HomeMy WebLinkAbout02 TPM 2004-256 DR 04-023
ITEM #2
Report to the
Planning Commission
DATE: NOVEMBER 22, 2004
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
PROPERTY
OWNERS:
LOCATION:
ZONING:
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2004-256, DESIGN REVIEW 04-023,
AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 04-028
MAKENA GREAT AMERICAN
1450 EL CAMINO REAL
TUSTIN, CA 92780
MAKENA GREAT AMERICAN
CITY OF TUSTIN REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
14001 & 14011 NEWPORT AVENUE & 770 EL CAMINO REAL
CENTRAL COMMERCIAL, PARKING OVERLAY DISTRICT
(C-2, P)
ENVIRONMENTAL
STATUS: THIS PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 15332, CLASS 32 (IN-FILL DEVELOPMENT
PROJECTS) AND SECTION 15315, CLASS 15 (MINOR LAND
DIVISIONS) OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
ACT
REQUEST: 1)
RECOMMENDATION
APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2004-256 TO MERGE
TWO PARCELS TO CREATE A 0.68 ACRE PARCEL;
2)
APPROVAL OF DESIGN REVIEW 04-023 FOR SITE
DEVELOPMENT, ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN, AND LANDSCAPE
DESIGN OF THE PROPOSED 7,400 SQUARE FOOT RETAIL
BUILDING; AND,
APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 04-028 FOR
OUTDOOR SEATING.
3)
That the Planning Commission:
1.
Adopt Resolution No. 3938 recommending that the City Council approve
Tentative Parcel Map 2004-256; and
2.
Adopt Resolution No. 3939 approving Design Review 04-023 for site
development, architectural design, and landscape design of the proposed 7,400
Planning Commission Report
TPM 2004-256, DR 04-023, CUP 04-028
November 22 2004
Page 2
square foot retail building; and Conditional Use Permit 04-028 for outdoor
seating.
BACKGROUND
The applicant is requesting the approval of a subdivision, design review, and conditional
use permit to merge two existing parcels and construct a new retail building with outdoor
seating on one unified parcel.
The site is located within the "Central Commercial, Parking Overlay" zoning district, Old
Town Commercial General Plan Land Use designation, and the Town Center
Redevelopment Project Area. The proposed use is consistent with the permitted uses in
the C-2, P zoning district. The site is located in a redevelopment project area where the
design of the retail building requires approval of the zoning administrator. However, since
the tentative parcel map and proposed outdoor seating require approval by the Planning
Commission, the Community Development Director has deferred consideration of the
design review to the Planning Commission.
Site and Surrounding Properties
The 0.68 acre project site is located at 14001 and 14011 Newport Avenue and 770 EI
Camino Real, which is bounded by EI Camino Real on the north, the 1-5 Freeway on the
south,' Newport Avenue on the east, and motel property on the west (Attachment A -
Location Map). The site consists of two parcels, one of which was a surplus parcel
previously owned by Caltrans. A former service station and transmission shop are located
on the second parcel and have been vacant since 2003.
DISCUSSION
Tentative Parcel Map
The project site contains two parcels: a 19,694 square foot parcel located at 770 EI
Camino Real and 14001 Newport Avenue at the southwest corner of EI Camino Real and
Newport Avenue and a 10,039 square foot parcel along the 1-5 Freeway and Newport
Avenue which was owned by Caltrans and has been purchased by the Tustin
Redevelopment Agency for conveyance to the applicant. On September 27, 2004, the
Planning Commission approved the General Conformity finding for disposition of the site,
and on October 4, 2004, the City Council approved the sale of the property and the Tustin
Redevelopment Agency approved Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) 04-02
for development of the site with Makena Great American.
Two dedication areas are identified on the map for the Newport Avenue widening which
include a total of 2,143 square feet.
Planning Commission Report
TPM 2004-256, DR 04-023, CUP 04-028
November 22 2004
Page 3
Site Design
The project site is a triangular shaped site with 220 linear feet of frontage on Newport
Avenue and 143 feet of frontage on EI Camino Real. The building is proposed on the north
westerly portion of the site with parking on the east with a zero foot setback from the
adjacent motel property on the southwest and a twelve (12) foot setback from EI Camino
Real on the north.
Access to the site is provided from a two-way drive on Newport Avenue and a two-way
drive on EI Camino Real. The drive apron on EI Camino Real is approximately ninety (90)
feet from the centerline of the EI Camino Real/Newport Avenue intersection. Both
driveways allow for right turn egress only from the site; therefore, motorists leaving the site
would need to drive east on EI Camino Real or south on Newport Avenue.
A covenant on the former Caltrans parcel limits access from the parcel to Newport
Avenue; therefore, the Newport Avenue vehicular access is located to the north of the
former Caltrans property. A fifteen (15) foot wide Caltrans easement area is to be located
at the southwest corner of the property for freeway maintenance purposes. This easement
only allows installation of parking and landscaping within the area, which is consistent with
the submitted plans.
A cesspool easement for the benefit of the adjacent motel property was granted in 1955
and has not been abandoned. The southwest corner of the proposed building is located
over the cesspool easement area. Condition 2.23 of Resolution No. 3939 requires that this
easement be abandoned and the cesspool be inspected and cleared prior to issuance of
any permit for this project.
A trash enclosure is proposed at the southwesterly corner of the building. Condition 2.25
requires approval of the City's trash hauler for this location prior to issuance of a grading
permit.
AccesslT raffic Analysis
A traffic analysis for the site was prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates and reviewed
by the City Traffic Engineer. The study noted that the proposed project is projected to
generate 1,996 trips to the surrounding street system on a daily basis, with 172 trips in the
morning peak hour and 153 trips in the evening peak hour. The analysis concluded that:
0 All study area signalized intersections currently operate at an acceptable level of
service.
0 At the Newport Avenue and 1-5 northbound ramp the delay experienced by
southbound right turners during periods when the ramp meter is active is
accounted for in the analysis, and the study determines that the level of service at
this intersection is considered to be satisfactory.
0 With the addition of ambient growth traffic, the study area signalized intersections
continue to operate at acceptable levels of service.
Planning Commission Report
TPM 2004-256, DR 04-023, CUP 04-028
November 22 2004
Page 4
0 The addition of project traffic to background traffic causes no impact during the AM
and PM peak periods to the signalized study intersections.
0 The vacant gas station and auto repair business are estimated to have generated
about half the traffic expected to be generated by this project.
The traffic analysis also considered re-implementing the northbound U turn at Newport
Avenue and EI Camino Real and a cost estimate for installation of the improvements. Due
to the recently installed protected left-turn phasing and the projected turning volume, staff
is not supportive of this proposal. Thus, the no U-turn condition will remain at this time.
As proposed on the site plan, the EI Camino Real driveway would enable motorists to
make unsafe incoming and outgoing left-turn movements. Condition 8.21 of Resolution
No. 3939 is included to prevent these left-turn movements by requiring that the driveway
design be modified with a median, subject to final approval by the Community
Development and Public Works Departments. Staff will work with the applicant to ensure
that the number of on-site parking spaces is not reduced, but there may be minor
modifications to the outdoor seating area.
Parking
At a ratio of one (1) space per 200 square feet, the 7,400 square foot building requires
thirty-seven (37) parking spaces which are proposed on the eastern portion of the site. Of
the thirty-seven (37) parking spaces, twenty-nine (29) are standard size stalls and eight (8)
are compact size stalls. The compact stalls are at the southern portion of the site and may
be used for employee parking.
Architecture
The proposed retail building is a single story structure twenty (20) feet in height with a
twenty-four (24) foot pyramid shaped tower at the corner finished with patina finish copper
roofing. The building is designed with a natural smooth trowel-finished stucco, clear glass
and black anodized storefront, stone cornice, smooth finish granite medallions, and a nine
(9) foot high brick face accent at ground level. The store fronts are accented with copper
color metal awnings and decorative lighting (Attachment C - Submitted Plans). Given the
site constraints the proposed building mass and scale is designed to make the best use of
the site and the proposed materials and colors would result ina quality project that is
compatible with the EI Camino Real streetscape. Condition 3.1 is included to require that
the quality of materials and colors are consistent with the submitted color/material board
and elevation drawings.
Landscaping
The project site includes twenty-five (25) percent landscaping including a twelve (12) foot
landscape setback along EI Camino Real, a fifteen (15) foot landscape setback along
Newport Avenue, and a five (5) foot landscape setback along the 5 freeway. In addition,
the site includes a ten (10) foot right-of-way area along Newport Avenue to be dedicated
for future street-widening that will include ground cover until the City is ready for
Planning Commission Report
TPM 2004-256, DR 04-023, CUP 04-028
November 22 2004
Page 5
acceptance of the dedication and the street widening project (Attachment C - Submitted
Plans).
Ten (10) Washingtonian palm trees are proposed for the perimeter of the site along
Newport Avenue and EI Camino Real. The existing project on the northwest corner of the
intersection includes several palm trees at the corner. To complement the opposite.corner
of the site, the palm trees are appropriate at the corner. Four (4) Tabebuia trees are
proposed along the EI Camino Real streetscape. Thirteen (13) queen palms are proposed
throughout the parking lot and the Newport Avenue entrance to enhance the
contemporary architecture of the building.
Condition 4.2 is included to require installation of landscape areas in accordance with the
submitted plans and ongoing maintenance and replacement of the landscaped areas as
necessary.
Lighting
Decorative building-mounted lighting is proposed above the storefront and for sign areas.
The parking area is proposed to include four (4) wedge design pole lights nineteen (19)
feet in height mounted on a three (3) foot high concrete base. Based on the submitted
photometric plan, a minimum lighting level of one (1) foot candle as required by Tustin
Security Ordinance will be maintained, and no light spillage to adjacent residential
properties is expected. Condition 2.2 is included to ensure that the final lighting design is
in accordance with the minimum requirements of the Tustin Security Ordinance and fully
contained on-site with no spillage or visibility from residential properties.
Outdoor Seating
An outdoor seating area consisting of a maximum of six (6) tables and eighteen (18)
chairs is proposed adjacent to the proposed building along EI Camino Real. The outdoor
seating area would complement the additional pedestrian activity desired in the Old Town
area and would not have a negative impact on surrounding properties in that the area
would be partially screened and outdoor live entertainment, amplified noise, coin operated
games and vending, and alcoholic beverages would be prohibited. The design of the
outdoor furniture is required to be durable and attractive and is subject to approval by the
Community Development Department.
Environmental Issues
The project site was previously occupied by a service station and an auto repair business.
In March 1999, three (3) underground storage tanks were removed from the site and
replaced with new ones in April 1999. Prior to installation of the new storage tanks, 407
tons of petroleum hydrocarbon impacted soil were excavated and removed from the site
as an interim corrective action.
Planning Commission Report
TPM 2004-256, DR 04-023, CUP 04-028
November 22 2004
Page 6
The site includes nine (9) groundwater monitoring wells and two (2) vapor extraction
wells. Three (3) additional ground water monitoring wells are located in the Newport
Avenue median that were installed for ground water monitoring of the site.
A work plan for ongoing monitoring of soil and ground water contamination was approved
by the Orange County Health Care Agency in October 2003. It is anticipated that a
remediation of two to three years will be necessary until the site is fully clean. The
applicant has indicated that any remaining contaminated soil will be removed during
demolition and remedial grading for the project and, upon approval of the site plan
including placement of building and landscape areas, installation of a vapor extraction
system will be requested. Tustin City Code Section 9299 requires approval of a
conditional use permit by the zoning administrator for soil or water remediation activities,
which will be processed under a separate permit. Please refer to Attachment E submitted
by the applicant on September 20, 2004, that lists the environmental documents on file for
the project and anticipated activities upon approval of the site plan.
ANAL YSIS
In determining whether to approve the project, the Planning Commission would need to
determine that the location, size, architectural features, and general appearance of the
project is compatible with the surrounding buildings and will not impair the orderly and
harmonious development of the area. A decision to approve this request may be
supported by the following findings:
a. The proposed project is consistent with the types of uses encouraged by the
General Plan Old Town Commercial Land Use Designation, which provides for
retail and service oriented uses. In addition, the floor area ratio of the project is
0.25:1 which is less than the standard density of 0.5:1 allowed in the Old Town
Commercial land use designation.
b. The proposed project complies with the development standards of the Central
Commercial Parking Overlay (C-2,P) zoning district.
c. As conditioned, the project will enhance the area in that a vacant transmission
shop and service station will be removed to accommodate the construction of a
retail building that provides convenient services to the community, and the
landscaping and architectural design of the building with use of brick veneer
accent and stone cornice will be compatible with the envisioned Old Town
developments.
d. The proposed outdoor seating along EL Camino Real is appropriate and
complements the additional pedestrian activity desired in the Old Town area.
e. Based on the submitted Traffic analysis (dated November 1, 2004 and revised
November 8, 2004) and as reviewed by the City's Traffic Engineer, the project,
compared to the previous development, will not result in a significant increase in
traffic in the area and surrounding major intersections. Further, the site
Planning Commission Report
TPM 2004-256, DR 04-023, CUP 04-028
November 22 2004
Page 7
configuration provides for adequate on-site circulation for vehicles and
delivery/service vehicles with a condition of approval that limits delivery trucks to
the hours between 7:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m.
f. Sufficient on-site parking would be provided in that thirty-seven (37) parking
spaces are required and would be provided.
g. Consistent with the Guidelines for Outdoor Seating, the outdoor seating is not in
close proximity to residential uses. The outdoor seating area would not be used
for serving alcoholic beverages, and no live entertainment will be provided.
h. The proposed outdoor seating use will not have a negative effect upon the
aesthetics of the area in that the proposed area will be screened with a 36-inch
low wall and adequate landscaping including four (4) 24-inch box Tabebuia trees.
i. The typical operational hours of 5:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. for the proposed coffee
house, and associated outdoor seating, are appropriate given the primarily
commercial nature of the area and proximity to a freeway and major arterial
roadway.
~~\.
C::::---.--é:-£a . ~ ~
Minoo Ashabi
Associate Planner
~~~
Scott Reekstin
Senior Planner
Attachments:
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
Location Map
Land Use Application Fact Sheet
Submitted Plans
Submitted Traffic Analysis Dated 11/01/04, revised 11/08/04
Submitted Summary of Environmental Documents
Resolution No. 3938
Resolution No. 3939
S:\CddIPCREPORnDR 04-023-Makena.doc
ATTACHMENT A
LOCATION MAP
LOCATION MAP
m
PROJECT NO.
ADDRESS
I tOOl
710
ð(
En
J1oif NlWpor~ ^~.,
Cì;tm ì no Rut I
ATTACHMENT B
LAND USE APPLICATION FACT SHEET
. LAND USE APPLICATION FACT SHEET
1.
LAND USE APPLICATION NUMBER(S): TPM 2004-256. DR 04-023. CUP 04-028
2.
LOCATION: sm Corner of Newport Avenue and EI Camino Real
3.
3. ADDRESS: 14001. 14011 Newport Avenue and 770 EI Camino Real
4.
LOT: N/A
TRACT: N/A
5. APN(S): 401-641-05. 401-641-07
6.
PREVIOUS OR CONCURRENT APPLICATION RELATING TO THIS PROPERTY: Previous
applications include CUP 65-196. CUP 68-252. UP 78-2. and UP 80-4.
7.
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
NORTH: Office buildina across EI Camino Real
SOUTH: 1-5 Freeway
EAST: Commercial businesses across Newport Ave.
WEST: Motel. Auto Service Use
8.
SURROUNDING ZONING DESIGNATION:
NORTH: Planned Community Commercial across EI Camino Real
SOUTH: N/A
EAST: Central Commercial and Commercial General across Newport Ave.
WEST: Central Commercial with Parkina Overlay
9.
SURROUNDING GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION:
NORTH: Old Town Commercial
SOUTH: N/A
EAST: Community Commercial
WEST: Old Town Commercial
10.
SITE LAND USE:
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
EXISTING: Service Station and Auto Service Use
PROPOSED: Retail Center
GENERAL PLAN: Old Town Commercial
ZONING: Central Commercial with Parkina Overlay
PROPOSED GP: Old Town Commercial
PROPOSED ZONING: Central Commercial with Parkina Overlay
DEVELOPMENT FACTS:
11. LOT AREA: 29,733 S.F. 0.68 ACRES
12. BUILDING LOT COVERAGE: 100% MAX. PERMITTED 27% PROPOSED
13. SITE LANDSCAPING: N/A REQUIRED 23% PROPOSED
14. OPEN SPACE: N/A REQUIRED N/A PROPOSED
15. PARKING: -R- REQUIRED ..J.L PROPOSED
16. BUILDING HEIGHT: ..ML MAX. PERMITTED .2L PROPOSED
17. BUILDING SETBACKS: REQUIRED PROPOSED
FRONT: -L- -1.L
SIDE: -L- -L
REAR: -L- -1L.
18.
OTHER UNIQUE CONDITIONS ASSOCIATED TO THE PROPERTY (I.E. SPECIAL STUDY
ZONES, EASEMENTS, ETC.) There are a cesspool easement and a Caltrans easement on the
property
Forms: land UseApplicationF actSheet
ATTACHMENT C
SUBMITTED PLANS
~
.bY
F
Z
~
<æ
W O~
I } .;~
y «Z
~~
~~
@éC
cd ¡;
t=2 ~~
-< ~
F
bbI
~
1
I
~-$-
", z
~
t ~
L I ¡ ¡'Ii P l-
ii J - im I~ .i~ :ß:
hi i . . h ,: 1!! æQ¡
t
11__-
"8 ..
Õ j i~ II .~ - . I
.~ nhi !h ill ~. H. .'11 !i,n . I n! II
~. ;ithtJ It I .11 ~:~~! I~I i ~~~ I~~: 1 ~~~ I~~:~
f I ~ I~ j , I
I Irl- ~U Ii I' 'I
I ~ ~ y~
. 'Iii il I ~ I~ 1111.. J
10111 ~ LIIr~ ~ HI I..,' H.. pI.'Uh¡
. . '. t is HI . ¡2Î ; I I J . I n HI
,I' I ~ .Ii .111iI.lIfì ~. ! I! i. .It!1 dq
11.1. [I IIi. II" Iii, 111.1 .1111! t IIi nt".1I.14
~'I' . I "", I ~ 1;011.1 iii II~I
. . 4 . I III. '", ': . I . I . A 1.1 t ¡. If
.. ... 1111..11 PI Îii 1111 ;a.llid I L. t'1'11 ßt ,.1 ~ 1'1 ~ D
~'11. 1.11. m I .'D II~I!I 'I Is 111
II ¡. 01. ~".,- IliftHIH:ìI.)¡ i. ta'i f4~
. lulull II ,IIIUhlllll. . Huh.
~........ ~..11......."""'. .....
I
-III
I P
II
"4. .. .
en
Z
Q
~lu1i~
ld"nalb111U~tu'" ;ø uI ø.Øøf ... hhdf.....h.lø6k
I
,..wJJJW.&. "Ji
.. ~J ¡;¡ ... .... ¡ hIl .aull .. ~dØ~a!dMlbØ ¡ ftØØld.
I-.J...- ..J1 It..!. .LJI¡.. I,.. .JII..I
.. i8I1Iib . - MÌI ÌIIt..
JddoLd' ..d.m.~Y..m".... Jut' jd..lL~iØ ø iIIIIdJ.. JI ADd. ..
~ ...aII J I . i ut
iIIIII8'" ~ iÌIIIIIiI d8
I...""" .øwd8 døid lIIi135g.dllllditi.~ dh..IiIIäØØ uu~
1-
<
>
W
iii:
ID'
ID
<
. I
. I I ~
I I ~ ,
~. r II ì
II I ! ' I ~i I I I
til¡q 111 j It i I II f I
II,:!,:! I J ~': I ¡-il ~ ! 'I ~ ; ; ; J II f'r
qø;¡¡5!8 III d¡1 '.BII t;
eft nit I I I I~II! 8 II I I = I II:
e@@e@eeeee@@@@@@@@@@~.
If:
~¡:.
~fl
Qt. Yr ¡; !!
~I I!:i:i -~ ',I!P
8-- !I, ¡.,"" :0: 11::
~I ~ijJi~::fi ~il
CD I ,..8
I!ê ~HtI;IH f~1 II
I ~ II ' 'r'"
! ; & <
II I i f
inl H I~ :¡Ii
~ ;Jj:
JI.~ ,.= ; ;11=
, ;.1.
~=========
/"
....
-J-....
$
I
- - - ---------:¡YiØÕNIWŸo-,T-=-
---------------
¡
I~ :i In I
e #.
"II II
B~' f '" It It t
If. :i I
. I II
I I; II U
§ I
~
3
Ii
II
Ii
~
fi II II . ;t . I,
I ~ ~
i!a!il
Ili;111
."C.@~
..
z
~
~Q.
z
¡
I
t"'-«
,.."", .".'
,,'\,..~..'"
."', 0"
! I i
III ¡ !
¡!tlti I
jlft
511 ai Þ
51!.! II .1
g e @ e
0-
e-
%
t
i
~
~
.
I
I
,
1---
I
I
,
1 I
, ,
1 I
, ,
- -1- - - - - - - +- - - - -
~
t
,
I
I
,
I
----- ud
,
I
,
I
,
,
I
,
I
----~
,
I
,
I
,
'mt
,
I
I
I!
~
.~-
.
~
~
~
-
"
-
...
-~
~ ,
w.,
~
-@
I ; ii . t\I
t I p~ <
I I ~
01 I~ 11 ,-Ii
Ii!~ : :Ii!
,= ; ;:1-
; . I
~
-
~
.....
-e
~
a.
~
~
I
I,
¡II
II'
~ I
~I,
~
I~~_-
I __,n"
I
I
,
I
,
I
I
,
I
1'-------
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
,
I
I
~ ~
, %
~
-e
~ t
~
-e
i
~ ~
~
-------
-0
~ 1
2
"
: I
I I ~
¡ i ~
,-1--- .
I ¡ i t
'J
--~
-e
..."
-
./HI
é
....
@
~
.!
i,I
i;
1
~
~
~
on
Iili.
I..
~
fli
I
1 .
ft 'J! :".&æ
= ~ : ';
Itæ :; :11:
II' . ; :'Ii
tf)
(.
-
@
....
-
-e ~
11.;
~ i
I
rn [I]
1
I -7
~
~
-e
~,
~
I 1
( i []IJ
II ~=t i b -7
Y ¡ qo
I I
1 I
- - - -1"",~",====,..=~=..,t-- - - - -
I I
I I
I I
! rn
~=~ I
1 1
! C!J
I I
I I
- 1 .._~-"'-~~-~-..+- - ---:- - -
I
I
I
Ei1
I
I
t
t
.
~
::
a
¡
~ ..
4'J--
-e
1
~
2
\
.
-7
2
-0
~
-7
Q:
, ~
0
I-
~
,..
-----1----
-e
Nt
Q
-@
é
...".
@
'Z
0
-~
,~
'W
I~
0
z
....
.....
I
I
l
....
-
11
~
ß
.-
z
0
~
~
.W
,
I
...... (
I
(
Z
0
5
w
0 U)
0-
I- (!)
1-- ~
<
0 9
c:J ::I
II ..... ...,. ....
...
'<
I-
W
III:
-
.... ....
-
-
10
<
jû~
~.:- '
in
I
10
Z
0
0
w
U)
(!)
z
9
5
œ
ATTACHMENT D
SUBMITTED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
DATED NOVEMBER 1, 2004
.
Traffic Impact Analysis
For the
NewportJEI Camino Retail Center
in the City Of Tustin
Prepared for:
Makena Great American Capital
October 2004
@ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
094331006
........-J - r1I Kimley-Horn
~ - LJ and Associates, Inc.
RECEIVED
NOY 0 1 2004
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
BY
11/08/2004 17:08 FAX
~.~
~ 002/004
Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
Minoo Ashabi
Associate Planner
City of Tustin
300 Centennial Way
Tustin, CA 92780
.
Slile 140
2100 W, Orøngewood Avenuo
Orange, Callfarnla
92868
Re: Makena Redevelopment Project at 14001 and 14011 Newport Avenue and
770 El Camino Real
Dear Minoo:
We have been infonned that the recommended driveway width of 30 feet for the
project driveway on Newport Avenue cannot be accommodated if we are to
achieve the required on-site parking 005 spaces. Therefore, we are modifYing
our recommendation to 27 feet; a 15 foot ingress lane and 12 foot egress lane.
This design should accommodate trucks tuming into the site and maintain the
number of on-site parking spaces. We have attached the revised
reconnnendations in the repon (pages 1 and 31) to be attached in the report
dated October 27,2004.
If you have any questions or comments, please contact me.
Very 'truly yours,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCTATES, INC.
CJ-.- ;:12
Michael Lloyd
Transportation Planner
K:\9433 1006 NewportEl Camino TlA\11-8Itr.duc
.
TEL 714 939 1030
FAX 71~ 938 9488
11/08/2004 17:08 FAX
~ 003/004
fIII'1_n Kimlay-Horn
IIII..J_L ~ and Associatei,lnc.
1. Introduction
This report has been prepared to document the potential traffic-related impacts of the proposed
development of a 7,400-square-foot retail and fast-food development on the southwest comer of
Newport Avenue and EI Camino Real in the City of Tustin, California. The scope of the analysis
in this report is in accordance with direction provided by the City of Tustin Planning and
Engineering Department staffs. This report will satisfy the Traffic Impact requirements of the
County of Orange Congestion Management Program (CMP).
Because driveway volumes are the primary interest in this report, no pass-by trip reduction has
been appHed. Actual traffic level increases at intersections outside the study area should be on
the OTder of 30% less than reported in this study, when compared to projections that would
include pass-by reductions. The analyses in this report also use the current land \.lSe (vacant) as a
baseline. However, the site was previously used DS a gas station (and other conunerce existed
next to it prior to the 1-5 freeway widening); thus, when compared to the prior land uses at this
site. this project will generate very little, if any, additional traffic. Therefore, it is our opinion
that this project will have no regional traffic impacts. Thus, the foous of this study is to provide
safe and efficient access between the project and the adjacent ~al and freeway transportation
system.
2. Project Description
The project site is located on the southwest comer of Newport Avenue and E1 Camino Real in
the City of Tustin California. A vicinity map is provided as Figure 1, and a site plan is provided
as Figure 2. The project site will contain 5,000 square feet of retail space; a l,OOO-square-foot
sandwich shop; and a 1 ,400-square-foot coffee shop. The project site will be accessible through a
right-in, right-out driveway on EI Camino Real and a right-in, right-out driveway approach on
Newport Avenue. Newport Avenue has a median in the vicinity of the proposed driveway;
therefore, the driveway will function as a right-in, right-out drive. El Camino Real is not divided
by a median; therefore, the driveway will have to be designed to ensure right-in, right-out access.
This can be achieved with a "pork-chop" channelization in the driveway at El Camino Real,
together with "No Left Turn" signage. In order to accommodate vehicles mming in and out, the
driveway should be 30 feet in width. The applicant has indicated that this driveway width will be
accommodated on a revised site plan to be submitted. The Newport Avenue driveway can
likewise be widened to 27 feet to ease ingress/egress (although no raised median need be
installed in this driveway since a raised median in the street already enforces right-in, right-oot
access).
3. Existing Conditions
3.1. Regional Access
Regional access to the project site is provided via the Interstate 5 (the Santa Ana Freeway). The 5
Freeway is an interstate freeway that extends throughout Orange and Los Angeles Counties.
Direct access to and from 1-5 north is provided via an interchange at Newport Avenue, located
NewportlEl Camino Retail Sire
Traffic ImpClC:/ Anfllysis
11108/04
Page I
11/08/2004 17:08 FAX
~_n Kimley-Hom
II1I....I-, . ~ and Associates, Inc.
C It is recommended that the project re-irnplement the northbound "U" turn movement at
Newport AvenueÆI Camino Real. This will require a traffic signal modification plan to be
prepared and approved by the City, and a constroction contract to be issued to implement the
modification. The estimated cost is $25,000. Since this recommendation is not accepted by
City staff, traffic conditions were forecast with and without this "U" turn movement. Traffic
conditions were fol.md to be acceptable with or without the "U" turn when measured with
lCU, HCM, and SimTraffic methodologies. Therefore, the decision to anow or disallow this
movement can be based on other factors.
0 The right-in, right-out driveway on Newport Avenue is found to meet the stopping sight
distance standard but not the more conservative gap acceptance sight distance standard.
However, providing adequate stopping sight distance between the Newport Avenue driveway
and the neare5t upstream intersection (EI Camino ReallNewport Avenue) is sufficient to
provide safe access. To ease ingress and egress, the site plan is being updated to provide 27
feet of width for this driveway.
IJ The right-in, right-out driveway on £1 Camino Real is found to meet both stopping and gap
acceptance sjght distance standards. To enforce right-in, right-out access, it is recommended
that a raised concrete median be installed in the driveway that discourages access to and from
westbound £1 Camino Real; and that no-left~tum signage be installed. The site plan is being
updated to show this driveway as 30 feet wide in order to accommodate the movements in
and out of the driveway with the median in place.
D A parking supply of 35 spaces is required by City Code and is provided on the Site Plan.
Newport/El Camino Retail Site
Traffic Impact Analysis
11/08/04
Page 31
@004/004
lIII'í-n Kimley-Horn
811.....J- U and Associates, lnG,
2100 W, Orangewood Ave., #140
Orange, California 92868
TEL 714939 1030
FAX 7149389488
Transmittal
Date: 11/1/2004
Job Number:
094331006
Project Name:
Makena Redevelopment at Newport Avenue
To:
Minoo Ashabi
Associate Planner
City of Tustin
Community Development Department
We are sending these by
0 US, Mail
0 Other:
0 FedEx
")i Hand De];",
We are sending you
ì;il Attached
0 Shop Drawings
0 Under separate cover via
the following items:
0 Prints/Plans
0 Samples
0 Specifications 0 Change Orders
0 Other:
Copies
Date
No,
Description
4 11/1 Makena NewportiEI Camino TIA
These are transmitted as checked below:
0 Returned for corrections
0 Resubmit
0 Submit
0 Return
0 Copies for approval
0 Copies for distribution
0 For your use
0 As requested
¥-For review and comment
0 Approved as submitted
0 Approved as noted
0 Corrected prints
Remarks: (Enter text here; you may enter as much as you want, If it becomes more than two pages
it will automatically create yoU/' header for you and number your page.)
Copy to:
Signed
Y--
/~
Page I
Newport/El Camino Retail Center
IN THE CITY OF TUSTIN
Prepared for:
Makena Great American Capital
1450 EI Camino Real, 2nd Floor
Tustin, CA 92780
Prepared by:
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INc.
2100 W Orangewood Avenue, Suite 140
Orange, CA 92868
(714) 939-1030
(þ October 2004
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.
INTR 0 D U CTI 0 N ....... .............. ............ ....... ..... ............ ................... ............ ................. ...... 1
2.
PROJECT D ESCRIPTI 0 N ........ ................... ......"... ........................................... ....... ....... 1
3. EXISTIN G CO ND ITI ON S ......................... ...................... ......... ....................... ..... ............ 1
3.1, REGIONAL ACCESS ................................,.,.......,................................................................. 1
3.2, LOCAL ARTERIAL STREET SYSTEM ...................................................................................2
3.3, TRANSIT SERVICE.......................,............. .....,............. ........"..................,.............,...., ......6
3.4, LEVEL OF SERVICE ,...............,.........,..............................,..."......,..................,......,............ 6
3.5. CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM COMPLIANCE ..................................................... 8
3.6. CiTY OF TUSTIN LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD............................................................. 10
3.7. TRAFFIC IMPACT CRITERIA................................,.......................................................,..... 10
3.8. EXISTING INTERSECTION CONDITIONS ............................................................................10
4. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITI ONS............................................................................... 12
-A. 1.
4.2.
AMBIENT GROWTH. .........., ......,.. ...... ...... ....,..........." ......,.... ...... .......,......,......,....,.......,... 12
FUTURE BACKGROUND TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ................................................................12
5.
PROJECT TRAFFIC .......................................................................................................14
5.1. PROJECT TRIP GENERATION ............................................................................................ 14
5.2, PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT ............................................................15
6. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITH THE PROJECT ..................................... 22
6.1. PROJECT IMP ACT COMP ARISON ....................................................................................... 22
6.2, SIMTRAFFIC MICROSIMULA TION ANALYSIS ................................................................... 26
SITE A CCESS ...................................................................................................................28
7.
8.
PARKIN G REQUIREMENTS ................................................................... ................ ..... 29
CON CL USI 0 NS ................................................. ........................................ ...... ....... ......... 30
9.
TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont.)
APPENDICES
Appendix A: Traffic Counts
Appendix B: Traffix Analysis Sheets
Appendix C: SimTraffic Analysis Sheets
Appendix D: AASHTO Sight Distance Standards
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: Vicinity Map ..."........................,..,..............,.........",..........................,.....,.............,......... 3
Figure 2: Site Plan ...........................................................................................................................4
Figure 3: Existing Lane Configurations ..........................................................................................5
Figure 4: CMP Highway System Plan ............................................................................................. 9
Figure 5: Existing AM and PM Traffic Volumes.......................................................................... 11
Figure 6: Future (2006) Background Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes ...............................................13
Figure 7 A: Project Trip Distribution ("U" Turn Prohibited at ECR) ............................................ 17
Figure 7B: Project Trip Distribution ("U" Turn Allowed at ECR) ...............................................18
Figure 8A: Project AMIPM Peak Hourly Traffic Volumes ("U" Turn Prohibited at ECR) .........19
Figure 8B: Project AMlPM Peak Hourly Traffic Volumes ("U" Turn Allowed at ECR) ............20
Figure 9A: Future (2006) Plus Project Peak Hourly Traffic Volumes ("U" Turn Prohibited at
ECR) """""""""""""""""""""""""""..............,..................................,.....................,.........23
Figure 9B: Future (2006) Plus Project Peak Hourly Traffic Volumes ("U" Turn Allowed at ECR)
.......,...................,......,.."..................,.................................................,....................................24
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Level of Service Descriptions ........................................................................................... 6
Table 2: Assignment of Measures of Effectiveness to Level of Service......................................... 7
Table 3: Existing Conditions ................................................,......,......,.........,.....................,..........10
Table 4: Future (2006) Conditions without Project....................................................................... 14
Table 5: Trip Generation Rates and Project Trip Generation .......................................................15
Table 6: Future (2006) Conditions With Project (HU" turn prohibited at ECR) .......................... 25
Table 7: Future (2006) Conditions With Project (HU" turn allowed at ECR) ..............................25
Table 8A: SimTraffic Results for Future With Project (HU" turn prohibited at ECR) ................27
Table 8B: SimTraffic Results for Future With Project (HU" turn allowed at ECR) ....................27
Table 9: City of Tustin Parking Requirements ..................".... ......... ....... ........ ........ ..... ........., ....... 29
Table lO: Required Parking .,....,.................................................................................................... 30
~I- If.. Kimley-Horn
........ - U and Associates, Inc,
1.
Introduction
This report has been prepared to document the potential traffic-related impacts of the proposed
development of a 7,400-square-foot retail and fast-food development on the southwest comer of
Newport Avenue and EI Camino Real in the City of Tustin, California. The scope of the analysis
in this report is in accordance with direction provided by the City of Tustin Planning and
Engineering Department staffs. This report will satisfy the Traffic Impact requirements of the
County of Orange Congestion Management Program (CMP).
Because driveway volumes are the primary interest in this report, no pass-by trip reduction has
been applied. Actual traffic level increases at intersections outside the study area should be on
the order of 30% less than reported in this study, when compared to projections that would
include pass-by reductions. The analyses in this report also use the cuaent land use (vacant) as a
baseline. However, the site was previously used as a gas station (and other commerce existed
next to it prior to the 1-5 freeway widening); thus, when compared to the prior land uses at this
site, this project will generate very little, if any, additional traffic. Therefore, it is our opinion
that this project will have no regional traffic impacts. Thus, the focus of this study is to provide
safe and efficient access between the project and the adjacent arterial and freeway transportation
system.
2. Project Description
The project site is located on the southwest comer of Newport Avenue and El Camino Real in
the City of Tustin, California. A vicinity map is provided as Figure 1, and a site plan is provided
as Figure 2. The project site will contain 5,000 square feet of retail space; a 1,000-square-foot
sandwich shop; and a 1,400-square-foot coffee shop. The project site will be accessible through a
right-in, right-out driveway on EI Camino Real and a right-in, right-out driveway approach on
Newport Avenue. Newport Avenue has a median in the vicinity ofthe proposed driveway;
therefore, the driveway will function as a right-in, right-out drive. EI Camino Real is not divided
by a median; therefore, the driveway will have to be designed to ensure right-in, right-out access.
This can be achieved with a "pork-chop" channelization in the driveway at EI Camino Real,
together with "No Left Turn" signage. In order to accommodate vehicles turning in and out, the
driveway should be 30 feet in width. The applicant has indicated that this driveway width will be
accommodated on a revised site plan to be submitted, The Newport Avenue driveway can
likewise be widened to 30 feet to ease ingress/egress (although no raised median need be
installed in this driveway since a raised median in the street already enforces right-in, right-out
access).
3. Existing Conditions
3.1. Regional Access
Regional access to the project site is provided via the Interstate 5 (the Santa Ana Freeway). The 5
Freeway is an interstate freeway that extends throughout Orange and Los Angeles Counties,
Direct access to and from I-S north is provided via an interchange at Newport A venue, located
Newport/EI Camino Retail Site
Traffic Impact A nalv.I'i.l'
10/29/04
Page 1
"...-1- ..-. Kimley-Horn
~ - L_J and Associates, Inc,
adjacent to the site. Access to and from 1-5 south is available at Red Hill Avenue, approximately
a half-mile to the south, Newport Avenue is oriented in the northeast-southwest direction,
beginning in the City of Tustin at its southern tenninus near SH 55, and ending in Orange where
it ends at Santiago Canyon Road.
3.2.
Local Arterial Street System
Direct access to the Newport/El Camino Retail Center site is provided via Newport Avenue and
El Camino Real. A brief description of these local streets is provided in the following
paragraphs.
Newport Avenue is a north-south major arterial running northeast-southwest in the vicinity of
the project. On the City of Tustin Circulation Element, Newport Avenue is a Modified Major
Arterial southwest of El Camino Real and an Augmented Arterial to the northeast of El Camino
Real. It is included in the Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) of Orange County. It is a
four-lane divided thoroughfare with a posted speed limit of 35 miles per hour. On-street parking
is not allowed in the project vicinity.
.....
EI Camino Real is a southeast-northwest secondary arterial in the central portion of Tustin. It is
included in the Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) of Orange County. It is identified as a
Local Collecter between Newport A venue and First Street, and as a Secondary Arterial in the
remainder of Tustin. El Camino Real starts in Irvine south of Toll Road 261 and tenninates at 1 st
Street in Old Town Tustin. The posted speed limit is 35 miles per hour south of Newport Avenue
and 25 miles per hour north of Newport Avenue. On-street parking is not allowed in the vicinity
of the proposed project.
This traffic study will include documentation of existing conditions, analyses of future traffic
conditions and identification ofproject-related impacts at the following study intersections:
D Newport Avenue and El Camino Real
0 Newport Avenue and 1-5 Northbound Ramp (unsignalized)
0 Newport Avenue and 1-5 Southbound Ramp/Nisson Road
Figure 3 summarizes the existing intersection lane configurations at the study intersections.
Newport/E/ CamillO Retail Site
Traffic Impact Al/a/l'si.l'
10/29/04
Page 2
FIGURE 1
VICINITY MAP
z
(/)
(/)
0
z
;::c
0
»
CJ
/'
V,
!l
~
~
~
&
g>
t
'\
tJ'
~
~
~
'è:
~
';C
~
'"()
---
I
(J1
"
;::c
'T
'T
=:
»
-<
Sep 01, 2004 - 5: 29pm K: \94331006 Newport EI Comino llA \dwg\Figures,dwg
PROJECT
SITE
'T
r
()
»
~
z
0
;::c
'T
»
r
NEWPORT BL YO
z
0
~
d
@
~
~
~=~
Kimley-Horn end Associotes, Inc,
MAKENA
GREAT
AMERICA
TUSTIN NEWPORT RETAIL CENTER
14001 NEWPORT AVENUE
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA
ZONE: C - 2P
APN:
LOT AREA:
BUILDING AREA:
LOT COVERAGE:
LANDSCAPE:
401 - 641 - 05, 07
28. 816 S.F.
7, 400 S,F,
27, 00 %
24, 00 % (6, 860 S,F,)
PARKING:
RETAIL 5, ODD S,F. / 2CD
FOOD SERVICE 30 SEATS / 30
TOTAL SPACES REO'D 35
TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED: 35
-<\
~
.J..
0
1--
25
28
@>
2!)'-Ø'
1
on
....
:13
28 II 2V 11301131 113211~11I34
16'-1'
1'3'oØ'
13
---'1'-
FIGURE 2 ~.:---------_____~E_~O_R~~~L_VD'
SITE PLAN - - --- -
IOO'-Ø'
Sep 01, 2004 - 5: 29pm K: \94331006 Newport EI Camino llA \dwg\Figures.dwg
3Ø'-Ø'
~
~
1/)
~
,
't
,g
~
t:
~
ÕI'I
....
'"
~
,
t:
~
~
N?Zf
SITE
PLAN
KEYNOTES
@) ~~~....,
"""",,."',NO."" 2Ø2
@) =~":~':1'mAD':~"""'"
@) _TOI-
@) ""-.-01-
@> -.:>::.AT!!' 0..0 TOIN ' ...".,. ..,..
...J
«
W
!r
0
Z
J;
«
<..>
...J
w
~=~
Kimley-Horn ond Associates, lnG,
Ì'
Ú)
~
.;¡-
çl
~
.~
~
§
-"'"'\
z
(/)
(/)
0
z
;;0
0
»
0
LEGEND
- = EXISTING LANE
CONFIGURA TION
FIGURE 3
EXISTING LANE CONFIGURATION
Sep 01, 2004 - 5:29pm K:\94331006 Newport EI Camino l1A\dwg\FIgures.dwg
---
I
(J1
"T
;;0
fTI
fTI
=E
»
-<
"\
(j\
-Z-
~
~
C¿
{,
-;0
~
~
--
PROJECT
SITE
NEWPORT BL YO
fT1
r
()
»
s::
z
0
;;0
fT1
»
r
z
0
-i
d
@
~
,..
~
~=~
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc,
~ I-"" Kimley-Horn
- [~ and Associates, Inc,
3.3.
Transit Service
Transit services are not immediately adjacent to the project site. OCT A Route 71 passes along
the site, but the nearest northbound stop is a half-block to the north and the nearest southbound
stop is at the next signalized intersection to the east (Orange Street). Six transit routes converge
on Newport Avenue and 151 Street (over one-half mile north of the project site) that provide
access into the neighboring communities of Santa Ana, Irvine, and Red Hill,
3.4.
Level of Service
Perfonnance of transportation facilities is measured qualitatively using a letter scale from "A" to
"F" (similar to grading, except including "E"), with "A" being best perfonnance (little
congestion) and "F" being worst perfonnance. The following table summarizes how level of
service relates to observable factors.
T bIlL
I f S
D
a e : eve 0 ervlce escrioÍlons
Level of Service Description
A Free flow; vehicles are almost completely unimpeded in their
ability to maneuver within the traffic stream.
Reasonably free flow; free-flow speeds are maintained; the
B ability to maneuver within the traffic stream is only slightly
restricted. Little queuing at traffic signals and/or blockages,
Flow at speeds at or near the free-flow speed; freedom to
C maneuver within the traffic stream is noticeably restricted,
and lane changes require more vigilance. Queues may be
expected to form at traffic signals and/or blockages,
D Speeds lower than the free-flow speed; freedom to maneuver
more noticeably limited; even minor incidents cause queuing,
Operation at capacity; operation is volatile; vehicles are
E closely spaced, leaving little room to maneuver in the traffic
stream; extensive queuing at traffic signals and/or blockages,
F Over capacity condition; breakdown in vehicular flow.
The qualitative "A" through "F" level of service scale is measured quantitatively using measures
of effectiveness. The measure used depends on the type of facility being assessed. Signalized
intersections are assessed using the Intersection Capacity Utilization method. In accordance with
the City of Tustin and the County of Orange Congestion Management Program (CMP)
requirements, peak hour operating conditions at the signalized intersections were evaluated using
the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology. The ICU methodology provides a
comparison of the theoretical hourly vehicular capacity of an intersection to the number of
vehicles passing through that intersection during a given hour.
Also, to meet Caltrans analysis requirements, the intersection of Newport Avenue and 1-5
Southbound Ramp/Nisson Road was evaluated utilizing the 2000 HCM methodology, This
Newport/EI Camino Retail Sitl!
Traffic Impact Analysis
10/29/04
Page 6
,.....-1- .... Kimley-Horn
........ - U and Associates, lnG,
method utilizes average delay per vehicle as the Measure of Effectiveness that translates into the
corresponding level of service.
The ICU calculation assumes a per-lane capacity of 1,700 vehicles per hour (vph) for each travel
lane (through or turning lane) through the intersection. Where there is no separately striped right-
turn lane, if the width of the outside through lane is 19 feet or more, and parking is prohibited
during the peak period, a separate "unofficial" right-turn lane is assumed. A clearance factor of
0.05 (5%) of the total intersection capacity is included in the ICU calculation.
Level of service at unsignalized intersections is measured using the methodology contained in the
Highway Capacity Manual, 2002 Edition (published by the Transportation Research Board).
The following table summarizes the measures of effectiveness used in this report:
bl
Ta e 2: Assienment of Measures of Effectiveness to Level of Service
I
Signalized I Two-Way Stop Control:
-
Signalized Intersections: Intersections: A verage Delay of Worst
Intersection Capacity Average Delay per Side-Street Movement
LOS Utilization (ICU) Vehicle (sec)* (see)
A ::;; 0.6 ::;;10 ::;;10
B > 0.6 and ::;; 0.7 > 1 0 and::; 20 > 10 and ::;; 15
C > 0.7 and ::;; 0,8 > 20 and::; 35 > 15 and::; 25
D > 0.8 and::; 0,9 > 35 and ::;; 55 > 25 and::; 35
E > 0,9 and s; 1.0 > 55 and s; 80 > 35 and s; 50
F > 1.0 > 80 > 50
*-Highway Capacity Manual methodology used for the intersection of Newport Avenue and 1-5
Southbound Ramp/Nisson Road, per Caltrans requirements
For delay-based methods, the delay estimated is control delay, which is the difference in average
time required to traverse the intersection with the control in place to the time it would have taken
to traverse the same distance had the intersection not been there. The HCM method estimates
control delay as follows:
0 The signalized intersection method estimates average delay based on existing or forecast
turning movements and intersection lane configuration.
0 The two-way stop method uses a gap acceptance model to estimate the average delay
experienced by the main street left-turn and side-street traffic.
Newport/El Camino Retail Site
Traffic Impact Analysis
10/29/04
Page 7
~I_"'" Kimley-Horn
~i_L_j and Associates, Inc,
3.5. Congestion Management Program Compliance
The Orange County Congestion Management Program (CMP) was established in 1991, to reduce
traffic congestion and to provide a mechanism for coordinating land use and development
decisions. Compliance with the CMP requirements ensures a city's eligibility to compete for
State gas tax funds for local transportation projects,
A copy of the County of Orange CMP Highway System is provided on Figure 4. Within the
project study area, there are no CMP Highway System arterials.
Newport/El Camino Retail Site
Traffic Impact Analysis
10/29/04
Page 8
2003' Congestion Management Program Highway System
Orange County, California
"". ""',"
, {\
'~!
, \"..".,~-,.
..... ";~ "
t
,"
I
."",
",,""""""'-. '
""""""",.,......"
,
, '"
,"1'.
..""""""
i
i
.
" \"'.
"'O,f"""
FIGURE 4: ORANGE COUNTY CMP HIGHWAY SYSTEM
LEGEND
. CMPIrI!ortt<I!On
- F_1t
-CMP~~
)~.
.
N..,J.JOOJ
~
....
m
OCTA
.---
~=~
Kimley-Horn and Associoles, Inc,
~I-r.. Kimley.Horn
........ - LJ and Associates, Inc,
3.6.
City of Tustin Level of Service Standard
The City of Tustin requires that Level of Service "0" be maintained at intersections (which is
more conservative than the Orange County CMP standard of LOS "E").
3.7.
Traffic Impact Criteria
One purpose of a traffic impact study is to identify the traffic-related impacts of a proposed
development, and to determine whether or not those impacts are significant, in order to satisfy
Cahfornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements. If determined to be significant, the
project would be required to mitigate the project's traffic-related impacts.
A significant project impact is defined as a 0.01 or greater increase in ICU due to the project
traffic at an intersection that, with the addition of project traffic, will operate at an unacceptable
level of service.
3.8.
Existing Intersection Conditions
Turning movement counts were taken in May 2004 to gauge existing traffic conditions. Figure 5
summarizes the existing AM and PM traffic volumes. The traffic counts are also reproduced in
Appendix A. Table 3 below summarizes existing conditions at intersections in the study area.
T bl 3 E . f
c
d.f
a e : XIS 1ll2 on I Ions
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
ICU HCM HCM ICU HCM HCM
Intersection ICU LOS delay LOS ICU LOS delay LOS
Newport Avenue and EI 0.557 A 21.3 C 0.493 A 22.9 C
Camino Real
Newport Avenue and 1-5 N/A N/A 91.4 F N/A N/A 35.9 E
Northbound Ramp*
Newport Avenue and 1-5 0.600 A 22.8 C 0.721 C 24.9 C
Southbound Ramp/Nisson
Road
ICU=lntersection Capacity Utilization
*-Unsignalized intersection control delay presented for the northbound left turn (as measured by
Traffix, a program that implements the Highway Capacity Manual methodology-see Section 6.2
for further discussion of this intersection's performance)
Newport/El Camino Retail Site
Traffic Impact Analysis
10/29/04
Page 10
(,. ~
()1<¡) en
~. >.(,.
.................."""'"
. >.~(,.
NOO
Jft
885/1201- ì (
64/92-- ~¡;
",,<0
(,. '2:-
OJ. >.
. >.
ì'
v,
¿y
.{;'
~
B
§
~
§
--
\
lJ'
-Z-
~
....\
~
~
~
1J
~
~
--
216/320-'
868/1180-
'"
z
(/)
(/)
0
Z
;0
0
»
0
I
(J1
"
::0
fT1
fT1
:E
»
-<
LEGEND
xx/YY = EXISTING PEAK HOURLY
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
FIGURE 5
EXISTING PEAK HOURLY TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Sep 01, 2004 - 5:29pm K:\94331006 Newport EI Camino TIA\dwg\Figures,dwg
PROJECT
SITE
~=
enen~
'/ """"'.........N
/ ~:þ~ '- 26/46
'-678./498 Í"<O~l-1542/960
-1341/930 J ,-120/126
139/260-' ì t (
584/796- <5 N en
177 /117 -- OJ ~ ~
.................."""'"
<O(,. ¡::;
. >.=O
fT1
r
()
»
5:
z
0
;0
fT1
»
r
NEWPORT BLVD
z
0
~
d
III
0
~
~=~
Kimley-Horn and Associotes, Inc,
@
~I- r,. Kimley-Horn
........ - [_J and Associates, Inc,
Table 3 shows that all study-area signalized intersections are currently operating at an acceptable
Level of Service C or better. The eastbound Newport Avenue left turns onto the 1-5 Northbound
ramp are operating at Level of Service F in the morning peak. This poor level of service is due to
the queue that forms on the ramp as well as the volume of westbound Newport Avenue traffic.
The level of service at this intersection is discussed in greater detail in Section 6.2.
4. Future Traffic Conditions
The proposed project is expected to open in the year 2006. In the next two years while the project
is being planned and constructed, a combination of other projects scheduled to open before this
one and general ambient growth are expected to cause background traffic to increase. This
section of the report quantifies this increase. '
4.1.
Ambient Growth
An ambient growth rate of 2% per year has been applied to existing traffic volumes to account
for traffic increases associated with other projects and regiòñal growth.
4.2. Future Background Traffic Conditions
Ambient growth was added to existing traffic volumes, to develop Future Background traffic
volumes forecasts for Opening Day of the project (Year 2006). These forecast volumes are
shown on Figure 6. Table 4 shows the forecast level of service at the study-area intersections for
future conditions without the project. Existing intersection lane geometry was assumed.
Newport/EI Camino Retail Site
Traffic Impact Analysis
10/29/04
Page 12
v. ~
(J) 0)(0
(J1-....JO
'-...'-...'-...
. >.~v.
v.O~
()J(J1(J1
) II
920/1249-
67/96"\
LEGEND
xx/YV = AM/PM PEAK HOURLY
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
v.~
v.N
, ..::::v.N
/ / v.~ '- 27/48
-....J(J1N
'-705/518 C{J(J1Nl-1604/998
-1395/967 J ¡-125/131
145/270-1 ì t (
607/828- ~ N ~
184/122"\ OÒ~
'-...'-...'-...
tOv.~
()JNN
v.(J1
('T1
r
()
}>
3::
Z
0
;IJ
('T1
}>
r
Ì'
CJ,
[f
ß
8>
~
CS
~
t
\'
l5'
~
~
..-\
~
C@:
ð
íO
~
"'0
FIGURE 6
FUTURE (2006) BACKGROUND PEAK HOURLY TRAFFIC VOLUMES
---
225/333-1
903/1227-
~
z
(/)
(/)
0
Z
;IJ
0
»
0
I
()1
-.,
;IJ
('T1
('T1
:E
}>
-<
Sep 01, 2004 - 5:30pm K:\94331006 Newport EI Camino TlA\dwg\Flgures.dwg
PROJECT
SITE
NEWPORT BL YO
z
s
a
1/1
()
~
~=~
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc,
@
~I-r.. Kimley-Horn
.........; - LJ and Associates, Inc,
Table 4: Future (2006) Conditions without Project
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
ICU HCM HCM ICU HCM HCM
Intersection ICU LOS delay LOS ICU LOS delay LOS
Newport Avenue and EI 0.579 A 21.6 C 0.513 A 23,2 C
Camino Real
Newport Avenue and 1-5 N/A N/A 138.8 F N/A N/A 49.3 E
Northbound Ramp*
Newport Avenue and 1-5 0.624 B 23.4 C 0.744 C 25.7 C
Southbound Ramp/Nisson
Road
ICU=lntersection Capacity Utilization
*-Unsignalized intersection control delay presented for the northbound left turn (as measured by
Traffix, a program that implements the Highway Capacity Manual methodology-see Section 6.2
for furlher discussion of this intersection's performance)
Table 4 shows that, by 2006, the signalized intersections will continue to operate at levels of
service C or better. The eastbound Newport Avenue left-turns onto the 1-5 northbound ramp will
continue to operate at level of service F during the AM peak hour (as measured by the HCM
methodology; see Section 6.2 for further discussion).
5. Project Traffic
The project site will contain 5,000 square feet of retail space, a 1,000-square-foot sandwich shop,
and a 1,400-square-foot coffee shop. The project site will be accessible through a right-in, right-
out driveway on El Camino Real and a right-in, right-out driveway approach on Newport
Avenue.
The site plan includes a right-in, right-out driveway to Newport Avenue, but permission to access
Newport Avenue has not yet been granted by the City of Tustin. This study includes evaluation
of projected operations ofthis driveway access if granted by the City.
5.1. Project Trip Generation
Trip generation estimates for the proposed retail/restaurant center were derived from the Institute
of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (7th Edition). Land Use Category
820-Shopping Center was used for the 5,000 square feet retail space while the Land Use
Category was 933 for the sandwich and coffee shops. The coffee shop trip generation was based
upon Table 2 (page 1742) of the Trip Generation Manual. No pass-by or internal capture was
assumed for this analysis in order to yield conservative results.
The site is currently vacant, so no trip generation reduction is taken for removal of existing land
uses.
Newport/El Camino Retail Site
Traffic Impact Analysis
10/29/04
Page 14
IIIIIII"!-r,. Kimley-Horn
~i_[_' and Associates, Inc,
Trip generation rates and the resulting trip generation for the project are summarized on Table 5.
The proposed project site is projected to generate 1,996 new trips to the surrounding street
system on a daily basis, with 172 trips in the morning peak hour, and 153 trips in the evening
peak hour, These trips were applied to the off-site intersection analysis.
Table 5: Trip Generation Rates and Project Trip Generation
Trip Generation Rates Project Trip Generation
Trip Generation ITE AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak
Category Code Units Daily In Out In Out Daily In Out In Out
Previous Land Use (Currently not operating; for information only)
Gasoline!
Service Stn. wi 944 6 162.7 5.03 5,03 6.69 6.69 977 30 30 40 40
Convenience 8
Market
Proposed Land Use -.
Shopping Center 820 5.00 42.94 * * ** ** 216 16 10 42 45
933
Coffee Shop (Table 2, 1.40 716 37.25 35.79 14.97 13.82 1,064 52 50 21 19
pg 1742)
Restaurant (fast- 933 1,00 716 26.32 17.55 13,34 12,81 716 26 18 13 13
food) Total external trips from Proposed Land Use: 1,996 94 78 76 77
* fitted curve data (page 1452) was used due to the square footage [Ln(T) = 0.60 Ln(X) + 2.29]
** fitted curve data (page 1453) was used due to the square footage [Ln(T) = 0,66 Ln(X) + 3.40]
Table 5 also reports the estimated trip generation associated with the prior land use (a gasoline
service station). This infonnation is reported for the reader's infonnation and to support the
finding that this project will have no regional impact. Since the traffic data collected in support
of this project was obtained after the service station was already closed, no credit or reduction
has been taken for the previous land use.
5.2. Project Trip Distribution and Assignment
Trip distribution is the process of estimating where traffic related to the site comes from, and
where it will go. The trip distribution for this project, presented on Figure 7, was derived from
nearby land-use patterns, the available roadway circulation system, and professional judgment.
At the time this study was originally prepared, the northbound "U" turn on Newport Avenue was
an allowed traffic movement. Since that time, the City implemented a project to provide
protected left-turn phasing (i.e., red, yellow, and green arrow indications for the left-turn
Newport/El Camino Retail Site
Traffic Impact Analysis
10/29/04
Page 15
......-1- ..11 Kimley-Horn
~ - U and Associates, Inc,
movements) to the east-west approaches (EI Camino Real). At the same time, an eastbound right-
turn overlap phase (i.e., a green arrow for the right-turn movement, active whenever the
northbound left-turn arrow is green) was implemented. Whenever right-turn arrows are provided,
it is standard practice to restrict the conflicting "U" turn movement (in this case, the northbound
"U" turn), and this change was also implemented. Therefore, today, the northbound "U" turn
movement is not allowed.
It is City staff's opinion that the current intersection configuration should be retained, and that
northbound "u" turns should continue to be precluded. However, it is the applicant's desire to re-
institute the "U" turn movement. It is our opinion that the "U" turn movement should be allowed,
but the study has been prepared to cover both access alternatives.
In each alternative, traffic would access the site as follows:
0 No "U" turn at ECR: Project traffic traveling northbound on Newport Avenue would make a
"U" turn at the intersection of Bonita Street and Newport Avenue. An existing "U" turn
prohibition would be removed by the project applicant. The width of Newport Avenue is
sufficient to accommodate "U" turns at this driveway.
0 "U" turn at ECR: Project traffic traveling northbound on Newport Avenue would make a
"u" turn at the intersection of EI Camino Real and Newport A venue. The traffic signal
equipment would be modified by the project applicant as needed to re-institute the
movement.
Figure 7 has been prepared to show both access alternatives.
Newport/El Camino Retail Site
TratJìc Impact Analysis
10/29/04
Page 16
l;:ÇlND
XX%"" f)ROJEC T mil)
DISTF~IBUTION
~
()1
~ -10%
l ,5%
10%- (
()1
~
z
If)
If)
0
z
:::u
0
»
0
ì'
Ú?
¿;;
.:;
d-'
B
&"
i.~
t
--
\
ú'
FIGURE 7 A
,
PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION (!lU" TURN PROHIBITED AT ECR)
[77;~ N ()1
V // 00
... ~~
\.-15% '/ Ä. /..... . .! l..-.. 55%
-15~:////, ".~
\ 30%- ..~
\ 0
\ ~
\
\
\
\
\
-z.
0
~
~
~
~
'13
~
-D
I
(Jl
"Tl
AJ
fTl
fTl
::;¿:
»
-<
,/,,-,..""" [" ""--"",
/ tN ""
/ 0 "...,
í ~ \
r----1--'- 75% \
\ )
, I
.. I
"'" /
'~--""._"/""'_/
Oct 25, 2004 - 6:49pm K:\94331006 Newport EI Camino TlA\dwg\Flgures.dwg
fTl
I
()
»
s::
z
0
AJ
fTl
»
I
/:JJ'//"-":--"""\
I ()1 ,
/ ~ \
j \
I
\ 70%""'\1 ¡
\ I /
\'~,,-._1_//
NEWPORT BLVD
30%...=1
CD
0
Z
-I
»
(J)
-I
z
0
....
....
0
U)
0
".
F;;
@
~=~
Kimley-Horn and Associates. Inc,
~
(J'1
~ - 10%
L ,- 5%
10%- (
(J'1
~
z
(f)
(f)
0
Z
;:0
0
J>
0
L[Ç,I NQ
x:\% c, PROJECT TRIP
DISTRIBUTIOt~
~~/ ~~ --25%
'--15% /.// ..,+ .\;
-15~ \ 30%-" '1
\ ~
\
\
///~r'-~""'\ \
/ ~ i \ \
í j 1'- 75% +---1
\~ )
\ .
", ~//
"""'-----"'-'
;'
V,
f1
.;;;
&'
c?
ð
.i.~
t
---
\
ú'
-Z-
0
~
~
C¿
~
/J
~
'::ó
I
(J1
.,.,
;:0
f'l
f'l
~
J>
-<
FIGURE 7B
PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION ("U" TURN ALLOWED AT ECR)
Oct 25. 2004 - 6: 51pm K: \94331006 Newport EI Camino TIA\dwg\Figures,dwg
f'l
r
0
J>
š:
Z
0
;:0
f'l
»
r-
N
(J'1
~
j
70%---,
NEWPORT BL VO
z
0
,-
...,
0
UJ
(')
»
r
,..,
~
~II~
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc,
~
~
Yf~ 8/8
l ,4/4
9/8- r
(]I
'"
~
z
(J)
(J)
0
z
:::u
0
»
0
LEGEND
xx/YY = AM/PM PEAK HOURLY
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
I'
V,
r!l
ß
çp
#'
~
~
§
....-
\
lJ'
-Z-
~
.-\
~
~
~
1J
~
"'0
PROJECT
SITE
NEWPORT BLVD
N
~
'::::-
<D
)
--
;@)
~=~
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc,
FIGURE 8A
PROJECT AM/PM PEAK HOURLY TRAFFIC VOLUMES CU" TURN PROHIBITED)
I
(]I
.,
:::u
JT1
JT1
::E
»
-<
JT1
r
()
»
3:
z
0
:::u
JT1
»
r
N
VJ
'"
N
VJ
) 1'--71/57
Oct 25. 2004 - 4: 14pm K: \94331006 Newport EI Camino llA\dwg\F1gures.dwg
~
.þ.
Yf? 8/8
l ,-4/4
9/8- r
U1
.........
.þ.
z
(/)
(/)
0
Z
:::0
0
»
0
LEGEND
xx/YY = AM/PM PEAK HOURLY
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Ì'
Û>
&
.ß
&'
~
CS
.4~
t
\'
(j\
-z.
~
Î>
~
ð
-;0
~
:..0
PROJECT
SITE
......... .........
~VI
U1ID
ilI=24/19
28/23'=511
<D
'::::-
U1
IT1
r
()
»
:s:::
z
0
:::0
IT1
»
r
FIGURE 88
PROJECT AM/PM PEAK HOURLY TRAFFIC VOLUMES ("U" TURN ALLOWED)
I
--
I
(J'!
"
::u
IT1
IT1
~
»
-<
N
VI
.........
N
VI
) 1'-- 71 /57
Oct 25, 2004 - 4:15pm K:\94331006 Newport EI Camino TlA\dwg\Figures,dwg
NEWPORT BLVD
N
.þ.
'::::-
<D
)
Z@
~
i y,
~=~
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc,
"""..1-"" Kimley-Horn
..... - r_J and Associates, Inc,
Precluding both the northbound "U" turn and the westbound left turn into the site (the latter of
which is a City staff recommendation that has been accepted by the applicant) means that access
to the site from northbound Newport Avenue is very difficult. Therefore, a recommendation of
this study is to re-implement the northbound "U" turn for the following reasons:
D Based on discussions with City staff, it appears that the main purpose of the recent
improvement project was to provide east-west left-turn phasing, and that the provision of an
eastbound right-turn overlap phase was a secondary consideration,
D The number of eastbound right-turners observed (Figure 5) is an intermediate number,
neither substantially small nor large.
0 The City's level of service standard can be maintained without the overlap right-turn phase.
D If necessary, the right-turn overlap phase, and its associated "U" turn restriction, can be
provided by time-of-day (similar to the operation found at Jamboree Road and Irvine
Boulevard, also in Tustin).
D Not providing this movement will increase traffic at this intersection since the most likely
access means will be to continue north to make a "U" turn at the earliest opportunity, and
will then return to the site by traveling through the intersection again, this time in the
southbound direction. (However, the delay increase associated with this additional traffic is
offset by the delay decrease associated with the eastbound right-turn aITow.)
D Some agencies feel that relying on "U" turn movements for site access introduce unnecessary
vehicular conflicts. It is our professional opinion that the site access advantages outweigh the
disadvantages of the "U" turn movement. Our observation is that, if"U" turn collisions were
to occur (which is not a certainty), they would not be severe in nature,
Therefore, it is recommended that this project re-implement the northbound "U" turn movement.
However, as mentioned previously, this focused traffic study analyzes the project's impacts with
and without the "U" turn at Newport AvenuelEl Camino Real.
Project traffic volumes with the "U" turn prohibition at El Camino Real/Newport Avenue are
shown in Figure 8A, while traffic volumes with "U" turns allowed are shown in Figure 8B.
Project traffic volumes at the site driveways reflect the full trip-making potential for the project.
(Per this report's introduction section, the purpose of this study is to analyze the project's local
impacts; it is assumed, based on discussions with City staff and the fact that the site was
previously developed as a gas station, that the project is not expected to have any regional traffic
impacts.)
For the purpose of this study, all trips were assigned to private vehicles. This generates a
conservative traffic impact analysis in the sense that to the extent other modes are used (e.g.
transit or carpooling); they would serve to reduce this project's impacts.
NewportlEI Camilla Retail Site
Traffic Impacl A IIi/lysis
10/29/04
Page 21
......-! - r.. Kimley-Horn
~I- L_~ and Associates, Inc,
6. Future Traffic Conditions with the Project
6.1. Project Impact Comparison
Ambient growth and proposed project-generated trips were added to the existing traffic volumes
to develop Future (2006) volumes with Background traffic and proposed project trips to forecast
Opening Day of the project. The forecast volumes are shown on Figures 9A and 9B to gauge the
impact of the proposed project on the surrounding area. Table 6 shows the forecast level of
service at the study-area intersections for future conditions with the project with northbound "U"
turns restricted at El Camino Real/Newport Avenue. Table 7 shows the forecast level of service
for future conditions with the "U" turns allowed. Existing intersection lane geometry was
assumed for both analyses. The analysis worksheets are provided in Appendix B.
Newporl/EI Camino Retail Site
Traff'¡c Impact Analysis
10/29/04
Page 22
~(". ~-
~1O(J1
..................~
/ / ~ :::j'ci'- 27/48
'- 716/529 OJ 0 ~-1656/1040
---140,7 /979/) J ,L,-- 125/131
145/270-!ì f ( 28/23-:;
635/851-- Ñ ~ m
184/122-,.~Z':::'
~(". ~
~NN
(". (J1
f"Tl
r
0
»
:š::
z
0
/'
V¡
r!J
:;
dJ'
~
:<
c::;;
j.::>
t
\'
ú'
-:t-
~
.-\
ð
~
"6
';0
~
-D
(,.j N
eneno
(J1-..J~
...........................
~~(,.j
(,.jON
ex> (J1 en -1233/795
J ~ l r-174/180
929/1257- 1£
67/96----" en (J1
~
(". ~
-..J(J1
~
z
(j')
(j')
0
Z
::0
0
»
0
Xx/yy" ¡'>,M/PM PEAK HOURLY
TRAFF;C VOLUMES
225/333--.1
931/1250-
I
(J1
'T
::0
T
T
~
»
-<
FIGURE 9A: FUTURE (2006) PLUS PROJECT
PEAK HOURLY TRAFFIC VOLUMES ("U" TURN PROHIBITED AT ECR)
Oct 25, 2004 - 7:14pm K:\94331006 Newport EI Camino TIA\dwg\Figures.dwg
::0
fT1
»
r
NEWPORT BL VO
(JJ
0
Z
"-i
»
(j')
-1
z
0
..,.,
-~
0
@
UJ
0
»
r
f"1
~=~
Kimley-Horn and Associates. lnG,
¡'
C?
¿y
.;:;
dt
c!:9
<f
i.~
t
úJ I'V
0')0')0
U1--.J' >'
"""
' >'~úJ
úJOI'V
CO U1 0>:"-1233/795
j ~ l ,-174/180
929/1257- ì (
67/96---- ~~
~
úJ~
--.JU1
. >.
z
(j)
(j)
0
Z
:::0
0
P-
O
LE.G.£~NQ
XX/YY = AM/PM PEAK HOURLY
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
..--
\
(j\
-Z
0
~
~
0
c
ð
';û
Y'
~
225/333 --"
931/1250-
I
U1
'1
:::0
fT1
fT1
~
»
-<
W~~~
""~
/ /~:::j6ì'- 27/48
L- 716/529 CO 0 ~-1628/1017
--140,7/979/) J ~;,- 125/131
2%23~ ì t (
145 270--" ~ I'V ~
I'V. >.O>
607/828- CD o--.J
184/122---- ':::Q~
úJl'Vl'V
úJU1
fT1
I
FIGURE 98: FUTURE (2006) PLUS PROJECT
PEAK HOURLY TRAFFIC VOLUMES ("U" TURN ALLOWED AT ECR)
Oct 25. 2004 - 7: 14pm K: \94331006 Newport EI Camino TJA \dwg\Fìgures,dwg
()
P-
~
z
0
::;0
fTl
P-
I
NEWPORT BLVD
z
0
-<
-<
0
(j)
0
»
r
.....
@
~=~
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc,
"""-1- .,.. Kimley-Horn
"II...J_~--~ and Associates, Inc,
Table 6: Future (2006) Conditions With Project ("U" turn orohibited at ECR)
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
ICU HCM HCM ICU HCM HCM
Intersection ICU LOS delay LOS ICU LOS delay LOS
Newport Avenue and EI 0.601 B 22.7 C 0.539 A 24.4 C
Camino Real
Newport Avenue and 1-5 N/A N/A 151.9 F N/A N/A 55,1 F
Northbound Ramp*
Newport Avenue and 1-5 0,629 B 23.3 C 0.758 C 26.1 C
Southbound Ramp/Nisson
Road
Driveway and EI Camino N/A N/A 10.1 B N/A N/A 10.4 B
Real*
Driveway and Newport N/A N/A 15,5 C N/A N/A 12.5 B
Avenue*
ICU=lntersection Capacity Utilization
*-Unsignalized intersection control delay presented for the northbound left turn (as measured by
Traffix, a program that implements the Highway Capacity Manual methodology-see Section 6.2
for further discussion of this intersection's performance)
Table 7: Future (2006) Conditions With Pro.iect ("U" turn allowed at ECR)
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
ICU HCM HCM ICU HCM HCM
Intersection ICU LOS delay LOS ICU LOS delay LOS
Newport Avenue and EI 0.697 B 26.5 C 0.670 B 29.2 C
Camino Real
Newport Avenue and 1-5 N/A N/A 151.9 F N/A N/A 55.1 F
Northbound Ramp*
Newport Avenue and 1-5 0.629 B 23.3 C 0.758 C 26.1 C
Southbound Ramp/Nisson
Road
Driveway and EI Camino N/A N/A 10.1 B N/A N/A 10.4 B
Real*
Driveway and Newport N/A N/A 15.5 C N/A N/A 12,5 B
Avenue*
ICU=lntersection Capacity Utilization
*-Unsignalized intersection control delay presented for the northbound left turn (as measured by
Traffix, a program that implements the Highway Capacity Manual methodology-see Section 6.2
for further discussion of this intersection's performance)
NewportlEl Camino Retail Site
Traffic Impact Analysis
10/29/04
Page 25
~1-r1l Kimley-Horn
- U and Associates, Inc,
Tables 6 and 7 show that all study-area signalized intersections are forecast to operate at an
acceptable Level of Service C or better with the project in operation, with the exception of the
Newport A venue and 1-5 northbound ramp. Field observations, however, do not confinn this
finding. During the PM peak period, the intersection is observed to operate acceptably. During
the AM peak period, the intersection is affected by queue spillover from the northbound 1-5 on
ramp metering operation. The following observations are made about the operation of this
intersection:
0 During both analysis periods, northbound Newport Avenue left turners are observed to
proceed simultaneously with southbound right turners, each entering their own lane of travel
on the northbound 1-5 on ramp.
0 The traffic signal at the Newport Avenue/EI Camino Real intersection creates gaps for
northbound left turners at the on-ramp intersection. Specifically, gaps are created when the
northbound left-turn and east-west movements are operating at the traffic signal.
The Highway Capacity Manual methodology does not account for the first observation; it
assumes left turners must yield to right turners coming from the opposite approach. Although the
method does accommodate an adjustment factor to account for upstream signals, it was decided
to use a traffic model that would explicitly account for both observed factors. The selected traffic
model is SimTraffic, a microsimulation software, The next section discusses the simulation
findings.
6.2. SimTraffic Microsimulation Analysis
A model ofthe three project intersections (southbound 1-5 ramp/Nisson Road at Newport
Avenue, northbound 1-5 ramp at Newport Avenue, and Newport Avenue at EI Camino Real) was
created. Also included were the proposed driveways on Newport Avenue and EI Camino Real.
The model also accounts for the ramp metering for the northbound 1-5 ramp. Although
SimTraffic does not explicitly model freeway systems such as ramp meters, a workaround was
developed that provides the same traffic flow characteristics. The following infonnation was
obtained from Rob Marsh, the Caltrans traffic engineer responsible for District 12's ramp
metering program:
0 The ramp is adaptively metering; that is, the metering rate depends on current freeway
mainline traffic volumes, as measured by vehicle detectors adjacent to the on ramp.
0 The ramp meter signals are continuously green when freeway traffic is light.
0 The system is configured to vary the allowed flow rate between 900 vehicles per hour per
lane and 660 vehicles per hour per lane throughout the day, depending on mainline traffic
volumes.
Queue spillback detector loops are present at the end of the ramp adjacent to Newport Avenue.
When the queue extends to Newport A venue, the metering flow rate increases to the maximum
900 vehicles per hour per lane.
To simulate the flow restriction of the on ramp, a traffic signal was placed on the on-ramp cycles
3 seconds green, 12 seconds red. Observation of the SimTraffic simulation (available upon
request) shows that queuing on the ramp and on Newport Avenue is similar to that which is
Newport/El Camino Retail Site
Traffic Impact Analysis
10/29/04
Page 26
~I- .... Kimley-Horn
.......I_LJ and Associates, lnG,
observed in the field, and also that the rate of vehicles entering the freeway is similar to the
metering rate reported by Caltrans.
The SimTraffic simulation reports that northbound Newport Avenue left-turners experience
delays of 25.6 seconds per vehicle during the AM peak period and 18.3 seconds per vehicle
during the PM peak period, which better reflects observed traffic conditions. These delays
equate to Level of Service D and C in the AM and PM peak periods, respectively.
Based on field observations and use of a more accurate traffic analysis tool, it is our opinion that
the HCM methodology overstates the amount of delay that occurs for northbound Newport
Avenue left-turners at the northbound 1-5 ramp. We also conclude that the traffic system in the
vicinity of the project site will continue to function at an adequate level of service with project
traffic added. Results of the SimTraffic analyses are provided in APPENDIX C.
For comparison and for completeness, the other study-area intersections were analyzed using the
SimTraffic model. The results of this scenario (future traffic conditions with the project) are
shown in Tables 8A and 8B. Based upon our observations in the field and review of the
graphical display of the SimTraffic model, we believe these results are more reflective of actual
operations versus the HCM methodology results.
T bl 8
S. T ffi R
f
"
h
d
ECR
a e A: 1m ra lC esults or Future With Project ( U" turn pro ¡bite at ~
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Intersection Delay LOS Delay LOS
Newport Avenue and 1-5 25,5 D 19.9 C
Northbound Ramp
Driveway and EI Camino Real 11.4 B 15.5 C
Driveway and Newport 21.0 C 10.5 B
Avenue
Table 8B: SimTraffic Results for Future With Project ("U" turn allowed at ECR)
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Intersection Delay LOS Delay LOS
Newport Avenue and 1-5 25,6 D 18.3 C
Northbound Ramp
Driveway and EI Camino Real 15,9 C 7.5 A
Driveway and Newport 19,3 C 11.1 B
Avenue
Newport/El Camino Retail Site
Traffic Impact Analysis
10/29/04
Page 27
......-1- n Kimley-Horn
~ - r~ and Associates, Inc.
7. Site Access
The site plan was reviewed for conformance with good traffic engineering practice and was
found to be acceptable. The right-in, right-out access on Newport Avenue is discussed in further
detail in this section. Section 8 discusses the adequacy of the parking supply.
The projected operations of the Newport Avenue driveway have been shown to operate at Level
of Service B or better during the AM and PM peak hours. The proximity of the driveway to the
Newport Avenue and El Camino Real intersection has been raised as an issue. The concern was
investigated by conducting a sight distance analysis for this approach to determine whether the
available sight distance meets current standards.
Sight distance is defined as the continuous distance down the road a driver can view an object of
interest, such as an oncoming vehicle or an object in the road. Available sight distance can be
compared to standards for required sight distance to determine whether a particular geometric
configuration provides adequate sight distance for its users.
Two methods are available to gauge the suitability of sight distance. The first method, which is
based on providing enough distance for drivers on the major street to see, react to, and stop
before striking another vehicle in the roadway, is called "stopping sight distance." In this report,
this is considered the "minimally acceptable" amount of sight distance to be provided for safe
operation. The second method is called "gap acceptance." This method, which is used nationally
to determine sight distance at intersections (A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and
Streets, 2001 Edition, published by the American Association of State Highway and
Transportation Officials, called the "AASHTO Green Book"), requires enough sight distance to
allow turning drivers to see gaps in the traffic stream that can accept them. Acceptable gaps,
which are measured in seconds, are translated to sight distance via the design speed of the
roadway. In this report, the gap acceptance method is considered the "desirable" amount of sight
distance to be provided,
The AASHTO Green Book was utilized in the review of Stopping Sight Distance standards.
Assuming right turners from eastbound El Camino Real to southbound Newport Avenue travel at
15 miles per hour (a typical turning speed), they can safely stop in 80 feet per the AASHTO
stopping sight distance standard. The project driveway along Newport Avenue is located
approximately 115 feet from the El Camino Real curb, exceeding this design standard. A copy of
this AASHTO standard is provided in APPENDIX D.
The Intersection Sight Distance required per AASHTO standard for a right-turn from the
Newport Driveway is 385 feet for a design speed of 40 miles per hour, a conservative estimate
based upon a posted speed limit of35 miles per hour. Thiscorresponds to being able to see
traffic approaching at 40 miles per hour 7.5 seconds before they arrive at the driveway
intersection. This standard would apply to the vehicles traveling southbound on Newport
Avenue. However, the intersection of Newport Avenue and El Camino Real is signalized, which
provides a break in the Newport Avenue traffic flow. During periods of red along Newport
Avenue, the speed of approaching traffic is less because the conflicting traffic is turning from El
Camino Real. Assuming a l5-mile-per-hour speed, the intersection sight distance requirement
would be 145 feet. The distance from the driveway to the curb line ofEl Camino Real is
approximately 115 feet. This means that the desirable sight distance standard is not met in the
case of right turning vehicles from eastbound El Camino Real to Southbound Newport Avenue
(although stopping sight distance, the minimum needed for safe operation, is met, per the
Newport/El Camino Retail Site 10/29/04
Traffic Impact Analysis Page 28
......-,-r1l Kimley-Horn
....... - U and Associates, tnc,
previous paragraph). However, both standards are met for left turning vehicles from westbound
EI Camino Real to southbound Newport Avenue, due to the width of the intersection of Newport
A venue and EI Camino Real.
It should also be noted that the signalized intersection of Newport Avenue and EI Camino Real
provides some means of control for vehicles turning right nom the proposed driveway. During
periods of red along Newport Avenue, motorists turning from the project driveway onto Newport
A venue have the greatest opportunity to complete the maneuver.
The EI Camino Real Driveway is also anticipated to operate satisfactorily as a right-in, right-out
drive (with the recommended "pork-chop" channelization in the driveway), This segment ofEI
Camino Real is signed for 25 MPH; therefore, a design speed of 30 MPH is assumed in this
review. Per the AASHTO standards, a stopping sight distance of200 feet is required along EI
Camino Real prior to the driveway in order for vehicles to safely avoid a right-turning vehicle
onto EI Camino Real. Based upon field observations, the available sight distance along EI
Camino Real exceeds the minimum standard. The intersection sight distance for a 30 MPH
design speed is 290 feet, per AASHTO standards. Again, the available sight distance in the field
exceeds this desirable standard. Therefore, the proposed EI Camino Real driveway exceeds the
sight distance standards,
As indicated earlier, a median is recommended for installation in the EI Camino Real driveway to
enforce right-in; right-out access. To provide this median, the driveway width is recommended to
be increased to 30 feet. The applicant's architect has indicated that both driveways can be
constructed 30 feet wide without significantly affecting the site design, and a revised site plan is
being prepared,
8. Parking Requirements
The following paragraphs summarize the off-street parking requirements for the proposed
development and the number of parking spaces provided.
The City of Tustin' s parking code requirement for the land uses present in the proposed project is
presented in Table 9.
Table 9: Ci
land Use
of Tustin Parkin Re uirements
Parking Requirement
Retail
1 space per 200 SF GLA
Restaurant 1 space per 3 seats
GlA=Gross leasable Area
Table 10 presents this project's Code-required parking calculation.
Newport/EI Camino Retail Site
Traffic Impact Analysis
10/29/04
Page 29
~ - r~ Kimley-Horn
~I- [-.J and Associates, lnG,
T bl 10 R
. dP
a e : eqUire arldn!!
Land Use GLA (KSF) Required Parking
Retail 5 25
Restaurant 30 s-eats 10
Total: .. 35
GLA (KSF)=Gross Leasable Area in Thousand Square Feet
The Newport/EI Camino site would require 35 parking spaces based on the City's parking code.
Based upon the Site Plan, adequate parking is provided to meet City Code.
9. Conclusions
The following conclusions and recommendations are made in this study:
D All study-area signalized intersections currently operate at an acceptable level of service.
D The northbound left-turn movement at the unsignalized intersection of Newport Avenue at
the 1-5 northbound on ramp is reported to operate at Level of Service "F," a finding that does
not match field observations. In the field, this movement is observed to proceed
simultaneously with the southbound right-turn movement and thus experiences less delay
,than predicted by the standard methodology.
D To better account for observed conditions at this intersection, a micro simulation
methodology (SimTraffic) was used to analyze the Tustin Avenue/I-5 northbound ramp
intersection. This analysis reports acceptable delay to northbound left turners. It should be
noted that the delay experienced by southbound right-turners during periods when the ramp
meter is active is accounted for in the analysis, but since it is associated with the ramp meter
and is not directly attributable to this intersection's operation, the level of service at this
intersection is considered to be satisfactory.
D With the addition of ambient growth traffic (Year 2006), the study-area signalized
intersections continue at operate at acceptable levels of service. When measured using the
SimTraffic program, the intersection of Newport Avenue and the 1-5 northbound on ramp
also continues to operate at an acceptable level of service in this scenario.
D The addition of project traffic to background traffic (Year 2006 with project) causes no
impact during the AM and PM peak periods to the signalized study intersections. When
measured using the SimTraffic program, the intersection of Newport Avenue and the 1-5
northbound on ramp also continues to operate at an acceptable level of service in this
scenarIO,
D The trip generation of the previous land use (gasoline service station) was reported for
comparison purposes. Since the data collected in support ofthis traffic study was obtained
after closure of the prior business, no credit has been taken for the gas station's trip
generation in this traffic study. However, the gas station is estimated to have generated about
half the traffic expected to be generated by this project.
NewportlEl Camino Retail Site
Traffic Impact Analysis
10/29/04
Page 30
.......,- r.. Kimley-Horn
...... - [-_J and Associates, Inc,
0
It is recommended that the project re-implement the northbound "U" turn movement at
Newport Avenue/EI Camino Real. This will require a traffic signal modification plan to be
prepared and approved by the City, and a construction contract to be issued to implement the
modification. The estimated cost is $25,000. Since this recommendation is not accepted by
City staff, traffic conditions were forecast with and without this "U" turn movement. Traffic
conditions were found to be acceptable with or without the "u" turn when measured with
lCU, HCM, and SimTraffic methodologies. Therefore, the decision to allow or disallow this
movement can be based on other factors.
The right-in, right-out driveway on Newport Avenue is found to meet the stopping sight
distance standard but not the more conservative gap acceptance sight distance standard.
However, providing adequate stopping sight distance between the Newport Avenue driveway
and the nearest upstream intersection (EI Camino Real/Newport Avenue) is sufficient to
provide safe access. To ease ingress and egress, the site plan is being updated to provide 30
feet of width for this driveway.
0
0
The right-in, right-out driveway on EI Camino Real is found to meet both stopping and gap
acceptance sight distance standards. To enforce right-in, right-out access, it is recommended
that a raised concrete median be installed in the driveway that discourages access to and from
westbound EI Camino Real; and that no-left-turn signage be installed. The site plan is being
updated to show this driveway as 30 feet wide in order to accommodate the movements in
and out ofthe driveway with the median in place.
A parking supply of 35 spaces is required by City Code and is provided on the Site Plan.
0
Newport/EI Camino Retail Site
Tratfìc Impact Analysis
10/29/04
Page 31
~ 1- r.. Kimley-Horn
- L_J and Associates, Inc,
APPENDICES
Beach/Edinger Retail Site
Traffic Impact Analysis
10/29/04
,.......1- r,. Kimley-Horn
..... - L_] and Associates, Inc,
Appendix A: Traffic Counts
BeachlEdinger Retail Site
Traffic Impact Analysis
10/29/04
TMC SUMMARY OF 1-5 S8 RamDs I NewDort Ave
Project #: 04-1331-001
N
~ N o.n (!) D
r- (!) co
g r- ~ "'"
~ N 0 M
0
"'" M
§1 0 0 0
~ ;;; "'" M
(!) co
M ~
AM MD PM
0 0 0 d)" ~
I 0 1201 c::::¿ <:==J
64 0 92 ~ .¡J
~ ~ DL?
m
rn
~ '" 0 "'"
M "'"
" 0 0 0
::¡
~ M (J)
'" 0 M
~
~
g
AM
MD
PM
TOTAL
ill
z
:S
I
0 0 0 0
1178 0 757 1935
163 0 169 332
2
LOCATION #:
001
TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT
(Intersection Name)
APPROACH LANES
COUNT PERIODS
7:00 AM - 9:00 AM
4:00 PM - 6:00 PM
4:00 PM - 6:00 PM
AM PEAK HOUR
730 AM
NOON PEAK HOUR
OAM
PM PEAK HOUR
500 PM
TMC SUMMARY OF 1-5 NB RamDS I NewDort Ave
Project#: 04-1331-002
N
~ D
~ 0 0 0
§I 0 0 0
~ 0 0 0
AM MD PM
0 320 dY "Cb
~ 0 1180 c:==) (==:J
0 0 ~ £P
2
~ ~Dr
ill
if 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
::;
~ 0 0 0
0 0
APPROACH LANES
AM
MD
PM
TOTAL
ffJ
z
:5
~
I
678 0 498 1176
1341 0 930 2271
0 0 0 0
LOCATION #:
001
TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT
(Intersection Name)
Day
COUNT PERIODS
am
noon
m
7:00 AM - 9:00 AM
4:00 PM - 6:00 PM
4:00 PM - 6:00 PM
AM PEAK HOUR
730 AM
NOON PEAK HOUR
OAM
PM PEAK HOUR
500 PM
TMC SUMMARY OF EI Camino RealI Newport Ave
III
GI
0:
0
.=
E
ð
jjj
TOTAL AM MD PM
139 0 260 c=£t "Cb
~ 584 0 796 c:=> <:::==J
177 0 117 ~ .cç=
§
~ <lJDl?
rn
~ .,. ;:: 0
m N
'"
0 0 0 0
:¡¡
~ to ;;; <õ
0
~ N ~
~
NewpôTt Ave
~
APPROACH LANES
Project#: 04-1331-003
N
D
AM
TOTAL
ff3
3
is
~
MD
PM
26 0 46 72
1542 0 960 2502
120 0 126 246
LOCATION #:
001
TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT
5/18/04
Date
COUNT PERIODS
7:00 AM. 9:00 AM
4:00 PM. 6:00 PM
4:00 PM. 6:00 PM
AM PEAK HOUR
730 AM
NOON PEAK HOUR
DAM
PM PEAK HOUR
500 PM
J II ~l- If.. Kimley-Horn
.II....J_L_~ and Associates, lnG,
Appendix B: Traffix Analysis Sheets
Beach/Edinger Retail Site
Traffìc Impact Analysis
10/29/04
AM Existing
Mon Oct 25, 2004 13,30,16
AM Existing
Page 2-1
Mon Oct 25, 2004 13,30.16
Page 1-1
_UU-u__-hh___u--_U_------------------_U_------_U_--------------U_-----
----- ------------___h-_h- _UUUUU__U_-- U_---------
Traffic Impact Analysis for NewportlEl Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions without project, AM peak period
("Base"=existing without project)
Traffic Impact Analysis for NewportlEl Camino Retàil Center
Existing traffic conditions without project, AM peak period
I "Base"=existing without project)
hUUUU--
h_u_uu
--- _--h__U__huu- uh -- _u- _h- -_u_u_uu- _u U- -- - U
Scenario,
----------_UU_-_U_____h-
Scenario Report
AM Existing
Impact Analysis Report
Level Of Service
Command,
Volume,
Geometry,
Impact Fee,
Trip Generation,
Trip Distribution,
Paths,
Routes,
Cont igura t ion,
Default Command
AM
Default Geometry
Default Impact Fee
AM
Default Trip Distribution
with u-turn
Default Routes
Default Configuration
Intersect ion Base Future Change
Dell VI Dell VI in
LOS Veh C LOS Veh C
# I Newport Ave/I-5 SB Ramp-Nisson A xxxxx 0,600 A xxxxx 0,600 + 0,000 VIC
# 3 Newport Ave/EI Camino Real A """XX 0,557 A xxxxx 0,557 + 0,000 VIC
# 11 Newport Ave/I-5 NB Ramp F 91,4 0,000 F 91.4 0,000 + 0,000 DIV
Traffix 7,6,0115 (cl 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, DRANGE, CA
Traffix 7,6,0115 Icl 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
AM Existing
Mon Oct 25, 2004 13,30,16
Page 3-1
AM Existing
Mon Oct 25, 2004 13,30,16
page 4-1
- - - - - -- - - - -- --- -- - --- ---- ---- ---- - ---- - -_u -- -- - ----- --- - - ----- - --_u-- - -- - -----
-- - ------- ----- ------ ----- - ----- - ------ -- - ------- - - ----- - - ---- - - - - - - - - _d - - -----
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions without project, AM peak period
I "Base"-existing without project)
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions without project, AM peak period
("Base"=existing without project)
--- - - - - - - - - -- -- -- - --- -- -- ------- - u-- - ---
-----------------------
-- - -- ---------- - ----- -------- ---- -- ---- -------- - - - - --- - - ---_u- - - - -- --h--- - ----
.. ................... .............. ........................ ........... ..........
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU llLoss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base yolume Alternative)
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1 (Loss as Cycle Length %) Method IBase yolume Alternative)
......... ...... ...... .............. .................. .... .......................
Intersection #l Newport Ave/I-5 SB Ramp-Nisson
Intersection #3 Newport Ave/El Camino Real
............................................................................... .
......... .......................................................................
Cycle I secl ,
Loss Time Isecl,
Optimal Cycle,
100
a IY+R -
57
Critical yol, /Cap, ex),
4 sec) Average Delay Isec/veh) ,
Level Of Service,
0,600
xxxxxx
A
Cycle (sec),
Loss Time (secl,
Optimal Cycle,
100
a IY+R =
51
Crit ical Vol. /Cap, (XI,
4 secl Average Delay (sec/veh) ,
Level Of Service,
0,557
xxxxxx
A
Control,
Rights,
Min. Green,
1-5 SB Ramp/Nisson Newport Avenue
North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
_hl-------- ----11---------------11---------------11---------------1
Protected Protected Protected Protected
Include Include Include Include
a a a a a a a a a a a
00011010100201102
-I ¡---------------II---------------II----------
a
a
--I
"""!""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""'.""" .
Street Name, E1 Camino Real Newport Avenue
Approach, North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement, L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------I
Control, Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights, Include Ovl Include Include
Min, Green, a a a a a a a a a a a a
Lanes, 1 a 1 1 a 1 a 1 a 1 1 a 2 a 1 1 a 2 1 a
- -- -- --- --- I -- -- --- -- - I 1 - - -- -- - -- --- -- - I 1 --- -- -- -- -- --- I I - --- - d h -- -- - i
yol ume Module,
Base yol, 106 231 161 12 118 318 139 584 177 120 1542 26
Growth Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 LOO 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse, 106 231 161 12 118 318 139 584 177 120 1542 26
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 LOO 1.00 LOa
PHF Adj' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 LOO 1.00 1.00
PHF yolume, 106 231 161 12 118 318 139 584 177 120 1542 26
Reduct yol, a 0 a 0 a a a 0 a a 0 a
Reduced yol, 106 231 161 12 118 318 139 584 177 120 1542 26
PCE Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 LOO 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 LOO 1.00 1.00
Final yol" 106 231 161 12 118 318 139 584 177 120 1542 26
------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1
Saturation Flow Module,
Sat/Lane, 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700
Adjustment, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 LOO 1.00 1.00
Lanes, 1.00 1.18 0,82 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2,00 1.00 1.00 2,95 0,05
Final Sat" 1700 2004 1396 1700 1700 1700 1700 3400 1700 1700 5015 85
------------1---------------11---------------11-- ------------11---------------1
Capacity Analysis Module,
yol/Sat, 0,06 0,12 0,12 0,01 0,07 0,19 0,08 0,17 0,10 0_07 0,31 0,31
Cri t Moves,
.......................................................... ......................
Street Name,
Approach,
Movement,
Lanes,
Volume Module,
Base yol, 63 a 139 183 64 351 a 885 64 163 1178 a
Growth Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse, 63 a 139 183 64 351 a 885 64 163 1178 0
User Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF yolume, 63 a 139 183 64 351 a 885 64 163 1178 a
Reduct yol, a a 0 a a a a a 0 0 0 a
Reduced yol, 63 a 139 183 64 351 a 885 64 163 1178 a
PCE Adj' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj, 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final yol" 63 0 139 183 64 351 0 885 64 163 1178 0
------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1
Saturation Flow Module,
Sat/Lane, 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700
Adjustment, 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes, 1.00 0,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0,00 2,00 1,00 1.00
Final Sat" 1700 0 1700 1700 1700 1700 0 3400 1700 1700
------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11----
Capacity Analysis Module,
yol/Sat, 0,04 0,00 0,08 0,11 0,04 0,21 0,00 0-26 0,04 0,10 0,35 0,00
Crit Moves,
1700 1700
1.00 1.00
2-00 0,00
3400 a
------I
.............................................. ........... .......................
.............................................................................. ..
Traffix 7,6.0115 ic! 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
Traffix 7,6,0115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
AM Existing
Mon Oct 25, 2004 13,30,16
Page 5-1
-- - - ---- ----- -- ---- -- ------ - - ---- - - -- -- ---- -- - ----- - ----- - ---- ----- ------- - - ----
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions without project, AM peak period
("Base-existing without project)
--_--___n-
------ --_u- - --- -- --- - -- -- -----
-------------
............................. ......................... ..........................
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #11 Newport Ave/I-5 NB Ramp
.............................................................................. ..
Average Delay (sec/veh) ,
6,4
Worst Case Level Of Service,
F[ 91,4J
................................................ ..................... ...........
Street Name, 1-5 NB Ramp Newport Avenue
Approach, North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement, L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------1------------- -II---------------II-------------hll---------------I
Conrrol, Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights, Include Include Include Include
Lanes, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 1
---11---------------11---------------11---------------1
-----------1
Vol ume Module,
Base yol, 0 0 0 0 a 0 216 868 0 0 1341 678
Growth Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse, a 0 a 0 0 0 216 868 0 0 1341 678
User Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF yolume, 0 0 0 0 0 0 216 868 0 0 1341 678
Reduct yol, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final yo1., 0 0 0 0 0 0 216 868 0 0 1341 678
------------I-----------h--II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Critical Gap Module,
Critical Gp,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
FollowUpTim,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
- -- -- -- - ----1---------------11--- ---- -- ------11- _--nh_------II------------h_!
Capaci ty Module,
Cnflict yol, xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 2024
Potent Cap" xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 228
Move Cap-' xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 228
yolume/Cap, xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0,95
------------In-------------I 1---------------1 1----
Level Of Service Module,
Queue, xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8 ,3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Stopped Del, xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 91. 4 xxxx XXXXX xxxxx xxxx xXXXX
LOS by Move, . . . . . . F . . . . .
Movement, LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap" xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd StpDel,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS,
ApproachDel,
ApproachLOS,
4,1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
2 ,2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
-----II----nh_------I
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
Traffix 7.6.0115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
PM Existing
Mon Oct 25, 2004 13,]2,42
PM Existing
Mon Oct 25, 2004 13']2,42
----_u_---_u_---------------------_-_h_____h-----_u_-----
Page 2-1
page 1-1
- - - - - - u - - h- -- - _uu- uu_u --- -- -_uuu_u- uu- - hhU-Uu - u_--
uu_uh
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions without project, PM peak period
I"Base"=existing without project)
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions without project, PM peak period
I "Base"=existing without project)
Scenario,
- - - - u- - - - -- -- - BU- uh___hhh____-__uu _uu- u_h- ---_u__u- - u_u
Scenario Report
PM Existing
Impact Analysis Report
Level Of Service
- - - u uu_u uuu- h _h- hh _h - ---------_u - _hu u uu- - _uuu- - - - -- hUh U
Command,
Volume,
Geometry,
Impact Fee,
Trip Generation,
Trip Distribution,
Paths,
Routes,
Configuration,
Defaul t Command
PM
Default Geometry
Default Impact Fee
PM
Default Trip Distribution
with u-turn
Default Routes
Default Configuration
Intersect ion
Base
Del/ VI
LOS Veh C
C xxxxx 0,721
#
1 Newport Ave/I - 5 SB Ramp-Nisson
3 Newport Ave/El Camino Real
#
A xxxxx 0,493
# 11 Newport Ave/I-5 NB Ramp
E
35,9 0,000
Future
Del/ VI
LOS Veh C
C xxxxx 0,721
A xxxxx 0,493
E
35,9 0,000
Change
in
+ 0,000 V/C
+ 0,000 V/C
+ 0,000 D/V
Traffix 7,6,0115 Ic) 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
Traffix 7,6.0115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
PM Exlsting
Mon Oct 25, 2004 1),32,42
Page 3-1
PM Existing
Mon Oct 25, 2004 1),32,42
Page 4-1
_u_u_---_Uu_-----_Uuu_u---_uuu_------_u_-----------_u_-------------
--- -- -----------_u_____u_n___-U-_U_U_-----_UUU--_UU_--------
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions without project, PM peak period
("Base"=existing without project!
Traff ic Impact Analysis for Newport/El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions without project, PM peak period
("Base"=existing without project!
--------------------------------_0._---------------------------------_u_-----
--------- ------------_u_------_u_u_u--u_uuu__uunu___U__UUU_U_-
Intersection #l Newport Ave/I-5 SB Ramp-Nisson
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU I (Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1 (Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
......... ............ ................. ..................... .... .................
................................. .................................... ...........
Intersection #3 Newport Ave/El Camino Real
................................................................................
Cycle (sec),
Loss Time (sec) ,
Optimal Cycle,
..................... ...... ....... ................. ....... ..... .................
C
100
0 (Y+R =
82
Critical vol,/Cap, (X),
4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) ,
Level Of Service,
0,721
xxxxxx
Cycle (sec) ,
Loss Time (sec) ,
Optimal Cycle,
Critical Vol,/Cap. (X),
4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) ,
Level Of Service,
A
0,493
xxxxxx
100
0 (Y+R =
45
................................. ...............................................
.... ........... .............. ..... .................. ........ ..... ...............
Street Name, 1-5 SB Ramp/Nisson
Approach, North Bound South Bound
Movement, L T R L T R
u_uu-_u-I--_uu---_uu II----_uuu--u II
Control, Protected Protected
Rights, Include Include
Min, Green, 00000 0
Lanes, 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1
-----h_----!---uu-----_ull----_u--uu--II
Volume Module,
Base Vol,
Growth Adj,
Initial Bse,
User Adj,
PHF Adj,
PHF Vol ume,
Reduct vol,
Reduced vol,
PCE Ad],
MLF Adj,
Final Vol,
Newport Avenue
East Bound West Bound
T R L T R
_uu---Ilu-_u---_uu-I
Protected Protected
Include Include
0 0 0 0 0
00201102
-----_0.-------11
L
0
0 0
uul
Street Name, El Camino Real Newport Avenue
Approac¡h, North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Moveme{,t, L T R L T R L T R L T R
--_u_u-_uluu-----u----II--uu--_uu--II------_u------II u-----_u-----I
Control, Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights, Include ovl Include Include
Min, Green, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes, 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 1 0
_--_n_---ul-uuu--------!1 u__u_h_u---II----u---------II-h--_uu-u--I
Volume Module,
Base Vol, 94 311 120 21 149 363 260 796 117 126 960 46
Growth Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse, 94 311 120 21 149 363 260 796 117 126 960 46
User Adj, 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00
PHF Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume, 94 311 120 21 149 363 260 796 117 126 960 46
Reduct Vol, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced vol, 94 311 120 21 149 363 260 796 117 126 960 46
PCE Adj, 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00
MLF Adj' 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00
Final Vol" 94 311 120 21 149 363 260 796 117 126 960 46
-- -- ---_u!-_uunu_----II-u---u----u-II---_unu_unll-u_--_n_,-----1
Saturation Flow Module,
Sat/Lane, 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700
Adjustment, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes, 1.00 1.44 0,56 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2,00 1.00 1.00 2,86 0,14
Final Sat" 1700 2453 947 1700 1700 1700 1700 3400 1700 1700 4867 233
_u_u-_uulu_u------_u-II-_u--_u_uu-llu-------------II_u----------HI
Capacity Analysis Module,
Vol/Sat, 0,06 0,13 0,1) 0,01 0,09 0,21 0,15 0,23 0,07 0,07 0.20 0.20
Crit Moves,
144 303 101 421 0 1201 92 169 757
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
144 303 101 421 0 1201 92 169 757
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
144 303 101 421 0 1201 92 169 757
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
144 303 101 421 0 1201 92 169 757
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
144 303 101 421 0 1201 92 169 757
-- 00_00- - _un -II hUUU___----!!-----u_uun II---nun
Saturatron Flow Module,
Sat/Lane, 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700
Ad) ustment , 1. 00 1. 00 1 - 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00
Lanes, 1.00 0,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0,00 2,00 1.00 1.00 2,00 0,00
Final Sat" 1700 0 1700 17001700 1700 0 3400 1700 1700 3400 0
- - 00 -- __n! nnn__-_u---II----nu_u__- II_n_---_-------lluu---uu_---!
Capaclty Analysis Module,
Vol/Sat, 0,02 0,00 0,08 0,18 0,06 0,25 0,00 0,35 0,05 0,10 0,22 0,00
Cri t Moves,
36 0
1.00 1.00
36 0
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
36 0
0 0
36 0
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
36 0
a
1. 00
0
1. 00
1. 00
0
a
0
1. 00
1. 00
0
-_u-I
............... ........................ .... ............... ........... ...........
............................................................................... .
Traffix 7,6.0115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
Traffix 7,6,0115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE. CA
PM Existing
Mon Oct 25, 2004 13,32,42
Page 5-1
- - - - -- - - - --- -- - --- - - ---------------------------------------------
Traffic 1mpact Analysis for Newport/El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions without project, PM peak period
("Base"=existing without project)
- - - - - ------ -----------------------_u_----------_u_------
............................... ........ ............ ...... ................. ......
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
............................................................................... .
1ntersection #11 Newport Ave/I-5 NB Ramp
Average Delay (sec/veh) ,
3,-9
Worst Case Level Of Service,
E [ 35,9]
..................................................................... ...........
Street Name, I - 5 NB Ramp Newport Avenue
Approach, North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement, L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------I
Control, Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights, Include Include Include Include
Lanes, a a a a a a a a a a 1 a 2 a a a 0 2 a 1
--- ---------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------I
Volume Module,
Base Vol, a 0 0 a 0 0 320 1180 0 0 930 498
Growth Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse, 0 a a 0 a 0 320 1180 a 0 930 498
User Adj' 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00
PHF Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume, a a a a 0 a 320 1180 0 0 930 498
Reduct Vol, a 0 a a 0 a 0 a 0 0 0 0
Final Vol. , 0 a a a 0 0 320 1180 0 0 930 498
-- - ---------1- - - ----- -------11- --------------11--"------- -----II ---------------1
Cri tical Gap Module,
crit ical Gp, xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4,1 XXX>< xxxxx xxxxx XXX>< xxxxx
FollowUpTim,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2,2 XXX>< xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
----------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------I
Capacity Module,
Cnflict Vol, xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1204 XXX>< xxxxx xxxx XXXX xxxxx
Potent Cap, xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx XXX>< xxxxx 421 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap, , xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 421 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Vol ume/Cap, xxxx xxxx xxx x xxxx xxxx xxxx 0,76 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
- I I - -- --- --- -- - - -- I I --- -- - -- -- --- -- I 1 - --- - --- - - - u I
Level Of Service Module,
Queue, xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Stopped Del,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move, .
Movement, LT
Shared Cap" xxxx
SharedQueue, xxxxx
Shrd StpDel,xxxxx
Shared LOS,
ApproachDel,
ApproachLOS,
LTR - RT
LT - LTR - RT
6,3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
35,9 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
E . . . . .
LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
xxxx xXxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx XXX>< xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
xxxx xxxxx xxx><x xxxx xxxxx xxxxx XXX>< xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
Traffix 7,6,0115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
AM Future without u-turn
- - - - - - - - - n u_u - u u -- u_u_u_u_-_uuu_uu_---_uu_uu__uuuu-
Mon Oct 25, 2004 13:59,03
page 1-1
AM Future without u-turn
Mon Oct 25, 2004 13,59,03
u- ---- - -_u__u__u_-----------_u_------ --- ---- u - - -- - - - --_u_---- - - -_u_--- U
Page 2-1
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport!El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, AM peak period
("Base"=2006 without project; "Future"=2006 with project)
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport!El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, AM peak period
("Base"=2006 without project; "Future"=2006 with project)
5cenano,
- - - - - - - ------ - _u_--- -_u_--_u__u_-_uu_uu_u_uuuu_uuuu_-_u
Forecast for AM
_u_----- uuuu_--- ----_u_uu_--------_u_-_u ------------- ---- ---- --_u_---
Command,
Volume,
Geometry,
Impact Fee,
Trip Generation:
Trip Distribution,
Paths,
Routes:
Configuration,
Trip Generation Report
Scenario Report
AM Future without u-turn
Default Command
AM Future without
Default Geometry
Default Impact Fee
AM
Default
without
Default
Default
u-turn
Zone
n Subzone
Rate
In
Rate
Out
Amount
Units
uu ----_u_u_-
uu_u_uuu
Trip Distribution
u-turn
Routes
Configuration
1 Makena TusH 1,00 commercial 94,00 78,00
Zone 1 Subtotal"""."""""""""""
Trips Trips
In Out
94
94
Total' Of
Trips Total
78
78
172 100,0
172 100,0
TOTAL/".""",.""".""."""""""""""
------_u-u_--- u_u ---_u_----_u_u_-_u_------- -- - --------- ------ -- ---------
172 100,0
94
78
Traffix 7,6,0115 (cl 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
Traffix 7,6,0115 Ie) 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
AM Future without u-turn
Mon Oct 25, 2004 13,59,03
Page 3-1
AM Future without u- turn
Mon Oct 25, 2004 13,59,03
Page 4-1
----------_u_------------_u_---_u_-_u_--_u__u-u_---_u-_uu_----
---------_u_-----_u_-----------------_u_----_u_---------------_u_-------
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/E1 Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, AM peak period
i "Base".2006 without project; "Future".2006 with project)
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, AM peak period
("Base".2006 without project; "Future".2006 with project)
5,0
10,0
15,0
20,0
25,0
25,0
-------------_u---_uu_------------- _u - U - U u_u - -- u_h-_uu----- --_u
Turning Movement Report
AM
Volume Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total
Type Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Volume
#1 Newport Ave/I-5 SB Ramp-Nisson
Base 66 0 145 190 67 365 0 920 67 170 1225 0 3214
Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 12
u-turn 0 0 5 14 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 28
Total 66 0 150 204 67 365 0 929 67 174 1233 0 3254
#3 Newport Ave/El Camino Real
Base 110 240 167 12 123 331 145 607 184 125 1604 27 3675
Added 19 0 0 39 16 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 98
u-turn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2B 0 0 28 0 56
Total 129 240 167 51 139 331 145 635 1B4 125 1656 27 3829
#5 El Camino Driveway
Base 0 412 0 0 466 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 878
Added 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 55 0 0 0 79
Total 0 412 0 0 466 24 0 0 55 0 0 0 957
#10 Newport Ave driveway
Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 903 0 0 2100 0 3002
Added 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 42 65
u-turnj 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 0 28 56
Total 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 931 0 0 2100 70 3123
#11 Newport Ave/I-S NB Ramp
Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 225 903 0 0 1395 705 3227
Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 12 24
u-turn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2B 0 0 0 0 28
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 225 931 0 0 1407 717 3279
#12
Base 0 894 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 894
Added 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12
Total 0 906 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 906
------------ _uu_uu_--_uu_uu_u_u_un_unnn__uuu_u_un_-
Trip Distribution Report
Percent Of Trips project
To Gates
3
Zone
u -- u uu-
Traffix 7,6,0115 icl 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
Traffix 7,6,0115 (cl 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
AM Future without u-turn
Mon Oct 25, 2004 13,59,05
- - - -- -- - - --- -- - - - - - - - - -- - -- - - - -- - - -- -- -- --- -- ----n ------ - ---- - - - ---- --- - __n ---
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, AM peak period
("Base"=2006 without project; "Future"=2006 with project)
Page 5-1
AM Future without u-turn
Page 6-1
Mon Oct 25, 2004 13,59,05
--------------------------- -------------- - -- - ------ - ------ ----------- ---- -- -----
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, AM peak period
I "Base"=2006 without project; "Future"=2006 with project)
-----------------_u_-----------------------------------------------------------
Impact Analysis Report
Level Of Service
-- - - - - -- - --- - -- - --__n_---- - ----- - n- -------------- ----------u------------- ----
........ ....... ........ .... ...... ... ..... ... . ...... . . . . .. ..... . ...... .. ... . .. . ..
Intersect ion
Base
Dell vi
LOS Veh C
B xxxxx 0,624
1 Newport Ave/! - 5 SB Ramp-Nisson
3 Newport Ave/El Camino Real
A xxxxx 0,579
5 El Camino Driveway
0,0 0,000
A
# 10 Newport Ave driveway
A
0,0 0,000
# 11 Newport Ave/I-5 NB Ramp
F 138.8 0,000
Level Of Service Computation Report
lCU 1 (Loss as Cycle Length t) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Future
Dell V I
LOS Veh C
B xxxxx 0,629
Change
in
Intersection #1 Newport Ave/I-5 SB Ramp-Nisson
............................................................... .................
Critical Vo1./Cap. IX),
4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) ,
Level Of Service,
Cycle (sec) ,
Loss Time (sec) ,
Opt imal Cycle,
100
0 IY+R =
61
0,624
xxxxxx
B
+ 0,005 v/C
B xxxxx 0,601 + 0,021 v/c
B 10,1 0,000 +10,094 D/V
C 15,5 0,000 +15,477 D/v
............................................................................... .
Street Name' 1-5 SB Ramp/Nisson Newport Avenue
Approach, North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement, L T R L T R L T R L T R
-- ----------1---------------11-- -------------11---- -----------11----------- ----I
Control, Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights, Include Include Include Include
Min, Green, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes, 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 0
------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1
Volume Module,
Base Vol, 63 0 139 183 64 351 0 885 64 163 1178
Growth Adj, 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04
Initial Bse, 66 0 145 190 67 365 0 920 67 170 1225
User Ndj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume, 66 0 145 190 67 365 0 920 67 170 1225
Reduct Vol, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced vol, 66 0 145 190 67 365 0 920 67 170 1225
PCE Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj, 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00
Final Vol., 66 0 145 190 67 365 0 920 67 170 1225
------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11-----
Saturation Flow Module,
Sat/Lane, 17001700 1700 17001700 1700 17001700 1700 1700
Adjustment, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
LaneS, 1.00 0,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0,00 2,00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat" 1700 0 1700 1700 1700 1700 0 3400 1700 1700
------------1---------------11--------------- II ---------------11-----
Capacity Analysis Module,
Vol/Sat, 0,04 0,00 0,09 0,11 0,04 0,21 0,00 0,27 0,04 0,10 0,36 0,00
Cd t Moves,
F 151.9 0.000
+13,137 D/v
0
1. 04
0
1. 00
1. 00
0
0
0
1.00
1. 00
0
- - - -- - ---I
1700 1700
1. 00 1. 00
2.00 0,00
3400 0
----- -- ---I
......... ...... ............. ........... ....................... ..................
Traffix 7,6,0115 Ic) 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KlMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
Traffix 7,6,0115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
AM Future without u-turn
Mon Oct 25, 2004 13,59,05
Page 7-1
AM Future without u-turn
Mon Oct 25, 2004 13,59,05
Page 8-1
-- ---------- --_u---- ------ n___---U_------- ---_u--_u-_nU-__n_- -----------
---______n_U----u_------______n__--------------______n_-__n_____------ ---
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, AM peak period
("8ase"=2006 without project; "Future"=2006 with project)
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, AM peak period
("Base"=2006 without project; "Future"=2006 with project)
- - - - - - - n -- -- n_----- nU_- -____--_n_n_--_------_--_u__n__- ----n------ --n-
n - - - _on U_------- -- - ---- ---- --_u_--- ____00---- -- -- --- - uU-- ----- - ---- -------
............................. ....... ........ ........ ...... ..... ...... ...........
Level Of Service Computation Report
lCU 1 (Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
... ....... ..... ....... ....... ..... ................... ....... ............ ..... ...
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1 (LOSS as Cycle Length %) Method (8ase Volume Alternative)
................ ...... ..... ...... ...............................................
Intersection U Newport Ave/I-5 S8 Ramp-Nisson
Intersection #) Newport Ave/El Camino Real
. . . . ..... ............ .... .. . . . . ........ ... . ..... .. . ... .. . .. .......... ........ ...
....................................... ....... ...... ...... ......................
100
0 IY+R =
61
Critical vol,/Cap, (X),
4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) ,
Level Of Service,
0,629
xxxxxx
8
Cycle (sec) ,
Loss Time (sec) ,
Optimal Cycle,
100
0 (Y+R =
54
Critical Vo1./Cap- (X),
4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) ,
Level Of Service,
0,579
xxxxxx
A
Cycle ,see;;
Loss Time see';
Opu:oal Cycle;
......... H""""""" H.......................,"""""""""""."""
1700 1700 1700 1700 1700
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0,00
1700 1700 1700 1700 0
---II-----u---_u--ll_n_-
1700 1700 1700 1700
1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00
2,00 1. 00 1. 00 2,00
)400 1700 1700 3400
_-----_n_llu---------
1700
1. 00
0,00
0
-- -I
El Camino Real Newport Avenue
North Bound South Bound East Bound West 8ound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
----- -_n_--I------u n_----II---uu--------II-- u--u- u_u-ll_n_--_u__n--1
Control, Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights, Include Ov1 Include Include
Min, Green, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
, Lanes, 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 1 0
_____n__n_l_nn----------II------_n_-_n_II------_--_n_ulIn---_n_------I
Volume Module,
8ase Vol, 106 231 161 12 118 318 139 584 177 120 1542 26
Growth Adj, 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04
Initial 8se, 110 240 167 12 123 331 145 607 184 125 1604 27
User Adj, 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00
PHF Adj, 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00
PHF Volume, 110 240 167 12 123 331 145 607 184 125 1604 27
Reduct Vol, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol, 110 240 167 12 12) 331 145 607 184 125 1604 27
PCE Adj, 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00
MLF Adj, 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Vol" 110 240 167 12 123 331 145 607 184 125 1604 27
------------I--_n_---------II------u-------II------------u-II---------_n---I
Saturation Flow Module,
Sat/Lane, 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700
Adjustment, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
LaneS'! 1.00 1.18 0,82 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2,00 1.00 1.00 2,95 0,05
Final Sat" 1700 2004 1396 1700 1700 1700 1700 3400 1700 1700 5015 85
- - - __uu_n I--_n--- -------II_nn--u ------11-------- ---- ---11---- - n_n- --HI
Capacity Analysis Module,
Vol/Sat, 0,06 0,12 0,12 0,01 0,07 0,19 0,09 0,18 0-11 0,07 0,32 0,32
Crit Moves,
Street Name,
Approach;
Movement;
1-5 SB Ramp/Nisson Newport Avenue
North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
____un----I---u---u-----II------u_u--- II----_n_-----ull--------n_----I
Control, Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights, Include Include Include Include
Min, Green, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes, 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 0
__---_nnul n____n__n_--II_u__nnu_---II------n_-_n_-II---------------1
Volume Module,
Base Vol, 63 0 139 183 64 351 0 885 64 163 1178 0
Growth Adj , 1. 04 1,04 1,04 1,04 1,04 1. 04 1,04 1 - 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1,04
Initial Bse, 66 0 145 190 67 365 0 920 67 170 1225 0
Added Vol, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 8 0
u-turn adju, 0 0 5 14 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut, 66 0 150 204 67 365 0 929 67 174 12)) 0
User Adj, 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00
PHF Adj, 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00
PHF Volume, 66 0 150 204 67 365 0 929 67 174 1233 0
Reduct Vol, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced vol, 66 0 150 204 67 365 0 929 67 174 1233 0
PCE Adj' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final vol" 66 0 150 204 67 365 0 929 67 174 1233 0
_--__n_u_-Iun--_u------II-----_u__n_--II-----------u--II---------------1
Saturation Flow Module,
Sat/Lane, 1700 1700
Adjustment, 1,001,00
Lanes, 1.00 0,00
FinalSat,,1700 0
------1---- _n-
Capacity Analysis Module,
vol/Sat; 0,04 0,00 0,09 0,12 0,04 0,21 0,00 0_27 0,04 0,10 0,36 0,00
Crit Moves,
Street Name,
Approach,
Movement'
.... H......... ........ H'" .......... ........................ ........ ..........
.......................... H"'" H..H H""" ...H H.......... ................
Traffix 7,6,0115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
Traffix 7,6,0115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
AM Future without u-turn
Mon Oct 25, 2004 1);59;05
Page 9-1
AM Future without u-turn
Mon Oct 25, 2004 13,59,05
Page 10-1
--------------- - -_u__u_---_uuu_---
-----------------
---------_u_-- ---_u_-- ---u_--_u----- -- --- ------------ ------------ -----_u_--
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, AM peak period
I"Base"=2006 without project; "Future"-2006 with project)
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, AM peak period
("Base"-2006 without project; "Future".2006 with project)
---------------_u_-_u_----_u_--------------------
-----------------u
- ----------- ---_U_-----__-__h_U_- ---- --- ------ - ---- _U_--- ---- -------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1 (Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
........................... ...... ...... ............ ....................... ......
............................................................................... .
Intersection #3 Newport Ave/El Camino Real
Intersect ion #5 El Camino Driveway
.................. .......... ..... ............ ............ ...... ..... ............
............................................................................... .
Cycle (sec) ,
Loss Time (sec),
Optimal Cycle,
100
0 IY+R -
57
Critical Vol./Cap, (X),
4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) ,
Level Of Service;
0,601
xxxxxx
B
Average Delay (sec/veh);
0,0
Worst Case Level Of Service,
A[
0, OJ
............................................................................... .
............................ .............. ..... .... ............ ............ .....
Approach,
Movement;
El Camino Real Newport Avenue
North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
L T R L T R L T R L T-R
- - -- - - I I --- -- - - --- --- -- I 1 - -- -- -- --- - --- - I 1 -- -- -- --- -- --- - I
Protected Protected Protected Protected
Include Ovl Include Include
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10110101011020110210
------------1-- ------------ -11---------------11---------------11---------------1
Volume Module,
Base Vol, 106 231 161 12 118 318 139 584 177 120 1542 26
Growth Adj, 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04
Initial Bse, 110 240 167 12 123 331 145 607 184 125 1604 27
Added Vor. 19 0 0 39 16 0 0 0 0 0 24 0
u-turn adju, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 28 0
Initial Fut, 129 240 167 51 139 331 145 635 184 125 1656 27
User Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj, 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00
PHF Volume, 129 240 167 51 139 331 145 635 184 125 1656 27
Reduct Vol, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol, 129 240 167 51 139 331 145 635 184 125 1656 27
PCE Adj, 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00
MLF Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Vol" 129 240 167 51 139 331 145 635 184 125 1656 27
--U_---- --I------u-------II---------------I 1---------------1 1---------------1
Saturation Flow Module,
Sat/Lane, 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700
Adjustment, 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00
Lanes, 1.00 1.18 0,82 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2,95 0,05
Final Sat" 1700 2004 1396 1700 1700 1700 1700 3400 1700 1700 5018 82
-- -- - -- -- --- I - -- --- --- -- -- -- I 1 - --- --- -- u - --- I I -- -- --- --- -- --- 1 1 -- u --- -- --- --- 1
Capacity Analysis Module,
Vol/Sat, 0,08 0,12 0,12 0,03 0,08 0,19 0,09 0,19 0,11 0,07 0,33 0,33
Crit Moves,
,-
North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
L-T R L T R L T R L T R
------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------I
Control, Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights, Include Include Include Include
Lanes, 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
------------I-------_u-----II-----_u-------II---------_u---II---------------1
Volume Module,
Base Vol, 0 396 0 0 448 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj, 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04
Initial Bse, 0 412 0 0 466 0 0 0 0 0
User Adj, 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00
PHF Adj' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume, 0 412 0 0 466 0 0 0 0 0
Reduct Vol, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol" 0 412 0 0 466 0 0 0 0 0
------------I---------------II---u----------II---------------II-------
Critical Gap Module,
Critical Gp,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Fo11owUpTim,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
------------Iu-------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Capacity Module;
cnflic, vol, xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap" xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap" xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Volume/Cap; xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
- -- ---------I------h ---_u-II------ -----hhll---- ------ -----11----- _h--- ----I
Level Of Service Module,
Queue, xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Stopped Del;xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move, . . . . . . . . . . . .
Movement, LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap" xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue,xxxxx ){Xxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd StpDel,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS,
ApproachDel,
ApproachLOS,
0 0
1. 04 1. 04
0 0
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
0 0
0 0
0 0
--------1
St reet Name,
Approach,
Movement ,
Control,
Rights,
Min, Green,
Lanes,
.............................. ........... .......... ............. ..... ...........
xx){Xxx
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
Traffix 7,6,0115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
Traffix 7,6,0115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
AM Future without u-turn
Mon Oct 25, 2004 13,59,06
Page 11-1
AM Future without u-turn
Mon Oct 25, 2004 13,59,06
Page 12-1
------------------_U---_____h_-
u_------_u_----
_--UhU__hU-
-------U_----U__--hh--_h_U_U--_h__------- ---
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/E1 Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, AM peak period
I "Base"-2006 without project; "Future"-2006 with project)
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, AM peak period
("Base"-2006 without project; "Future"-2006 with project)
- - _u -- - - -- - - - - u - ---- --_u-- ----- - --- - - ---- U_---- U --- ------- _u_-- ----- - - ----
_h___-----------_U----_U_------------_U_---- _____hU___----_U-----------
............................................................................... .
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative)
............................................................................... .
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #5 El Camino Driveway
Intersection #10 Newport Ave driveway
................................................................................
............... .................. ...............................................
Average Delay (sec/veh) ,
0,6
Worst Case Level Of Service,
B ( 10,1)
Average Delay Isec/veh) ,
0,0
Worst Case Level Of Service,
A[
0.0)
............................................................... .................
... ...... ............ ...... ............. ............... ........ ....... ..........
Volume Module,
Base Vol, 0 396
Growth Adj, 1 ,04 1,04
Initial Bse, 0 412
Added Vol, 0 0
PasserByVol, 0 0
Initial Fut, 0 412
User Adj, 1.001.00
PHF Adj, 1.001.00
PHF Volume, 0 412
Reduct Vol, 0 0
Final Vol" 0 412
Critical Gap Module,
Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx
FollowUpTim,xxxxx xxxx
u_--h-----I---------------II--_u-----u---II
Capacity Module,
Cnflict Vol, xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 245
Potent Cap" xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 762
Move Cap" xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 762
Volume/Cap, xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0,07
u_---------I---------------II----------u---II---------------II
Level Of Service Module,
Queue, xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 0 - 2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Stopped DeLxxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 10,1 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move, . . . . . . . . B . . .
Movement, LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap" xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd StpDel,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS,
ApproachDel,
ApproachLOS,
0
1. 04
0
0
0
0
1. 00
1. 00
0
0
0
0 448
1. 04 1. 04
0 466
0 0
0 0
0 466
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
0 466
0 0
0 466
0
1. 04
0
24
0
24
1. 00
1. 00
24
0
24
0 0
1,04 1. 04
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
1. 04
0
55
0
55
1. 00
1. 00
55
0
55
0 0
1. 04 1. 04
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1. 00 1. 00
1.00 1.00
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
1. 04
0
0
0
0
1. 00
1.00
0
0
0
Approach, North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R
---_u------I--------h-----Ilu-------------II---------_uh-II---------------1
Control, Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights, Include Include Include Include
Lanes, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 1 0
------------lu-------------llu-------------II---------_u---II_uu----------1
Volume Module:
Base Vol, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 668 0 0 2019 0
Growth Adj: 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04
Initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0903 0 02100 0
User Adj, 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00
PHF Adj' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 903 0 0 2100 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol, : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 903 0 0 2100 0
------_u---I---------------II-------_u-----I \---------------II------------h-I
Critical Gap Module:
Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx
Fo11owUpTim,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx
--------_u-I----hu----_ull---------
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol, xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx x><xxx
Potent Cap,: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap" xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx XXXX
------u----I_uu----------II---------_u---II---------------II---------hu--I
Level Of Service Module:
Queue, xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx XXXXX xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Stopped Del: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move: . . . . .' . . . . . . .
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap,: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue : xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd StpDe1: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared/LOS,
ApproachDel:
ApproachLOS:
xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
_u---II------huu---II------ ---------1
Control,
Rights,
Lanes:
North Bound
L T R
-i----------------
Uncontrolled
Include
0 2 0
South Bound East Bound West Bound
L T R L T R L T R
II---------------II-------_uu---II---------------I
Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Include Include Include
001100000100000
II--_uu----_u-II---------------II---_uu-------I
Approach,
Movement,
- -- - -- - -
xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx ><XXX 6 . 9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3 ,3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
-- ---II--_u---u-----I
xxxx xxxx xxxxx
xxxx xxxx xxxxx
xxxx xxxx xxxxx
xxxx xxxx xxxx
-----I
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
XX""""
10.1
B
xxxxxx
TrafEix 7,6,0115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
Traffix 7,6,0115 Ic) 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
AM Future without u-turn
Mon Oct 25, 2004 13,59,06
Page 13-1
AM Future without u-turn
Mon Oct 25. 2004 13,59,06
Page 14-1
-- - u- - - _u _u - _u - - - - -_u- - --_u - ----- u ---- ---_u_-
Uu_---_U__UU
---- -_u_u_u------_u_-_uuu_u_---_uu_u_--------_uu_u_--------------
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, AM peak period
("Base"=2006 without project; "Future"=2006 with project)
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, AM peak period
("Base"=2006 without project; "Future"=2006 with project)
--- u -- - - --- -- u-- ---- --u - - -- u- huU U-- U----- ------ uu_-- - --- u -- _h h ----
u- ---_u ----_U_---- - ----------------- --_u_--------- --- ------_u----------- ---
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
............................................. ...................................
. .. ..... . .................... ....... ......... . ... . . . ... . . ...... ...... . ... . . . . . . .
Intersection no Newport Ave driveway
Intersection #11 Newport Ave/I-5 NB Ramp
............................................................................... .
............... .................................................................
Average Delay (sec/veh) , 0,1 Worst Case Level Of Service, C [ 15, 5J
............................................................................... .
Average Delay (sec/veh) ,
9 - 7
Worst Case Level Of Service,
F[138,8]
............................................................................... .
North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
-I---------------II----------_u--Ilu_u---_u-_ulluu---_uu---I
Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Include Include Include Include
00000000010020000210
---- --¡----_u--------II----------_u--Iluu_u--_uu-II--u_u_uu---I
Volume Module,
Base Vol, 0 0
Growth Adj, 1,04 1,04
Initial Bse, 0 0
Added Vol, 0 0
u-turn adju, 0 0
Initial Fut, 0 0
User Adj, 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj, 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume, 0 0
Reduct Vol, 0 0
Final vol" 0 0
Critical Gap Module,
Critical Gp'xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6,9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
FollowUpTim, xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx XXX>< 3,3 xxxxx XXX>< xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
------------Iu--------_uull------------_ull--u------_u--II-----------u_-!
Capacity Module,
Cnflict Vol, xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx XXX>< 735
Potent Cap" xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx XXX>< 367
Move Cap, , xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx XXX>< 367
Vol ume/Cap, xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx XXX>< 0,06
_uu-_uu-I---------------II-------------u II--h--h-------II u_---------u-I
Level Of Service Module,
Queue, xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx XXX>< a ,2 xxxxx XXX>< xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Stopped Del,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx XXX>< 15,5 XXXXX XXX}( xXXX}( xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move, . . . . . C . . . . . .
Movement, LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap" xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx XXX}( XXX}( XXXXX xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx XXX}( xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd StpDel,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx XXX}( xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS,
ApproachDel,
ApproachLOS,
Approach,
Movement'
0
1. 04
0
0
0
0
1. 00
1. 00
0
0
0
0 0
1. 04 1. 04
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
1. 04
0
23
0
23
1. 00
1. 00
23
0
23
0 868
1. 04 1. 04
0 903
0 0
0 28
0 931
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
0 931
0 0
0 931
0
1. 04
0
0
0
0
1.00
1. 00
0
0
0
0 2019
1. 04 1. 04
0 2100
0 0
0 0
0 2100
1.00 1.00
1. 00 1. 00
0 2100
0 a
0 2100
0
1. 04
0
42
28
70
1. 00
1. 00
70
0
70
Street Name, 1-5 NB Ramp Newport Avenue
Approach, North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement, L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------I--_u_uuuu-Iluu---u---u-II---_u---------Iluu------_u_-I
Control. Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights, Include Include Include Include
Lanes, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 1
-u_--------I--uuu_hu--Il uu--------u-II----------_uull-----_u-------!
Vol ume Module,
Base Vol, 0 0 0 0 a 0 216 868 0 0 1341 678
Growth Adj, 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04
Initial Bse, 0 0 0 0 0 0 225 903 0 0 1395 705
User Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume, 0 0 0 0 0 0 225 903 0 0 1395 705
Reduct Vol, 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol" 0 0 0 0 0 0 225 903 0 0 1395 705
_u----u_ul---------------II u------u_-_u II u-------------lluh--_uuu--1
Critical Gap Module,
Critical Gp,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
FollowUpTim,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2,2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
u--u------I----------_uu II------u-------II-------_u_u--Ilu-----------ul
Capacity Module,
Cnflict Vol, XXX}( xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 2126 xxxx xxxxx XXX}( xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap-, xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 205 xxxx xxxxx XXX>< xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap" xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 205 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Volume/Cap' xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 1.09 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
-----hu---Iu---u_uuu-II----_u--------II---_uu---_u-II----u---u_---I
Level Of Service Module,
Queue, xxxxx xxxx xxxxx XXX}(X xxxx xxxxx 10 ,5 xxxx xxxxx XXXXX xxxx xxxxx
Stopped Del,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 138,8 xxxx xxxxx XXXX}( xxxx xxxxx
LOS by/Move, . . . . . . F . . . . .
Movement, LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap" xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd StpDel, xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS,
ApproachDel,
ApproachLOS,
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
Control,
Rights,
Lanes,
XXX}( XXX}( XXXXX
xxxx XXX}( XXXXX
xxxx XXX}( XXXXX
XXX}( XXX}( XXX}(
xxxx xxxx XXXX}(
XXX}( xxxx xxxxx
xxxx xxxx xxxxx
XXX}( xxxx xxxx
xxxxxx
15,5
C
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
Traffix 7,6,0115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE. CA
Traffix 7,6,0115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
AM Future without u-turn
Mon Oct 25. 2004 13,59,06
Page 15-1
-_u_----_uuU_---_u
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project. AM peak period
("Base"=2006 without project; "Future"=2006 with project)
---_u_--------_uu------_u__Uu
-_uuu_---_uu_-------_U_------
............................................. ...................................
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative)
........................................ ........................................
Intersection #11 Newport Ave/I-5 NB Ramp
Average Delay (sec/veh) ,
10,4
Worst Case Level Of Service,
F(151-9]
.................................. ................................... ...........
Control,
Right 5 ,
Lane5 ,
1-5 NB Ramp Newport Avenue
North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
-1----------- --11- uu_u------Ilu----u----u-II------u-------I
Stop Sign Stop Sign uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Include Include Include Include
0000000001020000201
-! I---------------II----------u---II---u----------I
Street Name,
Approach,
Movement,
volume Module,
9aseVol, 00
Gro"'th Adj, 1,04 1,04
Initial B5e, 0 0
Added Vol, 0 0
u-turn adju, 0 0
Initial Fut, 0 0
U5er Adj, 1. 00 1,00
PHF Adj' 1. 00 1. 00
PHF Volume, 0 0
Reduct Vol, 0 0
Final Vol" 0 0
Critical Gap Module,
Critical Gp'xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4,1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
FollowUpTim, xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2,2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
---_uu----I-_u---_uu_u II uu_------u--II u-----_u-----II---------------I
Capacity Module,
Cnflict vol, xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 2157 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap" xXxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 199 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap" xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 199 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Volume/Cap, xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 1-13 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
-------_u--I-_uu-----_u-II----------_u--II u-------------II---------------I
Level Of Service Module,
Queue, xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Stopped Del,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
LOSbyMove,' . . . . .
Movement, LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap" xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd StpDel,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS,
ApproachDel,
ApproachLOS,
0
1. 04
0
0
0
0
1. 00
1- 00
0
0
0
0 0
1.04 1.04
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1.00 1-00
1-00 1.00
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
1- 04
0
0
0
0
1- 00
1. 00
0
0
0
216 868
1- 04 1. 04
225 903
0 0
0 28
225 931
1- 00 1. 00
1-00 1-00
225 931
0 0
225 931
0
1. 04
0
0
0
0
1- 00
1. 00
0
0
0
0 1341
1. 04 1. 04
0 1395
0 12
0 0
0 1407
1-00 1.00
1.00 1.00
0 1407
0 0
0 1407
678
1- 04
705
12
0
717
1- 00
1. 00
717
0
717
10 - 9 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
151. 9 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
F . . . . .
LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
TraffIx 7,6,0115 ici 2004 Dowling A5S0C, Licen5ed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
PM Future without u-turn
u_n__-- ---_U__u_------- --_u_-_uu__un_--_u_u_-------- u__uuu- _u_--
Mon Oct 25, 2004 14,02,17
Page 1-1
PM Future without u-turn
_u_------------_u_---------------_u_-------_uu__u_-------_uu_-----------
Page 2-1
Mon Oct 25, 2004 14,02,17
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/E1 Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, PM peak period
("Base"=2006 without project; "Futureff=2006 with project)
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, PM peak period
(ffBase"=2006 without project; "Futureff.2006 with project)
Scenario Report
PM Future without u-turn
_u_uu_--_u_u_U_----------______hu____--------------------_u_-------_U-
Scenario,
------ - - - -- ---------_u- u_uuu_-_u_u_----_u__u__u_--_u_u_uu_--------
Default Command
PM Future without
Default Geometry
Default Impact Fee
PM
Default
without
Default
Default
u-turn
Zone
# Subzone
Amount
Command,
Volume,
Geometry,
Impact Fee,
Trip Generation,
Trip Distribution,
Paths,
Routes,
Configuration,
un ___UnU_--
Trip Distribution
u-turn
Routes
Configuration
Trip Generation Report
Forecast for PM
Units
Rate
In
Rate
Out
___nun_un
1 Makena Tusti 1,00 commercial
Zone 1 Subtotal
............
76,00
77,00
Trips Trips
In Out
76
76
Total % Of
Trips Total
77
77
153 100,0
153 100,0
-______hu____hu_____------------_U_--------_u_------_UU_---n---n_uu-
TOTAL, , , , , , , , . , , , , ' , , , , , , , , , . , , , ' , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
76
77
153 100,0
Traffix 7,6,0115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
Traffix 7,6.0115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
PM Future without u-turn
Mon Oct 25, 2004 14,02d7
Page 3-1
PM Future without u-turn
Mon Oct 25, 2004 14,02,17
--------_U_____hU__----____--h--__---------------_U-------------- ---------
Page 4-1
- - - --- - - - - --- -- - - ---- -- - --- ---- -- -- h- - - UU- -- - - -- _u_- - ---- -- ---- -- -- -- - - -- - --
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/E1 Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, PM peak period
I "Base"=2006 without project; "Future"=2006 with project)
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/E1 Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, PM peak period
("Base"=2006 without project; "Future"=2006 with project)
Trip Distribution Report
Turning Movement Report
PM
-- --- ---- ------------------------ -------------- ---- ---- - --- --- ------ - - ----------
#l Newport Ave/I-5 SB Ramp-Nisson
Base 37 0 150 315 105 438 0 1249 96 176 787 0 3353
Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 12
u-turn 0 0 4 11 0 0 0 8 0 0 -0 0 23
Total 37 0 154 326 105 438 0 1257 96 180 795 0 3388
#3 Newport Ave/El Camino Real
Base 98 323 125 22 155 378 270 828 122 131 998 48 3498
Added 15 0 0 39 15 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 88
u-turn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 23 0 46
Total 113 323 125 61 170 378 270 851 122 131 1040 48 3632
------ ----------------- ----_u-------------------u_-- --- ___h_--U-- - ---------
Percent Of Trips project
Southbound
Left Thru Right
Eastbound
Left Thru Right
Volume Northbound
Type Left ThruRight
To Gates
3
Zone
- - - - - - - ---
5,0
15,0
20,0
25,0
25,0
10,0
#5 El Camino Driveway
Base 0 642 0
Added 0 0 0
Total 0 642 0
0
19
19
0
0
0
0
0
0
554
0
554
#10 Newport
Base 0
Added 0
u-turn 0
Total 0
Ave driveway
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
23
0
23
0 1227
0 0
0 23
0 1250
0
0
0
0
#11 Newport
Base 0
Added 0
u-turn 0
Total 0
Ave/I-5 NB
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
333 1227
0 0
0 23
333 1250
Ramp
0
0
0
0
#12
Base
Added
Total
818
12
830
Westbound Total
Left Thru Right Volume
0 0 0 0 1196
54 0 0 0 73
54 0 0 0 1269
0 0 1485 0 2712
0 0 0 34 57
0 0 0 23 46
0 0 1485 57 2815
0 0 967 518 3045
0 0 12 12 24
0 0 0 0 23
0 0 979 530 3092
0 0 0 0 818
0 0 0 0 12
0 0 0 0 830
Traffix 7.6,0115 Ic) 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
Traffix 7,6,0115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
PM Future without u-turn
Mon Oct 25, 2004 14,02,19
- -- -- - -- ----- ---- ---- -- -- -- -- - -- - ------ ------ _u_-- -- --- - u ---- ------- - - -- - -- ---
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, PM peak period
("Base".2006 without project; "Future".2006 with project)
Page 5-1
PM Future without u- turn
Mon Oct 25, 2004 14,02,19
Page 6-1
-----______h-_----------------------------------------------______h______-----
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project. PM peak period
("Base".2006 without project; "Future"=2006 with project)
------------------------_uu_--------- ------ --__----__h ------ --_u- __h_- -----
Impact Analysis Report
Level Of Service
--hU_-____Uhn_-----
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1 (Loss as Cycle Length ,) Method (Base Volume Alternative!
*.............................................................................. .
_n----__n-------_U_------
Intersection
Base
Del/ V/
LOS Veh C
C xxxxx 0,744
1 Newport Ave/I-5 SB Ramp-Nisson
3 Newport Ave/El Camino Real
A xxxxx 0.513
A 0,0 0,000
A 0, ° 0,000
E 49,3 0,000
5 El Camino Driveway
# 10 Newpon Ave driveway
. 11 Newport Avell- 5 NB Ramp
Future Change
Del/ V/ in
LOS Veh C
C xxxxx 0,758 + 0,014 v/C
A xxxxx 0,539 + 0,026 V/C
B 10,4 0,000 +10,437 D/V
B 12.5 0,000 +12.491 D/V
F 55.1 0,000 + 5,787 D/V
Intersection #1 Newport Ave/I-5 SB Ramp-Nisson
............... .................................................................
Critical VoL/Cap, (X),
4 see) Average Delay (sec/veh) ,
Level Of Service,
0,744
xxxxxx
Cycle (sec!,
Loss Time (sec) ,
Optimal Cycle,
100
0 (Y+R .
89
C
............ ............. ..... ....................... ..... ......................
Street Name, 1-5 SB Ramp/Nisson Newport Avenue
Approach, North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement, L T R L T R L T R L T R
_n ------ ---1------- ---_uull--- ------------11------ ----h---II-hh- _h------I
Control, Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights, Include Include Include Include
Min, Green, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes, 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 0
------------I_____n_uh__-II---------------Ilh__--_____h_-Iluu-----------1
Vol ume Module,
Base Vol, 36 0 144 303 101 421 0 1201 92 169 757 0
Growth Adj, 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04
Initial Bse, 37 0 150 315 105 438 0 1249 96 176 787 0
User Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj' 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00
PHF Volume, 37 0 150 315 105 438 0 1249 96 176 787 0
Reduct vol, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol, 37 0 150 315 105 438 0 1249 96 176 787 0
PCE Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Vol" 37 0 150 315 105 438 0 1249 96 176 787 0
----u__hnl---u--_uuu-II---------------II---u-------u-lluuUh--_----I
Saturation Flow Module,
Sat/Lane, 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700
Adjustment, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes, 1.00 0,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0,00 2,00 1.00 1.00 2,00 0,00
Final Sat" 1700 0 1700 1700 1700 1700 o 3400 1700 1700 3400 0
_h_-_n----I---------------II---------------II---------------Iln_----h------I
Capacity Analysis Module,
Vol/Sat, 0,02 0,00 0,09 0.19 0,06 0,26 0,00 0,37 0,06 0,10 0,23 0,00
crit Moves,
............ .......... .......................... ................................
Traffix 7,6,0115 (cl 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
Traffix 7,6,0115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
PM Future without u-turn
Mon Oct 25, 2004 14,02,19
Page 7-1
PM Future without u-turn
Mon Oct 25, 2004 14,02,19
Page B-1
-- - - ------
-- -- -- - - ------- - _hh--- --- _h -- ---- -- ---- - ------ --- - - -----
--- ------- ----------- ------------ ------------------------- u--- -------------- ---
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, PM peak period
("Base"=2006 without project; "Future"-2006 with project)
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project. PM peak period
("Base"=2006 without project; "Future"=2006 with project)
- - - ------ -- -- -- --h _--__h- h_---
-------- u ------ - --_u- -- - ---- - - -- - --
- - - - -- - - - - - ------- -- - -- -- --- --- -- - -- -- -- _h - - --- - - - - -- - h - - -- ----- - - - - __h -- - ---
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1 (Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
.............................................. ..................................
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1 (Loss as Cycle Length \) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
............... .................. ...............................................
Intersection #l Newport Ave/I-5 SB Ramp-Nisson
..................... ...... .................... .......... .......................
Intersection #3 Newport Ave/El Camino Real
...... ..........................................................................
Cycle (sec) ,
Loss Time (sec) ,
Optimal Cycle,
100
0 (Y+R =
94
Critical Vol, /Cap. (X),
4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) ,
Level Of Service,
0.758
xxxxxx
C
Cycle (sec) ,
Loss Time (sec) ,
Optimal Cycle,
100
0 (Y+R =
47
Critical Vol, /cap, (X),
4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) ,
Level Of Service,
0,513
xxxxxx
A
............................................................................... .
... ......... .......... ......................................... ...... ...........
1700 1700 1700 1700
1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00
1. 00 1. 00 2,00 0,00
1700 1700 3400 0
11---------------1
Street Name, El Camino Real Newport Avenue
Approach, North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement, L T R L T R L - T R L - T R
---------h-I---------------II---h----------II---------------II---------------1
Control, Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights, Include Ovl Include Include
Min, Green, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes, 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 1 0
------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11----------h---I
Vol ume Module,
Base Vol, 94 311 120 21 149 363 260 796 117 126 960 46
Growth Adj, 1. 04 1,04 1,04 1,04 1,04 1 ,04 1,04 1,04 1,04 1. 04 1. 04 1,04
Initial Bse, 9B 323 125 22 155 37B 270 B28 122 131 998 48
User Adj, 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj, 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume, 9B 323 125 22 155 378 270 828 122 131 99B 4B
Reduct vol, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced vol, 9B 323 125 22 155 378 270 B28 122 131 998 48
PCE Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLP Adj, 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Vol" 9B 323 125 22 155 378 270 828 122 131 99B 48
--_h-------I---------------II-----h--------II---------------II---------------1
Saturation Flow Module,
Sat/Lane, 17001700 1700 17001700 1700 17001700 1700 17001700 1700
Adjustment, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes, 1.00 1.44 0.56 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 2,00 1.00 1.00 2,86 0.14
Final Sat" 17002453 947 17001700 1700 1700 3400 1700 17004B67 233
--- ---------1-------- -------11--- ------ ---- --11---------- - - ---llh- ------------1
Capacity Analysis Module,
Vol/Sat, 0.06 0,13 0,13 0,01 0,09 0,22 0,16 0,24 0.07 O,OB 0,21 0,21
crit Moves,
Street Name, I -5 SB Ramp/Nisson Newport Avenue
Approach, North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement, L T R L T R L T R L T R
- ---------1- --------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1
Cont rol , Protected' Protected Protected Protected
Rights' Include Include Include Include
M1n, Green, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes, 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 0
--II---------------II-----h--------II---h----------I
--1-----
Volume Module,
Base Vol, 36 0 144
Growth Adj, 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04
Initial Bse, 37 0 150
Added Vol, 0 0 0
u-turn adju, 0 0 4
Initial Fut, 37 0 154
User Adj, 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00
PHF Adj, 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00
PHF Volume, 37 0 154
Reduct Vol, 0 0 0
Reduced Vol, 37 0 154
PCE Adj, 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00
MLF Adj, 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00
Pinal Vol" 37 0 154
------------1---------------11
Saturation Flow Module,
Sat/Lane, 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700
Adjustment, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes, 1.00 0,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0,00 2,00
pinal Sat" 1700 0 1700 1700 1700 1700 0 3400
------------I---------------II--h-----------II---------
Capacity Analysis Module,
Vol/Sat, 0,02 0,00 0.09 0,19 0,06 0,26 0,00 0,37
Cdt Moves, .... .... ....
............................................................................... .
303 101
1. 04 1. 04
315 105
0 0
11 0
326 105
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
326 105
0 0
326 105
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
326 105
421 0 1201 92 169 757 0
1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04
438 0 1249 96 176 787 0
0 0 0 0 4 8 0
0 0 8 0 0 0 0
438 0 1257 96 180 795 0
1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
438 0 1257 96 180 795 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
438 0 1257 96 180 795 0
1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1,00
1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00
438 0 1257 96 180 795 0
--II----h--h-----II-------------hl
...................... ..........................................................
0,06
0,11 0,23
0,00
Traffix 7,6,0115 (cl 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
Traffix 7,6,O1l5 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
PM Future without u-turn
Mon Oct 25, 2004 14,02,19
Page 9-1
PM Future without u-turn
Mon Oct 25, 2004 14,02,19
Page 10-1
- - - - - ---- -- - --- -- -------- -- - ----- ---- - --- ---- - ------ --- -- ------ ---- -- -- n-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, PM peak period
("Base".2006 without project; "Future".2006 with project)
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/EI Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, PM peak period
I"Base".2006 without project; "Future"~2006 with project)
- -- -- -- ---- - - - - -- -- -- --- - -- -- -- ------- ---- ---- ---- --
-------------------
--- ---- -- ----------- ----------- ----------------- ---------- ---- - ------ - - - --- -- ---
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU IILoss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
................................. ............ ........ ...........................
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
............................................................................... .
Intersection #3 Newport Ave/El Camino Real
............................................................................... .
Intersection #5 El Camino Driveway
............................................................................... .
Cycle (sec) , 100 Critical VoL/Cap, (X), 0,539
Loss Time Isee) , 0 (Y+R. 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) , xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle, 49 Level Of Service, A
............................ ................. ............ ...... ...... ...... .....
Average Delay (sec/veh) ,
0,0
Worst Case Level Of Service,
AI
O,OJ
............... .................................................................
Street Name, El Camino Real Newport Avenue
Approach, Nort h Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement, L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1
Control, Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights, Include Ovl Include Include
Min, Green, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes, 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 1 0
------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------I
Volume Module,
Base vol. 94 311 120 21 149 363
Growth Adj' 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04
Initial Bse, 98 323 125 22 155 378
Added Vol, 15 0 0 39 15 0
u-turnadju, 00 0 00 0
Initial Fut, 113 323 125 61 170 378
User Adj, 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00
PHF Adj' 1,00 1,00 1. 00 1,00 1,00 1. 00
PHF Volume, 113 323 125 61 170 378
Reduct Vol, 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol, 113 323 125 61 170 378
PCE Adj' 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00
MLF Adj, 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00
Final Vol., 113 323 125 61 170 378
------------1---------------11---------------11
Saturation Flow Module,
Sat/Lane, 17001700 1700 17001700 1700 17001700 1700 17001700 1700
Adjustment, 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00
Lanes, 1.00 1.44 0,56 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2,00 1.00 1.00 2,87 0.13
Final Sat" 1700 2453 947 1700 1700 1700 1700 3400 1700 1700 4876 224
--- ---------1- - ---- -- ------ -11---------------11---------------11----------- ----I
Capacity Analysis Module,
Vol/Sat, 0.07 0,13 0,13 0.04 0,10 0.22 0,16 0,25 0,07 0.08 0,21 0,21
Crit Moves,
260 796
1. 04 1. 04
270 828
0 0
0 23
270 851
1. 00 1. 00
1.00 1.00
270 851
0 0
270 851
1.00 1.00
1. 00 1. 00
270 851
117
1. 04
122
0
0
122
1. 00
1. 00
122
0
122
1. 00
1. 00
122
-II
126 960 46
1.04 1.04 1.04
131 998 48
0 19 0
0 23 0
131 1040 48
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
131 1040 48
0 0 0
131 1040 48
1. 00 1. 00 1. 00
1.00 1.00 1.00
131 1040 48
------1
Approach, North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement, L T R L T R L T R L T R
-------- - ---1---------------11---------------11---------------11 ---------------1
Control, Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights, Include Include Include Include
Lanes, 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1
Volume Module,
Base Vol, 0 617 0 0 533 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj, 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04
Initial Bse, 0 642 0 0 554 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
User Adj, 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00
PHF Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume, 0 642 0 0 554 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduct Vol, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol" 0 642 0 0 554 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------I
Critical Gap Module,
Critical Gp'xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
FollowUpTim,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------I
Capacity Module,
Cnflict Vol, xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap" xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap, , ><XXX xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxXX xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Volume/Cap, xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11----------- ----I
Level Of Service Module,
Queue, xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Stopped Del,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move, . . . . . . . . . . . .
Movement, LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap" xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx ><XXX Xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd StpDel,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS, . . . . . . , .
ApproachDel, xxxxxx xxxxxx
ApproachLOS,
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
................................. .................... ....................... ....
Traffix 7,6,0115 ic) 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
Traffix 7,6.0115 Ic) 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
/
PM Future without u-turn
Mon Oct 25, 2004 14,02,19
page 11-1
PM Future without u-turn
Mon Oct 25, 2004 14,02,19
Page 12-1
- -- - 00- - - - - -- -- 00- - -- ----- - 00----- - - -------- - -- 00-- ----00 ----00 -- - -- ------ - - - - --
--- -- ------------------------------- --- ----______00___---------------- ----------
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, PM peak period
("Base".2006 without project; "Future".2006 with project)
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project. PM peak period
("Base"-2006 without project; "Future"=2006 with project)
- - 00- - --- __n- - - - - - ------- - ---u- ----- ----- - - - -_u- ----00-- __n-- -- --- ---- - - - - --
-----_u_----------- - ------ ------ ------------------ --------- --------- -----------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative)
............................................................................... .
Level Of service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
.......... ......................................................................
Intersection #5 El Camino Driveway
..... .............................. ............ .... .............................
Intersection #10 Newport Ave driveway
.............................................................................. ..
Average Delay (sec/veh) ,
0,4
Worst Case Level Of Service,
B [ 10.4)
Average Delay (sec/veh) ,
0.0
Worst Case Level Of Service,
A(
0,0)
............................................. ................. ..................
............................................................... .................
Approach,
Movement,
North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
-----------1---------------11-------00------11---------------11 ---------------1
Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Include Include Include Include
00200001100000100000
--- --------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1
Yol ume Module.
Base yolo 0 617
Growth Adj. 1,04 1,04
InItial Bse. 0 642
Added yol. 0 0
PasserByyol. 0 0
Initial Fut. 0 642
User Adj, 1. 00 1. 00
PHF Adj. 1. 00 1. 00
PHF yolume, 0 642
Reduct yol. 0 0
Final Vol,. 0 642
Critical Gap Module,
critical Gp,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx XXX){ xxxxx xxxxx XXX){ 6,9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Fo11owUpTim, xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx XXX){ XXX){x xxxxx XXX){ 3,3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
----00------1---------------11---------------11-------------0011---------------I
Capacity Module,
Cnflict Yol, xxxx
Potent Cap" xxxx
Move Cap" xxxx
Volume/Cap. xxxx
------------1---------------11----
Level Of Service Module,
Queue, xxxxx xxxx xxxxx XXX){x XXX){ XXX){x xXXX){ XXX){ 0, 2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Stopped Del,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx XXX){ xxxxx xxxxx XXX){ 10,4 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move, . . . . . . . . B . . .
Movement, LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap" xxxx XXX){ xxxxx xxxx XXX){ xxxxx xxx>< xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx XXX){ xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd StpDel,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx XXX){x XXX){ xxxxx xxxxx XXX){ xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS,
ApproachDel,
ApproachLOS.
0
1. 04
0
0
0
0
1. 00
1. 00
0
0
0
0 533
1.04 1.04
0 554
0 0
0 0
0 554
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
0 554
0 0
0 554
0
1. 04
0
19
0
19
1. 00
1.00
19
0
19
0 0
1. 04 1. 04
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
a 0
a a
a a
a
1. 04
a
54
a
54
1.00
1. 00
54
a
54
a a
1. 04 1. 04
a 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1.00 1.00
1. 00 1. 00
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
1. 04
0
0
0
0
1. 00
1. 00
0
0
0
Approach, North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement, L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------I
Control, Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights, Include Include Include Include
Lanes, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 a 2 1 0
--------uul---------------I 1---------------1 1---------------1 1------- --------1
Vol ume Module,
Base Vol, 0 0000 0 011BO 0 01428 0
Growth Adj' 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04
Initial Bse, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1227 0 a 1485 0
User Adj, 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj, 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1227 0 0 1485 0
Reduct Vol, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0
Final yol" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1227 0 0 1485 0
------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1
Critical Gap Module,
Critical Gp,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
FollowUpTim,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
------------I---------------II------------n_II------------n_II---------------1
Capacity Module,
Cnfl ict Vol, xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx XXX){ xxxxx
Potent Cap., xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxx>< xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap., xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxx>< XXX){ xxxxx
Volume/Cap, xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxx>< xxxx xxxx
---------u-I-------_n-----II---------------I 1---------------1 1---------- -----I
Level Of Service Module,
Queue, xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx){
Stopped Del,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move, . . . . . . . . . . . .
Movement, LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap" xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxx>< xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue ,xxxx){ xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd StpDel, xxxxx xxxx XXX){x xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx){
Shared LOS,
ApproachDel,
ApproachLOS ,
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
Control,
Right s,
Lanes,
XXX){ xxxxx xxxx ><XXX xxxxx xxxx ><XXX
XXX){ xxxxx xxxx ><XXX xxxxx xxx>< XXX){
xxxx xxxxx xxxx ><XXX xxxxx xxxx XXX){
xxxx xxxx xxxx ><XXX xxxx xxxx XXX){
287
716
716
0,08
-11---------------11---------------1
xxxx xxxx xxxxx
xxxx xxxx xxxxx
xxxx xxxx xxxxx
xxxx xxxx xxxx
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
10.4
B
xxxxxx
Traffix 7-6,0115 (cl 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
Traffix 7,6,0115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
PM Future without u-turn
Mon Oct 25, 2004 14:02,19
Page 13-1
PM Future without u-turn
Mon Oct 25, 2004 14,02019
Page 14-1
--- - -- - - ---- - --- ----- ----- -- - - -- - --- - - -_u - --_u_-- ------ ------ -- - - - - - - h- - - - ---
------------ _____h__U-__uu_--_U--_u_--- _u_- -- - ---- ----- - h_U__- ---- -- ---
I
I
Traff ic Impact Analysis for Newport/El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, PM peak period
("Base"-2006 without project: "Future"-2006 with project
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, PM peak period
("Base"-2006 without project: "Future"=2006 with project)
u_--------_U_-_u_--_U______h
u_----_u_U_----_U_-_U_U_---_u-
---_u__u__UUUU-----_u_- ----------_u_-- ----- h___- _u_-_u_--- -- ---------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative)
................ ................... .................... .................... .....
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
............... .................... .............................................
Intersection #10 Newport Ave driveway
............................................................................... .
Intersection #11 Newport Ave/I-5 NB Ramp
............................................................................... .
Average Delay (sec/veh) , 0,1 Worst Case Level Of Service, B[ 12,5J
............................ .............. ....................... ...............
Average Delay (sec/veh) ,
5,4
Worst Case Level Of Service,
E ( 49.3]
............................................................................... .
Approach, North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement, L T R L T R L T R L T R
u-------_.ol u_-_u--_uh-II-h_uh--uu-II-u_u----hu-Ilu--h_u_uu-I
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights, Include Include Include Include
Lanes, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 1 0
uh--_.o---I uh__hu_h--II--_u_u--h_hll-huh_u--h-II-u_h--hh_ul
Volume Module,
Base Vol, 0 0
Growth Adj, 1,04 1,04
Initial Bse, 0 0
Added Vol, 0 0
u turn ad]u, 0 0
Inltial Fut, 0 0
UserAdj, 1.001,00
PHF Ad], 1,00 1,00
PHF Volume, 0 0
ReduCt vol, 0 0
Final Vol" 0 0
Critical Gap Module:
Critical Gp,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6,9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
FollowUpTim, xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3,3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
uhuu_u-l----h_u_hh-II h____hhh_h II U_h.o _-__-h II-h--huuhh I
Capacity Module,
Cnflict Vol, xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 524
Potent Cap., xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 504
Move Cap" xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 504
Volume/Cap' xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.05
_huuuu-Iuu-_u_u----II-h--_u_uu--Ilhh
Level Of Service Module,
Queue, xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 0.1 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Stopped Del, xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 12 . 5 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move, . . . . . B . . . . . .
Movement, LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap., xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd StpDel, xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS, .
ApproachDel:
ApproachLOS,
0
1. 04
0
0
0
0
1. 00
1. 00
0
0
0
0 0
1.04 1.04
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
1. 04
0
23
0
23
1.00
1. 00
23
0
23
0 1180
1. 04 1. 04
0 1227
0 0
0 23
0 1250
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
0 1250
0 0
0 1250
0
1. 04
0
0
0
0
1. 00
1. 00
0
0
0
0 1428
1. 04 1. 04
0 1485
0 0
0 0
0 1485
1. 00 1. 00
1.00 1.00
0 1485
0 0
0 1485
0
1. O'
0
34
23
57
1. 00
1. 00
57
0
57
Street Name, 1-5 NB Ramp Newport Avenue
Approach, North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement, L T R L T R L T R L T R
_h_--h--hl h_uuh------Ilh-_u--u__u_!!_h_---_uh---II uh--hu-----I
Control, Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights, Include Include Include Include
Lanes, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 1
--------hulhhhhuh---II-_u-----_uu-II-h--h-----h-Il.ou--_u--u_-!
Volume Module:
Base Vol, 0 0 0 0 0 0 320 1180 0 0 930
Growth Adj, 1,04 1. 04 1,04 1. 04 1,04 1,04 1,04 1,04 1,04 1,04 1,04
Initial Bse, 0 0 0 0 0 0 333 1227 0 0 967
User Adj, 1,00 1,00 1,00 1. 00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1. 00
PHF Adj' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume, 0 0 0 0 0 0 333 1227 0 0 967
Reduct Vol, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol" 0 0 0 0 0 0 333 1227 0 0 967
_h_------h!-_hh------_.ollh----------h-I!------_u-_uhlluu---_u
Critical Gap Module,
Critical Gp'xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4,1 XXXX xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Fol lowUpTim , xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2,2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
h----huul--h---_u-----II-h-----_uuu II u_-_u_-_u---II---h-h--..u-I
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol, xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1266 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap" xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 390 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap" xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 390 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Volume/Cap, xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0, B5 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
--_u_u..ul-_uhh_hhhll-h_u--h--u-II---_u_h..uull u_hhu---..-I
Level Of Service Module,
Queue, xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx XXXX xxxxx 8 ,2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Stopped Del,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 49,3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move, . . . . . . E . . . . .
Movement, LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap" xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx XXXX xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd StpDel,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx XXXXX xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS, . .
ApproachDel: xxxxxx
ApproachLOS,
49B
1. 04
SIB
1. 00
1.00
SIB
0
SIB
--ml
xxxx xxxx xxxxX xxxx XXXX xxxxx
xxxx XXXX xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx XXXX xxxxx
xxxx XXXX xxxx xxxx XXXX xxxx
II-u_hmuuh I
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
12.5
B
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
Traffix 7,6,0115 Ic) 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
Traffix 7,6,0115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
PM Future without u-turn
Mon Oct 25, 2004 14,02,19
page 15-1
-----------------------------------_u_--
-- ---- u- --- ----- --- - -- - --- --
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/E1 Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, PM peak period
("Base"-2006 without project; "Future"-2006 with project)
---------------_--____hU---_----
-_U-----------_____--h_----
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative)
.............................................................. *.................
Intersection #11 Newport Ave/I-5 NB Ramp
.................................... ..... .............................. .........
Average Delay (sec/veh) , 5,9 Worst Case Level Of Service, F[ 55,lJ
.................................................... ............................
Street Name, I-5 NB Ramp Newport Avenue
Approach, North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement, L - T R L T R L T R L T R
-----------I---------------II---------------II---------_u---II---------------1
Control, Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights, Include Include Include Include
Lanes, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 1
-,--- -----I i ---------------11---------------11---------------1
Volume Module,
Base Vol, 0 0
Growth Adj, 1,04 1,04
Initial Bse, a 0
Added Vol, 0 0
u-turn adju, 0 0
Initial Fut, 0 0
User Ad),!. 00 1. 00
PHF Adj, 1,00 1.00
PHF Volume, 0 0
Reduct Vol, a 0
Final Vol, , a 0
Critical Gap Module,
Cd ti c a 1 Gp, xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4 ,1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
FollowUpTim,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2,2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
------------I---------------II--------hh---II---------_u---II---------------1
Capacity Module,
Cnflict Vol, xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1294
Potent Cap" xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx ""XXX 377
Move Cap" xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 377
Volume/Cap, xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0,88
_u------ ---I-h----------- -11---------------11----------- - ---11----------- ----I
Level Of Service Module,
Queue, xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8,7 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Stopped Del, xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 55 -1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move, . . . . . . F . . . . .
Movement, LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap" xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue ,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxX xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd StpDel, xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS,
ApproachDel,
ApproachLOS,
0
1. 04
0
0
0
0
1. 00
1- 00
0
0
0
0 0
1. 04 1. 04
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
1. 04
0
0
0
0
1. 00
1. 00
0
0
0
320 1180
1,04 1,04
333 1227
0 0
0 23
333 1250
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
333 1250
0 0
333 1250
0
1. 04
0
0
0
0
1. 00
1. 00
0
0
0
0 930
1. 04 1. 04
0 967
0 12
0 0
0 979
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
0 979
0 0
0 979
498
1. 04
518
12
0
530
1. 00
1. 00
530
0
530
xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
Traffix 7,6,0115 Icl 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
AM Future with u-turn
- - - -- - - --
Mon Oct 25, 2004 13,45,09
Page 1-1
AM Future with u-turn
Mon Oct 25, 2004 13,45,09
----------_uu_--------_h_h__- -------------------------------------------
Page 2-1
---- - - - ----------------------------_----_hU__----------
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, AM peak period
("8ase"-2006 without project; "Future"-2006 with project)
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, AM peak period
i"Base"-2006 without project; "Future"=2006 with project}
---------------------------------------------__--___h__-
Scenario,
Command,
Volume,
Geometry,
Impact Fee,
Trip Generation,
Trip Distribution,
Paths,
Routes,
Configuration,
Forecast for AM
-_u_------------- ---- ----------------- ---_u--------- ------------------- ----
Scenario Report
AM Future with u-turn
Trip Generation Report
Default Command
AM Future with u-turn
Default Geometry
Default Impact Fee
AM
Default Trip Distribution
with u-turn
Defaul t Routes
Default Configuration
Rate
In
Rate
Out
Zone
# Subzone
Amount
Units
------------
_UUU_------ U_---
1 Makena Tusti 1.00 commercial 94,00 78,00
Zone 1 Subtotal """"""""""",-"",
Trips Trips
In Out
94
94
Total % Of
Trips Total
78
78
172 100,0
172 100,0
TOTAL, , , , , , , , , , , , , . , , , , ' . ' , ' , ' , ' . , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
____h___---- ------------------------------------------------------------
172 100,0
94
78
Traffix 7,6,0115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
Traffix 7,6,0115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
AM Future with u-turn
Mon Oct 25, 2004 13,45,09
Page 3-1
AM Future with u-turn
Mon Oct 25, 2004 13,45,09
Page 4-1
-----u_---
_u____h-_---
- - --- - - hUu u _--_un __h -- u --_u----
__huU-
---_uu_-------_u_-------------_u_-----_uu_-----------
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/El Camino Retail Center
Exist ing traffic conditions with and without project, AM peak period
("Base",2006 without project; "Future"-2006 with project)
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, AM peak period
("Base".2006 without project; "Future".2006 with project)
5,0
10,0
15,0
20,0
25 - 0
25,0
-- - _h_-- - u_--uuu ------ u_--- -- -- - - ____h -------------- --- - h__-- - u_h- ----
Turning Movement Report
AM
Vol ume Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total
Type Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Volume
#1 Newport Ave/I-5 SB Ramp-Nisson
Base 66 0 145 190 67 365 0 920 67 170 1225 0 3214
Added 0 0 5 14 0 0 0 9 0 4 8 0 40
Total 66 0 150 204 67 365 0 929 67 174 1233 0 3254
#3 Newport Ave/El Camino Real
Base 110 240 167 12 123 331 145 607 184 125 1604 27 3675
Added 19 0 0 39 16 0 28 0 0 0 24 0 126
Total 129 240 167 51 139 331 173 607 184 125 1628 27 3801
#5 El Camino Driveway
Base 0 412 0 0 466 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 878
Added 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 55 0 0 0 79
Total 0 412 0 0 466 24 0 0 55 0 0 0 957
#10 Newport Ave driveway
Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 903 0 0 2100 0 3002
Added 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 71 94
Total 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 903 0 0 2100 71 3096
#11 Newport Ave/I-S NB Ramp
Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 225 903 0 0 1395 705 3227
Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 12 12 52
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 225 931 0 0 1407 717 3279
#12
Base 0 894 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 894
Added 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12
Total 0 906 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 906
_u__huu-
--------_uu_- __uu_huu---
Trip Distribution Report
Percent Of Trips project
To Gates
3
Zone
uu- u_--
Traffix 7,6,0115 Ic) 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
Traffix 7,6,0115 Ic) 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
AM Future with u.turn
Mon Oct 25, 2004 1),45,11
-. - - - -- ----- -- - - -------- ------ h_____UU__h__---UU U_-- ------------
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, AM peak period
("Base"-2006 without project; "Future".2006 with project)
Page 5-1
AM Future with u-turn
Page 6-1
Mon Oct 25, 2004 1),45,11
- ___h____--_--____h ----------- ------- h_____- h - - ---_u ---------- - -- - h ---- ---
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project. AM peak period
("Base"=2006 without project; "Future"-2006 with project)
___h- ---------____h______U__uuu--- ------_u- - - ---- - --------- ----_uu_- ---
Impact Analysis Report
Level Of Service
- -. ----- - - __h- h_____h_h___----_------------__--hh----_-
* * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * **** * * ** * ** * * * * * * * * * *** * * * *** * * * ** * * * * * * *. * * ** * * *. *** * * * ** * * * * * *
I ntersect ion
Base
Del/ V /
LOS Veh C
B xxxxx 0,624
1 Newport Ave/ I - 5 SB Ramp-Nisson
3 Newport Ave/El Camino Real
B xxxxx 0,664
#
5 El Camino Driveway
0,0 0,000
A
# 10 Newport Ave driveway
A
0.0 0.000
# 11 Newport Ave/I-5 NB Ramp
F 138,8 0_000
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1 (Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Future
Del/ V/
LOS Veh C
B xxxxx 0.629
Change
in
Intersection #1 Newport Ave/I-5 SB Ramp-Nisson
* * * * * * * *. * ** **** ** *** * * * * * * * * **** * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ** * * * * ** ** * ** * * * * * * * * * ** *
Critical VoL/Cap, IX),
4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) ,
Level Of Service,
0,624
xxxxxx
B
Cycle Isec) ,
Loss Time (sec) ,
Opt imal Cycle,
100
0 (Y+R -
61
+ 0,005 V/C
B xxxxx 0,697
+ 0,032 v/C
* * * * ** * ** * *** * * ** * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * *. * ** * * * ** * **** * * * * **** * * * * *
B 10,1 0,000 +10,094 D/V
C 15,5 0,000 +15,486 D/V
F 151.9 0,000 +13,1)7 D/V
Street Name, 1-5 SB Ramp/Nisson Newport Avenue
Approach, North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement, L T R L T R L T R L T R
---uu-----I------_uuu--llh-------------II-----------h--II--h-----------1
Control, Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights, Include Incl ude Include Include
Min, Green, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes, 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 0
---hu--hl-h-----_u-h'llh---h----- --II---------h----II---------hh--I
Vol ume Module,
Base Vol, 63 0 139 183 64 351 0 885 64 163 1178 0
Growth Adj, 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04
Initial Bse, 66 0 145 190 67 365 0 920 67 170 1225 0
User Adj, 1.00 1.00 LOO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 LOO 1.00
PHF Adj' LOO 1.00 1.00 1.00 LOO 1.00 1.00 1.00 LOO 1.00 1.00 LOO
PHF Volume, 66 0 145 190 67 365 0 920 67 170 1225 0
Reduct Vol, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol, 66 0 145 190 67 365 0 920 67 170 1225 0
PCE Adj' 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 LOO
MLF Adj' 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Vol" 66 0 145 190 67 365 0 920 67 170 1225 0
-_u-_u----I_uuuuuu--II---------------II---------------II---------huul
Saturation Flow Module,
Sat/Lane, 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700
Adjustment, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes, 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0,00 2,00 1.00 1.00 2,00 0,00
Final Sat" 1700 0 1700 1700 1700 1700 0 3400 1700 1700 3400 0
--_uu-----I---------h----II---------h_h-II--------h_h--II----h---------1
Capacity Analysis Module,
Vol/Sat, 0,04 0,00 0,09 0,11 0,04 0,21 0,00 0,27 0,04 0,10 0,36 0.00
Crit Moves,
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * . * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Traffix 7,6,0115 Ic) 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE. CA
Traffix 7,6,0115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE. CA
AM Future with u-turn
Mon Oct 25, 2004 13,45,11
Page 7-1
AM Future with u-turn
Mon Oct 25, 2004 13,45,11
page 8-1
-- - - -- -- - -- - - -- ------ --- h-__h____h_- ___h__h ___h_____h_hU_-----_U_-----
--_U-____hh_h_--__h__- - --- -- - - - - ------- __h - -- h- - --- _uu_--------_h- - ---
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, AM peak period
("Base".2006 without project. "Future".2006 with project)
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, AM peak period
("Base".2006 without project. "Future".2006 with project)
. -..- - -. ----- -------- -______h_U__h_____h___hh__Uhh_h_hh__h_-
-- - -______h__- -_____--h_- ------ --- -- - --- ---- --- -- hU_-- - ------- _____h_- - - u-
.......... ....,.. ..... .........HH..H...H'H.H..HH.HHHHHHHHHHH'
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1 (Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
'HHH., HHH H"H 'H'" 'H"'" H."'" H H"" ...'H.. .........HH""""
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1 (Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #1 Newport Ave/I-5 SB Ramp-Nisson
.,............... H"'" H"""" H.""" ......." "'H ..""H"" HH""H'
Intersection #3 Newport Ave/El Camino Real
",...""....., ,...." H"""""" H"""""""""" 'H"'" H' ,.........
Cycle ,sec',
Loss Time ,sec},
Optimal Cycle,
100
0 I Y+R ;
61
critical Vol. /Cap, (X),
4 secl Average Delay {sec/vehl,
Level Of Service, '
0,629
xxxxxx
B
Cycle (sec) ,
Loss Time (sec) ,
Optimal Cycle,
100
0 {Y+R .
68
CriticalVol,/Cap, (X"
4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) ,
Level Of Service,
0,664
xxxxxx
B
............ H......,.." H.,. H"" ,....,. 'H"""""""""" H' H"" HH.
.".. ... ...... . .... ,....,.. . ,.", , , , " , " , , " , '" . "".., .. H H '* . * .". ..". , ."
Street Name, 1-5 SB Ramp/Nisson Newport Avenue
Approach, North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement, L - T R L T R L T R L T R
_h_uu-_ul----_u_h-----II-hhu_h-----Ilh---h_uh_hll----h_uhh--I
Control, Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights, Include Include Include Include
Min. Green, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes, 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 0
_U --_uhhluhhh--h---II----h---------II-hu_u-- h_ull-h--h--hh--I
Volume Module,
Base Vol, 63 0 139 183 64 351 0 885 64 163 1178 0
Growth Adj, 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04
Initial Bse, 66 0 145 190 67 365 0 920 67 170 1225 0
Added Vol, 0 0 5 14 0 0 0 9 0 4 S 0
PasserByVol, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut, 66 0 150 204 67 365 0 929 67 174 1233 0
User Adj' 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00
PHF Adj' 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume, 66 0 150 204 67 365 0 929 67 174 1233 0
Reduct Vol, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol, 66 0 150 204 67 365 0 929 67 174 1233 0
PCE Adj' 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00
MLF Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00
Final Vol" 66 0 150 204 67 365 0 929 67 174 1233 0
- - -- h - - h --I - h h h U h -- U II -- -- - h h - - - h - II - h h -- - - h - h - 11- -- h h - h u - - - I
Saturation Flow Module,
Sat/Lane, 1700 1700
Adjustment, 1,00 1,00
Lanes, 1.00 0,00
Final Sat" 1700 0
dU- -Iu----
Capacity Analysis Module,
vol/Sat' 0,04 0.00 0,09 0.120,04 0,21 0,000,27 0,04 0,100,36 0,00
Cn t Moves,
1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0,00 2,00 1.00 1.00 2,00 0,00
1700 1700 1700 1700 0 3400 1700 1700 3400 0
--llu_uh_uu---II-hh----hh--llhhhh_uh--1
Street Name, El Camino Real Newport Avenue
Approach, North Bound South Sound East Bound West Sound
Movement, L T R L T R L T R L T R
_hh_h__hl-u------- ---II---hhh------II.hhu--------II-----.u_h---.1
Control, Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights, Include Include Include Include
Min, Green, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes, 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 1 0
_u_---_u--I---h----h_u-II------huu---Ilh--_u-----h-II-----h----h--I
Volume Module,
Base Vol, 106 231 161 12 118 318 139 584 177 120 1542 26
Growth Adj, 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04
Initial Bse, 110 240 167 12 123 331 145 607 184 125 1604 27
User Adj' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00
PHF Adj, 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00
PHF Volume, 110 240 167 12 123 331 145 607 184 125 1604 27
Reduct Vol, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol, 110 240 167 12 123 331 145 607 184 125 1604 27
PCE Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Vol" 110 240 167 12 123 331 145 607 184 125 1604 27
----_u--h-I-u-----u-----II---hh---_u--II---h--h---h-II----_uhu----I
Saturation Flow Module,
Sat/Lane, 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700
Adjustment, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes, 1.001.18 0.82 1.001.00 1.00 1.002,00 1.00 1.002,95 0,05
Final Sat" 1700 2004 1396 1700 1700 1700 1700 3400 1700 1700 5015 85
-_u_h-_u-Iu_hu_uh---II-h_h---------II-----_uu--h-Ilh---_u-h--hl
Capacity Analysis Module,
Vol/Sat, 0.06 0.12 0,12 0,01 0,07 0,19 0,09 0,18 0,11 0.07 0,32 0,32
Crit Moves,
..,., *.. * *",.. *".",..,., *,.,.".,."."..." H""""" HH * *...,....,. *.."
...... H". H HHH" HHH..H H .H'H'HHHHH'HH...,HH..H..H......,..
Traffix 7,6,0115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
Traffix 7,6.0115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
AM Future with u-turn
Mon Oct 25, 2004 13,45,11
Page 9-1
AM Future with u-turn
Mon Oct 25, 2004 13,45,11
Page 10-1
-- - ---_u_- - ------- -- ------___--__n_-- __--_n_u-- ---_u___--_nu-- - _nu-----
- ___nu- _u__u_--u___u___n_- ----------------______n--_-_------- u_--- u ---
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, AM peak period
("Base"=2006 without project; "Future"=2006 with project)
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, AM peak period
("Base"=2006 without project; "Future"=2006 with project)
. -. u -. - --
--- - - - u - -- _u- u_-- u- _uu_----_u uu- ---_u - - ---
----u - _uu- -----_u u_--- - --- ---- u- - --- -- --- - u- - u u - - - -----u_u - - u- - - - - --
........................................... ........ ................ .............
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1 (LOSS as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method IBase Volume Alternative)
............................................................................... .
Intersect ion #3 Newport Ave/El Camino Real
Intersect ion #5 El Camino Driveway
............... .................................................................
........................................ ..... ...... ....... ...... ........... .....
Cycle (sec!,
Loss Time (sec) ,
Optimal Cycle,
100
0 IY+R =
75
Critical Vol, /Cap. IX),
4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) ,
Level Of Service,
0,697
xxxxxx
B
Average Delay (sec/veh) ,
0.0
Worst Case Level Of Service,
A[
o. a)
................. ...............................................................
.......................................... ..................... ............ .....
Approach, North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement, L T R L T R L T R L T R
-----u-----Iuuuuuu---Ilu----u_uu--II---_uu_un_-II-uuuu------I
Control, Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights, Include Include Include Include
Lanes: a a 2 a a 0 0 1 1 a a a a 0 1 a a a a a
u_-_uuu_ uu_--uuu--II---_nn__uu_II----------uu-llu_u-----_u--I
Volume Module,
Base Vol, a 396 a a 448 a a a a 0
Growth Adj, 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04
Initial Bse, a 412 O. a 466 0 a a a a
User Adj, 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: a 412 a a 466 0 a 0 0 a
Reduct Vol: 0 0 a a 0 a a a 0 a
Final Vol,: 0 412 a 0 466 a a a a a
_u_---_u_-Iunuu--- ----II-nnuu_-_u-Ilu----------u- I-u----
Critical Gap Module,
Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
FollowUpTim,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
u--uu--ulu_un_-u----II-----u-----u-Iluu--------u-II---u------u--I
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol, xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap _: XXXX xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx ><xxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxXXX
Move Cap" xxxx ><xxx xxxxx ><xxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Vol ume/Cap: xxxx ><xxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
__-nu_----luu---uu_---II_n nn- - u_u-II--_uu--- u ---11----------- uul
Level Of Service Module,
Queue: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx x><xx xxxxx
WS by Move: . . . . . . . . . . . .
Movement, LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap,: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx x><xx xxxxx
SharedQueue,xxxxx ><xxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd StpDel:><xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx ><xxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS,
ApproachDel,
ApproachLOS:
a a
1. 04 1, 04
a a
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
a a
a 0
a a
---_nul
.............................................................................. ..
Street Name, El Camino Real Newport Avenue
Approach, North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement, L T R L T R L T R L T R
_u--nuu_lu-u_uu-----llu_uu----uulluu---u------II---uuu_hu-1
Control, Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min, Green: a 0 0 a a 0 a a a a 0 a
Lanes, 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 a 2 0 1 1 a 2 1 a
u_--- u- ---1--- u --- un_ull-----------uull-u- uu_uh--II_uu-----_uul
Volume Module,
Base Vol: 106 231 161 12 118 318 139 584 177 120 1542 26
Growth Adj' 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04
Initial Bse, 110 240 167 12 123 331 145 607 184 125 1604 27
AddedVo¡' 19 a 0 3916 a 28 a a 024 a
PasserByVol, a 0 a 0 0 0 a 0 a 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 129 240 167 51 139 331 173 607 184 125 1628 27
User Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume, 129 240 167 51 139 331 173 607 184 125 1628 27
Reduct Vol: a 0 a 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 a 0
Reduced Vol, 129 240 167 51 139 331 173 607 184 125 1628 27
PCE Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj, 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Vol" 129 240 167 51 139 331 173 607 184 125 1628 27
-_u_u_---- uu_u__nn_-II_uuu-----uCllu------uuu-ll-u----uu----I
Saturation Flow Module,
Sat/Lane, 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700
Adjustment, 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00
Lanes, 1.00 1.18 0,82 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2,00 1.00 1.00 2,95 0,05
Final Sat" 1700 2004 1396 1700 1700 1700 1700 3400 1700 1700 5017 83
--u-I---u--uuu--II-u--uuhu--ll--u_--_nn_--II_uu_n__u_--1
Capacity Analysis Module,
vol/Sat, 0,08 0.12 0,12 0,03 0,08 0.19 0.10 0,18 0,11 0,07 0,32 0,32
Crit Moves,
xx><xxx
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
Traffix 7,6,0115 Ic) 2004 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
Traffix 7,6,0115 Ic) 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
AM Future with u-turn
Mon Oct 25, 2004 13,45,11
Page 11-1
AM Future with u-turn
Mon Oct 25, 2004 13,45,11
Page 12-1
-- - - - uU --u _uu- - - _u_-- - --_u --uu_--_u- _u------_u__u--_u__u_u_uu
- u ---uu_--_u__u- ----_u_u-- U _u - - - - _u - ------- - - -pu- - _u u - - u__u - - u-
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/E1 Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, AM peak period
("Base"=2006 without project; "Future"-2006 with project)
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/E1 Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, AM peak period
("Base"=2006 without project; "Future"-2006 with project)
- - - - - ----- -- -- - --- --_uu--------- -----_u--------_u_--_uu_------_u_--
--_uu_--------_u_--_u_---_u_--_u_--------------_u_u_--------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative)
............................................................................... .
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
...................................................................... ..........
Intersection #5 E1 camino Driveway
Intersection #10 Newport Ave driveway
.., ,**. **"" **..,**""..., ** **"...",.....", **",.."..""....".. ,**.",..
................. ................ ............. ...., ...... ..............,........
Average Delay Isec/veh) ,
0,6
Worst Case Level Of Service,
B [ 10,1]
Average Delay (sec/veh) ,
0,0
Worst Case Level Of Service,
AI
0,0)
............. .............. ....... ................................,.............
,.. .,.....".....", " ,...... ,.. .,. ..,. . .... . . .. ..", . . ,...", ,.... .. ,.....".. .
0
1. 04
0
0
0
0
1. 00
1. 00
0
0
0
0 448
1. 04 1. 04
0 466
0 0
0 0
0 466
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
0 466
0 0
0 466
0
1. 04
0
24
0
24
1. 00
1. 00
24
0
24
0 0
1. 04 1. 04
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
1.04
0
55
0
55
1.00
1. 00
55
0
55
0 0
1. 04 1. 04
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1.00 1.00
1. 00 1. 00
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
1. 04
0
0
0
0
1. 00
1.00
0
0
0
Approach, North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement, L T R L T R L T R L T R
--_uu-u--I---uu_uu---Ilu---_u_u__u II------_u_uu-II---_uu-------I
Control, Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights, Include Include Include Include
Lanes, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 1 0
u_--_u----Iuu-----------II--_u----------II---------------Ilu-----_u-----I
Volume Module,
Base vol, 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj, 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04
Initial Bse, 0 0 0 0 0
User Adj, 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00
PHF Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHFVolume, 00 0 00
Reduct VoL 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol" 0 0 0 0 0
---_uu-_ul----_u--_u---II_u------
critical Gap Module,
Critical Gp,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx
FollowUpTim,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx
_uu---_u-I----_u--_uu-II u- ----
Capacity Module,
Cnflict Vol, xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap" xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Move cap" xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Volume/Cap' xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxXx xxxx xxxx
------------I-------_u-----II----_u-----_ull--_uu_u-----II----_uu------I
Level Of Service Module,
Queue, xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Stopped Del,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move, ' , ,
Movement, LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap" xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd StpDel,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS,
ApproachDel,
ApproachLOS,
0 0 868 0 0 2019 0
1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04
0 0 903 0 0 2100 0
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00
0 0 903 0 0 2100 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 903 0 0 2100 0
--II_uuu_u_u--II-_uu----_uul
Conuol ,
Rights,
Lanes,
--_uu-----I----
Volume Module,
Base Vol, 0 396
Growth Adj, 1,04 1,04
Initial Bse, 0 412
Added Vol, 0 0
passerByVo1, 0 0
Initial Fut, 0 412
User Adj, 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj, 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume, 0 412
Reduct Vol, 0 0
Final Vol, , 0 412
critical Gap Module,
Critical Gp,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6,9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
FollowUpTim,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3,3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
---u---_u-I u_--_u----u-ll_uu--uu_u-II-_uuuuu---11 u_--_u---_u-I
Capaci ty Module,
Cnflict Vol, xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 245
Potent Cap" xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 762
Move Cap" xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 762
Volume/Cap' xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0,07
---_u------I u_-_uu------Iluu--_u---_u II_u_u-_u_u--II----_u---_uul
Level Of Service Module,
Queue, xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 0 ,2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Stopped Del, x'\xxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 10,1 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move, . . . . , , . , B . , ,
Movement, LT - LTR RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Sha red Cap" xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue 'xxxxx xxx x xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd StpDel,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS,
ApproachDel,
ApproachLOS,
North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
- u -- u -------II u- _u---_u--II-_u---uu-_ull-_uu----uu-I
Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Include Include Include Include
0200001100000100000
-_u_uu--Ilu-_u---- u--II------------_ullu----uu--_ul
Approach,
Movement'
xxxxx xxxXx xxxx xxxxx
xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
----- -II---_u_u-_u--II--_o--------_ul
xxxx xxxx xxxxx
xxxx xxxx xxxxx
xxxx xxxx xxxxx
xxxx xxxx xxxx
m-~-n m-~-n m-~-n
xxxx xxxx xxxxX xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
10,1
B
xxxxxx
Traffix 7,6,0115 Ic) 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
Traffix 7,6,0115 Ic) 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN. ORANGE, CA
AM Future with u-turn
Mon Oct 25, 2004 13,45,11
Page 13-1
AM Future with u-turn
Mon Oct 25, 2004 13,45,11
Page 14-1
--- -- - _uu_--__uu__nu_________n__u- _n__u_--_---------- _n_nup--U---
----______n___nu___--------------------------______n___-u_--_u_-----------
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, AM peak period
I"Base"=2006 without project: "Future"=2006 with project)
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, AM peak period
I "Base"=2006 without project: "Future"-2006 with project)
-- - - - - - uuu- --_u- - - -------u_-u - u_u_hhu---_----_u___n_unu_--_--n-
--- ---____--_n_______n--_- - ---- ----- --- ---- ------------------------------ -- ---
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method IBase Volume Alternative)
............................................................................... .
............................................................................... .
Intersection #10 Newport Ave driveway
Intersection #11 Newport Ave/I-5 NB Ramp
............... .................................................................
............................................................................... .
Average Delay (sec/vehl,
0,1
Worst Case Level Of Service,
C[ 15,5]
Average Delay (sec/veh) ,
9 - 7
Worst Case Level Of Service,
F[138-8J
................................................................................
............................................................................... .
Approach,
Movement,
North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
- --- -----llunu_uu__ull-------------nlluu_nuu----1
Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Incl ude Include Include Include
00000000010020000210
-----------I-----------_u-II---- ----------II--_n_-u-_unllun_----_nn_1
Vol ume Module,
Base Vol, 0 0
Growth Adj, 1 ,04 1,04
Initial Bse, 0 0
Added Vol, 0 0
PasserByVol, 0 0
Initial Fut, 0 0
User Adj, 1. 00 1,00
PHFAdj, 1.001.00
PHF Volume, 0 0
Reduct Vol, 0 0
Final Vol" 0 0
Critical Gap Module,
Critical Gp ,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6,9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
FollowUpTim,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3 - 3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
------u----I--_nnnn----lluuu_u__n_-II----h---------II_n_u_--------1
Capacity Module,
Cnnict Vol, xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 735
Potent Cap" xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 366
Move Cap_' xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 366
Volume/Cap, xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0-06
---_uu---"-I--_un--n----lln_u_nnun_II------
Level Of Service Module:
Queue: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 0 ,2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Stopped Del,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 15_5 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move: . . . . . C . . . . . .
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap" xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd StpDel,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS,
ApproachDel,
ApproachLOS,
0
1. 04
0
0
0
0
1. 00
1. 00
0
0
0
0 0
1. 04 1. 04
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
1. 04
0
23
0
23
1. 00
1.00
23
0
23
0 868
1. 04 1. 04
0 903
0 0
0 0
0 903
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
0 903
0 0
0 903
0
1. 04
0
0
0
0
1. 00
1. 00
0
0
0
0 2019
1. 04 1. 04
0 2100
0 0
0 0
0 2100
1. 00 1. 00
1. 00 1. 00
0 2100
0 0
0 2100
0
1. 04
0
71
0
71
1. 00
1. 00
71
0
71
Street Name, I -5 NB Ramp Newport Avenue
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R
unuunu 1------------u-II---------------II_u----unnu II_u_hhn-----1
Control, Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 1
------------Iu---------unll----uuu---ull------h-------Iluu----_uu--I
Volume Module,
Base Vol:
Growth A<lj:
Init ial Bse,
User Adj:
PHF Adj,
PHF Volume:
Reduct Vol:
Final Vol-:
----n--hul-
Critical Gap Module:
Critical Gp,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4,1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
FollowUpTim: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2,2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
----uunnl-h_-_u_uh--II--------huu-II nnunu_----II------u--_hh\
Capacity Module:
Cnnict Vol, xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 2126 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap,: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 205 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap-: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 205 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 1. 09 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
------------I------h-_u---II----------_u--II----h_u-uu-II uU---_--_h__!
Level Of Service Module:
Queue: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 10 ,5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Stopped Del :xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 138,8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move: . . . . . . F . . . . .
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap,: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue : xxxxx XXXX xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd StpDel: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS,
ApproachDel:
ApproachLOS:
0 0
1. 04 1. 04
0 0
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0 216 868 0 0 1341 678
1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04
0 0 0 0 225 903 0 0 1395 705
1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00
1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00
0 0 0 0 225 903 0 0 1395 705
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 225 903 0 0 1395 705
II n__---u--h--II----h_h_h---II nun_--------I
-------,-----
Control,
Rights,
Lanes:
xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
II---h----------I
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
Xxxxxx
xxxxxx
15,5
C
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
Traffix 7,6,0115 Icl 2004 Dowling Assoc- Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
Traffix 7,6,0115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
AM Future with u-turn
Mon Oct 25, 2004 13,45,11
Page 15-1
- - - - - - - - - - - ---- - - ---- --- -- - - - - - -- - --- -- --- -- - - - - - ----- - -- ----- - --- - -- - - - - -- --- --
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, AM peak period
("Base"=2006 without project; "Future"=2006 with project)
- - - - - -- -- -------- - --- ------ ------ -----------------------------------------
......... ......................... ........ ....... ........ ....., ."....... ......,
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future volume Alternative)
Intersection Ul Newport Ave/I-5 NB Ramp
.........,....................,................, ,...... **' ",**' **'** ** ,.. **....
Average Delay Isec/vehl,
10,4
Worst Case Level Of Service,
F [151. 9J
..".........................".. **..**.".,. ** **. **** **. **' **, ****.****", ****.
1-5 NB Ramp
North Bound South Bound
L T R L T R
-i--- ----11--------------
Control, Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights, Include Include
Lanes, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
---------1-------- ---11--------------
Volume Module,
Base Vol, 0 0
Growth Adj, 1,04 1,04
Initial Bse, 0 0
Added Vol, 0 0
PasserByVol, 0 0
Initial Fur, 0 0
User Adj, 1. 00 1. 00
PHF Adj, 1. 00 1. 00
PHF volume, 0 0
Reduct Vol, 0 0
Final Vol,,' 0 0
crit ical Gap Module,
Critical Gp'xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4,1 xxxx ){xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
FollowUpTim,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2_2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx ){XXX xxxxx
------------1-------- -------11--------- ------11---------------11---------------1
Capacity Module,
Cnflict Vol, xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 2157 xxxx){xxxx ){XXX xxxx x){xxx
Potent Cap" ){XXX xxxx xxxxx xxxx){XXX xxxxx 199 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap, , xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 199 XXXX xxxxx xxxx xxxx x){xxx
volume/Cap' xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx){XXX xxxx 1.13 xxxx ){XXX ){XXX xxxx xxxx
------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1
Level Of Service Module,
Queue, xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 10 . 9 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Stopped Del,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx ){XXX xxxxx 151,9 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move, ' , , * , * F . , , . .
Movement, LT - LTR - RT LT. LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap" xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx ){XXX xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue ,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd StpDel, xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx ){XXX xxxxx
Shared LOS,
ApproachDel,
ApproachLOS,
Newport Avenue
East Bound West Bound
L T R L T R
-11---------------11---------------1
Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Include Include
1020000201
-11---------------11---------------1
Street Name,
Approach,
Movement'
0
1. 04
0
0
0
0
1. 00
1. 00
0
0
0
0 0
1. 04 1. 04
0 0
0 '0
0 0
0 0
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
1. 04
0
0
0
0
1. 00
1. 00
0
0
0
216 868
1,04 1,04
225 903
0 28
0 0
225 931
1. 00 1. 00
1.00 1.00
225 931
0 0
225 931
0
1.04
0
0
0
0
1. 00
1. 00
0
0
0
0 1341
1. 04 1. 04
0 1395
0 12
0 0
0 1407
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
0 1407
0 0
0 1407
678
1. 04
705
12
0
717
1. 00
1.00
717
0
717
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
XXXXXX
xxxxxx
Traffix 7,6,0115 Icl 2004 Dowling Msoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
PM Future with u.turn
._---------------------------_00_--_.._______00-------___00_--____00_00__-
Mon Oct 25, 2004 13,48,18
Page I-I
PM Future with u-turn
Mon Oct 25, 2004 1),48,18
00- 00- - ---- ---- 0000_- -- U_--__h- - _00- - -- - h - - - - - _00 - - --- U---- __00- - - h_U - 00_-
Page 2 - 1
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, PM peak period
("Base"=2006 without project; "Future"=2006 with project)
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, PM peak period
("Base"=2006 without project; "Future"=2006 with project)
Scenario,
- - - - __h - - - - - - - 00 hn_-- un- - -- - __un - --- ----- - -- --- _n n ---- U - - 00 00 - _u - - 00-
Forecast for PM
______n_--__------_U__U--U_-------_U_-------------------------------
Command,
Volume,
Geometry,
Impact Fee:
Trip Generation:
Trip Distribution:
Paths,
Routes,
Configuration,
Scenario Report
PM Future with u- turn
Trip Generation Report
Default Command
PM Future with u-turn
Default Geometry
Default Impact Fee
PM
Default Trip Distribution
with u-turn
Defaul t Routes
Default Configuration
Rate
In
Rate
Out
Zone
# Subzone
Amount
Units
-_u _u__un_--
_----_nunn
1 Makena Tusti 1,00 commercial 76,00 77,00
Zone 1 Subtotal"."""""""""""".,
Trips Trips
In Out
--h- --_u
76
76
Total' Of
Trips Total
77
77
153 100,0
153 100,0
TOTAL, , , , , , , ' , ' , , , , , , , , , . , , , , ' , , , , , ' , , , , , , , ' , , , , , , , , , , ,
U--_uu _00 00_--___- 000000 U_h--- 00 - - 00- - - - - - -- -- -p_u_-__uu----hhh- ----
153 100,0
76
77
Traffix 7,6,0115 (cl 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
Traffix 7,6,0115 (cl 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
PM Future with u-turn
Mon Oct 25, 2004 13,48,18
Page 3-1
PM Future with u-turn
Mon Oct 25, 2004 13,48,18
Page 4-1
-- -- -- --- n_- -- --______n__U __n_-- - -------_u__--u_n__--___un___n_-------
--- - - n- U --n- _n - u- n_- - -- - - u - - - - - - - - - - - - - u n- - - - -_On u- n -- - - - nn U n - --
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, PM peak period
("Base"=2006 without project; "Future"=2006 with project)
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, PM peak period
("Base"=2006 without project; "Future"=2006 with project)
_n- --- __n- ----______nun- __n--------_--_u--n u-_u_u-__unU--n__-----
-----n--n----_u------u- Uu---- ---- ------ __n_- -------- -_u_-------n_____n
To Gates
3
7
Turning Movement Report
PM
Volume Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total
Type Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Volume
#1 Newport Ave/I-5 SB Ramp-Nisson
Base 37 0 150 315 105 438 0 1249 96 176 787 0 3353
Added 0 0 4 11 0 0 0 8 0 4 8 0 35
Total 37 0 154 326 105 438 0 1257 96 180 795 0 3388
#3 Newport Ave/El Camino Real
Base 98 323 125 22 155 378 270 828 122 131 998 48 3498
Added 15 0 0 39 15 0 23 0 0 0 19 0 111
Total 113 323 125 61 170 378 293 828 122 131 1017 48 3609
#5 El Camino Driveway
Base 0 642 0 0 554 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1196
Added 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 54 0 0 0 73
Total 0 642 0 0 554 19 0 0 54 0 0 0 1269
#10 Newport Ave driveway
Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1227 0 0 1485 0 2712
Added 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 57 80
Total 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 1227 0 0 1485 57 2792
#11 Newport Ave/I-5 NB Ramp
Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 333 1227 0 0 967 518 3045
Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 12 12 47
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 333 1250 0 0 979 530 3092
#12
Base 0 81B 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 818
Added 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12
Total 0 830 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 830
Trip Distribution Report
Percent Of Trips project
Zone
5,0
10,0
15,0
20,0
25.0
25,0
Traffix 7,6,0115 Ic) 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
Traffix 7,6,0115 IC) 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
PM Future with u-turn
Mon Oct 25, 2004 13,48,20
Page 5-1
PM Future with u-turn
Mon Oct 25, 2004 13,48,20
Page 6-1
- -- - __h- -- _h- - --- __h____h hh_h- ----- h_hhh __h__h__- - _h_--____----- --
---------------------_h_-----______h_h__________h____---_____hh______h__-
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/E1 Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, PM peak period
I "Base",2006 without project; "Future".2006 with project)
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/E1 Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, PM peak period
("Base".2006 without project; "Future".2006 with project)
- - - - h - -- - -- - - - - -- - - - h- - - - h U _hh - - - _h - - h- _h- - -- _h_hh - hhh --_u -- - - --
--- - --- - --- - - h h - -- - h- -- - _uu- - - - - - - h- h - - - - _h- - _h - - _h- - h h- - - - - - h - - - --
Impact Analysis Report
Level Of Service
Level Of Service Computation Report
lCU 1 (Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
............... .................. ...............................................
5 El Camino Driveway
Base Future Change
Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in
LOS Veh C LOS Veh C
C xxxxx 0,744 C xxxxx 0,758 + 0,014 vlc
B xxxxx 0 - 644 B xxxxx 0-670 + 0,026 vlc
A 0-0 0,000 B 10,4 0,000 +10 _437 D/V
A 0,0 0,000 B 12,5 0-000 +12,491 D/V
E 49-3 0,000 F 55,1 0,000 + 5,787 D/V
Intersection #1 Newport Ave/I-5 SB Ramp-Nisson
Intersection
......................................................... ............. ..........
#
1 Newport AvejI-5 SB Ramp-Nisson
Cycle Isec) ,
Loss Time (see),
Optimal Cycle,
100
0 (Y+R =
89
Critical VoL /Cap, IX),
4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) ,
Level Of Service,
0 - 744
xxxxxx
C
#
3 Newport Ave/El Camino Real
........... ............................................... ......................
~ 10 Newport Ave driveway
Street Name, 1-5 SB Ramp/Nisson Newport Avenue
Approach, North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement, L T R L T R L T R L T R
h__h----hl-hh_hh-----II-u----------hll ----_h_h----II---hhh_---h!
Control, Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights, Include Include Include Include
Min, Green, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes, 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 0
--------hhl--_uhc-_u---II-------- ---h-lluhh_h_h---llhh--------_ul
Volume Module,
Base vol, 36 0 144 303 101 421 0 1201 92 169 757 0
Growth Adj, 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04
Initial Bse, 37 0 150 315 105 438 0 1249 96 176 787 0
User Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj, 1. 00 1. 00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1. 00 1,00 1,00 1. 00
PHF Volume, 37 0 150 315 105 438 0 1249 96 176 787 0
Reduct Vol, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced VoL 37 0 150 315 105 438 0 1249 96 176 787 0
PCE Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Vol" 37 0 150 315 105 438 0 1249 96 176 787 0
hhhh--hl-hh----uh--!1 hhh_hu_h-I!-h_hhh-----II--hhh-------!
Saturation Flow Module,
Sat/Lane, 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700
Adjustment, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes, 1.00 0,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0,00 2,00 1.00 1.00 2,00 0,00
Final Sat" 1700 0 1700 1700 1700 1700 0 3400 1700 1700 3400 0
hhhh--hl-h-_u---hh-ll-h------_uu-llhh--h---hhllh--h_Uhhhi
Capacity Analysis Module,
Vol/Sat, 0_02 0,00 0,09 0,19 0,06 0,26 0,00 0-37 0,06 0,10 0,23 0,00
crit Moves,
~ 11 Newport Ave/I-5 NB Ramp
............................................................................... .
Traffix 7,6,0115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
Traffix 7,6,0115 Ic) 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
PM Future with u.turn
Mon Oct 25, 2004 13,48,20
Page 7-1
PM Future with u-turn
Mon Oct 25, 2004 1),48,20
Page 8-1
.... ._n .------ __n___-------------------_____h__------------------
-----______h__-_---------------------------------------------------------------
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, PM peak period
("Base":2006 without project; "Future"=2006 with project)
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project. PM peak period
('Base'=2006 without project; "Future"=2006 with project)
- -- --- --- ---- ---- h_--- ------------------------------
------------------
------------------------------- ----------- -- ------- ------ h- --------- -----------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1 (Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
......... ........ ........... .................. ................. ............ .....
Level Of Service Computation Report
lCU 1 (Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
..... .......... .................................................................
Intersection #l Newport Ave/I-5 SB Ramp-Nisson
............................................................................... .
Intersection #3 Newport Ave/El Camino Real
............................................................................... .
Cycle (sec) , 100 Critical voL/Cap. (X), 0.758
Loss Time (sec) , 0 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) , xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle' 94 Level Of Service, C
.................................. ........................ ......................
Cycle (sec) ,
LOSS Time (sec) ,
Optimal Cycle,
100
0 (Y+R =
64
Critical voL/Cap, IX),
4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) ,
Level Of Service,
0,644
xxxxxx
B
............................................................................... .
Street Name, 1-5 SB Ramp/Nisson Newport Avenue
Approach, North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement, L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1
Control, Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights, Include Include Include Include
Min, Green, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes, 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 0
_h ---------I-----h--------II---------------II---------------II--------------I
Volume Module,
Base Vol, 36 0 144 303 101
Growth Adj' 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04
Initial Bse, 37 0 150 315 105
Added Vol, 0 0 4 11 0
PasserByVol, 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut, 37 0 154 326 105
User Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume, 37 0 154 326 105
Reduct Vol, 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol, 37 0 154 326 105
PCE Ad), 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flnal Vol.. 37 0 154 326 105
------------1-- --h-------II-----__h
Saturation Flow Module,
Sat/Lane, 17001700 1700 17001700 1700 17001700 1700 17001700 1700
Adjustment, 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00' 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00
Lanes, 1.00 0,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0,00 2,00 1.00 1.00 2,00 0,00
Final Sat" 1700 0 1700 1700 1700 1700 0 3400 1700 1700 3400 0
------------I---------------II------------h-II---------------II-------h------I
Capacity Analysis Module,
Vol/Sat, 0,02 0,00 0,09 0,19 0.06 0,26 0,00 0,37 0,06 0,11 0,23 0,00
Crit Moves,
421 0 1201 92 169 757 0
1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04
438 0 1249 96 176 7B7 0
0 0 8 0 4 8 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
438 0 1257 96 180 795 0
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00
438 0 1257 96 180 795 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
438 0 1257 96 180 795 0
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
438 0 1257 96 180 795 0
- - --- I I - - -- -- -- - - -- --- 1 I - --- -- -- --- - -- - I
Street Name, El Camino Real Newport Avenue
Approach, North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement, L T R L T R L T R L T R
-_h--------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------1
Control, Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights, Include Include Include Include
Min, Green, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes, 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 1 0
------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1
Volume Module,
Base Vol, 94 311 120 21 149 363 260 796 117 126 960 46
Growth Adj, 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04
Initial Bse, 98 323 125 22 155 318 270 828 122 131 998 48
User Adj, 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00
PHF Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume, 98 323 125 22 155 378 270 828 122 131 998 48
Reduet Vol, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol, 98 323 125 22 155 378 270 828 122 131 998 48
PCE Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Vol" 98 323 125 22 155 378 270 828 122 131 998 48
--_n_------I---------------II----___h___---II----_nh------Ilh__-_--_no-pi
Saturation Flow Module,
Sat/Lane, 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700
Adjustment, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes, 1.00 1.44 0,56 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2,00 1.00 1.00 2,86 0,14
Final Sat., 17002453 947 17001700 1700 17003400 1700 17004867 233
------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1
Capacity Analysis Module,
Vol/Sat, 0.06 0.13 0,13 0,01 0,09 0,22 0,16 0,24 0,07 0,08 0,21 0,21
Crit Moves,
................. ...............................................................
................................................................ ................
Traffix 7,6,0115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
Traffix 7,6,0115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoe, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
PM Future with u-turn
Mon Oct 25, 2004 13.48,20
Page 9-1
PM Future with u-turn
Mon Oct 25, 2004 13,48,20
Page 10-1
----_u____n__n___---n-----_u_---------------------------------___-_00-____-
------- ----- _00_--_----- -----_____0000_----_0000__--_____0000__-
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport /El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, PM peak period
("Base"=2006 without project; "Future".2006 with project)
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, PM peak period
("Base"=2006 without project; "Future".2006 with project)
-- ------------------- _00_----_----___0000_--____-------- - ------______00___- -----
-- --_u- 00_- -- - ---- - noon __h____-_----__----__n_____--_U-- ----___nhnu_-
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
... ............................................................ **...............
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1 (Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
.............................. **.. **........................... .................
Intersection #3 Newport Ave/El Camino Real
Intersection #5 El Camino Driveway
............. ......... .......................................... **..............
......................... **............................................ **.......
Cycle (sec) , 100 Critical VoL/Cap, (X), 0.670
Loss Time (sec) , 0 (Y+R. 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) , xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle, 69 Level Of Service, B
............................................................................... .
Average Delay (sec/veh) ,
Worst Case Level Of Service,
A[
0.0]
0,0
.......... **.............................................. ..**..... **...........
260 796 117 126 960 46
1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04
270 828 122 131 998 48
23 0 0 0 19 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
293 828 122 131 1017 48
1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
293 828 122 131 1017 48
0 0 0 0 0 0
293 828 122 131 1017 48
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
293 828 122 131 1017 48
___nu_------Iln------u-u--I
Approach, North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement, L T R L T R L T R L T R
--_00_------1-000000--------11--00_0000---00-11 00_00--------00 11-00--00_00-----1
Control, Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights, Include Include Include Include
Lanes. 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
-----00---00100--------_0000 II u_h--_hn_hll------n_------Ilh-----h------I
Volume Module.
Base Vol, 0 617 0 0 533 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj , 1,04 1. 04 1. 04 1,04 1,04 1,04 1,04 1,04 1,04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04
Initial Bse, 0 642 0 0 554 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
User Adj, 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00
PHF Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume, 0 642 0 0 554 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduct Vol, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol., 0 642 0 0 554 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
--------_h_l_nnnnuu--ll- ---_--_n--nll-_hh_h------Ilu_-_u__n__hl
Critical Gap Module,
Critical Gp'xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
FollowUpTil!NXXXXX XXXX xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
00- 00--_- u_/ uuu_-- 0000- -II--h-----__nn II 0000 0000_000000 II-hh---h- ----I
Capacity Module,
Cnflict Vol, xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxXXX xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap., xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap" xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Volume/cap' xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
----00_00_001 unnn__h_--II.--u._h_--_u II----_uunnhll-hh---h-----I
Level Of Service Module,
Queue, xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Stopped Del,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move, . . . . . . . . . . . .
Movement, LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap" xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue 'xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd StpDel,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS,
ApproachDel,
ApproachLOS,
Street Name. El Camino Real Newport Avenue
Approach, North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement, L T R L T R L T R L T R
u_nhu_--I-----_nn-----II u__u--_----n 11----_n_-_h_--II_n------_n_--1
Control, Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights, Include Include Include Include
Min, Green, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes, 1 a 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 1 0
__00--__0000 1-_nn_n_-_n_II-----_uu_n_-II-_nn_n_-_n_ll_h_---_nn_nl
Vol ume Module,
Base Vor, 94 311
Growth Adj, 1, 04 1,04
Initial Bse, 98 323
Added Vol, 15 0
PasserByVol. 0 0
Initial Fut. 113 323
User Adj, 1,00 1.00
PHF Adj. 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume, 113 323
Reduct Vol. 0 0
Reduced vol. 113 323
PCE AdJ' 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj. 1. 00 1. 00
Final Vol" 113 323
.---_u-----I----------
Saturation Flow Module.
Sat/Lane. 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700
Adjustment, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes, 1.00 1.44 0,56 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2,00 1.00 1.00 2,87 0,13
Final Sat" 1700 2453 947 1700 1700 1700 1700 3400 1700 1700 4871 229
____n_-----I--n------n---II---nn_hh_--II --__--_n_-_n_II-----nnn___-!
Capacity Analysis Module,
vol/Sat, 0,07 0,13 0.13 0,04 0,10 0,22 0,17 0.24 0,07 0,08 0.21 0,21
Cri t Moves,
120 21 149 363
1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04
125 22 155 378
0 39 15 0
0 0 0 0
125 61 170 378
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
125 61 170 378
0 0 0 0
125 61 170 378
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
125 61 170 378
-----11----------0000-11-
**........................................... ................... ................
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
Traffix 7.6,0115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
Traffix 7,6,0115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
PM Future with u-turn
Mon Oct 25, 2004 13,48,20
Page 11-1
PM Future with u-turn
Mon Oct 25, 2004 13,48,20
Page 12-1
- - ---- - ------ ------------------------ -----------------
- - - ---1- - -;~~~~i~-~~~~~~-~~~~~~i~ - ~~~- ~~~~~~ï~~ - ~~~i~~ - ~~~~i~ - ~~~~~~- --- -- - - - --
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, PM peak period
("Base":2006 without project; "Future":2006 with project)
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, PM peak period
("Base"-2006 without project; "Future"=2006 with project)
----------
- - - -- -- - - - - - --- - --- - - ----- - - - - --- -- ---- - - ---- -- ----- ---- - -----
--------------------------------------------- --- - -- -------- --------- - -- ------ ---
............................................................................. ...
Level Of Service Computat ion Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative)
.............. ........ ............................... .... ............ ...........
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Average Delay (sec/veh) , 0.4 Worst Case Level Of Service, B[ 10,4J
....................................................................... .........
Intersection #5 El Camino Driveway
............................................................................... .
............................................................................... .
Intersection #10 Newport Ave driveway
Average Delay (sec/veh) ,
0, a
Worst Case Level Of Service,
A[
0.0]
...................... ..........................................................
Approach, North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement, L T R L T R L T R L T R
---------- --1-------- -------11---------------11---------------11---------------1
Control, Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights, Include Include Include Include
Lanes, a a 2 a a a a 1 1 a a a a a 1 a a a a
------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11
Volume Module,
Base Vol, a 617
Growth Adj, 1, 04 1, 04
Initial Bse, a 642
Added Vol, a 0
PasserByVol, 0 0
Initial Fut, 0 642
User Adj, 1. 00 1. 00
PHF Adj, 1. 00 1. 00
PHF Volume, 0 642
Reduct Vol, a 0
Final Vol" a 642
crit ical Gap Module,
Cntical Gp,xxxxx xxx x
FollowUpT"m,xxxxx xxxx
a
1. 04
0
0
a
a
1. 00
1. 00
0
0
a
a 533
1. 04 1. 04
0 554
0 a
0 a
0 554
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
0 554
a a
a 554
0
1. 04
0
19
a
19
1. 00
1. 00
19
a
19
a 0
1,04 1,04
a a
0 a
0 a
a 0
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
0 a
0 0
a 0
0
1. 04
0
54
0
54
1.00
1. 00
54
0
54
a a
1. 04 1. 04
0 0
0 0
0 0
a a
1. 00 1. 00
1. 00 1. 00
0 0
a 0
a a
a
1. 04
a
a
0
a
1.00
1. 00
a
a
a
Approach, North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement, L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------I
Control, Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights, Include Include Include Include
Lanes, 0 a 0 0 0 a a 0 a 1 a a 2 a 0 0 0 2 1 0
------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------I
Volume Module,
Base Vol, a 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj, 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04
Initial Bse, 0 0 0 0 0
User Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj, 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00
PHF Volume, a 0 0 a 0
Reduct Vol, 0 a 0 0 0
Final Vol" 0 0 0 0 0
------------1---------------11-----------
crit ical Gap Module,
Critical Gp,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
FollowUpTim,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
------------1---------------11-------------'-11---------------11---.---------- -I
Capaci ty Module,
Cnflict Vol, xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx XXX>< xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap" xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap., xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Volume/Cap, xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
------------1---------------11---------- ----11---------------11---------------1
Level Of Service Module,
Queue, xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx>< xxxx xxxxx
Stopped Del,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx XXXX>< xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move, . . .
Movement, LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap" xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue ,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd StpDel,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS,
ApproachDel,
ApproachLOS,
0 0 1180 0 0 1428 0
1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04
a 0 1227 0 0 1485 0
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
0 0 1227 0 0 1485 0
0 0 0 0 0 a 0
0 a 1227 0 0 1485 0
----11--------'------11---------------1
xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6 ,9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3 ,3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
--II-------h------II---------------II---------------I
Capaclty Module,
Cnf! iCt Vol, xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 287 xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap" xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 716 xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap" xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 716 xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Volume/Cap, xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0,08 xxxx xxxx xxxx
------h---I---------------II- ----h--II---------------II---------------I
Level Of Service Module,
Queue, xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 0 ,2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Stopped Del, xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 10,4 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move, . . . . . . . . B . . .
Movement, LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap" xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue, xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd StpDel,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS,
ApproachDel,
ApproachLOS,
LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx XXXXX XXX>< xxxx xxxxx
xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx XXXX>< xxxx xxxxx
xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
10,4
B
xxxxxx
Traffix 7,6,0115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
Traffix 7,6,0115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
PM Future with u-turn
Mon Oct 25, 2004 1),48,20
Page 1)-1
PM Future with u-turn
Mon Oct 25, 2004 1),48,20
Page 14-1
- - - - - -- - --- --------------------____--_h--_U__--__h__h-
- ------ -- - - ---- --__00___--- 00---- - -- -- - _h_--oo - - 00 _Uh- __00_--- ---- ___0000 ----
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/E1 Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, PM peak period
:"Base".2006 without project; "Future"=2006 with project)
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/Ei Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, PM peak period
("Base".2006 without project; "Future".2006 with project)
- - - -- - - ---- - - --- -- __-hh_p_--_------------_oooo_---_oo_----_----_ooh__U-
----- ___h___--oo_-----oo_------- ---------______00____00- - _00___---- ------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
........... .....................................................................
................... ........ ...... ............ ...... ...... ...... .................
Intersection #10 Newport Ave driveway
Intersection #11 Newport Ave/I-5 NB Ramp
............................................................................... .
............................................................................... .
Average Delay (sec/veh) , 0-1 Worst Case Level Of Service, B[ 12-5J
............................................................................... .
Average Delay (sec/veh) ,
5,4
Worst Case Level Of Service,
E [ 49 -3J
............................................................................... .
Approach, North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement, L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------1---------------1 1----00---------1 Ih-----_oo-----I 1---------------1
Control, Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights, Include Include Include Include
Lanes, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 1 0
------------1---------------1 I------h-------I 1---------------1 1---------------1
Volume Module,
Base Vol, 0 0
Growth Adj, 1,04 1,04
Initial Bse, 0 0
Added Vol, 0 0
PasserByVol, 0 0
Initial Fut, 0 0
User Adj, 1. 00 1. 00
PHF Adj, 1,00 1,00
PHF Volume, 0 0
Reduct Vol, 0 0
Final Vol" 0 0
Critical Gap Module,
Critical Gp'xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 6,9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
FollowUpTim,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 3,3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
---------- -1---------------1 I---------------II-------h------I 1---------------1
Capaci ty Module,
Cnfl ict Vol, xxx x xxx x xxxxx xxxx xxxx
Potent Cap - xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx
Move Cap" xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx
Volume/Cap, xxxx xxx x xxxx xxxx xxxx
--I
Level Of Service Module,
Queue, xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 0,1 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Stopped Del, xxxxx xxx x xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 12,5 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move, . . . . . B . . . . . .
Movement, LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap" xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx XXXX ""-XXX xxxxx xxxx ""-XXX xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd StpDel, xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx XXXX ""-XXX
Shared LOS,
ApproachDel,
ApproachLOS,
Street Name,
Approach,
Movement,
1-5 NB Ramp Newport Avenue
North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
--h--------I---------------Ilhh-----p----II---------------II-_u-----------1
Control, Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights, Include Include Include Include
Lanes, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 1
------------I---------------II---------h----II--h_h--------II---------------I
Volume Module,
Base Vol, 0 0 0 0 0 0 320 1180 0 0 930 498
Growth Adj, 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04 1. 04
Initial Bse, 0 0 0 0 0 0 333 1227 0 0 967 518
User Adj, 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00
PHF Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume, 0 0 0 0 0 0 333 1227 0 0 967 518
Reduct Vol, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol., 0 0 0 0 0 0 333 1227 0 0 967 518
---------h-I---------------lloo-------_oo---II---------------II_oo-----h-----1
Cri tical Gap Module,
Critical Gp,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
FollowUpTim,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
----_oo-----I---------------II--------h-----II-------------hll---------------1
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol, xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1266 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap" xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 390 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap" xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 390 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Volume/Cap, xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0,85 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II-----h-h-----I
Level Of Service Module,
Queue, xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8 ,2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 49-3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move, . . . . . . E . . . . .
Movement, LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap" xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
SharedQueue oxxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd StpDel, xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS,
ApproachDel,
ApproachLOS,
4 ,1 xxxx ""-XXX xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
2 ,2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
0
1. 04
0
0
0
0
1. 00
1. 00
0
0
0
0 0
1.04 1.04
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
1. 04
0
23
0
23
1. 00
1. 00
23
0
23
0 1180
1. 04 1. 04
0 1227
'0 0
0 0
0 1227
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
0 1227
0 0
0 1227
0
1. 04
0
0
0
0
1. 00
1. 00
0
0
0
0 1428
1. 04 1. 04
0 1485
0 0
0 0
0 1485
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
0 1485
0 0
0 1485
0
1.04
0
57
0
57
1. 00
1. 00
57
0
57
524
504
504
0,05
--11-------------- II---------------II--h-----------I
xxxx xxxx xxxxx
xxxx xxxx xxxxx
xxxx xxxx xxxxx
xxxx xxxx xxxx
xxxx xxxx xxxxx
xxxx xxxx xxxxx
xxxx xxxx xxxxx
xxxx xxxx xxxx
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
12 - 5
B
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
Traffix 7,6,0115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
Traffix 7,6,0115 (cl 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
PM Future with u-turn
Man Oct 25, 2004 13,48,20
Page 15-1
- u --- - - u -- uU_----_U ----u_---------_u_---_u---
Traffic Impact Analysis for Newport/El Camino Retail Center
Existing traffic conditions with and without project, PM peak period
¡"Base".2006 without project; "Future"=2006 with project)
---------- -------_u_--_uu-----_u_----uu ----------------u_u_-
.............................. ................ ........ ........ ....... ...........
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #11 Newport Ave/I-5 NB Ramp
- ,___HH
...................... ................... ....... ..... ......... ...... ............
Average Delay (sec/veh) ,
................................................ ................................
5,9
Worst Case Level Of Service,
F [ 55, II
Street Name,
Approach,
Movement,
1-5 NB Ramp Newport Avenue
North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1
Stop Sign Stop Sign uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Include Include Include Include
00000 00000 10200 00201
----I u_------------II-------u------II---u----------II----_u--------I
Volume Module,
Base Vol, a 0
Growth Adj , I, 04 1,04
Initial Bse, 0 0
Added Vol, 0 0
passerByVol, 0 0
Initial Fut, 0 0
User Adj, 1,00 1,00
PHF Adj, 1.001.00
PHF Volume, 0 0
Reduct Vol, 0 0
Final Vol" 0 0
Critical Gap Module,
Critical Gp,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4,1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
FollowUpTim,xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2,2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
--------_u-I--_uuuu----II-u------------II-------_u_u--Iluu-----------I
Capacity Module,
Cnflict Vol, xxxx xxxx
Potent Cap" xxxx xxxx
Move Cap, , xxxx xxxx
Vol ume/Cap' xxxx xxxx
----1------
Level Of Service Module,
Queue, xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Stopped Del, xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move, .
Movement' LT
Shared Cap" xxxx
SharedQueue ,xxxxx
Shrd StpDel,xxxxx
Shared LOS,
ApproachDel,
ApproachLOS,
a
1. 04
0
0
0
0
1. 00
1. 00
0
0
0
0 0
1. 04 1. 04
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
1. 04
0
0
a
0
1. 00
1. 00
0
a
0
320 1180
1. 04 1. 04
333 1227
0 23
0 0
333 1250
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
333 1250
0 0
333 1250
a
1. 04
0
a
0
0
1. 00
1.00
0
0
a
a 930
1. 04 1. 04
0 967
0 12
0 0
0 979
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
0 979
0 0
a 979
498
1. 04
518
12
0
530
1. 00
1. 00
530
a
530
Control,
Rights,
Lanes,
xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1294 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
xxxxx 'xxxx xxxx xxxxx 377 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 377 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0 ' 88 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
----II---------------II---u-----uu-II----------u---I
8 ,7 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
55,1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
F . . . . .
~-n ~-~-n ~-~-n ~-~-n
xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
Traffix 7,6,0115 (c) 2004 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to KIMLEY HORN, ORANGE, CA
......-,-..~ Kimley-Horn
~ - [~ and Associates, Inc,
Appendix C: SimTraffic Analysis Sheets
'-
Beach/Edinger Retail Site
nylj7ìclmpactAnarysü
10/29/04
no E CR u-turn
10/25/2004
SimTraffic Performance Report
Projected AM with Project
5: Newport Boulevard & 1-5 NB Ramp Performance by movement
Total Delay (hr)
Delay/Veh (s)
Total Stops
Travel Dist (mi)
Travel Time (hr)
Avg Speed (mph)
Fuel Used (gal)
HC Emissions, (g)
CO Emissions (g)
NOx Emissions (g)
Vehicles Entered
Vehièles Exited
Hourly Exit Rate
Deriied,iEntryBêfsl"ê
Denied Entry After
1.6 0.5 1.0
25.5 1.6 2.5
200 6 106
11.7 55.8 53,4
2.1 2.6 2.8
6 21 19
1,8 8.2 4.0
5 25 12
102 1189 430
17 101 40
219 1098 1433
222 1097 1433
222 1097 1433
0 0 0
0 0 0
1.2
6.1
109
26.9
2.7
10
2,4
6
107
13
723
727
727
0
0
5: Newport Boulevard & 1-5 NB Ramp Intersection Performance
Total Delay (hr)
Delay I Veh (5)
Total Stops
Travel Gist (lTii)
Travel Time (hr)
Avg speed (rnPh)
Fuel Used (gal)
HC,Emissions!(g)
CO Emissions (g)
NQX:Emissiðlí1~;:(:g) "
Vehicles Entered
V~hiclesExit~'~, '
Hourly Exit Rate
De.hiê(¡\;;{ËntrytlJiJ~fCire "
Denied Entry After
2.1
5.6
206
67.4
4.7
14
10.0
1291
1 7
1~!19
1319
0
2.2
3.7
215
80,2
5.5
15
6.4
18
537
53
2156
2160
2160
0
0
,",!' ".0', '0'"
, ,
:i'.
4.3
4.4
421
147.7
10.3
14
16.4
48
1828
3473
3479
3479
0
NewportlEI Camino TIA
MOL
kimleylvl7-ff51
SimTraffic Report
Page 3
no ECR u-turn
10/25/2004
SimTraffic Performance Report
Projected AM with Project
7: Newport Boulevard & Project Driveway Performance by movement
Total Delay (hr) 0.5 1.9 0.1 0.0 0.2
Delay / Veh (s) 2.0 3.3 5.4 0.7 21.0
Total Stops 28 37 3 7 30
Travel Dist (mi) 35.7 87.2 3.2 0.7 0.6
Travel Time (hr) 1.8 5.2 0.3 0.0 0.2
Avg Speed (mph) 20 17 11 21 3
Fuel Used (gal) 1.7 9.5 0.3 0.1 0.1
HC Emissions (g) 5 28 1 0 0
CO Emissions (g) 110 1042 12 21 7
NOx Emissions (g) 9 111 2 1 2
Vehicles Entered 964 2130 80 50 30
Vehicles Exited 964 2125 80 50 30
Hourly Exit Rate 964 2125 80 50 30
Denied EntryBefore 0 0 0 0 0
Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0
7: Newport Boulevard & Project Driveway Intersection Performance
Total Delay (hr)
Delay / Veh (5)
Total Stops
Travel Dist (r"ni)
Travel Time (hr)
Avg Speed (tOph)
Fuel Used (gal)
HC Emissiør1$(g)
CO Emissions (g)
NO" Emissi~ns(gJ
Vehicles Entered
Vehicles Exited
Hourly Exit Rate
Denied Ent.rY¡aef~f~
Denied Entry After
0.5
2.0
28
35.7
1.8
20
1.7
5
110
9
964
964
964
0
0
2.0
3.3
40
90.4
5.5
17
9.8
29
1054
113
2210
2205
2205
0
0
0.2
8.3
37
1.4
0,3
5
0.2
1
28
3
80
80
80
0
0
2.8
3.1
105
127.5
7.5
17
11.7
35
1192
125
3254
3249
3249
0
Newport/EI Camino TIA
MDL
kimleylvl7-ff51
SimTraffic Report
Page 4
SimTraffic Performance Report
Projected AM with Project
12: Project Driveway & EI Camino Real Performance by movement
no ECR u-turn
10/25/2004
Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.1
Delay / Veh (s) 0.2 11.4 6.1 1.1 3.1 6.5
Total Stops 0 60 22 0 40 7
Travel Dist (mi) 0.3 1.8 1.8 16.4 32.9 2.3
Travel Time (hr) 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.8 1,6 0.2
Avg Speed (mph) 25 6 11 20 21 14
Fuel Used (gal) 0,1 0.2 0.2 3,0 2.1 0.2
HC Emissions (g) 0 0 1 11 7 1
co Emissions (g) 23 6 16 623 310 25
NOx Emissions (g) 1 1 3 46 19 2
Vehicles Entered 19 61 48 427 458 32
Vehicles Exited 19 60 48 427 458 32
Hourly Exit Rate 19 60 48 427 458 32
C!ehièclEntr:yBefore 0 0 0 0 0 0
Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 1 0
12: Project Driveway & EI Camino Real Intersection Performance
Total Delay (hr)
Delay! Veh(S)
Total Stops
Travel Dist (mi)
Travel Time (hr)
Avg Speed (mph)
Fuel Used (gal)
tiC mmissióñs (g)
CO Emissions (g)
NOXlZmissiohS(g) ,
Vehicles Entered
Vehicles Exited
Hourly Exit Rate
ÐehiedEhtry;Befot~.
Denied Entry After
0.2 0.2 0,5 0.9
8,7 1.6 3.3 2.9
60 22 47 129
2.1 18.2 35,2 55,5
0.3 1.0 1.7 3.1
18 21 18
0.2 3.2 2.3 5,7
12 8 21
30 640 335 1005
48 72
80 475 490 1045
ì{'íð .475 490 1044
79 475 490 1044
0 0 0
0 0 1 1
NewportlEI Camino TIA
MDL
kimleylvl7 -ff51
SimTraffic Report
Page 6
SimTraffic Performance Report
Projected PM with Project
5: Newport Boulevard & 1-5 NB Ramp Performance by movement
];r"
2.0 1.3
19.9 3.4
301 86
19.2 72.6
2.9 4.1
7 18
2.7 9,7
7 27
136 1081
22 111
360 1419
363 1417
363 1417
0 0
0 0
no ECR u-turn
10/25/2004
Total Delay (hr)
Delay! Veh (s)
Total Stops
Travel Dist (mi)
Travel Time (hr)
Avg Sþ~~d (mph)
Fuel Used (gal)
HC Emissions (g)
CO Emissions (g)
NOxEmi$sions (g)
Vehicles Entered
VehicJeSExited
Hourly Exit Rate
Del'liê;d,ItÍ'ltry Before
Denied Entry After
0.4
1.4
22
34.6
1,6
22
4.2
9
402
30
932
931
931
0
0
0.9
5.9
64
21.4
2.1
10
1.9
5
111
13
578
576
576
0
0
5: Newport Boulevard & 1-5 NB Ramp Intersection Performance
Total Delay (hr)
D~lay I Vèh (s)
Total Stops
Travel Dist (mi)
Travel Time (hr)
Avg Speed (mph)
Fuel Used (gal)
HC Eni¡~sions "(g)
CO Emissions (g)
NOx:j~mì$sion~ ,(g)
Vehicles Entered
Vehicle.~,Exited
Hourly Exit Rate
Dèni~~':SJitry Before
Denied Entry After
3,3 1.3 4.6
6.7 3;1 5.1
387 86 473
91,7 56.0 147.7
7.0 3.7 10,6
13 15 14
12.3 6.1 18.5
14 48
1217 513 1730
43 175
1779 1510 3289
178.0 1507 3287
1780 1507 3287
0 0
0 0 0
- . ',,~
Newport/EI Camino TIA
MDL
kimleylvl7-ff51
SimTraffic Report
Page 3
no ECR u-turn
10/25/2004
SimTraffic Performance Report
Projected PM with Project
7: Newport Boulevard & Project Driveway Performance by movement
Total Delay (hr)
Delay / Veh (5)
Total Stops
Travel Dist (mi)
Travel Time (hr)
Avg Speed (mph)
Fuel Used (gal)
HC Emissions (g)
CO Emissions (g)
NOx Emissions (g)
Vehicles Entered
Vehicles Exited
Hourly Exit Rate
Denied Entry Before
Denied Entry After
2.4 1.2
6.9 2.9
269 35
46.1 59.7
4,0 3.6
12 17
3.8 8.4
9 26
179 1052
21 106
1253 1482
1249 1486
1249 1486
0 0
0 0
0.1
5.4
4
3.1
0.3
11
0.4
1
21
3
76
77
77
0
0
0.1
10.5
23
0.4
0.1
4
0.1
0
2
0
23
23
23
0
0
7: Newport Boulevard & Project Driveway Intersection Performance
Total Delay (hr)
Delay / Veh (5)
Total Stops
Travel Dist (mi)
Travel Time (hr)
Avg Speed (mph)
Fuel Used (gal)
HC Emissions (9)
CO Emissions (9)
NOx Emissions (9)
Vehicles Entered
Vehicles Exited
Hourly Exit Rate
Denied Entry Beföre
Denied Entry After
2.4 1.3 0,1 3.8
6.9 3;0 10.5 4.8
269 39 23 331
46.1 62,8 0.4 109.2
4,0 3.9 0,1 8.0
12 16 4 14
3.8 8.7 0.1 12.6
9 0 36
179 1073 2 1254
21 0 1.31
1253 1558 23 2834
1249 1$63 23 2835
1249 1563 23 2835
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
NewportlEI Camino TIA
MOL
kimleylvl7 -ff51
SimTraffic Report
Page 4
no ECR u-turn
10/25/2004
SimTraffic Performance Report
Projected PM with Project
12: Project Driveway & EI Camino Real Performance by movement
Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.0
Dêlay / Veh (s) 0.7 15.5 1.1 3.0 6.5
Total Stops 0 71 0 58 1
Travel Dist (mi) 0.1 2.1 26.9 40.8 1.3
Travel Time (hr) 0,0 0.4 1.4 1,9 0.1
AvgSpeed (mph) 21 5 19 21 15
Fuel Used (gal) 0.0 0.3 5.3 2,7 0,1
HC Emissions (g) 0 1 17 9 0
CO Emissions (9) 5 8 882 346 12
NOx Emissions (g) 0 1 72 23 1
Vehicles Entered 6 71 665 569 18
Vehicles Exited 6 71 659 567 17
Hourly Exit Rate 6 71 659 567 17
[¡)êt1ifiÌd' Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0
Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0
12: Project Driveway & EI Camino Real Intersection Performance
Total Delay (hr)
D~lay J Veh (5)
Total Stops
Travel Oist (mi)
Travel Time (hr)
Avg ~peed (nìPh)
Fuel Used (gal)
HÇ;~missions,'(g )
CO Emissions (g)
NIDX1¡¡fnissions~ (9')
Vehicles Entered
VÉ!h¡¡ftJ~s Exit~d
Hourly Exit Rate
Øð\1~~i EntryS'~fore
Denied Entry After
0.3
14.3
71
2.2
0.4
5
0.3
1
13
77
77
77
0.2
0
26.9
1.4
19
5.3
882
QQ9
659
0
0.5
3.1
59
42.1
2,0
21
2.8
9
358
1.0
2.7
130
71.2
3,8
19
8.4
27
1252
97
1329
1320
1320
0
0
587
584
584
0
NewportlEI Camino TIA
MOL
kimleylvl7 -ff51
SimTraffic Report
Page 6
SimTraffic Performance Report
Projected AM with Project
5: Newport Boulevard & 1-5 NB Ramp Performance by movement
10/25/2004
Total Delay (hr)
Delay / Veh (s)
Total Stops
Travel Dist (mi)
Travel Time (hr)
Avg Speed (rnph)
Fuel Used (gal)
HC Emissions (g)
CO Emissions (g)
NOx Ernissiöns(g)
Vehicles Entered
Vehicles Exited
Hourly Exit Rate
Denied..6ntryBßföre
Denied Entry After
1.4 0.5 1.1
25.6 1.7 2.7
182 8 119
10A 53.0 56.2
1.9 2,5 3,0
6 21 18
1.6 6.3 4.5
4 18 12
87 652 329
15 94 48
196 1028 1510
19.5 1029 1504
195 1029 1504
0 0 0
0 0 0
1.2
5.9
76
26.6
2.6
10
2,3
6
94
12
721
716
716
0
0
~
5: Newport Boulevard & 1-5 NB Ramp Intersection Performance
Total Delay (hr)
Delay1 Veh (s)
Total Stops
Travel Dist (mi)
Travel Time (hr)
Avg Speed (mph)
Fuel Used (gal)
HC Emissions (g)
CO Emissions (g)
NOx6:missiòns(g)
Vehicles Entered
Vehicles Exited
Hourly Exit Rate
Denied 'Entrý:'Bèfore .
Denied Entry After
1.9
5.5
190
63.5
4.4
738
,109
1224
7.9
2.3
3.7
195
82.8
5.7
15
6.7
18
422
4,2
4.3
385
146.3
10.1
14.6
1161
, 3:444
3444
0
Newport/EI Camino TIA
MOL
kimleylvl7 -ff51
2231
2220
2220
SimTraffic Report
Page 3
SimTraffic Performance Report
Projected AM with Project
7: Newport Boulevard & Project Driveway Performance by movement
10/25/2004
n'1\~/
Total Delay (hr) 0.6 2.1 0.1 0.0 0.1
Delay I Vah (s) 2.1 3.3 5.6 0.8 19,3
Total Stops 37 48 2 6 24
Travel Dist (mi) 34.4 89.7 3.1 0.6 0.5
Travel Time (hr) 1.7 5.5 0.3 0.0 0.2
Avg Speed (mph) 20 17 11 20 3
Fuel Used (gal) 1.7 9.5 0.3 0.1 0.1
HCEmissions (g) 5 26 1 0 0
CO Emissions (g) 91 774 13 8 3
NOx Emissions (g) 10 118 2 1 1
Vehicles Entered 943 2203 76 43 24
Vehicles Exited 941 2206 75 43 24
Hourly Exit Rate 941 2206 75 43 24
Denied Entry Before 0 0 0 0 0
Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0
7: Newport Boulevard & Project Driveway Intersection Performance
Total Delay (hr)
Delay / Veh (s)
Total Stops
Travel Dist (mi)
Travel Time (hr)
Avg,speed (mph)
Fuel Used (gal)
HClZmissions (g)
CO Emissions (g)
NOx":Errtissibns (g)
Vehicles Entered
Vehicles Exited
Hourly Exit Rate
Deni.~d Entty Before
Denied Entry After
0.6
2.1
37
34.4
1.7
20
1.7
5
91
.to
943
941
941
0
0
2.2
50
92,7
5.8
16
9.8
27
787
2279
2?8.1
2281
0.1
7.4
30
1.1
0.2
6
0.2
0
11
0
. "'OdP";t;;:~.,.:~.^..~ ,'^^ ^".\j"j~P~.~1;\
67
2.9
3.1
117
128.2
7.7
17
11.6
32
889
133
3289
3289
3289
0
0
67
0
0
NewportlEI Camino TlA
MDL
kimleylvl7 -ff51
SimTraffic Report
Page 4
SimTraffic Performance Report
Projected AM with Project
12: Project Driveway & EI Camino Real Performance by movement
10/25/2004
Total Delay (hr) 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.0
Delay I Veh (s) 0.0 15.9 6.2 1.2 2.5 4.8
Total Stops 0 57 28 0 39 1
Travel Dist (mi) 0.3 1.7 1.6 16.8 33.9 1.9
Travel Time (hr) 0.0 0,4 0,1 0.9 1,6 0.1
Avg Speed (mph) 25 5 11 19 22 15
Fuel Used (gal) 0.1 0.2 0.2 2.7 1.9 0.2
HC Emissions (g) 0 1 1 8 6 0
CO Emissions (g) 12 9 13 327 167 14
NOx Emissions (g) 1 1 2 44 20 2
Vehicles Entered 18 57 39 415 474 27
Vehicles Exited 18 57 39 41.5 473 27
Hourly Exit Rate 18 57 39 415 473 27
Denied Entry.. Before 0 0 0 0 0 0
Denied Entry After 0 0 0 0 0 0
12: Project Driveway & EI Camino Real Intersection Performance
. Co, "-" ..
Total Delay (hr)
Delay I Vèh(¡;)
Total Stops
Travel Dist(mi)
Travel Time (hr)
Avg Speed (mph)
Fuel Used (gal)
HC Emiss.iò.Í1s (g)
CO Emissions (g)
NOx Emissiøhs.(g)
Vehicles Entered
VehiclesE*ìted
Hourly Exit Rate
Denied :lititry:Before
Denied Entry After
0.3 0.2 0.4 0.8
12.1 1,6 2.7 2.9
57 28 40 125
2,0 18.3 35,9 56,2
0.4 1,0 1.7 3.1
5 18 21 18
0.3 2.8 2.1 5.2
1 6 16
21 340 181 541
3 22
75 454 501 1030
75 454 50.0 102S
75 454 500 1029
0 0
0 0 0
NewporUEI Camino TIA
MDL
kimleylvl7-ff51
SimTraffic Report
Page 6
SimTraffic Performance Report
Projected PM with Project
5: Newport Boulevard & 1-5 NB Ramp Performance by movement
10/25/2004
Total Delay (hr)
Delay / Veh (s)
Total Stops
Travel Dist (mi)
Travel Time (hr)
Avg Speed (mph)
Fuel Used (gal)
HC Emissions (g)
CO Emissions (g)
NOx Emissions (g)
Vehicles Entered
Vehicles Exited
Hourly Exit Rate
Denied EhtryBefore
Denied Entry After
1.6
18.3
272
16.5
2.3
7
2,2
6
108
19
311
311
311
0
0
3.4
8.5
290
72.9
6.2
12
8.7
24
693
104
1415
1423
1423
0
0
0.4
1.4
25
35,7
1,6
22
2.6
7
217
30
957
960
960
0
0
, ~'
0.8
5.5
37
19.1
1.8
10
1.7
5
86
12
516
517
517
0
0
5: Newport Boulevard & 1-5 NB Ramp Intersection Performance
Total Delay (hr)
Delay / Veh (s)
Total Stops
Travel Dist (mi)
Travel Time (hr)
Avg Speed (mph)
Fuel Used (gal)
H:~ Emissiori$ (g)
CO Emissions (g)
NGx.Emissiot\s'(g)
Vehicles Entered
\l~l:1iclesExited
Hourly Exit Rate
ø.~rìièd~ht¡Y::å.ë1ore
Denied Entry After
4.9 1.2 6.1
10.3 2;9 6.9
562 62 624
89.5 54,8 144.3
8.5 3.5 11.9
11 16 12
11,0 4.4 15.3
30 42
801 303 1104
123
1726 1473 3199
1734
1734 1477 3211
0 0
0 0
Newport/EI Camino TIA
MOL
kimleylvl7 -ff51
SimTraffic Report
Page 3
SimTraffic Performance Report
Projected PM with Project
7: Newport Boulevard & Project Driveway Performance by movement
10/25/2004
Total Delay (hr)
Delay / Veh (5)
Total Stops
Travel Dist (mi)
Travel Time (hr)
AvgSpeed (mph)
Fuel Used (gal)
HC Emissions (g)
CO Emissions (g)
NOx Emissions (g)
Vehicles Entered
VehiCles Exited
Hourly Exit Rate
DehiE!êt E;ntry Befote
Denied Entry After
3.9 1.0
11.1 2.5
341 17
47.1 57.9
5,6 3.4
8 17
4,6 7.5
12 22
207 714
30 106
1275 1451
1282 1452
1282 1452
0 0
0 0
0.1
5.7
2
2.5
0,2
11
0,3
1
15
3
61
61
61
0
0
0.0
7.2
21
0.4
0.1
6
0.0
0
2
0
21
21
21
0
0
7: Newport Boulevard & Project Driveway Intersection Performance
Total Delay (hr)
Delay! Veh (s)
Total Stops
Travel Dist (mi)
Travel Time (hr)
AvgSpeed.(mph)
Fuel Used (gal)
HQ~ìrii~sion$(g )
CO Emissions (g)
NÖx;Emi$siQrip(g)
VehiCles Entered
Yahl(:le&;,EXned
Hourly Exit Rate
j¡1e~lè~;~tl'Y.; Sêfore
Denied Entry After
3,9
11.1
341
47.1
5,6
8
4.6
12
207
30
1275
1282
1282
0
0
1.1
2.6
19
60.4
3,6
17
7,8
22
729
1.09
1512
1513
1513
0
0
0.0
7.2
21
0.4
0,1
6
0.0
0
2
0
21
21
21
0
0
5.1
6.5
381
107.9
9.2
12
12.4
35
938
139
2808
2~16
2816
0
NewportlEI Camino TIA
MDL
kimleylvl7-ff51
SimTraffic Report
Page 4
SimTraffic Performance Report
Projected PM with Project
12: Project Driveway & EI Camino Real Performance by movement
:S
0.0
5.0
0
1.2
0.1
16
0.1
0
8
1
17
17
17
0
0
10/25/2004
Total Delay (hr)
Delay / Veh (s)
Total Stops
Travel Dist (mi)
Travel Time (hr)
Avg Speed (mph)
Fuel Used (gal)
HC Emissions (g)
CO Emissions (g)
NOx Emissions (g)
Vehicles Entered
Vehicles Exited
Hourly Exit Rate
Denied Entry Before
Denied Entry After
0.0
0.1
0
0.0
0,0
26
0.0
0
2
0
2
2
2
0
0
0.1
7.5
59
1.7
0.2
8
0.2
0
7
1
59
59
59
0
0
0.2
1.1
0
26.9
1.4
19
4.2
13
523
71
668
670
670
0
0
0.3
1.9
29
38.4
1.7
23
2.1
6
170
20
535
536
536
0
0
"'Te
e ;'y,
0,'
12: Project Driveway & EI Camino Real Intersection Performance
Total Delay (hr)
Delay / Veh (s)
Total Stops
Travel Dist (mi)
Travel Time (hr)
Avg Speed (mph)
Fuel Used (gal)
HC Emissions (9)
co Emissions (g)
NOx Emissions (9)
Vehicles Entered
Vehicles Exited
Hourly Exit Rate
Denied EntryBefore
Denied Entry After
0.1
7:2
59
1.8
0.2
8
0.2
9
2
61
61
61
0.2
1.1
0
26.9
1.4
19
4.2
13
523
71
668
670
670
0
0
0.3
2.0
29
39,6
1.7
23
2.2
7
178
21
552
553
553
0
0
0.6
1.8
88
68;3
3.4
20
6,5
20
710
94
1281
1284
1284
0
0
Newport/EI Camino TIA
MDL
kimleylvl7 -ff51
SimTraffic Report
Page 6
111'1- If" Kimley-Horn
~I_LJ and Associates, Inc.
Appendix D: AASHTO Sight Distance Standards
BeachlEdinger Retail Site
Trafjìc Impact Ana~ysis
10/29/04
.....
.....
tv
Metric
Brake Braking Brake
Design reaction distance Design reaction
speed distance on level Calculated Design speed distance
km/h m m m m m h ft
20 13.9 4.6 18.5 20 15 55.1
30 20.9 10.3 31.2 35 20 73.5
40 27.8 18.4 46.2 50 25 91.9
50 34.8 28.7 63.5 65 30 110.3
60 41.7 41.3 83.0 85 35 128.6
70 48.7 56.2 104.9 105 40 147.0
80 55.6 73.4 129.0 130 45 165.4
90 62.6 92.9 155.5 160 50 183.8
100 69.5 114.7 184.2 185 55 202.1
110 76.5 138.8 215.3 220 60 220.5
120 83.4 165.2 248.6 250 65 238.9
130 90.4 193.8 284.2 285 70 257.3
75 275.6
80 294.0
Note: Brake reaction distance predicated on a time of 2.5 s; deceleration rate of 3.4 m/s
calculated sight distance.
Design
!!.
80
115
155
200
250
305
360
425
495
570
645
730
820
910
;¡..
;¡..
CI:I
::t:
(j
I
C)
no
<;;)
::I
no
...
...
¡:;.
0
~
o'Q'
~
~
::t:
o'Q"
::r-
~
~
'"
~
~
~
CI:I
~
no
~
US Customa
Braking
distance
on level Calculated
ft) (ft)
21.6 76.7
38.4 111.9
60.0 151.9
86.4 196.7
117.6 246.2
153.6 300.6
194.4 359.8
240.0 423.8
290.3 492.4
345.5 566.0
405.5 644.4
470.3 727.6
539.9 815.5
614.3 908.3
[11.2 ft/s2] used to determine
/
Exhibit 3-1. Stopping Sight Distance
. "'~ .:;*"~j*,~'¡;M.~.(;j~;"),,,,,~;;
,"
Elements of Design
Design Design
speed speed
km/h m h
20 20 19 18 15 80 82 85 75 74 73
30 32 31 30 20 116 120 126 109 107 104
40 50 45 44 25 158 165 173 147 143 140
50 66 61 59 30 205 215 227 200 184 179
60 87 80 77 35 257 271 287 237 229 222
70 110 100 97 40 315 333 354 289 278 269
80 136 123 118 45 378 400 427 344 .331 320
90 164 148 141 50 446 474 507 405 388 375
100 194 174 167 55 520 553 593 469 450 433
110 227 203 194 60 598 638 686 538 515 495
120 263 234 223 65 682 728 785 612 584 561
130 302 267 254 70 771 825 891 690 658 631
75 866 927 1003 772 736 704
80 965 1035 1121 859 817 782
Exhibit 3-2. Stopping Sight Distance on Grades
Decision Sight Distance
Stopping sight distances are usually sufficient to allow reasonably competent and alert
drivers to come to a humed stop under ordinary circumstances, However, these distances are
often inadequate when drivers must make complex or instantaneous decisions, when information
is difficult to perceive or when unexpected or unusual maneuvers are required. Limiting sight
distances to those needed for stopping may preclude drivers from performing evasive maneuvers,
which often involve less risk and are otherwise preferable to stopping. Even with an appropriate
complement of standard traffic control devices in accordance with the MUfCD (6), stopping
sight distances may not provide sufficient visibility distances for drivers to corroborate advance
warning and to perfonn the appropriate maneuvers. It is evident that there are many locations
where it would be prudent to provide longer sight distances. In these circumstances, decision
sight distance provides the greater visibility distance that drivers need.
Decision sight distance is the distance needed for a driver to detect an unexpected or
otherwise difficult-to-perceive infonnation source or condition in a roadway environment that
may be visually cluttered, recognize the condition or its potential threat, select an appropriate
speed and path, and initiate and complete the maneuver safely and efficiently (7). Because
decision sight distance offers drivers additional margin for error and affords them sufficient
length to maneuver their vehicles at the same or reduced speed, rather than to just stop, its values
are substantially greater than stopping sight distance.
Drivers need decision sight distances whenever there is a likelihood for error in either
infonnation reception, decision-making, or control actions (8). Examples of critical locations
where these kinds of errors are likely to occur, and where it is desirable to provide decision sight
distance include interchange and intersection locations where unusual or unexpected maneuvers
are required, changes in cross section such as toll plazas and lane drops, and areas of concentrated
115
.......
ATTACHMENT E
SUBMITTED SUMMARY OF
ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS
~.
1450 EI Camino Real
Second Floor
Tustin CA 92780
P: 714.505.7611
F: 714.505.7619
MAKENA
GREAT AMERICAN
REA L
EST ATE
0 EVE LOP MEN T
September 20, 2004
Minoo Ashabi
Associate Planner
City Of Tustin
300 Centennial Way
Tustin, CA 92780
RECEIVED
SEP 2 0 2004
COMMUNITY DEVElOPMENT
BY
Re: NEWPORT & EL CAMINO
FORMER ULTRA-MAR
Dear Ms. Minoo:
For your file, I have enclosed the following:
1. Groundwater Monitoring Report, First Quarter 2004.
2. Request for extension and Work plan Addendum dated December 17, 2003
3. Groundwater Monitoring Report Fourth Quarter dated November 21,2003.
4. Work plan and Remediation Well Installation dated September 9,2003.
5. Letter from Frey Environmental and Resume of Fry Environmental that was submitted to
State of California UST Cleanup Fund.
6. Third Quarter Monitoring Report dated September 5, 2003.
7. Work plan dated July 28,2003.
8. Second Quarter Monitoring Report dated July 18,2003.
9. Additional Subsurface Investigation dated July 2,2003.
......
In summary, there is currently some ground water contamination that the County and State
have reviewed and a work plan for the installation and placement of a Vapor Extraction
System will be submitted once the project has full City approvals and the placement of the
building, landscaping etc., is defined. It may be a number of years until the site has been fully
remediated and we have obtained a no further action letter from the County and the State. This
is not unusual and we have developed many projects while this type of remediation occurs.
Any contaminated soil will be removed during tank excavation and demolition of the
buildings and canopy including all the tank lines, dispensers etc.
Please give me a call if I can help you understand all the reports. What's most important is
that this site is being cleaned up under the Sate Clean Up Fund. See exhibits A, B & C to help
validate the fund and what?f remaining cost to remediate will be. Thank you.
/ í ~-' ,J
Sincerely, " ! fl ik( '~! ,
Donald T, Robertson J1 ) / V ' ~t, -----------
ATTACHMENT F
RESOLUTION NO. 3938
RESOLUTION NO. 3938
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2004-256 TO MERGE TWO PARCELS TO
CREATE ONE PARCEL 29,733 SQUARE FEET IN AREA (0.68 ACRES)
LOCATED AT 14001 AND 14011 NEWPORT AVENUE AND 770 EL CAMINO
REAL (APNS. 401-641-05 AND 401-641-07) LOCATED AT THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF EL CAMINO REAL AND NEWPORT AVENUE
The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows:
I.
The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
A.
That a proper application for Tentative Parcel Map No. 2004-256 was
submitted by Makena Great American requesting approval to merge two
existing parcels to create a 29,733 square foot parcel (0.68 acres)
located at the southwest corner of EI Camino Real and Newport Avenue
for development of a 7,400 square foot single story retail building
(assessor parcel numbers 401-641-05 and 401-641-07);
B.
That a public hearing was duly called, noticed, and held for said map on
November 22, 2004, by the Planning Commission;
C.
That the proposed subdivision is in conformance with the Tustin General
Plan land use designation of Old Town Commercial and the Central
Commercial and Parking Overlay Zoning District in that these
designations provide for the development of retail commercial projects;
D.
As conditioned, the map would be in conformance with the State
Subdivision Map Act and Tustin City Code Section 9323 (Subdivision
Code);
E.
That the site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed;
F.
That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of the
development;
G.
That the design of the subdivision or the types of improvements
proposed are not likely to cause serious public health problems.
H.
That the parcel map or the proposed improvements are not likely to
cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably
injure fish or wildlife in their habitat; and,
I.
The parcel map is Categorically Exempt pursuant to Section 15315,
Class 15 of Title 14, Chapter 3, of the California Code of Regulations
(Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act).
Resolution No. 3938
Tentative Parcel Map 2004-256
November 22, 2004
Page 2
II.
The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve
Tentative Parcel Map 2004-256 to merge two parcels to create one parcel
29,733 square feet in area (0.68 acres) located at the southwest corner of EI
Camino Real and Newport Avenue for development of a 7,400 square foot
single story retail building, subject to the conditions contained in Exhibit A
attached hereto.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission,
held on the 22nd day of November, 2004
JOHN NIELSEN
Chairperson
ELIZABETH A. BINSACK
Planning Commission Secretary
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF ORANGE)
CITY OF TUSTIN )
I, ELIZABETH A. BINSACK, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the Planning
Commission Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, California;
that Resolution No. 3938 was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the
Tustin Planning Commission, held on the 22nd day of November, 2004.
ELIZABETH A. BINSACK
Planning Commission Secretary
GENERAL
(1)
1.1
(1 )
1.2
(1 )
1.3
(1)
1.4
EXHIBIT A
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2004-256
RESOLUTION NO. 3938
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
The proposed Project shall substantially conform with the submitted plans
for the project date stamped November 22, 2004, on file with the
Community Development Department, except as herein modified, or as
modified by the Director of Community Development in accordance with this
Exhibit. The Director of Community Development may also approve minor
modifications to plans during plan check if such modifications are to be
consistent with the provisions of the Tustin City Code and other applicable
codes.
Approval of Tentative Parcel Map 2004-256 is contingent upon the
applicant returning to the Community Development Department a notarized
"Agreement to Conditions Imposed" form and the property owner signing
and recording with the County Clerk-Recorder a notarized "Notice of
Discretionary Permit Approval and Conditions of Approval" form. The forms
shall be established by the Director of Community Development, and
evidence of recordation shall be provided to the Community Development
Department.
As a condition of approval of Tentative Parcel Map 2004-256, the applicant
shall agree, at its sole cost and expense, to defend, indemnify, and hold
harmless the City, its officers, employees, agents, and consultants, from
any claim, action, or proceeding brought by a third-party against the City, its
officers, agents, and employees, which seeks to attack, set aside,
challenge, void, or annul an approval of the City Council, the Planning
Commission, or any other decision-making body, including staff, concerning
this project. The City agrees to promptly notify the applicant of any such
claim or action filed against the City and to fully cooperate in the defense of
any such action. The City may, at its sole cost and expense, elect to
participate in defense of any such action under this condition.
Within 24 months from tentative map approval, the subdivider shall record
with appropriate agencies a final map prepared in accordance with
subdivision requirements of the Tustin Municipal Code, the State
Subdivision Map Act, and applicable conditions contained herein unless an
extension is granted pursuant to Section 9323 of the Tustin Municipal Code.
Time extensions may be considered if a written request is received by the
Community Development Department within thirty (30) days prior to
expiration.
SOURCE CODES
(1) STANDARD CONDITION
(2) CEQA MITIGATION
(3) UNIFORM BUILDING CODEIS
(4) DESIGN REVIEW
*** EXCEPTION
(5)
(6)
(7)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCY REQUIREMENT
LANDSCAPING GUIDELINES
PC/CC POLICY
Exhibit A
Tentative Parcel Map 2004-256- Conditions of Approval
Resolution No. 3938
Page 2
(1 )
1.5
(5)
1.6
(1 )
1.7
The subdivider shall conform to all applicable requirements of the State
Subdivision Map Act, the City's Subdivision Ordinance, and the City's
zoning regulations.
The subdivider shall be required to execute subdivision/monumentation
agreements and provide improvement/monumentation bonds to the City
prior to recordation of the final map.
Prior to final map approval, the subdivider shall submit:
A.
B.
A current title report; and,
A duplicate mylar of the Final Map, or 8% inch by 11 inch
transparency of each map sheet prior to final map approval and lias
built" grading, landscape, and improvement plans prior to Certificate
of Acceptance.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
(1 )
2.1
(1 )
2.2
(1 )
2.3
(1)
(1 )
2.4
2.5
The applicant shall Grant in Fee Title ten (10) feet additional street right-
of~way along Newport Avenue, and the appropriate corner cut-off shall be
required for future street widening. This shall be in the form of an
irrevocable offer of Grant Fee at this time.
All dedications, offers of dedication, grant in fee, and/or offer of grant in
fee shall also state that the City of Tustin shall be permitted to obtain, at
no cost, a Temporary Construction Easement and a right-of-entry for all
on-site joins when the ultimate street improvements are constructed. The
right-of-entry shall terminate on the date that the Notice of Completion is
recorded at the Orange County Recorder's office.
The applicant shall satisfy dedication and/or reservation requirements as
applicable, including but not limited to, dedication of all required street and
flood control right-of-way easements, vehicular access rights, sewer
easements, and water easements defined and approved as to specific
locations by the City Engineer and other agencies.
Subdivider's execution of a subdivision/monumentation agreement and
furnishing the improvement/monumentation bonds as required by the City
Engineer prior to recordation of the final map will be required.
Preparation and recordation of a final subdivision map will be required.
In addition to the normal full-size plan submittal process, all final
development plans including, but not limited to: tract maps, parcel maps,
right-of-way maps, records of survey, public works improvements, private
infrastructure improvements, final grading plans, and site plans are also
required to be submitted to the Public Works Department/Engineering
Division in computer aided design and drafting (CADD) format. The
Exhibit A
Tentative Parcel Map 2004-256- Conditions of Approval
Resolution No. 3938
Page 3
(1 )
2.6
FEES
(1 )
3.1
standard file format is AutoCAD Release 14 or 2000 having the extension
DWG. Likewise, layering and linetype conventions are AutoCAD-based
(latest version available upon request from the Engineering Division). In
order to interchangeably utilize the data contained in the infrastructure
mapping system, CADD drawings must be in AutoCAD "DWG" format
(Le., produced using AutoCAD or AutoCAD compatible CADD software).
The most current version of AutoCAD is Release 2000. Drawings created
in AutoCAD Release 2000 or Release 14 are compatible and acceptable.
The CADD files shall be submitted to the City at the time the plans are
approved and updated CADD files reflecting "as built" conditions shall be
submitted once all construction has been completed. The subdivision
bonds will not be released until the "as built" CADD files have been
submitted.
Within forty-eight (48) hours of approval of the subject project, the
applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department, a
cashier's check payable to the COUNTY CLERK in the amount of forty-
three dollars ($43.00) to enable the City to file the appropriate
environmental documentation for the project. If within such forty-eight
(48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the Community
Development Department the above-noted check, the statute of
limitations for any interested party to challenge the environmental
determination under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality
Act could be significantly lengthened.
.'
ATTACHMENT G
Resolution No. 3939
RESOLUTION NO. 3939
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW 04-023, AND
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 04-028 FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A
7,400 SQUARE FOOT RETAIL BUILDING WITH AN OUTDOOR
SEATING AREA AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF NEWPORT
AVENUE AND EL CAMINO REAL (14001, 14011 NEWPORT
AVENUE AND 770 EL CAMINO REAL AND APN NOS. 401-641-05,
401-641-07)
The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows:
I.
The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
A.
That proper applications for Conditional Use Permit 04-028 and Design
Review 04-023 were filed by Makena Great American requesting approval
to construct a 7,400 square foot retail building with an outdoor seating area.
B.
The proposed project is consistent with the policies of the General Plan
land use designation "Old Town Commercial" which provides for policies
and guidelines for commercial development and complies with the Central
Commercial and Parking Overlay (C-2,P) zoning district regulations and
development standards for permitted and conditionally permitted uses. In
addition, the project has been reviewed for consistency with the Air Quality
Sub-element of the City of Tustin General Plan and has been determined to
be consistent with the Air Quality Sub-element.
C.
That a public hearing was duly called, noticed, and held for said
application on November 22, 2004, by the Planning Commission;
D.
Pursuant to Section 9272 of the Tustin Municipal Code, the Planning
Commission finds that the location, size, architectural features, and general
appearance of the proposed development will not impair the orderly and
harmonious development of the area, the present or future development
therein, or the occupancy as a whole. In making such findings, the
Commission has considered at least the following items:
1. Height, bulk, and area of buildings.
2. Setbacks and site planning.
3. Exterior materials and colors.
4. Type and pitch of roofs.
5. Size and spacing of windows, doors, and other openings.
6. Towers, chimneys, roof structures, flagpoles, radio and
antennae.
7. Location, height, and standards of exterior illumination.
8. Landscaping, parking area design, and traffic circulation.
9. Location and appearance of equipment located outside an
structure.
television
enclosed
Resolution 3939
Page 2
10. Location and method of refuse storage.
11. Physical relationship of proposed structures to existing structures in the
neighborhood.
12. Appearance and design relationship of proposed structures to existing
structures and possible future structures in the neighborhood and public
thoroughfares.
13. Proposed signage.
14. Development Guidelines and criteria as adopted by the City Council.
E.
That the establishment, maintenance, and operation of the proposed retail
center and outdoor seating area will not, under the circumstances of this
case, be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort, or general
welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such
proposed use nor be a detriment to the property and improvements in the
neighborhood of the subject property, nor to the general welfare of the
City of Tustin as evidenced by the following findings.
a. The proposed project is consistent with the types of uses encouraged
by the General Plan Old Town Commercial Land Use Designation,
which provides for retail and service oriented uses. In addition, the
floor area ratio of the project is 0.25: 1 which is less than the standard
density of 0.5:1 allowed in the Old Town Commercial Land Use
Designation.
b. The proposed project complies with the development standards of the
Central Commercial Parking Overlay (C-2,P) zoning district.
c. As conditioned, the project will enhance the area in that a vacant
transmission shop and service station will be removed to
accommodate the construction of a retail building that provides
convenient services to the community, and the landscaping and
architectural design of the building with use of brick veneer accent and
stone cornice will be compatible with the envisioned Old Town
developments.
d. The proposed outdoor seating along EL Camino Real is appropriate
and complements the additional pedestrian activity desired in the Old
Town area.
e. The City's Traffic Engineer concurs with the traffic analysis prepared
by Kimley-Horn and Associates dated November 1, 2004, and revised
November 8, 2004, that found the project, as compared to existing
development, will not result in a significant increase in traffic in the
area and surrounding major intersections.
Resolution 3939
Page 3
f. The City's Traffic Engineer concurs with the traffic analysis dated
November 1, 2004, and revised November 8, 2004, which found the
site configuration provides for adequate on-site circulation for vehicles
and delivery/service vehicles and is not anticipated to impact off-site
traffic in the public right-of-way with a condition of approval that limits
delivery trucks to the hours between 7:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m.
g. The City's Traffic Engineer concurs with the traffic analysis dated
November 1, 2004, and revised November 8, 2004, which found the
proposed driveways along EL Camino Real and Newport Avenue are
designed with sufficient queuing and would not impede on-site or off-
site traffic.
h. Sufficient on-site parking would be provided in that thirty-seven (37)
parking spaces are required and would be provided.
i. Consistent with the Guidelines for Outdoor Seating, the outdoor
seating is not in close proximity to residential uses.
j. The proposed outdoor seating use will not have a negative effect upon
the aesthetics of the area in that the proposed area will be screened
with a 36-inch low wall and adequate landscaping including four (4) 24-
inch box Tabebuia trees.
k. The typical operational hours of 5:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. for the coffee
house, and associated outdoor seating, are appropriate given the
primarily commercial nature of the area and proximity to a freeway and
major arterial roadway.
m. As conditioned, no alcoholic beverages would be served at the
establishment.
n. As conditioned, no live entertainment or amplified noise is permitted.
F.
The project is categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15332 (Class 32) of
the California Environmental Quality Act.
II.
The Planning Commission hereby approves Conditional Use Permit 04-028 and
Design Review 04-023, for construction of a 7,400 square foot retail building
located at the southwest corner of Newport Avenue and EI Camino Real (14001,
14011 Newport Avenue and 770 EL Camino Real) also known as assessor parcel
nos. 401-641-05 and 401-641-07.
Resolution 3939
Page 4
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission, held
on the 22nd day of November, 2004.
JOHN NIELSEN
Chairperson
ELIZABETH A. BINSACK
Planning Commission Secretary
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF ORANGE)
CITY OF TUSTIN )
I, ELIZABETH A. BINSACK, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the Secretary of the
Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, California; that Resolution No.3939 was duly
passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission, held on the
22nd day of November, 2004.
ELIZABETH A. BINSACK
Planning Commission Secretary
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DESIGN REVIEW 04-023, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 04-028
NOVEMBER 22, 2004
GENERAL
(1 )
1.1
(1 )
1.2
(1)
1.3
(1 )
1.4
(1 )
1.5
The proposed use shall substantially conform with the submitted plans for
the project date stamped November 22, 2004, on file with the Community
Development Department, except as herein modified, or as modified by the
Director of Community Development in accordance with this Exhibit. The
Director of Community Development may also approve minor modifications
to plans during plan check if such modifications are to be consistent with the
provisions of the Tustin City Code and other applicable codes.
Unless otherwise specified, the conditions contained in this Exhibit shall be
complied with as specified or prior to the issuance of any grading or building
permits for the project, subject to review and approval by the Community
Development Department.
The subject project approval shall become null and void unless permits for
the proposed project are issued and substantial construction is underway
within twelve (12) months of the date of this Exhibit. Time extensions may
be considered if a written request is received by the Community
Development Department within thirty (30) days prior to expiration.
Approval of Design Review 04-023 and Conditional Use Permit 04-028 is
contingent upon the applicant returning to the Community Development
Department a notarized "Agreement to Conditions Imposed" form and the
property owner signing and recording with the County Clerk-Recorder a
notarized "Notice of Discretionary Permit Approval and Conditions of
Approval" form. The forms shall be established by the Director of
Community Development, and evidence of recordation shall be provided to
the Community Development Department.
The applicant shall agree, at its sole cost and expense, to defend,
indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees, agents, and
consultants, from any claim, action, or proceeding brought by a third party
against the City, its officers, agents, and employees, which seeks to attack,
set aside, challenge, void, or annul an approval of the City Council, the
Planning Commission, or any other decision-making body, including staff,
concerning this project. The City agrees to promptly notify the applicant of
any such claim or action filed against the City and to fully cooperate in the
defense of any such action. The City may, at its sole cost and expense,
elect to participate in defense of any such action under this condition.
SOURCE CODES
(1) STANDARD CONDITION
(2) CEQA MITIGATION
(3) UNIFORM BUILDING CODEIS (7)
(4) DESIGN REVIEW
(5) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY REQUIREMENT
(6) LANDSCAPING GUIDELINES
PC/CC POLICY
*** EXCEPTION
Exhibit A - Resolution 3939
DR 04-023, CUP 04-028
Page 2
(1 )
1.6
(1 )
1.7
(1 )
1.8
Any violation of any of the conditions imposed is subject to the payment of a
civil penalty of $100.00 for each violation, or such other amounts as the City
Council may establish by ordinance or resolution, and for each day the
violation exists, subject to the applicable notice, hearing, and appeal
process as established by City Council ordinance.
The applicant shall be responsible for costs associated with any necessary
code enforcement action, including attorney fees, subject to the applicable
notice, hearing, and appeal process as established by the City Council by
ordinance.
Prior to the issuance of a precise grading or building permit, the applicant
shall prepare and record a final subdivision map in accordance with the
Tustin City Code.
PLAN SUBMITTAL
(1 )
2.1
(3)
2.2
At the time of building permit application, the plans shall comply with the
most recently adopted codes. The City is currently using the 2001
California Building Code (CBC), 2001 California Mechanical Code (CMC),
2001 California Plumbing Codes (CPC), 2001 California Electrical Code
(CEC), California Title 24 Accessibility Regulations, Title 24 Energy
Regulations, City Ordinances, and State and Federal laws and regulations.
Building plan check submittal shall include the following:
.
Seven (7) sets of construction plans, including drawings for
mechanical, plumbing, and electrical.
Structural calculations, two (2) copies.
.
.
Title 24 energy calculations, two (2) copies.
Roofing material shall be fire rated class "B" or better.
.
.
The location of any utility vents or other equipment shall be
provided on the roof plan.
Details of all proposed lighting fixtures and a photometric study
showing the location and anticipated pattern of light distribution of all
proposed fixtures. All new light fixtures shall be consistent with the
architecture of the building. All exterior lighting shall be designed and
arranged as not to direct light or glare onto adjacent properties,
including the adjacent streets. Wall-mounted fixtures shall be
directed at a 90-degree angle directly toward the ground or toward
the building to illuminate signs. All lighting shall be developed to
provide a minimum of one (1) foot-candle of light coverage, in
.
Exhibit A - Resolution 3939
DR 04-023, CUP 04-028
Page 3
(1 )
(1 )
(4)
(1)
(1 )
(1)
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
.
accordance with the City's Security Ordinance.
A note shall be provided on the plans that "All parking areas shall be
illuminated with a minimum of one (1) foot-candle of light, and
lighting shall not produce light, glare, or have a negative impact on
adjacent properties."
Cross-section details showing the installation of the proposed rooftop
equipment. Rooftop equipment shall be installed and maintained so
as not to be visible from the public right-of-way and a minimum of six
(6) inches below the parapet. An elevation showing rooftop
equipment installation related to the height of the parapet and
proposed equipment must be identified at plan check submittal and
any design of required screening will be subject to the approval of
Community Development Department Director.
.
.
Note on plans that no field changes shall be made without prior
approval from the Building Official and architect or engineer of
record.
The plans submitted shall indicate that restrooms are accessible to persons
with disabilities as per State of California Accessibility Standards (Title 24).
Plumbing fixture units are required to comply with the 2001 California
Plumbing Code Chapter four (4) Table 4-1 as per type of group occupancy,
or as approved by the Building Official.
Prior to permit issuance, clearances from the Orange County Health Care
Agency, and Orange County Fire Authority are required.
A minimum of two (2) parking for disabled persons shall be provided, one of
which shall be van accessible stall with an eight (8) foot wide loading area.
Disabled persons shall be able to park and access the building without
passing behind another car except his/her own vehicle.
Vehicle parking, primary entrance to the building, the primary paths of
travel, cashier space, sanitary facilities, drinking fountain, and public
telephones shall be accessible to persons with disabilities.
The plans shall identify an area analysis for the building and show
compliance with allowable floor areas based on 2001 California Building
Code Chapter 5, Table 5-8.
Four (4) sets of final grading plans consistent with the site and
landscaping plans as prepared by a registered civil engineer shall be
submitted and shall include the following:
Exhibit A - Resolution 3939
DR 04-023, CUP 04-028
Page 4
.
Technical details and plans for all utility installations including
telephone, gas, water, and electricity.
Three (3) copies of precise soil report provided by a civil engineer
and less than one (1) year old. Expanded information regarding the
levels of hydrocarbons and ground water contamination found on-
site shall be provided in the soil report. All pavement "R" values
shall be in accordance with applicable City of Tustin standards.
.
.
All site drainage shall be handled on-site and shall not be permitted
to drain onto adjacent properties.
Drainage, vegetation, circulation, street sections, curbs, gutters,
sidewalks, and storm drains shall comply with the on-site Private
Improvement Standards.
.
.
Two (2) copies of Hydrology Report.
(1 )
The engineer of record shall submit a final compaction report to the
Building Division for review and approval prior to the issuance of a
building permit.
2.9
(1 )
2.10 The engineer of record shall submit a pad certification to the Building
Division for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit.
(1 )
2.11 A surety/cash bond shall be submitted to assure work is completed in
accordance with approved plans prior to permit issuance. The engineer's
estimated cost of the grading, drainage, and erosion control shall be
submitted to the Building Official for determination of the bond amount.
(1 )
2.12 Information to ensure compliance with requirements of the Orange County
Fire Authority, including fire flow and installation of fire hydrants subject to
approval of the City of Tustin Public Works Department, shall be provided
prior to issuance of anyon-site utility permit.
(1 )
2.13 Prior to issuance of any permits, the applicant shall submit for approval by
the Community Development and Public Works Departments, a Water
Quality Management Plan (WQMP) specifically identifying Best
Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to control
predictable pollutant run-off. This WQMP shall identify the: structural and
non-structural measures specified detailing implementation of BMPs
whenever they are applicable to the project; the assignment of long-term
maintenance responsibilities (specifying the developer, parcel owner,
maintenance association, lessee, etc.); and, reference to the location(s) of
structural BMPs.
Exhibit A - Resolution 3939
DR 04-023, CUP 04-028
Page 5
(1)
(1)
(1)
CD
(1)
2.14 Prior to submittal of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the
applicant shall submit a deposit of $2700.00 for the estimated cost of review
of the WQMP to the Building Division. The actual costs shall be deducted
from the deposit, and the applicant shall be responsible for any additional
review cost that exceeded the deposit prior to issuance of grading permits.
Any unused portion of the deposit shall be refunded to the applicant.
2.15 Prior to issuance of building permits, the property owner shall record
CC&Rs or another legal instrument approved by the City Attorney that
shall require the property owner, successors, tenants (if applicable), and
assigns to operate and maintain in perpetuity the post-construction BMPs
described in the WQMP for the project.
2.16 The Community Development and Public Works Departments shall
determine whether any change in use requires an amendment to an
approved Water Quality Management Plan.
2.17 Prior to the issuance of any permits, the property owner and applicant
shall provide written consent and authorization to enter the property for
the purpose of conducting compliance assessments. An authorized
inspector may inspect the property for the purpose of verifying compliance
with Chapter 4 of the Tustin City Code (Water Quality Ordinance) and
verifying compliance with the approved Water Quality Management Plan.
2.18 A note shall be provided on final plans that a six (6) foot high chain link
fence shall be installed around the site prior to building construction stages.
A nylon fabric or mesh shall be attached to the temporary construction
fencing. Gated entrances shall be permitted along the perimeter of the site
for construction vehicles.
(1 )
2.19 A corrective action plan for soil remediation on the site that describes and
justifies the proposed remediation shall be submitted to and approved by
the Community Development Department and Orange County Health Care
Agency. This report shall indicate: a) the locations of monitoring and
extraction wells proposed at the site; b) which wells will be abandoned, if
necessary; and c) where replacement wells will be located after site
construction is complete. Replacement wells shall be specifically identified
on the site plan and located not to obstruct site access, building locations,
or required parking spaces.
(1)
2.20 Pursuant to the City of Tustin's Security Ordinance and the Uniform Fire
Code, street numbers shall be displayed in a prominent location on the
street side of the building. The numerals shall be no less than six (6) inches
in height and shall be of contrasting color to the background to which they
are attached and illuminated during hours of darkness.
Exhibit A - Resolution 3939
DR 04-023, CUP 04-028
Page 6
(1)
«1 )
(1)
(*)
(*)
2.21
No outdoor storage shall be permitted except as approved by the Tustin
Community Development Director.
2.22 The applicant shall comply with all City policies regarding short-term
construction emissions, including periodic watering of the site and
prohibiting grading during second stage smog alerts and when wind
velocities exceed 15 miles per hour.
2.23 Authorization from all easement holders shall be submitted to the
Community Development Department, for construction within an easement
area, prior to issuance of any permits. The cesspool shall be removed and
the easement shall be abandoned prior to issuance of a grading permit.
2.24 Installation of any aboveground equipment for soil or ground water
remediation would require approval of a conditional use permit by the
zoning administrator.
2.25 Authorization of the City's trash hauler shall be obtained for the proposed
location of the trash enclosure prior to issuance of a grading permit.
ARCHITECTURE
(4)
(4)
3.1
All exterior treatments shall be consistent with the submitted color/material
samples and noted on all construction plans and elevations submitted for
Building Permit Plan Check, subject to review and approval by the
Community Development Department at final inspection. The colors and
materials for the exterior of the building shall be consistent with the
following:
0 Natural smooth trowel-finished stucco;
0 Nine (9) foot high brick accent;
0 Clear glass and black aluminum storefront;
0 Copper roofing and awnings;
0 Stone cornice; and,
0 Granite tile medallions.
A high quality of features, materials, and colors shall be used throughout
the site and maintained on an ongoing basis to create and maintain a
handcrafted building appearance. Any changes to colors or materials
during construction or operation shall be approved in writing by the
Community Development Department prior to installation.
3.2
All ground- and wall-mounted mechanical and electrical fixtures and
equipment shall be adequately and decoratively screened. The screen
Exhibit A - Resolution 3939
DR 04-023, CUP 04-028
Page 7
(4)
(4)
(4)
3.3
3.4
3.5
shall be considered as an element of the overall design of the project and
shall blend with the architectural design of the building. All telephone and
electrical boxes shall be indicated on the building plans and shall be
completely screened. Electrical transformers shall be located toward the
interior of the project, maintaining sufficient distance to minimize visual
impacts from the public right-of-way.
All exposed metal flashing or trim shall be painted to match the building.
No exterior down spouts or roof scuppers shall be permitted. All roof
drains shall utilize interior piping, but may have exterior outlets at base of
buildings.
A protective graffiti resistant finish shall be applied on all elevations of the
proposed structure, subject to review and approval by the Community
Development Department.
LANDSCAPING
(1 )
(1 )
(1 )
4.1
4.2
4.3
Complete landscape and irrigation plans that comply with the City of
Tustin Landscape and Irrigation Guidelines shall be submitted at plan
check. The irrigation plan shall show the location and control of backflow
prevention devices at the meter, pipe size, sprinkler type, spacing, and
coverage details for all equipment.
The site shall be landscaped consistent with the City's Landscaping and
Irrigation Guidelines. A minimum of ten (10) forty-foot tall trunk
Washingtonian palms, thirteen (13) 24-inch box queen palms, and four (4)
24-inch box Tabebuias, sixteen (16) 15-gallon plum trees, and eight (8)
15-gallon Carolina laurel Cherry trees shall be installed unless otherwise
approved by the Community Development Department.
The sizes and quantities of the landscaping shall be continually
maintained and replaced if unhealthy.
All plant materials shall be installed in a healthy and vigorous condition,
typical to the species, and shall be maintained in a neat and healthy
condition. Maintenance includes, but is not limited to, trimming, mowing,
weeding, removal of litter, fertilizing, regular watering, and replacement of
dead or diseased dying plants. All trees and landscaping within the site
and the perimeter of the site shall be maintained in a healthy and vigorous
condition. Unhealthy or dead trees shall be replaced within seventy-two
(72) hours upon notification by the City.
Exhibit A - Resolution 3939
DR 04-023, CUP 04-028
Page 8
(1 )
4.4
SIGNS
(1 )
5.1
The landscape materials shall not conflict with the visual clearance
requirements of any existing or new driveway approaches.
All wall-mounted signs and monument signs shall meet the requirements of
the Tustin Sign Code as they pertain to commercial properties. A detailed
sign plan including the sign area, materials, colors, specifications and
installation details shall be submitted for review and approval of the
Community Development Department.
USE RESTRICTIONS
(1 )
6.1
---
(1 )
6.2
(1) 6.3
(1) 6.4
(1) 6.5
(1 )
6.6
The owners/tenant shall be responsible for the daily maintenance and
upkeep of the facility, including but not limited to, trash removal, painting,
graffiti removal, and maintenance of improvements to ensure that the
facilities are maintained in a neat and attractive manner. All graffiti shall
be removed within 72 hours of a complaint being transmitted by the City to
the property owner/tenant. Failure to maintain said structure and adjacent
amenities will be grounds for City enforcement of its Property
Maintenance Ordinance, including nuisance abatement.
If in the future the City determines that parking, traffic, or noise problems
exist on the site or in the vicinity, the Community Development Director may
require the applicant/property owner to prepare an analysis and bear all
associated costs. If the study indicates that there is a parking or traffic
impact, the applicant/property owner shall be requi(ed to provide mitigation
measures to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission.
Outside storage or display of merchandise is prohibited, except as
authorized by the Community Development Director.
Exterior public pay telephones shall be prohibited, and interior public pay
telephones shall be programmed to prevent incoming calls.
A minimum of thirty-seven (37) parking stalls at a ratio of one (1) per 200
square feet shall be provided, unless otherwise approved in writing by the
Community Development Director.
A maximum of eighteen (18) seats and six (6) tables shall be provided in
the designated outdoor seating area in accordance with the approved
plans.
Exhibit A - Resolution 3939
DR 04-023, CUP 04-028
Page 9
(1 )
6.7
All outdoor furniture including, seats, tables, and trash receptacles shall be
of durable quality and attractive color and materials subject to approval of
the Community Development Department. No resin or plastic furniture shall
be permitted.
Outdoor seats, tables, trash receptacles or potted plants shall not obstruct
pedestrian and accessible access to the retail center. The on-site manager
shall be responsible for ensuring that a forty-eight (48) inch path of travel
remain clear and unobstructed at all times.
(1 )(3) 6.8
(1 )
(1 )
(1)
(1 )
(1)
(1 )
6.9
The outdoor seating area shall contain trash receptacles and shall be
cleaned on a continual and daily basis to ensure timely removal of litter
and food items.
6.10 No signs or advertisements shall be placed within the outdoor seating area.
6.11 tio coin-operated video, games, or vending items are permitted in the
outdoor seating area.
(1 )
6.12 No amplified noise or live entertainment is permitted unless authorized in
writing by the Community Development Department.
6.13 A minimum of one (1) foot-candle lighting shall be provided in the outdoor
seating area, consistent with the Tustin Security Code.
6.14 Sales of alcoholic beverages on the property, including the outdoor seating
area, are not permitted unless all required approvals are obtained prior to
selling alcoholic beverages on the property.
6.15 Prior to using the outdoor seating area and within five (5) days of the
installation of approved improvements, the applicant shall request and pass
a final inspection by the Community Development Department to ensure
compliance with the approved plans and conditions of approval.
(1)
6.16 Delivery trucks shall be restricted to making deliveries between 7:00 p.m.
and 7:00 a.m. to avoid potential conflicts during peak hours. Any
modification of these hours shall be approved in writing by the Community
Development Director.
NOISE
(1)
7.1
All construction operations, including engine warm-up and deliveries of
materials and equipment, shall be subject to the provisions of the Tustin
Noise Ordinance and shall take place only between the hours of 7:00 a.m.
Exhibit A - Resolution 3939
DR 04-023, CUP 04-028
Page 10
(1 )
7.2
ENGINEERING
and 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00
p.m. on Saturday, unless otherwise determined by the Building Official.
Construction hours shall be clearly posted on the project site to the
satisfaction of the Building Official.
(1 )
8.1
(1) 8.2
(1) 8.3
(1) 8.4
(1 )
8.5
A separate 24" by 36" street improvement plan, as prepared by a
California Registered Civil Engineer, shall be required for all construction
within the public right-of-way. Construction and/or replacement of any
missing or damaged public improvements along Newport Avenue and EI
Camino Real shall be required adjacent to this development. Said plan
shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
--
a) Curb and gutter
b) Sidewalk, including curb ramps for the physically disabled
c) Drive aprons
d) Street lighting
e) Catch basin/storm drain laterals/connection to existing storm drain
f) Domestic water facilities
g) Sanitary sewer facilities
h) Underground utility connections
In addition, a 24" by 36" reproducible construction area traffic control plan,
as prepared by a California Registered Traffic Engineer or Civil Engineer
experienced in this type of plan preparation will be required.
Preparation of a sedimentation and erosion control plan for all work
related to this development shall be required.
A complete hydrology study and hydraulic calculations shall be submitted
for review and approval by the City.
Hydraulic analysis of proposed water system and ability to meet OCFA fire
flow demands and requirements shall be performed and certified by the
developer.
Preparation and submittal of a final grading plan showing all pertinent
elevations as they pertain to the public right-of-way along with delineating
the following information:
a)
Final street elevations at key locations.
Exhibit A - Resolution 3939
DR 04-023, CUP 04-028
Page 11
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1 )
b)
Final pad/finished floor elevations and key elevations for all site
grading. All pad elevations to be a minimum of 1.0 foot above base
flood elevation as defined by FEMA.
All flood hazards of record.
c)
8.6
Any damage done to existing street improvements and utilities shall be
repaired before issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the
development.
8.7
Prior to any work in the public right-of-way, an Encroachment Permit shall
be obtained from and applicable fees paid to the Public Works
Department.
8.8
Current Federal Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements shall
be met at the drive aprons.
8.9
The appliGênt shall ensure that adequate sight distances are provided at
the project driveways.
8.10 In addition to the normal full size plan submittal process, all final
development plans including, but not limited to: tract maps, parcel maps,
right-of-way maps, records of survey, public works improvements, private
infrastructure improvements, final grading plans, and site plans are also
required to be submitted to the Public Works Department/Engineering
Division in computer aided design and drafting (CADD) format. The
standard file format is AutoCAD Release 14 or 2000 having the extension
DWG. Likewise, layering and line type conventions are AutoCAD-based
(latest version available upon request from the Engineering Division). In
order to interchangeably utilize the data contained in the infrastructure
mapping system, CADD drawings must be in AutoCAD "DWG" format
(i.e., produced using AutoCAD or AutoCAD compatible CADD software).
The most current version of AutoCAD is Release 2000. Drawings created
in AutoCAD Release 14 are compatible and acceptable.
The CADD files shall be submitted to the City at the time the plans are
approved and updated CADD files reflecting "as built" conditions shall be
submitted once all construction has been completed. The subdivision
bonds will not be released until the "as built" CADD files have been
submitted.
(1 )
8.11
This development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the City of
Tustin Water Quality Ordinance and all Federal, State, and Regional Water
Quality Control Board rules and regulations.
Exhibit A - Resolution 3939
DR 04-023, CUP 04-028
Page 12
(1 )
(1 )
(1 )
(1 )
(1 )
(1 )
(1 )
(1 )
(1 )
8.12 The City of Tustin is required to comply with State of California Integrated
Waste Management Act of 1989. To facilitate City compliance with this law,
the Project Applicant/Contractor is required to comply with Section 4327 of
Tustin City Code which details the requirements for developing and
implementing a Waste Management Plan. For commercial recycling, the
applicant is required to participate in the City's recycling program.
8.13 Prior to issuance of a building permit, a solid waste recycling plan identifying
planned source separation and recycling programs shall be submitted and
approved by the City of Tustin public Works Department.
(1 ),
8.14 Backflow prevention devices shall be installed in accordance with
applicable standards and codes and shall be installed within an easement
of suitable size to allow for unobstructed access, inspection, testing, and
maintenance.
8.15 All existing water meters/services shall be abandoned by the Developer,
except if able to be reused in conjunction with the development. The
Developer shall be responsible for all costs related to the abandonment of
all existing potable water and fire related service connections at the water
main.
8.16 The Developer shall be responsible for all costs relating to the installation
of new potable and fire related water services. The Developer shall be
responsible for all water connection fees.
8.17 The Developer is responsible for all costs related to the relocation of
existing fire hydrants and the installation of new fire hydrants.
8.18 The improvement plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Orange
County Fire Authority for fire protection purposes. The adequacy and
reliability of water system design and distribution of fire hydrants will be
evaluated. The water distribution system and appurtenances shall also
conform to the applicable laws and adopted regulations enforced by the
Orange County Health Department.
8.19 Release/approval from the East Orange County Water District shall be
obtained prior to receiving water services. The developer shall submit a
water permit application to the East Orange County Water District and is
responsible for all applicable and water connection fees.
8.20 Location of fire hydrants to be approved by the City of Tustin and the
Orange County Fire Authority.
8.21 The driveway at EI Camino Real shall be modified to include a median
that would prevent incoming and discourage outgoing left-turn
Exhibit A - Resolution 3939
DR 04-023, CUP 04-028
Page 13
FIRE
(1 )
(1 )
(1 )
(1)
(1 )
(1 )
9.1
9.2
9.3
9.4
9.5
9.6
movements, subject to final design approval by the Community
Development and Public Works Departments. The approved design shall
not reduce the number of on-site parking spaces, but may require minor
modifications to the proposed outdoor seating area.
Prior to the issuance of any grading or building permits, the applicant shall
submit a fire hydrant location plan to the Fire Chief for review and
approval.
Prior to the issuance of any certificate of use and occupancy, all fire
hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the
hydrant location on the street as approved by the Fire Chief, and must be
maintained in good condition by the property owner. Please contact the
OCFA at (714) 573=6100 or visit the OCFA website for a copy of the
"Guideline for Installation of Blue Dot Hydrant Markers."
Prior to the recordation of a subdivision map or the issuance of any
grading or building permits, the applicant shall provide evidence of
adequate fire flow. The "Orange County Fire Authority Water Availability
for Fire Protection" form shall be signed by the applicable water district
and submitted to the Fire Chief for approval. If sufficient water to meet
fire flow requirements is not available an automatic fire extinguishing
system may be required in each structure affected.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit plans
for the required automatic fire sprinkler system in any structure to the Fire
Chief for review and approval. Please contact the OCFA at (714) 573-
6100 to request a copy of the "Orange County Fire Authority Notes for
New NFPA 13 Commercial Sprinkler Systems."
Prior to the issuance of a certificate of use and occupancy, this system
shall be operational in a manner meeting the approval of the Fire Chief.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit for combustible construction, the
builder shall submit a letter on company letterhead stating that water for
fire-fighting purposes and all-weather fire protection access roads shall be
in place and operational before any combustible material is placed on site.
Building permits will not be issued without OCFA approval obtained as a
result of an on-site inspection. Please contact the OCFA at (714) 573-
6100 to obtain a copy of the standard combustible construction letter.
Exhibit A - Resolution 3939
DR 04-023, CUP 04-028
Page 14
FEES
(1 )
10.1
Prior to issuance of any building permits, payment shall be made of all
applicable fees, including but not limited to, the following. Payment shall be
required based upon those rates in effect at the time of payment and are
subject to change.
a) Building Division plan check and permit fees to the Community
Development Department based on the most current schedule.
b) Orange County Fire Authority plan check and inspection fees to the
Community Development Department based upon the most current
schedule.
c) Payment of the Major Thoroughfare and Bridge Fees to the Tustin
Public Works Department at the time a building permit is issued.
The current fee is $3.37 per square foot of the building.
d) Payment of the Orange County Sanitation District No.7 Sewer
Connection Fees at the time a building permit is issued.
e) Payment of the East Orange County Water District fee, as
established by the district for commercial development. Proof of
payment shall be provided to Tustin Public Works Department
(yVater Division) prior to domestic water connection.
f) Transportation System Improvement Program (TSIP) Benefit Area
"A" fees in the amount of $5.53 per square feet of new or added
gross square floor area of construction or improvements to the
Community Development Department.
g) School facilities fee to the Tustin Unified School District subject to
any agreement reached and executed between the District and the
applicant. The current fee for commercial development is $0.36
per square foot.
h) New development fees in the amount of $0.10 per square foot of
gross floor area paid to the Community Development Department.
i) Within forty-eight (48) hours of approval of the subject project, the
applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department,
a CASHIER'S CHECK payable to the County Clerk in the amount
of forty-three dollars ($43.00) to enable the City to file the
appropriate environmental documentation for the project. If within
such forty-eight (48) hour period that applicant has not delivered to
Exhibit A - Resolution 3939
DR 04-023, CUP 04-028
Page 15
the Community Development Department the above-noted check,
the statute of limitations .for any interested party to challenge the
environmental determination under the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act could be significantly lengthened.
-.