Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02 PC REPORT CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING COSTCO 2655 EL CAMINO REAL AGENDA REPORT ITEM #2 MEETING DATE: JULY 9, 2019 TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ELIZABETH A. BINSACK, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SUBJECT: CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2018- 00018 AND DESIGN REVIEW (DR 2018-00026)AT 2541 AND 2655 EL CAMINO REAL BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION Planning Commission Public Hearing -- June 11, 2019 On June 11, 2019, the Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on a request for a Conditional Use Permit and Design Review application to demolish the existing Goodyear Tire Center and adjacent Goodyear parking area at 2541 EI Camino Real and to construct a new 16 pump Costco gasoline fuel station with canopy and related equipment at 2655 EI Camino Real. The proposed project is located within an existing larger shopping center within the East Tustin Specific Plan. (Attachment I — PC report dated June 11, 2019). At the meeting, ten (10) public speakers provided comments regarding the project. The speakers included residents, interested parties, and business owners and the majority exprPssed opposition haled upon the concerns_ Two (2) e-mails were received indicating in favor of the proposed project. The concerns of those in opposition are identified below: • Demolition and removal of existing Goodyear Tire Center • Maintenance of existing parking lot within retail commercial center, particularly the area in front of the former Ansar Gallery/Kmart space (Costco is one of two major tenants within center) • Parking and queueing conflicts with vehicles within proposed gasoline station and existing parking lot; • Increase in traffic; • Impacts to other business owners and other gasoline station operators; • Hours of operation; • Fuel deliveries — timing and frequency;. • Noise and exhaust fumes from proposed gasoline station; After receiving the public comments, the Commission continued the public hearing to their meeting of July 9, 2019, so that staff could address the concerns expressed by the public as well as questions from the Commission. Specific questions/requests from the Commission included the following: Planning Commission Costco Continued Public Hearing July 9, 2019 Page 2 1. What are the lessons learned from {Costco at The District? How do the sites compare and what are the similarities and differences between the two locations? Staff Response: Staff has prepared an exhibit comparing details of the two Costco locations within the City(Attachment A— Comparison). There are several significant differences between the two sites which includes overall site design/layout, pump capacity, total qucueing capacity and implcmentation of a defined queue management plan. Generally, the proposed site has more pumps capacity which would speed up queuing, larger underground storage tank capacity which would reduce the frequency for fuel delivery, more vehicle queuing capacity which would allow on-site queuing without impacting the City's streets system, dedicated right turn lanes on EI Camino Real and on the main shopping center drive aisle to allow through traffic(would not block thru traffic as the District location had experienced), and the requirement for additional employees to manage operation and traffic/queuing on-site. In addition, Condition Nos.1.5 ,and 2.16 of Resolution filo. 4385 would allow the City to require additional measures, if necessary. 2. Hours of Operation: How do the proposed Costco hours of operation of 5:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., seven (7) days per week work with the other existing businesses within the shopping center? How do the proposed hours compare to other Costco gasoline locations? Staff Response: The majority of the other tenants within the retail shopping center have hours of operation that generally range from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. McDonalds is open the earliest and closes the latest with hours of 5:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. (the restaurant portion is open until 11:00 p.m. and the drive-through is open until midnight on weekdays and until 2:00 a.m. on Fridays and Saturdays). A summary of the hours for the other tenants and businesses within the center has been prepared to illustrate the varied hours for existing businesses (Attachment 6 — Hours of Operation Summary). Staff surveyed other Costco Warehouse buildings that provide gasoline and found that the proposed hours of operation are similar amongst the other stations. Costco gasoline stations located in Tustin (The District), Garden Grove, Laguna Niguel, Yorba Linda, Irvine Fountain Valley, San Juan Capistrano and all San Diego locations all operate as follows: * Monday— Friday: 5:30 a.m, to 9:30 p.m. o Saturday: 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. * Sunday 6:00 a.m. to 7:30 p.m. Planning Commission Costco Continued Public Hearing July 9, 2019 Page 3 Staff is recommending that the hours of operation be the same as the other Costco locations. Modified Condition No.2.1 states the specified hours or operation as well as allows for a potential modification if, once operational, it is determined that no impacts have occurred. 3. Parking Lot Maintenance: The overall maintenance and upkeep of the existing parking lot needs improvement. What additional conditions qof approval can be added to the project to ensure that the parking lot is continuously maintained in an acceptable manner? Staff Response: Consistent maintenance of the Costco parking lot and more specifically, the parking lot area in front of the former Ansar Gallery/Kmart tenant space is, at times, difficult to enforce due to multiple property owners. While Costco owns and controls a larger portion of the parking lot, the parking lot in front of the former Ansar Gallery/Kmart space is owned by a different entity as is McDonalds and the smaller in-line tenants along Bryan Avenue (Attachment C — Costco Property Outline), The City's Code Enforcement Division have been actively involved in on-going enforcement of property maintenance issues such as trash, landscaping, building upkeep, etc. and has issued numerous notices, letters and citations to the former Ansar Gallery/Kmart owner since December 2018 numerous notices, letters and citations to the former Ansar Gallery/Kmart owner since December 2018. The Tustin Police Department also has been actively engaged in the homeless issues in the area, which have become more prominent within the parking lot in front of the former Ansar Gallery/Kmart space. The City's Code Enforcement Division works closely with the Tustin Police Department which has assigned an officer to serve as the City's Homeless Liaison Officer to manage the homeless and associated quality of life concerns within the City. The Liaison Officer indicated that the Ansar Gallery/Kmart space is active with both homeless and parked recreational vehicles that remain overnight and then are often moved in the morning. Face-to-face contact was made with all the homeless individuals and Tustin shelter information was provided by the Liaison Officer with encouragement to go to the shelter. Some choose to go while others choose to remain in the parking lot. One difficulty the Liaison Officer has been experiencing has been enforcement of the City's Ordinance relative to overnight camping. The tenant space is located on private property with no signage installed citing City Codes whereby the Tustin Police can enforce the Ordinance. The City Attorney and Tustin Police are currently working on resolving this matter with installation of signage in the near future. Planning Commission Costco Continued Public Hearing July 9, 2019 Page 4 To address parking lot maintenance, Condition No. 1.17 requires that all plant materials shall be installed and maintained in a neat and healthy condition. Condition Nos. 2.0 and 2.7 require that the property shall be maintained in a safe, clean and sanitary condition at all times. Condition No. 2.8 has been added that requires Costco to provide daily security patrols of the parking lot during operation of the warehouse and gasoline station. Condition No.2.9 has also been added requiring that all shopping carts be returned to the shopping cart receptacles at the close of business each day. 4. Delivery Trucks: Provide more details on fuel deliveries such as where and when they will take place. Staff Response: The proposed project includes three (3) 40,000 square foot underground fuel tanks. The proposed tanks will be larger than at other Costco gasoline stations, which, per the applicant, will result in the need for less deliveries as the tanks can hold more fuel. The overall layout of the proposed station intentionally separates the queueing of vehicles from the remote filling area to avoid any potential conflicts. Depending on the volume of fuel at each gas station sells, approximately 1-2 deliveries will take place during regular hours of operation with the remainder of the fuel deliveries taking place during the off hours when the station is closed to the public. To mitigate any potential queueing conflicts with fuel deliveries, Condition No. 2.10 has been added to limit 1-2 fuel deliveries during the regular hours of operation and to allow additional fuel deliveries to take place during off hours. Costco warehouse deliveries already take place during this time. 5. Traffic/Queuing: Are parking aisles within the existing parking lot blocked when vehicles are queuing for fuel? How do the vehicle queues and parking within the existing lot work together? Staff Response: The Traffic Analysis prepared for the project includes several queuing exhibits to assist in understanding how the vehicle queueing will function within the existing parking lot (Attachment A & 1). The initial queue management strategy would provide stacking area of 40 vehicles for a total of 72 vehicles (Attachment D). While the applicant does not anticipate peak operations to exceed capacity, two (2) alternative queue management plans have been incorporated into the Traffic Analysis to address City staff concerns when and if peak operations exceed capacity. The first and second alternative queue management plans shows that an additional 8 vehicles and 18 vehicles, respectively can be accommodated prior to affecting access to the shopping center if peak operations exceed capacity (Attachments E and F). In addition, additional 13 vehicles may queue along main drive aisle before affecting traffic flow on El Camino. This configuration would provide up to 111 vehicles stacking on-site. Planning Commission Costco Continued Public Hearing July 9, 2019 Page 5 In addition, to avoid parking stalls being blocked when vehicles are queueing, the first row of parking north of the proposed gas station (containing 36 parking spaces) will be designated for Costco employee parking. Thirteen (13) parking spaces along the east property line adjacent to the EI Modena-Tustin Channel will also be restricted to employee parking. With these designations, impacts to customer parking spaces within the parking lot will be limited as employee vehicles will be parked for longer periods of time, limiting conflicts with vehicle queues. Fueling can also occur without impacting the vehicle queue. Statistics provided by the applicant indicate that approximately 41.6% of the gas sales at the District are from Costco members who live in the Tustin Ranch trade area; this area includes approximately 33,600 Costco member households. Based on the data gathered by the applicant, the applicant indicates that the transfer of fuel sales from The District to Tustin Ranch would be between 25% to 30%. 6. Level of Service at Analyzed Intersections: How will the studied intersections maintain a Level of Service A and B? Staff Response: The Traffic Analysis prepared for the project evaluates the performance at all study intersections, including driveways within the project. The analysis utilized the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology, which is consistent with the City standards. The iCU methodology assigns a LOS grade (A to F) representing the quality of intersection operations. All study intersections operate at level of service (LOS)A or B during the Weekday AM and PM peak hours. Based upon the Traffic Analysis as well as current roadway improvements taking place along Tustin Ranch Road and EI Camino Real and the provision of a designated westbound dedicated right turn lane into the site at Auto Center Drive and EI Camino Real, the proposed project is not expected to adversely affect intersection operations. All study intersections operate acceptably at LOS A and B under existing conditions and will continue to do so with the proposed project (Attachment G — Kittelson & Associates Memorandum) 7. Air Quality: What impacts (if any) will the proposed station have on air quality? Staff Response: The proposed facility includes operational characteristics that utilize the latest technology to meet all local, state, and federal regulations relative to air quality. All tanks and dispensers will be equipped with latest Phase I and Phase II Enhanced Vapor Recovery (EVR) vapor recovery air pollution control equipment technology per California Air Resources Board (GARB) regulations and associated Executive Orders, which document compliance with the GARB regulations. The Phase I EVR equipment controls the vapors in the return path from the tanks back to the tanker truck during offloading filling operations. The Planning Commission Costco Continued Public Hearing July 9, 2019 Page 6 Stage I EVR systems are 98 percent effective in controlling fugitive emissions from escaping into the environment. The Phase 11 EVR equipment controls the vapors in the return path from the vehicles back to the tanks and are 95 percent effective in controlling fugitive emissions from escaping into the environment. Fugitive emissions will be controlled to near zero from the vents with the use of the Healy Clean Air Separator Vapor Processor, which is a form of the Enhanced Stage II Vapor recovery system. Additionally, the applicant is proposing several measures to further limit emissions from vehicles waiting to fuel which includes the provision of additional pumps, a new quick key-FOB payment method, a red-light/green-light notification system for drivers and use of traffic attendants during peak times, which, together are designed to limit the time vehicles are queued. With these methods implemented, emissions are anticipated to be less than significant. Condition No. 1.12 requires the applicant to acquire all permits and approvals from the South Coast Air Quality Management district prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit and shall acquire an Authority to Construct ATC} and Permit to Operate (PTO). Condition No. 1.13 requires construction-level drawings to comply with the latest edition of the codes, City Ordinances, State, Federal laws, and regulations as adopted by the City Council of the City of Tustin. Based upon these conditions, the construction and operation of the gas station will operate within the ministerial requirements of the South Coast Air District Management District and will have a less than significant impact on air quality. Costco also submitted general information related to their fuel station operation (Attachment H). Costco indicated that the latest technology with many safety features to provide environmental safeguards are employed at the proposed site. As with the establishment of a new gas station, Costco are required and will comply with many of the local, State and federal regulatory agencies. Public Commeots Public comments have been received regarding the proposed project and they are included in Attachment K. Planning Commission Costco Continued Public Hearing July 9, 2019 Page 7 RECOMMENDATION Based upon the additional information and/or clarifications included in this report and for the findings and conditions of approval contained in Resolution No. 4385, staff is recommending that the Planning Commission adapt Resolution No. 4385, approving the project, izA�--'"Y A Erica H. Demkowicz., AICP Elizabeth A. Bin-sack Senior Planner Director of Community Development Attachments: A. Comparison of The District Costco and proposed El Camino Real location B. Hours of Operation Summary C. Costco Property Outline Exhibit D. Proposed Stacking Plan E. Queue Management Plan No.1 F. Queue Management Plan No.2 G. Kittelson & Associates Memorandum dated June 24, 2019 H. Additional General Information provided by applicant I. PC Report dated 6111119 and attachments thereto J. Resolution No. 4385 K. Public Comments i i i i ATTACHMENT A i COMPARISON OF THE DISTRICT COSTCO AND PROPOSED EL CAMINO REAL LOCATION i i 3 1 i m -Fa z 6 ani a a a • • s u i� r.r r !E LE ni as cu 7 7 7 tp ry era 1 a w t w a r cl 61 r1tif ` Q • } `� y + r a +y1 cin ai Li 1 r k p E Ln CL f6 E 'a1 m Q C3 i7 C1 01 n C i Q k3 �-+ p 0 ' ,0 OA v+ cn Ln a-+ CDU 0J 0.1 w wy 1 0 lJ a)U `n O .p O s s bo V, CU OJ O1 C: 0 E i 7 7 7 CL = fC (Il 7 N N O to j }' fp CL a 11 m lqr ri w lr1 w ri 0 N 7=7 71 b i i WE oil: ILI k r- t i E 3 1' g a -i SA I ►LL v r , h x I i A + + co Q RC: Ll E 'v CL E v E = o �" cr @� Lo Ln w 0) v CA tA Ln ai n > 3 y Q ro oo . a N Lo m 'C oa m cr - m LD .4 -a U Icy I d� qa rnt m m m µ `I I I T ,� .,--7773 9 V i i W m _ Fa imp, mvix I I I m a Z'n ¢ • 9 m Y w tin� ig F9 �.F .j 40 £ E c -- i i I `e 1 v iiR aai ai -- L ,A iii m I i spp i I � l — pp r]] 52EE r KFV m i a R. 0 U fL3 44 ti C - � 'k � f6 • � r i a C IN ` t © c M '2 r � . a--t / Y t +-jCL I P � Ln r Cr.. �, �a «, ❑ n ❑ N D U G. a a� Y L Q� Q w .._.....—_ ..� e b EM �777 � I .6•bE AE [ I --f.GC-- I I d•AZ .g 1 � I g I I ai 0 A SE 1111 n n l n 11 Set rr 4 Il h ." �r� 7.J�.f �� �' y '� ,ti _ �• '1� —+r'3 �� "�� � fit. ru m fk 4 NA cu �lk e ci Yy,9 L � "s�%.. � I'� a �"71 � ■ f+'�`y 1 �` ���� '� w Q O �/ J 4 U• "�'•� � � 4�F.+ fin, �r�.�r •! A. CL "� d1s M M NMW aj Q U �r! CC ----- S • 13rdNrli0 VN 3001 13 I L Qj V ( fa O „ ■ r e ,rXl V w ro Ln w S I 0 3i LU , i ATTACHMENT HOURS OF OPERATION SUMMARY Attachment B Hours of Operation Summary Tenant Name Hours of Operation Hoag Urgent Care Tustin Ranch, Suite A 8:00 a.m. — 8:00 p.m, (M-F) 8:00 a.m. — 5:00 p.m. Sat./Sun. Costco ^10:00 a.m. —8:30 p.m. (M-F) 9:30 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. Sat. Goodyear Tire Center 7:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. (M-Sat.) 9:00 a.m. — 5:00 (Sun. Chase Cleaners 7.00 a.m. --- 7:00 p.m. (M-F) 9:00 a.m. — 5:00 p.m. (Sat.) 9:00 a.m. — 2:00 p.m. Sun. Nails Luv 9:00 a.m. — 7:00 p.m. (M-Sat.) 9:00 a.m. — 5:00 p.m. Sun. Salon Ritz 10:00 a.m. — 7:00 p.m. (M-F) 9:00 a.m. — 5:00 p.m. (Sat.) Appointment only (Sun.) 20120 Eyecare Optometry 10:00 a.m. — 1:30 p.m. (M-F) 2:30 p.m. — 7:00 p.m. 10:00 a.m. --6:00 p,m. (Sat.) Closed Sun. Dentistry Now 9:00 a.m. -- 6:00 p.m. (M-Tues) 12:00 p.m. --4:00 p.m. (Weds. -- appt. only) 9:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m. (Thurs.) 9:00 a.m. — 5:00 p.m. (Fri.) 8:00 a.m. — 2:00 p.m. (Sat. — once per mo. by appointment only) Vacant — Suites B & C McDonalds 5:00 a.m. — 12:00 a.m. (Sun.-Thurs.) 5:00 a.m. — 2:00 a.m. (Fri./Sat.) Restaurant closes at 11:00 p.m. daily ATTACHMENT C COSTCO PROPERTY OUTLINE EXHIBIT l3NN'dl"fDMOON 13 V I _ � I -j� e a p p�y-- Ls j _ ` s --T-----• •_`. r a . —.- f ' ( - x oo , 1 I � a • . r-� I -� — 1 1 � r , 1 1 I ❑, 11 I 1 � I 1 1 , 1 1 1 CL L Q Z Y 1 i o �1 1 R d,l� El: a GVOb HON"NUN � �� ATTACHMENT D PROPOSED STACKING PLAN �L J I W c•� /r } I L i r� I } I � (13 7A `I ► { } Ly U I.6'iv£ i11Ty 191. L I { } { 1 1 _ _ 1 1 } I ?-,0 .19-19Z ,L a 1 1 1 t I t x I 1 t 1 I f If 1 1 w } 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 !fill 1 ! 1i i i [ :1 1 1 1 a 1 1 1 1 r 1 1 1 1 e LU —v— 1 •1 1 0 ! � LU co I w J r r [�--•� ••I 9. .l. ➢. ■ r J. z M LU r• r rn 1 / 1•- 0p 1 19 C 71 :1.. =-CY rr _ --�- w E 1 1 a f r.• ! I aV313d3371 o � I b —� M .9z� N 0] KEEP CLEA cr c � w C U 9) Q3 OC LL —jk Li � CJ : '– � coCL LLI W l � •X v� 57< 0q Lu lIl LII LU0 rz cr rA ti farrla zO 4�l lnahv7 ary�nsawiuv�sf-wey4c6-5T9Z'9t idy emp sarrvlay'8vinanb iCREt1�YR�4x3tu8aap��agippy sug y��uy unsnl-YL4ErIfiZ1�W QUEUE MANAGEMENT PLAN NO. I L, . " EO m ILI } I LL } } } ` E r—r 1 ` }` 1I1 ❑ co r_ . ll l t } n l I I a } l } a I 111'. •...k 1 1 1 z I 7-.0 - L i i �1 1 1r r x } �� � 1 1 1 1 l k k l l r l - 1 k 1 ! k 1 1 1 1 1®1 1 to 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I i 1' f 'l� 1. _ ;1 � a• .. 6 all 1 1. It 11 11 10 1. �. Lti 1• 1 . � 'k• 1 k 1 f 1 N Lij co IF A .- . z CD .19 +� LLI f7• I c >Uj - r , r ACI) 1'•. r r. r (] ME LD w 1. _Lu� 1 a••. 1. `� 1 k CL 1. .. 1 •r : r r 1 '•� 1 1 e i 1 1. =1 r •. :1 r. 1 I iV LU av310 d:-3�LU tn CO o ,aZ G L m Co c KEEP GLEA .Q--p -' tl] :3 cr LU U _ U u f11 O — Li 6? 7 IN 714 4 < CL cr_ ¢ z LU z u E C7 = O wr x x [7 a CE w Asa z3 ^ w a ri7 U 67 Q j r 9 ag . EO'•�Qj 115pFYl all Niawwasf.-01:8-5702 9l 16V �+�W salR813 �rnani7 ZcnFZ151�9.4k3��Eisap�uoiNppy�94�vQx�11sn1-LG6fiilE21'•}! ATTACHMENT F QUEUE MANAGEMENT FLAN NO. 2 T r EO I r^� I � C' eN S. W- D, Ln { 4] � r 1 A I r m :3 yr i � a: •1- r •:1 1 r �; 1 Y Y 1•� �k X 1Qa Itz- A—9 a 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 I I1I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CQ 1 1 I i 1 1 1 1 1 I i 1 d 1 1 1 tl 1 1 1 1 1 Lm Pi LU W i 1.. t• 1, 1 I 1 t U I ' . I 1 r � I LU C14' L. UJ I .1 :1,. 'P. 1.-• 1 ��` �p �r t 1 e � rI i• +' I Lu CL f LLI • � J — I ^ I , aa F= • w � 19U 0 co KEEP CLEA ' y' pT Tp O N .0. ! c o a rr �r LL- CP a D I H IQL �r•'r u. � � i cr D 0} to I r i u7 .[1 N +� +� X Q7 D 6 fir of w r� E 0 . ti f O Q {, Ln o m • � x LII Ama C ' ` D Onow tlA 9�l lnohrl alpNiu,kl9s�-Wrtp5-6'aYlli 9Y��1 flma•sa,n8y�ulnan�7 z�pEz5sY9V4u31�$!�plualpppy sig y�uaa upsnl-tLPfZ1EL1�li ATTACHMENT G I ITTELSON & ASSOCIATES MEMORANDUM DATED JUNE 2412019 KITTELSON Iso'ri-iE crry DRIVE,SUITE 410 GE,CA " & ASSOCIATES P714•4 8:9972Q68 L��'�`s, Ili MEMORANDUM Date: June 24, 2019 Project#: 23472 To: Diana Salazar, Costco Wholesale Warehouse Cc: Terry Odle, MG2 From: Neelam Dorman & Michael Sahimi, Kittelson &Associates, Inc. Project; Tustin Ranch Costco Fuel Station Addition Subject: Planning Commission Topics Kittelson & Associates, Inc. (KAi) has prepared this memorandum for the proposed addition of a Costco Gasoline fuel station to the existing Tustin Ranch Costco Warehouse on El Camino Real in Tustin, California to address items discussed at the June 11th Planning Commission Hearing.The following topics are discussed in this memorandum: • Proposed Development • Tustin District Costco Gasoline Site Comparison • Clarification on Gas Queues • Clarification on Parking Agreement • Clarification on Intersection Level of Service Analysis • Additional information on Fuel Delivery Trucks • Hours of Operation of Other Site Uses • Effects of Kmart Occupancy i i PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Costco is proposing to build a Costco Gasoline fuel station on the southeastern portion of the parking lot of their EI Camino Real location.The site forthe fuel station is currently Costco Warehouse parking,which will be relocated to the west in place of the existing Goodyear service facility (to be demolished). The Tustin Ranch Costco Gasoline fuel station will consist of four islands (sixteen dispensers) with a total of thirty-two (32) vehicle fueling positions. The site plan for the proposed Costco Gasoline fuel station is F provided in Figure 1. f 7% 41E I C)Of 4 C3 0 LLJ LLJ w w a (-D CD JI > uw Q- C3 w cr < to u� m Lu Lu tn M L: uj Z: < Of �e y IM CD LL, LLI uj hr C) L C, L PIZ W- af L LU C� 2 LD LLP LLJ LLJ tz ca 12. M�m IL 0 CL U3 LLJ U'j Q') Lo (0 LL: co [if 1 17011 z C-� '7— se �) AL IOC 2 < LLJ LL, ID CD u cc 0� LJ <F- �j w CD 0 �j 0 Z7 0, 0- CD CL 0 0 C�6 0 5R 6 SE a: uj Lu en �5 m 16 z Lu LLP Fusbn Ronch Co_,n o Furl Sfivion Addition Pro)cct It;?3d 72 June 24,?019 N10C 3 TUSTIN DISTRICT COSTCO GASOLINE SITE COMPARISON The Tustin District Costco Gasoline site was discussed in multiple comments at the Planning Commission Hearing. The following comparison between the District and proposed Tustin Ranch site was developed to better address the concerns: ■ Tustin Ranch would have 32 pumps versus 22 pumps at Tustin District. Compared to Tustin District, the efficiency of fueling would be approximately 45% higher,therefore queues would be processed much quicker. • The Tustin Ranch site can queue 40 vehicles in the stacking area with another 32 at the pumps for a total of 72 vehicles. The Tustin District site can queue approximately 38 vehicles in the stacking area with 22 at the pumps, for a total of 50 vehicles. In comparison, the Tustin Ranch site can hold 12 more vehicles in the stacking area. ■ The Tustin Ranch site can queue an additional 8 vehicles without affecting on-site operations for a total of 80 vehicles. The Tustin District site cannot queue beyond the 60 vehicles without severely impacting traffic on Park Avenue. • With the queue management plan in place,the Tustin Ranch site is designed to be able to contain an additional 18 vehicles within the Costco parking area before affecting operations to the on- site primary drive aisle. Another approximately 13 vehicles could also queue on-site prior to affecting operations on the EI Camino Real. This would be a total queue of 111 vehicles prior to affecting EI Camino Real. The Tustin District site would affect local road operations if one vehicle exceeds queues beyond the stacking area. • The layout of the Tustin District site precludes access to the northmost pumps if the center pumps have queues blocking the single access point. The layout at the Tustin Ranch site provides access from two points which allows for access to the center pumps from either direction. • The Tustin Ranch site provides a right-turn pocket on EI Camino Real to accommodate additional queues for vehicles turning onto the site whereas the Tustin District does not. • The Tustin Ranch site also has large underground fuel storage tanks which would reduce the number of re-fueling trucks and effects on gas operations. ■ For the Tustin Ranch site, the fuel pumps are approximately 700 feet from the closest residential unit. For the Tustin District site, the fuel pumps are approximately 700 feet from the closest residential unit (Irvine Inn Apartments). • The Tustin Ranch site would be served by two major arterials (Jamboree Road and Tustin Ranch Road), a primary arterial (Bryan Avenue) and a secondary arterial (El Camino Real), The Tustin District site is served by the same two major arterials (Jamboree Road and Tustin Ranch Road) as well as Barranca Parkway and a secondary arterial (Park Avenue). CLARIFICATION OF GAS QUEUES Multiple gas queue figures were provided in the April Traffic Analysis Memorandum and discussed at the meeting. Based on the discussions at the Planning Commission hearing, it should be clarified that over- capacity operations are not expected based on Costco data from multiple other sites. Queue Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Grongp,cmtornia Tustin Ranch Costco Fuel 5,o1 V_'ri Addition Project#.23472 June 24,2019 Page 4 management plans have been prepared to have ready if peak operations exceed capacity. aver-capacity operations not an expected occurrence, and should it occur, it is not expected to occur on a consistent basis. Based on Costco data, the design 95th percentile queue of 26 vehicles as well as the maximum observed qu Lie of 35 vehicles can be accommodated with an additional available capacity of 5 vehicles. The initial queue management strategy would provide additional space for 8 vehicles. To address City staff concerns for severe operating conditions, a second-tier queue management plan was prepared.The shows that an additional 18 vehicles can be accommodated prior to affecting access to the shopping center. Please note that this scenario is not expected to occur. In addition,the location of Costco gas queue data sites as they relate to regional access was discussed at the meeting.Table 1 below provides a comparison of the distances from freeway ramps for each site. As shown,the Tustin District and Concord sites are the furthest from a freeway ramp. Most other sites are in similar regional access locations as the proposed Tustin Ranch site and therefore would experience similar demand and operations. Table 1:Costco Gasoline Stacking Locations Tustin u,CA 22 210" Rohnert Park,CA 24 0.4 Concord,CA 24 3.5 NL San lose,CA 24 0.6 terneMla,CA 30 0.5 Tustin Ranch(Proposed 32 0.5 "Jamboree Road ramps are G.5 miles frorn site. CLARIFICATION ON PARKING AGREEMENT Shared parking was discussed at the Planning Commission hearing. However, please note that shared parking is not proposed as part of the project and is not part of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs). Although the CC&Rs established a non-exclusive easement for the passage and parking of vehicles over and across the parking and driveway areas, it also requires each tenant to meet parking requirements within each parcel.Therefore the Costco Warehouse meets both the City of Tustin and the CC&R requirements.Shopping center parking requirements and supply by pad are shown in Table 2. At the request of City staff, the Traffic Analysis Memorandum discussed the potential for shared parking between the various uses; however,this would require modifications to the CC&Rs. Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Orange,California Tustin Ranch Costco Fuel Station Additlnn Project ra:23472 June 24,2014 Page 5 Table 2: Proposed Shopping Center Parking Supply ��ori ri J Costco(proposed) 544 606 Kmart 474 530 PJIcDonald's 18 55 Pad B 37 32 Pad C 37 32 CLARIFICATION ON INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS At the Planning Commission Hearing, potential operational issues were discussed for intersections in the vicinity of the Project site. The Traffic Analysis Memorandum prepared in April 2019 evaluates performance at all study locations requested by City staff, including the Project driveways. As shown in the memorandum, all intersections operate at level of service (LDS) A or B during the Weekday AM and PM peak hours. Based on this analysis as well as the current roadway improvements taking place along Tustin Ranch Road and EI Camino Real, the proposed Project is not expected to adversely affect intersection operations. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON FUEL DELIVERY TRUCKS The issue of potential interruption to traffic operations due to fuel truck deliveries was discussed at the Planning Commission Hearing. The Traffic Analysis Memorandum provided truck turning templates and the planned access route for fuel delive-ytrucks, in addition to the information previously provided,truck deliveries are not expected to affect traffic operations as only 1-2 deliveries are expected during operating hours which reduces the chances of deliveries within peak hours. Tank sizes at the Tustin Ranch site are expected to be three 40,000-gallon tanks, which will reduce the required number of daytime fuel deliveries (in comparison to Tustin District and other locations that have three 30,000-gallon tanks). In addition, the remove fill location design would allow the truck to unload without entering the pump queues and would allow operations to continue without interruption. HOURS OF OPERATION OF OTHER SITE USES The hours o- operation of other uses on the site were discussed. The table below provides available information regarding hours of operation of other site uses, based on information available online. ,Kirtelson&Associates,tor. grange, California Tustin Ronch Costco Fuel3u7tian Addirioej I'roj-Cr 17:23472 lune 24,2419 Page 6 Table 3: Hours of Operation of Other Site Uses u McDonald's Sunday to Thursday: 5:00 AM - 12:00 AM Friday and Swurday: 5:00 AM - 2:00 AM Nails Luv Monday to Saturday:9:00 AM -7:00 PM Sunday: 9:00 AM -5:00 PM Monday to Friday: 7:00 AM - 7:00 PM Chase Cleaners Saturday: 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM Sunday: 9:00 AM -2:00 PM Monday to Friday: 10:00 AM - 7:00 PM 20-20 Eyecare Center Optometry Saturday: 10:00 AM -6:00 PM Sunday: Closed Monday/Tuesday/Thursday/Friday: 9:00 AM - 6:00 PM Dentistry Now Wednesday: 12:00 PM -4:00 PM Saturday: 8:00 AM - 2:00 PM Sunday: Closed Hoag Urgent Care Tustin Ranch Monday to Friday:8:00 AM - 8:00 PM Saturday and Sunday: 8:00 AM -5:00 PM EFFECTS OF WART OCCUPANCY At the Planning Commission meeting, concern over potential effects of the Kmart building being in use and occupied on local traffic and parking was discussed. The April Traffic Analysis Memorandum did not assume occupancy of the Kmart building in its Existing Plus Project intersection Level of Service (LDS) analysis. The April memorandum disclosed that with the addition of project trips, the three study intersections (Market Street & Bryan Avenue; Tustin Ranch Road & E1 Camino Real; Auto Center drive & EI Camino Real) would operate acceptably at LOS A and B during the AM and PM peak hours. For this memorandum, Kittelson added estimated trips that could be generated by the 105,31.9 square foot Kmart parcel to the study intersections, assuming full retail occupancy and with the proposed Tustin Ranch Costco gas station addition in place. With the addition of Kmart-generated vehicle trips to existing counts and Tustin Ranch Costco gas station trips, study intersections would still operate at LOS A or B, as shown in the table below. Kirtelson&Associates,Inc.. Orange,California Tustin iiancit Costco Fuc!Station Addition Project A 23472 June 24,20I9 Page 7 Table 4: Existing Plus Project Pius Kmart LOS Existing Plus Existing Plus Peak Existing Project Project Plus Intersection Control Hour Kmart ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS Market St. & AM 0.29 A 0.36 A 0.40 A 1 Bryan Ave. Signal PIV 0.43 A 0.49 A 0.59 A Tustin Ranch AM 0.68 B 0.69 B 0.69 B 2 Rd. & EI Camino Signal Real' pw 0.60 A 0.60 A 0.61 B Auto Center Dr. AM 0.27 A 0.28 A 0.29 A 3 & EI Camino Signal Real PM 0.47 A 0.47 A 0.51 A Note: 1. Planned and funded intersection improvements at this location are a55Llmed under Existing Conditions. In addition to traffic, the use of the Kmart building is not expected to affect parking at the site. Under City of Tustin minimum parking requirements,the Kmart parcel is required to provide 474 parking spaces (4.5 spaces per thousand square feet), The Kmart parcel provides 530 spaces, which is 56 spaces more than City requirements. Kittelson&Rssocictes,Inc. Orange,Cahfornio ATTACHMENT H ADDITIONAL GENERAL INFORMATION PROVIDED BY APPLICANT COSTCO WHOLESALE Fuel Facility 2655 EI Camino Real Tustin, California General Information Our Job No. 14640 The fuel facility component to this existing warehouse development will include equipment o= the latest technology, with many safety features to prevent potential environmental impact. It is designed in accordance with local, state, and federal requirements and will be installed by State Certified Installation Contractors according to specific construction guidelines and requirements. Below are a few operational and design features that provide exceptional environmental safeguards. Operational Features: 1. The fuel facility is designed to operate as an unattended self-serve facility. However; Costco Wholesale's policy is to provide a Costco Gasoline Program trained employee at the site during all hours of operation The Costco Gasoline training program includes an Interactive test that all gasoline employees must pass before working at a Costco Gasoline facility. 2. In addition to the above-mentioned employee, the facility is supported by senior management in the warehouse during the gasoline station's operating hours. The supervisor will be equipped with a roam telephone programmed to receive calls from the fueling facility and warehouse. Every gasoline facility is equipped with a "911" telephone that automatically contacts emergency dispatch in addition to a regular telephone line and roam phones. 3. Employees are trained to identify maintenance requirements and physically inspect the fuel islands regularly during operating hours. Their training includes the proper spill cleanup and emergency response procedures. Trained employees check for leaking hoses, malfunctioning nozzles, fuel spills, and physical damage to the dispensers and controller enclosure. During non-operating hours, the power to the dispensers is turned off and each nozzle pad is locked. Should the system require attention beyond what the trained site personnel can handle, the local authorized and certified service contractor will be contacted and dispatched to repair the equipment. 4. Emergency shutoff switches are installed next to the contra ler enclosure and in locations near the dispensers, as dictated by the Fire Code. 5. Closed circuit television monitor cameras aimed to show all fueling positions,the tank slab, and equipment enclosure are mounted on canopy columns adjacent to the fuel islands. A split- screen monitor located in the Costco Wholesale warehouse allows for full-time monitoring of the fueling operation. All images are recorded by the camera system. 6. The tank and piping monitoring system is programmed to activate visual/audible alarms in the event of an alarm condition. A visuatlaudible alarm is located on the outside of the controller enclosure. Further, the monitoring system is designed so that if power is lost to the monitoring console, the facility is shut down and will not operate. 7. An independent security company monitors the Costco Wholesale warehouse alarm system. The alarm system acknowledges an alarm condition at the fuel facility and notifies Costco Wholesale management staff of an alarm condition should it occur after operating hours. 14640-General In-o 5heet.dorx Design Features: 1. Costco Wholesale's tank and piping system is certified to meet the Federal UST leak detection standards of 95 percent probability of detection and 5 percent probability of false alarm. California State Water Resources Control Board also certifies the system under LG-113. 2. Costco Wholesale utilizes one of the most durable joint sealers available today to seal the concrete control joints. PTi sealer is a petroleum-resistant sealant developed by Prevention Technologies, lnc. (PTi). The sealer is used to prevent petroleum products from entering the underlying soil at the concrete joints. This product is used for its superior elasticity and user- friendly application. The elasticity allows the product to maintain a tight seal even with concrete expansion. The easy application ensures a proper seal whether it is applied by a contractor or maintenance personnel. Costco Wholesale is one of the few, if not only company, to have a nationwide standard to seal control joints and other areas to prevent product spills from reaching the soil. 3. The stone drainage system for the fueling facility area wi I be designed in accordance with State of California Best Management Practices for water quality treatment standards. Stormwater from the fueling area will be isolated and will be directed to a catch basin and processed through an oil/water separator prier to discharge to the downstream system. 4. The underground tank and piping control units are housed inside the controller enclosure. The enclosure will contain the power console, the dispenser interface unit, the submersible pump variable speed controllers, and the monitoring system console. An air conditioner mounted on the side of the enclosure will have a preset thermostat to maintain a safe operating temperature. 5. The USTs and all dispensers are equipped with non-metallic piping containment sumps with sensors. Fiberglass or High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) is used for its corrosion resistance and plasticity. The double-walled storage tank system includes a hydrostatic interstitial space sensor that monitors the primary and secondary tank walls. If a tank wall is compromised, the interstitial sensor will immediately shut down the product delivery system and activate a visuallaudible alarm. 6. The tanks are secured in place with anchoring straps (tie-clowns) connected to concrete hold dnwn deadmPn. The Pntire tank excavation hole is backfilled with pea gravel and capped with an 8-inch-thick reinforced concrete slab (overburden). The tie-downs, together with the overburden, overcorne any possible buoyancy factors and resist buckling under hydrostatic pressures 7. All product and vent piping is non-corrosive and provides three (3) levels of protection: (1), all product piping is monitored with pressure line leak detection; (2), all piping is double wall to provide secondary containment; and (3), all secondary piping is monitored with tank sump leak detectors. 8. All piping connections to the tanks and dispensers are flexible. Flexible connectors are used to prevent rupture from any form of ground movement. 9, If a piping leak occurs, the gasoline will flow through the secondary pipe to a sump where a sensor is triggered to immediately shut down the system and activate an audibleMsual alarm. 10, All tanks and dispensers are equipped with the latest Phase I and Phase It Enhanced Vapor Recovery (EVR) vapor recovery air pollution equipment technology per CARE regulations and associated Executive Orders. The Phase I EVR equipment controls the vapors in the return path from the tanks back to the tanker truck during offloacing filling operations. The Stage I 14640-General Into SheeLdoux EVR systems are 98 percent effective in controlling fugitive emissions from escaping into the environment. The Phase 11 EVR equipment controls the vapors in the return path from the vehicles back to the tanks and are 95 percent effective in controlling fugitive emissions from escaping into the environment. I 1 The UST monitoring system incorporates automatic shutoffs. If gasoline is detected in the sump at the fuel dispenser, the dispenser shuts down automatically and an alarm is sounded. If a problem is detected with a tank, the tank is automatically shut down and an alarm is sounded. If the product piping system detects a failure of the 0.1 gallons per hour(GPH) test, an alarm is sounded and the line is dispatched for service via the FMS monitoring service. Pursuant to federal requirements,monitoring equipment must be able to detect a minimum leak of 3 GPH (equivalent to the accuracy of a mechanical leak detector). By providing monitoring to a higher standard (0.1 vs, 3), Costco Wholesale maintains a higher degree of safety than required by current federal requirements. 12. Each fuel dispenser includes several safety devices. Specifically, each dispenser SUMP is equipped with an automatic shutoff valve to protect agains° vehicle impact. In addition, each fuel hose includes a poppeted breakaway device that will stop the flow of fuel at both ends of the hose in the event of an accidental drive-off. Also, each dispenser is equipped with internal fire extinguishers. Lastly, all dispensers include leak detection sensors connected to the alarm console inside the controller enclosure. Regulatory Agencies, Regulations, and Permits: The following is a list of regulations and agencies that govern gasoline facilities and, as rioted, require specific permits or approvals. This list shows the magnitude of the regulatory environment that governs this industry. Costco Wholesale has met or exceeded all the standards and requirements outlined below for the Costco Gasoline facility As described above, the Costco Wholesale retail fuel facility provides a significant number of features to reduce and control the potential for environmental health hazards. All systems to be installed are of the latest technology and meet or exceed all local, state, and Federal regulations. 1- California Fire Code, Chapters 23, 50, and 57 2. California Code of Regulations Title 23, Division 3, Chapter 16 ("California Underground Storage Tank Regulations") 3 California Health and Safety Code, Division 20, Chapter 6 7 ("Underground Storage of Hazardous Substances") 4 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Underground Storage Tank Regulations (Subpart D, 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 280) 5, Underwriters Laboratories, Inc. (UL) 5. National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) Articles 30 and 30A, regarding Flammab;e and Combustible Liquids Code 7. American Petroleum Institute (API) Recommended Practices for Installation of Underground Storage Systems 8. California Air Resources Board (GARB) Executive Orders and Procedures and South Coast Air Quality Management District Regulations 9. Orange County Environmental Health Hazardous Materials Program (CUPA), which provides enforcement of the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCD) Regulations 14640-General Info Sheet docx o 4-j 4mi Cld 11 4-J 4-1 ct cn LF••1..^.� '� � �I � CIS 4-4 � Ct co 4-J CZ 4 Cn -�-jpt.; cn a ay + �•"� J i III I� f�d kA © e. f "CL h Xs r: n�' W W m Cv L � i Ln vs 0 � a--+ c Ln Q {� U d Q r6 4--) 7- -0sem. ro p �✓ o � � � " L- ° 'V) m a .w a s Ln � OL L S- aA ro ClyE (D s.. L > D Ln Q fun 07 Ln 0 > E o Cucu - �� M m � M Q m ua n n U c • a Y Pik o CL cu . , •. . U v . . O � �(L)" > b.4 U) U) N N C 0 k ct � Q � - Q' � `� � � � -rig d � •� � � 4-4 � � p • � p Qti ATTACHMENT p PC REPORT DATED 6/11/1 AND ATTACHMENTS THERETO • AGENDA REPORT ITEM #4 MEETING DATE: JUNE 11 , 2019 TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2018-00018 AND DESIGN REVIEW 2018-00026 APPLICANT: TERRY ODLEIMG2 3333 MICHELSON DRIVE, SUITE 100 IRVINE, CA 92612 PROPERTY OWNER: DIANA SALAZAR COSTCO DIRECTOR OF REAL ESTATE COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION 9 CORPORATE PARK, SUITE 230 IRVINE, CA 92606 LOCATION: 2541 AND 2655 EL CAMINO REAL GENERAL PLAN: PLANNED COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL/BUSINESS ZONING: PLANNED COMMUNITY MIXED-USE EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL: THIS PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) SECTION 15332, CLASS 32. ilk- ` PC Report June 11, 2019 CUP 2018-000181DR 2018-00026 Page 2 REQUEST: A REQUEST TO DEMOLISH THE EXISTING GOODYEAR TIRE CENTER AND ADJACENT PARKING AREA AT 2541 EL CAMINO REAL AND REPLACE WITH 56 NEW PARKING STALLS AND CONSTRUCT A NEW 16 PUMP COSTCO GASOLINE FUEL STATION WITH CANOPY AND RELATED EQUIPMENT AT 2655 EL CAMINO REAL. RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 4385, approving Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 2018-00018 and Design Review (DR) 2018-00026 to demolish the existing Goodyear Tire Center and adjacent Goodyear parking area at 2541 EI Camino Real and replace with 56 new parking stalls and to construct a new 16 pump Costco Gasoline fuel station with canopy, related equipment and landscaping at 2655 EI Camino Real. APPROVAL AUTHORITY: The project site is located within the Planned Community Mixed-Use(PCMU)zoning district of the East Tustin Specific Plan (ETSP) area. Pursuant to Section 3.8.2 and 3.7.2.A.1.0 of the ETSP, new service.stations are subject to the approval of a CUP. Pursuant to Tustin City Code (TCC) Section 9291 c, the Planning Commission has the authority to review and act on CUPs. Pursuant to TCC Sections 9272, design review approval is required for new structures, major exterior alterations or enlargement of existing structures. BACKGROUND: Project Site and Surrounding Uses The shopping center, in which the proposed project is located, is improved with an existing Costco Warehouse building, Goodyear Tire Center, a major retail store (formerly Kmart/Sears/Ansar Gallery), McDonalds, and two (2) multi-tenant buildings. The site is located within the ETSP and is designated as Mixed-Use. To the north, across Bryan Avenue are single-family residences and to the west, across Tustin Ranch Road are condominiums. The Tustin Auto Center is to the south, across EI Camino Real; the Tustin Market Place is to the east beyond the EI Modena Flood Channel and Myford Road. Currently, there are two (2) Costco Warehouses within the City; one (1) at The District at Tustin Legacy shopping center and a second one at the subject property off EI Camino Real.The District location currently has a gasoline fuel station with eleven (11)fuel pumps with 22 fueling dispensers. The proposed project will consist of sixteen (16) pumps with 32 fueling dispensers, overhead canopy and associated equipment. PC Report June 11, 2019 CUP 2018-000181DR 2018-00026 Page 3 t Residential Residential I� . _� " �,s,, � � l"�� •.r a +. •. do a. as • , .. a7 CL oil Tustin Auto Center Site Plan IFM `A tsw' 4 m �) Wk 17 t 2655 EI Camino Real (Proposed Location) PC Report June 11, 2019 CUP 2018-0001 8/DR 2018-00026 Page 4 awl N me 2541 El Camino Real (Existing Building to be Demolished) East Tustin Specific Plan The ETSP was adopted by the City in 1986. In March 1992, an amendment to the East Tustin Development Agreement was approved which included a modification to the Sector 12 Concept Plan and approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map 14610. The original Sector 12 Concept Plan included 19-acres of commercial development and five (5) acres reserved for a hotel on the subject site. The 1992 modification eliminated the hotel use at the site and the tract map that was processed concurrently with a Design Review application subdivided the 12-acre property into six (6) numbered lots to allow the ultimate construction of a 274,175 square foot retail commercial center. The commercial center was comprised of two (2) major retail tenants and five (5) individual pad tenants. Costco and K-Mast were the first anchor tenants within the center and both moved in following construction completion in 1993-1994. Costco has remained a major tenant, at the same location since 1993-1994. DISCUSSION: Proposal The shopping center has an overall site comprised of approximately twelve (12) acres; however, the addition of the gasoline station would be contained within an approximate one(1) acre portion of the site within the Costco parcel; more specifically the southeastern corner of the existing shopping center. The gasoline station would be developed as an accessory use to the existing Costco Warehouse business, The existing 9,136 square foot Goodyear Tire Center building and adjacent parking area is proposed to be removed as part of the project. Fifty-six (56) parking spaces will be striped in place of the building. PC Report June 11, 2019 CUP 2018-00018/DR 2018-00026 Page 5 The proposed project will consist of sixteen (16) pumps with 32 fueling dispensers, overhead canopy and associated equipment. its C40STCr t It ELCMWRFA I S ,« Proposed Site Plan 4 M N 9 ------------ ----------- --- ----_- ——I--------------- -- I a rr . �I �i �ur/1f111�1uu�u�uiu�n�u>su�u�nufn®nwuu� � >tu�u�n� ►j: Enlarged Site Plan PC Report June 11, 2019 CUP 2018-00018/DR 2018-00026 Page 6 ANALYSIS: Business Hours of Operation The gasoline station is proposing to operate from 5:00 AM to 10:00 PM daily. The station will be available for Costco Warehouse members only and requires a Costco membership to access the fuel pumps. The proposed station would be manned by one (1) Costco employee who will oversee day-to-day operations and cleanliness at the site. No other automotive or retail sales will be available at the station. The gasoline station would be equipped with a red-light/green-light system to indicate which pump was open and available to the next person in line along with CostcoPay (a key-fob pay system), which, perthe applicant, improves efficiency and helps shorten lines to waiting customers. Entry and exit for fuel deliveries to the site would be to and from Bryan Avenue. No deliveries of fuel would take place off EI Camino Real. The proposed business hours of the service station are compatible with the surrounding businesses in that the station provides a consumer service during typical service station hours. Modifications to the hours of operation may be limited by the Community Development Director if it is determined that impacts to the surrounding tenants or properties are occurring. Parking/Circulation/Queue Management The existing Costco Warehouse property features 623 parking spaces, which exceeds the City's minimum parking standard of 544 stalls (4.5 stalls/1,000 SF of building area). There is also a recorded Covenant, Conditions and Restriction (CC&R's) document between Costco and Sears (formally Kmart) and the adjacent leaseholder of the other major tenant building) that is more restrictive. The applicant has indicated that they plan to adhere to the existing CC&R conditions and do not intent to modify. Per this agreement, the parking standards require both large retail users to maintain a minimum parking ratio of 5 stalls11 ,000 SF of building area. For the purpose of the CC&R's, the required number of parking stalls for Costco is 605 stalls and the total number of parking spaces with the proposed project will be 605 stalls, which adheres to this requirement. The Costco Warehouse and proposed project is part of a larger shopping center with other tenants. The existing overall parking for both Costco and the other retail commercial tenants within the shopping center is summarized below: RequiredParking Provided Costco 544 605 Kmart 474 530 Pad B 37 32 Pad C 37 32 McDonalds 18 55 Total Parking 1110 1254 PC Report June 11, 2019 CUP 2018-000181DR 2018-00026 Page 7 A Traffic Analysis was prepared for the proposed project which analyzed trip impacts of the proposed station and accounted for the fact that an existing on-site use, the Goodyear Tire Center, would be replaced with parking area. The analysis also included an examination of traffic volumes and intersection Levels of Service (LOS) and concluded that additional trips generated by the proposed use would allow all studied intersections to continue to operate acceptably at (LOS) A or B. The location of the four (4) islands with sixteen (16) pumps and the site configuration on the property will accommodate the fueling for 32 vehicles, with additional stacking of another 46 vehicles east of the pump islands. The project would also provide a dedicated westbound right turn lane into the site at Auto Center Drive and EI Camino Real and restriping of EI Camino Real. Y1AR ROUGE L A�ou,I s TC IA IN J�'sTR 30 24 11 Q I i �s ,s ® Q71 r -; 1 , 18.4; Jr-6,18'. U I _... EALSTIMG TRAFFIC rrrrr a_a�a w w ��c LIGHT SIGNAL F`WJTI IN PSACSIGN----____4 E Jam-a QICHT TURN ONLY SIGMy Q, � 24 ------------------�-- ---- EI Camino Real ®-95MTprarcmtneQueue Stacking Plan Figure ®•Maximum observed queues Tustin,California 2 Proposed Stacking Plan Customers would enter the site traveling either west or eastbound on EI Camino Real via an existing driveway apron at the intersection of EI Camino Real and Auto Center Drive that would continue to provide access to the existing commercial tenants and proposed gasoline station. Customers could also enter the shopping center from Bryan Avenue and Tustin Ranch Road. Vehicular queueing data was collected at other Costco Gasoline fueling sites to determine the anticipated queues for the proposed station. Based on the comparable locations with PC Report June 11, 2019 CUP 2018-00018/DR 2018-00026 Page 8 22 or more fueling positions, the average 95th percentile queue was 26 vehicles with the highest recorded queue at 35 vehicles. With 32 vehicles fueling at one time with the proposed station and queueing for another 40 vehicles behind those fueling, a maximum of 72 vehicles can be accommodated without interfering with site operations. If queues should extend beyond the designated queue area, two (2) queue management plans has been included within the Traffic Analysis (Attachment D and E). If queues cannot be adequately managed by the strategies shown in the plan, the northbound right tum into the parking aisle adjacent to the fuel station would be closed using retractable bollards to route customers to the next parking aisle to provide more queueing area prior to affecting street operations. In addition to the queue management plan, the City has stipulated that during peak demands, three (3) on-site traffic attendants will be present to guide and direct traffic when fueling, which is specified in Condition 2.9 in the attached Resolution. Per Condition 2.13, if the City determines that a parking or traffic queuing problem exists on the site or in the vicinity because of the facility, the Community Development Director, Police Chief, and/or Public Works Department may require the applicant to prepare a parking demand analysis or traffic study queuing analysis and the applicant would be required to provide measures to alleviate the problem. Design Review The proposed project would be developed within the southeastern corner of the existing Costco Warehouse parking lot adjacent to El Camino Real and Myford Road. A grade change exists between El Camino Real and the subject site and there is an existing CMU block wall that will provide added screening of the gasoline station from EI Camino Real. The project includes a ,12,684 square foot canopy over the proposed fueling stations which will be supported by sixteen (16) CMU columns which will have an exterior treatment of split and smooth face to match the existing warehouse building. The canopy will be painted white with an area towards the center of the canopy (on each side) designated for future signage (see proposed elevation). There will be two (2) pieces of equipment on-site which include a clean air separator (approx. 204 square feet) which will be contained within a split-face masonry CMU block wall measuring six (6) feet in height with metal gates for access. Surrounding the separator will be new landscaping for additional' screening. The controller enclosure (approx. 117 square feet) will be painted Camel (#PCTT 20169) to coordinate with the columns and existing Costco Warehouse building and will measure F-6" in height with landscaping to provide screening. The clean air separator and controller enclosure will both be located east of the proposed pumps on a raised island. PC Report June 11, 2019 CUP 2018-000181DR 2018-00026 Page 9 :r0 A—Z �--7j I 1 SOUTH ELEVATION AND DISPENSER ISLANDS NORTH SIMILAR 1 a z EAST ELEVATION AND IIISPENSER ISL.W�S WES'"SIMILAR Proposed Elevations No buildings are being proposed as part of this project aside from an equipment enclosure containing the equipment controllers. The site currently has some landscaping, and the proposed project includes the installation of new trees, planting and other types of landscaping throughout the existing Costco Warehouse parking lot and within the new fueling area. Additional landscaping will be added to the southeast corner of the shopping center/project site for added screening of the equipment enclosure. 9 ENCLOSURE 11-K 11-kl ENTRY_ ENCLOSURE ELEVATICN AWAY FROM CANOPY 5 ENaL URE—AT"I'AGNG CANOW 6 ENCL4SUAIX E STORAGE iRY MATERIALS -. Proposed Equipment Enclosure&Materials/Colors PC Report June 11, 2019 CUP 2018-000181DR 2018-00026 Page 10 Signage As part of the development of the service station,the applicant will be required to have signs pursuant to State Law to advertise the type and pricing of the fuel. The applicant has indicated that the sign plans will be submitted later in time and in conjunction with construction drawings. Pursuant to TCC Section 9403h, a master sign plan is required for developments in specific plan areas in the City. Accordingly, Condition 1.10 of Resolution 4385 will require the applicant to apply for a Master Sign Program for the property. PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION: A public hearing notice identifying the time, date and location of the public hearing for the project was published in the Tustin News. The applicantlarchitect and property owner as well as property owners within 300-feet of the site were also notified of the hearing by mail. in addition, hearing notices were physically posted at eight(8) locations throughout the property as well as on the City's website. ENVIRONMENTAL: This project is Categorically Exempt from further environmental review pursuant to the CEQA Class 32, "In-Fill Development Projects" in that the project is consistent with the City's General Plan and ETSP and occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five (5) acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. The project site has no value r as habitatfor endangered, rare, or threatened species. The project can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality as follows: Traffic A Traffic Analysis was included with the submittal application which analyzed anticipated trip generation & related impacts, LOS at different intersections and anticipated queueing. A detailed queueing management plan is incorporated into the analysis to accommodate peak demand scenarios at the gasoline station. In addition to the queue management plan, the City has stipulated that during peak demands, three (3) on-site traffic attendants will be present to guide and direct traffic which will mitigate any potential impacts to a less than significant level. Noise Per the TCC, residential properties are designated as Noise Zone 1 and commercial properties are designated Noise Zone 2. Based on these designations, any proposed uses shall be evaluated to ensure that the use not exceed specific noise standards. The PC Report June 11, 2019 CUP 2018-000181DR 2018-00026 Page 11 location of the proposed use is surrounded by an existing retail commercial area and is not located immediately adjacent to any sensitive uses. The nearest residential use is approximately 640-feet to the north (across Bryan Avenue ) and approximately 1,350-feet away to the west of the subject property. As conditioned, any noise generated by the proposed gasoline station, including any construction, would adhere to the Tustin Noise Ordinance and General Plan Noise Element. The proposed gasoline station would be compatible with surrounding uses in that scope of operations would be compatible with other uses in the area. Air Quality The construction and operation of the gas station will operate within the ministerial requirements of the Air District and the project has been conditioned with the applicant obtaining approval from the Air Quality Management District (AQMD) prior to issuance of either building or grading permits. The project will require the issuance of an Authority to Construct (ATC) and Permit to Operate (PTO) based on the Air District's review of the project and will utilize the latest technology to meet all local, state, and federal regulations. All tanks and dispensers are equipped with latest Phase I and Phase 11 Enhanced Vapor Recovery (EVR) vapor recovery air pollution control equipment technology per CARE regulations and associated Executive Orders. The Phase I EVR equipment controls the vapors in the return path from the tanks back to the tanker truck during offloading filling operations. The Stage I EVR systems are 98 percent effective in controlling fugitive emissions from escaping into the environment. The Phase 11 EVR equipment controls the vapors in the return path from the vehicles back to the tanks and are 95 percent effective in controlling fugitive emissions from escaping,into the environment. Water Quality The application for the proposed project included a Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP)and Hydrology Report which addressed and analyzed water quality and on-site drainage. The submitted water quality analysis for the project was reviewed by City staff and demonstrated compliance with the requirements of State Water Quality Regional Control (SWRCB)and other Federal, State and local regulations relative to water quality and drainage. FINDINGS: In determining whether to approve the CUP for the project, the Planning Commission must determine whether the proposed use would be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood, nor be injurious or detrimental to the property and improvements in the neighborhood of the subject property, or to the general welfare of the City of Tustin. PC Report ` June 11, 2019 CUP 2018-000181DR 2018-00026 Page 12 i 1) Pursuant to Section 3.8.2 and 3.7.2.A.1.0 of the ETSP, the Specific Plan allows for service stations with the approval of a CUP. 2) Pursuant to TCC Section 9291 c, the Planning Commission is authorized to act on CUPs and impose conditions deemed necessary to protect the public interest and ensure compliance with the General Plan. 3) The proposed use, as conditioned, would not be detrimental to surrounding properties in that the scope of operations for the proposed service station would be compatible and provide support services for the uses in the area. 4) The proposed use is not anticipated to result in parking impacts since the site provides more than the TCC required number of parking spaces to service the existing shopping center and proposed use. Demolition of the existing Goodyear Tire Center building will be replaced with additional parking spaces that will continue to provide adequate parking for the shopping center. 5) The proposed use is not anticipated to result in queueing or circulation impacts as the project has two (2) queue management plans incorporated into the Traffic Analysis to accommodate potential queueing demands. If queues cannot 'be adequately managed by the strategies in the plan, closure of the northbound right turn lane with retractable bollards and re-routing of customers to the next parking aisle will be implemented. In addition to the queuing management plans, the project has been conditioned to provide three (3) on-site .traffic attendants to guide and direct traffic. Through a combination of queueing plans and manned personal for traffic guidance, the use will not impact circulation on the site or within the existing shopping center. 6) The proposed project, as conditioned, adequately addresses anticipated off-site traffic impacts through the installation of a new westbound right tum lane along EI Camino Real into the Costco Warehouse parking lot at the intersection of Auto Center Drive and EI Camino 'Real and lane restriping along El Camino Real to accommodate the new vehicle lane. 7) The proposed use, as conditioned, would not create a noise impact on the surrounding neighborhood since the service station would be subject to the Tustin Noise Ordinance and General Plan Noise Element. 8) The construction and operation of the gasoline station will operate within the ministerial requirements of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and the project has been conditioned to comply with SCAQMD air quality standards and all required permits. A PC Report June 11, 2019 CUP 2018-000181DR 2018-00026 Page 13 9) The proposed use would not be detrimental to the surrounding properties in that the hours of operation of the instruction would be consistent with the general business hours of other businesses within the surrounding vicinity. In deter-pining whether to approve the DR for the project, the Planning Commission must determine whether it can be found, that the size, architectural features and general appearance of the proposal will not impair the orderly and harmonious development of the area, the present or future development therein, or the occupancy as a whole. A decision to approve this request may be supported by the following findings: 1) The location, size and general appearance of the proposed service station, canopy and equipment enclosure is compatible of the existing structures and surrounding area in that the proposed improvements, including the canopy, is proportionately sized for the site. 2) As conditioned, the applicant will be required to submit a Master Sign Plan. 3) The height, bulk, and area of proposed use is compatible with the existing Costco warehouse building. 4) Setbacks and site planning have been thoroughly evaluated in that the proposed project location, layout and proximity to the existing Costco Warehouse building has been analyzed and the proposed project complies with the requirements established in the ETSP. 5) Exterior material and colors have been reviewed for the proposed project and they are compatible with the existing warehouse building and other retail tenants within the shopping center. 6) Type and pitch of roofs have been reviewed for the proposed project and the proposed roofed canopy over the fuel pumps is compatible with the existing warehouse building and other retail tenants within the shopping center. 7) Landscaping, parking area design and traffic circulation have been reviewed and analyzed in that the project includes a Traffic Analysis that addressed overall on- site circulation. The installation of substantial new landscaping throughout the project area and within the remaining areas_of the existing Costco parking lot will improve and enhance the overall appearance. 8) Location and method of refuse storage has been adequately addressed in that the proposed project does not propose any changes to the existing refuse function and operation. PC Report June 11, 2019 CUP 2018-000181DR 2018-00026 Page 14 9) Physical relationship of proposed structures to existing structures has been evaluated in that the proposed canopy and small equipment will aid in the function of the gasoline station. The canopy will be proportional in height and area to the other buildings on the project site and within the existing shopping center overall. The location of the equipment is ancillary to the gasoline station and will be screened by either a wall and/or landscaping. 10) Appearance and design relationship of proposed structures to existing structures is consistent and compatible in that the proposed columns and colors for the canopy and equipment enclosure will correspond with the exterior of the existing warehouse building. Proposed landscaping will provide consistency throughout the parking lot and enhance the appearance of the proposed use. 11) Development guidelines and criteria for the ETSP Mixed-Use area as well as the City's Service Station Guidelines adopted by the City Council have been reviewed and incorporated into the project. r4En ko , CP El abeth A. Binsack Senior Planner Director of Community Development Attachments: A. Location Map B, Land Use Fact Sheet C. Submitted Plans D. Costco Gas Addition Traffic Analysis E. Queue Management Plan 1 and 2 F. Resolution No. 4385 ATTACHMENT A LOCATION MAP rr rr . rrr • .. �r Iowa;, 1 ' 71 - _ s 4(6 ILJ�?I �} iwrIE71 ���r�i��ly, a u v ATTACHMENT B LAND USE FACT SHEET LAND USE APPLICATION FACT SHEET 1. LAND USE APPLICATION NUMBER(S): DR 2018-000261CUP 2018-00018 2. LOCATION: EXISTING GOODYEAR TIRE CENTER BLDG. AND COSTCO WAREHOUSE SITE 3. ADDRESS: 2541 &2655 EL CAMINO REAL 4. APN(S): 500-185-05/500-185-04 5. PREVIOUS APPLICATION RELATING TO THIS PROPERTY: 1992-AMENDMENT TO THE EAST TUSTIN DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (ORD. NO. 1082) /MODIFICATION TO SECTOR 12 CONCEPT PLAN/APPROVAL OF VTTM 14610 • SUBDIVIDED 23.9 ACRE SITE INTO SIX(6) NUMBERED LOTS FOR 274,175 SF RETAIL COMMERCIAL CENTER • INCLUDED TWO MAJOR RETAIL TENANTS (COSTCO& K-MART)AND FIVE INDIVIDUAL PAD TENANTS 6. SURROUNDING LAND USES: NORTH: RESIDENTIAL SOUTH: COMMERCIAL EAST: COMMERCIAL WEST: COMMERCIAL 7. SURROUNDING ZONING DESIGNATION: NORTH: PC RES--PLANNED COMMUNITY RESIDENTIAL SOUTH: PCMU-PLANNED COMMUNITY MIXED USE WEST: PC COMM-PLANNED COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL EAST: PCMU-PLANNED COMMUNITY MIXED USE S. SURROUNDING GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: NORTH: PCR-PLANNED COMMUNITY RESIDENTIAL SOUTH: PLANNED COMMUNITY COMM ERCIAUBUSINESS (PCCB) EAST: PLANNED COMMUNITY COMM ERCIAUBUS[NESS (PCCB) WEST: PCR-PLANNED COMMUNITY RESIDENTIAL 9. SITE LAND USE: A. EXISTING: COSTCO WAREHOUSE, COSTCO PARKING LOT, GOODYEAR TIRE RETAIL STORE AND GOODYEAR PARKING AREA(APPROX. 3.5 TOTAL ACRES) B. PROPOSED: DEMOLISH EXISTING GOODYEAR TIRE CENTER BLDG. &ADJACENT PARKING AREA AND REPLACE WITH NEW PARKING STALLS AND LANDSCAPING, DEMOLISH PORTIONS OF EXISTING COSTCO PARKING LOT AND EXISTING PARKING STALLS AND THE ADDITION AND INSTALLATION OF 16 FUEL PUMPS AND ASSOCIATED LANDSCAPING. C. GENERAL PLAN: PLANNED COMMUNITY COMMERCIAUBUSINESS PCCB PROPOSED GP: SAME D. ZONING (500-185-051500-1.85-04): PC-MU (PLANNED COMMUNITY-MIXED USE PROPOSED ZONING: SAME DEVELOPMENT FACTS: 10. LOT AREA 10.77 AC APPROX. (COSTCO SITE WIBUILDING AREA: 120,920 SF) 1.02 AC APPROX. (GOODYEAR SITE/BUILDING AREA: 9,136 SF) 11. PARKING: Parking Parking Required (per TCC) Provided Costco 544 605 Kmart 474 530 Pad B 37 32 Pad C 37 32 McDonalds 18 55 Total Parking 1110 1254 1254 STALLS PROVIDED, REQUIRED PARKING: 1110 STALLS (TCC) 12. SITE ACCESS: THERE ARE FOUR (4) VEHICULAR ACCESS POINTS FOR THE SITE. PRIMARY ENTRY AND EXIT POINTS FOR THE SITE ARE PROVIDED BY 46-FOOT WIDE BRYAN AVE DRIVEWAY, WHICH IS SIGNALIZED, AND A 50-FOOT-WIDE DRIVEWAY OFF EL CAMINO REAL AT AUTO CENTER DRIVE THAT IS ALSO SIGNALIZED. 13. PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS: DEMOLISH EXISTING GOODYEAR TIRE CENTER BUILDING & ADJACENT PARKING AREA AND REPLACE WITH NEW PARKING STALLS AND LANDSCAPING. ADDITION AND INSTALLATION OF 16 NEW FUEL PUMPS FOR NEW GASOLINE STATION WITH LANDSCAPING. ATTACHMENT C SUBMITTED PLANS All 1111HH1 MW Ij CL m � Q � CLMe � fd .a>1 i I1I � .'t .) rl{�— - \S ly'O`er.`--#_♦ SG 4� yr� i S, i i�ls5 r t r� 1 -�� I ^a �pf g Fr -•. 5I _ J Thi,: iij`'<� •sem '4,�, \vI I , _ F' = I �� baa raI O ,zy �I` - —• �4 F—/�p+�_f �� i i i i O E. ho a 1+w [=J i -!',�. rte-- ` �_ — -1jai �ffl t`©� 411,i T7 ' ..�r•1 4 1 EG F � paG 6'� l"��=���_�_.�—..-.....�_._..—.....-.....—. 1� I A i f i i 1 �•. 2 � YLJ .� i II _ If 11 I I I I����I 0 I' } � :I ' 1 I I I o# I f ! lady �,� � �� `1U) i �, I � R � �_ _ �. I ��I I I I � ¢ � r �p��g��l Poo IE t5 -9b duo El El r U S. I El El ==jI Sa `5 z 1.h 'p F '' I I I I',]Il,i_J.,�..,�,�❑� rI-�I - �I,,IIIIIilIIII1V`s4�3 � � — - ------W - -UVONIH�FIdZfM15f11_- wa s S H t 5 � 0 $ 13RIMC A30011� � Wao . I •�,,r 1 ��. 'T>h. II I I I � i i i1�ll l k il�!<.I 1 �I i I _ IJ ' I 1� l R -1� i -� - - - - - II L� r', as i �j3r VU W1 IT LL 3 � !I I 16 8 �— -� _�-'-�k I r_ ___ _I '�-i•-�% � Ci-- dt I I� . r N � ��.�!� 1IT I �- l I !I', I I 77. �L. l moi, , III o W A ', , I I I cn { f 'W„ WiWHP Aff I 1 tiEI , z P-4 14 I U- :1 1I f' i J --o � - -- -- �_', I I , kl 1--- OFUSE U F ` �_� QVD9 HIS f y ;� •13NMf�gVN3�01N13 �� �� ❑ ;� 1 I f I II ;IIID ' w IL , Ell t � IL ul W I: f� ul ♦ ._.c—.a 11 , - 1 i I' ; �-� _ I I� ;� ;ter '•' _ 1 , 1 s li I«v It I wig— � �411�}III (f r {� i� 4�.��i� u'1��1 I�I i�!T17 ���T�� .�I •� i �;+I ' J; llfitP, I tI} # �� y i a �Tf`i( fl i � flll�f k 1� I IIi1TE Tla I I it �I zo JII�]I If Ij,7�� O 41 U h 1 I�"Lw 4 « — — — —--, Cl) c' � +I fI II'I =.1 I I I _ I.. j —J I L i f � i I 00 '� f / @: •• _.__ _.____ ______. ——— —_ —— I Er Wa ui J 0 t 1 —1---4-------+-- -+----}-_a--• t � 1 1 =-_ _ '� +_ r 1 �x-----{ Al— 1 t o I ! 1 1 1 I I I 1 I +n I t o R 1 1 1 r 1 1 1 1 1 a 1 1 1 1 1 r 1 1 ,• 1 1 1 1 I - - F It `� e l i 3 i i i i i• �" _ 1 1 ` _ 1 —t t � a i i I 7 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 ■ "T'"T I � TI -. _.__ ? _ _._i. �� T.. .�. _. �.. .f_.T-• .lo a3l3d33N I j --- -- uiui W/1 KEEP CLEAR —,' •, C�O C7 0 �- �. 0 !rIEL= a ! r �� 1" � a 1-8 =�a _ A r `S~ss . R i( _- �I�—II—^- J_L1 � a f 1 / yT�Jf § H a ---`- !` .. I T _ , II i , Y I I IZZ) IZZ) "I ,1 i iI. - T•-Y I j �`• S 1 1 6 1 [ 1 1 1- f 1 1 I` I n� 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 A II I I �I I LL[ eygyj I {� i IN 1. ! I .1 lip Liji KEEP CLEAR Z LL In � � s����� � o,..•i I i U j $ � � A ■ ❑ , | . _ §! ` S ■ ( Sill � § I � � § � J_ , ) to § | � � 2 § W. ! | °> ' . % \ 2' § ƒ FM k� | @ � § \ f ) § bR.- Lu> �. . ) §§ | | | _ twig ! ` E ( § , C ECK LU . §§§ � - . © � ■ | \ � - ` � - -- �§===3=== �-\ / <_ < §� • o � ---- - _ - 301 � 9 | §| 01 % a: < � i % | \ | z 2 �� 0 k m =q 2 CLL § LL . ` . . uj v cn Q Wa W cn LU _- z � J U Q CJ F z W LU ti z © zo A. o Y L a s G Q AYYMIMTaW ItU '. 6UY1/►0 m-.�..�..�. F3 1wp y 0 y R�G'r3i Vl Z 11T j7L � W S (Rte +,r. � ' // S 1,111111 13 UJ Fy .� 9q Egg I 43 It 7 'r , t e I Ord ig tit .4 it i if _ y, gg7c � � �tj� h� N 3�ks ,� =� a.�$ � 8f lit bill a ails i �F4° ae rya 01al ill pill m h 3 yg� j ijiCp g t` L 666 a ay 3k few a s Fl a ' Q q ylit eg litwi c 4 �m Y�I , X11 ' =a � � o i 3 w + R 6� € r a eg gni111 bt t a r a R ! rs.s a' I II gt 39 Jill E i " i8 a 3 Pi L go � aT l �+ E a. it f � it : I 5B j1111 �yH 5a� �gyyS ia� ii3 s I ii PIS igllg; ` §8 �,� _ 4ya mg e is! : � € 14i &I MINI six 19 � H � y s $� €h� iIN Y @ 4 iia bIt l fi5 rIto m a Fifa all 4111 [1v s tit 3 " i f � 4z a 55 '-' a"® � mei � y ■ 8 e N � ? ry °r a WWWWR4 Wk 1 ---1 6U9L/1,0 Fb tj I- - ---- - - - --- - - - - --- - --- --- cm MJQAArL Jr m mmm mm mm IF1S m m=I"mm m m m mm it Lu -4, LU = .. - Lu LU MAI - / ' _--- _ F it —1 i !�((( -�— , i a 1= --------- Ir CD uj 1 Illi-`, -1 W :!4 19 I I I'l I F'FflTITI 141 I Ag di Axa Hce �m 6L/9100 - "_ �a-._..�.._.+A he 4• YI t— _p� _� _:.iii , ' � • 4 � � � � �i ✓ �� - �� , _ I u-� aha& I n 1{11$ [ � .— ~ L + iy I �� B� � •' F �� 666— t JM 1 f+ 1 ii��l� '..) til I � XL1 �9 `i y�� IG'�t-1• _.. ' 11 V W• 1 I e i., .��•'1 4 f_ I€I 3if n If Ld <11 47 Hr x_ in fv 1 .4 ',[MVNIw{l3tld NlrAWMW M 1 6119M I z „ i A ry u Air, . 1� W' 1-2 •j31 -13NNVHa VN34OW-13 !�i3 j Ar ui *9 EMS 401-4m Maw 4 k I "v i s j,�, I •`� I � � I� p , G I Y�r f I J 4 r 1 Gi 4 ua I F r 1 iF 77-1 I 1 I i { 9 133HS 33S A741tlINi a RD!, "'^•'�•m+nn a+ - '6vglao° S (7 N Z y V 4133}[5335 Y V tam AA iz a '�I I •� ns i hili '',�' � tt � I �I I � 4.'t1 I I ySr:: Lz ;.` we ifl L � I.�t � ' } }` a\ ��•� _ �.-`�—_� g+ �E �3�.6 ,'r _ �s ;.e; lh�� ; i l'I 2 t G I �'s� { � •I ,�`� �amuwvr mJ � . it 4 � a ��ilL�I;� I I '.■ k �1 4.4 5 A. } 1 _ -1-11 WN{WY1 I NL► 61/41/00 Z_ z •R N O - $ v g Sl EY s U 4s� O R,Zr U �i_a Iw- � o E 'S i 0o1.] f�'oo r I63 ' OX Al IG J ➢ 1 1 1 '' �r� ...y M Y` w .� '1'•�'`� =N LU N - '.r-- 11+++ •r'I�t I � I I ( 1 ��__ - �Va�s--^•--�,�.�r^_-_�w..�.v�.� cam: ¢6Q �-� �. � � � i epi� .�� 1 �F�, ! ,•� /�� a�'}, 1 Fi' 1 vi- -t-4t— f ! y r A71tlNIWU38d HiY .6U9VP0 OaM IBMr .1 LIK gN Pag Ji j;sa —T w, /�•� 1 T_ cl Uhl C — =14- NilC J '1!:fi:i?i! SR i! riftS ��sqE i? i :'.H i e � 3 es ppq jii.i.•: •:x :.:•:;....il °e g 2 � {� g �� F� � il:'•i: J:::�:iil{;.:8:1!:iAi{. � a�■ � �s ya � y �@ � �pa ��� 1 . �l:x_.11Y� W . lu Eg'� il.'. NN �a ql �b �� � 1! Y BS�� eyF Q B 4B5 :Jiijilli ;—Illy::'lift t p it In: 111,! . $deSEe 4$ v_e�{iS�9a �p3z E�'e94 i{iI;;ii.I{::1'•i•::a'•ii::�...i.:�t::l':,ti!!!i.g•::,iJ.:.�!lJ:•�.'::!ix!J�l',�i{Iui.�i.ix jNhi, E �5S .' i.:; q IL A. ::::r. �eE ��fe111 3i ��i111 O . 41 :1 g ILA �:@k@ $o t ' a� i , x � E�6 E O = 3g 10 E 3 � 6 '6 a {' y •{... l:::n:. qR F aLy bio �g ii:q,i,;.y i lS a � F�i3 b 11 .4 U yb 5 l::i:1 ':ya Xe pEUL [: �q �E EJp I:m•I::..•:i;ti.,::i�: � i �� ���. a �: 6 � 3 W E ���'�'�� qq g F �:':d�id:p:i I l:.w;•:{j°i de A 1011, 55, N N ~ !$ 5 ESS @ E�@�I y�� E� 3.'dTNlwr}-]dd H_Y+ bl'9LJ p 13NNVH3 VN300A-13ioIII z I x - t; � LLJ I , . ♦ + Ir Y I IE I _ , a w 1 ,1 t 4 � � I Y �7 6133H5 335 AYYNTMTM Fitt w e'�".su;, 6119 voam ——.,.. .-- - B J.93}i5 335 j i � � ��� o l�' ��fa'� i •� �� �ti� �'' �i qui I ! � � a 111..,,_y I �� •'/�F�.'4 rv� 1�'�'. �f`,rr r �kd� ,--�yry��.��,' �y 5{ � p 32�_rn •„3.41 �� I . 1 iLr� 57 f_..fir.. {i-F1,� I/ E I r£ I I I �-. _ �/ � .. t �� I �,¢ p � `-•�s -p— ff ; I I I rrt d! '_,..•'� , i i 11Y��1` `�i 4r4 I iI I i I b —� i I �/�...,�Ir r i I..s•.-:y li I/ I 4 1 - � � IS I I; r� I I /�r �-".•—s=�� I 1°;4 fir. I T;. I I }!Fr V C1� !I- •=z- _i�a >x3�:`fi.�.r—t - Y� .i ;` I i� 4 e .j I �'• r I�1 't - �' Y f 'b - 4 4" it I F1� ` .+.f� �r/' �1 t I I 4 4�p �j �Z�,,• g��b� ���,JI•-..;F, i 1yrE �� Iw ��:� .A � 's •.'�` :s..� r"� i� 111888 1 �•'"�� :' '�° { 7�-���.� (� � ISE �3 II Ci4 r{r u I r � Ilp � — 1 a I' -fit •}�� �ial�l I P 4� IL Iac 12 I ] I ,•I I I� Y� I �: I Isf 93 is �I. B' a IDI tA a F i •. I ' 1T_Il� .� ■ G�i� yx�gb�i# ea I r P �Yr ra c G.� r 21. 7 � t di R —.e..— -. --- I'• C 3 iI Erg it All I r _ � 93 . It , ` �• ^II ii t M a 2sY Yi _•li �. r e d'} i �1!A yyeF�t L� ' l 8j a �EY �� j ) pi l �s 7 !a lid- i■ pr z qa `� ti # r p�^_ I� Y a {�,k•j 9 �' �ia�i�1°c"S: Y� s e ISI ,• i ,.- �g & ? 2s �'. e - ji, yg .� x r f4xi 11 �� Ejyly1l5z ' •fiI E� t ; . at 4 � ,�eRF13FsFt4r � AMVNIWi73Md FIL► 61l9 F/V0� ,,..v w:....wR.< u..,e9..n� a ilk ESe Eiji 981 n e o Ejig $ g 5ei ff 4 s s r p AhirVp S 1 s 14 a s g$� 3eLs ��_eeB�a�v +} 1 ' ' � 9-'�'1 �� 3 - ^� •:u: -. Y it 'ill. ,r, 'x� _I___��,s :_. ��' r.�.'_4 k �, �,�� L'-' • r , 1 j c �'� ,ter'_" _ r-':- @• � �3 �3� I Vim I gig id INA Gt`--- - ` _' --=-•ate--�-—_-1�� i ��3� '�i? ��k��a ffi` C� gg I r., L`. 1 ~{ -I• �r , r '�gao@ , ^ 19a ad QCg� 1 A 1 '� l_� _ __�` ' �: - �� i F � 1' i���"-iii,ii:9'iu:ir.�'!'ii.•i !.T � Wit ��� � I ` ! i::11'li!,;kl�•!�'� .11:1 �:II ! l::!:: -I1 1 i l qi 1 !!i„:il:�l , 'IT ! �'�� � F - 1!i'ri!il•aj`i!�ii�a°.ij;•!i!i . AHMMIMU M11r - vsrruxa wasp 51l911T° W��Giw.si•��-u-�a�v[iy-em«nan.eM1 g 0 d aigm _ pi os ggs S W H=s eee IN. R -IR _ I °s -a �: Fggg:111 gya I � aY $ p� ` s ? - G e a L: o� FIC�k 2 px � ISL ' p ¢ z1 r !'y9 • t ,fgug ry� � r �� 13NNVND VNXM 13 L -7—Fil _ a E 0 s W a a I I I F i 0 fWrLJ� VJ I u� •I RFU , 1 1�� G o i b 4 I I y n m; I 711T d I W � I � LL — • j 11 � � � I Q Q FV =%=li 12P1 Q 9 9,y a � F-- - - -- -- -- - -- - W 12 _ Z$ZU Y7".W'ura I I r . �aas�.W Y a�+w �,"LI 85170'.i3NY11 r/i 1 � � —- - - � mal•�-y A8.I31eOJAlld `AQ�FI�I I � A.LPII343.7�3 I f R OA9 �rill _ w .w Ald' e'�'K i.w��ro��a��ae�•v�utli6 �y vb Boil czrs 1 sazoa xna wLLnnmvj arm q"csza= DUTURnn MJ=?w.axa a3xtrz4ns W4 z � � •f -� k •1 i• • t n 3 11 I t , I $ 1 �, lilil! J o c i 4; . . n e! U -lig �� W O cc ! f g i UJI 7 � 5" •,; LU jLU _ U) ■ Aw a Y. d li 1 w _ 4 W .1 W W .__...... .. + _ W W � �: J z � � z o LU T J En L N W y w o 6 wI jV Z W b W 6 y § p N M 0) V _ C? 9 • VC cy) { � al Z ° N � W w d ,. w V w a P k •k �� 4M f'FI w w J Ir = v U o d V C U p U.'V M- ATTACHMENT D COSTCO GAS ADDITION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES r�z , MEMORANDUM «,,tp April 17, 2019 Project#; 23472 T,, Krys Saldivar, City of Tustin Public Works Manager—Traffic/Transportation Cc- Diana Salazar, Costco Wholesale Warehouse Terry Odle, MG2 Frame Neelam Dorman & Michael Sahimi, Kittelson & Associates, Inc ProjectTustin Ranch Costco Fuel Station Addition Subject: Final —Traffic Analysis Kittelson & Associates, Inc. (KAI) has prepared this updated traffic analysis memorandum for the proposed addition of a Costco Gasoline fuel station to the existing Tustin Ranch Costco Warehouse on EI Camino Real in Tustin, California. The initial traffic analysis was submitted in February 2019 based on initial scoping discussions with City of Tustin (City) engineering and planning staff.The traffic analysis was updated based on comments provided by the City. The following topics are discussed in this memorandum: • Proposed Development • Trip Generation • Intersection Level of Service Analysis • Intersection Queuing Analysis • Fuel Area Layout and Stacking Analysis • Parking Analysis • Fuel Delivery Truck Site Circulation PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Costco is proposing to build a Costco Gasoline fuel station on the southeastern portion of the parking lot of their EI Camino Real location.The site for the fuel station is currently Costco Warehouse parking,which will be relocated to the west in place of the existing Goodyear service facility (to be demolished). The Tustin Ranch Costco Gasoline fuel station will consist of four islands (sixteen dispensers) with a total of thirty-two (32) vehicle fueling positions. The site plan for the proposed Costco Gasoline fuel station is provided in Figure I. FIIENAME•H:123123472- TUS7INRANCH GAS ADDITIONIRFPOR71DRAFT123412 COSTCOGASADDT170NTRAFFIC ANA PSIS 0415201 Y.00CX u m O jf _ 44) a J �� •� �wd ❑ li aqf: 13NWHO 03"13 I I 0. LLJ , i ♦el b y L _ I 1 1 - - 2 ' a — � 4 — I' a g(�"s i�7. d7i �— --i'� ♦g 113 1 u S ri y I 1111 .xr � y y d I =7- El _ e El: El 14 all , ui El I 1 T5 ❑ noI El Fo n O El El -- - � I ❑ LU ggzSy�r OVMJ HO if NliSRl I CL 'l 8 s www 8 Tustin Ranch Costco Fuel Station Addition Project#:13472 April 17,2019 Page 3 TRIP GENERATION The methodology for the estimated trip generation for the project is outlined in the Costco Specific Trip Generation Information memorandum (updated December 26, 2018). Table 1 presents the estimated trip generation for the proposed Costco gas addition. The internal capture, pass-by and diverted trip adjustments applied have been approved by City staff. Table 1:Costco Gasoline Peak Hour Trip Generation Characteristics 'Costco Gasoline Fuel Size Weekday . . Station (positions) Total Trip Ends 32 346 615 (50/50 split) Internal Trips(34%PM) - 209 Total External Trips 346 406 Pass-by Trips(33%AM,37%PM) 114 150 Diverted Trips(43%AM,37°a PM) 149 150 Total Net New Costco Trips 83 106 Evaluating the trip impact of the proposed Costco Gasoline fuel station must account for the fact that it will replace an existing use on site,the Goodyear tire facility. Table'2 presents the net new trips for the proposed project with existing trip credit for the existing Goodyearservice facility applied.When applying the existing trip credit,the net new trips for the proposed project would be 58 trip ends in the a.m. peak hour and 70 trip ends in the p.m. peak hour. This represents on average approximately one additional net new trip into or out of the site each minute during peak periods, as compared to existing conditions. Table 2:Overall New Trip Differential (Utilizing Existing Trip Credit) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Scenario Total Total Project Trips 83 106 Existing Trip Credit -25 -36 Net New Project Trips 58 70 Trip Distribution and Assignment The traffic volumes figures provided in Appendix 1 show Existing traffic volumes, Project trip assignment, and Existing Plus Project traffic volumes. New Project trips were assigned to the roadway network based on travel patterns determined from the existing turning movements at the site access points. Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Orange,California Tustin Ranch Costco Fuel Station Addition Project 11:23472 April 17,2019 Page 4 For example, the existing outbound volumes at the intersection of Auto Center Drive & EI Camino Real inform the percentage of outbound Project trip turn movements at intersection. The driveway assignment was also traced through the intersection of Tustin Ranch Road & EI Camino Real. Existing traffic volumes were not collected at the right-in/right-out driveway on Tustin Ranch Road as this location was not a study location identified by the City. It was assumed that five percent of inbound and outbound project trips would use that driveway,.based on the directional distribution of existing traffic volumes at the surrounding intersections. INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS Based on discussion with City staff, the following study locations were evaluated for weekday a.m. and p.m. conditions: • Market Street & Bryan Avenue (Project Driveway) • Tustin Ranch Road & El Camino Real • Auto Center Drive& EI Camino Real (Project Driveway) Level of service (LOS) associated with the project are discussed below. Existing traffic volume data was collected for the weekday a.m. and p.m, peak hours on Wednesday, November 28, 2018, Geometric improvements at Tustin Ranch Road & EI Camino Real would be in place at time of Project opening and have thereby been assumed to be in place in the traffic analyses presented below. In addition,the Project would provide a dedicated westbound right turn lane into the site at Auto Center Drive&EI Camino Real. The study intersections were analyzed using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology, consistent with City of Tustin standards. Under the ICU methodology, the critical movement and critical movement capacity of an intersection are used to calculate a volume-to-capacity (V/C) ratio. After the V/C ratio is calculated, the ICU methodology assigns a LOS grade (A to F) representing the quality of intersection operations,with LOS F signifying volumes exceeding capacity.LOS grades and corresponding V/C ratios under the ICU methodology are provide in Table 3.The maximum acceptable level of service for the study intersections is LOS D. Table 3: Intersection Level of Service and ICU Values Level of Service Maximum:ICU Value A 0.60 B 0.70 C 0.80 D 0.90 E 1.00 F Above 1.00 Kittelson&Assocrotes,Inc. Orange,California Tustin Ranch Costco Fuel Station Addition Project 1l:23472 April I7,2019 Page 5 Based on the analysis methodology,the results for the Existing and Existing Plus Project LOS for the study intersections is shown in Table 4.All study intersections operate acceptably at LOS A and B under Existing and Existing Plus Project conditions. Table 4:Existing and Existing Plus Project LOS i Existing Existing Plus Project # Peak Intersection Control ncrease Hour ICU LOS ICU LOS Market St.& AM 0.29 A 0.36 A 0.07 1 Bryan Ave. Signal PM 0.43 A 0.49 A 0.06 2 Tustin Ranch Rd. Signal AM 0.68 B 0.69 B 0.01 & El Camino Real' g PM 0.60 A 0.60 A 0.00 Auto Center Dr. & AM 0.27 A 0.28 A 0.01 3 EI Camino Real Signal PM 0.47 A 0.47 A 0.00 Note:1.Planned and funded intersection improvements at this location are assumed under Existing Conditions. INTERSECTION QUEUING ANALYSIS In addition to the LOS analysis presented above, queues were reviewed for the turn lanes at the Project driveways to determine if signal timing adjustments or additional storage would be required. This includes the outbound left and right turn lanes (northbound left and right turn lanes) and inbound left turn lane (westbound left turn lane) at the intersection of Market Street & Bryan Avenue. The analysis was conducted using Synchro traffic analysis software and signal timing data provided by the City. For the intersection of Auto Center Drive & EI Camino Real, outbound left and right turn lanes (southbound left and right turn lanes)and inbound left turn lane(eastbound left turn lane).Table 5 shows the 95th percentile queues for Existing and Existing Plus Project conditions. As shown in the table, the existing northbound left and northbound right queues (queues out of the Project site) exceed available storage at the intersection of Market Street & Bryan Avenue during the existing p.m. peak hour. Both queues are expected to increase with the addition of project trips. As shown in the table,the available storage for the northbound left turn at Market Street&Bryan Avenue is 105 feet and 60 feet for the northbound right turn; this is the distance from the intersection to the intersection of the closest drive aisle. The total storage available along Market Street is approximately 335 feet. Northbound queues during the p.m. peak hour can be reduced by optimizing signal timing. By updating the cycle length to 60 seconds from the current 103.5 seconds and increasing the northbound maximum split from 19 seconds to 23 seconds,the northbound left turn and right turn 95th percentile queues can be decreased to 113 feet and 42 feet,respectively.The queue for the northbound left turn would exceed capacity by 8 feet. Please note that the storage capacity of 105 feet is defined by the location an internal drive aisle intersection,the full storage along Market Street is 335 feet therefore the 113 foot queue can Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Orange,California Tustin Howh Costco Fue!Station Addition Project#,234,2 Apoi 17,2019 Page 6 be accommodated with causing significant impacts to on-site circulation. Recommended maximum splits for each movement are as follows: • Northbound left/right: 23 seconds • Eastbound through: 26 seconds • Westbound through: 37 seconds • Westbound left: 11 seconds All other queuing movement were found to have sufficient storage under both Existing and Existing Plus Project conditions. Table 5: Existing and Existing Plus Project Queuing Results Available Existing Plus # Intersection Movement Storage Peak Hour Existing Project Increase NBL 105 AM 30 62 32 PM 120 #180 60 1 Market St. & NBR 60 AM 19 30 11 Bryan Ave. PM 62 108 46 WBL 260 AM 44 90 46 PM 100 138 38 AM 18 33 15 SBL 105 PM 54 65 11 Auto Center Dr. AM 0 12 12 3 & El Camino SBR 95 Real PM 30 31 1 AM 9 19 10 EBL 200 PM 37 52 14 AM - 0 - WBR 155 — PM #134 #signifies that 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer. Bold signifies queue that exceeds storage length. FUEL AREA LAYOUT AND STACKING ANALYSIS The proposed fuel station is in the southeastern portion of the parking lot. This location was selected because it is farthest away from the main entry and has sufficient land area to allow for the four dispenser wide by four dispenser deep Southern California gas layout. One other location was previously looked at by Costco which put the gas station on the Goodyear site Costco is purchasing (Preliminary Review Site Plan figure provided in Appendix 1). The site area only allowed for a three dispenser wide by three dispenser deep gas layout. This gas layout is too small for Kittelson&Associates,inc- orange,Collfornio Tustin Ranch Costco Fuel Station Addition Project N:23472 April 17,2019 Page 7 this market. The site also was not large enough to allow for the gas delivery truck to be out of the members stacking and dispensing area. The proposed layout of the fuel station has vehicles entering on the east and exiting to the west. This layout directs traffic further into the site to reduce effects on the EI Camino Real. Flipping the layout would have vehicles entering from the west and exiting to the east which would have vehicles queuing towards the signalized driveway and EI Camino Real.The City of Tustin requested Costco look at another option to keep the location of the gas station at the most southern portion of the site but rotate it 90 degrees. This north-south layout was analyzed in detail (Analyzed Alternative Site Plan figure provided in Appendix 1). This alternative layout of the fuel station has vehicles entering on the north and existing to the south. This alternative layout creates major conflict between the Costco Warehouse receiving truck maneuvering area and the queue area at the fuel station. In addition, the queue length for this alternative is only 82 feet which is below Costco's minimum queue length area of 100 feet. This layout would also have 27 less parking stalls than the proposed fuel station layout. Based on the analysis, this alternative layout was not selected. The proposed fuel addition would provide a total of 32 fueling positions.The queueing area beyond the pumps extending toward the parking area measures approximately 110 feet in depth. Figure 2 illustrates the queue storage area which holds 32 vehicles in queue in addition to the 32 vehicles at the fueling positions. Vehicular queuing data has been collected at other representative Costco Gasoline fueling station sites to provide reliable information related to the anticipated queues for the proposed station. For purposes of this analysis, Costco Gasoline queuing data collected in 2016 and 2017 was gathered from six Costco Gasoline sites each having 22 or more fueling positions. Table 6 summarizes the four comparable locations. Observed queues were reported for maximum, average, and 95th percentile scenarios during both the Weekday PM peak hour and during a Weekend Midday peak. The 95th percentile queue is defined to be the queue length (in vehicles) that has only a 5-percent probability of being exceeded during the analysis time period. The industry standard methodology for queuing analysis considers the 95th percentile queues. Table 6:Costco Gasoline Stacking Observations Location Dates Collected Size. Weekday PM Peak Queue Weekend Midday Peak Queue (Pu-ps) Min Max Average 951h Min M ax Average 951, Tustin ll,CA 7/28/16&7/30/16 22 11 35 26 34 14 38 29 35 Rohnert Park,CA 8/18/16&8/20/16 24 0 8 3 7 0 22 8 16 Concord,CA 8/25/16&8/27/16 24 0 10 3 8 11 32 19 28 NE San Jose,CA 2/9/17&2/11/17 24 6 6 1 3 10 31 20 29 Temecula,CA 12/8/2018& 30 0 24 11 18 5 26 16 22 12/11/2018 Average 25 3 17 9 14 8 30 18 26 Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Orange,California Tustin Ranch Costco Fuel5tation Addition Project#.23472 April 17,2019 Page 8 As shown in Table 6,the highest recorded 95th percentile queue was 35 vehicles observed at the Tustin 11 Costco Gasoline site during the Weekend Midday peak period while the lowest 95th percentile queue was 16 vehicles and was observed at both the Rohnert Park Costco Gasoline sites. The average 95th percentile queue for all four sites is 26 vehicles. Within the fuel station area,stacking space is provided for 40 vehicles. Therefore, 95th percentile as well as maximum observed queue of 35 vehicles can be accommodated. With the 32 vehicles fueling at the pump, a total of 72 vehicles can be accommodated without interfering with site operations. Please note that recent data collection at the Temecula Costco site which was recently expanded to 30 fueling positions shows a maximum queue of 26 vehicles. Similar to the number of open cash registers at a grocery store, having more fueling positions available to serve members reduces the number of vehicles that have to wait in the queue.The same is anticipated at the Tustin Ranch site which is proposed to have 32 fueling positions. The fuel station would be equipped with a red-light/green-light system to indicate which pump was open and available to the next person in line. This system improves station efficiency and helps shorten lines of waiting members. In addition, CostcoPay would be in place at the fuel station.The CostcoPay system provides members with a key-chain fob that contains membership and secure payment information. Using the fob instead of membership and credit cards reduces time at the pumps by approximately 35 seconds per transaction.The implementation of both these devices would help reduce time at the pumps which in turn reduces queues. Although not expected,a queue management plan was developed for rare occurrences if the fuel station queues extend beyond the designated queue area. This plan is illustrated in Figure 3 and includes the following measures: 0 Using cones/delineators limit access to the fuel station from the north entry.This would provide additional queueing space for vehicles in the north-south drive aisle. If queues cannot be managed by the strategy shown in Figure 3, the northbound right turn into the parking aisle adjacent to the fuel station would be closed using bollards or similar retractable device to route members to the next parking aisle to provide more queuing area prior to affecting street operations (shown in Figure 4). Both queue strategies would be implemented when the queue reaches the fuel station exit. In addition, and as requested by the City, a second attendant would also be on-site at the fuel station when queues exceed the fuel station area. It is important to note that the additional demand and resultant queuing shown in Figure 3 and 4 is not anticipated with the fuel station addition and is shown only to illustrate how the management plan would operate under extreme/unusual conditions. Implementation of this plan under such circumstances will effectively minimize the impacts of queued vehicles and limit impacts to parking supply, retain appropriate access and onsite circulation. Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Orange,California I LLLLLLJ v .6-.6£ .0£ 191 r I r 1 1 f 1r 1 W. , ., .I I• r , 1 � I w •r . r 1. :•1 �• ::1 1 , vFih � 4 � I LU LU - 1 � - cu Z) --,M-- r e i . 'ti i i c7 Of LU j A I I co tH310 d31 _ i� I ca C+7 �9U 1 KEEP 1O1 4C � O O J I 4) 6 C, LL. Ln as , w, �,, =---y _ z Li - _ E 0 F- ' ;- '.,•fes.-o --- z CL E �"-, { (A Q CID Lofw In o 7 ui LOW 0 iJ-9�14�ra4r1 aJjlmawwmf-66'6 610.'91 AV eMPs:9 Oun unsnl FL6£I\£[\'H 1 1 i I — ---- I co m LL - .r ® EMIDf l I I I c ro R- L J � O ro i,.. r C2I + 4 4 I n, u N £ 1 1 1 ! E e � zi Ln 1911 LO QW 1 11 .1 •1' 'F 1 1 1 I z U I � •1� ' 7-10 - .9 9 �L 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I l t l l l cn 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ( 1 1 1 Q C t ° 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 cn ul ... I � , W J C 0 iu C14 D —w— 1 A_• _1i,, is_ 1 yyyJJ1 I Q I _0 Of uj — `� � .�` •�..� _1 ' 1 �.1 .1� V I � I -gyp J - TUU.-f LLLJJJ����• .-.�,LLL��� ( '''t Il � I Q S —w av310 d3 1 ! I u ol t[)^} I _0 Ifs£ +?� I m "' 9ZL o co fI D KEEP CLEA p � D io I q W a Z j U IIII V' 4£ — v s.,. V. C7 F•' —+ I Q7 C Q z (n ril w n a _ X � w � l -D WQ W IL U7 U m Q V ---.- ' - u V) fi -------_... to V+Yan Arl agwawwosf.wcbv'fi 6Io?'91+dV Smp ainSi3-8uenanp-7l Ffi1ssigi4x3\u9isapluarPPPvsty4 u*a vgsnl 7GYEd�EZ�N M Nhl, inn ig fm V-1 c to C6 I 1 + 1 1 ZQ C us Q.J X V I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 W p 1 t t i 1 1 1 i t 1 f r a 1 1 t a • 5 �1 i Ct7 1 16 L Ll I. I Tit I � � _ 1 I o 9' 1 0 v •,- 9 � � L C Qca a �T N CD Z N CL A � , 00'q.i t..A" .1i...... we656 6ta"'9t OV A,.PssmBy'8arn.ntj'ZLVFZ\s�rgr4y 31waraap\uaruPPn:e9 rtauet�uusni.-ZG9€21€LSH Tustin Ranch Costco Fuel Stotion Addition Project#.23472 April 17,2019 Poge 12 PARKING ANALYSIS The proposed site for the fuel station is currently Costco Warehouse parking.To offset the parking lost due to construction of the fuel station, additional Costco Warehouse parking will be provided on the existing Goodyear service facility site which would be demolished as part of the Project. With the proposed Project the number of Costco Warehouse parking spaces would decrease from 623 stalls to 606 stalls. However, the parking provided will stili exceed the City's minimum parking requirement of 544 spaces. In addition, minimum parking requirements for the shopping center as a whole will be met. Shopping center parking requirements and supply by pad are shown in Table 7. Parking spaces abutting the fuel station would be designated for employees to limit interaction with fuel station operations. Table 7: Proposed Shopping Center Parking Supply SupplyPad City Parking Requirement Costco (proposed) 544 606 Kmart 474 530 McDonald's 18 55 Pad 8 37 32 Pad C 37 32 While the City's minimum parking requirements for the shopping center as a whole will be met, there are also opportunities for shared parking.Shared parking means that parking facilities are shared by more than one use, increasing the efficiency of the parking supply. Time-of-day factors for various land uses, published by the Urban Land Institute (ULI), show that utilization peaks at different times of day depending on the use.As shown in Table 8, peak utilization for different uses at the shopping center can take place at different times of the day. Table 8:Weekday and Weekend Peak Parking Utilization Land Use Weekday Peak Utilization Weekend Peak Utilization Hour(s) Hour(s) Shopping Center(Typical) 1:00P.M. 2:00 p.m. 3:00 P.M. Fast Food 12:00 p.m. 12:00 p.m. 1:00 P.M. 1:00 P.M. 10:00 a.m. Medical Office 11:00 a.m. 10.00 a.m. 2:00 p.m. 11:00 a.m. 3:00 p.m. Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Orange,California Tustin Ranch Costco Fuel Station Addition Project p:23472 April 17,2019 Page 13 FUEL DELIVERY TRUCK SITE CIRCULATION The City expressed concern on truck circulation turn templates provided as part of Costco-Specific Trip Generation Information memorandum (November 25, 2018). The turn template shown on the figures was run for the largest delivery vehicle used by Costco Wholesale. The largest truck, however, is larger than the fuel delivery trucks, therefore an updated truck turning template figure is provided to better outline the site circulation.As shown in Figure 5,the fuel truck(62.5 feet long) has a smaller turn radius and adequate spacing for maneuverability is provided on-site.As an alternative circulation path,the fuel delivery trucks can be directed to use the Bryan Avenue driveway. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Based on the analysis provided in this memo, the Project would have the following effect on the topic areas requested for evaluation by the City: • Level of service at study intersections: o All study intersections were found to operate at LOS B or better during the peak hour periods. • Queuing at project driveways: o Project trips increase the northbound left turn and right turn queues exiting at Market Street & Bryan Avenue during the p.m. peak hour. These queues exceed the available storage length as measured to the first drive aisle but can be accommodated along the Market Street drive aisle. Queues can be reduced to be accommodated by the available storage through signal timing and increasing the signal timing split available for the northbound approach. o All other access points were found to have sufficient storage to accommodate Existing and Existing Plus Project queues. • Fuel area stacking: o Adequate queueing capacity would be provided for the fuel station and queue management strategies can be implemented in the unlikely event that queues were to exceed available capacity. • Parking analysis: o With the proposed changes to parking supply, City parking requirements will be met. • Fuel delivery truck circulation: o The revised fuel deliverytruck turn template shows adequate spacing for maneuverability on-site. Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Orange,California P a j O O I�I I r � , CLQ LLQ O .i 3NNNHO NN3QOW 13 t- - I ; II GO 1 < LLI I I I _ I — I W I I' I � � • • ui I I LL MAM r _ II i I — I I I I I ' 1 •1111 1 !I II r.11 II 1 1 iI f I I ' W ' � I I ' IIS II // I I II I Cly I w 1 ' I 3r81 V rr .rte I Z �I zo I a I � � acJ HONVd N LSfll Appendix 1 Additional Figures � 13NNVHO4'k34fNMT3 LL _- htTi IMM I} _ ! •' � 1 I a [ — Ln CCS / m U o: I h I1.r,-i 1 .. 11 I` w C=:;2 C) LLJ w l q� I' 1 i. .;` 1" El _- _ -- -- X 7M r w o 1 = v j. i 1 1 1 C SIM ' � e r 1 � c ti iffi� i Ie " � I � m NEl W 3 1 v m O � 1 o m _ —_ — > IZ � # �0 0 rr� aC "W j r: %2$/158 T N n `148/337m n `63/171 a y (� O�- LL 5fi7/1&93 u :Zri a 9/15 = L ,.� 10,^, II"321149 ; x$9/275 r,n 116 ? cI- LLI� O U m M: F V) d N v 96/4ZTJ v £8/SCJ m rn 0 a c C M� :_1 Ol 00 N Q m 865/QOTZ ora�� 9/L vii r4 5 m Y $Ir/1+21 ui h h Z€T/4s1 -+m un vi F. N 1. -. 1NNtl477N3f]OPV13 TII it LL - Lo��.J _ m p d:4:? HE r !� - 4:4 r _ - mQ, l4 ytli'�IIt � t o I L�U�III�IIJ�'ILI"YIViII�i �V� I a °; �.� IIII'I 1 n = C c d Ey d o - cn Cx °I :cOL ; NyNI i - - "0 C: 4 Zw x y CD LL w N abl Sa rL W ___...-.-._------------�ye 13'IMYN3f10P113 CU ${' _ II LL rl� hl IIF- --- i _ 11 :3An w 1 It LA %a-- cc_ z—MM - - f { _ I" « I.LJ I i.. CC I6 i I I'TT II 117 I. IV 12 I I I o m fH11 % 131 li i o I ' � d I I d ro .n EW 0 m to 1 v y E 4J C � ------------- - - - 0 _ ib O ZLn LLJ to LL 1/2 az/1 0/o a V1 a r,/9 a `o/o LnLn o o r0/d d J V ��. ajti rlti r _ w© on n/�1 0-o s/v1 noa ~Q ov p/0 00-0 o/Z oln � N Illk(I 0114131: up 4 � P UJ Q — m Q r i lr'y Ir�. low. g ILL LLJ cr vU 11 it Lr ;a • — ' � f r,� LLU - 4 L r Lli � C E a I I 117— ja r I � I 0 q 1 0 _ I II I G I 1 = a r n I � C C r r al 4 i I LO Qom} b un O O m 0 = ZLlj /�Ln I`17/21 `4/10 160/0 `4/4 a V LL n 4/4 5/2 0/0 (/�_ r19/z0 0 ra/a a d o•0/a r W d o �{► J;� J�V ,lCL r wr err a V) u o 0 0/0J r 11/11J o F' o. O/D - Or o o` a Olaf 8i/0z106 9 ti 9 1 13lfNtlH3YN30dW13 .I sLn ILL 1 I q -• .. �I ! ! r� f is c:;:q l w 0 Ln rm: : ! — .— —S— Ul) — 4 1 — µ TI ilfil id �' ! , 1 's I E j 61 li 13 +` O LLJ z L13/18 v L3/4 a, 01 chi n" iF14/23 J U CL W© Q) a F-cn W m d ti � UNI H003oaw13 up LL 1 lit r ;W , vl m LuU I .. cl� lily Ln �— p_ J Ln I — — N. , I 11 -- -- W V I ,I I� T I I• . . �� � ' � II i' I i i ❑i_ r - li I I.. �• I I Il��l llla��j� � ` r I I I 1 �Ililli I I ��il a s I 4 III 4i I N E L +1 L n • � I m 3 I C m I Y s v a c �C ♦ --- \ _..._ . . LL.W. . --_ ... i _ I Y G D Z u� th a y LLJ n vai �6d/20' 1154/352 r m e +4.63/171 a d qMj O Q 572/1899 n m 16/18 �, d Ln 00 1 ( 89/275 v N {"'15/43 � y a .i U y �a .►l�. �j� o R w V Q 96/bZT./ oo 1 m OTT/69J oo a,a a c � f Q m _ _ 865/dOTZ =c LIE :7, a : F= g7/VZ1 `n%0 n LLTlZL1 -2m Ln i �y m 9 �4 � J tirc i if R 9 Z p2 + n� �a ❑ r Pa y� 13NNVH0 HN300W 13 ` _ Z o N 1 - I � r I c 1 W j LL I C I w ui CL OPP Ets Y�. , S Y":t a I f - I I I j � � — � 1 1 m I I - I tll m N N Yl N Pl N Yl b h Zan- IF .I o I w am w m N 1 Y.i y� d� rmz� 0 0 t W o a I �9 u� �3acn y�� rn u 'z'mo aO®lam°O Im, i w ll o W cbF- J n----n - -� _ n �¢ 1 m�N LC LC LL O n � n �� j'� Hca iC�Y a�W¢ m}uw U U I Sod -a av 1 ❑ F O WF 'a- aQ�a O p.' d rimy nZ �a�w LL m N J �� C WO 0 t2 O� 1-iuzi m ^ -u §1 o �Qo F �o ll 5� ns u m W 1 m? m m F OdOb HONV'd Niisni � 5 13NNVHO VN300A 13 a 1 I I I cnf W 3 } ?1 rfl U _ Sj E • y x u I p i• a — —� JIL Y n •n 17. I e I Y v ' , y w 777- 11g0 znT I I 1 a — ' Y Y wwNN ANN I I O — El E] El LLI WHO ����at I El ED 12 El Dw � 1 s p E Yj I 1 1 U El UJ El El lis � z 3 °daHol I I _.... °� � _ •� � 0 2'��rte-�g- 2 S a �� � © o o q o (/} sa u� r' w gig ED ui 21 03 &N HONVki NLISfl l ww6. 8 Appendix 2 Traffic Counts Type of peak hour being reported:Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATION:Market St--Bryan Ave QC JOB q:14853916 CITY/STATE:Orange,CA DATE: Wed,Nov 28 2018 q Peak-Hour:8:00 AM--9:00 AM o u o o Peak 15-Min:8:45 AM 9:00 AM o v n • r • 697 F 0 } t 0 t 727. 1.3 Y a J t C . I1 636 w 0.93 M 665 1.7 • • 14 653 • 17 1 r ST • 660 a: 7; • q l f q rt l e � • r T q 36 + Quality Counts 60 0 a.-:�rcaroravg W6�u`rT7o:3 L _j 4 L 0 1 t q 1 � � 3 4 • 1 t e 7 0 0 0 0 r tL_ I , ,. � L taa a• � a m:. � I I � u, rt �� a - I _ �A • 1 � rt 1 f � N. T_ ___T * ' F_ 5-Min Count Market St Market St Bryan Ave Bryan Ave Hourly Period (Northbound) Southbound (Eastbound) (westbound) Total ,Totals Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 700 AM 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 2 0 3 17 0 0 41 7:05 AM 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 3 23 0 0 51 7:10 AM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 5 25 0 0 56 7:15 AM 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 1 27 0 0 57 7:20 AM 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 0 0 4 23 0 0 69 7:25 AM 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 0 6 42 0 0 79 7:30 AM 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 1 0 4 32 0 0 78 7:35 AM 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 1 0 2 36 0 0 72 7:40 AM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 1 0 1 38 0 0 86 7:45 AM 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 2 0 6 37 0 0 84 7:50 AM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 1 0 3 41 0 0 84 7 r;AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 42 1 0 3 52 0 0 98 1 83 5 8:C0 AM 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 2 0 4 43 0 0 107 921 8;05 AM 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 1 0 8 58 0 0 113 983 8:10 AM 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 0 0 4 42 0 0 101 1028 8:15 AM 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 2 0 5 57 0 0 123 1094 810 AM 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 1 0 4 59 0 0 115 1140 8:25 AM 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 2 0 5 73 0 0 132 1193 8:30 AM 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 1 0 3 57 0 0 118 1233 8:35 AM 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 58 0 0 6 67 0 0 133 1294 8:40 AM 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 2 0 4 45 0 0 109 1 1317 8:45 AM 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 65 2 0 3 61 0 0 134 1367 8S()AM 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 2 0 7 49 0 0 126 1409 8:55 AM 5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 2 0 4 54 0 0 124 1435 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Lastbound Westbound Total Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 40 0 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 732 24 0 56 656 0 0 1536 Heavy Trucks 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 16 0 40 Pedestrians 4 0 0 0 4 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 Railroad tapped Buse Comments- Report generated on 1/9/2019 12:34 PM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC{http://www.qualitycounts.net)1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Type of peak hour being reported Intersection,F'eal Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATION:Market St--Bryan Ave QC JOB#:14853917 CITY/STATE: Orange,CA DATE:Wed,Nov 28 2018 0 Peak-Hour.4:35 PM—5:35 PM ° ° o Peak 15-Min:4:45 PM-- 5.00 PM R9p F o r t G r Rsa .a ♦ sJ t o • :, 6�� r o.Ra • ani e.� w �' . 1� 746 49 l f 173 8U5a: _'- rt fi 7 _ � C r 7 � f r T G 159 G U1 214 ,o, Quality Counts DATA THAT orb's=5 COW.11jrW t n i f � f r 0 n a r a f NA MA J • n• J j A. ry.s r � • rv.. ;I 1 I 1= W1 • � Na + 1 r • 1 r ♦ r F , f Nn NA + f 5-Min Count Market St Market St Bryan Ave Bryan Ave Period (Northbound) (Southbound) Eastbound (Westbound) Total Hourly Beginning At Left Thfu Right U left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Totals 4:00 PM 11 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 7 0 8 66 0 0 i 13 4:05 PM 7 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 5 0 14 64 0 0 151 4;10 PM 13 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 12 0 9 64 0 0 144 4:15 PM 18 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 3 0 6 71 0 0 1E3 4:20 PM 8 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 4 0 11 71 0 0 15' 415 PM 14 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 10 0 10 80 0 0 17 L 0 PM 16 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 13 0 5 63 0 0 i5C5 PM 14 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 11 11 72 0 0 163 0 PM 11 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 8 0 13 62 0 0 161 5 PM 14 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 17 0 8 81 0 0 193 0 PM 15 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 4 0 13 78 0 0 177 5 PM 10 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 10 0 8 83 0 0 173 1 1948 5'00 PM 16 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 9 0 6 64 0 a 153 1958 5.05 F'M 15 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 bl 12 C 5 57 0 0 1,58 1965 5 10 PM 11 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 6 0 8 59 0 C 159 1980 5-15 Pm 11 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 4 0 10 56 0 C 150 1967 5.20 PNI 11 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 5 0 11 87 0 1 184 1996 5:25 PM 9 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 8 0 10 82 0 0 177 1998 5:30 PM i2 C 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 58 5 0 10 59 0 C 159 2007 535 PM 9 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 67 5 0 3 63 0 0 160 2004 5:40 PM 11 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 9 0 12 69 0 0 163 2006 SA5 PM 5 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 3 0 7 57 0 0 133 1946 5:50 PM 10 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 8 0 6 80 0 0 165 1934 5:55 PM 1 10 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 4 0 7 68 0 1 162 1 1923 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Tota{ F'lowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 156 0 160 0 0 0 0 0 0 648 124 0 116 968 0 0 2172 Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 12 Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 Railroad topped Buse Comments: Report generated on 1/9/2019 12:34 PM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(htip://www.qualitycounts.net)1 877 580 2212 Page 1 of 1 Type of peak hour being reported:Intersection Peak Nietnad for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATION:Tustin Ranch Rd--EI Camino Real QCJOB#:14853901 CITY/STATE:Tustin,CA DATE:Wed,Nov 28 2018 2:aa sal Peak-Hour:7:55 AM—8:55 AM b 3.4 24 21w 120 Peak 15-Min:8:35 AM--8:50 AM 4.2 0.7 2-5 r • r r o e 197 P 53 ! IL 54 « 301 1.5 0J 6 74 '� 5 179 - H - 76 2.2.0 • 0 509 •272 1 r 171 0 447 2 14 � 1.1 1 r: 6.4 ♦ 3.1 w • r w • r 87 569 1432.3 33 4.7 ` Quality Counts ,', ,� 2547 506 DATA n-AT DZUIF,COMMl/MM I +— o a e • IL �* IL > r rv. h/ • 5-Min Count Tustin Ranch Rd Tustin Ranch Rd EI Camino Real EI Camino Real Period Northbound Southbound Lastboundl (Westbound) Total Hourly Totals Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 7:010 AM 2 21 30 0 8 105 0 1 2 10 12 C 8 2 4 C 185 7:05 AM 2 26 8 0 3 90 1 0 1 3 11 0 15 4 4 0 168 7:10 AM 6 32 7 0 5 108 0 0 3 9 16 0 10 5 2 0 203 7:16 AM 2 36 8 0 4 116 1 0 2 10 13 0 14 1 3 0 210 7 20 AM 4 42 7 0 6 152 0 0 2 3 22 0 10 2 6 0 256 7 2,ANI 3 30 5 1 8 163 2 1 3 3 19 0 15 2 1 0 256 7:30 AM 5 42 17 0 5 150 1 0 4 12 28 0 15 5 2 0 286 7:35 AM 6 39 6 0 5 134 2 0 7 5 33 0 17 5 2 0 261 7:40 AM 5 46 15 0 6 199 1 0 5 16 30 0 13 8 1 0 345 7:45 AM 6 64 12 0 4 197 2 0 5 7 21 0 14 4 1 0 337 7:50 AM 1 5 47 4 0 9 152 1 0 1 11 31 0 11 9 7 0 288 7:55 AM 4 52 15 1 5 152 1 0 4 10 15 0 16 4 7 0 286 3081 8:00 AM 9 SO 14 0 8 173 2 0 5 4 15 0 8 5 3 0 297 3193 8:05 AM 2 63 13 1 13 147 5 0 7 19 28 0 18 8 2 0 326 3351 8:10 AM 2 60 16 0 8 185 2 0 3 11 20 0 8 12 3 0 330 3478 8:15 AM 6 50 10 0 7 196 2 0 5 13 17 0 13 8 7 0 334 3602 8:20 AM 7 46 9 0 7 163 0 0 3 13 21 0 25 7 5 0 307 3653 8:25 AM 8 47 12 0 13 213 3 0 2 14 24 0 14 2 2 0 354 3751 8:30 AM 17 32 10 0 10 150 1 0 5 20 25 0 11 5 4 0 290 1 3755 8:35 AM 19 47 5 0 9 181 1 2 4 19 22 0 10 10 3 fl 332 3826 8:40 AM 12 43 13 0 9 204 4 1 7 14 24 0 16 3 4 0 354 3835 8:45 AM B 40 15 0 14 180 2 0 9 17 32 0 16 7 6 0 346 3844 8:50 AM 3 37 16 0 17 146 1 1 4 25 28 0 15 5 8 0 306 3862 8:55 AM 5 58 25 0 9 134 5 0 1 12 14 0 7 9 6 0 285 3861 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 156 520 132 0 128 2272 28 12 80 200 312 0 168 80 52 0 4140 keavyTrucks 4 4 8 4 20 0 0 12 4 24 0 8 88 Pedestrians 0 4 4 0 8 Bicycles 0 2 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 6 Railroad topped Buse Comments. Report F noraT--1.�r,1,V2,11r1 1234 PM SOUR-F Qt 110Y Coun!Sr LLC(ht:p//www quolltycount,ne11 1 S77 1,87)2212 Page 1 of 1 Type of peak hour being reported intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCAi ION:Tustin Ranch Rd--EI Camino Real QC JOB U: 14853902 CITY/STATE: Tustin,CA DATE:Wed,Nov 28 2018 s' Peak-Hour:5:00 PM—6:00 PM 09 03 • , a Peak 15-Min:5:40 PM—5:55 PM J + 4 J ♦ V 71B 3a J l 'S4 ' 9S30.3 0 ) t 0 w 05 145 '► 0.97 1;S a7+ O 0.2 y f r L4 • r CL4 03 03 990 ,' F Quality Counts ,•, o paha itin�l'X�t3 tY3��MUMr1E5 ♦ R 0 o a N� ♦ ♦ NA �'' 1 F- < T � w s 7 t rt i r f ~ M t ~ A 5-Min Count Tustin Ranch Rd Tustin Ranch Rd FI Camino Real EI Camino Real Period Northbound Southbound (Eastbound) {Westbound Total Hourly Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Leh Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Totals 4:00 PM 7 85 21 0 3 42 2 1 6 22 8 0 23 33 15 2t�-: 4:05 PM 12 120 17 0 8 73 2 0 6 9 7 0 21 19 17 G 311 4:10 PM 13 121 23 0 8 61 3 0 0 3 16 0 27 44 29 0 34S 4:15 PM 13 101 22 3 3 45 2 0 5 17 9 0 33 47 23 0 323 4:20 PM 19 134 25 1 8 51 2 0 3 8 6 0 15 37 23 0 332 415 PM 22 116 31 0 9 53 7 1 1 14 10 0 26 40 17 0 347 4:30 PM 16 123 40 0 9 35 4 0 2 11 13 0 17 33 15 0 318 4:35 PM 25 161 20 0 7 64 5 0 4 10 8 0 21 17 7 0 349 4:40 PM 25 127 28 0 1S 49 2 0 5 18 9 0 20 51 21 0 370 4:45 PM 12 121 33 1 7 53 1 0 3 22 7 0 20 37 20 0 337 4.50 PM 20 115 23 0 10 53 1 0 2 10 6 0 23 31 24 0 318 4:55 PM 19 136 29 1 5 62 5 0 0 6 6 0 28 38 21 0 356 3977 5:00 PM 34 175 15 0 6 58 5 0 1 8 6 0 24 32 27 0 391 4100 5105 PM 18 143 27 1 9 43 4 1 3 15 19 0 15 43 22 0 363 4152 510 PM 20 122 30 0 14 53 1 2 2 6 10 0 39 44 27 0 370 4174 5:15 PM 18 165 25 4 8 69 4 0 6 14 6 0 35 39 26 0 419 4270 5:20 PM 10 140 27 0 10 40 8 0 4 9 13 0 20 31 25 0 337 4275 5:25 PM 25 157 30 1 12 63 5 0 0 10 6 0 21 24 14 0 368 4296 5:30 PM 17 141 22 2 11 34 3 1 5 19 10 fl 21 45 20 0 351 4329 535 PM 14 157 28 0 8 41 4 0 1 10 1.1 0 33 31 21 0 359 4339 5:40 PM 21 190 32 0 2 63 1 0 1 14 6 0 1 12 78 15 0 385 4354 5:45 PM 26 142 27 0 4 36 5 0 5 12 6 0 23 38 21 0 345 4362 5:50 PM 35 1.88 36 0 5 71 4 0 3 8 5 0 17 31 20 0 423 4467 5:55 PM 27 173 38 2 3 27 4 0 7 20 5 0 15 39 16 0 376 4487 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 328 2080 380 0 44 680 40 0 36 136 68 0 208 388 224 0 4512 Heavy Trucks 0 12 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 Pedestrians 0 4 0 0 4 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Railroad Stopped Buse Comments., Report generated on 1/9/2019 12:34 PM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.ret)1-877-580-2212 Page l of 1 Type of peak hour bung reported:Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATION:Costco Dwy/Ruta Center Dr EI Camino Real QC JOB#:14853904 C 7Y/STATE:Tustin,CA DATE:Wed,Nov 28 2018 59 45 Peak-Hour:8:00 AM—9:00 AM 9.1 c9 34 7 uPeak 15-Min:8:45 AM-9:00 AM �5.9 ❑ seL J • J • V VA •' 15 .0 L 21 F 389 4.3 4 13.3 JL 4: 8 • 17 398 t � t t55 3.5 • � � 3.5 465 �' S) 1 l' ?!r - 479 C137+ 1-9 1 4' Z.7 t 3.8 � 4 r 'r ♦ r 15 9 67 �13.3 11.1 ae 172 B7 QuaLi ly Counts + 9 IIIM ] tl IL 0 NA a-- ❑ a • f T� NA i • 5 Min Count Costco Rwy/Auto Center Dr Costco Dwy/Auto Center Dr EI Camino Real I i Camino Flea! Period Northbound (Southbound Eastbound (VJcslbound) Total Hourly Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Totals r^' 1 0 1 1 2 0 1 24 3 0 4 .a T 0 57 7:05 AM Ck u 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 14 1 0 7 19 1 0 =1.. 7:10 AM 1 1 2 0 3 1 2 0 0 20 1 0 7 16 0 0 7:15 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 18 1 0 3 15 2 0 4- 7:20 AM 1 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 15 4 0 2 18 0 0 7:25 AM 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 14 2 0 5 17 0 0 7:30 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 4 0 2 22 5 0 8 19 4 0 ri 7:35 AM 0 0 5 0 0 0 5 0 0 14 4 0 11 20 ❑ 0 5:+ 7:40 AM 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 0 2 31 3 0 7 19 3 0 7:! 7:45 AM 0 0 5 0 1 0 1 0 1 22 2 0 12 20 2 0 66 7:50 AM 1 0 1 0 1 0 3 0 0 18 7 0 9 22 0 0 62 7:55 AM 1 0 4 0 2 2 1 0 2 25 2 0 10 21 2 0 72 676 8:00 AM 1 0 3 0 1 1 1 0 1 22 5 0 1.1 21 2 0 69 693 8:05 AM 0 0 3 0 0 1 2 0 2 38 3 0 7 20 0 0 76 723 8:70 AM 1 2 8 0 0 0 5 0 3 28 2 0 3 19 0 0 71 740 8 15 AM 2 0 4 0 0 1 5 0 1 23 4 0 9 26 3 0 78 776 8:20 AM 2 1 7 0 0 1 3 0 0 31 4 0 6 27 2 0 84 816 8:25 AM 1 0 4 0 5 2 3 0 3 32 4 0 13 17 0 0 84 857 8:30 AM 0 1 5 0 1 0 4 0 0 36 4 0 11 12 4 0 78 869 8:35 AM 0 1 6 0 3 0 0 0 0 24 5 0 16 28 0 0 83 893 6:40 AM 2 0 4 0 0 0 3 0 0 31 7 0 10 18 1 0 76 1 899 8,45 AM 2 0 5 0 3 1 2 0 1 37 6 0 5 26 3 0 91 924 8',50 AM 2 0 10 0 2 0 5 0 1 48 5 0 9 15 2 0 99 961. 8:5S AM 1 2 4 4 0 3 0 1 0 3 48 3 0 13 26 4 0 711 1000 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 24 16 76 0 32 4 32 0 20 532 56 0 108 268 36 0 1204 Heavy Trucks 4 4 4 0 0 $ 0 28 4 4 8 ID 64 Pedestrians 4 0 4 0 8 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 Raiiroad tapped Buse Comments: Report generated on 1/9/2019 12:34 PM SOURCE:Quality Counts,LLC(http://www.qualitycounts.net)1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Type of peak hour being reported:intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour:Total Entering Volume LOCATION:Costco Dwy/Auto Center Dr EI Camino Real QC JOB#:14853905 CITY/STATE: Tustin,CA DATE:Wed,Nov 28 2018 Peak-Hour:4:25 PM--5:25 PM u5i� Peak 15-Min:$:10 PM--5:25 PM J V �' • ti 2e.'/ • +,.; ! t .`,1 iNla ea n J t iii• 463 Snfi + ?l 41E 94 • 737 a: h ♦ t 'S t r 43 55 171 4,7 0 23 Quality Counts ' 32tl 224 U 2.6 AVIA 72WYORNFS CQh3l41lAVi1'7E5 J J ~ L a v a NA - • Nn I r NA w �r r 7 P • � 1 P + * t , N1 5-Min Count Costco Dwy/Auto Center Dr Costco Dwy/Auto Center Dr EI Camino Real EI Camino Real Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastboundi (westbound) Total Hourly Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right u Totals 4:00 PM 0 2 16 0 6 0 15 0 9 38 2 0 8 43 7 0 146 4:05 PM 5 2 6 0 7 1 13 0 7 21 1 0 13 64 13 0 153 410 PM 3 4 13 0 7 1 16 0 6 30 0 0 5 19 6 0 170 4:15 PM 4 2 18 0 6 1 10 0 8 37 1 0 9 67 9 0 172 4:20 PM 3 3 11 0 11 1 9 0 8 26 0 0 15 66 16 0 169 4:25 PM 0 0 17 0 6 3 8 0 9 37 1 0 7 59 10 0 157 4:30 PM 4 2 14 0 6 0 8 0 6 60 3 0 9 61 11 0 184 4:35 PM 4 1 5 0 7 0 13 0 7 30 3 0 12 50 11 0 143 4:40 PM 7 6 19 0 9 0 11 0 6 51 2 0 7 65 8 0 191 4:45 PM 3 1 10 0 5 0 6 0 11 55 0 0 8 52 17 0 168 4:50 PM 3 0 16 0 6 2 10 0 8 32 2 0 9 61 11 0 160 4:55 PM 7 0 8 0 3 1 10 0 S 31 2 0 7 84 19 0 177 1990 5:00 PM 2 1 20 0 4 0 18 0 8 28 3 0 5 66 13 0 168 2012 5:05 PM 7 0 22 0 11 0 5 0 6 34 1 0 9 74 5 0 174 1 2033 5:10 PM 2 1 8 0 8 0 20 0 12 45 C 0 7 82 10 0 195 2058 5:15 PM 3 0 15 0 8 0 1.1 0 9 35 1 0 5 73 9 0 169 2055 5:20 PM 1 3 17 0 10 0 12 0 6 45 2 0 9 65 8 0 178 2064 5:25 PM 1 0 12 0 13 1 13 0 10 42 0 0 r 46 :0 0 153 2060 5:30 PM 1 1 14 0 6 0 12 0 9 42 0 0 7 68 13 0 173 2049 5:35 PM 1 0 15 0 11 0 19 0 9 36 1 0 4 53 8 0 157 2063 5:40 PM 4 3 10 0 3 2 6 0 10 40 0 0 8 67 7 0 165 2037 5:45 PM 2 4 16 0 3 1 13 0 10 34 C C 3 62 9 0 157 2026 5:50 PM 0 1 13 0 2 1 13 0 5 40 1 0 3 50 12 0 141 2007 5:55 PM 0 1 19 0 6 0 6 0 11 50 1 0 7 58 8 0 167 1997 Peak 15-Min Northbound southbound Eastbound westbound Total Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right u Left Thru Right u All Vehicles 24 16 160 0 104 0 172 0 108 500 12 0 84 880 108 0 2168 Heavy Trucks 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 16 Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Railroad Stopped Busesl (��7r17r77c r;t5: Report generated on 1/9/201912:34 Piet SOURCE,Quality Counts,LLC(http)/www qualitycounts.net)1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of L Appendix 3 ICU Worksheets L Project Title: TUSTIN RANCH COSTCO FUEL STATION ADDITION Intersection: 1. MARKET ST. &BRYAN AVE. Description: EXISTING CONDITIONS DatelTime: AM PEAK HOUR(8:00-9:00) APPROACH MVMT LANES VOLUME CAPACITY VIC [CU ANALYSIS Southbound RT 0.00 0 0 0.00 N-S(1): 0.00 TH 0.00 0 0 0.00 ' N-S(2): 0.02 LT 0.00 0 0 0.00 E-W(1): 0.22 Westbound RT 0.00 0 0 0.00 E-W(2): 0.20 TH 2.00 665 3,400 0.20 LT 1.00 57 1,700 0.03 * VIC: 0.24 Northbound RT 1.00 28 1,700 0.00 Lost Time: 0.05 TH 0.00 0 0 0.00 [TS: 0.00 LT 1.00 32 1,700 0.02 * Eastbound RT 0.00 17 0 0.00 ICU: 0.29 TH 2.00 636 3,400 0.19 * LT 0.00 0 0 0.00 LOS: A DatelTime: PM PEAK HOUR(4:35-5:35) APPROACH MVMT LANES VOLUME CAPACITY VIC ICU ANALYSIS Southbound RT 0.00 0 0 0.00 N-S(1): 0.04 TH 0.00 0 0 0.00 * N-S(2): 0.09 LT 0.00 0 0 0.00 E-W(1): 0.29 Westbound RT 0.00 0 0 0.00 E-W(2): 0.25 TH 2.00 840 3,400 0.25 LT 1.00 114 1,700 0.07 * VIC: 0.38 Northbound RT 1.00 158 1,700 0.04 Lost Time: 0.05 TH 0.00 0 0 " 0.00 ITS: 0.00 LT 1.00 149 1,700 0.09 * Eastbound RT 0.00 99 0 0.00 ICU: 0.43 TH 2.00 647 3,400 0.22 * LT 0.00 0 0 0.00 LOS: A *-Denotes critical movement Project Title: TUSTIN RANCH COSTCO FUEL STATION ADDITION Intersection: 2.TUSTIN RANCH RD.&EL CAMINO REAL Description: EXISTING CONDITIONS DatelTime: AM PEAK HOUR(7:55-8:55) APPROACH MVMT LANES VOLUME CAPACITY VIC ICU ANALYSIS Southbound RT 1.00 24 1,700 0.00 N-S(1): 0.95 TH 3.00 2,100 5,100 0.41 * N-S(2): 0.44 LT 2.00 124 3,400 0.04 E-W(1): 0.19 " Westbound RT 1.00 54 1,700 0.00 E-W(2): 0.05 TH 2.00 76 3,400 0.02 LT 2.00 171 3,400 0.05 ' VIC: O.63 Northbound RT 1.00 148 1,700 0.05 Lost Time: 0.05 TH 3.00 567 5,100 0.11 ITS: 0.00 LT 2.00 89 3,400 0.03 * Eastbound RT 1.00 272 1,700 0.14 * ICU: 0.68 TH 2.00 179 3,400 0.05 LT 1.00 58 1,700 0.03 LOS: B DatelTime: PM PEAK HOUR(5:00-6:00) APPROACH MVMT LANES VOLUME CAPACITY VIC ICU ANALYSIS Southbound RT 1.00 48 1,700 0.01 N-S(1): 0.40 TH 3.00 598 5,100 0.12 N-S(2): 0.20 LT 2.00 96 3,400 0.03 * E-W(1): 0.12 Westbound RT 1:00 254 1,700 0.13 E-W(2): 0.15 TH 2.00 425 3,400 0.13 * LT 2.00 275 3,400 0.08 VIC: 0.55 Northbound RT 1.00 337 1,700 0.14 Lost Time: 0.05 TH 3.00, 1,893 5,100 0.37 * ITS: 0.00 LT 2.00 275 3,400 0.08 Eastbound RT 1.00 103 1,700 0.00 ICU: 0.60 TH 2.00 145 3,400 0.04 LT 1.00 38 1,700 0.02 * LOS: A *-Denotes critical movement Project Tit[e: TUSTIN RANCH COSTCO FUEL STATION ADDITION Intersection: 3.AUTO CENTER DR.&EL CAMINO REAL Description: EXISTING CONDITIONS DatelTime: AM PEAK HOUR(8:00-9:00) APPROACH MVMT LANES VOLUME CAPACITY VIC ICU ANALYSIS Southbound RT 1.00 34 1,700 0.01 N-S(1): 0.02 TH 0.56 7 952 0.01 N-S(2): 0.00 LT 1.44 18 2,448 0.01 * E-W(1): 0.20 Westbound RT 0.00 21 0 0.00 E-W(2): 0.09 TH 2.00 255 3,400 0.08 LT 1.00 113 1,700 0.07 * VIC: 0.22 Northbound RT 1.00 63 1,700 0.00 Lost Time: 0.05 TH 1.00 9 1,700 0.01 ITS: 0.00 LT 1.00 15 1,700 0.01 * Eastbound RT 0.00 52 0 0.00 ICU: 0.27 TH 2.00 398 3,400 0.13 * LT 1.00 15 1,700 0.01 LOS: A DatelTime: PM PEAK HOUR(4:25-5:25) APPROACH MVMT LANES VOLUME CAPACITY VIC ICU ANALYSIS Southbound RT 1.00 132 1,700 0.04 * N-S(1): 0.10 " TH 0.13 6 229 0.03 N-S(2): 0.00 LT 1.87 83 3,171 0.03 E-W(1): 0.21 Westbound RT 0.00 132 0 0.00 E-W(2): 0.32 TH 2.00 792 3,400 0.27 * LT 1.00 94 1,700 0.06 VIC: 0.42 Northbound RT 1.00 171 1,700 0.06 * Lost Time: 0.05 TH 1.00 15 1,700 0.01 ITS: 0.00 LT 1.00 43 1,700 0.03 Eastbound RT 0.00 20 0 0.00 ICU: 0.47 TH 2.00 483 3,400 0.15 LT 1.00 93 1,700 0.05 * LOS: A *-Denotes critical movement Project Title: TUSTIN RANCH COSTCO FUEL STATION ADDITION Intersection: 1.MARKET ST.&BRYAN AVE. Description: EXISTING PLUS PROJECT DateLTime: AM PEAK HOUR(8:00-9:00) APPROACH MVMT LANES VOLUME CAPACITY VIC ICU ANALYSIS Southbound RT 0.00 0 0 0.00 N-S(1): 0.00 TH 0.00 0 0 0.00 * N-S(2): 0.04 LT 0.00 0 0 0.00 E W(1): 0.27 Westbound RT 0.00 0 0 0.00 E W(2): 0.22 TH 2.00 648 3,400 0.19 LT 1.00 121 1,700 0.07 * VIC: 0.31 Northbound RT 1.00 64 1,700 0.00 Lost Time: 0.05 TH 0.00 0 0, 0.00 ITS: 0.00 LT 1.00 72 1,700 0.04 * Eastbound RT 0.00 0 0 0.00 ICU: 0.36 TH 2.00 620 3,400 0.20 * LT 0.00 47 1,700 0.03 LOS: A Date/Time: PM PEAK HOUR(4:35-5:35) APPROACH MVMT LANES VOLUME CAPACITY VIC ICU ANALYSIS Southbound RT 0.00 0 0 0.00 N-S(1): 0.05 TH 0.00 0 0 0.00 ` N-S(2): 0.12 LT 0.00 0 0 0.00 E-W(1): 0.32 Westbound RT 0.00 0 0 0.00 E-W(2): 0.24 TH 2.00 821 3,400 0.24 LT 1.00 159 1,700 0.09 * VIC: 0.44 Northbound RT 1.00 207 1,700 0.05 Lost Time: 0.05 TH 0.00 0 0 0.00 ITS: 0.00 LIT 1.00 201 1,700 0.12 * Eastbound RT 0.00 137 0 0.00 ICU: 0.49 TH 2.00 632 3,400 0.23 * LT 0.00 0 0 0.00 LOS: A *-Denotes critical movement Project Title: TUSTIN RANCH COSTCO FUEL STATION ADDITION Intersection: 2.TUSTIN RANCH RD.& EL CAMINO REAL Description: EXISTING PLUS PROJECT Date/Time: AM PEAK HOUR(7:55-8:55) APPROACH MVMT LANES VOLUME CAPACITY VIC ICU ANALYSIS Southbound RT 1.00 24 1,700 0.00 N-S(1): 0.15 TH 3.00 2,100 5,100 0.41 * N-S(2): 0.44 LT 2.00 124 3,400 0.04 E-W(1): 0.20 Westbound RT 1.00 54 1,700 0.00 E-W(2): 0.05 TH 2.00 84 3,400 0.02 LT 2.00 190 3,400 0.06 * VIC: 0.64 Northbound RT 1.00 154 1,700 0.05 Lost Time: 0.05 TH 3.00 572 5,100 0.11 ITS: 0.00 LT 2.00 89 3,400 0.03 ` Eastbound RT 1.00 272 1,700 0.14 ` ICU: 0.69 TH 2.00 186 3,400 0.05 LT 1.00 58 1,700 0.03 LOS: B Date/Time: PM PEAK HOUR(5:00-6:00) APPROACH MVMT LANES VOLUME CAPACITY VIC ICU ANALYSIS Southbound RT 1.00 48 1,700 0.01 N-S(1): 0.40 TH 3.00 598 5,100 0.12 N-S(2): 0.20 LT 2.00 96 3,400 0.03 * E-W(1): 0.12 Westbound RT 1.00 254 1,700 0.13 E-W(2): 0.15 TH 2.00 441 3,400 0.13 * LT 2.00 285 3,400 0.08 VIC: 0.55 Northbound RT 1.00 352 1,700 0.14 Lost Time: 0.05 TH 3.00 1,899 5,100 0.37 * ITS: 0.00 LT 2.00 275 3,400 0.08 Eastbound RT 1.00 103 1,700 0.00 ICU: 0.60 TH 2.00 151 3,400 0.04 LT 1.00 38 1,700 0.02LOS: A -Denotes critical movement Project Title: TUSTIN RANCH COSTCO FUEL STATION ADDITION Intersection: 3.AUTO CENTER DR. &EL CAMINO REAL Description: EXISTING PLUS PROJECT Date/Time: AM PEAK HOUR(8:00-9:00) APPROACH MVMT LANES VOLUME CAPACITY VIC ICU ANALYSIS Southbound RT 1.00 72 1,700 0.02 N-S(1): 0.03 ` TH 0.42 13 713 0.02 N-S(2): 0.00 LT 1.58 49 2,687 0.02 * E-W(1): 0.20 Westbound RT 1.00 47 1,700 0.01 E-W(2): 0.09 TH 2.00 247 3,400. 0.07 LT 1.00 113 1,700 0.07 * VIC: 0.23 Northbound RT 1.00 63 1,700 0.00 Lost Time: 0.05 TH 1.00 16 1,700 0.01 ITS: 0.00 LT 1.00 15 1,700 0.01 * Eastbound' RT 0.00 52 0 0.00 ICU: 0.28 TH 2.00 385 3,400 0.13 * LT 1.00 41 1,700 0.02 LOS: A Date/Time: PM PEAK HOUR(4:25-5:25) APPROACH MVMT LANES VOLUME CAPACITY VIC ICU ANALYSIS Southbound RT 1.00 177 1,700 0.05 ' N-3(1): 0.11 ` TH 0.12 7 203 0.03 N-S(2): 0.00 LT 1.88 110 3,197 0.03 E-W(1): 0.20 Westbound RT 1.00 187 1,700 0.08 E-W(2): 0.31 ` TH 2.00 768 3,400 0.23 ` LT 1.00 94 1,700 0.06 VIC: 0.42 Northbound RT 1.00 171 1,700 0.06 ` Lost Time: 0.05 TH 1.00 18 1,700 0.01 ITS: 0.00 LT 1.00 43 1,700 0.03 Eastbound RT 0.00 20 0 0.00 ICU: 0.47 TH 2.00 469 3,400 0.14 LT 1.00 128 1,700 0.08 * LOS: A *-Denotes critical movement Appendix 4 Synchro Queue and Timing Worksheets Queues 1 .. Market St. & Bryan Ave/Bryan Ave. 0111412019 --* 4,*' ~ 4N tO Lane Group EBT W'BL WBT NBL NBR Lane Group plow(vph) 702 61 715 34 30 v!c Ratio 0.29 0.27 0.25 0.16 0.14 Control Delay 7,1 22.2 2.6 21.1 10.8 Queue Delay 0,0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 7.1 22.2 2.6 21.1 10.8 Queue Length 50th(ft) 58 14 28 8 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 106 44 51 30 15 Internal Link Dist(ft) 629 822 131 Turn Bay Length (ft) 255 55 Base Capacity(vph) 3525 806 3574 604 540 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced vac Ratio 0,20 0.08 0.20 0.06 0.06 Intersection Summary Existing AM 0110812019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Queues 3: Auto Center Dr. & EI Camino Real 0111412019 Lane Group EBL EBT 1N1 qg ;„, __L NBT NBR SBL SBT SSR Lane Group Flow(vph) 18 543 136 332 18 11 76 15 15 41 vic Ratio 0.03 0,38 0.21 0.15 0.08 0.05 0.20 0.07 0,07 0.13 Control Delay 5.9 12.0 5 3 7.9 22.2 21.9 5.4 22.2 22.2 0.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 5.9 12.0 5.3 7.9 22.2 21.9 5.4 22.2 22.2 0.9 Queue Length 50th(ft) 1 24 0 10 3 2 0 2 2 0 Queue Length 95th(ft) 9 110 39 58 20 15 19 18 18 0 Internal Link Dist(ft) 1070 392 350 241 Tum Bay Length(ft) 200 155 130 105 95 Base Capacity(vph) 884 2422 1067 2850 1342 1439 919 778 825 619 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Oc Ratio H2 0.22 0.13 0.12 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.02 0.02 0.07 Intersection Summary Existing AM 0110812019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Timings 1 : Market St. & Bryan Ave/Bryan Ave. 0112312019 Lane Configurations tl� tt Traffic Volume(vph) 636 57 665 32 28 Future Volume(vph) 636 57 665 32 28 Tura Type NA Prot NA Prot Perm Protected Phases 6 5 2 4 Permitted Phases 4 Detector Phase 6 5 2 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 20.0 3.0 8.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Split(s) 25.5 7.0 13.5 23.0 23.0 Total Split(s) 60.5 24.0 60.5 19.0 19.0 Total Split(%) 58,5% 23.2% 58.5% 18.4°% 18.4% Yellow Time(s) 4.5 3.0 4.5 3.0 3.0 All-Red Time(s) 1.0 1.4 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 Total Last Time(s) 5.5 4.0 5.5 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Recall Mode Min None Min None None Act Effct Green(s) 30.5 5,7 36.5 5.5 5.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0,67 0.13 0.81 0.12 0.12 vlc Ratio 0.29 0.27 0.25 0.16 0.14 Control Delay 7.1 22.2 2.6 21,1 10.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 7.1 22.2 2.6 21.1 10.8 LOS A C A C B Approach Delay 7.1 4.2 16.3 Approach LOS A A B I=EMS ii 110 BEEN= ig Cycle Length: 103.5 Actuated Cycle Length:45.2 Natural Cycle:60 Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum vlc Ratio:0.29 Intersection Signal Delay:6.0 Intersection LOS:A Intersection Capacity Utilization 36.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 Splits and Phases 1 Market St,&Bryan Ave/Bryan Ave. 02 '1 04 r ©� 1 -006 Existing AM 01/0812019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Timings I Auto Center Dr. & EI Camino Beal 01/23/2019 '~ t No. l ,J o. Lane Configurations tT+ _ . . tib w.u.. t r , Traffic Volume(vph) 16 398 113 255 15 9 63 18 7 34 Future Volume(vph) 15 398 113 255 15 9 63 18 7 34 Tum Type pm+pt NA pre+pt NA Split NA pm+ov Split NA pm+ov Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 8 8 5 4 4 1 Permitted Phases 6 2 8 4 Detector Phase 1 6 5 2 8 8 5 4 4 1 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 2.0 8.0 2.0 8.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 Minimum Split(s) AM 6.5 22.4 6.5 22.4 7.7 7,7 6.5 23.6 23.6 6.5 Total Split(s) 16.5 22.5 24.5 40.4 40.4 40.4 24.5 22.6 22.6 16.5 Total Split(%) 13.8%n 18.8% 20.4% 33.7% 33.7% 33.7% 20.4% 18.8% 18.8% 13.8% Yellow Time(s) 3.5 4.4 3.5 4.4 3.7 3.7 3.5 3.6 3.6 3.5 All-Red Time(s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 4.5 5.4 4.5 5.4 4.7 4.7 4.5 4.6 4.6 4.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Min None Min None None None None None None Act Effct Green(s) 22.5 17A 29.7 27.5 5.6 5.6 8.7 5.4 5.4 5.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0,54 0.42 0.72 0.66 0.14 0.14 0.21 0.13 0.13 0.14 v/c Ratio 0 03 0.38 0.21 0.15 0.08 0,05 0,20 0,07 0.07 0.13 Control Delay 5.9 12.0 5.3 7.9 22.2 21.9 5.4 22.2 22.2 0.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0:0 0.0 Total Delay 5.9 12.0 5.3 7.9 22.2 21.9 5.4 22.2 22.2 0.9 LOS A B A A C C A C C A Approach Delay 11.8 7.2 10.0 9.9 Cycle Length: 119.9 Actuated Cycle Length 41.4 Natural Cycle:65 Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum We Ratio:0.38 Intersection Signal Delay:9.7 Intersection LOS:A Intersection Capacity Utilization 38,7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 Splits and Phases: 3:Auto Center Dr, EI Camino Real 01 02 �*o4 *t08 005 �Q6 Existing AM 01/08/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Queues 1 : Market St & Bryan Ave/Bryan Ave. 01"14'2019 xzwl 01; Lane Group Flow(vph) 811 124 913 162 172 v/c Ratio 0.50 0,46 0.40 0.50 0.43 Control Delay 12.7 30.3 5.4 28.7 11.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 Total Delay 12.7 30.3 5.4 28.7 11.2 Queue Length 50th(ft) 93 37 58 48 9 Queue Length 95th(ft) 179 100 112 120 62 lntemai Link Dist(ft) 629 822 131 -- Tum Bay Length(ft) 255 55 Base Capacity(vph) 3273 698 3574 523 566 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced vlc Ratio 0,25 0.18 0.26 031 0.30 n Existing PM 01/08;2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Queues 3: Auto Center Dr. & EI Camino Real 01/14/2019 + Lane Group Flow(vph) 98 529 99 973 45 16 180 46 47 139 vie Ratio 0.27 0.32 0.17 0.59 0.23 0.07 0.44 0.23 0.23 0.33 Control Delay 8,0 12.3 6.7 14.8 32.8 30.9 7.8 328 32.8 5.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 8.0 12,3 6,7 14.8 32.8 30.9 7,8 32.8 32.8 5.5 Queue Length 50th(ft) 15 71 15 150 17 6 0 18 18 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 37 122 38 245 51 25 45 54 55 30 Internal Link Dist(ft) 1070 392 350 241 Tum Bay Length(ft) 200 155 130 105 95 Base Capacity(vph) 599 2010 923 2222 1106 1222 814 600 605 632 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced vic Ratio 0.16 0.26 0.11 0.44 0.04 0.01 0.22 0A8 0.08 0.22 Existing PM 01/08/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Timings 1: Market St & Bryan Ave/Bryan Ave. 0112312019 ___* 41*' EBT WBL WBT NB Lane Configurations tk tT Traffic Volume(vph) 647 114 840 149 158 1111110111111111111 Future Volume(vph) 647 114 840 149 158 Tum Type NA Prot NA Prot Perm Protected Phases 6 5 2 4 Permitted Phases qOMMENgEnIff 4 Detector Phase 6 5 2 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 20.0 3.0 80 3.0 3.0 Minimum Split(s) 25.5 7.0 13.5 23.0 23.0 Total Split(s) 60.5 24.0 60.5 19.0 19.0 Total Split(%) 58.5% 23.2% 58,5% 18.4% 18.4% Yellow Time(s) 4.5 3.0 4.5 3.0 3.0 All-Red Time(s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 5.5 4.0 5.5 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Recall Mode Min None Min None None Act Effct Green(s) 25.2 8.2 34.9 9.9 9.9 Actuated g!C Ratio 0.46 0.15 0,64 0.18 0.18 v/c Ratio 0.50 0.46 0.40 0.50 0.43 Control Delay 12.7 30.3 5.4 28.7 11.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 12,7 30.3 5.4 28,7 11.2 LOS B C A C B Approach Delay 12.7 8.4 19.7 Approach LOS B A B Cycle Length: 103.5 Actuated Cycle Length 54.9 Natural Cycle:60 Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v1c Ratio:0.50 Intersection Signal Delay: 11.7 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min)15 S lits and Phases: 1:Market St&Bryan AvelBryan Ave. 02 04 MCI Existing PM 01/08/2019 Baseline Synchrc 10 Report Page 1 Timings 3: Auto Center Dr. & EI Camino Real 0123!2019 -�* -. f- '-- 4\ t /0. �► l Lane Group EBL EBT WBL _WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations I T� +T + r it r Traffic Volume(vph) 93 483 94 792 43 15 171 83 6 132 Future Volume(vph) 93 483 94 792 43 15 171 83 6 132 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Split NA pm+ov Split NA pm+ov Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 8 8 5 4 4 1 Permitted Phases 6 2 8 4 Detector Phase 1 6 5 2 8 8 5 4 4 1 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 2.0 8.0 2.0 8.0 3.0 3,0 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 Minimum Split(s) 6.5 22.4 6.5 22.4 7.7 7.7 6.5 23.6 23.6 6.5 JIM Total Split(s) 16,5 22.5 24.5 40A 40.4 40A 24.5 22.6 22.6 16.5 Total Split(%) 13.8% 18.8% 20.4% 33.7% 33.7% 33,7% 204% 18,8% 18.8% 13.8% Yellow Time(s) 3.5 4.4 3.5 4.4 3.7 3.7 3.5 3.6 3,6 3.5 All-Red Time(s) 1.0 1,0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 H 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 4.5 5.4 4.5 5.4 4.7 4.7 4.5 4.6 4.6 4.5 LeadlLag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Min None Min None None None None None None Act Effct Green(s) 33.6 27.2 34.7 27.7 6,8 6,8 9.7 6.9 6,9 11.5 Actuated 91C Ratio 0.57 0.46 0.59 0.47 0.12 0.12 0.16 0,12 0.12 0.20 v1c Ratio 00 0.32 0.17 0.59 0.23 0,07 0.44 0.23 0.23 0.33 Control Delay 8.0 12.3 6.7 14.8 32.8 30.9 7.8 32.8 32.8 5.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 Total Delay &0 12.3 6.7 14.8 32.8 30.9 7.8 32.8 32.8 5.5 LOS A B A B C C A C C A Approach Delay 11.7 14.0 14.0 16.5 Approach LOS & 41, In# Cycle ,.� Actuated Cycle Length:58.8 Natural Cycle:65 Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v1c Ratio:0.59 Intersection Signal Delay: 13.6 Intersection LOS:B Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 Splits and Phases: 3:Auto Center Dr.&El Camino Real 001 4-02 �*04 1 *t08 77 005 Existing PM 01/0812019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Queues 1: Market St. & Bryan Ave. 01118!2019 --* h Lane Group Flow(vph) 718 130 697 77 69 vlc Ratio 0.37 0.46 0.26 0.32 4.26 Control Delay 10.3 26.5 3.4 25.4 9.8 Queue Delay 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 10,3 26.5 3.4 25.4 9.8 Queue Length 50th(ft) 71 35 32 20 0 Queue Length.95th(ft) 137 90 60 62 30 Internal Link Dist(ft) 629 822 131 Turn Bay Length(ft) 255 55 Base Capacity(vph) 3398 730 3574 548 519 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced We Ratio 011 0.18 0.20 0.14 0.13 Existing Plus Project AM 01108/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Queues I Auto Center Dr. & EI Camino Rea[ 03/13/2019 __,, �*-- k_ 4\ t Lane Group Flaw(vph) 49 527 136 298 57 18 19 76 37 38 87 We Ratio 0.09 0.39 0.22 0.16 0.30 0.09 0.09 0.21 0.17 0.16 0.22 Control Delay 6.5 13.5 63 10.4 4.1 23.7 23.6 5.7 23.4 23.2 3.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 6.5 13.5 6.3 10.4 4.1 23.7 23.6 5.7 23.4 23.2 3.6 Queue Length 50th(ft) 3 46 9 22 0 4 4 0 8 8 0 Queue Length 95th(ft) 19 111 41 58 0 21 21 19 33 34 12 Internal Link Dist(ft) 1070 392 350 241 Tum Bay Length(ft) 200 155 155 130 105 95 Base Capacity(vph) 836 2268 1000 2791 188 1303 1397 858 717 752 665 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v!c Ratio 0:06 0.23 0.14 0.11 0.30 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.05 0.05 0.13 Existing Plus Project AM 01/08/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Timings 1: Market St. & Bryan Ave. 01123/2019 Lane Configurations 0 tt Traffic Volume(vph) 620 121 648 72 64 Future Volume(vph) 620 121 648 72 64 Tum Type NA Prot NA Prot Peal Protected Phases 6 5 2 4 Permitted Phases 4 Detector Phase 6 5 2 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 20.0 3.0 8.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Split(s) 25.5 7.0 13.5 23.0 23.0 Total Split(s) 60.5 24.0 60.5 19.0 19.0 Total Split(%) 58.5% 23.2% 58.5% 18.4% 18.4°fa Yellow Time(s) 4.5 3.0 4.5 3.0 3.0 All-fled Time(s) 1,0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 5.5 4.0 5.5 4.0 LeadlLag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Recall Mode Min None Min None None Act Effct Green(s) 27.8 7.9 37.6 6.9 6.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.55 0.16 0.74 0.14 0.14 vlc Ratio 0.37 0.46 0.26 0,32 0.26 Control Delay 10.3 26.5 3.4 25.4 9.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ■ Total Delay 10.3 26.5 3.4 25.4 9.8 LOS B C A C A Approach Delay 10.3 7.0 18.0 Approach LOS B A B Intersection Summary �- Cycle Length: 103.5 Actuated Cycle Length 50.6 Natural Cycle:60 Control Type Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum vlc Ratio:0.46 Intersection Signal Delay: 9.4 Intersection LOS:A Intersection Capacity Utilization 40.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 S lits and Phases: 1:Market St.&B an Ave. 02 04 �4�105 �L�S Existing Pius Project AM 0110812019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Timings I Auto Center Dr. & EI Camino Real 031312019 Lane Group EBL BBT WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations +I* tt r t r +T r Traffic Volume(vph) 41 385 113 247 47 15 16 63 49 13 72 Future Volume(vph) 41 385 113 247 47 15 16 63 49 13 72 Tum Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA NA Split NA pm+ov Split NA pm+ov Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 8 8 5 4 4 1 Permitted Phases 6 2 8 4 Detector Phase 1 6 5 2 8 8 5 4 4 1 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 2.0 8.0 2.0 8.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 Minimum Split(s) 6.5 22,4 6.5 22.4 7.7 7.7 6.5 23.6 23.6 6.5 Total Split(s) 16.5 22.5 24.5 40.4 40.4 40.4 24.5 22.6 22.6 16.5 Total Split(%) 13.8% 18.8% 20.4% 33.7% 33.7% 33.7% 20.4% 18.8% 18.8% 13.8% Yellow Time(s) 3,5 4.4 3.5 4.4 3.7 3.7 3.5 3.6 3.6 3.5 All-Red Time(s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 4.5 5.4 4.5 5.4 4.7 4.7 4.5 4.6 4.6 4.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead. Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Min None Min None None None None None None Act Effet Green(s) 23.0 17.5 28.4 23.0 0.0 5.5 5.5 8.7 6.1 6.1 8.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.52 0.40 0.64 0.52 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.20 0.14 0.14 0.20 We Ratio 0.09 0.39 0.22 0.16 0.30 0,09 0.09 0.21 0.17 0.16 0.22 Control Delay 6.5 13.5 6.3 10.4 4.1 23.7 23.6 5.7 23.4 23.2 3.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 6.5 13.5 6.3 10.4 4.1 23.7 23.6 5.7 23.4 23.2 3.6 LOS A B A B A C C A C C A Approach Delay 12.9 8.5 11.6 12.7 Cycle L Actuated Cycle Length 44.1 Natural Cycle:65 Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum vic Ratio:0.39 Intersection Signal Delay. 11.2 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 39.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 Splits and Phases: 3:Auto Center Dr.8 El Camino Real 01 02 O4 438 7-1 rv.w 005 - 06 Existing Plus Project AM 01108/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Queues 1: Market St. & Bryan Ave. 01118/2019 Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Group Flow(vph) 836 173 892 218 225 v/c Ratio 0.56 0.59 0.39 0.60 0.52 Control Delay 15.5 35.4 5.8 33.3 16.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 15.5 35.4 5.8 33.3 16.3 Queue Length 50th(ft) 119 63 75 75 29 Queue Length 95th(ft) 198 138 107 #180 108 Internal Link Dist(ft) 629 822 131 Tum Bay Length(ft) 255 55 Base Capacity(vph) 3033 586 3558 440 494 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced vrc Ratio 0:28 0.30 0.25 150 0.46 intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Existing Plus Project PM 01/08/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Queues 3: Auto Center Dr. & EI Camino Real 03/13/2019 EEL E8T W aL WBT WJR NK NBT 14 OR, t4._ SST SSR Lane Group Flow(vph) 135 515 99 808 197 45 19 180 61 62 185 vlc Ratio 0.33 0.36 0.18 0,56 1.05 0,21 0.08 0,41 0.26 0.26 0.36 Control Delay 9.2 14,2 7.6 16.3 91.4 30.6 29.3 7.1 30.2 30.3 4.6 Queue Delay 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 Total Delay 9.2 14.2 7.6 16.3 91.4 30.6 29.3 7.1 30.2 30.3 4,6 Queue Length 50th(ft) 22 71 16 124 -7 15 6 0 22 22 0 Queue Length 95th(ft) 52 125 39 210 #134 50 27 44 65 66 31 Internal Link Dist(ft) 1070 392 350 241 Turn Bay Length(ft) 200 155 155 130 105 95 Base Capacty(vph) 649 2064 932 2401 188 1171 1294 872 657 662 722 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced vlc Ratio 0,21 0,25 0.11 D.34 1,05 0.04 0.01 0.21 0.09 0.09 0.26 ftow.wn,,$�immm -- Volume exceeds capacity„queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Existing Plus Project PM 01108/2019 Baseline Synchro 9 Report Page 1 Timings 1: Market St. & Bryan Ave. 01/2312019 Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations tl+ tT if Traffic Volume(vph) 632 159 821 201 207 Future Volume(vph) 632 159 821 201 207 Tum Type NA Prot NA Prot Perm Protected Phases 6 5 2 4 Permitted Phases 4 Detector Phase 6 5 2 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 20.0 3.0 8.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Split(s) 25.5 7.0 13.5 23.0 210 Total Split(s) 60.5 24.0 60.5 19.0 19.0 Total Split(%) 58.5% 23.2% 58.5% 18.4% 18.4% Yellow Time(s) 4.5 3.0 4.5 3.0 3.0 AJI-Red Time(s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 5.5 4.0 5.5 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Recall Mode Min None Min None None Act Effct Green(s) 26.6 10.3 41.0 12.7 12.7 Actuated 9/C Ratio 0.42 0.16 0.64 0.20 0,20 v1c Ratio 0.56 0.59 0.39 00 0.52 Control Delay 15.5 35.4 5.8 33.3 16.3 Queue delay 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 15.5 35.4 5.8 33.3 16.3 LOS B D A C B Approach Delay 15.5 10.7 24.7 Cycle LiffiW17M, Actuated Cycle Length:63.6 Natural Cycle:60 Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v1c Ratio:0.60 Intersection Signal Delay. 15.0 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 Splits and Phases: 1:Market St.&Bryan Ave. w D2 04 �E35 �p6 Existing Plus Project PM 01/0812019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Timings 3: Auto Center [)[ & El Camino Real 03/13/2019 4^~ w4 � � | ~ Traffic Volume(vph) 128 469 94 768 187 43 18 171 110 7 177 Future Vdome(vph) 128 460 94 768 187 43 18 1/1 110 7 177 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA NA Split NA pm+ov Split NA pm+ov Protected Phases 11 O 6 2 8 8 5 4 4 1 Permitted Phases 8 2 8 4 Detector Phase 1 G 5 2 8 0 5 4 4 1 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 2,0 8.0 2.0 8.0 3.0 3.0 2�0 3.0 3.0 2.0 Minimum Split(s) 6.6 22�4 8.5 22.4 7.7 7.7 8.6 23.8 23.6 8.5 Total Split(s) 16f 22,6 24.6 40.4 40.4 404 24.5 22,6 22,6 16,5 Total Split(%) 13,8% 18,8% 20.4% 33.7% 33.7% 33.7% 20.4% 18.8% 18,8% 13.8% Yellow Time(s) 3,5 4.4 3.5 4.4 37 37 3.5 38 16 3.6 All-Red Time(s) 1.0 tU 1.0 1.0 \O 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0,0 8.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 Total Lost Time(s) 4.5 5.4 4,5 5,4 4,7 4.7 4.5 4.6 4.6 4.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Loud Lag Lead Load Lmod'LugOptindze? Yes Yeo Yeo Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Min None Min None None None None None None Act E0ctGreen(s) 28.2 32.0 29.4 22.1 0,0 6.9 6.8 10.0 7.5 7.5 12.9 Actuated g/CRatio 0.53 0.40 064 0,48 0.00 0.13 013 018 0.14 0.14 0,24 WtRaUo 0.33 0.38 0.18 0.56 t06 0.21 0.08 0.41 0.28 0.28 0.36 Control Delay 9.2 142 7.8 18.3 91.4 30.6 28.3 7.1 30.2 30.3 4.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 9.2 142 7.6 18.3 814 %Q.O 293 7.1 302 30.3 4.8 LOS A B A B F C C A C C A Approach Delay 13] 29,0 13.2 14.8 Approach L03 B C 8 B ~ Cycle Length:110.8 Actuated Cycle Length:54.7 Natural Cycle:85 Control Type.Actuated-Un000rdinated Maximum vcRok1.OS Intersection Signal Delay.20.0 Intersection LOS:C Intersection Capacity Utilization S0.3% ICU Level ofService A Analysis Period(min)15 plits and Phases: 3:Auto Center Dr.&El Camino Real Existing Plus Project PM 01/08/2019 Baseline SynohmOReport Page Queues 1 : Market St. & Bryan Ave. 01/2212019 —40. Lane Group EBT WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Group Flcw(vph) 836 173 892 218 225 vlc Ratio 0.59 0.72 0.41 0.59 0.44 Control Delay 14.1 43.1 6.4 25.4 6.1 Queue delay 0,0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 Total Delay 14.1 43.0 6.4 25.4 6 1 Queue Length 50th(ft) 93 51 60 60 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 165 #145 118 113 42 Internal Link Dist(ft) 629 822 131 Turn Bay Length(ft) 255 55 Base Capacity(vph) 1433 247 2206 572 742 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced vlc Ratio 0,58 0.70 0.40 0.32 0.30 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Existing Plus Project PM—MITIGATED 01/08/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Timings 1 : Market St. & Bryan Ave. 01123/2019 __* #� 4\ /01 Lane Group EBT WSL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations t1k tt r Traffic Volume(vph) 632 159 821 201 207 Future Volume(vph) 632 159 821 201 207 Turn Type NA Prot NA Prot Per Protected Phases 6 5 2 4 Permitted Phases 4 Detector Phase 6 5 2 4 4 Switch Phase AW Minimum Initial(s) 20.0 3.0 8.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Split(s) 25,5 7.0 13.5 23,0 23.0 Total Split(s) 26.0 11.0 37.0 23.0 23.0 Total Split(%) 43.3% 18.3% 61.7% 38,3% 38.3%'' Yellow Time(s) 4.5 3.0 4.5 3,0 3,0 All-Red Time(s) 1,0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 5,5 4.0 5.5 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Recall Mode Min None Min None None Act Effct Green(s) 20,4 6.9 31.3 10.5 10.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.40 0.13 0.61 0.20 0.20 vlc Ratio 0,59 0,72 0.41 0.59 0.4400. Control Delay 14.1 43.0 6.4 25.4 6.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0,0 0,0 0.0"IML Total Delay 14.1 43.0 6.4 25.4 6.1 LOS B D A C A Approach Delay 14.1 12.4 15.6 Actuated Cycle Length:513 Natural Cycle:60 Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum vlc Ratio:0.72 lntersectton Signal Delay: 13.6 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min)15 S lits and Phases: 1:Market St.&Bryan Ave. 02 04 4'0 5 -�Q6 Existing Plus Project PM-MITIGATED 01/08/2019 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Appendix 5 Signal Timing Sheets TUSTIN (TUSTIN RANCH ROAD AREA) BRYAN AV. & MARKET ST. 12/7/2018 9:46 Configuration ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Controller Sequence Priority 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Ring 1 Phases 1 2 1 3 4 1 9 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ring 2 Phases 5 6 1 7 8 111 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 In Use. . . . . . X X X X Exclusive Ped . Direction . . . . EB NB EBL WB Overlap A B C D Direction . . . Load Switch Channel/Driver Group Assign (Info Only) : Load Signal' Switch Driver Group (MMU) Phase/ Channel Ovlap Ped 1 1 2 . . . . . . 2 3 . . . . . . 3 4 . . . . 4 5 . . . . . . 5 6 . . . . . . 6 7 . . . . . . 7 8 . . . . 8 9 2 X 10 . . . . . . 4 X 11 . . . . . . 6 X 12 . . . . . . 8 X 13 . . . . . . A 14 . . . . . . B 15 . . . . C 16 . . . . . . D - V TUSTIN (TUSTIN RANCH ROAD AREA) BRYAN AV. & MARKET ST. 12/7/2018 9:46 Configuration Continued ---_-_----------------------------------------------------------------- Enable BIU: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Terminal/Facilities. . Detector Rack. . Type 2 Runs as Type 1. MMU Disable. . . . . . . . X Diagnostic Enable. . . . . . Peer-Peer Comm Enable. . . . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Peer To Peer Addresses 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 Port 2: Port 2 Protocol . . . . . . Terminal Port 2 Enable . . . . . . . . . YES AB3418 Address. . . . . . . . . 1 AB3418 Group Address. . . . . . 0 AB3418 Response Delay . . . . . 0 AB3418 Single Flag Enable . . . NO AB3418 Drop-Out Time. . . . . . 0 AB3418 TOD SF Select. . . . . . 0 Data Rate . . . . . . . . . . . 1200 bps Data, Parity, Stop. . . . . . . 8, 0, 1 Port 3: Port 3 Protocol . . . . . . . . Telemetry Port 3 Enable . . . . . . . . . YES Telemetry Address . . . . . . . 20 System Detector 9--16 Address. 0 Telemetry Response Delay. 8000 AB3418 Address. . . . . . 0 AB3418 Group Address. . . . . . 0 AB3418 Response Delay . . . . . 0 AB3418 Single Flag Enable . . . NO AB3418 Drop-Out Time. . . . . . 0 AB3418 TOD SF, Select. . . . . . 0 . Duplex. . . . . . . . . . . . . Full Data Rate . . . . . . . . . . . 1200 bps Data, Parity, Stop. . . . . . . 8, 0, 1 TUSTIN (TUSTIN RANCH ROAD AREA) BRYAN AV. & MARKET ST. 12/7/2018 9:46 Configuration Continued ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Event Enabling Alarm Enabling Critical RFE'S (MMU/TF) . . . . . X ALARM 1 . . . . . . . . . . . X Non-Critical RFE'S (DET/TEST) X ALARM 2 . . . . . . . . . . X Detector Errors . . . . . . . . . X ALARM 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . Coordination Errors . . . . . . . X ALARM 4 . . . . . . . . . . . X MMU Flash Faults. . . . . . . . . X ALARM 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . Local Flash Faults. . . . . . . . X ALARM 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . Preempt . . . . . . . . . . . . . X ALARM 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . Power On/Off. . . . . . . . . . . X ALARM 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . Low Battery . . . . . . . . . . . X ALARM 9 . . . . . . . . . . . . ALARM 10. . . . . . . . . . . . ALARM 11. . . . . . . . . . . . ALARM 12. . . . . . . . . . . . ALARM 13 . . . . . . . . . . . . ALARM 14 . . . . . . . . . . . . ALARM 15. . . . . . . . . . . . ALARM 16. . . . . . . . . . . . Supervisor Access Code. . . **** Data Change Access Code **** MMU Compatibility Program (Info Only) Channel Is Allowed to Time With Channel 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 . . . X- X 2 X X 3 X X . 4 X X 5 . . . . 6 . . . . 7 . . . . 8 . . . . 9 . . . X X 10. . . X X 11. 12. . . . 13. . . X X 14. . . X X 15. . . Version Info: Software Assy. Part No. Version Boot 27831 2.83 Program 45561 6.5 Application . 3 Help 27891 5.13 Configuration 27908 C0000 TUSTIN (TUSTIN RANCH ROAD AREA) BRYAN AV. & MARKET ST. 12/7/2018 9:46 By--Phase Timing Data ------------------__--------------------------------------------------- Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12. Direction EB NB EBI, WB Minimum Green 0 8 0 3 3 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bike Min Green 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cond Sery Min Grn 0 0 0 0 0 0 " 0 0 0 0 0 0 Walk 0 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped Clearance 7 7 7 14 7 10 7 7 7 7 7 7 Veh Extension 0.0 5 .0 0.0 2.0 1.5 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Alt Veh Exten 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Max Extension 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Max 1 0 55 0 15 20 55 0 0 0 0 0 0 Max 2 0 40 0 15 20 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 Max 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Det. Fail Max 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yellow Change 3.0 4 .5 3.0 3.0 3.0 4.5 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Red Clearance 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0. 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Red Revert 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6. 0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Act. B4 Init 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sec/Actuation 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Max Initial 0 6 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time B4 Reduction 0 12 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cars Waiting 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce 0 12 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 Minimum Gap 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TUSTIN (TUSTIN RANCH ROAD AREA) BRYAN AV. & MARKET ST. 12/7/2018 9:46 Power Start, Remote Flash ------------------------------------------------------------------- Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Power Start. X X . External Start X X . Into Remote Flash. X X . Exit Remote Flash. X X Overlap Remote Flash Yellow. A B C D Flash Together . . . X X X X X X . Initialization Interval: Power Start . . . . . . . . Green External Start. . . . . . . Green Power Start All Red Time. 6 Power Start Flash Time. 8 Remote Flash Options: Out of Flash Yellow . . . . NO Out of Flash All Red. . . . NO Minimum Recall. . . . . . . NO Alternate Flash •. . . . . . NO Flash Thru Load Switches. NO Cycle Through Phases. NO TUSTIN (TUSTIN RANCH ROAD AREA) BRYAN AV. & MARKET ST. 12/7/2018 9:46 Option Data -----------------------------------------------------------------_---- Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Guaranteed Passage . . . Call To NonActuated 1 . X X . Call To NonActuated 2 . X X . Dual Entry.. . . . . . . X X . Conditional Service . . . Conditional Reservice . . Actuated Rest in Walk . . Flashing Walk . . . . . . Enable Programmable Options Dual Entry. . . . . . . . . . . ON Backup Protection Group 1 . . . . OFF Conditional Service . . . . . . OFF Backup Protection Group 2 . . . . OFF Ped Clearance Protection. . . . OFF Backup Protection Group 3 . . . . OFF Special Preempt Overlap Flash OFF Simultaneous Gap Group 1. . . . . ON Cond Service Det Cross Switch OFF Simultaneous Gap Group 2. . . . . OFF Lock Detectors in Red Only. . . OFF Simultaneous Gap Group 3. . . . . OFF Five Section Left Turn Control Phases: 5-2 7-4 1-6 3-8 11-10 9-12 Left Turn Head. . . . TUSTIN (TUSTIN RANCH ROAD AREA) BRYAN AV. & MARKET ST. 12/7/2018 9:46 Recall Data, Dimming ------------------------------------------------------------------- Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Locking Detector. X ., X . Vehicle Recall. . . . . X X . Pedestrian Recall . . . . Recall To Max . . . . . . Soft Recall . . . . . . . Don't Rest Here . . . . . . Ped Dark if No Call . . . Dimming: Load Switch 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Green/Walk. . . . NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO Yellow/Ped Clear. NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO Red/Don't Walk. . NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO TUSTIN (TUSTIN RANCH ROAD AREA) BRYAN AV. & MARKET ST. 12/7/2018 9:46 Detector Type/Timers ----------------------------------------------------------------- Locking Log Timers Don't Reset Det. Memory Enable Extend Delay Extend Type 1 NO NO 0.0 0 0 - Normal 2 NO YES 0.0 0 0 - Normal 3 NO NO 0.0 0 0 - Normal 4 NO NO 0.0 0 0 - Normal 5 NO NO 0.0 0 0 - Normal 6 NO YES 0.0 0 0 - Normal 7 NO YES 0.0 0 6 - Calling 8 NO YES 0.0 0 0 - Normal 9 NO YES 0.0 0 0 - Normal 10 NO YES 0. 0 0 0 - Normal 11 NO NO 0.0 15 1 - Extend/Delay 12 NO NO 0. 0 15 1 - Extend/Delay 13 NO YES 0.0 0 0 - Normal 14 NO YES 0.0 0 0 - Normal 15 NO NO 0.0 0 0 - Normal 16 NO NO 0.0 0 0 - Normal 17 NO NO 0.0 0 0 - Normal 18 NO NO 0.0 0 0 - Normal 19 NO NO 0.0 0 0 - Normal 20 NO NO 0.0 0 0 - Normal 21 NO NO 0.0 0 0 - Normal 22 NO NO 0.0 0 0 - Normal 23 NO NO 0.0 0 0 - Normal 24 NO NO 0.0 0 0 - Normal 25 NO NO 0.0 0 0 - Normal 26 NO NO 0.0 0 0 - Normal 27 NO NO 0.0 0 0. - Normal 28 NO NO 0.0 0 0 - Normal 29 NO NO 0.0 0 0 - Normal 30 NO NO 0.0 0 0 - Normal 31 NO NO 0.0 0 0 - Normal 32 NO NO 0.0 0 0 - Normal Detector Names Det 1: Detector 1 Det 17: Detector 17 Det 2: WB PH 2 LIMIT 1-2 Det 18: Detector 18 Det 3: Detector 3 Det 19: Detector 19 Det 4: NB PH 4 LT Det 20: Detector 20 Det 5: WB PH 5 LT Det 21: Detector 21 Det 6: EB PH 6 LIMIT 1-2 Det 22: Detector 22 Det 7: Detector 7 Det 23: Detector 23 Det 8: Detector 8 Det 24: Detector 24 Det 9: Detector 9 Det 25: Detector 25 Det 10: WB PH 2 ADV 1-2 Det 26: Detector 26 Det 11: Detector 11 Det 27: Detector 27 Det 12: NB PH 4 RT Det 28: Detector 28 Det 13: Detector 13 Det 29: Detector 29 Det 14 : EB PH 6 ADV 1-2 Det 30: Detector 30 Det 15: Detector 15 Det 31: Detector 31 Det 16: Detector 16 Det 32: Detector 32 TUSTIN (TUSTIN RANCH ROAD AREA) BRYAN AV. & MARKET ST. 12/7/2018 9:46 Detector Phase Assignment ---------_------------------------------------------------------------- Phase Det. 1. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 X 3 4 X 5 X 6 X 7 8 9 10 X 11 12 X 13 14 X 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 TUSTIN (JAMBOREE ROAD AREA) EL CAMINO REAL 6 AUTO CENTER DR. 12/7/2018 9:49 Timing Data -----------------------------------__------------------------------- Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Direction E/L W N S W/L E Minimum Green 2 8 3 3 2 8 0 0 Walk 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 0 Ped Clearance 7 10 7 12 7 10 7 7 Vehicle Extension 1.0 4 .0 � 2 .0 2 .0 1.0 4 .0 0.0 0.0 Max Extension 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Max 1 12 35 30 18 20 35 0 0 Max 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Max 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yellow Change 3.5 4 .4 3.7 3. 6 3.5 4 .4 3.0 3.0 Red Clearance 1.0 1.0 1.0 1. 0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 Red Revert 2.0 2.0 2.0 2. 0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Actuations B4 Init 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Seconds/Actuation 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Max Initial 0 8 0 0 0 8 0 0 Time B4 Reduction 0 8 0 0 0 8 0 0 Cars Waiting 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Time To Reduce 0 8 0 0 0 8 0 0 Minimum Gap 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 Cond Sery Min Green 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TUSTIN (JAMBOREE ROAD AREA) EL CAMINO REAL & AUTO CENTER DR. 12/7/2018 9:49 Recall & Start/Flash Data ----------------------------------_---------------------------------- Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phases In Use . . . . . X X X X X X Locking Detector. X X Vehicle Recall. . . . . Pedestrian Recall . Recall To Max . . . . . Soft Recall . . . . . . X X Power Start . . . . . . X X External Start. . . . . X X Remote Flash Phases X X Initialization Interval Green Yellow Red Yellow Ovlps Power Start. . . . X External Start . . X Power Start All Red Time. . . . 4 Power Start Flash Time. . . . . 10 TUSTIN (JAMBOREE ROAD AREA) EL CAMINO REAL & AUTO CENTER DR. 12/7/2018 9:49 Option Data ----------------------------------------------------------------- Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Guaranteed Passage. . Call to Non Actuated 1. Call to Non Actuated 2. Dual Entry. . . . . . . X X Conditional Service . Conditional Reservice . Actuated Rest In Walk . Flashing Walk . . . . . Enable Programmable Options Dual Entry . . . . . . . . . . . X Backup Protection Group 1. X Conditional Service. . . . . . . Backup Protection Group 2. . . . Ped Clearance Protection . . . . Simultaneous Gap Group 1 . . X Special Preempt Ovlp Flash . . . Simultaneous Gap Group 2 . . . . Five Section Left Turn Control Phases: 1-6 3-8 5-2 7-4 Left Turn Head r TUSTIN (JAMBOREE ROAD AREA) EL CAMINO REAL & AUTO CENTER DR. 12/7/2018 9:49 Detector Type and Phase Assignment Data -------------------------_------------------__---------------------- Type Phase Assignment 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Detector 1 . . . 0 X Detector 2 . . . 5 X Detector 3 . . . 0 X Detector 4 . . . 0 X Detector 5 . . . 0 X Detector 6 . . . 5 X Detector 7 . . . 0 Detector 8 . . . 0 Detector 9 . . . 0 Detector 10 0 X Detector 11 0 Detector 12 1 X Detector 13 . . . 1 X Detector 14 0 X Detector 15 1 X Detector 16 1 X Note on Detector Type: 0 = normal 1 = extend/delay 2 = stop bar 3 = stop bar w/timer (use extend timer) 4 = calling 5 = stop bar with resettable timer (use extend timer) TUSTIN (JAMBOREE ROAD AREA) EL CAMINO REAL & AUTO CENTER DR. 12/7/2018 9:49 Detector Timers and Cross Switching Data ----------------------------------------------------------------- Timers Cross Switching Phase Extend Delay 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Detector 1 . . . 0.0 0 X Detector 2 . . . 2.0 0 Detector 3 . . . 0.0 0 Detector 4 0.0 0 Detector 5 . . . 0.0 0 X Detector 6 . . . 2.0 0 Detector 7 . . . 0.0 0 Detector 8 . . . 0.0 0 Detector 9 . . . 0.0 0 Detector 10 . . . 0.0 0 Detector 11 0.0 0 Detector 12 0.0 5 Detector 13 . . . 0.0 5 Detector 14 0.0 0 Detector 15 0.0 10 Detector 16 0.0 10 ATTACHMENT E QUEUE MANAGEMENT PLAN 1 AND 2 H: - Lir'_ - _ I cu z I m }} i ® } Eo 1 ' I } _ ' Y } 4 I � c•a %iiiiii No CF S I } � Ln CD co 0 X 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 ! r 1 I�1®1 1®1®1 ia*� ,®! ,®! ®1 � - � � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 �•r o I uj i Uf 1 I 1 f i i w LUt I . , W—wI,.. 1 F ,_ C1 , W— aa31O d3li In in Its ,� n3 Of JQ Ln c 19Z1 U ll c _ KEEP CLEAN O O_� a� I v 3 crim ! U U U � w I c z n w Q .� O f cn 2Up � Z LLJ m WV `^ w OL c~f) U f73 Q V7 `Q`x / c:� W h - EU�qab anoAa'I alluuauawosl-.e6b'S6ipY'97,N`J 3.+tip'saArtc9J'3u1nn^bZl."FZ,1-141• ',"..•1,,'n'VPPV seg:{.u¢b ullsnl-ZYbEZ\fZ1;H L.-. z Cl) LID ® cwm LL -177 co4f I N ria C C -- N U CD ro 3 -- -!- '1 T 1 1 Qj 7 rr 1 1 IX ffffCUJJJJJ 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 r 1 1 1 Cf 1 1 1 1 E 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 iJ7E ! 1 r 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 C `n O d LU 77 i 1 CD h l- J 1 1 LU 1 w w 1 1 11 Lu ggLU 1. _{ _ 'OL � 1 LLJ CD- 0 -� 9Z G e q KEEP CLEA �O O _O nn r O dow arm — •/l' RJ > Lo CZ LO O -0 (1)o cis O > LU LU / w L) E 0 1 CL a u LO 0) Q r ti^, ZI AA, ✓✓ 00 O I 6V qel jn An alUnaawwasl we04'6 51OZ 9I•dy Gnp sain8y Aurnanb ZLDF21sa1g14x31v8KavlvarS{AAtl sg�4au¢d'frisnl-ZLwE2\c Z1'H ATTACHMENT F RESOLUTION NO. 4385 RESOLUTION NO. 4385 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2018-00018 AND DESIGN REVIEW 2018-00026, A REQUEST TO DEMOLISH THE EXISTING GOODYEAR TIRE CENTER AND ADJACENT GOODYEAR PARKING AREA AT 2541 EL CAMINO REAL AND REPLACE WITH 56 NEW PARKING STALLS AND TO- CONSTRUCT A NEW 16 PUMP COSTCO GASOLINE FUEL STATION WITH CANOPY AND RELATED EQUIPMENT AT 2655 EL CAMINO REAL. The Planning Commission does hereby resolve as follows: I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: A. That a proper application for Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 2018-00018 and Design Review (DR) 2018-00026 has been submitted by Terry Odle1MG2, applicant, requesting authorization to demolish the existing Goodyear Tire Center and adjacent Goodyear parking area at 2541 El Camino Real and to construct a new 16 pump Costco gasoline fuel station with canopy and related equipment located at 2655 EI Camino Real. B. That the site is zoned as Planned Community Mixed-Use and within the East Tustin Specific Plan (ETSP) and has a General Plan land-use designation of Planned Community Commercial/Business. (PCCB). The project has been reviewed for consistency with the Air Quality Sub-element of the City of Tustin General Plan and has been determined to be consistent with the Air Quality Sub-element. C. Pursuant to ETSP Section 3.7.2.A.1.u, new service stations are permitted subject to approval of a CUP. D. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed, and held on said application on June 11, 2019, by the Planning Commission. E. That the establishment, maintenance, and operation of the proposed gasoline fuel station to an existing Costco Warehouse will not, under the circumstances of this case, be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use, nor be injurious or detrimental to the property and improvements in the neighborhood of the subject property, or to the general welfare of the City of Tustin in that: Resolution No. 4385 Page 2 1) Pursuant to Section 3.8.2 and 3.7.2.A.1.0 of the ETSP, the Specific Plan allows for service stations with the approval of I a Conditional Use Permit. 2) Pursuant to Tustin City Code (TCC) Section 9291c, the Planning Commission is authorized to act on CUPs and impose conditions deemed necessary to protect the public interest and ensure compliance with the General Plan. 3) The proposed use, as conditioned, would not be detrimental to surrounding properties in that the scope of operations forthe proposed service station would be compatible and provide support services for the uses in the area. 4) The proposed use is not anticipated to result in parking impacts since the site provides more than the TCC required number of parking spaces to service the existing shopping center and proposed use. Demolition of the existing Goodyear Tire Center building will be replaced with additional parking spaces that will continue to provide adequate parking for the shopping center. 5) The proposed use is not anticipated to result in queueing or circulation impacts as the project has two (2) queue management plans incorporated into the Traffic Analysis to accommodate . potential queueing. demands. If queues cannot be adequately managed by the strategies in the plan, closure of the northbound right turn lane with retractable bollards and re-routing of customers to the next parking aisle will be implemented. In addition to the queuing management plans, the project has been conditioned to provide three (3) on-site traffic attendants to guide and direct traffic. Through a combination of queueing plans and manned personal for traffic guidance, the use will not impact circulation on the site or within the existing.shopping center. 1 6) The proposed project, as conditioned, adequately addresses anticipated off-site traffic impacts through the installation of a new westbound right turn lane along EI Camino Real into the Costco Warehouse parking lot at the intersection of Auto Center Drive and EI Camino Real and lane restriping along El Camino Real to accommodate the new vehicle lane. T) The proposed use, as.conditioned, would not create a noise impact on the surrounding neighborhood since the service station would be subject to the Tustin Noise Ordinance and General Plan Noise Element. Resolution No.4385 Page 3 8) The construction and operation of the gasoline station will operate within the ministerial requirements of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and the project has been conditioned to comply with SCAQMD air quality standards and all required permits. 9) The proposed use would not be detrimental to the surrounding properties in that the hours of operation of the instruction would be consistent with the general business hours of other businesses within the surrounding vicinity. 10) The location, size and general appearance of the proposed service station, canopy and equipment enclosure is compatible of the existing structures and surrounding area in that the proposed improvements, including the canopy, is proportionately sized for the site. 11) As conditioned, the applicant will be required to submit a Master Sign_ Plan. F. That the location, size, and general appearance of the proposed project, as conditioned, is compatible with the surrounding area in that the proposed improvements, including the canopy and equipment enclosure, is proportionately sized to the site. The proposal will not impair the orderly and harmonious development of the area, the present or future development therein, or the occupancy as a whole. In making such findings, the Planning Commission has considered at least the following items: 1) The height, bulk, and area of proposed use is compatible with the existing Costco warehouse building. 2) Setbacks and site planning have been thoroughly evaluated in that the proposed project location, layout and proximity to the existing Costco Warehouse building has been analyzed and the proposed project complies with the requirements established in the ETSP. 3) Exterior material and colors have been reviewed for the proposed project and they are compatible with the existing warehouse building and other retail tenants within the shopping center. 4) Type and pitch of roofs have been reviewed for the proposed project and the proposed roofed canopy over the fuel pumps is compatible with the existing warehouse building and other retail tenants within the shopping center. Resolution No.4385 Page 4 5) Landscaping, parking area design and traffic circulation have been reviewed and analyzed in that the project includes a Traffic Analysis that addressed overall on-site circulation. The installation of substantial new landscaping throughout the project area and within the remaining areas of the existing Costco parking lot will improve and enhance the overall appearance. 6) Location and method of refuse storage has been adequately addressed in that the proposed project does not propose any changes to the existing refuse function and operation. 7) Physical relationship of proposed structures to existing structures has been evaluated in that the proposed canopy and small equipment will aid in the function of the gasoline station. The canopy will be proportional in height and area to the other buildings on the project site and within the existing shopping center overall. The location of the equipment is ancillary to the gasoline station and will be screened by either a wall and/or landscaping. 8) Appearance and design relationship of proposed structures to existing structures is consistent and compatible in that the proposed columns and colors for the canopy and equipment enclosure will correspond with the exterior of the existing warehouse building. Proposed landscaping will provide consistency throughout the parking lot and enhance the appearance of the proposed use. 9) Development guidelines and criteria for the ETSP Mixed-Use area as well as the City s Service Station Guidelines adopted by the City Council have been reviewed and incorporated into the:project. G. This project is categorically exempt from further environmental review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section Section 15332, Class 32, "In-Fill Development Projects" in that the project is consistent with the City's General Plan and ETSP and occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five (5) acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species. The project can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. If. The Planning Commission hereby approves CUP 2018-00018 and DR 2018-00026, authorizing the demolition of the existing Goodyear Tire Center and adjacent Goodyear parking area at 2541 EI Camino Real and construction of a new 16 pump Costco gasoline fuel station with canopy and related equipment located at 2655 EI Resolution No.4385 Page 5 Camino Real. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, at a regular meeting on the 11 w day of June, 2019. STEVE KOZAK Chairperson ELIZABETH A. BINSACK Planning Commission Secretary STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) CITY OF TUSTIN ) I, ELIZABETH A. BINSACK, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the Planning Commission Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, California; that Resolution No. 4385 was duly passed and adopted,at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission, held on the 11 th of June, 2019. PLANNING COMMISSIONER AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONER NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONER ABSTAINED: PLANNING COMMISSIONER ABSENT: ELIZABETH A. BINSACK Planning Commission Secretary EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2018-00018 DESIGN REVIEW 2018-00026 GENERAL (1) 1.1 The proposed project shall substantially conform to the submitted plans for the project date stamped June 11, 2019, on file with the Community Development Department, as herein modified, or as modified by the Community Development Director in accordance with this Exhibit. The Director may also approve subsequent minor modifications to plans during plan check if such modifications are consistent with provisions of the Tustin City Code or other applicable regulations. (1) 1.2 This approval shall become null and void unless the use is established within twelve (12) months of the date of this Exhibit. Time extensions may be granted if a written request and associated fee are received by the Community Development Department within thirty (30) days prior to expiration. (1) 1.3 Unless otherwise specified, the conditions contained in this Exhibit shall be complied with as specified, subject to review and approval by the Community Development Department. (1) 1.4 Approval of CUP 2018-000181DR 2018-00026 is contingent upon the applicant returning to the Community Development Department a notarized "Agreement to Conditions Imposed" form and the property owner signing and recording with the County Clerk-Recorder a notarized "Notice of Discretionary Permit Approval and Conditions of Approval"form. The forms shall be established by the Director of Community Development, and evidence of recordation shall be provided to the Community Development, Department. SOURCE CODES (1)STANDARD CONDITION (5) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY REQUIREMENT (2)CEQA MITIGATION (6) LANDSCAPING GUIDELINES (3) BUILDING CODE (7) PC1CC POLICY (4) DESIGN REVIEW ***EXCEPTION Exhibit A Resolution No.4385 Page 2 (1) 1.5 CUP 2018-00018/DR 2018-00026 may be reviewed on an annual basis, or more often if necessary, by the Community Development Director. The Community Development Director shall review the use to ascertain compliance with conditions of approval and compatibility with the area. If the use is not operated in accordance with CUP 2018-00018/DR 2018-00026, or is found to be a nuisance or negative impacts are affecting the surrounding tenants or neighborhood, the Community Development Director shall impose additional conditions or the applicant may be required to implement other measures to eliminate the nuisance or negative impacts, or may initiate proceedings to revoke CUP 2018-00018/DR 2018-00026. Failure to comply with conditions of approval, or if the establishment creates undue burden to City resources, or if the CUP is abandoned for a twelve (12) month period, these circumstances shall be grounds for revocation of the CUP. (1) 1.6 Any transfer of ownership of the establishment and/or operator shall require the new owner and/or operator to sign and return an "Agreement to Conditions Imposed" form provided by the Community Development. Failure to do so would be a basis for revocation.proceeding. (1) 1.7 Any violation of any of the conditions imposed is subject to the issuance of an Administrative Citation pursuant to TCC Section 1162(a). (1) 1.8 As a condition of approval of CUP 2018-00018/DR 2018-00026, the applicant shall agree, at its sole cost and expense, to defend, indemnify, and hold 1harrnless the City, its officers, employees, agents, and consultants, from any claim, action, or proceeding brought by a third-party against the City, its officers, agents,.and employees, which seeks to attack, set aside, challenge, void, or annul an approval of the City Council, the Planning Commission, or any other decision-making body, including staff, concerning this project. The City agrees to promptly notify the applicants of any such claim or action filed-against the City and to fully cooperate in the defense-of any such action. The City may, at its sole cost and expense, elect to participate in'defense of any such action under this condition. (1) 1.9 The applicant shall be responsible for costs associated with any necessary code enforcement action, including attorney's fees, subject to the applicable notice, hearing, and appeal process as established by the City Council by ordinance. (1) 1.10 All on-site signs shall comply with the City's Sign Code. Prior to the issuance of a sign permit, the applicant must apply for a Master Sign Program forthe property.Any proposed painted wall signs, including murals Exhibit A Resolution No. 4385 Page 3 or graphics to be added to the building or pump areas shall require a separate approval of a CUP. (1) 1.11 All final exterior colors and materials shall be subject to review and approval of the Community Development Department and final field inspection by the Planning Division. Colors, materials and textures shall be noted on the construction plans. (1) 1.12 The applicant shall obtain approval from the Air Quality Management District prior to the issuance of the building or grading permit. The applicant shall comply with all South Coast Air Quality Control District regulations and shall acquire an Authority to Construct ATC) and Permit to Operate (PTO). LANDSCAPING (1) 1.13 All proposed landscaping and irrigation plans shall comply with the approved plans and with the City's Water Efficiency Landscape Ordinance. A Landscape Installation Certificate of Completion, certifying that the landscaping was installed in accordance with the approved plans, shall be submitted to the City prior to the final inspections by Building and Planning Divisions. (1) 1.14 An irrigation plan should be provided which shows the location and control of backflow prevention devices at the meter, pipe size, sprinkler type, spacing, and coverage details for all equipment. Install efficient irrigation systems which minimize runoff and evaporation and maximize the amount of water which will reach the plant roots. Drip irrigation, soil moisture sensors, and automatic irrigation systems are a few methods of increasing irrigation efficiency. (1) 1.15 Backflow devices and double detector checks shall be painted to match surrounding landscaping when in planters or painted to match the building when located adjacent to the building. Landscaping shall be utilized to screen the devices whenever possible. (1) 1.16 All plant materials shall be installed in a healthy and vigorous condition, typical to the species, and shall be maintained in a neat and healthy condition. Maintenance includes, but is not limited to, trimming, mowing, weeding, removal of litter, fertilizing, regular watering, and replacement of dead or diseased dying plants. Unhealthy or dead trees shall be replaced within seventy-two (72) hours upon notification by the City. Exhibit A Resolution No.4385 Page 4 {***} 1.17 Additional landscape screening shall be provided at the southeast comer of the Costco property (adjacent to the EI Modena-Tustin Channel) to screen the proposed controller enclosure and clean air separator. r MISCELLANEOUS (1) 1.18 Adequate lighting shall be provided to illuminate the fueling area, subject to Community Development Department review and approval. Said lighting shall meet requirements set forth in the Building Security and California Fire Codes. (1) 1.19 Fire and Police access and passage shall be permitted at all times. (1) 1.20 "No Loitering" signage shall be posted on the site (1) 1.21 Outdoor vending activities are prohibited. (1) 1.22 All utility services serving the site shall be installed and maintained underground. USE RESTRICTIONS (1) 2.1 Business hours are limited to the following: Monday--Sunday— 5:00 AM— 10:00 PM Modifications to hours or operation may be modified by the Director of Community Development if it is determined that no impacts to surrounding tenants or properties will occur. (1) 2.2 Business operations shall be conducted in a manner that does not create a public or private nuisance. Any such nuisance must be abated immediately upon notice by the City. (1) 2.3 No outdoor storage is permitted or display of materials shall be permitted except allowed by the TCC. (1) 2.4 Storage and/or advertising of vehicles for sale or lease is not permitted. (1) 2.5 If water and air are to be provided to customers, then it shall be made available at no cost and for twenty-four(24) hours per day, seven (7) days per week. Exhibit A Resolution No. 4385 Page 5 (1) 2.6 The subject property shall be maintained in a safe, clean and sanitary condition at all times. The property owners shall be responsible for the daily maintenance and up-keep of the businesses', including but not limited to trash removal, painting, graffiti removal, and maintenance of improvements to ensure that the facilities are maintained in a neat and attractive manner. Any graffiti painted. or marked upon the premises or any adjacent area under control of the property owner or the business shall be removed or painted within 24 hours of being applied. (1) 2.7 All litter shall be removed from the exterior areas around the premises including public sidewalk areas,alleys and parking areas, no less frequently than once each day. TRAFFIC, PARKING AND CIRCULATION (***) 2.8 Retractable bollard's shall be installed within the northbound right-hand turn lane (within shopping center off Auto Center Drive and EI Camino,Real) to the gas station/re-fueling area as part of the queue management plan. Use of bollards may be necessary during peak times, per the approved pian. (***) 2.9 In addition to the queue management plan contained within the Final Traffic Analysis date stamped April 17, 2019, the applicant, at a minimum, shall provide three (3) traffic attendants during peak periods; 1-2 attendants directing cars to a queue lane and 1-2 attendants near the pump entrance directing cars to a fueling position. The third attendant shall be a floater depending on the need and could either be placed near the pumps or at the ` front of the queue lanes. In addition, there shall be one (1) individual staffed at the station during all open business hours. Said individual shall manage the overall operations for the gas station. (***) 2.10 The 36 parking spaces in the row directly north of the proposed gas station and the 13 parking spaces along the east property line adjacent to the EI Modena-Tustin Channel shall be restricted to employee parking only. (***) 2.11 The words "KEEP CLEAR' shall be painted in large capitalized letters onto the pavement of the parking lot adjacent to the vehicular exit from the gas station per the approved plans. Said signage shall help to maintain an unobstructed opening adjacent to the gas station and allow for vehicles entering and exiting from.the fueling area. Exhibit A Resolution No.4385 Page 6 (***) 2.12 A five (5) foot wide access stair shall be installed within the existing block wall along the south property line nearest the gas station adjacent to EI Camino Real. Said access stair will allow for emergency access (i.e. hose pull) by _the Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA) in the event of an emergency. (***} 2.13 If, in the future, the City's Community Development Director, Police Chief and/or Public Works Department determine that a parking or traffic queuing problem exists on the site or in the vicinity as a result of the facility, the Community Development Director, Police Chief, and/or Public Works Department may require the applicant to prepare a parking demand analysis ortraffic study queuing analysis and the applicant shall be required to provide measures to alleviate the problem. Said measures shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department, Police Chief, and/or Public Works Department. 2.14 Per the approved plans, the applicant shall install a westbound right tum lane along EI Camino Real into the Costco Warehouse parking lot at the intersection of Auto Center Drive and EI Camino Real. A second designated right turn lane shall be installed on the site to funnel vehicles into the Costco Gasoline fueling area. Final lane striping plans for EI Camino Real shall be subject to the review and approval of the Public Works/Engineering Division. (***) 2.15 Following demolition of the Goodyear Tire Center building, the new parking lot shall be restriped in accordance with TCC Section 9266. PLANCHECK SUBMITTAL (1) 3.1 At the time of building or encroachment permit application, the plans shall comply with the latest edition of the codes, City Ordinances, State, Federal laws, and regulations as adopted by the City Council of the City of Tustin. (1) 3.2 Prior to issuance of any permits, the applicant shall submit for approval by the Community Development and Public Works Departments, a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). If the WQMP has been determined to be a Priority WQMP, it shall identify Low Impact Development (LID) principles and Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on- site to retain storm water and treat predictable pollutant run-off. The Priority WQMP shall identify: the implementation of BMPs, the assignment of long-term maintenance responsibilities. (specifying the developer, parcel owner, maintenance association, lessees, etc.), and reference to the location(s) of structural BMPs. Exhibit A Resolution No. 4385 Page 7 (1) 3.3 Prior to submittal of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the applicant shall submit a deposit of$2,700.00 to the Public Works Department for the estimated cost of reviewing the WQMP. (1) 3.4 Prior to issuance of any permits,the applicant shall record "Covenant and Agreement Regarding O & M Plan to Fund and Maintain Water Quality BMPs. Consent to Inspect, and Indemnification" with the County Clerk- Recorder. This document shall bind current and future owner(s) of the property regarding implementation and maintenance of the structural and non-structural BMPs as specified in the approved WQMP. (1) 3.5 Prior to any work in the public right-of-way, an Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from and applicable fees paid to the Public Works Department. (1) 3.6 Prior to issuance of an Encroachment Permit, the applicant shall submit to the Public Works Department 24" x 36" reproducible street improvement plans, as prepared by a California Registered Civil Engineer, for approval. The plans shall clearly show existing and proposed surface and underground improvements, including construction, restdping of El Camino Real to accommodate a dedicated westbound right-turn lane, and/or replacement of any missing or damaged public improvements adjacent to this development. (1) 3.7 Prior to issuance of an Encroachment Permit for construction within the public right-of-way, a 24" x 36" construction area traffic control plan, as prepared by a California Registered Traffic Engineer, or Civil Engineer experienced in this type of plan preparation, shall be prepared and submitted to the Public Works Department for approval. (1) 3.8 Current Federal Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA) requirements shall be met at all driveways and sidewalks adjacent to the site. City of Tustin standards shall apply, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. "(1) 3.9 Prior to issuance of a Building Permit,- the applicant shall submit an underground storage tank plan to the Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA)for review and approval. (1) 3.10 In accordance with City policies, the developer shall post security for the grading permit in an amount to be determined by the Building Official. The required amount must include items relating to hazardous conditions such as erosion and air/dust control, the cost of completing any Mechanically-Stabilized Earth (MSE)walls, provisions for landscaping as relating to slope stability, compliance with approved landscape plans, and contingency funds which must include an allowance for site maintenance. Exhibit A Resolution No. 4385 Page 8 (1) 3.11 The developer shall submit a complete hydrology and hydraulic study (including off-site areas affecting the development), prepared by a California-registered professional civil engineer, consistent with the use of the criteria of the Orange County Hydrology Manual, to the City Building Official for review and approval. The study shall be consistent with the study submitted during the entitlement review process. The study report shall determine potential storm water runoff rates and peak flows for the City of Tustin and County of Orange design storms. Enough detail shall be provided to develop the existing conditions and proposed project conditions potential hydrograph and timing of peak flows. The study report shall demonstrate that the effect of storm water discharge to any City-, County-, or Other Agency-owned drainage or flood control facility as mitigated shall be designed and implemented to prevent post- construction storm flows from exceeding pre-construction volumes and rates. (1) 3.12 The developer shall submit storm drain plans, prepared by a California registered professional civil engineer, depicting proposed storm drain improvements for the project. All storm drain improvements shall comply with the City of Tustin Construction Standards for Private Streets, Storm Drain and On-Site Private Improvements Manual and the Orange County Local Drainage Manual. (1) 3.13 The developer shall submit precise grading plans, prepared by a California registered professional civil engineer, depicting proposed grading, erosion control and improvements for the project. All plans and design shall comply with the City of Tustin Grading Manual and requirements. (1) 3.14 Prior to approval of the final design plans and issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall conduct a site-specific geotechnical investigation for the entire site and prepare a report that fully assesses the geologic and soil conditions of the site. As part of the report preparation, soil sampling and any geotechnical testing will be completed at each location where structures are to be erected. The report shall provide grading and structural design recommendations for avoiding liquefaction, subsidence or collapse for each of the proposed structures. The recommendations shall be included in the plans submitted to the City. (1) 3.16 Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling and Reduction Plan (W RRP). Exhibit A Resolution No. 4385 Page 9 a. The applicant/contractor is required to submit a WRRP to the Public Works Department. The WRRP must indicate how the applicant will comply with the City's requirement (City Code Section 4351, et al) to recycle at least 65% of the project waste material or the amount required by the California Green Building Standards Code. b. The applicant will be required to submit a fifty-dollar $50.00 application fee and a cash security deposit. Based on the review of the submitted Waste Management Plan, the cash security deposit in the amount of five(5) percent of the project's valuation as determined by the Building Official, rounded to the nearest thousand.The deposit amount will be collected in accordance with the TCC. c. Prior to issuance of a permit, the applicant shall submit the required :security deposit in the form of cash, cashier's check, personal check; or money order made payable to the "City of Tustin". (1) 3.17 Any damage done to existing public right-of-way improvements and/or utilities shall be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Engineer before issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. (1) 3.18 The applicant is responsible for all costs related to the installation, upgrade, alteration, relocation or abandonment of all existing City of Tustin public water facilities affected by the proposed project. FEES (1) 4.1 Within forty-eight(48) hours of approval of the subject project, the applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department, a cashier's check payable to the COUNTY CLERK in the amount of fifty dollars ($50.00) to enable the City to file the appropriate environmental documentation for the project. If within such forty-eight(48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the Community Development Department the above-noted check, the statute of limitations for any interested party to challenge the environmental determination under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act could be significantly lengthened. (1) 4.2 Prior to issuance of a Building Permit(s), payment of the most current Major Thoroughfare and Bridge Fees (for the Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency (TCA)) to the City of Tustin (through the Public Works Department) shall be required. The fee rate schedule automatically increases on July 1 st of each year. Exhibit A Resolution No.4385 Page 10 (1) 4.3 The applicant shall pay are required fees to the City or the respective outside agency prior to the issuance of building permits. ATTACHMENT J RESOLUTION UTION NO. 4385 RESOLUTION NO, 4385 11 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2018-00018 AND DESIGN REVIEW 2018-00026, A REQUEST TO DEMOLISH THE EXISTING GOODYEAR TIRE CENTER AND ADJACENT GOODYEAR PARKING AREA AT 2541 EL CAMINO REAL AND REPLACE WITH 56 NEW PARKING STALLS AND TO CONSTRUCT A NEW 16 PUMP COSTCO GASOLINE FUEL STATION WITH CANOPY AND RELATED EQUIPMENT AT 2655 EL CAMINO REAL. The Planning Commission does hereby resolve as follows: I, The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: A. That a proper application for Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 2018-00018 and Design Review (DR) 2018-00026 has been submitted by Terry Odle/MG2, applicant, requesting authorization to demolish the existing Goodyear Tire Center and adjacent Goodyear parking area at 2541 El Camino Real and to construct a new 16 pump Costco gasoline fuel station with canopy and related equipment located at 2655 El Camino Real. B That the site is zoned as Planned Community Mixed-Use and within the East Tustin Specific Plan (ETSP) and has a General Plan land-use designation of Planned Community Commercial/Business. (PCCB). The project has been reviewed for consistency with the Air Quality Sub-element of the City of Tustin General Plan and has been determined to be consistent with the Air Quality Sub-element- C. Pursuant to ETSP Section 3.7.2.A.1.u, new service stations are permitted subject to approval of a CUP. D. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed, and held on said application on June 11, 2019, by the Planning Commission and continued to the Planning Commission meeting of July 9, 2019. E That the establishment, maintenance, and operation of the proposed gasoline fuel station to an existing Costco Warehouse will not, under the circumstances of this case, be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use, nor be injurious or detrimental to the property and improvements in the neighborhood of the subject property, or to the general welfare of the City of Tustin in that:. Resolution No. 4385 Page 2 1.7 Pursuant to Section 3.8.2 and 3.7.2.A.l.0 of the ETSP, the Specific Plan allows for service stations with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. 2y Pursuant to Tustin City Code (TCC) Section 9291c, the Planning Commission is authorized to act on CUPS and impose conditions deemed necessary to protect the public interest and ensure compliance with the General Plan. 3) The proposed use, as conditioned, would not be detrimental to surrounding properties in that the scope of operations for the proposed service station would be compatible and provide support services for the uses in the area. 4) The proposed use is not anticipated to result in parking impacts since the site provides more than the TCC required number of parking spaces to service the existing shopping center and proposed use. Demolition of the existing Goodyear Tire Center building will be replaced with additional parking spaces that will continue to provide adequate parking for the shopping center. 5) The proposed use is not anticipated to result in queueing or circulation impacts as the project has two (2) alternative queue management plans incorporated into the Traffic Analysis to accommodate potential queueing demands. In addition to the queuing management plans, the project has been conditioned to provide three (3) on-site traffic attendants to guide and direct traffic during peak hours. Through a combination of queueing plans and manned personnel for traffic guidance, the use will not impact circulation on the site or within the existing shopping center. 6) The proposed project, as conditioned, adequately addresses anticipated off-site traffic impacts through the installation of a new westbound right turn lane along EI Camino Real into the Costco Warehouse parking lot at the intersection of Auto Center Drive and El Camino Real and lane restriping along El Camino Real to accommodate the new vehicle lane. 7) The proposed use, as conditioned, would not create a noise impact on the surrounding neighborhood since the service station would be subject to the Tustin Noise Ordinance and General Plan Noise Element. 8) The construction and operation of the gasoline station will operate within the ministerial requirements of the South Coast Air Quality Resolution Ao. 4385 Page 3 Management District (SCAQMD) and the project has been conditioned to comply with SCAQMD air quality standards and all required permits. 9) The proposed use would not be detrimental to the surrounding properties in that the hours of operation of the instruction would be consistent with the general business hours of other businesses within the surrounding vicinity- 10) icinity.1g} The location, size and general appearance of the proposed service station, canopy and equipment enclosure is compatible of the existing structures and surrounding area in that the proposed improver rierits, including the canopy, is proportionately sized for the site. 11) As conditioned, the applicant will be required to submit a Master Sign Plan. F That the location, srze, and general appearance of the proposed project, as conditioned, is compatible with the surrounding area in that the proposed improvements, including the canopy and equipment enclosure, is proportionately sized to the site. The proposal will not impair the orderly and harmonious development of the area, the present or future development therein, or the occupancy as a whole. in making such findings, the Planning Commission has considered at least the following items: 1) The height, bulk, and area of proposed use is compatible with the existing Costco warehouse building. 2) Setbacks and site planning have been thoroughly evaluated in that the proposed project location, layout and proximity to the existing Costco Warehouse building has been analyzed and the proposed project compifes with the requirements established in the ETSP. 3) Exterior material and colors have been reviewed for the proposed project and they are compatible with the existing warehouse building and other retail tenants within the shopping center. 4) Type and pitch of roofs have been reviewed for the proposed project and the proposed roofed canopy over the fuel pumps is compatible with the existing warehouse building and other retail tenants within the shopping center_ 5) Landscaping, parking area design and traffic circulation have been reviewed and analyzed in that the project includes a Traffic Analysis that addressed overall on-site circulation. The installation of substantial new Resolution No. 4385 Page 4 landscaping throughout the project area and within the remaining areas of the existing Costco parking Pot will improve and enhance the overall appearance. 6) Location and method of refuse storage has been adequately addressed in that the proposed project does not propose any changes to the existing refuse function and operation. T} Physical relationship of proposed structures to existing structures has been evaluated in that the proposed canopy and small equipment will aid in the function of the gasoline station. The canopy will be proportional in height and area to the other buildings on the project site and within the existing shopping center overall. The location of the equipment is ancillary to the gasoline station and will be screened by either a wall and/or landscaping. 8) Appearance and design relationship of proposed structures to existing structures is consistent and compatible in that the proposed columns and colors for the canopy and equipment enclosure will correspond with the exterior of the existing warehouse building. Proposed landscaping will provide consistency throughout the parking lot and enhance the appearance of the proposed use. g) Development guidelines and criteria for the ETSP Mixed-Use area as well as the City's Service Station Guidelines adopted by the City Council have been reviewed and incorporated into the project. G. This project is categorically exempt from further environmental review pursuant to the California. Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section Section 15332, Class 32, "In-Fill Development Projects" in that the project is consistent with the City's General Plan and ETSP and occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five (5) acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species. The project can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. With the implementation of the standard conditions of approval and implementation measures related to traffic, noise and air quality, the requisite findings and facts thereto were comprehensively addressed. II.. The Planning. Commission hereby approves CUP 2018-00018 and DR 2018-00026, authorizing the demolition of the existing Goodyear Tire Center and adjacent Goodyear parking area at 2541 El Camino Real and construction of a new 16 pump Resolution No. + 385 Page 5 Costco gasoline fuel station with canopy and related equipment located at 2655 EI Camino Real. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, at a regular meeting on the 91h day of July, 2019. STEVE KOZAK Chairperson ELIZABETH A. BINSACK Planning Commission Secretary STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) CITY OF TUSTIN ) i, ELIZABETH A_ BINSACK, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the Planning Commission Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, California; that Resolution No. 4385 was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission, held on the 91" of July, 2019. PLANNING COMMISSIONER AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONER NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONER ABSTAINED: PLANNING COMMISSIONER ABSENT: ELIZABETH A. BINSACK Planning Commission Secretary EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2018-00018 DESIGN REVIEW 2018-00026 GENERAL (1) 1.1 The proposed project shall substantially conform to the submitted plans for the project date stamped July 9, 2019, on file with the Community Development Department, as herein modified, or as modified by the Community Development Director in accordance with this Exhibit. The Director may also approve subsequent minor modifications to plans during plan check if such modifications are consistent with provisions of the Tustin City Code or other applicable regulations. (1) 1.2 This approval shall become null and void unless the use is established within twelve (12) months of the date of this Exhibit. Time extensions may be granted if a written request and associated fee are received by the Community Development Department within thirty (30) days prior to expiration. (1) 1.3 Unless otherwise specified, the conditions contained in this Exhibit shall be complied with as specified, subject to review and approval by the Community Development Department. (1) 1.4 Approval of CUP 2018-0001$!DR 2018-00026 is contingent upon the applicant returning to the Community Development Department a notarized "Agreement to Conditions Imposed" form and the property owner signing and recording with the County Clerk-Recorder a notarized "Notice of Discretionary Permit Approval and Conditions of Approval"form. The forms shall be established by the Director of Community Development, and evidence of recordation shall be provided to the Community Development Department. SOURCE CODES (1) STANDARD CONDITION (5) RESPONSIBLE AGENCY REQUIREMENT (2) CEQA MITIGATION (f) LANDSCAPING GUIDELINES (3) BUILDING CODE (7) PCICC POLICY (4) DESIGN REVIEW "* EXCEPTION Exhibit A Resolution No. 4385 Page 2 (1) 1.5 CUP 2018-00018/DR 2018.00026 may be reviewed on an annual basis, or more often if necessary, by the Community Development Director. The Community Development Director shall review the use to ascertain compliance with conditions of approval and compatibility with the area. If the use is not operated in accordance with CUP 2018-00018/DR 2018-00026, or is found to be a nuisance or negative impacts are affecting the surrounding tenants or neighborhood, the Community Development Director shall impose additional conditions or the applicant may be required to implement other measures to eliminate the nuisance or negative impacts, or may initiate proceedings to revoke CUP 2018-00018/DR 2018-00026. Failure to comply with conditions of approval, or if the establishment creates undue burden to City resources, or if the CUP is abandoned for a twelve (12) month period, these circumstances shall be grounds for revocation of the CUP. (1) 1.6 Any transfer of ownership of the establishment and/or operator shall require the new owner and/or operator to sign and return an "Agreement to Conditions Imposed" form provided by the Community Development. Failure to do so would be a basis for revocation proceeding. (1) 1.7 Any violation of any of the conditions imposed is subject to the issuance of an Administrative Citation pursuant to TCC Section 1162(a). (1) 1.8 As a condition of approval of CUP 2018-00018/DR 2018-00026, the applicant shall agree, at its sole cost and expense, to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees, agents, and consultants, from any claim, action, or proceeding brought by a third-party against the City, its officers, agents, and employees, which seeks to attack, set aside, challenge, void, or annul an approval of the City Council, the Planning Commission, or any other decision-making body, including staff, concerning this project. The City agrees to promptly notify the applicants of any such claim or action filed against the City and to fully cooperate in the defense of any such action. The City may, at its sole cost and expense, elect to participate in defense of any such action under this condition. (1) 1.9 The applicant shall be responsible for costs associated with any necessary code enforcement action, including attorney's fees, subject to the applicable notice, hearing, and appeal process as established by the City Council by ordinance. (1) 1.19 All on-site signs shall comply with the City's Sign Code. Prior to the issuance of a sign permit, the applicant must apply for a Master Sign Program for the property. Any proposed painted wall signs, including murals Exhibit A Resolution Nn. 4385 Page 3 or graphics to be added to the building or pump areas shall require a separate approval of a CIDP. (1) 1.11 All final exterior colors and materials shall be subject to review and approval of the Community Development Department and final field inspection by the Planning Division. Colors, materials and textures shall be noted on the construction plans. (1) 1.12 The applicant shall obtain approval from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) prior to the issuance of the building or grading permit.The applicant shall comply with all District regulations and shall acquire an Authority to Construct ATC) and Permit to Operate (PTO). LANDSCAPING (1) 1.13 All proposed landscaping and irrigation plans shall comply with the approved plans and with the City's Water Efficiency Landscape Ordinance. A Landscape Installation Certificate of Completion, certifying that the landscaping was installed in accordance with the approved plans, shall be submitted to the City prior to the final inspections by Building and Planning Divisions.. (1) 1.14 An irrigation plan should be provided which shows the location and control of backflow prevention devices at the meter, pipe size, sprinkler type, spacing, and coverage details for all equipment. Install efficient irrigation systems which minimize runoff and evaporation and maximize the amount of water which will reach the plant roots. Drip irrigation, soil moisture sensors, and automatic irrigation systems are a few methods of increasing irrigation efficiency. (1) 1.15 Backflow devices and double detector checks shall be painted to match surrounding landscaping when in planters or painted to match the building when located adjacent to the building. Landscaping shall be utilized to screen the devices whenever possible. (1) 1.16 All plant materials shall be installed in a healthy and vigorous condition, typical to the species, and shall be maintained in a neat and healthy condition. Maintenance includes, but is not limited to, trimming, mowing, weeding, removal of litter, fertilizing, regular watering, and replacement of dead or diseased dying plants. Exhibit A ReSOILItion No. 4385 Page 4 (*" ) 1.17 Additional landscape screening shall be provided at the southeast comer of the Costco property (adjacent to the El Modena-Tustin Channel) to screen the proposed controller enclosure and clean air separator. MISCELLANEOUS (1) 1.18 Adequate lighting shall be provided to illuminate the fueling area, subject to Community Development Department review and approval. Said lighting shall meet requirements set forth in the Building Security and California Fire Codes. (1) 1.19 Fire and Police access and passage shall be permitted at all times. (1) 1.20 "No Loitering" signage shall be posted on the site (1) 1.21 Outdoor vending activities are prohibited. (1) 1.22 All utility services serving the site shall be installed and maintained underground. USE RESTRICTIONS (1) 2.1 Business hours are limited to the following: Monday — Friday: 5:30 a.m. to 9:30 p.m. Saturday: 6:00 a.m.. to 8:00 p.m. Sunday 6:00 a.m. to 7:30 p.m. Modifications to hours or operation may be modified by the Director of Community Development if it is determined that no impacts to surrounding tenants or properties will occur. (1) 2.2 Business operations shall be conducted in a manner that does not create a public or private nuisance. Any such nuisance must be abated immediately upon notice by the City. (1) 2.3 No outdoor storage is permitted or display of materials shall be permitted except allowed by the TCC. (1) 2.4 Storage and/or advertising of vehicles for sale or lease is not permitted, (1) 2.5 If water and air are to be provided to customers, then it shall be made available at no cost and for twenty-four (24) horns per day, seven (7) days per week. Exhibit A Resolution No, 4385 Page 5 (1) 2.6 The subject property shall be maintained in a safe, clean and sanitary condition at all times. The property owners shall be responsible for the daily maintenance and up-keep of the businesses, including but not limited to trash removal, painting, graffiti removal, and maintenance of improvements to ensure that the facilities are maintained in a neat and attractive manner. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the premises or any adjacent area under control of the property owner or the business shall be removed or painted within 24 hours of being applied. (1) 2.7 All litter shall be removed from the exterior areas around the premises including public sidewalk areas, alleys and parking areas, no less frequently than once each clay. (1) 2.8 Costco shall provide daily security patrols of the parking lot during operation of the gasoline station. (1) 2.9 Costco employees shall return all shopping carts to the Costco shopping cart receptacles at the end of each business day. Shopping carts shall not be "parked" in parking spaces overnight. (1) 2.10 To avoid conflict between fueling trucks and with vehicle queues, fuel deliveries shall be limited to 1-2 delivers during normal hours of operation. Additional fuels deliveries shall take place during off hours. TRAFFIC, PARKING AND CIRCULATION (�**� 2.11 Retractable bollards shall be installed within the northbound right-hand turn lane (within shopping center off Auto Center Drive and El Camino Real) to the gas station/re-fueling area as part of the queue management plan. Use of bollards may he necessary during peak times, per the approved plat). (*"*} 2.12 In addition to the queue management plan contained within the Final Traffic Analysis date stamped April 17, 2419, the applicant, at a minimum, shall provide three (3) traffic attendants during peak periods; 1-2 attendants directing cars to a queue lane and 1-2 attendants near the pump entrance directing cars to a fueling position. The third attendant shall be a floater depending on the need and could either be placed near the pumps or at the front of the queue lanes. Exhibit A Resolution No. 4385 Page 6 In addition, there shall be one (1) individual staffed at the station during all open business hours. Said individual shall manage the overall operations for the gas station. ('**� 2.13 The 36 parking spaces in the first row directly north of the proposed gas station, 72 parking spaces in the second row and the 13 parking spaces along the east property line adjacent to the El Modena-Tustin Channel shall be restricted to employee parking only. ( * � 2.14 The words "KEEP CLEAR" shall be painted in large capitalized letters onto the pavement of the parking lot adjacent to the vehicular exit from the gas station per the approved plans. Said signage shall help to maintain an unobstructed opening adjacent to the gas station and allow for vehicles entering and exiting from the fueling area. (``*) 2.15 A five (5) foot wide access stair shall be installed within the existing block wall along the south property line nearest the gas station adjacent to EI Camino Real. Said access stair will allow for emergency access (i.e. hose pull) by the Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA) in the event of an emergency. 2.16 If, in the future, the City's Community Development Director, Police Chief and/or Public Works Department determine that a parking or traffic queuing problem exists on the site or in the vicinity as a result of the facility, the Community Development Director, Police Chief, and/or Public Works Department may require the applicant to prepare a parking demand analysis or traffic study queuing analysis and the applicant shall be required to provide measures to alleviate the problem. Said measures shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department, Police Chief, and/or Public Works Department. (***� 2.17 Per the approved plans, the applicant shall install a westbound right turn lane along EI Camino Real into the Costco Warehouse parking lot at the intersection of Auto Center Drive and El Camino Real. A second designated right turn lane shall be installed on the site to funnel vehicles into the Costco Gasoline fueling area. Final lane striping plans for EI Camino Real shall be subject to the review and approval of the Public Works/Engineering Division. ('�* ) 2.18 Following demolition of the Goodyear Tire Center building, the new parking lot shall be restriped in accordance with TCC Section 9266. Exhibit A Resolution No. 4385 Page 7 PLANCHECK SUBMITTAL (1) 3.1 At the time of building or encroachment permit application, the plans shall comply with the latest edition of the codes, City Ordinances, State, Federal laws, and regulations as adopted by the City Council of the City of Tustin. (1) 3.2 Prior to issuance of any permits, the applicant shall submit for approval by the Community Development and Public Works Departments, a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). If the WQMP has been determined to be a Priority WQMP, it shall identify Low Impact Development (LID) principles and Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on- site to retain storm water and ti-eat predictable pollutant run-off. The Priority WQMP shall identify: the implementation of BMPs, the assignment of long-term maintenance responsibilities (specifying the developer, parcel owner„ maintenance association, lessees, etc.), and reference to the location(s) of structural BMPs. (1) 3.3 Prior to submittal of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the applicant shall submit a deposit of $2,700.00 to the Public Works Department for the estimated cost of reviewing the WQMP. (1) 3.4 Prior to issuance of any permits, the applicant shall record "Covenant and Agreement Regarding Q & M Plan to Fund and Maintain Water Quality BMPs, Consent to Inspect, and Indemnification" with the County Clerk- Recorder. This document shall bind current and future owner(s) of the property regarding implementation and maintenance of the structural and non-structural BMPs as specified in the approved WQMP. (1) 3.5 Prior to any work in the public right-of-way, an Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from and applicable fees paid to the Public Works Department. (1) 3.6 Prior to issuance of an Encroachment Permit, the applicant shall submit to the Public Works Department 24" x 36" reproducible street improvement plans, as prepared by a California Registered Civil Engineer, for approval. The plans shall clearly show existing and proposed surface and underground improvements, including construction, restriping of EI Camino Real to accommodate a dedicated westbound right-turn lane, and/or replacement of any missing or damaged public improvements adjacent to this development. Exhibit A Resolution No 4385 Page S (1) 3.7 Prior to issuance of an Encroachment Permit for construction within the public right-of-way, a 24" x 36" construction area traffic control plan, as prepared by a California Registered Traffic Engineer, or Civil Engineer experienced in this type of plan preparation, shall be prepared and submitted to the Public Works Department for approval. (1) 3.8 Current Federal Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA) requirements shall be met at all driveways and sidewalks adjacent to the site. City of Tustin standards shall apply, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. (1) 3.9 Prior to issuance of a Building Permit, the applicant shall submit an underground storage tank plan to the Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA) for review and approval. (1) 3.10 In accordance with City policies, the developer shall post security for the grading permit in an amount to be determined by the Building Official. The required amount must include items relating to hazardous conditions such as erosion and air/dust control, the cost of completing any Mechanically-Stabilized Earth (MSE)walls, provisions for landscaping as relating to slope stability, compliance with approved landscape plans, and contingency funds which must include an allowance for site maintenance. (1) 3.11 The developer shall submit a complete hydrology and hydraulic study (including off-site areas affecting the development), prepared by a California-registered professional civil engineer, consistent with the use of the criteria of the Orange County Hydrology Manual, to the City Building Official for review and approval. The study shall be consistent with the study submitted during the entitlement review process. The study report shall determine potential storm water runoff rates and peak flows for the City of Tustin and County of Orange design storms. Enough detail shall be provided to develop the existing conditions and proposed project conditions potential hydrograph and timing of peak flows. The study report shall demonstrate that the effect of storm water discharge to any City-, County-, or Other Agency-owned drainage or flood control facility as mitigated shall be designed and implemented to prevent post- construction storm flows from exceeding pre-construction volumes and rates. (1) 3.1.2 The developer shall submit storm drain plans, prepared by a California registered professional civil engineer, depicting proposed storm drain improvements for the project. All storm drain improvements shall comply with the City of Tustin Construction Standards for Private Streets, Storm Drain and On-Site Private Improvements Manual and the Orange County Local Drainage Manual. Exhibit A Resolution No. 4385 Page 9 (1) 3.13 The developer shall submit precise grading plans, prepared by a California registered professional civil engineer, depicting proposed grading, erosion control and improvements for the project. All plans and design shall comply with the City of Tustin Grading Manual and requirements. (1) 314 Prior to approval of the final design plans and issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall conduct a site-specific geotechnical investigation for the entire site and prepare a report that fully assesses the geologic and soil conditions of the site. As part of the report preparation, soil sampling and any geotechnical testing will be completed at each location where structures are to be erected. The report shall provide grading and structural design recommendations for avoiding liquefaction, subsidence or collapse for each of the proposed structures. The recommendations shall be included in the plans submitted to the City. (1) 3.16 Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling and Reduction Plan (WRRP). a. The applicant/contractor is required to submit a WRRP to the Public Works Department, The WRRP must indicate how the applicant will comply with the City's requirement (City Code Section 4351, et al) to recycle at least 65% of the project waste material or the amount required by the California Green Building Standards Code. b. The applicant will be required to submit a fifty-dollar $50.00 application fee and a cash security deposit. Based on the review of the submitted Waste Management Plan, the cash security deposit in the amount of five(5) percent of the project's valuation as determined by the Building Official, rounded to the nearest thousand. The deposit amount will be collected in accordance with the TCC. c. Prior to issuance of a permit, the applicant shall submit the required security deposit in the form of cash, cashiers check, personal check, or money order made payable to the "City of Tustin". (1) 3.17 Any damage done to existing public right-of-way improvements and/or utilities shall be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Engineer before final inspection. Exhibit A Resolution No, 4385 Page 10 (1) 3.18 The applicant is responsible for all costs related to the installation, upgraciP, altPration, relocation or abandonment of all existing City of Tustin public water facilities affected by the proposed project. FEES (1) 4.1 Within forty-eight(48) hours of approval of the subject project, the applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department, a cashier's check payable to the COUNTY CLERK in the amount of fifty dollars ($50.00) to enable the City to file the appropriate environmental documentation for the project. If within such forty-eight(48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the Community Development Department the above-noted check, the statute of limitations for any interested party to challenge the environmental determination under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act could be significantly lengthened. (1) 4.2 Prior to issuance of a Building Permit(s), payment of the most current Major Thoroughfare and Bridge Fees (for the Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency (TCA)) to the City of Tustin (through the Public Works Department) shall be required. The fee rate schedule automatically increases on July 15' of each year. (1) 4.3 The applicant shall pay are required fees to the City or the respective outside agency prior to the issuance of building permits. ATTACHMENT K PUBLIC COMMENTS Tiscareno, Vera To: Tiscareno, Vera subject: June 11 th Planning Commission meeting From:John Garay �jUirvr,rn ���it !f..c rcyt�ic?�}i_ il.eam� Sent: Monday,June 10, 2019 12:39 AM To: aemkowicz, Erica <t Qerr}ko�vic . � sti �ca.or � Subject.June 11th planning Commission rneeting Hello Erica, No email was provided in the public announcement so if you cotilri fcsr.^ ,Air; ii io i lire right people it would be greatly appreciated. Dear Planning commission, I am completely in favor of the Bearing item to demolish the Good Year Tire Center and build the Costco Fuel Station. That shopping center has stagnated over the fast years as the grocery store stopped its lease and it would be a step in the right direction to attract more business to the area.The added tax revenue would be helpful to address the decrease that has happen because of online sales. The only thing that needs to be addressed is how Costco plans to handle the cars that wait in line and for it not to lead to the street which could cause traffic congestion if not done correctly. Thank you, John Garay i Hera From: Ron ''Jestor, AIA, LEER AP, NCARB cronn@whainc.com> Sent: Frid,:y, lune 7, 2019 11:40 AM To: Tisc� 0,l D, Vera Subject: r",+,i?ing Commission 6111119 RE:Tustin Ranch Costco Gas I may not be able to attend the meeting due to travel commitments, but I would like to offer the following; To Tustin Planning Commission members: My name is Ron Nestor and I am a resident of the Montecito Community of Tustin Ranch. I would like to speak IN FAVOR of the proposed Costco Tustin Ranch gas station. The current Tustin Legacy faciiil.y is not sized for demand causing massive traffic tie ups, Having a second facility would benefit the Tustin communily,;/'h convenience and additional tax revenue. The Tustin Ranch plaza is an underutilized facility with the large vacant Ki i art store and is in need of revitalization. As for the traffic concern, the center is designed for an anchordep�rNr rcnt store so should be able to handle the traffic: of a gas station. Current projects to enhance the adjacent intersection and synchronize traffic lights on Tustin Ranch Road should alleviate some of the existing congestion as well. Please vote YES for this project. Ron Nestor 11970 N. Riviera Tustin, CA 92182 949-250-0607 mobile Ran Nestor, RIA, LEED AP, NCARB Senior Principal , ;•k al i. 1� fCi?1. i11f1,r. WPi li 1nts, 1'develop eine% re'Nn ' i.. 4j. c�ytrrs of�; lent=v11'l+i C�X_1i'ffCll '._' Ca lc bora`.E. i:ri l Ie :hair 1tl1.1'i Irv, =1,=r+0 i'ili r:_ ,)u pose, Push Elie boundariej:, ;oin us on our iourney as we transform lives anti I:..c.":•I..)fl ii i.1L tt ,'( inFi:iil .. Al;: I_ci-i i;?r,`_i Ivrl"i, y 2c850 ?Cid Hill Ave, shite -200, 'San(a Ana, CA av ov- o-date on aur bldg:WHAblol}.i.oni Vis;t our ur'ebsite:W HAiI scxo rri :iWFIDEN1IALITY.TII�:i, foll-It;t,+rr cctit ainert in tlr,r:-mail,in.-1kid uua aii] ar Inc.ilnrHA).is w(ernk:d oilly fr,1 tf::,usN 'r,I.-.1 Ilai;tual,;r rnih name.d abuv;;,anrr tlrn J cn I' lil.=n h,WiliAli the inFnnr+atr,rn r:ontainei I u ci SII r;ru ow-e[hal mfcmil'.11Ir1c„or iy for the pt,+[ar7se or prOlPi,I .. ir - inr�rsded,anti.to tl-a[,,II�;-.i:rnl is I:;-i t,, :::(ii r,.r<ri •r and i+1dhAiin,115 for&H c I -;7.krly SUCK mrsus r_i lirJ'Wf!, drldl=::I.�.lrc.trtyv..nra rdlii it LIL;'fLl :I •' ; ri •' ti:r`Cpnlc'.ili$Of f111S nl! ..S n!.: h C". .. .. I."rJ`.'.: I I':5 '.I'rl,;L'.I I+f.,•. nr7tiiy us by tr ie li.lhoilioq i voe Gi Igi 'a! 450 f iio r Ntirn She e-mail miessage and i Tiscareno, Vera From: Binsack, Elizabeth) Sent: Tuesday,June 11, 2019 1:21 PM To: Karol Reedy Subject: RE:Tustin Planning Commission -June 11 Hi Karol, I hop-you are well trio. The large vacant building (the former K-mart) is not affected as a result of this application. No car vvaSS i i; being proposed. Thank you for inquiry, Elizabeth .4 &W"Z &.wwg4t<e! Veoeio ,xee.sr Vdwaar 64 q ?U.'rtr From: Karol Reedy<kreedy@irv1necompany.coni Sent:Wednesday,June 5, 2019 5:50 PM To:Binsack, Elizabeth <EBinsack@tustinca.org> Subject: Tustin Planning Commission-June 11 Hi Elizabeth, I hope you are well. I noticed there is an item on the agenda (CIDP 2018-00018)to replace the Goodyear Tire Center and replace with a Costco gasoline station. Do you know if this will impact the large vacant building in that center and is there also plans for Costco to add a car wash? Thank you, Karol H. Reedy Senior General Manacger Irvine Company Retail Properties 2961 EI Camino Real I Tustin,Calfomia 192782 Plione 714.730.4124 I Fax 71».730.9690 KReady@irviiiecrimpany.com t C `'cilPP�G�, Vera r.- To: Tiscareno, Vera Subject: PC Meeting - Item#6 Attachments: PC Meeting - 6.11.19 - Item#f6.pdf From: DelMerari, Brooke Sent; Monday,June 10, 2019 9:35 AM To: Binsack, Elizabeth<EBin,,ack@ptusdnca.o,-g> Cc:Tiscareno, Vera <VTiscareno tustinca.or >; Yasuda, Erica <I Yast G {�7ustinca.or � Subject: PC Meeting - Item#6 Good morning Elizabeth, Please see the attached notice that was dropped off at our office for the upcoming Planning Commission Meeting for Item #b. Cordially, Brooke Del Merad Administrative Assistant City Clerk's Office I City of Tustin 1 Demkowicz, Erica From: Demkowicz, Erica Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2019 3:07 PM To: Anne Lee Subject: RE: Questions re proposed Costco gas station Hello Anne, Thank you for your patience. Please see the Uty's responses to your questions below in red: 1. What is the proposed route for the fuel trucks that will be delivering to the site? Can they not travel along El Camino Real instead of Bryan Ave which is lined with residential homes? • Fuel deliveries to and from the proposed Costco gasoline station site will take place off of Bryan Avenue. The fuel tanks for the station will be located towards the southeast corner of the Costco parcel (corner of land area nearest Myford Avenue and EI Camino Real)and per the applicant, turning radii for the fuel trucks/access to this area can be best achieved by the truck entering off of and exiting onto Bryan Avenue. 2. Wow many trucks will be traveling per day to deliver fuel?What time of day(or night) does this take place? Flow much additional noise and air pollution does this create? • According to the applicant, there will be 1-2 fuel deliveries during regular hours of operation with any other fuel deliveries taking place at night when the station is closed. Proposed hours of operation are 5:00 a.m.—10:00 p.m., 7 days per week. The applicant will be supplying the City with additional information as to the operational characteristics for the proposed station. 3. Have there been any studies done on the increase in noise and air pollution as a result of the proposed number of cars that will be idling in line for 15 hours per day, and traveling to the proposed site? The applicant has integrated operational features into the proposed gasoline station design to minimize emissions and fumes(i.e.vapor recovery) . A Traffic Analysis was submitted by the applicant which included the net increase in the number of vehicle trips generated to the site following the demolition of the Goodyear Tire Center. The analysis states that the adc itional vehicles (as a result of the proposed project)can be accommodated at the adjacent intersections while still maintaining Level of Service (LOS). 4. Is there any consideration to either reducing the number of fuel pumps or reducing the operating hours?This gas station is proposed to be even larger than the recently expanded gas station at The District,which has been a traffic hazard for shoppers dealing with aggressive drivers and long lines. ■ Concern as to the proposed hours of operation was raised by the Planning Commission at their June 11, 2019 meeting. The EI Camino Real Costco location is proposing sixteen (16) pumps whereas than The District Costco station currently has eleven (11), so there will be an increase. The City is well aware of the issues associated with The District Costco gasoline station and has worked diligently to address the queueing and circulation related to the use. Based upon this experience, the City has carefully evaluated the proposed gasoline station and as a result, included several queue management plans within the Traffic Analysis to address potential stacking of vehicles and on-site circulation as well as adjustment to signal timing at adjacent intersections. Staff has also included additional conditions that will assist drivers in moving through the fuel queues most efficiently. These measures include use of traffic attendants during peak user times and a red-light/green-light system for pump availability. Staff will be including a comparison of the two locations in the July 9,2019 Planning Commission staff report (the Planning Commission meeting was continued from, 6/11/19 to 7/9/19 for additional information), Please let me know if you have any additional questions and/or if you would like a copy of the staff report when it is available (approx. 72 hours prior to the meeting) or your name added to the interested party list for future updates. 1 Regards, Erica H.Demkowicz,AICD Senior Planner City of Tustin Community Development Department 300 Centennial Way Tustin,CA 92780 (714) 573-3127 From: Anne Lee <annejlee33@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2019 8:2S AM To: Demkowicz, Erica <EDemkowicz@tustinca.org> Subject: Re: Questions re proposed Costco gas station i lello Crica, Thank you for your response. I hope to hear from you soon. Sincerely, -Anne Lee On Tue, Jun 1.8, 2019, 11:03 AM Demkowicz, Erica <EDemkowicz@tustinca.or >wrote: Hello Anne, I am in receipt of your e-mail and will follow-up with you later today. Thank you for your patience. Regards, Erica H.Demkowicz,AICP Senior Planner City of Tustin Community Development Department 300 Centennial Way Tustin.CA 92780 (714)573-3127 2 From:Anne Lee<anne`lee33@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday,June 13, 2019 5:02 PM To: Demkowicz, Erica<EDemkowicz@tustmca.ore> Subject:Questions re proposed Costco gas station Hello Ms. Demkowicz, My name is Anne Lee. I am a long-time homeowner in Tustin,a place I have greatly enjoyed and appreciated for 21 years now. Could you please clarify some issues related to the proposed Costco gas station?I will be directly impacted,as my master bedroom window faces Bryan Ave. 5. What is the proposed route for the fuel trucks that will be delivering to the site?Can they not travel along El Camino Real instead of Bryan Ave which is lined with residential homes? 5. How many trucks will be traveling per day to deliver fuel?What time of day(or night) does this take place? How much additional noise and air pollution does this create? 7. Have there been any studies done on the increase in noise and air pollution as a result of the proposed number of cars that will be idling in line for 15 hours per day, and traveling to the proposed site? 8. Is there any consideration to either reducing the number of fuel pumps or reducing the operating hours?This gas station is proposed to be even larger than the recently expanded gas station at The District, which has been a traffic hazard for shoppers dealing with aggressive drivers and long lines. Thank you for your help. Sincerely, -Anne Lee 3