Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05 APPROVAL OF PRE-QUALIFIED GENERAL CONTRACTORS & ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 18-31 TO APPROVE PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS FOR BIDS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF VETERANS SPORTS PARK AT TUSTIN LEGACY PARK IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT, CIP NO. 20043AGENDA REPORT �trg►t1 MEETING DATE: MAY 1, 2018 TO: JEFFREY C. PARKER, CITY MANAGER Agenda Item 5 Reviewed: City Manager Finance Director FROM: DOUGLAS S. STACK, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS \ CITY ENGINEER SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF PRE -QUALIFIED GENERAL CONTRACTORS AND ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 18-31 TO APPROVE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR BIDS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF VETERANS SPORTS PARK AT TUSTIN LEGACY PARK IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT, CIP NO. 20043 SUMMARY The general contractors for construction of Veterans Sports Park at Tustin Legacy Park Improvements Project, CIP No. 20043 have been pre -qualified and are ready to be approved as eligible to bid the project. Also, the plans and specifications for the Veterans Sports Park at Tustin Legacy Park Improvements Project, CIP No. 20043 are being finalized and ready to bid mid-June pending final approval of the Project Environmental Review Form (PERF) T-012 and applicable portions of plans and specifications pertaining to the PERF by the Department of the Navy and City Engineer. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Approve the eligible pre -qualified general contractors as identified to bid the construction of the Veterans Sports Park at Tustin Legacy Park Improvements Project, CIP No. 20043. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 18-31 approving the plans and specifications for construction of the Veterans Sports Park at Tustin Legacy Park Improvements Project, CIP No. 20043, and authorize the City Clerk to advertise to receive bids from the seven (7) pre -qualified general contractors. FISCAL IMPACT Sufficient funds have been budgeted and appropriated in this Fiscal Year 2017-2018 Capital Improvement Program for the project. The engineer's estimate for the park improvements project is $16,000,000. The project is funded through a combination of sources that include MCAS Backbone Fees (Fund 187), MCAS Tax Allocation Bonds (Fund 561) and Park Development Fees (Fund 132). CORRELATION TO THE STRATEGIC PLAN The park improvements for the Veterans Sports Park at Tustin Legacy, CIP No. 20043 contributes to the fulfillment of the City's Strategic Plan Goal A: Economic and Neighborhood Development. Specifically, the project implementation of Strategy 1, which among other items is to complete the Master Plan for Tustin Legacy and Strategy 6, which is to assess and to explore opportunities for expanded recreational activities. Plans and Specifications Approval for Veterans Sports Park Improvements May 1, 2018 Page 2 BACKGROUND Pursuant to Public Contract Code 20101, on December 19, 2017 the City Council approved a pre - qualification package for general contractors, utilizing a pre -qualification process modeled after the California Department of Industrial Relations guidelines, for construction of the Veterans Sports Park at Tustin Legacy Park Improvements Project. The pre -qualification procedure was selected for the construction of the Veterans Sports Park at Tustin Legacy Park Improvements Project due to the very specialized nature of construction. Construction scheduling may prove difficult and will require significantly more expertise in coordination and facilitation of project progress. The City Council approved pre -qualification package is attached for reference. The pre -qualification questionnaire consisted of three (3) parts: Part I - Requirements for Qualification, Part II - Organization, History, Organizational Performance and Compliance with Civil and Criminal Laws and Part III - Recent Park Construction Projects Completed. Each of the above Parts included numerical, scorable questions as well as a series of "yes" and "no" questions. In Part I the criteria indicates that a contractor will be immediately disqualified if the answer to any of the questions #1 through #5 is "no". The majority of contractors successfully completed the scorable questions in the pre -qualification package. However, Part III included a requirement (Item No. 39) to provide information about completed projects and comparable projects, which some of the contractors did not provide the minimum requirement information. Specifically, Item No. 39 required a contractor to provide information about its three (3) most comparable park construction projects all of which must have been successfully completed within the last seven (7) years. The projects identified by respondents had to be in California, comparable in scope and quality with the Project, and with a contract value of at least $10,000,000. Whether a respondent was determined pre -qualified was based upon scores achieved by assigning point values to completed responses in the three (3) parts described above, and complete, affirmative responses to the "yes" and "no" questions. A passing score in Part I was 64 out of 80 possible points, Part II was 44 out of 55 possible points, and Part III was 88 out of a possible 110 points. On March 1, 2018, the City received submittals under the pre -qualification process from fifteen (15) general contractors for this project. As a result of review of the stipulated essential requirements for qualification and analysis completed by gkkWorks and City staff, it has been determined that seven (7) of the fifteen (15) general contractors have successfully met the minimum requirements of pre - qualification for this project, and will be eligible to bid when this project is advertised for bid. The list of the eligible pre -qualified general contractors is as follows: • Angeles Contractor, Inc. • BrightView Landscape Development Inc. • Byrom -Davey, Inc. • P.H. Hagopian Contractor, Inc. • Los Angeles Engineering, Inc. • Ohno Construction Company • Pinner Construction Company, Inc. As identified in the original Request for Pre -Qualification, the pre -qualification packages (respondent questionnaire answers and financial statements) submitted by prospective contractors are not public records and are not open to public inspection. All information provided is kept confidential to the extent permitted by law. However, the contents may be disclosed to third parties Plans and Specifications Approval for Veterans Sports Park Improvements May 1, 2018 Page 3 for purpose of verification, or investigation of substantial allegations, or in an appeal hearing. State law requires that names of contractors applying for pre -qualification status shall be public record subject to disclosure, and the first page of the questionnaire is used for that purpose. A list of those general contractors that were not determined qualified based on the adopted Request for Pre - Qualification are also attached. As set forth on the Prequalification package, two (2) contractors did not meet the Part II required minimum passing score of 44 and in the past 5 years has court litigations. Four (4) contractors did not meet the minimum project experience criteria required. Specifically, the 3 projects listed were not all park improvements related construction and did not meet the minimum $10,000,000 project size. And two (2) contractors did not meet the minimum project experience criteria required and in the past 5 years has court litigations claim. The construction effort for the entire park improvements project is segregated into two phases. The grading phase of this project consists of grading, storm drain, water, reclaimed water and sanitary sewer installation. That phase of the construction was awarded to Sukut Construction, LLC, on October 3, 2017 and is nearing completion. The park improvements phase will complete the construction of the Veteran's Memorial monument, sports fields, sports courts, restroom buildings, walkways and site amenities. The tentative schedule for construction of the project is as follows: • Authorization to Advertise for Bids .......... • First Legal Advertisement ....................... • Second Legal Advertisement ................. • Bid Opening ............................................ • Tentative Award of Contract ................... • Tentative Start Construction ................... • Estimated Completion of Construction ... Dotr s 7.Stack, P.E. Di f Public Works/City Engineer ..05/01/2018 ................................................... 06/14/2018 ................................................... 06/21/2018 ................................................... 07/17/2018 ................................................... 08/07/2018 ................................................... 09/04/2018 ...................................................09/01 /2019 Attachment 1: City Council Approved Pre -Qualification Questionnaire Attachment 2: List of Contractors Not Determined Qualified Attachment 3: Resolution No. 18-31 Attachment 4: Location Map S:\City Council Items\2018 Council Items\05-01-2018\Approval of Prequalified & Approved P & S for Veterans Sports Park, CIP 20043Wpproval of Prequalified Contractors & Approve P & S for Veterans Sports Park, CIP 20043.docx ATTACHMENT 1 City Council Approved Pre -Qualification Questionnaire PRE -QUALIFICATION QUESTIONNAIRE CONTACT INFORMATION Firm Name: (As it appears on license) Check One: ❑ Corporation ❑ Partnership ❑ Sole Proprietor ❑ LLC/LLP Contact Person: Address: Phone: E -Mail: If firm is a sole proprietor or partnership: Owner(s) of Company Contractor's License Number(s): 0 Fax: REQUIREMENTS FOR QUALIFICATION Contractor will be immediately disqualified if the answer to any of questions 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 is "NO". 1 Contractor will be immediately disqualified if the answer to any of questions 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 is "YES". 2 If the answer to question 8 is "YES", and if debarment would be the sole reason for denial of pre -qualification, any pre -qualification issued will exclude the debarment period. Contractor possesses a valid and current California "A" Contractors License for the project for which it intends to submit a bid. ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. Contractor has a commercial liability insurance policy with a policy limit of at least $2,000,000 per occurrence, commercial automobile insurance with a limit of at least $2,000,000 per occurrence, and California workers' compensation insurance with a limit of at least $1,000,000. Contractor's insurers are authorized to do business in the State of California by the Department of Insurance and meet the following qualifications: A.M. Best's Key Rating of Grade A and Class VII (seven) (if an Admitted Insurer), and Grade A- or better and Class X (ten) or better (if offered by a. Surplus Line Broker). Workers' compensation insurance rated Grade B- or better and Class VII (seven) or better, or offered by the State Compensation Fund. ❑ Yes ❑ No 3. Contractor has current workers' compensation insurance policy as required by the California Labor Code or is legally self-insured pursuant to Labor Code section 3700 et. seq. ❑ Yes ❑ No 7 A "NO" answer to Question 4 will not be disqualifying if the contractor is exempt from complying with Question 4, for reasons explained in footnote 3. A contractor disqualified solely because of a "YES" answer given to question 6, 7, 9, or 10 may appeal the disqualification and provide an explanation of the relevant circumstances during the appeal procedure. 7 4. Have you attached your latest copy of a reviewed or audited financial statement with accompanying notes and supplemental information? 3 ❑ Yes ❑ No Note: A financial statement that is not either reviewed or audited is not acceptable. A letter verifying availability of a line of credit may also be attached; however, it will be considered as supplemental information only, and is not a substitute for the required financial statement. 5. Have you attached a notarized statement from an admitted surety insurer (approved by the California Department of Insurance) and authorized to issue bonds in the State of California, which states: (a) that your current bonding capacity is sufficient for the project for which you seek pre -qualification; and (b) your current available bonding capacity? 4 ❑ Yes ❑ No Note: Notarized statement must be from the surety company, not an agent or broker. 6. Has your contractor's license been revoked at any time in the last five (5) years? ❑ Yes ❑ No 7. Has a surety firm completed a contract on your behalf, or paid for completion because your firm was default terminated by the project owner within the last five (5) years? ❑ Yes ❑ No 8. At the time of submitting this pre -qualification form, is your firm ineligible to bid on or be awarded a public works contract, or perform as a subcontractor on a public works contract, pursuant to either Labor Code section 1777.1 or Labor Code section 1777.7? ❑ Yes ❑ No 3 Public Contract Code Section 20101(e) exempts from this requirement a contractor who has qualified as a small business pursuant to Government Code section 14837(d)(1), if the bid is "no more than 25 percent of the qualifying amount provided in section 14837(4)(1)." As of January 1, 2001, the qualifying amount is $10 million, and 25 percent of that amount, therefore, is $2.5 million. 4 An additional notarized statement from the surety may be requested by City at the time of submission of a bid, if this pre -qualification package is submitted more than 60 days prior to submission. of the bid. F] If the answer is "Yes," state the beginning and ending dates of the period of debarment: 9. At any time during the last five years, has your firm or any of its owners or officers been convicted of a crime involving the awarding of a contract of a government construction project, or the bidding or performance of a government contract? ❑ Yes ❑ No 10. At the time of submission of this pre -qualification package, is your firm, or any subsidiary, parent, holding company or affiliate, or any of their respective owners, partners, or officers a plaintiff in an active lawsuit against the City or any of its agencies? ❑ Yes ❑ No Note: For this question, "owner" and "partner" refer to ownership of ten percent or more of the business, or ten percent or more of its stock, if the business is a corporation. E PART II ORGANIZATION, HISTORY, ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE, AND COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL AND CRIMINAL LAWS A. Current Organization and Structure of the Business For Contractors that are Corporations: 1 a. Date incorporated: 1 b. Under the laws of what State: 1 c. Provide all the following information for each person who is either (a) an officer of the corporation (president, vice president, secretary, treasurer), or (b) the owner of at least ten percent of the corporation's stock. Name Position Years with % Company Ownership 1 d. Identify every construction firm that any person listed above has been associated with (as owner, general partner, limited partner or officer) at any time during the last five (5) years. Note: For this question, "owner" and "partner" refer to ownership of ten percent or more of the business, or ten percent (10%) or more of its stock, if the business is a corporation. Person's NameI Construction Firm Dates of Person's Participation with Firm 10 For Contractors that are Partnerships: 1 a. Date of formation: 1 b. Under the laws of what State: 1 c. Provide all the following information for each partner who owns ten percent (10%) or more of the firm. Name Position Years with Company % Ownership 1 d. Identify every construction company that any partner has been associated with (as owner, general partner, limited partner or officer) at any time during the last five years. Note: For this question, "owner' and "partner" refer to ownership of ten percent or more of the business, or ten percent or more of its stock, if the business is a corporation. Person's Name Construction Company Dates of Person's Participation with Companv For Contractors that are Sole Proprietorships: 1 a. Date of commencement of business: 1 b. Social security number of company owner: 1 c. Identify every construction firm that the business owner has been associated with (as owner, general partner, limited partner or officer) at any time during the last five (5) years. 11 Note: For this question, "owner" and "partner" refer to ownership of ten percent or more of the business, or ten percent or more of its stock, if the business is a corporation. Person's Name Construction Company Dates of Person's Participation with Companv For Contractors that Intend to Make a Bid as Part of a Joint Venture: 1 a. Date of commencement of joint venture: 1 b. Provide all of the following information for each firm that is a member of the joint venture that expects to bid on one or more projects: Name of Company Firm % Ownership of Joint Venture B. History of the Business and Organizational Performance 2. Has there been any change in ownership of the Contractor at any time during the last three (3) years? Note: A corporation whose shares are publicly traded is not required to answer this question. ❑ Yes ❑ No If "yes," explain on a separate Signed page. 3. Is the Contractor a subsidiary, parent, holding company or affiliate of another firm? Note: Include information about other firms if one firm owns 50 percent or more of another, or if an owner, partner, or officer of your firm holds a similar position in another firm. 12 ❑ Yes ❑ No If "yes," explain on a separate signed page. 4. Are any corporate officers, partners or owners connected to any other firms? Note: Include information about other firms if an owner, partner, or officer of your firm holds a similar position in another firm. ❑ Yes ❑ No If "yes," explain on a separate signed page. 5. State Contractor's gross revenues for each of the last three years: 6. How many years has Contractor been in business in California as a contractor under your present business name and license number? Years 7. Is Contractor currently the debtor in a bankruptcy case? ❑ Yes ❑ No If "yes," please attach a copy of the bankruptcy petition, showing the case number, and the date on which the petition was filed. 8. Was Contractor in bankruptcy at any time during the last five years? (This question refers only to a bankruptcy action that was not described in answer to question 7, above) ❑ Yes ❑ No If "yes," please attach a copy of the bankruptcy petition, showing the case number and the date on which the petition was filed, and a copy of the Bankruptcy Court's discharge order, or of any other document that ended the case, if no discharge order was issued. Licenses 9. Provide copies of and list all California construction license numbers, classifications and expiration dates of the California contractor licenses held by Contractor: 13 10. If any of Contractor's, license(s) are held in the name of a corporation or partnership, list below the names of the qualifying individual(s) listed on the Contractors State License Board (CSLB) records who meet(s) the experience and examination requirements for each license. 11. Has Contractor changed names or license number in the past five (5) years? ❑ Yes ❑ No If "yes," explain on a separate signed page, including the reason for the change. 12. Has any owner, partner or officer of Contractor operated a construction firm under any other name in the last five (5) years? If "yes," explain on a separate signed page, including the reason for the change. 13. Has any CSLB license held by Contractor or its Responsible Managing Employee (RME) or Responsible Managing Officer (RMO) been suspended within the last five years? ❑ Yes ❑ No If "yes," please explain on a separate signed sheet. Disputes 14. At any time in the last five (5) years has Contractor been assessed liquidated damages after completion of a project under a construction contract with either a public or private owner? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, explain on a separate signed page, identifying all such projects by owner, owner's address, the date of completion of the project, amount of liquidated damages assessed and all other information necessary to fully explain the assessment of liquidated damages. 14 15. In the last five (5) years has Contractor, or any firm with which any Contractor's owners, officers or partners was associated with, been debarred, disqualified, removed or otherwise prevented from bidding on, or completing, any government agency or public works project for any reason or settled a dispute with any government agency by in part agreeing not to bid on future aublic works oroiects involving that government agency? Note: "Associated with" refers to another construction firm in which an owner, partner or officer of your firm held a similar position, and which is listed in response to question 1 c or 1 d above. ❑ Yes ❑ No If "yes," explain on a separate signed page. State whether the firm involved was the Contractor applying for pre -qualification here or another firm. Identify by name of the company, the name of the person within your firm who was associated with that company, the year of the event, the owner of the project, the project and the basis for the action. 16. In the last five (5) years has Contractor been denied an award of a public works contract based on a finding by a public agency that Contractor was not a responsible bidder? ❑ Yes ❑ No If "yes," explain on a separate signed page. Identify the year of the event, the owner, the project and the basis for the finding by the public agency. Note: The following two questions refer only to disputes between Contractor and the owner of a project. You need not include information about disputes between your firm and a supplier, another contractor, or subcontractor. You need not include information about "pass-through" disputes in which the actual dispute is between a sub -contractor and a project owner. Also, you may omit reference to all disputes about amounts of less than $50,000. 17. In the past five (5) years has any claim against Contractor concerning Contractor's work on a construction project been filed in court or arbitration? ❑ Yes ❑ No If "Yes", on separate signed sheets of paper identify the claim(s) by providing the project name, date of the claim, name of the claimant, a brief description of the nature of the claim, the court in which the case was filed and a brief description of the status of the claim (pending or, if resolved, a brief description of the resolution). 15 18. In the past five (5) years has Contractor made any claim against a project owner concerning work on a project or payment for a contract and filed that claim in court or arbitration? ❑ Yes ❑ No If "Yes," on separate signed sheets of paper identify the claim by providing the project name, date of the claim, name of the entity (or entities) against whom the claim was filed, a brief description of the nature of the claim, the court in which the case was filed and a brief description of the status of the claim (pending, or if resolved, a brief description of the resolution). 19. At any time during the past five (5) years, has any surety company made any payments on your firm's behalf as a result of a default, to satisfy any claims made against a performance or payment bond issued on your firm's behalf, in connection with a construction project, either public or private? ❑ Yes ❑ No If "yes," explain on a separate signed page the amount of each such claim, the name and telephone number of the claimant, the date of the claim, the grounds for the claim, the present status of the claim, the date of resolution of such claim if resolved, the method by which such was resolved if resolved, the nature of the resolution and the amount, if any, at which the claim was resolved. 20. In the last five (5) years has any insurance carrier, for any form of insurance, refused to renew the insurance policy for Contractor? ❑ Yes ❑ No If "Yes", explain on a separate signed page. Name the insurance carrier, the form of insurance and the year of the refusal. Criminal Matters and Related Civil Suits 21. Has Contractor or any of its owners, officers or partners ever been found liable in a civil suit or found guilty in a criminal action for making any false claim or material misrepresentation to any public agency or entity? ❑ Yes ❑ No If "Yes", explain on a separate signed page, including identifying who was involved, the name of the public agency, the date of the investigation and the grounds for the finding. 16 22. Has Contractor or any of its owners, officers or partners ever been convicted of a crime involving any federal, state, or local law related to construction? ❑ Yes ❑ No If "Yes", explain on a separate signed page, including identifying who was involved, the name of the public agency, the date of the conviction and the grounds for the conviction. 23. Has Contractor or any of its owners, officers or partners ever been convicted of a federal or state crime of fraud, theft, or any other act of dishonesty? ❑ Yes ❑ No If "Yes", identify on a separate signed page the person or persons convicted, the court (the county if a state court, the district or location of the federal court), the year and the criminal conduct. Bonding 24. Bonding capacity: Provide documentation from your surety identifying the following: Name of bonding company/surety: Name of surety agent, address and telephone number: 25. If your firm was required to pay a premium of more than one percent for a performance and payment bond on any project(s) on which your firm worked at any time during the last three years, state the percentage that your firm was required to pay. You may provide an explanation for a percentage rate higher than one percent, if you wish to do so. 26. List all other sureties (name and full address) that have written bonds for your firm during the last five years, including the dates during which each wrote the bonds: 17 27. During the last five years, has your firm ever been denied bond coverage by a surety company, or has there ever been a period of time when your firm had no surety bond in place during a public construction project when one was required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If "Yes", provide details on a separate signed sheet indicating the date when your firm was denied coverage and the name of the company or companies which denied coverage; and the period during which you had no surety bond in place. C. Compliance with Occupational Safety and Health Laws and with Other Labor Legislation Safety 28. Has CAL OSHA cited and assessed penalties against Contractor for any "serious," "willful" or "repeat" violations of its safety or health regulations in the past five years? Note: If you have filed an appeal of a citation, and the Occupational Safety and Health Appeals Board has not yet ruled on your appeal, you need not include information about it. ❑ Yes ❑ No If "Yes", attached a separate signed page describing the citations, including information about the dates of the citations, the nature of the violation, the project on which the citation(s) was or were issued, the amount of penalty paid, if any. If the citation was appealed to the Occupational Safety and Health Appeals Board and a decision has been issued, state the case number and the date of the decision. 29. Has the Federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration cited and assessed penalties against Contractor in the past five (5) years? Note: If you have filed an appeal of a citation and the Appeals Board has not yet ruled on your appeal, or if there is a court appeal pending, you need not include information about the citation. ❑ Yes ❑ No If "Yes", attach a separate signed page describing each citation. 18 30. Has the EPA or any Air Quality Management District or any Regional Water Quality Control Board cited and assessed penalties against either your firm or the owner of a project on which your firm was the contractor, in the past five (5) years? Note: If you have filed an appeal of a citation and the Appeals Board has not yet ruled on your appeal, or if there is a court appeal pending, you need not include information about the citation. ❑ Yes ❑ No If "Yes", attach a separate signed page describing each citation 31. How often does Contractor require documented safety meetings to be held for construction employees and field supervisors during the course of a project? 32. List your firm's Experience Modification Rate (EMR) (California workers' compensation insurance) for each of the past three premium years: Note: An Experience Modification Rate is issued to your firm annually by your workers' compensation insurance carrier. Current year: Previous year: Year prior to previous year: If your EMR for any of these three years is or was 1.00 or higher you may, if you wish, attach a letter of explanation. 33. Within the last five (5) years has there ever been a period when Contractor had employees but was without workers' compensation insurance or state -approved self-insurance? ❑ Yes ❑ No If "Yes", please explain the reason for the absence of workers' compensation insurance on a separate signed page. If "No," please provide a statement by your current workers' compensation insurance carrier that verifies periods of workers' compensation insurance coverage for the last five years. (If your firm has been in the construction business for less than five years, provide a statement by your workers' compensation insurance carrier verifying continuous workers' 19 compensation insurance coverage for the period that your firm has been in the construction business). Prevailing Wage and Apprenticeship Compliance Record 34. Has there been more than one occasion during the last five (5) years in which your firm was required to pay either back wages or penalties for your own firm's failure to comply with the State's prevailing wage laws? Note: This question refers only to your own firm's violation of prevailing wage laws, not to violations of the prevailing wage laws by a subcontractor. ❑ Yes ❑ No If "Yes", attach a separate signed page or pages, describing the nature of each violation, identifying the name of the project, the date of its completion, the public agency for which it was constructed; the number of employees who were initially underpaid and the amount of back wages and penalties that you were required to pay. 35. During the last five (5) years, has there been more than one occasion in which your own firm has been penalized or required to pay back wages for failure to comply with the Federal Davis -Bacon prevailing wage requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No If "Yes", attach a separate signed page or pages describing the nature of the violation, identifying the name of the project, the date of its completion, the public agency for which it was constructed; the number of employees who were initially underpaid, the amount of back wages you were required to pay along with the amount of any penalty paid. 36. Provide the name, address and telephone number of the apprenticeship program (approved by the California Apprenticeship Council) from whom you intend to request the dispatch of apprentices to your company for use on any public work project for which you are awarded a contract by the City. 20 37. If your firm operates its own State -approved apprenticeship program: (a) Identify the craft or crafts in which your firm provided apprenticeship training in the past year. (b) State the year in which each such apprenticeship program was approved, and attach evidence of the most recent California Apprenticeship Council approval(s) of your apprenticeship program(s). (c) State the number of individuals who were employed by your firm as apprentices at any time during the past three years in each apprenticeship and the number of persons who, during the past three years, completed apprenticeships in each craft while employed by your firm. 38. At any time during the last five (5) years, has your firm been found to have violated any provision of California apprenticeship laws or regulations, or the laws pertaining to use of apprentices on public works? Note: You may omit reference to any incident that occurred prior to January 1, 1998, if the violation was by a subcontractor and your firm, as general contractor on a project, had no knowledge of the subcontractor's violation at the time they occurred. ❑ Yes ❑ No If "Yes", provide the date(s) of such findings, and attach copies of the Department's final decision(s). 21 PART III RECENT PARK CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS COMPLETED 39. Contractor shall provide information about at least three (3) most comparable park construction projects (public sector preferable), all of which must have been successfully completed within the last seven (7) years.5 The projects submitted must be in California comparable in scope and quality with the Project and have a contract value in excess of $10,000,000. Names and references must be current and verifiable. Use separate sheets of paper that contain all of the following information: Project Name: Location: Owner: Owner Contact (name and current phone number): Architect or Engineer: Architect or, Engineer Contact (name and current phone number): Construction Manager (name and current phone number): Description of Project, Scope of Work Performed: Total Value of Construction (including change orders): Original Scheduled Completion Date: Time Extensions Granted (number of days): 5 If you wish, you may, using the same format, also provide information about other projects that you have completed that are similar to the project(s) for which you expect to bid. 22 Actual Date of Completion: I, the undersigned, certify and declare that I have read all the foregoing answers to this prequalification questionnaire and know their contents. The matters stated. in the questionnaire answers are true of my own knowledge and belief, except as to those matters stated on information and belief, and as to those matters I believe them to be true. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that the foregoing is correct. I also certify and declare that I have read and understand all of the background information on pages 1-53 of this document. Dated: 23 (Signature) (Print Name) (Title) (Contractor Name) c 24 LIST OF SCORABLE QUESTIONS AND SCORING INSTRUCTIONS The scorable questions arise in three different categories: History of the business and organizational performance; II. Compliance with occupational safety and health laws, workers' compensation and other labor legislation; and III. Completion of recent projects and quality of performance. The interview questions (interviews by the City or the City's authorized representative of project managers on projects completed recently by the contractor) are included in Part III. This last category also includes a scoring of the number of recently completed projects that are similar to the Project on which pre -qualification is at issue. Note: Not all questions in the questionnaire are scorable. Some questions simply ask for information about the contractor firm's structure, officers and history. This document includes only those questions that are "scorable." To prequalify, a contractor would be required to have a passing grade within each of the three categories referred to above. Part I. History of the business and organizational performance The passing score is 64 on this portion of the questionnaire of a maximum score of 80 on this portion of the questionnaire. Part II. Compliance with occupational safety and health laws, workers' compensation and other labor legislation The passing score is 44 on this portion of the questionnaire of a maximum score of 55 points on this portion of the questionnaire. Part III. Completion of recent projects and quality of performance Includes a series of interview questions, and may also include questions about recently completed (public or private) construction projects. For the interview questions, the City or the City's authorized representative will interview project managers for the owners of two completed projects. The City will utilize a scoring system that will allow a maximum score of 110 points for each interview. For these questions, the passing score for each of two interviews is 88 points or more. 25 Part I Questions about History of the Business and Organizational Performance 1. How many years has Contractor been in business in California as a contractor under your present business name and license number? Years 3 years or less = 2 points 4 years = 3 points 5 years = 4 points 6 years or more = 5 points 2. Is Contractor currently the debtor in a bankruptcy case? ❑ Yes ❑ No No = 5 points Yes = 0 points 3. Was Contractor in bankruptcy any time during the last five (5) years? (This question refers only to a bankruptcy action that was not described in answer to question 7, above). ❑ Yes ❑ No No = 5 points Yes = 0 points 4. Has any CSLB license held by Contractor or its Responsible Managing Employee (RME) or Responsible Managing Officer (RMO) been suspended within the last five years? ❑ Yes ❑ No No = 5 points Yes = 0 points 5. At anytime in the last five (5) years, has Contractor been assessed and paid Liquidated damages after completion of a project, under a construction contract with either a public or private owner? ❑ Yes ❑ No No projects with liquidated damages of more than $50,000 or one project with liquidated damages = 5 points Two projects with liquidated damages of more than $50, 000 = 3 points 91 Any other answer = 0 points 6. In the last five (5) years has Contractor, or any firm with which any of your company's owners, officers or partners was associated, been debarred, disqualified, removed or otherwise prevented from bidding on, or completing, any government agency or public works project for any reason? Note: "Associated with" refers to another construction firm in which an owner, partner or officer of Contractor held a similar position. ❑ Yes ❑ No No = 5 points Yes = 0 points 7. In the last five (5) years, has Contractor been denied an award of a public works contract based on a finding by a public agency that Contractor was not a responsible bidder? ❑ Yes ❑ No No = 5 points Yes = 0 points Note: The following two questions refer only to disputes between Contractor and the owner of a project. You need not include information about disputes between a Contractor and a supplier, another contractor, or subcontractor. You need not include information about "pass-through" disputes in which the actual dispute is between a sub -contractor and a project owner. Also, you may omit reference to all disputes about amounts of less than $50,000. 8. In the past five (5) years, has any claim against Contractor concerning its work on a construction project been filed in court or arbitration? ❑ Yes ❑ No If the Contractor's average gross revenue for the last three years was less than $50 million, scoring is as follows: 5 points for either "No" or "Yes" indicating 1 such instance 3 points for "Yes" indicating 2 such instances 0 points for "Yes" if more than 2 such instances. If Contractor's average gross revenue for the last three years was more than $50 million, scoring is as follows: 27 5 points for either "No" or "Yes" indicating 1, 2, or 3 such instances 3 points for "Yes" indicating either 4 or 5 such instances 0 points for "Yes" if more than 5 such instances 9. In the past five (5) years, has Contractor made any claim against a project owner concerning work on a project or payment for a contract, and filed that claim in court or arbitration? ❑ Yes ❑ No If Contractor's average gross revenues for the last three years were less than $50 million scoring is as follows: 5 points for either "No" or "Yes" indicating 1 such instance 3 points for "Yes" indicating 2 such instances 0 points for "Yes" if more than 2 such instances If Contractor's average gross revenues for the last three years were more than $50 million, scoring is as follows: 5 points for either "No" or "Yes" indicating 1, 2, or 3 such instances 3 points for "Yes" indicating either 4 or 5 such instances 0 points for "Yes" if more than 5 such instances 10. At any time during the past five (5) years, has any surety company made any payments on your firm's behalf as a result of a default, to satisfy any claims made against a performance or payment bond issued on your firm's behalf in connection with a construction project, either public or private? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5 points for either "No" or "Yes" indicating 1 such claim 3 points for "Yes" indicating no more than 2 such claims Subtract 5 points for "Yes" if more than 2 such claims 11. In the last five (5) years has any insurance carrier, for any form of insurance, refused to renew the insurance policy for Contractor? 28 ❑ Yes ❑ No 5 points for either "No" or "Yes" indicating 1 such instance 3 points for "Yes" indicating 2 such instances 0 points for "Yes" or if more than 2 such instances 12. Has Contractor or any of its owners, officers, or partners ever been found liable in a civil suit, or found guilty in a criminal action, for making any false claim or material misrepresentation to any public agency or entity? ❑ Yes ❑ No No = 5 points Yes = subtract 5 points 13. Has Contractor or any of its owners, officers or partners ever been convicted of a crime involving any federal, state, or local law related to construction? ❑ Yes ❑ No No = 5 points Yes = subtract 5 points 14. Has Contractor or any of its owners, officers or partners ever been convicted of a federal or state crime of fraud, theft, or any other act of dishonesty? ❑ Yes ❑ No No = 5 points Yes = subtract 5 points 15. If your firm was required to pay a premium of more than one percent (1%) for a performance and payment bond on any project(s) on which your firm worked at any time during the last three years, state the percentage that your firm was required to pay. You may provide an explanation for a percentage rate higher than one per cent, if you wish to do so. 5 points if the rate is no more than I% 3 points if the rate was no higher than 1.10 % 0 points for any other answer 29 16. During the last five years, has your firm ever been denied bond credit by a surety company, or has there ever been a period of time when your firm had no surety bond in place during a public construction project when one was required? ❑ Yes ❑ No No = 5 points Yes = 0 points I0ralII Questions about Compliance with Safety, Workers Compensation, Prevailing Wage and Apprenticeship Laws 1 Has CAL OSHA cited and assessed penalties against Contractor for any "serious," "willful" or "repeat" violations of its safety or health regulations in the past five. years? Note: If you have filed an appeal of a citation and the Occupational Safety and Health Appeals Board has not yet ruled on your appeal, you need not include information about it. ❑ Yes ❑ No If the Contractor's average gross revenues for the last three years were less than $50 million, scoring is as follows: 5 points for either "No" or "Yes" indicating 1 such instance 3 points for "Yes" indicating 2 such instances 0 points for "Yes" if more than 2 such instances If the Contractor's average gross revenues for the last three years were more than $50 million, scoring is as follows: 5 points for either "No" or "Yes" indicating 1, 2, or 3 such instances 3 points for "Yes" indicating either 4 or 5 such instances 0 points for "Yes" if more than 5 such instances 2. Has the Federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration cited and assessed penalties against Contractor in the past five years? 30 Note: If you have filed an appeal of a citation and the appropriate appeals Board has not yet ruled on your appeal, you need not include information about it. ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, attach a separate signed page describing each citation. If the Contractor's average gross revenues for the last three years were less than $50 million, scoring is as follows: 5 points for either "No" or "Yes" indicating 1 such instance 3 points for "Yes" indicating 2 such instances 0 points for "Yes" or if more than 2 such instances If the Contractor's average gross revenues for the last three years were more than $50 million, scoring is as follows: 5 points for either "No" or "Yes" indicating 1, 2, or 3 such instances 3 points for "Yes" indicating either 4 or 5 such instances 0 points for "Yes" if more than 5 such instances 3. Has the EPA or any Air Quality Management District or any Regional Water Quality Control Board cited and assessed penalties against either your firm or the owner of a project on which your firm was the contractor, in the past five years? Note: If you have filed an appeal of a citation and the Appeals Board has not yet ruled on your appeal, or if there is a court appeal pending, you need not include information about the citation. ❑ Yes ❑ No If the firm's average gross revenues for the last three years were less than $50 million, scoring is as follows: 5 points for either "No" or "Yes" indicating 1 such instance 3 points for "Yes" indicating 2 such instances 0 points for "Yes" or if more than 2 such instances If the firm's average gross revenues for the last three years were more than $50 million, scoring is as follows: 31 5 points for either "No" or "Yes" indicating 1, 2, or 3 such instances 3 points for "Yes" indicating either 4 or 5 such instances 0 points for "Yes" if more than 5 such instances 4. How often does Contractor require documented safety meetings to be held for construction employees and field supervisors during the course of a project? 5 points for an answer of once each week or more often 0 points for any other answer 5. List your firm's Experience Modification Rate (EMR) (California workers' compensation insurance) for each of the past three (3) premium years: Note: An Experience Modification Rate is issued to your firm annually by your workers' compensation insurance carrier. Current year: Previous year: Year prior to previous year: If the EMR for any of these three (3) years is or was 1.00 or higher, you may attach a letter of explanation. Note: An Experience Modification Rate is issued to your firm annually by your workers' compensation insurance carrier. 5 points for three-year average EMR of 0.95 or less 3 points for three-year average of EMR of more than 0.95 but no more than 1.00 0 points for any other EMR 6. Within the last five (5) years, has there ever been a period when Contractor had employees but was without workers' compensation insurance or state -approved self-insurance? ❑ Yes I ❑ No 32 5 points for either "No" or "Yes" indicating I such instance 0 points for any other answer 7. Has there been more than one occasion during the last five (5) years on which Contractor was required to pay either back wages or penalties for your own firm's failure to comply with the State's prevailing wage laws? ❑ Yes ❑ No Note: This question refers only to your own firm's violation of prevailing wage laws, not to violations of the prevailing wage laws by a subcontractor. If your firm's average gross revenues for the last three years were less than $50 million, scoring is as follows: 5 points for either "No, " or "Yes" indicating either I or 2 such instance 3 points for "Yes" indicating 3 such instances 0 points for "Yes" and more than 3 such instances If your firm's average gross revenues for the last three years were more than $50 million, scoring is as follows: 5 points for either "No" or "Yes" indicating no more than 4 such instances 3 points for "Yes" indicating either 5 or 6 such instances 0 points for "Yes" and more than 6 such instances 8. During the last five (5) years, has there been more than one occasion on which Contractor has been penalized or required to pay back wages for failure to comply with the Federal Davis -Bacon prevailing wage requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No If your firm's average gross revenues for the last three years were less than $50 million, scoring is as follows: 5 points for either "No," or "Yes" indicating either I or 2 such instance 3 points for "Yes" indicating 3 such instances 0 points for "Yes" and more than 3 such instances 33 If your firm's average gross revenues for the last three years were more than $50 million, scoring is as follows: 5 points for either "No" or "Yes" indicating no more than 4 such instances 3 points for "Yes" indicating either 5 or 6 such instances 0 points for "Yes" and more than 6 such instances 9. Provide the name, address and telephone number of the apprenticeship program sponsor(s) (approved by the California Division of Apprenticeship Standards) that will provide apprentices to your company for use on any public work project for which you are awarded a contract by the City. 5 points if at least one approved apprenticeship program is listed 0 points for any other answer 10. If Contractor operates its own State -approved apprenticeship program: a. Identify the craft or crafts in which your firm provided apprenticeship training in the past year. b. State the year in which each such apprenticeship program was approved, and attach evidence of the most recent California Apprenticeship Council approval(s) of your apprenticeship program(s). c. State the number of individuals who were employed by your firm as apprentices at any time during the past three years in each apprenticeship and the number of persons who, during the past three years, completed apprenticeships in each craft while employed by your firm. 5 points if one or more persons completed an approved apprenticeship while employed by your firm 0 points if no persons completed an approved apprenticeship while employer by your firm I 34 11. At any time during the last five (5) years, has Contractor been found to have violated any provision of California apprenticeship laws or regulations, or the laws pertaining to use of apprentices on public works? Note: You may omit reference to any incident that occurred prior to January 1, 1998 if the violation was by a subcontractor and your firm, as general contractor on a project, had no knowledge of the subcontractor's violation at the time they occurred. ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, provide the date(s) of such findings, and attach copies of the Department's final decision(s). If your firm's average gross revenues for the last three years were less than $50 million, scoring is as follows: 5 points for either "No," or "Yes" indicating either 1 or 2 such instance 3 points for "Yes" indicating 3 such instances 0 points for "Yes" and more than 3 such instances if your firm's average gross revenues for the last three years were more than $50 million, scoring is as follows: 5 points for either "No" or "Yes" indicating no more than 4 such instances 3 points for "Yes" indicating either 5 or 6 such instances 0 points for "Yes" and more than 6 such instances Part III Reference Interview Questions The following questions will be used to interview selected contacts from at least two projects that have been completed by the Contractor. The City may conduct the interviews at the City's own discretion. No action on the contractor's part will be necessary. These questions are included in the package given to the contractor for information purposes only. The highest possible score for each interview is 110 points. A score of less than 88 points on either interview will automatically disqualify the Contractor from further consideration. 35 1. Provide a brief description of the project. 2. Are there any outstanding stop notices, liens, or claims by Contractor that are currently unresolved on contracts for which a notice of completion was recorded more than 120 days ago? (1 point for each is deducted from the overall score; maximum amount to be deducted is 5 points). 3. On a scale of 1-10, with 10 being the best, did Contractor provide adequate personnel to successfully complete the work? (Maximum 10 points). 4. On a scale of 1-10, with 10 being the best, did Contractor provide adequate supervision to successfully complete the work? (Maximum 10 points). 5. On a scale of 1-10, with 10 being the best, did Contractor provide adequate equipment to successfully complete the work? (Maximum 10 points). 5. On a scale of 1-10, with 10 being the best, was Contractor timely in providing reports and other paperwork, including change order paperwork, scheduling updates and close-out documents? (Maximum 10 points). 7. On a scale of 1-10, with 10 being the best, did Contractor adhere to the project schedule that your agency approved? (Maximum 10 points). 8. Was the project completed on time? (10 points is the answer is "Yes"). If the answer is "No," on a scale of 1-10, with 10 being the best, to what extent was Contractor responsible for the delay in completion? (Award appropriate points). 9. On a scale of 1-10, with 10 being the best, rate Contractor on the timely submission of reasonable cost and time estimates to perform change order work. (Maximum 10 points). 10. On a scale of 1-10, with 10 being the best, rate Contractor on how well Contractor performed the work after a change order was issued, and how well Contractor integrated the change order work into the existing work. (Maximum 10 points). 11. On a scale of 1-10 with 10 meaning little or none, rate Contractor on whether there were an unusually high number of claims, given the nature of the project, or unusual difficulty in resolving them. (Maximum 10 points). 12. On a scale of 1-10, 10 being the best, rate Contractor with respect to the timely payments by Contractor to either subcontractors or suppliers. (Maximum 10 points). 13. On a scale of 1-10, with 10 being the best, how would you rate the quality of the work overall? (Maximum 10 points). 36 SITE INFORMATION ACREAGE: 33 ACRES (AREA 1A, 19A, 22A, 22B) PARKING: NORTH 352 PROPOSED STALLS 7L-77104 EXISTING STALLS 0 ao' e0' 1E0. 456 TOTAL STALLS TUSTIN APRIL 2014 REVISED CONCEPT S2 TUSTIN LEGACY PARK MOORE IACOFANO GOLT9MAN,INC. TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA o�nuour. non ranine` RaNunYNG ()UIX I'n51' nwmmwu nay wx�M�mm� ATTACHMENT 2 List of Contractors Not Determined Qualified LIST OF GENERAL CONTRACTORS NOT DETERMINED QUALIFIED FOR CONSTRUCTION OF VETERANS SPORTS PARK AT TUSTIN LEGACY PARK IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT, CIP No. 20043 • Environmental Construction, Inc. • Hellas Construction, Inc. • KASA Construction, Inc. • Morillo Construction Inc. • ProWest Constructors • S.J. Amoroso Construction Company, Inc. • Tobo Construction Inc. • USS Cal Builders, Inc. ATTACHMENT 3 Resolution No. 18-31 RESOLUTION NO. 18-31 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE VETERANS SPORTS PARK AT TUSTIN LEGACY PARK IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT, CIP NO. 20043 AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California to contract for the construction of the Veterans Sports Park at Tustin Legacy park improvements project, CIP No. 20043; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has presented plans and specifications for the construction of said work; and WHEREAS, That on January 16, 2001, the City of Tustin certified the Program Final Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (FEIS/EIR) for the reuse and disposal of MCAS Tustin. On December 6, 2004, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 04-76 approving a Supplement to the FEIS/EIR for the extension of Tustin Ranch Road between Walnut Avenue and the future alignment of Valencia North Loop Road. On April 3, 2006, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 06-43 approving an Addendum to the FEIS/EIR. The FEIS/EIR along with its Addendums and Supplement is a program EIR under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The FEIS/EIR, Addendum and Supplement considered the potential environmental impacts associated with development on the former Marine Corps Air Station, Tustin; and WHEREAS, an environmental checklist was prepared for the proposed project that concluded no additional environmental impacts would occur from approval of the project. The Environmental Analysis Checklist concludes that it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City Engineer are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for: Veterans Sports Park at Tustin Legacy Park Improvements Project, CIP No. 20043 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for the performance of the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications; PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Tustin held on the 1St day of May 2018. Elwyn A. Murray, Mayor ATTEST: Erica N. Rabe, City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS CITY OF TUSTIN ) I, Erica N. Rabe, City Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of the members of the City Council is five; that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 18-31 was duly and regularly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 1St day of May 2018 by the following vote: COUNCILMEMBER AYES: COUNCILMEMBER NOES: COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT: Erica N. Rabe, City Clerk ATTACHMENT 4 Location Map LOCATION MAP Veterans Sports Park at Tustin Legacy I q P TUSTIN lia RANCH Y4 AK TUSTIN LEGACY I a NO SCALE f �U PROJECT LOCATION Veterans Sports Park at Tustin Legacy (CIP No. 20043) VALENCIA PROJECT cTo�r LOCATION 11, "GF FILE: CIP-20043 Veterans Sports Park.dwg