HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC RES 3956
RESOLUTION NO. 3956
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 04-001 TO ESTABLISH THE GENERAL
PLAN DESIGNATION OF "MCAS TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN" FOR THE
ANNEXATION OF MCAS TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN DISPOSITION
PARCEL 36
The Planning Commission does hereby resolve as follows:
I.
The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows:
A. That a proper application for General Plan Amendment 04-001 was
submitted by Moffet Meadows Partners, LLC.
B. That Moffet Meadows Partners, LLC has filed a landowner petition with the
Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) for the reorganization of the
boundary between Tustin and Irvine, including the detachment of
approximately 21.6 acres from the City of Irvine and annexation of the same
21.6 acres to the City of Tustin.
C. Prior to taking action on the proposed reorganization, LAFCO requires that
the City of Tustin adopt a General Plan Amendment for the territory to be
annexed.
D. That on December 14, 2004, the City of Irvine adopted a resolution
supporting the proposed boundary reorganization involving the detachment of
21.6 acres from the City of Irvine and the corresponding annexation of 21.6
acres to the City of Tustin.
E. Prior to annexation, a general plan amendment is required.
F. The annexation of MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Disposition Parcel 36 will
improve the delivery of public services for future residents within the subject
territory.
G. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed, and held on said application on
January 24, 2005, and continued to February 14, 2005, by the Planning
Commission.
H. That General Plan Amendment 04-001 is consistent with and implements the
following policies of the General Plan:
Resolution No. 3956
Page 2
Policy 1.4: Consider modification of present City boundaries in unincorporated
areas within the City of Tustin's sphere where they are irregular and create
inefficiencies.
Although General Plan Amendment 04-001 would modify the City's
boundaries with the adjacent City of Irvine rather than an unincorporated
area, the modification would improve the provision of public services to the
residents of the affected territory.
Policy 13.2: Encourage a development pattern that offers a connectedness
between buildings and uses, and has a strong sense of place through
architectural styles and creative landscape design.
Policy 13.5: Promote high quality architecture, landscaping, signage, open
space design, circulation patterns, and landscape patterns distinct from
surrounding areas.
II.
The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve
General Plan Amendment 04-001 to establish the General Plan land use
designation of "MCAS Tustin Specific Plan" for the annexation of MCAS Tustin
Specific Plan Disposition Parcel 36 as identified in Exhibit A attached hereto.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission
meeting on the 14th day of February, 2005
JOH IELSEN
Chairperson
&J~L~--!
ELIZABETH A. BINSACK
Planning Commission Secretary
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF ORANGE)
CITY OF TUSTIN)
I, ELIZABETH A. BINSACK, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the Planning
Commission Secretary of the City of Tustin, California; that Resolution No. 3956 was duly
passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission, held on the
14th day of February, 2005.
ßð>~#?~
ELIZABETH A. NSACK
Planning Commission Secretary
EXHIBIT A OF RESOLUTION NO. 3956
..
(GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 04-001)
INTRODUCTION TO THE GENERAL PLAN
The City of Tustin is located in central Orange County and encompasses an area of ~
11.08 square miles. The City is bounded on the south by the cities ofIrvine and Santa Ana,
on the north by the unincorporated portions of the County of Orange and the City of Orange,
and on the east by unincorporated County territory and the City of Irvine. Within the context
of the larger Southern California region, Tustin is located approximately two miles north of
Orange County's John Waynè Airport and is transected by two major regional freeways: the
1-5 (Santa Ana) Freeway, divides the City into north and south; and the SR-55 (Costa Mesa)
Freeway, divides westerly portions of the City. The City continues to be a discernible entity,
characterized physically by its strategic crossroads location, the former Marine Corps Air
Station, Tustin, (closed in July 1999), hillside areas which offer sweeping panoramic views
of the Pacific Coast and Saddleback Mountains, prime commercial, iridustrial, and residential
development, and one of the oldest historical "old towns" in Orange County. These
signi,ficant natural and man-made characteristics provide a commonly acknowledged basis
for a "sense of place". Together, they act as a foundation for Tustin's Future...a functional
desirable and attractive community to live, work or visit.
..
--..
PACIFIC OCEAN
CITY OF TUSTIN
GENERAL PLAN
INTRODUCTION
FEBRUARY 7, 2005
TUSTIN PLANNING AREA
CITY OF TUSTIN
GENERAL PLAN
The Tustin Planning Area consists of approximately ~ 17.26 square
miles as shown on Figure I-I. This area includes all of the land within the
City's incorporated boundaries (~ 11.08 square miles), as well as the City
of Tustin's existing "sphere of influence 11 (an additional 6.2 square miles of
unincorporated county area) located immediately adjacent to the City's
northerly boundaries and. approved by the Local Agency Formation
Commission as Tustin's probable ultimate physical boundaries and service
area. Two smaller. additional areas of approximately 115 acres located
adjacent to the City of Tustin's southeasterly boundary are also included in
the Tustin Planning Area. Currently within the corporate limits of the City of
Irvine, a modification to the City's existing "sphere of influence" and a
municipal reorganization would be necessary to make them apart of the City
of Tustin.
..
2
INTRODUCTION
FEBRUARY 7, 2005
E3 -. -----......
E3""'..-
Fat_. A..
,\;
;~;,;,
:.i
Ii
..
~
i
.....
t:.~
'--,
\., D..[J1r:1un~
I GENERAL PLAN ~
í
!
Fioure 1-1
'-'
Tustin Planning Area
0
For amendment ofthe General Plan associated with the reuse ofMCAS
Tustin, a public "Open House" was held to review the Draft Amendment,
followed by public hearings held before the City's Planning Commission
and City Council.
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS
As amendments to the General Plan are considered and adopted by the City, a general
description of each should be identified and added as an attachment to the Introduction to the
Plan. Amendment of Table 1-2 as an attachment to the Introduction Chapter below will not
require an amendment to the General Plan.
Table 1-2 below identifies each amendment and the General Plan elements affected.
TABLE 1-2
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS
Amendment Date of Affected Amendment Description
. Name Adootion Elements
04-001 2-07-04 All. excem Resolution 05-
Bousme: and
Growth
Mana ement
MCAS Tustin AIl Planning policies and programs for
Specific Plan! future development of MCAS Tustin
Reuse Plan propertY foIlowinQ" base closure
99-001 3-1-00 Circulation Resolution 99-22
15500 Tustin Village Way Land Use
98-002 1-19-99 Circulation Resolution 99-10
15580 Tustin Villae:e Way Land Use
96-003 7-21-97 Land Use Resolution 97-59
Lot 27 Tract 13627;
Commercial to Residential
96-002 5-6-96 Land Use Resolution 96-48
1062-1082 WagS St; Low
Density Residential to
Medium Density
Residential
95-001 1-2-96 Land Use Resolution 96-3
Warner/Jamboree;
Military to Industrial
94-001 11-20-95 Land Use Resolution 95-114
Lot 6, Tract 12870; P&I to
PCR Portion of Lot 27
Tract 13627' PCCB to PCR
CITY OF TUSTIN
GENERAL PLAN
10
INTRODUCTION
FEBRUARY 7, 2005
SUMMARY OF ISSUES, NEEDS, OPPORTUNITIES
AND CONSTRAINTS
The Land Use Element establishes policy which is reflected in all the other General Plan
elements. The following land use issues, needs, opportunities, and constraints have been
identified in Tustin, and are addressed in the goals and policies which follow in the next
section.
BALANCED DEVELOPMENT IN TUSTIN
0
There is a lack of commercial services in certain geographic areas, such
as the Irvine Business Center, which warrants consideration of additional
commercial designations.
0
Land use patterns eñcourage Tustin rësidents to rely on the automobile to
commute to work and shopping.
0
The City has the opportunity to purchase surplus freeway parcels and
develop them with uses which capitalize on their freeway accessibility.
0 Following the closure of MCAS Tustin the MCAS Tustin Specific
PlanlReuse Plan will guide future development on approximately -l-;*-l-
. 1.533 acres in the City of Tustin.
0
The annexation of certain areas in North Tustin could establish more
logical City boundaries.
0 . Hillside areas within the City's sphere of influence may be subject to
slope instability. In the event of annexation, significant infrastructure
deficiencies, where they exist, shall be mitigated to the extent feasible.
COMPATIBLE AND COMPLEMENTARY DEVELOPMENT
0
The intermixing of land uses in some areas without adequate buffering
has resulted in land use incompatibilities, such as those related to
CITY OF TUSTIN
GENERAL PLAN
5
LAND USE ELEMENT
FEBRUARY 7, 2005
t
Land Use Policy Map
D !P~! II
LEGEND
~ aph.. of 1nf_lannIng ArM
¡zsz CIIy ør1\l8lln
Re8kI8ntI8I
- ~-"_(1-7c1woo)
- -- -., 11M_I 11-11 dlll8C)
- HIgh Don8Ity - 1'6-2& du/ooJ
- __-11-1OdW...)
Cornmen:lal
- COINmIntIy ~I
- Old Town c:omn-:t8I
- P.-lanal 0IIIce
'~"¡';;¡~" :,~,;
-,-
Public
\II1II """""'-""
MCASTuIlin Planned Community
- IlCAS1II8Un IIp8cIIIc Plan
Planned Community
l1li PC ....-
- PC c-n:I8VBU8InM8
- PC PubII--
TABLE LU-2
DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY/DENSITY STANDARDS
MAJOR MAXIMUM EFFECTIVE LAND USE DESIGNATION AND SUMMARY DESCRIPTION
LAND USE DWELLING DWELLING
GROUPINGS UNITS PER UNITS PER
ACRE OR ACRE OR
MAXIMUM AVERAGE
FLOOR AREA FLOOR AREA
RATIO (a) RATIO (b)
RESIDENTIAL 1-7 5.61 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL - Detached single family dwellings
which allows up to 7 dwelling units per net acre with an average of
3.25 persons per dwellil'lg unit
8-15 15.00 MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL- Multi-family dwellings including
duplexes, condominiums, townhomes, and apartments. Allows up
to 15 dwelling units per net acre with an average of 2.73 persons
per dwelling unit.
15.25 - 21.53 HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL - Multi family dwellings including
duplexes, condominiums, townhomes, and apartments. Allows up
to 25 dwelling units per net acre with an average of 2.15 persons
per dwelling unit.
1-10 6.3"1 MOBILE HOME PARK - Mobile Home Park development which
~ ., allows up to 10 dwelling units per acre with an average of 2.15
persons per dwelling unit.
COMMERCIAL 0.5:1 0.4:1 COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL - Includes retail, professional office,
and service-oriented business activities serving a community-wide
area and population.
1.0:1 0.5:1. OLD TOWN COMMERCIAL - Includes retail, professional office,
and service-oriented business activities serving Old Town and
surrounding areas. (May also include high density residential).
0.8:1 0.4:1 PROFESSIONAL - Primarily single tenant or multi-tenant offices
that include legal and medical services, financial institutions,
corporate and government offices, and other supporting uses.
INDUSTRIAL 0.6:1 0.5:1 INDUSTRIAL - A mix of industrial and office uses such as wholesale
businesses, light manufacturing, storage, distribution and sales,
research and development laboratories, and service commercial
business.
PUBLIC 0.6:1 0.2:1 PUBLlCIfNSTITUTIONAL - Public and private uses such as
schools, churches, City Hall, flood control channels, reservoirs,
communication, utility substations, and recreation/open spaces such
uses as parks, golf courses, and designated open spaces.
0.25:1 0.1:1 MILITARY - Federal govemment military operations.
PLANNED (c) (c) PC RESIDENTIAL - Includes low, medium, and high density
COMMUNITY residential described above with respective averages of 3.15, 2.45,
and 2.05 persons per dwelling unit.
1.5:1 0.4:1 PC COMMERCIAUBUSINI;SS - Mix of commercial and office uses
such as hotel/motels, commercial centers, research and
development, and professional offices.
0.6:1 0.2:1 PC PUBLIC/INSTITUTIONAL - Same as Public/Institutional above.
MCAS TUSTIN LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL - Low density detached and
CITY OF TUSTIN
GENERAL PLAN
29
LAND USE ELEMENT
FEBRUARY 7, 2005
T ABL.E LU-2
DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY/DENSITY STANDARDS
MAJOR MAXIMUM EFFECTIVE LAND USE DESIGNATION AND SUMMARY DESCRIPTION
LAND USE DWELLING DWELLING
GROUPINGS UNITS PER UNITS PER
ACRE OR ACRE OR
MAXIMUM AVERAGE
FLOOR AREA FLOOR AREA
RATIO (a) RATIO (b)
MCAS TUSTIN (d) (d) LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL - Low density detached and
SPECIFIC PLAN attached dwellings at a maximum of 7 dwelling units per acre with
an average of 3.25 persons per dwelling unit.
MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL - Medium density detached and
attached dwellings at a maximum of 8-15 dwelling units per acre
with an average of 2.73 persons per dwelling unit.
MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL -, medium-high density
dwellings of 16-25 dwelling units per acre with an average of 2.12
persons per dwelling unit.
TRANSITIONAUEMERGENCY HOUSING - Adaptive reuse of
." .. military dormitory type structures for emergency housing, single
occupancy housing, or congregate care with an average of 32
persons per acre.
COMMERCIAL AND BUSINESS - A variety of industrial, research
and development, professional office, retail, commercial recreation,
and specialized employment and merchandising uses at an average
floor area ratio of .35:1 which can be increased under special
circumstances. Residential uses are permitted at 16-25 dwelling
units per acre with an average of 2.12 persons per dwelling unit.
INSTITUTIONAURECREA TIONAL USES - A wide range of public
and quasi-public uses including educational facilities, public and
private schools, colleges, neighborhood, community and regional
parks, child care centers, and governmentaVsocial service facilities.
TRANSPORTATION - - TRANSPORTATION - Consists of major and primary arterial
roadways and railroads.
(a) Maximum allowable level of development standard for individual parcels of land.
(b) Assumed overall standard level of development. Since the development which has occurred to date has not reached the
maximum allowed level of density or intensity, future development is expected to be less than the maximum. Therefore, an
effective level of densityliritensity is used when projecting total future dwelling units/population for residential development and
future square footage for non-residential development where floor area is used as a measurement of building intensity.
(c) Maximum'density in dwelling units per acre is prescribed by individual Planned Community documents. Effective dwelling units
per acre for low, medium, and high density residential is 4.485, 11.834, and 17.39, respectively.
(d) Maximum and effective dwelling units per acre and floor area ratio described in MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/Reuse Plan (1996)
and Errata (1998).
CITY OF TUSTIN
GENERAL PLAN
30
LAND USE ELEMENT
FEBRUARY 7, 2005
.,
CITY OF TUSTIN
GENERAL PLAN
character of surrounding development and within the development area itself,
the specific location of land use types, density and building intensity
standards will be governed by a Specific Plan, as authorized by the California
Government Code. The Specific Plan designation, however, would allow for
a number of the following uses.
0
Low Density Residential uses at a maximum density of 7 dwelling
units per acre will provide for development of low density attached
and detached dwellings and accessory uses and buildings. A wide
range of accommodations including single family units, patio homes,
and multiple family dwellings such as condominiums, townhouses,
cooperatives and community apartments would be permitted. Uses
such as public/institutional facilities, child care facilities and others
which are determined to be compatible with, and oriented towards the
needs of these neighborhoods may also be allowed. The average
population for this permitted land use is approximately 3.25 per
dwelling unit which represents a population density range of 3 to 23
persons per acre.
0
Medium Density Residential uses at a density range of 8-15
dwelling units per acre will provide for development of medium
density attached and detached dwellings and accessory uses and
structures. A wide range of accommodations including single family
units, patio homes, and multiple family dwellings such as
condominiums, townhouses, cooperatives and community apartments
would also be permitted. Uses such as public/institutional facilities,
child care facilities and others which are determined to be compatible
with, and oriented towards the needs of these neighborhoods may also
be allowed. The average population for this permitted land use is
approximately 2.73 persons per dwelling unit representing a
population density range of 22 to 41 persons per acre.
0
Medium-High Density Residential uses at a density range of 16-25
dwelling units per acre. The designation to provide for development
of multiple family dwellings at a higher density may include rental
apartments, condominiums, and townhouses. The average population
for this permitted land use is approximately 2.12 persons per dwelling
unit representing a population density range of 34 to 53 persons per
acre.
0
TransitionalÆmergency Housing uses would be permitted to
accommodate the adaptive use of existing military dormitory type
structures for emergency housing, single occupancy housing, or
39
LAND USE ELEMENT
FEBRUARY 7, 2005
Future Land Use Density/Intensity and p,,~'dation G~pacity of the Land Use Plan
Gron A"'" Gron A"'" Gron A"", O...tH.. Owolfi... o...m.. Sq.... Sq..... .:; Ponuladan
Incorpnnœd U.i.c."",- T....' Om.. Om" um.. F-.. F-.. A- -- -- -- -... .....-. """"-
..... A... P'on.i.. I"""""" um.........,... TnIaI """"""'" u..in""'1lOf8lOd TnIaI P- Per ,."..... P.,........ PopooIolton ,......... - --
..... ..... ..... -. Area Area Ptannint Dwell'" I"""""*,, u........,....... T"". . -,....I PapoIoIiao P--
Mojor lAnd Use Grou IÓ.... and (A) (8) (C) A... (OOO'J) (_,) Area - ..... ..... -. Area . Oopodty C8podtJ
lAnd Ooe """""""" (0) (0) (000'1' ..... low HI'" - T...I
(0 (E) II!) "", -,
1m /HI"""
""",1hI
Low OcnsIJyRcoidcntiBI (1-7 dnIDC) m,¡. ~ 4,000.8 a.- 6,3» 9.761 3.39 tom. »,!to ~ 'MD ~ - ~).933
790.S 3.210.3 2.977 6,"4 10.092 22.'" )3.019 '.511 IIJ.'91 12.220
MedIum Dallioy ROJidcnriel (8-IS duI..) 35.1 0.0 3S.' 4]0 0 4)0 2.1S 1.22' 0 1.225 1,163 1,216 1,22! J,22J
HIp Dallioy RdIdeoIUol I 1S-15 dnIoc, 611.S 0.0 6II.S 10.360 0 10.360 2.24 23,206 0 23.206 22,04.1 24;166 27.701 27,701
MobiIc_hd«\-IOdllloc' 84.7 0,0 84,7 702 0 102 2.24 1.512 0 1,572 1.49.1 I-"SO 1762 17"
c'
c-..._I
ConIInan"" Commercial 1611.7 0.0 161.7 2,312 0 2,372
Old Town Conum:rdal 72.0 0.0 72.0 (F) IF) 1.15S 0 1,2S' (F) (F) (F)
.....- om.. SM 0.0 ".6 m 0 T7S
1.._1 'm
IødustriaI 16'-7 IS.0 110.7 261 314
'0"" .2721
I'1IbIIcIIDJIIIDIIOÞOI 320.7 16S.7 486.4 II" 147
MCAB TOIIIa _In. Pin ~ 0.0 1,IHoO 4,049 0 4,049 11.407 11,407 (I) 10.900 0 1 B.900 10,900 10,900 10.900 10,900
1.532.6 1.532.6 4.199 ~ I" 11.417 1I~17 IUl7 114" 11.417 1141
PI.."" c.....o.."" (PC)
pc Ln" DallitylleJ1dcnllai 306.7 331.4 1.138.1 ),107 946 4,OS) 3.25 10,097 ),074 1),171 9.592 10,602 11.'1" 1S.192
PC MedI... - R_1IaI 470.3 58.2 m.s 3.690 .,4 4.101-1 2.7) 10,073 1,239 11.311 9.518 lo.sn 15.407 16,773
PC HIp Dallioy Rafdoollal 191.1 3.0 294.7 4.)S6 4' 4,397 2.12 9,234 H 9,)20 &,m 9,696 12,36& I...,..'
pc ConmIercial/B1IhIeJJ 373.S 3S.9 959.4 11,176 1,197 13,373
PC~ 37D.9 20.3 391.7 :uIS 14S 2.7)0
T.._"".....
T_don »M 63.3 19M
S33.9 '97.2
T.... 'I,U3.8 '1,t-7U u,m.o - ~ I>,IM 35,m 2.7s& 38,S37 ~ - m.- - ~ 93,UI -Y9,UI
7,191.8 ].'IS].' 11.1"" 29,621 1,22! Jl,HI ! ~" '7,72I IM,)11 73,IJt &0,191 94,IQ 129,,"
""-""""""'-"""'-""""""'--""""'" ...-....... .-""'--"--."'--""""'-"
...._--..__..a...."""""'.""""".
........ -................ -- _bod...................... -"'.'""""" r-...... -- ,,-..-.................,.......,...............--
120"""""""""""" . .
c- -..... -- - -"""- --- -",...........r-................. '-""""'PC r- -.- UI - ..PC- _.'" "..-
.............- "".-.....-..--..................-"""",.....,.,...,.,....-..--...-...........- ...0aa0I_....-.
"",,-,"""""'..--"""""'"
D_""""'---.""""-"""""""""""""""""'-
E'__"""""--.-"- "-"""""""",,,,"""""-""""""--""""""""""""""-'" 'IS ,....",...
--..........................-,.....-....-...--....""....""""'_1_' .
F'" .......-.........~ ~ --.......................- -"- -...-.
D ---"""'" ........-...... """-""""'" "'-""" - - --................. --..............-...
""'8_"'--
H -.- -- ........-.......... ...-.... -""""""'- --.............. C..... ""'-""" -_...".....-
, PC r-......- -- ,..'....... _PC""""""""""" -- '1M""'" -... PC"" -- 'J" ......-.. ........ .......,.....,. ,.. PC""-'
... '" PC --...................... -- -..... T-' 1201 PC r-...................... --.....-........... r."..- "- ~ m PC""""""
----"""""~""---"",,,,,PC.""""-"'-""_""""""""""'T-- . .
--""",-"--",--"""""",,,---"'--""'_""""""T___-""'-""""""'"
",---"""","""""""--""'M<:AI.--""'" .
~_..---
::3.....-
:; ~800
I .... in teet
"'..
"',
"'"
~.
..
.-'---,
SOURCE: City otTustin
I .. ..... '
1 DIJj~DD~
I GENERAL PLAN ~
I .
Figure LU'-3
Planning Subareas
TABLE LU-4
PLANNED LAND USE COMPOSITION
SUMMARY FOR PLANNING SUBAREAS
Major Land Use Groupings and Gross Acres of Land by Subarea Total by
Land Use Designations I I Land Use
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Designation
Residential
Low Density Residential (1-7 du/ac) 422.9 120.3 12.9 20.0 221.1 3,203.6 4,000.8
Low Medium Density Residential (8-15 du/ae) 4.8 29.5 1.5 35.8
High Density Residential (15-25 dulac) 68.2 415.6 0.6 134.1 618.5
Mobile Home Park (1-10 dulae) 3.5 62.8 18.4 84.7
Commercial
Community Commercial 33.2 60.0 75.5 168.7
Old Town Commercial 72.0 72.0
Professional Office 48.5 1.9 5.2 55.6
Industrial -
industrial 11.0 169.7 180.7
Public
Publicllnstitutional 68.4 94.2 52.2 105.9 165.7 486.4
-- -
MCAS Tustin Specific Plan ~ 29.4 " .w +;&++
1.504.2 1.532.6
Planned Commu~1ty (PC)
PC Residential 20.2 0.0 331.5 1,215.8 1.8 392.0 1,961.3
205.3 959.4
PC CommereiallBusiness 136.6 188.6 403.0 370.9 19.3 6.6 391.7
PC Public/Institutional
20.8
Transportation
Transportation 106.3 97.4 54.1 81.1 +8M 30.7 40.3 &e-:h4
187.3 597.2
Total by Subarea 995.6 881.7 ~ 929.1 ~ 595.1 3,829.0 ++;+1-8
1.916.6 1.999.3 11,145,4
CITY OF TUSTIN
GENERAL PLAN
44
LAND USE ELEMENT
FEBRUARY 7. 2005
'--...
CITY OF TUSTIN
GENERAL PLAN
maximum pennitted density/ intensity all have an impact on the level or
intensity of development within a particular land use designation. However,
a maximum level of development may occur on individual parcels of land
where minimal constraints exist or where a project's exceptional design
quality or important public amenities/benefits warrant development at
maximum density/intensity.
The second concept of. development capacity is referred to as "effective
development capacity" which assumes that under realistic circumstances, all
development will not be at maximum density or intensity based on appraisal
of development constraints in the City which would restrict development to
less than that shown by the maximum density/ intensity of the Land Use Plan.
For example, in some zoning districts, the level of development permitted
may be based on the size of a lot; smaller lots may only be authorized to
develop at densities/intensities substantially less than permitted by a
maximum density/intensity standard.
Table LV-3 provides a breakdown of land uses within the City and total
Planning area for purposes of identifying the effective..development capacity
of the Land Use Plan for both dwelling units/population and square footage
of non-residential uses. In arriving at effective development capacity for
population growth and the number of units possible under build-out
conditions, the effective permitted units by each specific residential land use
designation was multiplied by the average household size estimated for each
residential land use designation.
For non-residential uses, the effective level of intensity (the average floor
area factor shown in Table LU-2) was used to determine the level of expected
future square footage of development.
The degree to which plan capacity exceeds projected population is referred to
as "overage". Some overage is desirable to make allowance for inevitable
small pockets of undevelopable land, to allow for difficulty in recognizing
development trends in completely vacant areas, to allow for an unforeseen
need for public utilities, and to recognize that some owners will maintain
their land in an undeveloped state beyond the time span of the Plan. The
Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) has recommended
that plan capacity overage not exceed approximately 20 to 25 percent of
the projected population. The measurement of overage is accomplished by
dividing the maximum population capacity of the plan by the projected
population. For the Tustin Planning Area, the maximum population capacity
of the Plan is 129,138 129.655. and the projected population is 103,795
104.312 resulting in an overage of approximately 24 percent.
45..
LAND USE ELEMENT
FEBRUARY 7, 2005
y,'
, ~----
E3"'--.
':t: ~ eoo
I ICIIie In tæt
'-"
""
""
, "
",
,
"
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
, II
II
./1
II
II
III
1/1
II '
~~, II.
<~,:~.ll
','.'" '¡ ,"
, 1/ n,
, //1
"7)"'" W
"";"¡""~/,Ij',..'
'if..' II"
, ,~,.,
. ,,;:;jI.,..., ,;<,
1i'" ,
,f;
/;'
/;'
AIf: c/;'
~¿;
~~
/;'V
, ,/j
," /;'
'l'
h
""
'it:
>,
.f
ì
y"
SP,ECIFIC PLANS
~ First Street
[ffi[J]]] East Tustin
- Pacific Center East
f:::::::::::ì North Tustin
~.;.:.:..j fiCAS Tustin
..'
, "
0'111' ~'IIR"" 'II'
, ' , 'i ..
;,' " '.' ."...
.. GENERAL PLAN', ,
Figure LU-4,
Special MamagèrhantJÂteå.s'
Specific Plans
E!3-..--
E3c."",-
-;;: ~ eoo .
I 8CIIie In teet
,~!' , '
~"" .' . .: ,':'
0,
I:--~!(I TÖW~ CENTE~ ÄÈD~'. #~Ó~ECT
'/:::::;::[ SOLrrH/CENTRf\LREDEV...PROJECT
, . NORTH TU§)TIN (unincorporated)
" . ITIJ]j~6iHER AÅËAS,
'.~. FyrURE ~.ÇAS. TUSTI NfÄoJ a I NING
;"."",>ABE;A REDEV. PAQ:JECT
",,\~,'" . : ..
"'-<,.'
UI!e!!~
/
Figure LU-5
S pec;al f'4ana,g~ment Are_~.s
Redevèlo.prDel1~i!p.ró.jêct Aré'ã'sr,
M6rth Tustin/Other Arè'âs '
I
'.'
SOURCE: City of Tustin. An Update on Redevelopment. March 1990
CITY OF TUSTIN
GENERAL PLAN
is located primarily within Tustin with the exception of % 73 acres located
within the City of Irvine. One privately owned parcel of approximately 4.1
acres is immediately adjacent to the northeasterly boundary of the base and
will be included in any planning for reuse of the base. Following closure, the
MCAS Tustin property is under the jurisdictional authority of the cities of
Tustin (approximately ~ 1533 acres) and Irvine (approximately ~ 73
acres), and will be subject to requirements of a Specific Plan/Reuse Plan on
the former military base and the 4.1 acre privately owned site.
The overall goal of the Specific Plan should be to translate community values
into the most important qualities or characteristics of the future uses and
overall design and seek to create results that are very special, worthy of the
site's present and historical importance to the City of Tustin and the region.
A variety of land uses will be permitted by the Plan, including residential,
commerciallbusiness, and institutional! recreational activities. Through the
federal disposition process, certain portions of the property will be available
to federal, state, homeless, and local agencies through public benefit
conveyances. Property will also be offered to the Local Reuse Authority
(e.g.;.. the City of Tustin) in the pursuit of Job creation and, economic
development. Property not transferred as a public benefit conveyance or
transferred to the Local Reuse Authority will be sold by the Department of
the Navy.
Future Specific Plan Study Areas
To achieve General Plan goals and objectives, other portions of the planning
area may be identified as Specific Plan study areas for specific plans..
If specific plans are adopted in these areas, amendment to the Special
Management Areas Policy Maps is not necessary.
Redevelopment Project Areas
State Redevelopment Law provides the mechanism whereby cities and
counties, through the adoption of an ordinance, can establish a redevelopment
agency. The Tustin Community Redevelopment Agency was created in 1976
and is made up of the City Council who are elected at large by popular vote.
Redevelopment law enables the Agency to undertake community projects
designed to improve certain areas within the City which have suffered
economic decline, deterioration of improvements, or which have been unable
to attract and promote new private investments to enhance the quality oflife
51
LAND USE ELEMENT
FEBRUARY 7,2005
n
-o~
QIto'jE FWf
AII£
!ì!
<
'~
c
...,
...
..
, ,
F_AIÐI
AII£
~
ÞHTA
"
II
i E
1
..
IE G END
~'or (6 lanes)
W:e.jor (6 le.nes)
-' ..~.."~od.1.f1ed. Major (6 lenes)
t -- - - - -Primary (4 lanes)
"""""1 ~od1fled Primary (4.- le.nos)
Secondary (4 or 2 lanes)
,-,-" ..,--:--
'ÅUe=tmted Roadways
nil Cit.y Bow:uiary
- I I - Ple.nnin¡ Area Boundary
1-
NORTH not to scale
SOURCE: Austin-Foust Associates, Inc.
n æSJt!1 ~
Figure C-2
Arterial Highway ptan
28
~ " - 'I
G~
~pW1,
AYE
~
~
.
Ii;
'AIIIAWN.";' '
--
i'
-----
ilK
FDO1ItU. iiLiIIr' t '; ,
',¡' ,I"'"
, ~'
.
¡¡
,~" ," I Ii
'"" '",h,' .. f
SANTA
,,',
'\,/
S
\1(', "
,I.'
~....,.-:
.
t"Ir.,
:
..
8
8.,
a.AAA
:'",~, (~DQ)~~~
'..", ' """"~:,;,
'.. '"
, ;;¡",
ï '
'r:'
i
~t
..
u_"...
~
l' "
NORTH not to scale
SOURCE: Austin-Foust Associates, Inc.
- ClaD. I .-- City Boundary
- Claa n Ple.nning .Area
I - Cl.... m I c School Site
, County Regional Tre.il
'II} 'l'l~;IID~
GENERAL PLAN ~
Figure C-4
Existing Bikeways
40
~
FoIRH"\IÐ
AVE ~ ~ ~
:;¡
"'IE
SAHT/\
ITtH
!
(/
.~
l'
NORTH not to scale
SOURCE: Austin-Foust Associates, Inc:.
Cla.s I
- C lass n
Class m
County Regional
Trail
Dashed line indicates
City Boundary
P11!D.~ Area
* School Site
** Park: Sit.e
otentiel route.
/-
~
U,IJ1~unl~
: : GENERAL PLAN ~
Figu re C-5
Master Bikeway Plan
4t
.,-
'"
:,';:
II
II
/1
II
II
II
//
II
II
1/
II
/1
fil
II
II
,. -1/
;: ,;,/1
tl/
,"
1;'
/¡
l'
//".
, //
/¡
4;é
~~-g
~~
1;'/
,~
?-
","
",.' ,
.,'
.." ", .. "
~~X~R FLOOD PLAIN
" :, "~i1:'1:" .;: ,~~FLOOD PLAIN
..H;~~:jj6uEFACTION PO!~~:n~k
..BLE BEDROCK lANDSUœS
~"" ." '.
":.,,
:>'
SOURCE: Federal Emergency Manàgemern Agency
Flood Insurance Rate Map and MCAS Master Plan (1988)
,l
\ '
I (I !t~"tU II
I -,.." , .", ",.. '- '.. " ' ..
I
Figure COSR- ~¡ .
H azartl Þ1ânñi ng\il¡~~¥, J
.,0
~-"--
E:=:-~'-
.;,:
"'~:>;' """it
....,'
~."
".
~ ;
.
.:
~ ~S)O
I -- Ì\ i8et
~)¿:¡tfl: :::N1þlOGIÒ ~Ë~~rr"nY
l(k,?:~ ¡ ~OWER p'ETER,S ~ANr,O.HI;!ETÀ.fU)ING BASIN
~~~;::~;s~~
I"~' RlOGëlJNE
_AGRICULTURE
P Pt:iMæ
S STA'TEWIΠIMPORfANCE
U UMQUS
SOURCE: Natural Resource Conservation
Services (1999); California Department 01
Conservation Farmland Mapping and
Monnoring Program (1990),
City 01 Tustin, Aeriaj Photographs,
John Minch & Associates, January (1991),
¡ierrs Madre Consultants (1994)
no.. IJjGlU.U.~o
GENERAL PLAN I.ItJ
FigureCQ,SB-2
I mportant Natural Resources
..
... .., -, - -M,'
14302 Verba
, 14332 Verba St
14372 Verba Sf
14402 Prospect Avå
Zlelian Residence
14611 Prospect Ave
Qheney Reslden
1331 Bryan Ave
, .., ': ,- ,
, -: HlIITCRIC RESOURCE AREAS
E3-"--
1::3"""-
---
'h- -f.::::-
/ '
rël5äf'.'\""'~-~~:'
...,'.. ,.,
. -, ,-'- .
--- --'-' -"'-
SOURCE: '.Clty .f TU8~n,
";U811n S18t1on SP8oKIo PI8n I R8UH Plan 11995)
, . " ,
II_JIll
Figure COSR-3
Historic Resources
~-"--
5;3"",..,-
.' '
;; u.
II
/1
II
II
II
//
II
'/
1/
II
1/
II
1//
Iii
1/
II
/1
II
~I!
",,'Ï/
pI!
/1/
//
/¡
-7
~
IX
, /¡"
,.,.6t:
r¡,'f-7"
'*'
/¡
/¡
/¡
-7
"..
"..
"..
"..
'"
'.
"
.'
,)
I~; PROPOSED LANDSCAPE CqRRIDOR
STRENGTHENING
-t ~eoo
ICIIIe In feet
~r
,~l
:~i
[OJ
,[]I]
PROPOSED FREEWAY EDGE
LANDSCAPE BUFFERING
EXISTING LANDSCAPE CORRIDOR
(FILL. GAPS IN TREE STRUCTURE)
NEVV LANDSCAPED CITY GATEWAY
E \/TRANCE
ExISTING CITY GATSNAY (pROPOSED
LANDSCAPE STRENG11-lENING)
SOURCE: Urban Design Teëiïñicäi Memorandum,
Gastand HIllmer (1991).
Tus1ín Station SpecIfic Plan I Reuse Plan (1995)
ß. [IlI:JUD ~
GENERAL PLAN ~
Figure COSR-4
Scenic Resources
-.,
.' .. .-.... ,.-
.....--- - ------.----..---.:.-.:---.---.--,--
--_._..~,..__....,."..
--.-.--- - . - - ,.
. ",'
E!i!3-..--
E3.....- -
t ::.¿.-:
-'- ... -_. ..
, t
'.. ..
SOURCE: OIly afTuolln, -- _In'" Tuolin ArM (1lIIIO),
MCAS Tu8IIn Sp8dtIa PI- PIon (1l1li7)
n.LlRJII:O~
GENERAL PLAN ~
44
,..-- -. ........ ..--.
- ÉXlSl1NG SCHOOL
l1li PROPOSED LOOAL SdHOOL.
fill, EXI8T1NG COMMUNITY F AOILrrv
_~G~CPARK' -
_PAOPOSED PUBUC PARK
~,~ PRIVATE RECREATION .
. ~ n i ~EXl8TItG Štcycu: ROUTES.
. 84REGIotw. ~~. TIIAIL
.. '." ~..' '."
. .~.... -,. ."
..-.. ....
. .'.. -.-
. Figure COSR-5'
! Recreation Plan
--
... ",I.-
,,'.. \~¡
II
II
1/
II
II
1/
1/
II
II
II
II
II
III
II!
II
if
'.:, ' I r~",
r
i ","
;n.,: -,
g
,j , ,;' ¡'I:,
" -' ',' .' ¡."
r.- -
",.
1/
tIi/¡
J}'" 'ÏI
~
~
//
//
~
~
~
l'
,~
"",;r
~
". I ~ Existing Evacuation Routes
: B Future Evacuation Routes
E3.........--
:::::i3 """',-
- 0 800 '!DO
t~
.-
SOURCE: City of Tustin Police Department <1991).
n- lJII:1 D U ~
.-, GENERAL PLAN ~
, Figure PS-1
Evacuation Routes
-
....' -.-.'-......,.
~_._-
E:3.....-
.,..........
...- " .
.....-----'
.-
-'t..~_. -
-.----.,--...,..'-...- ""'-" ..
-......-..-.....-......... .'-'.'
SOURCE: J.J. Van HouI8n&AooacI_.JWytllll3.. .
NOT1æ: - - dopIcIecI- MCAS r-. BpecIIIc Plan InII)' .
~-..._~~- "
D. ll~IID~'
" GENERAL PLAN ~
. Figure N-1
Future (2010) Community 'NoIse Equivalent
Level (CNEL) Contours for the
. Tustin Planning Area
.,.
13