Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09 APPROVAL OF PRE-QUALIFICATION PACKAGE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE VETERANS SPORTS PARK AT THE TUSTIN LEGACY CIP NO. 20043• Agenda Item AGENDA REPORT Reviewed: City Manager Finance Director fA MEETING DATE: DECEMBER 19, 2017 TO: JEFFREY C. PARKER, CITY MANAGER FROM: DOUGLAS S. STACK, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS / CITY ENGINEER SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF PRE -QUALIFICATION PACKAGE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE VETERANS SPORTS PARK AT TUSTIN LEGACY PROJECT, CIP NO. 20043 SUMMARY Staff has prepared a Pre -Qualification Package for construction of the Veterans Sports Park at Tustin Legacy Project, CIP No. 20043. The package includes a standard questionnaire and financial statement, a uniform system of rating bidders based upon objective criteria, and an appeal procedure which will allow a contractor to appeal decisions that they are not qualified to bid on this project. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the Pre -Qualification Package for construction of the Veterans Sports Park at Tustin Legacy Project, CIP No. 20043. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this item. CORRELATION TO THE STRATEGIC PLAN The construction of Veterans Sports Park at Tustin Legacy, CIP No. 20043 contributes to the fulfillment of the City's Strategic Plan Goal A: Economic and Neighborhood Development. Specifically, the project implementation of Strategy 1, which among other items is to complete the Master Plan for Tustin Legacy and Strategy 6, which is to assess and to explore opportunities for expanded recreational activities. DISCUSSION Pursuant to Public Contract Code 20101, local public agencies are authorized to require licensed contractors to pre -qualify before bidding for public works projects. A few of the key points of the statute are: Contractors must meet trustworthiness, quality, fitness, capacity, and experience standards in order to pre -qualify to bid. 2. Local public agencies may require contractors and subcontractors to submit completed standardized questionnaires which identify information necessary to determine whether the contractors have met these standards. Pre -Qualification Package for Veterans Sports Park Project December 19, 2017 Page 2 3. Uniform, objective rating systems must be used to determine both the minimum requirements for qualification to bid, and the type and size of the contracts upon which each bidder shall be deemed qualified to bid. 4. Agencies must have procedures in place which allow contractors to appeal decisions that they are not qualified to bid, which will result in review and conclusion prior to the submission of bids. The Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) has prepared model guidelines for pre -qualifying bidders of public works projects. Local agencies are allowed to use the DIR model and make the necessary adjustments based on project specific requirements. City staff has prepared the attached Pre -qualification Package for the construction of the Veterans Sports Park at Tustin Legacy, CIP No. 20043, and has closely followed the DIR model guidelines and templates. The pre -qualification procedure has been selected for use with the construction of the Veterans Sports Park at Tustin Legacy project due to the very specialized nature of construction. Construction scheduling may prove difficult and will require significantly more expertise in coordination and facilitation of project progress. The pre -qualification process will create a short list of prequalified bidders, which will in turn ensure all bidders possess sufficient expertise in constructing this unique facility, and will assist staff in determining bidder responsibility prior to submission of bids and selecting the lowest responsible bidder. Stack, P. E. ublic Works / City Engineer Attachments: Pre -qualification Package SACity Council Item s\2017 Council Items\12-19-2017\Pre-Qualify General Contractor for Veterans Sports Park, C I P 20043Wpprove Pre -Qu alifed Package for Veterans Sports Park, C I P 20043.docx PRE -QUALIFICATION SUBMITTAL PACKAGE FOR GENERAL CONTRACTOR PRE -QUALIFICATION FOR THE VETERANS SPORTS PARK AT TUSTIN LEGACY, CIP NO. 20043 IN THE CITY OF TUSTIN 300 CENTENNIAL WAY TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA 92780 (714) 573-3150 SEALED PRE -QUALIFICATION SUBMITTALS DUE ON OR BEFORE: 2:00 P.M., MARCH 1, 2018 AT CITY HALL, CITY CLERK'S OFFICE, 2ND FLOOR DOUGLAS S. STACK, P.E. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS CITY.OF TUSTIN REQUEST FOR PRE -QUALIFICATION OF CONTRACTORS AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION COMMENCING WITH FORTHCOMING PUBLIC WORK BID SPORTSVETERANS ..O PROJECT, 20043 Notice is hereby given that the City of Tustin ("City") has determined that all general contractor bidders on "Veterans Sports Park at Tustin Legacy Park Improvements Project, CIP No. 20043" consisting of precise grading, sports field, sports court, signage, monument, restroom buildings, site amenities, parking lot sports field and security lighting, landscape and irrigation construction (hereinafter, the "Project") to be undertaken by the City must be pre -qualified prior to submitting a bid on the Project. Construction estimate for the work is $16,000,000. It is mandatory that all Contractors who intend to submit a bid, fully complete the pre - qualification questionnaire, provide all materials requested herein (the "Application"), and be approved by the City to be on the final qualified Bidders list. A Portable Document Format (PDF) Compact Disk (CD) of the Pre -Qualification Submittal can obtained from the City of Tustin, Office of the City Engineer, Public Works Department, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California 92780 (Telephone No. 714-573- 3150). The last date to submit a fully completed Application is 2:00 PM, March 1, 2018. An Application received from a Contractor that has failed to comply with these requirements may be deemed non-responsive. If two or more business entities submit a bid as part of a Joint Venture, or expect to submit a bid as part of a Joint Venture, each entity within the Joint Venture must be separately qualified to bid. Answers to questions contained in the attached questionnaire, information about current bonding capacity, notarized statement from surety, and the most recent reviewed or audited financial statements, with accompanying notes and supplemental information, are required. The City will use these documents as the basis for determining whether a Contractor will be pre -qualified to bid on the Project. The City reserves the right to check other sources available. The City's decision will be based on objective evaluation criteria. The City reserves the right to adjust, increase, limit, suspend or rescind the pre - qualification rating based on subsequently learned information. Contractors whose rating changes sufficient to disqualify them will be notified, and given an opportunity for a hearing 2 consistent with the hearing procedures described below for appealing a pre -qualification rating. While it is the intent of the pre -qualification questionnaire and documents required therewith to assist the City in determining bidder responsibility prior to bid and to aid the City in selecting the lowest responsible bidder, neither the fact of pre -qualification, nor any pre -qualification rating, will preclude the City from a post -bid consideration and determination of whether a bidder has the quality, fitness, capacity and experience to satisfactorily perform the proposed work, and has demonstrated the requisite trustworthiness. The pre -qualification packages should be submitted to the City Clerk at the City of Tustin, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, CA 92780 under seal and marked: "CONFIDENTIAL" "Veterans Sports Park at Tustin Legacy Park Improvements Project, CIP No. 20043 Pre -Qualification Packages" The pre -qualification packages (questionnaire answers and financial statements) submitted by Contractors are not public records and are not open to public inspection. All information provided will be kept confidential to the extent permitted by law. However, the contents may be disclosed to third parties for purpose of verification, or investigation of substantial allegations, or in the appeal hearing. State law requires that the names of contractors applying for pre -qualification status shall be public records subject to disclosure, and the first page of the questionnaire will be used for that purpose. Each application must be signed under penalty of perjury in the manner designated at the end of the questionnaire, by an individual who has the legal authority to bind the Contractor on whose behalf that person is signing. If any information provided by a Contractor becomes inaccurate, the Contractor must immediately notify the City and provide updated accurate information in writing, under penalty of perjury. The City reserves the right to waive minor irregularities and omissions in the information contained in the pre -qualification application submitted, to make all final determinations, and to determine at any time that the pre -qualification procedures will not be applied to a specific future public works project. Contractors may submit pre -qualification packages during regular working hours on any day that the offices of the City are open. Contractors who submit a complete pre - qualification package will be notified of their qualification status no later than twenty (20) business days after submission of the information. application for a later project is permitted. The closing time for bids will not be changed in order to accommodate supplementation of incomplete submissions, or late submissions. Where a timely and completed application results in a rating below that necessary to pre - qualify, an appeal can be made. An appeal by a Contractor must be filed with the City Clerk no later than fifteen (15) business days prior to the closing time for the receipt of bids for the Project. Failure to timely file the appeal will result in the Contractor waiving any and all rights to challenge the decision of the City, whether by administrative process, judicial process or any other legal process or proceeding. If the Contractor files a timely appeal and requests a hearing, the hearing shall be conducted so that it is concluded no later than seven (7) business days after the City's receipt of the notice of appeal, and no later than seven (7) business days prior to the last date for the receipt of bids on the Project. The hearing will be an informal process conducted by a panel to be selected by the City Manager's office to which the City has delegated responsibility to hear such appeals (the "Appeals Panel"). At or prior to the hearing, the Contractor will be advised of the basis for the City's pre -qualification determination if it has not already done so. The Contractor will be given the opportunity to present information and present reasons in opposition to the rating. Within three (3) business days after the conclusion of the hearing, the Appeals Panel will render its decision. It is the intention of the City that the date for the submission and opening of bids for the Project will not be delayed or postponed to allow for completion of an appeal process. Note: A Contractor may be found not pre -qualified for bidding on a specific public works contract to be let by the City, or on all contracts to be let by the City until the Contractor meets the City's pre -qualification requirements. In addition, a Contractor may be found not pre -qualified for either: (1) Omission of requested information; or (2) Falsification of information. Reviewed and Approved by: 4 Ken Nishikawa Date Deputy Director of Public Works / Engineering Douglas S. Stack, P.E. Director of Public Works / City Engineer Date CONTACT INFORMATION Firm Name: (As it appears on license) Check One: ❑ Corporation ❑ Partnership ❑ Sole Proprietor ❑ LLC/LLP Contact Person: Address: Phone: E -Mail: If firm is a sole proprietor or partnership: Owner(s) of Company Contractor's License Number(s): 7 PART REQUIREMENTS FOR QUALIFICATION Contractor will be immediately disqualified if the answer to any of questions 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 is "NO". 1 Contractor will be immediately disqualified if the answer to any of questions 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 is "YES". 2 If the answer to question 8 is "YES", and if debarment would be the sole reason for denial of pre -qualification, any pre -qualification issued will exclude the debarment period. Contractor possesses a valid and current California "A" Contractors License for the project for which it intends to submit a bid. ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. Contractor has a commercial liability insurance policy with a policy limit of at least $2,000,000 per occurrence, commercial automobile insurance with a limit of at least $2,000,000 per occurrence, and California workers' compensation insurance with a limit of at least $1,000,000. Contractor's insurers are authorized to do business in the State of California by the Department of Insurance and meet the following qualifications: A.M. Best's Key Rating of Grade A and Class VII (seven) (if an Admitted Insurer), and Grade A- or better and Class X (ten) or better (if offered by a Surplus Line Broker). Workers' compensation insurance rated Grade B- or better and Class VII (seven) or better, or offered by the State Compensation Fund. ❑ Yes ❑ No 3. Contractor has current workers' compensation insurance policy as required by the California Labor Code or is legally self-insured pursuant to Labor Code section 3700 et. seq. ❑ Yes ❑ No A "NO" answer to Question 4 will not be disqualifying if the contractor is exempt from complying with Question 4, for reasons explained in footnote 3. ` A contractor disqualified solely because of a "YES" answer given to question 6, 7, 9, or 10 may appeal the disqualification and provide an explanation of the relevant circumstances during the appeal procedure. 4. Have you attached your latest copy of a reviewed or audited financial statement with accompanying notes and supplemental information? 3 ❑ Yes ❑ No Note: A financial statement that is not either reviewed or audited is not acceptable. A letter verifying availability of a line of credit may also be attached; however, it will be considered as supplemental information only, and is not a substitute for the required financial statement. 5. Have you attached a notarized statement from an admitted surety insurer (approved by the California Department of Insurance) and authorized to issue bonds in the State of California, which states: (a) that your current bonding capacity is sufficient for the project for which you seek pre -qualification; and (b) your current available bonding capacity? 4 ❑ Yes ❑ No Note: Notarized statement must be from the surety company, not an agent or broker. 6. Has,your contractor's license been revoked at any time in the last five (5) years? ❑ Yes ❑ No 7. Has a surety firm completed a contract on your behalf, or paid for completion because your firm was default terminated by the project owner within the last five (5) years? ❑ Yes ❑ No 8. At the time of submitting this pre -qualification form, is your firm ineligible to bid on or be awarded a public works contract, or perform as a subcontractor on a public works contract, pursuant to either Labor Code section 1777.1 or Labor Code section 1777.7? ❑ Yes ❑ No 3 Public Contract Code Section 20101(e) exempts from this requirement a contractor who has qualified as a small business pursuant to Government Code section 14837(d)(1), if the bid is "no more than 25 percent of the qualifying amount provided in section 14837(d)(1)." As of January 1, 2001, the qualifying amount is $10 million, and 25 percent of that amount, therefore, is $2.5 million. 4 An additional notarized statement from the surety may be requested by City at the time of submission of a bid, if this pre -qualification package is submitted more than 60 days prior to submission of the bid. 0 If the answer is "Yes," state the beginning and ending dates of the period of debarment: 9. At any time during the last five years, has your firm or any of its owners or officers been convicted of a crime involving the awarding of a contract of a government construction project, or the bidding or performance of a government contract? ❑ Yes ❑ No 10. At the time of submission of this pre -qualification package, is your firm, or any subsidiary, parent, holding company or affiliate, or any of their respective owners, partners, or officers a plaintiff in an active lawsuit against the City or any of its agencies? ❑ Yes ❑ No Note: For this question, "owner" and "partner" refer to ownership of ten percent or more of the business, or ten percent or more of its stock, if the business is a corporation. 10 PART II ORGANIZATION, HISTORY, ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE, AND COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL AND CRIMINAL LAWS A. Current Organization and Structure of the Business For Contractors that are Corporations: 1 a. Date incorporated: 1b. Under the laws of what State: 1 c. Provide all the following information for each person who is either (a) an officer of the corporation (president, vice president, secretary, treasurer), or (b) the owner of at least ten percent of the corporation's stock. Name Position Years with % Company Ownership 1 d. Identify every construction firm that any person listed above has been associated with (as owner, general partner, limited partner or officer) at any time during the last five (5) years. Note: For this question, "owner" and "partner" refer to ownership of ten percent or more of the business, or ten percent (10%) or more of its stock, if the business is a corporation. Person's NameI Construction Firm Dates of Person's Participation with Firm 11 For Contractors that are Partnerships: 1 a. Date of formation: 1 b. Under the laws of what State: 1 c. Provide all the following information for each partner who owns ten percent (10%) or more of the firm. Name Position Years with %Company Ownership 1 d. Identify every construction company that any partner has been associated with (as owner, general partner, limited partner or officer) at any time during the last five years. Note: For this question, "owner" and "partner" refer to ownership of ten percent or more of the business, or ten percent or more of its stock, if the business is a corporation. Dates of Person's Person's Name Construction Company Participation with Companv For Contractors that are Sole Proprietorships: 1 a. Date of commencement of business: 1 b. Social security number of company owner: 1 c. Identify every construction firm that the business owner has been associated with (as owner, general partner, limited partner or officer) at any time during the last five (5) years. 12 Note: For this question, "owner" and "partner" refer to ownership of ten percent or more of the business, or ten percent or more of its stock, if the business is a corporation. Person's Name Construction Company Dates of Person's Participation with Companv For Contractors that Intend to Make a Bid as Part of a Joint Venture: 1 a. Date of commencement of joint venture: 1 b. Provide all of the following information for each firm that is a member of the joint venture that expects to bid on one or more projects: Name of Company Firm % Ownership of Joint Venture B. History of the Business and Organizational Performance 2. Has there been any change in ownership of the Contractor at any time during the last three (3) years? Note: A corporation whose shares are publicly traded is not required to answer this question. ❑ Yes ❑ No If "yes," explain on a separate signed page. 3. Is the Contractor a subsidiary, parent, holding company or affiliate of another firm? Note: Include information about other firms if one firm owns 50 percent or more of another, or if an owner, partner, or officer of your firm holds a similar position in another firm. 13 ❑ Yes ❑ No If "yes," explain on a separate signed page. 4. Are any corporate officers, partners or owners connected to any other firms? Note: Include information about other firms if an owner, partner, or officer of your firm holds a similar position in another firm. ❑ Yes ❑ No If "yes," explain on a separate signed page. 5. State Contractor's gross revenues for each of the last three years: 6. How many years has Contractor been in business in California as a contractor under your present business name and license number? Years 7. Is Contractor currently the debtor in a bankruptcy case? ❑ Yes ❑ No If "yes," please attach a copy of the bankruptcy petition, showing the case number, and the date on which the petition was filed. 8. Was Contractor in bankruptcy at any time during the last five years? (This question refers only to a bankruptcy action that was not described in answer to question 7, above) ❑ Yes ❑ No If "yes," please attach a copy of the bankruptcy petition, showing the case number and the date on which the petition was filed, and a copy of the Bankruptcy Court's discharge order, or of any other document that ended the case, if no discharge order was issued. Licenses 9. Provide copies of and list all California construction license numbers, classifications and expiration dates of the California contractor licenses held by Contractor: 14 10. If any of Contractor's license(s) are held in the name of a corporation or partnership, list below the names of the qualifying individual(s) listed on the Contractors State License Board (CSLB) records who meet(s) the experience and examination requirements for each license. 11. Has Contractor changed names or license number in the past five (5) years? ❑ Yes ❑ No If "yes," explain on a separate signed page, including the reason for the change. 12. Has any owner, partner or officer of Contractor operated a construction firm under any other name in the last five (5) years? ❑ Yes ❑ No If "yes," explain on a separate signed page, including the reason for the change. 13. Has any CSLB license held by Contractor or its Responsible Managing Employee (RME) or Responsible Managing Officer (RMO) been suspended within the last five years? ❑ Yes ❑ No If "yes," please explain on a separate signed sheet. Disputes 14. At any time in the last five (5) years has Contractor been assessed liquidated damages after completion of a project under a construction contract with either a public or private owner? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, explain on a separate signed page, identifying all such projects by owner, owner's address, the date of completion of the project, amount of liquidated damages assessed and all other information necessary to fully explain the assessment of liquidated damages. 15 15. In the last five (5) years has Contractor, or any firm with which any Contractor's owners, officers or partners was associated with, been debarred, disqualified, removed or otherwise prevented from bidding on, or completing, any government agency or public works project for any reason or settled a dispute with any government agency by in part agreeing not to bid on future public works projects involving that government agency? Note: "Associated with" refers to another construction firm in which an owner, partner or officer of your firm held a similar position, and which is listed in response to question 1c or 1 d above. ❑ Yes ❑ No If "yes," explain on a separate signed page. State whether the firm involved was the Contractor applying for pre -qualification here or another firm. Identify by name of the company, the name of the person within your firm who was associated with that company, the year of the event, the owner of the project, the project and the basis for the action. 16. In the last five (5) years has Contractor been denied an award of a public works contract based on a finding by a public agency that Contractor was not a responsible bidder? ❑ Yes ❑ No If "yes," explain on a separate signed page. Identify the year of the event, the owner, the project and the basis for the finding by the public agency. Note: The following two questions refer only to disputes between Contractor and the owner of a project. You need not include information about disputes between your firm and a supplier, another contractor, or subcontractor. You need not include information about "pass-through" disputes in which the actual dispute is between a sub -contractor and a project owner. Also, you may omit reference to all disputes about amounts of less than $50,000. 17. In the past five (5) years has any claim against Contractor concerning Contractor's work on a construction project been filed in court or arbitration? ❑ Yes ❑ No If "Yes", on separate signed sheets of paper identify the claim(s) by providing the project name, date of the claim, name of the claimant, a brief description of the nature of the claim, the court in which the case was filed and a brief description of the status of the claim (pending or, if resolved, a brief description of the resolution). 16 18. In the past five (5) years has Contractor made any claim against a project owner concerning work on a project or payment for a contract and filed that claim in court or arbitration? ❑ Yes ❑ No If "Yes," on separate signed sheets of paper identify the claim by providing the project name, date of the claim, name of the entity (or entities) against whom the claim was filed, a brief description of the nature of the claim, the court in which the case was filed and a brief description of the status of the claim (pending, or if resolved, a brief description of the resolution). 19. At any time during the past five (5) years, has any surety company made any payments on your firm's behalf as a result of a default, to satisfy any claims made against a performance or payment bond issued on your firm's behalf, in connection with a construction project, either public or private? ❑ Yes ❑ No If "yes," explain on a separate signed page the amount of each such claim, the name and telephone number of the claimant, the date of the claim, the grounds for the claim, the present status of the claim, the date of resolution of such claim if resolved, the method by which such was resolved if resolved, the nature of the resolution and the amount, if any, at which the claim was resolved. 20. In the last five (5) years has any insurance carrier, for any form of insurance, refused to renew the insurance policy for Contractor? ❑ Yes ❑ No If "Yes", explain on a separate signed page. Name the insurance carrier, the form of insurance and the year of the refusal. Criminal Matters and Related Civil Suits 21. Has Contractor or any of its owners, officers or partners ever been found liable in a civil suit or found guilty in a criminal action for making any false claim or material misrepresentation to any public agency or entity? ❑ Yes ❑ No If "Yes", explain on a separate signed page, including identifying who was involved, the name of the public agency, the date of the investigation and the grounds for the finding. 17 22. Has Contractor or any of its owners, officers or partners ever been convicted of a crime involving any federal, state, or local law related to construction? F-1 Yes ❑No If "Yes", explain on a separate signed page, including identifying who was involved, the name of the public agency, the date of the conviction and the grounds for the conviction. 23. Has Contractor or any of its owners, officers or partners ever been convicted of a federal or state crime of fraud, theft, or any other act of dishonesty? ❑ Yes ❑ No If "Yes", identify on a separate signed page the person or persons convicted, the court (the county if a state court, the district or location of the federal court), the year and the criminal conduct. 24. Bonding capacity: Provide documentation from your surety identifying the following: Name of bonding company/surety: Name of surety agent, address and telephone number: 25. If your firm was required to pay a premium of more than one percent for a performance and payment bond on any project(s) on which your firm worked at any time during the last three years, state the percentage that your firm was required to pay. You may provide an explanation for a percentage rate higher than one percent, if you wish to do so. 26. List all other. sureties (name and full address) that have written bonds for your firm during the last five years, including the dates during which each wrote the bonds: 18 27. During the last five years, has your firm ever been denied bond coverage by a surety company, or has there ever been a period of time when your firm had no surety bond in place during a public construction project when one was required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If "Yes", provide details on a separate signed sheet indicating the date when your firm was denied coverage and the name of the company or companies which denied coverage; and the period during which you had no surety bond in place. C. Compliance with Occupational Safety and Health Laws and with Other Labor Legislation Safety 28. Has CAL OSHA cited and assessed penalties against Contractor for any "serious," "willful" or "repeat" violations of its safety or health regulations in the past five years? Note: If you have filed an appeal of a citation, and the Occupational Safety and Health Appeals Board has not yet ruled on your appeal, you need not include information about it. ❑ Yes ❑ No If "Yes", attached a separate signed page describing the citations, including information about the dates of the citations, the nature of the violation, the project on which the citation(s) was or were issued, the amount of penalty paid, if any. If the citation was appealed to the Occupational Safety and Health Appeals Board and a decision has been issued, state the case number and the date of the decision. 29. Has the Federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration cited and assessed penalties against Contractor in the past five (5) years? Note: If you have filed an appeal of a citation and the Appeals Board has not yet ruled on your appeal, or if there is a court appeal pending, you need not include information about the citation. ❑ Yes ❑ No If "Yes", attach a separate signed page describing each citation. 19 30. Has the EPA or any Air Quality Management District or any Regional Water Quality Control Board cited and assessed penalties against either your firm or the owner of a project on which your firm was the contractor, in the past five (5) years? Note: If you have filed an appeal of a citation and the Appeals Board has not yet ruled on your appeal, or if there is a court appeal pending, you need not include information about the citation. ❑ Yes ❑ No If "Yes", attach a separate signed page describing each citation. 31. How often does Contractor require documented safety meetings to be held for construction employees and field supervisors during the course of a project? 32. List your firm's Experience Modification Rate (EMR) (California workers' compensation insurance) for each of the past three premium years: Note: An Experience Modification Rate is issued to your firm annually by your workers' compensation insurance carrier. Current year: Previous year: Year prior to previous year: If your EMR for any of these three years is or was 1.00 or higher you may, if you wish, attach a letter of explanation. 33. Within the last five (5) years has there ever been a period when Contractor had employees but was without workers' compensation insurance or state -approved self-insurance? ❑ Yes ❑ No If "Yes", please explain the reason for the absence of workers' compensation insurance on a separate signed page. If "No," please provide a statement by your current workers' compensation insurance carrier that verifies periods of workers' compensation insurance coverage for the last five years. (If your firm has been in the construction business for less than five years, provide a statement by your workers' compensation insurance carrier verifying continuous workers' 20 compensation insurance coverage for the period that your firm has been in the construction business). Prevailing Wage and Apprenticeship Compliance Record 34. Has there been more than one occasion during the last five (5) years in which your firm was required to pay either back wages or penalties for your own firm's failure to comply with the State's prevailing wage laws? Note: This question refers only to your own firm's violation of prevailing wage laws, not to violations of the prevailing wage laws by a subcontractor. ❑ Yes ❑ No If "Yes", attach a separate signed page or pages, describing the nature of each violation, identifying the name of the project, the date of its completion, the public agency for which it was constructed; the number of employees who were initially underpaid and the amount of back wages and penalties that you were required to pay. 35. During the last five (5) years, has there been more than one occasion in which your own firm has been penalized or required to pay back wages for failure to comply with the Federal Davis -Bacon prevailing wage requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No If "Yes", attach a separate signed page or pages describing the nature of the violation, identifying the name of the project, the date of its completion, the public agency for which it was constructed; the number of employees who were initially underpaid, the amount of back wages you were required to pay along with the amount of any penalty paid. 36. Provide the name, address and telephone number of the apprenticeship program (approved by the California Apprenticeship Council) from whom you intend to request the dispatch of apprentices to your company for use on any public work project for which you are awarded a contract by the City. 21 37. If your firm operates its own State -approved apprenticeship program: (a) Identify the craft or crafts in which your firm provided apprenticeship training in the past year. (b) State the year in which each such apprenticeship program was approved, and attach evidence of the most recent California Apprenticeship Council approval(s) of your apprenticeship program(s). (c) State the number of individuals who were employed by your firm as apprentices at any time during the past three years in each apprenticeship and the number of persons who, during the past three years, completed apprenticeships in each craft while employed by your firm. 38. At any time during the last five (5) years, has your firm been found to have violated any provision of California apprenticeship laws or regulations, or the laws pertaining to use of apprentices on public works? Note: You may omit reference to any incident that occurred prior to January 1, 1998, if the violation was by a subcontractor and your firm, as general contractor on a project, had no knowledge of the subcontractor's violation at the time they occurred. ❑ Yes ❑ No If "Yes", provide the date(s) of such findings, and attach copies of the Department's final decision(s). 22 PART III RECENT PARK CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS COMPLETED 39. Contractor shall provide information about at least three (3) most comparable park construction public sector projects and two (2) most comparable park construction private projects, all of which must have been successfully completed within the last ten (10) years.5 The projects submitted must be in California comparable in scope and quality with the Project and have a contract value in excess of $10,000,000. Names and references must be current and verifiable. Use separate sheets of paper that contain all of the following information: Project Name: Location: Owner: Owner Contact (name and current phone number): Architect or Engineer: Architect or Engineer Contact (name and current phone number): Construction Manager (name and current phone number): Description of Project, Scope of Work Performed: Total Value of Construction (including change orders): Original Scheduled Completion Date: Time Extensions Granted (number of days): Actual Date of Completion: ' If you wish, you may, using the same format, also provide information about other projects that you have completed that are similar to the project(s) for which you expect to bid. 23 I, the undersigned, certify and declare that I have read all the foregoing answers to this prequalification questionnaire and know their contents. The matters stated in the questionnaire answers are true of my own knowledge and belief, except as to those matters stated on information and belief, and as to those matters I believe them to be true. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that the foregoing is correct. I also certify and declare that I have read and understand all of the background information on pages 1-53 of this document. Dated: 24 (Signature) (Print Name) (Title) (Contractor Name) r. o SCORING INSTRUCTIONS 25 LIST OF SCORABLE QUESTIONS AND SCORING INSTRUCTIONS The scorable questions arise in three different categories: History of the business and organizational performance; II. Compliance with occupational safety and health laws, workers' compensation and other labor legislation; and III. Completion of recent projects and quality of performance. The interview questions (interviews by the City or the City's authorized representative of project managers on projects completed recently by the contractor) are included in Part III. This last category also includes a scoring of the number of recently completed projects that are similar to the Project on which pre -qualification is at issue. Note: Not all questions in the questionnaire are scorable. Some questions simply ask for information about the contractor firm's structure, officers and history. This document includes only those questions that are "storable." Scores Needed for Prequalification To prequalify, a contractor would be required to have a passing grade within each of the three categories referred to above. Part I. History of the business and organizational performance The passing score is 64 on this portion of the questionnaire of a maximum score of 80 on this portion of the questionnaire. Part II. Compliance with occupational safety and health laws, workers' compensation and other labor legislation The passing score is 44 on this portion of the questionnaire of a maximum score of 55 points on this portion of the questionnaire. Part III. Completion of recent projects and quality of performance Includes a series of interview questions, and may also include questions about recently completed (public or private) construction projects. For the interview questions, the City or the City's authorized representative will interview project managers for the owners of two completed projects. The City will utilize a scoring system that will allow a maximum score of 110 points for each interview. For these questions, the passing score for each of two interviews is 88 points or more. 26 Part I Questions about History of the Business and Organizational Performance 1. How many years has Contractor been in business in California as a contractor under your present business name and license number? Years 3 years or less = 2 points 4 years = 3 points 5 years = 4 points 6 years or more = 5 points 2. Is Contractor currently the debtor in a bankruptcy case? ❑ Yes ❑ No No = 5 points Yes = 0 points 3. Was Contractor in bankruptcy any time during the last five (5) years? (This question refers only to a bankruptcy action that was not described in answer to' question 7, above). ❑ Yes ❑ No No = 5 points Yes = 0 points 4. Has any CSLB license held by Contractor or its Responsible Managing Employee (RME) or Responsible Managing Officer (RMO) been suspended within the last five years? ❑ Yes ❑ No No = 5 points Yes = 0 points 5. At any time in the last five (5) years, has Contractor been assessed and paid liquidated damages after completion of a project, under a construction contract with either a public or private owner? ❑ Yes ❑ No No projects with liquidated damages of more than $50,000 or one project with liquidated damages = 5 points Two projects with liquidated damages of more than $50,000 = 3 points 27 Any other answer = 0 points 6. In the last five (5) years has Contractor, or any firm with which any of your company's owners, officers or partners was associated, been debarred, disqualified, removed or otherwise prevented from bidding on, or completing, any government agency or public works project for any reason? Note: "Associated with" refers to another construction firm in which an owner, partner or officer of Contractor held a similar position. ❑ Yes ❑ No No = 5 points Yes = 0 points 7. In the last five (5) years, has Contractor been denied an award of a public works contract based on a finding by a public agency that Contractor was not a responsible bidder? ❑ Yes ❑ No No = 5 points Yes = 0 points Note: The following two questions refer only to disputes between Contractor and the owner of a project. You need not include information about disputes between a Contractor and a supplier, another contractor, or subcontractor. You need not include information about "pass-through" disputes in which the actual dispute is between a sub -contractor and a project owner. Also, you may omit reference to all disputes about amounts of less than $50,000. 8. In the past five (5) years, has any claim against Contractor concerning its work on a construction project been filed in court or arbitration? ❑ Yes ❑ No If the Contractor's average gross revenue for the last three years was less than $50 million, scoring is as follows: 5 points for either "No" or "Yes" indicating 1 such instance 3 points for "Yes" indicating 2 such instances 0 points for "Yes" if more than 2 such instances. If Contractor's average gross revenue for the last three years was more than $50 million, scoring is as follows: 28 5 points for either "No" or "Yes" indicating 1, 2, or 3 such instances 3 points for "Yes" indicating either 4 or 5 such instances 0 points for "Yes" if more than 5 such instances 9. In the past five (5) years, has Contractor made any claim against a project owner concerning work on a project or payment for a contract, and filed that claim in court or arbitration? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Contractor's average gross revenues for the last three years were less than $50 million scoring is as follows: 5 points for either "No" or "Yes" indicating 1 such instance 3 points for "Yes" indicating 2 such instances 0 points for "Yes" if more than 2 such instances If Contractor's average gross revenues for the last three years were more than $50 million, scoring is as follows: 5 points for either "No" or "Yes" indicating 1, 2, or 3 such instances 3 points for "Yes" indicating either 4 or 5 such instances 0 points for "Yes" if more than 5 such instances 10. At any time during the past five (5) years, has any surety company made any payments on your firm's behalf as a result of a default, to satisfy any claims made against a performance or payment bond issued on your firm's behalf in connection with a construction project, either public or private? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5 points for either "No" or "Yes" indicating 1 such claim 3 points for "Yes" indicating no more than 2 such claims Subtract 5 points for "Yes" if more than 2 such claims 11. In the last five (5) years has any insurance carrier, for any form of insurance, refused to renew the insurance policy for Contractor? 29 ❑ Yes ❑ No 5 points for either "No" or "Yes" indicating 1 such instance 3 points for "Yes" indicating 2 such instances 0 points for "Yes" or if more than 2 such instances 12. Has Contractor or any of its owners, officers, or partners ever been found liable in a civil suit, or found guilty in a criminal action, for making any false claim or material misrepresentation to any public agency or entity? ❑ Yes ❑ No No = 5 points Yes = subtract 5 points 13. Has Contractor or any of its owners, officers or partners ever been convicted of a crime involving any federal, state, or local law related to construction? ❑ Yes ❑ No No = 5 points Yes = subtract 5 points 14. Has Contractor or any of its owners, officers or partners ever been convicted of a federal or state crime of fraud, theft, or any other act of dishonesty? ❑ Yes ❑ No No = 5 points Yes = subtract 5 points 15. If your firm was required to pay a premium of more than one percent (1%) for a performance and payment bond on any project(s) on which your firm worked at any time during the last three years, state the percentage that your firm was required to pay. You may provide an explanation for a percentage rate higher than one per cent, if you wish to do so. 5 points if the rate is no more than I% 3 points if the rate was no higher than 9.10 % 0 points for any other answer 30 16. During the last five years, has your firm ever been denied bond credit by a surety company, or has there ever been a period of time when your firm had no surety bond in place during a public construction project when one was required? ❑ Yes ❑ No No = 5 points Yes = 0 points 0.rM1 Questions about Compliance with Safety, Workers Compensation, Prevailing Wage and Apprenticeship Laws 1. Has CAL OSHA cited and assessed penalties against Contractor for any "serious," "willful" or "repeat" violations of its safety or health regulations in the past five years? Note: If you have filed an appeal of a citation and the Occupational Safety and Health Appeals Board has not yet ruled on your appeal, you need not include information about it. ❑ Yes ❑ No If the Contractor's average gross revenues for the last three years were less than $50 million, scoring is as follows: 5 points for either "No" or "Yes" indicating 1 such instance 3 points for "Yes" indicating 2 such instances 0 points for "Yes" if more than 2 such instances If the Contractor's average gross revenues for the last three years were more than $50 million, scoring is as follows: 5 points for either "No" or "Yes" indicating 1, 2, or 3 such instances 3 points for "Yes" indicating either 4 or 5 such instances 0 points for "Yes" if more than 5 such instances 2. Has the Federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration cited and assessed penalties against Contractor in the past five years? 31 Note: If you have filed an appeal of a citation and the appropriate appeals Board has not yet ruled on your appeal, you need not include information about it. ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, attach a separate signed page describing each citation. If the Contractor's average gross revenues for the last three years were less than $50 million, scoring is as follows: 5 points for either "No" or "Yes"indicating 1 such instance 3 points for "Yes" indicating 2 such instances 0 points for "Yes" or if more than 2 such instances If the Contractor's average gross revenues for the last three years were more than $50 million, scoring is as follows: 5 points for either "No" or "Yes" indicating 9, 2, or 3 such instances 3 points for "Yes" indicating either 4 or 5 such instances 0 points for "Yes" if more than 5 such instances 3. Has the EPA or any Air Quality Management District or any Regional Water Quality Control Board cited and assessed penalties against either your firm or the owner of a project on which your firm was the contractor, in the past five years? Note: If you have filed an appeal of a citation and the Appeals Board has not yet ruled on your appeal, or if there is a court appeal pending, you need not include information about the citation. ❑ Yes ❑ No If the firm's average gross revenues for the last three years were less than $50 million, scoring is as follows: 5 points for either "No" or "Yes" indicating 1 such instance 3 points for "Yes" indicating 2 such instances 0 points for "Yes" or if more than 2 such instances If the firm's average gross revenues for the last three years were more than $50 million, scoring is as follows: 32 5 points for either "No" or "Yes" indicating 1, 2, or 3 such instances 3 points for "Yes" indicating either 4 or 5 such instances 0 points for "Yes" if more than 5 such instances 4. How often does Contractor require documented safety meetings to be held for construction employees and field supervisors during the course of a project? 5 points for an answer of once each week or more often 0 points for any other answer 5. List your firm's Experience Modification Rate (EMR) (California workers' compensation insurance) for each of the past three (3) premium years: Note: An Experience Modification Rate is issued to your firm annually by your workers' compensation insurance carrier. Current year: Previous year: Year prior to previous year: If the EMR for any of these three (3) years is or was 1.00 or higher, you may attach a letter of explanation. Note: An Experience Modification Rate is issued to your firm annually by your workers' compensation insurance carrier. 5 points for three-year average EMR of 0.95 or less 3 points for three-year average of EMR of more than 0.95 but no more than 1.00 0 points for any other EMR 6. Within the last five (5) years, has there ever been a period when Contractor had employees but was without workers' compensation insurance or state -approved self-insurance? ❑ Yes ❑ No 33 5 points for either "No" or "Yes" indicating 1 such instance 0 points for any other answer 7. Has there been more than one occasion during the last five (5) years on which Contractor was required to pay either back wages or penalties for your own firm's failure to comply with the State's prevailing wage laws? ❑ Yes ❑ No Note: This question refers only to your own firm's violation of prevailing wage laws, not to violations of the prevailing wage laws by a subcontractor. If your firm's average gross revenues for the last three years were less than $50 million, scoring is as follows: 5 points for either "No," or "Yes" indicating either 1 or 2 such instance 3 points for "Yes" indicating 3 such instances 0 points for "Yes" and more than 3 such instances If your firm's average gross revenues for the last three years were more than $50 million, scoring is as follows: 5 points for either "No" or "Yes" indicating no more than 4 such instances 3 points for "Yes" indicating either 5 or 6 such instances 0 points for "Yes" and more than 6 such instances 8. During the last five (5) years, has there been more than one occasion on which Contractor has been penalized or required to pay back wages for failure to comply with the Federal Davis -Bacon prevailing wage requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No If your firm's average gross revenues for the last three years were less than $50 million, scoring is as follows: 5 points for either "No, " or "Yes" indicating either 1 or 2 such instance 3 points for "Yes" indicating 3 such instances 0 points for "Yes" and more than 3 such instances 34 If your firm's average gross revenues for the last three years were more than $50 million, scoring is as follows: 5 points for either "No" or "Yes" indicating no more than 4 such instances 3 points for "Yes" indicating either 5 or 6 such instances 0 points for "Yes" and more than 6 such instances 9. Provide the name, address and telephone number of the apprenticeship program sponsor(s) (approved by the California Division of Apprenticeship Standards) that will provide apprentices to your company for use on any public work project for which you are awarded a contract by the City. 5 points if at least one approved apprenticeship program is listed 0 points for any other answer 10. If Contractor operates its own State -approved apprenticeship program: a. Identify the craft or crafts in which your firm provided apprenticeship training in the past year. b. State the year in which each such apprenticeship program was approved, and attach evidence of the most recent California Apprenticeship Council approval(s) of your apprenticeship program(s). c. State the number of individuals who were employed by your firm as apprentices at any time during the past three years in each apprenticeship and the number of persons who, during the past three years, completed apprenticeships in each craft while employed by your firm. 5 points if one or more persons completed an approved apprenticeship while employed by your firm 0 points if no persons completed an approved apprenticeship while employer by your firm 35 11. . At any time during the last five (5) years, has Contractor been found to have violated any provision of California apprenticeship laws or regulations, or the laws pertaining to use of apprentices on public works? Note: You may omit reference to any incident that occurred prior to January 1, 1998 if the violation was by a subcontractor and your firm, as general contractor on a project, had no knowledge of the subcontractor's violation at the time they occurred. ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, provide the date(s) of such findings, and attach copies of the Department's final decision(s). If your firm's average gross revenues for the last three years were less than $50 million, scoring is as follows: 5 points for either "No," or "Yes" indicating either 1 or 2 such instance 3 points for "Yes" indicating 3 such instances 0 points for "Yes" and more than 3 such instances If your firm's average gross revenues for the last three years were more than $50 million, scoring is as follows: & points for either "No" or "Yes" indicating no more than 4 such instances 3 points for "Yes" indicating either 5 or 6 such instances 0 points for "Yes" and more than 6 such instances Part III Reference Interview Questions The following questions will be used to interview selected contacts from at least two projects that have been completed by the Contractor. The City may conduct the interviews at the City's own discretion. No action on the contractor's part will be necessary. These questions are included in the package given to the contractor for information purposes only. The highest possible score for each interview is 110 points. A score of less than 88 points on either interview will automatically disqualify the Contractor from further consideration. 36 1. Provide a brief description of the project. 2. Are there any outstanding stop notices, liens, or claims by Contractor that are currently unresolved on contracts for which a notice of completion was recorded more than 120 days ago? (1 point for each is deducted from the overall score; maximum amount to be deducted is 5 points). 3. On a scale of 1-10, with 10 being the best, did Contractor provide adequate personnel to successfully complete the work? (Maximum 10 points). 4. On a scale of 1-10, with 10 being the best, did Contractor provide adequate supervision to successfully complete the work? (Maximum 10 points). 5. On a scale of 1-10, with 10 being the best, did Contractor provide adequate equipment to successfully complete the work? (Maximum 10 points). 6. On a scale of 1-10, with 10 being the best, was Contractor timely in providing reports and other paperwork, including change order paperwork, scheduling updates and close-out documents? (Maximum 10 points). 7. On a scale of 1-10, with 10 being the best, did Contractor adhere to the project schedule that your agency approved? (Maximum 10 points). 8. Was the project completed on time? (10 points is the answer is "Yes"). If the answer is "No," on a scale of 1-10, with 10 being the best, to what extent was Contractor responsible for the delay in completion? (Award appropriate points). 9. On a scale of 1-10, with 10 being the best, rate Contractor on the timely submission of reasonable cost and time estimates to perform change order work. (Maximum 10 points). 10. On a scale of 1-10, with 10 being the best, rate Contractor on how well Contractor performed the work after a change order was issued, and how well Contractor integrated the change order work into the existing work. (Maximum 10 points). 11. On a scale of 1-10 with 10 meaning little or none, rate Contractor on whether there were an unusually high number of claims, given the nature of the project, or unusual difficulty in resolving them. (Maximum 10 points). 12. On a scale of 1-10, 10 being the best, rate Contractor with respect to the timely payments by Contractor to either subcontractors or suppliers. (Maximum 10 points). 13. On a scale of 1-10, with 10 being the best, how would you rate the quality of the work overall? (Maximum 10 points). 37