Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
03-13-00 PC PACKET
AGENDA - TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION r_ REGULAR MEETING MARCH 13, 2000 CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 p.m., City Council Chambers PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Commissioner Davert ROLL CALL: Chairperson Kozak, Bell, Davert, Kawashima and Pontious PROCLAMATION PUBLIC CONCERNS: (Limited to 3 minutes per person for items not on the agenda.) At this time members of the public May address the Commission regarding any items not on the agenda and within the subject .matter jurisdiction of the Commission (NO action can- be taken off-agenda items unless authorized by law). IF YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION ON ANY MATTER, PLEASE FILL OUT ONE OF THE CARDS LOCATED ON THE SPEAKER'S TABLE SO THAT YOUR REMARKS ON THE TAPE RECORDING OF THE MEETING CAN BE ATTRIBUTED TO YOU. WHEN YOU START TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION, PLEASE STATE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. ® IF YOU REQUIRE SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS, PLEASE CONTACT THE PLANNING COMMISSION SECRETARY AT (714) 573-3106. CONSENT CALENDAR: (ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER CONSENT CALENDAR ARE CONSIDERED ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE VOTING ON THE .MOTION UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, STAFF OR PUBLIC REQUEST SPECIFIC ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AND/OR REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION,) Planning Commission Agenda March 13, 2000 Page 2 CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. Minutes of the February 28, 2000 Planning Commission Meeting. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 2. Conditional Use Permit 00-003 a request to establish a specialty veterinary office for optometric and ophthalmologic procedures within Building 3 (Planning Area BID) of Jamboree Plaza. The project is located at 3025 Edinger Avenue, Building 3 within the Planned Community industrial (PC--Ind) zoning district. APPLICANT: CALIFORNIA EYE CLINIC FOR ANIMALS ATTN: PAUL BARRETT PROPERTY OWNERS: JAMBOREE PLAZA HOLDINGS, LLC RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 3717 approving Conditional Use Permit 00-003. • Presentation: Bradley Evanson, Assistant Planner 3. Conditional Use Permit 99-012 And Design Review 99-017 a request to construct a major wireless communication facility. The project is located at 15201 Woodlawn Avenue within the Pacific Center East Specific Plan (Technology Center)zoning district. APPLICANT: SPRINT PCS/SAUNDRA JACOBS PROPERTY OWNER: DAVID FRENCH SNAPPLE RECOMMENDATION Pleasure-of the Planning Commission Presentation: Lori Ludi, ssociate Planner REGULAR BUSINESS No Regular Business Planning Commission Agenda March 13, 2000 Page 3 STAFF CONCERNS: 4. Re ort on Actions taken at the March 2000 Cily Council Meeting Presentation: Elizabeth A. Binsack, Director of Community Development 5. Summary of Projects Presentation: Karen Peterson, Senior Planner COMMISSION CONCERNS: ADJOURNMENT: . A regular meeting of the Planning Commission will be held on March 27, 2000 beginning at 7:00 p.m., City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin. F • i - I • h • MINUTES TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 28, 2000' CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 p.m., City Council Chambers. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Commissioner Bell ROLL CALL: Chairperson Kozak, Bell, Davert, Kawashima and Pontious PUBLIC CONCERNS: No Public Concerns were expressed. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. Minutes of the February 14, 2600 Planning Commission Meeting. ' Commissioner Davert moved Commissioner- Pontious seconded, to. approve the minutes corrected as.follows: Top of page 4, need to complete sentence attributedto Chairperson Kozak. as follows: "is pleased that approval of this request will provide the congregation with a permanent home." Motion carried 5-0. PUBLIC.HEARINGS: 2. Conditional Use Permit 00-004 a request to-establish a contractor's office in an existing office building. The project is located' at 275 Centennial,Way, Suite 211,. within the.First Street Specific Plan zoning district. APPLICANT: ORANGE COUNTY .CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE PROPERTY OWNER: LARWIN SQUARE, LLC. Recommendation That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 3716 approving Conditional Use Permit 00-004. The Public Hearing opened at 7:02 p.m. Planning Commission Minutes February 28, 2000 Page 2 Bradley Evanson, Assistant Planner presented the subject report. Commissioner Davert asked if the hours stated in Condition 2.4 were requested by the applicant. Bradley stated that the hours in Condition 2.4 are more generous than what the applicant requested because staff wanted to give the applicant more flexibility. Commissioner Davert stated that he would like to change the hours to Monday through Saturday. Commissioner Pontious asked if the current requested hours would preclude an employee from working on Saturday or just not opening for business. Bradley stated that an employee would not be precluded' from working on Saturday but not opening for business. Commissioner Davert asked if staff could approve this kind of application in the future. The Director stated that uses identified as office use only have later converted to • something different and construction materials have shown up on site. She further noted that the Zoning Administrator Ordinance could be modified to allow the Zoning Administrator to approve this kind of conditional use permit. Commissioner Davert stated that the change should be considered at a future meeting. Chairperson Kozak asked for a consensus for changing the hours of operation. Commissioner Davert noted that he did not wish the applicant to have to return to request a change in the hours at a later date. The Director stated that staff is not concerned with changing the hours. Chairperson Kozak suggested amending Condition 2.4 by changing Friday to Saturday. The public hearing closed at 7:07 p.m. Commissioner Davert moved Commissioner Bell seconded, to approve Conditional Use Permit 00-004 by adopting Resolution No. 3716 amended as. • follows: Finding 1. D.2: change "Friday" to "Saturday" Planning Commission Minutes February 28, 2000 Page 3 Condition 2.4: change "Friday" to "Saturday" Motion carried 5-0. 3'. Conditional-Use Permit 99-012 And, Design 'Review 99.017. a request to construct a major wireless communication facility: The project is located at 1.5201, Woodlawn Avenue within the Pacific' Center East Specific Plan (Technology Center) zoning.district.. APPLICANT: SPRINT PCS PROPERTY OWNER: DAVID FRENCH SNAPPLE RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission continue the public hearing to:the March 13, 2000 Planning Commission meeting. Commissioner Davertmoved- Commissioner Kawashima seconded, to continue • the public hearing to the March 13, 2000_Planning Commission meeting. Motion t_ carried 5-0. REGULAR BUSINESS No Regular Business STAFF'CONCERNS: 4. Report on Actions taken at the Februaly 22 2000 Cily Council Meeting' Elizabeth A. Binsack,- Director of Community Development reported on the subject agenda. Commissioner Pontious moved Commissioner. Kawashima seconded, to receive and file. Motion carried 5-0. COMMISSION CONCERNS: Commissioner Bell - Noted 'that there have been half-constructed block pilasters at the intersection of Pioneer,and Patriot Way since before Christmas. The Director responded that staff will check into the pilasters. ' ` Planning Commission Minutes February 28, 2000 Page 4 Commissioner Davert Noted that the Wendy's on Red Hill is under construction. Stated 'that he attended a special board meeting of the Tustin Unified School District and a member of the board asked him to answer some questions related to potential development on the vacant lot at Tustin Ranch Road and Rawlings Way. He stated that he spoke only as a private citizen, made genera[ comments about the planning process, and clarified that there are no entitlements on the property. He further noted that he made no reference to any specific projects agendized or otherwise. He did, however, meet the architect on a possible upcoming project. Asked about the status of getting a City sea[ for the Council Chambers. 'The Director noted that a vendor was located who agreed to make the seal but later stated they-were not able to complete the job. Staff will need to explore other sources to create the seal. Commissioner Pontious Stated that staff should re-evaluate the First Street Specific Plan and noted that there have been a.lot of exceptions through the years. The Director stated that staff would review the document and evaluate theP ros • and cons of revising the plan. Staffs findings can be brought to the Planning Commission in the form of a workshop. Commissioner Kawashima Noted there are a large number of cars with for sale signs in the rear parking lot at Larwin Square. Commissioner Pontious Noted that Bally's had balloons flying over their building during the weekend and suggested that staff[et them know they are not allowed. The'Director said staff would follow-up with Bally's. Chairperson Kozak - Noted that auto auction signs from a shop in Santa Ana were on the offramp at Irvine Blvd and 55.freeway, the bridge and the private property fence on the north side of Irvine Boulevard all day Sunday. The Director noted that a City code enforcement officer works on Saturday but not Sunday so it is difficult to address the removal of signs posted on Sundays. She further noted that code enforcement does, however, do a sweep for signs every Planning Commission Minutes February 28, 2000 Page 5 Monday. She 'added that staff will propose a code amendment that would allow staff to issue citations based on the business name on the flyer. Noted that the City monument sign on First Street by the 55 freeway is not illuminated. Staff will advise Public Works. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner- Davert moved, Commissioner Pontious seconded, to adjourn the meeting at 7:20.p.m., Motion carried 5-0. A regular meeting of the Planning Commission will be held on March 13, 2000 beginning at 7:00 p.m., City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin. 1 Y Seport to the Planning Commission DATE: MARCH 13, 2000 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USEPERMIT 00-003 APPLICANT: CALIFORNIA EYE CLINIC_ FOR ANIMALS Jr3132 GARDEN GROVE BOULEVARD GARDEN GROVE, CA 92843 'ATTN: PAUL BARRETT ` PROPERTY OWNERS: JAMBOREE PLAZA HOLDINGS, LLC 26482 SAN TORINI ROAD MISSION VIEJ0, CA 92692 LOCATION: 3025 EDINGER AVENUE, BUILDING 3- ZONING: PLANNED.COMMUNITY INDUSTRIAL(PC-IND) ENVIRONMENTAL .STATUS- THIS PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT (CLASS 3) PURSUANT TO SECTION 15303 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT REQUEST: AUTHORIZATION TO ESTABLISH A SPECIALTY VETERINARY OFFICE FOR OPTOMETRIC ' AND OPHTHALMOLOGIC PROCEDURES WITHIN BUILDING .3 (PLANNING AREA B/D), OF JAMBOREE PLAZA RECOMMENDATION ' That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 3717 approving Conditional Use Permit 00-003. 3 BACKGROUND The_applicant is proposing to develop a specialty veterinary clinic for small domestic animals within -Building 3 located in -Planning Area BID of Jamboree Plaza Planned Development. In accordance with the Jamboree Plaza District Regulations, Section 3.4.B.4.t,. "veterinary clinics" are allowed within Planning Area D with approval of a conditional use permit. The property is Iocated south of the planned commuter rail - platform and north of the Marine Corps Air Facility (MCAF). There are commercial uses to the east and west of the site. Planning Commission Report CUP 00-003 March 13, 2000 Page 2 Project Description The applicant is requesting approval to establish a veterinary facility that would offer optometric and ophthalmologic procedures for small domestic animals. Boarding, grooming and the retail sale of pet products are not proposed. 'No outdoor runs are proposed and no pets would be allowed outside of the building, except to and.from an owner's vehicle. The applicant would provide diagnostic services and treat approximately twenty (20) animals a day. The office would operate Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m.to 6:00 p.m. with approximately eight (8) staff members. Parking and Circulation The project site is within Building 3, a concrete tilt-up structure with approximately 3,036 square feet of floor area. Building 3 is within Planning Area BID and is located east of the main entrance from Edinger Avenue to Jamboree Plaza (see Attachment A - Location Map). Within Jamboree Plaza, Building 3 is allocated sixteen (16) parking spaces. Based on a review of submitted plans (Attachment B), parking requirements for the proposed use would be calculated as follows: USES SQUARE FEET PARKING RATIO SPACES office 567 square feet 4 spaces/1,000 SF 2.3 req'd. Medical 1,489 square feet 6 spaces/1,000 SF 8.9 req'd. Warehouse 979 square feet 1 space 11,000 SF 0.9 req'd. TOTAL 3,035 SQUARE FEET 92.1 REQU. 16 PROVIDED Although veterinary services are not included in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) trip generation tables, the City Traffic Engineer has determined that the proposed veterinary clinic would generate approximately 112 daily trips onto Edinger Avenue. The potential trip generation is below that estimated for a retail use in Jamboree Plaza. As a result, the project would not exceed the trip generation approved for Jamboree Plaza and no impacts to Edinger Avenue and the adjacent public circulation system are expected. Hazardous Materials and Waste Hazardous wastes, such as biological wastes, would be disposed of by contract with firms specializing in hazardous waste removal such as BFI Waste and Stericycle. Storage of products prior to pickup would take place in sealed plastic biohazard containers provided by the collection company. Conditions of approval are included to require these methods to be reviewed and approved by the appropriate regulatory agencies, including the Orange County Fire Authority, the Orange County Health Care Agency, and the Orange County Integrated Waste Management Department. Planning Commission Report CUP 00-003 March 13, 2000 Page 3 • ANALYSIS In determining whether to approve the Conditional Use Permit, the Planning Commission must determine whether or not the proposed veterinarian services will be detrimental to the health, safety, .morals, comfort and general welfare of the persons residing in or working in the neighborhood or whether it will be injurious or detrimental to property or improvements in the vicinity or to the welfare of the City. A decision to approve this request can be supported by the following findings: 1) That operation of a specialty veterinary office, as conditioned, will not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use, nor be injurious or detrimental to the property and improvements in, the neighborhood of the subject property, or to the general welfare of the City of Tustin, as evidenced by the following findings: a) The proposed facility, as conditioned, would not be detrimental to, or have a negative effect on, surrounding properties in that the proposed facility is located within a commercial business center where sufficient parking is available. The maximum trip generation associated with the veterinary office will not exceed the maximum trip capacity for Jamboree Plaza and no impacts to Edinger Avenue are anticipated. b) All operations would be monitored by regulatory agencies including. Orange County Fire Authority, the Orange County Health Care Agency, the Orange County Integrated Waste ,Management Department, and the California Department of Health Services. c) The proposed use, as conditioned, will not be detrimental.to the health, safety, morals, comfort and general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood in that all activities would take place within the building. In particular, animals would be confined to within the. building. Storage of biohazardous, medical, and sharps wastes would take place within the building in compliance with requirements of the applicable regulatory agency. /9,4�t✓ n'_ ra ey E nso Karen Peterson Assistant P Senior Planner Attachments: A- Location Map B - Submitted Plans C - Resolution No. 3717 BE\PCReport\Cupo0003pcxeport.doc ATTACHMENT A LOCATION MAP LOCATION MAP,�rrr LQGAT 1 v N I . r r• - �_ —� --------=--------^-- ----- ----------------- TA/: LRRA RAlLMAT R - --^- ^-----_---- ---- JAMBOREE PLAZA UMUTER RAIL �^ eqy ti~ ^ 2965 STATION y ti 2975 , ryA b� >: JAMBOREE PLAZA 3025 3 75 3085 `\ 3029 n oo 3069 Q 2 \ 3037 b" D w Z 3097 0 3087 K �s TUSTIN LEGACY \� �:' a • , � (FORMERLY MARINE CORPS AIR STATION) so,� r SNO SCALE c ATTACHMENT B SUBMITTED PLANS 86.-0" 14._0" 10'-6• r- 7-4-FILES LAB PHARMACY 3055 sq.ft. SPECIAL PRE-OP BREAK RECEPTION PROCEDURES KENNEL ROOM 131 sq.ft 150 sq.ft. ql sq,fL 99ft sq. Mop FCU IU`7 EXAM EXAM. 9b sq.ft. 96 sq.ft. skylight above EXAM EXAM tq 96 sq.ft. 96 sq.ft. ' PACKET PREP 4 89 sq.ft. wet TREATMENT o i tab] 212sq.ft. o TWAMNG q,ft. ij skylight above ---Ll � ❑� Women EXAM EXAM r Men Area SURGERY - a0 t``8 �� 91 sq.ft. 91 sq.ft. X715 sq.fLi 166.5 sq.ft 1770 sq.ft. R , Mop 7-0" 15'-2" 164' Plan Notec for Conditional Use P Holt#O(1-00 BUILDING DIVISON 2.All E4t doors shall swing in the path of travel, PL NNRJ.DM40N and shall have a sign above the door stating 3.All roof mounted equipment and vents shallbe '"i•HFSE DOORS TO REMAIN UNLOCKED located a minimum of 6"below the top of the DURING BUSINESS HOURS- parapet parapet or shall be located behind an architecturally compatible equipment screen. 3.Occupant load is 29(3114 sq.ft.less Restrooms mop sunk areas,and Break Room,is a net area 4.All signage shall be addressed under separate 'of 2884.6 sq.ft.) Tustinpermit and shall e comply with the Signrequirments FLOOR PLAN Tustin Sign Code,and the Master Sign Program 4.Vehicle parking,primary entrance to the building for Jamboree Plaza. the pprimary paths of travel,cashier sppace,saaltary faolities,dunking fountain,and public telephones- Tenant Space 3,114 sq.ft. sahll be accessible to persons with disabilities. -•----------•-------------------•--....--------•---. --------------- ----------------------- --__-_ _t• : :a.LAg:=•.::.....:.::..:..PHARMACY::.::::.:. ------ - -- --- - -----305.5-:: ...........................am=:: rrrcrr::.a:rr:r_.........-:_ ................................-- --- ---- -- - _ __...... :::::::..:..:::. '.:- SPECIAL • RE- P BREAK CEPIION=:::_::r r:._..:-_=......: {::......-::'.............•_............. :::_-r:.__: ......_......_ .......... ROCEDURES_-�rr:�: CENNE ROOM 150 s k. "•-'•.. 94 .k. 9 sq.R. ]31 sq.ft =•-:..:.••:•.::_-::............................. .......::......::'...:......::•....:::::-.......: q• = ........................ LEGEND m --- - -= OP - ---- --- H Iw al a 734,5 s .ft. - - ----- \\\ Ys 9 -Ft - :: i©(pNl•:-:• _ --- ---- -- --- ---- - - --- --- Animal Housing _ ::._--"_ar:::: ffFFff 94.5 sq.R. --- -- -----_ ....ERAM._.... ...... (1/1000) s......sq.h.=::_.. .:::..96 sq.Et"= — ---- -- - ------------------ -- _:--- _r_ ---- --- •ACKEC PREP•. :x.:.:::;r:._::-r..-� _:. _- Restrooms 149.5 sq.ft. -- ------- - - - 89s ft. -wet::::::::::::::.t-.:'.::^•----:-:.::.:.::- ® (1/1000) ----- -- ---:------ --- ........ --- able:..:::::.._::;CRF.AiMEhS7--:::-:- .•.:• ---- WAITWG 212sg-----------------k . . ---- - Medical 1489sq.ft 865 s ft _ ------- (6/1000) Office 567 sq.k. (4/1000) -----:: ---- __ -----W ------------------------ \Viewm omen --:=•'EXAtvI.:.r '.:-EXAM:::•:: Area --- _ .::.....:::...... ............ RY..........:: OFFICE PARKING SUMMARY- ...... 91 _h..::r IS sq.R. ::::;1665 sq.h.---------- ---------- ---:--- ------------------- ...........r - - Office: 567 sq.k.-2.3 space ------ o -- ---- - (4/1000) , Medical: 1,489 sq.k.= 9 spaces FLOOR PLAN (6/1000) Warehouse:9785 sq.R.= 1 space (1/1000) Total Area 3,034.5 sq.ft. Required parking 12.3spaces ATTACHMENT C RESOLUTION NO. 3717 RESOLUTION NO. 3717 1 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 3 00-003 TO ESTABLISH A VETERINARY FACILITY AT 3025 EDINGER 4 AVENUE (JAMBOREE PLAZA). 5 The Planning Commission does hereby resolve as follows: 6 7 I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: s A. That a proper application, Conditional Use Permit 00-003, was filed by the California Eye Clinic for Animals requesting authorization to establish a 9 specialty veterinary facility for the purpose of providing optometric and 10 ophthalmologic procedures for small domestic -animals at 3025 Edinger Avenue, Building 3 of Planning Area BID within the Jamboree Plaza 11 Planned Community. 12 B. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held for said application 13 on March 13, 2000 by the Planning Commission. 14C. That the proposed project is in compliance with .the Jamboree Plaza 15 Planned Community District Regulations and is in compliance with the Planned Community Commercial Business General Plan Land Use 16 Designation. 17 D. That establishment, maintenance, and operation of the use applied for will 18 . not, under the circumstances of this case, be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare of the persons residing or' 19 working in the neighborhood of such proposed use, evidenced by the 20 following findings: 21 a) The proposed facility, as conditioned, would not be detrimental to, or 22 have a negative effect on, surrounding properties in that the proposed facility is located within a commercial business center 23 where sufficient parking is available. The maximum trip generation associated with the veterinary specialty office will not exceed 2a maximum trip capacity for Jamboree Plaza and no impacts to 25 Edinger Avenue are anticipated. �6 b) All operations would be monitored by regulatory agencies including: 27 Orange County Fire Authority, the Orange County Health Care Agency, the Orange County Integrated Waste Management 28 Department, and the California Department of Health Services. 29 c) The proposed use, as conditioned, will not be detrimental to the • health, safety, morals, comfort and general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood in that all activities would take place within the building. In particular, animals would be I Resolution No. 3717 Page 2 2 confined to within the building. Storage of biohazardous, medical, 3 and sharps. wastes would take place within the building in compliance with requirements of the applicable regulatory agency. 4 E. That this project is categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15303 (Class 5 3) of the California Environmental Quality Act. 6 11. The Planning Commission hereby approves CUP 00-003 to establish a specialty 7 veterinary -facility for the purpose of providing optometric and ophthalmologic procedures for small domestic animals at 3025 Edinger Avenue, Building 3 of S Planning Area BID within the Jamboree Plaza Planned Community. 9 10 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, at a regular 11 meeting on the 13th day of March, 2000. 12 13 Stephen V. Kozak Chairperson 14 15 16 ELIZABETH A. BINSACK Planning Commission Secretary I7 18 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) 19 COUNTY OF ORANGE ) CITY OF TUSTIN ) 20 1, ELIZABETH A. BINSACK, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the Planning 21 Commission Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, California; that 22 Resolution No. 3717 was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission, held on the 13th day of March, 2000. 23 24 ELIZABETH A. BINSACK 21 Planning Commission Secretary 26 27 0211 - 29 EXHIBIT A . CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 00-003 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESOLUTION NO. 3717 GENERAL ' (1) 1.1 The proposed use shall substantially conform with the submitted plans for the project date stamped March 13, 2000 on file with the Community Development Department, except as herein modified, or as modified 'by the Director of Community Development in accordance with this Exhibit. The Director of Community Development may also approve minor modifications to plans during plan check if such modifications are to be consistent with the provisions of the Tustin City Code and other applicable codes. (1) 1.2 Unless otherwise specified, the conditions contained in this Exhibit shall be complied with as'specified or prior to the issuance of any building permits for the project, subject -to review and approval by the .Community Development Department. (1) 1.3 The subject project approval shall become null and void unless permits are issued within twelve (12) months of the date of this Exhibit and substantial tenant improvements are underway. Time extensions may be granted if a written request. is received by the Community Development Department within thirty (30) days prior to expiration. (1) 1.4 Approval of Conditional Use Permit 00-003 is contingent upon the applicant and property owner signing and returning an "Agreement to Conditions Imposed" form as established by the Director of Community Development. (1) 1.5 The applicant shall hold harmless and defend the City of Tustin from all claims and liabilities arising out of a challenge of the City's approval for this project. PLAN SUBMITTAL (1)(5) 2.1 At building plan check, the applicant shall submit tenant improvement plans, structural calculations and Title 24 energy calculations. Requirements of the Uniform Codes and State Handicap/Energy requirements shall be complied with as approved by the Building Official. SOURCE CODES (1) STANDARD CONDITION (5) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY (2) CEQA MITIGATION - REQUIREMENTS (3) UNIFORM BUILDING CODEIS (6) LANDSCAPING GUIDELINES (4) DESIGN REVIEW (7) PC/CC POLICY ""` EXCEPTIONS Exhibit A- Conditions of Approval Cup 00-003 Page.2 (1)(3) 2.2 Indicate on the title sheet compliance with applicable codes and City, State and Federal laws and regulations to.include: 1998 California Building Code 1998 California Mechanical Code, 1998 Califomia Plumbing Codes 1998 California Electrical Code City of Tustin Grading and Security Ordinance City of Tustin Landscaping and Irrigation.Guidelines City of Tustin Private Improvement Standards *** 2.3 All necessary approvals from the Orange County Health Department shall be submitted prior to building permit issuance. . (1) 2.4 Vehicle parking; primary entrance to the building, paths of travel, sanitary facilities, drinking fountains, and public telephones shall be accessible to persons with disabilities. Identify these on the plans. (3) 2.5 Access to'two exits from the suite is required for any.area-with occupant loads of - thirty (30) persons or more. Show the exits and exit signage on.the plans. 3 2.6 All exit doors shall swing in the path of travel, and be equipped with State l=ire O 9 P Marshal approved panic hardware. Identify these on the plans or provide a note ,on the plans confirming this. (3) 2.7 Identify,the maximum occupant load for the suite on the°plans. , (3) 2.8 The plans submitted into plan check shall show restroom facilities for both sexes and shall indicate that toilet facilities in..the restrooms ,shall be accessible to persons with disabilities. .(1) 2.9 All signage shall be addressed under separate permits and shall comply with the requirements of the Tustin Sign Code and the Master Sign Program for Jamboree Plaza. (4) 2.10 In, accordance with the Design Review for-Jamboree Plaza- (Condition 3.6 of Planning Commission Resolution No: 3557), please provide elevations identifying. the cross-section view and location of all proposed roof-equipment and vents. All roof-mounted equipment and vents shall be located a minimum of six (6)' inches below the top of the .parapet or shall be located behind an architecturally compatible equipment screen. USE RESTRICTIONS 3.1 In accordance with the approved plans, the facility will require a total of thirteen x (13) parking stalls. Any additional tenant improvements will require approval of an amended parking summary for Jamboree Plaza by the Community Development Director prior to issuance of permits. Exhibit A- Conditions of Approval Cup 00-003 Page 3 *** 3.2 All biohazard and sharps waste shall be stored inside the enclosed building, in accordance with appropriate regulatory standards, as set by the Orange County Fire Authority, Health Care Agency, and Integrated Waste Management Department, for disposal by a firm specializing in the handling of biohazardous, sharps and medical wastes. *** 3.3 All animals shall be confined to within the building, except for movement to and from the owners'vehicles. *'* 3.4 Boarding, grooming and the retail sale of pet products shall be prohibited. FEES (1)(5) 4.1 Prior to issuance of any building permits, payment shall be made of all applicable fees, including but not limited to the following. Payment shall be required based upon those rates in effect at the time of payment and are subject to change. A. Building plan check and permit fees to the' Community Development Department based on the most current schedule. B_ Orange County Fire Authority plan-check and inspection fees to the Community Development Department based upon the most current schedule. (1) 4.2 Within forty-eight (48) hours of approval of the subject project, the applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department, a cashier's check payable to the COUNTY CLERK in the amount of $38.00 (thirty eight dollars) to enable the City to file the appropriate environmental documentation for the project. If within such forty-eight (48) hour period that applicant has not delivered to the Community Development Department the above-noted check, the statute of limitations for any_ interested party to challenge the environmental determination under the provisions' of the California Environmental Quality Act could be significantly lengthened. r '10., 4leport to the Planning Commission DATE: MARCH 13, 2000 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-012 AND DESIGN REVIEW 99-017 APPLICANTS: SAUNDRA JACOBS SPRINT PCS SBA, INC. 4683 CHABOT DRIVE 3151 AIRWAY AVE., STE. #L3 SUITE 100 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 PLEASANTON, CA 94588 PROPERTY OWNER; DAVID FRENCH SNAPPLE 15201 WOODLAWN AVENUE TUSTIN, CA 92780 , LOCATION: 15201 WOODLAWN AVENUE ZONING: PACIFIC CENTER EAST SPECIFIC PLAN (TECHNOLOGY CENTER) ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: APPROVAL OF THIS PROJECT WOULD BE CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT PURSUANT TO SECTION 15303, CLASS 3 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY- ACT; DENIAL OF THIS PROJECT WOULD BE EXEMPT PURSUANT TO SECTION 15270 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT WHICH STATES THAT CEQA DOES NOT APPLY TO PROJECTS REJECTED OR DISAPPROVED BY A PUBLIC AGENCY REQUEST: AUTHORIZATION TO CONSTRUCT A MAJOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY RECOMMENDATION Pleasure of the Planning Commission. BACKGROUND The applicant is requesting approval to establish a major wireless communication facility for the Sprint PCS cellular communication network. The proposed facility is comprised of a unipole sixty (60) feet in height and related equipment located on the west (rear) side of an existing single story building. Pursuant to Tustin City Code Section 9276, any ground-mounted wireless communications facility located outside the public right-of-way Planning Commission Report CUP 99-012 & DR 99-017 March 13, 2000 Page 2 is considered a major facility subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission. Tustin City Code Section 9276 includes development regulations related to screening and site selection for wireless communications facilities. The screening regulations require that facilities be located in areas that minimize their intrusion on the surrounding community. Ground-mounted facilities should only be located in close proximity to existing above ground utilities, such as electrical towers or utility poles. In addition, the site selection order of preference identifies that wireless facilities be primarily located on existing structures or secondarily be located where existing topography, vegetation, or other structures provide the greatest screening. As a last choice, facilities should be located on, vacant ground without significant visual mitigation only in commercial and industrial districts. Further, the site selection criteria require applicants to provide written documentation demonstrating a good faith effort in locating facilities in accordance with the site selection order of preference. The project site is located within the "Technology Center" zoning district of the Pacific Center East Specific Plan which provides for general research and development, light industrial, and accessory office and commercial uses. Surrounding uses include a vacant parcel, Del Amo Avenue and the SR-55 Freeway to the west and commercial and office uses to the east, north and south (see location Map - Attachment A). There S are no other major wireless communication facilities in the immediate vicinity. Project Description The facility is proposed to be located on the west side (rear) of a building occupied by Snapple. The monopole would be situated approximately eleven (11) feet west of the rear building wall and fifteen (15) feet from the rear property line (see Submitted Plans - Attachment B). The'facility would be 800 feet west of the Woodlawn Avenue right-of- way. The sixty (60) foot tall unipole would accomodate six (6), 56 inch long vertically attached antenna panels. The maximum height allowed in the• Pacific Center East Specific Plan area is 50 feet. However, TCC Section 9276(l) allows consideration of wireless facilities that exceed the maximum height permitted within a zoning district by up to ten (10) feet. The equipment necessary for operation of the facility would be located at the base of the monopole in a 615 square foot lease area. The applicant proposes to use a portion of the existing eight (8) foot high chain link fence along the property line and new sections of eight (8) foot chain link fencing to enclose the monopole and equipment. Access to this area would be provided by a new gate in the existing chain link fence which would require access from the railroad right-of-way. Site Selection Justification Attachment C contains the applicant's rationale for the proposed facility and documents their efforts to comply with the Site Selection Order of Preference for wireless communication facilities (TCC Section 9276). The proposed project location is desired by the applicant to provide better coverage for users living or working in the surrounding area and to mobile users traveling the SR-55 Freeway and nearby roadways. The Planning Commission Report CUP 99-012 & DR 99-017 March 13, 2000 • Page 3 coverage in this area is currently weak and the applicant has.received complaints of dropped calls from customers. Attachment D contains the applicant's radio frequency analysis of the proposed facility. Based on the analysis, the antennas need .to be mounted at a height of 57 feet and 11 inches to achieve optimal signals. Map 3 shows the signal strength, or coverage, of a sixty (60) foot tall facility and Map 4 shows the coverage of a forty-five (45) foot tall facility. The taller facility would provide more. "In Building" coverage than the shorter facility (shown in green on the maps). The "in Vehicle", coverage (shown in yellow) does not differ widely between the two heights. According 'to the applicant, the 60 foot facility would provide the most efficient coverage for the area. Given the average thirty (30) foot height of buildings within the project vicinity, one building mounted facility would not provide sufficient coverage. Although two or more building-mounted facilities could provide sufficient coverage, the applicant wishes to pursue one ground mounted facility since it would be more cost effective. Project Alternatives The unipole shown in the submitted plans (Attachment B) is the applicant's preferred project (Alternative 1). However, the applicant has also provided alternative photographic • rendersings that would disguise the facility as a palm or pine tree within a cluster of shorter trees for the Planning Commission's consideration (Alternative 2). The height of the cluster of trees would need .to be maintained below the antennas to prevent interference caused by the leaves. Attachment E includes photographic renderings of the unipole, monopalm and monopine alternatives from five vantage points: 1) the view facing east on Del Amo Avenue (which would also be,the same view from the SR-55 Freeway); 2) the view facing north from Valencia Avenue; 3) the view facing west from Santa Fe Drive and Woodlawn Avenue intersection; 4) the view facing south from the adjacent parking.lot; 5) the view facing southwest from Woodlawn Avenue. These five perspectives provide the most common views of the proposed alternative facilities from the public right-of-way. DISCUSSION For wireless communication systems to provide sufficient service, a number of facilities must be located within a service area and mounted above the ground .to overcome topographic constraints. As a result, the primary issues associated with wireless communications facilities are the potential for overconcentration and visual intrusion. The proposed facility would be visible from public view on Valencia and Del Amo Avenue right- of-ways and the SR-55-Freeway. Given the potential adverse visual intrusion of a unipole facility, staff does not support the proposed unipole (Alternative 1). However, a stealth facility constructed as a monopalm or monopine located in a cluster of trees (Alternative 2) may be less.visually intrusive. Altemative 1 The proposed unipole is the applicant's preferred alternative, however, it is located where there are no other structures, utilities, or trees of comparable heights in the Planning Commission Report CUP 99-012 & DR 99-017 March 13, 2000 Page 4 immediate vicinity. Other wireless facilities in the general vicinity are more effective at minimizing their visual impact to the general public. Examples include: 1671 El Camino Real: A tower element on the Key Inn was increased to 47 feet in height to provide sufficient coverage while disguising the facility as a part of the building. 600 W. 6t' Street: The 60 foot tall monopole facility is surrounded by a number of trees, that are the same height as the facility which diverts attention from the monopole. 550 W. 6t' Street: The 60 foot tall monopole facility is designed as a palm tree. To camouflage the facility, several live palm trees of similar heights are planted around the facility. The equipment at the base is enclosed within the adjacent self storage building to screen it -from public view. 2721 Michelle Drive: The 60 foot tall monopole facility is located behind a eucalyptus tree of a comparable height to the facility, • thus screening if from view along the Santa Ana (1-5) Freeway. 36 Auto Center Drive: The 60 foot tall monopole facility at the Tustin Ranch Road1l-5 Freeway interchange is surrounded by light standards of similar heights. SR-22 Freeway/Main Street: The monopole at the Main StreetlGlassell Street interchange is designed as a palm tree. To camouflage the facility, several live palm trees of similar heights are planted around the facility. The equipment at the base is screened by hedgerows along the freeway on-ramp. 1-5 Freeway/Culver Drive: On the east side of the freeway, a tower that duplicates the design theme of the adjacent office building houses a stealth facility. 1-5 Freeway/Jeffrey Road: A monopole facility is situated in front of a row of tall Eucalyptus trees and is visible from the freeway. However, the monople is painted forest green and effectively blends into the row of trees. Unlike these examples, the proposed unipole would be visible from Valencia, Del Amo Avenue, and the SR-55 Freeway due to the lack of screening materials, buildings, or landscaping. The photographic renderings demonstrate that the height of the proposed unipole in contrast with the lack of adjacent buildings or vegetation of similar heights Planning Commission Report CUP-99-012 & DR 99-017 March 13, 2000 Page 5 y would have a negative visual impact. The potential visual intrusion of the unipole is not consistent with the screening requirements for wireless communication facilities and would be a detriment to the surrounding area. Alternative 2 The applicant has provided two alternatives to the preferred unipole to minimize the visual impact of the facility; 1) a grouping of a monopalm and two palm trees; and 2) a grouping of a monopine'and two pine trees (Attachment E). Staff recommends consideration of the following modifications to these alternatives: A. The monopalm facility could be clustered with two living trees on each side of the facility (total of five trees). The trees should be the same type of palm tree as the wireless facility and.approximately the same height as the facility at the time of planting. B. The monopine facility could be clustered with two artificial pine trees and two living trees of a different species such as eucalyptus trees. Installation of mature living pine trees would not be feasible given the limited amount of space and the large root system of mature pine trees. The artificial trees should simulate the same type of pine trees as the wireless facility and be of a similar height with. branching to the ground. Two additional living trees would unify the appearance of the simulated and living vegetation. C. The monopalm or monopine facility could also be clustered with a variety of living tree species (total of four living trees). Eucalyptus trees thrive in a limited amount of space and achieve heights comparable to the proposed facility. If the Planning Commission is inclined to approve one of these alternatives (A, B, or C), staff recommends'the following conditions of approval in Resolution No. 3714: Condition No. 1.9: This condition would ensure that any future facilities south of the 1-5 and east of SR-55 would be building mounted rather than ground mounted. The intent of this condition is-to prevent overconcentration of monopoles and encourage building mounted facilities. The applicant would be required to submit a master plan to the.Community Development Department demonstrating that' building mounted facilities could be developed to eliminate existing or future gaps in service. Condition No. 3.1: This condition is presented in three different versions to reflect the three options (A, B, or C) outlined above for the Planning Commission's consideration. In addition, this condition would ensure that the trees intended to screen the facility could be successfully integrated into the construction level plans (see Attachment F for conceptual site plans). The applicant has Planning Commission Report CUP 99-012 & DR 99-017 March 13, 2000 Page 6 . indicated to staff that additional lease space could be obtained if the leased area does not provide the necessary space for a cluster of trees. If sufficient space for the facility and a cluster of mature trees cannot be provided, the applicant would be required to seek Planning Commission approval of any modification to the plans. Condition 3.3: This condition would require the applicant to maintain the artificial tree/monopole structure in good condition so that it continues to resemble a tree. Conditions 3.4 and 3.5: These conditions would ensure that the trees that provide screening of the facility are maintained in a healthy condition and pruned in a manner which follows the International Society of Arborculture (ISA) pruning practices. Condition No. 3.6: This condition would require a six (6) foot eight (8) inch tall block wall instead of chain link fencing for the equipment enclosure. This would enhance the appearance of the facility and screen equipment from view. In addition, the condition would require the applicant to take access to the facility from the same property where the facility is located rather than the adjacent railroad right-of-way. " Resolution No. 3714 denying Alternative 1 and Resolution No. 3714 approving Alternative 2 are included as Attachments G and H for the Planning Commission's consideration. y L L i A. Ludi ' Karen Peterson Associate Planner Senior Planner s:perepUcup9M12.doc Attachments: A - Location Map B - Submitted Plans C - Applicant's Site Selection Justification D - Radio Frequency Analysis E - Photographic Renderings of Unipoae, Monopalm, and Monopine F - Conceptual Site Plans Illustrating Cluster of Trees G - Resolution No. 3714 -Alternative#1 H - Resolution No. 3714 -Alternative#2 ATTACHMENT A Location Map k III _ I LOC rl cjupqei --- oJ2 i - 1 i i —4— =� has t � � � LOM6[II�VLNIR 1 - 3 a P�dtL BF[L i� 9 • ` _ l ,]Irl ..., Y VIp 11lUS�VMI k � S r _ Isle] IW IMfi CCL KN7 t y \ wa s.ua.0 � - NLP�C14 •YLMX 15201. W(X)lD,LAW14 AqqF,, NO SCALE AT"I'ACIMENT S Submitted Plans *s��t. R ao�n - . .i CR.BD+DRtvL.NfC 100 r ©� TUSu OU a1ES T INF—h014, SOUTHWEST TUSTIN ® OG63XCI65A 15201'INV WODOUWN AV[HUE cn Sprint PCS 5M Rmr ISM W- cD SOUTHWEST TUSTIN9/20/99 SSJCD fpR. ZONING — O G 0 3 X C 16 5A L[V"�AiE=SSVED lCR-BP 15201 WOO®LAWN AVENUE TUSTIN, CA D V+s/aa rDsg2nY ccc _ "EPARED m ML T-1 amu " ARw _w� L51 Rn�Pf,.�w aWa TETRATECH c3 I as F+n.....$.. PROJECT DESCRIPTION CODE COMPLIANCE o="f�i ui=++•°rte a�a�o=a;+� xsucrANr, Y F1 APPLICANTILESSEE SURVEYOR: SITE LOCATION AruuC+�n Rr PRDPERTYINFORMATIONR a.an CIVILENGINEER: _ TUSTIN F •d�e11.=Li w. w n p2N�rca Cr+f: �w OPAwN m: a crc tiCx+f: F..wo-2•,r-eu.. rc[ruueu STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: wA VICINITY MAP MDa � ro ,u ,,, SHEETINDEX aim ELECTRICAL ENGINEER: 00 NOT SCALE DRAWINGS =o-cw E+n un a�• o.=nn a,�.;x...�, �w.w.u.na..wm ,. �, _' i'vrH, m.u n,.o-..�. n Isx[[r rm[. uP,»<rwn wm A w Pou .oma w,r P.am.P. TOWER ENGINEER: n.rs.wsma rw v„c •nron..xnow.+.rK.o•+a. DRIVING DIRECTIONS PROJECT SUMMARY PROJECT TEAM M. GENERAL CONTRACTOR NOTES sREE NcweERRr,rsmrr Al. F PCA-9 .n 1 Legend vspril1t• MMES � ��aBENpI ulq GS uFtp B BEOnnIC COON�MRS G� `"E"NNro%wAN. ® 'a smm.IwRi ® ¢ nE001c>RNarRPRER nrwwrtax,a a1]ea µT5, m nSV�RETE PAVNE� ROE MF or SIOPE � NOat oe-6 PMxnM LOT I1GrRNIC r9P mrEorV rn sn �. c�t� aaJ[crwronunnOx: NCE M PAVFNENI --PROPFNEY lNf [B aEC1Rq BDK r +� E/- yF PUN m¢ • rAor+.ou 9lwx �05H i141p°'^ ® ¢Pnnrc wvu it rmiul noon °F11^""I--no" SOUTHWEST 7US71N OG03XC165A TN.CU 927e0�E SpTE_/ sus109.wa7 // // �l- u'` R.R.—R/W / couNi'aE G 90ro1xX oNA�E"CEif // b" 09 B4 _ 1 ` // URRENI ISSUE CAM nP I aao- - n 1`IC 0.I I �� . / .e9rc 9 rc 9120/99 Vicinity Mop m mro IR P ¢ ssuco foa; Legal Description (mm) smN1Eo N nrt an a1I�]µmom a aRu6z sun u' / o? ZONING N WrOOM AW 0 OF9]On[D A9 N0Lv5 PROP08En NONOPoY / 118.01108 a OUfIE 101.09NG J��tl+ ,J�p0.�1tJC ,p�+1 fAeaa 16 9UN M A YrP ISNmN N BO}(N,P.Vn R a Or00RTIC e00®nilrOt iiri ikQ PAPII M°9.N n0 OIF[E a M ameFA a Sb mJNTf. VT. nS 4Y 10.01 / vF U Title Report(Easernente- NKa ea /. p htJ</ qa / F�R P0 Y1a b BaF M.66aR1 998N//-IB PRPA9m 81 Y We 1fRf.WRAW�a1R094ln13f,IN9. 113.anov Qi USEUCN9 RaA A M[1N[6 MorbrD N N01RN1 AO., / e,° a �!J\ N+•.` / / ¢]611 M NPEYB(R 10.1100 amu RFcoaS(P10TIN I[R[dl• / A � �`00.95E / Qr [AgNFM fdR PJEIL Uan[S A5 PnVRam N 0a1PWFM AO. / �t" y'M1O \; / 1�tl W 1®IOIR!?L 1901.a1PLul RmOFOJ(Pl91Rp / 6(•' D• \i>• B �e /, �+�/ ' T I N C ..SPRINT PCS Wuscla"�irs aancluu"w1 / +� $.,•• lv Site Address /� �{' '� 's / 1 9/30/99'i@TRIC nal 9wauo 6mPR' / '� �l WAREN 0 U 5 E .:..:•�:,.•. 'K—EO a'; ASSimeRS DNxq IEw ln,oa-ui-lo / 1' I�i+ `\ 1aa.9rf.. _a0/ CevdetlC Coordinates at Proposed Monopole /! Q,. B V I L D[N C + :�. sss', a "O ®TETRA TECH 1N41UaC 1 i 1'01�' INI ONW / 4'' '`� r•- 7.i7' / I0.9 n WWMY U]NO'00.10 19N 01Me axone Cm'9M1s la e'sR ucx tK falcart PRurnw a nr // Ye, f,: Q���+`�1J` q. ' 1o].nrc aL9a0610'AIRMR].31En.9pge(IY9])Ava l0e 61191WRIX , i0].aJTG� i 1.�liv�'i1 V'ru'1.1N er".15 i" NgIrIH OIIW AS F9I1aB[0 0Y ax,IAAfO 6 NU 1INNFF OxSUIiAN! 4 ( Nxwxr a r"s soon N mN1 ra uRirs REouRm er ra // �� ,of" .�. CRL VRDR 1--ores suxiwos nec xoRaa9wLr 1oR umuoE um lnxana/ , 1 alalox rmN J im. , - S SVfNMNo,INC. Dates of Survey1os.KRr ...ik[N9 a#• / tl 'd'" \ //\\//�\ roc Iwl co-ew iArl rw-nr la 1990 \ .«wv.R" Hasls of Hearings IIR nVNMO1 Sr10A'R HEREON OO .E— IRON JHE MM—E .. -. �h'10&5369 �, ,~' \ �J ��j \ MwN Bf.— m•va CRO MIE MIEN OI n01. Hench Mark ' I6 1r5 n 175 k/- ( J s ,c ,E .+ \ .q \ AP/-�UcrE cH+oo INE nronws sv9R X(16011 NR /PDX THE OaFa ORAR[E .. / 10a01FS -O 9 ++�R]95r5 .Ly \Qtq'� \\ [NwRE: OBN6000..b(Ip.r-)0}_801 aNAMA}eN.90.119 FM. 10A9 w{ K •r lo�.aiFf V \ `\ o L \\ . R • ` + 0].699 + .. 1OT 14F c �SaOIY im n0rC 1 .. 6 --a-4L Jill; oo_ - ---------1`R. n11liioPG TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY \\ Graphic Scale // \\ nEn'—ER: - M*11� NOTE: � 4 \\ \ IwA• / w�wN�nAmc amlEil9 q�n9MlE"9RaEial�0 a"�Arr R""9so.uREuv�n.°�"a \ \ / PG'NCOW9 Sprint. 16_ DR SIRR 109 Pe,R9 nn wu rnrn RUJECI[LixC PMA11011: Q SOUTHWEST TUSTIN N o iRR.o ,,. al u w u..,�[m.o wmoao.arc wunor OGOlXC165A 15391 w090Nwx o-KeNE �yqP lniixiU 1[1 1u511H.LA �� LURREIR ISSU 0.1[: - rntayso lo'-o'not p 9/20/99 SSVE9 M— =E qi:=E ZONING a I[I eaa u w�mlm fV a'[n ton wnx � � \ PEi.:�1.If155Vf0 FOR.=VY: uA r.o wnR \wan I i \ 1 9/:9/ss mxnlc coc Ia[xw�vvc[ 0 1/15/93 iK,Ellm _ r/eeocm[[awrs - �\`�o-`\ \ FREPo-REL 9r. ,r ,1 \ ®TETRATECH .�o..,w.rt.0 onsmwn: lar wr r 1 x.Mw PAwx ar:-c ' onmrr e u xc9c coc ENSM[Y SITE PLAN am g R wn o a Q _ n �w n aM w w�. ,nt a 'xE __ wsM�e+u�iecensiiMm[ws.e int[auvnm urounnn m[nre!unx p9i6'1' P'o , °'^'"„�Rnwaw a.nnnm,n,wv rtru.,wx .[nnRrn[.n,�xa m[.n.w.w.[.+[o... -zzn ORMow,,.,�.,n. n mw vti.r SITE PLAN 10nu.w"n.'w � [w.,m 'r aRxnw. CONSTRUCTION NOTES �swlma�a r.unaa pumera.w Mu�wmwsw,/ow+�Ne � Il�a�^w�;�e.�[ SxECI MIUBEx�REwsl'olrc a eoon[Rf um imws a.nmvo wmwa m w.w lovwi wr m[n,r[uiurx cvnwcan. a•wrnen nww x[n I � mn vw[a pwm[o a �� PVwi0909 CONSTRUCTION NOTES 2 vsp t. 6P:— 1 1 OPM.Salk 1p0 PINYNlON,N 911L9 PR0.F_Cf PifOPNATION: ro u.•v.,u,d° SOUTHWEST TUS71N 0GOIX0155A ' +s�o w000uwx Pnxue +usnx. o¢u+cc. {Iii°�•��� cuxPii¢rssui ow 9/20/99 - _ ueo ron --- _ ZONING — r 1 1 1 9/79/10[CrONG COC rorcw Q �° I o ./u/cv rnmenn, 1 C.IM.EO m � O TETRA TECH I 1 1 ONsIP.— w ii O+iiv.rib4�w — --tt----'� 11 uno«u smws w r:v W ---------- ---------------------- 4 wx m:=cx,.i Pvi: s 1 .."u ml — I COO EIMR r rvnn¢,ss+cx¢.m I ' 9xw.a0 aw:V m. 1 I EQUIPAIENT LAYOUT, CO ANTENNA CONFIGURATIUN - _ r. sx[[(xuuasn—^rnsom EQUIPMENT LAYOUT/ANTENNA CONFIGURATION Sprit. swnres- .aa3 c,n]o[LrNc suxE ioo riuvmox.a s]sa] ROIELi RJFORIUiM)N. SOUTMW E5T TUSTIN OG03XCI65A 1]loe•OOwv[NUE (ULAN,TA OMNLI,Co.C URRENT MWE WE 9/20/99 ssuEo raw: .» ZONING m"'" Ray.:marE:�ssuco raw:—Rn • p d�—— m wrr r�rT 33i� ❑ � _ I++.nicea i - iu�+,e rrm><,e crown o Vn/Ls rumanm _�• TETRA TECH • ONSULrINI. NORTH ELEVATION - � 3 WEST ELEVATION 1 _ .vv.: �f0 er•.•,oe wuwx rn: u E coo coc r�nrra� m..n.o ..,.e,n.en �.,wMn � - m°"0•e'u.`1i n:°°"""°' m i _ m m(O s'Tin ru�Rwn —T EEr T ELEVATIONS rtm (0 w nr SNEET NUNOER;�•MLiON. �L] w � C3 �>v _ r»a •,eTM�µ .�,G r.�rer.���.^: �,rrR rM], �.,M� 1 (NORTH EQUIPMENT ELEVATION """ ® 4 WEST EQUIPMENT ELEVATION ATTACHMENT C Applicant's Site Selection Justification SBA � February 23, 2000 Ms. Karen Peterson Senior Planner Ms. Lori Ludi Associate Planner Community Development Department City of Tustin 300 Centennial Way Tustin, CA 92780 Re: Conditional Use Permit 99-012 Design Review 99-017 Sprint PCS Antenna OG03XC165A 15201 Woodlawn Avenue City of Tustin, Orange County, California Dear Ms. Peterson: SBA Inc., on behalf of Cox PCS Assets (Sprint PCS), respectfully submits the following antenna location and height justification, and photo simulations as requested. Additional specific Radio Frequency Information, include the requested Drive Test information, will be submitted under a separate cover. BACKGROUND PCS is a rapidly evolving digital technology that is expected to change the future of telecommunications through easy-to-use, lightweight and highly mobile communications devices including: portable phones, pagers, computers, and personal digital assistants. PCS will provide voice and data capabilities for customer's communications needs virtually anywhere and at anytime. The system that Sprint will be using involves a technology known as Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA). The benefits include a six-fold increase in channel capacity, call privacy and security, and improved voice quality. PCS will also serve to enhance personal safety and security. With the PCS network in place, individuals will have the ability to communicate during periods of discontinued electrical service and/or when circumstances preclude them from utilizing a conventional phone. PROJECT OVERVIEW r The project consists of the installation and operation of a 60-foot monopole mounted antennas and associated equipment cabinets for Sprint Spectrum's Personal Communication Services (PCS) wireless telecommunications network. A total of six antennas are proposed at this site. The equipment will be located at ground level directly adjacent to the monopole. The approximate lease area Is 615 square feet. SSA, Int. • Wireless Communications Consultants SBA, Inc. • 3151 Airway Avenue • Suite L-3 • Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Telephone: (114) 557-6052 • Fax: (114) 551-6249 d/b/a in the State of California as SBA Consulting Services,Inc. Equipment Cabinets: The BTS units are proposed to be located immediately adjacent•to the monopole. The equipment cabinets include five Base Transceiver Stations (BTS), with dimensions of approximately 2'-6"wide by 5'-6" high by 2'-6" deep, one meter pedestal approximately 5' high, one emergency generator receptacle, and two service lights, all located on a concrete foundation of approximately 8 inches in thickness. Minimal grading will be required to establish a flat area for the foundation. As required by the City, the equipment units will be enclosed by a concrete block wail. Access to the equipment will be gained through a four-foot wide chain link gate. All utilities will be under-grounded. Coaxial cables associated with the Sprint lease area are housed in a cable tray and are located between the equipment cabinets.and the actual monopole. These cables are not public utilities. The equipment cabinets, cable tray and monopole are completely fenced and not accessible to non-Sprint personnel. No "trip-and-fall" risks exist outside of the lease area associated with the Sprint equipment or easements. Antennas: Three antenna sectors (80 degrees, 210 degrees and 310 degrees), each with two panels, will be installed at 57 feet above the ground on the proposed monopole. The total height with antennas will be 60 feet. Each antenna, measured at approximately 48" long, 8" wide and 2.75" deep, is capable of transmitting*and receiving signals. Height Justification The site has been approved by Sprint technical staff responsible for the design and operation of • the PCS network. Radiofrequency (RF) engineers have conducted a technical analysis of the site, and determined the necessary height and orientation of the antennas for ensuring adequate signal coverage. Based on RF analysis and testing, RF engineers have concluded that the proposed tower mounted antennas need to be installed at a height of sixty (60) feet in order to achieve the network's signal requirements. The total height of the pole and antennas will not exceed 60 feet. Additional Height and Location Justification Additional height and location justification will be submitted to the City under separate cover and will include the"Drive Test" exhibits which indicate the need for the antenna in this area, as well as the height required. The currently proposed 60-foot antenna does not completely fulfill the needs of the signal coverage, and in fact a higher antenna would be required to fully achieve the network signal requirements. However, due to the zoning constraints on this property, only 60 feet is allowable under existing City of Tustin ordinances. Therefore, 60 feet has been requested as part of our application. An antenna.height of less than 60 feet may require the placement of two antenna locations in order to cover the signal requirements for this area. The RF information to be submitted will demonstrate the need for the proposed height of 60 feet and the possible need for two separate antennas should a lower height be required by the City of Tustin. SITE SELECTION Sprint technicians, planning and leasing staff have been working to design the network of wireless interconnects throughout Southern California, including the City of Tustin. Like the existing cellular systems, Sprint PCS will employ a network of transmitting/receiving station ("cell sites") that carry and "hand off' signals as the user moves from one area to another. As the user moves from one sell area(the area where the base station and antenna are located to receive and transmit calls)to 2 the next, signals to and from the first cell site fade while those to and from the next cell site strengthen. Sophisticated computer systems sense these changes and automatically hand the signal off to an available channel as the user moves between cell areas. The network of PCS cell sites throughout the region is locationally dependent, meaning that there is a necessary and logical interrelationship between each cell site. Eliminating or relocating a single cell site. can lead to gaps in the system or area where a continuous signal cannot be maintained. f=urther, the elimination or relocation of a single cell site will most often have a domino effect on other cell site locations and necessitate significant design changes or modifications to the PCS network. The FCC has licensed Sprint to develop and operate a wireless communications network. In designing the PCS network, Sprint has determined that the Snapple site at 15201 Woodlawn Avenue is necessary to ensure PCS network coverage for users living and working in the surrounding communities, and to mobile.users traveling along the 55 Freeway, and nearby arterial highways. All Sprint sites are chosen based on a number of factors including technical feasibility, a property owner's willingness to agree to acceptable lease terms, and planning/zoning consistency. Compliance with City Ordinance No. 1192 The following provides a description of the screening and site selection guidelines and the applications'compliance with these guidelines. Sprint compliance justifications have been bolded. City of Tustin Development Criteria and Guidelines for Wireless Commubicafion Facilities: 1. Screening Criteria and Guidelines: a) Wireless communication facilities shall have subdued colors and non-reflective materials which blend with surrounding materials and colors. A. The Sprint antenna has been proposed as a "flush-mounted" standalone antenna which would be painted the same color as the existing building. At the City's request, Sprint will convert the flush-mounted pole to a tree pole if necessary. However, based on the photos simulations provided to the City, Sprint feels the flush-mounted pole is more compatible with the surrounding industrial area. b) Wireless communication facilities shall be located in areas that will minimize their aesthetic intrusion on the surrounding community. Ground-mounted facilities should only be located in close proximity to existing above-ground utilities, such as electrical tower or utility pole (which are not scheduled for eventual removal or under grounding), light poles, or trees of comparable heights. For building mounted facilities, all screening shall be compatible with the existing architecture, color, texture and or materials of the building. A. Sprint has relocated the antenna site to the.northwest portion of the site and to the rear of the existing facility. The photo simulations provided to the . City show how the antenna will look from various angles around the 3 immediate area of the community. As indicated in the photo simulations there are numerous existing above-ground utilities which provide vertical elements in the immediate area. The adjacent industrial-uses and railroad easement location also provide a compatible surrounding to the proposed antenna site. The relocation of the antenna facility to the rear of the property, behind the existing building and the existing landscaping in this area will assist in the screening requirements outlined in the City's Ordinance No. 1192. Additional landscaping will be proposed if necessary and as requested by the City. The new location also now meets the rear setback requirement of 10 feet and this dimension is depicted on plans submitted to the City. The previous , location was located in the southwest corner, and visible from adjacent rights-of-way. As indicated in the previous site plan,the configuration of the lot resulted in the need to request a variance for the front and rear lot setbacks. The new location will not require the variance. 2. Site Selection Order of Preference: a) Wireless communication facilities shall be located in the following order of preference: 1) On existing structures such as buildings, communication towers, church steeples, freestanding signs, and/or co-located on existing facilities. A. The existing building at 15201 Woodlawn Avenue is approximately 30- feet in height. Construction of a roof-mounted antenna would require an extension of 30-feet above the existing roofline in order to meet the coverage height of 60-feet., Installation of a 30-foot screen around the existing building top was not an acceptable alternative to the current building owner. - B. The length that the coaxial cable can run between the antenna and equipment is a maximum of 200 feet before transmission signals begin to weaken (requiring more height). If the equipment were to stay in the currently proposed location, the cable run between the antenna and equipment would be exceeded by at least one set of antennas due to the size of the existing structure. Placement of the equipment on the roof is not structurally feasible for this building. C. Alternative Sprint locations reviewed by TDI Associates prior to the SBA Inc. submittal to the City included Kent Industrial USA, located at 1231 Edinger Avenue, in the City of Tustin. Based on review of this location, TDI Associates indicated that the zoning in this area was not compatible with the antennas height required by Sprint. This alternative location was not re- reviewed by SBA. 4 D. The building owner adjacent to Kent Industrial was contacted. However, after a site visit to this rooftop location, it was determined that there was not enough room for the Sprint equipment either on the roof or on the ground. E. The Tustin Marine Air Station was considered at an alternative location. However, it was withdrawn by Sprint and SBA until future development projections are made and reviewed. Future locations in the eastern portion of the base may be considered. F. The Tustin Centennial Park site, Iocated north of Edinger•Avenue and east of Redhill Avenue was reviewed as an alternative candidate. However, there was not enough room in the maintenance yard area for all of the Sprint equipment. In addition, the immediately adjacent residences were considered and this site was withdrawn. G. A business at Edinger Avenue, west of Woodlawn was contacted but not interested*in a Sprint antenna at this facility. H. A Pacific Bell Wireless building is located on Michelle Avenue, east of Tustin Ranch Road was contacted but not interested in another roof mounted carrier since their antennas were already on this building. 1. Based on previous and recent field visits, there are no existing co- locatable towers within Sprints necessary"search ring." J. Once an acceptable location was found, SBA did not review alternative roof-mount locations since the current landowner was willing to accept Sprints offer. In addition, there was enough room for all of Sprints equipment at this location. 2)_ In locations where the existing topography, vegetation, buildings, or other structures provide the greatest amount of screening. A. As indicated in 1. b) above, Sprint has relocated the antenna site to the rear of the existing building providing a partial screen from industrial uses to the north, south and east. The existing adjacent trees and landscaping also provide a partial vegetation screen.. To the north of the site exists vacant and undeveloped property. In addition, there are numerous existing above-ground utilities which provide vertical elements in the immediate area. The adjacent industrial uses and railroad easement location also provide a compatible surrounding to the proposed antenna site. Additional landscaping will be proposed if necessary and as requested by the City. 5 • 3) On vacant ground. without significant visual mitigation .only in commercial and industrial zoning districts. A. Although the proposed antenna location is not vacant property, there is vacant property to the west. The proposed location is within a generally light industrial area of the PC--Planning Community zoning. b) As part of the application process, applicants for wireless communication facilities shall be required_to provide written documentation demonstrating a good faith effort in locating. facilities- in accordance with the Site Selection Order of Preference. A. Please accept this correspondence as our written documentation of SBA's and Sprints demonstration of a good faith effort in locating our facilities in the City of Tustin. Should you have any further questions, please contact me at (949) 599-2039. Respectfully submitted, SBA, Inc. Saundra Jacobs Zoning Specialist - cc: Debbie Bond-SBA, Inc. 6 4 ATTACUMENT D Radio Frequency Analysis ATTACHMENT E Photographic Renderings of Unipole, Monopalm, and Monopine ATTACHMENT F Conceptual Site Plans Illustrating Cluster of Trees PROPOSED SPRINT LEASE AREA (615 SF) 1 (E) OVERHEAD CANOPY (E) A.T. k S.F. RAIL ROAD PROPOSED IN LINE PULLBOX MOUNTED TO SIDE OF (E) BUILDING (6'X8'X24') I I f Iwo���<<+ PROPOSED 10'-0' H � SPRINT UTILITY EASEI PROPOSED EME _ GENERATOR REQ ING PLATFORM MOUNTED TO S - I ---- tit,FORAGEPROPOSED POWER/TELCO LINES \ MOUNTED TO SIDE OF (E) BUILDING (1) 2' EMT FOR POWER (1) 2' EMT FOR TELCO I � I I I (E) LOADINGRAMP i (E) BUILDING 7(E) - TELCO—=PANELS INSIDE BUILDING AND PROPOSED TELCO SOURCE (E) BUILDING h ATTACHMENT G `, Resolution No. 3714 —Alternative #1 ! ' RESOLUTION N0. 3714 (ALTERNATIVE#9) 3 1 4 A RESOLUTION OF'THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY 5 OF TUSTIN DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-012 AND DESIGN REVIEW 99-017 REQUESTING TO ESTABLISH A 6 MAJOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY SIXTY FEET IN HEIGHT AND RELATED EQUIPMENT AT 15201 WOODLA_WN 7 AVENUE. 8 The Planning Commission does hereby resolve as follows: 9 10 1. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: A. That a proper application for Conditional Use Permit 99-012 and Design Review 99-017 was filed by Sprint PCS to establish a major 12 wireless facility located behind the building at 15201 Woodlawn 13 Avenue. The facility includes a 60 foot tall monopole structure containing six (6) antenna panels 56 inches in length to be vertically 14 attached at the top of the monopole. 15 B. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed, and held on said 16 application on February 14, February 28, and March 13, 2000 by the Planning Commission. 17 1s C. That the establishment, maintenance, and operation of a major wireless communication facility will be detrimental to the health, 19 safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use, or be injurious or zD detrimental to the property and improvements in the neighborhood of 21 the subject property, or to the general welfare of the City of Tustin, as evidenced by the following findings: zz z3 1) The proposed location of the facility is not consistent with the Site Selection Order of Preference within Tustin City Code 24 Section 9276(F)(2). This section requires facilities to be located primarily on existing structures and secondarily 25 where existing topography, vegetation, or other structures 26 provide the greatest screening. The proposed 60 foot tall monopole would be located. adjacent to a building that is 27 approximately thirty (30) feet in height and in an area where zs no vegetation or other structures would provide screening. • 29 2) The proposed facility is not consistent with the Additional Locational Guidelines , within Tustin City Code Section 9276h(4) which states ,that major wireless communication Resolution No. 3714 (Alternative #1) CUP 99-012, DR 99-017 1 Page 2- • facilities should be encouraged to locate and or co-locate on properties which are located within the Industrial (M) Zone 3 and the Planned Community-[ndustrial (PC-IND) zoning districts. The proposed site is located in the Pacific Center a East Specific Plan "Technology Center' zoning designation s which provides for general research and development, light industrial, and accessory office and commercial uses. 6 7 3) The proposed facility is not consistent with the Screening Criteria and Guidelines within Tustin City Code Section s 9276(F)(1)j. This section requires wireless communications facilities to be located in areas that will minimize their aesthetic 9 intrusion on the surrounding community. Ground-mounted 10 facilities should only be located in close proximity to existing above ground utilities, such as electrical towers, utility poles, or 11 fight poles of comparable heights. The lack of utilities of 12 comparable heights and styles and the lack of landscaping on the property does not allow for screening of the proposed 13 wireless facility from the adjacent properties and public right- of-ways. 14 is 4) The location of the proposed accessory equipment is not in compliance with- the Other Criteria and Guidelines within 16 Tustin City Code Section 9276(f)(3) which requires that accessory equipment be located in a building, structure or " enclosure to ensure appropriate screening. The proposed 18 equipment would be located at the base of the monopole and visible through the proposed chain [ink fence enclosure. 19 20 5) -The proposed wireless facility would impair the orderly and harmonious present and future development of the area. In 21 addition to the buildings to the north, east and west of the site, there are several vacant lots directly adjacent to the 22 west of the proposed site, which would be adversely 23 impacted by the proposed monopole. The proposed monopole does not comply with design review criteria in 24 Tustin City Code Section 9272 as follows: 25 ' • The proposed location lacks any physical buffer for 26 adequate screening; • The design and form of the structure- is a standard 27 monopole with vertical antennas which will be visible 28 above surrounding structures and visually intrusive in the given setting; 29 The height and size of the structure is visible over existing structures and from three major right-of-ways; Resolution No. 3714 (Alternative#1). CUP 99-012, DR 99-017 • ' Page 3 2 The general appearance of the proposed structure is not compatible, with or visually integrated into surrounding 3 structures; 4 There is,a lack of mature landscaping for screening; • The physical relationship of the proposed structure is not s in scale with the existing structures within the surrounding area; and, 6 The proposal does not comply with the. City's. adopted 7 development guidelines for major wireless communication facilities., s 9 5) The monopole structure would be visible from three major transportationright-of-ways which does not comply with the 10 Section 3.2, Urban Design Concept, of the Pacific Center East Specific Plan. The design objectives within the Specific 11 Plan state that special emphasis should be given to the 12 relationship. of structure and building forms oriented toward the visibility opportunities from the SR-55 Freeway, Del Amo 13 Avenue and Valencia Avenue. 14 7} .'The Pacific Center East Specific Plan promotes the removal 15 of unsightly and cluttering elements, including the undergrounding of overhead wires and utility poles. Section 16 3.2 of the Specific Plan refers to "other elements" that are 17 similar . to aboveground utilities, including wireless communication monopoles, which should be examined with i8 a view toward improvement of design and elimination of these unnecessary elements to improve the visual clarity of 19 the area. 20 ` 8) The proposed location, height, scale, visibility, and lack of 21 screening of the monopole structure does not comply with 22 the following goals within the. General Plan for the character development of the Pacific Center East Specific Plan area: 23 91.2 Create a cohesive architectural image of attractive 24 streetscape through implementation of development 25 standards and design'guidelines to unify the area. 26 11.3 Promote building forms that relate to the scale and 27 character of surrounding development. • 2s D. Pursuant to Section 9272 of the Tustin Municipal Code, the Commission finds that the location, size, architectural features and 29 general appearance of the proposed facility will impair the orderly and harmonious development of the area, the present or future Resolution No. 3714 (Alternative #1) CUP 99-012, DR 99-017 Page 4 1 2 development therein, or the occupancy as a whole. In making such findings, the Commission has considered at least the following items: 3 1 Height, bulk and area of buildings. 4 2. Setbacks and site planning. .. 5 3. Location, height and standards of exterior illumination. 4. Physical relationship of proposed improvements to existing: 6 structures in the neighborhood. 7 5. Appearance and design relationship of proposed improvements to existing structures and possible future s structures in the neighborhood and public thoroughfares. 6. Development Guidelines and criteria as adopted by the City 9 Council. io E. This project is exempt from the requirements of the California 11 Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15270 which 12 states that CEQA does not apply to projects rejected or disapproved by a public agency. 13 II. The Planning Commission hereby denies Conditional Use Permit No. 99- 14 012 and Design Review 99-017 requesting the establishment of a major 1; wireless communication facility sixty feet in height and related equipment at 15201 Woodlawn Avenue. 16 17 PASSED AND ADOPTED"by the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, at a regular meeting on the 13th day of March, 2000. �s 19 20 STEPHEN V. KOZAK 21 Chairperson 22 23 ELIZABETH A. BINSACK Planning Commission Secretary 24 2' STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) 26 COUNTY OF ORANGE ) CITY OF TUSTIN } 27 2s •29 Resolution No. 3714 (Alternative #1) CUP 99-012, DR 99-017 Page 5 2 I, ELIZABETH A. BINSACK, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the Planning 3 Commission.Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, California; that Resolution No. 3714 was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the 4 Tustin Planning Commission, held on the 13th day of March, 2000. 5 6 ELIZABETH A. BINSACK 8 Planning Commission Secretary 9 . 10 . 12 13 14 • 15 16' 17 18 ' 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 • 29 ATTACHMENT H 1 Resolution No. 3714 —Alternative 92 z� i 0. 2 RESOLUTION NO. 3714 (ALTERNATIVE#2) 3 4 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY 5 OF TUSTIN APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 98-012 AND DESIGN REVIEW 98-017 AUTHORIZING THE 6 ESTABLISHMENT OF MAJOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION 'FACILITY AT 15201 WOODLAWN AVENUE: 7 8 The Planning Commission does hereby resolve as follows: 4 10 I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: 11 A. That a proper application for Conditional 'Use Permit 98-012 and Design Review 98-017 was flied by Sprint PCS to establish. a major 12 wireless communications facility sixty feet in height with six antenna 13 panels fifty_-six (56) inches in length on the property located at 15201 Woodlawn Avenue. 14 15 B. That the proposed facility is consistent with the requirements .of Tustin City Code Section 9276 et seq., relating to wireless 16 communications facilities. 17 C. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held on said 18 application on February 14, 2000, and continued to the February 28 and March 13, 2000 meetings of the Planning Commission. 19 D. That installation, operation, and maintenance of a major wireless 20 communication facility, as-conditioned, will not be detrimental to the 21 health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use, nor be 22 injurious or detrimental to the property and improvements in the neighborhood of the subject property, or to the general welfare of the 23 City of Tustin,.as evidenced by the following findings: 24 1) As conditioned, the proposed facility would not be detrimental 25 to, or have a negative effect on, surrounding properties in that 26 it would appear to be a tree set within the 'Technology Center' zoning district of the Pacific Center East Specific Plan which 27 provides for general research and development_, light industrial and accessory office and commercial uses. A monopole 2s constructed as an artificial tree within a cluster of trees at this �9 _ location would adhere to the second and third site selection Resolution No, 3714 (Alternative #2) Page 2 order of preference in Tustin City Code Section 9276(F)(2)(a)(3) which identifies placement where vegetation 3 would provide screenings and in commercialand industrial 4 zones. In addition, consistent with the locational guidelines in TCC Section 9276(H), the facility would not be located within .5 100 feet of any existing, legally established' major wireless communication facility nor within 300, feet of residentially 6 zoned or used property. 2) As conditioned, the proposed' facility would not be detrimental to, or have a negative effect on, surrounding properties in that the facility would appear to be a tree and would be located in 9 close proximity to living trees of comparable heights consistent ori with the screening guidelines of Tustin City Code Section 9276(F)(1). 12 3) As conditioned, the use of a portion of the project site for the facility would not impair the operations of the existing use. I The facility would be unattended and not necessitate use of required parking spaces nor generate significant traffic in the 14 neighborhood. 15 E. Pursuant to Section 9272 of the Tustin Municipal Code, the 16 Commission finds that the location, size, architectural features and 7 general appearance of the proposed facility would not impair the orderly and harmonious development of the area, the present or future development therein, or the occupancy as a whole. In making 18 such findings, the Commission has considered at least the following items: 20 1 Height, bulk and area of buildings. 21 2. Setbacks and site planning. 3. Physical relationship of proposed improvements to, existing structures in the neighborhood, 23' 4. Appearance and design relationship of proposed improvements to existing structures and possible future 24 structures in the neighborhood and public thoroughfares, 25 5Development Guidelines and criteria as adopted by the City Council. 26 F This project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to Section 15303, 27 Class 3 of the California Environmental Quality Act. IS2 29 Resolution No. 3714 (Alternative #2) Page 3 • 1 2 G. That the project has been reviewed for consistency with the Air Quality Sub-element of the City of Tustin General Plan and has been 3 determined to be consistent with the Air Quality Sub-element. 4 II. The Planning Commission hereby approves Conditional Use Permit No. 98 5 012 and Design Review, 98-017 authorizing establishment- of a major wireless communication facility sixty (60) feet in height with' six (6) antenna 6 panels fifty-six (56) inches in length.at 15201 'Woodlawn Avenue, subject to the Conditions contained in Exhibit A, attached hereto. s . PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, at, a regular meeting on the 1.3th.day of March,,2000. 9 10 12 - STEPHEN V. KOSAK 13 .Chairperson 14 15 ELIZABETH A. BINSACK • 16 Planning Commission Secretary . 17 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) 1g COUNTY OF ORANGE- CITY RANGECITY OF TUSTIN ) ; 19 - - - - I, ELIZABETH A. BINSACK,,the undersigned,.hereby;certify that I am the Planning . 20 Commission Secretary of the,Planning.Commission of the,City of Tustin, California; 31. that Resolution No. 3714 Was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the ,Tustin Planning Commission, held on.the 13th day of March, 2000. 22 . 23 24 ELIZABETH A. BINSACK -` Planning.Commission Secretary 25 26 27 28 i 29 . EXHIBIT A • CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CUP 98-012 AND DR 98-017 MARCH 13, 2000 GENERAL (1) 1.1 The proposed project shall substantially conform with the submitted plans for the project- date stamped March 13, 2000, on file with the Community Development Department, as herein modified, or as modified by the Director of Community Development Department in accordance with this Exhibit. The Director of Community Development may also approve subsequent minor modification to plans during plan check if such modifications are to be consistent with provisions of the Tustin City Code. (1) 1.2 Project approval shall become null and void unless building permits are issued within eighteen (18) months of the date of this Exhibit: (1) 1.3 The applicant shall sign and return an Agreement to Conditions Imposed. form prior to the issuance of any permits. (1) 1.4 All conditions in this Exhibit shall be complied with prior to the issuance of any building permits for this project, subject.to review and approval of plans by the Community Development Department. (1) 1.5 Any public improvements damaged by the applicant adjacent to this project shall be repaired and/or replaced by the applicant as determined by the Engineering Division and shall include but not be limited to curb, gutter, street paving and drive apron. (1) 1.6 Design Review approval shall be reviewed by the Community Development Director on February 28, 2005. The Director may recommend to the City Council modification to the existing conditions or impose new conditions as part of such review to protect the public health, safety, community aesthetics and general welfare. (1) 1.7 The applicant shall hold harmless and defend the City of Tustin from all claims and liabilities arising out of a challenge of the City's approval of this project. SOURCE CODES (1) STANDARD CONDITION (5) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY (2) CEQA MITIGATION EQUIREMENTS (3) UNIFORM BUILDING CODE/S (6) LANDSCAPING GUIDELINES (4) DESIGN REVIEW (7) PC/CC POLICY `* EXCEPTIONS i Exhibit A— Resolution No. 3714 (Alternative #2) Conditions of Approval CUP 99-012, DR 99-017 Page 2 (1) 1.8 Except as otherwise stated in Condition 1.2, Design Review approval shall remain valid for a period not to exceed the term of the lease on the subject property, including any extension thereof. A copy of said lease shall be submitted to the Community Development Director prior to issuance of any permits. If the lease is extended or terminated, notice and evidence thereof shall be provided to the Community Development Director. Upon termination or expiration of the lease, the facilities shall be.removed from the subject property. (1) 1.9 To prevent overconcentration of monopole structures, future wireless communication facilities proposed by Sprint south of the 1-5 Freeway and east of the SR-55 Freeway within the City of Tustin shall be limited to building mounted facilities which are integrated into the architecture of the host buildings. The applicant shall submit a master plan of the for the area south of the 1-5 Freeway and SR-55 Freeway to the Community Development Department demonstrating that building mounted facilities could be developed to eliminate existing or future gaps in service. • PLAN SUBMITTAL (1) 2..1 At building permit plan check, the applicant. shall submit three (3) complete sets of architectural, electrical and mechanical plans with the necessary structural calculations, specifications and details complying with the Uniform Building Code, other related Codes, City.Ordinances and State and Federal Laws and,regulations. The structural calculations and specifications shall be prepared by_a California registered civil or structural engineer. The engineer's license number and license expiration date shall be indicated on the report. . r (1) 2.2 All grading, drainage, vegetation and circulation shall comply with the City of Tustin Grading Manual. Ali street sections, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, lighting and storm drains shall comply with on-site improvement 'standards. Any deviations shall be brought to the attention of the Building Official and request for approval shall be submitted in writing prior to any approval. (6) 2.3 At building plan check, the applicant shall submit three (3) sets of landscaping and irrigation plans identifying the existing and proposed landscaping, planting details, soils report and modifications to the existing irrigation system. The plan shall be prepared consistent with the City's landscaping and irrigation guidelines. J Exhibit A— Resolution No. 3714 (Alternative #2) Conditions of Approval CUP 99-012, DR 99-017 Page 3 f USE RESTRICTIONS (4) 3.1 ,{Alteriatie R`) The wireless facility shall be disguised as a palm tree no more than sixty (60) feet in height. A total of four living palm trees shall be installed in close proximity and height to the monopalm structure subject to review and approval of the Community Development Department. If sufficient space is not available for installation of one monopalm structure and four living palm trees, the applicant shall request approval of revised plans from the Planning Commission. 4 3.1 Alternafive:_B,) The wireless facility shall be disguised as a pine tree no more than sixty (60) feet in height. Two additional artificial pine trees and two living trees of another species shall be installed in close proximity and height to the monopine structure subject to review and approval of the Community Development Department. The monopine and two artificial pine trees shall incorporate full branching along the entire length of the structures. if sufficient space is not available for installation of one monopine structure, two artificial pine trees, and two living trees, the applicant shall request approval of revised plans from the Planning Commission: (4) 3.1 (Alternative C) The wireless facility shall be disguised as a palm or pine tree no more than sixty (60) feet in height. A total of four living trees of a variety of species shall be installed in close proximity and height to the-monopole tree structure subject to review and approval of the Community Development Department. If sufficient space is not available for installation of one monopole structure and four living trees, the applicant shall request approval of revised plans from the Planning Commission. (4) 3.2 The number and dimensions of the antenna sectors shall be limited to six (6) panels fifty-six (56) inches in length as shown on the approved plans. The location and configuration of the facility shall be restricted to the location and configuration shown on the approved plans. **' 3.3 The artificial tree/monopole structure shall be maintained in good condition. If the condition of the structure serves to lessen the visual mitigation of the communication facility as an artificial tree, the Director may require that the structure be refurbished within thirty (30) days of_notification from the Community Development Department. '* 3.4 The condition of the living trees shall be monitored by the Community Development Department. If the height, style or condition of the trees serves to lessen the visual mitigation of the communication facility, the Exhibit A-- Resolution No. 3714 (Alternative #2) Conditions of Approval _ CUP 99-012, DR 99-017 Page 4 - Director may require that the trees be trimmed, altered, moved or replaced within thirty (30).,days of notification from the Community Development Department to ensure. that .the facility will be screened by healthy trees of comparable heights. ' * 3.5 'Maintenance andprg:of the live trees shall comply with the�lntemational Society,of Arborculture (ISA) pruning practices. (4) 3.6 A six (6) foot eight (8) inch tall block wall enclosure shall be installed around the wireless facility to prevent unauthorized access and visibility from any surrounding sites or public right-of-ways, subject to final approval of the Community. Development Director. Access into the facility shall not encroach over by property line. *** 3.7 The applicant shall prepare a preliminary report within 90 days of completion of the project demonstrating conformance with national standards for safe human exposure to electromagnetic fields and radio frequency installation. Said report shall be submitted to the Community Development Director. • NOISE (1) 4.1 All construction operations including engine warm up shall be,subject to the provisions of the City of Tustin Noise Ordinance, as amended, and may take place'only during the hours of 7:00 a.m. until 6:00 p.m.,, Monday through Friday and 9:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. on Saturday unless the. Building Official determines that said, activity will. be in substantial conformance with the •Noise Ordinance and that ,public health and safety will not be impaired subject to application being made at-the time the permit for the work is awarded or during progress of the work. FEES (1) 5.1 Prior to issuance of any building permits, payment' shall .be made of all applicable fees-, including but not limited to the following. Payment shall be- required based upon those rates in effect at the time of payment and are subject to change. A. Building plan check and. permit fees to the Community Development Department based on the most current schedule. B. Within forty-eight (48) hours of approval of the subject project, the • applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department, a Exhibit.A— Resolution No. 3714 (Alternative #2)" Conditions of Approval CUP 99-012, DR'99-017 Page 5 cashiers check..,payable to -thee COUNTY CLERK in the amount of $38.00 (thirty-eight dollars) to enable-the City.to file the appropriate environmentaldocumentation for the project. If within such forty-eight (48) hour period that applicant has- not delivered to the Community Development Department the above-noted check, the statute of limitations for any interested party to challenge the environmental determination under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act could be significantly lengthened. ITEM #4 Y U ort to the' - 'Use' �0p - Planningg -Commission . DATE: MARCH 1 3, 2000 _ SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA, MARCH 6, 2000 PRESENTATION: ELIZABETH A. BINSACK, DIRECTOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • ATTACHMENT: CITY COUNCIL ACTION.AGENDA-- MARCH 6, 2000 t ' r ' ACTION AGENDA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MARCH 6, 2000 7:08 P.M. CALL TO ORDER GIVEN INVOCATION • Pastor Dane Counts, Kings Way Church PRESENTED PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Tustin Girl Scout Flag Patrol COLORS ALL PRESENT ROLL CALL PRESENTED PROCLAMATION - Census Day, April 1 NONE PUBLIC INPUT NONE PUBLIC HEARING - None CONSENT CALENDAR ( ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 ) APPROVED 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES -- FEBRUARY 22, 2000 REGULAR MEETING Recommendation: Approve the City Council Minutes of February 22, 2000. APPROVED 2. APPROVAL OF DEMANDS AND . RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL Recommendation: Approve Demands' in the amount of $1,760,249.59 and ratify Payroll in the amount of $409,555.20. RATIFIED 3. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION AGENDA — FEBRUARY 28, 2000 All actions of the Planning Commission become final unless appealed by the City Council or member of the public, Recommendation: Ratify the Planning Commission Action Agenda of February 28, 2000. RECEIVED 4. CENSUS 2000 UPDATE AND FILED Recommendation: Receive and file subject report as recommended by the Community Development Department. Action Agenda-- City Council March 6, 2000— Page 1 ADOPTED . 5. RESOLUTION NO..00-15 • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY RESOLUTION- COUNCIL OF THE CITY-OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, NO. 00-15 -ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF AN ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR THE TUSTIN LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT LEVY OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS_ .FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000.2001 Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 00-15 which orders'the preparation of the Engineer's Report for the Tustin Landscape and 'Lighting .District Levy :of Annual. Assessments for � fiscal year 2000-2001 as recommended -by. the. Public Works Department/ f-. Engineering Division. APPROVED 6. -APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE MASTER FUNDING AGREEMENT NO. C-95-993 WITH ORANGE COUNTY- TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY FOR PROJECTS FUNDED BY MEASURE M Recommendation: Approve Amendment No. . 2 to = Cooperative Agreement No. C-95-993 with the Orange County Transportation- Authority, and authorize -the Mayor. and City Clerk to execute the agreement on behalf of the , City upon approval by the City Attorney -as recommended by the Public �Works Department/ Engineering Division., REGULAR BUSINESS ( .ITEM 7 ) DENIED $8500 7'.• FIRE SERVICES APPROPRIATION FOR ALTERNATE At-the February 22', 2000 City Council meeting, FIRE SERVICE Councilmember Doyle requested that a presentation STUDY; WILL regarding an alternate fire,services plan be agendized on RETAIN OCFA March 6, 2000. SERVICE CONTRACT' (4.1 MD OP) Recommendation: Pleasure of the City Council. PUBLIC INPUT BERKLEE MAUGHAN: SPOKE IN FAVOR OF ALTERNATE FIRE SERVICE STUDY. OTHER BUSINESS / COMMITTEE REPORTS -POTTS: ENCOURAGED. EVERYONE TO VOTE IN THE ,PRIMARY ELECTION-ON MARCH 7.TH Action Agenda — City Council March 6., 2000—Page 2 SALTARELLI: CONGRATULATED THE MISS TUSTIN CONTESTANTS AND 'COMMENDED THE VOLUNTEERS AND -PAGEANT y STAFF FOR A SUCCESSFUL EVENT. THOMAS: REPORTED ON NUMEROUS COMMENTS HE HAD • RECEIVED ON THE BEAUTY OF CEDAR GROVE PARK: REQUESTED STAFF EXPLORE THE 'POSSIBILITY OF RENAMING INDUSTRIAL WAY TO MARCONI .WAY IN RECOGNITION OF THE MARCONI AUTOMOTIVE MUSEUM. ENCOURAGED RESIDENTS TO VOTE ON,MARCH 7TH. WORLEY: ENCOURAGED EVERYONE TO VOTE ON MARCH 7TH. CONGRATULATED THE NEW MISS TUSTIN, CINDY STUCK, AND THE RUNNER:UP CONTESTANTS. EXPRESSED DISPLEASURE THAT THE SCHOOL-DISTRICT, . HAD INSTALLED A GATE BETWEEN THE SPORTS PARK AND TUSTIN RANCH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL BLOCKING THE PUBLIC'S ACCESS TO THE SCHOOL GROUNDS. COMMENDED THE VOLUNTEERS WHO REFURBISHED THE FIELDS AT UTT MIDDLE SCHOOL. EXPRESSED DISPLEASURE WITH A LETTER TO THE EDITOR CONTAINING DISPARAGING REMARKS ABOUT MAYOR PRO TEM . THOMAS AND • COUNCILMEM13ER SALTARELLI,° COMMENTED THAT THE NEWCOMER WAS UNAWARE OF THE CLOUT THOSE COUNCILMEMBERS HAD WITHIN THE COUNTY; STATED THE LETTER WAS VERY OFFENSIVE, AND 1T APPEARED, THAT- CAMPAIGN 2000 WAS UNDERWAY, r . ANNOUNCED CLOSED SESSION - The City ,Council shall convene in closed session. to confer with its labor negotiator, William A. Huston, City Manager, regarding unrepresented employees; and, to confer with the City Attorney regarding pending litigation to which the City is a party: Plaza Lafayette_, LLC v. City of Tustin, OCSC No. 8115036. 9:32 P.M. ADJOURNMENT - The'next regular meeting of the City Council is' scheduled for Monday, March 20, 2000, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at 300 Centennial Way. Action Agenda — City Council March 6, 2000— Page 3 ACTION AGENDA REGULAR MEETING OF THE TUSTIN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MARCH 6, 2000 9:32 P.M. 'CALL TO ORDER ALL PRESENT ROLL CALL REGULAR BUSINESS { ITEMS 1- THROUGH 2 ) APPROVED 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES ' — FEBRUARY 22, 2000 REGULAR MEETING Recommendation: Approve the Redevelopment Agency Minutes of February 22, 2000. ADOPTED. 2. THE SECOND FIVE-YEAR IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR RESOLUTION THE TOWN CENTER.AND SOUTH CENTRAL NO. RDA 00-3 REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREAS FOR FISCAL YEARS 2000-2001 TO 2004-2005 Agency approval is requested of Second Five-Year • Implementation, Plan for the Town Center and South Central Redevelopment Project Areas for fiscal years 2000-2001 to 2004-2005. Recommendation: Adopt the following Resolution No. RDA 00-3 approving the proposed Second Five-Year Implementation Plan for the Town Center and South Central Redevelopment Project Areas for fiscal years 2000-2001 to 2004-2005 as recommended by Redevelopment staff: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 00-3 - A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SECOND FIVE-YEAR IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR THE TOWN CENTER AND SOUTH CENTRAL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREAS NONE OTHER BUSINESS NONE CLOSED SESSION - None 9:32 P.M. ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the Redevelopment Agency is scheduled for Monday, March 20, 2000, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at 300 Centennial Way. Action Agenda—Redevelopment Agency March 6, 2000—Page 1 ITEM ,ATE: I me µ- Com MARCH I13, 0010 TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: COM'MUNI'TY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT S URJECT: SUMMARY OF PROJECTS Staff has compiled the following list of projects and activities for your information. The list focuses on the status of projects that the Planning Commission, Zoning administrator, or Community Development Director approved, major tenant improvement projects„ and other items of interest. attached are the Current Planning Project Status reports for the City and East Tustin. Zoning Administrator Actions o Wells Fargo (18858 Irvine Boulevard); On February 22, 2000, construction of a 195 square foot accessory building to accommodate two (2) automated teller machines at the existing bank building was approved. TemDorairy Use Permits l "Nai Israel (21111 Bryan venue) will hold an outdoor youth carnival in celebration of Purina on Sunday, 'March 19, 2000, from 12:00 to 2:00 p.m. Major Projects in Plan Check or Under Construction o Commuter Raul Platform (Jamboree Plaza): Construction drawings have been completed and building permits have been issued. The City Council approved the authorization to bid and the estimated date of completion date is December 2009 . Wendy's (18922 Red Hill avenue): Grading has been completed and building permits were issued on February 28, 2000E Recently Cram Ieted/Finaled Projects • Bally Fitness (630 El Camino Real)-. after successfully providing roof screening, this project was finalized on February 15 and issued a permanent certificate of occupancy. o tlarmun ton (Sixth Street): Thirty-five (85) of a total of thirty-eight units of Ambrose Lane Planned Community in told Town Tustin have received certificates of occupancy. Summary of Projects March 13, 2000 Page 2 MCAF-Tustin Reuse/Redevelopment • Tustin Legacy: Christine Shingleton will provide an update on the status of the Request For Proposals for development of portions of MCAF-Tustin at the March 27 Planning Commission meeting. • Final Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (EIS/EIR) for the Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin: This document was circulated for a 45-day public review period that ended on January 24, 2000. The City received seven comment letters. Following Navy approval of the EIS, the City will proceed with Planning Commission and City Council consideration, currently anticipated by summer of 2000. Miscellaneous' • Nextel: The palm trees along 1-5 Freeway/SR-55 interchange near the monopalm cellular facility are in poor health and are scheduled to be replaced in April. Nextel has coordinated the replacement with work Cal Trans will perform in April when a,portion of the Newport Avenue on-ramp and the SR-55 connector ramp will be closed. 0 Tustin. Lanes: The wall-signs will be redone in accordance with the approved plans in March. • Salvation Army (Pioneer Road): The Salvation Army has submitted an application to develop Phase 11 of the facility. Once complete, the application will be considered by the Planning Commission. • City's Consolidated Plan: The draft Consolidated Plan has been circulated for public review and comment from March 1, 2000, to March 30, 2000. The Consolidated Plan identifies. the City's needs and goals for affordable and supportive housing, community development programs, social services and economic opportunities. The Action Plan, a section of the Consolidated Plan, will serve as the. annual application to HUD for the City's CDBG programs. Once the review period has ended, the City Council will review the Consolidated Plan/Action Plan and authorize proposed funding allocations for FY 2000-2001. • City's Housing Element: Staff is currently preparing the.update to the General Plan Housing Element for Planning Commission and City Council review and approval. Pending legislation is likely to extend the submittal date to the State Department of Housing and Community Development from June 30, 2000 to December 31, 2000. r Attachments COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CURRENT PLANNING PROJECT STATUS - NOT INCLUDING EAST TUSTIN PROJECTS PROJECT STATUS LEGEND DATE OF REPORT: March 8, 2000 01 - ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL 05 - PROJECT APPROVED SORT: LEGEND ITEMS 01-07 02 RESUBMITTAL 06_- PLAN CHECK 03 - COMMENTS OUT/PENDING APPLICANT RESPONSE 07 - PERMITS ISSUED/UNDER CONSTRUCTION 08 PROJECT COMPLETE TENTATIVE NEARING DATES 09 WITHDRAWN 10 EXPIRED 04.1 - ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 11 - DENIED 04.2 - PLANNING COMMISSION -12 - REVOKED 04.3 - CITY COUNCIL STATUS RESPONSE CASE.# APPLICANT PROJECT ADDRESS DESCRIPTION STATUS DATE DUE STAFF CUPOO-006 Vision Quest 1131 MAIN ST Training Facility 01 02/22/00 03/15/00 Brad Evanson CUP99-025 County of Orange TUP Extension 01 02/25/00 03/17/00 Lori Ludi UD 00-001 Marc Kassoff 14511CARFAX AV Residential 01 02/17/00 03/13/00 Karen Peterson UD 00-002 Marc Kessoff 14512 CARFAX AV Residential 01 02/17/00 03/13/00 Karen Peterson UD 00-003 Vision Quest 1131 MAIN ST Training Center 01 02/22/00 03/15/00 Brad Evanson CUP99-027 AT&T Wireless Services 1421 EDINGER ST Monopole Cell Site 02 03/07/00 03/28/00 Brad Evanson. CUP99-031 Henry& Judy Kumagai 14122 NEWPORT AV Transmission Repair Shop 02 03/07/00 03/28/00 Brad Evanson DR 99-036 AT&T Wireless Services 1421 EDINGER ST Monopole Cellular Site 02 03/07/00 03/28/00 Brad Evanson DR 99-039 Henry& Judy Kumagai 14122 NEWPORT AV Transmission Repair Shop 02 03/07/00 03/28/00 Brad Evanson CUPOO.002 Tustin Plaza Center 13771 NEWPORT AV 50-Seat Restaurant 03 02/02/00 Brad Evanson CUP98-018 Orange County Rescue Miss MCAS PA3 Emergency/Transitional Housing 03 09/03/98 Lori Ludi CUP99-007 American Senior Living 1101 SYCAMORE AV 60-Unit Senior Housing Project 03 04/26/99 Justina Wilkhom CUP99-009 Willy Paul, Architect 1352 IRVINE BL Law Office & School 03 05/06/99 Lori Ludi CUP99-017 Alex Mann 1091 IRVINE BL Live Entertainment/Tustin Lanes 03 11/01/99 Lori Ludi CUP99-020 Reverand Mark E. Whitlock 1541 PARKWAY LOOP Church in Industrial 03 09/15/99 Minoo Ashabi CUP99-026 Foothill Chevron 17241 IRVINE BL Gas Station/Convenience Store/Carwash 03 12/08/99 Lori Ludi CUP99-030 Los Chorritos 15761 TUSTIN VILLAGE Convenience Store/Remodel 03 12/16/99 Brad Evanson CUP99-032 Dr. Robert Helm 215 EL CAMINO REAL Office Development 03 01/03/00 Lori Ludi CUP99-036 Hope Christian Church 1372 IRVINE SL Church Use/Remodel 03 01/18/00 Lori Ludi DR 00-006 Brian Overholt 143 8 ST SFR Remodel 03 02/22/00 Minoo Ashabi DR 00-008 John Frankel 14191 MYFORD RD Industrial Expansion03 .03/02/00 Minoo Ashabi DR 98-018 Orange County Rescue Miss MCAS PA3 - Emergency/Transitional Housing 03 09/03/98 Lori Ludi OR 98-024 ASL Consulting Engineers 235 E MAIN ST Main Street Reservoir/Parking 03 02/02/00 Karen Peterson Page 1 STATUS RESPONSE CASE N APPLICANT PROJECT ADDRESS DESCRIPTION STATUS DATE DOS STAFF DR 9B-032 Arther Masaoka 140 A ST Demo/New Residence 03 07/14/99 Karen Peterson DR 99-006 American senior Living 1101 SYCAMORE AV 60-Unit Senior Housing Project 03 04/26/99 Justine wilkhom DR 99-010 Media One Phase II: 12 Power Supply Cabinets 03 06/24/99 Minoo Ashabi DR 99-012 Media One 'Phase III: 50 Power Supply Cabinets 03 12/08/99 Minoo Ashabi DR 99-024 Media one Phase IV: 6 Power Supply Cabinets 03 08/19/99 Minoo Ashabi DR 99-027 Conrad & Denise Sawicz 13571 FAIRMONT WY Residential Remodel 03 08/16/99 Brad Evanson DR 99-028 Media One phase V: 6 Power Supply Cabinets '03 08/23/99 Minoo Ashabi DR 99-030 Sprint PCS Cell Site a Commuter Rail Platform 03 10/14/99 Minoo Ashabi DR 99-033 Foothill Chevron 17241 IRVINE BL Gas Station/Convenience Store/Carwash 03 12/08/99 Lori Ludi DR 99-037 Robert Lindquist 140 MAIN ST Second Story Addition/Ped Bridge 03 12/03/99 Minoo Ashabi DR 99-038 Los Chorritos 15761 TUSTIN VILLAGE Convenience Store/Remodel 03 12/16/99 Brad Evanson_ DR 99-041 Dr. Robert Helm 215 EL CAMINO REAL office Development 03 01/03/00 Lori Ludi DR 99-042 Diversified Arts 1062 IRVINE BL Remodel of Alta-Dena Drive-thru Dairy 03 01/04/00 Minoo Ashabi DR 99-045 Hope Christian church 1372 IRVINE BL Church Use/Remodel 03 01/18/00 Lori Ludi GPA99-002 American Senior Living 1101 SYCAMORE AV MDR to HDR 03 04/26/99 Justina WiLkhom GPA99-003 Foothill Chevron 17241 IRVINE BL Gas Station/Convenience Store/Carwash 03 12/08/99 Lori Ludi SCE99-004 Jerry Firth 12821 NEWPORT AV Wall Sign • . 03 09/30/99 Lori Ludi TPM99-217 David Anderson 15901 RED HILL AV Condominium Map 03. 12/15/99 Minoo Ashabi VAR99-001 American Senior Living 1101 SYCAMORE AV 60-Unit Senior Housing 03 04/26/99 Justina WiLkhom ZC 99-003 American Senior Living 1101 SYCAMORE AV R-4 to R-3' 03 04/26/99 Justina WiLkhom ZC 99-004 Foothill Chevron 17241 IRVINE BL Gas Station/Convenience Store/Carwash 03 12/08/99 Lori Ludi CUPOO-003 California Eye Animal Cli 3025 EDINGER ST Animal Eye clinic 04.2 03/13/00 Brad Evanson CUP99-012 sprint PCS 15201 WOODLAWN AV 60-Monopole w/ 12 Antennas 04.2 03/13/00 Lori Ludi OR 99-017 Sprint PCS 15201 WOODLAWN AV Major Wireless Communication Facility 04.2 03/13/00 Lori Ludi CUPOO-001 Steve casade 12571 NEWPORT AV Construction Staging/city Project 05 01/31/00 Minoo Ashabi CUPOO-004 Orange County constructio 275 CENTENNIAL WY Construction Office in FSSP 05 02/26/00 Brad Evanson CUP98-022 Jack Stanaland 13011 NEWPORT AV Add parking on vacant ROW 05 07/06/99 Justina WiLLkom CUP98-028 Dr. Craig/Dr. Lavach 2955 EDINGER ST Veterinary Hospital at Jamboree Plaza 05 01/05/99 Brad Evanson CUP98-031 Akira Takashio 658 EL CAMINO REAL Amendment: 39 Seat Expansion 05 10/25/99 Justina WiLLkom CUP99-004 Pacific Bell Wireless 14451 MYFORD RD Modification of existing cell site. 05° 04/12/99 Minoo Ashabi CUP99-008 Michael & Lisa Broome 3047 EDINGER ST Vetrinary Nuclear Imaging 05 05/10/99 Minoo Ashabi CUP99-010 PairGain Technologies 14352 FRANKLIN AV Temporary Office Trailer (18 Month Extension) 05 11/08/99" Lori Ludi CUP99-016 Denise Manz 14392 HOLT AV Second Unit 05 10/11/99 Brad Evanson CUP99-019 Donald Frizzell 1111 EL CAMINO REAL 90-Student Pre-School/B Staff 05 01/24/00 Brad Evanson CUP99-021 L.J. Hausner 505 1ST ST Construction Office 05 01/24/00 Minoo Ashabi CUP99-023 Hassan Keivannia 13882 NEWPORT AV Restaurant ABC License 05 11/01/99 Lori.Ludi CUP99-024 David Hughes 640 IST ST UD/CUP for Marital Arts Studio 05 11/22/99 Minoo Ashabi CUP99-028 Mitsui Real Estate 14151 NEWPORT AV 9 Assigned Parking Spaces 05 12/20/99 Lori Ludi Page 2 • • ' • STATUS RESPONSE CASE N APPLICANT PROJECT ADDRESS DESCRIPTION STATUS DATE DUE STAPP CUP99-029 Sea Breeze Community Chur 15102 RED HILL AV Church in Industrial 05 02/14/00 Minoo Ashabi CUP99-035 Zov's Bistro 17440 17TH ST Outdoor Seating/Remodel 05 02/14/00 Minoo Ashabi DR 00-001 Victor Nassereddin 12892 NEWPORT AV Fascia/Pale Sign Remodel 05 01/31/00 Brad Evanson DR 00-002 Ronald & Desire Roche 153 B ST Garage Relocation 05 01/31/00 Lori Ludi DR 00-004 Jonathon Lapin 18231 IRVINE BL Roof-mounted cellular antennas. 05 02/11/00 Minoo Ashabi DR 00-005 Beard Family 2292 COCO PALM DR SFR Remodel 05 02/23/00 Lori Ludi DR 98-026 Jack StanaLand 13011 NEWPORT AV Add parking on vacant ROW 05 07/06/99 Justine Willkom DR 98-036 Hal Woods 12569 NEWPORT AV New Building 05 11/01/99 Lori Ludi DR 99-009 Euilon Enterprises 13891 RED HILL AV Exterior Remodel of SheLL Station 05 07/21/99 Minoo Ashabi DR 99-015 Audrey Heredia 355 C ST Gazebo/Removal of Parking 05 06/21/99 Minoo Ashabi DR 99-016 Tyrone Hurtsdo 305 6TH ST Residential Remodel 05 07/19/99 Minoo Ashabi DR 99-020 Ed and Diane Finkbeiner 163 MOUNTAIN VIEW D New Residence 05 09/22/99 Mir= Ashabi DR 99-021 Ed and Diane Finkbeiner 165 MOUNTAIN VIEW D New Residence 05 09/22/99 Minoo Ashabi DR 99-022 Jersey Business Center As 2741 WALNUT AV New 35,000 S.F. Building 05 11/01/99 Minoo Ashabi DR 99-023 Hien Pham 14092 c ST Kitchen/Beth Expansion G5 07/16/99 Minoo Ashabi DR 99-025 Curt and Sheila Lilly 145 A ST Reconstruction of fire-damaged residence. 05 07/27/99 Brad Evanson DR 99=029 Mel Malkoff 2111 BRYAN AV Expansion of pre-school to 79%modular unit. 05 09/13/99 Lori Ludi DR 99-034 Rosa Gaston 14701 CHARLOMA DR Balcony/Front Porch Alteration 05 12/29/99 Minoo Ashabi DR 99-043 Zov's Bistro 17440 17TH ST outdoor Seating/Remodel 05 02/14/00 Minoo Ashabi DR 99-044 Wells Fargo Bank 18356 IRVINE BL ATM Building 05 02/22/00 Brad Evanson MA 99-003 Elmer Tiedje 15500 TUSTIN VILLAGE Pool Fence 05 12/17/99 Brad Evanson SCE99-001 Consolidated Restaurants '13922 RED HILL AV SCE 99-001(A)&(B) Well/Pole Sign 05 08/09/99 Brad Evanson FPM99-196 Jersey Business Center As 2741 WALNUT AV Lot Split/New Building 05 11/01/99 Minoo Ashabi VAR99-003 Willis Sutcliff 330 CALIFORNIA ST Fence Height Variance 05 09/13/99 Minoo Ashabi .ZC 98-006 Hal Woods 12569 NEWPORT AV New Building 05 11/01/99 Lori Ludi CUP97-005 Bennett Architects 535 E MAIN ST Appeal Carwash/Service Station/Retail 06 06/22/99 Brad Evanson CUP98-007 Alegre Associates 12972 NEWPORT AV Appeal - Lube/Oil Facility 06 06/16/99 Lori Ludi CUP98-013 The Meridien Group 3017 EDINGER ST ABC Type 20 06 02/10/99 Karen Peterson CUP98-023 Barbara Krull 1091 BRYAN AV 60 Student Preschool 06 01/11/99 Justina Willkom CUP99-013 Vons - 550 1ST ST Vons expansion of 11,400 square feet. 06 07/12/99 Brad Evanson CUP99-015 Bennett Architects 155 EL CAMINO REAL Mail Order Use/Parking Ratio 06 08/25/99 Lori Ludi DR 95-044 Michael A. Murphy&Assoc 2832 DOW AV Parking Lot Expansion 06 11/20/98 Justina Willkom DR 96-056 The Meridian Group 3017 EDINGER ST Service Station/Conv. Market 06 02/10/99 Karen Peterson DR 97-031 City of Tustin 13331 FOOTHILL BL City Water Reservior Booster Pump 06 06/08/98. Lori Ludi DR 98-006 The Meridian Group 3017 EDINGER ST Service Station/Conv. Market/Drive-thru 06 02/10/99 Karen Peterson DR 98-007 Alegre Associates 12972 NEWPORT AV Appeal - Lube/Oil Facility 06 06/16/99 Lori Ludi DR 98-022 William B. Standford O.D. 190 EL CAMINO REAL Remodel 06 06/04/99 Minoo Ashabi DR 99-007 City of Tustin Commuter Rail Platform 06 05/10/99 Scott Reekstin DR 99-014 Bennett Architects 155 EL.CAMINO REAL New Building 06 08/25/99 Lori Ludi Page 3 STATUS RESPONSE CASE N APPLICANTPROJECT ADDRESS DESCRIPTION STATUS DATE' DUE STAFF DR 99-019 Vons 550 IST ST Vons expansion of 11,400 square feet. 06 07/12/99 Brad Evanson TPM97.117 Bennett Architects 535 E'MAIN'ST Carwash/Service Station/RetaiL 06 06/22/99 Brad Evanson CUP06-019 James Kincannon 14752 HOLT AV 10 Person Rest Home 07 04/16/98''. Lori Ludi �CUP96-020 Service Station Services 13891 RED HILL-AV. Time Extension - Station Remodel 07 03/29/99 Minoo Ashabi CUP97-006 Richard Rengel 333 EL CAMINO REAL Office Addition 07 02/09/99 Karen Peterson CUP98-021 IEA 630 E 4T ST New monument signs 07 09/28/98 Minoo Ashabi CUP99-002 ConsoLidated Restaurants 13922 RED HILL AV CUP 99-602(A)8(B) Restaurant/Pole Sign .07 02/28/00 Brad Evanson CUP99-018 Mel Malkoff 2111 BRYAN AV Expansion of pre-schoolto 79/modular unit. 07 09/13/99 Lori Ludi. DR 95-037 Ralph Turner 235 S MYRTLE ST Remodel/Addition 07 02/05/96 Dan Fox DR 96-,007 Chevron USA 13052 NEWPORT AV Soil Remediation 07 07/14/98 Brad Evanson DR 96-044 Kimberly Bernhard 265 S PACIFIC ST Room addition and detached garage - Old Town 07 10/10/96 Karen Peterson DR 96-053 MC WILLIAMS, TRAVIS 0 328 W 3RD ST Roof Remodel 07 01/17/97' Karen Peterson DR 97-009 Bennett Architects 535 E MAIN ST' Appeal Carwash/Service Station/Retail 07 04/09/99 Brad Evanson DR 97-011 Richard RengeL 333 EL CAMINO REAL Office addition 07 02/09/99 .Karen Peterson DR 97-012 Patrick Mattison 510 S 8 ST Room Addition 07 10/01/97 Karen Peterson DR 97-018 Julie Chamberlain Archite X158 N MOUNTAIN VIEW D Residential.RemodeL - - C7 01/16/98 Brad Evanson 'DR 97-034 Terry Tull 165 S PACIFIC ST Room Addition 07 10/05/98 Minoo Ashabi DR 98-013 McCausland, Charles 8 Ali 135 S A ST Second Dwelling Unit 07 04/22/99 Minoo Ashabi DR 98-017 BORUSKY, THOMAS J 160 N B ST Residential Remodel 07 08/19/98 Lori Ludi DR 98-023 Custom signs, Inc. 1091 OLD IRVINE BL Neon Sign, Paint/Reface pole sign 07 09/29/98 Brad Evanson DR 98-037 Jerry'soxman/Leslie Mitch 13792 MALENA DR Room Addition/Remodel ,07 03/22/99 Justin Wilkom DR 99-001 Consolidated Restaurants 13922 RED HILL AV New Drive-thru Restaurant, 07 02/28/00 Brad Evanson DR 99-013 William H. Barstow 14282 WILLOW LN Residential Remodel 07. 07/08/99 Minoo Ashabi SCE98-003 PBMS 2521 MICHELLE DR Increase sign area 07 10/28/98 Lori Ludi VAR98-005 E/C Engineering 1452 EDINGER ST Equipment Building encroaching into Streetsid 07 02/17/,99 Minoo Ashabi •"• END OF REPORT **• ' i yA• Page 4 COMMUNITY DEVE-PMENT DEPARTMENT CURRENT PLANNING PROJECT STATUS --EAST TUSTIN PROJECTS PROJECT STATUS LEGEND DATE OF REPORT: March 8, 2000 01 - ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL 05 - PROJECT APPROVED SORT: LEGEND ITEMS 01-07 02 - RESUBMITTAL- 06 PLAN CHECK 03 - COMMENTS OUT/PENDING APPLICANT RESPONSE 07 - PERMITS ISSUED/UNDER CONSTRUCTION 08 PROJECT COMPLETE TENTATIVE HEARING DATES 09 - WITHDRAWN 10 - EXPIRED 04.1 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 11 -DENIED _ 04-2 - PLANNING COMMISSION 12 - REVOKED i 04.3 CITY COUNCIL PROJECT LOCATION STATUS RESPONSE CASE.# APPLICANT LOT TRACT DESCRIPTION STATUS DATE DUE STAIrr , TT 15993 DOUGLAS BENDER B.ASSOCIAT 17SFD - 01 ,Brad Evanson - DR 95.045 HOME DEPOT Monitor outside display area 02 01/13/00 Karen Peterson CUP00 005 SALVATION ARMY PHASE II ADDITION. 8375 SF CLASSROOM, 7930 S 03 03/06/00 Lori Ludi CUP987025 The Church 7 12870 900 Seat church/Pre School 03 11/11/98 - Lori Ludi DR 00 007 SALVATION ARMY SALVATION ARMY PHASE II. 8375 SF CLASSROOM, 03 03/06/00 Lori Ludi DR 98-029 The church 7 12870 900 Seat Church/Pre School 03 11/11/98 Lori, Ludi FM 14396 Bender 8 Associates Final Parcel Map. 03 01/12/00 Karen Peterson DR 96-054 The Irvine Company 24 13627 113 Custom Home Sites, Equestrian Center 05 02/12/98 Karen Peterson DR 99-032 Home Depot Home Depot Garden Area Remodel 05 12/13/99Lori Ludi ' DR 99-040 Compass Telecom Modification to existing ceLL site at Sports 05 12/16/99 Karen Peterson HR 96-002 The Irvine Company 24 13627 113 Custom Home Sites, Equestrian Center 05 02/12/98 Karen Peterson TT 14396 Irvine Community Developm 24 13627 113 Custom Home Sites, Equestrian Center 05 02/12/98 Karen Peterson DR 96-050 Mr. Mel Mercado 27 13627 162 SFD• 07 01/19/98 Minoo-Ashabi DR 96-057 John Laing Homes 4 12870 75 SFD 07 04/16/98 Lori Ludi DR 97-014 LPA, Inc. Auto dealer/museum 07 04/0.9/98 Minoo Ashabi DR 97-019 Rielly Homes, Inc. 19 12870 Add New Recreation'Facility 07 02/23/98 Karen Peterson DR 97-035 Warmington Homes 26 13627 44 sfd 07 07/09/98 Karen Peterson DR 98-012 BrookField Horses 9 13627 114 sfd 07 12/07/98 Karen Peterson . DR 98-015 Standard Pacific 24 13627 46 sfd on Tract 15563 07 10/15/98 Karen Peterson DR 98;027 James H. Parkinson Exterior remodel/Remove canopy & office build 07 10/01/98 Lori Ludi DR 98-031 Frank Bennett Development of 2 pads in Tustin Annex 07 _ 08/11/99 Lori Ludi Page 1 PROJECT LOCATX014 STATUS RESPONSE CASE p APPLICANT LOT TRACT DESCRIPTION STATUS DATE DUE STAFF DR 99-018 Richard Chang Old Navy Storefront Modification 07 06/28/99 Brad Evanson HR 98-001 Warmington Homes 26 13627 HILLSIDE REVIEW 07 06/01/98 Karen Peterson HR 98-002 BrookField Homes 9 13627 114 sfd -07 12/07/98 Karen Peterson MA 99-002 Hunsaker 8 Associates Increase WaLI Height 07 09/27/99 Brad Evanson TT 15380 Mr_ Mel Mercado 27 13627 162 SFD, Amend Conditions 07 01/19/98 Minoo Ashabi TT 15420 John Laing Homes 4 12870 75 SFD 07 01/30/98 Lori Ludi TT 15568 Kaufman 8 Broad Coastal, 19 13627 130 SFD 07 04/16/98 Lori Ludi TT 15601 Warmington Homes 26 13627 44 sfd 07 06/01/98 Karen Peterson TT" 15681 BrookField Homes 9 13627 114 sfd 07 12/07/98 Karen Peterson *** END OF REPORT *** - Page 2 , - • �