HomeMy WebLinkAboutADDITIONAL PUBLIC COMMENTS Demkowicz, Erica
From: Tom O'Meara <tomeara@icidevco.com>
Sent: Tuesday,September 25,2018 5:12 PM
To: Binsack, Elizabeth;Willkom,Justina; Demkowicz, Erica; Reekstin, Scott;Tiscareno,Vera;
Craig,Jerry
Cc: Mike Abel (mabel@lee-associates.com); 'Bruce Heathcote'; Howard Abel; Robert Jarrard
Subject: RHASP Item
Hi Elizabeth:
Thank you for your time yesterday.An item we are still having heart burn over is in the event of an insured building
casualty within the RHASP where more than 50%of the building's replacement value is destroyed I cannot rebuild
the building in the same approximate location. I understand that the building will need to be rebuilt to current
construction code and per the development standards and architectural elements of the RHASP.However,if a
casualty occurs and I'm required to be constructed per the RHASP design criteria then it will require me to relocate
the building up front,along Red Hill Avenue.
This requirement would put us in direct violation of our existing leases,lender requirements,shopping center
CC&Rs and creates undue legal and financial burdens. Could we look at a carve out in the RHASP whereby,in the
event of an insured building casualty,we can rebuild the building at approximately the same location where it
currently sits?This is especially important to our ownership as we own a single tenant 26,000 SF building which we
will be re-tenanting in the next few years.If I cannot offer prospective tenants a concrete right to rebuild then I will
not be able to find a tenant to occupy and invest in our building.
Could you please provide the Planning Commission a copy of this email tonight?Perhaps we can discuss at tonight's
meeting.
Regards,
Tom O'Meara
ICI Development Company, Inc.
2222 E Seventeenth Street
Santa Ana,CA 92705
P: (714)541-1200 x2o6 I C: (949)933-9116
This email may contain material that is confidential or privileged. It is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s).Any review,reliance
or distribution by others,or any forwarding or copying by means,without express permission is strictly prohibited.If you are not the
intended recipient,please contact the sender and delete all copies.
1
Demkowicz, Erica
From: Tom O'Meara <tomeara@icidevco.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 4:40 PM
To: Demkowicz, Erica;jerry@fsbcorestrategies.com; Robert Jarrard;
bheathicote@leeirvine.com,- Mike Abel; luckyhwrd@aol.com
Cc: Binsack, Elizabeth;Willkom, Justina; Reeks,tin, Scott; Craig, Jerry;Tisc�areno, Vera
Subject: RE: RE; Second Revised Attachment F - Errata List for the Red Hill Avenue Specific Plan
Thank you, Erica.A quick question along,the lines of your most recent strikeout edit to section 4-6.Could you please
confirm if my understanding is correct?
1) When remodeling an existing,non-conforming structure and the remodel cost exceeds fifty(50) percent of
the structures assessed value this will only trigger the application of the development standards in Table 4-3
and NOT require conformance with the RHASP design criteria?Correct?
Thank you,
Tom O'Meara
ICI Development Company, Inc.
2222 E Seventeenth Street
Santa Ana,CA 92705
P'. (714)541-1200 X2o6 I C: (949)933-9U6
This email may contain material that is confidential or privileged. It is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s).Any review,reliance
or distribution by others,or any forwarding or copying by means,without express permission is strictly prohibited.If you are,not the
intended recipient,please contact the sender and delete all copies.
From: Demkowicz, Erica <EDemkowicz@tustincaorg>
Sent:Tuesday, September 25, 2018 4:15 PM
To:Tom O'Meara <tomeara@icidevco,com>;jerry@fsbcorestraltegies.com; Robert Jarrard<bobjarrard@gmaiI.com>;
bheathcoteleeirvine,com; Mike Abel <mabel@lee-assodates.com>; luckyhwrd@aol.com
Cc: Binsack, Elizabeth <EBinsack@tusfinca.org>; Willkom,Justina <JWiI1kom@tustjnca.org>; Reekstin, Scott
<SReekstin@tustinca.org>; Craig,Jerry<JCraig@tustinca.org>;Tiscareno,Vera <VTlsc,areno@tustinca.org>
Subject: RE: RE; Second Revised Attachment IF- Errata List for the Red Hill Avenue Specific Plan
Please note the staff has made some additional changes to the Errata List that I e-rnailed to you this morning. There is
sorne additional language that will be removed from the document in Sections 4,6 and C. It is shown in strikeout with a
line through it. Please see attached.
Regards
Erica HI. Demkowicz,AICP
Senior Planner
City offustin
Community Development Department
300 Centennial Way
Tustin,CA 92780
(714)573-3127
From: Demkowicz, Erica
Sent:Tuesday,September 25, 2018 10:29 AM
To: 'tomeara@icidevco.com' <toriieara@icidevco.col"n>; Robert Jarrard
<boWarrarq@ c thcoLeCc�leeirv4ivxorn; Mike Abel<riiabel,aig�,.zElssociates�corTi>;Luck iwrd aol.cqm
_gm ai 1,C D m>; L�i L�_ yi �
Cc: Binsack, Elizabeth <Effinsack@jq�sfinra.o�r >; WillkornJustina <WllkOn12tq.Ltjicaorg>; Reekstin, Scott
_— '
<S!Reekstir�� siqn �t,2_(g>; Craig,Jerry< r�Lca.o ,>;Tiscareno,Vera, >
Eg _[g
Subject: RE; Revised Attachment F-Errata List for the Red Hill Avenue Specific Plan
Good Morning Everyone,
Please find the attached revised Errata List,which is Attachment F of the Staff Report for tonight's Planning Commission
meeting.
Regards,
Erica H.Demkowicz.AICP
Senior Manner
City of Tustin
Community Development Department
300 Centennial Way
Tustin,CA 92780
(714) 57'3-3127
2