Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItems DistributedCFD 18-01 Formation Overview • Community Facilities Districts (CFDs) are special taxing districts used at Tustin Legacy for: • Major backbone infrastructure improvements (Tax A) • Essential ongoing services (Tax B) • Police • Fire & life safety • Recreation programs • Parkiparkway maintenance • Rood/storm protection • Street/sidewalk maintenance March 7, 2018 Why are CFDs Needed? PROPERTY TAX SHARE ■ Property Tax Share Tustin Leq-y CFD History • City Council adopted Mello -Roos Goals and Policies forTustin Legacy in 2004 • Five CFDs have been formed to date: • CFD 04-0-1 (Tustin Field I and II) • Tax A and B • CFD o6 -o1 (Villages of Columbus) Tax A and B • CFD 07-01 (The District) • Tax A and B • CFD 13-a1(FLIGHT, The Village, TUSD Middle/High School, Amalfi, Anton Legacy) • Tax B only • CFD 14-o1(Greenwood) • Tax A and B Existing CFD Map lot, CFD 13-01. • City Council created CFD -.3-01 to: • Fund services for projects that may not have incorporated a Tax A • Save time and costs associated with CFD formations • Tustin Legacy plan has evolved since 2013 to include uses not considered in CFD 13-01 • Hotels • Separate types of commercial uses • New CFD needed to account for known and unknown future land uses 00 Victory Park Fire Station #37 CFD 18 -os: ImprovementArea(s) • CFD 18-o1 will be broken up into "ImprovementAreas" • Project -specific Rate and Method of Apportionments (RMA) • Improvement Area No. is Levity (Lot ig/Disposition Package 6B) • Balance of CFD 3.8-o:1 is "Future Annexation Parcels" that are not being liened at this time, but may (or may not) be in the future • Reasoning • Ensure services cost recovery on a project -by -project basis • CFD formation cost and time savings • Maximum flexibility in the future • Future Improvement Areas • Each project will generate its own RMA and require Council approval CFD 18-o1: Improvement Area No. 1 • Improvement Area No. 1: Levity at Tustin Legacy • Levity: 21.8 units • Flats • Single Family Detached • Townhomes • CFD agreed to in DDA and DA CFD Formation Schedule • March 7 • Accept Petition to form CFD • Resolution designating Improvement Area No. :1 • April 17 • Public hearing • Fiscal impacts presentation • De -annexation of CFD'3-01 • CFD 18-o1 election ordinance • May 1 • 2nd reading of ordinance • May 31 • CFD in effect Recommendations Staff recommends that the Council: • Approve and Ratify the Petition to Create a Community Facilities District requested by the landowner (City) signed by the Deputy City Manager as the authorized agent of the City Adopt Resolution No. 18-15, a resolution designating Improvement Area No. 1 of CFD 18-o1 and authorizing the levy of a special tax within said Improvement Area 3/6/2018 Preferential Permit Parking Old Town Residential Area City Council — March 7, 2018 ................ BACKGROUND Many vehicles parked on Old Town residential streets. Vehicles frequently obstruct sidewalks and driveways. Individuals from other areas park in front of homes. Illegal construction and conversions to living units. Second units, new condominiums, etc. exacerbate the demand for on -street parking in Old Town. RECOMMENDATION ----------- -------------- ----- That the City Council: Introduce and have first reading of Ordinance No. 1494; o Set the second reading for March 20, 2o18; and ► Adopt Resolution No. 38-14, approving the Policy and Procedures and establishing a permit fee. lip! Preferential Permit Parking Old Town Residential Area ' City Council —March 7,20 18 3/6/2018 3 `TY � Mid -Year FY 2017-18 - TUSTIN H ISTORY BUILDING OUR FUTURE HONORING OUR PAST FY 17118 Mid -Year General Fund • Projected General Fund Revenue June 30, 2018 • Mid -Year FY17118 projected revenue is $61,402,696 • 4.5% or $2,621,866 greater than the amended budget: $58,780,830 Major contributors to this change in revenues: • Increase in Property Tax in lieu of VLF: $871,500 Increase in Property Tax: $431,200 Increase in Sates Tax: $438,500 FY 17118 Mid -Year General Fund Cont. Planned Use of Excess Reserves CltyAttomey City Manager Economic City Clerk 550,000 - 702,342 Development City Council $70,3841% 1% 1% 1,278,446 42,600 Finance 2% <1% 1,513,645 2% Non -Departmental _. Human Resources 8,452,222 944,601 12% 1% Parks and Recreation Community 4,041,790 Development 6% PubRt Warks 3,875,752 11,893,121 6% 17% Fire services 7,476,100 11% Polite Services 28,062,851 40% GF Projected Expenditure: $69,403,904 5 FY 17118 Mid -Year General Fund Cont. FY 2017-2018 Adopted Budget Balanced Budget Transferin $1,704,500 Planned Use of Excess Reserves $1,191,495 Revenue $57,076,330 Expenditures ($59,972,325) Transfer Out $0 $0 FY 2017-2018 Midyear Budget Balanced Budget Transferin $1,704,500 Planned Use of Excess Reserves E$8,001,208 Revenue $59,698,196 Expenditures ($62,825,881) Transfer Out ($6,578,0233 $0 6 FY 17118 Mid -Year General Fund Cont. • Projected Year End Fund Balance Mid -Year budget: $21,989,058 • 35% of General Fund Expenditures (excludes one- time transfers) • Necessary for cash-flow • Meets the City Council reserve policy of 20% General Fund reserve • Future policy consideration: • Setup an automatically transfer of excess reserves towards pre -payment or pre -funding pension & oPEB liabilities FY 17/18 Mid -Year General Fund Cont. • Residual Property Taxes • AB X1 26 & AB 1484 Distribution of Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (formerly tax increment) Pass-through payments County administrative fees ROPS enforceable obligations Successor agency administrative cost allowance (3% of ROPS or $250,000) Any remaining amounts (residual) will be distributed to all taxing entities • Enforceable obligation for FY 2017-18: $4,420,676 • Enforceable obligation for FY 2018-19: $4,181,176 10 61 FY 17118 Mid -Year — All Funds Cont. • Increased expenditures • General Fund: Approve supplemental appropriation of $6,578,023 for unfunded liabilities. General Fund: Approve supplemental appropriation of $82,575 for City Net Contract. Street Lighting Fund: Approve supplemental appropriation of $40,000 for streetlight repair & maint. • Worker's Comp. Fund: Approve supplemental appropriation of $15,943 for insurance premiums. • Liability Fund: Approve supplemental appropriation of $1,439,563 for claims paid. Capital Projects Fund: Approve supplemental appropriation of $156,000 PD property room HVAC. 13 FY 17118 Mid -Year — All Funds Cont. Increased expenditures CFD 06-1 Fund: Approve supplemental appropriation of $80,034 for Legacy Ave extension. CFD 07-1 Fund: Approve supplemental appropriation of $141,561 for Park Ave improvement. Tustin Housing Authority Fund: Approve supplemental appropriation of $20,980 for affordable housing activity. 14 7 CITY OF TUSTIN DATE: March 7, 2018 TO: Jeffery Parker, City Manager Inter -Com FROM: David Wilson, Director, Parks and Recreation Services SUBJECT: Tustin Tiller Days Carnival Agreement Please review the past agreement terms for the Tustin Tiller Days carnival operator. The proposed agreement improves the terms for the event as related to carnival ride revenue and game and food concessions. I appreciate the opportunity to communicate the improved terms for your review. Prior Carnival Operator Agreement terms: Shamrock 2012 — Operator agrees to pay City twenty-five percent (25%) of the Gross Receipts up to eighty thousand dollars ($80,000), and twenty-nine percent (29%) of all Gross Receipts beyond eighty thousand dollars ($80,000), up to one- hundred and five thousand dollars ($105,000), and thirty-three percent (33%) of Gross Receipts beyond one hundred and five thousand dollars ($105,000) $250 per game booth $450 per food wagon Brass Ring Amusements 2015 — Operator agrees to pay City twenty- five percent (25%) of the Gross Receipts up to eighty thousand dollars ($80,000) and thirty percent (30%) of all Gross Receipts beyond eighty thousand dollars ($80,000), up to one hundred and five thousand dollars ($105,000), and thirty-three percent (33%) of Gross Receipts beyond one hundred and five thousand dollars ($105,000) $300 per game booth $500 per food wagon G&S SHOWS 2018 — Operator agrees to pay the City twenty- seven percent (27%) of the Gross Receipts up to seventy- five thousand dollars ($75,000), and thirty-one percent (31 %) of all Gross Receipts beyond seventy- five thousand dollars ($75,000), up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), and thirty- three percent (33%) of Gross Receipts beyond one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) $350 per game booth $550 per food wagon From: Reekstin, Scott Sent: Wednesday, March 7, 2018 8:29 AM To: Woodward, Carrie Cc: Rabe, Erica Subject: FW: FW: Requesting Update on Parking Impact Study, From: John Garay [ Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2018 10:51 PM To: Reekstin, Scott Cc: Saldivar, Krys Subject: Re: FW: Requesting Update on Parking Impact Study. Good Morning, I am checking back in hopes that the parking study south of the 5 freeway is now completed and see what the time table is for our area and the sycamore gardens community. In the time since the Del Almo Permit parking was established and the Newport Ave Cul de sac was converted, what ever relieve has slowly gone away. Some unintended consequences is that it has made it easier for people to leave their cars far beyond the 72 hour parking limit or leave them during street sweeping hours, Enclosed is a picture of the street at 1 pm on a Saturday and now has become the norm by 5pm on a weekday. What makes this situation now a bit dangerous is that you people who will wait in the middle of the street to see if anyone will move, blocking other cars traveling down that street. I've finished watching the City Council Meeting on February 20 that included Multi Family housing united and the attorney generals recommendation to include them. That being said I hope that the wishes of the people from Sycamore gardens {which covers Sycamore and Newport street. and a few single family units on sycamore street who were left out of the del amo permit process might be able to make some progress on this matter. over the last year I've been hearing from neighbors who have lived here 10- 20 years that they can't take it anymore and will have to sell at some point. Our neighbors who lived with us since 2004 and didn't want to sell were forced to and in their place moved in more people with more cars. Which brings me to the next topic, there's a recursive loop to this problem in the form of homes being sold and the new owners being a large family or group of people paying the mortgage as a group. Were once two people with two cars lived, now 6 people in a two bedroom live with 5 cars. I imagine that its something that is happening all over the city and with no shuttles besides the scattered bus system you have people who have extra cars to just go to the store or as a back up car. Thank you for your time, John Garay htti2s://oag.ca.gov/system/files/opinions/pdfs/14-304 I.pdf P.S In our talks about Pasadena street its clear that any change in permit parking shifts cars around. If this image can be shown at the meeting on 317 as proof that the surrounding areas won't be able to take the additional load which is why I'm asking again for our property to have permit parking. PARKING NOTICE OF ACTION Come to the City Council Meeting Weds 3-7-17 7pm by the Police Station The City of Tustin should simplify its policy and issue residential parking stickers to each of the registered vehicles of homeowners. Tustin's most recent permit parking zone includes six streets between Nissan Road and Mitchell Avenue, west of Utt Drive and east of Carfax Avenue. And now, in 2018, they want to expand this to Old Town and other areas. Tustin's residential permit program must be changed. it has overreached its goal. It goes far beyond solving the initial problem by inconveniencing and punishing homeowners. Homeowners are faced with daily hassle and worry about fines as they shuttle their cars around their driveways in an attempt to comply with the rules. The wrong-headed city says homeowners "should" keep their garages clear for two cars, and their driveways clear for two more — and only once that has been certified will they issue a permit for a fifth or sixth vehicle. The reality is, today's cars and trucks are longer and wider than in earlier days, and most ordinary homeowners in these modestly sized 1500 sq ft homes can't keep their garages and driveways free from normal "stuff," and so cannot meet the test for a permanent street permit. So since we can't jump through the hoops the city requires, we are forced to move cars around each night like chess pieces before the nightly "curfew" so that we can accommodate our spouses' schedules with the minivan, long truck or cars at that time and the following morning. The solution is a very simple and fair, and is used by cities like Costa Mesa, Santa Ana, San Diego and Sacramento — by 90% of jurisdictions that require residential permits. This solution is to issue a sticker— possibly with a barcode and unique number - upon confirmation of vehicle registration for each vehicle at a home and apply it to the bumper or window. Then, we homeowners regain our freedom and the full and proper use of our homes, driveways and the curbside parking that our taxes help support. In summary: The current system solves the initial problem in an unfairly burdensome way. • The current solution is unusual —most other jurisdictions choose the simple solution we also want. • The best choice is a sticker for each registered car for each household. Share this with your neighbors and friends. Tell them to call and email Mayor Allan Bernstein at (714) 573-3012 and abernstein@tustinca.org and the City Council at CityCouncil@tustinca.org and demand action! Questions: Your concerned neighbor- Duncan Millar m( For more information, suggested book list or to make a donation go to: tustincommunityfoundation.orglbooks # Books4tusd Reading Reading develops develops p the mind the imagination F7 Reading is fundamental for success In-kind sponsor: 1-5 Storage ALT Nonprofit Tax ID# 23-7060661 1 TCF Nonproft Tax ID# 33-0558228