HomeMy WebLinkAboutPACIFIC ST S 540 11/28/1990w
City of Tustin
Community Development Department
November 28, 1990
Shirlene Bradrick
540 South Pacific Street
Tustin, California 92680
SUBJECT: CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR A PROPOSED RE -ROOF AT
540 S. PACIFIC STREET
Dear Mrs. Bradrick:
In accordance with Ordinance No. 1001 which was adopted June 20,
1988 by the Tustin City Council, the Community Development Director
has the authority to approve, approve with conditions or deny
Certification of Appropriateness for improvements requiring a City
building permit for property located within a Cultural Resource
District.
The following findings are required before a Certificate of
Appropriateness is issued:
a. The proposed work conforms to the Municipal Code and design
standards which may be established from time to time by the
Cultural Resources Committee.
b. The proposed work does not adversely affect the character of
the District or Designated Cultural Resources within the
District.
C. The proposed work is harmonious with existing surroundings.
The extent of harmony shall be evaluated in terms of
appropriateness of materials, scale, size, height, placement
and use of a new building or structure in relationship to
existing buildings and structures and the surrounding setting.
The Community Development Director has reviewed the proposed re -
roof for the above mentioned residence and has determined that the
proposed improvement is in conformance with the above requirements
in that the proposed roof material is consistent with existing
conditions and similar structures in the immediate neighborhood.
300 Centennial Way • Tustin, California 92680 • (714) 544-8890
Shirlene Bradrick
November 28, 1990
Page 2
Should you have any questions regarding this matter please feel
free to contact me at (714) 544-8890, extension 255.
Sincerely,
Christine A. Shingleton
Director of Community Development
Becky Stone
Assistant Planner
BCS:kbc\540pacif.ltr
1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
A
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Resolution No. 90-136(a)
Page 2
H. The proposed project is categorically exempt
(Class 1) from the provisions of the
California Environmental Quality Act.
I. That pursuant to Section 9252 of the Tustin
City Code, the City Council finds the
following:
1. The proposed work will conform to the
Municipal Code once a Certificate of
Approval and building permit is issued
and will conform to the design review
standards which may be established from
time to time by the Cultural Resources
Committee in that the proposed siding
would simulate the wood siding previously
existing on the residence.
2. The proposed work does not adversely
affect the character of the District in
that the proposed siding would retain the
architectural character of the existing
structure.
3. The proposed masonite siding is
harmonious with existing surroundings in
terms of material, size and scale in that
the proposed siding, when consistently
applied to the entire structure, would
simulate the woodsiding previously
existing on the residence_
II. The City Council hereby approves the subject
Certificate of Appropriateness to allow the
complete residing of the subject residence with
either the proposed 6" masonite shiplap edge siding
or 3" siding to match the existing, subject to the
following conditions:
A. The entire house shall be resided with
the subject material.
B. All required building permits shall be
obtained and fees paid as applicable,
including those fees for work without
permits.
1
9
3
4
5
6
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
A
20
21
22
23
24
25.
26
27
28
ELLE COPT(
RESOLUTION NO. 90-136(a)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CERTIFICATE
OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR PROPOSED INSTALLATION
OF NEW MASONITE BUTT JOINT SHIPLAP EDGE SIDING
AT 450 WEST THIRD STREET.
The City Council of the City of Tustin does hereby
resolve as follows:
I. The City Council finds and determines as follows:
A. That on March 27, 1990, the Director of
Community Development denied a Certificate of
Appropriateness. for the installation of new 6"
masonite siding at 450 West Third Street. No
appeal was received within the 7 day appeal
period as defined by Ordinance 1001.
B. That on August 8, 1990, the Director of
Community Development denied a second
Certificate of Appropriateness for the same
request as March 27, 1990.
C. That on August 15, 1990, an appeal of the
August 8, 1990 decision was submitted by G.
Santori to the Planning Commission.
D. That on September 24, 1990, the Planning
Commission reached a 2-2 split vote to
overturn the denial of the Certificate. of
Appropriateness, thus upholding the original
denial.
E. That on September 25, 1990 an appeal of the
September 24, 1990• Planning Commission
decision was submitted by G. Santori to the
City Council and on October 11" 1990, the City
Council also requested that the City's
Cultural Resources Advisory Committee review
and recommend on this item prior to City
Council consideration.
F. That on October 18, 1990, the City's Cultural
Resources Advisory Committee reviewed the
request and unanimously recommended to the
City Council that the structure be completely
resided in either the proposed material or
siding to match the existing with a preference
to match the existing 3" siding.
G. That the City Council held a public hearing on
the appeal on November 5, 1990.
3
4
5
6
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
A
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
•
Resolution No. 90-136(a)
Page 3
C. If the existing garage is demolished,
siding on the new garage structure shall
match the siding on the house. In any
case, a separate Certificate of
Appropriateness for the design of said
garage would be required prior to
commencement of such a project.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at .a regular meeting of the Tustin
City Council, held on the 5th day of November, 1990.
y
Y WYNN
i y Clerk
RICHARD EDGAR
Mayor
0 City of Tustin
RESOLUTION CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS
CITY OF TUSTIN )
RESOLUTION NO. 90-136(A)
MARY E. WYNN, City Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the City Council of
the City of Tustin, California, does hereby certify that the whole
number of the members of the City'C6uncil of the City of Tustin is
five; that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 90-136(A) was duly
and regularly introduced, passed and adopted at a regular meeting of
the City Council held on the 5th day of November, 1990 by the following
vote:
COUNCILMEMBER AYES: Edgar, Puckett, Potts, Prescott
COUNCILMEMBER NOES: None
COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAINED: None
COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT: Pontious
v
ar E. Wynn, City Clerk
fi
„y � ► .
� <�
.� _ �_
_� �:
-� _r _ ='tet- � � �