The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About03-27-00 PC PACKET A-GENDA TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MARCH 27, 2000 CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 p.m., City Council Chambers PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Commissioner Kawashima ROLL CALL: Chairperson Kozak, Bell, Davert, Kawashima and Pontious PUBLIC CONCERNS: . (Limited to 3 minutes-per,person for items not on the.agenda.) At this time members of the public may address the Commission regarding any, items not on the agenda and within the subject matter Jurisdiction of the Commission (NO action ;can be taken off.-agenda items unless authorized by I law). _ . . IF-YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION ON ANY MATTER, ' PLEASE FILL OUT ONE OF THE CARDS LOCATED ON THE SPEAKER'S TABLE SO THAT YOUR REMARKS ON THE TAPE RECORDING OF THE MEETING CAN BE ATTRIBUTED TO YOU. WHEN YOU START TO .ADDRESS THE COMMISSION, PLEASE STATE YOUR FULL NAME'AND ADDRESS FOR'THE RECORD. IF YOU REQUIRE SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS, PLEASE CONTACT THE PLANNING COMMISSION`SECRETARY AT (714) 573-3106. CONSENT CALENDAR: (ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER CONSENT CALENDAR ARE CONSIDERED ROUTINE AND-WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION. THERE WILL BE -NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE VOTING ON THE MOTION UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION,' STAFF OR PUBLIC REQUEST SPECIFIC ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AND/OR REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT, CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION.) 5 Planning Commission Agenda March 27, 2000 Page 2 CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. Minutes of the March 13 2000 Planning Commission-Meeting. 2. Conditional Use Permit 99-012 and . Design Review 99-017 a request to construct a major wireless communication facility: This project is located at 15201 Woodlawn .Avenue, within the Pacific Center East Specific Plan (Technology Center)zoning district. APPLICANT: SAUNDRA JACOBSISPRINT PCS SBA, INC. PROPERTY OWNERS: DAVID FRENCH SNAPPLE RECOMMENDATION , That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 3714 approving the.. construction of a monopine 60 feet in height.. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 3. Conditional Use Permit 00-002 a request to-modify the shared parking program to allow-the establishment of a fifty (50) seat restaurant within an existing retail commercial-center. This project is located at 13771 Newport Avenue, #12 within the Planned Community Commercial (PC_'Comm) zoning district. - APPLICANT/: TUSTIN PLAZA CENTER, LP PROPERTY ATTN: SCOTT FRASER . OWNER: RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 3720 approving Conditional Use Permit 00-002. Presentation: Bradley Evanson, Assistant Planner, 4. Conditional Use Permit 99-025 a request to allow the stockpile of quarry rock on ; private property. This project is located on the southwest corner of Harvard Avenue and the OCTAISCRRA raiMtay. This project is within the Public and Institutional (P'& 1) zoning district. Planning Commission Agenda March 27, 2000 Page 3 APPLICANT: COUNTY OF=ORANGE, PUBLIC'FACILITIES` AND RESOURCES ATTN: DALE DILLON PROPERTY OWNERS: THE IRVINE COMPANY RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission .adopt Resolution No. approving. an amendment to Conditional Use Permit 99-025. Presentatloh:.Lori Ludi, Associate Planner REGULAR BUSINESS 5. _General Plan Conformity Determination a request to determine that the proposed location for lease .of a 950 -square foot area for counseling services at C.E: Utt School is, in conformance with the Tustin General Plan. The project is located at 93601 Browning Avenue within the Public and Institutional (P & 1) zoning district. APPLICANT: COUNTY OF ORANGE HEALTH CARE AGENCY PROPERTY OWNER: TUSTIN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT RECOMMENDATION f That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution 'No. 3719 determining that the proposed location for lease of a.950 square foot area for counseling services at C.E. Utt.School is in conformance with the Tustin General Plan. Presentation:: Lori Ludi, Associate Planner_ STAFF CONCERNS: 6. Report on Actions taken atthe March 20 2000 City Council Meeting Presentation: Elizabeth A. Binsack, Director of Community Development COMMISSION CONCERNS: ADJOURNMENT: A regular meeting of the Planning Commission will be held on April.10,'2000 beginning at 7:00 p.m., City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin. ITEM #1 MINUTES TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MARCH 13, 2000 CALL TO ORDER: 7:01 p.m., City Council.Chambers PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: . Commissioner Davert ROLL CALL: Chairperson Kozak, Bell, Davert, Kawashima and Pontious PROCLAMATION: Presented to Kathy Martin, Recording Secretary, as she leaves service for the City of Tustin. PUBLIC CONCERNS: No Public Concerns were expressed. CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. Minutes of the Februa 28 2000 Planning Commission Meeting. Commissioner Davert moved Commissioner Kawashima, to.approve the Consent Calendar. Motion carried 5-0. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 2. Conditional Use Permit 00-004 a request to establish a contractor's office in an existing office building. The project is located at 275 Centennial Way, Suite 211, within the First Street Specific Plan zoning district. APPLICANT:,_ ORANGE COUNTY CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE PROPERTY OWNER: LARWIN SQUARE, LLC. Recommendation That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 3716 approving Conditional iUse Permit 00-004.- . The public hearing opened at 7:08 p.m. Bradley Evanson; Assistant Planner presented the subject report. Planning Commission Minutes March 13, 2000 Page 2 The public hearing closed at 7:10 p.m. Commissioner Davert moved, Commissioner Bell 'seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 3716 approving Conditional Use Permit 00-004. Motion carried 5-0. 3. Conditional Use Permit 99-012 And DeqLqn Review 99-017 a request to construct a major wireless communication facility. The project is located at 15201 Woodlawn Avenue within the Pacific Center East Specific Plan (Technology Center) zoning district. APPLICANT: SPRINT PCS PROPERTY OWNER: DAVID FRENCH SNAPPLE RECOMMENDATION Pleasure of the Planning Commission. The public hearing opened at 7:11 p.m. Lori Ludi presented the subject report. Commissioner Davert asked staff if the applicant could make do with a monopole of less than 60 feet and still have reasonably good coverage. Lori Ludi replied that the radio frequency analysis indicated that 45 feet would be sufficient for vehicular use but not for use within a building and a 60 foot facility, may leave gaps in coverage. Commissioner Davert asked if the applicant anticipated another structure. Lori referred that question to the applicant. Commissioner Davert noted that there are a number of buildings taller than the Snapple building and asked staff's opinion on the feasibility of using the Orange County Teachers Credit Union building for a roof mounted antenna. The Director responded that staff believes it would be possible and the applicant has not provided justification that it cannot be done and further noted other sites that use signs and relatively high buildings to accommodate cell sites. Chairperson Kozak stated that the Micro Center sign would be an excellent site. Planning Commission Minutes March 13, 2000 Page 3 Commissioner Davert stated that with the upcoming Tustin Legacy project he would like to see other options explored before committing to a 60 foot monopole.. Commissioner Kawashima asked what the height restriction is for the Pacific Center East. The Director stated that the maximum height permitted in this district is 50 feet for buildings which is why an additional 10 feet for clearance was incorporated in the wireless ordinance. Commissioner Davert asked if two or more building mounts would provide the same coverage. : Karen Peterson noted that the applicant's justification letter states that any antenna height of less than 60 feet may require the placement of two antenna locations to cover the signal requirements for the area. Commissioner Davert stated that the Planning Commission could suggest. two well- screened antennae as opposed to one monopalm. The Director responded that the Commission,could request that and noted that several • other carriers have done that. She further noted that the ordinance incorporated approval of stealth facilities at the Zoning Administrator level for ease of development. Chairperson Kozak noted that the Commission has to take potential developments at Tustin Legacy into consideration. Saundra Jacobs, Sprint representative, thanked Lori Ludi and Karen Peterson for their hard work and assistance through the application process. She stated that the proposed antenna is in response to very poor cellular coverage in the area of the 55 freeway, Redhill and Edinger 'Avenue. She noted that Sprint reviewed several potential site candidates and chose this property owner because he-was a willing.lessor, agreed to the lease rate that Sprint budgeted for, and lastly there is- enough physical space for the equipment. She asked for the Commission to approve a standard antenna because it is conducive to co-location and the tree poles are not conducive to collocation. She thanked the Planning Commission for their time. Chairperson Kozak stated his appreciation for comments regarding alternatives and, stated his preference for a multiple building alternative. Saundra Jacobs, Sprint representative, stated that the site acquisition personnel looked at various buildings in the area and this was the best alternative. Chairperson Kozak asked the applicant for assistance in reading the graphical depictions of coverage and drop areas. Kathleen Abola, radio.frequency engineer for Sprint, stated that map 1 shows the current cell sites and.green and yellow is vehicle coverage level; map 2 shows the same area Planning Commission Minutes March 13, 2000 Page 4 with two additional cell sites that are being added to show what they will cover; map 3 shows the same area with the requested at 60 feet; and map 4 shows the same area with the facility at 45 feet. She noted that the system is very dynamic and coverage changes according to how many people are using their phones. She further noted that if the, pole is approved for only 45 feet, the coverage gets smaller and the site would have to be revisited. Commissioner Davert asked staff how much the FCC limits what the City can do. The Director stated that the City may not ban the technology they are proposing which is why the ordinance identifies site location criteria. TheCity does have the discretion to regulate location and what the facility looks like. She further noted that five years ago it was not possible to do a-monopalm or building. mounted, otherwise monopoles would be located throughout the community. Commissioner Pontious stated that she cannot support a monopole and believes it is unfortunate that:once an acceptable location was found, the applicant did not review alternative mounting locations. She further stated that she would be more inclined to approve a monopine since there have been problems with keeping the palm trees alive in other locations. Chairperson Kozak asked Commissioner Pontious if her recommendation would be for 60 feet or lower. Commissioner Pontious responded that she is willing to approve the- 60 foot proposal because of the possibility of having more poles at the 45 foot height. Commissioner Davert stated his first preference would be something that is building mounted but noted that he does find the applicant's justification compelling-. ..He stated he is very concerned about the impact on surrounding community particularly with the Tustin Legacy project. He stated that he would be willing to approve a monopalm with a round trunk. He further noted that the project site has rusty furniture and garbage all over and asked if the property owner could be encouraged to clean up the site. Commissioner Bell stated that she would also prefer a roof mounted facility but given the choice between a palm or a pine she feels the pine blends in better with the existing landscaping. She also encouraged the applicant to look at other locations. Commissioner Kawashima stated he would be willing to approve a monopine at 60 feet. The Director stated that she believed the applicant did not explore the possibility of a 45 foot screen on top of a 30 foot building but staff would not likely recommend approval. Commissioner Dayert noted that, to be fair to the applicant, this was the one property owner they were able to come to terms with. Planning Commission Minutes March 13, 2000 Page 5 Seline (incomprehendable), a representative from Sprint, noted that the, search for buildings is left to the site acquisition personnel to negotiate with landlords who are responsive to their needs. He further stated that it is not a case of not investigating other sites since the search, has been going on for a year and they have been, looking in that area extensively. He noted that there are technical restrictions in terms of power loss and requirements for this type of equipment. Chairperson Kozak stated that he did not see the difference in the cable run for a 60 foot above ground antenna and a 30 foot building because it is still 60 feet above ground level. Seline (incomprehendible) stated that the underground structural engineers would not approve an extension at a maximum 50 feet above roof line even if the landlord .was willing: Commissioner Davert asked if the applicant would be lowering antennas in the future. Seline stated that they probably wouldn't lower antennae`but adjust specific antennae. Commissioner Davert asked staff about the conditions that would limit the applicant.- The Director noted that Condition 1.6 would allow her to re-review the project in 2005 in the event that technology exists to bring down the height but would require Council approval; Condition 1..9 would limit the overconcentration of their facilities in this area which would mandate a building mounted facility in the future; and, she noted that other carriers' technology may allow them to collocate on stealth facilities and a condition could be included that would mandate that at a fair market rate. Commissioner Pontious asked if Condition 1.6 could-be amended to indicate review every five years after. The Director stated that the condition could be modified as such. Chairperson Kozak asked staff if they had any information about future development plans for the vacant property between the Snapple building and,Del Amo. The Director responded that City is undertaking the development of the Newport Avenue extension and the reconfiguration of the offramps in that area. As. part of the public improvements, the undergrounding of Edison trunkliries that are going through there is being considered. Chairperson Kozak stated his concern about the effect of a 60 foot cell site on the Tustin Legacy and any development proposals for the vacant property. He stated his preference for a roof-mounted alternative and his concern about setting a precedent by going above 50 feet. He further stated he would be more in favor of a palm tree rather than a pine but would not like either at 60 feet. E Planning Commission Minutes March 13, 2000 Page 6 Commissioner Davert asked the Director if there is a.50 foot limit on the height of the antenna. The Director responded that there is a 50 foot height limit on buildings but the wireless ordinance allows an additional 10 feet in height for an antenna. Commissioner Davert asked if a 50 foot building were constructed on the vacant lot what affect that would have on the cell site and what the applicant would do in that situation. Saundra Jacobs, Sprint representative, stated that if the antenna were 60 feet high and the building were 50 feet high there would be no affect on coverage. She further noted that she brought samples of the fake,pine branch and trunk and noted that they can now be made round and the carrier guarantees to the landlord 'the site will be kept .working and in good order. Commissioner Davert noted the staff recommendation of Pleasure of Commission and asked staff has a recommendation after examining the issue. The Director stated that staff does not feel that all options have been exhausted which is why a resolution of denial has been presented. She stated that the decision was up to . the Commission and if they are inclined to approve a palm or pine monopole, staff would recommend continuing the hearing for two weeks to allow staff to modify the resolution. Commissioner Pontious stated she is pleased`that the cell site will -not be impacting residential areas as in the past. Commissioner Davert stated he did not wish to be unbusiness friendly but did not wish to see cell sites continue to-proliferate. Chairperson Kozak_ stated that the Commission is going to see more requests of this kind. Commissioner Davert stated that he accepts the applicant's justification for 60 feet height but he prefers a stealth site. The Director stated that the Commission can take action this evening and direct staff to prepare a resolution of approval. Commissioner- Davert moved Commissioner Pontious seconded, to approve the project and directed staff to prepare a resolution of approval to reflect the Commission's direction. Saundra Jacobs, Sprint representative, noted that the additional living trees have to be shorter than the antenna. The Director noted modifications including requirement for collocation and lowering facility if technology exists. Planning Commission Minutes March 13, 2000 Page 7 Chairperson Kozak stated that the pole should be round. The applicant responded affirmatively. Commissioner Pontious thanked the applicant for the excellent graphics that were provided. Commissioner Davert asked if the property owner could- be encouraged to clean up the property. The public hearing closed at 8:17 p.m. REGULAR BUSINESS No Regular Business STAFF CONCERNS: 4. Report on Actions taken at the March 6 2000 City Council Meeting Presentation: Elizabeth A. Binsack, Director of Community Development 5. Summary of Projects Presentation: Karen Peterson, Senior Planner Commissioner Bell moved Commissioner Pontious seconded, to receive and file. Motion carried 5-0. COMMISSION CONCERNS: Commissioner Bell Wished Kathy good luck.. Congratulated Commissioner Davert on the birth of his daughter. Commissioner Davert - Noted that the Baskin Robbins store closed and has been replaced with something else. Stated that the public auto auction signs mentioned at the last meeting have been up for the last three weekends. He suggested that the City of Santa Ana code enforcement be enlisted to assist in the elimination of the signs. Planning Commission Minutes March 13, 2000 Page 8 • The Director stated that staff contacted the persons placing the signs and they said they would not locate the signs in Tustin and staff will contact them again. Wished Kathy good luck and thanked her for her work for the Commission. Commissioner Pontious Wished Kathy good luck and fond farewell." Congratulated Commissioner Davert on the birth of his daughter. Commissioner Kawashima Thanked Kathy for her work and congratulated her on her upcoming wedding. - Congratulated Commissioner Davert on the birth of his daughter. Noted that the roper rink on Walnut Avenue closed down. Karen Peterson noted that the rink was sold to another owner but will continue to operate. Chairperson_Kozak Asked for the status of the'quick lube on Newport Avenue. The Director stated that the project is moving along and going through the plan check process and is close to getting building permits. Asked if staff could provide public works improvements on the project summary report in the future. The Director responded that staff will add that information as an attachment to the reports. Thanked Kathy for her work and support of the Commission. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Pontious moved Commissioner Kawashima seconded, to adjourn the meeting at 8:30.p.m. Motion carried 5-0. A regular meeting of the Planning Commission will be held on March 27, 2000 beginning at 7:00 p.m., City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin. 4beport to the Planning Commission DATE: MARCH 27, 2000 . , SUBJECT: .CONDITIONAL USE.PERMIT 99-012 AND . DESIGN REVIEW 99-017 APPLICANTS: SAUNDRA JACOBS . SPRINT PCS SBA, INC. 4683 CHABOT DRIVE 3151 AIRWAY AVE., STE. #L3 SUITE 100 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 PLEASANTON, CA 94588 PROPERTY OWNER:- DAVID FRENCH SNAPPLE 15207 WOODLAWN AVENUE TUSTIN, CA 92780 LOCATION: 15201 WOODLAWN AVENUE ZONING: PACIFIC CENTER EAST SPECIFIC PLAN (TECHNOLOGY CENTER) ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: APPROVAL OF THIS PROJECT WOULD BE CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT PURSUANT, TO SECTION 95303, CLASS 3 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL. QUALITY ACT; DENIAL OF THIS PROJECT WOULD BE EXEMPT PURSUANT TO SECTION 95270 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT WHICH STATES THAT CEQA DOES NOT APPLY TO PROJECTS REJECTED OR.DISAPPROVED BY A-PUBLIC AGENCY REQUEST: AUTHORIZATION TO CONSTRUCT A MAJOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution No. 3714 approving the construction of a monopine 60 feet in height. BACKGROUND -- At the March 13, 2000 meeting the .Planning Commission directed staff to revise Resolution 3714 approving a sixty (60) foot tall monopine major wireless communication facility. The modifications made to Resolution 3714 include the following: .Planning Commission Report CUP 99-012 & DR 99-017 .March 27, 2000 Page 2 • Condition 1.6 has been modified to include a review of the'Conditional Use Permit by the Community Development Director every five (5) years. • Condition 1.10 has been added to mandate co-location of the facility by additional carriers. Finding No.. 4 has also been added, which states that mandating co- Iodation ofthe facility would 'avoid infiltration of additional major wireless communication facilities within the surrounding area. • Condition 3.1 has been modifed 'td identify that a sixty (60) foot tall monopine shall be located on the subject site with a cluster of six (6)additional live mature trees planted in the leased area Jand the monopine shall have a round trunk with artificial bark and full branching from top to bottom. L •.A. Ludi Karen Peterson Associate Planner Senior Planner s:perepticup99-012resoconL.doc ' • Attachment A: Resolution No. 3714 ATTACHMENT A Resolution 3714 r .. 1 ;f 1 RESOLUTION-NO. 3714- 2 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY 4 OF TUSTIN• APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 98-012 AND DESIGN REVIEW 98-017 AUTHORIZING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF MAJOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION 6 FACILITY AT 15201 WOODLAWN AVENUE. 7 8 The Planning Commission does hereby resolve as follows: 9 I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: 10 - A. That a proper application for Conditional Use Permit 98-012 and 11 Design Review 98-017 was filed by Sprint PCS to establish-a major wireless communications facility sixty feet in height with six antenna 12 panels fifty-six (56) inches in length on the property located at 15201 13 Woodlawn Avenue. >> B. That -the proposed facility is consistent with the requirements of Tustin City Code Section 9276 et seq., relating to wireless 15 communications facilities. • 16 C. That a public hearing was .duly called, noticed and held on said 17 application on February 14, 2000, and continued to the February 28 18 and March 13, 2000 meetings of the Planning Commission. 19 D. That installation, operation, and maintenance of a major wireless communication facility, as conditioned, will not be detrimental to the 20 health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the persons 21 residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use, nor be injurious or detrimental to the property and improvements in the 72 neighborhood of the subject property, or to the general welfare of the 23 City of Tustin, as evidenced by the following findings: 24 1) As conditioned, the proposed facility would not be detrimental to, or have a negative effect on, surrounding properties in that 25 it would appear to be a tree set within the "Technology Center" 26 zoning district of the Pacific Center East Specific Plan which provides for general research and development, light industrial 27 and accessory office and commercial uses. A monopole constructed as an artificial tree within a cluster of trees at this 28 location is consistent with the second and third site selection 29 order of preference in Tustin City Code Section Resolution No.'3714 Page 2 1 _ 9276(F)(2)(a)(3)`which identifies placement where vegetation 2 would provide screenings and in commercial and industrial 3 zones. In,addition, consistent with the locational guidelines in TCC Section 9276(H), the facility would not,be located within 4 '100 feet of any existing, legally established major wireless 51 communication facility nor within 300 , feet of' residentially zoned or used property. 2) As -conditioned, the-proposed facility would riot be detrimental. 7 to, or Have a negative effect on, surrounding properties in that 8 the facility would appear to be ,a tree and would be located in close proximity to living trees of comparable heights consistent 9 with the screening guidelines of Tustin City Code Section 9276(F)(1). 10 3) As conditioned, the use of a. portion of the project site for the facility world riot impair the operations of the existing use. 12 The facility would- be unattended and not necessitate use of 13 required parking spaces nor generate significant traffic in the neighborhood. 14 • 15 4) As conditioned, co-location of the facility shall be required for other carriers at a fair market rate to avoid an infiltration of' 16 additional' major wireless communication facilities within one hundred (100) feet of the facility. 17 1s E. Pursuant to Section 9272 of the Tustin Municipal Code, the Commission ,finds that the location, size, architectural features and 19 ger"eral appearance of the proposed facility would not impair the ?o orderly and harmonious development of the area, the present or future development therein, or the occupancy as a inrhole. In making 21 I such findings, the.,Commission has considered at least the following 'items: 22 23 1. Height, bulk and area of buildings. 2. Setbacks and site planning. " 24 3. Physical relationship of proposed improvements to existing structures in the neighborhood. 25 4. Appearance and design relationship of proposed 26 improvements .to existing structures and possible future structures in the neighborhood and public thoroughfares. 27 6. Development Guidelines and'criteria as adopted by the City t 28 -Council. 29 Resolution No. 3714 Page 3 F. This project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to Section 15303, 2 Class 3 of the California Environmental Quality Act. G. That the project has been reviewed for consistency with the Air A Quality Sub-element of the City of Tustin General Plan and has been 5 determined to be consistent with the Air Quality Sub-element. 6 1[. The Planning Commission hereby approves Conditional Use Permit No. 98- 012 and Design Review 98-017 authorizing establishment of a major ' wireless communication facility sixty (60) feet in height with six (6) antenna s panels fifty-six (56) inches in length at 15201 Woodlawn Avenue, subject to the Conditions contained in Exhibit A, attached hereto. 9 10 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, at a regular meeting on the 27th day of March, 2000. 11 12 13 14 STEPHEN V. KOZAK 15 Chairperson 16 17 ELIZABETH A. BINSACK 18 Planning Commission Secretary 19 STATE OF CALIFORNIA } 20 COUNTY OF ORANGE ) CITY OF TUSTIN ) 21 I, ELIZABETH A. BINSACK, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the Planning 22 Commission Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, California; 23 that Resolution No. 3714 was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission, held on the 27th day of March, 2000. 24 25 26 ELIZABETH A. BINSACK Planning Commission Secretary 27 2s 29 EXHIBIT A 1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CUP 98-012 AND DR 98-017 MARCH 27, 2000 GENERAL (�} .1.1 The proposed project shall substantially conform with the submitted plans for - the project.date stamped .March 2-7, 2000, on file with the Community Development Department, as herein modified,.or as modified by the Director of Community Development Department. in accordance .with this Exhibit. The Director of Community Development may also approve subsequent minor modification to plans.during pian check if such modifications-are to be consistent with provisions of the Tustin City Code.- (1) 1.2 Project approval shall 'become null and void unless building permits are . issued within•eighteen (18) months of the date of this Exhibit. ' (1) ' 1.3 The applicant shall sign and return an Agreement to Conditions Imposed form prior to the issuance of any permits. (1) 1.4 All conditions in this Exhibit.shall be complied with prior to'the issuance of any building permits for this project, subject to review and approval of plans by the Community Development Department. r (1) -1.5 Any public improvements damaged by the applicant adjacent to this project shall. be repaired and/or replaced by the applicant as determined by the Engineering. Division and shall'.include 'but not be limitedrto curb, gutter, ,street paving and drive apron. (1) 1.6 Design Review approval shall be reviewed..by the Community Development Director on or about March 27, 2005 and every five .(5) years thereafter or sooner if deemed appropriate. The Director may recommend to the City Council modification to the existing conditions and facility including lowering or requiring a building mounted facility or impose new conditions as part of" ° such review to protect the-public health; safety, community ;aesthetics and ' general welfare. (1) 1.7 The applicant shall hold harm{ess and defend the City of Tustin from all claims and liabilities arising out of a challenge of the City's approval of this project. SOURCE CODES. (1) STANDARD CONDITION (5) RESPONSIBLE-AGENCY (2) CEQA MITIGATION EQUIREMENTS (3) UNIFORM BUILDING CODETS (6) -LANDSCAPING.GUIDELINES (4) DESIGN REVIEW (7) PC/CC POLICY *** EXCEPTIONS { Exhibit A— Resolution No. 3714 Conditions of Approval CUP 99-012, DR 99-017 Page 2 (1) 1.8 Except as otherwise stated in Condition 1.2, Design Review approval shall remain valid for a period not to exceed the term of the lease on the subject property, including any.extension thereof. A copy of said lease shall be submitted to the Community Development Director prior to issuance of any permits. if the lease is extended or terminated, notice and evidence thereof shall be provided to the Community Development Director. Upon - termination or expiration of the lease, the facilities shall be removed from the subject property. (1).. 1.9 To prevent overconcentration of monopole structures, future wireless communication facilities proposed by Sprint south of the 1-5 Freeway and east of the SR-55 Freeway within the City of Tustin shall be limited to building mounted facilities which are integrated into the architecture of the host buildings. The applicant shall submit a master plan of the for the area south of the 1-5 Freeway and SR-55 Freeway to the Community Development Department demonstrating that building mounted facilities could be developed to eliminate existing or future gaps in service. (1) 1.10 The applicant shall be required to accommodate additional carriers that request to co-locate on the facility at a lease that is at a fair market rate. (1) 1.11 The owner shall bring the property into compliance with the City's Property Maintenance Ordinance prior to the issuance of a building permit. Said property shall be maintained in a manner to ensure compliance with the Property Maintenance Ordinance. PLAN SUBMITTAL (1) 2.1 At building permit plan check, the applicant shall submit three (3) complete sets of architectural, electrical and mechanical plans with the necessary structural calculations, specifications and details complying with the Uniform Building Code, other related Codes, City Ordinances and State and Federal Laws and regulations. The structural calculations and specifications shall be prepared by a California registered civil or structural engineer. The engineer's license number and License expiration date shall be indicated on the report. (1) 2.2 All grading, drainage, vegetation and circulation shall comply with the City of Tustin Grading Manual. All street sections, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, lighting -and storm drains shall comply with on-site improvement standards. Any deviations shall be brought to the attention of the Building Official and request for approval shall be submitted in writing prior to any approval. Exhibit A— Resolution No. 3714 Conditions of Approval CUP 99-012, DR 99-017 Page,3 _ . (6) 2.3 At- building plan check, the applicant shall submit three (3) sets of 'landscaping and irrigation plans identifying the existing, and proposed landscaping, planting details, soils report 'arid,modifications to the existing irrigation system. The plan shall be prepared consistent with the City's landscaping and,irrigation guidelines. USE RESTRICTIONS (4) 3.1 The wireless-facility shall be,disguised as a pine tree no more than sixty (60) feet in height with a round trunk with artificial bark and full branching from the _top of the. pole to the ground. A total of six (6),living trees_ of a variety of species shall be installed in close proximity and height to the monopole tree structure subject to review and approval of the Community Development Department. , If sufficient space -is not available for. installation of one monopole structure and' 'six (6) living trees, the applicant shall request approval of revised plans from the Planning Commission. (4) 3.2 The number and dimensions of the antenna sectors shall be limited to six (6) panels fifty-six (56) inches in length as shown on the approved plans. The location and configuration of the facility shall be restricted to the location and • configuration shown on the approved pians. *** 3.3 The artificia[tree/monopole structure shall be maintained in good condition. If the condition of the structure serves to lessen the visual mitigation of the communication facility as an artificial tree, the Director may require that the structure be -refurbished within thirty (30) days of notification from the Community Development Department.' *** ` 3.4 The condition of the. living trees shall be monitored by 'the. Community Development Department. If the height, style -or condition of the trees serves to lessen the visual mitigation of the- communication facility, the Director may require That the trees be trimmed, altered, moved or replaced within 'thirtji (30) days of notification from the. Community Development Department to ensure that thea facility will 'be screened by healthy trees .of comparable heights. 3.5 Maintenance and pruning of the live trees shall comply with the International Society of Arborculture (ISA) pruning practices.. (4) 3.6 A six (6) foot eight (8) inch tall block wall enclosure shall be installed around the wireless facility to prevent unauthorized -access and visibility,from any surrounding sites or public .right-of-ways, subject to final approval of the Community Development Director. Access into the facility shall not encroach over any property line. ,5 Exhibit A— Resolution No. 3714 Conditions of Approval CUP 99-012, DR 99-017 Page 4 - *** 3.7 The applicant shall prepare a preliminary report within 90 days of completion of the project demonstrating conformance with national standards for safe human exposure to electromagnetic fields and radio frequency installation. Said report shall be submitted to the Community Development Director. NOISE (1) 4.1 Afl construction operations including engine warm up shall be subject to the provisions of the City of Tustin Noise Ordinance, as amended, and may take place only during the hours of 7:00 a.m. until 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday and 9:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. on Saturday unless the Building Official determines that said activity will be in substantial confo- rmance with the Noise Ordinance and that public health and safety will not be impaired subject to application being made at the time the permit for the work is awarded or during progress of the work. FEES (1) 5.1 Prior to issuance of any building permits, payment shall be made of all applicable fees, including but not limited to the following. Payment shall be required based upon those rates in effect at the time of payment and are subject to change. A. Building plan check and permit fees to the Community Development Department based on the most current schedule. B. Within forty-eight (48) hours df approval of the subject project, the applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department, a cashiers check payable to the COUNTY CLERK in the amount of $38.00 (thirty-eight dollars) to enable the City to file the appropriate environmental documentation for the project. If within such forty-eight (48) hour period that applicant has not delivered to the Community Development Department the .above-noted check, the statute of limitations for any interested party to challenge the environmental determination under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act could be significantly lengthened. 09port. to the " Planning Commission DATE: MARCH 27, 2000 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 00-002 APPLICANT/ PROPERTY OWNERS: TUSTIN PLAZA CENTER, LP 26302 LA PAZ, SUITE #215 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 .ATTN: SCOTT FRASER LOCATION: 13771 NEWPORT AVENUE, #12 ZONING: PLANNED COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (PC-COMM). ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: THIS PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT (CLASS. 1) PURSUANT TO SECTION 15301 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT REQUEST: AUTHORIZATION TO MODIFY THE SHARED PARKING PROGRAM TO ALLOW THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A FIFTY (50) SEAT RESTAURANT WITHIN AN EXISTING RETAIL COMMERCIAL CENTER RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 3720 approving Conditional Use Permit 00-002. BACKGROUND The applicant is proposing to establish a fifty (50) seat restaurant in conjunction with the existing Honeybaked Ham retail outlet within the Tustin Plaza retail commercial center (see Attachment A - Location Map). Permitted -uses and development standards within Tustin Plaza generally conform to those within the Commercial General (CG) zoning district. To accommodate the additional seating, the applicant is proposing to modify the shared parking program established for the center in March 198.7 and amended in July Planning Commission Report CUP 00-002 March 27, 2000 Page 2 1990 and November 1996. Shared parking programs are conditionally permitted by Tustin City Code (TCC) Section 9271(AA) and require Planning Commission approval for developments larger than 30,000 square feet of floor area. Uses surrounding the project site include the Civic Center complex to the north, residential and commercial uses to the west, office uses to the south, and commercial uses to the east. Project Description Restaurant and Retail Outlets Honeybaked Ham has operated a 2,268 square foot retail facility within the Tustin Plaza center since October 1988 and offers a variety of products and services, from individual sandwiches and side orders to full catered meals. To broaden their range of services and take advantage of increased demand, they are proposing to expand into an adjoining 1,134 square foot tenant space and offer restaurant seating for their customers. The restaurant portion would be operated in conjunction with the retail outlet as one facility. Parking and Circulation Pursuant to the approved Conditional Use Permit for Tustin Plaza (CUP 85-009) and three subsequent amendments, parking spaces allotted to tenants are calculated based upon the proposed use. Retail uses utilize the parking :ratio of one (1) space for every 200 square feet of floor area, and restaurants are parked at a ratio of one (1) space for every three (3) seats (TCC Section 9235(F)(3)(b)). This tenant space was originally allocated six (6) parking spaces, which would permit a total of eighteen (18) seats. The additional thirty- two (32) seats proposed by the applicant would require an additional eleven (11) parking spaces. The applicant is requesting an' amendment to the shared parking program to account for the additional eleven (11) spaces required for the thirty-two (32) seats. ANALYSIS As part of the City review of the proposal, staff required the preparation of a Parking Demand Study by a Licensed Traffic Engineer. The Parking Demand Study is an analysis of conditions within the center's parking facilities based on the current mix of tenants. At the time the Study was prepared, there were three (3) tenant spaces that were vacant, totaling approximately 4,500 square feet. Assuming the spaces were occupied by retail uses, at a ratio of one (1) space for every 200 square feet of floor area, the vacant spaces would have a parking demand of twenty-three (23) parking spaces. The same methodology used with Conditional Use Permit 85-.009, as amended, was used to determine if the center can accommodate additional restaurant seats based upon the current tenant mix. The study is included as Attachment C. Planning Commission Report CUP 00-002 March 27, 2000 Page 3 The Public Works Department has reviewed the parking study and determined that the methodology and conclusions are accurate. - The study finds that during the peak parking demand periods (lunch and dinner) there is adequate parking in close proximity to the subject tenant space to accommodate the seventeen (17) spaces needed for the Honeybaked Ham restaurant and the existing restaurants and retail spaces. At the peak demand (measured ion a Friday during the noon hour), the study concludes that of the total 447 parking spaces provided within the retail portion of the project, .a total of 314 spaces were occupied, thus leaving -133 spaces available. Taking into account the potential. parking demand from the three (3) other vacant suites for twenty-three (23).spaces, there are 110 spaces remaining to accommodate the seventeen (17) additional spaces for the proposed restaurant. The study also found that the parking area behind the project location is under-utilized, as only 11 vehicles were parked in the area with a total of 37 parking spaces. Condition No. 3.6 has been included'in Resolution No. 3720 (Attachment D)' requiring the applicant to notify their employees that this area.shall be used for employee parking. Existing Condition No. 1.6 of Planning Commission Resolution No. 3494 which approved the 3rd Amendment to CUP 85-009 reads as follows: "The maximum floor area for restaurants and/or food related uses (including outdoor seating areas) shall not exceed tenant commitments and/or proposed tenant plans of the property owner as of November 12, 1996." The subject tenant space was previously designated for a. retail use. If approved, the proposed restaurant use will require an amendment to this condition. A current summary table including existing ,and proposed uses, gross square footage for.each use, and the required parking ratios for the uses has been included in the parking demand analysis (Attachment C). Condition No. 1.6 would modify the previous_Condition 1.5 to incorporate this updated tenant mix. Additionally, Condition No. 3.7 would require preparation of another parking demand analysis identifying, mitigation measures should there be a problem with adequacy of parking in the future. Staff does not anticipate parking problems due to the abundance of parking (447 parking spaces)for the current mix of tenants (office, retail and restaurant). In determining whether to approve the Conditional Use Permit, the Planning Commission must determine whether or not the proposed project will be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort and general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood or whether it will be injurious or detrimental to property or improvements in the vicinity or to the welfare of the City. A decision to approve this request can be supported by the following findings: Planning Commission`Report CUP 00-002 Marchi 27, 2000 Page 4 1) - The proposed use, as conditioned, will-not .be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort and :general ,welfare of- persons residing or working in the neighborhood in that: a) The parking study was prepared by a licensed traffic, engineer and demonstrates that no substantialconflict will exist in the peak hours. of parking demand for the center; b) The number of spaces credited against the requirements for the proposed restaurant does not exceed the •number of spaces anticipated. to be available during different hours of operation; and, C) Parking spaces designated for joint-use are located such that,they will adequately serve the uses for which they-are intended. 2) The proposed use, as conditioned, will not be detrimental to nor have a negative effect on surrounding property owners in that the shared parking.program ensures that the parking demand can be accommodated on-site. l y Mvdns,/4'� Karen Peterson Assis tIPlann r Senior Planner Attachments: A- Location Map B -.Submitted Plans. C - Parking Demand Analysis D - Resolution No. 3720 BEIPCReportlCup00002pereport.doc I ATTACHMENTIA . LOCATION.MAP — t -� LOCATION MAP I 4 � LocA r I of 1 - t lt' � S--•--% t •i _ i � II �NL 498 rn m rn b 'rn rn 1 500 502 496 504 rn i m a / 506 ao a m 494 16 508 1 492 -� N 510 g rte- / ` 490 512 O Z r z �� a 4 514 /" •� m Ln 190 88 516 Q z 32 y a � z 466 516 1 C S 200 - --" ---- ----- 215 522 2 .15-79 524 X 225-29 PODE ARTMENT j 27s 526 / Jf •34 m 235-39 °30 240-44 c 245-49 CIT HALL 275 �, 0' N w,t A U 4 V O ♦ rn m O O o � 700 m 7H1R0 STREET 305 300 315 m 301 30 �� o o do ~ C MUNITY CENTER r 11 325 n 305 307 11 320-24 325-29 > 333-35 r. 11 330-35 335-39 337-39 11 LIHRAPY 345 Oti j ATTACHMENT .B' SEE FOLDED PLANS. IN BRIEFCASE ATTACHMENT C PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS W1 VIP WPA Traffic Engineering, Inc. . - A TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING December 17, 19991jCME a DEC 2 Mr. Scott Fraser America West Properties,Inc. 26302 La Paz, Suite 215 Mission Viejo, CA 92691 SUBJECT. HONEYBASED HAMS- TUSTINPLAZA, PARKING STUDY` Dear Mr. Fraser: This letter.report presents a parking analysis of the proposed expansion'of an existing Honey Baked Ham store located within the Tustin Plaza shopping center,which is located on the southwest corner • of Ne ort Avenue and Main Street in the Ci of Tustin. These analyses are based upon .wP �' , discussions with City Staff, information provided by you, field studies and parking counts, and. standard reference material. Y PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project is adding a sandwich shop with 50 seats to the existing Honey Baked Ham store;within-a vacant suite which is located adjacent to the existing Honey Baked Ham store in the Tustin Plaza shopping center. Figure I illustrates the location of the proposed suite within the shopping center. This study has been directed toward the evaluation of the adequacy of the parking 'supply to accommodate existing and future parking demands. 23421 South Pointe Drive • Suite 190 • Laguna Hills,CA 92653 • (949) 460-0110 FAX: (949) 460-0113 O� Q�4. ti CITY HALL AND TUSTIN PLAZA J 3 Q?-I PUBLIC LIBRARY - . o J ys000�,�`o� s uI 1 1 1 Spoons Souplanlalion 13G 81 U° 3 SIGNALED INTERSECTION SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION NEWPORT AVENUE 7 Wa1 <,cn • PROJECT SU LOCATION •FIGURE 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS • The existing uses within the Tustin Plaza shopping center were verified and are listed in Table I along with the associated square footages. As shown in Table I,there are a total of four(4)vacant suites. The proposed proj ect will be located'within building 13771, Suite 12 which is 1,134 square feet. There are a total of 447.,existing marked parking spaces that currently serve the existing uses within the•Tustin Plaza shoppirig.center. FIELD STUDIES The Tustin Plaza shopping center was counted. by WPA Traffic Engineering, Inc. on Friday (12110199)and Saturday(12/11/99) from 11:30 AM to 1:30 PM and 4:00 PM to 7:00 PM by fifteen minute intervals. The existing parking lot was subdivided into five parking areas to provide detailed information on where.the current parking demand is being provided.-These parking areas are shown on Figure 2 and the count data can be found in Appendix A. The.numb er of vehicles-parked in the study.area are documented in Table 2. As shown in Table 2, the peak parking period for the Tustin Plaza shopping center was observed on Friday(12110199)•at 12:15 PM with 314 parked vehicles and on Saturday (12111/99) at 1:15 PM.with 275 parked vehicles. The-shopping center has a total of 447 parking spaces,which indicates that the parking lot was 70 percent utilized during the peak period under existing conditions. J WPA Trak Engineering, Inc. Honey Baked Ham Expansion, Parking Study Job #99163.0 City of Tustin I AtiLE I PAR IG DEMAND PER CITY CODE-TUSTIr ',AZA Honey Baked Ham Expansion,Parking Study ADDRESS/ PARKING PARKING SUITE TENANT SIZE SEATS RA770 REQUIRED 13681/1 Souplantation 7,468 SF 209 1/3 seats 69.6 • 1368117 Apple One Services.LTD 1,837 SF 11250 sf 7.3 1368118 Mail Boxes,Etc. 1,090 SF 1/200 sf 5.5 13691/9 Osaka Kappo 1,524 SF 21 1/3 seats 7.0 13681/10 L.A.Jewelry and Watch Repair 2,268 SF 11200 sf 11.3 13681/12 The Gold Gallery 1,134 SF 11200 sf 5.7 13681/13 Standard Beauty Supply 1,330 SF 1/200 sf 6.7 13681/14 Diedrich Coffee 1,746 SF 11200 sf 8.7 13721/1 Vacant 2,669 SF 1/200 sf 13.3 137211 14 USA Hapkido 1 Taekwando Center 2,688 SF 1/200 sf 13.4 137211 5 Vista Eye Care 1,134 SF 1/250 sf 4.5 13721/6 Artisan Frame&,Gallery 1,134 SF 1/200 sf 5.7 13721/15 Edward D.]ones&Co. 1,134 SF 11250 sf 4.5 13721/S Advantage Hair Salon 1,134 SF 1200 sf 5.7 13721/9 Tustin Music Center 2,777 SF 1/200 sf 13.9 13771/27 Jenny Craig Weight Loss B167 2,268 SF 1/200 sf 11.3 13771/3 Lovely Nail 864 SF 1200 sf 4.3 13771/4 Citi Financial 1,404 SF 1/250 sf 5.6 13771/5 Anil Patel 1,134 SF 1200 sf 5.7 • 1377116 Vacant 695 SF 1200 sf 3.5 1377117 Children's Orchard 1,573 SF 1200 sf 7.9 13771/8 Vacant 1,134 SF 1/200 sf 5.7 1377119 Barolo Cafe 1,134 SF 32 113 seats 10.7 13771/10 Chin's Chinese Kitchen 1,134 SF 28 113 seats 93 13771/11 Takashi Kumamoto.DDS 1,134 SF 1250 sf 4.5 13771 112 Vacant-Proposed Site 1,134 SF 50 113 seats ' 16.7 13771/13 Honey Baked Hams 2,268 SF 1/200 sf 113 13771115-16 Aaron Brothers,Inc. 6,130 SF 1200 sf 30.7 13771117 Round Table Pi=a 3,154 SF 135 1/3 seats 45.0 13791/1 Cottroy's Florist 1,665 SF 1200 sf 8.3 1379112 Signs Now 1,190 SF 1200 sf 6.0 1379113 Wahoo's Fish Tacos 3,572 SF 80 1/3 seats 26.7 13721 Office Depot,Inc. 23,259 SF 1/200 sf 116.3 13741 Spoons Restaurant 5.500 SF 170 113 seats 56.7 TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED PER CITY CODE 569.0 i CITY HALL AND PUBLIC L18RARY TUSTIN PLA 397-1 0f ica Depol cp •fib. `b G\\ - s S na r. o nO0 3ouplanialion SIC HAL¢ED.INTERSECTION SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION 'NEWPORT AVENUE xL3 x H PARKING AREAS FIGURE 2 -4- TABLE 2 PARKING DEMAND ANALYSTS Honey Baked Ham Expansion, Parking Study TOTAL AVAILABLE SPACES(IN THE COUNT AREA)=447 TIME OBSER VED REMAINING "WORST CASE" PARSING DEMAND AVAILABLE SPACES PARKING DEMAND PER CODE (Number of Vehicles) (447 Total-Demand) Friday Sates F. ridaY_ Saturday Vacant Suites Polect TOTAL (12/10199) (12111199) (12110199) (12/11/99) (4,498 SF) (1,134 SF) (50 Seats) 11:30 AM 218 203 229 244, 11:45 Alvl 242 227 205 220 12:00 PM 284 229 163 218 12:15 PM 314 240 133 207 23 17 40 12:30 PM 301 246 146 201 12:45 PM 310 255 137 192 1:00 PM 294 k 262 153 185 1:15 PM 288 275 159 172 23 17 40 1:30 PM 267 270 180 177 4:00 PM 186 153 261 294 4:15 PM 162 168 285 279 4:30 PM 161 1..66 286, 281 4:45 PM 175 175 272 272 5:00 PM 176 182 271 265 5:15 PM 215 174 232 273 5:30 PM 231 1.90 216 257 5:45 PM 272 209 175 238 6:00 PM 276 229 171 218 6:15 PM 294 246 153 201 6:30 PM 304 258 143 189 6:45 PM 308 258 139 189 7:00 PM 276 239 171 208 CITY PARKING CODE The City of Tustin Planning Department was contacted to ascertain the City Parking Codes for the remaining uses within the shopping center. The parking code requirements are shown below: LAND USE CITYPARKING,CODE RETAIL 1 Space Per 200 SF OFFICE 1 Space Per 250 SF RESTAURANT 1 Space Per 3 Seats Based upon the City Parking Code's listed above along with the projected number of parking spaces required for the proposed project, a total of 569 parking 'spaces would be required for the entire shopping.center with the vacant suites. Table I lists each land use within the Tustin Plaza shopping center along with the applicable parking code and number of parking spaces required. PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS The focus of these analyses is to document the actual parking demand in proximity to the proposed proj ect and to determine if there is justification for a parking variance. The parking demand analyses will not only account for the existing spaces utilized, but the spaces required by the vacant suites within the Tustin Plaza shopping center and the demand for the proposed Money Baked Ham 4 expansion. Parking counts were conducted at the Tustin Plaza shopping center on a Friday and Saturday. These parking demand counts were conducted from 11:30 AM to 1:30 PM and from 4:00 PM to 7:00 PM. A summary of the number of vehicles parked in the study area are documented in Table 2. WPA Trak Engineering, Inc. Honey Baked Ham Expansion, Parking Study Job #991630 City of Tustin For convenience, the parking demand counts were translated to "REMAINING AVAILABLE SPACES", so the remaining parking supply could be compared to the projected parking demand. The projected parking demand requires that both the vacant suites in the study area and the proposed Honey Baked Ham expansion be accounted for within these analysis. Four of the suites within the Tustin Plaza shopping center are presently vacant. Of these four suites one is the proposed project location,the remaining three suites total 4,498 SF,which would translate into a parking demand of 23 spaces based on City code. The project is proposing 50 seats and would require 17 parking spaces based upon the City code of 1 space per 3 seats. A combination of the vacant suites and the proposed project would result in an added parking demand of 40•parking spaces. Table 2 shows that the 40 space demand can be adequately served by the available supply of 133 spaces on Friday afternoon and 172 spaces on Saturday afternoon. These are representative of the "worst case" peaks, as they represent a 15-minute period and assume full parking code for the vacant suites at these particular times of the day. • SUMMARY The actual parking demand within the Tustin Plaza shopping center was observed. This resulted in documentation of the available parking supply. The projected parking demand of 40 spaces would be adequately served by the peak parking supply of 133 and 172 available spaces during a Friday and Saturday afternoon, respectively. x • WPA Traffic Engineering, Inc. Honey Baked Ham Expansion, ParkinS Study Job #991630 - City of Tustin We trust that these analyses will be of assistance to you-and the City of Tustin. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact us. Respectfully submitted, "A TRAFFIC ENGINEERING,INC. Weston S. Pringle, P.E. Registered Professional Engineer State of California Numbers C16828 &TR565 WPS:HN #991630 r WPA Trac Engineering, Inc. Honey Baked Ham Expansion, Parking Study Job'#991630 City of Tustin APPENDIX A Count Data " :USTIN PLAZA Friday (12-I0-99) • 11:30 AM to 1:30 PM 4:00 PM to 7:00 PM PARKING AREAS TIME A B C D E TOTAL TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKINGSPACES IN 55 84 91 151 66 . 447 EACH PARKING AREA 1.1:30 AM 30 64 31 63 30 218- 11:45 PM 46 64 26 75 31 242 12:00 PM 50 71 41 92 30 284 12:15 PM 54 72 52 104 32 314 12:30 PM 46 79 47 97- 32 301 12:45 PM 42 81 58 97 32 310 1:00 PM 45 73 51 93 32 294 1:15 PM 39 75 48 95 31 288 2:30 PM 48 65 39 81 34 267 4:00 PM 18 50 40 57 21 186 4:15 PM 11 46 37 48 20 162 4:30 PM 11 40 30 62. 18 161 4:45 PM 12 47 38 60 18 175 5:00 PM 13 44 32 64 23 176 5:15 PM 23 57 43 . 69 23 215 5:30 PM 25 69 45 68 24 231 5:45 PM 39 83 53 73 24 272 6:00 PM 45 83 56 67 25 276 6:15 PM 50 80 55 85 24 294 6:30 PM 52 78 56 95 23 304 6:45 PM 53 83 62 90 20 308 • 7:00 PM 44 80 60 74 18 276 TUSTIN PLAZA Saturday (12-11-99) ' 11:30 AM to 1:30 PM 4:00 PM to 7:00 PM • PARSING AREAS TIME A B C D E TOTAL TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES IN 55 84 91 151 66 447 EACH PARKING AREA 11:30 AM 12 58 41 76 16 203 11:45 PM 12 78 40 82 15 227 12:00 PM 25 76 36 77 15 229 12:15 PM 30 84 41 70 15 240 12:30 PM 30 79 41 81 15 246 12:45 PM 39 83 44 74 15 255 1:00 PM 41 . 79 42 85 15 262 1:15 PM 45 79 51 84 16 275 1:30 PM 38 84 58__j 75 15 270 4:00 PM 20 47 24 50 12 153 4:15 PM 19 46 24 67 12 168 4:30 PM 19 51 23 58 15 166 4:45 PM 20 55 2'6 57 17 175 5:00 PM 15 63 29 58 17 182 5:15 PM 18 57 23 59 17 174 5:30 PM 20 71 22 60 17 190 5:45 PM 24 83 34 51 17 209 6:00 PM 29 82 43 58 17 229 6:15 PM 36 84 57 54 15 246 6:30 PM 45 83 60 56 14 258 6:45 PM 46 83 66 50 13 258 7:00 PM 36 81 55 54 13 239 . ( e , ATTACHMENT D RESOLUTION NOA720 I' RESOLUTION NO. 3720 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF 3 TUSTIN APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 00-002 MODIFYING THE SHARED PARKING PROGRAM FOR TUSTIN PLAZA TO ALLOW 4 THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A FIFTY (50) SEAT RESTAURANT 1N AN 1,134 SQUARE FOOT TENANT SPACE LOCATED AT 13771 NEWPORT 5 AVENUE#12. b The Planning Commission does hereby resolve as follows: 7 8 I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: 9 A. That a proper application for Conditional Use Permit 00-002 was filed by Tustin Plaza, LP to request authorization to modify the shared parking 10 program to allow the establishment of a fifty (50) seat restaurant in 11 conjunction with the Honeybaked Ham retail outlet at 13771 Newport Avenue#12, more specifically described as Assessor's Parcel No. 401-611- 12 06. 13 B. That the proposed use is consistent with the Planned Community- 14 Commercial (PC-Comm) zoning district which allows restaurants as ,permitted uses and the City's General Plan "Old Town Commercial" land 15 use designation which allows development of service. commercial, office, 16 retail and restaurant uses. 17 C. That a shared parking program was established on March 9, 1987, and was .s - most recently amended on November 1.2, 1996. 19 D. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held on said application on March 27, 2000 by the Planning Commission. 70 21 E. That the establishment, maintenance and operation of the contractors office will not, under the circumstances of this case, be detrimental to the 22 health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed Use, nor be injurious or �s detrimental to the property and improvements in the neighborhood of the 24 subject property, or to the general welfare of the City of Tustin, as evidenced by the following findings: 25 26 1) The proposed use, as conditioned,.will not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort and general welfare of persons 27 residing or working in the neighborhood in that: ..S a) The parking study was prepared by a licensed traffic engineer 29 and demonstrates that no substantial conflict will exist in the peak hours of parking demand for the center; i Resolution No..3720 _ Page 2 _ 2 3 b) The number of spaces credited against the requirements for ' the proposed restaurant does not exceed the number of a spaces anticipated -to be available during different hours of operation; and, 6 c) Parking spaces designated for joint-use are located such that they will- adequately serve the uses ''for which they are 7 intended. 2) The proposed use, as conditioned, will not be detrimental to nor. 9 have a negative effect on surrounding property owners in that the shared parking program ensures that the parking demand can be 10 accommodated on-site. 11 F. That this project.is'Categorically Exempt pursuant to Section 15301 (Class 12 1) of the California Environmental Quality Act. 13 G. That the project has been reviewed for consistency with the Air Quality Sub- 14 ' Element of-the City of Tustin General Plan and has been determined to be consistent with the Air Quality Sub-Element. is .. 16 [I The Planning Commission hereby approves Conditional Use Permit 00-00.2, to 17 modify the shared parking program to allow, the establishment of a fifty (50) seat restaurant in conjunction with the'Honeybaked Ham retail outlet at 13771.Newport 18 Avenue #12, subject to the conditions contained in Exhibit.A attached hereto. 19 20 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, at a regular meeting.on the 27th day of March, 2000. 21 23, 24 STEPHEN V. KOZAK Chairperson 25 26 27 ELIZABETH A. BINSACK Planning Commission Secretary 28 29 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) , COUNTY OF ORANGE } CITY OF TUSTIN } 1 Resolution No. 3720 Page 3 2 4 I, ELIZABETH A. BINSACK,- the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the Planning Commission Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, California; that 5 Resolution No. 3720 was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin 6 Planning Commission, held ori the 27th day of March, 2000. 7 s 9 ELIZABETH A. BINSACK 10 Planning-Commission Secretary • 11 - 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 • - EXHIBIT A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 00-002 CONDITIONS OF-APPROVAL RESOLUTION NO. 3720 GENERAL (1) 1.1. The proposed use shall substantially conform with the submitted plans for the project date stamped March 27, 2000 on file with the Community Development Department;.except as herein modified, or as modified by the Director of Community Development in accordance with this Exhibit. The Director of Community Development may also approve minor modifications to plans during plan check if such modifications are to be consistent with the provisions of the Tustin City Code and other applicable codes. (1) 1.2 Unless otherwise specified, the conditions contained in this Exhibit shall be complied with as specified or prior to the issuance of any building permits for the project, subject to review and approval by the Community Development Department. (1) 1.3 The subject project approval shall become null and-void unless permits are issued within twelve (12) months of the date of this Exhibit and substantial tenant improvements are underway. Time extensions may be granted if a written request is received by the Community Development Department within thirty (30) days prior to expiration. (1) 1.4 Approval of Conditional Use Permit 00-002 is contingent upon the applicant and property owner signing and returriing an "Agreement to Conditions Imposed"form as established by the Director of Community Development. " " (1) 1.5 The applicant shall hold harmless and defend the City of Tustin from all claims and liabilities arising out of a challenge of the City's approval for this project. 1.6 Condition 1.5 of Planning Commission Resolution No. 3494 shall be amended to read as follows: "The maximum floor area for restaurants and/or food related uses (including outdoor seating areas) shall not exceed tenant commitments and/or proposed,tenant plans of the property owner as of March 27, 2000." SOURCE CODES - (1) STANDARD CONDITION (5) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY (2) CEQA MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS (3) UNIFORM BUILDING CODES (6) LANDSCAPING;GUIDELINES (4) DESIGN REVIEW (7) PC/CC POLICY. *** EXCEPTIONS Exhibit A Resolution No. 3720 PLAN SUBMITTAL (3) 2.9 Submit seven (7) sets of building plans to the Building Division for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. Include plans pertaining to the proposed new ceiling beam in the tenant space. All plan sheets submitted into plancheck for building permit review shall be stamped and signed by a licensed, registered Architect or Engineer. (1)(3) 2.2 [ndicate on the title sheet the applicable codes, City, state and federal laws and regulationsto include: 1997 Uniform Building Code with California Amendments; • 1997.Uniform Mechanical and Plumbing Codes with California Amendments; • 1996 National Electrical Code with California Amendments; City of Tustin Grading and Security Ordinance; City of Tustin Landscaping and Irrigation Guidelines; and, • City of Tustin Private Improvements Standards. 2.3 The plans shall identify the location and number of seats or seating positions at each table or booth location. The dimensions of the booth or table units shall also be included. 2.4 lm accordance with the Uniform Building Code, access to two exits from the suite is required for any area with occupant loads of fifty (50) persons or more. Post the maximum suite occupancy in the building and on the plans. Show the exits on the plans. (3) 2.5 All exit doors shall swing in the path of travel and be equipped with State Fire Marshal approved panic hardware. Identify these on the plans. (3) 2.6 Vehicle parking, primary entrance to the building, the primary paths of travel, cashier space, sanitary facilities, drinking fountain, and public telephones shall all be accessible to persons with disabilities. Show these, including any existing or proposed handicapped-accessible parking stalls and the path of travel from the stalls to the building entrance on the plans. (5) 2.7 Prior to permit issuance, clearances from the following shall be required: Orange County Health Department and Orange County Fire Authority. (3) . 2.8 The plans submitted into plan check shall show restroom facilities for both sexes and shall indicate that toilet facilities in the restrooms shall be accessible to persons with disabilities. Exhibit.A , • Resolution No. 3720 USE RESTRICTIONS- (2). . 3.1 _ •The, total number of. seats 'within the restaurant shall be limited to a maximum of fifty (50). "No increase in the number of seats shall occur without approval_from,the Community Development Director. (7) 3.2 No'outdoor seating shall be permitted unless a separate Conditional Use Permit'is approved consistent with the current provisions of the Tustin City Code. (7) 3.3 The' sale of alcoholic beverages at .the project- location shall not be permitted unless a separate,Conditional Use Permit is.approved consistent with the current provisions,of the Tustin City Code. (1), 3.4 No live entertainment'rhay be provided in the restaurant or outdoor seating area without approval of,a Live Entertainment Permit in accordance with Tustin City Code Section 3222. *** 3.5 Hours of operation shall be limited to 6:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. Alterations to the hours of operation shall not occur without prior written approval of the i Community Development Director.. 3.6 Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the restaurant use, the applicant-shall notify their employees that all employees shall use the parking area to the west-of the 13771 Newport Avenue building for vehicle' parking.. The owner shall submit a, copy of such notification to the Community Development Department and shall enforce this restriction. 3.7 If in the future the City becomes aware that a parking problem exists on the. site or in the vicinity as 'a result of the restaurant use, then the Director of Community Development may require the applicant/property owner to prepare a parking demand analysis. If said study indicates that there is inadequate parking, the applicant/property owner shall' be required to provide mitigation measures to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission. Said mitigation measures may include, but are not limited to, the following: a) Establish alternate hours of operation. b) Restrict the maximum number of restaurant seats.` c) Secure off-site parking from adjacent property owners. r • *** 3.8 Deliveries to the restaurant shall be limited to between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Exhibit A Resolution No. 3720 • SIGNS (1) 4.1 All signage shall be addressed under separate permits and shall comply -with the requirements of. the Tustin Sign Code and the Master Sign Program for the Tustin Plaza Center. FEES (1)(5) 5.1 Prior to issuance of any building permits, payment shall be made of all applicable fees, including but not limited to the following. Payment shall be required based upon those rates in effect at the time of payment and are subject to change. A. • Building plan check and permit fees, including any applicable permit penalties to the Community Development Department based on the most current schedule. B. Orange County Fire Authority plan check inspection fees to the Community Development Department based upon the most current schedule. (1) 5.2 Within forty-eight(48) hours of approval of the subject project, the applicant shall deliver to the Community.Developmerit Department, a cashier's check payable to the COUNTY CLERK in the amount of $38.00 (thirty eight dollars) to enable the City to file the appropriate environmental documentation for the project. If within such forty-eight(48) hour period that applicant has not delivered to the Community Development Department the above-noted check, the statute of limitations for any interested party to challenge the environmental determination under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act could be significantly lengthened. Y Oeport.,.to the Planning Commission DATE: , MARCH 27, 2000 SUBJECT: . AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT.99-025 APPLICANT: ' .DALE DILLON COUNTY OF ORANGE, PUBLIC FACILITIES AND RESOURCES DEPARTMENT 10852 DOUGLAS ROAD ANAHEIM, CA 92806 PROPERTY THE IRVINE COMPANY OWNER: 550 NEWPORT CENTER DRIVE • IRVINE, CA 92658-6370 LOCATION: THE SOUTHWEST_ ,CORNER OF HARVARD AND THE OCTA/ SCRRA RAILWAY ZONING: PUBLIC AND INSTITUTIONAL (P,& I) ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: THIS PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY' EXEMPT (CLASS 1). -PURSUANT , TO SECTION 15301 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT. REQUEST: AUTHORIZATION TO ALLOW THE STOCKPILE OF QUARRY ROCK ON THE PROPERTY FOR ELEVEN MONTHS. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution 3718 approving an -amendment to Conditionaf.Use Permit 99-025. BACKGROUND On November 15, 1999 the Zoning. Administrator approved a Conditional Use Permit to allow the County of Orange Public Facilities and Resources Department to stockpile quarry rock on private property located on the west side of Harvard Avenue directly north of Edinger Avenue for a period up to six months-or'until'April 1, 2000. 'In accordance with Tustin ,City Code Section 9299b(3), a temporary use for a period of up� to six months requires a conditional use permit subject to the approval of the Zoning Administrator. Temporary uses that exceed six.(6):months require approval by the Planning Commission. Thee applicant is proposing to use the site for the purpose of,storing quarry rock for an additional 5 months, or until August 31, 2000 (see Attachment B). Planning Commission Report Amendment to Conditional Use Permit 99-025 March 27, 2000 Page 2 SITE AND SURROUNDING PROPERTIES The vacant site is located at the southwest cornea of Harvard Avenue and the OCTA/ SCRRA Railway (See Location Map- Attachment A).' Existing and future residential properties are located to the east and north of the site within the City of Irvine. Located to the south and southwest of the site is MCAT-Tustin. Jamboree Plaza, which is an industrial complex, is located to the west across Jamboree Road. DISCUSSION The applicant proposes to store quarry rock at the subject site for use in repairing the Como Orange County Flood Control Channel (see Site Plan - Attachment B) which is located directly north of the project site, parallel to the OCTA/ SCRRA Railway. The quarry rock is used to line and reinforce the slopes and the bottom of the channel, which protects the houses and railroad located next to the channel. The angular quarry rocks are 18 inches at the widest dimension and the color of granite. In order to receive FEMA funding for the project, the entire amount of quarry rock to be used must be stored at the location by March 31, 2000. There would be a maximum of 10,000 tons of quarry rock stored at this location. There will be four, ten-wheeler trucks without trailers that will transport the rock from the storage site to the channel from the hours. of 7:00 am to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Thursday. -These trucks are stored overnight at a maintenance facility in Anaheim. In addition to the quarry rocks, a loader (Model 950 Caterpillar) approximately the size of a dump truck will be stored on the lot. This loader will • be used to transport the rocks from the ground to the trucks. Due to the large size of the rocks, there- would not be -a significant amount of erosion on the site. Also, the lot is. covered with a gravel material used for dust control. The applicant began storing material at this site on October 1, 1999. The project was originally scheduled to start in November 1999, but has been delayed due to delays in obtaining the necessary permits from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The estimated date of completion is August 31, 2000, depending on the weather. Condition 2.2 is included to allow the Community Development Director to approve a ninety (90) day extension if the weather delays the project. Since the project site is located on the former MCAF-Tustin facility, the application was routed to the Redevelopment Agency (RDA) for comment. The RDA indicated no concerns related to the use. FINDINGS In determining whether to approve this Conditional Use Permit, the Zoning Administrator must determine whether or not the proposed use will be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort and. general welfare of the persons residing in or .working in the neighborhood or whether it will be injurious or detrimental to the property or improvements in the vicinity or to the welfare of the City. Planning Commission Report Amendment to Conditional Use Permit-99-025 March 27, 2000 Page 3 A decision to approve this request can be supported by the following findings: k 1} The proposed temporary use, as conditioned,•would not be detrimental to the surrounding properties in that storage of the quarry rocks will not result in erosion or excessive dust. 2} As conditioned, the use would not have a negative effect on the surrounding properties in that there would not be excessive truck traffic on Harvard Avenue and operations will occur only between 7:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Thursday. 3) As conditioned, the use would terminate by August 31, and no later than November 30, 2000, and the applicant would be required to,remove all excess quarry rock and related equipment. Peterson Lon udl , , Karen , Associate Plannei Senior Planner Attachments: A. Location Map , B. Site Plan 'f C. Letters from Dale Dillon dated February 23 and March 13, 2000 D. Resolution No..3718 CDD!perpVamendmentCup99025.dO9 ATTACHMENT A Location Map LOCA 11 Q N MAP rr i 1 i •l 'j�•1 • fMV 1 l� 1 j. 1 I ATTACHMENT A _ NO SCALE L �' P 99 - 0HS ATTACHMENT B Site Pian - 4.34.- 06 _ S -I i C -PL /9 ,9 449—Of ' ur sts-Ja-rJY-.f1 1VAO.'Sr .; 4 -- .�,,.• f Y. 4 Tl ,y 20 w r " = aoo ' may a POR. T Je r.Y ' PGO L'1 r 11 iti Ci U 1 ' o Zd 4, 3 O 1 ` acrc.A ►J?HX£ 5 CZV VER + POR. LDT 189DRh£ QNIc 062 / !Q V POR. for'" ` - ---` __-- - - - P -- 16L K: 62 - -1' rST.[RJ1" I it I � t P v� POA. i ar�9s (V + PPA tari96 IS � �s.Je.rc • � 4Z&Z4 AC 90 i 8a- PAR. t a14 CV I I P.M.256 - S9 �� V• fir;�� . . I PM.743-S d• •; f � E ' \ M 18 +mer 12 v $(JQ 2.TJ9 A[. _ (D I 20 l7 16 I r.tr �C. �C.,, k cu r '� I 1 7 r A94VD S r.'jva �r r.136 Ac. FOR. t OF is 11B1Masr.r �h 01 etr. it 03 NOTE — A;SESSOR'S BL OL t 4:•SESSaR'S 6U1P PaFIt'Fl, kr3z�Qf�t5 ES)Dx -434 PAGE 05 5%�D�N JN C1 CL S fowrY OF DIUMCc ATTACHMENT B ATTACHMENT C Letters from Dale Dillon dated February 23 and Mareh 1.3, 2000 L10 COUNTY OF ORANGE RECE-NED 0 0 PUBLIC FACILITIES & RESOUR'CES DEPARTMENT FEB 2 . L • ��ztfio �'t� VICKI L. WILSON, DIRECTOR LoMmUI�I DEVl4PM� T February 23, 2000 City of Tustin 300 Centennial Way Tustin; CA 92780 Attn: Lori Ludi,Associate Planner Community Development Department Subject: Zoning Administrator Action 99-010 Conditional Use Permit 99-025 Dear Ms. Ludi: The purpose of this letter is to request an extension of time for the subject permit which is currently set to expire on May 9,2000. The need for the stockpile site is to facilitate the repair of Como Flood Control Channel that provides flood protection for the local residents. This project was initially scheduled'to start in November, 1999,however, we experienced substantial delays in obtaining the necessary Section 404 permit from•the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. We have made substantial progress in our negotiations and feel confident,of receiving theauthorization to proceed within the next 30 days. For this reason,we are requesting an extension to August 31, 2000. _ I have enclosed.an executed Development Application form, a copy of my Entry Permit with The Irvine Company and check No. 827 in the amount of$375 to cover the applicable fees. Thank you in-advance for your favorable consideration of this request. Please contact me at (714) 567-6231 if you have`any questions or require additional information. Very truly yours, Dale Dillon,Manager PFRDIO&M/Field Operations DD:sp/0054 1lfileserver\Ops&MainAO&M FoIders\Clerica1\SP\DDIL Ludi City of Tustin Permit 99-025:doe Attachments cc: Bill Tidwell Carol Graeber Bill Reiter Max Bridges LOCATION: MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: 300 N. FLOWER ST P,O.BOX 4048 (714)!567-6300 SANTA ANA,CALIFORNIA SANTA ANA,CA 92702.4048 . FAX 567-6340 ACIIL UY. nF41CLLN INnLJ ! I`YJU/T,3,2*U, vv) v)vv U..]Va•'.Ivi�� Q�a1J:JL�. oyc tit r Vicki L t�ilion,Dj"cror 300 N_Flowex Strus r �$. COU111Y OF ORANGE Sanra Ma,cA v P.Q.Box 4048 PUBL1'C FACILITIES RESOURCES DEPAR 7'MENT Santa A� CA 92702-4048 `qtr p4fi`� Tdepho= (714)567.0300. F= (714)567-6340 March 13, 2000 City of Tustin 300 Centennial Way Tustin, CA 92780 Attn: Lori Ludi, Associate Planner, Community Development Department Dear Ms. Ludi: This letter will confirm our Telecon this moming regarding Conditional Use Permit 99- ' 025. In addition to our request fora time extension, we-also request that t1he maximum allowed stockpile of 5,000 tons be increased to 10,000 tons of quarry rock. would like to again thank you in'advance for a favorable consideration of this request. Please contact me at (714) 567-6231 if you have any questions or require additional information. ,' Very truly yours, i Dale Dillon, Manager/Field Operations PFRD/Operations and Maintenance 00 jd10073 S,10&M Folders%CiericalLIDIRSchooley%L Ludi Telephone conversation 3.13-Q4.doc ATTACHMENT D Resolution No. 371.8 • RESOLUTION NO. 3718 - AMENDMENT TO 2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-025 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF 4 TUSTIN RECOMMENDING AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE 5 PERMIT 99-025 TO ALLOW THE STOCKPILE OF QUARRY ROCK FOR ELEVEN MONTHS AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HARVARD 6 AVENUE DIRECTLY NORTH OF EDINGER AVENUE ' The Planning Commission does hereby resolve as follows: s 1. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: 9 to A. That a proper application for Conditional Use Permit 99-025 was filed by Dale Dillon, County of Orange Public Facilities and Resources Department, 11 requesting authorization to temporarily store quarry rock at the southwest 12 corner of Harvard and the'OCTAI SCRRA Railway for.use in repairing the Como Orange County Flood Control Channel for a maximum of eleven 13 months. 14 B. Pursuant to City Code Section 9299b(3), a temporary use exceeding six 15 (6) months requires a conditional use permit approved by the 'Planning Commission. IG C. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held on said application 17 on March 27, 2000 by the Planning Commission. D. That the establishment, maintenance and operation off the use applied for 19 will not, under the circumstances of this case, be detrimental,to the health, �0 safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use, nor be injurious or 21 detrimental to the property and improvements in the neighborhood of the 22 subject property, or to the general welfare of the City of Tustin, as evidenced by the following findings: 23 1) The proposed temporary use, as conditioned, would not be 24 detrimental to the surrounding properties in that storage of the quarry ,; rocks will not result in erosion or excessive dust. 26 2) As conditioned, the use would not have a negative effect on the 27 surrounding properties in that there would not be excessive truck traffic on Harvard Avenue and operations will occur only between 28 7:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Thursday. �9 3) As conditioned, the use would terminate by August 31, and no later than November 30, 2000 and the applicant would be required to remove all excess quarry rock and related equipment. Planning Commission Resolution 3718 Conditional use Permit 99-025 - March 27, 2000 I Page 2 2 3 E. That this project is Categorically Exempt from the requirements of the 4 California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to Section 15301 (Class 1). 5 F. That the project has been reviewed for consistency with the Air Quality Sub- 6 element ofthe City of Tustin General Plan and has been determined to be consistent with the Air Quality Sub-element. 7 8 11. The Planning Commission hereby approves the amendment to Conditional Use Permit No. 99-025 authorizing the temporary storage of quarry rocks at the 9 southwest corner of Harvard and the OCTA/ SCRRA Railway for a period of eleven months, subject to the conditions contained within: Exhibit A, attached 10 hereto. 11 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin at a regular 12 meeting held on the 27ffi day of March, 2000. 13 14 STEPHEN V. KOSAK 1$ Chairperson 16 17 ELIZABETH A. BINSACK 1s Planning Commission Secretary ]g STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) 20 CITY OF TUSTIN ) - 21 I, ELIZABETH A. BINSACK, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the Recording 22 Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, California; that Planning Commission Resolution No. 3718 passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin 73 Planning Commission, held on the 27h day of March, 2000. 24 25 26 ELIZABETH A. BINSACK Recording Secretary 27 28 79 EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION 3718 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-025 GENERAL (1) 1.1 The proposed use shall substantially conform with the submitted pians for ;the project date stamped March 27, 2000, on file with the Community Development Department, except as herein modified, or as modified by the Director of Community Development in accordance with this Exhibit. The Director of Community Development may also approve minor modifications to plans during plan check if such modifications are to be consistent with the provisions of the Tustin City Code and other applicable codes. (1) 1.2 Approval to amend Conditional'Use Permit 99-025 is contingent upon the applicant signing and returning an "Agreement to Conditions Imposed" form as established by the Director of Community Development. (1) 1.3 The applicant shall hold harmless and defend the City of Tustin from all claims and liabilities arising out of a challenge of the City's approval of this project. USE RESTRICTIONS (1) 2.1 The Temporary Use approved under this Conditional Use Permit shall expire on August 31, 2000. The applicant shall remove all quarry rock and equipment prior to the expiration date of this permit. (1) 2.2 Time extensions may be granted by the Community Development Director if a written request is received by the Community Development Department ---. by August 31, 2000. An extension up to ninety (90) days may be granted subject to review and approval by the Community Development Director. (1) 2.3 All operations, including engine warm-up, and deliveries and- pick-up of materials and equipment, shall be subject to the provisions of the Tustin Noise Ordinance and shall take place only between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on Saturday, unless otherwise determined by the Building Official. (1) 2.4 No more than 10,000 tons of quarry rock and one (1) loader may be stored on the site at one time. (1) 2.5 Movement of quarry rock will occur only during the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Thursday unless otherwise approved by the Director of Community Development. e port to the r�sT. Plan.n"i ng ' Gom mission DATE: MARCH 27, 2000" SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN CONFORMITY APPLICANT: COUNTY OF ORANGE HEALTH CARE AGENCY 515 N. SYCAMORE,SUITE 618 SANTAANA,,CA 92701 PROPERTY - OWNERS: TUSTIN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 300 S. C'STREET' TUSTIN, CA 92780 LOCATION: 13601 BROWNING AVENUE ZONING: PUBLIC& INSTITUTIONAL(P&1) ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: GENERAL PLAN CONFORMITY DETERMINATIONS ARE NOT "PROJECTS" REQUIRING ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT RECOMMENDATION That the PlanningCommission adopt Resolution No. 3719 determining that the proposed location for lease of a 950'square feeffor counseling services at C.E. Utt School located at- 13601 Browning. Avenue, for use by the Orange County Health Care Agency is in conformance with the Tustin General Plan. BACKGROUND Section 65402(b) of the California Government Code (State Planning and Development Law) requires counties to inform and obtain general plan conformity from .the local planning agencies prior to- acquisition or disposition of real property. The Orange County Health Care Agency is proposing to enter into a lease agreement for approximately 950 square feet located at the C.E. Utt School located 'at 13601 Browning Avenue (see Location Map): The proposed space would be used for physical and occupational therapy services-to physically disabled school age children. This location would be operated by a maximum of 4-6 staff members depending on the case load for the day. The County has a case load of approximately 125 students from the Tustin Unified and Irvine Unified Planning Commission Report General Plan Conformity March 27, 2000 Page 2 School Districts that would be using the services. The majority (66%), of these students would be using the services twice a year. The remaining number (34%) of the students are more active and use the services 2-3 times a week. The program will operate from - 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday.through Thursday. The services provided include individual and group therapy; consultation with parents; consultation with doctors .and related medical personnel; and home consultation to assess and advise on the student's activities. The Planning Commission is authorized to,determine whether the location, purpose, and extent of the proposed lease is consistent with the General Plan. The Tustin General Plan Land Use - Map classifies the proposed , site as "PublictInstitutional". The Public/Institutional designation provides for a wide- range of public and quasi-public uses (i.e. schools, churches, child care centers, etc.). Goal 8 of the General Plan Land Use Element states-"Ensure that necessary public facilities and services are available to accommodate development proposed on the Land Use Policy Map, The proposed' therapy and counseling services for school age children would be compatible with the school use and would provide a service to students and parents within the Tustin Unified and rlrvine Unified School Districts. As such, the location, purpose, and extent of the proposed lease is in conformance with the City of Tustin General Plan and the Land Use Policy Map. i L d Ludi Karen Peterson Associate Planner- Senior Planner - Attachments: A. Location Map B. Submitted Request C. Resolution No. 3719 -s:poreport\GPGt3601brown ing.doc L -a LOCATION MAP, -rr ! ' L_ L � 1 < + T J ti 3 �o � -K�� lgco AVE# r - �� •,/`.,Y 10, ONRN1 WLL ROh0 _ IIURry7 WILL ROAD f RED,act LIR. ; 1 73 JJ �.•I� y1 � &�I t •d' $• - �6 `K �•• I SDUMERN 9 j •IJrJ2 JJrJ+: a rJeJ� t]..1 tE6, r j CAilFDRNm 4 J CD+SDN j `�\LFNE � �Ilasx '3r]1 < 113.57 1].5,j •. __ _ 1]rsll • 0 6 _ o w w 1 VENUE '.$w, io f]502 050, •.13502 . 1351114 'sckwoaaLc9 � 13531• 135]2 13531 '13537 I ,a.' + e f i' R __ • Ila. NVW,, ` Jur {I tSS�f• 3342 ,Sial II]Sr! I •a"��1 . .w *y j '.ta7 ' 1]561' �'u567 1]56,1 j;3582 'ar pmt +"r0r �, ` I 1 — i � .lar., „y.l .d A^��C.• /t 0 IE V•13602 13672 C.E. UTT - °'u0cllLry T A0 1'[/rt 3 13501 / `-. -�• 'tiY ,, = � .J��,]632 !{��[��J I '�••�_ \. •NOR1.1 SINLET 13661 II3692 1 j 13621 I K:13672 13671! j 13672 ,1•� ' 1�9i! t •13697. 13591 113692 '�i ' ' pi1tA z j a: ...�, ...+, 137W 13701 ,-3702 13711: 113717 13711 ,13712 x .a�a'. 1`,r*' �a.t•i,',.pa••, '� 1]737 0731•� �'13737 .+*„'T 1"'>• .t•+.41a,'•'•, ;TALE: m. I,�,�.air 7aw1 'dM �• 1.0 ' •� � - � � .. � _ _ ',3765 � j .1ww� i wTM � `'� SAN JUAN wSAN JUAN-3771 I , . 137N JESUS CC RAST -MEADDWS NO SCALE 1]791 LATTER DAY SAINTS 1'6 1]005 MICHEAL SCHUMACHER, Ph. D. C1 � COUNTY OF ORANGE DIRECTOR V � DAVID L RILEY HEALTH. CARE AGENCY CHIEF FINANCIAL ER MAILINGS. 515 N.SYCAMORE.FINANCIAL* B 8 tIF0 FINANCIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SANTA ANA,CA 62701 TELEPHONE:(714)834-4422 FAX:(714,834-5506 RECEIVED March 2, 2000 MAR d 7 Ms..Elizabeth Binsack Director, Community Development City of Tustin 300 Centennial Way Tustin, CA;92780 t SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE Pursuant to Government Code Section 65402, you are hereby given notice that the County of Orange is, considering providing physical'and occupational therapy services to school age children in approximately 950 square feet of leased space at the C.E.Utt School, located at 13601 Browning Avenue in Tustin. This is a new program that will operate at this facility under a Rent Free Lease Agreement. The services to be.provided by the County will include individual and group therapy; consultation with parents; consultation with doctors and related medical personnel; and home consultation to assess and advise on . the student's activities. 'The program will operate from 7:00-a.m. to 5:00-p.m.,Monday through Thursday. Please review this proposal and determine if the use conforms to the General PIan of the City of Tustin. To simplify processing,,you may complete the bottom portion of this letter and return it to me at the address on the letterhead. Thank you for your cooperation and prompt attention to this matter. If you have any questions,please contact me at(714) 834-5664. V.John Iagjian Senior Staff Analyst Determination: YES NO This project is in conformance with the General PIan of the City'of Tustin. City of Tustin: BY DATE: VJI: ev ATTACHMENT`C Resolution No. 3719 RESOLUTION NO. 3799 z • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE 3 CITY OF TUSTIN DETERMINING THAT THE LOCATION, PURPOSE, AND EXTENT OF THE PROPOSED LEASE FOR 4 PHYSICAL AND OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY SERVICES FOR SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN AT 13601 BROWNING AVENUE BY s THE COUNTY OF ORANGE . HEALTH CARE AGENCY 6 CONFORMS WITH THE TUSTIN GENERAL PLAN. 7 s The Planning Commission does hereby resolve as follows: 9 10 . I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: I1 A. That the County of Orange Health Care Agency proposes -to enter into a lease agreement for the use of 950 square feet of area for physical and 12 occupational therapy services for school age children within the existing 13 C.E. Utt School at 13601 Browning Avenue located within the Public and Institutional(P&I) zoning district. 14 B. That California Government Code Section 65402 (b) provides that a county 15 shall not acquire or dispose of real property until the location, purpose, and 16 extent of the project has been reported upon by the local planning agency as to the conformitywith the applicable,adopted general plan. 17 . 18 C. That leasing space at the Utt School site for the physical and occupational therapy services for school age children by the Orange County Health Care 19 Agency is consistent with Goal 8 of the General Pian Land Use Element which states "Ensure that necessary public facilities and services are 20 available to accommodate development proposed on the Land Use Policy 21 Map" in that the proposed use is allowed by the "PublicPnstitutional"Iand use designation of the General Plan and would serve students within 22 enrolled within the Tustin Unified and Irvine Unified School Districts. 23 D. That general plan conformity determinations required by Government Code 24 Section 65402(b) are not "projects"requiring environmental review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. 25 26 11. The Planning Commission hereby determines that the location, purpose, and extent of the proposed lease for a- 950 square foot area for physical and 27 occupational therapy facility for school age children at 13601 Browning Avenue by 28' the Orange County Health Care Agency conforms with the Tustin General Plan. 29 c- Resolution 3719 March 27, 2000 • 1 Page 2 3 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin at a regular 4 meeting held on the 27'r' day of March, 2000. s 6 7 STEPHEN V. KOZAK 8 Chairperson 9 ELIZABETH A. BINSACK 10 Planning Commission Secretary - 11 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) 12 COUNTY OF ORANGE ) 13 CITY OF TUSTIN ) 14 1, ELIZABETH A. BINSACK, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the Planning 15 Commission Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, California; that Resolution No. 3719 was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin 16 Planning Commission, held on the 27th day of March, 2000. 17 18 19 ELIZABETH A. BINSACK zo Planning Commission Secretary _ 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 79 ITEM #6 eeport to the Planning Commission , DATE: MARCH 27„2000 SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA, MARCH 20, 2000 PRESENTATION: ELIZABETH A. BINSACK, DIRECTOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ATTACHMENT:. CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA— MARCH 20, 2000 s . ACTION AGENDA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MARCH 2O; 2000, 7:02 P.M. CALL TO ORDER GIVEN 'INVOCATION - Mr. Steve Garrison GIVEN PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ALL PRESENT ROLL CALL PUBLIC INPUT KEN-MORRISON: CONGRATULATED MAYOR WORLEY ON HER SELECTION AS A "WOMAN MAKING A DIFFERENCE" BY OC METRO AND COMMENDED..HER FOR SUPPORTING MEASURE F. CHARLES GRIFFIN: ENCOURAGED THE COUNCIL TO REMAIN ACTIVE IN THE DESIGN OF AN AIRPORT 'DUE TO INCREASING ORANGE COUNTY,P_OPULATION. • UNIDENTIFIED SPEAKER:. SUBMITTED ORANGE' COUNTY REGISTRAR OF VOTER, 1994 ELECTION RESULTS ON-EL TORO AIRPORT. LOU ALLARD: EXPRESSED CONCERN WITH EXCESSIVE'VEHICLE SPEED AND SCHOOL BUS TRAFFIC ON MAIN STREET AND REQUESTED INCREASED POLICE PATROL. GREG BENNETT: REPRESENTING 'ACORN NATURALIST, REQUESTED THE CITY COUNCIL• AGENDIZE GRANTING FEE, WAIVERS FOR THE PROJECT. NONE PUBLIC HEARING None CONSENT CALENDAR ( ITEMS 1 THROUGH 8 ) APPROVED 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — MARCH 6, 2000 REGULAR MEETING Recommendation: Approve the City Council Minutes of March 6, 2000. .. Action Agenda — City Council March 20; 2000— Page 1 APPROVED 2. APPROVAL OF DEMANDS AND RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL Recommendation: Approve Demands in the amount of • $847,224.74 and ratify Payroll in the amount of $394,712.59. RATIFIED 3. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION AGENDA — MARCH •13, 2000 All actions of the Planning Commission become final - unless appealed by the City. Council or member of the public. ,. Recommendation: Ratify the Planning, Commission Action Agenda of March 13, 2000. APPROVED 4. ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND RELEASE OF BONDS FOR TRACT NO. 15475 (BAYWOOD) Recommendation: Release the following bonds for the indicated amounts: Faithful Performance Bond No. B97-013943, $113,000; Labor and Materials Bond No. B97-013943, $56,500; and Monumentation Bond No. B97-013944, $17,000 as recommended by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division. • ADOPTED ' 5. RESOLUTION NO. 00-18 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY RESOLUTION COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, NO. 00.18 AUTHORIZING APPROVAL OF "AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO THE FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT CREATING THE FOOTHILL/EASTERN TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR AGENCY TO ENABLE THE CITY OF- RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA TO BE ADMITTED AS A FULL MEMBER OF THE FOOTHILL/EASTERN TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR AGENCY Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 00-18 to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute "Amendment No. 4 to the First Amended and Restated Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Creating the Foothill/Eastern• Transportation Corridor Agency" to include the newly incorporated, City of Rancho Santa' Margarita as a full member of the of. Transportation Corridor Agency as recommended by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division. APPROVED 6. CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR TUSTIN COMMUTER RAIL STATION CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (CIP NO. 7138) Action Agenda — City Council March 20, 2000— Page 2 Recommendation: Approve a Consultant Services Agreement with the firm of. Harris & Associates to provide construction management services for the Tustin Commuter Rail Station in an amount not to exceed 175 000 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to • $ Y execute the contract on behalf of the City subject to approval by the City Attorney as recommended by the• Public Works Department/Engineering Division. APPROVED 7. REFURBISH PATROL CARS Recommendation: (1) Authorize the Chief of Police to execute a contract for the refurbishing of six (6) Chevrolet Caprice police vehicles to . George Bates Automobile of Upland, California, in the approximate amount of $72,000; and (2) Authorize a 10 percent ove'rrun for this refurbishment if necessary as recommended by the Police Department. APPROVED; 8. DECLARATION OF SURPLUS EQUIPMENT BOYS AND GIRLS Recommendation: (1) Declare the listed computer CLUB TO BE equipment, furniture, and bicycles surplus and not CONSIDERED AS required for public use; (2) Authorize staff to donate the A RECIPIENT surplus computer equipment to the Tustin Community Foundation for reconditioning and distribution to non- profit organizations; (3) Authorize staff to donate a surplus bicycle to the Main Place Christian Fellowship for reconditioning and distribution to the community; (4) Authorize staff to have auctioned serviceable equipment of value, , surplus furniture; and (5) Authorize staff to dispose of assets beyond repair as recommended by the Police Department. REGULAR BUSINESS ( ITEMS 9 THROUGH 10 ) APPROVED STAFF 9. DESIGNATION OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES WITH RECOMMENDATION PLAQUES On August 16, 1999, the City Council directed staff to' implement a plaque designation program as conceptually recommended by the Cultural Resource Advisory Committee. This report serves to provide the City Council with more specific program parameters developed by the Committee. Recommendation: Direct staff to publicize and implement the City's plaque designation program for f- historic properties as recommended by the Community Action Agenda — City Council March 20, 2000— Page 3 Development Department.= APPROVED 10. ORANGE COUNTY REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY WITHDRAWING (OCRAA) AND EL TORO REUSE-PLANNING AUTHORITY FROM OCRAA (ETRPA)-MEMBERSHIPS . On Ja"nuary 17, 2000, the City Council voted 3 2 to support Measure F, the Safe and Healthy Communities Initiative. On March 7, 2000, in the Primary Election, - the . Orange County; voters approved Measure F. Councilmember Potts requested this item be agendized t and requested that -the. City Council consider withdrawing.frorh the Orange County Regional Airport Authority- and joining. the EI Toro Reuse Planning Authority. , Recommendation: Pleasure of the City Council. PUBLIC INPUT CHARLES GRIFFIN: EXPRESSED SUPPORT FOR THE WILD LAND RANCH ALTERATIVE IN THE COUNTY EIR. MATT RUIZ: COMMENDED THE MAYOR AND APPLICABLE COUNCILMEMBERS' FOR THEIR SUPPORT OF MEASURE F AND THE SUBSEQUENT IMPACT ON THE FINAL ELECTION. VOTE, AND SPOKE IN FAVOR OF - - WITHDRAWING FROM OCRAA AND JOINING ETRPA- MEG WATERS: SPOKE IN.FAVOR OF ETRPA MEMBERSHIP, BRUCE JUNOR: REPORTED ON EXAMPLES OF EL TORO RELATED ORANGE"COUNTY MANAGEMENT INCOMPETENCE. SERGIO PRINCE: SPOKE IN OPPOSITION TO JWA EXPANSION AND IN FAVOR OF ETRPA MEMBERSHIP. KARIN SMOGYI: SPOKE . IN SUPPORT -OF OCRAA WITHDRAWAL AND OFFERED SOUTH COUNTY, ASSISTANCE TO THE COUNCIL. OTHER BUSINESS / COMMITTEE REPORTS DOYLE: REQUESTED ADJOURNMENT IN MEMORY OF HIS FATHER-IN-LAW, ERNEST WOODALL Action Agenda — City Council March 20; 2000— Page 4 , POTTS: COMMENDED LARRY AGRAN AS A PROJECT 99 ANTI- AIRPORT CATALYST AND KEN MORRISON FOR PROMOTING ETRPA. THOMAS: REITERATED THAT TUSTIN'S BASE CLOSURE WAS: TOP PRIORITY FOR ,STAFF AND THE COUNCIL, CHASTISED. SUPERVISOR SMITH FOR HIS COMMENT REGARDING "IGNORING"<THE VOTE -OF THE PEOPLE ON MEASURE F, AND STRESSED THE IMPORTANCE OF OPPOSING THE EXPANSION OF JWA. WORLEY: REPORTED ON THE CITY'S EFFORTS IN WASHINGTON D.C. T0.GAIN CONTROL OF-TUSTIN LEGACY, STATED THE NAVY WAS REFUSING TO COOPERATE REGARDING THE FEDERAL "NO COST" TURNOVER;' LAW, THAT DEVELOPMENT OF THE BASE HAD'CEASED DUE TO THIS CONFLICT, AND THE CITY WAS HOPEFUL THEIR EFFORTS IN WASHINGTON WOULD BE SUCCESSFUL. CONGRATULATED PLANNING 'COMMISSIONER -DAVERT ON THE BIRTH OF HIS DAUGHTER. ' URGED STAFF AND THE IRVINE COMPANY-TO CONTINUE EFFORTS TO PRESERVES A GROVE OF 100 .YEAR OLD EUCALYPTUS TREES IN THE ESTATE HOME AREA. REPORTED SHE' WOULD . BE PARTICIPATING IN THE "PRINCIPAL FOR A DAY" PROGRAM AT PIONEER MIDDLE SCHOOL. NONE CLOSED SESSION - None 8:10 P.M: ADJOURNMENT - The next regular meeting of the City IN MEMORY OF Council is scheduled for Monday, April 3, 2000, at 7:00 p.m. ERNEST WOODALL in the Council Chamber at 300 Centennial Way. , .Action Agenda — City Council March 20, 2004— Page 5 ' Cb ACTION AGENDA REGULAR MEETING OF THE TUSTIN COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY • r ' MARCH 20, 2000 8:10 P.M. CALL TO ORDER ALL PRESENT ROLL CALL REGULAR BUSINESS ( ITEM I ) APPROVED 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — MARCH 6, 2000 REGULAR MEETING Recommendation: Approve the Redevelopment Agency Minutes of March 6, 2000. NONE OTHER BUSINESS NONE CLOSED SESSION - None regular meetingofi the 8:10 P.M. ADJOURNMENT - The next reg Redevelopment Agency is scheduled for Monday, April 3, 2000, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at 300 Centennial Way. D Action Agenda---Redevelopment Agency.March 20, 2000—Page 1