The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About09 JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT NOISE ABATEMENT QUATERLY REPORT_, • nda AGENDA REPORT Reeeweld m 9 City Manager Finance Director N/A MEETING DATE: APRIL 2, 2019 TO: MATTHEW S. WEST, ACTING CITY MANAGER FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT NOISE ABATEMENT QUARTERLY REPORT SUMMARY: This agenda report transmits the John Wayne Airport (JWA) Noise Abatement Quarterly Report for the third quarter of 2018. The average noise level measured at Tustin's monitoring station (NMS 1 ON), located at Columbus Tustin Middle School on Beneta Way (Figure 1), remained fairly consistent with prior quarters during this third quarter reporting period. Average noise levels during the third quarter continued to remain well below the City, County, and State criteria of 65 dB Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) for residential uses. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file this report. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. Figure 1 JWA Noise Report April 2, 2019 Page 2 CORRELATION TO THE STRATEGIC PLAN: Staff's analysis and report of the quarterly JWA Noise Abatement Report falls under Goal D of the Strategic Plan pertaining to strong community and regional relationships. The City of Tustin strives to work collaboratively with agencies both within and outside Tustin on issues of mutual interest and concern, and in this instance, on matters of airport traffic and noise. DISCUSSION: Following the conclusion of each calendar quarter, JWA staff prepares a Noise Abatement Program Quarterly Report and posts a copy of the report on their website. Attached is the quarterly report for the third quarter of 2018, which includes the months of July through September. An overview of the information contained within the JWA Noise Report includes measured noise levels and an analysis of noise complaints. Measured Noise Levels Aircraft noise is most noticeable during airplane takeoffs and landings, primarily due to engine noise. Although engines produce a significant amount of aircraft noise, many other factors may influence the perception of noise including: proximity; weather — in bad weather, engine noise is reflected off of the atmosphere making jets appear louder than on clear days; routes — non-scheduled operations which could include military or private aircraft and may be louder than commercial aircraft; emergencies; and, weight — a heavier load may affect an aircraft's rate of ascent. During the third quarter of 2018, the average CNEL at Tustin's monitoring station on Beneta Way was 56.5 dB. This is 1 dB lower than the average of the previous quarter (Q- 2: April — June 2018). The average noise level for this quarter is the same as the average from the previous four quarters. Figure 2 provides a visualization of Tustin's CNEL levels for each month during the third quarter of 2018. 70 60 50 a 40 Z 30 U 20 10 He Daily Community Noise Equivalent Levels (CNEL) in Tustin - July through September 2018 1 3 5 7 9 1113151719212325272931 Date Figure 2 July August September Noise Impact Area Level (65 dB) JWA Noise Report April 2, 2019 Page 3 Noise Complaints The Airport's Access and Noise Office receives and investigates noise calls and complaints from local citizens and other sources. During the third quarter of 2018, there were six (6) Tustin area complaint calls, which is one (1) less complaint than the previous quarter. Tustin staff has outreached to JWA staff to gather further details on the nature of the complaints, and to understand how JWA staff responds to each complainant. The breakdown of the six (6) complaints is as follows: two (2) were regarding general aircraft noise; two (2) were specifically regarding arrival noise; one (1) was regarding the flight path; and, one (1) was regarding curfew. Each of these incidents were either discussed over the phone with the complainant, received and responded to via e-mail, or received via voicemail with no return phone call requested. To provide an understanding of the trend in Tustin area complaints throughout the years, a chart displaying the number of noise complaints for the past five (5) years is displayed below (Figure 3). 16 N c 14 a 12 E 10 c°v 8 w 0 6 L 4 E 2 0 z n Noise Complaints - Tustin oti1 Q)I (ti, otiIb t"° oti° otic (Z II otic' oti1' (Z yy otic oti1 otic otic oti. (SI Is, otiI otic' otic' otic' ��T ��T ti\T _Inti �\T t\ti ti\ti -V\T �\T ��ti ti\T -\T Ib\T IXti �\T ��ti �\ti IX'ti ti\ti ��ti 111\'Va a a a a a o- o- o- a o- o- o- a a a o- a o- a 0- Quarter/Year Figure 3 Since noise issues are of considerable importance to the City of Tustin, the Community Development Department will continue to monitor operations at JWA unless otherwise directed by the City Council. The public are additionally welcome to participate in JWA's Quarterly meetings held by the Access and Noise Office. The next quarterly meeting will be held on June 19, 2019, at 2:00 p.m. in the Eddie Martin Administration Building located at 3160 Airway Avenue in Costa Mesa. Adrianne DiLeva- ohnson Management Analyst II Elizabeth A. Binsack Director of Community Development Attachment: John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Quarterly Report for July 1, 2018, through September 30, 2018. ATTACHMENT A JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT NOISE ABATEMENT QUARTERLY REPORT FOR JULY 1, 2018, THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2018 NOISE ABATEMENT PROGRAM QUARTERLY REPORT For the period: July 1, 2018 through September 30, 2018 Prepared in accordance with: AIRPORT NOISE STANDARD STATE OF CALIFORNIA California Administrative Code Title 21, Chapter 2.5, SubChapter 6: Division of Aeronautics Noise Standards Sub fitted by: 1/ Barry A. Rondinella, A.A.E./C.A.E. Airport Director John Wayne Airport, Orange County V4(• PkRtVAYK ' 0*�4et COUNV rCOUNVY INTRODUCTION This is the 183`d Quarterly Report submitted by the County of Orange in accordance with the requirements of the California Airport Noise Standards (California Administrative Code Title 21, Chapter 2.5, SubChapter 6: Division of Aeronautics Noise Standards). Effective January 1, 1986, the criteria for defining "Noise Impact Area" was changed from 70 dB to 65 dB Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL). Under this criteria, John Wayne Airport currently has a "Noise Impact Area." NOISE IMPACT SUMMARY Caltrans' Aeronautics Program has established guidelines in the California State Noise Standard to control residential area noise levels produced by aircraft operations using the State's airports. Under those guidelines, residential noise sensitive areas exposed to an average Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) of more than 65 dB define the "Noise Impact Area." John Wayne Airport uses ten permanent remote noise monitoring stations (NMS) located in Newport Beach, Santa Ana, Tustin and Irvine to measure noise levels, at the following locations: MONITOR STATIONS NMS -1S: Golf Course, 3100 Irvine Ave., Newport Beach NMS -6S: 1912 Santiago, Newport Beach NMS -2S: 20162 S.W. Birch St., Newport Beach NMS -7S: 1131 Back Bay Drive, Newport Beach NMS -3S: 2139 Anniversary Lane, Newport Beach NMS -8N: 17372 Eastman Street, Irvine NMS -4S: 2338 Tustin Ave., Newport Beach NMS -9N: 1300 S. Grand Avenue, Santa Ana NMS -5S: 324 %2 Vista Madera, Newport Beach NMS -10N: 17952 Beneta Way, Tustin The map in Figure 1 shows the general location of each permanent remote NMS. Figure 2 shows the Airport's "Noise Impact Area" for the previous year (October 1, 2017 - September 30, 2018). The Figure 2 information was developed by Landrum and Brown, in consultation with John Wayne Airport. CNEL values measured for the period and current digitized land use information were utilized to calculate the land area acreages, number of residences and estimated number of people within the "Noise Impact Area". FIGURE 1 NOISE MONITORING STATIONS (NMS) LOCATION MAP SANTA ANA �L ,Y —•`,�- 4 JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT, COSTA MESA" ORANGE COUNTY �F IRVINE AT 7 2 3 4 S Scale In miles JOFN \AAYNE AIRPORT ORANGE COUNTY Noise Abatement Program Quarterly Report July — September 2018 3 AIRCRAFT TRAFFIC SUMMARY The Airport traffic summary for this quarter is shown in Table 1 below. Air Carrier operational count histories and average daily departure counts are illustrated in Tables 9 & 11. TABLE 1 LANDING AND TAKEOFF OPERATIONS July - September 2018 Period Jet • .. .. •. I Average Daily Operations July 8,274 62 3,150 28,466 369 August 8,403 62 3,305 30,621 378 September 7,781 60 3,156 27,987 365 Third Quarter 24,458 184 9,611 87,074 370 Twelve Months 10/01/17-09/30/18 92,427 918 35,968 312,917 352 NOTE: (1) GA Jet figures include a 5% factor for operations not identified by the JWA noise monitor stations. (2) Counts in this column are based upon records provided by the local FAA representatives. COMMUNITY NOISE EQUIVALENT LEVELS The monthly, quarterly and twelve month Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) average values for each monitor station are shown in Table 2, while daily CNEL values are shown in Tables 3 through 5. Insufficient data is indicated by "#N/A" entries in each table. Also, "*#N/A" entries in each table indicate there were no aircraft related noise events. Average Single Event Noise Exposure Level (SENEL) values for Air Carrier and General Aviation Jet aircraft are shown in Tables 6 through 8. ACOUSTICAL INSULATION PROGRAM Four hundred eighteen residences in the Santa Ana Heights area have been sound attenuated and an avigation easement reserved through the County's Acoustical Insulation Program, which closed in December 2009. Nine (9) residences opted for acoustical insulation only. The County has also acquired 46 residences as part of the Purchase Assurance Program, many of which were acoustically insulated, an avigation easement reserved and then resold. Among these County acquired homes, those located within areas designated for Business Park uses were razed, avigation easements were reserved, and the land resold for compatible Business Park uses. A total of 473 residences in the Santa Ana Heights area have been purchased or otherwise made compatible through the County's Purchase Assurance and Acoustical Insulation Programs. Seventy-seven dwelling units in Santa Ana Heights remain in the "Noise Impacted Area" (within 65 dB CNEL contour). COMPLAINT TOTALS (July 1, 2018 - September 30, 2018) The Airport's Access and Noise Office receives and investigates noise complaints from local citizens and all other sources. During the July 1, 2018 through September 30, 2018, the Office received 3,776 complaints from local citizens. This is a 637.5% increase from the 512 complaints received last quarter. It is a 461.9% increase from the 672 complaints received during the same quarter last year. Figure 4 shows the distribution of the quarterly complaints from local communities. F c E E 0 v Note: Anaheim Hills Balboa Island Balboa Peninsula Bayshores Bayview Terrace Corona Corona del Mar Costa Mesa Coto De Caza Dover Shores Eastbluff Irvine Laguna Beach Laguna Hills Laguna Niguel Laguna Woods Lake Forest Lemon Heights Lido Isle Mission Viejo Newport Beach Newport Heights North Tustin Orange Orange Park Acres Panorama Heights Placentia San Juan Capistrano Santa Ana Santa Ana Heights Trabuco Canyon Tustin Unknown Westcliff Yorba Linda FIGURE 3 HISTOGRAM BY COMMUNITY 909 279 93 ! 3 6 �I 87 40 7 i 1,48 37 j 15 619 4 3 7 6 1 16 12 35 3 9 3 1 2 1 4 19 6 4 6 34 10 11 0 200 400 6)00 800 1000 1200 1400 1000 Number of Complaints City of Newport Beach — 2,052. 98% of complaints from "Anaheim Hills" category were from one community group. 86% of complaints from "Balboa Island" category were from one household. 97% of complaints from "Corona Del Mar" category were from one household. 99% of complaints from "Dover Shores" category were from one household. 99% of complaints from "Laguna Beach" category were from one household. 63% of all complaints were from a complaint form subscription service. TABLE 2 LONG TERM MEASURED LEVELS Aircraft CNEL from 10/01/17 through 09/30/18 Values in dB at Each Site Period NMS Site is 2S 3S 4S 5S 65 7S 8N 9N ION Oct 2017 68.1 67.0 66.8 59.6 59.2 60.7 56.7 68.0 45.0 55.8 # Days 31 31 31 31 26 31 30 31 26 31 Nov 2017 68.4 67.4 67.0 60.1 59.4 60.7 56.9 68.0 43.4 56.4 # Days 30 30 30 30 30 30 22 30 30 30 Dec 2017 66.7 65.7 66.3 57.9 57.3 60.6 54.4 66.7 43.4 54.5 # Days 1 31 31 311 31 311 31 31 311 26 27 Q-4 2017 67.8 66.8 66.7 59.3 58.7 60.7 56.0 67.6 44.0 55.7 # Days 92 92 92 92 87 92 83 92 82 88 Jan 2018 67.8 66.8 66.3 59.6 59.2 60.5 56.4 67.5 44.0 55.6 # Days 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 Feb 2018 67.7 66.9 66.1 59.8 59.3 60.4 56.6 67.5 44.5 56.0 # Days 28 28 281 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 Mar 2018 68.2 67.4 66.5 60.3 59.8 60.7 57.4 68.3 43.2 57.0 # Days 31 30 31 31 31 31 31 31 29 31 Q-12018 67.9 67.0 66.3 59.9 59.4 60.6 56.9 67.8 43.9 56.3 # Days 90 89 90 90 90 90 90 90 88 90 Apr 2018 68.3 67.5 66.5 60.3 59.8 60.8 57.3 68.3 42.7 57.1 # Days 301 30 30 30 30 301 30 30 29 30 May 2018 68.5 67.6 66.7 60.9 60.1 60.9 57.5 68.7 49.4 57.8 # Days 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 25 31 Jun 2018 68.6 67.6 67.0 60.7 60.1 60.9 57.4 68.8 44.3 57.5 # Days 30 30 30 30 27 30 30 30 27 30 Q-2 2018 68.5 67.5 66.7 60.6 60.0 60.9 57.4 68.6 46.3 57.5 # Days 911 91 91 91 88 911 91 91 81 91 Jul 2018 68.5 67.5 66.8 60.1 59.6 60.6 57.0 68.2 42.6 56.2 # Days 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 30 31 Aug 2018 68.7 67.7 67.0 60.3 59.8 61.0 57.1 68.3 43.4 56.7 # Days 31 31 31 311 31 31 31 31 301 31 Sep 2018 68.3 67.4 66.7 60.0 59.7 60.7 56.6 67.9 43.5 56.5 # Days 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 25 30 Q-3 2018 68.5 67.5 66.8 60.1 59.7 60.8 56.9 68.1 43.2 56.5 # Days 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 85 92 Q-4 2017 thru Q-3 2018 Total 68.2 67.2 66.6 60.0 59.5 60.7 56.9 68.0 44.5 56.5 # Days 1 365 364 365 3651 357 365 356 365 336 361 Q-3 2017 thru Q-2 2018 (Previous 4 Quarters) Total 68.1 67.1 66.6 59.8 59.4 60.6 56.8 68.0 44.4 56.2 # Days 361 364 365 365 357 365 356 365 332 361 Change from Previous 4 Quarters 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.11 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.3 TABLE 3 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION July 2018 Date 1 is 68.4 2S 67.5 3S 66.9 4S 60.5 N MS Site 5S 60.1 6S 61.0 7S 57.1 8N 68.2 9N 43.4 AN 56.7 2 67.8 67.1 66.0 59.8 59.9 60.3 57.1 68.3 44.1 56.3 3 67.6 66.6 66.0 60.2 59.6 60.1 57.3 67.2 45.0 56.2 4 65.7 64.6 64.1 58.5 57.9 58.4 55.6 66.8 44.6 55.3 5 68.11 66.8 65.9 58.51 58.9 59.11 55.7 67.2 41.81 54.7 6 68.1 67.3 66.2 56.8 57.9 58.1 55.0 66.5 35.0 54.0 7 67.7 65.8 65.3 58.1 56.5 58.2 54.9 65.9 45.8 53.6 8 68.8 67.5 66.9 60.1 58.5 59.5 56.7 68.2 *#N/A 56.2 9 68.8 67.4 66.6 60.1 58.8 60.1 56.8 68.6 40.8 56.9 10 68.8 67.5 66.9 60.7 59.6 60.4 57.3 68.5 44.6 56.4 11 68.9 67.8 67.2 60.6 60.2 61.1 57.6 68.4 36.1 56.1 12 69.2 68.2 67.5 61.2 61.0 62.1 58.4 68.8 41.5 56.2 13 68.7 68.1 67.2 60.3 60.2 61.3 57.8 68.7 34.2 56.6 14 67.2 66.5 65.5 58.6 58.4 59.5 55.9 66.7 34.3 54.6 15 68.3 67.6 66.7 60.7 59.4 60.9 56.8 68.6 35.6 57.2 16 68.6 67.3 66.9 60.6 59.8 61.1 57.2 68.5 45.9 57.2 17 68.8 67.3 66.8 60.0 59.4 60.6 56.1 68.6 47.7 56.3 18 69.1 68.2 67.3 61.0 60.4 61.6 58.1 68.8 41.4 57.4 19 69.2 68.2 67.7 61.5 60.5 62.1 58.2 68.8 42.9 56.9 20 69.01 68.2 67.3 61.0 60.6 61.6 58.1 69.0 37.5 56.7 21 67.5 66.9 65.9 58.8 58.9 59.9 56.1 66.7 38.3 54.1 22 68.8 68.0 67.4 60.0 60.4 61.0 57.6 68.1 38.0 56.1 23 69.2 68.3 67.5 60.1 59.8 61.1 57.3 68.1 30.8 55.7 24 68.9 67.5 66.9 60.2 59.4 60.7 57.2 68.5 44.9 56.0 25 68.8 68.2 67.4 60.3 60.0 61.11 57.5 68.8 43.5 57.1 26 69.2 67.6 67.4 60.9 60.5 61.6 57.0 69.2 45.6 57.4 27 69.1 68.2 67.5 60.5 60.1 61.1 57.0 69.1 45.4 57.3 28 67.7 66.3 65.8 59.4 58.7 60.1 56.0 67.4 40.7 55.5 29 69.0 67.8 67.2 60.3 59.7 60.9 57.5 68.6 39.2 56.5 30 69.1 68.1 67.2 60.2 59.9 60.9 57.4 68.0 39.9 56.2 31 68.7 67.9 67.4 60.2 60.0 60.6 57.2 68.6 41.2 56.4 Days 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 30 31 En. Avg 68.5 67.5 66.8 60.11 59.6 60.6 57.0 68.2 42.6 56.2 #N/A indicates insufficient data. *#N/A indicates no aircraft -related noise events. TABLE 4 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION August 2018 Date 1 is 68.7 2S 67.8 3S 67.0 4S 59.9 NMS Site 5S 59.8 6S 60.7 7S 57.1 8N 68.3 9N 43.6 ION 57.0 2 68.7 67.9 66.9 60.6 60.1 60.9 57.6 68.9 42.3 57.2 3 69.0 68.1 67.2 60.6 59.7 60.8 57.1 70.1 41.7 56.9 4 67.3 66.2 65.3 59.2 57.6 59.0 54.9 66.8 42.5 55.1 5 69.01 68.2 67.4 60.01 59.7 60.91 57.3 68.2 34.7 56.5 6 68.9 67.8 67.4 59.7 59.5 60.7 56.8 67.6 35.6 55.3 7 68.9 67.7 67.1 59.6 58.9 60.4 56.8 68.5 36.3 56.9 8 68.5 67.1 66.6 59.8 58.8 60.3 56.6 69.0 50.8 56.7 9 69.1 68.2 67.1 59.5 59.5 60.5 57.1 68.6 46.9 56.9 10 68.4 67.4 66.4 59.7 59.2 60.4 57.2 68.0 47.4 56.5 11 67.7 66.7 65.8 58.6 58.8 59.7 56.3 66.9 47.4 55.1 12 68.9 67.9 67.2 60.3 59.8 61.0 57.4 68.8 40.1 57.3 13 69.0 67.8 67.1 60.3 60.2 60.8 57.0 68.8 *#N/A 57.4 14 68.7 67.6 66.9 60.6 60.4 61.3 58.0 68.6 38.9 57.7 15 68.8 67.7 67.2 61.2 60.3 61.7 58.2 68.4 35.2 57.1 16 69.2 68.0 67.6 61.4 60.3 61.7 57.8 68.9 37.5 57.8 17 68.7 67.6 67.2 60.4 60.0 61.2 57.0 68.4 44.0 56.7 18 67.7 66.4 65.5 59.2 58.2 59.3 52.6 66.6 44.1 54.8 19 69.1 68.4 67.2 60.6 60.1 61.4 56.4 68.6 41.8 57.1 20 69.9 68.8 68.0 61.5 60.4 62.01 56.9 68.7 44.2 57.5 21 68.8 67.2 66.8 60.6 59.9 61.0 56.9 68.7 44.4 57.6 22 68.9 67.6 67.2 60.9 60.4 61.8 57.4 67.7 31.7 56.2 23 68.6 69.5 67.1 60.7 60.4 61.4 58.0 68.7 38.9 57.1 24 68.8 67.4 67.1 60.7 60.4 61.6 58.3 68.1 46.6 56.5 25 67.31 66.2 65.4 58.9 58.5 59.6 56.0 65.4 40.6 54.5 26 69.0 68.0 67.2 60.4 60.4 61.3 57.8 68.2 36.7 56.6 27 69.0 68.1 67.1 60.9 60.5 61.6 57.9 68.0 44.1 57.2 28 68.4 67.0 66.3 60.3 59.9 60.9 57.1 68.0 28.4 56.8 29 68.7 66.8 67.1 60.5 60.3 61.2 57.6 67.6 42.0 55.7 30 69.0 68.3 67.5 60.5 60.1 61.2 56.4 68.1 40.2 56.7 31 69.0 68.0 67.3 60.8 60.2 61.4 58.0 68.6 42.2 57.0 Days 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 30 31 En. Avg 68.7 67.7 67.0 60.3 59.8 61.0 57.1 68.3 43.4 56.7 #N/A indicates insufficient data. *#N/A indicates no aircraft -related noise events. TABLE 5 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION September 2018 Date 1 is 67.6 2S 65.9 3S 65.3 4S 60.0 NMS Site 55 58.2 6S 59.8 75 56.1 8N 65.9 9N 39.5 1 55.0 2 66.8 66.0 65.0 59.6 58.4 59.7 56.5 67.1 35.5 56.3 3 68.4 67.8 66.9 60.3 60.4 61.2 57.8 68.6 *#N/A 57.6 4 67.5 67.5 66.6 60.0 59.9 60.7 56.2 68.2 39.7 57.5 5 67.91 67.8 66.6 59.91 60.2 61.01 57.7 67.7 35.11 56.4 6 67.7 67.5 66.6 60.2 60.2 61.0 57.7 68.2 39.61 56.8 7 68.6 67.4 67.0 59.7 59.9 60.8 57.0 68.4 44.3 56.7 8 66.9 65.8 65.4 57.6 57.5 58.7 54.6 65.5 38.3 53.9 9 68.1 67.0 66.2 59.7 58.8 60.3 56.4 68.1 36.9 56.6 10 68.5 67.2 66.7 60.8 59.8 61.1 56.4 68.3 44.4 57.0 11 68.2 66.5 66.2 60.7 59.6 60.7 56.5 67.7 *#N/Aj 56.8 12 68.4 67.6 66.8 60.7 60.3 61.4 57.3 68.5 42.7 57.0 13 69.0 67.9 67.4 60.0 60.2 61.0 57.0 68.0 49.2 55.3 14 68.7 67.9 67.1 59.5 59.6 60.3 56.7 67.4 47.7 55.4 15 66.9 65.8 65.0 58.21 58.1 58.71 54.5 65.8 40.6 54.1 16 68.9 68.2 67.5 60.1 60.0 60.6 56.3 68.2 #N/A 56.1 17 68.5 67.7 66.7 59.6 59.6 60.1 55.8 67.8 38.41 56.5 18 66.8 67.4 66.5 60.0 59.7 60.4 54.9 67.7 37.4 55.7 19 68.9 68.0 67.0 60.3 60.3 61.2 57.1 67.9 47.8 55.8 20 69.3 68.0 67.3 61.4 60.1 61.8 57.9 68.6 46.8 57.0 21 68.8 67.7 67.0 60.8 60.6 61.7 57.1 68.5 45.7 56.9 22 66.9 65.9 65.4 58.4 58.4 58.8 54.4 66.4 40.4 53.7 23 68.7 67.9 67.0 60.4 60.0 61.3 57.2 68.9 30.7 56.0 24 68.6 67.5 66.9 60.9 60.2 61.0 56.8 68.3 *#N/A 57.9 25 68.2 67.3 66.6 60.0 60.0 60.91 56.7 68.5 40.1 57.8 26 69.3 68.2 67.6 60.2 60.4 61.6 57.6 68.5 44.7 57.2 27 69.1 67.9 67.5 59.6 60.0 61.2 57.1 68.4 43.81 57.3 28 68.8 67.7 67.4 60.5 59.8 61.4 56.8 68.2 46.2 57.3 29 67.5 66.1 65.8 59.6 58.7 60.0 56.0 66.3 *#N/A 55.1 30 68.5 67.6 66.8 60.0 59.5 60.5 56.5 68.8 38.9 57.4 Days 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 25 30 En. Avg 68.3 67.41 66.7 60.0 59.7 60.7 56.6 67.91 43.5 56.5 #N/A indicates insufficient data. *#N/A indicates no aircraft -related noise events. TABLE 6 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commercial Class A July - September 2018 Carrier AC Type # Deps NMS Site is 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N SIN 1ON Alaska Air A320 68 Average 96.2 94.9 95.2 88.1 86.1 87.2 84.1 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (63) (64) (68) (65) (68) (65) (6S) (0) (0) (0) B737 74 Average 95.1 94.5 93.6 88.7 88.0 88.7 83.9 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (72) (68) (73) (74) (72) (72) (69) (0) (0) (0) 8738 1008 Average 98.1 96.9 95.3 88.9 88.8 89.8 86.4 96.7 #N/A #N/A Count (992) (954) (994) (996) (997) (974) (967) (1) (0) (0) American A320 104 Average 94.6 93.8 92.9 86.2 85.1 86.4 83.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (101) (97) (104) (101) (100) (100) (98) (0) (0) (0) B738 1507 Average 99.1 97.8 97.3 89.4 88.8 89.7 86.2 96.9 88.7 80.1 Count (1479) (1390) (1490) (1474) (1482) (1440) (1446) (7) (7) (1) B752 1 Average 97.1 #N/A 95.6 86.9 84.6 85.7 79.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (1) (0) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (0) (0) (0) Compass E175 407 Average 95.4 94.6 96.0 89.2 88.9 89.7 84.7 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (402) (394) (402) (402) (403) (388) (389) (0) (0) (0) Delta A319 260 Average 96.1 95.3 95.4 88.6 87.3 87.8 82.8 94.1 85.8 82.2 Count (234) (220) (237) (231) (232) (226) (227) (23) (20) (4) B712 89 Average 93.2 93.2 89.7 81.3 80.4 82.3 79.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (87) (80) (88) (73) (56) (85) (48) (0) (0) (0) B737 2 Average 95.1 93.7 92.0 86.7 86.1 88.0 84.9 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (2) (2) (2) (1) (2) (2) (2) (0) (0) (0) 8738 2 Average 94.7 94.0 92.6 86.5 86.7 88.6 84.8 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (0) (0) (0) B739 1 Average 94.3 93.3 91.9 86.4 86.3 88.0 84.8 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (0) (0) (0) B752 400 Average 96.7 96.2 96.2 88.9 87.8 87.9 83.5 94.8 85.7 81.7 Count (380) (374) (379) (383) (383) (373) (358) (12) (13) (4) FedEx A306 62 Average 97.3 97.1 94.5 89.1 88.2 89.7 85.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (62) (61) (61) (62) (61) (60) (61) (0) (0) (0) Frontier Airlines A20N 92 Average 89.2 89.1 88.4 82.2 79.9 83.0 79.1 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (90) (88) (87) (90) (76) (86) (54) (0) (0) (0) A320 86 Average 95.9 95.3 93.6 86.7 85.7 87.5 85.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (83) (81) (84) (84) (85) (86) (80) (0) (0) (0) Horizon Air E175 183 Average 91.3 90.7 88.9 84.9 83.9 85.6 82.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (180) (173) (181) (178) (179) (174) (168) (0) (0) (0) Southwest B38M 3 Average 87.2 87.2 85.8 81.5 80.0 81.1 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (3) (3) (3) (2) (2) (3) (0) (0) (0) (0) B737 1637 Average 93.2 92.6 90.5 85.0 85.4 86.0 82.7 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 1 (1616) (1554) (1623) (1622) (1614) (1578) (1550) (0) (0) (0) 8738 7 Average 93.8 93.5 90.0 84.6 85.5 86.1 83.7 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (7) (7) (6) (7) (7) (7) (7) (0) (0) (0) United A320 909 Average 94.6 93.8 92.4 85.9 85.6 88.2 86.1 93.9 85.5 79.9 Count (853) (803) (865) (851) (869) (843) (844) (33) (29) (3) B737 337 Average 97.3 95.7 96.5 89.6 89.8 90.8 86.3 95.3 89.1 #N/A Count (329) (317) (330) (327) (332) (326) (328) (3) (3) (0) 8738 455 Average 98.3 97.0 95.8 89.1 89.3 90.4 86.7 95.4 89.2 #N/A Count (438) (428) (448) (446) (444) (435) (436) (5) (3) (0) UPS 8752 50 Average 96.5 96.2 93.5 86.7 86.0 86.9 82.5 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (50) (47) (50) (50) (50) (50) (48) (0) (0) (0) West.let B737 92 Average 95.6 94.4 94.8 89.5 88.6 89.7 84.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (89) (88) (92) (89) (91) (87) (83) (0) (0) (0) TABLE 7 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commercial Class E July - September 2018 Carrier AC Type # Deps NMS Site is 2S 3S 4S 55 6S 7S 8N 9N 1ON Delta 8712 339 Average 92.4 92.6 89.0 80.0 79.7 81.5 78.9 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (332) (322) (339) (264) (230) (317) (174) (0) (0) (0) Horizon Air DHBD 92 Average 84.6 84.8 85.4 78.7 78.2 79.5 81.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (88) (82) (89) (29) (31) (71) (4) (0) (0) (0) E175 185 Average 91.5 91.0 89.1 84.9 84.0 85.6 82.3 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (183) (178) (184) (184) (185) (180) (179) (0) (0) (0) SkyWest Coml. CRJ9 1 Average 89.1 88.4 85.5 #N/A 83.3 78.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (1) (1) (1) (0) (1) (1) (0) (0) (0) (0) E175 848 Average 90.3 90.0 88.7 84.7 83.7 85.2 82.1 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (827) (774) (840) (836) (833) (813) (766) (0) (0) (0) Southwest 8737 2669 Average 91.9 91.5 89.4 84.7 84.5 85.3 81.8 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 1 (2621) (2489) (2635) (2645) (2643) (2579) (2514) (0) (0) (0) TABLE 8 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commuter July - September 2018 TABLE 8 -GA MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS General Aviation July - September 2018 TABLE 9 AIR CARRIER OPERATIONAL HISTORY Carrier Alaska Air AS AC Type A319 2014 2015 Year 2016 2017 2018 16 A320 121 B734 89 80 76 24 8737 4.381 2.666 3.258 1,233 364 B738 2,486 4.590 4.439 6.420 6,259 American AA A319 421 178 332 546 A320 344 868 266 48 A321 326 563 56 8738 9,339 9,090 10,538 11,556 8,645 8752 4 22 74 4 4 Compass CP E170 152 78 E175 1 1.669 2,726 2,406 Delta DL A319 3,290 3.352 3.444 2.053 1.499 A320 142 162 160 94 8 8712 3,267 2,551 B737 146 60 B738 4 4 40 14 B739 21 2 8752 2.196 2.130 2.128 2.137 2.199 MD90 2 FedEx FM A306 508 508 510 506 380 A310 2 Frontier Airlines F9 A20N* 414 A319 2,381 1.4971 646 356 190 A320 154 740 628 472 A321 2 A32N* 12 438 Horizon Air QX DH8D 1,156 1,456 550 E175 339 1,932 Interlet 40 A320 428 SkvWest Coml. SC CRJ9 2,007 1.922 1,899 1,440 6 E175 3,554 4,761 4,934 Southwest WN B38M 2 10 B733 2 8737 33,490 37.101 41,806 35,971 24,348 B738 1,385 2.5861 1.144 58 50 United UA A319 1,926 1,393 1,999 1,470 910 A320 2,774 3.207 2.670 3,957 3,458 8737 4.436 4.523 5,246 4.044 2,300 B738 1.748 1.853 1.252 3.302 3.283 8752 237 44 2 4 UPS 5X A306 521 52 45 B752 414 366 370 369 306 US Airways AW A319 808 240 A320 1.426 1,476 A321 934 740 6752 1 46 98 Westlet WS B73632 30 4 6737 728 718 642 644 508 Total 77,615 81,288 91,279 90,250 68,803 *In 2018, the code for the Airbus A320neo was changed from A32N to A20N. TABLE 10 AIRCRAFT OPERATIONAL HISTORY ;Aircraft A20N* 014 2015 Year 20160: 414 A306 508 560 562 551 380 A310 2 A319 8,405 6,524 6,267 4,211 3,161 A320 4,770 5,343 4,438 4,945 4,107 A321 934 1,066 565 56 A32N* 12 438 B38M 2 10 B712 3,267 2,551 B733 2 B734 89 80 76 24 B736 4 32 30 4 B737 43,035 45,008 50,952 42,038 27,580 B738 14,962 18,123 17,373 21,376 18,251 B739 2 2 8752 2,897 2,660 2,572 2,512 2,513 CR -19 2,007 1,922 1,899 1,440 6 DI -18D 1,156 1,456 550 E170 152 78 E175 5,223 7,826 9,272 MD90 2 Total 1 77,615 1 81,288 91,279 90,250 1 68,803 *In 2018, the code for the Airbus A320neo was changed from A32N to A20N. TABLE 11 AIR CARRIER AVERAGE DAILY DEPARTURE HISTORY ;�Carrier Alaska Air AS AC . - A319 014 2015 Year 2016 2017 2018 .022 A320 .164 B734 .121 .110 .104 .033 B737 6.000 3.652 4.451 1.693 .499 B738 3.408 6.288 6.066 8.789 8.575 American AA A319 .058 .243 .455 .748 A320 .471 1.186 .364 .066 A321 .447 .770 .077 B738 12.792 12.452 14.402 15.827 11.844 B752 .005 .030 .101 .005 .005 Compass CP E170 .208 .107 E175 1 2.279 3.734 3.296 Delta DL A319 4.507 4.592 4.705 2.811 2.055 A320 .195 .222 .219 .129 .011 B712 4.471 3.493 B737 .200 .082 B738 .005 .005 .055 .019 B739 .003 .003 8752 3.008 2.918 2.910 2.926 3.014 M D90 .003 FedEx FM A306 .696 .696 .697 .693 .521 A310 .003 Frontier Airlines F9 A20N* .567 A319 3.260 2.052 .883 .488 .260 A320 .211 1.011 .860 .647 A321 .003 A32N* .016 .600 Horizon Air QX DH8D 1.579 1.995 .753 E175 .466 2.647 Interjet 40 A320 .586 SkyWest Coml. SC CRJ9 2.748 2.633 2.593 1.975 .008 E175 4.855 6.523 6.759 Southwest WN B38M .003 .014 B733 .003 B737 45.874 50.819 57.104 49.274 33.348 B738 1.901 3.542 1.563 .079 .068 United UA A319 2.636 1.910 2.730 2.014 1.249 A320 3.803 4.395 3.648 5.422 4.729 B737 6.077 6.195 7.169 5.534 3.151 8738 2.395 2.537 1.710 4.526 4.501 B752 .326 .060 .003 .005 UPS 5X A306 .071 .071 .060 8752 .567 .501 .505 .507 .419 US Airways AW A319 1.107 .329 A320 1.953 2.022 A321 1.279 1.014 B752 .063 .134 WesUet WS B736 .005 .044 .041 .005 8737 .997 .984 .877 .882 .696 Total 106.321 111.351 124.699 123.622 94.247 *In 2018, the code for the Airbus A320neo was changed from A32N to A20N. TABLE 12 AIRCRAFT Glossary Type A20N Make Airbus Model/SeriesAC 320-200 Neo A306 Airbus 300-600 A310 Airbus 310-200 A320 Airbus 320 A32N Airbus 320-200 Neo B38M Boeing 737-800 Max B712 Boeing 717-200 B733 Boeing 737-300 8734 Boeing 737-400 B736 Boeing 737-600 B737 Boeing 737-700 B738 Boeing 737-800 B739 Boeing 737-900 B752 Boeing 757-200 CRJ7 Canadair Regional Jet 700 CRJ9 Canadair Regional Jet 900 DH8D Bombardier Dash 8 E135 Embraer 135 E170 Embraer 170 E175 Embraer 175 MD90 McDonnell Douglas 90 • v 0 QUARTERLY NOISE MEETING j�AIIRRMRV\ATM ORANGE COUNTY Date: September 12, 2018 Barry A. Rondinella A.A.E./C.A.E. Airport Director Time: 2:00 PM Place: Airport Commission Room ITEM DISCUSSED A summary of the JWA airport statistics for the month of July 2018 was provided by Beatrice Siercke. Nikolas Gaskins presented an overview of the capacity allocation process. Attendees inquired about how airlines are selected to receive Supplemental Class A capacity and why one airline received less than the current year. Mr. Gaskins explained allocations are not based on noise and that other carriers requested more of their presumptive seats hence less supplemental capacity could be allocated. A discussion of the Million Annual Passenger cap and its relation to noise occurred between Ms. Child and Mr. Gaskins. This was followed by a discussion between Ms. Martin and Mr. Gaskins concerning airspace authority, flight schools and general aviation operations that affect local residents. Mr. Gaskins discussed how the GANO regulates general aviation and provided contact information for the FAA Flight Standards District Office. Mr. August requested a breakdown of the airlines' seat requests, and was directed to the Board Agenda Staff Report attachment on the Airport's website. Mr. Macias and Ocampos voiced their concerns about arrival noise in the city of Tustin. Mr. Gaskins informed them operations may take place after curfew if the airline has obtained a curfew extension. The precision of the flight path due to Metroplex was also mentioned as a contributing factor. Mr. Cook added that there have been several changes over recent years, such as the magnetic variance adjustment, changes to flight procedures, and the fact that planes have gotten quieter over the years in a way that permits them to meet the noise limits without performing the engine cutback procedure on departure. Ms. Child stated that while Newport Beach has many rules to protect them, Tustin does not. Mr. Gaskins explained that the airport does have regulations which pertain to Tustin, such as the three noise monitors to the north, including the one at Columbus Tustin Middle School and curfew hours for arrivals. Mr. Mosher inquired about how many other airports have regulated curfews, to which Mr. Gaskins responded Long Beach and San Diego, with a possibility of others on the East Coast. Burbank Airport's unsuccessful attempt to initiate a curfew was mentioned to emphasize how rare curfew regulations are and how difficult they can be to obtain. Mr. Mosher noted that Title 21 of the California Code requires an airport to issue quarterly reports by 75 days after the end of the quarter. He also suggested moving the date of quarterly meetings in order for the public to have more time reviewing the Quarterly Report which is presented in the meetings. QUARTERLY NOISE MEETING ROSTER SEPTEMBER 12, 2018 NAME ORGANIZATION Sally Peterson Resident — Newport Beach Diana Martin Resident — Newport Beach James Johnson Resident — Tustin Christine Child Resident —Tustin Joe August Resident — Newport Beach Jim Mosher Resident — Newport Beach Dave Cook Resident — Newport Beach/ Aviation Committee Jaime Macias Resident—Tustin Miguel Ocampo Resident—Tustin Nikolas Gaskins John Wayne Airport Anthony Cangey John Wayne Airport Bonnie Frisch John Wayne Airport Louie Ilustrisimo John Wayne Airport Beatrice Siercke John Wayne Airport Cristina Magana John Wayne Airport