HomeMy WebLinkAbout04 JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT NOISE ABATEMENT QUARTERLY REPORT•
AGENDA REPORT Reeewendald m 4
City Manager
Finance Director N/A
MEETING DATE: JULY 16, 2019
TO: MATTHEW S. WEST, CITY MANAGER
FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT NOISE ABATEMENT QUARTERLY REPORT
SUMMARY:
This agenda report transmits the John Wayne Airport (JWA) Noise Abatement Quarterly
Report for the first quarter of 2019. The average noise level measured at Tustin's
monitoring station (NMS 1 ON), located at Columbus Tustin Middle School on Beneta Way
(Figure 1), remained fairly consistent with prior quarters during this first quarter reporting
period. Average noise levels during the first quarter continued to remain well below the
City, County, and State criteria of 65 dB Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) for
residential uses.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council receive and file this report.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No fiscal impact.
Figure 1
JWA Noise Report
July 16, 2019
Page 2
CORRELATION TO THE STRATEGIC PLAN:
Staff's analysis and report of the quarterly JWA Noise Abatement Report falls under Goal
D of the Strategic Plan pertaining to strong community and regional relationships. The
City of Tustin strives to work collaboratively with agencies both within and outside Tustin
on issues of mutual interest and concern, and in this instance, on matters of airport traffic
and noise.
DISCUSSION:
Following the conclusion of each calendar quarter, JWA staff prepares a Noise
Abatement Program Quarterly Report and posts a copy of the report on their website.
Attached is the quarterly report for the first quarter of 2019, which includes the months of
January through March. An overview of the information contained within the JWA Noise
Report includes measured noise levels and an analysis of noise complaints.
Measured Noise Levels
Aircraft noise is most noticeable during airplane takeoffs and landings, primarily due to
engine noise. Although engines produce a significant amount of aircraft noise, many other
factors may influence the perception of noise including: proximity; weather — in bad
weather, engine noise is reflected off of the atmosphere making jets appear louder than
on clear days; routes — non-scheduled operations which could include military or private
aircraft and may be louder than commercial aircraft; emergencies; and, weight — a heavier
load may affect an aircraft's rate of ascent.
During the first quarter of 2019, the average CNEL at Tustin's monitoring station on
Beneta Way was 57.5 dB. This is 1.2 dB higher than the average of the previous quarter
(Q-4: October— December 2018). During the month of March, there was one day in which
JWA operated in reverse flow due to a change in wind direction. When this occurs, the
pattern of operations is reversed such that aircraft depart to the north, and arrive from the
south. The departures to the north are turned eastward before they reach the Tustin noise
monitoring station, and thus the measured noise levels are significantly lower than a day
of normal operations. During the month of January, there were two days in which there
was no aircraft noise detected by the monitoring station, thus skewing the data on the
graph. Figure 2 (below) provides a visualization of Tustin's CNEL levels for each month
during the first quarter of 2019.
Daily Community Noise Equivalent Levels (CNEL) in Tustin -
70
60
v 50
J 40
w 30
Z 20
10
0
January through March 2019
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31
Date
Figure 2
January
February
March
Noise Impact Area Level (65 dB)
JWA Noise Report
July 16, 2019
Page 3
Noise Complaints
The Airport's Access and Noise Office receives and investigates noise calls and
complaints from local citizens and other sources. During the first quarter of 2019, there
was one (1) Tustin area complaint call, which is eight (8) less complaints than the previous
quarter. Tustin staff has outreached to JWA staff to gather further details on the nature of
this complaint, and to understand how JWA staff responded. In this instance, the
complaint was regarding general arrival noise. The complaint was left as a voicemail for
JWA staff, and there was no additional follow-up requested by the complainant. To
provide an understanding of the trend in Tustin area complaints throughout the years, a
chart displaying the number of noise complaints for the past five (5) years is displayed
below (Figure 3).
LA
16
c 14
Q 12
E 10
U 8
C 6
L
4
E 2
3
z n
Noise Complaints - Tustin
tX tX- rX h h- hO�O A A - %
Q�l 611 O�O�OoO,OH61OQ,l (SN O,O�Q�l OQ,l O�(SN O
,�
ti�Troti��ti Xti 1\T �\" tXT ti\T -\T �\ti �, titi ati yeti
o- a o- oaso-o0- o-�o- a s O- 0- o-�o- oao-
o-
Quarter/Year
Figure 3
Countywide, there was a significant increase in the number of noise complaints received
by the Noise Office during the first quarter reporting period. JWA has indicated that the
increase is due to a new online noise service which allows users to file a noise complaint
through clicking a button. It was discovered that a small number of users utilized this
service, through submitting complaints on a daily basis, as well as consistently throughout
the day.
Since noise issues are of considerable importance to the City of Tustin, the Community
Development Department will continue to monitor operations at JWA unless otherwise
directed by the City Council. The public are additionally welcome to participate in JWA's
Quarterly meetings held by the Access and Noise Office. The next quarterly meeting will
be held on September 18, 2019, at 2:00 p.m. in the Eddie Martin Administration Building
located at 3160
y AAv nue in Costa Mesa.
Adrianne DiLeva-Johnson Elizabeth A. Binsack
Management Analyst II Director of Community Development
Attachment:
John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Quarterly Report for January 1, 2019, through March 31, 2019.
ATTACHMENT
John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Quarterly Report for
January 1, 2019 through March 31, 2019 (First Quarter)
NOISE ABATEMENT PROGRAM
QUARTERLY REPORT
For the period:
January 1, 2019 through March 31, 2019
Prepared in accordance with:
AIRPORT NOISE STANDARD
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
California Code of Regulations
Airport Noise Standards
Title 21: Public Works
Division 2.5 Division of Aeronautics (Department of Transportation)
Chapter 6. Noise Standards
itted by:
Barry A. Rondinella, A.A.E./C.A.E.
Airport Director
John Wayne Airport, Orange County
i HfY
AIRPORT
J!l.MG[ [9f11v
INTRODUCTION
This is the 185th Quarterly Report submitted by the County of Orange in accordance with the
requirements of the California Airport Noise Standards (California Code of Regulations, Title 21: Public
Works, Division 2.5 Division of Aeronautics (Department of Transportation), Chapter 6. Noise
Standards). Effective January 1, 1986, the criteria for defining "Noise Impact Area" was changed from 70
dB to 65 dB Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL). Under this criteria, John Wayne Airport currently
has a "Noise Impact Area."
NOISE IMPACT SUMMARY
Caltrans' Aeronautics Program has established guidelines in the California State Noise Standard to
control residential area noise levels produced by aircraft operations using the State's airports. Under
those guidelines, residential noise sensitive areas exposed to an average Community Noise Equivalent
Level (CNEL) of more than 65 dB define the "Noise Impact Area." John Wayne Airport uses ten
permanent remote noise monitoring stations (NMS) located in Newport Beach, Santa Ana, Tustin and
Irvine to measure noise levels, at the following locations:
MONITOR STATIONS
NMS -1S: Golf Course, 3100 Irvine Ave., Newport Beach NMS -6S: 1912 Santiago, Newport Beach
NMS -2S: 20162 S.W. Birch St., Newport Beach NMS -7S: 1131 Back Bay Drive, Newport Beach
NMS -3S: 2139 Anniversary Lane, Newport Beach NMS -8N: 17372 Eastman Street, Irvine
NMS -4S: 2338 Tustin Ave., Newport Beach NMS -9N: 1300 S. Grand Avenue, Santa Ana
NMS -5S: 324 % Vista Madera, Newport Beach NMS -10N: 17952 Beneta Way, Tustin
The map in Figure 1 shows the general location of each permanent remote monitor station.
Figure 2 shows the Airport's "Noise Impact Area" for the previous year (April 1, 2018 - March 31, 2019).
The Figure 2 information was developed by Landrum and Brown, in consultation with John Wayne
Airport. CNEL values measured for the period and current digitized land use information were utilized to
calculate the land area acreages, number of residences and estimated number of people within the
"Noise Impact Area".
(COSTA MESA
FIGURE 1
NOISE MONITORING STATIONS (NMS)
LOCATION MAP
(SANTA ANA)
"N
V,
,_`' / ° f JOHNNAYNE AIRPORT,
e ORANGE COUNTY
f f
J
NEWPORT BEACH
1 2 3 4
Scale In miles
N
JOFN \AAYM Al RMRT
ORANGE COUNTY
Noise Abatement Program
Quarterly Report January— March 2019
3
AIRCRAFT TRAFFIC SUMMARY
The Airport traffic summaryfor this quarter is shown in Table 1 below. Air Carrier operational count
histories and average daily departure counts are illustrated in Tables 9 & 11.
TABLE 1
LANDING AND TAKEOFF OPERATIONS
January - March 2019
Period
January
Jet
7,862
..
12
3,028
.. I
O.
22,810
Average Daily
Operations
351
February
7,153
0
2,720
21,360
353
March
8,120
0
3,337
26,107
370
First Quarter
23,135
12
9,085
70,277
358
Twelve Months
04/01/18 - 03/31/19
94,579
556
36,533
313,252
359
NOTE: (1) GA Jet figures include a 5% factor for operations not identified by the JWA noise monitor
stations.
(2) Counts in this column are based upon records provided by the local FAA representatives.
COMMUNITY NOISE EQUIVALENT LEVELS
The monthly, quarterly and twelve month Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) average values for
each monitor station are shown in Table 2, while daily CNEL values are shown in Tables 3 through 5.
Insufficient data is indicated by "#N/A" entries in each table. Also, "*#N/A" entries in each table indicate
there were no aircraft related noise events.
Average Single Event Noise Exposure Level (SENEL) values for Air Carrier and General Aviation Jet aircraft
are shown in Tables 6 through 8.
ACOUSTICAL INSULATION PROGRAM
Four hundred eighteen residences in the Santa Ana Heights area have been sound attenuated and an
avigation easement reserved through the County's Acoustical Insulation Program, which closed in
December 2009. The County has also acquired 46 residences as part of the Purchase Assurance Program,
many of which were acoustically insulated, an avigation easement reserved and then resold. Among these
County acquired homes, those located within areas designated for Business Park uses were razed, avigation
easements were reserved, and the land resold for compatible Business Park uses. A total of 464 residences
in the Santa Ana Heights area have been purchased or otherwise made compatible through the County's
Purchase Assurance and Acoustical Insulation Programs. 67 dwelling units in Santa Ana Heights remain in
the "Noise Impacted Area" (within 65 dB CNEL contour).
COMPLAINT TOTALS (January 1, 2019 - March 31, 2019)
The Airport's Access and Noise Office receives and investigates noise complaints from local citizens and all
other sources. During the January 1, 2019 through March 31, 2019, the Office received 22,594 complaints
from local citizens. This is a 71.2% increase from the 13,198 complaints received last quarter. It is a
5,410.7% increase from the 410 complaints received during the same quarter last year. Figure 4 shows the
distribution of the quarterly complaints from local communities.
n
T 001111011
Aliso Viejo
Anaheim Hills
Balboa Island
Balboa Peninsula
Bay Shores
Corona Del Mar
Costa Mesa
Dana Point
Dover Shores
Eastbluff
Huntington Beach
Irvine
FIGURE 3
HISTOGRAM BY COMMUNITY
2
Irvine Terrace
Ladera Ranch
Laguna Beach
Laguna Hills
3
Laguna Niguel
E
Laguna Woods
E
Lido Isle
Mission Viejo
Modjeska Canyon
2,
Newport Beach
North Tustin
Orange
1
Rancho Mission Viejo
Rancho Santa Margarita
San Juan Capistrano
Santa Ana Heights
6
Sea Island
Temecula
Trabuco Canyon
Tu sti n
17
Tustin Ranch
Unknown
Yorba Linda
FIGURE 3
HISTOGRAM BY COMMUNITY
2
654
504!
2,
i84
1
6
17
609
8,094
-22
2,889
168
176
92
2,37
"3,126
39
1
8
3
194
8
2
332
8
443
3
1
1
127
1
1
2
5
I
1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 0,000 7,000 8,000
Number of Complaints
Note:
• City of Newport Beach —11,442 total number of complaints.
• 96% of total complaints were from a complaint subscription service.
• 88% of complaints from "Balboa Island" category were from one point of contact.
• 99% of complaints from "Balboa Peninsula" category were from one point of contact.
• 74% of complaints from "Dana Point" category were from one point of contact.
• 91 % of complaints from "Dover Shores" category were from one point of contact.
• 67% of complaints from "Huntington Beach' category were from one point of contact.
• 90% of complaints from "Irvine" category were from one point of contact.
• 100% of complaints from "Ladera Ranch' category were from one point of contact.
• 85% of complaints from "Laguna Beach' category were from one point of contact.
• 99% of complaints from "San Juan Capistrano' category were from one point of contact.
• 98% of complaints from "Trabuco Canyon" category were from one point of contact.
TABLE 2
LONG TERM MEASURED LEVELS
Aircraft CNEL from 04/01/18 through 03/31/19
Values in dB at Each Site
Period
NMS
Site
Apr 2018
68.3
67.5
66.5
60.3
59.8
60.8
57.3
68.3
42.7
57.1
# Days
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
29
30
May 2018
68.5
67.6
66.7
60.9
60.1
60.9
57.5
68.7
49.4
57.8
# Days
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
25
31
Jun 2018
68.6
67.6
67.0
60.7
60.1
60.9
57.4
68.8
44.3
57.5
# Days
30
30
30
30
27
30
30
30
27
30
Q-2 2018
68.5
67.5
66.7
60.6
60.0
60.9
57.4
68.6
46.3
57.5
# Days
91
91
91
91
88
91
91
91
81
91
Jul 2018
68.5
67.5
66.8
60.1
59.6
60.6
57.0
68.2
42.6
56.2
# Days
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
30
31
Aug 2018
68.7
67.7
67.0
60.3
59.8
61.0
57.1
68.3
43.4
56.7
# Days
31
31
311
31
31
31
31
31
30
31
Sep 2018
68.3
67.4
66.7
60.0
59.7
60.7
56.6
67.9
43.5
56.5
# Days
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
251
30
Q-3 2018
68.5
67.5
66.8
60.1
59.7
60.8
56.9
68.1
43.2
56.5
# Days
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
85
92
Oct 2018
68.4
67.2
66.9
59.9
59.8
60.9
56.9
68.0
43.3
56.8
# Days
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
30
31
Nov 2018
67.5
66.4
66.4
59.5
59.0
60.7
56.7
67.3
44.8
55.8
# Days
30
30
30
29
30
30
28
30
281
30
Dec 2018
67.6
66.6
66.8
59.6
59.6
61.4
57.0
67.6
45.0
56.3
# Days
31
31
31
31
31
31
30
31
30
31
Q-4 2018
67.9
66.8
66.7
59.7
59.5
61.0
56.9
67.6
44.4
56.3
# Days
92
92
92
91
92
92
891
92
88
92
Jan 2019
67.7
66.6
66.5
59.9
59.5
60.7
57.0
67.9
43.4
57.1
# Days
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
281
29
Feb 2019
67.9
66.7
66.6
60.2
60.0
60.8
57.7
68.6
45.4
57.9
# Days
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
27
28
Mar 2019
67.9
66.9
66.9
60.2
59.9
61.2
57.4
68.5
43.8
57.6
# Days
30
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
28
31
Q-12019
67.8
66.8
66.7
60.1
59.8
60.9
57.3
68.3
44.3
57.5
# Days
89
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
831
88
Q-2 2018 thru Q-1 2019
Total
68.2
67.2
66.7
60.2
59.7
60.9
57.1
68.2
44.7
57.0
# Days 1
364
365
365
364
362
365
362
365
337
363
Q-1 2018 thru Q-4 2018 (Previous 4 Quarters)
Total
68.2
67.2
66.6 60.1
59.7
60.8
57.0
68.0
44.6
56.7
# Days
365
364
365 364
3621
365
362
365
342
365
Change from Previous 4 Quarters
0.0
0.0
0.1 0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.3
TABLE 3
DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION
January 2019
Date
1
is
56.2
2S
51.2
3S
66.5
4S
38.9
NMS Site
5S
44.7
6S
62.2
7S
34.2
8N
62.1
9N
31.1
AN
*#N/A
2
67.4
66.4
65.4
59.3
59.1
60.1
56.7
68.1
40.1
56.2
3
67.2
66.2
65.7
59.0
58.5
59.2
56.0
67.9
44.5
57.1
4
68.3
67.4
66.6
60.7
59.9
60.8
57.0
68.4
42.6
57.1
5
68.21
66.7
66.2
61.01
59.5
60.71
57.8
67.6
35.8
57.5
6
69.3
68.0
67.4
61.0
61.3
61.6
58.7
69.0
44.4
58.6
7
68.5
67.6
67.3
61.4
60.8
61.6
58.5
68.5
38.7
58.1
8
67.5
66.6
66.2
59.7
59.8
60.1
56.8
67.9
40.9
57.2
9
67.7
67.0
66.5
60.4
59.2
60.6
57.3
68.0
41.4
56.8
10
68.7
67.9
67.1
61.0
61.0
61.5
58.3
68.9
47.0
58.2
11
68.4
67.2
66.9
61.0
60.1
60.5
58.1
68.3
47.1
57.6
12
67.2
65.5
65.1
59.4
58.7
59.2
56.6
66.3
46.9
55.8
13
68.3
67.0
66.4
60.5
60.1
60.8
57.7
68.0
47.1
57.0
14
68.0
66.4
67.1
60.7
59.6
61.9
57.0
69.2
47.5
58.3
15
68.61
67.0
66.6
61.81
60.1
61.11
58.2
68.6
39.2
58.4
16
68.7
67.0
66.6
61.4
59.8
60.4
58.2
69.3
*#N/Aj
59.1
17
68.8
68.2
67.0
60.8
61.3
61.4
58.7
69.8
*#N/A
58.8
18
69.1
67.4
67.7
61.1
61.4
62.0
58.7
69.1
43.6
58.1
19
66.9
65.8
65.8
58.7
59.0
59.5
55.8
65.4
36.8
54.4
20
67.6
66.2
66.2
58.9
59.8
60.0
57.0
68.6
44.6
57.8
21
67.6
67.1
67.2
58.2
59.0
61.7
56.8
68.4
46.4
56.5
22
55.7
53.1
65.7
38.4
45.5
61.8
31.9
62.1
38.3
*#N/A
23
66.7
66.2
65.2
58.3
58.7
58.8
55.6
67.5
36.4
55.4
24
68.2
66.6
67.0
60.3
59.4
60.61
56.9
67.2
35.9
54.7
25
67.7
66.3
66.6
58.8
59.3
60.5
56.3
66.6
37.7
53.4
26
60.9
60.2
62.5
52.4
52.7
57.5
50.2
64.4
*#N/A
49.4
27
67.4
66.5
66.4
58.9
59.2
60.0
55.9
67.5
44.0
55.3
28
68.4
67.4
66.7
59.8
59.6
60.1
56.6
68.0
40.6
56.9
29
67.7
66.6
66.2
60.1
59.5
60.11
56.2
67.8
36.7
56.8
30
68.4
67.6
66.8
61.0
60.2
61.2
57.9
68.2
44.2
57.3
31
69.0
68.2
67.7
61.6
61.6
61.9
58.7
69.1
45.0
58.4
Days
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
28
29
En. Avg
67.7
66.6
66.5
59.9
59.5
60.7
57.0
67.9
43.4
57.1
#N/A indicates insufficient data.
*#N/A indicates no aircraft -related noise events.
TABLE 4
DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION
February 2019
Date
1
is
69.2
2S
67.6
3S
67.6
4S
62.2
NMS Site
5S
61.4
6S
62.1
7S
59.0
8N
68.9
9N
44.7
ION
58.5
2
65.5
62.9
63.9
57.5
57.1
58.2
54.5
67.8
40.0
57.8
3
67.6
66.6
65.9
60.3
60.0
60.1
57.6
68.6
48.6
58.3
4
69.0
67.5
67.3
61.9
61.3
61.7
59.5
69.8
*#N/A
59.9
51
67.8
67.6
66.41
60.0
60.91
60.7
58.2
68.81
31.7
58.4
6
67.5
66.6
66.0
59.5
59.5
60.1
57.3
67.9
41.2
57.1
7
68.6
67.0
67.0
60.3
60.4
60.7
57.8
68.4
47.6
56.8
8
68.6
67.5
67.0
60.5
61.0
61.0
58.3
69.5
40.5
58.9
9
66.41
65.2
64.8
59.01
59.2
59.31
56.5
66.5
53.3
56.1
10
68.1
67.5
66.5
60.2
60.8
61.3
58.5
69.3
41.7
58.8
11
68.3
67.3
66.8
60.7
60.6
61.0
58.1
68.0
42.2
57.1
12
68.0
65.3
65.3
58.6
57.8
58.2
53.7
67.4
40.1
55.5
13
68.9
66.8
66.7
61.5
59.6
61.0
57.5
70.1
47.5
59.8
14
68.4
67.4
66.5
60.2
60.9
60.9
58.2
70.3
37.8
59.5
15
68.7
68.0
67.7
61.6
61.7
61.9
59.3
69.9
37.7
59.2
16
66.5
65.6
64.8
58.1
58.3
59.1
56.6
67.4
35.2
56.5
17
66.4
66.7
65.1
58.4
55.2
59.7
58.1
68.8
33.7
58.4
18
68.0
66.9
67.1
59.8
60.2
60.6
57.3
68.4
43.7
56.4
19
67.6
64.2
66.4
60.1
60.0
60.5
57.7
67.9
37.9
57.3
20
68.0
66.6
66.3
60.7
60.5
61.2
58.8
69.4
47.51
59.4
21
66.8
65.9
69.3
58.1
59.1
64.5
55.8
66.3
47.0
53.6
22
68.2
67.4
66.8
60.2
60.1
60.0
57.4
68.9
45.5
57.9
23
66.5
65.6
65.0
58.6
58.4
58.4
55.5
66.6
44.6
56.3
24
67.9
67.1
66.7
59.61
60.0
60.3
57.2
68.0
49.7
56.4
25
68.7
67.5
67.1
61.1
60.3
60.9
57.4
68.5
49.6
57.3
26
67.4
66.9
66.6
60.7
60.4
60.9
57.8
68.2
43.5
57.9
27
67.9
66.9
66.5
60.5
60.2
60.9
57.9
68.0
36.6
57.5
28
68.7
67.1
66.9
60.3
60.3
61.2
57.9
68.9
35.5
57.4
Days
28
28
28
28
281
281
28
28
271
28
En. Avgj
67.9
66.7
66.61
60.21
60.01
60.81
57.71
68.61
45.4
57.9
#N/A indicates insufficient data.
*#N/A indicates no aircraft -related noise events.
TABLE 5
DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION
March 2019
Date
1
is
68.7
2S
67.8
3S
67.8
4S
60.9
NMS Site
5S
60.6
6S
61.4
7S
57.5
8N
68.6
9N
30.9
ION
57.7
2
67.3
65.5
64.9
59.5
58.6
58.6
55.9
67.8
39.7
56.7
3
68.2
67.6
67.1
61.0
61.2
61.3
58.5
69.0
31.9
58.7
4
68.5
67.6
67.1
61.1
60.9
61.5
58.4
68.7
42.0
58.8
5
68.3
67.2
66.9
60.8
59.8
60.6
56.6
68.5
38.4
57.9
6
68.1
66.7
66.2
60.9
59.9
60.3
57.4
69.9
43.3
59.1
7
68.4
67.7
67.1
60.7
61.2
61.5
58.2
69.8
41.5
59.6
8
68.9
68.5
67.8
61.1
60.2
61.7
58.9
69.9
39.6
59.8
9
67.1
65.6
65.8
59.8
59.1
59.9
56.8
67.3
43.6
57.2
10
68.7
67.8
67.4
61.2
61.1
61.6
58.7
69.8
46.5
59.2
11
67.9
66.8
67.7
60.2
60.4
61.8
57.8
68.6
50.6
57.3
12
68.4
67.5
66.6
60.6
60.8
60.9
57.9
70.1
39.8
58.8
13
68.7
67.6
67.3
61.2
60.9
61.4
57.8
68.6
46.1
57.8
14
58.5
55.7
67.4
45.2
50.7
64.3
27.8
63.7
46.1
38.6
15
63.61
62.7
67.5
53.7
55.0
63.5
51.1
64.9
41.6
44.8
16
63.8
62.9
63.4
55.3
55.6
58.3
52.3
65.8
42.7
53.0
17
67.5
66.3
66.4
59.3
59.1
59.8
56.4
67.8
*#N/A
56.2
18
67.7
66.8
66.4
60.1
59.4
60.7
57.5
68.4
46.8
57.3
19
68.1
67.0
66.5
61.0
59.6
60.81
57.4
69.2
37.3
58.4
20
67.4
67.8
67.0
60.8
60.5
61.5
58.0
69.1
44.1
58.2
21
#N/A
68.2
67.5
61.4
61.2
61.8
58.8
69.1
47.3
58.9
22
70.1
67.8
67.5
61.3
61.4
62.0
59.0
69.4
29.4
58.9
23
66.6
66.2
65.9
59.3
59.3
60.2
55.9
67.3
*#N/A
56.7
24
68.1
67.5
66.6
60.3
60.1
60.81
57.8
69.0
39.5
57.7
25
68.6
67.9
67.5
60.4
60.5
61.6
58.0
68.3
41.7
57.5
26
68.2
67.2
67.0
60.5
60.0
60.8
57.3
68.5
46.2
57.3
27
68.2
67.2
67.1
60.5
60.7
61.4
58.2
68.9
44.8
58.3
28
68.6
67.4
67.4
60.9
60.7
61.7
58.8
69.0
44.2
58.0
29
68.6
67.3
67.3
61.0
60.3
61.6
58.1
68.8
44.5
57.2
30
67.2
65.4
66.0
58.8
58.6
59.0
56.6
66.3
*#N/A
55.1
31
68.1
67.2
66.7
59.3
58.9
59.9
56.3
67.6
38.4
55.7
Days
30
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
28
31
En. Avg
67.9
66.91
66.9
60.2
59.9
61.2
57.4
68.5
43.8
57.6
#N/A indicates insufficient data.
*#N/A indicates no aircraft -related noise events.
TABLE 6
MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS
Commercial Class A
January - March 2019
Carrier
AC Type
# Deps
NMS
Site
is
2S
3S
45
5S
6S
7S
8N
9N
1ON
Alaska Air
A320
607
Average
95.7
94.9
94.5
88.1
86.8
87.3
84.7
90.4
79.7
82.2
Count
(546)
(534)
(560)
(557)
(536)
(551)
(554)
(35)
(3)
(4)
B737
33
Average
95.3
94.8
94.1
89.0
89.2
89.3
84.8
91.8
#N/A
#N/A
Count
(28)
(31)
(31)
(31)
(30)
(31)
(30)
(2)
(0)
(0)
B738
473
Average
98.0
96.6
95.3
89.2
89.6
89.9
86.8
92.6
84.3
81.8
Count
(401)
(379)
(417)
(419)
(396)
(416)
(415)
(46)
(9)
(11)
American
A320
94
Average
94.4
93.5
92.5
86.5
86.0
86.6
83.9
88.7
77.8
#N/A
Count
(80)
(80)
(86)
(83)
(81)
(78)
(80)
(6)
(1)
(0)
A321
1
Average
98.5
98.3
94.4
#N/A
87.7
88.3
86.4
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
Count
(1)
(1)
(1)
(0)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(0)
(0)
(0)
B738
1332
Average
99.0
97.7
97.3
89.9
89.8
90.1
87.0
93.5
85.3
81.6
Count
(1155)
(1118)
(1202)
(1195)
(1149)
(1187)
(1194)
(96)
(25)
(31)
Compass
E175
333
Average
95.8
95.0
96.1
89.7
89.4
89.5
85.5
92.5
81.6
83.7
Count
(293)
(285)
(308)
(304)
(291)
(299)
(299)
(21)
(1)
(1)
Delta
A319
230
Average
96.4
95.4
95.2
88.8
88.4
88.6
84.6
93.1
86.9
82.6
Count
(174)
(163)
(180)
(178)
(170)
(173)
(172)
(47)
(24)
(7)
B712
86
Average
93.2
93.2
89.8
81.1
80.9
82.2
79.8
86.5
#N/A
#N/A
Count
(73)
(64)
(77)
(71)
(72)
(74)
(69)
(6)
(0)
(0)
B737
4
Average
96.0
95.4
92.8
86.8
87.2
88.4
84.6
88.6
#N/A
#N/A
Count
(3)
(3)
(3)
(3)
(3)
(3)
(3)
(1)
(0)
(0)
8738
4
Average
95.5
94.9
93.8
89.3
90.0
90.5
87.5
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
Count
1 (4)
(4)
(4)
(4)
(4)
(4)
(4)
(0)
(0)
(0)
B752
335
Average
96.4
95.8
96.0
88.9
88.4
88.4
84.8
93.3
86.1
81.6
Count
(275)
(269)
(288)
(276)
(265)
(280)
(281)
(43)
(20)
(15)
FedEx
A306
63
Average
97.3
96.9
94.6
88.9
88.9
89.5
86.3
92.7
80.2
#N/A
Count
(56)
(60)
(58)
(60)
(58)
(60)
(60)
(3)
(1)
(0)
Frontier Airlines
A20N
72
Average
89.9
89.2
88.7
82.6
81.6
83.2
79.8
85.9
82.5
#N/A
Count
1 (63)
(62)
(63)
(62)
(47)
(57)
(44)
(7)
(1)
(0)
A319
49
Average
94.6
93.8
93.1
87.2
86.8
87.7
85.1
91.6
#N/A
81.4
Count
(46)
(46)
(46)
(46)
(43)
(45)
(47)
(2)
(0)
(1)
A320
58
Average
95.7
95.1
93.8
87.3
86.6
87.6
85.8
90.0
#N/A
#N/A
Count
(49)
(46)
(54)
(52)
(54)
(55)
(53)
(3)
(0)
(0)
Horizon Air
E175
174
Average
92.4
91.6
89.8
85.7
85.3
86.4
83.9
89.7
#N/A
79.6
Count
(155)
(153)
(160)
(159)
(147)
(157)
(157)
(13)
(0)
(2)
Southwest
B38M
1
Average
90.0
88.3
88.6
83.1
#N/A
83.4
79.4
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
Count
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(0)
(1)
(1)
(0)
(0)
(0)
8737
1509
Average
93.0
92.5
90.7
85.6
86.1
86.2
84.4
92.4
81.3
81.3
Count
(1304)
(1274)
(1350)
(1361)
(1324)
(1359)
(1311)
(110)
(10)
(21)
8738
17
Average
91.9
91.9
89.0
83.8
85.2
84.6
82.8
89.1
#N/A
#N/A
Count
(15)
(15)
(16)
(16)
(14)
(15)
(15)
(1)
(0)
(0)
United
A320
458
Average
94.6
93.9
92.9
86.8
86.5
88.0
85.7
91.3
86.5
80.1
Count
(387)
(365)
(412)
(407)
(387)
(404)
(401)
(34)
(7)
(2)
8737
297
Average
97.0
95.5
96.4
90.3
90.8
90.9
86.9
92.9
84.2
80.2
Count
(253)
(250)
(264)
(267)
(256)
(262)
(254)
(24)
(6)
(7)
8738
777
Average
98.5
97.0
96.5
89.9
90.3
90.7
87.3
93.6
86.7
81.9
Count
(665)
(628)
(680)
(673)
(661)
(675)
(664)
(78)
(22)
(18)
UPS
B752
51
Average
95.8
95.5
94.0
86.8
86.9
87.1
82.7
87.9
#N/A
#N/A
Count
(44)
(48)
(46)
(48)
(46)
(46)
(45)
(3)
(0)
(0)
West.let
B736
6
Average
94.4
93.1
93.8
87.8
87.6
87.5
82.8
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
Count
(6)
(6)
(6)
(6)
(6)
(6)
(6)
(0)
(0)
(0)
B737
71
Average
95.9
94.7
95.2
89.8
90.Oi
90.5
85.9
91.0
77.3
#N/A
Count
(63)
(61)
(65)
(64)
(61)
(64)
(62)
(5)
(1)
(0)
TABLE 7
MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS
Commercial Class E
January - March 2019
Carrier
AC Type
# Deps
NMS Site
is
2S
3S
45
5S 6S
7S
8N
9N
ION
Delta
8712
331
Average
91.9
92.1
88.1
80.6
81.0 82.0
79.7
85.9
80.3
#N/A
Count
(290)
(284)
(301)
(243)
(263) (301)
(246)
(22)
(1)
(0)
Horizon Air
DHBD
6
Average
84.6
85.0
85.5
80.2
78.6 80.3
#N/A
78.1
#N/A
#N/A
Count
(5)
(5)
(5)
(2)
(1) (3)
(0)
(1)
(0)
(0)
E175
335
Average
91.4
90.9
89.4
85.8
85.2 86.1
84.0
90.4
78.7
80.4
Count
(294)
(285)
(303)
(297)
(286) (290)
(289)
(25)
(3)
(4)
SkyWest Coml.
E175
855
Average
90.6
90.4
89.3
85.7
85.1 85.8
83.8
88.6
#N/A
#N/A
Count
(755)
(719)
(788)
(783)
(722) (770)
(753)
(51)
(0)
(0)
Southwest
B38M
4
Average
89.8
89.1
87.6
81.0
81.6 83.6
79.5
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
Count
(4)
(4)
(4)
(4)
(4) (1)
(3)
(0)
(0)
(0)
B737
2315
Average
92.0
91.7
89.9
85.2
85.5 85.7
84.0
91.5
80.8
81.0
Count
(2015)
(1975)
(2083)
(2097)
(2005) (2109)
(2021)
(166)
(19)
(20)
TABLE 8
MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS
Commuter
January - March 2019
TABLE 8 -GA
MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS
General Aviation
January - March 2019
TABLE 9
AIR CARRIER OPERATIONAL HISTORY
Carrier
Alaska Air
AS
AC .-
A319
2015
2016
Year
2017
2018
64
2019
80
A320 262
1.142
B734 80 76 24
B737 2.666 3.258 1.233 384
66
B738 4.590 4,439 6,420 8.260
946
American
AA
A319
42
1781
332
722
184
A320 344 868 266 78
4
A321 326 563 56 4
2
B738 9.090 10.538 11.556 11.457
2.664
B752 22 74 4 4
Compass
CP
E170
152
78
E175 1.6691 2,726 3,188
666
Delta
DL
A319
3,352
3,444
2,053
1,979
460
A320 162 160 94 12
B712 3,267 3,379
834
B737 146 188
8
B738 4 40 18
8
B739 2 2
8752 2.130 2.128 2.137 2.889
670
MD90 2
FedEx
FM
A306
508
510
506
508
126
Frontier Airlines
F9
A20N*
600
144
A319 1,497 646 356 190
98
A320 154 7401 628 654
116
A321 2
A32N* 12 438
Horizon Air
QX
DI -18D
1,156
1,456
728
12
E175 339 2.716
1.024
SkvWest Coml.
SC
CRJ9
1,922
1,899
1,440
6
E175 3,5541 4,761 6,960
1,714
Southwest
WN
B38M
2
14
10
B737 37,101 41,806 35,971 32,380
7,652
B738 2,586 1,144 58 64
34
United
UA
A319
1,393
1,999
1,470
999
271
A320 3,207 2,670 3,9571 3,927
646
8737 4,523 5,246 4,044 2,987
596
B738 1,853 1,252 3,302 5,154
1,551
B752 44 2 4
UPS
5X
A306
52
52
45
22
B752 366 370 369 394
102
US Airways
AW
A319
240
A320 1,476
A321 740
B752 98
WestJet
WS
6736
32
30
10
12
B737 1 718 642 6441 666
142
Total
1 81,288
91,279
90,250 1
91,875
21,984
*In 2018, the code for the Airbus A320neo was changed from A32N to A20N.
TABLE 10
AIRCRAFT OPERATIONAL HISTORY
Aircraft
A20N*
2015
2016
Year
2017
2018
600
0•
144
A306
560
562
551
530
126
A319
6,524
6,267
4,211
3,954
1,093
A320
5,343
4,438
4,945
4,933
1,908
A321
1,066
5651
56
4
2
A32N*
12
438
B38M
2
14
10
B712
3,267
3,379
834
8734
80
76
24
8736
32
30
10
12
8737
45,008
50,952
42,038
36,605
8,464
8738
18,123
17,373
21,376
24,953
5,203
B739
2
2
B752
2,660
2,572
2,512
3,291
772
CRJ9
1,922
1,899
1,440
6
DHBD
1,156
1,456
728
12
E170
152
78
E175
5,223
7,826
12,864
3,404
M D90
1
2
Total
1 81,288
91,279 1
90,250 1
91,875
21,984
*In 2018, the code for the Airbus A320neo was changed from
A32N to A20N.
TABLE 11
AIR CARRIER AVERAGE DAILY DEPARTURE HISTORY
'Carrier
Alaska Air
AS
AC Type
A319
2015
2016
Year
2017
2018
.088
0•
.110
A320 .359
1.564
B734 .110 .104 .033
B737 3.652 4.451 1.693 .526
.090
B738 6.288 6.066 8.789 11.315
1.296
American
AA
A319
.058
.243
.455
.989
.252
A320 .471 1.186 .364 .107
.005
A321 .447 .770 .077 .005
.003
B738 12.452 14.402 15.827 15.696
3.649
B752 .030 .101 .005 .005
Compass
CP
E170
.208
.107
E175 2.279 3.734 4.367
.912
Delta
DL
A319
4.592
4.705
2.811
2.712
.630
A320 .222 .219 .129 .016
8712 4.471 4.627
1.142
8737 1 .200 .258
.011
B738 .005 .055 .025
.011
B739 .003 .003
B752 2.918 2.910 2.926 3.959
.918
M D90 .003
FedEx
FM
A306
.696
.697
.693
.696
.173
Frontier Airlines
F9
A20N*
.822
.197
A319 2.052 .883 .488 .260
.134
A320 .211 1.011 .860 .896
.159
A321 .003
A32N* .016 .600
Horizon Air
QX
DHBD
1.579
1.995
.997
.016
E175 .466 3.721
1.403
SkyWest Coml.
SC
CRJ9
2.633
2.5931
1.975
.008
E175 4.855 6.523 9.534
2.348
Southwest
WN
B38M
.003
.019
.014
B737 50.819 57.104 49.274 44.351
10.482
B738 3.542 1.563 .079 .088
.047
United
UA
A319
1.910
2.730
2.014
1.373
.370
A320 4.395 3.648 5.422 5.375
.885
B737 6.195 7.169 5.534 4.093
.814
8738 2.537 1.710 4.526 7.058
2.129
B752 .060 .003 .005
UPS
5X
A306
.071
.071
.060
.030
8752 .501 .505 .507 .540
.140
USAirways
AW
A319
.329
A320 2.022
A321 1.014
B752 .134
West.let
WS
8736
.044
.041
.014
.016
B737 .984 .877 .882 .912
.195
Total
111.351
124.699
123.622
125.852 1
30.115
*In 2018, the code for the Airbus A320neo was changed from A32N to A20N.
1A
TABLE 12
AIRCRAFT Glossary
Type
A20N
Make
Airbus
Model/SeriesAC
320200 Neo
A306
Airbus
300-600
A310
Airbus
310-200
A320
Airbus
320
A32N
Airbus
320-200 Neo
B38M
Boeing
737-800 Max
B712
Boeing
717-200
8733
Boeing
737-300
B734
Boeing
737-400
B736
Boeing
737-600
B737
Boeing
737-700
8738
Boeing
737-800
8739
Boeing
737-900
8752
Boeing
757-200
CRJ7
Canadair Regional Jet
700
CRJ9
Canadair Regional Jet
900
DH8D
Bombardier
Dash 8
E135
Embraer
135
E170
Embraer
170
E175
Embraer
175
MD90
McDonnell Douglas
90
QUARTERLY NOISE MEETING
Date: March 20, 2019
Time: 2:00 PM
Place: Airport Commission Room
ITEMS DISCUSSED
Nikolas Gaskins provided an update on the release of the JWA Quarterly Noise Report for the 4th
Quarter of 2018. A summary of the JWA airport statistics for the month of January 2019 was provided
by Bonnie Frisch.
Louie Ilustrisimo presented an overview of the soon-to-be released JWA noise complaint management
system supported by Bruel & Kjaer called Viewpoint. The presentation highlighted the automation of
noise complaints at JWA through Viewpoint, which will be readily accessible to the community via a
mobile app, desktop version, and telephone tree when it is released in late spring.
Tony Cangey presented a flight track analysis comparing the reverse flow operational procedures with
respect to pre- and post -FAA SoCal Metroplex implementation at JWA, and discussed other factors
relating to reverse flow.
Tom Meng of Newport Beach and member of the Newport Beach Aviation Committee inquired as to
how noise complaints are currently being received by the airport and whether staff will continue to
investigate complaints after Viewpoint is implemented. Mr. Gaskins explained that over the past several
months the John Wayne Airport Access & Noise Office has received over 30,000 complaints via a
subscription complaint service that is also referred to as a "noise button" or "clicker." Mr. Gaskins
emphasized that Viewpoint will assist staff by increasing efficiency and accuracy in how complaints are
entered into the database, and staff will continue to monitor and investigate complaints when received.
Steve Byers of Newport Beach and member of the Newport Beach Aviation Committee asked if the
volume of noise complaints increases during reverse flow. Mr. Cangey affirmed that complaints do
increase as a result of residents not being familiar with the reverse flow flight paths.
Mr. Byers asked how Viewpoint will be made accessible to the public. Mr. Gaskins explained that the
implementation of Viewpoint at JWA will occur in three phases: First, the mobile app will be accessible
to the public, followed by the desktop version, then concluded by the release of the telephone tree
approximately 1 % months after the initial release date of Viewpoint. Mr. Gaskins emphasized that the
airport will have information available to the public on the airport website prior to the release date of
Viewpoint, and the airport may conduct presentations to the community.
Mr. Byers inquired as to how the airport is managing the 30,000 noise complaints that it has recently
received. Mr. Gaskins explained the "noise button" is currently being used by approximately 50
residents, and the technology has made it easier for residents to submit complaints. Mr. Gaskins
emphasized that the large amount of noise complaints the airport has received over the past several
months, as a result of the "noise button," was a factor in the airport considering remedies to effectively
manage noise complaints in the future.
QUARTERLY NOISE MEETING
Newport Beach resident Dr. Jim Mosher asked if the email address to the noise office that is currently
being used for noise complaints will be discontinued, and whether noise complaints being sent through
the "clicker" will be rejected once Viewpoint is released. Mr. Gaskins advised that once the Viewpoint
mobile app and desktop versions are released to the public, the noise office email address will continue
to be active for an undetermined period of time while providing an autoreply message referring the
complainant to the Viewpoint application website to register and submit a noise complaint. Mr. Gaskins
explained that noise complaints submitted through the "clicker" are currently and will continue to be
automatically registered into the database.
Dr. Mosher inquired if noise complaints prompt the issuance of curfew violations at the airport., Mr.
Gaskins explained that there are several systems and checks conducted by the noise office to ensure
curfew regulations are strictly enforced, whether or not complaints about such flights are received.
Dr. Mosher asked for an update on the detailed noise reports that will be made available to the public.
Mr. Gaskins advised that within the next couple of months the detailed noise reports will be made
available to public on a monthly basis once that particular month has been flight -matched by staff. Mr.
Gaskins explained that the detailed noise reports will be similar to the platform used by Reagan National
Airport in an effort to be as transparent as possible with respect to noise data.
Mel Beale of Newport Beach and member of Airport Working Group (AWG) asked if the subscription
complaint form service gets a copy of the email with the details of the complaint. Mr. Gaskins explained
he was not aware of whether the service administrator receives an email for each complaint. Mr. Beale
also asked if the increase in complaints from the subscription service has affected the workload of the
noise office. Mr. Gaskins explained that if the noise office did not utilize a system such as Viewpoint,
staff would have to manually enter each complaint into the database, which would take staff away from
completing other daily tasks in a timely manner.
QUARTERLY NOISE MEETING ROSTER
March 20, 2019
NAME ORGANIZATION
Steve Byers Resident - Newport Beach/Aviation Committee
Jim Mosher Resident — Newport Beach
Mel Beale Resident —Airport Working Group
Tom Meng Resident - Newport Beach/Aviation Committee
Nikolas Gaskins John Wayne Airport
Bonnie Frisch John Wayne Airport
Anthony Cangey John Wayne Airport
Beatrice Siercke John Wayne Airport
Louie Ilustrisimo John Wayne Airport
Cristina Magana John Wayne Airport
SUMMARY OF STATISTICAL INFORMATION
FOR
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1. Size of Noise Impact Area as defined in the Noise Standards (California Code of Regulations, Title 21:
Public Works, Division 2.5 Division of Aeronautics (Department of Transportation), Chapter 6. Noise
Standards):
6.67 acres (or 0.010 square miles)
2. Estimated Number of dwelling units included in the Noise Impact Area as defined in the Noise
Standards:
67
3. Estimated number of people residing within the Noise Impact Area as defined in the Noise Standards:
168 (based on 2.5 people per dwelling)
4. Identification of aircraft of type having highest takeoff noise level operating at this airport together with
estimated number of operations by this aircraft type during the calendar quarter reporting period:
B737-800 -5,204 (Arrivals + Departures)
5. Total number of aircraft operations during the calendar quarter:
6. Number of Air Carrier operations during the calendar quarter:
(Not mandatory)
70,277
23,147
7. Percentage of Air Carrier operations by aircraft certified under Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 36,
Stage III:
(Not mandatory)
100%
8. Estimated number of operations by General Aviation aircraft during the calendar quarter:
(Not mandatory)
46,921
9. Estimated number of operations by Military aircraft during the calendar quarter:
(Not mandatory)
209