, RECONSTRUCTION) Backlog by Fiscal Year -A I I Scenario (FY 2017-2024) .3,000,000 62,500, Xc $2,0w,000 "$1,5{}0,0{}0 $1,000,0{}0 s5w,000 50 11 Current Funding Maintain PCI PIC I Increa!?-= ■ 2017-18 ■ 201&14 ■ 2014-10 ■ 2020-21 ■ 2021-22 ■ 2022-23 ■ 2023-24 st— City of Tustin, CA Page 18 2017 Citywide Pavement Management Plan - OCTA Submittal Final Report - April 20, 2017 LOCAL MATCH REDUCTION REPORTING With our reporting above, Bucknam Infrastructure Group has enclosed the necessary tables and graphs to demonstrate the City of Tustin's eligibility for Local Match Reduction. In addition to the biennial PMP reporting requirements of M2 the City has demonstrated the following: 4. Shows measurable improvement of paved road conditions during the previous reporting period defined as an overall weighted (by area) average system improvement of one Pavement Condition Index (PCI) point. 4. No reduction in the overall weighed (by area) average PCI in the MPAH or local street categories -or- Has road pavement conditions, for the overall network, during the previous reporting period within the highest twenty (20%) percent of the scale for road pavement conditions in conformance with OCTA Ordinance No. 3, defined as a PCI of 75 or higher, otherwise defined as in "good condition". Road conditions found through our 2017 PMP management studies show that the City is eligible for Local Match Reduction based on the current network weighted PCI of 87.1. Additionally, the City of Tustin has demonstrated with the enclosed budget projection (pages 13) that the City's weighted average PCI (by area) remains above a PCI of 75 after the seven year program. City of Tustin, CA Page 19 2017 Citywide Pavement Management Plan - OCTA Submittal Final Report - April 20, 2017 APPENDIX A PMP AGENCY SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST City of Tustin, CA Page 20 2017 Citywide Pavement Management Plan - OCTA Submittal Final Report - April 20, 2017