The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About04 JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT NOISE ABATEMENT QUARTERLY REPORTAGENDA REPORT Agenda Item 4 s •: ••• -- Reviewed: City Manager Finance Director /A MEETING DATE: OCTOBR 3, 2017 TO: JEFFREY C. PARKER, CITY MANAGER FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT NOISE ABATEMENT QUARTERLY REPORT SUMMARY: This agenda report transmits the John Wayne Airport (JWA) Noise Abatement Quarterly Report for the second quarter of 2017. The average noise level measured at Tustin's monitoring station (NMS 1 ON), located at Columbus Tustin Middle School on Beneta Way (Figure 1), remained consistent with prior quarters during this second quarter reporting period. Average noise levels during the second quarter remained well below the City, County, and State criteria of 65 dB Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) for residential uses. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file this report. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. Figure 1 JWA Noise Report October 3, 2017 Page 2 CORRELATION TO THE STRATEGIC PLAN: Staff's analysis and report of the quarterly JWA Noise Abatement Report falls under Goal D of the Strategic Plan pertaining to strong community and regional relationships. The City of Tustin strives to work collaboratively with agencies both within and outside Tustin on issues of mutual interest and concern, and in this instance, on matters of airport traffic and noise. DISCUSSION: Following the conclusion of each calendar quarter, JWA staff prepares a Noise Abatement Program Quarterly Report and posts a copy of the report on their website. Attached is the quarterly report for the second quarter of 2017, which includes the months of April through June. An overview of the information contained within the JWA Noise Report includes measured noise levels and an analysis of noise complaints. Measured Noise Levels Aircraft noise is most noticeable during airplane takeoffs and landings, primarily due to engine noise. Although engines produce a significant amount of aircraft noise, many other factors may influence the perception of noise including: proximity; weather — in bad weather, engine noise is reflected off of the atmosphere making jets appear louder than on clear days; routes — non-scheduled operations which could include military or private aircraft and may be louder than commercial aircraft; emergencies; and, weight — a heavier load may affect an aircraft's rate of ascent. During the second quarter of 2017, the average CNEL at Tustin's monitoring station on Beneta Way was 55.8 dB. This is .3 dB higher than the average of the previous quarter (Q-1: January — March 2017). The average noise level for this quarter is very similar to the average from the previous four quarters which is 56.3 dB. Figure 2 provides a visualization of Tustin's CNEL levels for each month during the second quarter of 2017. v J W Z U Daily Community Noise Equivalent Levels (CNEL) in Tustin - April to June 2017 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 Date Figure 2 April May June Noise Impact Area Level (65 dB) JWA Noise Report October 3, 2017 Page 3 Noise Complaints The Airport's Access and Noise Office receives and investigates noise calls and complaints from local citizens and other sources. Throughout all of the Orange County monitoring area, noise complaints decreased by 13% during the second quarter of 2017 in comparison to the first quarter of 2017. It should be noted that several of the complaints during the second quarter were made from one (1) household in Irvine and one (1) household in Costa Mesa. During the second quarter of 2017, there were seven (7) Tustin area complaint calls, which is six (6) more complaints than the previous quarter. Tustin staff has outreached to JWA staff to gather further details on the nature of the complaints, and to understand how JWA staff responds to each complainant. The breakdown of the seven (7) complaints is as follows: three (3) complaints were regarding general aircraft noise, these calls were either left via voicemail, or discussed over the phone, with no further follow-up requested by the complainant; one (1) complaint was regarding the flight path, this item was discussed over the phone, with no follow-up requested; one (1) complaint was regarding the frequency of flights, this item was discussed over the phone, with no follow-up requested; one (1) complaint was regarding the curfew of flights, this call was left via voicemail with no follow-up requested; and, one (1) complaint was made regarding helicopter noise, this call was left via voicemail, with no follow-up requested. To provide an understanding of the trend in Tustin area complaints throughout the years, a chart displaying the number of noise complaints for the past five (5) years is displayed below (Figure 3). Generally, there is an increase in noise complaints during the second and third quarters of the year, which further supports the theory that an increase in complaints tends to occur during the warmer months of spring and summer, when residents are likely to leave their windows open. Overall, the number of complaints has not reached more than twelve (12) complaints in a single quarter during this five-year reporting period. Figure 3 Noise Complaints -Tustin 14 - - 12 - a 10 ---- 0 8 U 0 6 hi a 4 E 2 Z 0 I I I ° otic otic oti' otic oticoti-' otic' 611 (S oti° oti° otic' otic' otic' otic' otic otio otic otio otil otic ��ti 1�1 _�ti �\ti txti anti 5\ti t\ti ti�ti ��ti �t\ti yeti �0ti a g U o- o- a U o- a o- a o- a a a a a o- a o- a Quarter/Year Figure 3 JWA Noise Report October 3, 2017 Page 4 Since noise issues are of considerable importance to the City of Tustin, the Community Development Department will continue to monitor operations at JWA unless otherwise directed by the City Council. The public are additionally welcome to participate in JWA's Quarterly meetings held by the Access and Noise Office. The next quarterly meeting will be held on December 13, 2017, at 2:00 p.m. in the Eddie Martin Administration Building located at 3160 Airway Avenue in Costa Mesa. Adrianne DiLeva-Johnson Management Analyst l zabeth A. Binsack Director of Community Development Attachment: John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Quarterly Report for April 1, 2017, through June 30, 2017. ATTACHMENT John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Quarterly Report for April 1, 2017 through June 30, 2017 (Second Quarter) NOISE ABATEMENT PROGRAM QUARTERLY REPORT For the period: April 1, 2017 through June 30, 2017 Prepared in accordance with: AIRPORT NOISE STANDARD STATE OF CALIFORNIA California Administrative Code Title 21, Chapter 2.5, SubChapter 6: Division of Aeronautics Noise Standards Submitted by: Barry A. Rondinella, A.A.E./C.A.E. Airport Director John Wayne Airport, Orange County INTRODUCTION This is the 178th Quarterly Report submitted by the County of Orange in accordance with the requirements of the California Airport Noise Standards (California Administrative Code Title 21, Chapter 2.5, SubChapter 6: Division of Aeronautics Noise Standards). Effective January 1, 1986, the criteria for defining "Noise Impact Area" was changed from 70 dB to 65 dB Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL). Under this criteria, John Wayne Airport currently has a "Noise Impact Area." NOISE IMPACT SUMMARY Caltrans' Aeronautics Program has established guidelines in the California State Noise Standard to control residential area noise levels produced by aircraft operations using the State's airports. Under those guidelines, residential noise sensitive areas exposed to an average Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) of more than 65 dB define the "Noise Impact Area." John Wayne Airport uses ten permanent remote noise monitoring stations (NMS) located in Newport Beach, Santa Ana, Tustin and Irvine to measure noise levels, at the following locations: MONITOR STATIONS NMS -1S: Golf Course, 3100 Irvine Ave., Newport Beach NMS -6S: 1912 Santiago, Newport Beach NMS -2S: 20162 S.W. Birch St., Newport Beach NMS -7S: 1131 Back Bay Drive, Newport Beach NMS -3S: 2139 Anniversary Lane, Newport Beach NMS -8N: 17372 Eastman Street, Irvine NMS -4S: 2338 Tustin Ave., Newport Beach NMS -9N: 1300 S. Grand Avenue, Santa Ana NMS -5S: 324 % Vista Madera, Newport Beach NMS -10N: 17952 Beneta Way, Tustin The,map in Figure 1 shows the general location of each permanent remote monitor station. Figure 2 shows the Airport's "Noise Impact Area" for the previous year (July 1, 2016 - June 30, 2017). The Figure 2 information was developed by Landrum and Brown, in consultation with John Wayne Airport. CNEL values measured for the period and current digitized land use information were utilized to calculate the land area acreages, number of residences and estimated number of people within the "Noise Impact Area". -1- Figure 1 JOHN 'WAYNE AIRPORT, COSTA MESA ORANGECOUNTY INt:.� NEWPORT BEACH N 0 1 2 3 4 5 Scale In miles AIRCRAFT TRAFFIC SUMMARY The Airport traffic summary for this quarter is shown in Table 1 below. Air Carrier operational count histories and average daily departure counts are illustrated in Tables 9 & 11. TABLE 1 LANDING AND TAKEOFF OPERATIONS April - June 2017 Period Air Carriers Jet Prop GA Jet (1) Total Operations (2) Average Daily Jet Operations April 7,162 120 2,888 24,754 335 May 7,645 124 2,860 27,769 339 June 7,565 120 2,980 25,482 352 Second Quarter 22,3721 364 8,728 78,005 342 Twelve Months 07/01/16 - 06/30/17 89,531 1,448 34,383 285,704 339 NOTE: (1) GA Jet figures include a 5% factor for operations not identified by the JWA noise monitor stations. (2) Counts in this column are based upon records provided by the local FAA representatives. COMMUNITY NOISE EQUIVALENT LEVELS The monthly, quarterly and twelve month Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) average values for each monitor station are shown in Table 2, while daily CNEL values are shown in Tables 3 through 5. Insufficient data is indicated by "#N/A" entries in each table. Also, "*#N/A" entries in each table indicate there were no aircraft related noise events. Average Single Event Noise Exposure Level (SENEL) values for Air Carrier and General Aviation Jet aircraft are shown in Tables 6 through 8. ACOUSTICAL INSULATION PROGRAM Four hundred eighteen residences in the Santa Ana Heights area have been sound attenuated and an avigation easement reserved through the County's Acoustical Insulation Program, which closed in December 2009. The County has also acquired 46 residences as part of the Purchase Assurance Program, many of which were acoustically insulated, an avigation easement reserved and then resold. Among these County acquired homes, those located within areas designated for Business Park uses were razed, avigation easements were reserved, and the land resold for compatible Business Park uses. A total of 464 residences in the Santa Ana Heights area have been purchased or otherwise made compatible through the County's Purchase Assurance and Acoustical Insulation Programs. Seventy-seven dwelling units in Santa Ana Heights remain in the "Noise Impacted Area" (within 65 dB CNEL contour). TELEPHONE COMPLAINT CALLS (April 1, 2017 - June 30, 2017) The Airport's Access and Noise Office receives and investigates noise calls and complaints from local citizens and all other sources. During the April 1, 2017 through June 30, 2017, the Office received 401 complaints from local citizens. This is a 13.0% decrease from the 461 complaints received last quarter. It is a 22.0% decrease from the 514 complaints received during the same quarter last year. Figure 3 shows the distribution of the quarterly telephone calls and complaints from local communities. -4- Note FIGURE 3 HISTOGRAM BY COMMUNITY Anaheim Hills r Balboa Island 1 I Balboa peninsUla ' I ays, hor 14 Bayside Village 7 i i Corona Del Mai 12 } I Costa Mesa # Cowan Heights Dana point Cover Shores 16 astblufF 62; Harbor Cove Huntington Beach2 Irvine 32` ' s LadeaLaguna Ranch s Laguna Hills 4 Laguna Higuel 66 Laguna Woods 2 Lake Forest 2 Lilo Isle 9 ; Mission Viejo i t Newport Beach a { I North Tustin 16 € Orange # 1 I arita Rancho Santa Margarita $ San Clemente ` I 3 i t Sari Juan Capistrano 13 i } Santa Ana -y* i u tin own Unknown 3 { Villa Parlr 1 i est�ff 3; v `( I 1 t 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 Number of Complaint • 72% of the complaints from the "Irvine" category were from one household. 9 79% of the complaints from the "Costa Mesa" category were from one household. -5- TABLE 2 LONG TERM MEASURED LEVELS Aircraft CNEL from 07/01/16 through 06/30/17 Values in db at Each Site Period NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N ION Ju12016 68.2 67.1 66.6 59.9 58.8 59.5 55.8 67.9 42.8 56.4 # Days 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 27 31 Aug 2016 68.5 67.5 67.0 60.1 59.2 59.5 56.2 68.1 42.1 56.9 # Days 1 31 31 31 31 31 30 29 31 25 31 Sep 2016 67.7 66.7 66.3 59.5 58.7 58.8 56.0 67.8 43.6 56.5 # Days 30 25 30 30 30 30 30 30 23 30 Q-3 2016 68.1 67.1 66.6 59.8 58.9 59.3 56.0 67.9 42.8 56.6 # Days 92 87 92 92 92 91 90 92 75 92 Oct 2016 67.8 66.8 66.5 59.5 59.0 60.0 56.1 67.7 42.9 56.1 # Days 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 27 31 Nov 2016 67.5 66.5 66.2 59.3 58.7 59.8 55.7 67.2 44.2 55.1 # Days 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 Dec 2016 67.1 66.3 66.9 59.4 58.9 61.3 55.8 67.4 45.6 55.3 # Days 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 29 31 Q-4 2016 67.5 66.5 66.5 59.4 58.9 60.4 55.9 67.4 44.4 55.5 # Days 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 86 92 Jan 2017 67.6 66.6 66.4 59.7 58:6 60.4 56.5 67.9 44.5 55.7 # Days 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 22 31 Feb 2017 68.0 66.8 66.6 60.1 58.8 60.0 56.5 67.8 43.4 55.6 # Days 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 23 28 Mar 2017 67.5 66.5 66.3 58.8 58.2 59.3 55.8 67.6 43.5 55.1 # Days 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 29 31 Q-1201.7 67.7 66.6 66.4 59.5 58.6 59.9 56.3 67.8 43.8 55.5 # Days 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 74 90 Apr 2017 68.1 66.9 66.4 59.2 59.5 59.3 56.4 68.0 43.1 55.6 # Days 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 28 30 May 2017 67.9 67.0 66.6 59.1 60.0 59.2 56.5 68.1 41.6 56.0 # Days 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 28 31 Jun 2017 68.1 67.1 66.7 59.1 59.2 59.2 56.2 68.2 42.0 55.6 # Days 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 28 30 Q-2 2017 68.0 67.0 66.5 59.1 59.6 59.2 56.3 68.1 42.3 55.8 # Days 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 84 91 Q-3 2016 thru Q-2 2017 Total 67.8 66.8 66.5 59.5 59.0 59.7 56.1 67.8 43.4 55.9 # Days 365 360 365 365 365 364 363 365 319 365 Q-2 2016 thru Q-1 2017 (Previous 4 Quarters) Total 67.8 66.8 66.5 59.7 58.8 59.9 56.1 67.8 43.9 56.3 # Days 365 303 365 365 365 364 363 365 318 365 Change from Previous 4 Quarters 0.01 0.01 0.0 -0.21 0.2 -0.2 0.0 0.0 -0.5 -0.4 -6- TABLE 3 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION April 2017 Date 1S I 2S 3S 4S NMS Site 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N ION 1 67.4 66.0 65.5 58.2 58.6 58.0 55.2 65.9 35.9 52.6 2 68.3 66.9 66.4 60.2 59.1 59.6 56.3 70.8 40.6 59.0 3 68.4 66.9 66.5 60.3 59.7 60.1 56.5 68.2 42.3 56.8 4 68.0 67.0 66.6 59.6 60.0 60.3 56.8 67.6 40.4 55.2 5 68.21 66.8 66.5 59.1 59.1 59.0 55.9 67.9 34.1 55.0 6 68.9 67.6 67.3 60.6 59.8 60.1 56.4 68.7 46.3 56.5 7 68.7 67.3 66.8 59.8 59.2 58.8 54.6 68.6 41.6 55.8 8 66.9 66.0 65.0 58.1 58.3 58.0 55.0 66.3 47.11 54.1 9 67.4 66.9 65.9 58.5 59.4 59.1 56.6 67.9 42.6 55.1 10 68.3 67.4 66.6 59.6 59.4 58.5 55.7 68.4 34.5 56.1 11 68.2 67.1 66.5 59.2 59.6 59.2 56.2 68.6 40.9 56.6 12 68.1 67.2 66.3 59.2 60.1 59.5 56.9 68.2 36.3 55.8 13 68.4 66.5 66.5 59.4 60.6 59.9 57.5 68.8 45.41 56.4 14 68.1 66.9 66.4 60.2 59.9 59.8 57.2 67.4 44.71 55.4 15 66.1 65.2 64.2 57.6 57.5 57.2 54.0 65.5 39.7 52.1 16 67.9 66.8 66.3 58.8 58.8 58.6 55.1 68.0 45.2 55.3 17 68.8 67.9 67.3 59.4 60.6 60.2 57.2 68.1 45.9 56.5 18 68.3 67.3 66.7 59.1. 60.3 59.8 56.9 68.5 44.8 56.6 19 68.3 67.2 66.4 59.7 60.0 59.9 57.2 68.5 36.6 56.6 20 68.7 67.4 66.8 59.9 60.0 60.0 57.6 68.1 *#N/A 56.1 21 68.6 67.3 67.2 58.7 59.5 59.1 56.3 68.2 40.2 55.0 22 67.11 66.1 65.3 57.8 57.8 57.4 54.7 65.9 *#N/A 52.5 23 68.8 67.4 67.0 60.6 59.7 60.5 57.1 68.6 47.9 56.2 24 68.8 67.5 66.9 60.5 60.2 60.5 57.6 68.5 33.2 56.8 25 67.7 66.9 66.5 59.7 59.7 59.7 57.0 68.1 45.6 55.2 26 68.4 66.9 66.5 59.8 59.8 59.8 57.1 68.4 48.2 56.6 27 68.5 67.4 67.3 59.3 60.7 60.0 58.11 68.4 39.61 56.3 28 68.5 67.5 66.8 57.9 60.4 59.4 57.1 67.1 38.2 53.3 29 61.8 60.3 63.3 51.1 53.1 57.8 48.6 63.4 30.7 47.3 30 67.7 66.5 65.6 56.9 58:6 57.6 54.6 66.9 38.6 54.3 Days 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 28 30 En. Avg 68.1 66.91 66.41 59.21 59.5 59.3 56.4 68.01 43.1 55.6 #N/A indicates insufficient data. *#N/A indicates no aircraft -related noise events. -7- TABLE 4 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION May 2017 Date 1S 2S 3S 4S NMS Site 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N ION 1 68.0 66.4 66.2 57.8 59.0 58.3 55.4 67.5 45.3 54.1 2 66.9 66.3 65.7 57.6 59.2 58.2 55.5 67.3 *#N/A 54.4 3 67.5 66.8 66.2 58.5 59.7 58.7 56.2 67.7 37.7 54.3 4 68.3 67.6 67.1 59.5 60.9 60.0 57.1 68.2 40.4 55.3 5 67.8 67.2 66.9 58.9 60.0 58.6 55.5 68.2 28.1 57.3 6 66.4 65.5 64.7 58.0 59.1 57.2 54.4 66.0 37.4 54.8 7 68.5 66.8 67.0 59.81 60.4 59.81 57.5 68.4 34.91 56.8 8 68.4 67.7 67.1 58.8 61.1 59.9 57.5 67.3 35.4 55.3 9 68.2 66.8 66.7 59.9 60.4 59.6 56.7 71.4 43.1 56.9 10 68.5 67.4 61.4 59.8 60.8 59.9 57.3 67.8 43.5 56.6 11 68.5 67.9 67.0 59.5 60.8 60.4 58.0 68.6 39.4 56.4 12 68.6 67.7 67.6 59.41 60.6 60.2 56.9 68.8 38.11 57.4 13 66.21 65.5 64.9 57.8 58.7 57.8 55.6 65.6 48.41 52.6 14 67.3 66.3 66.0 59.6 59.8 59.5 56.9 68.7 42.5 57.3 15 67.7 67.3 66.8 59.7 60.8 60.0 57.5 68.3 *#N/A 57.0 16 67.9 67.2 66.7 59.9 60.5 59.8 57.4 68.0 39.0 56.7 17 67.8 67.2 66.6 59.8 60.5 59.8 57.3 67.9 40.9 56.9 18 68.4 67.4 67.1 59.0 60.8 59.8 57.7 68.4 *#N/A 56.2 19 68.0 67.3 66.5 57.9 59.8 58.6 56.4 68.1 39.4 55.8 20 66.5 65.3 65.2 55.7 57.5 55.9 53.8 65.1 35.7 51.4 21 68.0 66.9 67.1 58.11 60.0 58.7 55.9 68.4 35.8 56.4 22 68.5 67.6 67.2 58.8 60.3 59.2 56.7 67.9 35.7 55.0 23 68.0 67.1 66.6 58.3 59.9 58.9 55.61 67.9 37.2 54.7 24 68.6 68.0 67.4 59.5 60.5 59.6 55.5 68.7 39.7 57.2 25 68.6 67.6 67.3 60.7 60.7 60.5 57.9 69.0 39.9 57.6 26 68.3 67.6 66.9 60.1 60.3 59.9 57.7 68.61 44.0 5 6. 61 27 66.3 65.9 65.1 58.3 58.4 58.0 54.3 65.8 47.0 52.4 28 65.6 65.1 64.0 57.8 57.8 57.3 53.6 66.6 40.1 54.5 29 68.0 67.2 66.9 60.0 59.5 59.5 56.7 68.5 38.4 56.6 30 68.21 66.9 66.8 59.8 59.3 58.4 55.4 68.4 44.51 56.3 31 68.5 67.6 67.0 60.2 59.9 59.2 56.4 68.4 39.9 57.4 Days 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 28 31 En. Avg 67.9 67.0 66.6 59.1 60.0 59.2 56.5 68.1 41.6 56.0 #N/A indicates insufficient data. *#N/A indicates no aircraft -related noise events. -8- TABLE 5 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION June 2017 Date 1S I 2S 3S 4S NMS Site 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N ION 1 67.6 67.0 66.2 60.1 60.4 59.7 58.2 67.4 *#N/A 56.0 2 68.1 67.1 66.8 58.9 59.3 59.1 55.3 67.7 33.9 54.9 3 66.4 65.6 64.9 56.6 56.7 56.5 53.2 65.9 32.4 52.9 4 67.8 66.8 66.4 58.0 58.3 58.3 54.6 68.8 *#N/A 56.2 5 68.41 67.3 66.7 58.8 58.3 58.4 55.2 68.6 29.0 56.1 6 68.7 67.7 67.2 60.2 59.6 59.7 56.2 68.7 46.7 56.2 7 68.5 67.4 67.0 60.11 59.8 59.71 56.1 68.2 44.51 56.2 8 68.3 68.0 67.7 59.8 60.7 60.1 57.6 68.6 43.3 56.0 9 68.0 67.4 66.7 59.4 59.7 59.4 57.1 68.6 48.0 56.6 10 66.7 65.5 64.9 58.7 57.5 57.9 55.1 66.3 33.2 55.3 11 67.8 66.7 66.1 59.7 59.2 59.2 56.3 68.8 43.6 57.1 12 68.2 67.6 66.7 59.81 59.9 59.9 57.4 68.3 46.8 55.5 13 67.6 66.9 66.1 59.1 59.3 59.1 56.4 67.9 43.8 55.3 14 68.11 67.2 66.7 59.0 59.4 59.6 56.6 68.2 43.5 54.8 15 67.6 67.2 67.3 59.1 59.5 59.4 56.3 67.9 27.7 55.3 16 68.3 67.4 67.0 59.0 59.2 59.2 56.7 68.2 46.0 55.6 17 67.1 66.3 65.7 57.81 58.1 57.7 53.6 67.0 46.8 54.0 18 67.8 67.0 66.5 58.3 58.9 58.4 56.1 68.3 30.7 54.8 19 68.3 67.2 66.9 58.4 59.5 59.1 56.41 68.3 42.9 55.0 20 68.1 67.4 66.7 58.0 58.4 58.5 55.7 68.0 29.5 55.2 21 68.2 67.2 67.1 58.4 59.0 58.9 55.4 68.6 34.7 56.3 22 68.2 67.1 66.9 59.21 58.7 59.3 56.2 69.0 34.8 55.6 23 68.4 67.4 67.0 59.4 60.0 59.91 57.0 69.11 35.9 56.4 24 67.1 66.1 65.3 57.6 57.9 57.6 55.2 66.9 39.7 54.0 25 69.1 67.7 67.7 58.9 59.2 59.7 56.9 68.4 31.3 54.9 26 68.9 67.4 67.0 58.3 58.7 58.3 55.1 67.9 40.9 54.1 27 68.51 67.2 66.3 58.31 58.1 57.9 54.9 68.2 30.51 55.5 28 68.5 67.3 67.0 60.5 59.5 60.4 56.0 68.7 31.2 56.7 29 68.8 67.6 67.0 60.7 60.0 61.3 57.1 69.1 40.3 56.8 30 68.7 67.6 67.1 59.5 59.7 60.6 56.8 68.7 34.8 56.6 Days 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 28 30 En. Avg 68.1 67.1 66.7 59.1 59.2 59.2 56.2 68.2 42.0 55.6 #N/A indicates insufficient data. *#N/A indicates no aircraft -related noise events. -9- TABLE 6 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commercial Class A April - June 2017 Carrier AC Type # Deps NMS Site is 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N ION Alaska Air B734 2 Average 98.5 95.7 98.6 90.1 90.5 91.0 88.7 #N/A #N/A 7N -/A Count (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (0) (0) (0) B737 220 Average 96.1 95.0 94.6 88.6 88.5 88.1 83.8 89.0 #N/A #N/A Count (215) (214) (215) (214) (216) (200) (205) (3) (0) (0) B738 742 Average 98.8 97.5 97.3 89.0 89.4 88.9 86.1 92.9 #N/A 78.6 Count (724) (698) (720) (724) (729) (699) (704) (5) (0) (2) American A320 92 Average 94.3 93.7 92.1 85.2 85.4 85.2 83.6 87.0 #N/A #N/A Count (88) (90) (89) (88) (91) (79) (85) (1) (0) (0) A321 2 Average 99.5 98.2 97.5 88.9 89.4 87.5 85.8 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (0) (0) (0) B738 1517 Average 99.0 97.7 97.2 88.8 89.5 89.1 86.4 93.9 78.2 79.9 Count (1463) (1453) (1467) (1473) (1484) (1399) (1446) (16) (2) (6) Compass E170 9 Average 96.1 94.6 95.0 90.3 88.2 88.4 84.5 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (8) (9) (9) (8) (9) (9) (9) (0) (0) (0) E175 327 Average 96.0 95.1 96.0 89.7 88.5 88.3 84.8 90.6 #N/A #N/A Count (316) (303) (321) (321) (315) (305) (307) (3) (0) (0) Delta A319 266 Average 96.1 95.2 95.1 87.7 87.8 87.3 83.8 92.6 82.5 79.7 Count (218) (218) (230) (228) (228) (204) (221) (31) (5) (2) A320 11 Average 96.2 94.9 94.7 88.3 87.0 87.5 83.3 91.6 #N/A #N/A Count (10) (10) (10) (10) (10) (9) (10) (1) (0) (0) B712 412 Average 91.7 91.8 87.7 80.2 80.3 80.8 79.1 83.9 #N/A #N/A Count (401) (388) (396) (226) (352) (313) (229) (2) (0) (0) B738 5 Average 96.1 94.8 93.1 86.8 87.8 88.2 85.7 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (0) (0) (0) B752 270 Average 96.9 95.9 96.4 88.6 88.0 87.2 84.3 93.1 80.1 79.0 Count (246) (244) (252) (244) (251) (234) (238) (15) (1) (4) FedEx A306 64 Average 97.4 97.0 94.7 88.6 88.5 88.4 85.5 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (64) (63) (63) (63) (64) (59) (62) (0) (0) (0) Frontier Airlines A319 22 Average 94.6 93.9 92.8 86.0 86.8 86.3 83.7 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (22) (22) (22) (22) (22) (20) (22) (0) (0) (0) A320 101 Average 95.4 94.9 92.9 86.1 85.8 85.9 83.8 92.8 #N/Ai 80.1 Count (98) (98) (98) (100) (100) (95) (98) (1) (0) (1) A32N 59 Average 90.0 89.1 88.4 82.5 80.9 82.2 79.6 87.6 #N/A #N/A Count (56) (58) (57) (55) (50) (46) (29) (1) (0) (0) Horizon Air DHBD 182 Average 84.5 85.0 85.0 78.9 78.1 79.1 79.7 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (179) (168) (176) (52) (44) (84) (3) (0) (0) (0) Southwest B737 1727 Average 92.3 91.7 88.9 82.8 83.8 83.7 81.2 89.8 #N/A #N/A Count (1670) (1658) (1680) (1624) (1692) (1593) (1546) (15) (0) (0) B738 7 Average 92.1 91.9 88.7 83.1 84.3 83.5 82.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (7) (7) (7) (6) (7) (7) (7) (0) (0) (0) United A320 885 Average 94.2 93.3 92.3 85.5 86.4 87.1 85.9 93.7 87.0 80.3 Count (828) (818) (834) (838) (839) (795) (816) (35) (2) (5) B737 608 Average 96.5 95.0 96.1 88.9 90.2 89.7 85.8 92.1 #N/A 78.8 Count (591) (582) (594) (592) (601) (559) (577) (5) (0) (1) B738 173 Average 97.4 96.3 95.9 88.7 90.0 89.5 86.2 92.6 87.1 #N/A Count (165) (164) (166) (167) (170) (154) (163) (2) (1) (0) UPS B752 52 Average 96.4 96.1 93.8 86.4 86.7 86.3 83.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (52) (52) (51) (51) (50) (52) (51) (0) (0) (0) WestJet B737 87 Average 95.2 94.0 94.5 88.31 89.3 89.3 84.6 90.9 #N/A #N,/A1 Count (86) (84) (83) (84) (86) (84) (81) (1) (0) (0) -10- TABLE 7 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commercial Class E April - June 2017 Carrier AC Type # Deps NMS Site is 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N ION SkyWest Coral. CRJ9 291 Average Count 88.9 (280) 88.6 (276) 87.3 (282) 80.1 (106) 81.0 (225) 80.8 (203) 80.2 86.9 (189) (3) #N/A 7N -/A (0) (0) E175 386 Average Count 89.9 (377) 89.7 (376) 88.5 (379) 84.5 (370) 83.6 (374) 84.0 (364) 82.7 87.6 (351) (2) #N/A #N/A (0) (0) Southwest B737 2753 Average Count 90.7 (2676) 90.4 (2632) 87.8 (2680) 82.3 (2608) 83.2 (2710) 83.0 (2554) 80.41 89.1 (2445) (14) #N/A#N/A (0) (0) TABLE 8 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commuter April - June 2017 Carrier AC Type # Deps NMS Site is 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N ION SkyWest CRJ7 84 Average Count 88.3 87.886.9 (81) (80) (81) 80.4 (48) 80.1 (62) 81.4 79.5 (63) (55) 88.7 (2) #N/A (0) #N/A (0) TABLE 8 -GA MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS General Aviation April - June 2017 Carrier AC Type # Deps NMS Site IS 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N ION General Aviation Jet 4156 Average Count 88.5 (3859) 87.6 (3762) 89.0 (3818) 83.1 (2117) 82.7 (1672) 83.5 82.3 (1906) (914) 86.3 (48) #N12 78.8 (0) (6) -11- TABLE 9 AIR CARRIER OPERATIONAL HISTORY Carrier AC Type 2013 2014 Year 2015 2016 2017 Alaska Air AS B734 73 89 80 76 20 B737 5,673 4,381 2,666 3,258 988 B738 1,162 2,486 4,590 4,439 2,787 American AA A319 42 178 112 A320 3441 868 128 A321 326 563 54 B738 8,658 9,339 9,090 10,538 5,743 B752 4 22 74 2 Compass CP E170 152 78 E175 1,669 1,220 Delta DL A319 3,3541 3,290 3,352 3,444 1,059 A320 21 142 162 160 60 B712 1,595 B737 11 B738 14 4 4 20 B739 2 B752 2,214 2,1961 2,130 2,128 1,077 FedEx FM A306 506 508 508 510 254 A310 2 2 Frontier Airlines F9 A318 17 A319 21278 2,381 1,497 646 198 A320 154 740 284 A321 2 A32N 12 226 Horizon Air QX DHBD 1,156 722 Interjet 40 A320 1,490 428 Mesa Airlines YV CRJ9 418 SkyWest Coral. SC CRJ9 2,034 2,007 1,922 1,899 587 E175 1 3,554 1,452 Southwest WN B733 2 2 B737 35,234 33,490 37,101 41,806 17,939 B738 391 1,385 2,586 1,144 20 United UA A319 2,453 1,926 1,393 1,999 1,142 A320 4,229 2,774 3,207 2,670 2,198 B737 3,836 4,4361 4,523 5,246 2,026 B738 1,305 1,748 1,853 1,252 909 B752 1,557 237 44 2 UPS 5X A306 52 52 B752 412 414 366 370 206 US Airways AW A319 1,997 808 240 A320 888 1,4261 1,476 A321 860 934 740 B752 22 46 98 Westlet WS B736 4 32 14 B737 730 728 718 642 312 Total 81,841 77,615 81,288 91,279 43,434 -12- TABLE 10 AIRCRAFT OPERATIONAL HISTORY Aircraft 2013 2014 Year 2015 2016 2017 A306 506 508 560 562 254 A310 2 2 A318 17 A319 10,082 8,405 6,524 6,267 2,511 A320 6,628 4,770 5,343 4,438 2,670 A321 860 934 1,066 565 54 A32N 12 226 B712 1,595 B733 2 2 B734 73 89 801 76 20 B736 4 32 14 B737 45,484 43,035 45,008 50,952 21,265 B738 11,530 14,962 18,123 17,373 9,479 B739 2 B752 4,205 2,897 2,660 2,572 1,287 CRJ9 2,452 2,007 1,922 1,899 587 DHBD 1,156 722 E170 152 78 E175 5,223 2,672 Total 81,841 77,615 81,288 91,279 43,434 -13- TABLE 11 AIR CARRIER AVERAGE DAILY DEPARTURE HISTORY Carrier AC Type 2013 2014 Year 2015 2016 2017 Alaska Air AS B734 .101 .121 .110 .104 .027 B737 7.775 6.000 3.652 4.451 1.353 B738 1.586 3.408 6.288 6.066 3.816 American AA A319 .058 .243 .153 A320 .471 1.186 .175 A321 .447 .770 .074 B738 11.860 12.792 12.452 14.402 7.866 B752 .005 .030 .101 .003 Compass CP E170 .208 .107 E175 2.279 1.671 Delta DL A319 4.5971 4.507 4.592 4.705 1.449 A320 .027 .195 .222 .219 .082 B712 2.184 B737 .016 B738 .019 .005 .005 .027 B739 .003 B752 3.033 3.008 2.918 2.910 1.474 FedEx FM A306 .693 .696 .696 .697 .348 A310 .003 .003 Frontier Airlines F9 A318 .025 A319 3.121 3.260 2.052 .883 .271 A320 .211 1.011 .389 A321 .003 A32N .016 .310 Horizon Air QX DHBD 1.579 .989 Interjet 40 A320 2.041 .586 Mesa Airlines YV CRJ9 .573 SkyWest Coml. SC CRJ9 2.786 2.748 2.633 2.593 .805 E175 4.855 1.989 Southwest WN B733 .003 .003 B737 48.268 45.874 50.819 57.104 24.573 B738 .537 1.901 3.542 1.563 .027 United UA A319 3.364 2.6361 1.910 2.730 1.564 A320 5.797 3.803 4.395 3.648 3.011 B737 5.249 6.077 6.195 7.169 2.773 B738 1.792 2.395 2.537 1.710 1.247 B752 2.132 .326 .060 .003 UPS 5X A306 .071 .071 B752 .564 .567 .501 .505 .282 US Airways AW A319 2.732 1.107 .329 A320 1.219 1.953 2.022 A321 1.181 1.279 1.014 B752 .030 .063 .134 WestJet WS B736 .005 .044 .019 B737 1 1.000 .997 .984 .877 .427 Total 1 112.126 1 106.321 1 111.351 124.699 59.490 -14- QUARTERLY NOISE MEETING Date: June 14, 2017 Time: 2:00 PM Place: Airport Commission Room ITEMS DISCUSSED Jaci Hall of Laguna Niguel and member of Citizens for No Plane Noise discussed her concerns about the noticeable increase in the past year of smaller type aircraft with some of the aircraft as low as 300 feet. Ms. Hall also had concerns with commercial jet noise, which she believed began in May 2016. Ms. Frisch stated that aircraft have always been allowed to fly over that area and that our office has not seen any change. Ms. Frisch also explained there is a threshold for general aviation aircraft of 1,000 ft. over the highest obstacle and suggested that the FAA FSDO be contacted to report any low and unsafe aircraft at (562)420-1755. Mr. Ilustrisimo explained the difference of VFR and IFR traffic in regard to general aviation and in terms of FAA airspace restrictions. Mr. Ilustrisimo also added that smaller aircraft do not fly a typical pattern. Later in the meeting, Ms. Hall asked about the current status of the lawsuit between the County of Orange and FAA. Mr. Freed stated the attorneys on both sides are working on the settling points of the lawsuit. Joan Smith of Dana Point and member of Citizens for No Plane Noise discussed her concerns with being bombarded with small planes and banner planes, which she believed are more frequent and lower. Mr. Freed stated that depending on where you live and flight scheduling some days are better than others in regard to the flight path. Steve Bakke of Laguna Sur and member of Citizens for No Plane Noise discussed how he hardly heard aircraft noise in the past, but now he hears it all the time especially the planes in the middle of the night coming from Mexico. Mr. Bakke also described his experiences while flying out of JWA as a passenger and his impression that recently the aircraft are not going as far out over the ocean as they use to. Mr. Bakke asked why the aircraft don't gain more altitude and head farther out to the ocean before they make their turn. Mr. Freed explained several factors can impede aircraft from operating in this manner, such as the performance characteristics of aircraft types and air traffic at higher altitudes going to LAX and LGB. Later in the meeting, Mr. Bakke asked if expansion was occurring at the airport. Mr. Freed clarified no plans are in place or currently being discussed for expansion. Mr. David Cook of Newport Beach and member of the Newport Beach Aviation Committee did explain there are operational limits at the airport that are defined in the Settlement Agreement, which runs through 2030. Lisa Hosinski of San Juan Capistrano and member of Citizens for No Plane Noise discussed how before March 1, 2017 she didn't hear anything and now quality of life has been altered because of the frequent low planes. Ms. Hosinski stated the new flights fly over many schools, which should not be allowed at the new altitude; she is a realtor in the area and believes the new flight path has effected home prices. Ms. Hosinski also said that the flights used to go out to Catalina before they would make their turn, and suggested the aircraft -15- should be at 25,000 feet before they reach the land, or that altitudes prior to 2011 would be a good starting point. Mr. Freed explained how airway layers limit altitude and how a change to one could possibly effect other flight paths. Mr. Cook added the planes are now funneled closer together which makes them more noticeable and suggests contacting the FAA Metroplex person. Mr. Cook also added JWA cannot do anything; it's the FAA who has jurisdiction. Marlene Hellerman, a member of Citizens for No Plane Noise, asked why low-flying aircraft complaint information JWA receives is not forwarded to the FAA FSDO. Ms. Frisch explained it is FAA FSDO's jurisdiction to enforce altitudes, and that our office just doesn't have the manpower to forward each and every complaint to FSDO. Ms. Hellerman discussed how she works from home and the constant aircraft noise is incredibly disruptive. Ms. Hellerman expressed her understanding that a San Diego community was able to get a flight path changed and her belief that we should be able to do the same here. Ms. Hellerman conveyed this is not a NIMBY thing nor should it be a "you against us" type of relationship. Ms. Hellerman also stated that she felt JWA should be more of an advocate for the community, and that JWA needs to maximize their relationship with the FAA to make changes. Mr. Freed explained the best way to affect change is through a lawsuit, which the County, Newport Beach and Laguna Beach have already filed against the FAA regarding Metroplex. Jo Carol Hunter, member of AirFair and SPON, asked if the FAA ever has meetings with the public. Mr. Freed stated the FAA has been invited many times and doesn't attend. Ms. Hunter added her belief that these meetings are not productive for you (JWA) and not productive for the community. -16- QUARTERLY NOISE MEETING ROSTER June 14, 2017 NAME ORGANIZATION Lisa Hosinski Citizens for No Plane Noise, San Juan Capistrano Joan Smith Citizens for No Plane Noise, Dana Point Michelle Monda Citizens for No Plane Noise, Laguna Beach Steve Bakke Citizens for No Plane Noise, Laguna Niguel Jaci Hall Citizens for No Plane Noise, Laguna Niguel Marlene Hellerman Citizens for No Plane Noise Mel Beale Airport Working Group Jim Dunlap Airport Working Group Janet Winter Airport Working Group David Cook Aviation Committee, Newport Beach Jo Carol Hunter Airfair / SPON Jim Mosher Resident, Newport Beach Eric Freed John Wayne Airport Bonnie Frisch John Wayne Airport Anthony Cangey John Wayne Airport Beatrice Siercke John Wayne Airport Louie Ilustrisimo John Wayne Airport -17- SNA/John Wayne Airport SUMMARY OF STATISTICAL INFORMATION FOR CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Size of Noise Impact Area as defined in the Noise Standards (California Code of Regulations, Title 21, chapter 2.5, Subchapter 6): 8.35 acres (or 0.013 square miles) 2. Estimated Number of dwelling units included in the Noise Impact Area as defined in the Noise Standards: 77 dwelling units Estimated number of people residing within the Noise Impact Area as defined in the Noise Standards: 193 (based on 2.5 people per dwelling unit) 4. Identification of aircraft of type having highest takeoff noise level operating at this airport together with estimated number of operations by this aircraft type during the calendar quarter reporting period: B737-800 — 4,889 ops (arrivals + departures) 5. Total number of aircraft operations during the calendar quarter: 6. Number of Air Carrier operations during the calendar quarter: (Not mandatory) 78,005 22,736 7. Percentage of Air Carrier operations by aircraft certified under Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 36, Stage III: (Not mandatory) 100% 8. Estimated number of operations by General Aviation aircraft during the calendar quarter: (Not mandatory) 55,154 9. Estimated number of operations by Military aircraft during the calendar quarter: (Not mandatory) 115