Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC RES 3773 [ 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 11 12 13 14 15 [6 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 RESOLUTION NO. 3773 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 01-008 A REQUEST TO PLACE A MODULAR BUILDING FOR A TEMPORARY OFFICE TRAILER FOR A PERIOD OF TWELVE (12) MONTHS AT THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12575 NEWPORT AVENUE. The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines as follows: That Condition No. 1.8 of Resolution No. 3765 adopted by the Planning Commission on January 8, 2001, required that the applicant submit a complete Conditional Use Permit application to establish a temporary office use by January 23, 2001. That on January 28, 2001, the applicant was granted a thirty (30) day Temporary Use Permit to locate the modular building on site in accordance with required Uniform Building Code setbacks. Conditions of approval required that the applicant provide six (6) parking spaces, a path of travel, site access, and temporary pavement. The applicant agreed to conditions of approval which included electing not to submit a Conditional Use Permit to extend the thirty (30) day Temporary Use Permit. That the Temporary Use Permit expired on February 27, 2001, the required site amenities including the parking, path of travel, access, and paving were not provided, and the modular building has not been removed. That on March 13, 2001, a proper application, Conditional Use Permit 01-008, was filed by Steve McKinlay requesting authorization to place a modular building for a temporary office for a period of twelve (12) months at the property located at 12575 Newport Avenue. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed, and held on said application on April 9, 2001, by the Planning Commission. That the location, construction, establishment, maintenance, and operation of a temporary office within a modular building will be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use, or be injurious or detrimental to the property and improvements in the neighborhood of the subject property or to the general welfare of the City of Tustin, as evidenced by the following findings: 6 7 9 I0 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2l 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Resolution No. 3773 CUP 01-008 Page 2 3. 4. 5. 6. The proposed access to the site extends beyond the property line. The portion of the access located on the applicant's properbj does not provide the minimum width requirements for a driveway. Therefore, the necessary access to the site for the temporary use is not provided. The proposed access does not comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). A path of travel that meets ADA requirements is required from the parking lot to the building and future sidewalk along Newport Avenue. Such access is not proposed. The proposed location of the modular structure and lack of permanent site amenities would inhibit timely development of the site and cause a delay in the occupancy of the first building constructed. The adjacent properly owner intends on constructing and occupying the building to the north by June 2000. In accordance with Condition No. 2.2 of Resolution No. 3766, the site amenities including parking, landscaping, curbing, trash enclosure, and signage for both parcels must be constructed prior to occupancy of the first completed building. The size (24 feet by 44 feet) and use of the modular building precludes it from being considered a construction trailer. Construction trailers are typically located on a development site when construction begins. Construction trailers are small in size to allow for maneuverability and do not obstruct or impede construction activities. In addition, the applicant, Steve McKinlay, is not the general contractor for the construction of Dr. Shepherd's building and therefore should not need a construction trailer or modular office building on site to oversee the first phase of the construction project. Typically modular structures used for temporary office purposes are incidental to a permanent office building. There are no other authorized temporary office uses conducted within a modular building which is not associated with a permanent structure within the City of Tustin. Approving the modular building for an extended temporary office use would grant a benefit that other property owners who are required to construct permanent facilities do not enjoy. Permanent offices for contractors within the Newport Warren Specific Plan area are conditionally permitted uses due to the potential for adverse impacts to the surrounding area. An extended temporary contractor's office use also has the potential to adversely impact the surrounding area. Since the proposed modular structure is not screened or buffered from the adjacent residential properties, adjoining properties will suffer a loss of Resolution No. 3773 CUP 01-008 Page 3 o privacy and an increase in activity, which is not sufficiently mitigated. The proposed modular building does not comply with the Newport Warren Planned Community Design Guidelines which states the following: 3.4 (G)2. Architectural elevations from arterial and collector streets should achieve a single family residential character through architectural design and control of building bulk, setbacks, and spacing of buildings. 9 I0 Il 12 13 14 15 16 10. 11. 12. Continuous fiat roofs and mansard roofs are discouraged. Peaked roofs such as gable, hip, or shed roofs are appropriate for the desired character. Variety in roof design within each building is encouraged. The reflectivity of all exposed surfaces (walls, roofs, windows, frames, and paved surfaces) should be mitigated by such devices as overhangs, awnings, trellises, plantings, and similar features. ... no windows on walls facing residential uses. 17 19 15. Site design and architectural treatment of building site edges within neighboring residential uses should be sensitively treated in order to preserve the privacy of residents of both sites. 20 21 22 23 24 o 16. Building orientation should be sensitive to minimizing intrusion upon the privacy of users of adjacent properties either within buildings or extedor living spaces. The proposed use inconsistent with the following issues included within the City of Tustin General Plan: 25 26 27 28 29 The intermixing of land uses in some areas without adequate buffering has resulted in land use incompatibilities, such as those related to scale, noise, and traffic. A specific type and example of incompatible land uses includes the following: Commercial uses abutting residential development without adequate buffering. The proposed use is inconsistent with Policy 4.6 of the City of Tustin General Plan which states: f; ~(~ :1 12 i3 14 15 16 1- 19 2O 21 22 _.23 25 27 2¥ Resolution No. 3773 CUP 01-008 Page 4 4.6 Maintain and enhance the quality of healthy residential neighborhoods, and safeguard neighborhoods from intrusion by non-conforming and disruptive uses. That the project is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15270 of Title 14, Chapter 3 of the California Code of Regulations (Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act) which states that projects that are rejected or disapproved by a public agency are not subject to CEQA. II. The Planning Commission hereby denies Conditional Use Permit No. 01-008, a request :to place a modular building for a temporary office trailer for a period of twelve (12) months at the property located at 12575 Newport Avenue. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, at a regular meeting on the 9th day of April, 2001. ELIZABETH A. BINSACK Planning Commission Secretary -Lesqie A. Pontious Chairperson STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) CITY OF TUSTIN ) I, Elizabeth A. Binsack, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Tustin, California; that Resolution No. 3773 was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission, held on the 9m day of April, 2001. ELIZABETH A. BINSACK Planning Commission Secretary 29