HomeMy WebLinkAboutZA REPORT ATE: DECEMBER 3, 1996 Inter--COM
TO: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96.-037
DESIGN REVIEW 96-051
APPLICANT: C.'L. BURNETT
PLAZA PROPERTIES, LLC
13031 NEWPORT -AVENUE, SUITE 200
TUSTIN, CA 92780
LANDOWNER: SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY
C. SCOTT BERM, SOUTHERN PACIFICREAL -ESTATE
1200• CORPORATE CENTER .DRIVE, SUITE 100
MONTEREY- PARK, .CA 91754
LOCATION: VACANT PARCEL TO THE NORTH OF 13031 NEWPORT AVENUE
AND TO THE WEST OF 1.2901.-1:2943 NEWPORT ,AVENUE
iZONING: MULT�PLE FAMILY. RESIDENTIAL (R-3)
ENVIRONMENTAL THIS PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT (SECTION
. STATUS: - 15311, CLASS 11) PURSUANT TO THE —CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL .QUALITY ACT
REQUEST: ESTABLISHMENT OF A COMMERCIAL PARKING -LOT IN A 50'
BY 314' PORTION OF AN ABANDONED RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-
WAY LOCATED IN THE MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-
.3) ZONING DISTRICT
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Zoning Administrator Action 96-011'.approving Conditional Use'
Permit 96-037. and. Design Review 9.6-051 .,
BACKGROUND & DISCUSSION
The` applicant , is requesting authorization to establish a= parking
lot in a vaaaizt' 501 by 3141` portion of an' abandoned•railroadright r
`• .- f �
of-way located to, the north`_of the Plaza La• Fayette shopping•"center ,, ,,
at- 13031- Newport Avenue and to� the ' wedt of-'L "the.-; Wood, :Crest'.:
Apartments:,.at , 12901-12943 Newport Avenue: The -parkizig• lot; would.:
serve the . existing shopping center. The,'° subject site;
Multiple Family Residential (R-3)'. The. proposed use; wYieii"`adjac.en
to,a commercial district, is permitted in the- R.-3- District" subject ~ -
Zoning Administrator Report
Conditional Use Permit 96-037
Design Review 96•-051
December 3 , 1996
Page 2
to a Conditional Use Permit (City Code Sections 9226 (a) (1) ;
9225 (a) (1) and 9223 (b) (4) ) .
The project is located in the Town Center Redevelopment area;
therefore, final design review, approval rests with the
Redevelopment Agency. However, City Code Section 9299 (b). (3) (c)
grants authority to the Zoning Administrator to approve Design
Review applications within the City' s Redevelopment Areas in lieu
of the Redevelopment Agency.- -
Site and Surroundincr Properties '
The vacant parcel is 15, 700 square feet in size and is located
directly north of the northwest portion of the Plaza LaFayette
shopping center. Surrounding land uses, include- multiple family
residential to the east and west, the existing Plaza LaFayette
shopping center rear parking area to the south, and the remaining
portion of" the abandoned railroad -right-of-way to the north. - The
site is bordered by County unincorporated land to the. north and
east .
Prosect Description
r
The applicant proposes to ' expand the existing shopping center
parking lot to include the vacant parcel . Given the distance from ,
the proposed parking spaces -to the tenant locations in the shopping
center, the parking spaces will be reserved for employee and/or
valet parking only. * No customer parking is proposed in the parking
lot expansion area.
According to the applicant, additional parking is needed based on"
current parking demand at the shopping center. The shopping center
was constructed in 1986 . In 1988, the Planning Commission approved
Variance 88--05 to allow Plaza Lafayette to deviate from the Tustin
City Code parking requirements to accommodate the establishment of
three restaurant tenant spaces having a total of 337• seats. A
second' Variance, No. 95-011, was approved to accommodate the
establishment of a fourth restaurant . - The two variances have
resulted in a reduction of required parking spaces in the shopping
center from 327 spaces to 241 spaces.
Zoning Administrator Report
Conditional. Use Permit 96-037
' Design Review 96-051
December 3 , 1996
Page 3
Condition 6 . 18 of Planning Commission Resolution No. 3413 (Variance
No. 95--011) states that if a parking and/or traffic problem exists
at the shopping center as a result of insufficient on-site parking
availability, the City may -require the property owner to submit an
updated parking demand analysis and/or traffic study. If said
study .indicates that there is a problem, the property owner shall
be required to provide additional mitigation measures approved by .
the City. One of the mitigation measures requires the provision of
additional parking as needed, up to the minimum number required for
the aggregate of shopping center uses ,pursuant to Zoning Code
standards, by purchase and/or lease of property within 500 feet of
the property or provision of the needed parking on site.
The City has not required the property owner to update the parking
analysis or traf tic study or provide additional parking at this
time. Instead, the property owner is making a proactive effort to
satisfy parking demand by providing additional "on-site" parking
spaces .
The. proposed parking lot expansion area, as conditioned, will
accommodate approximately 36 vehicles . The actual number will be
determined at plan check. The parking spaces in the expansion area
are proposed to be compact spaces that are eight feet in width and
17.5 feet in length plus a 2 . 5 feet - overhang area. Because the
proposed parking spaces will be 'considered excess parking spaces,
all of the spaces are permitted to be developed as compact spaces .
Landscaping will not be required within the parking lot expansion
area because the area is isolated from the remainder of the
shopping- center and will only be used by shopping center business
owners and employees . Further, the width of- the property and .the_ ,
parking lot layout would not provide adequate planter. width to
plant trees. The isolated location - would create maintenance
, concerns with only ground cover and shrubs planted'
Discussion
In determining whether to approve a Conditional Use 'Permit, the ,
Zoning . Administrator must- determine . whether or not - - the
establishment, maintenance or operation of the subject , use is
detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort or general
welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood of. ,
the subject site and secondly, whether it - will be injurious or
detrimental to property and improvements in the neighborhood or the
general welfare of the City.
r
Zoning Administrator Report
Conditional Use Permit 96-037
Design Review 96-051
December 3, 1996
Page 4
The proposed use, as conditioned, will be compatible with the
surrounding community. Condition No. 3 .5 requires that - the
proposed site be used as a parking lot for employee and/or valet
parking only. This restriction will reduce the potential for noise
and other nuisance impacts on the adjacent residential
developments. Condition No. 2 . 1 'requires a solid masonry ' wall
around the perimeter of the lot where no masonry, garage or carport
walls exist . Condition No. 2 .3 requires lighting to comply with
the City' s Security Ordinance and requires that the lighting does
not negatively impact adjacent properties.
Condition No 3 . 1 will not allow the additional. parking spaces to be
counted as required parking spaces for the shopping center or be
used. to accommodate .additional parking intensive uses, such as
restaurants or medical uses, in the shopping center unless
additional City approvals are obtained.
Condition No. 3 .4 requires the parking lot parcel to be held as one
with the adjacent parcel within -the shopping center through the
filing of a lot line adjustment, reciprocal access agreement or
other legally binding instrument.
Finally, Condition Nos. 3 .2 and 3 .3 have been included to provide
for the future review of the parking lot expansion area and the
parking demand for the entire shopping center. These conditions
require that additional mitigation measures be ' implemented if
deemed necessary by the Community Development Director.
Scott -Reekstin
Associate Planner
Attachments : Attachment A - Location Map
Attachment 'B - Site plan
Attachment C —Submitted Plan-
Zoning Administrator Action 96-011
r
- LOCATION MAP" ,... "
WARRFN
JJ '
14452 e Y
6114472 1 i 'R'842r 00
'E40 wa
I f w
14441 14442W d l jf _ 145011 _
r I .. ..., 8 114512
14511 _.a 14512 Y 1145121 i M i� tl 4.`YCbJ 14482
145111�1� 14522 - C
14515
14r2U 1452.2
14531MM w 14542
F 14531 f 145�2ui ��9 14511
✓ s° intra i 114552 ;_ ._ ..
\ 1'24
to
X �_. 14562 4 14551t I 572 14521
L
__._. '' 145'51 4552 "n M xr o r
1"561
14581M I 14561, 14562
14`x81 _ 14582 x1
� u�r * r 4582
�CtS
14591
• 14612n.18 � 3 ✓�, �
22,28,32, . 462
38.42,48.52 ..
r 14672,74, 14fi81 1 82 C1
76.78,BO °'x,1 q14 2
s. ✓
C7 3
14682,84 PA _ 0 ,
86n88,9�M 14641 1 02 T ' r
Z _
W a ch 14cpw
4Y 1 12 cM
ear
to Cay
> T r / �
1475h ^d. ' �
< '4
as ana 14 7 Al 3
c7
�
� 14152 �
141'11 .�.._..®�..,I
14762 14712 7
1.4772 '0
147'82
NO SCALE
IRVINE BOULEVARD
T Cy"IrN
o
W
f •
PLAZA LAFAYEfTE UP
U Q�%�/•
.
ATTACHMENT B
existing apartments
O light standard___..._..__.___�•______ 4'tandscaped area O light standard—_ ..... ...
1
t 9 - 24'drive aisle
I� c
_ 3
la'
I
' I
trash 1 I 10 IlN 20r� JO J9�112'i 5'
' ti I V .�•,
3-landscaped area
014.64' •
" existing apartments
SUMMARY
- 39 compact spaces(7.5'X 19') -
.Z light standards
turnaround area
PLAZA LAFAYETTE
landscaping on beth sides PARKING EXPANSION
trash enclosure
NOVEMBER 5,1996
L
1 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR ACTION 96-011
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-037
2 AND DESIGN REVIEW 96-051
DECEMBER 3, 1996
3
4 The Zoning Administrator of the City of Tustin does
hereby resolve as follows :
5
6 z . The Zoning Administrator finds and determines as
follows :
7
A. That a proper application, Conditional Use
8 Permit '96-037 and Design Review 96-051, was
filed by C.L. Burnett to authorize the
9 establishment of a parking lot in a vacant 50'
by 314' portion of an abandoned railroad
10 right-of--way located to the north of the Plaza
La Fayette shopping center at 13031 Newport
11 Avenue and to the west of the Wood Crest
Apartments at 12901--12943 Newport Avenue.
12
B. That the proposed use is allowed within the R--
13 3, Multiple-Family Residential. District, with
the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. �-
14
C. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed
15 and held on said application on December 3,
1996 by the Zoning Administrator.
16
D. That establishment, maintenance, and operation'
17 of a parking lot in a residential district to
serve an adjacent commercial shopping center,
18 as conditioned, will not be detrimental to the .
health, safety, morals, comfort, or ,general
19 welfare of the persons residing or working in.
the neighborhood of such proposed •use, nor be-
20 injurious or detrimental to the property and
improvements in the neighborhood of the
21 subject property, or to the general welfare of
the • City of Tustin, as evidenced by the
22 following findings :
23 1. The parking lot expansion area will be
used for employee and/or valet parking
24 only, thereby reducing the potential for
noise and ,other nuisance impacts on
25 adjacent properties.
26 2 . Lighting will comply with the City' s
Security Ordinance and• will be directed
27 downward and will not produce glare or
have a negative impact on adjacent
28 properties.
Zoning Administrator Action 96-011
Page 2
1
3 . The proposed parking spaces will. not ' be
2 permitted to count as required parking
spaces for the shopping center or be used
3 to accommodate additional parking
intensive uses, such as restaurants or
4 medical uses, in the shopping center.
5 4 . The additional parking spaces will
indirectly provide' more parking for
6 patrons of the shopping center, thereby .
mitigating parking demand impacts as
7 required by Condition 6 .a.8 of Planning
Commission Resolution No. 3413 (Variance
8 No. 95-011) .
9 5 . The adjacent residential uses will be
buffered from the proposed parking lot
10 expansion area by a solid 6' -8" block
wall and/or existing garage or carport
11 walls .
12 E. Pursuant to Section 9272 of the Tustin
Municipal Code; the Zoning Administrator finds
13 that the location, size, architectural
features and general appearance of the parking
14 lot expansion area will not impair the orderly
and harmonious development of the area, the
15 present or future development therein, or the
occupancy as a whole. In making such
16 findings, the` Zoning Administrator has
considered at least the following items :
17
1. . Height, bulk and 'area of buildings .
18
2 . Setbacks and site planning.
19
3 . Landscaping, parking area design and
20 traffic circulation.
21 4 . Location, height and standards of
exterior illumination.
22
S . Location and method of refuse storage.
23
6 . Physical relationship of . proposed
24 improvements to existing_ structures in
the neighborhood.
25
7. Appearance and design relationship of
26 proposed improvements to existing
structures and possible future structures
27 in the neighborhood and public'
thoroughfares .
28
Zoning Administrator Action 96-011
Page 3
1
8 . Development Guidelines and criteria as
2 adopted by the City Council .
3 F. This project is categorically exempt (Class
11) pursuant to Section, 15311 of the
4 California Environmental Quality Act..
5 G. That the project has been reviewed for
consistency with the Air Quality Sub--element
6 of the City of Tustin General Plan and has
been determined to be consistent with the Air
7 Quality Sub-element.
8 II . The Zoning Administrator' hereby approves
Conditional Use Permit- No. 96-037 and Design Review
9 96--051 to authorize the establishment of a parking
lot in a vacant 50' by 314' portion of an abandoned _
10. railroad right-of--way located to the north of the
Plaza La Fayette shopping center at 13031 Newport
11 Avenue and to the 'west of the Wood Crest Apartments
at 12901-12943 Newport Avenue. -
12
PASSED 'AND ADOPTED by the Zoning Administrator of the
13 City of Tustin at a regular meeting held on the 3rd day
of December, 199.6 .
14
15
16 Rick Brown
Zoning Administrator Designee
17
BARBARA REYES
18 Recording Secretary
19
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
20 COUNTY OF ORANGE )
CITY OF TUSTIN )
21
22 I, BARBARA REYES, the undersigned, hereby certify that
I am the Recording Secretary of the Zoning Administrator
23 of the City of Tustin, California; that Zoning
Administrator Action No. 96-011 'was duly passed and
24 adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin Zoning
Administrator, held on the 3rd day of December, 1996 .
25 i
26
BARBARA-REYES
27 Recording Secretary
28
EXHIBIT A
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR ACTION 96-011
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-037
AND DESIGN REVIEW 96-051
GENERAL
(1) 1.1 The proposed project shall substantially conform with the
submitted plans for the •proj ect date stamped November 8,
1996, .on file with the Community .Development Department,
except as herein modified, or as modified by the Director
of Community Development in accordance with this Exhibit .
The Director of Community. Development may also approve
minor modifications to plans during plan check if such
modifications are to be consistent with the provisions of
the Tustin City Code.
(1) 1.2 Unless otherwise specified, ' the conditions contained in
this Exhibit shall be complied with prior to the' final
inspections for -any building permits for * the project,
subject to review and approval by the Community
Development Department.
(1) 1.3 The subject project approval shall become -null and void
unless the use is established within twelve (12) months
of the date of this Exhibit and substantial construction
is underway. Time extensions maybe granted if a written
request is received by the Community Development
Department within thirty (30) days prior to expiration.
(1) 1.4 Approval of Conditional Use Permit 96-037 and Design
Review 96-051 is contingent upon the applicant and
property owner signing and returning an "Agreement to
Conditions Imposed" form as established by the Director
of Community Development .
(1) - 1.5 The. applicant shall hold and defend the City of Tustin
harmless for all claims and liabilities arising out of
City' s approval of the entitlement process for this
project .
----------------------------------------------------------------------
SOURCE CODES
- (1) STANDARD CONDITION (5) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY REQUIREMENT
(2) -CEQA MITIGATION ' (6) LANDSCAPING GUIDELINES
(3) UNIFORM BUILDING CODE/S (7) PC/CC POLICY ;
(4) ' DESIGN REVIEW
*** EXCEPTION
Exhibit A
CUP 96-037 and DR 96-051
December 3, 1996
Page 2
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
(4) 2 .1 in accordance with Tustin City Code Section 9271 (i)
related to the required separation between commercial and
residential uses, the parking lot expansion area shall be
screened from surrounding residential properties by a 6' -
8" high solid masonry wall . ' This wall shall be .required
on, or. adjacent to, the north, ; east and west property
lines. If the wall is built directly on ' the property
line, the written approval of the adjacent property
owners will be required at plan check. The' wall is not
required to be built along the rear wall of the existing
garages . In the event that the garages are removed in
the future, the property owner of the - shopping center
shall be required, within sixty (60) days of removal, to
construct a 6' -8" high solid block wall as a barrier in
the exposed areas, subject, to review and approval by the
Community Development Director. Plans for the 61 - 8"
high solid masonry. wall shall be submitted to the
Community Development Department at plan check.
(4) 2 .2 All of the parking stalls in the parking lot expansion
area shall be a minimum of eight (8) feet in width and
17 . 5 feet in length plus an overhang of 2 . 5 feet. The
drive aisle shall be a minimum of 25 feet in width. The
. turnaround space shall be a minimum of twelve (12) feet
in width and -17 .5 feet in length and shall be located a
minimum of three (3) feet from the north property line.
(5) 2 .3 Lighting for the parking lot expansion area shall comply
with the City of Tustin Security - Ordinance and shall
provide a minimum of one (1) footcandle of illumination
throughout the site. , All exterior light fixtures shall
be directed 90 degrees down and not produce direct light.
or glare or have -a negative impact -on adjacent
properties. Manufacturer' s details of all proposed light
fixtures shall be submitted at plan check for review by
the Community Development Department .
(4) 2 .4 A raised concrete walkway of at least four (4) feet in
width shall be required along entire length ,of the east
or west side of the parking lot expansion area.
(4) 2 .5_ Six (6) inch raised concrete c'urbs' -shall be- placed on-
site adjacent to the perimeter boundary walls and carport
walls, unless approved otherwise by the Community
Development Director. Landscaping, gravel; concrete or
other material acceptable to the Community Development.
Director may be placed between the curb and the walls. ^�,
Exhibit A
CUP 96-037 and DR 96-051
December 3 , 1996
Page 3
:(1) 2 . 6 The applicant shall be responsible for the daily
maintenance and up-keep of the parking lot expansion
area, including but not limited to trash removal,
painting, graffiti removal and maintenance of
improvements to ensure that the facilities are maintained
in a neat and attractive manner. All graffiti shall be
removed within 72 hours of a complaint being transmitted
by the City to the .property owner. Failure to maintain
said structures and adjacent facilities will be grounds.
for City enforcement of its Property Maintenance
Ordinance, including nuisance abatement procedures.
*** 2.7 The installation and/or operation of outdoor public
telephones or public address systems in the parking lot
expansion area shall be prohibited.
(4) 2 .8 All parking areas and walkways for the parking lot
expansion area shall be steam cleaned and maintained free
of trash and debris on a regular basis as needed. All
damaged and cracked areas shall be repaired as needed.
USE RESTRICTIONS
*** 3 .1 The parking spaces ' located in the parking lot expansion
area -shall not be counted toward the required number of
. parking spaces for the shopping center. Likewise, the
spaces shall not be used to accommodate additional
parking intensive uses or use expansions in the shopping
center unless additional City approvals are- obtained.
(5) 3 .2 The use of the parking lot expansion area may be reviewed
by the Community Development Director on a biannual -
basis . If in the future the Community Development
Director determines that noise, security, and/or other
nuisance problems exist on the site or in the vicinity as
a result of the establishment of the parking lot
expansion area, the Community Development Director may
require the applicant • to •provide additional mitigation
-measures to be` reviewed and approved by the Zoning
Administrator. Said mitigation may include, but are not.
limited to, the following:
a. Establish hours of use. .
b. Secure parking lot expansion area from adjacent
parking .area.
C. Retain an on-site security guard
r
Exhibit A
CUP 96-037 and DR 96-051
December 3 , 1996
Page 4
Failure to satisfy the above condition could be grounds
for the Zoning Administrator to reconsider Conditional
Use Permit 96-037 and Design Review 96-051 which may
result in revocation.
(5) 3 .3 If, at any time in the future, an on-site or neighboring
tenant or customer advises the City, or if the City is
otherwise made aware and concurs, that a parking and/or
traffic• problem exists at the Plaza LaFayette shopping
center as a result of the: insufficient on-site parking
availability, and it has been confirmed that the subject
property is in compliance with all applicable conditions
of approval, then the Community Development and Public
Works Departments may require the property owner to
submit an updated parking demand analysis and/or traffic
study, at no expense to the City, within the time
schedule stipulated by the City; the property owner may
delegate this responsibility, through lease negotiations,
to any tenant operating under Conditional Use Permit 95-
019 and Variance 95-011 . If said study indicates that
there is inadequate parking or a traffic problem, the
property owner shall be required to provide additional
mitigation measures to be reviewed and approved by the
Community Development and Public Works Departments . Said
mitigation may include, but not be limited to, the
following:
a. Establish alternate hours of operation.
b. Provision of additional parking as needed, up to
the minimum number required for the aggregate of
shopping center uses pursuant to Zoning Code
standards, by purchase and/or lease of additional
property within 500 feet of the shopping center or
provision of the needed parking on site . The
securing of off-site parking would require approval
of a revised Variance .
Failure to adequately respond to such a request and to
implement mitigation measures within the time schedules
established shall be grounds for initiation of revocation
procedures for Variance 95-011 and Conditional Use Permit
95-019 .
Exhibit A
CUP 96--037 and DR 96-051-
December 3, 1996
Page 5
(5) 3 .4 Prior- to issuance of any permit, the parcel to be used
for- the parking lot expansion area shall be held together
with the adjacent shopping center parcel (Assessor' s -
Parcel No. 401--281-•10) as one parcel . The applicant
shall. file a lot line adjustment, a reciprocal access
agreement or some other legally binding instrument
acceptable to the City of Tustin to ensure that joint use
of the two lots continues for the duration of the parking
lot use with said document being subject to City Attorney
approval and recorded on the property prior to issuance
of any permits.
*** 3 .5 The use_ of the parking lot expansion area shall be
limited to employee parking and/or valet parking only.
Customer parking shall be prohibited, except in
conjunction with a special event or under special
circumstances as approved by the Community Development
Director. '
*** 3 .6 Prior to the final inspection for any building permit,
"Employee and Valet Parking Only" signs shall be posted
at the entrance to the parking .lot expansion area, with
sign details and locations to be approved by - the
Community Development Department .
*** 3 .7 No structures shall be constructed within the parking lot
expansion area.
(1) 3 .8 Outdoor storage shall be prohibited within the parking
lot expansion area.
(1) 3 .9 All construct ion ,operations, including engine warm up and
deliveries of materials and equipment, shall 'be subject
to the provisions of the City of Tustin Noise 'Ordinance
as amended, and may take place only during the hours of
7 : 00 a.m. until 6 : 00 p.m. , Monday through Friday, and
9 : 00 a.m. to 5 : 00 p.m. on Saturday, unless the Building
Official determines _ that said activity will be in
substantial conformance with the Noise Ordinance and the
public health and safety will not be impaired, subject to
apRlication being made at the time the permit for the
work is awarded or during progress of the work. No Sunday
or holiday construction shall be permitted.
(1) - 3 .10 "No Loitering" signs shall be posted on the, site, with
sign details and locations to be approved by the
Community Development Department .
Exhibit A
CUP 96-037 and DR 96-051
December 3, 1996
Page 6
PLAN SUBMITTAL
(1) 4 .1 All grading, drainage, vegetation and circulation shall
comply with the City of 'Tustin Grading Manual. All
street sections, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street
lighting ' and storm drain shall comply with on-site
improvement standards . At plan check, indicate on plans
the applicable codes, City Ordinances and the state and
federal laws and regulations to include :
1994 Uniform Building Code with California Amendments
1994 Uniform Mechanical Code with California Amendments
1994 . Uniform Plumbing Code with California Amendments
1993 National Electrical Code. with California Amendments
T-24 California Disabled Access Regulations
T-24 California Energy Efficiency Standards
City of Tustin Grading Ordinance
City of Tustin Landscape and Irrigation Guidelines
City of Tustin Private Improvement Standards
City of. Tustin Security Ordinance
(1) 4.2 Drainage from new areas shall be collected and drained to
the existing drainage system at- Plaza La Fayette. At
plan check, the capacity of existing systems shall be
calculated to be adequate.
(5) 4.3 At plan check, provide project data to show the total
number of parking spaces and ' the number of existing
spaces accessible to disabled persons . Additional
accessible parking spaces may be required on-site based
on the total number of parking spaces.
{5} 4 .4 At plan check, a photometric study of the proposed
lighting for the parking lot expansion area shall - be
submitted to the Community Development Department .
(5) 4 .5 At plan check, three (3)* sets of the site improvement
plans, modified in accordance with this Exhibit,' shall be
submitted to the Community Development' Department.
(1) 4.6 - At plan check, three (3) inch striping detail shall be
shown for all parking spaces.
FIRE AUTHORITY
(5) 5.1 Prior to the issuance of any building/grading permits,
the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of plans
for the parking lot, from the Fire Chief in consultation
with the Manager, Traffic Engineering. ' The plans shall
include the plan view, section view, and indicate the
width of the drive aisle, measured flow line to flow
line . All proposed fire apparatus turnarounds shall be
clearly marked when a dead--end drive aisle exceeds 150
feet or when other conditions require •it . '
Exhibit A
CUP 96-037 and DR 96-051
December 3, 1996,
Page 7
(5) 5 .2 A fire lane shall be established for the drive aisle.
(5) 5 .3 Prior to the issuance of any grading/building permits,
the applicant- shall submit and 'obtain approval from the
Fire Chief for parking lot plans with fire lanes shown.
The plans shall indicate the locations of red curbing and
signage. A drawing of the proposed signage with the -
height; stroke and color of lettering and the contrasting
background color shall be submitted to and approved by
the Fire Chief .
-(5) 5 .4 Prior to the use of the parking lot, the approved fire
lane marking plan shall be installed.
FEES
(1) 6.1 Prior to issuance of any building permits payment shall
(5) be made of all required fees. Payment shall be made
based upon' the rates in effect at the time of permit :
issuance and are subject to change. -
a. - All applicable building,, grading and private
improvement plan check and permit fees to the
Community Development Department .
b. Within forty-eight (4,B) hours of• approval of the
subject project, the applicant shall deliver to the
Community Development Department, a cashier' s check
payable to the COUNTY CLERK in the amount of $38 . 00
(thirty-eight dollars) to enable the City to file
the appropriate environmental documentation for the
project. If within such forty-eight (.48) hour
period that applicant has not delivered to the
Community Development Department the above-noted
check, the statute of limitations for any,
interested party to challenge the. environmental
determination under the provisions of the
California Environmental Quality Act could be.
significantly lengthened.