Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC RES 3949 RESOLUTION NO. 3949 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL FIND THAT THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT/FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT IMPACT REPORT FOR THE DISPOSAL AND REUSE OF MCAS TUSTIN ("FEIS/FEIR") IS ADEQUATE TO SERVE AS THE PROJECT EIS/EIR FOR ZONE CHANGE 04-003, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 16581, CONCEPT PLAN 03-003, DESIGN REVIEW 04- 006, THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING PLAN AND DENSITY BONUS APPLICATION, AND THE REQUEST TO TRANSFER AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS FROM PLANNING AREA 4 AND 21 TO PLANNING AREA 5 AND THAT ALL APPLICABLE MITIGATION MEASURES WILL BE INCORPORATED INTO THE PROJECT AS REQUIRED BY THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT. The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows: II. A. That Zone Change 04-003, Concept Plan 03-003, Tentative Tract Map 16581, Design Review 04-006, the "Affordable Housing Plan and Density Bonus Application," and the request to transfer affordable housing units from Planning Area 4 and 21 to Planning Area 5 is considered a "Project" pursuant to the terms of the California Environmental Quality Act; and, B. That the FEIS/FEIR was certified by the City Council on January 16, 2001. The FEIS/FEIR is a program EIR under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). The FEIS/FEIR considered the potential environmental impacts associated with development on the former Marine Corps Air Station, Tustin, including development of residential uses within Planning Area 4 and Planning Area 5. C. That an initial study checklist, attached as Exhibit A hereto, was prepared to evaluate the potential impacts associated with the Project. The initial study checklist demonstrates that all potential environmental impacts of the Project were addressed by the certified FEIS/EIR, no additional impacts have been identified, and all applicable mitigation measures in the FEIS/EIR will be implemented through the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Project (Attachment 2 of Exhibit A) or as conditions of approval of the Project. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council find that the project is within the scope of the previously approved Program FEIS/FEIR and that pursuant to Title 14 California Code of Regulations Section 15168 (c) and 15162, no new effects could occur and no new mitigation measures Resolution No. 3949 Page 2 would be required. Accordingly, no new environmental document is required by CEQA. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, at a regular meeting on the 14th day of February, 2005. JO NIELSEN Chairperson &iv/~;¡¡¡~ ELIZABETH A. BINSACK Planning Commission Secretary STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF ORANGE) CITY OF TUSTIN ) I, ELIZABETH A. BINSACK, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the Planning Commission Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, California; that Resolution No. 3949 duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission, held on the 14th day of February, 2005. a ~¿?---/ ELIZABETH A. BI SACK Planning Commission Secretary EXHIBIT A TO RESOLUTION NO. 3949 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 300 Centennial Way, , Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 573-3100 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS CHECKLIST For Projects With Previously Certified/Approved Environmental Documents: Environmental Impact StatementlEnvironmental Impact Report (EIS/EIR) for the Disposal and Reuse of Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) Tustin This checklist and the following evaluation of environmental impacts (Attachment 1 to Exhibit A of Resolution No. 3949) takes into consideration the preparation of an environmental document prepared at an earlier stage of the proposed project. The checklist and evaluation evaluate the adequacy of the earlier document pursuant to Section 15162 and 15168 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. A. BACKGROUND Project Title(s): Development of 1,077 residential units in Planning Area 4 and 5 Lead Agency: City of Tustin, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California 92780 Lead Agency Contact Person: Minoo Ashabi Phone: (714) 573-3126 Project Location: Planning Area 4 and 5, MCAS-Tustin Specific Plan, bounded by the Edinger Avenue on the north, North Loop Road on the south, existing industrial business park on the west, and West connector on the east. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Marble Mountain Partners LLC c/o Lennar Communities 25 Enterprise, Suite 300 Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 General Plan Designation: MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Zoning Designation: Low Density Residential, Planning Area 4 Medium Density Residential, Planning Area 5 Project Description: Approval of Concept Plan 03-003, Tentative Tract Maps 16581, Design Review 04-006, Specific Plan Amendment/Zone Change 04-003 (MCAS Tustin disposition parcels 23 & 24) for the purpose of developing 1,077 residential units including eighty-four (84) single family detached units, 199 carriage way units, 552 multiple family residential units and a senior housing project with 242 units. The project also includes a density bonus to construct 182 additional units and a request for transfer of a portion of affordable housing units from Planning Area 21 and Planning Area 4 to Planning Area 5. Surrounding Uses: North: Edinger Avenue, self-storage and retail uses and residential uses East: Vacant - MCAS Tustin Planning Area 7 - Village Service (retail uses) South: Vacant - MCAS Tustin Planning Area 6 - Urban Regional park West: Industrial Business Park - Industrial Zoning (M) Previous Environmental Documentation: Program Final Environmental Impact StatementlEnvironmental Impact Report (Program FEIS/EIR) for the Disposal and Reuse of Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) Tustin (State Clearinghouse #94071005) certified by the Tustin City Council on January 16, 200 I. B. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist in Section D below. OLand Use and Planning DPopulation and Housing DGeology and Soils OHydrology and Water Quality DAir Quality DTransportation & Circulation OBiological Resources OMineral Resources OAgricultural Resources OHazards and Hazardous Materials DNoise OPublic Services OUtilities and Service Systems OAesthetics OCultural Resources ORecreation DMandatory Findings of Significance C. DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation: D I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. 0 I fmd that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. D I find that the proposed project MA Y have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. 0 I fmd that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect I) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. IZI I fmd that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects I) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. D I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier NEGATIVE DECLARA nON pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. -~ ~ Preparer: c:;:;-- -~~~. ~ Minoo Ashabi, Associa: e Planner Ed r;~M ~~¿ Elizabeth A. Binsack, Community Development Director D. EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMP ACTS See Attached Date: I. /3.0S- Date /. /.3 'ðo EV ALVA TION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS No Substantial New More Change From Significant Severe Previous I. AESTHETICS - Would the project: Impact Impacts Analysis a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? 0 0 ~ b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? 0 0 ~ c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? 0 0 ~ d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? 0 0 ~ II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In detennining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? 0 0 181 b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? 0 0 181 c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? 0 0 ~ III. AIR QUALITY: Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? 0 0 ~ b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? 0 0 ~ c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? 0 0 ~ d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? 0 0 ~ e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? 0 0 ~ ¡Y. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: - Would the project: New Significant Impact More Severe Impacts No Substantial Change From Previous Analysis a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department ofFish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? 0 0 ~ b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department ofFish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? 0 0 ~ c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? 0 0 ~ d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or - impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? 0 0 ~ :) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting oiological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? 0 0 ~ f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? 0 0 ~ V. CULTURAL RESOURCES: - Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of fonnal cemeteries? 0 0 ~ 0 0 ~ 0 0 ~ 0 0 ~ b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS: - Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: No Substantial New More Change From Significant Severe Previous Impact Impacts Analysis i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. D D ~ H) Strong seismic ground shaking? D D ~ Hi) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? D D ~ iv) Landslides? D D ~ b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? D D ~ c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? D D ~ d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-I-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? D D ~ e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? D 0 ~ " .-. VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport,. use, or disposal of hazardous materials? D D ~ b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? 0 D ~ c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? 0 0 ~ d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? 0 0 ~ e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? D 0 ~ t) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? D 0 ~ No Substantial New More Change From Significant Severe Previous ลก) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an Impact Impacts Analysis 'ldopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? 0 0 rg h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fifes, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? D D ~ VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER OUALITY: - Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? D D ~ b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? 0 0 rg c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site __or area, including through the alteration of the course of a ;tream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial ~rosion or siltation on- or off-site? 0 0 rg d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattemofthe site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? 0 D ~ e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? 0 0 rg f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? D D ~ g) Place housing within a IOO-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? 0 0 rg h) Place within a IOO-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? 0 0 rg i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding as a result of the failure ofa levee or dam? 0 0 rg Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? D D ~ IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING - Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? 0 0 rg No Substantial New More Change From Significant Severe Previous b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or Impact Impacts Analysis regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project L__- (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? 0 0 ~ c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? 0 0 ~ X. MINERAL RESOURCES - Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? 0 0 ~ b) Result in the Joss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? 0 0 ~ XI. NOISE - Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? 0 0 ~ ..- b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundbome vibration or groundbome noise levels? 0 0 ~ c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? 0 0 ~ d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? -0 0 ~ e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? 0 0 ~ f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excess noise levels? 0 0 ~ XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING - Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of ,--...1 roads or other infi'astructure)? 0 0 ~ b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? 0 0 ~ .--- - - --- ----- --- ------- ------- No Substantial New More Change From Significant Severe Previous Impact Impacts Analysis ;) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? D D ~ XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other perfonnance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? D D ~ Police protection? D D ~ Schools? D D ~ Parks? D D ~ Other public facilities? D D ~ XIV. RECREATION - a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? D D ~ b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? D D ~ XV. TRANSPORTATIONffRAFFIC - Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e. result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? D D ~ b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? D 0 ~ c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results - -in substantial safety risks? 0 0 ~ i) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? 0 0 [8J e) Result in inadequate emergency access? 0 D [8J f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? D D ;g¡ -----,------,-,-,-,--'" , g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? New Significant Impact More Severe Impacts 0 0 XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS - Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? D D b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? 0 0 c) Require or result in the construction of new stonn water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? D D d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project ITom existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? 0 0 e) Result in a detennination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? D 0 f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient pennitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? 0 0 g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? D 0 XVII. MANDA TORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? 0 0 b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? 0 0 c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? D D No Substantial Change From Previous Analysis [8] [8] [8] [8] [8] " - . [8] [8] [8] [8] [8] [8] ATTACHMENT 1 OF EXHIBIT A OF RESOLUTION NO. 3949 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS CONCEPT PLAN 03-003, SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT/ZONE CHANGE 04-003, TENT A TIVE TRACT MAP 16581, DESIGN REVIEW 04-006, AFFORDABLE HOUSING PLAN AND DENSITY BONUS AND TRANSFER OF AFFORDABLE UNITS (MCAS TUSTIN REUSE DISPOSAL PARCELS 23 & 24) PLANNING AREA 4 & 5 - MCAS TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN BACKGROUND The former Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) Tustin was officially closed on July 2, 1999 as a result of recommendations of the Federal Base Closure and Realignment Commission. The City was designated as the Local Redevelopment Authonty (LRA) for the reuse of MCAS Tustin and, acting as such, approved a Reuse Plan that provided for future land uses at the former MCAS Tustin on October 1996 and subsequently amended on September 1998 ("the Reuse Plan"). The Reuse Plan was subsequently reviewed and approved by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (BUD) as consistent with federal law regarding the homeless. In accordance with the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act ("NEPA") of 1969, as amended, and the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), the federal government and City prepared a Joint Final Program Environmental Impact StatementlEnvironmental Impact Report for the Reuse and Disposal of MCAS Tustin. On January 16, 2001, the City of Tustin certified the Final Joint Program Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report for the disposal and reuse of MCAS- Tustin (referenced as FEIS/EIR herein). The project is within the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan. The land was purchased by the developers directly from the Department of Navy through a land auction. The project site is comprised of 105.5 acres (gross) within Planning Areas 4 and 5 of the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan and bounded by the Edinger Avenue on the north, North Loop Road on the south, existing industrial park on the west, and West connector on the east. Access to the site is provided mainly from Edinger Avenue The proposed project would develop 1,077 residential units as follows: 84 single family detached units 199 carriage way units 552 multiple family residential 242 units (senior housing project) Total 1,077 units The project also includes a request for a density bonus to construct 63 additional units in Planning Area 4 and 119 units in Planning Area 5 for a total of 182 units. In addition, since Planning Area 4 and 21 are intended for low density development, the applicant has requested to transfer twenty-five (25) of the required units for Very Low and Low income families from Planning Area 21 to Planning Area 5 and eight (8) of Very Low and Low income units and fourteen (14) of the Moderate income units from Planning Area 4 to Planning Area 5, which allows medium density development. Attachment 1 of Exhibit A of Resolution No. 3949 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Concept Plan 03-003, TT 16581, DR 04-006 Page 2 In accordance with the requirements of the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Section 3.4.2.G and 3.4.3.H a total of241 affordable units would be required as follows: Planning Affordable Units RHNA Total Required Area (15%) PA4 16 Very Low 16 Very Low 10 Low 38 Low 48 Low 15 Moderate 15 Moderate 31 Moderate Total = 41 Total = 53 Total = 94 PA5 37 Very Low 37 Very Low 22 Low 38 Low 60 Low 34 Moderate 16 Moderate 50 Moderate Total = 93 Total = 54 Total = 147 Total 134 107 241 The project includes development of 6.33 acres of parkland recreational sites including 3.66 acres accessible for public and facility improvements for which parkland credit is eligible and recommended in accordance with the requirements of the Quimby Act and the City's Subdivision requirements. Access to the public park sites would be provided by public access easements in perpetuity from two entry points to the site with recordation of an easement on Tentative Tract Map 16581. A portion of the site would also include private amenities available to the residents of the development. As part of the analysis of the MCAS Tustin FEIS/EIR for the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan, Planning Area 4 was identified as a Low Density Residential (LDR) site, with a development potential of 1-7 dwelling units per acre and Planning Area 5 was identified as a Medium Density Residential (MDR) site, with a development potential of 8-15 dwelling units per acre. There were a total of 274 military housing units within Planning Area 4 (Table 3-1, MCAS Tustin Specific Plan). These units were in dilapidated and have been demolished. In accordance with Table 3-2 of MCAS Tustin Specific Plan, Planning Area 4 includes 43.3 net acres with potential development of 304 maximum units at 7 units per acre that was considered for the FEIS/EIR analysis. However, the Planning Area 4 site includes only 39.1 net acres (adjusted with adjustment of Severyns Road), and therefore potential for a maximum of 274 units. In addition a density bonus is requested for 63 additional units that would increase the density to 8.62 dwelling units per acre. In accordance with Table 3-2 of MCAS Tustin Specific Plan, Planning Area 5 includes 41.1 net acres with potential development of 621 maximum units at 15 units per acre. The proposed development includes 42.2 net acres (modified with adjustment of Severyns Road), and therefore potential for a maximum of 633 units. In addition a density bonus is requested for 119 additional units more than the 633 maximum units based on the net area of the site that would increase the density to 17.54 dwelling units per acre. Attachment 1 of Exhibit A of Resolution No. 3949 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Concept Plan 03-003, TT 16581, DR 04-006 Page 3 The project includes 152 additional units more than the analysis included in the FEISÆIR for number of units in Planning Area 4 and Planning Area 5. Potential impact on the increased number of units will be discussed in each category. All related environmental impacts of such development were addressed in the FEISÆIR and implementation and mitigation measures were incorporated into the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan, which are included in the DDA or with conditions of approval for the other entitlement portions of the project as identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program Matrix (Attachment 2 of Exhibit A of Resolution No. 3949). The following information provides support for the conclusions identified in the Environmental Analysis Checklist. I. AESTHETICS - Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? The project is not located on a scenic highway nor will it affect a scenic vista. The project would be consistent with the permitted uses identified within the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan. Development of low-density and medium-density residential units within Planning Areas 4 and 5 were considered within the FEIS/EIR and will have no negative aesthetic effect on the site when mitigation measures identified in the FEIS/EIR are incorporated with approval of the project. All exterior design is required to be in compliance with Section 2.17.3(A) - Urban Design Guidelines for Residential Development of MCAS Tustin Specific Plan, and the Landscape Concept Section 2.17.2 as they relate to design of Edinger Avenue, North Loop Road, and West Connector, and primary street comers and project entries. The proposal includes a design review, which requires that the design of the project is cohesive and in harmony with surrounding uses. All exterior lighting would be designed to reduce glare, create a safe night environment, and avoid impacts to surrounding properties in compliance with Section 2.17.3 (A) of the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan and the City's Security Ordinance. The proposed project will result in no substantial changes to the environmental impacts previously evaluated with the certified Program FEIS/EIR. Mitigation/Monitoring Required: Mitigation measures have been adopted by the Tustin City Council in the FEISÆIR as identified in the Mitigation and Implementation Measures matrix (Attachment 2); these measures would be included as conditions of approval for the project. Sources: FEIS/EIR for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin MCAS Tustin Specific Plan (pages 2-37 to 2-54) Attachment 1 of Exhibit A of Resolution No. 3949 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Concept Plan 03-003, TT 16581, DR 04-006 Page 4 Tustin Security Ordinance Tustin General Plan II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use? As documented in the FEIS/EIR, the project site is part of MCAS Tustin Reuse Plan that contained 702 acres of farmland. The FEIS/EIR concluded that there would be no viable long-term mitigation to off-set the impact of converting farmland on MCAS Tustin to urban uses. Mitigation/Monitoring Required: Specific mitigation measures have been adopted by the Tustin City Council in certifying the FEIS/EIR. However, the FEIS/EIR also concluded that Reuse Plan related impacts to farmland were significant and impossible to fully mitigate. A Statement of Overriding Consideration for the FEIS/EIR was adopted by the Tustin City Council on January 16, 2001. Sources: Field Observations FEIS/EIR for Disposal and Reuse ofMCAS Tustin (Page 3-37 to 3-54) MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Tustin General Plan III. AIR QUALITY: Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? Attachment 1 of Exhibit A of Resolution No. 3949 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Concept Plan 03-003, TT 16581, DR 04-006 Page 5 c) result i~ a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? As documented in the FEIS/EIR, the project is part of larger project that was projected to result in air quality impacts. A Statement of Overriding Consideration for the FEIS/EIR was adopted by the Tustin City Council on January 16,2001. Since the project will construct only 152 additional units more than analysis in the FEIS/EIR, which is below the threshold established for air quality impact for residential development (Table 6-2, 1993 South Coast Air Quality Management District, CEQA Air Quality Handbook) no significant impact beyond what was analyzed in the adopted FEIS/EIR is anticipated. Mitigation/Monitoring Required: Specific mitigation measures have been adopted by the Tustin City Council in certifying the FEIS/EIR. However, the FEIS/EIR also concluded that Reuse Plan related operational air quality impacts were significant and impossible to fully mitigate. A Statement of Overriding Consideration for the FEIS/EIR was adopted by the Tustin City Council on January 16,2001. Sources: Field Observations FEIS/EIR for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin (pages 3-143 throughl53, 4-207 through 4-230 and pages 7-41 through 7-42) MCAS Tustin Specific Plan (Pages 3-38 through 3-54) Table 6-2, 1993 South Coast Air Quality Management District, CEQA Air Quality Handbook Tustin General Plan IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: - Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the Calüornia Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? Attachment 1 of Exhibit A of Resolution No. 3949 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Concept Plan 03-003, TT 16581, DR 04-006 Page 6 d) Inteñere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) . Confliét with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? 1) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional or state habitat conservation plan? The FEIS/EIR found that implementation of the Reuse Plan and MCAS Tustin Specific Plan would not result in impacts to federally listed threatened or endangered plant or animal species. The proposed project is within the scope of development considered with the analysis of the FEIS/EIR for MCAS Tustin. The FEIS/EIR determined that implementation of the Reuse Plan and MCAS Tustin Specific Plan (including the proposed project) could impact jurisdictional waters/wetlands and the southwestern pond turtle or have an impact on jurisdictional waters/wetlands. The project site is not located in an area that would affect the southwestern pond turtle or have an impact on jurisdictional waters or wetlands. No substantial change is expected from the analysis previously completed in the FEIS/EIR for MCAS Tustin. Mitigation/Monitoring Required: No mitigation is required. Sources: Field Observations FEIS/EIR for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin (Pages 3-75 through 3- . 82,4-103 through 4-108, and 7-26 through 7-27) MCAS Tustin Specific Plan (pages 3-38 to 3-54). Tustin General Plan v. CULTURAL RESOURCES: - Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside formal cemeteries? A portion of the existing blimp pads are within the project site boundary that were identified as part of a Discontiguous Historic District. The Navy, State Office of Historic Preservation (SHPO), and Advisory Council executed Memorandum of Agreement (attached as part of the EIS/EIR) with City of Tustin and County of Orange as invited signatories allowed for the destruction of the blimp pads. The EIS/EIR noted that it may not be fmancially feasible to retain the blimp hangers and there maybe irreversible significant impacts. A Statement of Overriding Consideration for the FEIS/EIR was adopted by the Tustin City Council on January 16,2001. Attachment 1 of Exhibit A of Resolution No. 3949 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Concept Plan 03-003, IT 16581, DR 04-006 Page 7 Numerous archaeological surveys have been conducted at the former MCAS Tustin site. In 1988, the State Office of Historic Preservation (SHPO) provided written concurrence that all open spaces on MCAS Tustin had been adequately surveyed for archaeological resources. Although one archaeological site (CA-ORA-381) has been recorded within the Reuse Plan area, it is believed to have been destroyed. It is possible that previously unidentified buried archaeological or paleontological resources within the project site could be significantly impacted by grading and construction activities. With the inclusion of mitigation measures that require construction monitoring, potential impacts to cultural resources can be reduced to a level of insignificance. No substantial change is expected from the analysis previously completed in the FEIS/EIR for MCAS Tustin. Mitigation/Monitoring Required: Mitigation measures have been adopted by the Tustin City Council in the FEIS/EIR; these measures would be included as conditions of approval for the project. Sources: Field Observations FEISÆIR for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin (Pages 3-68 through 3- 74,4-93 through 4-102 and 7-24 through 7-26) MCAS Tustin Specific Plan (Pages 3-38 to 3-54). Tustin General Plan VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS: - Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: . Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning map, issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. . Strong seismic ground shaking? Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? . . Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Attachment 1 of Exhibit A of Resolution No. 3949 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Concept Plan 03-003, TT 16581, DR 04-006 Page 8 The FEIS/EIR indicates that impacts to soils and geology resulting from implementation of the Reuse Plan and MCAS Tustin Specific- Plan would "include non-seismic hazards (such as local settlement, regional subsidence, expansive soils, slope instability, erosion, and mudflows) and seismic hazards (such as surface fault displacement, high-intensity ground shaking, ground failure and lurching, seismically induced settlement, and flooding associated with dam failure." However, the FEIS/EIR for MCAS Tustin concluded that compliance with state and local regulations and standards, along with established engineering procedures and techniques, would avoid unacceptable risk or the creation of significant impacts related to such hazards. No substantial change is expected for development of the project from the analysis previously completed in the FEIS/EIR for MCAS Tustin. Mitigation/Monitoring Required: As identified in the FEISÆIR, compliance with existing rules and regulations would avoid the creation of potential impacts. No mitigation is required. Sources: Field Observations FEISÆIR for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin (Pages 3-88 through 3- 97,4-115 through 4-123 and 7-28 through 7-29) MCAS Tustin Specific Plan (Pages 3-38 to 3-54). Tustin General Plan VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: - Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonable foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles or a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? t) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Attachment 1 of Exhibit A of Resolution No. 3949 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Concept Plan 03-003, TT 16581, DR 04-006 Page 9 h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? The project will not create a significant hazard to the public through the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials, nor are there reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions at the property. In addition, construction and residential uses would not emit hazardous emissions within a quarter mile of an existing or proposed school. There are four sites that have been classified as hazardous waste sites; IRP-16, IRP -13W, IRP-13S and UST-268. The FEISÆIR notes that these sites would be remediated to residential standards prior to conveyance from the Navy. The applicant has indicated that IRP-16, which underlies the main entry to the site and is part of phase I (model home) development has been released from the Department of Navy and no further action is required on that site. In addition, the project site is located within the boundaries of the Airport Environs Land Use Plan; however, it is at least four (4) miles from John Wayne Airport, and does not lie within a flight approach or departure corridor and thus does not pose an aircraft-related safety hazard for future residents or workers. The project site is not located in a wildland fire danger area. Compliance with all federal, state and local regulations concerning handling and use of these hazardous substances will reduce potential impacts to below a level of significance. No substantial change is expected from the analysis previously completed in the FEIS/EIR for MCAS Tustin. Mitigation/Monitoring Required: As identified in the FEIS/EIR, compliance with existing rules and regulations would avoid the creation of potential impacts. No mitigation is required. Sources: Field Observation FEIS/EIR for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin pages (3-106 through 3- 117,4-130 through 4-138 and 7-30 through 7-31) MCAS Tustin Specific Plan (Pages 3-38 through 3-54) Finding of Suitability to Transfer (FOST), MCAS Tustin Tustin General Plan. VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: - Would the project: Attachment 1 of Exhibit A of Resolution No. 3949 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Concept Plan 03-003, TT 16581, DR 04-006 Page 10 a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge, such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff'. t) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? g) Place housing within a tOO-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood hazard Boundary of Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a tOO-year flood hazard area structures, which would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? The proposed project includes construction of 1,077 residential units that would increase runoff. However, the project will not result in additional impacts beyond what was analyzed in the adopted FEIS/EIR. The project design and construction of facilities to fully contain drainage of the site would be required as conditions of approval of the project. No long-term impacts to hydrology and water quality are anticipated for the proposed project. The proposed projects will not impact groundwater in the deep regional aquifer or shallow aquifer. The proposed project would not include groundwater removal or alteration of historic drainage patterns at the site. The project is not located within a 100-year flood area and will not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury and death involving flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam, nor is the proposed project susceptible to inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow. Construction operations would be required to comply with the Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for the Newport Bay watershed that requires compliance with the Drainage Area Master Plan (DAMP) and National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) and the implementation of specific best management practices (BMP). Compliance with state and local regulations and standards, along with established engineering procedures and techniques, would avoid unacceptable risk or the creation of significant impacts related to Attachment 1 of Exhibit A of Resolution No. 3949 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Concept Plan 03-003, TT 16581, DR 04-006 Page 11 such hazards. Consequently, no substantial change is expected from the analysis previously completed in the FEISÆIR for MCAS Tustin. Mitigation/Monitoring Required: As identified in the FEIS/EIR, compliance with existing rules and regulations would avoid the creation of potential impacts. No mitigation is required. Sources: Field Observation FEIS/EIR for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin (pages 3-98 through 3- 105,4-124 through 4-129 and 7-29 through 7-30) MCAS Tustin Specific Plan (Pages 3-38 through 3-54) FEMA Map (August 9, 2002) Tustin General Plan IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING: Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? '- b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited, to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? The City of Tustin is the controlling authority over implementation of the Reuse Plan for the former base, such as land use designations, zoning categories, recreation and open space areas, major arterial roadways, urban design, public facilities, and infrastructure systems. On February 3,2003, the Tustin City Council approved the Specific Plan for MCAS Tustin that established land use and development standards for development of the site. The proposed project meets the density requirements of Table 3-2 of the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan and development standards of Planning Areas 4 and 5 as they relate to Single Family Residential Units and Multiple Family residential Units as noted in Sections 3.4.2 and 3.4.3 of MCAS Tustin Specific Plan. New development standards were proposed for development of the Carriage Way units that will be considered as a specific plan amendment. These units are similar to the single family detached product with the exception of the rear yard setback since access to the garage is proposed from a rear alleyway. The new standard would create an appealing streetscape with elimination of driveway approached on the main roads. Compliance with state and local regulations and standards would avoid the creation of significant land use and planning impacts. Also, the proposed project will not conflict with any habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. Consequently, no change is expected from the analysis previously completed in the FEISÆIR for MCAS Tustin. Mitigation/Monitoring Required: The proposed project is consistent with the development standards of the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan as identified by the adopted FEIS/EIR. No mitigation is required. Attachment 1 of Exhibit A of Resolution No. 3949 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Concept Plan 03-003, IT 16581, DR 04-006 Page 12 Sources: Field Observation FEIS/EIR for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin (pages 3-3 to 3-17, 4-3 to 4-13 and 7-16 to 7-18) MCAS Tustin Specific Plan (Pages 3-38 through 3-54). Tustin General Plan x. MINERAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be a value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Chapter 3.9 of the FEIS/EIR indicates that no mineral resources are known to occur anywhere within the Reuse Plan area. The proposed project will not result in the loss of mineral resources known to be on the site or identified as being present on the site by any . mineral resource plans. Consequently, no substantial change is expected from the analysis previously completed in the FEIS/EIR for MCAS Tustin. Mitigation/Monitoring Required: No mitigation is required. Sources: Field Observation FEIS/EIR for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin (page 3-91) MCAS Tustin Specific Plan (Pages 3-38 through 3-54). Tustin General Plan XI. NOISE: Would the project: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Attachment 1 of Exhibit A of Resolution No. 3949 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Concept Plan 03-003, TT 16581, DR 04-006 Page 13 e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not. been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? 1) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? The proposed project could result in implementation activities that generate noise. The FEIS/EIR indicates that full build-out of the base will create noise impacts that would be considered significant if noise levels experienced by sensitive receptors would exceed those considered "normally acceptable" for the applicable land use categories in the Noise Elements of the Tustin General Plan. A noise analysis was prepared for the project site that includes sensitive receptors along Edinger Avenue, ValenciaINorth Loop Road, and West Connector Road. The noise analysis concludes that special building construction will be required to achieve a 45 dB interior noise level for units along these areas. No substantial change is expected from the analysis previously completed in the approved FEIS/EIR for MCAS Tustin. However, the City of Tustin will ensure that construction activities comply with the City's Noise Ordinance and the housing units are designed with adequate noise attenuation (i.e., window design, sound walls) to meet the allowable noise levels as required by Tustin City Code for residential use. The project would be sound attenuated against present and projected noise so as not to exceed an exterior noise standard of 65 dB CNEL in outdoor living areas and an interior standard of 45 dB CNEL in all habitable rooms to reduce noise-related impacts to a level of insignificance. Compliance with adopted mitigation measures and state and local regulations and standards, along with established engineering procedures and techniques, will avoid unacceptable risk or the creation of significant impacts related to such hazards. Mitigation/Monitoring Required: Mitigation measures have been adopted by the Tustin City Council in the FEISÆIR; these measures would be included as conditions of approval for the project. Sources: Field Observation FEIS/EIR for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin (Pages 3-154 to 3-162, 4-231 to 4-243 and 7-42 to 7-43) MCAS Tustin Specific Plan (Pages 3-38 through 3-54). Tustin General Plan XII. POPULATION & HOUSING: Would the project: Attachment I of Exhibit A of Resolution No. 3949 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Concept Plan 03-003, TT 16581, DR 04-006 Page 14 a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? The proposed project would construct 1,077 new residential units on a site that included 274 existing military housing units that were vacant since 1997 and have been demolished. The proposed project will not displace people or necessitate construction of replacement housing elsewhere. The proposed number of residential units is consistent with the density than was previously considered in the FEIS/EIR for MCAS Tustin. The project will remove vacant military housing units and include 155 additional units more than considered in the FEIS/EIR for MCAS Tustin. No substantial change is expected from the analysis previously completed in the FEIS/EIR for MCAS Tustin. Mitigation/Monitoring Required: No mitigation is required. Sources: Field Observations FEIS/EIR for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin (pages 3-18 to 3-34, 4- 14 to 4-29 and 7-18 to 7-19) MCAS Tustin Specific Plan (pages 3-38 through 3-54). Tustin General Plan XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the public services: . The site contains military housing which has been vacant since mid-1997. Development of the site would require public services such as fIfe and police protection services, schools, libraries, recreation facilities, and biking/hiking trails. Fire Protection. The proposed project will be required to meet existing Orange County Fire Authority (OCF A) regulations regarding demolition, construction materials and methods, emergency access, water mains, fire flow, fire hydrants, sprinkler systems, building setbacks, and other relevant regulations. Adherence to these regulations would reduce the risk of uncontrollable fire and increase the ability to efficiently provide fire protection services to the site. The number of fire stations in the areas surrounding the site will meet the demands created by the proposed project. ~ Attachment 1 of Exhibit A of Resolution No. 3949 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Concept Plan 03-003, TT 16581, DR 04-006 Page 15 Police Protection. The need for police protection services is assessed on the basis of resident population estimates, square footage of non-residential uses, etc. Development of the site would increase the need for police protection services. The developer as a condition of approval for the project would be required to work with the Tustin Police Department to ensure that adequate security precautions such as visibility, lighting, emergency access, address signage are implemented in the project at plan check. Schools. The proposed project is located within Tustin Unified School District (TUSD). The implementation of the Reuse Plan would provide two 10-acre sites for elementary schools and a 40-acre high school site to serve the growing student population within its district. Based on the student generation factors of 0.29 per unit for grades K-5; 0.127 student per units for grades 6-8; 0.153 student per unit for grades 9-12, and the potential of 2,585 dwelling units developed within the TUSD boundaries, the EIS/EIR noted that reuse development would generate approximately 750 students for grades K-5, 328 students for grades 6-8, and 395 students for grades 9-12 for a total of 1,473 students. The total number of units considered in the EIR/EIS for Planning Areas 4 and 5 was 925 units. The applicant is requesting approval of 152 additional units as part of a density bonus request. The total number of residential units will be increased to 1,077 units and the additional 152 units would generate 87 additional students (5.9% increase). As part of development of Columbus Square, a senior housing project is also proposed that includes 242 units. Using the student factors noted above, if these units were developed as family units, they would have generated 138 students. Therefore, with consideration of the senior housing units, the overall number of students are anticipated to decrease by 51 students (138 - 87 = 51) from the total number of students considered in the FEIR/EIS analysis. The proposed density bonus units will not increase the potential number of students considered by the certified FEIRÆIS. The TUSD will receive its statutory school impact fees per Senate Bill 50 from both residential and commercial development. As a condition of approval for the project, the developer will be required to pay applicable school fees prior to issuance of the building permit. In summary, no new additional students are anticipated beyond what was considered in the FEIR/EIS for the Disposal and Reuse of MCAS, Tustin, and in any event, City required mitigation is limited by State law to requiring payment of the SB 50 school impact fees." Other Public Facilities (Libraries). Implementation of the entire Reuse Plan would only result in a library demand of up to approximately 2,500 square feet of library space. This relatively small amount of space is well below the library system's general minimum size of 10,000 square feet for a branch library and would not trigger the need for a new facility. General Implementation Requirements: To support development in the reuse plan area, the Reuse Plan/Specific Plan requires public services and facilities to be provided concurrent with demand. The proposed project will be required to comply with FEIS/EIR implementation measures adopted by the Tustin City Council. No substantial change is expected from the analysis previously completed in the approved FEIS/EIR for MCAS Tustin. Attachment 1 of Exhibit A of Resolution No. 3949 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Concept Plan 03-003, TT 16581, DR 04-006 Page 16 Mitigation/Monitoring Required: Mitigation measures have been adopted by the Tustin City Council in the FEIS/EIR; these measures would be included as conditions of approval for the project. Sources: Field Observation FEIS/EIR for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin (Pages 3-47 to 3-57, 4- 56 to 4-80 and 7-21 to 7-22) MCAS Tustin Specific Plan (Pages 3-38 through 3-54). Tustin General Plan XIV. RECREA TI ON a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities, such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the proj~ct include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? The Reuse Plan provides for a new 84.5-acre Regional Park, a 24-acre Community Park and three (3) Neighborhood Parks of more than five-acres, and five (5) community riding and hiking paths through the property connecting to the regional bikeway/trail system, a privately owned 159-acre golf course, play areas associated with schools, and child care facilities. Since the Reuse Plan process included public conveyance of city parks and an Urban Regional Park, individual developers were relieved of the requirement to dedicate land for park purposes. However, pursuant to the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan, the developers are required to provide in-lieu fees or public accessible park space (where approved by the City). This requirement will be included in the conditions of approval for the project. The proposed project would not generate an increase in the use of existing neighborhood parks since a park site would be included in the site. Consequently, no substantial change is expected from the analysis previously completed in the FEIS/EIR for MCAS Tustin. Mitigation/Monitoring Required: Mitigation measures have been adopted by the Tustin City Council in the FEIS/EIR; these measures would be included as conditions of approval for the project. Sources: Field Observation FEIS/EIR for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin pages 3-47 to 3-57,4-56 to 4-80 and 7-21 to 7-22 Reuse Plan and MCAS Tustin Specific Plan (pages 3-38 through 3-54) Tustin Parks and Recreation Services Department Tustin General Plan ---- .~ Attachment 1 of Exhibit A of Resolution No. 3949 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Concept Plan 03-003, TT 16581, DR 04-006 Page 17 xv. TRANSPORTATIONffRAFFIC: Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that result in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? t) Result in inadequate parking capacity? g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? The FEIS/EIR indicates that transportation and circulation impacts would be created through the phased development of the approved Reuse Plan and MCAS Tustin Specific Plan. A projected 216,445 Average Daily Trips (ADT) would be generated by full redevelopment of the base by year 2020 that, if left unmitigated, would overburden existing roadways and intersections surrounding the base property. The FEIS/EIR indicates that traffic circulation activities at MCAS Tustin generated a baseline of 12,400 ADT when the base was fully operational (1993). As a military facility, the FEISÆIR considered the traffic impact and developed a mitigation program to reduce potential impacts to a level of insignificance. This site will be conditioned to participate in its fair share responsibility for both on-site and off-site circulation mitigation and implementation measures. In addition, construction activities are required to be meet all Transportation related FEIS/EIR Implementation and Mitigation Measures (e.g., lane closures, street/utility construction, construction vehicle traffic, etc.). The FEIS/EIR implementation and mitigation measures will reduce potential impacts to the tra~c and circulation system to a level of insignificance. Consequently, no substantial change is expected from the analysis previously completed in the approved FEIS/EIR for MCAS Tustin. Based upon the Traffic Study for Columbus Square (PA-4 and PA-5), the traffic generation identified for the 1,077 units is less than the Trip Budget identified in the Specific Plan. The proposed project ADT is decreased by 726 trips (compared with the Trip Budget) with the proposed development. Therefore, there would not be additional impacts associated with the proposed project's traffic. Mitigation/Monitoring Required: Mitigation measures have been adopted by the Tustin City Council in the FEIS/EIR; these measures would be included as conditions of approval for the project. Attachment 1 of Exhibit A of Resolution No. 3949 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Concept Plan 03-003, TT 16581, DR 04-006 Page 18 Sources: Field Observation FEISÆIR for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin (Pages 3-118 through 3- 142,4-139 through 4-206 and 7-32 through 7-41) Reuse Plan and MCAS Tustin Specific Plan (pages 3-38 through 3-54). Tustin General Plan XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? --- d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? 1) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? The FEIR/EIR analyzed low-density and medium density residential development on the proposed site, which is consistent with the proposed project. Development of the site would require on-site improvements and off-site infrastructure improvements to utilities and roadway systems, including design and construction of full width improvements on Severyns Road; curb and gutter on project entries at Valencia Loop Road/Lot P and West Connector Road/Lot T; sidewalk and curb ramps along both sides of Severyns Road, the south side of Edinger Avenue, north side of Valencia North Loop Road, and west side of West Connector Road; storm drain, domestic water, reclaimed water, sanitary sewer, and dry utility service systems necessary to serve the site, landscape and irrigation on Severyns Road, on the south side of Edinger Avenue and on the Edinger Avenue median, on the north side of Valencia North Loop Road and on the west side of West Connector Road; and traffic signals at Valencia North Loop Road/Lot P and West Connector Road/Lot T. In addition, development of the site is required to meet federal, state, and local standards for design of wastewater treatment. The number of proposed units can be supported by the Irvine Ranch Water District for domestic water and sewer services. Attachment 1 of Exhibit A of Resolution No. 3949 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Concept Plan 03-003, TT 16581, DR 04-006 Page 19 Mitigation/Monitoring Required: Mitigation measures have been adopted by the Tustin City Council in the FEIS/EIR; these measures would be included as conditions of approval for the project. Sources: Field Observations FEISÆIR for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin (pages 3-35 through 3- 46,4-32 through 4-55 and 7-20 through 7-21) Reuse Plan and MCAS Tustin Specific Plan (pages 3-38 through 3-54). Tustin General Plan . XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a ¡ISh or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) c) Does the project have environmental effects, which will. cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Based upon the foregoing, the proposed project does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitats or wildlife populations to decrease or threaten, eliminate, or reduce animal ranges, etc. With the enforcement of FEIS/EIR mitigation and implementation measures approved by the Tustin City Council, the proposed project does not cause unmitigated environmental effects that will cause substantial effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. In addition, the proposed project does have air quality impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of the reuse and redevelopment of the fonner MCAS Tustin. The FEIS/EIR previously considered all environmental impacts associated with the implementation of the Reuse Plan and MCAS Tustin Specific Plan. The project proposes no substantial changes to environmental issues previously considered with adoption of the FEISÆIR. Mitigation measures were identified in the FEISÆIR to reduce impact but not to a level of insignificance. A Statement of Overriding Consideration for the FEISÆIR was adopted by the Tustin City Council on January 16, 2001. Mitigation/Monitoring Required: The FEIS/EIR previously considered all environmental impacts associated with the implementation of the Reuse Plan and MCAS Tustin Specific Attachment 1 of Exhibit A of Resolution No. 3949 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Concept Plan 03-003, TT 16581, DR 04-006 Page 20 Plan. Mitigation measures have been adopted by the Tustin City Council in the FEIS/EIR and would be included in the project as applicable. Sources: Field Observations FEIS/EIR for Disposal and Reuse ofMCAS Tustin (pages 5-4 through 5-11) Reuse Plan and MCAS Tustin Specific Plan (pages 3-144 through 3-154). Tustin General Plan CONCLUSION The summary concludes that all of the proposed project's effects were previously examined in the FEIS/EIR for MCAS Tustin, that no new effects would occur, that no substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects would occur, that no new mitigation measures would be required, that no applicable mitigation measures previously not found to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and that there are no new mitigation measures or alternatives applicable to the project that would substantially reduce effects of the project that have not been considered and adopted. A Mitigation and Monitoring and Reporting Program and Findings of Overriding Considerations were adopted for the FEIS/EIR on January 16,2001 and shall apply to the proposed project, as applicable. S:\Cdd\MINOO\MCAS Tustin\Planning Area - Lennar& William Lyon\Columbus Square\Columbus Square-Initial Study- analysis. doc ,. ATTACHMENT 2 TO EXHIBIT A OF RESOLUTION NO. 3943 PLANNING AREA 4 & 5 OF MCAS TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN MARBLE MOUNTAIN PARTNERS LLC/ TRACT 16581 Mitigation and Implementation Measures The Final EISIEIR for the Disposal and Reuse ofMCAS Tustin considered the redevelopment ofthe entire fonner base as proposed in the approved specific plan. The following identities only those EIRIEIS mitigation and implementation measures that are required of the proposed project as identified in the "Environmental Checklist." All other mitigation/implementation measures identified in the final EISÆIR are not applicable to this project*. Implementation measures are to be required where environmental impacts are less than significant, but to support proposed development within the reuse plan area. Both implementation and mitigation measures are identified in the adopted Mitigation and Monitoring Report Program (Resolution No. 00-090) and are equally enforceable. Measure* Timing and Implementation Mitigation Compliance Mitigation Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility Implementation Measures for Utilities (a) The City of Tustin or City of Irvine, as appropriate, shall ensure that inftastructure is constructed in phases as Per Table 4.3-1 of the Mitigation City Public Works Department triggered by identified threshold in Table 4.3-1. The Monitoring Program and Community Phasing Plan provides an organizational ftamework to ! Redevelopment Agency facilitate development of the reuse plan area in tandem The project complies with with inftastructure necessary to support the planned phasing requirements; all development. This ftamework reflects the fact that each subdivision infrastructure component of the inftastructure has its own threshold for will be provided by the accommodating additional development toward built-out applicant as conditioned of the reuse plan area. The triggering mechanisms that by Resolution Nos. 3952 identify timing of key inftastructure provisions are and 3953 summarized in Table 4.3-1. (b) Prior to a fmal map recordation (except for fmancing and Prior to fmal map recordation Project developer Community Development reconveyance purposes), the development applicant shall (except for fmancing and Department (Tustin and/or enter into an agreement with the City of Tustin and City reconveyance purposes). Conditions 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 of Irvine, as applicable) of Irvine and any appropriate regional utility agencies, Resolution No. 3952 Attachment 2 of Exhibit A of Resolution No. 3943 I Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Measure* Timing and Implementation Mitigation Compliance Mitigation Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility districts, and providers, as applicable, to dedicate all easement, rights~of-way, or other land detennined necessary to construct adequate utility infrastructure and facilities to serve the project as detennined by the city, agency, district, or other providers. (c) Prior to any fmal map recordation (except for fmancing Prior to final map recordation Project developer Community Development and conveyance purposes), the development applicant (except for fmancing and Condition 4.1 of Department (Tustin and/or shall enter into a secured agreement with the cities of reconveyance purposes). Resolution No. 3952 Irvine, as applicable) Tustin and/or Irvine, as applicable, to participate on a pro-rated basis in construction of capital improvements necessary to provide adequate utility facilities. (d) Prior to the issuance of penn its for any public Prior to the issuance of pennits Project developer Community Development improvements or development project, a development for any public improvements or Department (Tustin and/or applicant shall submit to the City of Tustin and City of development project. Provided with Irvine, as appropriate) Irvine, as applicable, infonnation from IRWD which Development Application outlines required facilities necessary to provide adequate of Tract 16581 potable water and reclaimed water service to the development. (e) Prior to the issuance of the certificates of use and Prior to the issuance of the Project developer Community Development occupancy, the project developer shall ensure that fire certificates of use and occupancy. Department (Tustin and/or hydrants capable of flows in amounts approved by the Condition 12.1 to 12.5 Irvine, as appropriate); OCF A are in place and operational to meet fire flow Resolution 3953 OCFA requirements. (t) Prior to the issuance of pennits for any public Prior to the issuance of pennits Project developer Community Development improvements or development project, a development for any public improvements or Department (Tustin and/or applicant shall submit to the City of Tustin and City of development project. Provided with Irvine, as applicable) Irvine, as applicable, infonnation from IRWD, OCSD, or Development Application the City of Tustin which outlines required facilities of Tract 16581 necessary to provide adequate sanitary sewage service to the development. (g) Prior to the issuance of grading pennits or approval of any Prior to the issuance of grading Project developer Tustin Building Division or subdivision map (except for financing and reconveyance pennhsoraDDrovalofanv the Irvine Public Works Attachment 2 of Exhibit A of Resolution No. 3943 2 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Measure* Timing and Implementation Mitigation Compliance Mitigation Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility purposes), whichever occurs first, for development within subdivision map (except for Department, as applicable the IOO-year flood plain, grading and drainage systems financing and reconveyance Site not within the 100- shall be designed by the project developer such that all purposes), whichever occurs first year flood pain (FEMA building pads would be safe from inundation from runoff Map dated August 9, from all stonns up to and including the theoretical 2002) I DO-year stonn, to the satisfaction of the City of Tustin Building Division or the Irvine Public Works Department, as applicable. Grading permits or subdivision maps generated for fmancing and reconveyance purposes are exempt. (h) Prior to construction of regional flood control facilities, Prior to construction of regional Project developer Public Works Department appropriate state and federal approvals, including flood control facilities. (Tustin and/or Irvine, as agreements and pennits, shall be obtained. These include Condition 5.1 of applicable) but are not limited to Regional Water Quality Control Board permits, including NPDES pennits; Section 404 Resolution 3953 pennits from the USACOE, and Section 1601 or 1603 agreements from the CDFG in a manner meeting the approval of the City of Tustin and the Irvine Public Works Department, as applicable. (i) Prior to issuance of any grading pennit or approval of any Prior to issuance of any grading Project developer Tustin Building Division or subdivision map (except for financing arid conveyance pennit or approval of any the Irvine Public Works purposes), for any development that is either partially or subdivision map (except for Site not within the 100- Department, as applicable completely located within the IOO-year flood plain of the fmancing and conveyance year flood pain (FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map, the development applicant purposes). shall submit all required documentation to the FEMA and Map dated August 9, demonstrate that the application for a Conditional Letter 2002) of Map Revision for changes to the IOO-year flood plain ¡ is satisfied in a manner meeting the approval of each respective city, as applicable. G) Prior to the approval of any applicable subdivision map Prior to the approval of any Project developer Public Works Department (except for fmancing and conveyance purposes), the applicable subdivision map (Tustin and/or Irvine, as developer-applicant shall design and construct local (except for fmancing and Not applicable to this site applicable) drainage systems for conveyance of the IO-year runoff. If conveyance purposes). the facility is in a local sump, it shall be designed to Attachment 2 of Exhibit A of Resolution No. 3943 3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Measure* Timing and Implementation Mitigation Compliance Mitigation Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility convey the 25-year runoff. (k) Prior to any grading for any new development, the Project developer Tustin Building Division or following drainage studies shall be submitted to and Public Works Department approved by the City of Tustin, City of Irvine, and/or (Tustin and/or Irvine, as OCFCD, as applicable: applicable) (I) A drainage study including diversions (i.e., Prior to any grading for any new Condition 5.1 of off-site areas that drain onto and/or through the development. Resolution 3952 project site), with justification and appropriate mitigation for any proposed diversion. (2) A drainage study evidencing that proposed Prior to any grading for any new Project developer Tustin Building Division or drainage patterns would not result in increased development. Public Works Department lOO-year peak discharges within and (Tustin and/or Irvine, as downstream of the project limits, and would not applicable) worsen existing drainage conditions at stonn drains, culverts, and other street crossings Condition 3.8 of including regional flood control facilities. The Resolution 3952 study shall also propose appropriate mitigation for any increased runoff causing a worsening condition of any existing facilities within or downstream of project limits. Implementation of appropriate interim or ultimate flood control infrastructure construction must be included. (2) Detailed drainage studies indicating how, in Prior to any grading for any new Project developer Tustin Building Division or conjunction with the drainage conveyance systems development. / Public Works Department including applicable swales, channels, street flows, Conditions 3.7 of (Tustin and/or Irvine, as catch basins, stonn drains, and flood water retarding, Resolution 3952 applicable) building pads are made safe from runoff inundation which may be expected from all stonns up to and including the theoretical 1 DO-year flood. (I) Prior to approval of any subdivision map (except for Prior to approval of any financing or conveyance purposes), an agreement will be subdivision map City Tustin Public Works Attachment 2 of Exhibit A of Resolution No. 3943 4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program J Measure* executed with the OCFCD that provides for the identification and contribution of a project-specific fair share contribution toward the construction of ultimate flood control faculties needed to accommodate built-out of the affected project. Interim flood control facilities may be considered for approval provided such facilities meet OCFCD requirements. Nothing shall preclude the City of Tustin from transferring the obligation onto other project developers within the project area. Timing and Implementation Mitigation Compliance Responsibility Not applicable to this site Conditions 4.1 of Resolution 3952 (m) General Implementation Measures for Public Services and Facilities Project developer The City of Tustin and the City ofIrvine, each within its respective jurisdiction, shall ensure that adequate fire protection, police protection, and parks and recreation facilities (including bikeways/trails) needed to adequately serve the reuse plan area shall be provided as necessary. To eliminate any negative impact the project could have on each community's general fund, fmancing mechanisms including but not limited to developer fees, assessment district fmancing, and/or tax increment fmancing (in the event that a redevelopment project area is created for the site), shall be developed and used as detennined appropriate by each City. Specifically; (1) Applicants for private development projects shall be required to enter into an agreement with City of Tustin or the City of Irvine, as applicable, to establish a fair-share mechanism to provide needed fIre and police protection services and parks and recreation facilities (including bikeways) through the use of fee schedules, assessment district fmancing, Community Facility District financing, or other mechanisms as detennined appropriate by each respective city. Prior to final map recordation or building pennit issuance I I Condition 14.1 of Resolution 3953 Mitigation Monitoring and Enforcement Responsibility Department and Community Redevelopment Agency Community Development Department Attachment 2 of Exhibit A of Resolution No. 3943 5 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Measure. Timing and Implementation Mitigation Compliance Mitigation Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility (2) Recipients of property through public conveyance process shall be required to mitigate any impacts of their public uses of property on public services and facilities. (n) The cities of Tustin and Irvine shalljointIy consult and Prior to fmal map recordation or Agreement executed Community Development coordinate with the OCPFRD/Harbors, Beaches and building pennit issuance between City and OCFCD Department (Tustin and/or parks, Program management and Coordination Division, Irvine, as applicable) in preparation of trail designs for the Peters Canyon and Barranca trails within the reuse plan area. Improvements for each of these trails would be installed upon completion of flood control channel improvements and approval of their joint use by the OCPFRD. (0) Fire ProtectionlEmergencv Medical Services Prior to the first final map Project developer Tustin Community recordation or building pennit Redevelopment Agency and Prior to the first fmal map recordation or building pennit issuance for development (except Condition 15.1 of the City of Irvine issuance for development (except for financing and for financing and reconveyances Resolution 3953 reconveyances purposes), the project developer could be purposes). required to enter into an agreement with the City of Tustin or City ofIrvine/OCF A, as applicable, to address impacts of the project on fIfe services. Such agreement could include participation for fire protection, personnel and equipment necessary to serve the project and eliminate any negative impacts on fIfe protection services. (p) Prior to issuance of building pennits, the project Prior to issuanc,e of building Project developer Community Development developer shall work closely with the OCF A to ensure pennits. Department (Tustin and/or that adequate fire protection measures are implemented in Conditions 12.1 to 12.5 of Irvine, as applicable) the project. Resolution 3953 f (q) Prior to issuance of building pennits for phased projects, Prior to issuance of building Project developer Community Development the project developer shall submit a construction phasing pennits for phased projects. Department (Tustin and/or plan to the OCF A demonstrating that emergency vehicle Conditions 12.1 to 12.5 of Irvine, as applicable) access is adequate. Resolution 3953 Attachment 2 of Exhibit A of Resolution No. 3943 6 Mitigation Monitoring andReporting Program . I I Measure. Timing and Implementation Mitigation Compliance Mitigation Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility (r) Prior to the issuance of building penn its, the project Prior to issuance of building Project developer Community Development developer shall submit a fire hydrant location plan for the pennits. Department (Tustin and/or review and approval of the Fire Chief and ensure that fire Conditions 12.1 to 12.5 of Irvine, as applicable) hydrants capable of flows in amounts approved by the Resolution 3953 OCF A are in place and operational to meet fIre flow requirements. (s) Police Protection Prior to issuance of building Project developer Community Development pennits. Department (Tustin Police) Prior to issuance of building pennits, the project Condition 13.1G of developer shall work closely with the respective Police Resolution 3953 Department to ensure that adequate security precautions are implemented in the project. (t) Schools Prior to the issuance of Project developer Community Development certificates of use and occupancy. Department (Irvine UnifIed Prior to the issuance of certifIcates of use and occupancy, Condition 14.1 of School District) the project developer shall submit to the respective City Resolution 3953 proof of payment of appropriate school fees adopted by the applicable school district. (u) Parks and Recreation Prior to the first fInal map Project developer Tustin Community recordation (except for fmancing Development Department Prior to the first fmal map recordation (except for and reconveyance purposes) or Condition 12.1 and 12.2 of and Parks and Recreation fmancing and reconveyance purposes) or building pennit building penn it issuance. Resolution 3952 Department issuance for development within the City of Tustin portion of the site, the project developer shall be required to provide evidence of compliance with all requirements and standards of the City of Tustin Park Code. (v) Prior to the first fmal map recordation or building pennit Prior to the first final map Project developer Irvine Community issuance within the City ofIrvine portion of the site, the recordation (except for finltflcing Not applicable to tracts in Development Department Attachment 2 of Exhibit A of Resolution No. 3943 7 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Measure* Timing and Implementation Mitigation Compliance Mitigation Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility project developer shall be required to provide evidence of and reconveyance purposes) or Tustin compliance with all requirements and standards of the building penn it issuance. City of Irvine Park Code. (w) Prior to the first concept plan for tentative tract map in the Prior to the first concept plan for Project developer Tustin Public Works City of Tustin, the project developer shall file a petition tentative tract map. Department; Tustin for the creation of a landscape maintenance district for the Community Redevelopment project area with the City of Tustin. The district shall Agency include public neighborhood parks, landscape improvements, and specific trails (Barranca only), the medians in arterials, or other eligible items mutually agreed to by the petitioner and the City of Tustin. In the event that a district is not established prior to issuance of the flrst building pennit, maintenance of items mentioned above shall be the responsibility of a community association. (x) Prior to approval of any subdivision map (except for Prior to approval of any Project developer Community Development financing or conveyance purposes), an agreement will be subdivision map (except for Department (Tustin and/or executed with the following agencies for the associated fmancing or conveyance Condition 8.5 of Irvine, as applicable) trail improvements: purposes). Resolution 3953 a. County of Orange Harbors, Beaches - identification of a project-specific fair share contribution toward the installation of necessary regional bikeway trail improvements within Peters Canyon Channel, to be installed in conjunction with the County of Orange's other channel improvements; b. City of Tustin - the identification of a Prior to the first final map Project developer Tustin Community project-speciflc fair share contribution toward recordation (except for financing Development Department the installation of Class II bicycle trails through and reconveyance purposes) or Not applicable and/or SCRRA/aCTA, as the project site. For the area of the site northeast building pennit issuance. appropriate of Irvine Center Drive, a separate agreement would be required to ensure the provision of a bikeway right-of-way easement, and design and f construction of a bike trial along the Attachment 2 of Exhibit A of Resolution No. 3943 8 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program . ! Measure* Timing and Implementation Mitigation Compliance Mitigation Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility SCRRA/OCT A rail tracks tTom Harvard Avenue westerly to the Peters Canyon Channel. In addition, project developers of the areas of the site southeast ofthe Peters Canyon Channel would need to accommodate access to both the Peters Canyon Trail and the trail adjacent to the SCRRA/OCTA tracks in any project site design including dedication of any necessary recreational trail easements; c. City of Tustin - the identification of a Prior to the first fmal map Project developer Tustin Community project-specific fair-share contribution toward recordation (except for financing Development Department installation of Class I bikeway trail and reconveyance purposes) or Not applicable improvements northerly of Barranca Parkway building pennit issuance. after completion of the Barranca Channel improvements. For proposed developments adjacent to Barranca Channel, separate agreements would be required to ensure the establishment of a bikeway right-of-way easement between Jamboree Road and Red Hill Avenue. Mitigation Measures for Aesthetics Vis-l In conjunction with any zoning ordinance amendments to Prior to the fIrst fmal map City of Tustin and City of Community Development implement the reuse plan in Tustin or Irvine, an urban recordation (except for financing Irvine Department (Tustin and/or design plan shall be adopted to provide for distinct and and reconveyance purposes) or Irvine, as applicable) cohesive architectural and landscape design, features and building pennit issuance. treatments, as well as hannony with adjacent landscaping. Conditions 7.1 to 7.9 and The urban design plan shall have the following elements: . landscaping concept and master signage plan; 8.1 to 8.9 of Resolution . design review and approval process; 3953 . limits on development intensity for each specific land use; . limits on height of structures and lot coverage; . minimum site building setbacks; . minimum on-site landscaping requirements; 9 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Attachment 2 of Exhibit A of Resolution No. 3943 Measure. Timing and Implementation Mitigation Compliance Mitigation Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility . buffering requirements, including berms, masonry walls, and landscaping; . lighting regulations, including regulations ensuring that exterior lighting does not negatively impact surrounding property; . screening regulations for mechanical equipment and outside storage; and site signage requirements, including sign permit approval Mitigation Measures for Cultural and Paleontological Resources Arch-I Prior to issuance of grading permits, the four-acre parcel Prior to issuance of grading Project developer Tustin Community currently outside the boundaries of the Air Station along permits. Not applicable to this Development Department Harvard A venue shall be surveyed to determine the project presence/absence of archaeological resources prior to grading. Arch-2 Prior to issuance of grading permits, the cities of Tustin Prior to issuance of grading Project developer Community Development and Irvine shall each require applicants of individual permits. Department (Tustin and/or development projects to retain, as appropriate, a county- Condition 13.1 of Irvine, as applicable) certified archaeologist. If buried resources are found Resolution 3953 during grading within the reuse plan area, a qualified archaeologist would need to assess the site significance and perform the appropriate mitigation. The Native American view point shall be considered during this process. This could include testing or data recovery. Native American consultation shall also be initiated during this process. Paleo-I The cities of Tustin and Irvine shall each require Prior to issuance of grading Project developer Community Development applicants of individual development projects to comply permits. Department (Tustin and/or with the requirements established in a PRMP prepared for Condition 13.1 of Irvine, as applicable) the site, which details the methods to be used for Resolution 3953 surveillance of construction grading, assessing fmds, and actions to be taken in the event that unique paleontological resources are discovered during construction. Attachment 2 of Exhibit A of Resolution No. 3943 10 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Measure* Timing and Implementation Mitigation Compliance Mitigation Monitoring and . Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility Paleo-2 Prior to the issuance of a grading pennit, project Prior to issuance of grading Project developer Community Development applicants shall provide written evidence to each city, that pennits. Department (Tustin and/or a county-certified paleontologist has been retained to Condition 13.1 of Irvine, as applicable) conduct salvage excavation of unique paleontological Resolution 3953 resources if they are found. Mitigation Measures for Traffic/Circulation T/C-I Construction Prior to site development pennit. Project developer Public Works Department (Tustin or Irvine, as In conjunction with the approval of a site development Condition 13.1 of applicable) pennit, the City of Tustin and the City ofIrvine, as Resolution 3953 applicable (for that portion of the reuse plan within Irvine), shall require each developer to provide traffic operations and control plans that would minimize the traffic impacts of proposed construction activity. The plans shall address roadway and lane closures, truck hours and routes, and notification procedures for planned short-tenD or interim changes in traffic patterns. The City of Tustin and the City ofIrvine, as applicable, shall ensure that the plan would minimize anticipated delays at major intersections. Prior to approval, the City of Tustin or the City of Irvine, as applicable shall review the proposed traffic control and operations plans with any affected jurisdiction. T/C-2 Development Prior to issuance of certificates of Project developer Public Works Department occupancy. (Tustin or Irvine, as The City of Tustin and the City ofIrvine, as applicable Staff received final traffic applicable) (for that portion of the reuse plan area within Irvine), shall study addressing ensure that the arterial intersection improvements required cumulative ADT in 1005 and 2020 and as indicated in Tables 4.12-7 and thresholds and fair share 4.12-9 of the Final EISÆIR (see Tables 2 and 4 and at the responsibility for end of this Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting mitigation improvements; Program) are implemented for their respective traffic study determined jurisdictions according to the cumulative ADT thresholds need for traffic signal at identified in each table and according to the fair share Attachment 2 of Exhibit A of Resolution No. 3943 11 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Measure* Timing and Implementation Mitigation Compliance Mitigation Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility basis noted. The ADT threshold represents the traffic Harvard; required by volume which would result in an impact and the fair share various Conditions of percentage reflects the percent of the traffic impact Resolution No. 3952 resulting fTom the reuse generated traffic. In some cases, reuse traffic would generate 100 percent of the impact, thereby assuming full financial responsibility for the identified improvements. In other cases, reuse traffic would generate only a fTaction of the traffic impacting the intersection and [mancial responsibility would correspond. T/C-3 The City of Tustin and the City ofIrvine, as applicable See Table 4.12-8 of the Final Project developer Public Works Department (for that portion of the reuse plan area within Irvine), shall EISÆIR or Table 3 at the end of (Tustin or Irvine, as contribute, on a fair share basis, to improvements to the Mitigation Monitoring and Addressed by backbone applicable) fTeeway ramp intersections as listed in Table 4.12-8 of the Reporting Program for each infrastructure fee Final EISÆIR (see Table 3 at the end of the Mitigation specific triggering mechanism. requirement in Condition Monitoring and Reporting Program). The method of 4.1 Resolution 3952 implementing improvements, e.g., restriping, ramp widening, shall be based on special design studies, in association with Caltrans. T/C-4 The City of Tustin and the City ofIrvine, as applicable Ongoing (see Table 4.12-10 of Project developer Public Works Department (for that portion of the reuse plan area within Irvine), shall the Final EISÆIR or Table 5 at (Tustin or Irvine, as ensure that all on-site circulation system improvements the end of the Mitigation Addressed by backbone applicable) for the reuse plan area assumed in the 2005 and 2020 Monitoring and Reporting infrastructure fee traffic analysis and as shown in Table 4.12-10 of the Final Program for each specific requirement in Condition EISÆIR (see Table 5 at the end of the Mitigation triggering mechanism. 4.1 of Resolution 3952 Monitoring and Reporting Program) are implemented according to the cumulative ADT thresholds identified in the table. Under this Phasing Plan, the City of Tustin shall monitor all new development within the site, accounting for the cumulative ADT generated by development projects. As each ADT threshold is reached, the roadway improvements listed in Table 4.12-10 ofthe Final EISÆIR (see Table 5 at the end of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program) shall be constructed before any additional projects within the reuse plan area Attachment 2 of Exhibit A of Resolution No. 3943 12 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program I Measure* Timing and Implementation Mitigation Compliance Mitigation Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility would be approved. TIC-51 Prior to approval of a site development permit or vesting Ongoing, prior to approval of a Project developer Public Works/Community tract, except for financing or conveyance purposes, for all site development permit or Required by Condition 4.1 Development Departments land use designation areas in Alternative I with the vesting tract, except for financing of Resolution 3952 (Tustin and/or Irvine, as exception of the Learning Village, Community Park, and or conveyance purposes, based on applicable) Regional Park, a project developer shall enter into an the ADT generation thresholds agreement with the City of Tustin and City of Irvine, as shown in Tables 4.12-7, 4.12-8, applicable (for that portion of the reuse plan area within 4.12-9, and 4.12-10 of the Final Irvine) which assigns improvements required in the EISÆIR (see Tables 2 through 5 EISÆIR to the development site and which requires at the end of the Mitigation participation in a fair share mechanism to design and Monitoring and Reporting construct required on-site and arterial improvements Program for each specific consistent with the ADT generation thresholds shown in triggering mechanism). Tables 4.12-7, 4.12-8, 4.12-9, and 4.12-10 (see Tables 2 through 5 at the end of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program). TIC-61 The City of Tustin and the City of Irvine, as applicable Ongoing, based on the ADT Project developer Public Works and (for that portion of the reuse plan area in Irvine), will generation thresholds shown in Community Development monitor new development within the reuse plan area, Table 4.12-10 of the Final Final traffic study Departments (Tustin and/or accounting for the cumulative ADTs generated by EISÆIR (see Table 5 at the end identified cumulative Irvine, as applicable) development projects within the reuse plan area. As each of the Mitigation Monitoring and ADTs; City monitoring cumulative ADT threshold shown in Table 4.12-10 (see Reporting Program for each will determine timing of Table 5 at the end of the Mitigation Monitoring and specific triggering mechanism). roadway improvements Reporting Program) is reached, the roadway identified in MMP Table improvements listed shall be constructed before any 5; per project final traffic additional projects within the reuse plan area are study, project does not approved. exceed ADT threshold level requiring roadway improvements shown in Table 5. lA-I Table 4, 12-10 of the Final EISÆIR (see Table 5 at the See Table 4.12-10 of the Final City of Tustin Community Development end of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program) EISÆIR or Table 5 at the end of and Public Works Table references in the mitigation measures have been changed from Final FEISÆIR to match the correct table numbers in the FEISÆIR. Attachment 2 of Exhibit A of Resolution No. 3943 13 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Measure* Timing and Implementation Mitigation Compliance Mitigation Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility presents the Phasing Plan for the on-site circulation the Mitigation Monitoring and Departments (Tustin and/or system. The Phasing Plan for the on-site circulation Reporting Program for each Final traffic study Irvine, as applicable) system. The Phasing Plan is based upon traffic circulation specific triggering mechanism. identified cumulative impact and mitigation analyses contained in the Traffic ADTs; City monitoring Report (Final Appendix F of the Final EISÆIR). Under will determine timing of this Phasing Plan, the City of Tustin shall monitor all new roadway improvements development within the Specific Plan, accounting for the identified in MMP Table cumulative ADT generated by development projects. As 5; per project final traffic each ADT threshold is reached, the roadway study, project does not improvements listed in Table 4.12-10 ofthe Final exceed ADT threshold EISÆIR (see Table 5 at the end of the Mitigation level requiring roadway Monitoring and Reporting Program) shall be constructed improvements shown in before any additional projects within the Specific Plan Table 5. would be approved. IA-2 Table 7-3 of the Final EISÆIR (see Table 6 at the end of See Table 7-3 of the Final City of Tustin Tustin Community the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program) EISÆIR or Table 6 at the end of Development and Public presents the Trip Budget which summarizes the square the Mitigation Monitoring and Not applicable to this Works Departments footage of non-residential uses allocated to each Reporting Program for each project; staffis neighborhood by Planning Area and the Associated ADT. specific triggering mechanism. monitoring ADT levels (Residential uses are shown for information only; they are associated with non- not part of the budget). Pursuant to Section 3.2.4 of the residential development. Specific Plan, the City of Tustin shall implement the trip budget by neighborhood to control the amount and intensity of non-residential uses. Trip Budget transfers between neighborhoods shall also be implemented as directed in subsection 3.2.4 of the Specific Plan. IA-3 Prior to the approval of (I) a Planning Area Concept Plan Prior to the approval of (I) a Project developer Tustin Community pursuant to Section 4.2 of the Specific Plan, (2) a site Planning Area Concept Plan Development and Public development permit, or (3) a vesting tentative map for pursuant to Section 4.2 of the Works Departments new square footage (not for financing or conveyance Specific Plan, (2) a site Not applicable to this purposes), a project developer shall provide traffic development permit, or (3) a information consistent with the provisions of the Specific vesting tentative map for new project; staff is Plan, this EISÆIR and the requirements of the City of square footage (not for fmancing monitoring ADT levels Tustin Traffic Engineer. The traffic information shall (a) or conveyance purposes). associated with non- identify and assign traffic circulation mitigation measures residential development. required in the EISÆIR pursuant to the Phasing Plan Attachment 2 of Exhibit A of Resolution No. 3943 14 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Measure* Timing and Implementation Mitigation Compliance Mitigation Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility described in Table 4.12-10 of the Final EISÆIR (see Table 5 at the end of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program); (b) evaluate the effects of either the delay of any previously committed circulation improvements or the construction of currently unanticipated circulation improvements; and (c) utilize the circulation system and capacity assumptions within the EISÆIR and any additional circulation improvements completed by affected jurisdictions for the applicable timeftame of analysis. IA-4 Prior to the issuance of building permits for new Prior to the issuance of building Project developer Tustin Community development within planning areas requiring a concept permits. Development and Public plan, a project developer shall enter into an agreement Not applicable Works Departments with the City of Tustin to (a) design and construct roadway improvements consistent with the ADT generation Phasing Plan described in Table 4.12-10 of the Final EISÆIR (see Table 5 at the end of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program) and (b) address the impact of and specify the responsibility for any previously committed circulation improvements assumed in the EISÆIR which have not been constructed. IA-5 Tustin Community If a subsequent traffic Phasing Plan demonstrates that Prior to the issuance of building Project developer Development and Public certain circulation improvements should be included in a permits. Works Departments different phase of Specific Plan development (accelerated Not applicable to this or delayed) or that a circulation improvement can be substituted, the mitigation Phasing Plan in Table 4.12-10 project. of the Final EISÆIR (see Table 5 at the end of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program) may be amended, subject to approval of the City of Tustin and any other affected jurisdictions, provided that the same level of traffic mitigation and traffic capacity would be provided. IA-6 The City of Tustin will enter into agreements with Within one (1) year of approval City of Tustin Tustin Public Works and Caltrans and the cities of Santa Ana and Irvine to ensure of reuse and disposal ofMCAS Community Development that the off-site roadway improvements needed to mitie:ate 15 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Attachment 2 of Exhibit A of Resolution No. 3943 Measure* Timing and Implementation Mitigation Compliance Mitigation Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility the effects of the Specific Plan are constructed pursuant to Tustin Completed as part of Departments improvement programs established by the respective FEIS/EIR approval. jurisdiction. IA-7 Each Specific Plan project would contain, to the Prior to issuance of grading Project developer Community Development satisfaction of the City of Tustin and/or City ofIrvine, as pennits Department (Tustin and/or applicable, a pedestrian circulation component showing Condition 8.5 of Irvine, as applicable) pedestrian access to regional hiking trails, parks, schools, Resolution 3953 shopping areas, bus stops, and/or other public facilities. Mitigation Measures for Air Quality AQ-l If detennined feasible and appropriate on a Prior to issuance of grading or Project developer Community Development project-by-project basis, the City of Tustin and the City of building penn its. Department (Tustin and/or Irvine, as applicable, shall require individual development Condition 3.15 of Irvine, as applicable) projects to implement one or more of the following Resolution 3953 control measures, if not already required by the SCAQMD under Rule 403: - Apply water twice daily, or chemical soil stabilizers according to manufacturers' specifications, to all unpaved parking or staging areas or unpaved road surfaces at all actively disturbed sites. - Develop a construction traffic management plan that includes, but is not limited to, rerouting construction trucks off congested streets, consolidating truck deliveries, and providing dedicated turn lanes for movement of construction trucks and equipment onsite and offsite. - Use electricity from power poles rather than temporary diesel or gasoline powered generators. - Reduce traffic speeds on all unpaved roads to 15 Attachment 2 of Exhibit A of Resolution No. 3943 16 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program . 1 Measure* Timing and Implementation Mitigation Compliance Mitigation Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility mph or less. - Pave construction roads that have a traffic volume of more than 50 daily trips by construction equipment or 150 total daily trips for all vehicles. - Apply approved chemical soil stabilizers according to manufacturers' specifications to all inactive construction areas (previously graded areas inactive for four days or more). - Replace ground cover in disturbed areas as quickly as possible. - Enclose, cover, water twice daily, or apply approved soil binders according to manufacturers' specifications, to exposed piles of gravel, sand, or dirt. - Cover all trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials, and maintain at least two feet of fteeboard (Le., minimum vertical distance between top of the load and top of the trailer). - Sweep streets at the end of the day if visible soil material is carried over to adjacent roads (use water sweepers with reclaimed water when feasible). - Install wheel washers where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto paved roads, or wash off trucks and any equipment leaving the site each trip. - AQ-2 Unless determined by the City of Tustin and the City of Prior to issuance of grading or Project developer Community Development Irvine, as applicable, to be infeasible on a building permits. Department (Tustin and/or project-by-project basis due to unique project Irvine, as applicable) Attachment 2 of Exhibit A of Resolution No. 3943 17 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Measure* Timing and Implementation Mitigation Compliance Mitigation Monitoring and Responsibility Enforcement Responsibility characteristics, each city shall require individual development projects to use low VOC architectural Condition 3.15 of coatings for all interior and exterior painting operations. Resolution 3953 Mitigation Measures for Noise . N-l Prior to reuse of any existing residential units within the Prior to reuse of any existing Project developer Community Development reuse area for civilian use, the City of Tustin or the City residential units. Department (Tustin and/or ofIrvine, as applicable, and where necessary and feasible, Conditions 12.1-12.3 Irvine, as applicable) shall require the installation of noise attenuation barriers, insulation, or similar devices to ensure that interior and of Resolution 3953 exterior noise levels at these residential units do not exceed applicable noise standards. N-3 For new development within the reuse area, the City of Prior to issuance of building Project developer Community Development Tustin and City ofIrvine, as applicable, shall ensure that pennits. Department (Tustin and/or interior and exterior noise levels do not exceed those Condition 12.1-12.3 of Irvine, as applicable) prescribed by state requirements and local city ordinances Resolution 3953 and general plans. Plans demonstrating noise regulation confonnity shall be submitted for review and approval prior to building pennits being issued to accommodate reuse. *Measures LV-I, LV-2 have been completed; Hist 1,2,3,4,5, Bio 1,2,3,4, and N-2, N-4 do not apply to the project site; AQ-3, AQ-4 do not apply to residential projects, TC-7, TC-8 have been created through the adoption of the FEISÆIR and staff is monitoring, TC-9 has been completed, Attachment 2 of Exhibit A of Resolution No. 3943 18 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program