Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-13-99 PC PACKET AGENDA TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 13, 1999 CALL TO ORDER: 7.:00 p.m:, City Council Chambers PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Commissioner Kawashima ROLL CALL_ : Chairperson Kozak, Bell, 'Davert, Kawashima and Pontious PUBLIC CONCERNS: (Limited to 3 minutes per person for items not.on the agenda.) At .this time members of the public may address the Commission regarding any items not on the agenda and within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Commission (NO action can be taken off-agenda items unless authorized by law). IF YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION ON ANY MATTER, PLEASE FILL OUT ONE OF THE CARDS LOCATED ON THE SPEAKER'S TABLE SO -THAT YOUR REMARKS ON THE TAPE RECORDING OF THE MEETING CAN BE ATTRIBUTED TO YOU. WHEN YOU START TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION, PLEASE STATE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. IF YOU REQUIRE SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS, PLEASE CONTACT THE PLANNING'COMMISSION SECRETARY AT (714) 573-3106. CONSENT CALENDAR: (ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER CONSENT CALENDAR ARE CONSIDERED ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE . NO_ SEPARATE DISCUSSIONOF THESE ITEMS PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE VOTING ON THE MOTION UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, STAFF OR PUBLIC REQUEST SPECIFIC ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AND/OR REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION.) CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. Minutes of the,November 22 1999 Plannin Commission Meeting. Planning Commission Agenda December 13, 1999 Page 2 PUBLIC HEARINGS: 2. Conditional Use Permit 99-014 a request to amend the development standards for the Tustin Village II Planned Community under Conditional Use Permit 63-149 to include a definition, development' standards and design review criteria for accessory structures. The project is located west of Tustin Village Way; north of Alliance Avenue, south of the 1-5 Freeway and east of Williams Street within the Planned Community (PC) zoning district. APPLICANT/ PROPERTY OWNER: TUSTIN VILLAGE 11 HOMEOWNERS ASSOC. Recommendation That the Planning Commission continue Conditional Use Permit 99-014 to the January 24, 2000 Planning Commission meeting. Presentation: Lori Ludi, Associate Planner 3. Design Review 99-032 a request to remodel and expand the Home Depot garden center and construct a screen wall adjacent to the existing loading dock. The project is located at 2732 EI Camino Real. in the Planned Community - Mixed Use (PC-MU) zoning district within the East Tustin Specific Plan (ETSP). APPLICANT: HOME DEPOT PROPERTY OWNERS: IRVINE RETAIL PROPERTIES C/O: DONAHUE SCHRIBER Recommendation That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 3709 approving Design Review 99-032. Presentation: Lori Ludi, Associate Planner .4. General Plan Conformity Determination a request to determine that the proposed location for potential elementary school for the Tustin Unified School District is in conformance with the Tustin General Plan. The project is located at the northeast corner of Township Drive and Rawlings Way within the Planned Community Residential (Pcr), Potential Elementary School (ES) zoning district. APPLICANT: BOWIE, ARNESON, WILES & GIANNONE (REPRESENTING THE TUSTIN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT) Planning Commission Agenda December 13, 1999 Page 3 PROPERTY OWNERS: IRVINE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY Recommendation That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 3708 determining that the proposed Rawlings Way Elementary School is in conformance with the Tustin General Plan. Presentation:Lori Ludi, Associate Planner REGULAR BUSINESS No Regular Business STAFF CONCERNS: -- —_6:_ Report on Actions taken at the December 6, 1999 City Council Meeting Presentation: Elizabeth:A..Binsack, Director of Community Development COMMISSION CONCERNS: ADJOURNMENT: A regular meeting of the Planning Commission will be held on January 10, 2000 . beginning at 7:00 p.m., City Council'Chambers, 300-Centennial Way;Tustin. MINUTES TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 22, 9999 CALL TO ORDER: - - 7:00 p.m., City Council Chambers. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Commissioner Davert ROLL CALL: Chairperson Kozak, Bell, Davert, Kawashima and Pontio6s - - Present: Chairperson Kozak Vice Chair Davert Bell Kawashima .Pontious Absent: None Staff: Elizabeth A. Binsack, Director of Community Development Lois Bobak, Deputy City Attorney . Rita Westfield, Assistant Director of Community Development Scott Reekstin, Acting Senior Planner Lori Ludi, Associate Planner Mingo Ashabi, Assistant Planner Kathy Martin, Recording.Secretary PUBLIC CONCERNS: CONSENTCALENDAR: 1. Minutes of the November 8 9999 Planning Commission Meeting. Commissioner: Davert moved Commissioner Kawashima se_ corded; to approve the Consent Calendar. Motion carried 5-0. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 2, Conditional Use Permit 99-094 a request to amend the development standards • for the Tustin Village-11 Planned Community under Conditional Use.Permit 63-149 Planning Commission Minutes November 22, 1999 Page 2 to include a definition, development standards and design ' review criteria for accessory structures. The project is located west of Tustin Village Way, north of Alliance Avenue, south of the 1-5 Freeway and east of Williams Street within the Planned Community (PC) zoning district. APPLICANT/ PROPERTY OWNER: TUSTIN VILLAGE 11 HOMEOWNERS ASSOC. Recommendation That the Planning Commission continue Conditional Use Permit 99-014 to the December 13, 1999 Planning Commission meeting. The public hearing opened at 7:01 p.m. Lori presented the subject report and .noted the continuance was being requested due to a complaint received after the public hearing notices were mailed out. The public hearing closed at 7:02 p.m. Commissioner Davert moved; Commissioner Pontious_.seconded, to continue Conditional Use Permit 99-014 to the December 13, 1999 Planning Commission meeting. Motion carried 5-0. 3. Use Determination 99-003 and Conditional Use Permit 99-024 a request to operate a martial arts studio in the retail center located at 640 W. First Street within the Commercial as Primary Use designation of the First Street Specific Plan APPLICANT: DAVID HUGHES QOM YUNG DOE PROPERTY OWNERS: MELLILI FAMILY TRUST PLAZA ON FIRST ASSOCIATES Recommendation That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution Nos. 3703 and 3704 approving Use Determination 99-003 and Conditional Use Permit 99-024 to allow a martial arts studio at 640 W. First Street within the "Commercial as Primary Use" designation of the First Street Specific Plan (FSSP). Minoo Ashabi presented the subject report. Planning Commission Minutes November 22, 1999 Page 3 The public nearing opened at 7:05 p.m. Commissioner Davert noted his concern about the hours of operation being restrictive and noted that perhaps changing the hours to 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. for all days would be more appropriate. Minoo noted that these are the hours proposed by applicant. Chairperson Kozak noted that private lessons provided on Saturday should have hours of operation listed also. Commissioners Davert, Bell and Pontious concurred with Chairperson Kozak. Chairperson Kozak asked Doug Anderson about the need for condition 2.7 which requires a parking demand analysis and asked if the analysis would include circulation as his concerns are centered on drop off and pick up of vehicles and the creation of problems for-tenants. Doug Anderson replied that typically any congestion would be for no more than 15 or 20 minutes and staff would not be as restrictive to invoke a traffic study. The Director noted that if the Planning Commission is concerned about circulation, the condition could be amended to reflect that concern. Chairperson Kozak stated he did not wish to impose anything on the applicant if there were no issue. The Director noted that the site is relatively small but there could be an issue in the future. Doug Anderson noted there could be issues with other businesses. Commissioner Pontious stated she believed the- center would be underparked in most cases. Ch_airperson Kozak stated his comfort with leaving the conditions as they are. The Public hearing closed at 7.:08 p.m. Commissioner Pontious suggested that staff speak with the property owners since they were not aware.of what kind of businesses are appropriate for their center. Commissioner Davert moved Commissioner Pontious seconded, to adopt Resolution Nos. 3703 and 3704 approving: Use Determination 99-003 and r , Planning Commission Minutes November 22, 1999 Page 4 Conditional Use Permit 99-024 to allow a•martial arts studio at 640 W. First Street y within the "Commercial as Primary Use" designation" of the First Street,Specific Plan (FSSP) amended as follows: Condition 2.2: to'read "Hours of operation shall be limited to 9:00 a.m..to 9:00-p.m. Monday through Saturday. The school shall be closed on Sundays. Modifications to the hours of operation may be approved by the Director 'of Community_ _ Development if it is determined that no impacts to surrounding tenants or properties will occur." Motion carried 5-0. - 4. - Code Amendment 99-001 a request to amend the Tustin City Code related to Boarding Houses in the Suburban Residential (R-4) and Multiple Family :Residential (R-3) Districts. and associated definitions. APPLICANT: CITY OF TUSTIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - Recommendation - That the Planning Commission: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 3706 recommending approval of the environmental.determination for the project; and, 2. Adopt Resolution No. 3707 recommending that the City Council° approve Code Amendment 99-001.. Scott Reekstin presented the subject report and` noted the changes made to the ordinance. The Public Hearing opened at 7:12 p.m. Commissioner Davert noted his concern with the definition-of,boarding houses and asked how compensation would be addressed if a non-profit group were running a facility. The Director stated,that issue is covered under the definition: Lois Bobak stated that type of facility would.fall under a single family. use and-Would have to meet the code and if there were unique burdens placed on that development_ it would be dealt with as a code enforcement issue. Commissioner Davert asked if there was any benefit to tightening up the ordinance. Planning Commission Minutes November 22, 1999 Page 5 . Lois Bobak noted that would be difficult because California and Federal law places restrictions on cities regulating uses on the basis of family definitions. The uses must be regulated by their impacts and not the nature of the people making the impacts. The Director noted that if eleven individuals get together to live in a fraternity house on a college campus it would be considered a boarding house..and would be' subject to-,a_ _ conditional use permit. Commissioner Davert asked about the impacts if an individual were to buy a big house and take in homeless people for free. The Director stated that use would fall under the definition of a family and further stated that staff believes what is being presented is as restrictive as permitted by law. Chairperson Kozak asked the Director if staff received any contacts from interested parties. The Director responded that notices were- provided as required and she spoke with Nick Spadafno who indicated that he and his attorney found the ordinance acceptable. • The Public Hearing closed at 7:17 p.m. Commissioner Kawashima asked if individuals'in the R-4 district could use the ordinance as a tool of enforcement. The Director noted the ordinance establishes boarding house as a conditionally permitted use within the R-4 district with certain development standards and provides greater opportunity for someone to legally establish a use and affords the City the ability to regulate the use in a reasonable manner. Chairperson Kozak noted that someone in audience may wish to speak. The.individual noted that he was attending for Conditional Use Permit 99-014. The Director informed the individual that the hearing,was continued to December 13' but he could supply staff with his comments in writing or over the phone if he is unable to attend the meeting on December 13'. Commissioner Kozak moved, Commissioner Davert seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 3706 recommending that the City Council approve the environmental determination for the project. Motion carried 5-0. Planning Commission Minutes November 22, 1999 Page 6 Commissioner Kozak moved. Commissioner Davert seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 3707 recommending that the City Council approve Code Amendment 99-001, revised.as follows: Ordinance No. 1225, Page 4, Section IV, under definition of "Family" — delete the following "related' by blood or legal status or a group of not more than six (6) persons who are not so related" Motion carried 5-0. REGULAR BUSINESS 5. AIRPORT ENVIRONS LAND USE PLAN (AELUP). -The Orange County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) has the- authority to adopt a comprehensive airport land use plan. I'n-1975 the ALUC adopted Orange County's first Airport Environs Land Use Plan (AELUP). The AELUP is a twenty-year planning document for the airports within Orange County. The AELUP may be amended on.an annual basis. The City of Tustin has responded to a number of issues proposed in previous amendments and the current 1999 Amendment. Recommendation Receive and file. The Director noted that the Planning Commission requested information on'the AELUP so staff has provided a staff report on that topic. Chairperson Kozak asked the status of the cities in litigation. The Director replied that she was not sure how many cities were involved, but does not believe Tustin will join the effort and'noted that staff will provide updates to the Commission as the issue progresses. The Director stated that part of the reason the City is not joining the litigation is because Tustin has a different issue than the other cities who are considering litigation. Commissioner Davert thanked Rita Westfield for an excellent report. Commissioner DaVert moved., oved Commissioner Bell seconded, to receive and file the subject report. Motion carried 5-0.• Planning Commission Minutes November 22, 1999 , Page 7 6. Status Report Elizabeth A. Binsackpresented the subject report and noted that staff will be doing a status report every other month or quarterly starting in January 2000. STAFF CONCERNS: 7. Report on Actions taken at the November 15, 1999 City Council Meeting, Elizabeth A. Binsack, Director of Community Development reported on the. subject agenda. COMMISSION CONCERNS: - -- Commissioner Bell Asked staff for clarification'on the Sutcliffe;property issue. The Director responded that in addition to the variance that the Planning Commission approved for the.:property to allow the owner to maintain a fence, the • Public Works Department issued an encroachment permit to allow construction in the public right-of-way.. The property owner proceeded to construct the wall without permits. She.further noted that permits have,been issued since that time. Commissioner Davert, - Stated his agreement with comments from Councilmembers Saltarelli and Thomas who pointed out the importance of building permits. Noted the Mayor's Prayer breakfast was a huge success and reminded everyone of the December 3`d tree lighting ceremony in Old Town. Commissioner Pontious Noted that landscaping at the former headache clinic at Newport and Mitchell was overgrown. Noted that graffiti was coming down and thanked staff. Commissioner Kawashima Noted that he did some work in the City of Orange and they,required him to obtain a business license. He. asked if the City of Tustin requires a business'license for:work being done in the City. Planning Commission_ Minutes November 22, 1999 Page 8 The Director respondedthat although she was not sure of .the City of Orange's regulations; however, if an individual is doing business in Tustin, they are required to obtain a license similar to a contractor. Chairperson Kozak - Thanked staff for taking care of the lease sign in front-of-the- Fireman's Fund building. Stated that the Tustin Lanes bowling alley -has received a new coat of purple paint and he believed one of the conditional use permit. conditions was for the color purple to be fazed out. t The Director responded that staff will follow up on that issue. Thanked staff for their help and wished everyone a Happy Thanksgiving. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Bell moved Commissioner Pontious seconded, to adjourn the • meeting at 7:32 p.m: Motion,carried 5-0. A regular meeting of the Planning Commission will be held on December 13, 1999 beginning at 7:00 p.m., City Council Ch�ambers,.300 Centennial Way, Tustin. ITEM #Z eport to the r }` Planning Commission DATE: DECEMBER 13, 1999 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-014 CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING. APPLICANT/ TUSTIN VILLAGE 11 HOMEOWNERS ASSOC. PROPERTY. - .1000 W. LA PALMA AVENUE - OWNER: ANAHEIM, CA 92801 LOCATION: TRACT 5142 (WEST OF TUSTIN .VILLAGE WAY, NORTH OF ALLIANCE AVENUE, 'SOUTH OF THE 1-5 FREEWAY AND EAST OF WILLIAMS STREET). ZONING: PLANNED COMMUNITY (PC) ENVIRONMENTAL- ---- -- _ --- - - - —_.- --- - - --- - - - - - STATUS: THE CONSTRUCTION -OF SMALL STRUCTURES IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT UNDER CLASS 3 AND PURSUANT TO SECTION 15303 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT. REQUEST: AUTHORIZATION TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR THE TUSTIN VILLAGE 11 PLANNED COMMUNITY :UNDER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 63-149 TO INCLUDE A DEFINITION, DEVELOPMENT- STANDARDS AND DESIGN REVIEW CRITERIA FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning.Commission continue Conditional Use Permit 99-0.14 to the January 24, 2000, Planning Commission meeting. BACKGROUND Staff recommends that the public hearing on this item be continued to allow_ the City Attorney additional time to review legal issues associated with this proposal. IMA4,4t L6fi 9.Cud if V Karen Peterson Assistant Planner Senior Planner . s:pereptsl2ndcup9M 1400nUnue.doc ITEM #3 e pori- o= h e - - WnT Planning Commission DATE: DECEMBER 13, 1999 SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW 99-032 APPLICANT: HOME DEPOT { 2732 EL CAMINO REAL TUSTIN, CA 92782 PROPERTY OWNERS: IRVINE RETAIL PROPERTIES CIO: DONAHUE SCHRIBER 2777 EL CAMINO REAL. TUSTIN, CA 92782 LOCATION: 2782 EL CAMINO REAL ZONING: PLANNED COMMUNITY - MIXED USE (PC-MU) WITHIN THE EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN (ETSP) ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: THIS PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT PURSUANT TO CLASS 1, SECTION 15301 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT.(CEQA). REQUEST: AUTHORIZATION TO REMODEL AND EXPAND THE HOME DEPOT GARDEN CENTER AND CONSTRUCT A SCREEN WALL ADJACENT TO THE EXISTING LOADING DOCK. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 3709 approving Design Review 99-032. BACKGROUND The applicant is requesting approval to expand the existing Garden Center area on the north side of the building and construct a canopy and A-frame structure to cover a portion of the Garden Center. The application includes the construction of additional walls to enclose the Garden Center area and screen the existing loading dock. Since exterior modifications are proposed, Design Review approval is required for this project, Section 3.12.2 of the East Tustin Specific Plan requires that Design Review projects be reviewed by the Planning Commission. Planning Commission Report DR 99-032 December 13, 1999 Page 2 Site and Surrounding Conditions The site is zoned "Planned Community--Mixed Use" by the East Tustin Specific Plan and located southwest of the intersection of El Camino Real and West Drive in Phase I of the Tustin Market Place (see Location Map—Affachmenf A). Surrounding uses include a car wash to the north, in- line retail tenants to the south, the auto center and flood control channel to the west of Myford Road and Carl's Junior and EI Polio Loco restaurants across the parking lot to the east. DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS The following summarizes the proposed modifications to the building (see Site Plan and Elevations --Attachment B): • The construction of new metal canopy to cover 5,400 square feet of existing gross floor area within the Garden Center. This would replace an existing screen canopy. The proposed metal canopy is relatively flat and would not be visible from the exterior of the building. The canopy would be screened by the proposed A-frame'structure,which also has a flat roof. • The construction of a new A frame structure to cover 1,475 square feet of existing gross floor area within the front portion of the Garden Center. The 24-foot high A-frame structure would extend 96-feet north along the front fagade and be approximately 24 feet in depth. Four gates would be incorporated into the design of the A-frame structure, which would provide access to the Garden Center from the front of the store. Three of the gates would be made of black tubular steel and one would be a fence made of the same materials and design. All four openings in the wall of the structure are the same size and spaced equally apart. On the north side elevation of the A-frame, an additional gate the same size as the front gates is proposed, which is made of the same black tubular steel as the front gates and fence. The color and texture of the A-frame structure exteriormatches the exterior color and texture of the main building. Four cash registers and checkout counters are proposed to be located under the A-frame structure. • The construction of a new shade screen to cover 2,980 square feet of existing gross floor area within the center of the Garden Center. • The construction of a 24-foot high wall to continue from the'A-frame structure along the north property line and enclose the Garden Center area. The wall would incorporate the design of the A-frame with picket fencing evenly spaced, similar to the gates and fence on the A-frame. This wall would have three small jogs, approximately 2'6"'in depth and extend 154 feet from the A frame structure to the west, or rear, of the Garden Center. The color and texture of the wall would match the exterior color and texture of the main building. • The addition of 476 square feet of uncovered gross floor area. This additional area would "square" an existing diagonal corner of the Garden Center area, add more space to display merchandise, and incorporate the existing rear access gate. • Planning Commission Report DR 99-032 _ December 13, 1999 Page 3 • The construction of anew 12-foot high screen wall adjacent to the existing loading dock. This screen wall would extend north from the existing building to the existing 8-foot high perimeter wall. The existing perimeter wall would be increased an additional four (4) feet in height with tubular steel metal fencing to match the fencing and gates incorporated into the A- frame structure and wall. The increased height of the existing wall would match the height of the new 12-foot screen wall adjacent to the loading dock. The color and texture of the proposed wall would match the A-frame, 24-foot wall, and the exterior of the main building. This screen wall will buffer any visual impact of the loading dock area from public view. The proposed alterations to the Garden Center and loading dock are designed to incorporate materials, colors and finishes that are consistent with the existing conditions to ensure compatibility with the surrounding buildings. As such the proposed modifications would be consistent with the architectural design of the existing Home Depot building and Tustin Market Place. Parking and Circulation As part of the original construction of Home Depot, the calculations for required parking did not include uncovered areas in the Garden Center. This rationale was continued when determining the required parking for the Garden Center expansion proposed under Design Review 94-021, • which was neves constructed. The Home Depot main building is 96,715 square feet which requires 484 parking spaces at the retail parking ratio of 1 space for every 200 square feet of gross floor area. The area of the Garden Center that is proposed to be covered is 6,875 square feet, which requires 34 spaces. The total required parking for Home Depot with the proposed remodel and expansion is 518 spaces. Tustin Market Place requires 3,921 parking spaces and has 4,142 parking spaces available for use by all tenants. Therefore, there is sufficient amount of parking for the proposed expansion of the Home Depot Garden Center. Pedestrian and vehicular circulation should not be adversely affected by the proposed project. Additional pedestrian access gates will be available on the front elevation. The new exit gates on the north elevation will be used for emergency access only and the access gate on the rear elevation is existing and being relocated. i A. Ludi Karen Peterson Associate Planner Senior Planner s:perept99032.doc Attachments: A- Location Map B— Submitted Plans C - Resolution No. 3709s ATTACHMENT A Location,Map • -� LOCATION MAP,�� •r �� i a3 2732 6 L CAM1140 KeAL ro3ect N - tin f� .....� ..... ,5 co 0 4 as .J` :' ry lee 41 yes aP J III y --■ '• ik k� � l' NO SCALE A*"hmu* ATTACHMENT B Submitted Plans J f 1 i ' A m EAST EIEVAPON Ir � .. •-�••-•• ...,.,.w m�nu.��nouni x�vuc..uirvwniauuue IBM ^../ <aW ewiA�urorwtewuarrc S:Y'. G `t 3'F�-9 nn wc. "nurcrxrcaacrowiw NORM gVVAM , m 01 9 b* PROPOSED ELEVATIONS FOR THE HOME DEPOT U.S.A.,INC. TUSTIN,CA. GARDEN CENTER REMODEL 9 990150 ASA tii�S.�y7Elt&tr"mLiii®I�i�➢�t�/iQti'�111a®®��fi®t� dE7sHH�Tit�til)➢tL71®®tli i I VSrI F 1. 1tJ I I I PROJECF100RUunoa w Nw.a.rtx t I �rz uc ro N[Txcl ----------------- ........... �R9ix awe w�t Ii:Is' eiioo ... O wean axrx mm°wR xcI .r°u ..__.._......_:.... µ'...- _ __........... t �..r...a xn taj�.Kr........... I +—n,...w.0 larx..'tx.9 rn.mzn R[ewcR rw.rw .9 f m.x r...xc aax w rL°R see v ! ' ................._................................. "" l.�►1Lll LI LI.LI.1L_ I If� 1.1111 _ j — s� """"``""w;","p"' r /. J '.l/, . ' �C-�' � � txsrx• rxsw wnntr [aassl° —moi � I } '.'`� x Cx1511NG I $NIIf: -—m.-.. rw wrw norm[°rut°rxrtirto see/i°°°srxes r I .q IqU[11001 01 CVLNI R RU[N T Z1=1I � �r,/tW ,. 6 "'�"�� 0 41xt°�P[xV lrvn terrumM1 unte,ustl,c[s I � ''•' /� �' - ',�� � � d e[srvmo ae�rut Dior ' 11 ' um snxt.roror rwe� " w [nsnrtlRxc __-- R xrt rw.c am winc[R sw.snare[ur - I 'i __�_�__- ..................................-......................__....._ IE aY I �Illllllllllllllllllllllllf�� — —_ ` J. .ww.,.. x.------ ----------— - ff1TTTTTTTf 1 i flTff I}}}-1}{+}}0}�{+�+++{+iso THE HOME DEPOT a TVS,IN NNRRCI RIM10E � I I NIYEORO 6[L CAMINO AEM1L =ti m CA-3090 I1Y., t99e1x0.01 ARA _ PLAN TWO �. . I7 C �� .�__ — rt[u[xl[WgMwt IOb APO�w W PpR,vrD I lr 1 1 yin 11 II 11111 b110 l 1 ( Px.Y ut f 1 ! ft 9 a \1p ��, �'l-{ L I g155 i 5 1 m°S. ,. '0.D w.rr .. ` • 1 `RCa I[ [! ,00) 0 0 0) 1 { t'.,. ­E 10­ un)D) p 0 [m 3D1 1,001•• t I 0 3K,411 _ 3Pj E_T. Q- E = R<1t19.x1 e a o 0 ,t "•t t c= c - F• - __ __ - TIRa1F sxZ 1 I "I 0 2K.193 91. Rl 1ll T •EDn 1 I L�uu.wuuu ultunl.uuI'MI Dlu, 17—' i•s;' - 1 � - s11>gNt rxaY,rg1E` ' wl l�- ~ l rtm,rr.—lrtrPllt(r'rTmlrlrlt3� Crmrtlumrrtrlmrmr� xwlx.a [ IIIIIII 'uuumuuew Q> —wm j e o 29.15 . - I 7�-�( 4'I s�.rol.i—9D.�espD o—9e m. sae )DJ I,• 'I M�Of - n141:1p+w1 33.1"e 1400 U 35169 P A N YE Io )eao _ i i 4 - _I 1`� _- SUR T014 ta.Jse s500 TO AJ e6e 1 ­1E MAL ni.Jai n.w0 •' I. i�'..r nq°rcl 1Dut )!gm J.DaD D SsI T 1pl fr1F 1X1 -. l f uaq [t�l I, RF.51wa„1 .14 I. •` 1 •• I 1, I I MMXyJ 5 TN YC`G[ '.ul! CC CAY�.O R[al 11.1sb e.SDD a >f5.23f t503 le.. • "0"{,.fa.01 { '¢ T,r3 t �I IIII.�..I aEE� (- Ct1[iliomttaE11 ."", 5.50° 0 ba4f l,lw. )we 1 .. II 11 IlIIL y�llkl�lll l E SUMMARY I I1 ,rylE • —1N(111Uf I19[1MM1t 1I 11WPb1i11G-AA-IJ[I4 N1.CWINtIR IS­R, AsF ' IIfIM[D[ttlT 94,1151.x. 111Y I'ARkIN(;NIUUIRIMLNI. OUtUEJOR GARUFN r[Nl[0. _1ZD111! _� `{ C ; I L REVISION; DUE IOCIIANGESIGR11bAJEUEPUT fKARKING REQUIRED BY CITY• SPACS _{ �{ t -j _ tFASt)[NANt S1 AN,AUlII511UPARAEN(.Cl-I5 t91�ZOD 5'1'1 . ..P "15 N1E¢.. '_ -Ii ..._.=. _-- .N CNl ItJ uoR+nutt)nqu"1 rARN1Nc 1s n„sw+iPq G.xo-Da�[n Pr E 'J I t - ulc rnitn nv lSUlls l nu-brit rngk NG is ° E 1 { a 'B f PARRwC.Pgov o[D: { t 1 I -{ 1[r SIU RY ISlAIIR OIACON NGR WA51. CDSIOMI RS: IqB stores � ' Q�I IA RB+r�I51NCRfAS[D nYIPARNIN051•AC[' fmgfllX4: ,I SPACES CMI'LOYCC: _JJSPL,EIS [ kli ,3� ( t _ BlE THE HOME DEPOT [.aPACES • `s ,¢••�� .._A__ - 1! 1 u:Jlr.' )1 `W' MYIUROb[I RITN REAS IID PARKING MTION PROvtUfD:]PNl final SPACES r �_ __ __ _ '.. IVSINA,nRRIT­CE ' -5„ �� 33 ZUNF PCMU PIAN CO U 9Y 11R6 VSE, srbM[R PnR dd IfU fROrvT CU bNG JBe SPAC[5 I JO!�'?•US �' / CA-309'n NOTE: "IIS SIiF?I AN IS BASED UNfMUtt SUt '. 1•I'� - u.u. qP UAtfUVI•RI UIUBYI AACIR1FCTURF. 1� 111)f1Y 9ggn Nq.N IL a- " ,IIS Tuslin Mat Place -- LPA OVERALLlSITEV PLAN _ P.2 Ii ' I NUMB ' �T I• E �.,r �!�4 j r ® ec..o EAST El EVAPON NOTE: ' 'E® BUM ��'w u.y4 uw.rnurc�. •, a�,�. .qS uuow4l e7kH� .. � orcuaw' e,oanwvcrv4 e. �I" � + I: Fpi — - . -........ .N9RiN E�EVAnoN ....•.., - ,......-- -- ��, 3 • N�iH ELEVAliON �, 'y I- PROPOSED ELEVATIONS FOR f -"� _•- THE HOME DEPOT U.S.A.,INC. RNIS Ctl@ , TUSTIN, CA — GARDEN CENTER REMODEL It o .Err taa�.�ts�tt�rt�tattt�utsttn�ti�p�ata��.�o�cat�t�.�i■ ree j f � I i F 77 VJ,-- =2i G THE HOME DEPOT U.S.A.,INC. ! TUSTIN, CA GARDEN CENTER REMODEL -1 9,0,10 El t! ' 1 �•�;— � �T::Y::.. �.--�— - - `�::,:�.:.. _.., mss �'r' ...._.� ��-.•�.^ _ �.......� NOT. OT.r CURD DETAIL LJ�"- � �i - �..: `.. �$IEEI.PICKET FEHC£ '�� ,� • (�lsEcnDN_-•PALL_ ��.cnoN-wAu Uv,•,r�.'-� i Ego.lawi T Imo_. ` W WON x " I•I' .p.�• VIII------ A-rrar_�e — DELEVAnON-CHAIN LINK FENCE .,{_ ..w.�- THE HOME DEPOT U.S.A.,INC. GARDEN CENTER REMODEL rlsecnar-wAu eNORM_ yr r-i�OPANE RAdf ENCLQ$�� DETAILS I'll � �ta��.Ro�ta�tsi��■ ' A5 0 �r CA IIO 9} 1 it 1 •P r� F"r. I W� i I r,✓� L ��,I gym.' "T �ti j - _ I 1 it WAM Q' ELENATIOR—DCCBLE LEAF "NOETNt—FEI+LE.P1�!�LT�nNc ;I ' I'• -- 'i m Z-L". E - G15ECADNp CAIS DPDP RDD ASSEMBLY e e r DETAII GAIE 9LL - �.T.iY �� ✓_;ter n.��n .. •,.i' _ THE HOME DEPOT U.S.A.,INC. -----f.- LIELEVATDN—SERNCE GALE DROP RDO ASSEMBLY � ' ---. �� — T JSTIN, CA GARDEN CENTER REMODEL DETAIL—DBL sr.Af EMEg DATES �10E A2—DBL LEAF EDEA CATS JAMB DETAILS - ' inMss vvm.n nnn A6,Z - ATTACHMENT C 'ResoIution No. 3709 { = = RESOLUTION N0. 3709" z A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION"OF THE CITY-OF 3 TUSTIN APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW 99-032 AUTHORIZING THE 4 REMODEL AND 476 SQUARE FOOT' EXPANSION OF THE HOME DEPOT GARDEN CENTER AREA AND THE CONSTRUCTION -OF A 5 SCREEN. WALL ADJACENT TO ' THE EXISTING 'LOADING DOCK 6 LOCATED AT 2782 EL CAMINO REAL, 7 The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows: 8 I. The Planning Commission Ends and determines as".follows: A. That a proper application, Design Review 99-018, was fled by Home Depot 10 on.behalf of Irvine Retail Properties requesting authorization to remodel and expand the Home Depot Garden Center area.and construct a screen wall ' adjacent to the existing loading dock located at 2782 EI Camino Real. 1z - B. In accordance With Section 3.12.2 of the East Tustin'Specific Plan (ETSP), 13 the Planning. Commission is authorized, to consider Design Review 14 applications for projects within the ETSP. • 15 C. That said application. was reviewed and considered by the Planning . Commission on December 13, 1999. 16 17 D. Pursuant to Section 9272 of the Tustin Municipal Code, the-Commission.' finds that the location, size, architectural features and general appearance 18 of Design ReView.'99-018 will not impair the orderly and harmonious 19 development of the area, the present or future development therein, or the occupancy as a whole. In making such findings, the Commission has 20 considered at least the;following items: 21 1. Height, bulk and area of buildings.: 22 2. Setbacks and site planning. 3. Exterior materials and colors. 23 4. Type and pitch of roofs. 5. Size and spacing of windows, doors and other openings. 24 6.. Towers, chimneys, roof structures, flagpoles, radio and television 25 antennae. 7. Landscaping,parking area design and traffic circulation. 26 8. Location,,height and standards of exterior illumination. 27 9. Location and appearance of equipment located outside of an enclosed structure. 28 10.' Location and method of refuse storage. 11.- Physical relationship of proposed structures to existing structures in 29 the neighborhood. 12. Appearance and design relationship of proposed structures to existing structures and possible future structures in the neighborhood and public thoroughfares. _ Conditionsof Approval Resolution_%. 3709 2 Page 2 3 4 13. :Proposed signage. 14. Development Guidelines and criteria as adopted by the City Council. 5 6 E. In accordance with Section 15301 'of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), this project. is Categorically Exempt (Class 1) from 'the 7 requirements of the Act. F. That the project has been reviewed for"consistency with the Air Quality Sub- 9 - Element of the City .of Tustin General Plan and has been determined to be consistent with the Air Quality Sub-Element. 10 - r 11 11. The . Planning Commission -hereby approves Design: Review 99-036 authorizing the remodel-and 476 square'foot expansion of the.Home"Depot 12 Garden Center area and the construction of a screen wall adjacent to the 13 existing loading dock located at 2782 El Camino Real, subject to the conditions contained in Exhibit A, attached hereto. 14 PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission, held 19 on the 13th day of December, 1999.1 • 16 17 1s STEPHEN-V. KOZAK Chairperson 19 ELIZABETH A. BINSACK 70 Planning Commission Secretary 21 22 23 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE } 24 CITY,OF TUSTIN ) 25 26 I, ELIZABETH A. BINSACK, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the"Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, Califomia; that Resolution No. 3709 was duly 27 passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission, held on the 28 13th day of December, 1999. 29 ELIZABETH A..BINSACK Planning Commission Secretary - EXHIBIT A- 588(64 I]ESIGN REVIEW 99=032 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESOLUTION NO. 3.709 GENERAL (1) IA The proposed project shall substantially conform with the submitted plans for the , project date-stamped December 13, 1999, on, file with the 'Community Development Departrnent,,as herein modified, or as modified by the Director of Community Development Department in accordance with this Exhibit. The Director may also approve minor modifications to the plans if such modifications are determined to,;.be consistent with the approved plans. (1) ' 1.2 Unless otherwise specified, the-conditions.coritained in this Exhibit shall be complied with prior to the issuance of any building`permits for the project, subject to` review and. approval by the Community_ Development Department. (1) 1.3. Design Review approval shall become null -and void unless'all building permits are issued within twelve (12) months of the date of this Exhibit and . substantial construction is underway. (1) 1.4 The applicant and--property owner shall sign and return an Agreement to Conditions Imposed form prior to issuance of building permits. (1) ' 1.5 The applicant`shall hold harmless .and defend the City of Tustin from all claims and liabilities arising out of a challenge of'the City's approval of this -project. - SOURCE CODES ' (1) STANDARD CONDITION (4) DESIGN REVIEW (2) CEQA MITIGATION AS) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY REQUIREMENTS (6) LANDSCAPING GUIDELINES (3) UNIFORM BUILDING CODEIS (7) PC/CC POLICY """` EXCEPTIONS --EX hjbitA_ _ __ _-_s= -_-_ -- --=-_ __ -_ _ -- _ - - .-- . - . - • Design Review 99-032 Conditions of Approval Resolution No. 3709 Page 2 PLAN SUBMITTAL (3) 2.1 Indicate on the title sheet the applicable codes, City, state and federal laws and regulationsto include: • 1997 Uniform Building Code with California Amendments • 1997 Uniform Mechanical and Plumbing Codes with California Amendments 1996 National Electrical Code with California Amendments City of Tustin Grading and Security Ordinance • City of Tustin Landscaping and Irrigation Guidelines • City of Tustin Private Improvements Standards (1) 2.2 Vehicle parking, primary entrance to the building, the primary paths of travel, cashier space, sanitary facilities, drinking fountain, and public telephones shall be accessible to persons with disabilities. • (3) 2.3 At building pian check submittal the following shall be provided: (3) A. Four (4) sets of construction plans, two (2) sets of structural calculations, and Title 24 energy calculations prepared by a licensed engineer/architect. Requirements of the Uniform Building Codes, State Disabled Access and Energy Requirements shall be complied with as required by the Building Official. No field changes shall be made without corrections submitted to and approved by the Community Development Department. (5) B. Information to ensure compliance with requirements of the Orange County Fire Authority including required fire flow and- installation, where required, of fire hydrants .subject to approval of the Fire Authority, City of Tustin Public Works Department. and/or Irvine Ranch Water District. (5) C. Information to ensure - compliance -with. the requirements of. the Orange County Sanitation District No. 7. (5) D. The applicant shall update the chemical inventory to include the materials to be used in the treatment process. This update shall be i provided to the Orange County Fire Authority/Hazardous Materials Disclosure OfFce. _ExhibitA �Desigri Review 99-032= Conditions of Approval Resolution No. 3709 Page 3 (1) 2.4 Specifications at Building Permit plan check submittal shall reflect materials call-outs on all elevationswith-applicabledetails and notes added. (1) 2.5 All site drainage shall be handled on=site, subjectto review and approval by ti the Building Official (3). 2.6 A surety/cash bond will- be required. to assure work Is completed in accordance with approved plans. Bonds will.be based upon the estimated cost of the grading, drainage, and,erosion control prior to the issuance of t -a-grading permit. (3) 2.7 The plans submitted into plan_check shall indicate that restroom/s shall be 'made "accessible to, persons with disabilities as. per State of California Accessibility Standards. (Title 24). (3) 2.8 Provide area analysis for-ail buildings, and show compliance with allowable floor areas based on U.B.C. Table 5b. (3) 2.9 Exit door.in the expansion area shall remain. The exit doors are required 'to be unlocked,,identified with an illuminated exit sign and powered by the buildings' power source. (1) 2.10 Label property lines and show setbacks. (3) 2.11 Note.on plans "Canopy construction type shal[ 'match,existing building". SITE AND BUILDING CONDITIONS (4) 3.1' All materials, styles and colors shall be consistent with existing treatments within the Tustin Market!Place. (1) 3.2 Note on final plans that a six-foot-high�chain [inked fence shall be installed around the site,prior to building construction;stages. Gated entrances shall be permitted along the perimeterfor construction ingress and egress. (4) _3.3 Installation of security hardware and locking devices as required for commercial structures pursuant to the Tustin City Code. A sign plan shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for review and approval prior to installation of business identification or service signs. - - FxhlbitA Desi - - __ - - - -- - - - - n Review 99-032 9 _ Conditions of Approval Resolution No. 3709 Page 4 (4) 3.4 - If applicable, -all mechanical and electrical fixtures and equipment shall be adequately and,decoratively screened. The screen shall be considered as an element of the overall design,of the project and shall blend with the architectural design of the building. NOISE (1) 4.1 All construction operations including engine warm up shall be subject to the provisions of the City of Tustin -Noise.Ordinance and shall take place only during the hours of 7:00 a.m. until 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday unless the Building Official determines that said activity will be in substantial conformance with the Noise Ordinance and the public health and safety will not be impaired subject to application being-made at the time the permit for the work is awarded- or 'during progress of the work unless other construction noise standards are subsequently adopted-by the City Council in which case said new standards shall be complied with. USE RESTRICTIONS k • (2) 5.1 The following parking summary shall be shown on the site plan: Home Depot Main Building(Existing) - 96,715 H.D.Garden Center Canopy(New) 5,400 H.D.Garden CenterA-Frame(New) - 1.,475 H.D.Garden Center Outdoor(Exisfing) - 10,137" H.D.Garden Center Outdoor ExpansionArea - 476.' Total Garden Center(New/Existing) - 17,488 Total H.D.Square Feet - 114,203 Uncovered Garden Center Outdoor Area (e.g., not'under canopy or A-Frame)is not included in requiredparkingcalculationsperPlanningCommissionResolution2462adoptedon 1-11-88. Required Parking for Home Depot: H.D.Main Building(Existing) - 96,715 H.D.Garden Center Canopy(New),. - 5,400 H.D.Garden CenterA-Frame(New) = 1,475 Total: - 103,590 Total H.R.required parking @1:200 518 spaces + Phase I Total Required Parking - 1,951 ` Phase l Total Provided Parking 1,844 Phase I (Deficient): - . 107 spaces Tustin Market Place Total Required Parking - 3,921 Tustin Market Place Total Provided Parking - 4,142 Tustin Market Place(Excess): - 221 spaces ExhibitA _- - -= Design Review 99=03 _ - Conditions of Approval Resolution No. 3709 Page 5 FIRE (5) 6.1 Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans for any required automatic fire sprinkler system in any structure to the OCFA for review and approval. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of use and occupancy, this system shall be,operational in a manner meeting the approval by the Fire Chief. (5) 6.2 Prior to the issuance of a building permit for combustible construction, the builder shall submit a letter on company letterhead stating that water for fire-fighting purposes and the all weather fire protection access roads shall be in place and-operational before any combustible material is placed on site. (5) 6.3 Prior to the issuance of any building permits the applicant shall submit to the Fire Chief a list of the quantities of .all hazardous, flammable and combustible materials, liquids or gases.` These liquids and materials are to be classified according to the "Orange County Fire Authority Chemical Classification Handout". The submittal shall provide a summary sheet listing each hazard. class, the total quantity of chemicals stored per class and the total quantity of chemicals used in that class. All forms of materials are to be converted to units of measure in pounds, gallons and cubic feet. (5) 6.4 Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall contact the Orange County Fire Authority Hazardous Materials Disclosure Office at (714) 744-0463 to obtain a "Hazardous Materials Business Information and Chemical Inventory Packet". This shall be completed and submitted to the Fire Chief prior to the issuance of a building permit. (5) 6.5 Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans for the review and approval of the Fire Chief as indicated on the OCFA Plan Submittal Criteria form. Contact the OCFA at (714).744-0403 for a copy of the Fire Safety Site/Architectural'Notes to be placed on the plans prior to submittal. FEES (1)' 7.1 Prior to issuance of any permits, payment shall be made of all required S fees, as may be in effect at the time of. permit issuance, including, but not limited to: xhibit A Desi n Review 99-032 g -- _ _ _ w_ -= _ -- -• Conditions of Approval Resolution No. 3709 Page 6 A. All, -applicable plan: check and permit fees to the Community Development Department, based on the most current schedule, as may be amended prior to permit issuance. B. Orange County Fire Authority plan check and inspection fees'to the Community Development Department based upon the most current schedule. C. `New developmenttax to the Community Development Department in the amount of $.10 per square foot or as may be amended prior to permit issuance.,' .(5) 7.2 Within forty-eight (48) hours of approval- of the subject project, the , applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department, a cashier's check payable to the COUNTY CLERK in the,amount of $38.00 (thirtj eight dollars) to enable the City.to file the appropriate environmental documentation for-the project. If within such forty-eight (48) hour period • that �applicant has not-, delivered to the, Community Development - 'Department the above-noted check, the statute of limitations for any interested party to challenge the environmental determination under the -provisions of the California ITEM #4 cwsr ,),-*te opt-= othep Planning Commission DATE: DECEMBER 1.3, 1999 SUBJECT: GENERAL-PLAN CONFORMITY DETERMINATION APPLICANT: BOWIE, ARNESON, WILES & GIANNONE (REPRESENTING THE TUSTIN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT) 4920 CAMPUS:DRIVE .NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 PROPERTY- OWNERS: IRVINE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 550 NEWPORT CENTER DRIVE, FLOOR 7 NEWPORT-BEACH, CA 92660 LOCATION: NORTHEAST CORNER OF TOWNSHIP DRIVE AND RAWLINGS WAY ZONING: PLANNED COMMUNITY RESIDENTIAL (PCR), POTENTIAL • ELEMENTARY SCHOOL(ES) ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: GENERAL PLAN CONFORMITY DETERMINATIONS ARE NOT "PROJECTS" REQUIRING ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW. PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT RECOMMENDATION . That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution-No. 3708 determining that the proposed Rawlings Way Elementary School is,in conformance with the Tustin General Plan. BACKGROUND Section 65402(a) of.the California Government Code (State Planning and Development Law) requires agencies to inform and obtain general plan conformity determinations from the• local planning agency prior to acquisition or disposition of- 'real property .-and construction or authorization of public buildings. The Tustin Unified School District is proposing to acquire land and construct an elementary school:on nine (9) acres at the northeast corner of 'Township Drive and. Rawlings Way, which will accommodate • approximately 650 students (Attachment A - Location Map/ Site Plan). The district Planning Commission Report . General Plan Conformity December 13, 1999 • Page 2 proposes to undertake the construction of permanent school buildings; modular teaching stations; play fields; administration, support, and parking facilities; and, lighting (see Attachment B). The Planning Commission is authorized to determine whether the location, purpose,:and extent of the proposed acquisition and construction is consistent with the.General Plan. The General Plan designates the project site as "Planned Community Residential" (PCR). Schools that are determined to be compatible with and oriented towards meeting the needs of surrounding residential neighborhoods are allowed in this land use designation. The East Tustin Specific Plan Land Use Map classifies the proposed site as a "Potential Elementary School". With respect. to schools, the General Plan identifies the following Goals and Policies: Goal 1: "Provide for a well balanced land use pattern that accommodates existing and future needs for open space and community facilities and services". Goal 8: "Ensure that necessary public facilities and services are available to accommodate development proposed on the Land Use Policy Map". Polis 9.2: "Provide for supporting land uses in East Tustin, including neighborhood Y pp g 9 g commercial centers, park and recreational facilities, and schools, to serve the residential community". The City of Tustin has transmitted comments on the environmental documentation for the project to the Tustin Unified School District (see Attachment C). With implementation of the City's recommended mitigation measures, the proposed elementary school would be compatible with uses in the vicinity and serve residents of the surrounding community. As such, the location, purpose, and extent 'of the proposed acquisition/ construction is in conformance with the City of Tustin General Plan and the East Tustin Specific Plan. • n�P Jam- 1 Lt-/X)-C\- Melanie Pickett Karen Peterson Administrative Intern Senior Planner Attachments: A. Location Map/Site Plan B. Submitted Request _ C. Letter Dated December 7, 1999 D. Resolution No. 3708 Pcreport/GPC-RAWLINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL • ATTACHMENT A Location Map/Site Plan • "LOCATI ON- MAP I r_ 1 I x7�:� 4r apt y.,.•'• � f_ ' \ "amu\+ :•^�,��o'' N ,1.N Ups ¢ l •* - �- is`y T`To•. 4;•1` • '�`' SI 42,36 7.r6:, � •T.10'i .,Ti2q 1.]4•' 0.•yy i " 2.30: 1``p 1's:lys 1'�••,v �`<'9•r �J yi,7r•6 Salo: S.W i T.•5 5.>0 `✓;• TiyS 2-50.1 - 1660 •! -L` i`1 t3�SC��p4 P 0 6 s ed -_ _ P �:x•6r 7 . .e61 r�rN 251- 25 Ts6•:a• T 355 _ '•x.ex 3506;�'•3705 253•'+`• Sys . gq{ 7ef6: TSiS TSSa':'fti'•ti ry R s iUriU 1 1 Nv, 3 i6 N S 357. w Sags- -TU 5 T; !1yy... �oyymo.mom.. •xse i I / . �'x1]7 h•n=$ n$� - :J e Y P.anc-h 0-0 CL 3 ..665:'3.93 ~•�• r.y ,"•�r�....�•T 35ti..,•�,1y9 aye`' :+;' � pM U✓' � ' • air, [tl,c ` ",g7 ! '._.—.-~� . NO SCALE GENERAL PLAN CONFORMITY FOR RAWLINGS WAY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL-ATTACHMENT A Land- ............ and- buff to Qt1Ve g,�-- prkale nel�bahood•" -� tll18h,� �[� • _. � ,ac:po op` field PJerjr,�4`r , Ce 11 Vall�nc/i�7 3 a Bldg. `� - , - oca Bldg. u I , Wig ® '. � ! �r A r _ Ell EF E[]_ Bldg. Entry a ardreap atrmlwa . 0 50' 100' 150' TRf1T�� 1�, ��nAMGa1� ATTACHMENT B Submitted Request • RECEI1/ED - - _ 999 BQWTE, APNESON, WILES & GIANNONE 0 f 1- A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS COMMUNITY NITY D jL-VELOPMENT ATTORNEYS AT LAW U M� * 4920 CAMPUS DRIVE (800)423.6454 ALEXANDER BOWIE JOAN C.ARNESON NEWPORT BEACH,CALIFORNIA 92660 FAX(949)851-2014 WENDY H.WILES* (949)851-1300 PATRICIA B.GIANNONE ROBERT E.ANSLOW 3403 TENTH STREET,SUITE 715 RESPOND TO NEWPORT BEACH DANIELJ.PAYNE RIVERSIDE,CALIFORNIA 92501 REF.OUR FIIE BRIAN W.SMITH (909)222-2750 JULIA D.RICE LEONIE MULVIHILL 27201 TOURNEY ROAD,SUITE 20oB THOMAS A.MILLER VALENCIA,CALIFORNIA 91355 18047.9.1 BRIAN H.GUNN (661)284-2508 'A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION November 9, 1999 Elizabeth Binsack Director of Planning City of Tustin 300 Centennial Way Tustin, California 92780 Re: Request for Report on the Construction of the proposed Rawlings Elementary School by the Tustin Unified School District Dear Ms. Binsack: On behalf of the Tustin Unified School District("District"), this letter serves as notice of the District's intention to construct the proposed Rawlings Elementary School which will accommodate approximately 650 students. Specifically, the District proposes to undertake the construction of all appropriate and necessary permanent and/or temporary school facilities, including, but not limited to, modular teaching stations, play fields, administration, support, and parking facilities, as well as lighting on approximately 9 acres of real property located at the northeasterly corner of Township Drive and Rawlings Way legally described as Lot 6 of Tract No.,12870 contained within Sections 42 and 43, Township 5 South; Range 9 West, in the City of Tustin, County of Orange, State of California ("Proposed Project Site"). The purpose of the project is to provide educational facilities for up to 650 elementary students within the Tustin Unified School District. The beneficiaries of the Project include the students, parents and other members of the community. This letter shall serve as formal request for the Planning Commission to investigate the Proposed Project Site and submit a written report to the District within thirty days of your receipt of this letter. The report should detail the Planning Commission's investigation and recommendations concerning the District's proposed use of the property for classroom activities. Because the County has adopted a general plan, this letter also serves to advise the Planning Commission, pursuant to Government Code Section 65402, that the District is BAW&G/LM/61598 s` BOWIE, ARNESON, WILES & WGIANNONE'_ Ms. Elizabeth Binsack • November 9. 1999 Page 2 considering the construction of the proposed Rawlings Elementary School at the Proposed Project Site. We further request that the Planning Commission report on whether the District's construction of the proposed Rawlings Elementary School will conform with the adopted general plan as is required pursuant to Government Code Section 65402. This additional aspect of the County's report should include a determination of whetl=the zoning for the Proposed Project Site permits construction of the proposed Rawlings Elementary School. To assist the Planning Commission in its investigation, we have enclosed a vicinity map and tract map showing the location of the Proposed Project Site. We would appreciate your sending your response to this request to the undersigned on or before December 10, 1999. If you have any questions with respect to this request or the proposed construction, please feel.free to contact this firm. Very truly yours, BOWIE, ARNESON, • WILES & GIANNONE f 4�j k��4 By: Leonie Mulvihill LM/ad Encl. cc: Brock Wagner (w/o enclosures) Alex Bowie, Esq. (w/o enclosures) 13AW&GILM/6I 598 ATTACHMENT C Letter Dated December 7, 1999 CiS.C1�: Community Development Department City -of Tustin December 7, 1999 300 Centennial Way Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 573-3100 Leonie Mulvihill Bowie, Arneson, Wiles & Giannone 4920 Campus Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 SUBJECT: RAWLINGS WAY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DRAFT NEGATIVE DECLARATION Dear Ms. Mulvihill: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the draft Negative Declaration for the proposed elementary school on Rawlings Way. The City of Tustin has reviewed the document and offers the comments: 1. Determination: Under the "Determination" section of the Environmental • Information Form, item number 2 should be checked. The project will have an impact on the environment and mitigation measures will be necessary. If measures will not mitigate impacts, an EIR should be prepared. 2. General: The draft Negative Declaration does not mitigate the project's impacts nor provide a monitoring program as required by CEQA. 3. General: Throughout the document, the statement is made that "the project was included within the scope of the East Tustin Specific Plan and Final EIR 85-2." While Final EIR 85-2 may be incorporated by reference as a previous environmental document which generally addressed the development of schools within East Tustin, the EIR did not provide construction level environmental analysis. The draft Negative Declaration needs to identify specific, construction level impacts and mitigation measures under each topical discussion. If no impact is anticipated, the text should provide the justification for this conclusion. 4. General: The project description should be modified to clarify what lighting is proposed for the project. 5. Page 4, Aesthetics: Construction of the school has the potential to affect the visual character and quality of the site and surroundings and introduce new light s - - -• =_ �Ms.Leonie-Mulvihill - Dec- _'b_ 7,-1-9 99 - - . Page 2 sources on the property. The responses to I(c) and I(d) shouldbe revised. At a minimum, the following mitigation measures are necessary: a. The existing jandscaping along Rawlings and Township may be altered but shall conform to the requirements of the East Tustin Specific Plan. Approval from the homeowners associations affected by any changes to the. existing landscaping shall be obtained. The slopes at the rear of the property will be maintained in an attractive. manner and shall not be encroached upon. b. A Street Improvement Pian shall be submitted for review and approval by the City of Tustin which includes existing or proposed street 'lighting. Approval of the Street Improvement Plan shall be obtained from the City of Tustin Public Works Department to ensure that there are no impacts due to light or glare. 5. Page 5, Air Quality: Since the project will increase vehicular traffic in the vicinity, potential air quality impacts should be analyzed and appropriate mitigation measures included.- 6. Page 7, Geology and Soils: Since the project site-is located in an area that ,is subject to seismic activity, the text should identify that potential impacts will be reduced to a IeVel of insignificance with implementation of the requirements of the Office of the State Architect. 7. Page 9, Hydrology and Water Quality: Construction on the project site will modify drainage patterns and introduction of impervious surfaces has the potential to affect the amount and quality of surface runoff water. Items VIII (c), (d), (e), and (1) .should be modified and° construction and operational impacts should be analyzed. At a minimum, the following mitigation measures are necessary: a. The TUSD shall obtain approval of the Tustin Ranch III Homeowners Association for runoff.into private facilities and approval from the City of Tustin for runoff into public facilities. b. Construction and operation of the school shall comply with the requirements of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System. 8. Page 11, Noise: The school facility has the potential to increase the noise level within the area. Items XI(a), (c), and (d) should be modified and construction and operational impacts should be analyzed. At a minimum, the following mitigation measures are necessary: s — - - Ms. Leonie Mulvihill December 7, 1999 Page-3 - a. Construction and operation of the school shall comply with the City of Tustin,Noise Ordinance. b. The Tustin Unified School District shall work ' with the adjacent Homeowners Associations to reduce the noise generated by traffic on Rawlings Way by directing maintenance vehicle access to the Township Drive entrance of the adjacent gated community. 9. Page 12, Public Services the Orange County Fire Authority should be provided with the opportunity to review*and comment on the plan. 10. Page 12, Recreation: The text should document that no adverse impacts from joint use or lighting of the play fields is anticipated since joint use and lighting are not proposed. 11. Page 13, Transportation/Traffic: Based upon land use generation rates of- the East Tustin Specific Plan, this project will generate approximately 520 vehicle trips per day. It is anticipated that approximately 50 percent, or 260 trips, will be generated in the A.M. peak hour. Since Rawlings Way terminates into a private gated community, all of the vehicular access to the school will be from the intersection of Tustin Ranch Road and Rawlings Way. In addition, maintenance vehicles and workers use the Rawlings Way entrance gate for A.M. access and may conflict with the A.M. peak hour school drop off activities. This may result in traffic congestion and driver frustration from attempting to maneuver for street frontage to drop-off students and turn around to return to Tustin Ranch Road. Items XV (a) and (c) should be modified and construction and operational impacts should be analyzed. In addition, items XV (d), (e), and (f) should be explored with the Office of the State Architect for compliance with design and parking criteria and with the Orange County Fire Authority for emergency access. With respect to traffic impacts on Rawlings Way, at a minimum the .following mitigation measures are necessary: a. The TUSD shall work with the adjacent homeowners associations to reduce the traffic congestion by directing maintenance access to the Township Drive entrance of the adjacent gated community. b. The location of the two access driveways on Rawlings Way and the location of the bus drop-off and the vehicular parking/drop-off area shall not be modified without review and approval of the City of Tustin. No parking shall be permitted on Rawlings Way. The curbs along Rawlings Way shall be painted red and signing shall be added for drop-off only after the completion of the project. :_--- - —Ms-,Leonie-Mulvihill. �. - - December 7, 1999 - Page 4 G. An area of right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City of Tustin adjacent to the two driveway approaches. Radius returns shall be used to increase the circulation at these access points. d. The TUSD shall work with the adjacent homeowners association to obtain a permanent and secure pedestrian access to the school from Township Drive. e. Prior to construction, the proposed access plan shall be approved by the Orange County Fire Authority and applicable requirements shall be incorporated into the construction plans. 12. Page 14, Utilities and Service Systems: Construction and *operation of a new school will require utility installations and coordination with service agencies. Item XVI(c) should be modified and potential impacts analyzed -and mitigated. With respect to storm water facilities, at a minimum, the following mitigation measures are necessary- a. A Street Improvement Plan shall be submitted to the City 'of Tustin for review and approval. The plan shall include the location of all proposed and existing utilities and storm drains. Approval of the Street • Improvement Plan shall be obtained from the City of Tustin Public Works Department to ensure that there are no impacts on the existing water supplies and the water drainage facilities. 13. Mandatory Findings of Significance: Item "c" was not answered. If you have any questions, please contact me at (714) 57.3-3031. Sincerely, r , Elizabeth A. Binsack, Director Community Development Department cc: Brock Wagner William Huston Tim Serlet (i<areri Peterson Doug Anderson Lori Ludi • s:111eahlraw1ingsesnegdec.doc ATTACHMENT D Resolution No. 3708 I RESOLUTION NO. 3708 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE 3 CITY OF TUSTIN DETERMINING THAT THE LOCATION, PURPOSE, AND EXTENT OF THE PROPOSED ACQUISITION a AND CONSTRUCTION"OF AN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL AT THE 5 NORTHEAST CORNER OF TOWNSHIP DRIVE AND RAWLINGS WAY BY THE TUSTIN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CONFORMS 6 WITH THE TUSTIN GENERAL PLAN. 7 8 - The Planning Commission does hereby resolve as follows: 9 10 I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: 11 A. That the Tustin Unified School District proposes to construct an elementary school at the northeast corner of Township Drive and Rawlings Way within 12 the East Tustin Specific Plan "Planned Community Residential' zoning 13 district and General Plan.land use designation. 14 B. That California Government Code Section 65402 (a) provides that an 15 agency shall not acquire or dispose of real property and construct or authorize public buildings until the location, purpose, and extent of the 16 project has been reported upon by the local planning agency as to the conformitywith the applicable, adopted general plan. 17 18 C. That the "Planned Community Residential" land use designation provides for the establishment of schools that are compatible with and oriented 19 towards serving the needs of the surrounding community. In addition, the . General Plan,contains the following Goals and Policies which support the 20 provision of schools: 21 Goal 1: "Provide for a well balanced land use pattern that 22 accommodates existing and future needs for open 23 space and community facilities and services" 24 Goal 8: "Ensure that necessary public facilities and services are available to accommodate development proposed 25 on the Land Use Policy Map" 26 - Policy 9.2: "Provide for supporting land uses in East Tustin 27 including neighborhood commercial centers, park and 28 recreational facilities, and schools, to serve the residential community" ?9 With implementation of the City's recommended mitigation measures contained in the letter dated December 7, 1999, the proposed acquisition and construction would conform to the Tustin General Plan. Exhibit=A_ --- - - - Resolution 3708 - 1 December 13, 1999 Page 2 -_ - - --_ _ __ _ - _ -- - - _— • 2 3 D. That general plan conformity determinations required by Government Code 4 Section 05402(a) are not "projects" requiring environmental review pursuant 5 to the California Environmental Quality Act. 6 II. The Planning Commission hereby determines that the location, purpose, and 7 extent of the proposed acquisition and construction of an elementary school at the northeast corner of Township Drive and Rawlings Way by the Tustin Unified 8 School District conforms with the Tustin General Plan. 9 10 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin at a regular meeting held on the 13" day of December, 1999. 11 12 13 STEPHEN V. KOZAK 14 ' Chairperson 15 ELIZABETH A. BINSACK 16 Planning Commission Secretary 17 18 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE } 19 CITY OF TUSTIN ) 20 I, ELIZABETH A. BINSACK, the undersigned, hereby certify that 1 am the Planning 21 Commission Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, California; that 22 Resolution No. 3708 was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission, held on the 13'" day of December, 1999. 23 24 25 ELIZABETH A. BINSACK 26 Planning Commission Secretary 27 28 29 • ITEM#5 1, Oapo'rt to the Planning Commission DATE: DECEMBER 13, 1999 SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA, DECEMBER 6, 1999 PRESENTATION: ELIZABETH A. BINSACK, DIRECTOR a� -- - - -� - -----COMMUNITY-DEVELOPMENTDEPARTMENT ATTACHMENT: CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA- DECEMBER 6, 1999 ACTION AGENDA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 6, 1999 7:08 P.M. CALL TO ORDER GIVEN INVOCATION - Pastor Dane Counts, Kings Way Church PRESENTED COLORS PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Boy Scout Troop 323 ALL PRESENT ROLL CALL PUBLIC INPUT ROBERT MACHADO: REPRESENTING TUSTIN PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION, PRESENTED THE CITY COUNCIL WITH A DINOSAUR DASH SPONSOR TROPHY AND THANKED THEM FOR THEIR CONTINUED SUPPORT OF THE EVENT. PUBLIC HEARING- (-ITEM 1 ) APPROVED STAFF 1. CITIZEN'S OPTION FOR PUBLIC SAFETY PROGRAM RECOMMENDATION SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES FUND • In 1996, AB 3229 was enacted for supplemental funding for public safety services. Recommendation by the Police Department: 1. Open and close the Public Hearing. 2. Approve the Police Department's recommendation to use the funds for continued operation of the gang unit. CONSENT CALENDAR ( ITEMS 2 THROUGH 17 ) APPROVED 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — NOVEMBER 15, 1999 REGULAR MEETING Recommendation: Approve the City .Council Minutes of November 15, 1999. APPROVED 3. APPROVAL OF DEMANDS AND RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL • Recommendation: Approve Demands in the amount of Action Agenda —City Council December 6, 1999 — Page 1 $1,540,948.08 and ratify Payroll in the amount of $404,418.70. *ADOPTED 4. RESOLUTION NO. 99-102 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY RESOLUTION COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, NO. 99-102 ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION FOR PLANNING COMMISSIONERS, PARKS AND - RECREATION COMMISSIONERS, AND MEMBERS OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 99.102 approving increases in compensation for members of the Planning Commission, Parks and Recreation Commission and Audit Committee as recommended by the City Clerk's Office. APPROVED 5. 2000 LOCAL APPOINTMENTS LIST Recommendation: Approve the 2000 Local Appointments List for the Planning Commission, Parks and Recreation Commission, and Cultural Resources Advisory Committee as recommended by the City Clerk's - Office. RATIFIED Y 6. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION AGENDA- ------ - -� NOVEMBER 22, 1999 Ali actions of the Planning Commission become final unless appealed by the City Council or member of the public. . Recommendation: Ratify the Planning Commission Action Agenda of November 22, 1999. APPROVED 7. CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT ABFIOR THE AT ON DESIGN OF IRVINE BOULEVARD RE BETWEEN THE SR-55 FREEWAY AND PROSPECT AVENUE (CIP NO. 7160) AND PROSPECT AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION BETWEEN FIRST STREET AND IRVINE BOULEVARD (CIP NO. 7161) Recommendation: Approve the Consultant Services Agreement with Harris & Associates to provide design related services for Irvine Boulevard Rehabilitation (CIP No. 7160) and Prospect Avenue Reconstruction (CIP No. 7161) for a not-to-exceed fee of $77,540.00 and authorize execution of the Consultant Services Agreement by the Mayor and City Clerk, subject to approval by the City Attorney, as recommended by the. Public Works Department/Engineering Division. Action Agenda—City Council December 6, 1999 — Page 2' APPROVED 8. AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR RED HILL AVENUE UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 14 ON-SIT ELECTRICAL SERVICE CONVERSIONS Recommendation: Award the construction contract for • the Red Hill Avenue Underground Utility District No. 14 On-site Electrical Service Conversions (CIP No. 7156) to National Electrical Contractors, Inc. in the amount of $13,826.00 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the contract documents on behalf of the City as recommended by the Public Works Department/ Engineering Division. ADOPTED 9. RESOLUTION NO. 99-104 — A RESOLUTION OF THE RESOLUTION CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, NO. 99-104 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPGRADE AT , FIRST STREET AND PROSPECT AVENUE (CIP NO. 4058) Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 99.104 approving the plans and specifications for the traffic signal upgrade at the intersection of First Street and _ Prospect Avenue, and authorizing the City Clerk to �w adve.rtise far_bids as_ recommonded by_the blic Works_ Department/Engineering Division. ADOPTED '10. RESOLUTION NO. 99-103 — A RESOLUTION OF THE • RESOLUTION CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, NO. 99-103 APPROVING PLANS .AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZATION TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION OF PASADENA AVENUE FROM MAIN STREET CUL-DE-SAC TO THE FIRST STREET CUL-DE- SAC (CIP NO. 7157) AND SECOND STREET FROM PASADENA AVENUE TO MYRTLE AVENUE (CIP NO. 7158) Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 99-103 approving the plans and specifications for the reconstruction of Pasadena Avenue from Main Street cul- de-sac to the First Street cul-de-sac (CIP No. 7157) and Second Street from Pasadena Avenue to Myrtle Avenue (CIP No. 7158) and authorizing and directing the City Clerk to advertise for bids as recommended by the Public Works Department/ Engineering Division. APPROVED 11. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR DESIGN OF PASADENA AVENUE WELL (PROJECT NO. 6130) Recommendation: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk, subject to final City Attorney approval, to execute subject Professional Services Agreement with AKM Consulting 0 Action Agenda— City Council December 6, 1999 — Page 3 Engineers for engineering services for the design of the Pasadena Avenue Well as recommended by the Public Works Department/Water Division. RECEIVED 12. 1998-99 ANNUAL REPORT AND FILED Recommendation: (1) Receive and file the Annual Report for 1998.99, and (2) Direct a copy of this report be filed with the State Controller as recommended by the Redevelopment Agency staff. RECEIVED 13. CENSUS 2000 UPDATE AND FILED Recommendation: Receive and file subject report as recommended by the Community Development -- - Department.. - APPROVED 14. AWARD OF BID FOR PEPPERTREE AND MAGNOLIA TREE PARKS RENOVATION PROJECT NO. 2039 Recommendation: Approve the following action subject to an appropriation of $210,000.00 from the Parks and Recreation Services Parks Development Fund to Capital Improvement Project No. 2039: Award a contract for - - — --- -- - ------ - - -- ----------- --- -the. construction_of.Peppertree Park and Magnolia Tree Park Renovation (Project No. 2059) to--Big---Ben--- Construction o-Big---Ben---Construction Company of Newport Beach in the amount not-to-exceed $599,700.00 as recommended by the • Parks and Recreation Department. APPROVED 15. CONSULTANTSERVICES RCROSS CONNECTION CONTROL ADMINISTRATION OF PROGRAM Recommendation- Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk, subject to final City Attorney and Department of Health Services approval, to execute subject Consultant Services Agreement with *Irvine Ranch Water District for administration of the Water Division's Cross-Connection Control Program along with providing electrical and mechanical maintenance services on an "on-call" basis as recommended by the Public Works Department/ Water Services Division. APPROVED 16. JOINDER IN NO COST AMICUS BRIEF ON BEHALF OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES IN ZEL1G V. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, SUPREME COURT NO. S081791- Recommendation: Approve Joinder on behalf of the County of Los Angeles at no cost to the City of Tustin in the above-referenced amicus brief as.recommended by the City Attorney. Action Agenda — City Council-December 6-, 1999— Page 4 RECEIVED 17. FINAL YEAR 2000 REPORT AND FILED Recommendation: Receive and file subject report as recommended by the Community Development Department. - • REGULAR BUSINESS ( ITEMS 18 THROUGH 22 } APPROVED STAFF 18. ORANGE COUNTY FIRE AUTHORITY -AMENDMENTS RECOMMENDATION TO THE JOINT POWERS AG Upon formation of the Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA) in 1995, the members agreed that there would be a three-year period during-which no charges could be _ made to the basis for setting the cost of services. An Equity Study was prepared in order to address the issue of whether members of OCFA are paying a "fair share of the cost of providing regional fire services. -The Tustin City Council considered the study at. its April 5, 1999 meeting and directed staff to submit comments to OCFA. The City Council also directed staff to prepare an analysis of service levels/costs for options to whatever final action_ was-taken_ _by_the OCFA Board of Directors on - — the Equity Stud . The OCFA Board created a corrmmittee to provide final recommendations concerning the Equity Study. After several months of negotiations, the Board approved policy guidelines concerning equity issues, and in September 1999, approved amendments to the Joint Powers Agreement (JPA). The amendments to the JPA . would enable the City of Tustin to enter into a ten-year contract with fixed caps on yearly increases. Approval of the amended JPA does not commit the City to a ten-year contract. The amended JPA provides that the City has until July 1, 2000 to consent to a ten-year fire services contract or withdraw from OCFA effective July 1, 2001. Recommendation by the City Manager: 1. Approve the amended Orange County Fire Authority Joint Powers Agreement.- 2. Direct staff to enter into negotiations with the OCFA on a ten-year fire services agreement based on the terms of - the amended Joint Powers Agreement, including fire services performance standards. i Action Agenda—City Council December 6, 1999 — Page 5 ADOPTED 19. ORDINANCE NO. 1203, GRADUATED COMPLIANCE ORDINANCE PLAN MCAS TUSTIN N0. 1203 Ordinance No. 1203 had first reading by title only and introduction at the November 15, 1999 City Council meeting. Recommendation by the City Clerk's Office: 1. Have second reading by title only of Ordinance No. 1203. 2. With a roll call vote, adopt the following Ordinance No. 1203: ORDINANCE NO. 1203 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, PERTAINING TO CERTAIN EXISTING BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES AT MCAS TUSTIN IN ACCORDANCE WITH HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 18941.9 - - -----ADOPTED 20. ORDINANCE NO. 1213, ABOVE GROUND CABINETS ORDINANCE _ - - -- -- --- — -- _-- - -- - NO, 1213 Ordinance No. 1213 had first reading by title only and introduction at the November 15, 1999 City Council meeting. Recommendation by the City Clerk's Office: 1. Have second reading by title only of Ordinance No. 1213. 2. With a roll call vote, adopt the following Ordinance No. 1213: ORDINANCE NO. 1213 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING REGULATIONS FOR ABOVE GROUND CABINETS WITHIN THE CITY'S RIGHT-OF- WAY INCREASED 21. ORDINANCE PROVIDING FORAN ADJUSTMENT IN VE N NOVEMBER Y SALARY TO COUNCIL SALARIES TO BE $675 PER 2000 MONTH EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 2000 Government Code Section 36516 establishes base (4.0 JP OP) salaries for City Councilmembers in accordance with population. Tustin Councilmembers currently receive Action Agenda —City Council December 6, 1999 — Page 6 J $500.00 per month, which is the applicable base salary for Councilmembers in cities over 50,000 in population, up to and including 75,000 in population. Recommendation: Pleasure of the City Council. • ADOPTED 22. APPROVAL OF SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZATION RESOLUTION TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS FOR SOLID WASTE NO. 99-101 MANAGEMENT SERVICES (3-2 ST,TS OP) Staff is recommending that the City Council approve the specifications for solid waste services and direct the City Clerk to advertise for bids. The proposed specifications will require the hauler to a) provide a fully automated, three-cart residential recycling -program, b) offer enhanced recycling programs to commercial customers and, c) achieve sufficient solid waste diversion to comply with the State's 50% landfill diversion requirement. Recommendation: Adopt the following Resolution No. - 99-101 approving the specifications for Solid Waste __Management Services and directing the City Clerk to advertise for bids as recommended by the Public Works — Department/Engineering Division: RESOLUTION NO. 99-101 — A RESOLUTION OF THE i CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SPECIFICATIONS FOR SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SERVICES NONE PUBLIC INPUT OTHER BUSINESS / COMMITTEE REPORTS DOYLE: SENT HOLIDAY WISHES T0, FRIENDS. POTTS: REQUESTED STAFF PROCEED WITH OBTAINING MEMBERSHIP IN ETRPA. REQUESTED LANDSCAPING AND/OR MITIGATING WALL BE INSTALLED AT BROWNING AND 1.5 FREEWAY TO MINIMIZE FREEWAY NOISE. REQUESTED A PROCLAMATION FOR MARIA HALVERSON, FOUNDER OF LEARNING CENTER AT LYON STREET CLUBHOUSE. Action Agenda—City Council December 6, 1999 — Page 7 SALTARELLI: CLARIFIED THAT HIS MOTION TO INCREASE COUNCIL COMPENSATION WAS FOR $675.00 PER MONTH. NOTED THAT WITH THE CLOSURE OF MCAS TUSTIN, THE NUMBER OF JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT FLIGHTS DIRECTLY OVER TUSTIN HAD INCREASED. THOMAS: REFERENCING A LETTER TO THE EDITOR REGARDING HIS POSITION/KNOWLEDGE ON THE SAFE AND HEALTHY COMMUNITIES - INITIATIVE, CLARIFIED THAT HIS CONCERN WAS THE INITIATIVE'S POTENTIAL IMPACT ON BASE DEVELOPMENT; STATED HIS SUPPORT FOR JOINING ETRPA; AND REQUESTED THE COUNCIL DISCUSS THE ISSUE AND TAKE A POSITION. WISHED EVERYONE A HAPPY HOLIDAY SEASON. WORLEY: ANNOUNCED A NEW YEAR'S EVE CELEBRATION AT THE TUSTIN RANCH GOLF COURSE WOULD BE HOSTED BY THE LIONS, KIWANIS AND ROTARY CLUBS OF TUSTIN, REPORTED REQUEST IFOR PROPOSALS FOR BASE DEVELOPMENT WAS IN THE FINAL STAGES AND WOULD BE PROVIDED TO MASTER DEVELOPERS. • EXPRESSED FRUSTRATION WITH THE IRVINE COMPANY'S CONSTRUCTION OF TWO ADDITIONAL PADS AT THE TUSTIN MARKET PLACE CREATING SIGNIFICANT PARKING PROBLEMS, RECEIVED. CLARIFICATION FROM STAFF THAT THE PADS WERE IN COMPLIANCE, AND REQUESTED A MAYORAL LETTER BE FORWARDED TO THE IRVINE COMPANY EXPRESSING CONCERNS. REPORTED EL TORO FLIGHT REPORT HAD BEEN RECEIVED BY THE COUNCIL AND WAS AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC. ANNOUNCED CLOSED SESSION - The City Council shall convene in closed session to confer with the City Attorney regarding pending litigation to which the City is a party: Sara Pashalides v. City of Tustin , et.al, OCSC No. 801875. . 10:22 P.M. ADJOURNMENT — The December 20, 1999, City Council meeting has been cancelled. The next regular meeting of the City Council is scheduled for Monday, January 3, 2000, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at 300 Centennial Way. Action Agenda--City Council December 6, 1999— Page 8 ACTION AGENDA REGULAR MEETING OF THE TUSTIN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DECEMBER 6, 1999 10:22 P.M. CALL TO ORDER ALL PRESENT ROLL CALL REGULARBUSINESS ( ITEMS 1 THROUGH 5 } APPROVED 1. APPROVAL OF. MINUTES NOVEMBER 15, 1999 REGULAR MEETING Recommendation: Approve the Redevelopment Agency Minutes of November 15, 1999. APPROVED 2. APPROVAL OF DEMANDS Recommendation: Approve Demands in the amount of $1,418,813.81. CONTINUED 3. SECOND FIVE-YEAR IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR THE--------TO 1/17 TOWN CENTER AND SOUTH/CENTRAL MEETING REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREAS Recommendation: Continue this item to the January 17, 2000 meeting of the Tustin Community Redevelopment Agency as recommended by the Redevelopment Agency staff. RECEIVED 4. 1998-99 ANNUAL REPORT AND FILED Redevelopment Law requires that the Redevelopment Agency submit to the legislative body an annual report for the preceding fiscal year. Redevelopment Agency staff has prepared and submitted•subject report to the City Council. Recommendation: Receive and file the Annual Report for 1998-99 . as recommended. by the Redevelopment Agency staff. ADOPTED 5. PURCHASE OF PROPERTIES AT 14741 AND 14751 RESOLUTION NEWPORT AVENUE NO. RDA 99-3 This action requests certification of a Negative APPROVED STAFF Declaration and approval of a Purchase and Sale RECOMMENDATION Agreement for properties located at 14741 and 14751 Action Agenda--Redevelopment Agency December 6, 1999—Page 1 Newport Avenue plus ancillary actions. Recommendation by the Redevelopment Agency staff: 1. Adopt the following Resolution No. RDA 99-3 certifying the Final Negative Declaration for acquisition of the properties at 14741 and 14751 Newport Avenue: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 99-3 — A RESOLUTION OF THE TUSTIN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE FINAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AS ADEQUATE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CEQA FOR THE PURCHASE OF PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 14741 AND 14751 NEWPORT AVENUE 2. Approve the Purchase and Sale Agreement by and between Dennis S. Smith and the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Tustin for the properties. located at 14741 and 14751 Newport Avenue-and authorize the Assistant City Manager to - — -- - . - - - - --- - execute said.Agreement.__ - - -- - - - - --- ---- -- 3. Appropriate $715,000.00 from the South Central Redevelopment Project Low and Moderate Income Housing Set-Aside Fund to be used for acquisition of the subject property. 4. Authorize the Assistant City Manager to execute all escrow documents . and enter into a property management agreement.for leasing, management and maintenance of the subject properties, subject to approval by the City Attorney. NONE OTHER BUSINESS NONE CLOSED SESSION - None 10:22 P.M. ADJOURNMENT — The December 20, 1999, Redevelopment Agency meeting has been cancelled. The next regular meeting of the Redevelopment Agency is scheduled for Monday, January 3, 2000, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at 300 Centennial Way. Action Agenda— Redevelopment Agency December 6, 1999—Page 2