Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-11-99 PC PACKET 'AGENDA TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING JANUARY 11, 9999 CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 p.m., City Council Chambers PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Commissioner Davert .INVOCATION: Chairperson Pontious ROLL CALL: Chairperson Pontious, Browne, Davert, Jones, Kozak PUBLIC CONCERNS: (Limited to 3 minutes per person for items-not'on the agenda.) At this time members of the public may address the Commission regarding any items not on; the agenda and within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Commission (NO action can be taken off agenda items unless authorized by law). IF YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION ON ANY MATTER, PLEASE FILL OUT ONE OF THE CARDS LOCATED ON THE SPEAKER'S TABLE SO THAT YOUR REMARKS ON THE TAPE RECORDING OF THE MEETING CAN BE ATTRIBUTED TO ,YOU. WHEN 'YOU START TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION, PLEASE STATE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. IF YOU REQUIRE SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS, PLEASE CONTACT THE PLANNING COMMIS_S10N SECRETARY AT (714) 573-3106. CONSENT CALENDAR: (ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER CONSENT CALENDAR ARE CONSIDERED ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE - MOTION. ' THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS PRIOR TO THE TIME OF i THE VOTING ON THE MOTION UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, STAFF OR� PUBLIC REQUEST SPECIFIC ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AND/OR REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION.) Planning Commission Agenda ` January 11, 1999 Page 2 Y CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. Minutes of the December 14. 1998 Planning Commission Meeting. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 2. Conditional Use Permit 98-023 and Design-Review 98-028 a request to establish a 60-student pre-school. The project is located at 1091 Bryan Avenue within the Retail Commercial C=1 zoning district. APPLICANT/ BARBARA J. KRU.LL PROPERTY EDGEWOOD PRE-SCHOOL OWNER: Recommendation That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 3647, approving Conditional Use Permit 98-023 and Design Review 98-028. Presentation: Justina Willkom, Associate Planner 3. General Plan Amendment 98.002 and Zone Change 98-005 a request to amend the General Plan Land Use Designation for a .5 acre abandoned Caltrans parcel from Transportation to High Density Residential and amend the zoning district from Unclassified (U) to Planned Development (PD). The project is located at 15500 Tustin Village Way within the Unclassified zoning district. APPLICANT/ PROPERTY MR. ELMER TIEDJE OWNER: TUSTIN VILLAGE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION Recommendation 1. That the Planning ' Commission adopt Resolution No. 3642 recommending that the City Council certify as adequate the Negative Declaration for General Plan Amendment 98-002 and Zone Change 98- 005; and, 2. That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 3643 recommending that the City Council approve General Plan Amendment 98-002 and Zone Change 98-005. Presentation: Bradley Evanson, Assistant Planner Planning Commission Agenda January11, 1999 Page 3 . 4. Conditional Use Permit 98-032 is a request to amend the Master Sign Program for the Tustin Marketplace to allow pad tenants occupying a building of at least 10,000 square feet as a sole tenant to have an aggregate total of up to 300 square feet of signage, allocated among up to four elevations with no more than 150 square feet on any one elevation. The project is located at 3030 EI Camino Real within the East Tustin Specific Plan Mixed Use Land Use designation. APPLICANT: STUART ANDERSON'S RESTAURANTS PROPERTY OWNER: IRVINE RETAIL PROPERTIES CIO: DONAHUE SCHRIBER Recommendation That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 3646appro_ving Conditional Use-Permit 98-032. ' Presentation: Bradley Evanson, Assistant Planner REGULAR BUSINESS: STAFF CONCERNS: 5. Report on Actions taken at the January 5 1999 City Council Meeting Presentation: Elizabeth A. Binsack, Community Development Director COMMISSION CONCERNS: ADJOURNMENT: A regular meeting of the Planning Commission will be held on January 25, '1999 beginning at 7:00 p.m., City Council Chambers, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin. ITEM #I MINUTES TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 14, 1998 CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 p.m., City Council Chambers PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Commissioner Kozak INVOCATION: Commissioner Browne ROLL CALL: Chairperson Pontious, Browne, Davert, Jones, Kozak Commissioners: Present: Chairperson-Pontious Vice Chair Kozak Davert Browne Jones Absent: None Staff: Elizabeth A. Binsack, Director Lois Bobak, Deputy'City Attorney Minoo Ashabi, Assistant Planner Bradley Evanson, Assistant Planner . Kathy Martin, Recording Secretary PUBLIC CONCERNS: (Limited to 3 minutes per person for items not on the agenda.) No Public Concerns were expressed. IF YOU REQUIRE SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS, PLEASE CONTACT THE PLANNING COMMISSION SECRETARY AT (714) 573-3106. CONSENT CALENDAR: (ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER CONSENT. CALENDAR ARE CONSIDERED ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION. THERE WILL- BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE ITEMS PRIOR TO THE TIME OF THE VOTING ON THE MOTION UNLESS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, STAFF OR PUBLIC REQUEST SPECIFIC ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AND/OR REMOVED Planning Commission Minutes December 14, 1998 Page 2 FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION.) CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. Minutes of the November 23, 1998 Planning Commission Meeting. Commissioner Davert moved Commissioner Browne seconded, to approve the Consent Calendar. Motion carried 5-0. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 2. Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 98-028 And Zone Change 98-003 a request for authorization to amend the Jamboree Plaza District regulations Section 3.4.b.4 to list veterinary surgical clinics as conditionally permitted uses within Planning Area D and to amend Section 3.7.f.2 to include parking ratios for medical uses. CUP 98-28 is a request to establish a veterinary surgical clinic within Building 22 at Jamboree Plaza at 2955 Edinger Avenue within the Planned Community Industrial zoning district. APPLICANT: DR. DIANE CRAIG p VETERINARY SPECIALTY ASSOCIATES PROPERTY OWNER: JAMBOREE PLAZA HOLDINGS, LLC Recommendation That the Planning Commission: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 3640. recommending that the City. Council certify as adequate the Negative Declaration for the project; 2. Adopt Resolution No. 3641 recommending that the City Council approve Zone Change 98-002; and, .3. Adopt Resolution No. 3644 recommending that the City Council approve Conditional Use Permit 98-028. The Public Hearing opened at 7:02 p.m. Bradley Evanson presented the subject report. Commissioner Jones inquired if the clinic would be boarding animals being treated. Bradley Evanson responded that boarding would be an ancillary use. r Planning Commission Minutes December 14, 1998 Page 3 The Public Hearing closed at 7:05 p:m. ' Commissioner Jones stated that he liked buffer in the parking;',andIrip,,generation was very conservative. Commissioner Davert moved. Commissioner.Jones seconded, toI recommend that the City Council approve Zone Change 98-002 and Conditional. Use Permit 98-028. Motion carried 5-0. 3. General Plan Amendment 98.002 and Zone. Change 98-005 a request to amend the General Plan Land Use designation for a .152 acre abandoned Caltrans parcel from Transportation to High Density Residential and amend the zoning designation 'from Unclassified (U) to Plann`ed..Development (PD). The.project is located at 15500 Tustin Village Way within the"Unclassified zoning district. APPLICANT/ PROPERTY OWNER: MR. ELMER TIEDJE TUSTIN VILLAGE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION - Recommendation ` 1. That the Planning-Commission adopt Resolution No. 3642 recommending that the City Council certify as.adequate the Negative Declaration for General Plan "Amendment 98-002 and Zone Change 98-005; and, 2. That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution iNo. 3,643-recommending that . the City Council,approve General Pian Amendment 98-002 and Zone Change 98-005. The Public Hearing opened-at 7:06.p'.m. Bradley Evanson presented the subject report. ` The Director stated that the Commission should continue the item to a date uncertain. because of an inaccurate legal.description and the item will be rerioticed. The Public Hearing closed at 7:12 p.m. ; t Commissioner Davert moved, Commissioner Kozak seconded, to continue the , hearing to a date uncertain. Motion carried 5-0. Planning Commission Minutes December 14, 1998 Page 4 REGULAR BUSINESS: 4. Sin Code'Exce tion 98-005 a request to install,a monument sign 7'-2" in height and forty eight (48) square feet ,in area for business identification and price, information of a gasoline service station. The project is located at 17241.• Seventeenth Street within the.Retail Commercial zoning district. APPLICANT: R.E.M ENGINEERING STEVE BIRCKETT PROPERTY OWNERS: WILDE MANAGEMENT GROUP DOMINIC KOVACEVIC Recommendation That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution.No. 3635 approving Sign Code Exception 98-005. Minoo Asliabi presented the subject report. Commissioner Jones asked for height of the berm and if the sign would be installed at grade. Minoo Ashabi responded that the berm is from .,I 'foot to 3 feet and portions. of the pedestal will'be hiddenby the berm. Commissioner Kozak asked staff to,-compare this-sign to.,the ;Unocal monument sign. and stated his concern about weakening the:sign code. The Director indicatedthat- staff would check on,the size of.the Unocal sign and the Unocal sign is part of a larger center tn'at'has different sign regulations. J Commissioner Davert noted that the Unocal monument sign is not on the corner and, maybe a little smaller: Commissioner Kozak stated that the sign was well'designed and he supports adoption. Chairperson Pontious inquired if the findings could be changed to indicate combining the two signs into one. s a The;.Director provided additional language to be added to Finding D1 to identify that the copy area contains price and bdsiness identification information. Commissioner Davert moved Commissioner Kozak seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 3635, as revised, approving Sign Code Exception 98-005. Motion carried 5-0. Planning Commission Minutes December 14, 1998 Page 5 STAFF CONCERNS: 5. Report on Actions taken at the December 7, 1998 City Council Meeting Elizabeth A. Binsack, Community Development Director presented the subject report. COMMISSION CONCERNS: Commissioner Davert Noted that the Tustin Lanes sign was still purple: Commented about the proliferation of commercial real estate signs. Asked. if the City would be developing an e-mail system that would be accessible to the public. The Director responded that staff is working on a City web site and currently have an internal e-mail system and offered her own 'e-mail address. - Stated his pleasure with the media attention MCAF Tustin has been receiving and asked when the EIR would be finaled. The Director stated that the Elk would be finaled sometime in-March or April. Wished everyone a Happy Holiday. Commissioner Jones Complemented the City's contract tree trimmers for,their work and excellent customer service. The Director stated that she would forward the comment to the City's Public Works Department. Asked if the large temporary banner at Enderle Center on the corner of Yorba and Vandenberg was permitted. The Director responded that staff temporarily permitted the banners because the center could not get their monument signage prior-toathe holidays. i I Planning Commission Minutes December 14, 1998 Page 6 Commissioner Kozak Inquired if their were any inquiries on the former Marshall's.site. The Director stated that a health spa or gym may be proposed. Wished everyone a Happy Holiday. Chairperson Pontious Thanked, staff for the excellent status report on the Tustin Meadows Apartment relocation. Inquired if the Redevelopment Agency staff could do a workshop to update the Commission on the status of projects. The Director indicated that the iters would be agendized next year. Wished everyone a happy holiday. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Davert moved Commissioner Jones seconded, to adjourn the meeting at 7:22 p.m. Motion carried 5-0. A regular meeting of the Planning Commission wily be held on January 11, 1999 beginning at 7:OO p.m., City Council-Chambers, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin. ITEM r2 Deport to the Planning Commission DATE: JANUARY 11, 1999 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 98-023 DESIGN REVIEW 98-028 APPLICANT: BARBARA J.KRULL EDGEWOOD PRE-SCHOOL 1071 REGIS WAY TUSTIN, CA 92780 PROPERTY OWNER: BARBARA J. KRULL 1071 REGIS WAY TUSTIN, CA 92780 LOCATION: 1091 BRYAN AVENUE ZONING: RETAIL COMMERCIAL(C1) • ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: THIS PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT (CLASS 1, MINOR ALTERATIONS TO EXISTING PRIVATE FACILITIES) PURSUANT TO SECTION 15301 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT REQUEST: AUTHORIZATION TO ESTABLISH A 60-STUDENT PRE- SCHOOL AT 1091 BRYAN AVENUE RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 3647, approving Conditional Use Permit 98- 023 and Design Review 98-028. BACKGROUND The applicant is requesting approval to establish a pre-school for children ages 2 to 6 years old in. an'existing building at 1.091. Bryan Avenue. The property is currentlyimproved with a single family home which has been modified and used commercially. The property is surrounded by medical office buildings to the east and north, an adult care home to the west, and offices and veterinarian clinic to the south (see Location Map). The establishment of a nursery school/preschool is authorized by Section 9232bo) of Tustin City Code with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Design Review is required for exterior modifications to the building. Planning Commission Report CUP 98-023 &DR 98-028 January 11, 1999 Page 2 DISCUSSION Project Description/Use The proposed pre-school would accommodate 60 students and would employ 5 teachers and I director. The applicant indicated that there would be 95-100 percent occupancy between September to June, and 50 percent occupancy between July and August. The pre-school will operate Monday through Friday, with school hours proposed from 8:20 A.M. to 2:45 P.M. The school will conduct five classes-each day: two classes for younger children, two classes for pre- kindergarten children, and one older children's class. All start and dismissal times.are staggered in fifteen (15) minutes intervals to avoid parking and circulation congestion. For those children who need extended care before and after the class hours,extended childcare will be provided from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. Site Plan Vehicular Circulation The proposed site plan indicates a one way circulation along the front of the building. Condition No. 4.3 requires installation of"Entrance Only and Exit Only"signs to regulate traffic circulation. To avoid congestion in the front of the building, the front parking area is designated'as a drop-off and pick-up area only. Should parents wish to enter the building for any reason, they will be required to park at the rear of the.building. Condition No. 2.2 requires installation of signs which designate the front parking spaces as loading and unloading only. If in the future the City is advised that a parking or traffic circulation problem exists-on the property as a result of this establishment, the applicant will be required to prepare a parking demand analysis or traffic study. If said study indicates that there is inadequate parking or a traffic problem, the applicant will be required to provide mitigation measures to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission (Condition No. 2.3). Parking Requirements Section 9232(b) (j) of the Tustin City Code requires one (1) parking space for each staff member and one(1) loading space for each eight(8) children. The Code also requires that loading spaces be located for easy circulation and not interfere with other required parking. The proposed site plan indicates 4 drop-off spaces at the front of the building,-and 4 drop-off and 6 staff parking spaces to the rear of the building. Although the number of spaces provided would meet the code requirement, the City's Traffic Engineer has a concern with the possibility of 60 vehicles dropping off and picking up students at the same time. As noted above class start times PIanning Commission Report • CUP 98-023&DR 98-028 January 11, 1999 Page 3 and dismissal times are staggered to reduce congestion on the property and Bryan Avenue. Condition No. 2.9 requires the applicant to have parents sign an,acknowledgement which indicates parking restrictions. The parking restrictions include: ■ No parking in adjacent lots; ■ Parents who need to leave the car must park in the rear parking lot; ■ Parking along the front is for loading and unloading only; and ■ No line-up or parking along the curb on Bryan Avenue is permitted. FIoor Plan/Elevations The proposed site plan shows an addition of 989 square feet to the front and rear of the existing 2,305 square feet building. The front addition consists of a child restroom facility and an enlargement of a classroom. The rear addition consists of an additional classroom and enlargement of two classrooms. • Improvements to the building elevation include installation of decorative brick veneer along the front, and portions of the sides of the building. The existing glass storefront will be removed and replaced with stucco and a shadow box to create the appearance of a window. New windows and doors will be installed through out the building to accommodate Uniform Building Code and Uniform Fire Code requirements as they relate to exits and openings requirements. The building • will be painted with an Off-white (Soft Shimmer) color and the trimmings will be painted with a Taupe (Simply Taupe) color. A new roof will be installed utilizing wood-tone asphalt shingles. The front decorative wall will be demolished to provide parking spaces and landscape areas. Perimeter Wall The property is currently surrounded,by a five-foot high solid wall along the eastern, northern and western property lines, and a five-foot perforated wall along the front of the existing building. The applicant wishes to maintain the perimeter solid block walls and utilize them as screening for the play area along the rear. Tustin City Code Section 9232 (b) 0) requires outdoor play areas to be screened from surrounding properties by a 6'8" high solid wall or fence. The applicant submitted a request to use of the existing five-foot wall as the screening. The City, in the past,has granted this request since State law regulating child`-care facilities only requires a four-foot high fence. Condition 2.7 is included for the Planning Commission consideration. 1 Planning Commission Report CUP 98-023&DR 98-028 January 11, I999 Page 4 Landscaping The property is currently improved with minimal landscaping along the front of the property. New concrete walkway and landscape areas will be provided around the building. A five-foot landscape area along the front property Iines will also be provided to create a buffer for the parking area. A five-foot landscape area is proposed along the front of the building. Four trees and shrubs will be planted in the front planter adjacent to the sidewalk to screen the parking area from the street. To the rear of the property, annuals will be planted within planters in the parking area. Existing lemon/tangerine trees will remain in the playground area to the rear of the building'. The applicant will provide new turf on the entire area of the playground. To the west of the property, adjacent to the playground area, is a driveway of an adult care facility that leads into a'parking area. No immediate rooms are adjacent to the playground area. Thus, with the existing trees within the playground area and the existing trees along the driveway of the adjacent lot, sufficient screening would be provided. Noise Noise may be generated from the outdoor playground area and may affect the adult care facility. Therefore, Condition No. 2.3 is included to ensure if in the future the City is advised that a noise problem exists as a result of the school, the City may require a noise analysis be prepared which include mitigation measures. ANALYSIS In determining whether to approve the Conditional Use Permit, the Planning Commission must determine whether or not the proposed pre-school will be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort and general welfare of the persons residing in or working in the neighborhood or whether it will be injurious or detrimental to property or improvements in the vicinity or to the welfare of the City. A decision to approve this request is supported by the following findings: 1) As conditioned, the proposed use will not be detrimental to nor have a negative effect on surrounding property owners in that the preschool will provide adequate student loadinglunloading areas and staff parking, and the number of students and staff allowed at any time will be limited by the total number of parking spaces provided for the site. 2) As conditioned, the proposed circulation will not be detrimental to the surrounding properties in that the property shall have a one-way traffic circulation at the front of the Planning Commission Report CUP 98-023 &DR 98-028 January 11, 1999 Page 5 property with signs to be installed indicating "Entrance"Only" and"Exit Only", and that the parking spaces at the front of the property shall be designated as loading and unloading only. Should there be a problem with adequacy of parking or traffic circulation, the applicant will be required to prepare a parking demand analysis identifying and implementing mitigation measures required by the City., 3) As conditioned,the use is compatible with and may support existing uses in the surrounding neighborhood. 7ustina illkom Karen Peterson Associate Planner Acting Senior Planner S AMDWREPORMCUP98-023.doc • Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Submitted Plans 3. Resolution No. 3647 ' r • RESOLUTION NO. 3647 1 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE 3 CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING 4 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 98-023 & DESIGN REVIEW 98- 028 ESTABLISHING A PRESCHOOL IN AN EXISTING s BUILDING LOCATED AT 1091 BRYAN AVENUE. 6 The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows: 7 I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: s 9 A. That a proper application for a Conditional Use Permit was filed by Barbara J. Kruil to establish a pre-school in an existing building at 1091 Bryan Avenue, more 10 specifically described as Assessor's Parcel No. 500-131-09. 11 B. That the proposed use is allowed within the Retail Commercial (Cl), with the 12 approval of a Conditional Use Permit(TCC 9232). 13 C. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held on said application on 14 January 11, 1999 by the Planning Commission. 15 .D.' That the establishment, maintenance and operation of the use applied for will not, under the circumstances of this case, be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, 16 comfort, or general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood 17 of such proposed use, nor be injurious or detrimental to the property and improvements in the neighborhood of the subject property, or to the general welfare 18 of the City of Tustin, as evidenced by the following findings: 19 1) As conditioned, the proposed use will not be detrimental to nor have a negative 20 effect on surrounding property owners in that the preschool will provide adequate student loadinglunloading areas and staff parking, and the number of 21 students and staff allowed at any time will be limited by the total number of 22 parking spaces provided for the site. 23 2) As conditioned, the proposed circulation will not be -detrimental to the 24 surrounding properties in that the property shall have a one-way traffic circulation at the front of the property with signs to be installed indicating 25 "Entrance Only" and "Exit Only", and that the parking spaces at the front of the property shall be designated as loading and unloading only. Should there be a 26 problem with adequacy of parking or traffic circulation, the applicant will be 27 required to prepare a parking demand analysis identifying and implementing ' mitigation measures required by the City. 28 3) As conditioned,the use is compatible with and may support existing uses in the 29 surrounding neighborhood. 1 j 02E. al Code the Commission finds that Pursuant to Section 9272 of the Tustin Municipal , 3 the location, size, architectural features and general appearance of the proposed project will not impair the orderly and harmonious development of the area, the 4 present or future development therein,or the occupancy as a whole. In making such 5 findings,the Commission has considered at least the following items: 6 1. Height,bulk and area of buildings. ' 7 2. Setbacks and site planning. 8 3. Landscaping,parking area design and.traff c circulation. 9 10 4. Location,height and standards of exterior illumination. 11 5. Location and method of refuse storage. 12 6. Physical relationship of proposed improvements to existing structures in the 13 neighborhood. 14 7. Appearance and design relationship of proposed improvements to existing 15 structures and possible future structures in the neighborhood and public . thoroughfares. 16 8. Development Guidelines and criteria as adopted by the City Council. 17 1s F. This project is Categorically Exempt (Class 1, minor alterations to existing private facilities) pursuant to the provisions of Section 15301 of -the California 19 Environmental Quality Act. 20 II. The Planning Commission hereby approves Conditional Use Permit 98-023 & Design 21 Review 98-028, to allow establishment of a preschool in an existing building located at 1901 Bryan Avenue,subject to the conditions contained in Exhibit A,attached hereto. 22 23 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin,at a regular meeting ori the 11th day of January, 1999. 24 25 LESLIE PONTIOUS 26 Chairman 27 28 ELIZABETH BINSACK Planning Commission Secretary • 29 STATE OF CALIFORNIA } COUNTY OF ORANGE } CITY OF TUSTIN } I, Elizabeth Binsack,the undersigned,hereby certify that I am the Planning Commission Secretary 2 of the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, California;that Resolution No. 3647 was duly 3 passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission,held on the 11 th day of January, 1999. 4 s 6 7 Elizabeth Binsack s Planning Commission Secretary 9 10 II 12 13 14 is • 16 17 is 19- 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 77 28 i29 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 98-023 &DESIGN REVIEW 98-028 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESOLUTION NO. 3647 GENERAL (1) 1.1 The proposed project shall substantially conform with the submitted plans for the project date-stamped January 11, 1999, on file with the Community Development Department, except as herein modified, or as modified by 'the Director of Community Development in accordance with this Exhibit. The Director of Community Development may also approve minor modifications to the plans if such modifications are consistent with the provisions of the Tustin City Code. (1) 1.2 Unless otherwise specified, the conditions contained in this Exhibit shall be complied with prior to the issuance of any building permits for the project, subject to review and approval by the Community Development Department. (1) 1.3 The subject project approval shall become null and void unless the use is established within twelve (12) months of the date of this Exhibit. Time extensions may be granted if a written request is received by the Community Development Department prior to expiration. 1 (1) 1.4 Approval of Conditional Use Permit 98-023 and Design Review 98-028 is contingent upon the applicant and property owner signing and returning an "Agreement to Conditions Imposed" form as established by the Director of Community Development. (1) 1.5 The applicant shall hold harmless and defend the City of Tustin from all claims and liabilities arising out of a challenge of the City's approval of this project. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SOURCE CODES (1) STANDARD CONDITION (5) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY (2) CEQA MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS (3) UNIFORM BUILDING CODE/S (6) LANDSCAPING GUIDELINES (4) DESIGN REVIEW (7) PC/CC POLICY ** EXCEPTIONS Exhibit A Conditional Use Permit 98-023 Resolution No.3647 Page 2 USE RESTRICTIONS (4) 2.1 A total of 60 students are authorized by CUP 98-023. The maximum number of occupants in the preschool shall be limited by the total number of parking spaces provided on site based upon the following ratios: Preschool: 1 parking space for each staff member,plus 1 Ioading space for each eight children If student enrollment is increased, the applicant shall request an amendment, subject to review and approval of the Planning Commission. (4) 2.2 A minimum of three spaces in the front parking lot shall be marked by either painting the curb or installation of signs as restricted for children Ioading and unloading only during peals period hours. Said spaces may be used for parking during non-peak periods. (4) 2.3 If in the future the City is advised that a parking, traffic, or noise problem exists on the site or in the vicinity as a result of the school, the Director of Community Development may require the applicant to prepare a parking demand analysis, traffic study, or noise analysis. If said study indicates that there is inadequate parking or a traffic or noise problem, the applicant shall be required to provide mitigation measures to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission. Said mitigation may include,but are not limited to,the following:. a_ Adjusting hours of operation; b. Securing off-site parking from adjacent property owners; and, C. Limiting student enrollment. (4) 2.4 Any graffiti occurring on the properly shall be removed within 72 hours of a complaint being transmitted by the City to the property owner. Failure to maintain said structure and adjacent facilities would be grounds for City enforcement of its Properly Maintenance Ordinance,including nuisance abatement procedures. (4)7 2.5 The front gate leading to the rear parking lot area shall remain open during business hours. 1 Exhibit A Conditional Use Permit 98-023 Resolution No.3647 Page 3 (4) 2.6 In accordance to the Tustin City Code Section 8402 (a), all electrical, telephone, community antenna, television and similar services wires or cables which provide direct service to the property being developed, shall, within the exterior boundary lines of such property,be installed underground. (4) 2.7 The outdoor play area shall be separated from surrounding properties by a minimum of five (5)foot high solid wall or fence. (6) 2.8 The applicant shall install two 24"box trees within the five foot front landscape area and two 24"box trees within other landscape area along the front property line. J (4) 2.9 The applicant shall provide the City with a statement that must be signed by each parent upon enrollment which indicates parking and circulation restrictions. The restriction shall include the following: ■ No parking in adjacent lots; ■ Parents who need to leave the car must park in the rear parking Iot; • ■ Parking along the front is for loading and unloading only; and ■ No line-up or parking along the curb on Bryan Avenue is permitted. The acknowledgement shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department. BUILDING DIVISION (3) 3.1 Plans shall comply with applicable codes, City Ordinances, and the State and Federal laws and regulations including: O 1994 Uniform Building Code with California Amendments; O 1997 Uniform Mechanical and Plumbing Codes with California Amendments; O 1993 National Electrical Codes with California Amendments; O T-24 California Disabled Access Regulations; O T-24 California Energy Efficiency Standards; O City of Tustin Grading an Security Ordinances; O City of Tustin Landscape and Irrigation Guidelines; and, O City of Tustin Private Improvement Standards. (3) 3.2 Plans shall comply with adopted local codes, ordinances and applicable state amendments for an E-1 occupancy or as addressed by Chapter 3 U.B.C. Exhibit A Conditional Use Permit 98-023 Resolution No.3647 Page 4 (3) 3.3 Plans shall comply with 904.2.4.1. U.B.C. for fire sprinkler requirements. (3) 3.4 In accordance with the Private School Safety Act,the design professional submitting construction documents must be a licensed architect or civil engineer. (3) 3.5 When submitting for a building permit, submit four sets of plans, two sets of structural calculations, acoustical-reports, specification and soils reports. Electrical,mechanical and plumbing plans shall be included. Landscaping plans and sign plans shall be submitted separately. ENGINEERING (5) 4.1 A street improvement plan shall be submitted and shall identify the installation of red curb on the approaches to the proposed driveways. The street improvement plan shall include a stripping pattern(to scale)on Bryan Avenue. (5) 4.2 The dimensions of the adjacent driveways shall be included on the street improvement plan. (5) 4.3 Access signs indicating "ENTRANCE ONLY • Exit -+" and "EXIT ONLY- Entrance —>" shall be maintained on site. Prior to installation, the location and dimension of signs shall be approved by the Community Development Department and Public Works Department. FIRE AUTHORITY (5) 5.1 Fire Hydrants Prior to the issuance of any building permits,the applicant shall submit to the Fire Chief evidence of the on-site fire hydrant system and indicate whether it is public or private. If the system is private, the system shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Chief prior to issuance of building permits. Provisions shall be made by the applicant for the repair and maintenance of the system, in a manner meeting the approval of the Fire Chief. A fire hydrant shall be located within 150 feet of all exterior portions of the building. (5) 5.2 Fire Access Prior to issuance of any building permits,the applicant shall obtain approval of the Fire Chief of all fire protection access locations. Obstructions within the fire protection access locations are prohibited. The approval of the Fire Chief is Exhibit A • ConditionaI'Use Permit 98-023 Resolution No.3647 Page 5 required for any modifications such as speed bumps, control gates or other changes that would affect Fire Authority access. A fire lane with turning radius, apparatus turnaround, signage and widths meeting the requirements of the OCFA shall be provided on the east side of the building or provide access through the new proposed concrete'wall on the west side of the building by a gate meeting the requirements of the OCFA. The lockable grill gate on the south,side of the building shall be approved by the Fire Chief. (5) 5.3 Street Plans Prior to the issuance of any building permits,the applicant shall submit and obtain z approval of preliminary plans for all streets and courts,.public or private, from the Fire chief in consultation with the Manager, Traffic Engineering. The plans shall include the plan view, sectional view, and indicate the width of the street or court measured flow line. All proposed fire apparatus turnarounds shall be approved by the Fire Chief and be clearly marked when a dead-end street exceeds 150 feet or when conditions require it. Both vehicular entrance and exit driveways shall be a minimum of 20 feet wide. i (5) 5.4 Street Markings a) Prior to the issuance of any building'permits, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval from the Fire Chief for street improvement plans with fire lanes shown. The plans shall indicate the Iocations of red curbing and signage. A drawing of the proposed signage with the height, stroke and color of lettering and the contrasting background color shall be submitted to and approved by the Fire Chief. b} Prior to the issuance of the certificate of use and occupancy,the approved fire lane marking plan shall be installed. The applicant shall develop a fire lane map and provisions which prohibit parking in the fire lanes. A method of enforcement shall be included. (5) 5.5 Access Gates Prior to the issuance of any certificate of occupancy permits, the applicant shall submit and obtain the Fire Chief's approval of the construction details for any access gate. Contact the Orange County Fire Authority Plan Review Section at (714) 744-0403 for a copy of the"Guidelines for Fire Authority.Emergency Access". Exhibit A Conditional Use Permit 98-023 Resolution No.3647 Page 6 (5) 5.6 Water Availability Prior to the issuance of any building permits, an Orange County Fire Authority Water Availability Form shall be submitted to and approved by the Plan Review Section of the Orange County Fire Authority. If sufficient water to meet fire flow requirements is not available, an automatic fire extinguishing system shall be installed in each structure, in a manner meeting the approval of the Fire Chief. (5) 5.7 Architectural Plan Prior to the approval of a site development/use permit, or the issuance of a building permit, whichever occurs first,the applicant shall submit plan for the review and approval of the Fire Chief. The applicant shall include information on the plans required by the Fire Chief. Contact the Orange County Fire Authority Plans Review.Section at(71.4) 744-0403 for the Fire Safety Site/Architectural Notes to be placed on the plans. (5) 5.8 Fire Alarm System Prior to the installation,plans for the fire alarm system shall be submitted to and approved by the Fire Chief. This system shall be operational prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Use and Occupancy. SIGNS (4). 6.1 Prior to construction and installation of any wall signs, a complete sign plan shall be submitted which addresses all proposed monument, wall, direction and address signs, subject to the approval of the Community Development Department. The sign plans shall include dimension, materials, colors and method of illumination for each proposed sign. FEES (1) 7.1 Prior to issuance of any building permits,payment shall be made of all applicable fees, including but not limited to the following. Payment shall.be required based upon those rates in effect at the time of payment and are subject to change. a) Building plan-check and permit fees to the Community Development Department based on the most current schedule. -- Exhibit A Conditional Use Permit 98-023 Resolution No.3647 Page 7 b) Orange County Fire Authority plan-check and inspection fees to the Community Development Department based upon the most current schedule. c) New development fees in the amount of $.10 per square foot for the 989 square feet that is being added. d) School facilities fee to the Tustin Unified School District in the amount of $.31 per square foot of new floor area. e) Payment of Sewer Connection Fees in the amount of$2,360 at the time a building permit is issued. (1) 7.2 Within forty eight(48)hours of approval of the subject project,,the applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department, a cashier check payable to the COUNTY CLERK in the amount of$38.00 (thirty eight dollars)to enable the City to file the appropriate environmental documentation for the project. If within such forty eight(48)hours period that applicant has not delivered to the Community Development Department the above noted check,the statute of limitations for any interested party to challenge the environmental determination under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act could be significantly lengthened. �-- LOCATION MAP/-Ir ' � .4 ' L � C J w L-N l/e-- e J n a _. 131!14 � �• �.-[.'—I•--1� iI 7 I 11111 lAlll w13171 (7—• __ •r. /13]. ; 1]110 1 1 Q 13472 y – 134tH f Z1341: cr i p fit. 1 13477 —— 1347% f •` . 13414 13431. iN 1317: Lai 1.3432. ]1 rJSTlrY I 4 s u 1 13444 AIA I fw7t _ =J 13448 LESTY LANEI�1 145; 134411 6`' --- - �� `' BRYAN AVENUE 4 •! i ZZsc: r i• 1,6+ 1L iJ sal: 1 1 1 1 / 1 j Z:t r ~ 995:: � /• 1 L �-1 1 r�r°i .•/�� j i f >*lt C�L•;I U tel: ZaS.: I E � j Z \ � 1 T a• ; e.., =L 9tL. /• � i � 491[ >9tl C I GLZ: / t I 1 ! 1 r f f " ' ' NO SCALE ITEM{ #3 �T Y O Oeport 'to the Planning Commission DATE: JANUARY 11, 1999 SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 98-002 AND ZONE CHANGE 98-005 APPLICANT/ PROPERTY OWNER: MR. ELMERTIEDJE TUSTIN VILLAGE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION 15500 TUSTIN VILLAGE WAY,#119 TUSTIN, CA 92780 LOCATION: 15500 TUSTIN VILLAGE WAY ZONING: UNCLASSIFIED(U) 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: A NEGATIVE DECLARATION HAS BEEN PREPARED IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT(CEQA). REQUEST: AUTHORIZATION TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR A .5 ACRE ABANDONED CALTRANS PARCEL FROM TRANSPORTATION TO HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND AMEND THE ZONING DISTRICT FROM UNCLASSIFIED (U) TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT(PD). RECOMMENDATION 1. That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 3642 recomme6ding that the City Council certify as adequate the Negative Declaration for General Plan Amendment 98-002 and Zone Change 98-005; and, 2. That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 3643 recommending that the City Council approve General Pian Amendment 98-002 and Zone Change 98-005. Planning Commission Report Zone Change 98-005 January 11, 1999 Page 2 BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION The Tustin Village Townhomes community is a 118 unit owner-occupied townhome complex located at-the southwest comer of the intersection of the 1-5 Santa Ana Freeway and the SR-55 Newport Freeway at 15500 Tustin Village Way. In 1995, Caltrans completed their work on the reconfiguration of the 1-5/SR-55 freeway interchange. In reconfiguring the interchange, Caltrans abandoned a parcel that was a portion of the freeway right-of-way. This .5 acre parcel is situated along the eastern edge of the Tustin Village Townhomes complex. The parcel abuts the Townhome complex and is separated from the current freeway right-of-way by a sound wall (see Location Map). ` The Tustin Village Community Association purchased the parcel from Caltrans with the intent of paving a portion of the parcel for additional guest parking,spaces and landscaping the remaining area. The City had the first option to acquire the parcel, but the City Engineer had found that there was no public need for the parcel. To make use of the parcel,the Zoning District and General Plan Designation must be changed. Currently,the parcel is zoned "Unclassified" (U) and is designated "Transportation" by the General Plan. This application would change the Zoning District to "Planned Development (PD)and change the General Plan Land Use Designation to "High Density Residential".(see Zone Change and General Plan Amendment Exhibits to Resolution No. 3643). These designations are consistent with the Zoning District and Land Use Designations of the Tustin Village Townhomes Complex. No formal plans for any improvements on site have been submitted, however, accessory structures such as residential parking facilities is a permitted use within this Planned Development and future improvements would require building permits. Any other improvements would be subject to applicable discretionary actions. ENVIRONMENTAL Attachment C is the Initial Study/Negative Declaration prepared for this project. Notice of the Negative Declaration public comment period was provided from December-25, 1998, through the Planning Commission and City Council meetings. No significant impact's were identified. Any potential impacts would be relat to the approval of future projects. ad v so Karen Peterson Assist n I ne Acting Senior Planner BE2c98605paeporLdoe Attachments: A- Location Map i B- Negative Declaration Resolution Nos. 3642 and 3643 ATTACHMENTA LOCATION MAP - LOCATION MAP EE- LU fee..^-- 1 Ix' ti Lo cAT-, I � m I 1 J i r—� —DaBO LANE '107 �• r 1109 3� 113 AL � 1 1133 11 01 1117 Q �122�1 r1T ..c50T0 LANE^ =- J 1141 11�IfI 119 Q ra-�--- rBr�il2f � 1143 :a ;r423 ~ I"I TV Towv�r�M=� Axl I SERRx LANE _ Iz 1 I , yl r----- --� r--- 7 r127 rp $ I ' 1 i � i � 1 n ^� r , � 1 1 1 121147 'l 31 ~ rn> y I�11{9 1133 ----- --------------- - - �i I i , I e e n r. � I n � i 511..1153 ter; 1f� I 1®8 5 l+ ry I 1 uj VILLA G_ :SEGOVIA FLANDERS, �®® � l W�Sr POINTE ® � ���,• j N :EEE2 COSTA MESA FREEWAY ' i NO SCALE ATTAC H M E NT B NEGATIVE D COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTME'+ 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 573-3100 INITIAL STUDY A. BACKGROUND Project Title: General Plan Amendment 98-002 and Zone Change 98-005 Lead Agency: City of Tustin .300 Centennial Way Tustin, California:92780 Lead Agency Contact Person: Brad Evanson Phone: (714) 573-31.18 Project Location: 15500 Tustin-Village Way_ Project Sponsor's Name and Address: .Tustin Village Community Association 15500 Tustir Village Way #119 Tustin, CA 92780 General Plan Designation: Transportation Zoning Designation: Unclassified Project Description: Caltrans abandoned a .5 acre parcel of right-of-way adjacent to the Tustin Village Townhome Complex. The Tustin Village Community Association has acquired the parcel .and is proposing to incorporate it into their community. A General Plan Amendment from Transportation :to High Density Residential and a Zone Change from Unclassified (U) to Planned Development (PD) are required to4low for residential`use of the parcel. Surrounding Uses: North: Caltrans Right-of-Way East: Caltrans Right-of-Way South: Residential West: Residential Other public agencies whose approval is required: ❑ Orange County Fire Authority ❑ City of Irvine ❑ Orange County Health Care Agency [] City of Santa Ana 0 . South Coast Air Quality Management [] Orange County EMA ' District ❑ Other 1 B. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a"Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist in Section D below. Land Use and Planning [Hazards Population and HousingNoise Geological Problems Public Services Water Utilities and.Service Systems DAir Quality nAesthetics Transportation& Circulation 7Cultural Resources Biological Resources 7Recreation QEnergy and Mineral Resources OMandatory Findings of Significance C. DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation: ® I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and'a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect.on�the'ehvironment,there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures**deskribed on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. . • I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment,but at least one effect 1)has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2)has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a"Potentially Significant Impact" or"Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. F] I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR,including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2)have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imp on the proposed project. Signature Print Name Bradle ancon Title Assistant Planner % 2 D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: [] Earlier analyses used: Potentially , Available for review at: City of Tustin Community Significant Development Department Potentially Unless Less than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact f. LAND USE&PLANNING—Would the proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? ❑' ❑ M b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? ❑ ❑ ❑ M c) Be incompatible with existing land uses in the vicinity? L1 E] E d) Affect agricultural resources or operations? El ❑ ❑ e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community(including a low-income or minority community)? ❑ 2. POPULATION&HOUSING—Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? ❑ ❑ b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly(e.g.,through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? E . ❑ ❑ c) Displace existing housing,especially affordable housing? ❑ ❑ ❑ 3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS— Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving:, a) Fault rupture? El Z b) Seismic ground shaking? 0 0 c) Seismic ground failure,including liquefaction? ❑ ❑ ❑ M d) Seiche,tsunami,or volcanic hazard? ❑ ❑ ❑ e) Landslides or mudflows? El Elf) Erosion,changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation,grading,or fill? ❑ ❑ , • M g) Subsidence of land? ❑ ❑ h) Expansive soils? 0 0 E] i )Unique geologic or physical features? 4. WATER—Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates,drainage patterns,or the rate and amount of surface runoff? ❑ ❑ b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? ❑ ❑ L1 M c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality(e.g.,temperature,dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? ❑ ❑ ❑ M d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? ❑ ❑ ❑ e) Changes in currents,or the course or direction of water movements? ❑ ❑ ❑ 3 Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact f) Change in the quantity of ground waters,either through direct additions or withdrawals,or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial Ioss of groundwater recharge capability? g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? ❑ ❑ 0 h) Impacts to groundwater quality? ❑ El i) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? E E] El IK 5. Alk QUALITY—Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ❑ 1:1 0 c) Alter air movement,moisture,or temperature,or cause any change in climate? 1:1 El 1:1 21 d) Create objectionable odors? El E El 6. TRANSPORTATION& CIRCULATION—Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? El E] El b) Hazards to safety from design features(e.g.,sharp curves or dangerous intersections)or incompatible uses (e.g.,farm equipment) c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? � 1:1 Q d) Insufficient parking capacity onsite or offsite? 0 El El M e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? El 1-1 El f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation(e.g.bus turnouts,bicycle racks)? g) Rail,waterborne or air traffic impacts? El 0 0 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES—Would the proposal result in impacts to: . a) Endangered,threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but not limited to plants,fish,insects, animals,and birds? b) Locally designated species(e.g.,heritage trees)? � 0 0 c) Locally designated natural communities(e.g.,oak forest,coastal habitat,etc.)?' 0 0 0 d )Wetland habitat(e.g.,marsh,riparian,and vernal pool)? e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? 1:1 El El M 8. ENERGY&MINERAL RESOURCES— Would the proposal: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? b) Use nonrenewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner? 1:1 El c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral • resource that would be of future value to the region? ❑ 0 El Z 4 Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Imp; 9. HAZARDS— Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances(including,but not limited to,oil,pesticides, chemicals,or radiation)? ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Possible interference with emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? ❑ ❑ c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? ❑ ❑ ❑ d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? ❑ e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass,or trees? ❑ ❑ 10. NOISE—Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? El b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? Q Q 11. PUBLIC SERVICES-- Would the proposal have an affect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? El El E b) Police protection? ❑ L1 El c) Schools? El El d) Maintenance of public facilities,including roads? 0 El0 e) Other government services? ❑ ❑ ❑ 12. UTILITIES &SERVICE SYSTEMS—Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? ❑ El E b) Communications systems? El c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities? d) Sewer or septic tanks? 0 0 e) Storm water drainage? f) Solid waste disposal? g) Local or regional water supplies? ❑❑❑ ❑0El 13. AESTHETICS—Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? ❑ ❑ ❑ c) Create light or glare? ❑ ❑ 5 • Potentially Significant , Potentially Unless Less than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact- Incorporated, Impact No Impact 014. CULTURAL RESOURCES—would the proposal?: a) Disturb paleontological resources? ❑ b) Disturb archaeological resources? L1 El ❑ c) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? ❑ ❑ ❑ d) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? ❑ ❑ ❑ 15. RECREATION— Would the proposal. a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? ❑❑ 0 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment,substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or 0 prehistory ❑ ❑ b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term to the disadvantage of long-term,environmental_goals? El ❑ ❑ c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited,but cumulatively considerable?("Cumulatively considerable"means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects,the effects of other current projects,and the effects of probable future projects). ❑ ❑ ❑ d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? El ❑ ❑ E. EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS • Please.refer to Attachment A for an evaluation of the environmental impacts identified in Section D above. i 6 ATTACHMENT A EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 98-002 AND ZONE CHANGE 98-005 ANALYSIS The proposed project involves amending the General Plan Land Use Designation,and Zoning District of an abandoned portion of Caltrans right-of-way. The proposed amendments would not create significant impacts. Any potential impacts would be associated with discretionary approval of future projects at the subject location, if proposed. Additional environmental review and analysis would be conducted at the time that a specific project is proposed to be implemented in accordance with the Tustin City Code and the California Environmental Quality.Act. - Since the proposed amendment is regulatory in nature, no potential impacts related to land use, planning, population, housing, geology, water quality, air quality, transportation, circulation, biological resources, energy or mineral resources, hazards, noise, public services, utilities, aesthetics, cultural resources, or recreation are anticipated. In addition;: the proposed project does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment nor achieve short--term environmental goals to the disadvantage of long-term goals. The amendment has no environmental effects which are individually limited but cumulatively = considerable nor that will cause substantial adverse direct or indirect effects. Source: Tustin City Code Tustin General Plan Mitigation/Monitoring Required: None required. BE2c98005negdec.d0c r 1 2 Resolution 3642' - Page 2 3 4 PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission,held on the 11th day of January, 1999. 5 6 7 LESLIE PONTIOUS 8 Chairperson 9 10 ELIZABETH A. BINSACK Planning Commission Secretary II 12 STATE OF CALIFORNIA } 13 COUNTY OF ORANGE } 14 CITY OF TUSTIN ) 15 I, ELIZABETH A. BINSACK,the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the Planning 16 Commission Secretary of the City of Tustin, California; that Resolution No. 3642 was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning 17 Commission,held on the 11th day of January, 1999. I8 I9 20 ELIZABETH A. BINSACK 21 Planning Commission Secretary 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 • RESOLUTION N0. 3643 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF' THE 3 CITY OF TUSTIN, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 98-002 AND ZONE 4 CHANGE 98-005, AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM TRANSPORTATION TO HIGH DENSITY 5 RESIDENTIAL AND CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT FROM 6 UNCLASSIFIED(U) TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT.(PD) ON A .5 ACRE ABANDONED PARCEL OF CALTRANS RIGHT-OF-WAY 7 ADJACENT TO PROPERTY LOCATED AT 15500 TUSTIN VILLAGE WAY. 8 The Planning Commission does hereby resolve as follows: 9 I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: 10 A. That a proper application for General Plan Amendment 98-002 and 11 Zone Change 98-005 to amend .the General.: Plan" Land, Use Designation and Zoning District of .5 acre abandoned Caltrans lz right-of-way parcel .located adjacent'to .the 1-5/8R-55 freeway 13 interchange at 15500 Tustin Village .Way- more, specifically r described as the Director's Deed recorded on September 28, 1998 14 as Instrument No. 19980649965 in the County of Orange. 015 B. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held on said application on January 11, 1999 by the Planning Commission. 16 C. That the proposed General Plan Amendment 98-002 and Zone -17 Change 98-005 are consistent with and implement the policies of the General Plan, in that: 1) Policy 1.9 encourages the consolidation of unused parcels 19 to -increase -the opportunities for development and 20 redevelopment. The proposed amendments would allow an abandoned right-of-way parcel to be incorporated into an 21 existing residential community. 22 2) Policy 5.&encourages the improvement of edge treatments 23 between transportation rights-of-way- and residential developments. The proposed amendments would allow a 24 residential community the opportunity to redevelop an abandoned freeway right-of-way parcel that is adjacent to 25 their community. z6 D. Whereas, the City Engineer has determined that there`is no public 27 need for the subject parcel. - •28 E. That the proposed amendments ensure consistency between the . General Plan and the Zoning Ordinance. 29 1 i i 1 Resolution No.3643 Page 2 2 F. A Negative.Declaration has been prepared and recommended for 3 certification for this project in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA). 4 II. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council 5 approve General Plan Amendment 98-002 and Zone Change 98-008, amending the General Plan Land Use Designation of the subject property 6 from "Transportation" to "High Density Residential" and amending the 7 Zoning Designation of the subject parcel from "Unclassified" (U) to "Planned Development"(PD), as identified on Exhibit attached hereto. S 9 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, at a regular meeting on the 11th day.of January, 1999, 10 11 12 LESLIE A. PONTIOUS Chairperson 13 14 ELIZABETH A. BINSACK 15 Planning Commission Secretary 16 17 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) 1s COUNTY OF ORANGE ) CITY OF TUSTIN ) 19 I, ELIZABETH A. BINSACK,the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the Planning 20 Commission Secretary of the City of Tustin, California; that Resolution No. 3643 was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning 21 Commission,held on the 11th day of January, 1999. 22 23 ELIZABETH A. BINSACK 24 Planning Commission Secretary 25 26 27 28 29 27 TUSTIN SP ' C \ i ZONING DISTRICT: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT(PD) y GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: n HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL �1 a 0 � a co N / rn s 3a ti O� m I r ! s n A PORTION OF PARCEL 10 IN THE CITY OF.TUSTIN, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS DESCRIBED IN THE FINAL ORDER 'OF CONDEMNATION RECORDED ON AUGUST 16, 1954 IN BOOK 2793; PAGE 423 AND A PORTION OF PARCEL 4A PER FINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION RECORDED MAY 17, 1961 IN ' BOOK 5724, PAGE 681 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY, LYING a. SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE- rl BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEASTERLY TERMINUS OF THE CURVE DESCRIBED AS c HAVING A RADIUS OF 828.00 FEET IN PARCEL 72564-1 OF THE FINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION RECORDED ON MARCH 29, 1996 IN DOCUMENT NO. 19960153956 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY; THENCE CONTINUING EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 57.11 4 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3057107";THENCE NON-TANGENT TO SAID CURVE SOUTH 13°46'38" EAST 45.12 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NOW a TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 801.33 FEET, A RADIAL TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 41016'56° EAST; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND SOUTHERLY 438.50 FEET THROUGH A • CENTRAL ANGLE OF 31°21;11: TO THAT CERTAIN COURSE DESCRIBED AS "NORTH 49010'02° WEST 215.33 FEET' IN PARCEL 4A OF THE FINAL ORDER OF u CONDEMNATION RECORDED ON MAY 17, 1961 IN BOOK 5724, PAGE 681 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID �o ORANGE COUNTY. EXHIBIT A-- RESOLUTION No. 3643 Y O 1 , *port to the Planning Commission DATE: JANUARY 11, 1998 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 98-032 APPLICANT: STUART ANDERSON'S RESTAURANTS 4410 EL CAMINO REAL, SUITE#201 LOS ALTOS, CA '94022 PROPERTY OWNER: IRVINE RETAIL PROPERTIES CIO: DONAHUE SCHRIBER 2777 EL CAMINO REAL TUSTIN, CA 92782 LOCATION: 3030 EL CAMINO REAL J ZONING: EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN MIXED USE LAND USE DESIGNATION, .ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: THIS PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT (CLASS 11) PURSUANT TO SECTION 15311 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, REQUEST: AUTHORIZATION TO AMEND THE MASTER SIGN PROGRAM FOR THE TUSTIN MARKETPLACE TO ALLOW PAD TENANTS OCCUPYING A BUILDING OF AT LEAST 10,000 SQUARE FEET AS A SOLE TENANT TO HAVE AN`AGGREGATE TOTAL OF, UP TO 300 SQUARE FEET OF SIGNAGE, ALLOCATED AMONG UP TO FOUR ELEVATIONS WITH NO MORE THAN 150 SQUARE FEET ON ANY ONE ELEVATION. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 3646 approving Conditional Use Permit 98-032. Planning Commission Report . CUP 98-032 January 11, 1999 Page 2 BACKGROUND In September 1997, the Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit 97-010 by adopting Resolution No. 3545 for .the current Master Sign Plan for the Tustin Marketplace, located at the intersection of Jamboree Road and the 1-5 Santa Ana Freeway (see Location Map). The applicant is requesting an amendment to the Master Sign Plan to allow pad tenants that occupy a buildingof at least 10,000 square feet of floor area as a sole tenant to have an aggregate total of 300 square feet of signage and/or logos allocated as desired among up to four elevations, not to exceed 150 square feet on any one elevation (Attachment B). The site is within the East Tustin Specific Plan Mixed Use land use designation and all.signs on the property are regulated by the Master Sign Plan for the Tustin.Marketplace. Section 9403(h)(2)(e)of the Tustin City Code Sign Regulations allows flexibility for master sign plans with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Surrounding properties are developed withresidential uses to the north.and commercial uses to the;east, west and south. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AMENDMENT The applicant is proposing to amend Section C of the,"Sign Type Criteria for Tenant Signs"' section of the Tustin Marketplace Master Sign Program (see Attachment B). Pad tenants who occupy a building of at Ieast 10,000 square feet are allowed a maximum of 220 square feet total of sign copy area to be allocated among up to four building elevations, as desired (CUP 93-028). Sign copy includes actual text, closed line logos and figures, and open line designs. Multiple sign elements are allowed per elevation provided the maximum total sign copy area is not exceeded, as noted above. The amendment would authorize pad tenants who occupy a building of at least 10,000 square feet of floor area as a sole tenant to have a maximum of 300-square feet total of signage and/or logos. Signage would be allocated among up to four elevations as desired, but with a maximum of 1'50 square feet of sign area on any one elevation. The proposed amendment would apply throughout the Tustin Marketplace, however, the Black*Angus restaurant is the only pad tenant that would be able to make use of the proposed amendment. All other pad tenant- buildings are either occupied by multiple tenants or are smaller than 10,000 square feet in size (see Attachment C - Site Plan). I { Planning Commission Report CUP 98-032 January 11, 1999 Page 3 WALL SIGNS The existing signage is installed on three of the building elevations. The entry tower facing Jamboree Road currently has a neon "Cowboy, Fire, and Smoke" logo (16 square feet) installed between the columns with "Stuart.Anderson's" and "Black Angus" copy (total of 60 square feet) above and below the logo. There are two neon "Cow" logos totaling 64 square feet mounted on the side elevation facing EI Camino Real. On the rear elevation facing the parking area, there is currently"Black Angus" copy (28 square feet) and a neon "Cowboy, Fire,.and Smoke" logo (38 square feet), for a total of 206 square feet of signage for all elevations. Sign copy and logo area is calculated using regular geometric outlines around the logos or copy. The applicant is proposing to :remove the signage and logo on the entry elevation and replace them with a 36 square foot"Cowboy, Fire, and Smoke" logo mounted between the entry columns and "Black Angus" open channel letter sign copy (57 square feet) mounted above the logo on the fascia of the tower, for a total of two (2) sign elements on that elevation. Three bands of neon (ruby, purpie, and emerald) are also to be mounted along the upper-entry fascia, as 'is existing on the side columns and rear elevation (see • Attachment C.1 - Submitted Plans). The "Cow" logos on the side elevation are proposed to remain, and-a second open channel letter "Black Angus" sign of 57 square feet would be installed on the center of the-building elevation facing El Camino Real, for a total of three (3) sign elements on the elevation (see Attachment C.2 - Submitted Plans). The existing sign copy and iogo_on the rear elevation are proposed to remain as is (Attachment C.3 - Submitted Plans). The following table Iists the proposed changes: ELEVATION EXISTING AREA PROPOSED AREA ENTRY ELEVATION LOGO- 16 SF LOGO-36 SF COPY-60 SF COPY-57 SF SIDE ELEVATION LOGOS-64 SF TOTAL LOGOS-64 SF TOTAL COPY NONE COPY-57 SF REAR ELEVATION LOGO-38 SF LOGO-38 SF COPY-28 SF COPY-28 SF NEON BANDING SIDE AND REAR ' SIDE, REAR, ENTRY "TOTALS 206 SQUARE FEET 280 SQUARE FEET I Planning Commission Report CUP 98-032 .January 11, 1999 Page 4 ANALYSIS The proposed amendment to the Master Sign Plan meets the criteria as identified in TCC Section 9403h(2) in that: 1. The signs reflect a common theme, incorporating design elements, in terms of materials, letter styles, colors, illumination, sign'type and sign shape. The new wall signs utilize open channel letters, logos and, neon banding, as encouraged by the, existing,Master Sign Plan. 2. All of the new signs- utilize: materials, colors, and a design: motif which are compatible and reflect the special qualities of the architecture of the existing. buildings both in- daytime and nighttime settings. , The Tustin Marketplace encourages larger scale signage and distinctive designs that complement the multi;- colored ulti=colored stucco buildings. 3. Provisions of the proposed Master Sign Program may be less restrictive than the standards for' permanent business identification within the Tustin 'Sign Code provided.the center is greater than one acre in size. In determining whether to approve this Conditional Use Permit, the Planning Commission must determine whether or not .the Master Sign Plan will be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort and general welfare of the persons residing in or working in the neighborhood or whether it will'be injurious or detrimental to property or improvements in the vicinity or to the welfare of the City. A decision to approve this request may be-supported by-the following findings: 1. The Master Sign Program, as conditioned, wili not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort and general welfare of the persons residing in or working in the neighborhood of the use, nor will. it be injurious or detrimental to property or improvements in the vicinity or to the general welfare of the City in that: a) The new wall signage uses materials, colors, and styles complementary to existing signage and buildings within the Tustin Marketplace-, and, b) The signage allowed under the Master Sign Program uses materials, colors, and styles appropriate fora mixed-use commercial and entertainment center. i Planning Commission Report CUP 98-032 January 11, 1999 Page 5 c) Increased sign area for Pad Tenants occupying a building of at least 10,000 square feet as a sole.tenant is appropriate to reflect the size and scale of such a building and tenant within a mixed-use center.. f Ev ns Karen Peterson Asses nt PI n Acting Senior Planner BE:Cup98032pcneport.doc Attachments: A- Location Map B - Submitted Amendment to the Master Sign Plan C - Plans/Site Plan Resolution No. 3646 - ATTACHMENTA LOCATION MAP J !, -W LOCATION MAP rrr AII rl , . J � a o 1 I cr w 1 Lu � � m EL CAMINO REAL fV - • O - t ti� n o o � O O a LD � I n ix fi M1e�1 4 TUSTIN MARKET PLACE I SOUTH \�` � 1 r ` � 1 l 1 1 1 1 1 � 1 1 I I NA FREEWAY -—-_- Rr of wsnm 1 _ 1 1 j - NO SCALE ATTACHMENT SIGN PLAN AMENDMENT Tustin Market Place Sign Plan page 27 • Maximum allowable wall sign copy area per tenant shall be Iimited to that area which would be allowed for three building frontages; signs may, however, be placed on more than three tenant building elevations and allowable area may be allocated as desired among the building elevations providing that the copy area of any individual sign does not exceed the Iimits outlined in the above charts. Example: Double Bay Tenant With Four Building Elevations/North Village/Building A _ Area allowed for(3)elevations: 3 X 60 sq. ft. = 180 sq. ft. Possible allocations of 180 sq. ft. area among(4) elevations: • (4)signs @ 45 sq. ft. each or • (2) signs @ 60 sq. ff. and(2)signs @ 30 sq. ft. or • any combination up to 180 sq. ft. 2. Criteria for S' n Band Si ns • Sign placement shall adhere to the following margins: a. Horizontal Margin Up to 80%of the sign band length is available for sign lettering and figures. b. Vertical Margin Height of sign lettering and figures contained within the sign band shall be at Ieast 6 inches less than the height of the sign band. • Copy area of identification signs placed in sign band areas shall be limited only by the horizontal and vertical margin restrictions outlined above. C. Pad Tenant Identification Wall Signs (Exhibit 16) • copy to consist of tenant name and/or logo • 139 square feet maximum aggregate copy area per pad tenant allocated as desired among up to four building elevations O sign treatments, colors, typestyles and lighting to conform to"Design Guidelines for Tenant Signs"as outlined herein • *where Pad Tenants occupy a building of 10,000 square feet or more as a sole tenant, copy area up to 300 sq. ft. may be allocated among up to four elevations,not to exceed 150 sq. ft. on any one elevation. COOPER . grouP SYSICUS October 26, 1998 Community Development Dept. Tustin City Hall 15222 Del Amo Ave. Tustin, CA 92680 Regarding: Application for C.U.P. to amend the master sign plan for Tustin Market Place. To whom it may concern: Acting with consent and upon request of the owners, we submit the following for your approval. We are requesting approval of the following modification to the master sign plan for Tustin Market Place, subsection C, regarding Pad Tenants. The current sign plan copy reads: 139 square feet maximum aggregate copy area per pad tenant allocated as desired among up to four building elevations". We request the following text be added: Where Pad Tenants occupy a building of 10,000 square feet or more as a sole tenant, copy area up to 300 square feet may be allocated among up to four elevations, not to exceed 150 square feet on any one elevation. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely yours, THE COOPER GROUP ' J 1 Barry P. Coo 3375 Seocrest Drive/PO Box 2566,Codsbad,CA 92018 Phone 760-720-1495 Fax 720-2090 I Rl fd h- u— "' p �,� f Uhie�a vlvr p -�1 r,;—; —I!Er!f•f-._-.•.:'_:J'lC l Co.araln nh..-iu—:°9_! G'"i'.'. ._ ._. ;aur:9 .—.r�,1—'.•� _.—._,_ llio!f!iILiknrn.lllllll lowsii. ti F — D aGG!7!i;:...."iv C a+--••+C=:i �Ltiii'r.I:�J Cal.,PI 05!ij31 G!ii!J ' G!'' �I!5Fd7 ODS!F!cl!E!!c83e7` GflF! !al!L'!41!lFriyll!I!EGI!1111119 "r.C�aCl.r6 :7 o¢ cilnl Irl ,.J'7 :'M "!ll�EIFI!IIl!iliC� i9 . Q I!0 OR fl.J:! „ art —` r ra• c..,,,„ i /'• � I:,dlll_rnzlliill�IlGli9 � w cy 1 w ,M1"Mr:!I0 rrm�xranm m z A PILI NI) D:?II)fYt wJ D4JD!I19f1118!IlGil!C!?i!kIJ o � o GGFwDWluSi;.l�7 � @( �°° �}���,� �GFeliO Dirl!i:47 011191DJDIIIIII.''irlE�DIDI119110 I � a TM—i Ul r m ¢ ' !„1!IOWH.Ea,91lIJIE„'d4DJIIlD1911G11i5iII) w @I W _� S, 1 / ®V 141311(nf�OIDDIIIUIIIiIII!IYw5 GllIGGl1♦) 0 11- G _...,......,„ .y c1. L.._ o # `”- <Icc z Q Ed g [!t MI� [n rnn]mGm]namraurscL� I w aa1k4FE!I!ii7:=A °filQg ;� .si F�. P'I!! DIDIGiIG:'1�5ilii!DII!Gk!2110 i z w ma (/3 r "� :�iL DIGsIiD9lGlll3i 11511, i LU LU '3 -~' v V ' csLu r r r En L� NOSE;WIS IS A DESIGN CONCEPT FOR DELETIONS AND 37-0. ADDITIONS TO BLACKANGUS SIGNAGEAND GRAPHICS. 25',6• I— 6'-0' --� SHOP DRAWINGS WH ENGINEERING DETAILS TO BE SUBMITTED 0'-3'.— AS '-3'.—AS REQUIRED WUHAPPUCATTON FOR BUILDING PERMITS. 7n4TR+':tiq�r+ccf i F4 Li-} 17.0'(NEON) I� 20,,0. LOGO DETAIL(CO'NBOY,FIRE&SMOKE):UNITIZED ALUMINUM CHANNEL, 6'DEEP,FLAT FACE,WITH PAINTED GRAPHICS, COWBOY TO BE BLACK&WHITE,SMOKE GREY,FIRE YELLOW& RED.SKELETON NEON OVERLAY OF RUBY RED ON COWBOY AND EKISRNG ENTRANCE ELEVATION&SIGN 2 ''a I��':`iT��. FYING PAN,4500WHRE ON SMOKE,CLEAR RED,RUBY&LEMON YELLOW ON FIRE. RESTAURANTFM2ANCE ELEVATION THREE LINES OF SKELETON NEON BELOW LOGO TO BE MOUNTED A/ P_QSEp�EWGN.LOGO.ANp�E1 10 ALUMINUM CABINET,12'HIGH,9'DEEP. PAINT FACE BLACK. z NEON TO BE RUBY,PURPLE&EMERALD GREEN. PAINT ALL RETURNS AND BACKS PURPLE TO MATCH BUILDING - FRONT ELEVAIIONAEMRANCE, (DUNN EDWARDS W701 U). REMOVE EXISTING SIGN. THESE MODULES ARE INTENDED TO BE SELF CONTAINED WITH MFG.&INSTALL ONE SET NEW'BLACK ANGUS'OPEN SUPPORT AND ATTACHMENT 10 COLUMNS THROUGH BOTTOM CHANNEL LETTERS ON`NALL ABOVE. MFG.&INSTALL NEW LOGO(SEE DETAIL)AND NEON BANDING IRUBY,PURPLE&EMERALD,SAME AS EXISTING REAR ELEVATION AND SIDE COLUMNS). NOTE:THREE RANDS OF NEON AT TOP TO CONTINUE ON SIDES,AND NEON AT TOP OF COLUMNS TO CONTINUE ON OUTSIDE FACE OF EACH ISEE EXAMPLE OF PLAN VIEW BELOW). COLUMNS TOP rhe COME R. n PROJECT. STUART A14DERSONS BLACK ANGUS ��.J •O�� ACORES S:TUSTIN MARKETPLACE,TUSTIN.CA CONTACT. BARRYCOOPER ...oiaur,aEn E'Ia7EM5 PAGE 1 of 3 FILE:BATmtfn OWG#60705 DATE:JULY5,1995 LATEST REVISION:027198 3375 GEACREGT DR.7PO.BOX 2566 CARLSBAD.CA 92006PHONE: 760 720.-1115 FAX: 760 720 2090 r •r• r rr- r "r O 199798 The Cooper Group CENTER SIGN BETWEEN TOP OF PARAPET AND TOP OF SERVICE YARD ENCLOSURE / NMRE RETURNS �` PURPLE INSIDE ' ., 'tel IDEYAW PROPOSED NEW SGGN-MFG.&WSTALL ONE SET'BLACKANGUS'OPEN CHNL LTRS xixN.l NOTE: PHOTO PRINTED DARK,SO LIGHT COLOR BACKGROUND WAS ADDED BEHIND SIGN SIMPLY TO SHUN MORE ACCURATE CONTRAST AND COLOR REPRESENTATION. CLEAR RED NEON CHANNEL LETTER TYPICAL: OPEN PAN CHANNEL,2-112'DEER EXPOSED SINGLE AND DOUBLE TUBE CLEAR RED NEON.15MM,30MA, PAINT INSIDE OF LETTERS SEMI-GLOSS PURPLE,DUNN EDWARDS W701 U. PAINT OUTSIDE/RETURNS WHITE. REMOTE TRANSFORMERS BEHIND WALL. ----- — -- - --- 25'-6' -- - sTs �7tYwvy I 7 . - r�'aS. ' #>'e•,��.y.'�y s"1'�q ti (�r',ti#;� gy +T '" Vlkl" Nx, hxS„"tL" ; tt 5.�. s'll'�Cw�'. 'y�'"' v:J.au.,.N.u.i,. k SfgLls:4'ar1 ,T MFG.&INSIAU-02E.N_CIVL.11-RS-2_1(2D;EP.-EXPC)SEONEON.-SINGLEANP_DO-UBLE TUBE CLEAR RED_1SMM AN. the, COOPER PROJECT: STUARTANDERSON'SIBLACKANGUS �9Oup ADDRESS:TUS71N MARKET PLACE,TUSTIN,CA N CONTACT,.BARRY000PER 6roruoeauaemi4 MUM PAGE 2 o13 FILE:BATuelin DING00705 DATE:JULYS,1966 LATEST REVISION:6/17196 3375GEACHEGT DRJP.0.BOX2556 CARLSBAU,CA 92008 PHONE: 760 720-1495 FAX: 760 720.2000 r r r r rr- •Q 1997.96 fie Cooper Group SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGES TO EXTERIOR SIGN AND GRAPHICS PACKAGE I - 25'-6' Trwr. ,..,,.BLACK ANGUS TWO NEW SIGNS PROPOSED,ONE EACH FOR 'BLACK ANGUS'applox.57.4 sq.11. SIDE ELEVATION AND ENTRY ELEVATION. �1! INTTN LQQQ ANP SIGN COPY-(COPV 60 37 S9,Fes, LOGO 16.27 S9 F1'TO BE RFMOVEDI. NEW COPY TO BE 57.4 SQ FL.LOGO 36 S9 FT 6'-0' 1 Cowboy logo approx.36 sqA. r• -`` /' _ ASGI I i. �sv NEW GRAPHICULOGO PROPOSED FOR ENTRANCE ELEVATION SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONS: EXISTING SIGN COPY=88.87 EXISTING GRAPHICS=117.89 REMOVE SIGN COPY -60_37 REMOVE GRAPHICS .16.27 EXISTING TO REMAIN=28.50 EXISTING TO REMAIN=101.62 NEW SIGN COPY +114.80 NEW GRAPHICS + 36_00 TOTAL SIGN COPY 143.30 TOTAL GRAPHICS 137.62 •r� .-.. L,7,; - c.i.t,�ice,>:.�:l�;:r:s•'i7.aVs ►i ' TOTAL COMBINED COPY AND GRAPHICS TO BE 280.92 EXISTING SIDE ELEVA17O`N WDM TWO'COW GRAPHICS.32.06 S9.FL EACH. NEW SIGN COPY TO BE ADDED OF 57.4 SQ FT. COLOR PALETTE FOR BUILDING AND SIGNS: 21r f i ti PURPLE: DUNN ED'NARDSW701U ALL FOLLOWING COLORS ARE BY FRAZEE: `(f la ss,.y 1 T k y MED.BROWN: 4354D APPLE CIDER F�." �i} ?aleµ t ''�, '�. .w�•T+ f�5 "T l,_., a3.p LT,BROWN: 4353M TEAKWOOD T"' I "�""k ' ""�""' •`!'~ -� PINK: 41 BSA GERANIUM BLACK: 6436N CHARCOAL --WHITE: 6620W WHITE WHILE - GRAY: 6433M SWAN GRAY RED: 6355R CHERRY YELLOW: 4565Y ZINNIA the COOPER PROJECT:STUARTANOERBONB BLACK ANGUB FX1SLIlLC'SfG()(-Q-[Y�EA(�a'E✓AT70N' BLEL�SbP1G�fS-12'LfRS SHRNW- APA7C�Y.28'-6'. -9 r I"Oull ADDRESS:TUSTIN MARKET PLACE,TUSTIN,CA AND LpGO GRAP171CS OF 37.55 62 FT TO RFMNN AS IS. a� CONTACT. BARRYCOOPER sprutaeeuormuo srsnm PAGE 3 of 3 FILE:BATuslin DWG#60705 DATE:JULYS,MOB LATEST REVISION:W7198 3375 SEACREST DR./P,O.BO%2566 GARLSBAO,CA 92DOB PHONE:760 •720-1495 FAX:760 720.2090 r• r r •� -r �r r �- • X. 0 1997-98 the Cocger Gap ATTACHMENT D RESOLUTION NO. 3646 RESOLUTION NO. 3646 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY-OF 02 TUSTIN APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 98-032 TO AMEND THE MASTER SIGN PROGRAM FOR THE TUSTIN MARKETPLACE TO 3 ALLOW FOR PAD TENANTS WHO OCCUPY BUILDING OF AT LEAST 10,000 SQUARE FEET AS A SOLE TENANT TO HAVE UP TO 300 4 SQUARE FEET OF WALL SIGNAGE ALLOCATED AMONG UP TO FOUR ELEVATIONS AS DESIRED WITH A MAXIMUM OF 150 SQUARE FEET s OF SIGNAGE ON ANY ONE ELEVATION. 6 The Planning Commission does hereby resolve as follows: 7 I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: 8 A. That a proper application, Conditional Use Permit 98-032, was filed by The 9 Cooper Group and Stuart Anderson's Restaurants on behalf of Irvine Retail . 10 Properties requesting approval of an amendment to the Master Sign Plan for the Tustin Marketplace to allow pad tenants occupying.a building of at 11 least 10,000 square feet of.floor areaas a sole tenant to have up to 300 12 square feet of signage allocated among up to four elevations as desired with a maximum of 150 square feet of signage on anyone elevation. . 13 r B. That a master sign plan less restrictive than the sign code is allowed 14 pursuant to Tustin City Code Section 9403(H)(2)(e) with the approval of a • is Conditional Use Permit. 16 C. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and.held for said application 17 on January 11, 1999 by the Planning Commission. 18 D. Pursuant to Sign Code Section 9403h(2), the request to amend the master sign plan can be supported by the following findings: 19 20 1. The signs reflect a common theme; incorporating design elements in terms of materials, letter styles, colors, illumination, sign type and 21 sign shape. The new wall signs utilize open channel, letters, logos 22 and neon banding, as encouraged by the existing Master Sign Plan. 23 2. All of the new signs utilize materials,colors, and a design motif which are compatible and which reflect the special qualities of the 24 architecture of the existing buildings both in daytime and nighttime 25 settings. The Tustin Marketplace encourages larger scale signage and distinctive designs that complement the multi-colored stucco 26 buildings. 27 3. Provisions of the proposed Master Sign Program. may be less 28 restrictive than the standards for permanent business identification 929 within the Tustin Sign Code provided the center is greater than one � - Resolution No. 3646 1 Page 2 acre in size. 2 4. - The Master Sign Program, as conditioned, will not be detrimental to 3 the' health, safety, ' morals, comfort and general welfare of the 4 persons residing in or working in the neighborhood of the use, nor will,it be injurious or detrimental to property or improvements in the 5 vicinity or to the general welfare of the City in that: 6 a) The new wall signage uses materials, colors, and styles 7 complementary to existing signage and buildings within the Tustin Marketplace;and, s 9 b) The signage allowed under the Master Sign Program uses materials, colors, and styles appropriate for a mixed-use 10 commercial and entertainment center. 11 c) Increased sign area for Pad Tenants occupying a building of 12 at least 10,000 square feet as a sole tenant is appropriate to reflect the size and scale of such a building and tenant within 13 a mixed-use center. 14 E. That this project is categorically exempt -pursuant to Class 11, Section 15 15311 of the California Environmental Quality Act. 16 IL The Planning Commission hereby approves CUP 98-032 for an amendment to the 17 Master Sign Program for the Tustin Marketplace allowing pad tenants that occupy at least 10,000 square feet of building space as a sole tenant to have up to 300 1s square feet of wall signage allocated among up to four elevations as desired, with 19 a maximum of 150 square feet of signage on any one elevation, subject to the. conditions contained in Exhibit A, attached hereto. 20 zi PASSED AND'ADOPTED by the Planning'Commission of the City of Tustin, at a regular meeting on the 11th day of January, 1999. 22 23 24 LESLIE PONTIOUS Chairperson 25 26 27 ELIZABETH A. BINSACK Planning Commission Secretary 2s 29 Resolution No. 3646 I Page 3 02 i STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) 3 CITY OF TUSTIN 4 I, ELIZABETH A. BINSACK, the undersigned, hereby certify that I .am the Planning 5 Commission Secretary of the Planning Commission of the "City of Tustin, California; that 6 Resolution No. 3646 was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission, held on the 11thday of January, 1999. 7 s • ELIZABETH A. BINSACK 9 Planning Commission Secretary 10 11 12 I3 I4 • 15 - I6 k 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 29 29 1 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 98-032 2 - CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESOLUTION NO. 3646 3 GENERAL 4 5 (1) 1.1 The proposed signs shall substantially conform with the submitted plans for the project date stamped January 11, 1999, on file with the Community 6 Development Department,except as herein modified, or as modified by the Director of Community Development in accordance with this Exhibit. The Director of Community Development may also approve minor modifications 8 to plans during plan check if such modifications are to be consistent with the provisions of the Tustin City Code and other applicable codes. 9 to (1) 1.2 Unless otherwise specified, the conditions contained in this Exhibit shall be complied with as specified or prior to the issuance of any building permits 11 for the project, subject to review and approval by the Community Development Department. 12 13 (1) 1.3 The subject.project approval shall become null and void unless permits are issued within twelve (12) months of the date of this Exhibit and substantial . 14 construction is underway. Time extensions may -be granted if a written 15 request is received by the Community Development Department within thirty(30) days prior to expiration. 16 (1) 1.4 Approval of Conditional Use Permit 98-032 is contingent upon the applicant " and property owner signing -and returning an "Agreement to Conditions 18 Imposed"form as established by the Director of Community Development. 19 (1) 1.5 The applicant shall hold harmless and defend the City of Tustin from all 20 claims and liabilities arising out of a challenge of the City's approval for this project. 21 1.6 All:signs shall be maintained in proper operating order at all times. If the 22 City becomes aware of any lighting or signs that are not operable, the 23 applicant shall be responsible for making appropriate repairs within 72 - hours of being notified by the City. The entire sign shall not be illuminated 24 until such repairs are completed. 25 26 SOURCE CODES 21 (1) STANDARD CONDITION (5) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY (2) CEQA MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS 28 (3) UNIFORM BUILDINGCODEIS (6) LANDSCAPING GUIDELINES (4) DESIGN REVIEW (7) �PCICC POLICY 29 *** EXCEPTIONS • i Exhibit A-Conditions of Approval Cup 98-032 z Page 2 3 SIGNS 4 (1) 2.1 All signs shall comply with the applicable provisions of the Uniform Building 5 Code and the National Electrical Code as adopted by the City (including UL -approvals). 6 (1) 2.2 All signs, including any change of copy, require review and approval by the 7 Community Development Department prior to installation. Permits shall be 8 required for all signs. 9 (5) 2.3 All signs shall conform to the City of Tustin Sign Code and the Tustin 10 Marketplace Master Sign Program including window signs, which shall not exceed 15% of the glass area upon which the sign is located. (5) 2.4 All signs and their supporting structures shall be enclosed,structurally safe, 12 and maintained in good condition and shall comply with the most current 13 -Uniform Building Codes, as locally amended. 1014 (5) 2.5 All types of signs prohibited pursuant to 'Tustin City code Section , 9404(A)(1), such as aerial signs, animated signs, audible signs, beacons, 15 festoons, flashing or moving signs, Iight bulb strings, roof mounted signs, 16 and projecting signs, are not permitted. 17 PLAN SUBMITTAL 16 (5) 3.1 Three (3) sets of construction"level plans with necessary, specifications, 19 and details prepared in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, and other related Codes, City Ordinances, and state and federal laws and zo regulations:shaIl be submitted for review and approval by the Community 21 Development Department. Compliance with, approved plans shall be inspected by the Community Development Department during construction zz and prior to final inspection. 23 FEES 24 (1) 4.1 Prior to issuance of any building permits, all payments shall be made of.all 25 applicable fees including the building division and sign permit fees,. 26 including but not limited to the following. Payment shall,be required based upon those rates in effect at the time of payment and are subject to change: 27 �28 A) Building plan check and permit fees to - .the Community, Development Department based on the most current schedule. 29 i I Exhibit A-Conditions of Approval • 2 Cup.98-032 Page 3 3 (1) 4.2 Within forty-eight(48) hours of approval of the subject project; the applicant 4 shall deliver to the Community Development Department, a cashier's check 5 payable to the COUNTY CLERK in the amount of $38.00 (thirty eight dollars)' to enable the City . to file the appropriate environmental 6 documentation for the project. If within such forty-eight(48) hour period.that applicant has not delivered to the Community Development Department the above-noted check, the statute of limitations for any interested party to s challenge the environmental determination under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act could be significantly lengthened. 9 10 11 12 13 14 16 I7 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 29 29 ITEM #5 .09port to the aUST� Planning Commission f DATE: JANUARY 11, 1998 SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA, JANUARY 5, 1998 PRESENTATION: ELIZABETH A. BINSACK, DIRECTOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ATTACHMENT: CITY COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA-JANUARY 5, 1998 ACTION AGENDA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING JANUARY 5, 1999 7:03 P.M. CALL TO ORDER GIVEN BY INVOCATION . Mr. Bill Stevens, Salvation Army Church WORLEY PRESENTED PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Cub Scout Pack 217, Den 1 COLORS ALL PRESENT ROLL CALL PUBLIC INPUT 1RWIN GROSS- COMPLAINED ABOUT COMMERCIAL NUISANCES ADJACENT TO HIS HOME, DISPLAYED BAGS OF TRASH COLLECTED FROM OUTSIDE THE COMMERCIAL DUMPSTERS, AND REPORTED NOISE VIOLATIONS COMMITTED BY NATIONAL RAIN 'GUTTER JASON SOIFER: NOTED EXCESSIVE CONCENTRATION OF LIQUOR SALE ESTABLISHMENTS IN THE WALNUT AVENUE AREA PUBLIC HEARING ( ITEMS 1 THROUGH 3 ) DENIED I. ZONE CHANGE 98-002, AMENDMENT TO THE OFFICIAL ZONE CHANGE` TUSTIN ZONING MAP APPLYING THE CULTURAL 98-002 RESOURCE OVERLAY DISTRICT TO THE PROPERTIES {4-0 MD AB} SHOWN IN ATTACHMENT A OF SUBJECT REPORT Zone Change,98-002 is a proposal to expand the Cultural Resource Overlay District to include the residentially zoned properties on'Mountain View Drive, "A" Street, "B" Street and "C" Street between First Street and Irvine Boulevard. Recommendation by the Community Development Department: 1—Open and close the Public Hearing. F Action Agenda — City Council January 5, 1999— Page 1 2. Adopt the following Resolution No. 99-1 approving the environmental determination for the project: RESOLUTION NO. 99-1 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE FiNAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION-AS- ADEQUATE FOR ZONE CHANGE 98-002 INCLUDING REQUIRED FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT 3. Have first reading by title only and introduction of the following Ordinance No. 1205 approving Zone Change 98-002: ORDINANCE NO. 1205 — AN ORDINANCE OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE 98.002 TO AMEND THE OFFICIAL TUSTIN ZONING MAP AND APPLY THE CULTURAL RESOURCE OVERLAY DISTRICT TO THE PROPERTIES SHOWN IN EXHIBIT A.OF ORDINANCE NO. 1205 ADOPTED 2. ZONE CHANGE 98-003 AND CONDITIONAL USE RESOLUTION NOS. 99.6 PERMIT 98-028 (APPLICANT: DR. DiANE CRAIG,AND 99-6 VETERINARY SPECIALTY ASSOCIATES) Zone Change 98-003 is a request to amend the INTRODUCED Jamboree Plaza Planned Community District ORDINANCE N0. 1209 Regulations to list Veterinary Specialty Clinics as conditionally permitted uses within Planning Area D of Jamboree -Plaza and to establish . parking ratios for medical uses. Conditional Use Permit 98-028 Is a request to establish a Veterinary Specialty Clinic in Building 22 of Jamboree Plaza located at 2965 Edinger Avenue adjacent-to the proposed Commuter Rail Station. Recommendation by the Community Development Department: I. Open and close the Public Hearing. 2. Adopt the following Resolution No. 99-5 approving the environmental determination for the project: RESOLUTION NO. 99-5 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, •. CERTIFYING THE FINAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION AS Action Agenda —City Council January 5, 1999 — Page 2 ADEQUATE FOR ZONE CHANGE 98-003 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 98-028 AS REQUIRED BY THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT 4D 3. Have first reading by title only and introduction of the following Ordinance No. 1209: ORDINANCE NO. 1209 — AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE 98-003 AMENDING THE JAMBOREE PLAZA DISTRICT REGULATIONS TO DESIGNATE VETERINARY SPECIALTY CLINICS AS CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USES AND ESTABLISH PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR MEDICAL USES 4. Adopt the following Resolution No. 99-6 approving Conditional Use Permit 98-028: RESOLUTION NO. 99-6 - A RESOLUTION OF THE-CITY COUNCIL OF- THE , CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, . APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 98-028 TO ESTABLISH A , VETERINARY SPECIALTY CLINIC AT 2965 EDINGER AVENUE (JAMBOREE PLAZA) CONTINUED 3. GENERAL PLA TO 1/19 N AMENDMENT 98-002 AND ZONE CHANGE 98-005 (APPLICANT: MR. -ELMER TIEDJE, MEETING TUSTIN VILLAGE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION) General Plan Amendment 98-002 and Zone Change 98- 005 are requests to amend the General Plan Land Use. Designation and Zoning District of a .5 acre parcel of abandoned Caltrans. freeway right-of-way that was acquired by the Tustin Village Townhomes Community Association. Recommendation: Continue this item to the January 19, 1999 City Council meeting as recommended by the Community Development Department. CONSENT CALENDAR ( ITEMS 4 THROUGH 15 ) APPROVED 4. APPROVAL ' OF MINUTES -- DECEMBER 7, 1998 REGULAR MEETING Recommendation: Approve the City Council Minutes of • December 7, 1998. Action Agenda —City Council January 5, 1999 — Page 3 APPROVED 5. APPROVAL OF DEMANDS AND RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL Recommendation: Approve Demands in the amount of $2,091,094.12 and ratify Payroll' in the amount of $732,785.63. RATIFIED 6. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION AGENDA DECEMBER 14, 1998 All actions of the Planning Commission become final unless appealed by the City Council or member of the public. Recommendation: Ratify the Planning Commission Action-Agenda of December 14, 1998. APPROVED 7. AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE. CITY AND HASSETT & DAVIS ENTERTAINMENT (TILLER DAYS/STREET FAIR RIDES AND CONCESSIONS) Recommendation: Approve Amendment No. 2 to subject Agreement between the City and Hassett & Davis Entertainment, Inc. as recommended by Parks and Recreation Services. RECEIVED 8. JOHN WAYNE AiRPORT NOISE ABATEMENT - AND FILED QUARTERLY REPORTS Recommendation: Receive and file subject report as recommended by the Community Development Department. APPROVED 9. AMENDMENT TO 'MASTER FEE RESOLUTION AND FACILITY USE POLICIES Recommendation: Amend the Master Fee Resolution and Facility Use Policies as identified in Appendices A and B of subject report as recommended by the Parks and Recreation Commission. ADOPTED 10. RESOLUTION NO. 99-8 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY RESOLUTION COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, NO. 99-8 ACCEPTING THE WORKS OF IMPROVEMENT AND AUTHORIZING RECORDATION OF NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE MAIN STREET DEMOL'iTION PROJECT (PROJECT NO. 6001.08) Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 99-8 accepting said work and authorizing the .recordation of the Notice of Completion and direct the City Clerk to: (1) Release the Labor and Materials Bond not sooner than thirty-five (35) days after the date of recordation of the Notice of Completion, and (2) Release the Faithful Performance Action Agenda — City-Council January 5, 1999 — Page 4 Bond not sooner than one year after the date of recordation of the Notice of , Completion as recommended by the Public Works Department/Wate Division. . APPROVED I!. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT BOARD .OF DIRECTORS APPOINTMENTS Recommendation: Appoint Mayor Saltarelli as the City of Tustin representative to the Orange County Sanitation District Board of Directors and appoint Councilmember Potts as alternate representative as recommended by the City Clerk's Office. APPROVED 12. QUITCLAIM OF - CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AND PORTIONS OF THE SLOPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT ALONG JAMBOREE ROAD Recommendation: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute subject Quitclaim Deeds identified as follows: (1) Temporary construction easement for the construction of Jamboree Road along the easterly side from approximately 2800 feet northerly of Tustin Ranch Road to approximately 1800 feet northerly of the City of Tustin/City of Orange boundary, and (2) Portions of the slope maintenance easement along the easterly side of Jamboree Road from approximately 1500 feet northerly of Patriot Way to the northerly City limits as recommended by the ' Public Works Department/ Engineering Division. APPROVED 13. CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR DESIGN OF PASADENA AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION BETWEEN THE FIRST STREET CUL-DE-SAC AND THE MAIN STREET CUL-DE-SAC (CIP NO. 700.157) AND SECOND STREET RECONSTRUCTION BETWEEN PASADENA AVENUE AND MYRTLE STREET (CIP NO. 700158) Recommendation: Approve Consultant, Services Agreement with Berryman and Henigar to provide design related services for Pasadena Avenue. Reconstruction (CIP No. 700157) and Second Street Reconstruction (CIP No. 700158) for a not-to-exceed fee of $42,082.00 and authorize execution of the Consultant Services Agreement by the Mayor and City Clerk subject to approval by the City Attorney as recommended by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division. APPROVED 14. AMENDMENT TO THE SAN DIEGO CREEK/UPPER NEWPORT BAY WATERSHED COOPERATIVE Action Agenda —City Council January 5, 1999— Page 5 AGREEMENT AND THE NEWPORT BAY/SAN DIEGO CREEK WATERSHED SEDIMENT CONTROL MONITORING AND IN-CHANNEL MAINTENANCE PROGRAM COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT-(D98-034). Recommendation: Approve the "Second Amendment to Cooperative Agreement San Diego Creek/Upper Newport Bay Watershed" along with the "Cooperative Agreement Newport Bay/San Diego Creek Watershed Sediment Control Monitoring and In-Channel Maintenance Program" and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute subject agreements as recommended *by the Public Works Department/Engineering Division. APPROVED 15. APPROVAL OF CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES FOR PEPPERTREE PARK AND MAGNOLIA TREE PARK RENOVATION (CIP NO. 400039 AND 400035) Recommendation: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a Consultant Services Agreement with the firm of Purkiss Rose-RSI for Architectural Services for Peppertree Park and Magnolia Tree Park renovation in the amount of $64,195.00 as recommended by Parks and Recreation Services. REGULAR BUSINESS ( ITEM 16 ) ADOPTED 16. ORDINANCE NO. 1208, ZONE CHANGE 98-004 ORDINANCE (APPLICANT: WARMINGTON HOMES) NO. x.208 Ordinance No. 1208 had first reading by title only and introduction at the December 7, 1998 City Council meeting. Recommendation by the City Clerk's office: Have second reading 'by title only of Ordinance No. 1208. 2. With a roll call vote, adopt the following Ordinance No. 1208: ORDINANCE -NO. 1208 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY ` OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE 98.004 TO CHANGE THE ZONING FROM MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-3) AND CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT (C-2P) TO PLANNED COMMUNITY (PC) Action Agenda —City Council January 5, igg9-- Page 6 AND ESTABLISH PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT REGULATIONS ON THE PROPERTIES KNOWN A. 120-250 SIXTH STREET AND 715-765 EL CAMINO REAL AND DESCRIBED AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 401-642-04 OF TRACT 15707 NONE PUBLIC INPUT OTHER BUSINESS / COMMITTEE REPORTS DOYLE: REQUESTED , THE O.C. FIRE AUTHORITY ATTEND THE 1/19 MEETING AND PROVIDE COUNCIL WITH AN UPDATE ON THE PAID CALL FIREFIGHTER PROGRAM REPORTED ONE OF HIS CUSTOMERS, ARTURO, HAD DONATED 100 DOZEN TAMALES, WHICH WERE _ DISTRIBUTED TO THE COMMUNITY THROUGH THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, AND REQUESTED A PROCLAMATION BE AWARDED WORLEY: REPORTED FORMER CITY EMPLOYEE, CHRISTINE CARPENTER, HAD BEEN INVOLVED IN , THE COLUMBIA SHIP ACCIDENT AT DISNEYLAND SUGGESTED A NEW YEARS EVE 2000 MILLENNIUM PARTY BE HELD IN TUSTIN AND REQUESTED THE SUBJECT BE AGENDIZED ON 1/19 POTTS: WISHED EVERYONE A SUCCESSFUL NEW YEAR THOMAS. CONVEYED-NEW YEAR GOOD WISHES TO EVERYONE COMMENTED ON . MEDIA HYPE SURROUNDING THE MILLENNIUM AND Y2K WARNINGS, SUGGESTED TUSTIN NOT JOIN THE HYPE, AND EXPRESSED SUBDUED SUPPORT FOR A MILLENNIUM CELEBRATION REPORTED HE HAD MADE DONATIONS TO THE O.C. RESCUE MISSION DURING THE HOLIDAYS, THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE MISSION HAD PERSONALLY PICKED UP THE ITEMS BECAUSE THE NEED WAS GREAT, AND ENCOURAGED EVERYONE TO ' GIVE GENEROUSLY DURING THE HOLIDAY SEASON Action Agenda —City Council January 5, 1999-- Page 7 THOMAS: EXPRESSED DISPLEASURE WITH THE CITY OF IRVINE FOR CLOSING BRYAN AVENUE AND iFAILING TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE NOTICE TO TUSTIN. COUNCIL DISCUSSION ' FOLLOWED REGARDING WORKING RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CITY OF IRVINE SALTARELLI: WISHED EVERYONE A HAPPY NEW YEAR REPORTED THAT COL. BILL HAMMERLEE'S FATHER- HAD UNEXPECTEDLY DIED DURING THE HOLIDAYS AND REQUESTED ADJOURNMENT IN HIS MEMORY NONE CLOSED SESSION - None 8:3.2 P.M. ADJOURNMENT - The City Council has scheduled a joint IN MEMORY OF meeting-with the Audit Committee on Tuesday, January 19, COL. BILL 1999, at 5:30 p.m. in the Community Center; and the next 'HAMMERLEE'S regular meeting of the City Council is scheduled for Tuesday, FATHER January 19, 1999, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at 300 Centennial Way: r Action Agenda --City Council January 5, 1999— Page 8 i, ACTION AGENDA REGULAR MEETING OF THE TUSTIN COMMUNITY REDEVEILOPMENT�AGENCY JANUARY 5, 1999 8:12 P.M. CALL TO ORDER ALL PRESENT ROLL CALL REGULAR BUSINESS ( ITEMS 1 THROUGH 2 ) APPROVED 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - DECEMBER 7, 1998 REGULAR MEETING, Recommendation: Approve the Redevelopment Agency. Minutes of December 7, 1998. APPROVED 2. APPROVAL OF DEMANDS Recommendation: Approve Demands in the amount of $137,036.64. OTHER BUSINESS �'- POTTS: COMMENDED COL. BILL HAMMERLEE FOR HIS CONTRIBUTION TO THE MARINE CORPS AND THE COMMUNITY SALTARELLI: REPORTED THAT HE HAD SPOKEN WITH COL. HAMMERL'EE REGARDING THE FAMILY'S LOSS NONE CLOSED SESSION None 8:14 P.M. ADJOURNMENT - The next regular meeting of the Redevelopment Agency is scheduled for Tuesday, January 19, 1999, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at 300 Centennial Way. Action Agenda—Redevelopment Agency January 5, 1999—Page I