HomeMy WebLinkAbout10 LEGISLATIVE UPDATEAgenda Item 10
Reviewed:
AGENDA REPORT City Manager
Finance Director
MEETING DATE: JULY 5, 2017
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: JEFFREY C. PARKER, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: LEGISLATIVE UPDATE
SUMMARY:
Staff has prepared an update of proposed key legislative items.
RECOMMENDATION:
At the direction of the City Council.
NEW ITEMS (SINCE LAST UPDATE JUNE 6, 2017)
FY 2017-18 State Budget Package and Trailer Bills Passed
Major Shift in Board of Equalization Jurisdiction Approved; Several Items Pending
The Legislature adopted its FY 2017-18 budget package, which largely tracked Gov. Jerry
Brown's framework in his May Revise with total spending of $125.1 billion for the state's
General Fund, and $9.9 billion in total reserves. By the end of FY 2017-18, the Rainy Day
Reserve Fund is projected to have a balance of $8.5 billion, equivalent to 66 percent of
the Constitutional target.
Important issues for cities within the package include the allocation of $2.8 billion in
transportation funds under the recently passed SB 1 and a recent agreement on the
cannabis trailer bill, SB 94, which reconciled existing medical marijuana law with recently
enacted Proposition 64, and incorporated numerous amendments requested by the
League and Police Chiefs.
Other major issues that have yet to come together include funding for affordable housing,
proposed extensions to the state's Cap -and -Trade program, and reforms to the state's
recycling programs via a "bottle bill." A seismic shift in tax administration occurred with
the passage of AB 102, where disputes over politics and mismanagement at the State
Board of Equalization (BOE) culminated in a proposal by the Governor, legislative leaders
with the support of the State Controller and Treasurer to transfer the many tax programs
Legislative Update
July 5, 2017
Page 2
BOE oversees, including the collection and allocation of local sales and use taxes, to a
newly created Department of Tax and Fee Administration.
As the budget came together, some controversial items included the expenditure of
recently passed Prop. 56 funds derived from a new $2 per pack increase in tobacco taxes.
The budget agreement shifted approximately half of the funds expected to be allocated
to increase reimbursement rates for doctors treating medical patients, for other health
care purposes.
Another provision included in SB 96 imposed more rigorous signature verification
requirements and additional processes on legislative recall requirements, with the debate
touching on the pending effort to recall Sen. Josh Newman (D -San Dimas). Not included
in the final package was the Administration's proposal to make water conservation a way
of life, which has now been shifted to a policy discussion.
Several trailer bills were ineligible to be heard due to the recently enacted 72 -hour print
rule and are likely to be taken up soon. One trailer bill the Legislature has yet to take
action on is AB 121/SB 106, opposed by the League and the California Association for
Local Economic Development (CALED) due to provisions that undermine small cities and
counties access to economic development set-aside funds from' Community
Development Block Grants allocated by the Department of Housing and Community
Development (HCD).
UPDATES OF PRIOR ITEMS (LAST UPDATE JUNE 6, 2017)
AB 346 (Daly & Brough): Redevelopment: Housing Successor: Low and Moderate
Income Housing Asset Fund
Existing law dissolved redevelopment agencies and community development agencies
as of February 1, 2012, and provides for the designation of successor agencies to wind
down the affairs of the dissolved redevelopment agencies and to, among other things,
make payments due for enforceable obligations and to perform duties required by any
enforceable obligation. This bill would authorize a housing successor to use funds
remaining in the Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund for homelessness
services, transitional housing, or emergency housing services, as well as for the
development of affordable housing.
Association of California Cities Orange County— SUPPORTS
League of California Cities — SUPPORTS
Location: Passed Assembly — Signed by Governor/Enrolled
Legislative Update
July 5, 2017
Page 3
AB 572 (Quirk -Silva): Alcoholism or drug abuse treatment facilities: Orange County
Pilot Program
This bill would require the Department of Health Care Services to establish a voluntary
pilot program to locate a Compliance Investigator within the County of Orange to
investigate complaints against licensed adult alcoholism or drug abuse recovery or
treatment facilities. This would be an added resource for cities, helping them to enforce
state and local regulations, and provide patients with better outcomes. This legislation
was brought to ACC -OC by Orange County cities to combat the complex issues related
to sober living facilities.
Association of California Cities Orange County — SPONSORED
Location: Passed Senate — Moving Through Assembly
AB 890 (Medina): Local land use initiatives: environmental review.
Would require a proponent of a proposed initiative ordinance, at the time he or she files
a copy of the proposed initiative ordinance for preparation of a ballot title and summary
with the appropriate elections official, to also request that an environmental review of the
proposed initiative ordinance be conducted by the appropriate planning department.
League of California Cities — OPPOSES
Location: Passed Assembly — Moving through Senate
AB 1250 (Jones -Sawyer) Counties and cities: contracts for personal services.
Would prohibit any city or county from contracting out any work until the city or county
can show that the work will save the entity money and will not displace workers. In
addition, the measure stipulates that employee benefit costs (e.g. CalPERS, healthcare,
etc.) cannot be a sole factor in justifying a contract for service.
League of California Cities — SUPPORTS (Changed from OPPOSITION)
Association of California Cities Orange County - OPPOSES
Location: Passed Assembly — Moving through Senate
AB 1323 (Weber): Sustainable Water Use and Demand Reduction: Stakeholders
Working Group
AB 1323 would require the Department of Water Resources to convene a stakeholder
working group to develop, evaluate, and recommend proposals for establishing new water
use targets for urban water suppliers. A number of bills have been introduced in the
Legislature proposing the next iteration of long-term water use efficiencies beyond the
existing 2020 -time frame. Inevitably, those bills represent different stakeholder
perspectives, visions, and approaches to the development of California's future efficiency
Legislative Update
July 5, 2017
Page 4
and conservation framework. In the face of these conflicting perspectives, AB 1323 takes
an important and necessary step towards creating consensus recommendations that can
be advanced legislatively.
Association of California Cities Orange County — SUPPORTS
Location: Passed Assembly — Moving through Senate
AB 1479 (Bonta) Public Records: Supervisor of Records: Fines
oppose League Opposes AB 1479 (Bonta) would place substantial burdens on local
agencies by adding onerous, costly and unnecessary requirements in processing
California Public Records Act (CPRA) requests. AB 1479 would mandate that every local
agency assign a "Supervisor of Record" to review each public records act denial prior to
the final determination being issued.
Association of California Cities Orange County - OPPOSES
Location: Passed Assembly — Moving through Senate
AB 1654 (Rubio): Water Shortage: Urban Water Management Plan
This bill would create a new process of drought -response planning and reporting by local
water suppliers. By requiring water suppliers to describe and analyze the reliability of their
water supplies in greater detail, AB 1654 would improve overall urban water management
planning. Annual reporting from every urban retail water supplier would allow the state to
better identify suppliers experiencing water shortages, as well as suppliers prepared to
deal with drought conditions.
Association of California Cities Orange County- SUPPORTS
League of California Cities — SUPPORTS
Location: Passed Assembly — Moving through Senate
AB 1668 (Friedman): Water Management Planning
This bill creates a new drought response plan by making numerous changes to water
supply planning, and drought planning to incorporate climate change, and enhance water
supply analysis. Unlike the Rubio bills, being supported by ACC -OC (AB 968 and AB
1654), this bill would require three separate reporting mechanisms, which would be
unnecessary and burdensome to local governments.
Association of California Cities Orange County - OPPOSES
Location: Passed Assembly — Moving through Senate
Legislative Update
July 5, 2017
Page 5
SB 2 (Atkins) Building Homes and Jobs Act
SB 2 would generate hundreds of millions of dollars per year for affordable rental or
ownership housing, supportive housing, emergency shelters, transitional housing and
other housing needs via a $75 recordation fee on specified real estate documents.
League of California Cities — SUPPORTS
Location: Awaiting Third Senate Reading
SB 3 (Beall) Affordable Housing Bond Act of 2018
Affordable Housing Bond Act of 2018 authorizes a $3 billion general obligation bond to
fund affordable housing programs and infill infrastructure projects.
League of California Cities — SUPPORTS
Location: Passed Senate — Moving through Assembly
SB 35 (Wiener) Planning and zoning: affordable housing: streamlined approval
process.
Would pre-empt local, discretionary land use authority by making approvals of multifamily
developments and accessory dwelling units (ADUs) that meet inadequate criteria,
"ministerial" actions.
League of California Cities — OPPOSES
Association of California Cities Orange County - OPPOSES
Location: Passed Senate — Moving through Assembly
SB 54 (De Leon): Law Enforcement: Sharing Data
Existing law provides that when there is reason to believe that a person arrested for a
violation of specified controlled substance provisions may not be a citizen of the United
States, the arresting agency shall notify the appropriate agency of the United States
having charge of deportation matters. This bill would repeal those provisions. This bill
contains other related provisions and other existing laws.
Association of California Cities Orange County - OPPOSES
California Police Chiefs Association — OPPOSES
Location: Passed Senate — Moving through Assembly
SB 540 (Roth): Workforce Housing Opportunity Zone
Local elected leaders are acutely aware of the severity of California's housing affordability
crisis and their role in fashioning solutions. While numerous factors are contributing to the
problem, there is an agreement that more needs to be done to create a path for and
streamline new housing construction. Local governments do not build homes. Cities are
responsible for planning and land use decisions that allow housing to be built. The League
Legislative Update
July 5, 2017
Page 6
of California Cities® is sponsoring Sen. Richard Roth's (D -Riverside) SB 540 to create a
robust system for planning and streamlining housing approvals and construction that
ensures public engagement on the upfront planning process.
League of California Cities – SUPPORTS
Location: Passed Senate – Moving through Assembly
SB 649 (Hueso): Wireless Telecommunications Facilities
The bill would establish a streamlined permitting process for small cell wireless facilities,
and limit the fees that local governments may charge for placement of small cells on city
or county owned infrastructure. This is concerning to cities in Orange County and
throughout the State, because it severely restricts the ability for cities to make necessary
discretionary decisions related to the aesthetic and safety of small cell and wireless
infrastructure within their jurisdictions.
League of California Cities – OPPOSES
Association of California Cities Orange County - OPPOSES
Location: Passed Senate – Moving through Assembly
SB 711 (Hill): Local -State Sustainable Investment Incentive Program
Despite all the state's focus on infill development and greenhouse gas reduction, the
sobering reality is that — absent sufficient resources to address financing gaps — many
desirable projects fail to pencil -out. Such missed opportunities_ will frustrate the state's
efforts to achieve its greenhouse gas reduction goals.
League of California Cities – SUPPORTS
Location: Passed Senate – Moving through Assembly