HomeMy WebLinkAboutPROSPECT AVE 230 10/29/2015Community Developmtt Department
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
OCTOBER 29, 2015
230 S PROSPECT AVENUE
tUSTIN
BUILDING OUR FUTURE
HONORING OUR PAST
This Certificate of Appropriateness replaces the Certificate of Appropriateness dated June 3, 2015,
to address modifications to the project. The previous project proposed the reconstruction of the fire
damaged residence, with portions of the existing siding, several windows, the front porch, and
some interior elements remaining; and the complete reconstruction of the garage. However, none
of the existing windows or siding were able to be salvaged.
The modified project consists of the following:
1) Demolition of the fire, heat, and water damaged portions of the original residential structure;
2) Complete demolition of the fire, heat, and water damaged detached single -car garage;
3) Construction of a completely new roof, new siding and new windows on the original
single-family residence, with the original front porch and some interior elements
remaining; and
4) Construction of a new detached single -car garage.
The project site is located at 230 S. Prospect Avenue and is located within the Cultural Resources
(CR) Overlay District. As a result of the extensive fire, heat, and water damage, the main house
has lost its historic integrity. Although the main house is listed on the City's 1990 and 2003 Historic
Resources Surveys, the house is no longer historically significant.
The residence and single -car garage at 230 S. Prospect Avenue are located in the Central
Commercial (C2) Zoning District. These uses are nonconforming, but Design Review 2013-005
and Minor Adjustment 2013-04 authorized the reconstruction of the nonconforming buildings
based on the extent of the damage being less than 50% of the replacement value pursuant to
Tustin City Code Section 9273d. With the exception of the improvements authorized by Design
Review 2013-005, Minor Adjustment 2013-04, and this Certificate of Appropriateness, these
nonconforming uses may not be further enlarged, extended, reconstructed, or structurally
altered, unless such enlargement, extension, reconstruction or alteration is in compliance with
the Tustin City Code for the C2 District in which the structures are located.
The main residence was assigned a rating of 5D1 in the 2003 Historic Resources Survey. The
National Register of Historic Places (NRNP) status code of 5D1 indicates that the original structure,
constructed in 1915, was not eligible for National Register but was of local interest because the
resource was: A contributor to a fully documented district that is designated or eligible for
designation as a local historic district, overlay zone, or preservation area under an existing
ordinance or procedure.
The City of Tustin Historical Resources Survey (1990) described the site as follows:
300 Centennial Way, Tustin, CA 92780 9 P: (714) 573-3100 • F: (714) 573-3113 0 www.tustinca.org
The single storied building, with a low pitched roof, front facing gable, is significant as an
example of the colonial revival style in Tustin.
The building's character defining features include, but are not limited to:
• Low pitched front facing gable
• Porch which extends the full length of the front facade and has columns with railings and
balustrades
• Door and series of windows that are framed with wood trim and mouldings
• Narrow, horizontal siding
• Vent located above the symmetrically placed eaves of the front fagade
Consistent with the original structure, the architectural design of the proposed newly constructed
portions of the residence is representative of the Late Colonial Revival style and will include a
low pitched roof and a front facing gable. The existing porch with columns and railing with
balustrades which extend the full length of the front fagade will be repaired in kind. The existing
horizontal narrow siding will be replaced to match the siding of the original residence. The
proposed color (Toffee Crunch 700D-5 Behr) and off-white trim are appropriate for the proposed
architectural style of the buildings.
In accordance with TCC 9252h, Required Findings for Construction or Alteration, a Certificate of
Appropriateness is required prior to construction of improvements within a designated Cultural
Resources District requiring a City building permit. The required findings for construction are as
follows:
1. Construction of improvements in a CR Overlay District.
a) The proposed work conforms to the Municipal Code and design standards which
may be established from time to time by the Historic Resource Committee.
The construction conforms to the City's Cultural Resource District Residential Design
Guidelines. The following excerpts apply to the construction of the residence:
"Rehabilitation efforts should retain and restore original elements of the house. If
damage or deterioration is too severe, the element might be recreated using
materials which match the design, color, texture and other important design
features".
"Colonial Revival - Types of siding and all trim, windows, and other decorative
elements may be painted in a wide array of colors. Paint colors [for Colonial Revival
were] generally of a muted tone, not bright or bold, and are either light or dark, muted
medium tones were not used. Color combinations are generally light and dark, with
one on the main body of the building and the other on the trim."
The materials and colors proposed will be consistent with Late Colonial Revival
architecture. The reuse and construction utilizing similar or like materials and
matching the existing colors will further the consistency with the Old Town area by
incorporating these features back into the structures.
b) The proposed work does not adversely affect the character of the district or
Designated Cultural Resources within the district.
The proposed project is compatible with surrounding structures and uses within the
Old Town area. The existing fagade will be repaired and will retain the original
features including the existing porch with columns and railing with balustrades. The
new construction will be essentially the same as the original structure and will be
finished with the existing neutral green color on the residential structure and single -
car garage.
c) The proposed work is harmonious with existing surroundings. The extent of harmony
shall be evaluated in terms of appropriateness of materials, scale, size, height,
placement and use of a new building or structure in relationship to existing buildings
and structures and the surrounding setting.
The residence and single -car garage will be substantially the same size as the original structure.
The exceptions are:
Addition of 6'8" by 187' to the rear (west) end of the house to accommodate a master
bedroom and bathroom; and
Minor expansion of the garage in order to accommodate an interior space of 10' x 20'
and a popout for a washer and dryer. Therefore, the scale, size, height, placement and
use of the new buildings are compatible with the surrounding setting.
The proposed project is hereby approved, subject to the following conditions:
The property owner and applicant signing and returning to the Community
Development Department the notarized Agreement to Conditions Imposed
form in accordance with Condition No. 1.4 of Exhibit A of ZAA 2013-008.
2. The Agreement with Conditions of Approval/Discretionary Permit Approval
form is required to be signed and notarized by the property owner, and
recorded with the Orange County Recorder's Office.
Elizabeth A. Binsack
Community Development Director
Property Owner Acknowledgement
I understand and hereby agree to abide by the above conditions of approval imposed by this
Certificate of Appropriateness and by Zoning Administrator Action 2013-008, and understand
that issuance of this Certificate of Appropriateness is discretionary, and that the residence and
single -car garage at 230 S. Prospect Avenue are nonconforming uses and may not be enlarged,
extended, reconstructed, or structurally altered, unless such enlargement, extension,
recon uction or alteration is in compliance with the Tustin City Code for the zoning district in
which t e structure are located. I also certify that the cost to reconstruct the damaged
Wside� an ar ge does not exceed 50% of the replacement value of the structures.
Dave Vicioso
Property Owner