Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01 CUP 2017-19 REDUCTION IN PKG SPACES 18121 IRVINE BLVD AGENDA REPORT ITEM # 1 MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 29, 2017 TO: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2017-19 PROPERTY OWNER/ GIOVANNI MILAN APPLICANT: GIOVANNI MILAN LAW OFFICES 18121 IRVINE BOULEVARD LA JOLLA, CA 92037 LOCATION: 18121 IRVINE BOULEVARD GENERAL PLAN: PROFESSIONAL OFFICE ZONING: PROFESSIONAL (PR) ENVIRONMENTAL THIS PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT (CLASS 1) STATUS: PURSUANT TO SECTION 15301 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT. REQUEST: TO AUTHORIZE A REDUCTION IN THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES THROUGH A JOINT-USE PARKING FOR ATTORNEY OFFICE WITHIN AN EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING L,. wx_) Zoning Administrator November 29, 2017 CUP 2017-19 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION That the Zoning Administrator adopt Zoning Administrator Action (ZAA) No. 17-010 approving Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 2017-19, a request for a reduction in the required number of parking spaces through a joint-use parking facility to accommodate attorney offices within an existing office building. APPROVAL AUTHORITY The subject property is located within the Professional (PR) zoning district and the Professional Office land use designation. Pursuant to the Tustin City Code (TCC) Section 9264, Zoning Administrator approval of a CUP is required for a reduction of off- street parking requirements and joint-use parking for parking areas serving structures with less than thirty thousand (30,000) square feet. BACKGROUND The project site is located in an existing office building on the north side of Irvine Boulevard. The site is surrounded by commercial and office uses to the south, east and west and abuts existing single-family dwellings within the unincorporated portion of the County of Orange to the north (Figure 1). The project site is an existing 4,426 square foot office building and the existing structure has been undergoing interior and fagade improvements in conjunction with the proposed project. rrwo Subject Property Y J�. i r ..,'. "` y. ..' r • { y4 r ,u Figure 1: Aerial Zoning Administrator November 29, 2017 CUP 2017-19 Page 3 DISCUSSION Project Description The proposed law offices are located in an existing building at 18121 Irvine Boulevard, west of Holt Avenue (Attachment A). The project site is adjacent to commercial office buildings to the east, west, and south along Irvine Boulevard and residential uses to the north. The 0.22 acre site was created from Tract Map 4581 in approximately 1967 and was originally developed with an approximately 3,726 square foot, two-story office building, eleven (11) surface lot parking stalls, and three (3) additional garage parking spaces within the footprint of the building. Following the development of the property, one (1) surface lot stall has been removed to accommodate ADA accessible parking requirements and all three (3) garage spaces were converted to building area and are currently being used as conference rooms resulting in 4,426 square feet of office area at the subject property (Figure 2). ,..STH T 6 5 # � 2 1 Rla{ S'P: i N —='1"aL`l ACO:tS�I.'Lt"§rX Ot Y':L• A J' la:ntl L°S TOTAL OF 10 I (7-W WIDE x 9 9'-0°LONG �v s Thur :v c I Pd TN OF TRWR$"M.I.r'T FxYFF}',s:d PARING SPACES) 2%RrsrccTU:Lr.raa-1)a_krrlt_or " 9-Lui R nWrM711 Le. I I ffi I 81 1 IRVINE BLVLI. n " mill[,-.IN(; 7 .. {{ "�i'"aun tdawtrx 7?J1fll:iaraCf _ _ _ _ _ . �. T rA WI W.x fwu.ur!Mu.Y . ... . . . . c F - _ Figure 2: Site Plan Zoning Administrator November 29, 2017 CUP 2017-19 Page 4 Joint Use Parking Pursuant to TCC Section 9263, the off-street parking requirement for a professional office use is 1 spaces for each 250 square feet of floor area resulting in an off-street parking requirement of eighteen (18) spaces for the proposed project. The project site currently provides ten (10) parking spaces on site. As such, there is a deficit of parking based on the requirements presented in the TCC. Since only ten (10) spaces are currently available onsite, the applicant is proposing to use the parking spaces jointly based upon a Parking Study prepared by Adnan Hindiyeh. (Attachment C). A parking generation survey was conducted at the subject property to quantify the existing and projected parking demands once the offices are fully occupied. Assuming that the office building is occupied by two (2) attorneys, four (4) support staff, and four (4) clients, the study concluded that the peak parking demand for the office use would be ten (10) spaces, less than the eighteen (18) spaces required for the site when parked individually. For this reason, the applicant has requested a reduction in the required number of parking spaces for the property through joint-use parking to accommodate the expansion of the non-conforming structure. Requests for joint-use parking shall be accompanied by a parking study prepared by a California licensed traffic engineer or civil engineer and shall be submitted by the applicant demonstrating that no substantial conflict will exist in the peak hours of parking demand for the uses for which joint use is proposed. The submitted parking study determined the peak demand for the attorney offices at 10 spaces and a total of 10 spaces have been provided for the building. Therefore, the Parking Study finds that adequate parking is available and no substantial conflict will exist in the peak hours of parking demand for the office complex for the proposed uses. The City's Traffic Engineer has reviewed and accepted the Parking Study for methodology and accuracy and, based on the number of employees and clients projected, the site would be adequately parked for the attorney office use as proposed. The City Traffic Engineer recommends that the project be approved with a condition that if the City receives complaints regarding parking at the site, the joint-use parking would be reevaluated. In addition, Condition 2.5 of ZAA 17-010 would require a deed restriction to be recorded on the property limiting the use of the building as described in the parking study. Any change of use would require review and approval of the Community Development Department. ANALYSIS In determining whether to approve the CUP, the Zoning Administrator must determine whether or not the proposed joint-use parking will be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort, and general welfare of the persons residing in or working in the neighborhood or whether it will be injurious or detrimental to property or improvements in the vicinity or to the welfare of the City. Zoning Administrator November 29, 2017 CUP 2017-19 Page 5 A decision to approve this request may be supported by the following findings: 1. A Parking Study dated November 3, 2017, was prepared by a licensed traffic engineer (Adnan Hindiyeh, PE, TE, PTOE) in accordance with TCC Section 9264. 2. That the site is improved with an existing two-story office building that has been increased to 4,426 square feet in building area and provides 10 on-site parking spaces. 3. Pursuant to TCC Section 9263, the off-street parking requirements for a professional office use is 1 spaces for each 250 square feet of floor area resulting in an off-street parking requirement of eighteen (18) spaces for the proposed project resulting in a deficit of parking based on the requirements presented in the TCC. 4. A Parking Study determined the peak demand for the attorney offices at 10 spaces and a total of 10 spaced have been provided for the building. Therefore, the Parking Study finds that adequate parking is available and no substantial conflict will exist in the peak hours of parking demand for the office complex for the proposed uses. 5. The Parking Study has been reviewed and accepted by the City's Traffic Engineer for methodology and accuracy. 6. A Deed Restriction will be recorded on the property limiting the use of the building as described in the parking study. 7. Any change in use would require review and approval by the Community Development Department. 8. That all of the on-site parking spaces are designated for joint-use for which they are intended. . 9. That the proposed use, as conditioned, will not have a negative effect on surrounding properties or impact traffic based on the availability of parking in that sufficient parking would be available on-site. i k--/40 Samantha Beier, AICP Associate Planner Attachments: A. Location Map B. Land Use Fact Sheet C. Parking Study D. ZAA 17-010 ATTACHMENT A LOCATION MAP M 14721 147$2 14721 1472T � 1722 � � Y 14721 l��7�1 t 4711 � 10.7$2 7!: 10.7k7 � 10.732 C !4742 1470.1 Y47S1 w 14742 14711 A 10.70.1 � 147rs 1474, � 147+2 � BSc J , G � 14769 tT7� 147e1 S 0.7c7 10.731 - �c771 I i 0.]71 tan 14r72 5 tem 1 1 14741 lawt 1761 a 1 51031 oG � o IL ®� 160CZ � � 2Y1 1 w Fashion L!1 . Mum • r� �■r �xr I}� :'1ti_ ATTACHMENT B LAND USE FACT SHEET LAND USE APPLICATION FACT SHEET 1. LAND USE APPLICATION NUMBER(S): CUP 2017-19 2. ADDRESS: 18121 IRVINE BLVD 3. APN(S): 401-161-03 4. PREVIOUS APPLICATION RELATING TO THIS PROPERTY: N/A 5. SURROUNDING LAND USES: NORTH: RESIDENTIAL SOUTH: COMMERCIAL EAST: PROFESSIONAL OFFICE WEST: PROFESSIONAL OFFICE 6. SURROUNDING ZONING DESIGNATION: NORTH: COUNTY OF ORANGE SOUTH: Cl -RETAIL COMMERCIAL& SP11 -FIRST STREET SPECIFIC PLAN EAST: PR - PROFESSIONAL WEST: PR - PROFESSIONAL 7. SURROUNDING GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: NORTH: LDR-LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL SOUTH: PO - PROFESSIONAL OFFICE & PCCB-PLANNED COMMUNITY COMM/ BUSINESS EAST: PO - PROFESSIONAL OFFICE WEST: PO- PROFESSIONAL OFFICE 8. SITE LAND USE: A. EXISTING: OFFICE B. PROPOSED: SAME C. GENERAL PLAN: PO D. ZONING: PR PROPOSED GP: SAME PROPOSED ZONING: SAME DEVELOPMENT FACTS: 9. LOT AREA: 9,583 SF/0.22 ACRES APPROX. (BUILDING AREA: 4,426 SF) 10. PARKING: 10 PROVIDED STALLS; CHANGE TO PARKING FOR ACCESSIBILITY AND MINIMUM STALL DIMENSIONS (E) 5,200 SF PAVED PARKING; (P) NO CHANGE 11. TENANT IMPROVEMENTS: CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION FOR INTERIOR AND FACADE IMPROVEMENTS FOR ATTORNEY OFFICES ATTACHMENT C PARKING STUDY NOVEMBER 3", 2017 Community Development Department City of Tustin Subject: Parking Study Report for 18121 Irvine Blvd, Tustin CA 92780 Attachment to Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 2017-19 Dear Planner: In compliance with the City of Tustin Guideline for Application Submittal Requirement Matrix of Conditional Use Permit for the above address, and after meeting with you at various times to define the scope of work of required Parking Study Report to be attach to the application, we have conducted the required parking study under the supervision of a California Registered Traffic Engineer, Adnan Hindiyeh, and it can be used for that purpose only. Scope of Work: The study will include the following items: 1) Parking Demand for low client use (i.e. Attorney Office) 2) Max number of off-street standard parking stalls that the existing site can accommodate. Existing Conditions: This existing 2-story office building (4,426 sq.ft.) is zoned as PR (PROFFESIONAL) and was built in Year 1964. It is located at 18121 Irvine Blvd, Tustin within a strip of office buildings that contains 8 existing buildings facing the Boulevard with off- street parking in the back. The parking lots can be accessed through 4 driveways between the buildings from Irvine Blvd. 10 parking stalls were provided at the back of the lot in addition to a 3-car garage at the side of the building on the first floor facing the short alley connecting the driveway on Irvine Blvd with the parking lot in the back. The 3-car garage was not Rev 1 Traffic Study CUP 2017-19 (11/3/2017) Page 1 used to house cars, and rather was open to the inside of the office building. This is a common practice amongst.existing.office buildings in this strip. Land Use and Parking Demand: Zoning Designation: PR (PROFESSIONAL) Ordinance 157 in 1962 establishes the office parking at 1 sp per 300 sq ft of floor area. This means that: 4,426 sq ft/ 300 sq ft = 14.75 stalls say 15 standard parking stalls are required. The footprint of the existing building did not change from the remodeling activities. The garage space in the first floor was included in the remodeling to be used from the inside of the building. The parking lot (100' x 52') in the rear is open to the parking lots of the other seven buildings in this office buildings strip. The existing building was remodeled to be the law office of the new Owner, who is also the Occupant. I talked to the Occupant and witnessed the parking demand of his operation at several time periods of various days of the week. Since this is a new office, I observed that max occupied parking spaces were 7 including my car and the Contractor's (Owner's Father) two vehicles. I estimated the parking demand according to the Occupant's use of the building as his Law Office, which receives clients by appointments only. The estimation is as follows: Employees: Currently there is only 1 Attorney and 2 employees. This can expand to have a second Attorney with 2 additional employees or just .1 additional employee while.both attorneys share the 3 employees. With the electronic age, lots of employee .work can be done off-site and not in the office, but for the purpose of this study we assume that all Attorneys and employees would occupy the parking lot at the same time. This means that max 6 stalls will be occupied. Rev 1 Traffic Study CUP 2017-19 (11/3/2017) Page 2 Clients: Clients come to the Law office by appointments only. Each Attorney can have maximum 2 appointments in the morning or in the afternoon periods when they are not at the Courts. For the purpose of this study we assume that the 2 appointments overlap in occupying the parking stalls to create a maximum parking demand of 4 stalls. Therefore, we can estimate the maximum parking demand when all attorneys, employees and clients overlap to be 10 parking stalls. Parking Stalls Provided: The 100'x 52' existing parking lot in the back of the building can accommodate a maximum of 10 parking stalls as follows: Nine (9) standard parking stalls (9' x 19' according to the latest code) One (1) Van Accessible Handicap stall Therefore 10 Code Complaint spaces parking stalls can be provided as shown on attached plan Recommendation: We recommend that the City of Tustin to approve the findings of this parking study that estimated the parking demand to this Law office to be at maximum 10 parking stalls. The existing parking lot can provide 10 code complaint parking stalls which is equals to the estimated parking demand. Therefore we recommend that the City approve the Conditional Use Permit for the Law Office at 18121 Irvine Blvd, Tustin CA 92780. Y Prepared B : �A 41 p Adnan Hindiyeh PE, TE, PTOE PE # 42255 exp March 31, 2018 Adnan.hindiyeh@gmail.corn TE # 1488 exp December 31, 2018 Cell: 949-338-1322 Rev 1 Traffic Study CUP 2017-19(11/3/2017) Page 3 RE TIN FF CEBUIL INVISIONS: DATE: TU t nF[ISIPlg Zf6te nirvlsleos rear-11 EXTERIOR AND INTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS REMODEL v 18121 IRVINE BOULEVARD rJ CEJ POWER L7� IF~iJ-r� PC1LE& I 4 I U � TREE IN :3'HIGH LAkTER r. PLANTER. vyAl_L t7'�IATi,;H AGJA ENT T U S T I C A 92780 i = v IE;r-;Hr� FRS NE IGI I BOR'S ADJ CENT4 1 Jr I r?. Fi PAR NG f {I 9.l HBOR`5 BUELDING CODES SHEET INDEX AR INC, 1 T a. VAN �SI11•]I rI1.l iIILI .__111111 �- ry 1I.�-I ® 9p ING i,.y,. q.-0- a.R° 9•� s-o• s'a' s.rr a r{r g-cH' "o- HUFLDFNGCGDE: 2013 CBC :1-I f'(Lt E.N Sflr.k-:1'1 115`1;'FI Ar. PLLIMBL14G COflE: 201'3 CPC ;ill I TILS 1117 I LJ �I i d-p'WI[]{A U'-.S,Ig!.E FAT of TRAVEL: ELECTRICALCODF_- 2U13 CEC _.. - ® TOTAL OF I Q qu Au,tL HANL;Lti I I f rLJnTI 1. 1 MECHANICAL COW', 2013 CIVIC FN IS 1114:F1.:)llf r L. S-N [IIAN(i, fla ' I E`,�.H OF THr FI 1H()WNI THE I ENERGY CLlZ1E: 201 S CA ENERGY STANDARD {9'-0"WIDE x 19'-0"LONG �CROSS-SLOPEALONG IHE ( � , SIy111I LI.+- a,1u1. A11 Of= LAV t S,ALLMOr nx m PA.RK1NG SPACES) rF•T'FL EL Art j TI n-VF RIF IED EYI A- A-11' r'f:tJ r)til D I..LI [IONS 4S-1)1'[ .1IOIi.I I. NCs1 Ir E Lus,i GF F i r HC.CESS AISLE 1 PROJECT DIRECTORY A-SP f RCN 171E D rl}1 1[11' S I 1 R Fr..l + SHALL BE PAINTED 80 E. ti ate' 4-h 1C1'+114< I.S Tr fC111 V,171.1 AILS ' CII:D1lL.1 ARCHHECT. JES US APURTAVC 86TRUCTURAL WHI.CONSULTING ENGINEERS 'I I irl IC T L i•L m 11105.MCOONNELL AVE ENGINK;IC gyp SOUTH T•TRUEROA STRI:EET LOS ANC,ELFS,CA Boozz SUITE SPP S�rR-k rl lisl a,".L7.,51.4 VNII EL17[HR IRn1i;N'Ct PLANS ;.. I r;V I TEL 3L23465.+WO LOSS ANGELIES,9"1 -__ _ � _ Lu la xa WUApQD�gmiW,cm LAEL Pt3 02408 CARPENTER }Fit- .+. - " Q .� W Llf I,,(JS f,i 11114 PLANAND tIIS ' Ia F Cl]R1L I' VJ wr. J. //�• ./ , •�� ,�j#,� �/ / // �'/ la LL E-1 [;F.4'f.d:1L:\llllti I4 L)Si:`.v ll :.I'•.1:L+1•aLld•i 11 C_ �/- !.I k C +Ir Ph r-L T:Ull,1`• V 'Z m ❑�-•'. / „/ ''� / �// p E-1 LST& tiU t VI1,(k[)N1.R 1 t 7NS F ��- . ,f %� / 18121 IRVINE al_•d❑ ��� / / /.` ry F.-a IST I tiLlILtII1 I.I CiII i I.”( 1..:1hS �E)2-STORY OFFICE / r� j j/ / I 9 Ir SCOPE OF WQRIi h I / BUILDING t / / ¢ II 4 p GS I f:In l 11(1 HSIti CII+IIIn 1u.i)1•C nsL,I\N L1. p — AI'N.4C))1.161-03 /. :'� Q ' YL7 E-F 1?:U[1 It L,LII,ItiC. (L.`RTII 1C.+iL t)I r[Wtl ;,4t'I.L'. Q •, / 1. j' /✓f W? -EXTERIOR FI�LISH I.SPGRADF(7E LXISTTN(•2-STORY Or FICE o 4 f-+.t:LL711tr-1111 l lEd -I.hCH1 t4.:::17rIF ii'.:f-'.:`CL]LGR� t•.;-,• L11 // / J N Z r PLL '/' - 1' . <)1 Iti \LN INI LT It7P FI:LS1iES,1Yli'r WAL.L1 -- LLJ r / OL � In I v' Q} C7, �:•_,' /� .,. ////�.':i/ �,///'/ a �m I;li i.1 11711.\tS11\t WE(1:s,..1;t 111,1 IT rIxTURES TD NCw LE6 p.y ft-1�1 14114 \IIrISill4c 1'�n ul,..�l.' a n/ r I /f{� // / /./ ./ � !�//. ; it1"•5.1-��f P LrLtSI f 1X3+R.E1i. LL m Qq Z' •.t I,' �'"�/ hlj v r.% // RnLE55LL LLND G TO RF7AAIN REV-1 tiLiJF'l:[]I 11 f)Itfi P-S ISI CII L)1°U[11i IjQI Iti[lillfl)1'aAll-k 11,+ tiC l{7-17L�11N __ .-�- K Y _ A-S COVER 5HrEr 4[� 1L 1)FI- ll10 II tTf I 151 LI 1' \'1!'Ivti4'ert[0 AREgpr I:.\I111U[ 1tk:,T zt S[)1'ti T(F -- •--- E+r. aOVBp SURFACE Lll'il f• II ttiL 1 �Ir)A fi. ,I'.• ` I4T'FBGH&TEFL QUARDRAL4 :':': : VICINITY MAF --�--- '-- r4 A-5 EXiSTLNG RESTRClOh45 F'.:?lT^.[ cdaf Nff]AaS-F^I.eNtI"[7!'I aV4 k 4F AND DETAILS: '. ':c � I BRAVING, - I � E4 PSLTA&N52. D FOR GTG ..T . +ll] LIt)1. IHICII -_—_--- _t__ S .? L,.AO ; LI Is COVER srt>rer 1-I.At A t tl);LED LIGHTS IN Of 11(-1.111 AND SITE PLAN C1 y_-t s•-0' 9'F' !�' _-.— ._ _...._ ,1a• F'-9 - ^'B' 19'-0- _ _ —IRVINE BLVD.(110') r• rIn•4 .I.l�. TI aI:L LElarvvEwnv BUILDING SUMMARY l I R/,NSC' Rt i InN ASS3:.`iSC1H5 I,%RC f'I :�1'.11ftp:R: 401-I6I4}] LEGALDLSCRIPTION: I_GT:7 TRACTt45$I 1 15suF.p F(1P, N TR 4581 BILK LOT VEV:E.1-' .Wh,TBERQF$TOM! a PLAN CHEEK YF,ARPlffI.T 1464 Bl r7[ilfJ!; FLRL 1,PIRINKLERS: NO PERMa Rnn.T„ O('C1.`ANC Y GROUP: B - CONS-RVC T!0N mil SITE PLAN 1 CON., RI 4-II0NTYP& v-BINOTSPRINKLERR,A1 DRAW, BY u1 SCALP:W=I'AJ` L01 a:f l'. 9,fi00 S,F. EXII i I\.. i 1-Lot,I' -.n 0: NGEY 2.374 SF Eal I I'. ,1-I n :NOCHANGEI: 1.9525E �^ Fti l I'. I' I.r,lR ARPA PROJECT LOCATION: 4,42E 5F 18121 IRVINE BLVD. ssA F Ns ,'.::'•I.`„ I:::I.`.•:TION: PRWROFESSKWAL, TUSTIN,CA 92780 CAPFILD ATTACHMENT D ZAA 17-010 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR ACTION 17-010 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2017-19 18121 IRVINE BOULEVARD The Zoning Administrator of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows: I. The Zoning Administrator finds and determines as follows: A. That a proper application was filed by Giovanni Milan requesting authorization for a reduction of off-street parking requirements through a joint-use for attorney offices at 18121 Irvine Boulevard. B. Pursuant to Tustin City Code (TCC) Section 9264, parking facilities may be used jointly for non-residential uses with different peak hours of operation with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). C. That the site is designated as Professional Office by the City General Plan and is zoned Professional District (PR) which provides for a variety of professional office uses. In addition, the project has been reviewed for consistency with the Air Quality Sub-element of the City of Tustin's (City) General Plan and has been determined to be consistent with the Air Quality Sub-element. D. Pursuant to Section 9264a5 of the TCC, the Zoning Administrator has the authority to review and approve a Minor Conditional Use Permit for a reduction of off-street parking requirements and joint- use parking for parking areas serving structures with less than thirty thousand (30,000) square feet. E. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed, and held for CUP 2017-19 on November 29, 2017, by the Zoning Administrator. F. That the establishment, maintenance, and operation of the proposed joint-use parking will not, under the circumstances of this case, be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use, nor be injurious or detrimental to the property and improvements in the neighborhood of the subject property, or to the general welfare of the City of Tustin in that: 1. A Parking Demand Analysis dated November 3, 2017, was prepared by a licensed traffic engineer (Adnan Hindiyeh, PE, TE, PTOE) in accordance with TCC Section 9264. Zoning Administrator Action 17-010 CUP 2017-019 Page 2 2. That the site is improved with an existing two-story office building that has been increased to 4,426 square feet in building area and provides 10 on-site parking spaces. 3. Pursuant to TCC Section 9263, the off-street parking requirements for a professional office use is 1 spaces for each 250 square feet of floor area resulting in an off-street parking requirement of eighteen (18) spaces for the proposed project resulting in a deficit of parking based on the requirements presented in the TCC. 4. A Parking Study determined the peak demand for the attorney offices at 10 spaces and a total of 10 spaced have been provided for the building. Therefore, the Parking Study finds that adequate parking is available and no substantial conflict will exist in the peak hours of parking demand for the office complex for the proposed uses. 5. The Parking Study has been reviewed and accepted by the City's Traffic Engineer for methodology and accuracy. 6. A Deed Restriction will be recorded on the property limiting the use of the building as described in the parking study. 7. Any change in use would require review and approval by the Community Development Department. 8. That all of the on-site parking spaces are designated for joint- use for which they are intended. 9. That the proposed use, as conditioned, will not have a negative effect on surrounding properties or impact traffic based on the availability of parking in that sufficient parking would be available on-site. G. This project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to Section 15301 (Class 1) of the California Code-of Regulations (Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act). II. The Zoning Administrator hereby approves CUP 2017-19 authorizing a reduction in required parking through a joint use parking for the proposed attorney offices located at 18121 Irvine Boulevard subject to the conditions contained within Exhibit A, attached hereto. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Zoning Administrator of the City of Tustin, at a regular meeting on the 29th day of November, 2017. Zoning Administrator Action 17-010 CUP 2017-019 Page 3 ELIZABETH A. BINSACK ZONING ADMINISTRATOR VERA TISCARENO RECORDING SECRETARY STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) CITY OF TUSTIN ) I, Vera Tiscareno, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the Zoning Administrator Secretary of the City of Tustin, California; that Zoning Administrator Action 17-010 was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin Zoning Administrator, held on the 29th day of November;2017. VERA TISCARENO RECORDING SECRETARY EXHIBIT A ZONING ADMINISTRATOR ACTION 17-010 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2017-19 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL GENERAL (1) 1.1 The proposed project shall substantially conform with the submitted plans for the project date stamped November 29, 2017, on file with the Community Development Department, as herein modified, or as modified by the Director of Community Development in accordance with this Exhibit. The Director of Community Development may also approve subsequent minor modifications to plans during plan check if such modifications are consistent with provisions of the Tustin City Code. (1) 1.2 Unless otherwise specified, the conditions contained in this Exhibit shall be complied with as specified, subject to review and approval by the Community Development Department. (1) 1.3 This approval shall become null and void unless the use is established within twelve (12) months of the date of this Exhibit. Time extensions may be granted if a written request is received by the Community Development Department within thirty (30) days prior to expiration. (1) 1.4 Approval of CUP 2017-19 is contingent upon the applicant signing and returning to the Community Development Department a notarized "Agreement to Conditions Imposed' form and the property owner signing and recording with the County Clerk-Recorder a notarized "Notice of Discretionary Permit Approval and Conditions of Approval" form. The forms shall be established by the Director of Community Development, and evidence of recordation shall be provided to the Community Development Department. (1) 1.5 Any violation of any of the conditions imposed is subject to issuance of an administrative citation pursuant to TCC 1162(a). (1) 1.6 The applicant shall be responsible for costs associated with any necessary code enforcement action, including attorney fees, subject to the applicable notice, hearing, and appeal process as established by the City Council by ordinance. Conditions of Approval Exhibit A CUP 2014-14 Page 2 (1) 1.7 As a condition of approval of CUP 2017-19, the applicant shall agree, at its sole cost and expense, to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees, agents, and consultants, from any claim, action, or proceeding brought by a third party against the City, its officers, agents, and employees, which seeks to attack, set aside, challenge, void, or annul an approval of the City Council, the Planning Commission, or any other decision-making body, including staff, concerning this project. The City agrees to promptly notify the applicant of any such claim or action filed against the City and to fully cooperate in the defense of any such action. The City may, at its sole cost and expense, elect to participate in defense of any such action under this condition. (1) 1.8 CUP 2017-19 may be reviewed on an annual basis, or more often if necessary, by the Community Development Director. The Community Development Director shall review the use to ascertain compliance with conditions of approval. If the use is not operated in accordance with CUP 2017-19, or is found to be a nuisance or negative impacts are affecting the surrounding tenants or neighborhood, the Community Development Director shall impose additional conditions to eliminate the nuisance or negative impacts, or may initiate proceedings to revoke the Conditional Use Permit. USE RESTRICTIONS (5) 2.1 A total of 10 parking spaces shall be maintained at all times. Any reduction of on-site parking, change of tenant spaces/uses, change of parking lot, and/or circulation shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department. (5) 2.2 No more than six (6) staff members shall be present at any given time, in accordance with the provided parking study. (5) 2.3 Any change in use and/or operation shall require review and approval by the Community Development Department. (5) 2.4 If in the future the City determines that a parking problem exists on the site or in the vicinity as a result of the proposed project or if the parking analysis does not support the uses as concluded, the Community Development Director may require the applicant to prepare a parking demand analysis and bear all associated costs. If the Study indicates that there is inadequate parking, the applicant shall be required to provide immediate interim and permanent measures to be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department and the Public Works Department. Conditions of Approval Exhibit A CUP 2014-14 Page 3 (5) 2.5 A Deed Restriction shall be recorded on the property limiting the use of the building as described in the parking study prior to final inspection of Permit #C2016-0291 pertaining to interior and facade improvements at the subject property. PLANCHECK SUBMITTAL (1) 3.1 At the time of building permit application, the plans shall comply with the latest edition of the codes, City Ordinances, State, Federal laws, and regulations as adopted by the City Council of the City of Tustin. (1) 3.2 Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling and Reduction Plan (WRRP). A. The applicant/contractor is required to submit a WRRP to the Public Works Department. The WRRP must indicate how the applicant will comply with the City's requirement (City Code Section 4351, et al) to recycle at least sixty-five (65) percent of the project waste material or the amount required by the California Green Building Standards Code B. The applicant will be required to submit a $50.00 application fee and a cash security deposit. Based on the review of the submitted Waste Management Plan, the cash security deposit in the amount of five (5) percent of the project's valuation as determined by the Building Official, rounded to the nearest thousand, or $2,500, whichever is greater. In no event shall a deposit exceed $25,000. C. Prior to issuance of a permit, the applicant shall submit the required security deposit in the form of cash, cashier's check, personal check, or money order made payable to the "City of Tustin". FEES (1) 4.1 Prior to issuance of any building permits, payment shall be made of all applicable fees, including, but not limited to, the following, Payment shall be required based upon those rates in effect at the time of payment and are subject to change. a. Building and Planning plan check and permit fees to the Community Development Department based on the most current schedule. (1) 4.2 Within forty-eight (48) hours of final approval of the project, the applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department, a CASHIER'S CHECK payable to the County Clerk in the amount of fifty dollars ($50.00) to enable the City to file the appropriate environmental Conditions of Approval Exhibit A CUP 2014-14 Page 4 documentation for the project. If within such forty-eight (48) hour period that applicant has not delivered to the Community Development Department the above-noted check, the statute of limitations for any interested party to challenge the environmental determination under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act could be significantly lengthened.