HomeMy WebLinkAbout01 GEN PLAN AMEND 04-18-05
A G END A REPORT
Agenda Item ~
Reviewed: ¡¿L
City Manager
Finance Director ~
MEETING DATE:
APRIL 18, 2005
TO:
WilLIAM A. HUSTON, CITY MANAGER
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
FROM:
SUBJECT:
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 05-001
SUMMARY
The proposed project is a General Plan Amendment to the City's Circulation Element to
reclassify a street segment of EI Camino Real between First Street and Newport
Avenue from a four-lane Secondary Arterial to a two-lane collector roadway. On April
11, 2005, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve
General Plan Amendment 05-001.
Applicant! Owner: City of Tustin
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
1. Adopt Resolution No. 05-61 approving the Final Negative Declaration as adequate
for General Plan Amendment 05-001.
2. Adopt Resolution No. 05-62 approving General Plan Amendment 05-001 for the
reclassification of EI Camino Real between First Street and Newport Avenue.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The General Plan Amendment is a City-initiated project. There is no direct fiscal impact
associated with the proposed General Plan Amendment.
ENVIRONMENTAL:
A Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project (Exhibit A of Resolution No. 05-
61). The attached Initial Study discusses potential impact categories. Based on the Initial
Study, there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the
environment, and no mitigation measures are proposed. The public comments period for
the environmental documents was from March 22, 2005, to April 11, 2005. No comments
were received during the comments period.
City Council Report
April 18, 2005
GPA 05-001
Page 2 of 3
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION:
The Circulation Element is one of the seven General Plan elements mandated by the
State of California, as articulated in Sections 65580 to 65589.8 of the Government
Code.
The proposed project is a General Plan Amendment to the City's Circulation Element to
reclassify a street segment of EI Camino Real between First Street and Newport
Avenue from a four-lane Secondary Arterial to a two-lane collector roadway. The
roadway segment of EI Camino Real has a north-south alignment before it transitions to
a northwest-southeast alignment between Sixth Street and Newport Avenue. This
portion of EI Camino Real is located within the City's Old Town commercial district,
which supports a mixture of retail and commercial uses and includes various public
improvements to provide a more pedestrian-oriented environment.
In November 1997, the City, in coordination with the Orange County Transportation
Authority (OCTA) , approved a demonstration project to reduce the number of travel
lanes on EI Camino Real between Second Street to Sixth Street (one block south of
First Street and west of Newport Avenue) from a four-lane undivided Secondary Arterial
street to a two-lane undivided collector street with diagonal parking along both sides of
the street. The purpose of the demonstration project was to document the existing and
define the future impacts of the redesignation on other nearby streets and intersections.
A subsequent traffic study (Appendix B of the Initial Study, which is Exhibit A to
Resolution No. 05-61) was prepared by WPAJlNilidan in May 2001 that concluded 2020
traffic conditions, both with and without the project, would result in acceptable daily
traffic levels and intersection operations.
Following the success of the demonstration project and the preparation of the traffic
study, the OCTA approved an amendment to the Master Plan of Arterial Highways
(MPAH) to change the status of the street segment of EI Camino Real between First
Street and Newport Avenue from a four-lane secondary arterial to a two-lane local
collector roadway. The proposed General Plan Amendment would similarly reflect the
two-lane collector status of the roadway on the City's Circulation Element and ensure
consistency between the City's General Plan and OCTA's MPAH.
The purpose of the proposed amendment to the City's Circulation Element is to: (1)
achieve consistency with the MPAH designation, (2) reflect the existing and future traffic
levels on the roadway segment, and (3) ensure consistency between the roadway and
the adjacent land uses by supporting the pedestrian-friendly character of the Old Town
commercial district. The two-lane configuration and on-street diagonal parking are
consistent with the revitalization goals for Old Town by contributing to a pedestrian-
oriented environment.
City Council Report
April 18,2005
GPA 05-001
Page30f3
Specifically, the General Plan Amendment includes the following:
. Adds a definition of Collector to the Circulation Plan
. Adds a cross section of a Collector roadway to Figure C-1, Typical Cross Sections
. Amends Figure C-2 to add Collector to the Legend and to redesignate EI Camino
Real between First Street and Newport Avenue
. Amends Table C-5 to reclassify EI Camino Real south of First Street and EI Camino
Real south of Main from Secondary to Collector
The proposed General Plan Amendment is included as Exhibit A of Resolution No. 05-
62.
On April 11, 2005, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council
approve General Plan Amendment 05-001. A decision to approve General Plan
Amendment 05-001 may be supported by the findings contained in Resolution No. 05-
62.
Jedl: ~
Scott Reekstin
Senior Planner
~I{/~
Engineering Services Manager
Attachments:
A. Location Map
B. Resolution No. 05-61 - (Environmental Findings)
C. Resolution No. 05-62 - (General Plan Amendment)
S:\CddICCREPORTlGPA 05-001 EI Camino Real Reclassification.doc
ATTACHMENT A
LOCATION MAP
0 1000
~
fEET
2000
,
SOURCE: USGS 7.5' QUADS - TUSTIN & ORANGE, CALIFORNIA
FIGURE 2.1
Tustin/EI Camino
Project Location
1:\CruJ30IG\'-'",,¡oo.,d,(7!lIOJ)
RESOLUTION NO. 05-61
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE FINAL NEGATIVE
DECLARATION AS ADEQUATE FOR GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT 05-001, AS REQUIRED BY THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT.
The City Council of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows:
I.
II.
The City Council finds and determines as follows:
A.
That General Plan Amendment 05-001 is considered a "Project" pursuant
to the terms of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA");
B.
That an Initial Study and a Negative Declaration have been prepared for
this project and distributed for public review. The Initial Study/Negative
Declaration evaluated the implications of the proposed project.
C,
That the Initial Study/Negative Declaration was advertised for public review
for 20 days in compliance with Section 15105 of the State CEQA
Guidelines,
D,
That at a regularly scheduled meeting on April 11, 2005, the Planning
Commission considered the proposed Final Negative Declaration before
considering a recommendation to approve General Plan Amendment 05-
001.
E.
The City Council of the City of Tustin has considered evidence presented
by the Community Development Director and comments received during
the public review process with respect to the proposed Final Negative
Declaration at the April 18, 2005, meeting.
A.
A Final Negative Declaration, attached hereto as Exhibit A, has been
completed in compliance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. The
City Council finds that, on the basis of the whole record before it (including
the initial study and any comments received), there is no substantial
evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment
and that the proposed Final Negative Declaration reflects the City's
independent judgment.
B.
The City Council hereby adopts the Final Negative Declaration for the
purpose of approving General Plan Amendment 05-001.
Resolution No. 05-61
Page 2
C.
The record of proceedings upon which this decision is based is located at
City Hall, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California, Attention: Director of
Community Development.
III.
The City Council finds that the project involves no potential for any adverse effect,
either individually or cumulatively, on wildlife resources as defined in Section 711,2
of the Fish and Game Code.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin City Council held on the
18th day of April, 2005.
LOU BONE
MAYOR
PAMELA STOKER
CITY CLERK
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF ORANGE)
CITY OF TUSTIN )
CERTIFICATION FOR RESOLUTION NO. 05-61
SS
I, Pamela Stoker, City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Tustin,
California, do hereby certify that the whole number of the members of the City Council of
the City of Tustin is five; that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 05-61 was duly
passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin City Council, held on the 18th day
of April, 2005, by the following vote:
COUNCILMEMBER AYES:
COUNCILMEMBER NOES:
COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAINED:
COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT:
PAMELA STOKER
CITY CLERK
EXHIBIT A OF RESOLUTION NO. 05-61
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
300 Centennial Way, Tustin, CA 92780
(714) 573-3100
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Project Title: EI Camino Real General Plan Amendment
Project Location: EI Camino Real between First Street and Newport Avenue, Tustin
Project Description: Amend the Circulation Element of the Tustin General Plan to redesignate EI Camino
Real between First Street and Newport Avenue from a Secondary Arterial to a Collector
Arterial.
Project Proponent: City of Tustin
Lead Agency Contact Person: Scott Reekstin
Telephone: 714/573-3016
The Community Development Department has conducted an Initial Study for the above project in accordance
with the City of Tustin's procedures regarding implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act,
and on the basis of that study hereby finds: .
That there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment.
JZl
0
That potential significant effects were identified, but revisions have been included in the project plans
and agreed to by the applicant that would avoid or mitigate the effects to a point where clearlyno
significant effects would occur. Said Mitigation Measures are included in Attachment A of the Initial
Study which is attached hereto and incorporated herein.
Therefore, the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report is not required.
The Initial Study which provides the basis for this determination is attached and is on file at the Community
Development Department, City of Tustin. The public is invited to comment on the appropriateness of this
Negative Declaration during the review period, which begins with the public notice of Negative Declaration and
extends for twenty (20) calendar days. Upon review by the Community Development Director, this review
period may be extended if deemed necessary.
REVIEW PERIOD ENDS 4:00 P.M. ON APRIL 11,2005
Date ~.;¿¡.OS ~~ ~k
E lzabeth A. Bmsack
Community Development Director
INITIAL STUDY AND NEGA TIVE
DECLARA TION
CITY OF TUSTIN
EL CAMINO REAL GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
L S ^
March 2005
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC.
MARCH '005
DRAFT INITIAL srVDY
TVSTIN/" CAMINO GENERAL PLAN AMEHDMENT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION ...........,.................,..........................................,..,..............,.............................1-1
1.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE -...................................................................................................11
1.2 FINDINGS OF THIS INITIAL STUDY............................................................................ I-I
1.3 EXISTING DOCUMENTS TO BE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE .....................1-2
1.4 CONTACT PERSON .......,.................................................................................................1-3
2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................,..............................2-1
2.1 PROJECT SITE SETIING ....................................................................:........................... 2-1
2.2 PROPOSED DISCRETIONARY ACTION ......................................................................2-1
2.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""....,.......,..... 2-3
3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM.....,...............".........................................,................3-1
4.0 EXPLANATIONS TO THE CHECKLIST FORM...................................................................... 4-1
4.1 AESTHETICS.............................................................,..............................,........,........~.:.4-1
4.2 AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES .................................,............................,...................... 4-1
4.3 AIR QUALITY ,.....,................................................................,.......................,..................4-2
4.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES..........,...,..,...................................,............."..................,....4-5
4.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES.............................................,............................................,....4-6
4.6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS ......................................................................................"........... 4-7
4.7 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS .............................................................. 4-9
4.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY .....................................................................4-12
4.9 LAND USE AND PLANNlNG """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""'" 4-15
4,10 MINERAL RESOURCES..............................................................................................4-17
4.11 NOISE............".........,......,......................................,......,...............................................4-17
4.12 POPULATION AND HOUSING ..................................................................................4-19
4.13 PUBLIC SERVICES .................,...,..............,........,..................,..............................,......4-20
4.14 RECREATION..........................................,..........,.........,....................................,.........,4-20
4.15 TRANSPORTATIONrrRAFFlC ......................................................................,..,......... 4-20
4,16 UTILITIES """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""'"....,................,..................4-26
4,17 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE........................................................ 4-27
APPENDICES
A: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
B: TRAFFIC STUDY
P:\ctu330\Fi"al Se,,\TOCdoc "OJ/ll/OS«
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC.
MARCH "OS
DRAFT INITIAL STUDY
TUSTINIEL CAMINO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
FIGURES
Figure 2.1: Project Location .......,....................................................................................................... 2-2
Figure 4.1: Existing Daily Volumes (two lanes)............................................................;.................. 4-22
Figure 4.2: Year 2020 Peak-Hour Volumes (with project, two lanes).............................................. 4-23
TABLES
Table 4.A: Intersection Analyses Summary ...............................................................;..................... 4-24
P:\ct,,330IFino' SentlTOc.dnc ,,03/11105»
ii
LSA ASSOCIATES. INC.
MARCH 'OOS
DRAFT INITIAL STODY
TUSTIN/EL CAMINO GENERAL PLAN AME.DME.T
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE
This Initial Study (IS) is being prepared to analyze the environmental effects of a proposed
amendment to the City of Tustin General Plan. The proposed project is to reclassify El Camino Real
between First Street and Newport Avenue ITom a secondary arterial to a collector roadway in the
Circulation Element of the General Plan. The proposed reclassification is consistent with a parallel
change that has already been made to the County of Orange Master Plan of Arterial Highways
(MPAH) and reflects the current conditions of the affected roadway segment.
The Circulation Element is one of seven mandated elements of the General Plan and is intended to
guide the development of the City of Tustin (City) circulation system in a manner that is compatible
with the Land Use and other Elements of the General Plan. The purpose of the Circulation Element is
to provide a safe, efficient, and adequate circulation system for the City. To meet this purpose and the
requirements of Government Code Section 65302 (b), the Circulation Element addresses the
circulation improvements needed to provide adequate capacity for future land uses. Corresponding
goals and policies are designed to improve overall circulation in the City and to address circulation
issues that concern the City. For highway transportation, the physical attributes involve a network of
existing and future roadways defmed according to designated roadway types, each with specific
design standards, Other modes are defined by appropriate physical attributes (e.g., bicycle trails).
The County of Orange MPAH fonns part of the Orange County General Plan and designates the
arterial system in the Circulation Element of the County General Plan. Defined according to specific
arterial functional classification, the MPAH serves to define the intended future road system within
the County. Cities within the County are expected to achieve consistency with the MPAH in their
individual General Plan Circulation Elements.
The purpose of the proposed amendment to the City of Tustin Circulation Element is to: I) achieve
consistency with the MP AH designation, 2) to reflect the existing and future traffic levels on the
roadway segment, and 3) to ensure consistency between the roadway and the àdjacent land uses by
supporting the pedestrian-friendly character of the Old Town commercial district in the City of
Tustin. The two lane configuration and on-street diagonal parking is consistent with the
revitalization goals for Old Town by contributing to a pedestrian-oriented environment.
This Initial Study has evaluated each of the environmental issues contained in the checklist provided
in Section 3.0 of this document.
1.2 FINDINGS OF THIS INITIAL STUDY
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the State CEQA Guidelines, this
Initial Study has been prepared to detennine whether implementation of the City's proposed General
Plan Amendment to the Circulation Element (proposed project) will result in significant
Plc,"330\Fin,1 Sent\Sect;on l.doc ,,01128/05»
I-I
LS. 'SSOCIATES. INC.
"ARCH 10"
DRAFT INITIAL srDDY
TUSTINIEL C."'NO CENER'L PLAN "'END"ENT
environmental impacts that would require mitigation or the preparation of an Environmental Impact
Report (EIR) if significant impacts cannot be avoided,
This Initial Study is based on an Environmental Checklist Form, as suggested in Section 15063 (d)(3)
of the State CEQA Guidelines. The completed Form is found in Section 3.0 of this Initial Study. It
contains a series of questions about the proposed project for each of the listed environmental areas.
The Form is used to evaluate whether or not there are any significant environmental effects associated
with implementation of the proposed project and, if there are, whether or not mitigation can be
attached to the project to lessen or avoid such impacts.
Section 4.0 provides an explanation for each answer indicated on the Form. The Form and
accompanying evaluation provide the information and analysis upon which the City may make its
determination as to whether or not an EIR must be required for the project. The Form is used to
review the potential environmental effects of the proposed project for each of the following areas:
Aesthetics
Agricultural Resources
Mineral Resources
Noise
Air Quality
Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
PopulationIHousing
Recreation
Public Services
Geology/Soils
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Hydrology/Water Quality
Land UselPlanning
Transportation/Traffic
Utilities/Service Systems
Mandatory Findings of Significance
1.3 EXISTING DOCUMENTS TO BE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Section 15 I 50 of the State CEQA Guidelines permits an environmental document to incorporate by
reference other docIUllents that provide relevant data.
The docIUllents outlined in this section are hereby incorporated by reference, and the pertinent
material is summarized throughout this Initial Study, where that information is relevant to the analysis
of potential impacts resulting from the project. Any document incorporated by reference is available
for review at the following public service counter:
City ofTustin
Community Development Department
300 Centennial Way
Tustin, California 92780
City of Tustin General Plan, 2001
County of Orange General Plan, 2000
Plotu330IF;,,1 SontlSw;o" I.doc ,,01/28/05»
1-2
LOA ASSOCIATES, INC.
MARCH ,.OS
DRAFT INITIAL STUDY
TUSTIN/EL CAMINO'GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
Master Plan of Arterial Highways, Orange County (acTA)
1.4 CONTACT PERSON
The Lead Agency for the Initial Study for the proposed project is the City of Tustin, Any questions
about the preparation of this Initial Study, its assumptions, or its conclusions should be referred to the
following:
Mr. Dana R. Kasdan
Engineering Services Manager
City of Tustin
Public Works Department
300 Centennial Way
Tustin, California 92780
(714) 573-3150
tM. Scott Reekstin
Senior Planner
City of Tustin
Community Development Department/Planning Division
300 Centennial Way
Tustin, California 92780
(714) 573-3106
Plctu3JO\F;nal S,ntlS,ction ] .doc «OJ /28/05!
1-3
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC.
MARCH ""
DRAFr INITIAL STVDV
TVSTIN'EL CAMINO GENERAL FLAN AMENDMENr
2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2.1 PROJECT SITE SETTING
The City of Tustin is located in central Orange County and encompasses an area of 11.02 square
miles, The City is bound on the south by the Cities ofIrvine and Santa Ana, on the north by the
urìincorporated portions of the County of Orange and the City of Orange, on the west by Jamboree
Road, and on the east by unincorporated County territory and the City of Irvine. Tustin is located
approximately two miles north of Orange County's John Wayne Airport. There are two freeways that
transect the City, the Interstate 5 (1-5) (Santa Ana) freeway dividing the City into north and south and
the State Route 55 (SR-55) (Costa Mesa) freeway transecting the western portions ofthe City. The
City has an Old Town commercial area, which is one of the oldest historical commercial areas in
Orange County.
The proposed project is the reclassification ofEI Camino Real between First Street and Newport
Avenue as shown on Figure 2.1. This segment ofEI Camino Real is located north ofI-5 within the
Old Town commercial district. The City is proposing to reclassify this portion ofEI Camino Real
from a four-lane Secondary Arterial to a two-lane Local Collector in the Circulation Element of the
City's General Plan. This segment ofEI Camino Real is currently two lanes with on-street diagonal
parking.
2.2 PROPOSED DISCRETIONARY ACTION
The proposed discretionary action is the approval of an amendment to the Circulation Element of the
City's General Plan by the City Council. The proposed amendment includes text, tables, and map
changes to reflect a redesignation from a Secondary Arterial to a Collector Arterial,
Specifically, the General Plan Amendment includes the following:
Add a definition of Collector to the Circulation Plan
Add a cross section of a Collector roadway to Figure C-l, Typical Cross Sections
Amend Figure C-2 to add Collector to the Legend and to redesignate EI Camino Real between
First Street and Newport Avenue
Amend Table C-5 to reclassify EI Camino Real south of First Street and El Camino Real south of
Main from Secondary to Collector
The proposed General Plan Amendment is included as Appendix A of this document.
Plctv330lFinai SentlS,ction 2.doc ,,0 1/28/05"
2-1
FIGURE 2.1
0
,........,
fEET
2000
TustinlE/ Camino
Project Location
SOURCE: USGS 7.5' QUADS - TUSTIN & ORANGE, CALIFORNIA
¡o\CfU330IGlLoc";o".o'" (711/03)
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC.
MA'CH "OS
DRAFT 'NITIA. STUDY
TUSTINIE. CAMINO GENE'A' PLAN AMENDMENT
2.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Circulation Element is one of the seven General Plan elements mandated by the State of
California, as articulated in Sections 65580 to 65589.8 of the Government Code.
The proposed project is a General Plan Amendment to the City's Circulation Element to reclassify a
street segment ofEI Camino Real between First Street and Newport Avenue fÌ'om a four-lane
Secondary Arterial to a two-lane collector roadway. The roadway segment of EI Camino Real has a
north-south alignment before it transitions to a northwest-southeast alignment between Sixth Street
and Newport Avenue. This portion ofEI Camino Real is located within the City's Old Town
commercial district, which supports a mixture of retail and commercial uses and includes various
public improvements to provide a more pedestrian-oriented environment.
In November 1997, the City, in coordination with the Orange County Transportation Authority
(aCTA), approved a demonstration project to reduce the number of travel lanes on EI Camino Real
between Second Street to Sixth Street ( one block south of First Street and west of Newport Avenue)
from a four-lane undivided Secondary Arterial street to a two-lane undivided collector street with
diagonal.parking along both sides of the street. The purpose of the demonstration project was to
document the existing and define the future impacts of the redesignation on other nearby streets and
intersections. A subsequent traffic study (Appendix B of this IS) was prepared by WP AlWilIdan in
May 2001 that concluded that 2020 traffic conditions, both with and without the project, would result
in acceptable daily traffic levels and intersection operations.
Following the success of the demonstration project and the preparation of the traffic study, the
aCTA approved an amendment to the MP AH to change the status of the street segment of EI
Camino Real between First Street and Newport Avenue fÌ'om a four lane secondary arterial to a two
lane local collector roadway. The proposed General Plan Amendment would similarly reflect the
existing and planned two-lane collector status of the roadway on the City's Circulation Element and
ensure consistency between the City's General Plan and aCTA's MPAH.
The proposed action is limited to the amendment to the Circulation Element of the General Plan.
Since the physical changes to the roadway have already been implemented, the proposed project does
not include changes to the existing physical environment. The changes that occurred in the past are
included as part ofthe environmental setting defined as the physical conditions existing at the time
environmental analysis is commenced (CEQA Guidelines Section 15125).
The purpose of the proposed amendment to the City's Circulation Element is to (I) achieve
consistency with the MP AH designation, (2) reflect the existing and future traffic levels on the
roadway segment, and (3) ensure consistency between the roadway and the adjacent land uses by
supporting the pedestrian-friendly character of the Old Town commercial district. The two-lane
configuration and on-street diagonal parking are consistent with the revitalization goals for Old
Town by contributing to a pedestrian-oriented environment.
Plcm330lFloa' SontIS,ct;o" 2 doc "0]/28105,,
2.3
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
300 Centennial Way, Tustin, CA 92780
(714) 573-3100
INITIAL STUDY
A.
BACKGROUND
Project Title: EI Camino Real General Plan Amendment
Lead Agency:
City ofTustin
300 Centennial Way
Tustin, California 92780
Lead Agency Contact Persons: Mr. Dana R. Kasdan
Mr. Scott Reekstin
Phone: (714) 573-3150
Phone: (714) 573-3106
Project Location:
El Camino Real between First Street and Newport Avenue
Project Sponsor's Name and Address:
City of Tustin, 300 Centennial Way
General Plan Designation:
Secondary Arterial
Zoning Designation: Not Applicable
Project Description: Amend the Circulation Element of the General Plan to redesignate this portion of
El Camino Real to a Collecter Arterial
Surrounding Uses:
Project is located in the Old Town Commercial District
Other public agencies whose approval is required:
0
0
0
0
Orange County Fire Authority
Orange County Health Care Agency
South Coast Air Quality Management
District '
Other
0
0
0
City of Irvine
City of Santa Ana
Orange County
EMA
Plctu330\F;na] SentlSection 3 Checklist doc
B. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at
least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist in Section D
below.
0 Aesthetics
0 Air Quality
0 Cultural Resources
0 Hazards & Hazardous Materials
0 Land UselPlanning
0 Noise
0 Public Services
0 TransportationlTraffic
0 Mandatory Findings of Significance
0 Agriculture Resources
0 Biological Resources
0 Geology/Soils
0 HydrologylWater Quality
0 Mineral Resources
0 PopulationIHousing
0 Recreation
0 Utilities/Service Systems
C. DETERMINATION:
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
[8J I fmd that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
0 I find that although the proposed project could have a sigriificant effect on the environment, there will
not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by
the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
0 I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
0 I find that although the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially
significant unless mitigated impact" on the environment, but at least one effect I) has been adequately
analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by
mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described in the attached sheets. An
ENVIRONMENTAL IMP ACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to
be addressed. .
0 I fmdthat although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all
potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR OR NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to
that earlier EIR OR NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are
imposed upon the proposed project, and no further documentation is required.
Preparer: Scoff k'ee/GSh;¡
¿ø~#~~
Elizabeth A. Binsack, Community Deve opment Director
Title Sèn,òr Planner
Date ~,,2/. oÇ
P\ctu330\Fin,] SentlSect;o" 3 Ch"kli&.doc
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
D. EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Directions
A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the
information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is
adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects
like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact"answer should be
explained where it is based on project-specific factors and general standards (e.g., the project will not expose
sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis).
All answers must take into account the whole action involved, including off-site, on-site, cumulative project level,
indirect, direct,. constructi°!1, and operational impacts.
Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must
indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant.
"Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If
there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, and EIR is
required.
"Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of
mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less than Significant
lmpact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect
to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross-
referenced),
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has
been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063 (c) (3)(D). In this case, a brief
discussion should identify the following:
a)
Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review.
b)
lmpacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of
and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether
such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis,
c)
Mitigation Measures, For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated,"
describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the
extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project.
Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential
impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances), Reference to a previously prepared òr outside document should,
where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated.
Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals
contacted should be cited in the discussion.
This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies
normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in
whatever format is selected,
The explanation of each issue should identify:
a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and,
b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance.
P\otu330IF;nal SentlSectian 3 Checkl;O.dac
EV ALVA nON OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMP ACI'S Less Than
Significant
Potentially With Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant
I. AESTHETICS - Would the project: Impoct Incorporation Impact No Impact
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? 0 0 0 ~
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not
limited to, n-ees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings
within a state scenic highway? 0 0 0 ~
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or
quality of the site and its sUIToundings? 0 0 0 ~
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which
would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? 0 0 0 ~
ll. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In determining
whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant
environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the
California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment
Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of
Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts
on agriculture and farmland. Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farìñland, or Fannland
of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps
prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring
Program of the Califomia Resources Agency, to non-
agricultural use? 0 0 0 ~
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a
Williamson Act contract? 0 0 0 ~
c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which,
due to thèir location or nature, could result in conversion of
Farmland, to non-agricultural use? 0 0 0 ~
Ill. AIR OUALITY: Where available, the significance
criteria established by the applicable air quality management
or air pollution conn-ol district may be relied upon to make the
following determinations, Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable
air quality plan? 0 tJ 0 ~
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially
to an existing or projected air quality violation? 0 0 0 ~
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any
criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-
attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air
quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed
quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? 0 0 0 ~
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concenn-ations? 0 0 0 ~
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number
of people? 0 0 0 ~
P:\ctu330IFinal S""t\Section 3 Checkli~ doc
Less Than
Significant
Potentially With Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: - Would the project: Impact Incorporation Impact No Impact
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or
thrDUgh habitat modifications, on any species identified as a
candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or
regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California
Department ofFish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service? 0 0 0 181
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat
or other sensitive natural community identified in local or
regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California
Department ofFish and Game or U.S, Fish and Wildlife
Service?' 0 0 0 181
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected
wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.)
through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or
other means? 0 0 0 181
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native '
resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or
impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? 0 0 0 181
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting
biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or
ordinance? 0 0 0 181
1) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or
other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation
plan? 0 0 0 181
V. CULTURAL RESOURCES: - Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of
a historical resource as defmed in § 15064.5? 0 0 0 181
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of
an archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? 0 0 0 181
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological
resource or site or unique geologic feature? 0 0 0 181
d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred
outside of formal cemeteries? 0 0 0 181
VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS: - Would the project:
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial
adverse effects, including the risk ofloss, injury, or death
involving:
P\ctu33O1Fi""] ScntlSect;on 3 Checklistdoc
Less Than
Significant
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the Potentially With Less Than
most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map Significant Mitigation Significant
issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other Impact Incorporation Impact No Impact
substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of
Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. 0 0 0 181
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? 0 0 D 181
Hi) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? 0 0 0 181
iv) Landslides? 0 0 0 181
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? 0 0 0 181
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or
that would become unstable as a result of the project, and
potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading,
subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? 0 0 0 181
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defmed in Table 18-I-B
of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial
risks to life or property? 0 0 0 181
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the ùse of
septic tanks or altemative waste water disposal systems where
sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? 0 0 0 181
VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS:
Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of
hazardous materials? 0 0 0 181
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident conditions involving the release of hazardous
materials into the environment? 0 0 0 181
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely
hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter
mile of an existing or proposed school? 0 0 0 181
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government
Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a
significant hazard to the public or the environment? 0 0 0 181
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a
public airport or public use airport, would the project result in
a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project
area? 0 0 0 181
t) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,
would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing
or working in the project area? 0 0 0 181
P:\ctu330\Final Sent\Se";on 3 Checklist.doc
Less Than
Significant
Potentially With Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant
g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an Impact Incorporation Impact No Impact
adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation
plan? 0 0 ¡g 0
h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk ofloss,
injury or death involving wildland fires, including where
wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences
are intermixed with wildlands? 0 0 0 ~
VllI. HYDROLOGY AND WATER OUALITY: - Would
the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge
requirements? 0 0 0 ~
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere
substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would
be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local
groundwater table level (e.g" the production rate of pre-
existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not
support existing land uses or planned uses for which pennits
have been granted)? ~. 0 0 0 ~
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site
or area, including through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial
erosion or siltation on- or off-site? 0 0 0 ~
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site
or area, including through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of
surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on-
or off-site? 0 0 0 ~
e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the
capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems
or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoft'l 0 0 0 ~
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? 0 0 0 ~
g) Place housing within a IOO-year flood hazard area as
mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood
Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? 0 0 0 ~
h) Place within a I DO-year flood hazard area structures
which would impede or redirect flood flows? 0 0 0 ~
i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss,
injury or death involving flooding as a result of the failure of a
levee or dam? 0 0 0 ~
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? 0 0 0 ~
k) Potentially impact stormwater runoff ITom construction
activities? 0 0 0 ~
P'\ctu330\Fin,i Sent'Sect;on 3 Check"; doc
Less Than
Significant
Potentially With Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant
Impact Incorporation Impact No Impact
I) Potentially impact stonnwater runoff &om post-
construction activities? 0 0 0 ¡g¡
m) Result in a potential for discharge of stonnwater
pollutants &om areas of material storage, vehicle or equipment
fueling, vehicle or equipment maintenance (including
washing), waste handling, hazardous materials handling or
storage, delivery areas, loading docks or other outdoor work
areas? 0 0 0 ¡g¡
n) Result in a potential for discharge of stonnwater to affect
the beneficial uses of the receiving waters? 0 0 0 ¡g¡
0) Create the potential for significant changes in the flow
velocitY or volume of stonnwater runoff to cause
environmental harm? 0 0 0 ¡g¡
p) Create significant increases in erosion of the project site
or surrounding areas? 0 0 0 ¡g¡
IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING - Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community? 0 0 0 ¡g¡
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or
regulation ofan agency with jurisdiction over the project
(including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan,
local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the
purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effèct? 0 0 0 ¡g¡
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or
natural communitY conservation plan? 0 0 0 ¡g¡
X. MINERAL RESOURCES - Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availabilitY ofa known mineral
resource that would be of value to the region and the residents
of the state? 0 0 0 ¡g¡
b) Result in the loss of availabilitY of a locally-important
mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general
plan, specific plan or other land use plan? 0 0 0 [8J
XI. NOISE -
Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in
excess of standards established in the local general plan or
noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? 0 0 0 [81
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive
groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? 0 0 0 [81
PlcruDOIFina] SentlSwion 3 Ch"kl;,¡doc
Less Than
Significant
Potentiolly With Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant
c) A substantial pennanent increase in ambient noise levels Impact Incorporation Impact No Impact
in the project vicinity above levels existing without the
project? 0 0 ¡g¡ 0
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient
noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing
without the. project? 0 0 ¡g¡ 0
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a
public airport or public use airport, would the project expose
people residing or working in the project area to excessive
noise levels? 0 0 0 ¡g¡
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,
would the project expose people residing or working in the
project area to excess noise levels? 0 0 0 ¡g¡
XII.POPULA TION AND HOUSING - Would the project:
a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either
"directly (for example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of
roads or other infrastructore)? 0 0 0 ¡g¡
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing,
necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere? 0 0 0 ¡g¡
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing elsewhere? 0 0 0 ~
Xill. PUBLIC SERVICES
a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical
impacts associated with the provision of new or physically
altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically
altered governmental facilities, the construction of which
could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to
maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other
perfonnance objectives for any of the puhlic services:
Fire protection? 0 0 0 ~
Police protection? 0 0 0 ~
Schools? 0 0 0 ~
Parks? 0 0 0 ~
Other public facilities? 0 0 0 ~
P:I",330\Fin,1 SontlS",ion 3 Checkli>tdoo
Less Than
Significant
Potentially With Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant
XIV. RECREATION - Impact Incorporation Impact No Impact
a) Would the project increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational
facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the 0 0 0 !8J
facility would occur or be accelerated?
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require
the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which 0 0 0 !8J
might have an adverse physical effect on the environment?
XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC - Would the project:
a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation
to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system
(i.e. result in a substantial increase in either the number of
vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or 0 0 !8J 0
congestion at intersections)?
b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of
service standard established by the county congestion 0 - 0 0 !8J
-management agency for designated roads or highways?
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either
an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results 0 0 0 !8J
in substantial safety risks?
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g.
sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses 0 0 0 !8J
(e.g.. farm equipment)?
0 0 !8J 0
e) Result in inadequatè emergency access?
0 0 0 !8J
f) Result in inadequate parking capacity?
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs
supporting alternative transportation (e.g" bus turnouts, 0 0 0 !8J
bicycle racks)?
XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS -
Would the project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the 0 0 0 !8J
applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?
b) Require or result in the construction of new water or
wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause significant 0 0 0 !8J
environmental effects?
c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water
drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant environmental 0 0 0 !8J
effects?
Plctu330\Final SentIS",;o, 3 Checkli.doe
Less Than
Significant
Potentially With Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant
Impact Incorporation Impact No Impact
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the
project ftom existing entitlements and resources, or are new or
expanded entitlements needed? 0 0 0 [8J
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment
provider which serves or may serve the project that it has
adequaue capacity to serve the project's projected demand in
'addition to the provider's existing commitments? 0 0 0 [8J
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity
to accoinmodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? 0 0 ~
g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and
regulations related to solid waste? 0 0 0 [8J
h) Would the project include a new or retrofitted storm water
treatment control Best Management Practice (BMP), (e.g.
water quality treatment basin, constructed treatment wetlands),
the operation of which could result in significant
environmental effects (e.g. increased vectors and odors)? 0 0 0 ~
XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or
wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the nwnber or restrict the range of
a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of California history or
prehistory? 0 0 0 ~
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cuinulatively considerable? ("Cwnulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project
are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects
of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the
effects of probable future projects)? 0 0 0 ~
c) Does the project have environmental effects which will
cause substantial adverse effects on hwnan beings, either
directly or indirectly? 0 0 0 ~
P:lct0330IFi,.1 SentISe"i"" 3 Checkli~.doc
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC.
MARCH "OS
DRAFT INITIAL STUDY
TOSTIN/EL CAMINO GENERAL FLAN AMENDMENT
4.0 EXPLANATIONS TO THE CHECKLIST FORM
4.1 Aesthetics
Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
No Impact. According to the County General Plan's Resources Element, no open space/scenic
resources are located within or near the project study area. The Conservation/Open Space/Recreation
Element of the City's General Plan states that the Peters Canyon ridgeline is a prominent visual
feature in east Tustin that should be protected. The proposed General Plan Amendment will have no
effect on this or any other visual/natural resource within the City or the County,
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway?
~o Impact. There are no natural scenic resources located within the project study area (El Camino
Real between First Street and Newport Avenue [see Figure 2.1], nor is the project site located within
a State Scenic Highway. Part ofEl Camino Real, however, is within a historic resource area of the
City called the Cultural Resources Overlay District. It also passes through the Old Town commercial
district. The proposed project is to reclassifY a portion ofEI Camino Real from a four-lane Secondary
Arterial to a two-lane collector in the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan. Reducing the
designated number of lanes will not adversely impact scenic resources, On the contrary, the proposed
General Plan amendment may benefit the historic resource by maintaining a two-lane, pedestrian-
oriented roadway.
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its
surroundings?
No Impact. Please refer to discussion 4. I (a), above.
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect day or
nighttime views in the area?
No Impact. The proposed project does not involve construction of any kind and does not involve any
change to the existing street lighting, Therefore, the proposed project will not affect day or nighttime
views in the area relating to light, glare, shadows, or shading.
4.2 Agricultural Resources
In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects,
lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment
Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to
us in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project:
PI",,330\Fioal SeMIS'ctioo 4.doc «01/28/05"
4-1
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC.
MARCH 'OOS
DRAFT INITIAL srUDY
TusrlNln CAMINO GSNU" PLAN AMSNDMSNT
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance
(Farmland) as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Program of the California Resource Agency, to non-agricultural use?
No Impact. As described in Section 2, the proposed project will not result in any changes to the
existing two-lane conditions of this portion ofEI Camino Real. The City of Tustin (City) General
Plan and Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (State Department of Conservation, 2000) do
not identify any designated farmland in the project study area. Therefore, the proposed project will
not have an impact to designated farmland.
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract?
No Impact. There is no agriculturally zoned land, or land protected by a Williamson Act contract,
within the study area. Therefore, there will be no impact to agriculturally zoned or protected lands.
c) InvolVèotber changes in the existing environment which, due to their location-or nature,
could result in conversion of Farmland to nonagriculture?
No Impact. The proposed project is a General Plan Amendment to reclassify a portion of EI Camino
Real that will result in maintaining the existing two-lane configuration of the roadway, consistent
with the future two-lane build out condition identified in the MPAH. The proposed project will not
result in changes in the existing environment and therefore will not lead to the conversion of existing
farmland.
4.3 Air Quality
Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan?
No Impact. California is divided into 15 air basins for the purpose of managing the air resources of
the State on a regional.basis. Areas within each air basin are considered to share the same air masses
and are therefore expected to have similar ambient air quality. Additionally, the State is divided into
35 Air Pollution Control Districts (APCD) and Air Quality Management Districts (AQMD), which
are county or regional authorities that have primary responsibility for controlling air pollution. Air
basin boundaries may fall within the jurisdiction of one or more APCD/ AQMD.
The City is geographically located within the South Coast Air Basin (Basin). Air quality conditions in
the Basin are und.er the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD).
The SCAQMD regulates stationary sources of pollution throughout its jurisdiction area, Direct
emissions from motor vehicles are regulated by the California Air Resources Board (CARB). The
SCAQMD governing Board approved the 2003 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) in August
2003 and submitted it to the California Air Resources Board and the U.S. Environmental Planning
Agency for approval. The SCAQMD also establishes construction and operational emissions
thresholds for the Basin.
P:lctu330\Fin" SentISect;o" 4.due ,,0] /28/05.
4-2
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC.
MARCH 2OOS
DRAFT 'NITIAL STUDV
TUSTIN'EL CAM'NO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
The proposed project is a General Plan Amendment to reclassify El Camino Real between First Street
and Newport Avenue. The General Plan Amendment designates the roadway a two-lane collector,
consistent with existing conditions. Therefore, the proposed project will not result in a physical
change to existing conditions. The proposed General Plan Amendment is consistent with the adopted
MPAH.
New development within the City shall comply with the density and intensity standards outlined in
the Land Use Element and the City's current Zoning Ordinance. Implementation of the proposed
amendment to the Circulation Element will be consistent with the Land Use Element of the City's
General Plan. The City's Land Use Element, along with the plans of other cities and counties in the
region, are reflected in the assumptions for the land use, traffic, population, and air quality projections
. used to develop the AQMP. Therefore, the proposed project will not conflict with or obstruct
implementation of the AQMP,
In addition, the proposed project is intended to ensure consistency between the affected portion ofEI
Camino Real and the adjacent land uses by supporting the pedestrian-friendly cJ:¡aracter of the Old
Town commercial district. The two-lane roadway configuration and on-street diagonal parking are
consistent with the revitalization goals for Old Town by contributing to a pedestriaÌi-oriented
environment. The proposed project will support continued and increased pedestrian activity in this
area of the City, and is therefore consistent with the goal of the AQMP to implement land use patterns
that reduce overall vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled.
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air
quality violation?
No Impact. New development within the City is required to comply with the density and intensity
standards outlined in the Land Use Element and the City's current Zoning Ordinance. Implementation
of the proposed amendment to the Circulation Element will be consistent with the Land Use Element
of the City's General Plan, which is reflected in the assumptions for the projections used to develop
the AQMP.
The AQMP identifies a number of air pollution reduction goals, measures, and policies. Local
jurisdictions have been mandated to reduce a fair share proportion of vehicle pollution through the
adoption of a menu of optional transportation control measures (TCMs) that have been identified by
the local agency to be politically and economically feasible. In addition, the 2001 City General Plan,
Conservation/Open SpacelRecreation Element, includes air quality goals and policies intended to
reduce emissions through proper land use and transportation planning, implementation of
Transportation Demand Management (roM) programs, alternative transportation modes, and reduced
energy consumption.
The proposed project is consistent with the Land Use and Conservation/Open SpacelRecreation
Elements of the City's General Plan and with the MPAH. It will not result in a change to the existing
physical environment. It will result in the reclassification of the existing designation of this portion of
El Camino Real to one that accommodates lower traffic volumes. Some traffic that would have used
El Camino Real will be redistributed to adjacent, parallel streets; however, the overall traffic volumes
P:\ctu330\F;nol SontlSoct;on 4 doc «01/28/05»
4-3
LOA ASSOCIATES, INC.
MARCH ,."
DRAFT INITIAL STUDV
TuSTIN/n CAMINO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
in the vicinity of the project will remain essentially the same. In other words, the increased traffic
volume on adjacent streets would offset the lower traffic volumes on EI Camino Real. Total vehicular
emissions within the study area would remain similar before and after the proposed project. In
addition, the County of Orange is in attainment with the State CO standard, and no monitoring
stations in the County have recorded any CO exceedances in the.past five years. Therefore, the
proposed project is not expected to result in new, or contribute to existing, air quality violations.
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the
project region is nonattainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality
standard (including releasing emissions, which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone
precursors)?
No Impact. The proposed project is consistent with Land Use and Conservation/Open
SpacelRecreation Elements of the City's General Plan and with the MPAH. It will not result in a
change to the existing physical environment. It will result in the downgrade of the existing
designation of this portion ofEI Camino Real. Total vehicular emissions within the study area would
remain similar before and after the proposed project. Therefore, the proposed project will not
contribute to adverse, Cumulative air quality conditions.
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations?
No Impact. The proposed project is a General Plan Amendment to the City's Circulation Element
that will match existing conditions with proposed future conditions for the portion ofE! Camino Real
between First Street and Newport Avenùe. The project will not require construction activities;
therefore, there will be no construction air quality impacts to nearby uses. There will be no physical
change to the existing roadway configuration.
Changes in the number of vehicular trips associated with the proposed project would affect the traffic
at intersections and along roadway segments in the project vicinity. The primary mobile source
pollutant oflocal concern is carbon monoxide (CO). CO concentration is a direct function of vehicle
idling time and, thus, traffic flow conditions. CO disperses rapidly with distance from the source
under nonnal meteorological conditions. Typically, high CO concentrations are associated with
roadways or intersections operating at unacceptable levels of service or with extremely high traffic
volumes.
The Traffic Study (Appendix B) addressed 2020 traffic conditions in the study area under "with
project" conditions (El Camino Real at two lanes between First Street and Newport Avenue) and
"without project" conditions (El Camino Real at four lanes between First Street and Newport
Avenue). The traffic study found that under both conditions, the daily traffic levels on the street
segment and the study intersections would continue to maintain acceptable levels of service.
Therefore, the project is not expected to result in a substantial increase in pollutant concentration as a
result of traffic congestion. The County of Orange is in attainment with the State CO standard, and no
monitoring stations in the County have recorded any CO exceedances in the past five years, The
proposed project is not expected to result in any substantial changes in CO concentrations. Because
no CO hotspots are anticipated, no sensitive receptors would be affected by project-related local air
quality impacts.
P"w330\F;ns¡ S"t\Sect;on 4doc "01128/05,,
4-4
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC.
MARCH '.OS
DRAFT INITIAL STVDY
TVSTINIEL CAMINO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people?
No Impact. The proposed project will not require construction activity; therefore, there will be no
odors from the application of asphalt or paint. The project will not result in a change to existing
physical environment; therefore, no odors will be created.
4.4 Biological Resources
Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any
species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans,
policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service?
No Impact. The pro~t site is currently a two-lane road located in an urban area. There are no known
animal species inhabiting the site. The City and County General Plans (200 l, 2000) do not indicate
any sensitive or special status species on the project site.
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural
community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California
Department ofFish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service?
No Impact. According to Figure COSR-2 in the City's General Plan, the site has not been identified
as being the location of an important natural resource (i.e., a sensitive natural community). Peter's
Canyon Regional Park is identified as a significant natural resource in the City, and the site of the
proposed project is not located in or adjacent to the park.
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404
ofthe Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.)
through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means?
No Impact. The Lower Peters Canyon Retarding Basin contains a small amount of riparian habitat.
However, the wetlands are not in close proximity to the proposed project site and would not be
affected by the project. .
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or
wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or
impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
Plctu330\F;nal SentlSect;on 4.doc "OI/28/0S"
4-5
LSA ASSOCOATES. INC.
MARCH 'OOS
DRAFT INITIAL STVDY
TVSTlNIEL CAMINO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
No Impact. The project site is an existing roadway. It has not been identified as a crucial portion of
the migratory path of any animal species. Its usefulness to migratory species would be limited,
considering that it has no natural water sources or habitat.
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance?
No Impact. Two tree groups that are identified in the General Plan as important to the City are
eucalyptus windrow and redwood grove. The proposed project would not result in the removal of, or
otherwise adversely impact, these tree communities, No specific local policies or ordinances would be
violated by the proposed project.
t) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community
Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan?
No Impact. The Natural Community Conservation Plan (NCCP), as prepared by the County of
Orange Environmental Management Agency, covers a large portion of Orange County, including
portions of the City of Tustin. The proposed project is located outside the NCCP and will not conflict
with its policies.
4.5 Cultural Resources
Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in
CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.51
No Impact. Cultural resources are places, structures, or objects that are important for scientific,
historic, and/or religious reasons to cultures, communities, groups, or individuals. Cultural resources
include historic and prehistoric archaeological sites, architectural remains, engineering structures, and
artifacts that provide evidence of past human activity. They also include places, resources, or items of
importance in the traditions of societies and religions,
CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5 defines historic resources as any object, building, structure, site,
area, place, record, manuscript, or other resource listed or detennined to be eligible for listing by the
State Historical Resources Commission, a local register of historic resources, or the Lead Agency.
Generally, a resources is considered to be "historically significant" if it meets one of the following
criteria:
is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of
California's history and cultural heritage;
is associated with the lives of important persons in the past;
embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or
represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values; or
P\"o330IF;nal S,nt\S,"'on 4.doo ,,01/28/05»
4-6
LSA ASSOCIATES. INC.
MARCH 2G.'
DRAFT INITIAL srUDY
TVsrlNISL CAMINO "EN<RAL PLAN AMENDMENr
has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history.
El Camino Real between First Street and Newport Avenue is within an area of the City known as Old
Town. The Old Town District characterizes the City's historical and architectural focus,
The area south of First Street, and on either side of Camino Real, is a City designated Cultural
Resources District. The purpose of the district is to provide a :&amework for recognizing, preserving,
and protecting culturally significant structures, natural features, sites, and neighborhoods within the
City of Tustin.
The proposed reclassification of this portion ofEI Camino Real is intended to allow for the
continuation of the existing on-street diagonal parking and to support the pedestrian focus of the Old
Town District. The pedestrian-friendly nature of the street is consistent with the historical and
architectural context of the adjacent land uses, including Old Town and the adjacent Cultural
Resources District. Therefore, there are no adverse effects associated with maintaining El Camino
Rea] in current conditions on the historic character and historic resources in Old Town,
b) Cause a substantial adverse-change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursu-
ant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5?
No Impact. The proposed project will not result in any construction activities, including grading, and
therefore will not impact any archaeological resources.
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic
feature?
No Impact. The proposed project will not result in any construction activities, including grading, and
therefore will not impact any paleontological resources,
d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries?
No Impact. The proposed project will not result in any construction activities, including grading, and
therefore will not impact any interred human remains.
4.6 Geology and Soils
Would the project:
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of
loss, injury, or death involving:
(i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other
P:\ctu330\Flnal SentlSectlon 4 doc <cOl/28/05»
4-7
LSA ASSOCIATES, 'NC.
"A'CH ,.oo
D,.,T INlrlAL STUDY
TUSTIN,.L CA..INO GEN"AL PLA. A"ENDMENT
substantial evidencès of known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geological Special
Publication 42.
No Impact. The Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zones Act was signed into law in 1972. In 1994, it
was renamed the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act (A-P Act). The primary purpose of the
Act is to mitigate the hazard of fault rupture by prohibiting the location of structures for human
occupancy across the trace of an active fault. The A-P Act requires the State Geologist (Chief of the
California Geology Survey) to delineate "Earthquake Fault Zones" along faults that are "sufficiently
active" and "well-defined." The boundary of an "Earthquake Fault Zone" is generally about 500 feet
from major active faults and 200 to 300 feet from well-defined minor faults. The A-P Act dictates that
cities and counties withhold development permits for sites within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault
Zone until geologic investigations demonstrate that the sites are not threatened by surface
displacements from future faulting. There are no known active or suspected potentially active faults
within the City of Tustin (City General Plan, Public Safety Element, 2001).
(ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
No Impact. No faults have been mapped immooiately near the City, although several major faults lie
within 10 to 45 miles of the City. Therefore, the City would experience decreased magnitude or lesser
ground shaking from an adjacent fault rupture. Development within the City will be designed and
constructed in accordance with requirements of the latest edition of the Uniform Building Code
standards and applicable City requirements, Adherence to these requirements will reduce potential
impacts associated with new construction to a less than significant level. The proposed project does
not result in new construction but rather a General Plan Amendment to maintain existing conditions,
The segment of EI Camino Real does not include any bridges or overpasses that would be subject to
seismic evaluation and retrofit. The portion ofInterstate 5 adjacent to El Camino Real was upgraded
in the mid-1990s and is in compliance with seismic safety requirements. Therefore, the proposed
project will not expose people or structures to substantial adverse effects associated with strong
seismic ground shaking.
(m) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction?
No Impact. Liquefaction is a process by which water-saturated materials (including soil, sediment,
and certain types of volcanic deposits) lose strength and may fail during strong ground shaking.
Liquefaction is defined as "the transformation of a granular material from a solid state into a liquefied
state as a consequence of increased pore-water pressure,"
The project study area is not located within an area subject to liquefaction as defined in the County of
Orange General Plan Safety Element (Figure IX-12). Therefore, the proposed project is not expected
to expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects associated with liquefaction.
(iv) Landslides?
No Impact. The study area's flat topography minimizes the potential for landslides, liquefaction,
settlement, or other seismically related hazards. Furthermore, new development within the City will
Plotu330\Fi,,1 S,"t\Sect;on 4.doc "OI12810S"
4-8
LOA ASSOClArES, INC.
MA'C. "OS
DRAFT 'NITIAL srUDY
TUSTIN/n CAMINO GENE'AL PLAN AMENDMENT
be designed and constructed to meet the most current safety standards included in the Unifonn
Building Code and/or standards established by the City, The proposed project does not involve new
construction and will not increase any risks associated with landslides.
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?
No Impact. The proposed project will not require earthmoving activities, which would expose soils
and thereby increase the potential for erosion or loss of topsoil. Therefore, the proposed project will
not result in soil erosion or loss of topsoil.
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a
result of the project, and potentially result in 00- or off-site landslides, lateral spreading,
subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
No Impact. Refer to Responses 6a(iii) and 6a(iv),
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code
(1994), creating substantial risks to life or property?
No Impact. Expansive soils have a significant amount of clay particles that can give up water
(shrink) or take on water (swell). The change in volume exerts stress on buildings and other loads
placed on these soils. The occurrence of these soils is often associated with geologic units having
marginal stability. The distribution of expansive soils can be widely dispersed, and they can occur in
hillside areas as well as low-lying alluvial basins.
Expansive soils are not identified in the County General Plan. The proposed project will result in the
maintenance of the existing two-lane condition of this segment ofEl Camino Real. The proposed
project does not involve any new construction and therefore will not create risks associated with
expansive soil.
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative
wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater?
No Impact. The proposed project will result in the maintenance of the existing two-lane condition of
this segment ofEl Camino Real and will have no effect on sewer availability.
4.7 Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport,
use, or dispOSàl of hazardous materials?
Plctu330\Flnal SentlSect;on 4.doc "01/28/05,,
4-9
LSA ASSOCIATES. INC.
MARCH "OS
DRAFT INITIAL STUDY
rUSTIHIEL CAMINO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
No Impact. The proposed project involves a General Plan Amendment to reclassify a portion of
El Camino Real from a four-lane Secondary Arterial to a two-lane local collector roadway to be
consistent with the MP AH. The proposed project will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of
hazardous materials, nor demolition or construction activity.
The City of Tustin is concerned with hazardous materials that are transported through the planning
area either by aboveground transport or via underground pipeline. The City follows the Orange
County Hazardous Waste Management Plan (1991), which contains policy direction and action
programs to deal with incidences of hazardous waste emissions goals to prevent hazardous material
emergencies include having transportation routes to safely transport any hazardous materials.
The Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS), located on Barranca Parkway between Jamboree Road and
Red Hill Avenue in Tustin, is identified as a source of hazardous materials. Identification and clean
up of hazardous waste disposal sites on military bases occurs under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation Liability Act (CERCLA), The Department of the Navy
would implement CERCLA policies for the MCAS. The MCAS is located over two miles from the
project site and poses no threat to the site.
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably
foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into
the environment?
No Impact. Refer to Response 4.7(a), above.
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances,
or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?
No Impact, According to Thomas Brothers Maps (2003), there are no existing school sites within
one-quarter mile of the project site. Therefore, there are no impacts associated with this issue. Also,
refer to Response 4.7(a), above.
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled
pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant
hazard to the public or the environment?
No Impact. The proposed project involves a General Plan Amendment to reclassify a portion of
El Camino Real from a four-lane Secondary Arterial to a two-lane collector roadway to be consistent
with the MP AH. The project does not involve grading, demolition, or construction; therefore, a search
of known hazardous material sites in the vicinity of the project site is not warranted.
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result
in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area?
Plclu330\F;",¡ S,ntlSection 4.doc "01/28/05,,
4-10
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC.
MARCH "0'
ORAFT INITIAL STUDY
TUSTIN/EL CAMINO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
No Impact. The proposed project location is over four miles from John Wayne Airport and is not
located within the John Wayne Airport land use plan. The landing flight path of aircraft, however, is
near or over the project site location. Generally, if a site is greater than two miles away from an
airport and it is not under a direct flight path, then the impact and safety threat from the airport is
negligible. Safety hazards related to this issue are anticipated to be less than significant.
t) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety
hazard for people residing or working in the project area?
No Impact. There are no private airstrips identified in close proximity to the proposed project
location. The proposed project will not affect or be affected by private airstrips.
g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan
or emergency evacuation'plan?
Less Than Significant Impact. El Camino Real is an existing Evacuation Route, according to Figure
PS-l of the Public Safety Element of the City's Generalltlan. The City's Emergency Operations Plan
identifies routes through the City that are suitable for use as evacuation routes. The Public Safety
Element of the General Plan states that the extent and severity of a disaster wíll determine which
routes and which directions people may take in order to escape the afflicted areas. El Camino Real is
identified as an existing evacuation route that terminates at First Street and Jamboree Road. EI
Camino Real does not provide a direct connection to major freeways or to major arterials in other
communities, and as such is the only evacuation route that is entirely contained within the City limits.
While the reconfiguration of the affected portion ofEI Camino Real reduces its capacity, its current
status as an evacuation route wíll not be adversely impacted. As the Public Safety Element of the
General Plan states, the extent and severity of a disaster wíll determine which routes and which
directions people may take in the event of an emergency; therefore, the reconfiguration of one of
many existing evacuation routes will not impair implementation of or physically interfere with the
adopted emergency response/evacuation plan.
The proposed project does not involve demolition or new construction, nor wíll it induce population
growth. The area immediately surrounding the project site is fully built out and is not anticipated to
increase in occupancy. Therefore, it is not anticipated to increase a need for emergency response or
the re-routing of evacuation plans.
h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland
fires, including where wildlauds are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are
intermixed with wildlands?
No Impact. The project site is located in an urban area with no wildlands in close proximity, The
project does not involve the construction of any residential or commercial areas. Therefore, the
project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss,. injury, or death from
wildfires,
P:lctu330\Final SentlSect;on 4.doc "OI/28/0S»
4-11
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC.
MARCH ...S
DRAFT INITIAL STUDY
TUSTlN,.L CAMINO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
4.8 Hydrology and Water Qnality
Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements?
No Impact. The proposed project is a General Plan Amendment that will allow the continuation of
the existing roadway configuration. There will be no change to existing water quality or discharge
requirements as a result of the project.
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or inteñere substantiaUy with groundwater
recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volnme or a lowering of the local
groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to
a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have
been granted)?
No Impact. The proposed project is a General Plan Amendment to reclassify a portion of El Camino
Real from a four-lane Secondary Arterial to a two-lane collector roa~ay to be consistent with the
MPAH. The proposed project would not cause any long-term interference with groundwater recharge
or affect existing aquifer volumes because the project does not involve construction, Therefore, there
are no impacts associated with depletion of groundwater supplies.
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the
alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial
erosion or siltation on- or otI-site?
No Impact. The project site is an existing road located on relatively level topography. The site is not
in close proximity to a stream or river, nor would runoff from it be expected to enter a stream or river
and alter its course. The existing drainage pattern would remain unchanged as a result of the proposed
General Plan Amendment. The proposed project would not alter existing drainage, and no significant
impacts associated with erosion or siltation are anticipated.
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the
alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of
suñace runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site?
No Impact. The proposed General Plan Amendment would not alter existing drainage conditions nor
would it cause flooding to the area,
e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity ofexisting or planned
stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff?
No Impact. The proposed project is a General Plan Amendment to aIIow the maintenance of the
existing roadway configuration. It wiII not create or contribute runoff water. Existing storm drain
Plotu330\F;nal SentlSect;on '.doc «01128/05»
4-12
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC.
MARCH 1OOS
DRAFT INITIAL STUDY
TUSTINIEL CAMINO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENr
capacity will not be affected, nor will the project increase polluted runoff. The proposed project will
not substantially increase sources of polluted runoff.
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality?
No Impact. The proposed project is a General Plan Amendment to reclassifY a portion ofEI Camino
Real from a four-lane Secondary Arterial to a two-lane collector roadway to be consistent with the
MPAH. The proposed project will not change or degrade water quality.
g) Place housing within a tOO-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard
Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map?
No Impact. The proposed project does not include the addition of new housing. According to the
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Iñsurance Rate Map (FIRM), the project
site is not located in a special flood hazard area (IOO-year or less floodplain); therefore, there are no
impacts associated with housing and flood hazards. Source: FIRM Map No. 06059COO30 E,
September IS, 1989. -
h) Place within a tOO-year flood hazard area structures which wonld impede or redirect flood
flows?
No Impact. While the proposed project site is located in a 500-year floodplain, it does not incJude the
addition of new structures. Therefore, there are no impacts associated with structures redirecting flood
flow. Source: FIRM Map No, 06059CO030 E, September 15,1989.
i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk ofloss, injury or death involving flooding,
including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam?
No Impact. The project site is not located in the vicinity of a large body of water with a levee or a
dam, nor does the project involve the construction of homes or any other structures. Therefore, there
is no impact associated with damage from the failure of a levee or a dam associated with the proposed
project.
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow?
No Impact. A seiche is an oscillation of a landlocked body of water that can cause water damage to
buildings, roads, and infrastructure that surround the body of water. There is no such body of water
located in the City of Tustin. Therefore, impacts to the project study area associated with seiches will
not occur. The project site is over 20 miles from the Pacifjc Ocean or any body of water that could
cause tsunami, also know as a tidal wave, to the area. There is no risk of tsunami associated with the
project. The project is located on relatively level topography, is not adjacent to hills or mountains that
could be the source of mud flow or landslide, and is therefore not at risk for mud flow damage.
P:\ctu3JO\F;nal SentlSect;on 4 doc "01128105,,
4-13
LSA ASSOCIArES. INC.
MARCH "0'
DRAFT '"ITIAL STDDY
rD'TlNIEL CAMINO GEN"AL 'LA' AMENDMENT
k) Potentially impact stormwaterrunofffrom construction activities?
No Impact. The proposed project is a General Plan Amendment to allow the maintenance oftbe
existing roadway configuration. There are no new construction activities associated with this action.
The proposed amendment will not result in a change to existing runoff conditions.
I) Potentially impact.stormwater runoff from post-construction activities?
No Impact. The proposed project is a General Plan Amendment that will allow the continuation of
the existing roadway configuration. There will be no change to existing stormwater runoff as a result
of the project.
m) Result in a potential for discharge of stormwater pollutants from areas of material storage,
vehicle or equipment fueling, vehicle or equipment maintenance (including washing), waste
handling, hazardous materials handling or storage, delivery areas, loading docks or other
outdoor work areas?
The proposed project is a General Plan Amendment to reclassify a portion orE! Camino Real from a
four-lane Secondary Arterial to a two-lane collector roadway to be consistent with the MPAH. The
project does not include areas of material storage, vehicle or equipment fueling, vehicle or equipment
maintenance, waste handling, hazardous materials handling or storage, delivery areas, loading docks
or other outdoor work areas. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in a potential for
discharge of storm water pollutants as a result of these uses.
n) Result in a potential for discharge of stormwater to affect the beneficial uses of the receiving
waters?
No Impact. The proposed project is a General Plan Amendment that will allow the continuation of
the existing roadway configuration. There will be no change to existing stormwater runoff as a result
of the project, and therefore no potential to affect the beneficial uses of the receiving waters.
0) Create the potential for significant changes in the flow velocity or volume of stormwater
runoff to cause environmental hanD?
No Impact. The proposed project is a General Plan Amendment that will allow the continuation of
the existing roadway configuration. There will be no change to existing stormwater flow velocity or
volume as a result of the project.
p) Create significant increases in erosion of the project site or surrounding areas?
No Impact. The proposed project is a General Plan Amendment that will allow the continuation of
the existing roadway configuration. There will be no change to existing stormwater runoff as a result
of the project; and therefore no increase in erosion potential for the project site or surrounding areas,
P:I",330lF',,] SentlSee,;" 4.doc "OII28!OS"
4-14
LOA ASSOCIATES, INC,
MARCH >OOS
DRArT INITIAL STUDY
TUSTlNIEL CAMINO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
4.9 Land Use and Planning
Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community?
No Impact. The proposed project would result in the maintenance of the existing roadway
configuration as a two-lane undivided roadway with on-street diagonal parking, Previously, this
roadway segment of EI Camino Real was a four-lane undivided arterial street with parallel on-street
parking. The reconfiguration and downgrading of the roadway was undertaken by the City and the
OCT A in November 1997 as. a demonstration project. The purpose of the proposed amendment to the
City's Circulation Element is to (1) achieve consistency with the MPAH designation, (2) reflect the
existing and future traffic levels on the roadway segment, and (3) ensure consistency between the
roadway and the adjacent land uses by supporting the pedestrian-friendly character of the Old Town
commercial district. The purpose of the demonstration project was to document the existing and
define the future impacts of the redesignation of the roadway. The results of the Traffic Study
(Appendix B) indicate that 2020 traffic conditions, both with and without the project, would maintain
acceptàble daily traffic levels and intersection operations.
The proposed project is an amendment to the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan to
institutionalize existing conditions and the MPAH designation of the roadway. The two-lane
configuration and on-site diagonal parking are consistent with the revitalization goals for Old Town
to create a pedestrian-oriented environment. The proposed project does not divide an established
community; rather, it creates a stronger connection between the land uses on both sides of the street
by creating better pedestrian access.
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy or regulation of an agency with
jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan,
local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or
mitigating an environmental effect?
No Impact. El Camino Real between First Street and Newport Avenue lies within an area that is
designated as Old Town Commercial on the City's Land Use Policy map. The Old Town Commercial
designation includes retail, professional office, and service-oriented business activities that serve Old
Town and surrounding areas. The proposed project is consistent with, and furthers the intent of,
several goals of the Land Use Element of the General Plan.
Goal 3: Ensure that new development is compatible with surrounding land uses in the community, the
City's circulation network, availability of public facilities, existing development constraints, and the
City's unique characteristics and resources,
By downgrading the classification orE! Camino Real within the Old Town district, the roadway
classification will be compatible with the surrounding Old Town commercial uses, characterized by
historic buildings and a pedl<strian orientation.
P:lctu330IF;nal SentlSec';on 4.doc ,,01/28/05»
4-15
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC.
MARCH "OS
DRAFT INITIAL STUDY
TUSTINIEL CAMINO GENERAL 'LAN AMENDMENT
Goal 5: Revitalize older commercial, industrial, and residential uses and properties.
The proposed General Plan Amendment to maintain the existing configuration ofEI Camino Real in
the Old Town district will support the revitalization efforts that rely on the historic character and
pedestrian orientation of this unique commercial area.
Goal 10: Improve and strengthen the Tustin Old Town/First Street area with a unique pedestrian
environment and a diverse mix of goods, services, and uses,
The Land Use Element of the General Plan (page 21) states, "The development character of Old
Town and the First Street area can be significantly enhanced by greater integration ofresidential uses
and physical renovations to existing buildings and street ITontages which promote a pedestrian
orientation." The proposed reclassification ofEI Camino Real from a Secondary Arterial to a
collector in order to maintain the existing street configuration furthers the intent of this goal by
maintaining a pedestrian-tTiendly environment. A collector street is characterized by slower speeds
than the speeds of a Secondary Arterial. Additionally, the provision of on-street diagonal parking has
a traffic calming effect and reduces travel speeds due to parking and backing-out maneuvers, The
future street width will be two lanes instead of four lanes, which will allow for eàSier pedestrian street
crossing. Finally, on-street parking provides convenient access to commercial establishments'11nd
reduces the need to provide additional public parking away tTom Old Town land uses,
In addition to the general goals and policies in the Land Use Element, specific development guidance
is provided for this area through the First Street Specific Plan and the Town Center Redevelopment
project. The First Street Specific Plan encompasses approximately one mile along the First Street
commercial corridor tTom central Tustin at Newport Avenue to the SR-55 &eeway, The plan is
intended to define the entry into Tustin tTom the west and to provide access to Old Town and the
Civic Center. All development activities within this area of the City are subject to the provisions of
the First Street Specific Plan. All development within the redevelopment project area is subject to
design review and confonnity with the redevelopment plan by the Redevelopment Agency.
The proposed project is located within the Town Center Redevelopment Plan area. The Town Center
Redevelopment Plan was approved in 1976 and has been amended several times since then. The
objectives of the plan include creating a mixed-use town center, revitalizing the El Camino Real
section of the redevelopment area, and increasing the level of capital improvements. The proposed
redesignation of El Camino Real to a two-lane collector roadway is consistent with the redevelopment
plan's intent of". . . encouraging business development, attracting new customers to the area,
alleviating pass-through traffic congestion and conflict, and improving safety."
The portion ofEI Camino Real that intersects with First Street is located within the First Street
Specific Plan (1985) area, which extends tTom Newport Avenue to the Newport Freeway. The
Specific Plan provides the land use regulations and design guidelines to maintain and enhance the
uses along First Street, create an attractive entrance to the City, rehabilitate facades and signage,
improve vehicular circulation, and maximize pedestrian movement and access, As noted previously,
the proposed General Plan Amendment to reclassify a portion ofEI Camino Real tTom a four-lane
Secondary Arterial to a two-lane collector is consistent with the pedestrian-orientation of the area
where it intersects with First Street and furthers the intent of the First Street Specific Plan.
P:\ctu330\F;,,1 SentlSect;on 4doc "0]/28/05,,
4-16
LSA ASSOCIATES. INC.
MARCH 'OOS
DRAFT INITIAL STUDY
TUSTINIEL CAMINO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural communities?
No Impact. The City does not have a habitat conservation plan, and there are no natural communities
in the study area. No impact would occur from the implementation on the proposed project.
4.10 Mineral Resources
Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the
region and the residents ofthe state?
No Impact. According to Figure VI-3 found in the County's General Plan Resources Element, no
mineral resources are located in the project site. There are no impacts associated with mineral
resources.
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery-site
delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? .
No Impact. According to the County General Plan, there are no locally important mineral resource
sites on the project site, There are no impacts associated with this issue.
4.11 Noise
Would the project result iu:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the
local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
No Impact. The Noise Element of the General Plan identifies the noise contours for the build out
conditions of the Land Use Policy Map, The General Plan noise contours were developed based upon
existing and future traffic conditions, train operations, and other environmental conditions. The Noise
Element defines the 60 dB CNEL contour as the noise impact area. Any proposed new noise sensitive
land uses, such as residences, hospitals, schools, and churches, within the contour are to be evaluated
on a project-specific basis.
The 2010 Noise Map (Noise Element Figure N-l) identifies the study area for the EI Camino Road
redesignation as within the 60+ CNEL dB area. The Noise Element also notes that residences next to
. a number of major and secondary arterials in Tustin are exposed to a CNEL in excess of 65 dB,
including El Camino Real. Noise levels below 65 dB are generally considered compatible with
residential uses, and noise levels up to 70 dB are generally considered compatible with most
commercial uses (Noise Element, Table N-2, Land Use Noise Compatibility Matrix),
The proposed redesignation of this segment ofEI Camino Road will allow the maintenance of the
existing roadway configuration. Some residences along the street frontage may currently experience
noise in excess of 65 dB, However, noise levels on the road are not expected to change as a result of
P:letu330IF;n" SentlSection 'doc «01 128/05"
4-17
LSA ASSOCIATES. ONC,
MARCH "'S
DRAFT "ITIAL STUDY
TDSTINIEL CAMINO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
the project. Noise levels with the project may be less than what is accommodated for in the 2010
General Plan noise conditions if the 20 I 0 noise modeling reflected the planned four-lane roadway
configuration. The proposed project will not result in a substantive increase in noise levels compared
with existing conditions; therefore, there will be no increase in noise exposure.
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne
noise levels?
No Impact. The proposed project involves a General Plan Amendment to reclassify a portion of
El Camino Real trom a four-lane Secondary Arterial to a two-lane collector roadway. The
downgrading of the roadway to match existing conditions will not result in an increase in
'groundborne vibration or noise levels.
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels
existing without the project?
Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed General Plan Amendment will allow the existing
roadway configuration to continue in the future. Small increases in traffic may occur within the
existing roadway as a result of growth and deveiopment in the surrounding areas; however, the
proposed project will not cause land use growth beyond what is already planned for in the General
Plan. Therefore, the project will not result in an increase in overall ambient noise levels. Some traffic
that would have used EI Camino Real when it was four lanes will now use parallel streets as a result
ofthe reduction of travel lanes, The increased traffic on parallel streets will result in an increase in the
traffic-related noise levels on those parallel streets. The Traffic Study (Appendix B) indicates that
South B Street experiences a 5 to 10 percent increase in traffic as a result of the reconfiguration ofEI
Camino Real. South C Street and Prospect A venue experience a 1 percent increase in traffic, A 10
percent increase in traffic volumes would result in an increase ofOA dBA in traffic noise, which is
not perceptible to the human ear. The incremental nature of the change in traffic levels is further
documented in the Traffic Report, Figures 9 and 10, which illustrate an average daily traffic level of
5,800 in 2020 without the project and 5,900 in 2020 with implementation of the project (continuation
of existing conditions), The increase of the daily traffic volumes trom 5,800 to 5,900 would result in
less than a 0.1 dBA increase in traffic noise, a negJigible change. The incremental changes to traffic
levels on streets that currently handle relatively low volumes of traffic is not sufficient to result in
significant changes in traffic-related noise levels.
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity
above levels existing without the project?
Less Than Significant Impact. See Response 4,ll(c) above,
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles ofa public airport or public use airport, would the project expose
people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
P\ctu3301F;nol S.ntlSw;on 4 doc "01128/05,,
4-18
LSA ASSOCIArES, INC.
MARCH 1005
DRAFT INITIAL STUDY
rUSTINIEL CAMINO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
No Impact. The project area is within two miles of the fonner Marine Corps Air Station Tustin
(MCAS- Tustin); however, the fonner base was conveyed by the Department of the Navy to the City
of Tustin, the Local Redevelopment Authority as designated by federal law. Nonaviation reuse plans
are currently underway for the fonner base.
The project is located over three miles ftom John Wayne Airport and is well outside the 60 dB and 65
dB aviation noise contour. The project is not within the airport land use plan or within two miles of
the airport and will have no impact on aircraft noise exposure levels.
t) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people
residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
No Impact. The proposed project is not located within the vicinity of a private airstrip.
4.12 Population and Housing
Would the project:
a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing
new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other
infrastructure) ?
No Impact. The proposed project involves a General Plan Amendment to reclassify a portion of
El Camino Real from a four-lane Secondary Arterial to a two-lane collector roadway. The
downgrading of the roadway to match existing conditions will not result in an increase in roadway
capacity or traffic levels that could have growth-inducing effects. Future growth and development of
the City is defined in the General Plan, including the Land Use and Growth Management Elements.
The proposed project is consistent with these EJements and will not result in a change to the future
population growth of the City,
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere?
No Impact. The proposed project will allow the maintenance of the existing two-lane configuration
of this portion ofE! Camino Real with on-street diagonal parking. The project does not involve any
new construction; therefore, no housing units will be displaced.
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement
housing elsewhere?
No Impact. Please refer to the response 12(b).
P:lctu330\F;nal SentlSection 4doc "01/28/05,,
4-19
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC,
MARCH ,.OS
DRAFT INITIAL STUDY
TUSTINln CAMINO CENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
4.13 Public Services
a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the
provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically
altered governmental facilities, the constrnction of which could cause significant
environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or
other performance objectives for Fire Protection, Police Protection, Schools, or Parks?
No Impact. The proposed project is to reclassifY a portion ofEI Camino Real fÌ"om a four-lane
Secondary Arterial to a two-lane collector in the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan. The
proposed project will not add new structures to the area or induce population growth. Therefore,
governmental facilities will not be affected by the proposed project.
4.14 Recreation
a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood ,and regional parks or other
recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur
or be accelerated .
No Impact. The proposed project will not increase population and housing in the area, and the
demand for recreational facilities will not increase. Therefore, existing recreational facilities in the
area will not be impacted by the proposed project.
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of
recreational facilities that might have an adverse physical effect on the environment?
No Impact. The project site is not located in or adjacent to a City or County recreational facility and
will not require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities. Therefore, implementation of
the project will not have a physical environmental impact relating to recreational facilities.
4.15 Transportationrrraffic
Would the project:
a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and
capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of
vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)?
Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed General Plan Amendinent to reclassifY a portion of
EI Camino Real will not cause an increase in traffic. The Traffic Study (Appendix B) addressed 2020
conditions with EI Camino Real as a two-lane roadway ("with project" conditions) and as a four-lane
roadway ("without project" conditions). The study considered other changes to land use and traffic
conditions that would occur over this period, including the redevelopment of Marine Corps Air
Station (MCAS) Tustin base and the extension of Newport Avenue to the south. The traffic study
assumed MCAS traffic model projections where possible (two locations) and a traffic growth rate of
1.0 percent per year to existing volumes at four study intersections. The growth rate was considered
PI",,330\F',,' S"tlS"t'O" 4.doc «01/28/05«
4-20
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC.
MARCH "..
DRAFT INITIAL STUDY
TDSTIN/EL CAMINO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
. conservative to represent a "worst-case" projection. A midblock arterial volume-to-capacity (v/c)
analysis provided a general overview of roadway operation under both "with" and "without project"
conditions, Intersection capacity utilization (lCU) analyses were conducted based on a.m. and p.m.
peak-hour intersection turn volumes and the intersection approach lanes. Six study intersections were
analyzed in order to address the potential impact of maintaining El Camino Real at two lanes on other
streets and intersections. The selected study intersections were:
El Camino ReallFirst Street
El Camino ReallMain Street
El Camino ReallNewport Avenue
Main StreetlNewport Avenue
Main StreetIProspect Avenue
Prospect AvenuelFirst Street
See Figure 4,1 for information regarding existing traffic volumes and the location of study
intersections. Figure 4.2 illustrates 2020 peak-hour traffic volumes with the project (two lanes), and
Table 4.A summarizes the intersection analysis.
The traffic study concluded the following:
All of the study intersections currently operate at acceptable levels of service (LOS) during the
a.m. and p.m. peak hours.
Year 2020 traffic conditions "without project" were evaluated and showed that acceptable LOS
values for the daily traffic analyses and the six study intersections are maintained.
Under "with project" conditions where the MPAH Amendment (two lanes on El Camino Real) is
assumed to be in place, the street segment (daily traffic analyses) and study intersections continue
to operate at an acceptable LOS. No significant traffic impacts are anticipated as a result of the
El Camino Real redesignation.
No significant traffic-related impacts are expected for any jurisdictions outside of the City.
b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level ofservice standard established by the
City congestion management agency for designated roads or highways?
No Impact. The aCTA is the congestion management agency for Orange County, The Orange
County Congestion Management Plan (CMP) generally consists of a composite of submittals ftom
local agencies, in which each localjurisdiction develops the required data in accordance with the
guidelines established by the aCTA. The aCTA compiles the data and submits the results to the
Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) for a finding of regional consistency. Based
on the success of the demonstration project and the results of the traffic study, the aCTA approved an
amendment to the MPAH to reclassifyEI Camino Real between First Street and Newport Avenue to a
two-lane collector road. The proposed project is a General Plan Amendment to the City's Circulation
Element to create consistency with the adopted, countywide MP AH, Therefore, the proposed project
is consistent with the standard established by the congestion management agencies.
P:\ct,330\F;nal SentlS,ct;on 4.doc «01128105"
4-2]
119.0001
1STST
119.0001
~~.
'" 0
2 0
;¡¡ co
ð
...J
W
~~
t; g
~ ex)
~ ~
MAlNST
19.9001
110.2001
~
Legend
. Study Intersections
110.2001 Dally Traffic Volumes
L SA
FIGURE 4.1
NO SCALE
Tustin/El Camino
Existing Daily Volumes
(2 Lanes)
SOURCE: r>am, Study Fonhe Mast"PlanAr"'¡o' Highwoy (MPAH)
Arnendm'"t orEI Comlno Rea'. WPA Wlld,n, Moy 10, 2001.
1:ICfU3301GIDaily YoL,'" (711/03)
",If ~
N!:
~.,' \..130/2-4<4
;ø~:;
~ 777/76B --- ~ 641/699
f 110/119 '1STST "';t~ f 54/24
",¡r 168/250.1 ",t¡r
S69/9S2-+- SO2IaB2--+-
140/227, ø-... 30/3~ g¡;g¡
- \II
~ ~ ;¡¡~~
~ ~ it ~ ...;",
CD I i
CD"'...¡¡
~N~ \. 57/50 \II!
ø-Sn \11-
N-- "
~ 44B/434 """
...;+~ f 64/85 ø- ... \. 91/132
MAINST ..J ~ ~ 409/290
35/49.1 ",+¡r 87/132..J 40/60 ..J ~
3661344 -+- 323/433 -+- 240149O-+-
102/120", ",¡¡¡I\i 133/32 ~ ,....
:!!~~ if!
~...",
CD!!! ) t?'
Leç¡end
. Study Intersections
10/15 AMlPM Peak Hou'r Volumes
L SA
FIGURE 4.2
NO SCALE
SOURCE: Traffic Study Fo, the M",c> PI" A>tetiel H;ghwey (MPAH)
Am"dm,n' orEI Cem;noReal, WPA WHd", Mey 10,2001.
Tustin/EI Comino
2020 Peak Hour Volumes
(With Project 2 Lanes)
1:\CfU330IG\2020 P,ak.od, (7/1/03)
EI Camino Real & I A I 0.32 I A I 0.47 I A I 0.39 I A I 0.59 I A I 0.38 I A I 0.55
1st Street
2 I El Camino Real & I A I 0.44 I A I 0.54 I A I 0.56 I C I 0.72 I A I 0.54 I B 1,0.66
Main Street
3 I EI Camino Real & I A I 0.53 I B I 0.68 I A I 0.49 I C I 0.79 I A I 0.49 I C I 0.77
Newport Avenue
41 Main Street & I B I 0.64 I B I 0.62 I B I 0.65 I B I 0.65 I B I 0.64 I B I 0.65
Newport Avenue
51 Main Street & I A I 0.39 I A I 0.52 I A I 0.48 I B I 0.63 I A I 0.44 I A I 0.40
Prospect A venue
Prospect Avenue & I A I 0.43 I A I 0.58 I A I 0.52 I 8 I 0.70 I A I 0.49 I 8 I 0.63
61 1st Street
L S ^
TABLE 4.A
Tustin/El Gamino
Intersection Analysis Summary
City of Tustin
'oICfU330\G\Analy';' S"mmory.od, (711/03)
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC.
MARCH "'S
DRAFT ¡NlrIAL STUDY
TUSTIN/EL CAMINO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a
change in location that results in snbstantial safety risks?
No Impact. The proposed project will result in the maintenance of the existing roadway configuration
of EI Camino Real between First Street and Newport A venue, Maintaining the existing roadway
configuration will have no impact on air traffic patterns.
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous
intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
No Impact. The proposed project will result in the maintenance of the existing roadway configuration
ofEI Camino Real between First Street and Newport Avenue, There will be no change to the existing
roadway geometries or to the existing intersections. Therefore, there will be no increase in traffic
hazards.
e) ~esult in inadequate emergency access?
Less Than Significant Impact. EI Camino Real is identified as an existing Evacuation Route
according to Figures PS~l of the Public Safety Element of the City's General Plan. The proposed
project will result in the maintenance of the existing roadway configuration between First Street and
Newport Avenue. Current emergency access and evacuation conditions would not change as a result
of the project. Please see also response to 4.7 (g).
I) Result in inadequate parking capacity?
No Impact. Additional parking has been created as a result of changing El Camino Real from a four-
lane roadway to a two-lane roadway with on-street diagonal parking. The proposed General Plan
Amendment will result in the maintenance of the existing roadway configuration and therefore has a
beneficial effect on parking in the Old Town commercial district.
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation
(e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)?
No Impact. The City provides access to several fonns of alternative transportation such as buses,
walking trails, and bike paths. The Circulation Element of the City's General Plan identifies existing
public bus routes and existing and proposed bikeways. El Camino Real between First Street and
Newport Avenue is currently served by a bus route; however, it is neither an existing or proposed
bikeway. The existing two-lane configuration with on-street diagonal parking is a more pedestrian
friendly environment than the four traffic lanes that existed prior to the demonstration project. The
proposed project will maintain the existing pedestrian-oriented conditions and will not preclude
continued bus service to the study area.
P:ktu330\F;n,1 SentIS"';on 4.doc "DI/28/05"
4-25
LOA ASSOCIATES, INC.
MARCH '.05
DRAFT INITIAL STUDY
TUSTIN,.L CAMINO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
4.16 Utilities
Would the project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality
Control Board .
No Impact. The proposed project is to reclassify a portion of El Camino Real ITom a four-lane
Secondary Arterial to a two-lane collector in the Circulation Element oftbe City's General Plan. The
proposed project will not add new structures in the area, increase population in the area, or require
construction. Therefore, utilities will not be affected by implementation of the proposed project,
b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or
expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
No Impact. Refer to Response 4.16(a), above.
c) Require or result in tbe construction of new storm water drainage facilities. or expansion of
existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects?
No Impact. Refer to Response 4. I 6(a), above.
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and
resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed?
No Impact. Refer to Response 4. I 6(a), above.
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve
the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition
to the provider's existing commitments?
No Impact. Refer to Response 4.16(a), above.
1) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid
waste disposal needs?
No Impact. Refer to Response 4.16(a), above,
g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste?
No Impact. Refer to Response 4.16(a), above.
P:lctu330lFinal SentlSect;on 4doc «01/28/05,.
4-26
LSA ASSOCIATES. INC.
MARCH ""
DRAFT INITIAL STUDY
TUSTINIEL CAMINO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
h) Would the project include a new or retrofitted storm water treatment control Best
Management Practice (BMP) (e.g. water quality treatment basin, constructed treatment
wetlands), the operation of which could result in significant environmental effects (e.g.
increased vectorS and odors)?
No Impact. The proposed project is a General Plan Amendment that will allow the continuation of
the existing roadway configuration. There will be no change to existing storm water runoff treatment
as a result of the project, and therefore no implementation of new or retrofitted storm water treatment
control measures.
4.17 Mandatory Findings of Significance
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self-sustainiug levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the
number or...estrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory?
No Impact. The proposed project will result in the maintenance of tile existing roadway configuration
fòrthe segment ofEI Camino Real between First Street and Newport Avenue. Sensitive species and
cultural resources are not present within the existing right-of-way of the roadway.
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable?
Cumulatively considerable means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable
when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current pro-
jects, and the effects of probable future projects)?
No Impact. The proposed General Plan Amendment will allow the existing configuration of the street
to remain, without adversely affecting nearby streets or intersections. The project will not make any
substantial adverse contributions to cumulative impacts. The project may result in beneficial effects
on land uses adjacent to the roadway and has been demonstrated to enhance revitalization of the Old
Town area by supporting pedestrian orientation of the commercial district.
c) Does the project have environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly or indirectly?
No Impact. The proposed downgrading of this segment ofEl Camino Real will further the goals of
the Land Use Element of the General Plan and support the continued revitalization of the Old Town
district. There are no substantial direct or indirect adverse effects.
P:\clu330\>;,,1 Senl\Sectwo 4.doc «01128105"
4-27
LSA ASSOCIATES. INC.
MARCH "OS
DRAFT INITIAL STVDY
TUSTINIKL CAMINO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENr
APPENDIX A
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
P\CTU330ISENnAppendix.doc ,<0311512005"
Secondary: A four-lane undivided roadway, with a typical right-of-way
width of 80 feet and a curb-to-curb pavement width of 64 feet. These
roadways serve as collectors, distributing traffic between local streets, and
major and primary arterials. For the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan, 80-foot
right-of-way was modified to a 92-foot right-of-way to provide a painted
median for two-way left tum lanes and Class II bicycle lanes.
Collector: A two-lane undivided roadwav. with a minimum right-of-wav
width of 66 feet and a minimum curb-to-curb width of 50 feet. The width
mav be increased to accommodate roadwav features such as bicvcle lanes. on-
street parking. and turn lanes, At LOS "C." this road type accommodates UP
to approximatelv 10.000 vehicle trips per dav. This road functions as a
collector facilitv. however it tends to move traffic between two arterials rather
than between local streets. it has been added to the Citv's arterial highwav
svstem because it provides network continuitv and is regionallv significant,
and mav serve through traffic demand where projected volumes do not
warrant a higher classification such as Secondary.
The Circulation Element roadway classification system does nOt include
private streets, Private street widths and cross-sections will vary from those
described for roadways in this Element. Standard cross-sections represent the
obvious and accepted answer to most situations. However, the standard
cross-sections do not always provide the best solution to any given need or
set of objectives. Reasonable flexibility and variety is provided for in the
City's private street standards.
Figure C-l shows schematic cross sections of each category of arterial
roadway. These sections represent desirable standards, but variation in right-
of-way width and specific road improvements will occur in certain cases due
to physical constraints and/or right-of-way limitations. In particular, the
median width in eight-lane, six-lane and four-lane roadways wiJI vary
according to the area being served and the available right-of-way constraints
and turn lane requirements. Hence, any of the arterial classifications may
deviate from the standards where physical constraints exist or where
preservation of community character dictates special treatment. Bikeway
facilities are another factor which affect the specific standards applied for
various facilities.
The desirable goal for every classified street section is that it carry the
designed volume of traffic at the desired level of service. Within this
requirement, descriptions of width and facilities are offered as basic
guidelines and as noted above, variation in design is expected, depending on
CITY OF TUSTIN
GENERAL PLAN
20
CIRCULATION ELEMENT
April 18,2005
.'
~I
~
"
1-t1
72'
56'
r---ï
ß,LANE MAJOR ARTERIAL 144' R/W .
H
~
60'
44'
m
~
6-LANE MAJOR ARTERIAL 120' R/W
~
50'
35'
~j
PRIMARY ARTERIAL 100' R/W
,kl
~
-
46'
36'
SECONDARY ARTERIAL 92' R/W
(WTI1I CLASS 11 BICYCLE LANES)
~
-
I :~:
---
SECONDARY ARTERIAL 80' PJW ,
40'
82'
~'
~
33'
25'
COLLECTOR ARTERIAL 66' R/W
SOURCE: Austin-Foust Associates, Inc.
City ofTustin
IIIIJJJIr! ~
Muoh 21, 2005
21
72'
50' '
ri
. ,r--'
60'
44'
14
,r--'
. 50'
35'
rl
46'
33'
rl
~
p
--'
33'
25'
rl
~
. Figure C-1
Typical Cross-Sections
Table C-4
LAND USE AND TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY
- 1993 - -- Future--
Land Use Category Units Amount ADT Amount ADT
1. CITY OF TUSTIN 1. Resideolial DU 17,604 148,213 29,790 250,672
2. ConJmercialiOfficel!nd. TSF 11,926 275,434 28,555 625,744
3. Other 43,241 79,197
Sub-Total 466,888 955,613
2, SPHERE OF INFLUENCE 1. Residential DU 8,146 101,043 8,363 103,343
2. CommeccialiOfficellnd. TSF 75 2,513 113 2,467
3. Other 19,089 19,635
Sub.Total 122,645 125,445
TOTAL I. Residenlial DU 25,750 249,256 38,153 354,015
2. CommercialiOfficellnd. TSF 12,001 277,947 28.668 628,21 I
3. Other 62,330 98,832
Sub-Total 589,533 1,081,058
Note: DU = Dwelling Units, TSF = Thousand Square Fee~ ADT = Average Daily Traffic
The "Other" land use category refers to schools, churches, hospitals, hotels, parks, etc.. which do not bave a square foot based trip
rate (see trip rates in Appendix A). The square footage, eqIrivaients are shown in parenthesis to provide consistency with the data
given in the Land Use Element
Source: City ofTostin General Plan Amendment Trffic Study, Austin-Foust Associates, October 1995.
GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION SYSTEM
The goals and policies included in this Element emphasize the need for a circulation
system that is capable of serving both existing and future residents while preserving
community values and character. The location, design, and constituent modes of the
circulation system have major impacts on air quality, noise, community appearance, and
other elements of the environment.
The highway network designated in the Arterial Highway Plan is illustrated in Figure C-
2, and indicates all of the designated Major arterials, Primary arterials, Secondary
arterials, Collector arterials, and the sections of roadway designated for modified right-
of-way or augmented capacity. Table C-5 provides an additional description of the
Arterial Highway Plan links. Discussions on sections of roadway for which these two
qualifiers are proposed as follows:
CITY OF TUSTIN
GENERAL PLAN
27
CIRCULATION ELEMENT
April 18,2005
II
'ì
....
~
,~......""
~
'0011"" ILVO
""'TA
~
¡ E
!1
Æ
OooCE
r.
l'
NORTH not to scale
SOURCE: Austin-Foust Associates, Inc.
City of Tustin
".~q;
LEGEND
- Major (8 lanes)
- Major (6 lanes)
_K- Modified Major (6 lanes)
- Primary (4 lanes)
-K- Modified Primary (4 ianes)
-, Secondary (4 or 2 lanes)
-----; Augmented Roadways
- City Boundary
- , , ..' Planning Area Boundary
"""C- Collector (2 lanes)
D~jtq! ~
Figure 0-2
Arterial Highway Plan
M",h 21, 2005
28
(
TABLE C-5
ARTERIAL HIGHWAY
Link Classification Link Classification
ArmsIrong/so Loop Rd N Secondary Irvine wlo Yorba , Major (A)
ArmsIrong slo Warner Secondary Irvine wlo Prospect Major (A)
Armstrong % Bammca ' Secondary Irvine <10 Prospect Major
Irvine <10 Holt Major
Bammca <10 Red Hill MBjor Irvine <10 Newport Major (M, A)
Bammca wlo Von Karman Major Irvine wlo Red Hill Major (M, A)
Barranca wlo Jamboree Major Irvine wlo Browning Major (M, A)
Irvine wlo Tustin Rancb Major (A)
Browning slo Irvine Secondary Irvine <10 Tustin Rancb Major
Browning slo Bryan Secoodary Irvine wlo Jamboree Major
Browning % Nisson Secondary Jamboree % Tustin Ranch Rd. Major
Browning s/o Nisson Secondary Jamboree slo Tustin Ranch Road Major
Bryan elo Newport Secondary
Bryan wlo Red Hill Secondary Jamboree slo Portola Major
Bryan wlo Browning Secoodary Jamboree slo Irvine Major (A)
Bryan wlo Tustin Rancb Primary Jamboree slo Bryan MBjor(A)
Bryan wlo Myford Primary Jamboree slo EI Camino Major (A)
Bryan wlo Jamboree Primary Jamboree slo Walnut Major
Jamboree slo Edinger Major
Del Amo slo Edinger Secondary Jamboree slo Warner Major
-
East Coonectar slo Edioger Secoodary Loop Rd <10 Red Hill Secoodary
Loop Rd N <10 ArmsIrong Secondary
Edinger wlo Del Amo Major Loop Rd wlo Tustin Rancb Secondary
Edinger wlo Red Hill Major Loop Rd N <10 Tustio Rancb Secondary
Edinger <10 Red Hill Major Loop Rd slo Warn.. Secondary
Eding.. wlo Tustin Rancb Major Loop Rd S <10 Tustin Rancb Secondary
Edinger <10 Tustio Ranch Majo, Loop Rd S <10 ArmsIrong Secondary
Eding.. wlo Jarnboree Major
Edinger <10 Jamboree Major Main wlo EI Camino Real Primary
Main <10 EI Camino Real Primary
EI Camino slo I" ~ Maio <10 Pruspect Secoodary
EI Camino slo Main ~ Main <10 Newport Primary
EI Camino <10 Newport Secondary Primary
EI Camino <10 Red Hill Secondary McFaddeo wlo Williams Primary
EI Camino <10 Browning Secoodary McFadden <10 Williams
EI Camino <10 Tustin Ranch Secoodary
EI Camino <10 Myford Primary McFadden wlo Walnut Primary
McFadden wlo Newport Primary
l"w/oYorba Primary
1"<loYorba Primary Myford slo Irvine Secondary
l"w/oProspect Primary Myford slo Bryan Secoodary
I" wlo Newport Primary Myford slo EI Camino Real Secondary
Mydord % Walnut Secondary
Harvard % ICD Secondary
Harvard slo ICD Primary Newport % Irvine Primary (A)
Harvard % Warner Primary Newport % Holt Primary (A)
NewportsioHolt Primary (A)
Holtslo 17' Secondary Newportslo 1" Primary (A)
Holt slo Irvine Blvd. Secoudary Newport %Main Prinwy (A)
Newport O/C EI Camino Real Primary (A)
Newport slo El Camino Primary (A)
CITY OF TUSTIN
GENERAL PLAN
29
CIRCULATION ELEMENT
APRIL 18, 2005
LU A"OCUTE'. 'NC.
MANCH ""
DNAFT INITIAL nuoy
Tun'N/EL CAM'NO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
APPENDIX B
TRAFFIC STUDY
P'\CTU330\SENTlApp'ndix.doc ,,03115/2005»
ill ŒMA~ I~ 4U1~1 Œ @i
I
TUSTIN PUBUC WORKS DEPT.
TRAFFIC STUDY
FOR THE.
MASTER PLAN OF ARTERIAL HIGHWA Y(MPAH)
AMENDMENT OF EL CAMINO REAL
Prepared for:
City of Tustin.&.OCTA
Prepared by:
WP AlWilldan
27042 Towne Centre Drive, Suite 270
Foothill Ranch, California 92610 .
May 10, 2001
\Xl ~~~1g~~
27042 Towne Centre Drive, Suite 270
Foothilllùlncl:l, Calffomia 92610
949/470-8840 fax 949/770-9041
www,wllldan.com
May 10, 2001
Mr. Douglas Anderson
Senior Project Manager - Transportation
City of Tustin
300 Centennial Way
Tustin, CA 92680
SUBJECT:
TRAFFIC STUDY FOR THE MASTER PLAN OF ARTERIAL HIGHWAYS
(MPAH) AMENDMENT OF EL CAMINO REAL .
Dear Mr. Anderson:
The enclosed Traffic Study' presents a summary of our traffic analyses arid findings related to
the proposed MPAH Amendment of EI Camino Real for the section located between First
- -
Street and Newport Avenuè, in the City of Tustin. These analyses are based upOn field
studies conducted by our staff, information provided by the. City of Tustin, long range traffic
model data, previously completed ,studies and standard reference materials. The primary
purpose of this evaluation is to identify any potential traffic impacts that may result from the
project and recommend mitigation measures as may be necessary. These analyses can
serve to determine if acceptable traffic operations can be maintained 'for' both current and
future conditions, if the proposed project is implemented.
We appreciate the opportunity to serve you, through our work on this important project. If we
can be of further assistance or need to respond to any questions, please do not hesitate to
contact us. We trust that this study will be of assistance to OCT A and the City of Tustin.
Respectfully submitted,
WPA TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
A Division of Willdan
ø~ /:1 ~.
Steven S. Sasaki, P.E. .
Registered Professionai Engineer.
State of California Numbers C52768 & TR1462
TABLE OF CONTENTS
DESCRIPTION
PAGE NUMBER
INTRODUCTION.,.... ......................................................... ....................... ......1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION........................... .:...................................................1
EXISTING DESCRIPTION,.....,.......,.................................................................4
EI Camino Real,....................................'................................................4
Newport Avenue........................ ..............................,.............................4
Main Street...... """""""""""""" """""""""""""""""""'" ......... .......7
First Street............ """""""""""""""""""""" ..;....,............ ...............7
Prospect Avenue................................... ....... ...... ....::.............................7
Daily Traffic. Analyses........ """"""""""""""""" ..... ....,..............,..... .....8
Intersection Analyses...... """"""""""""'" """""""""""""" ...............13
FUTURE CONDITIONS WITHOUT PROJECT....................... .............................14
Traffic Projection Methodology...................... """"""'" """"""""""""" .15
Daily Traffic Analyses.. """""""""""""""""""""'" ....................,...... .20
Intersection Analyses................................ .......... ......... :...................... ..20
FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT..........................................................20
Daily Traffic Analyses.................. ..... ...,...... ......... ..... .................... ..... ...24
Intersection Analyses.................. """"""""""" """"""""""""'" .........24
IMPACTS TO OTHER JURISDICTIONS..,................................................ .........24
SUMMARY..,..............................,.........,......,...,...........................................25
WPA Traffic Engineering
(A Division of Willden)
Job # 12680
EJ Cemlno Reel MPAH Amendment
City of Tustin
LIST OF FIGURES
i
FIG. NO.
DESCRIPTION
PAGE NO.
1
2
3
4
5
6
'7
8
9
10
11
12
SITE MAP....................................................................................2
EL CAMINO REAL ROADWAY CONFIGURATION..............................3
. . , .
EXISTING MPAH ROADWAY NETWORK.........................................5
OLD TOWN COMMÈRCIAL DISTRICT BOUNDARIES........................ 6
STUDY INTERSECTION LOCATIONS.............................................9
EXISTING DAIL Y VOLUMES (2 LANES)......................................... 10
EXISTING PEAK HOUR VOLUMES (2 LANES)................................11
REDISTRIBUTION OF FUTURE TRIPS (4 LANES)........................... 17
YEAR 2020 DAILY VOLUMES (WIO PROJECT- 4 LANES)................. 18
YEAR 2Ò20 PEAK HOUR VOLUMES (WIO PROJEGT- 4 LANES)...... 19
YEAR 2020 DAILY VOLUMES (WIPROJECT -2LANES)..................22
YEAR 2020 PEAK HOUR VOLUMES (W/PROJECT -2 LANES).........23
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE NO. DESCRIPTION
PAGE NO.
1
2
DAILY TRAFFIC ANAL YSES SUMMARY........................................ 12
INTERSECTION ANAL YSES SUMMARY........................................21
WPA Traffic Engineering
(A Division of W/Ildan)
Job # 12680
Ii
EI Camino Real MPAH Amandment
CIty of Tustin
INTRODUCTION
This report presents a summary of our traffic analyses and findings related to the proposed
MPAH Amendment of EI Camino Real for the section located between First Street and Newport
Avenue, in the City of Tustin. These analyses are based upon field studies conducted by our
staff, information. provided by the City of Tustin, long range traffic model data,. previously
completed studies and standard reference materials. The primary purpose of this evaluation is
to Identify any potential traffic impacts that may result from the project and recommend
mitigation measures as may be necessary. It is important to deteITTline if acceptable traffic
operations can be maintained for both current and future conditions, if the proposed project is
implemented.
. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This report analyzes the effects of amending a street segment of EI Camino Real between First
Street and Newport Avenue from a four lane "Secondary" arterial to a two lane "Locar collector
roadway. This roàtlwaysegment of EI Camino Real has a north-south a11gnment before it
transitions to a northwest-southeasterly alignment between Sixth Street and Newport Avenue.
The overall study street segment. of EI Camino Real is also located within the City of Tustin's
Old Town Commercial District, which supports a mixture of retail and ~omme"cial uses including
various public improvements to provide a more pedestrian oriented environment. Figure 1
illustrates the location of the proposed project in relationship to the surrounding street system.
In November 1997, the City of Tustin, in coordination with the Orange County Transportation
Authority (OCT A), approved a demonstration project to reduce the number of travel lanes on EI
Camino Real between Second Street to Sixth Street from a four lane undivided Secondary
arterial street to a two lane undivided Local collector street with diagonal parking along both
sides of the street (Figure 2 provides a representation of the EI Camino Real study section).
With more than three years of experience since its implementation, the existing and future
impacts of the proposed Amendment are better defined. The potential operations of EI Camino
Real and the surrounding roadway network, resulting from the proposed Amendment and
change in the roadway capacity (on EI Camino Real) is documented and. summarized in the
following sections of this report.
WPA Traffic Engineering
(A Division of Willdan)
Job # 12680
EI Camino Real MPAH Amendment
City of Tustin
EI Camino Real Reclassification
JOB# 12680
WP A lRAFFIC EN~INEERIN~
A DIVISION OF WILLDAN
Legend
-$-
No Bcale
FIGURE'
Site Location Mal
- Study Area Boundary
~
"'-
"
y""," LOT
f I!
CAMINIO
5iXlH 'ÍlRËtT
E L
MAIN SJRE£T
MAIIi S1ÄÈET
lHlRD S1REtT .
E L C A MI NO~' .
I
REA L
SECOND SlREET
W. .... 1IWF1C "'-
. IIMSION Of WI1J)AH
----......
---..-
!
I ¡
i.
,i!
R
A-L
MAIN srREET
:t
"
RGURE 2
EL CAMINO REA!- ROADWAY CONFIGURATION
FIRST . STREET T(j) SOUTH OF SIXTH STREET
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The existing conditions serve to provide a .preview" of the effects of the proposed MPAH
Amendment (two lanes) on EI Camino Real. This roadway has been operating under geometry,
consistent with. the proposed MPAH Amendment conditions, for several years. This allows
stronger documentation of the potential impacts of the project, since the future operations
presently exist and the analyses are based on conditions measured in the field (through counts),
which are representative of the proposed MPAH Amendment conditions.
The existing MPAH is illustrated in Figure 3, which reflects a four-lane roadway for the study
section. This also provides an overview of the study section and its relationship to other Master
Plan roadways. The number of lanes and conditions indicated In FiguÌ'e 3 are not necessarily
representative of existing field conditions, but show the current long-range plan. The current
status of some pertinent study area roads and their operations, are further addressed below.
It is also Important to note that EI Camino Real is central to the Old Town commercial district as -
illustrated in Figure 4. A revitalization plan for the Old Town area was developed by the City of
Tustin In approximately 1991 and many elements can presently be seen in the area. There are
on-going efforts to continue implementation of the plans and a significant element is the
. proposed MPAH Amendment for EI Camino Real. There was a significant amount of focus on
this roadway and the development, which, is and would be adjacent to EI Camino Real.
EI Camino Real presently has two undivided lanes from Sixth Street to Second Street and has
a general north-south alignment. Four travel lanes are provided north and south of this section.
On-street diagonal parking is available on both sides of EI Camino Real through the two-lane
section, with some restrictions. EI Camino Real south of Sixth Street curves into a northwest-
southeast alignment and is a four lane undivided roadway with no on-street parking. A speed
limit of 25 miles per hour (MPH) is posted. The proposed project would result in maintenance of
this roadway configuration as a two-lane undivided roadway with on-street diagonal parking.
Previously, this roadway segment on EI Camino Real was a four-lane undivided arterial street
with parallel on-street parking.
Newport Avenue is a four-lane divided roadway in the study area and has a general northeast-
southwest direction. A raised median divides the four travel lanes with 35 miles per hour (MPH),
WPA Traffic Engineering
(A Division of Wilfdan)
Job # 12680
4
EI Camino Real MPAH Amendment
City of Tustin
rn
'<t
-$-
No Scale
IRVINE BLVD
6M
6M
,..
'" (.)
II> N
Z
(.)
N
, ~
;,c
b rn
w '<t
g;
~
11.
4P
4P .
E 1STST
4P
~
2NDS 3!
.,.. Ii;
'" 2C z
II> (,) rn rn I ~
'" '" '<t "'"
3RD
(.) (.) ~ 2C
N N
EMAlNS1:..
4P 4P 4P
0
z
rn -
(.) "'" ~
N
611-1 ST
2C 2C
¡¡
Legend
6M MAJOR (6 LANES)
4P PRIMARY (4 LANES. DIVIDED)
4S SECONDARY (4 LANES, UNDIVIDED)
2C LOCAL COLLECTOR (2 LANES)
EI Camino Real MPAH Amendment
wprrRAfFI~ ~NGINE~RING
A DIVISION OF WILLDAN
FIGURE 3
Existing MHAH Roadway Network I
c
:'1 ~'j ')I"I~;"
,¡,,
\i .'..
EI Camino Real MPAH Amendment
Wr81RAfFI~ ENGINEERING
A DIVISION OF WILLDAN
FIGURE I.
Old town Commercial District Boundrie
speed limit posted. No on-street parking is allowed. Newport Avenue provides ramp
connections at the 1-5 Freeway for travel to and from the north. The southem terminus of
Newport Road is presently south of Sycamore Avenue, just north of the railroad tracks.
Main Street is a two-lane undivided roadway in the immediate study area and has an east-west
direction. The posted speed limit is 35 miles per hour (MPH). On-street parking is allowed with
some restrictions. To the west, Main Street becomes Chestnut Avenue in the City of Santa Ana
and terminates at Grand Avenue. In an easterly direction, there' are four travellanes.east of
Preble and Main Street transitions to become Bryan Avenue.
FIrst Street is a four-lane divided roadway in the study area and has a general east-west
direction. A two-way 1eftturn lane divide ! the four travel lanes In the study area and the posted
speed limit is 30 miles per hour (MPH). On-street parking Is allowed with some restrictions: To
the west, First Street continues through the City of Santa Ana and eventually becomes Bolsa
Avenue. To the east, First Street terminates in Tustin at Red Hili Avenue.
Prosoect Avenuè is a' two-lane undivided roadway between Main ::;treet (me soU1herly
terminus) and FIrst Street with a north-south alignment. A speed limit of 25 miles per hour
(MPH) Is posted. On-street parking is allowed with no restrictions in the two-lane section. To
the north of First Street, Prospect continues as a four lane divided roadway to 17th Street, where
there is an 'offset" before it continues further to the north.
Prior to evaluation of the existing conditions, it is necessary to determine the scope of work for
the proposed project. In compliance with OCTA procedures and policies regarding reque !tsfor
MPAH Amendments, the City of Tustin developed a scope of work with OCTA as P¡Ùt of the
Cooperative Study Agreement. Pursuant to the agreed upon scope between the aCTA and
City Staff, six study intersections were analyzed in order to address the potential impact of the
project. The study intersections are:
WPA Traffic Engineering
(A Division of Willdan)
Job # 12680
7
EI Camino Real MPAH Amendment
City of Tustin
+
+
+
+
+
+
EI Camino RealI First Street
EI Camino RealI Main Street
EI Camino RealI Newport Avenue
Main Street I Newport Avenue
Main Street I Prospect Avenue
Prospect Avenue I First Street.
Existing field data were collected for use in the analyses, which included the information shown
in Figure 5. These existing approach lanes (Figure 5) at the study intersections are critical to
the intersection analyses and in addition, factors such as driveway locations; type of adjacent
development,general circulation patterns and other related information were noted but not
illustrated. The existing conditions analyses also required collection of existing daily traffic
volumes and AM/PM peak hour counts at the six study intersections, which can be referenced In
Figures 6 and 7, respectively.. The dally traffic count information serves to provide more
general evaluations of roadway operations to supplement the more detailed existing (and future)
intersection analyses.
Dailv Traffic Analvses
The daily volume traffic analyses provide a general assessment of the current roadway
conditions and can serve as a "baseline" for evaluation of the project related impacts~ These
analyses were based on current dally traffic volumes, compared to the existing roadway
capacities established by the County of Orange, as well as previously included in the Orange
County Congestion Management Program (CMP) document. The CMP previously required mid-
block analyses as a part of the City's annual reporting procedures. The existing daily volumes
used are based on the most recent counts conducted by the City of Tustin, Table 1 includes
the County daily traffic "Capacities", applicable to the varying types of existing roadway
segments found in the study area.
The daily capacities shown. in Table 1 are representative of maximum roadway operations
(Level of Service "E") and serves as a base for volume to capacity reviews. The street segment
roadway operations are typically evaluated through 'comparison of existing daily traffic volumes,
divided by the theoretical (LOS E) capacities in order to provide a volúme to capacity (V/C) ratio.
This V/C ratio then provides a measure for evaluating the roadway performance. Ranges of
VIC ratios relate to varying Leve!s of Service (LOS), which is further explained below. For the
WPA Traffic Engineering
(A Division of Willdan)
Job # 12680
8
El Camino Real MPAH Amendment
City of Tustin
~
~
("
¿.. ~ ¡""
~
'~
!!
:ï
13
..;¡
U/
\.
~
..; ~ \... 7
¿.. "\ tr--
T .'
1STST
U/
~
t5
U/
5;
ff
0.
....; .k ~.
l~ ("
~ ~¡""
T
~. \.
-+-
~
~
MAIN ST
Leç¡end
. Study Intersections
EI Camino Real MPAH Amendment
WIJrrRAFFIL ~NGINE~RING
A DIVISION OF WlLLDAN
FIGURE 5
Study Intersections
119,0001
1STST
119,0001
I
I,
,I
l
I
~
~~
ti 8
æ co
~. '<t
...
!~o.
z 0
~ CD
..I
W
MAIN ST
I 9,900 1
110,2001
Legend,
. Study Intersections
110,2001 Dally Traffic Volumes
]
]
I
]
1
. EI Camino Real MPAH Amendment
I wpr1RAFFI~ ENGINEERING
I A DIVISION OF WlLLDAN
FIGURE 6
Existing Daily Volumes
(2 Lanes)
TABLE 1
DAILY TRAFFIC ANALYSIS SUMMARY
EI Camino Real (ECR,
--NeWport to Main
. Two Lanes, Undivided 15,000 9,900 I 0.66-8
. FourLane~ UnmWded 25,000
--Main to 1s
. Two Lanes, Undivided 15,000 7,300 I 0.48.A
. Four Lanes, Undivided 25,000
Prospect Avenue
--Main to 1s I~-A
. Two LaneS,Undivided I 15,000 I 4,800 I 0.32-A' l. 5,800 I 0.39-A I 5,900
Main Street
--ECR to Pros ect
. Two Lanes, Undivided 15,000 0.83-D
. Four Lanes, DMded 37,500 0.33-A
1st Street,
-ECR to Prospect
. Four Lanes, Divided 37,500 0.6o:.A 0.62-B
(a) If the MPAH Amendment .Project" is not implemented, there are four lanes.
(b) If the MPAHAmendment .Project" ~ implemented, .there are two lanes.
(c) SOURCE:; County of Orange and Orange County CMP documents.
City of Tustin; a VIC ratio of 0,90, which relates to a Level of Service "D" (LOS D), has been
established as the maximum acceptable level of service for the roadway system.
The purpose of these performance criteria is to specify target levels of service 'on the arterial
highway system. Traffic LOS values are. qualitative descriptions of roadway operations and
designated in terms of letters "A" through "F," with LOS "A" representing free flow conditions and
LOS "PO representing severe traffic congestion. The portion of the overall capacity used by the
existing (and future) traffic determines the LOS assigned to a particular roadway. The City of
Tustin requirements are consistent with generally recognized standards of acceptable roadway
operations (LOS D, which relates to about 90 percent of the capacity). The qualitative, technical
roadway operation description for each of the LOS "letters" is contained in AppendIx A.
The results of the daily traffic analyses are shown in Table 1. The VIC ratios for the study area
street system~ based on the existing volumes and existing road geometry, show acceptable
LOS results. This is of particular relevance to the proposed MPAH Amendment, ~nce the
reduction of roadway capacity on EI Camino Real from a four-lane Secondary. arterial to a two-
lane Local collector roadway has been in existence for several years and the effects are
reflected in Table 1. In other words, the present roadway capacities (which include the two
lanes on EI Camino Real) provide acceptable levels of service for the area streets. Table 1
shows that EI Camino Real and the surrounding roadways are all operating at LOS D or better.
It should be recognized that the street segment (mid-block) analyses are more general
indicators of traffic operations due to the various inherent assumptions included In these'
evaluations. The intersection analyses provide a more detailed verification of traffic conditions.
A summary of the analyses for the study intersections, agreed to be the focus of the evaluation
within this cooperat1vestudy between the aCTA and the City of Tustin, is presented below.
Intersection Analvses
The recent AM and PM peak hour intersection counts conducted by the City of Tustin, at the six
study intersections, served as bases for documenting existing conditions. These existing traffic
volumes were' combined with the current intersection geometric information, then incorporated
. .
into the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology of intersection analysis. The ICU
methodology is the required procedure for Orange County CMP evaluations and widely utilized
in the Southern California area.
WPA Traffic Engineering
(A Division of Wi/ldan)
Job # 12680
13
EI Camino Real MPAH Amendment
City of Tustin
In this methodology, the critical intersection volumes are divided by the available lane capacities
and other "lost" time is considered, resulting i~ an ICU value for the study location. The ICU
value is then related to a Level of Service (LOS), which ranges from "A" (the best) to up (the
worst). This procedure is very similar to the daily traffic "ViC" evaluation, although the ICU
contains more analysis factors since the evaluation of intersection operations is inherently more'
complex than the street segments. It is the City policy that LOS results A through D represent
acceptable operations, while LOS E and F are considered over capacity.
The ICU analyses for the existing conditions are utilized to determine If any significant traffic'
impacts presently exist atthe study area intersections. These ICU evaluations reflect present
operations thro~gh the recent counts and current intersection approach lanes. It should be
remembered the existing analyses actually provide a base condition that reflects the proposed
MPAH Amendment, given the existence of the approved ECR demonstration project (two lanes
exist for the majority of the study section of ECR).
Table 1 summarizes the results of the ICU analyses at the six study intersections under existing
conditions. As shown in Table 1, all the study intersections are operating at LOS C or better
which documents acceptable existing operations (LOS D or better) during both the AM and PM
peak hours. Based upon the findings for existing conditions, with EI CaminO Real currently
operating as a two lane Local collector, there are no present adverse impacts or deficiencies in
peak hour performance at all study intersections. The supporting intersection analysis
worksheets are contained in Appendix B of this study. The existing count data, which were
utilized in the analyses, can be referenced il] Appendix.C.
FUTURE CONDITIONS WITHOUT PROJECT (Current MPAH - Four Lanes on ECR)
The evaluations of future conditions under the current MPAH referenced previous year 2020
traffic modeling efforts performed for the City of Tustin and also include separate analyses of
the intersections more '~nternal" to the project area. Extensive traffic modeling efforts were
undertaken as a part of the Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) Tustin Disposal and Reuse Traffic
Study1. The year 2020 traffic modeling assumptions for the MCAS project included the current
MPAH road system for the study area (i.e., ECR at four lanes) and specifically analyzed two of
the study intersections agreed to be evaluated as a part of this MPAH Amendment project. .
WPA Traffic Engineering
(A Division of Wllldan)
Job # 12680
14
EI Camino Real MPAH Amendment
City of Tustin
Traffic Project/on Method%av
Two study intersections (Newport/ECR and Newport/Main) previously modeled and analyzed in
the MCAS report were referenced directly for the 'Without (MPAH) Project" condition. It was
determined the other four study intersections, however, required detailed evaluations and
considèrations in order to reflect future conditions 'Without the Project". These four
intersections are more "internal" to the City of Tustin and their future traffic increases are not
expected to be as significantly influenced by traffic generated outside the City of Tustin.
The projection of future 'traffic for the four "internal" intersections were determined to be best
reflected through use of a reasonably conservative growth factor. Given the configuration of the
street system and the relatively built out condition of the surrounding areas, it is anticipated the
present traffic movements would provide the best representation of future traffic patterns. The
traffic growth documented in the MCAS analyses, at the Newport Avenue study interseCtions, is
shown to be In the 1.2 to 2.9 percent per year range. The Newport Avenue intersections,
however, are anticipated to be subject to significantly greater through traffic increases-,
especially when factors such as the extension/connection of Newport Avenue to the south is
considered.
In order to provide an accurate evaluation of pre-project conditions, appropriate growth rates
over a twenty-year growth period were utilized in this study. A traffic growth rate of 1.0 percent
per year was applied to the existing volumes at the study intersections of EI Camino ReaV181
Street and EI Camino ReaVMain Street in these traffic analyses. A traffic growth rate of 1.0
percent per year was also applied to the existing volumes at the study intersections of Prospect
Avenue/1st Street and Prospect Avenue/Main Street in these analyses. These growth rates are
intended to address. the potential traffic increases due to various potential projects and/or
general traffic growth in the study area. This provides a conservative growth rate and is
anticipated to be representative of "worst cas(/' projections.
For purposes of evaluating the four "internal" study intersections, it is anticipated that application
of the one percent per year growth factor through the year 2020 will provide a conservative
projection of the future traffic volumes at these study locations. The growth factor, however, is
, "Marine Corps AirStation (MCAS) Tustin Disposal and Reuse Traffic Study" Appendix B
WPA Traffic Engineering
(A Division of WIllden)
Job # 12680
15
EI Camino Real MPAH Amendment
CIty of Tustin
not the only consideration required. It must be recognized the existing intersection counts
included the condition where EI Camino R,eal has two undivided lanes for most of the study
sections, Adjustments were, therefore, required to assure the volumes used in these 'Without
Project" analyses reflect four travel lanes on ECR. (It can be noted the 'Newport Avenue
intersections do not require adjustment for these conditions since the MCAS modeling
incorporated a four-lane condition for ECR).
Trip origin and destination patterns for traffic using ECR as a through route were developed
based upon the str-eet system configuration,. review of ECR related traffic volumes,
consideration of the types of area land uses, potentia! regional attractors, the current roadway
configurations, and the changes planned for the project street classIfication. Numerous
individual travel routes were. examined and evaluated. An overview of the trip Elssignment
patterns Included in the origin/destination evaluations is illustrated in FIgure B.
The numerous travel routes considered specifically examined the traffic that would be "drawn" to
, .
ECR if four lanes were to be provided. These "Without Project" analyses for the four "internal"
intersections must consider the "draw" to ECR, since the existing counts reflect ECR at its
present two-lane configuration (and the growth factor is applied to these volumes). It should be
recalled, the two-modeled intersections already Included the assumption of four lanes on ECR,
and so the Figure B "adjustments" are not applicable to the 'Newport Avenue intersections for
the 'Wlthout Project" conditions.
These same principals anti considerations were also applied to the daily traffic volumes. The
resulting daily and peak hour traffic volumes are illustrated in FIgures 9 and 10, respectively.
These volumes were then incorporated in the same analyses that were performed for the
existing conditions. These evaluations will show how the future conditions compare to, the
existing operations and also will serve to provide a baseline .to measure the 'With" project
operations against.
WPA Traffic Engineering
(A Division of W/l/dan)
Job # 12680
16
EI Camino Real MPAH Amendment
City of Tustin
I-
m
ID
z
+5
.-.----~~~~---------
ti
0
ü:
Õ
«
IL
"
I
I
I
-5 I -1
ti I
CD I
m I
I
I
I
I
I '+5
.1-
m
«
'"
I-
m
u
ü:
~
I
I
-10 II
I
I
,
6TH ST
EI Camino Real MPAH Amendment
JOB# 12680 .
WP A lRAFTI~ ENGINEERING
A DIVISION OF WILLDAN
+6
~I:
!d I
!); ,
-3 ~ I' . -2 E1STST
--------
,
II
I
I
-2 I ~
I ~
I z
I ffi
I ~
, 0
,
,
I
,I -3
I
I
I
,
, +9
,
I
I
I
1-1
l-
I
I
3RD ST ..1
2ND ST
till
0 I
'" I
~
-3
E MAIN ST
0
+1511~
-- =1õ --"
üI
-$-
No Soale
Legend
- Existing Cut-Through Route
- - - With Project Cut-Through
Route
(.t-) 25 Percentage of EI Camino Real Traffic
(Exists as 2 lanes so added traffic Is
.attracted" for the 4 lane conditions)
FIGURE 8
Redistribution of Future
Trips (4 Lanes)
122,5001
1STST
122,5001
~'~
00
z 0
~ aJ
...J
W
~~
t) g
w co
0. -
@ IC)
0.
MAIN ST
112,7001
~
Legend
. Study Intersections
110,2001 Daily Traffic Volumes
EI Camino Real MPAH Amendment
wfîRAFFIL ~NGINEERING
FIGURE 9
Year 2020 Daily Volumes I
Without Project (4 Lanes) I
I A DIVISION OF WILLDAN
\... %
~ 777/769
,. 1101119 1STST
010'; '\tl'"
S69/9S2~
140/227, "'°'"
-""
"'°-
, ,
~. '" ...
!!! ....
a:
0
~
~
II> 1S
~~~¡¡f \... 57/50
,;::¡,
"'1I>1fI
OJ-- -,+- 449/434
--*"+"" ,. 64/85 MAIIfST
35/49..1 ~+r
366/344-+-
102/120, ",-""
~~~
O"""
l "'!!!"'
I!
I (
I
II
,I
,I
,I
,I
EI Camino Real MPAH Amendment
I I WP frRAFFI( ~NGIN~~RING
I A DIVISION OF WILLDAN
¡;¡!tj13
S~~
"""",
;Jt~
168/250';
SOI!l9~
30139,
\... 130/244
~ 641/69'
,. 54/24
'\+1'"
~¡;!;:¡¡
ri¡~;;:
"'~"'.
w
~
t
~
'"
if
D.
. '" ¡g
"'-
;:;.¡:;:
'" .... \... 91/132
--*" "" ~ 409/e90
87/132..1 40/60 ..I ./
3e3/433 -+-- e4014'O-+- /,_,
133/32 ~~ ~
i..\~\~
~~
Legend
. Study Intersections
10115 AM/PM Peak Hour Volumes
FIGURE 10
Year 2020 Peak Hour Volumes
(Without Project - 4 Lanes)
Dally Traffic Analvses
Table 1, y.thich was presented earlier in this study, provides a summary of the daily traffic
analyses results for year 2020 'Without Projecf' conditions. It can be seen the study locations
maintain acceptable (LOS D or better) operations for conditions where four lanes are provided
on EI Camino Real: It can also be noted, these daily traffic analyses were performed based on
both the existing road configurations and the future MPAH lanes. Acceptable operations are
noted under both geometric conditions. For EI Camino Real, only the four-lane condition is
shown to clarify this is the 'Without Project" scenario.
Intersection Analvses
The ICU worksheets document the traffic volumes, approaèh lanes and analyses of the 'Without
Project" traffic conditions, while the approach lanes and volumes used in these analyses are
also shown in Figures 5 and 9, respectively. The existing intersection approach lanes are
maintained to reflect a "worst case" and the volumes provide well-documented evaluation of the
two Newport Avenue intersections and conservative analyses of the four "internal" intersections.
The ICU worksheets can be referenced in Appendix B. As shown in Table 2, acceptable LOS
results are maintained at all of the study intersections for year 2020 'Without Project" conditions.
FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT (Proposed MPAH Amendment - 2 Lanes on ECR)
The proposed MPAH Amendment is considered in this section through evaluation of the daily
traffic conditions and detailed evaluation of the six study intersections. As was described .earlier
in this study, there is a high level of confidence in the results of these 'With Project" analyses,
which include the two lane configurations on EI Camino Real. In part, this is due to counts that
could be taken while this configuration is actually "in place", as well as consideration of other
pertinent traffic related factors (i.e., the layout of the surrounding street system, the relative built
out condition of the surrounding areas, etc.).
Figures 11 and 12 present the daily and AM/PM peak hour volumes; which resulted from the
same type of analyses and considerations applied in the 'Without Project" analyses. This
s¡¡rves to assure that the comparison of 'With" to 'Withouf' the Project is valid. These volumes
were then incorporated in the sam¡¡ analyses that were perfòrmed for the previously considered
conditions.
WPA Traffic Engineering
(A Division of Wi/ldan)
Job# 12680
20
EI Camino Real MPAH Amendment
City of Tustin
TABLE 2
INTERSECTION ANALYSES SUMMARY
City of Tustin
ETCamlno Real &
1st Street
EI Camino Real & A 0.44 A 0.54 A 0.56 C 0.72 I A I 0.54 I B I 0.66
21 Main Street
El CamIno Real & A 0.53 B 0.68 A 0.49 C 0.79 A I 0.49 I C I 0.77
31 Newport Avenue . .
Main Street & B 0.64 B 0.62 B 0.65 B 0.65 B I 0.64 I B I 0.65
41 Newport Avenue
Main Street & A 0.39 A 0.52 A 0.48 B 0.63 A I 0.44 I A I 0.40
51 Prospect Avenue
Prospect Avenue & A 0.43 A 0.56 A 0.52 B 0.70 A I 0.49 I B I 0.63
61 1st Street
"
123,2001
1STST
123,2001
~~.
0 0
;!; C')
~ ,...
¡¡
~~
t3 g
æ CD
u). Lt)
61
Il.
MAIN ST
112,1001
.112,4001
~
Leg~nd
. Study Intersections
110,2001 Daily Traffic Volumes
EI Camino Real MPAH Amendment
¡ ~[1R~l!GrnEERrnG
FIGURE 11
Year 2020 Daily Volumes
With Project (2 Lanes)
~ 777n68
f 110/119
¡;j~~
~.~~
~+\...
\..130/24-4
~ 641/699
f 54/24
1ST ST.
\.. 57/50
~ 448/434
f 64/85
168/250.J
S02I8sa-+-
. 30/38,
~
t5
æ
~
~ ~- 0. l-t.<6'
- ¡"'i"i'\~'i'
;:¡ ~ ...~ 1 10/10
'" ... \.. 91/132 ~ t§' ~ 3801520
~ \.... ~ 409/290" 160/90
97/132,). 40/60.J. "'I
323/433 -+- 240/490-+- J
133/32 . ~rÆ'. ,....
iil:f
rrW
S69/"2-+- "'" I"
140/227, ~ ~
;;; ~
!!! ...
""'+1"
~~:g
ri¡~;¡;
...~'"
~
0
z
CD ~
æ~g;¡¡
;¡;;:;~
N!!!:';
~t\....
35/49.J
366/344-+-
102/120,
MAIN ST
""'+1"
",-'"
~~~
c...""
CD!!!'"
LeQend
. Study Intersections
10/15 AM/PM Peak Hour Volumes
EI Camino Real MPAH Amendment
'r1RlJFI~ ~NGINE~RING
A DIVJSION OF WILLDAN
FIGURE 12
Year 2020 Peak Hour Volumes
(With Project - 2 Lanes)
Daily Traffic Analyses
The same as for the 'Without Projecf' analyses, evaluations are provided based on both the
existing lanes and the future MPAH geometries. Of course, for EI Camino Real the .Project" is
to provide a two-lane configuration, so only this condition is analyzed. for the study segments.
Table 1, which was presented earlier in this study, shows the proposed two-lane configuration
for EI Camino Real would provide acceptable Levels of .Servìce. This is shown to be the case
for all of the study locations under both the existing roadway and future MPAHconditions.
IntersectIon Analyses
The es1imated traffic growth was applied to the existing traffic volumes so the study
intersecti.ons could be analyzed for the 'With Project" conditions. The proper adjustments to the
study intersections were applied, depending on their locations, as was oescribed in the 'Without
Project: conditions. The volumes in Figure 12 were then used In the ICU analyses, which were
calculated for these 'With Project" (two lanes on EI Camino Real) analyses.. The existing
intersection approach lanes (Figure 51 were also utilized to consider the "worst case".
The resuitsfor these 'With Project" conditions can be referenced in Table 1. The mid-block
arterial volume-to-capacity (V/C) analysis provides a more general overview of roadway
operations, while these Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) analyses results in detailed
evaluations of the intersections, which are the critical locations of the street system. The
combination of the mid-block analysis component (utilizing the daily traffic volumes and
capacities) and the ICU analyses (based on AM and PM peak hour intersection turn volumes
and the intersection approach lanes) serve to provide well documented evaluations of the
anticipated operations and whether the proposed MPAH Amendment is feasible and can result
in acceptable operations for 1he street system. For the proposed MPAH Amendment, D.Q
deficiencies are forecast, based on daily traffic VIC ratios or the detailed intersection analyses.
IMPACTS TO OTHER JURISDICTIONS
Given the location of the proposed MPAH Amendment of EI Camino Real, there is not expected
to be very significant traffic impacts on any other jurisdiction. The changes in travel due to the
proposed Amendment are shown to be "local" to the City of Tustin. In addition, since the
proposed project configuration presently exists, there are well defined indications of the future
operations.
WPA Traffic Engineering
(A Division of W/Ildan)
Job # 12680
24
EI Camino Real MPAH Amendment
CIty of TustIn
SUMMARY
This study has examined traffic factors related to the reclassification (MPAH Amendment) of EI
Camino Real between First Street and Newport Avenue in the City of Tustin. The project is to
change this section of EI Camino Real from a future fo~r-Ianei' Secondary arterial to a'proposed
two-lane local roadway. It is noted, however, the present configuration of EI Camino Real
between Sixth Street and Second Street is as a two-lane roadway.
This study addresses the potential project traffic impacts at the six designated study
intersections, identifièd through agreement between OCT A and the City of Tustin. Existing traffic
conditions were reviewed and quantified to provide a basis for this study. Potential year 2020
traffic conditions, both 'With" and 'Withouf the Project were considered. Evaluations were
made of these future conditions and the ability of the street system to accommodate the trips
evàluated.
The following are the principal findings of these analyses:
(1) All of the study intersections currently operate at acceptable levels of Service
during the AM and PM peak hours:
i. EI Camino Real & 1 II Street
ii. EI Camino Real & Main Street
iii. EI Camino Real & Newport Avenue
iv. Main S1reet & Newport Avenue
v. Main Street & Prospect Avenue
vi. Prospect Avenue & 1 II Street
(2)
Year 2020 traffic conditions 'Without Project" were evaluated and It showed that
acceptable lOS values for the daily traffic analyses and the six study
intersections are maintained.
(3)
A "worst case" analysis was used, in evaluating the future traffic impacts at the
study segments and intersections. A'conservative growth rate was applied in the
evaluation of future conditions and analyses were shown for lane geometries that
presently exist.
WPA Traffic Engineering
(A Division of Willdan)
Job # 12680
25
EI Camino Real MPAH Amendment
City of Tustin
(4)
Under "With Project" conditions where the MPAH Amendment (two lane on EI
Camino Real) is assumed to be in place, the street segment (dally traffic
analyses) study intersections continue to operate at acceptable Levels of
Service. No significant traffic impaèts are anticipated as a resuR of the EI
Camino Real Reclassificat¡òn. . .
(5)
No significant traffic related impacts are expected for any jurisdictions outside of
the City of Tustin.
.*
WPA Traffic Engineering
(A Division of Willdan)
Job # 12680
26
EI Camino Real MPAH Amendment
City of Tustin
'APPENDIX A
EX PLANA TIO'N OF
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTJUZATION
AND
LEVEL OF SERVICE
APPENDIX A
EXPLANA TIDN OF INTE:RSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZA TIOH
The capacity of a street is nearly always greater between intersections and less at
intersections. The reason for this is that the traffic flows continuously betWeen
intersections and only part of the time at interSections. To study intersection capacity, a
technique known as Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) has been developed. ICU
analysis consists of (a) determining the proportion of signal time needed'to serve each,
. conflicting movement; (b} summing the times for the movements; 'and (c) comparing the.
total tima required to the time available,- For example, if for nort"h-south traffic the
northbound traffic is 1,000 vehicles per' hour, the southbound traffic is 800 vehicles per
hour, and.the capacity of either approach is 2,000 vehicles per hour of green, then
northbound traffic is critical and requires 1 ,0000/2,000 or 50 percent of the signal time.' If.
for the east-west traffic, 40 percent ofthe signal time is required, then flcan be seen that
the ICU is 50 plus 40, or 90 percent. When left-turn phases exist, they are incorporated
, into the analysis. As IClJ's approach 100 percent, the quality of traffic service'approaches
Level of Service (LOS) E, as defined in the Hiahwav Capacity Manual, Special Report 87,
Highway Research Board, 1965.' .
Level of Service is'used to describe quality oftraffic flow. Levels of Service A to C operate
quite well. Level of Service D is typically the Level of Service for which an urban street is
designed. Level of Service E is the maximum volume a facUlty can accommodate and will
result in possible stoppages of momentary duration. Level of Service F occurs when a
facility is overloaded and is characteriz~d by stop-and~go traffic with stoppages of 1009
duration. A description ot-the various Levels of Service appears on the following page.
..The ICU calculations assume that an intersection is signalized and that the. signal is ideally
timed. It is possible to have an ICU well below 1.0, yet have severe traffic congestion,
This would occur because one or more movements is nQt getting enough time to satisfy its
demand, with excess time existing on ather moves. Although calculating ICU for an
unsignalized intersection is not necessarily valid, it can be performed with the presumption
that a signal can be installed and the calculations show whether the geometries are.
capable of accommodating the expected volumes.
Capacity is often defined in terms of roadway width. However, standard lanes have
approximately the same capacity whether they are .11 foot or 14 foot lanes. Our data
indicates that a typical lane, whether a through lane or a left-turn lane, has a capacity as
high as approximately 2200 vehicles per h:ìne per.hour of green time. The 1985 Hiahwav
Capacity Manual found capacities of 1800 vehicles per lane per hour of green time. These
studies show that values in the 1600 to 1700 range should result in a conservative
analysis.
APPENDIX A
LEVEL OF SERVICE DESCRIPTIONS
FOR INTERSECTIONS
A
B
1,-
c
D
E
F
. Low volumes; high speeds; speed not restricted by other vehicles; all
signal cycles clear with no vehicles; aI/signal cycles clear with no.
vehicles waiting through more than one signal cycle.
Operating speeds beginning to be affected by other traffic; between
one and ten percent of the signal cycles have one or more vehiclas
which wait through more than one signal cycle during peak traffic
periods.
Operating speeds and maneuverability closely controffed by other
traffic; between 11 and 30 percent ofthe signal cycles have one or
more vehicles which wait through more than 'one signal cycle during
peak traffic periods; recommended ideal design standard.
Tolerable operating speeds; 31 to 70 percent of the signal cycles
have one or more vehicles which wait through more than one signal
cycle during traffic periods; often used as design standard in urban
areas.
Capacity; the maximum traffic volumes an intersection can
accommodate; restricted speeds; 71 to 100 percent of the signal
cycles have one or more vehicles which wait through more than one
signal cycle during peak traffic periods,
Long queues of traffic; unstable flow; stoppages of long duration;
traffic volume and traffic speed can drop to zero; traffic volume will be
less than the volume which occurs at Level of SeNÎce E.
O.oo~o. 60
0.61-0.70
0.71-0.80
0.81-0.90
0.91-1.00
Not Meaningful
(a)
ICU (Intersection Capacity Utilization) at various Levels of Service versus Level of Service E
for urban arterial streets.
SOURCE:
HiGhwav Capacitv Manual; Special Report 87; Highway Research Board; 1965.
APPEN'DfX B
INTERseCTION ANAL YS,ES
we RKSHE ETS
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANAlYSIS
PROJECT: CIty of Tuslln-E! CamIno Real R_1Ioo
INTERVAl: AM PEAK HOUR '
INTERSECTION: EI Carnno Real & 1st Street Exlsilng CondIIIoo.
¡Iiil --- ïiiíl - ìí - ïiiíl - ìí - ïiiíl - ìí - ìí - ¡¡¡II ----:- ñ - ñ ~ ñ - ñ EX. 'OTHER ñ - ii ~ ii:- rnll
11111 MOVEMENT 11111 EXIST II PROP 11111 EXISTING 11 PROPOSED 11111 EXISTING 11 OTHER 11 PROJECT 11111 EXISTING 11 II . OTHER 11 11 'PROJECT 11 11 'PROJECT II 11111
11111 11111 LANES 11 LANES 11111 CAPACITY 11 CAPACITY 11111 VOlUME 11 VOLUME II VOLUME 11111 VlC 11 11, VlC II 11 VlC 11 II VlC-W_IMP II 11111
11111====-=11111'==-11===-'11111==11 ~IIIII-li ~11-1I1II-11-11 ~11-11 """'-===11-11-=='11=11111
11111 NL 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 13911 11 \1111 0.0811'11 0.0811'11 0.0811'11 11'11111
11111 NT 11111 °Il 011111 all 011111 all II 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
11111 NR 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 5711 II 11111 0.0311 II 0.0311 II 0.0311 II II 11111
IIIIISLIllIl 011 011111 011 011111 all II 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
IIIIISTIllIl all 011111 all 011111 all 11 11111 11'11 11'11 11'11 11"11111
IIIIISRIllIl all 011111 011 011111 011 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
11111 EL 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 all 11 11111 0.0011'11 0.0011'11 0.0011'11 11'11111
11111 ET 11111 211 011111 340011 011111 46711 II lIIil 0.1411 11 0.1411 11 0.1411 II II 11111
11111 ER 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 10511 11 11111 0.0611 11 0.0611 11 0.0611 II II 11111
11111 WL 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 8811 11 11111 0.0511 II 0.0511 II 0.0511 II 11 11111
11111 WT 11111 211 011111 340011 011111 63811 II 11111 0.1911'11 0.1911'11 0.1911'11 11'11111
IIIIIWRIllIl all 011111, 011 011111 all 11 11111 '1111' '1111 1111 1111111
,- -- ---- ---- -----11111- =-.=-==- ==.===~ '=-.~-'=IIIII
NORTHISOUTH CRIllCAl SUMS . 11111 0.08 I 0.08 I D.08 I 0.00 11111
11111-....,.-----'--- ------11111
11111 0.19 I 0.19 I 0.19 I 0.00 11111
11111---------'----- ------11111
11111 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 11111
11111 ===-==- . - . """""-"'= . .. . ---== = .. = =-.- = = 11111
11111 0.32 I 0.32 I 0.32 I 0.05 11111
11111-------- ------11111
UIDA IA IA 'IA 1101
--=- ....- ....¡,~ =-=- ==-
ICU SPREAOSHEET FILE NAME
ECR&1st I
N = ",ORTHBOUND, S = SOUTHBOUND
E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND
L=LEFT, T = THROUGH, R - RIGHT
N.S, = NOT SIGNAlIZED
LOS = lEVEl OF SERVICE
. DENOTES CRITICAl MOVEMENTS
EASTIWEsr CRIrICAl SUMS .
ClEARANCE .
ICU VAlUE =
LOS-
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANÀl YSIS
PROJECT:
INTERVAL:
INTERSECTION:
City of T uslln-EI Carrino Real _Iloo
PM PEAK HOUR
E1 Co"'" Real & 1st S.- ExlsIIng CondIIIons
-- --~- ---- -----'----~- ------- ---- -----
¡¡III 11111 II 11111 II 11111 II II 11111 . II II EXISTING II II EX.+OTHER II II EX.+OTHER II 11111
11111 MOVEMENT 11111 EXIST II PROP 11111 EXISTING II PROPOSED 11111 EXlSTlN<¡ II OTHE~ II PROJECT 11111 EXISTING II II + OTHER II II +PROJECT II II +PROJECT II 11111
11111 11111 LANES II LANES 11111 CAPACITY II CAPACITY 11111 VOlUME II VOLUME II VOlUME 11111 VIC II II VlC II II VIC II II V/CoWJMP II 11111
11111 ,==--." 1ll1I=="II~--1I1II ~ II - 11111 - II - II - 11111 - II-II - II-II ---= 11=11 == 11=11111
11111 NL 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 21411 II 111110.1311"11 0,1311"11 0.1311"11 11"11111
11111 NT 11111 011 11111 011 011111011 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
IIIIINRIIIII'1i 11111 170011 01111112211 II 11111 0.071111 0.071111 0.071111 1111111
11111 SL 11111 011 11111011 011111011 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
IIIIISTIllIl 011 11111 011011111 011 II 11111 11"11 11"11 11"11 11"11111
IIIIISRIllIl 011 11111 011 011111 011 11.11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
11111 EL 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 011 II 11111 0.0011 II 0.0011 II 0.0011 II 11"11111
11111 ET 11111 211 11111 340011 011111 78211 II 11111 0.23 II" II 0.23 II", II 0.23 II" II II 11111
11111 ER 11111 '11 11111 170011 011111 17011 II 11111 0,101111 ,0.101111 0.101111 1111111
11111 WL 11111 '11 11111 170011 011111 9511 II 11111 0.0811" II 0.0811" II 0.0811" II II 11111
11111 WT 11111 211 11111 340011 011111 83611 II 11111 0.1811 II 0.1811 II 0.1811 II 11"11111
IIIIIWRIIIII 011 11111 011 011111 011 II 11111 1111, 1111 1111 1111111
,- -- ---,- ---------11111-===--= ------== --=-==-=== ==-= -=11111
- NORTWSOUTHCRITICALSUMS- 11111 0.13 I, 0.13 I' 0.13 I 0.00 11111
ECR&lst 1 11111----------------'---11111
EASTIWEST CRITICAL SUMS - 11111 0.28, I 0.28 1 0.29 I 0.00 11111
11111---------------11111
I 11111 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 11111
11111- ---- -=.~ -=-~== -=11111
11111 0.47 I 0.47 I 0.47 I 0.05 11111
11111---------------11111
lUll A I A I A I A 11111
-===-------------====--=-=---
ICU SPREADSHEET FilE NAME
N = NORTHBOUND, S" SOUTHBOUND
E = EAST1!OUND, W - WEST1!OUND
L = LEFT. T = THROUGH. R = RIGHT
N.S, = NOT SIGNALIZEO
LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE
" DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS
ClEARANCE =
ICUVALUE -
LOS-
I/{TERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS
-- -.---- ---- ~----- --- ---- ---- ---- ~
iiïll-- 11111 II 11111 II 11111 II II 11111 II II EXISTING 11 11 EX.+oTHER 11 II EX.+OTHER II 11111
11111 MOVEMENT 11111 EXIST 11, PROP 11111 EXISTING 11 PROPOSEO 11111 EXISTING II OTHER 11 PROJECT 11111 EXISTING II II + OTHER II 11 +PROJECT 11 II +PROJECT II 11111
11111 11111 LANES II LANES 11111 CAPACITY II CAPACn:Y 11111 VOLUME II VOLUME II VOlUME¡ 11111 VlC II II VlC 11 11 VIe 11 II VlC-W_IMP II 11111
11111 ========= 1II1I===~I1"=~1I1I1 ==-=-==== II ==== 11111 ~=. II =-==-- II ==--J. 11111 ~~ 11=11 ~ 11=11 ~= 11=11 === II~IIIII
IIIIINLIIIII 011 011111 011 011111 BOil II 11111 1111 1111 1111 11"11111
11111 NT 11111 111 011111 17~1I 011111 13411 II 11111 0.1111°11 0.1111°11 0.1111°11 II 11111
IIIIINRIIIII'1i 011111 170011 011111 4111 II 111110.021111 0.021111 0.021111 1111111
IllIISLIIIII 011 011111 011 0111111211 II 11111 11°11 11"11' 11°11 1111111
11111 ST 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 13611 II 11111 0.0911 II 0.0911 II 0.0911 II II" 11111
IIIIISRIIIIIII1 011111 170011011111 2411 II 11111 0.011111 0.011111 0.011111 1111111
11111 EL 11111 111 011111 170011 011111,2911 II 111110.0211°11 0.0211°11 0.0211°11 11°11111
11111 ET 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 30011 II 11111 0.2211 II 0.2211 II 0.2211 II II 11111
IIIIIERIIIII 011 011111 011 011111 8011 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
11111 Wl 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 5011 II 11111 0.0311 II 0.0311 11 0.0311 11 II 11111
11111 WT 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 38711 II 11111 0.2411' II 0.2411' 11 0.2411° II II" 11111
lllllWR1II1I 011 011111 011 011111 4711 11 11111 1111 ,1111 1111 1111111
.., -- ---- ---'- -----IIIII~ .=.~ ._-~~ .==-==-===- ==-11111
- NORTHISOUTH CRITICAl SUMS. 11111 0.13 I . 0.11 I 0.11 I 0.00 11111
ECR&MaIn 1 . 11111--------.-----------11111
EAST/WEST CRITICAl SUMS. 11111 ' 0.28 I 0.28 1 0.26 I 0.00 11111
11111---------------11111
11111, 0.05 I' 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 lIIil
11111-'" - ~ -... --- . = = -= 0,= 11111'
11111 0:44 I 0.42 I 0.42 I 0.05 11111
11111----------------11111
IIIR A I A I A I A 11111
..- -...- ._-~ -==-~ ---
PROJECT:
INTERVAl:
INTERSECTION:
ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME
N = NORTHBOUND, S - SÓUTHBOUND
E = EASTBOUND, W = WEST1!OUND
L = lEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT
N.S. = NOT SIGNAlIZED
LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE
. DENOTES CRmCAl MOVEMENTS
Clly or Tuslln-EI Canino Reaf ReclassIfication
/1M PEAK HOUR
EI Canino Real & Main St- ExIsIIng CondItIons
CLEARANCE -
ICUVALUE-
LOS-
INTERSEcnON CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS
-- ~--- ---- ------ -----,---- ----,-- -----
mll- 11111 II 11111 II 11111 II, II .1 11111 11 11 EXISTING 11 11 EX.+OTHER 11 11 EX.+oTHER 11 11111
11111 MOVEMENT 11111 EXIST 11 PROP 11111 EXISTING 11 PROPOSED 11111 EXISTING 11 OTHER 11 PROJECT 11111 EXISTING 11 II + OTHER 11 11 +PROJECT II II +PROJECT II 11111
11111 11111 lANES 11 lANES 11111 CAPACITY II CAPACITY 11111 VOLUME II VOLUME II VOLUME 11111 VlC II 11 VlC II 11 VlC 11 11 VIC-WJMP 11 11111
11111 ==~~=== 11111====11===11111--- - II =~~ IIIII~ II ==--11 --IIIII~ 11-11--11-11 -~ 11=-11 -=--=- 11=11111
IIIII'NLIllIl 011 11111 011 011111 10911 11 11111 1111 1111 1111 11'11111
11111 NT 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 20311 11 11111. 0,1811'11 0.1811'11 0.1811'11 11 11111
11111 NR 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 9211 11 11111 0.061111 0,051111 0.051111 1111111
11111 SL 11111 011 11111 011 011111 3211 11 11111 II~II 11'11 11'11 1111111
11111 ST 11111 111 11111170011 011111 .18411 II 11111 0.131111 0.1311"11 0.131111 11'11111
11111 SR 11111 111 11111170011 011111 2311 II 11111 0.011111 0.011111 0.011111 1111111
11111 EL 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 4011 II 11111 0.0211 11 0.0211 11 0.0211 11 11'11111
11111 ET 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 28211 II 11111 0.2211' II 0.2211' II 0.2211' II II 11111
IIIIIERIIIIIOIl 11111 011 011111 9411 n 11111 1111 110 1111 1111111
11111 WL 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 8711 II 11111 0.0411'11 0,0411'11 0.0411'11 11 11111
11111 WT 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 35811 11 11111 0,2311 11 0.2311 11 0.2311 11 11'11111
11111 WR 11111 011 11111 on 0111114111 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
... -- ---- ---- -----11111====== =='==- =--=-=-=- =.-=-==== ==11111
- NORTHISOUTHCRITICAlS~= 11111 0.23 I 0.18 I 0.18 I 0.00 11111
ECR&MaIn I 11111---------------11111
EASTIWEST CRITICAl SlIMS . 11111 0.26 I 0.26 I 0.26 I 0.00 11111
11111--- ---- ---- ----11111
11111 0.05 I 0.05 I ' 0.00 I 0.05 11111
11111-- ---- ==-==== ==-=-= -=11111
11111 0.54 1 0.49 I 0.49 I 0.05 11111
11111---------------11111
11111 A I A I A I A 11111
.1' -~ ---- -_.~~ ==-= -==
PROJECT:
INTERVAL:
INTERSECTION:
ICU SPREADSHEET Fn.E NAME
N = NORTHBOUND, S = SOUTHBOUND
E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND
L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R - RIGHT
N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED
LOS = LEVEL OF I¡ERVICE
, DENOTES CRITICAl MOVEMENTS
CUy of T uslln-E! CaITino Real RedassIfIcatIon
PM PEAK HOUR
EI carrino Real & Main SIreaI ExIstIng CondItIon.
ClEARANCE .
ICUVAlUE=
LOS-
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTUlA TION ANAlYSIS
-- ---- ---- ---~-- --- ---- -~-- -~---
;;;ïl - 11111 II 11111 II' 11111 II 11 11111 11 11 EXISTING 11 11 EX. +OTHER 11 11 EX. +OTHER II 11111
11111 MOVEMENT 11111 EXIST 11 PROP 11111 EXISTING II PROPOSED 11111 EXISTING II OTHER II PROJECT 11111 EXISTING 11 II + OTHER 11 11 +PROJECT 11 II +PROJECT II 11111
11111 11111 LANES II LANES 11111 CAPACITY II CAPACITY 11111 VOLUME II VOLUME' II VOLUME 11111 VlC II, II VlC II 11 Vie II 11 VIC-W_IMP 11 11111
11111 ==-==== 11111 ' -11-='11111 ~- 11 - 11111 ~ 11 ~ II -- 11111 ~ 11-11 == 11-11 ~= II-II ~ 11-11111
11111 NL 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 15111 II 11111 0.0911.11 0.0911.11 0.0911.11 11.11111
11111 NT 11111 211 011111 340011 011111 82011 II 11111 0.1811 11 0.1811 II 0.1811 II II 11111
11111 NR 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 ~811 11 11111 0.131111. 0.131111 0.131111 1111111
11111 SL 11111 '11 011111 170011 011111 7411 II 111111 0.0411 II 0.0411 II 0.0411 II II 11111
11111 ST 11111 311 011111 510011 011111 128011 II 11111 0.2611"11 0.2611.11 0.2611'11 11'11111
IIIIISRIllIl 011 011111 011 011111 2811 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
IIIIIELIIIIIII1 011111 170011011111 1711 II 11111 0.0111110.011111 0.011111 11'11111
11111 ET 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 8311 11 11111 0,0511.11 0.0511' 11 0.0511. II II 11111
IIIIIERII1II111 011111 170011 01111123611 II 11111 0.141111 0.141111 0.141111 011111
11111 WL 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 14211 II \1111 0.0811" II 0.0811' 11 0.0811. II II 11111
11111 WT 11111 211 011111 340011 011111 19711 11 11111 0.0711 11 0.0711 11 0.0711 11 11.11111
IIIIIWRIIIII 011 011111 011 011111 370,11 11111 1111 1111 ,1111 1111111
- ,---- ---- ---- -----11111- -_o_~ -----~ -=-====='0-11111
- NORTHISOUTHCRIT!CALSUMS- 11111 0.35 I 0:35 ,0.35 0.00 11111
ECR&NIIWpoI llllI--------~---~--11I1I
EASTIWESTCRITICALSUMS- 11111 0.13 I 0.13 I 0.13 I 0.00 11111
11111--- ---- -~-- -~--IIIII
11111 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 11111
11111- -=-~ ---==-=-=- ----- --11111
11111 0.53 I 0.53 I 0.53 I 0.05' 11111
1I11I--------~------11I11
mil ^ I ,A I A I A 11111
-------------------==--======
PROJECT:
INTERVAL:
INTERSECTION:
ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME
N = NORTHBOUND, S - SOUTHBOUND
E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND
L=LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT
N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED
LOS - LEVEL OF SERVICE
. DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS
CltyotTu81Jn.EI CamIno Real Redo..-1Ion
AM PEAK HOUR
EI CamIno Real & NewpoIt Avenue ExIsting Conditions
CLEARANCE -
ICU VALUE =
LOS-
INTERSECTION CAPACITY lJTltlZATION ANALYSIS.
PROJECT:
INTERVAl:
INTERSECTION:
CIty of Tusl1n-EI CamIno Real -
PM PEAK HOUR .
EI ~ Res! & Nowporl Avenue ExIstIng CondIIIona
-- ---- --,-- ------ ------- ---- -----
iïm 11m II ,11111 ,II 11m II II 11111 II II EXISTING II II EX.+OTHER II II EX.-OTHER II Iml
11111 MOVEMENT 11111 EXIST II PROP 11111 EXISTING II PROPOSED 11111 EXISTING II OTHER II PROJECT 11111 EXISTING II II + OTHER II II +PROJECT II II -PROJECT II 11m
11111 11m LANES II LANES 11111 CAPACITY II CAPACITY 11111 VOlUME II VOLUME II VOLUME Iml VlC ,II II VlC II II VlC II II VlC-W_IMP II 11111
11m =':':===,11111=.:==11=11111--11 ~ 11111 ~ II """"'"= II -11111-11=0 = 11=11 =~~= 11=11 =====-= 11-11111
11m NL 11111 111 11111 170011' 011111 28211 II 11111 0.1711 II 0.1711 II 0.1711 II 11011111
mil NT 11m 211 11111 340011 011111 129311 II I 11111 0.38 11'11 0.38 II' II 0.38 II' II II 11111
mil NR 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 14511 II 11111 0.0911 II 0.0911 II 0.0911 II II 11111
mil SL 11111 111 Iml 170011 011111 10511 II 11111 0.0611' II 0.0611' II 0.0011' II II 11111
11m ST 11111 311 11111 510011 011111 88011 II 11m 0.1911 II 0.1911 II 0.1911 II 11'11111
11111 SR 11111 011 11111011 011111 8211, II 11111 1111 1111 '1111 II mil
11111 EL 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 5511 II 11111 0.031111 0.0311 II 0.0311 II 11'11111
11m ET 11111 111 11111 170011 Olml 18011 II 11111 0.1111'11 0.1111'11 0.1111'11 II 11111
11111 ER 11111 111 11111170011011111 35611 II 11111 0,211111 0.211111 0.211111 II mil
11111 WL 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 14011 II 11111 0,0811'11 0.0811'11 0.0811'11 II 11111
11111 WT 11111 211 11111 340011 011111 26611 II 11111 0.1111 II 0.1111 II 0.1111 II 11'11111
IIIIIWRIIIII 011 11111 011 0 mil 12211 II 11111 ,HII 1111 1111 11'11111
- -- ---- ---------11111=== =_a-==-==-- ._----= "'...=- ==11111
NORTH/scum CRITICAL SUMS a 11111 OM I 0.44 I 0.44 I 0.00 11111
11111--- ---- ---- ---'---- 11111
11111 0.19 I 0.19 I 0.19 I 0.00 11111
11111----__---------11111
11111 0,05, I 0.05 I 0;05 I O.05lml
IIIII~""" __a- --a=-== --=,=====-- --11111
11m 0.88 I 0.88 I 0.88 I 0.05 11111
11111--- ---- ,---- ----11111
IIIH 8 I 8 I 8 I A 11111
= ==-=== . - , === - = . ====;=== , ,. . ===-==- , ,. -
ICU SPREADSHEET FIlE NAME
ECR&N_I
N = NORTHBOUND. S . SOlJTHBOUND
E = EASTBOUND, W a WESTBOUND
L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R. RIGHT
N.S. - NOT SIGNALIZEO
LOS. LEVEL OF SERVICE
0 DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS
EASTIWEST CRmCAL SUMS .
ClEARANCE'
ICUVALUE.
LOS.
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTIlIZATION ANALYSIS
PROJECT:
INTERVAL:
INTERSECTION:
City at Tuslln-EI Calrino Reel R-
AM PEAK HOUR . .
Newport Avenue & MaIÌl SInIeI, Exfs\Ing CondItions
iiill-iiill-iì-iiill-iì-iiiíl~iì~iì-iiìo-iì~iì EXISTING iï-iìEX.+OTHERiï-iï~ii-iiiil
11111 MOVEMENT 11111 EXIST II PROP 11111 EXISTING II PROPOSED 11111 EXISTING II OTHER II PROJECT 11111 EXISTING II II + OTHER II II +PROJECT II II <PROJECT II 11111
11111 11111 LANES II LANES 11111 CAPACITY II CAPACITY 11111 VOlUME II VOLUME II VOlUME 11111 VlC U II VIe II, II VIe II II VIC-W_tMP II 11111
11111 ~='== IIIII=~--II~'IIIII ~ II ~ 11111 ~ II ~ II =- 11111 ~ 11""" - II-II ~= 11=11 = 11=11111
11111 Nl 11111 III 011111 170011 011111 14011 II 11111 0.0811'1\ 0.081\'1\ 0.061\'11 11"11111
11111 NT 11111 2,11 011111340011 01111\ 81911 11'11111 0,211\1\ 0.211111 0.211111 1111111
IIIIINRIIIII 011 011111 Oil 011111 10311 II 11111 1111 1111 ,1111 1111111
IIIIISlllllll11 011111 170011 011111 2311 II 11111 0.011111 0.011\11 0.011\11 1111111
liIIl ST illil 211 Oilill 340011 011111 120211 II 11111 0.35\\' \\ 0.351\' II 0.35 1\' 1\ II" 11111
IIIIISRIIIII III 011111170011 011111 11211 II 111110.071111 0.071111 0.071\11 1111111
11111 El 11111 111 011111 17001\ 011111 781\ " \1111 0.04" 1\ 0.0411 II 0.04111\ 11'11111
11111 ET 11111 211 011111 34001\ 011111 15511 II 1111\ 0.0511'11 0.051\'11 0.0511'11 II 11111
IIIIIERlIIlI'li 011111 170011 011111 2181\ II 11111 0.131111 0.131\11 0.131111 1111111
lIiII Wl 11111 III 011111 170011 011111 17911 II ¡Ilill 0.1111'11 0.1111'11 0.1111'11 II 11111
11111 WT 11111 211 011111340011 011111 36911 II 111110.1111110.111111 0.111111 11"11111
11111 WR 11111 'II 011111 170011 011111 2211 U 11111 0.01" U 0.0111 II 0.011\ 'II 1\ 11111
- -- ~------'---o-----------IIIII- .-.- =-====-== '~.--'-lilil
NORTWSOUTH CRIllCAI. SUMS . 11111 0.43 I 0.43 I 0.43 I 0.00 11111
IIIH----~-..,- -------""--1110
11111 0.18 I 0.18 I, 0.18 I 0.00 11111
1110------'----- , ------11111
11111 0.05 I o.OS I 0.05 I 0.05 11111
11111- . ... . -=== . = . ~ =... ==-===- . - 11111
11111 0.84 I 0.84 1 0.84 I . 0.05 11111
11111------,----- , -----11111
IllUB IB \B IA 11111
-----._.----.-.--=-.=.-==-.~-
ICU SPREADSHEET FilE NAME
NewporÌ & MaIn
EASTIWEST CRITICAl SUMS .
ClEARANcE'
N = NORTHBOUND, S = SOUTHBOUNO
E = EASTBOUND. W = WESTBOUND
l = lEFT, T - THROUGH, R = RIGHT
N.S. = NOT SIGNAlIZED '
LOS' LEVEL OF SERVICE
. DENOTES CRITICAl MOVEMENTS
ICUVALUE.
LOS-
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTLIZATION ANALYSIS
City of T ustin-EI CamIno Real RedanIIice1fcn
PM PEAK HOUR
Newport A_us & Main S- -.g CondIIJons .
~--- -------'--- --- ---- ---- --'---
ïllil - iiiil - ii- iiiil 11 11111" II 11 11111 11 11 EX STING 11 11 EX,+QTHER 11 11 EX,'OTHER 11 11111
11111 MOVEMENT 11111 EXIST 11 PROP 11111 EXISTING 11 PROPOSED 11111 EXISTING 11 aTHER 11 PROJECT 11111 EXISTING 11 11 . OTHER II II 'PROJECT 11 11 'PROJECT II 11111
11111 11111 LANES II LANES 11111 CAPACITY II CAPACn'Y 11111 VOLUME 11 VOlUMe 11 VOlUME 11111 VlC II 11 VlC 11 11 VlC 11 11 VlC-W_IMP 11 11111
11111 ..~=. 11111 ~--II ~ 11111 - 11 -- 11111 - 11 -- 11 ~ 11111 == 11-11 ====- 11 = 11 ==== 11 = 11 --=-- 11"'; 11111
11111 NL 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 21111.11 11111 0.121111 0.121111 0,121111 11'11111
11111 NT 11111 211 11111 340011 011111 108511 11 11111 0.3811' 11 0.38 II' II 0.36 II' 11 II 11111
11111 NR 11111 011 11111011 01111114511 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
11111 SL 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 5211 11 11111 0.0411"11 0,0411',11 0.0411'11 11 11111
11111 ST 11111 211 11111 340011 011111 934ft 11 11111 0.2111 11 0.2111 11 0.2111 11 11'11111
IIIIISR,III1I111 11111 110011011111 165ft 11 111110.1011110.101111 0.101111 1111111
11111 EL 11111 111 11111 110011 011111 13211 ß 11111 0.0811'11 0.0811'11 O.!J8I1'1I 11'11111
11111 ET 11111 211 11111 340011 011111 28111 ß 11111 0.08 11 11 0.08 11 II 0.08 11 11 II 11111
IIIIIERIIIIIII1 11111170011 01111121111 II 1 mil. 0.161111 '0.181111 0.181111 1111111
IIIIIWLIIIIIII1 11111 170011 011111 12111 ß 11111 0.071111 0.0111110.071111 1111111
11111 WT 11111211 11111 340011 011111 30111 II 11m 0.0911'11 0.0911"11 0.0911"11 11'11111
11111 WR 11111 111 11111 170011 01l1li 2811 II ,11111 0.021111 0.0211.11 0.0211 11 11 11111
.- -- ---- ---- -----IIIII=-=- ---- ---=---=- -=--=== --11111
---'-- NORTHISOUTH CRITICAl. SUMS - 11111 0.40 I 0.40 I 0.40 1 0.00 11111
ICUS,PREAOSHEETFLENAIIIE NowporI&Mâ1 1111,--- ---- ---- ---.-11111
EASTIWEST CRITICAl SUMS- 11111, 0.11 I 0.11 I 0.11 I 0.00 11111
11111--- ---- -----,--- ----11111
11111 0.05 I, 0.05 I . 0.05 I 0.05 11111
11111- ----'---=-===,. ------- --11111
11111 0.62 I 0.62 I 0.62 I 0.05 11111
11111--- ---- ---- ---- 11111
11111 BIB I B I A 11111
--- ----... --.--- =-.---=-- ---
PROJECT:
INTERVAl;
INTERSECTION:
N - NORTHBOUND, S . SOUTHBOUND
E - E.A.STBOUNO, W . WESTBOUND
L -LEFT, T - THROUGH, R - RIGHT
N.S. . NOT SIGNALIZED
LOS - lEVEL OF SERVICE
, DENOTES CRmCAl MOVEMENTS
ClEARANCE .
ICU VAlUE.
LOS-
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANAl YSI5
PROJECT:
INTERVAL:
INTERSECTION:
CIty of T uotMl CamIno Real -
AM PEAK HOUR
Prospect Ave & - Street Exlsiing CondItIons
- ~- ---- ----'--------- ----~-- ---- -----
11111 11111 II 11111 II 11111 II II 11111 II II EXISTING II II EX.tOTHER II II EX.+OTHER II 11111
11111 MOVEMENT 11111 EXIST II PROP 11111 EXISTING II PROPOSED 11111 EXISTING II OTHER II PR9JECT 11111 EXISTING II II + OTHER II II 'PROJECT II II +PROJECT II 11111
11111 11111 LANES II LANES 11111 CAPACITY II CAPACIlYIllIl VOlUME II VOLUME II VOlUME 11111 V/C II II VtC II II VtC II II VlC-W_IMP II 11111
11111 ====== 11111==11'=11111 = II """"""'="' 11111 ~ II - II - 11111 -- II-II ~ II-II -= 11=11 - - 11=11111
IIIIINLIIIII Oil 011111 011 011111 011 II 11111 11°11 11°'11 11°11 11"11111
11111 NT 11111 011 011111011 011111 011 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
IIIIINRIIIII 011 011111 011 011111 011 II 11111 1111 1I11 1111 1111111
IIIIISLIIIII 011 011111 011 011111 6811 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
11111 ST 11111 III 011111 170011 011111 011 II 11111 0.0811°11 0.0811°11 0.0811°11 11°11111
IIIIISRIIilI 011 011111 011 0111117411 II 11111 1111 11111111 1111111
11111 EL 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 6811 II 11111 0.0411° II 0.0411+ II 0.0411" II 11° 11111
IIIIIETIIIIIII1 011111 170011 01111126511 II 111110.161111 0.161111 0.161111 1111111
IIIIIERIIIII 011 011111 011 011111 011 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
IIIIIWLIllIl 011 011111 011 011111011 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
11111 WT 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 40911 II 11111 0.2411°11 0.2411°11 0.2411°11 11°11111
11111 WR 11111 111 011111 1700" 011111 IIOB II 11111 0.0511 II 0.0511 II 0.05'11 II II 11111
- -- - - - ~ - - - - - - - ------, - ----- 11111 """""'-== - - - ~ - = " --.6:... ,,- - =- - - 11111
NORTHI8OUTH CAITICAI. S,l!M$ - 11111 0.00 I 0.08 I '0.08 . I 0.00 11111
IIIII~--'-~-------'---IIIII
11111 0.28 I 0.28 I 0.28 I 0.00 11111
11111- -- ---':-- -- -- -- -- -- 11111
11111. 0.05 I 0.05, I 0.05 I 0.05 0111
BIII- ---- -----== -==== -=11111
HIli ,0.41 I 0.41 I 0.41 I 0.05 '11111
11111----_----------11111
DIll A 'I A I A I A 11111
-=-------=-=-=--===-=-==-=--=
ICU SPREADSHEET FIlE NAME
Prospect & MaIn
N = NORTHBOUND, S - SOUTHBÓ!JND
E = EASTBOUNO, W - WESTBOUND
L - LEFT, T.THROUGH, R- RIGIIT
N.S. - NOT SIGNALIZED
LOS - LEVa OF SERVICE
° DENOTES CRITICAl MOVEMENTS
EASTIWEST CRITICAl SUMS,.
ClEARANcE .
ICUVAlUE-
LDS-
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTR.IZATION ANAlYSIS
PROJECT:
INTERVAl:
INTERSECTION:
CUy 01 T USU...EI Canm Real R_1Ion
PM PEAK HOUR
Proopect Ave & MaIn S"" - CondItIons
- - ~ - - - - - - - - - --'-'-- - - - - - - - - - - - -'- - -
¡WI - rnll - ii 11111 II 11111 11 'II' 11111 II II EXISTING II II EX.+OTHER II 11 ex.+OTHER 11 11111
11111 MOVEMENT 11111 EXIST II PROP 11111 EXISTING 11 PROPOSED 11111 EXISTING 11 OTHER 11 PROJECT 11111 EXl5TING II II < OTHER II U+PROJECT 11 11 <PROJECT 11 11111
lilil ilililANES II lANES 11111 CAPACITY II CAPACITY 11111 VOlUME 11 VOlUME 11 VOLUME 11111 VlC II II VlC II 11 VtC II II VIC-W_IMP II 11111
1I1II~~==IIIII=="I1--I1I11-I1-IIII1===--11 ====-'-11 ====='-11111-11-11-11-11-===11==11 ===11=11111
IIIIINLIIIIIOIl 11111 011 011111,00 II 11111 11"11 11°11 11°11 11°11111
11111 NT 11111 011 11111 011 011111 011 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
IIIIINRIIIIIOIl 11111011 011111011 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
11111 SL 11111 0 II 11111 0 n 0 11111 94 11 11 11111 0 11 11 11 11 II 11 11111
11111 ST 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 011 11 11111 0.0911"11 0.0911°11 0.0911°11 11°11111
IIIIISRI1I11 011 11111 011 011111 520 II 11111 Oil 1111 1111 1111111
IIIIIELIIIIIII1 11111170011 011111 960 II 11111 0.1161111 0.1161111 0.061111 11°11111
11111 ET 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 35511 II 11111 0.210°0 0.2111°11 0.2111°11 II 11111
IIIIIERIllIl 011 11111 011 011111 011 II 11111 011 1111 1111 1111111
IIIIIWLIIII1 011 11111 011 011111011 II 11111 11"11 11°11 11°11 1111111
IIIIIWTIIIIIII1 11111170011 011111 23811 11 111110.141111 0.141111 0.141111 11°11111
11111 WR 11111 111 11111. 170011 0 IliA 8811 II 11111 0.06011 O.05ß 11 0.0511 II II 11111
- -- ---- -----C--------,-.IIIII- ----- ---- ===-= --11111
. - NORTHISOUTH CRITICAl SUMS - I 11111 0.09 I 0.09 I 0.09 I 0.00' 11111
ICUSPREAOSHEETFR.ENAME Prospecl&,MaIn 11111--- ---- ---- ----11111
EASTlWeSTCRITICAlSUMS- 11111 0.21 I 0.21 I 0.21 I 0.00 11111
11111--- ----'---' ---- ----11111
11111 '0.06 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 11111
11111- ------ =-==",""",== ========-= --11111
11111 0.35 I ,0.35' I 0.35 I 0.05 11111
010~-- ---- ---- ----11111
1118 A I A I A I A 11111
--------~-=-====-=--=-----
N = NORTHBOUND, S . SOUTHBOUND
E' EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUNO
L = LEfT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT
N.S. = NOT SIGNAlIZED
LOS = LEVEl OF SERVICE
° DENOTES CRITICAl MOVEMENTS
a.EARANCE -
ICUVAlUE-
LOS-
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTilIZATION ANAlYSIS
PROJECT:
INTERVAL:
INTERSECTION:
Clly 01 TuBiln-EJ Canino Real _Itan
AM PEAK HOUR
prospect Ave & 181 SInIet E>dollng cadUons
-- - --- ---- ------ --- ---- ---- -----
iiill 11111' II 11111 II 11111 II II 11111, II II EXISTING II II EX.+OTHER II II EX.+OTHER 11 11111
11111 MOVEMENT 11111 EXIST II PROP 11111 EXISTING II PROPOSED 11111 EXISTING II. OTHER II PROJECT 11111 EXISTING II II + OTHER II II +PROJECT II II +PROJECT II 11111
11111 11111 LANES II LANES 11111 CAPACI1Y II CAPACI1Y 11111 VOlUME II VOLUME II VOLUME 11111 VIC II II VIC II II VlC II II VIC-W_IMP II 11111
1II1I""=-=-=-"IIIII==I1=""""IIIII.--.II-IIIII-II-~11 ~IIIII-II-II-=-II-II-=-==II=II ==11=11111
11111 NL 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 3511 II 11111 0.0211'11 0.0211"11 0.0211'11 11'11111
11111 NT 11111'11 011111 170011 01111113811 II 11111 0,101111 0.101111 0.101111 1111111
IIIIINRIIIII 011 011111 011 0111113211 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
IIIIISLIIIII 011 011111 011 011111 16211 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
11111 ST 11111 2+ 011111 34QO1I 011111 16811 II 11111 0.09 11'11 0.09 11'11 0,09 11'11 11'11111
11111 SR 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 13211 II 11111 0.0811 II 0.0811 II 0.0811 II II 11111
11111 EL 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 13411 II 11111 0.0811'11 0.0811'11 0.0811'11 11'11111
IllIIET.1I1II 211 011111 340011 01111141111 II 11111 0.131111 0.131111 0.131111' 1111111
IIIIIERIllIl 011 011111 011 011111 2511 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
11111 WL 11111 111 011111 170011 011111' 4411 II 11111 0.0311 II 0,0311 II 0.0311 II II 11111
11111 WT 11111 211 011111 340011 011111 52511 II 11111 0.1511'11 0.1511'11 0.1511"11 11"11111
11111 WR 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 107ft II 11111 0.0811 II 0.0611 II 0.0611 II \I 11111
-. -- -M_- ---- -----0111- ---- ---- ---- --11111
- NORTHI50UTH CRITICAl SUMS- 11111 0.11 I 0.11 I 0.11 I 0.00 11111
Proopect& tsl , 11111------------ ---- ----11111
EASTIWEST CRITICAl. SUMS = 0111 '0.23 I 0.23 I 0.23 I 0.00 11111
0111---------.-----11111
11111 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 11111
11111-===-== ----- --======-=- ==-===-= - -11111
11111 0.39 I 0.39 I 0.39 I 0.05 11111
11111----------------11111
IIIØ A I A I A, 1 A 11111
--===- =--==- =--- ----- .---
ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME
N . NORTHBOUND, S - SOUTHBOUND
E " EASTBOUND. W - WESTBOUND
L" LEFT, T c THROUGH, R - RIGKT
N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED
LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE
" DENOTI:5 CRITICAL MOVEMENTS
CLEARANCE .
ICUVALUE=
LOS-
(+) REPRESENTS LEFT AND LEFT I THROUGH LANES
NOT!: : SPLIT PHASED NoS
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS
PROJECT:
INTERVAL;
INTERSECTION:
City ofTuslin-E1 Carßno Real R-
PM PEAK HOUR
Prospod Ave & 1.. SInIet ExIstIng CoodIIIoos
--- --'----- ------ --- ---- ---~--
iiiil - iiiil- 11 11111 11 11111 II II 11111 II 11 EXISTING 11 II EX.+OTHER II II EX.+OTHER ii - iiiil
11111 MOVEMENT 11111 EXIST 11 PROP 11111 EXISTING II PROPOSED 11111 EXISTING II OTHER II PROJECT 11111 EXISTING II II . OTHER II II 'PROJECT. II II +PROJECT II 11111
11111 11111 LANES II lANES 11111 CAPACITY II CAPACITY 11111 VOlUME II VOlUME II VOlUME 11111 VlC II II VIe II II VIe II II VtC-W_IMP II 11111
11111 ======- 1ll1I=~II~1I1II - II ~ 11111 - II ====== II --= 11111 ====== II~II = 11=11 == II-II -- 11-11111
11111 NL 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 8711 II 11111 0.0511 II 0.0511 II 0.0511 II 11° 11111
11111 NT 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 24511 II 11111 0.1911"11 0.1911°11 0.1911°11 II 11111
IIIIINRIIIII 011 11111 011 011111 708 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
11111 SL 11111 011 11111 011 011111 18811 II 11111 11°11 11°11 11°11 1111111
11111 ST 11111 2- 11111 340011 011111 10711 II 11111 0.09 0 II 0.0911 II 0.0911 II, 11° 11111
llIliSRIIIIII11 11111 170011 011111 10111 II /111110.061111 .0.0611110.061111 1111111
11111 EL'IIIII 111 11111 170011 011111 19311 II 11111 0.1111"110.1111°00.1111°11 11°11111
11111 ET 11111 211 11111 340011 011111 72311 II 11111 0.2211 II 0.2211 II 0.2211 II II 11111
11111 ER 11111 011 11111 011 011111 330 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
IlIIIWLIIIIIII1 11111 170011 011111 200 II 111110.011111 0.011111 '0.011111 1111111
11111 WT 11111211 11111 340011 011111 57311 II 11111 0.1711°11 0.1711°11 0.1711°11 11°11111
IllIlWRIIIIIII1 11111 170011 0111112060. 11,11111 0.121111 0.121111 0.121111 1111111
- -- ---- ---- -----11111- --=- ========= ========. -=11111
NORTHISOUTHcmncAl..SUMs- 11111 0.19 I. 0.19 I 0.19 I 0.00' 11111
11111--- ---- --'------ ----11111
11111 0.28 I 0.28 I 0.28 I 0.00 11111
11111----__---------11111
11111 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 11111
11111"'""'""- ---======- ==== ==== ==11111
11111 . 0.52 I 0.52 I 0.52 I 0.05 11111
8111----__---------11111
1110 A I A I A I A 11111
-=-------=---==--=-=====-===-
ICU SPREAOSHEET FLE NAME
Prosped & 181/
N = NORTHBOUND, S = SOUTHBOUND
E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND
L = LEFT. T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT
N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED
LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE
° DENOTES CRITICAl MoVEMENTS
(-) REPRESENTS LEFT AND LEFT /THROUGH lANES
NOTE: spur PHASED N-S
EASTtWEST CR./TICAL SUMS -
ClEARANCE =
ICUVAlUE=
LOS-
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTIlIZATION ANALYSIS
PROJECT: City of Tuslln-El Carrino Real_lion
INTERVAl: AM PEAK HOUR
INTERSECTION: EI Carrino Real & 101 S- YEAR 2020 WIIhouI PROJECT
¡¡¡;1-¡¡¡;I~ii-¡¡¡;I-ii-¡¡¡;I-ii-ii~mll-ii-ii~ii-ii~ñ-ñ~ii-iiill
11111 MOVEMENT 11111 EXIST II PROP 11111 EXISTING II PROPOSED 11111 YEAR 2020 II OTHER II PROJECT 11111 EXISTING II II + OTHER II II +l'ROJECT II II +PROJECT II 11111
11111 11111 LANES II LANES 11111 CAPACITY II CAPACITY, 11111 VOlUMES II VOlUME II VOlUME 11111 Vie II II VIC II II ,VlC II II VIC-W_aAP II 11111
1I1II=====IIIII~=~II~='IIIII-=~11 ==11111-11--11-11111-11=11 ~-II-II-===--II==I1-=-=II-1il1l
11111 NL 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 18811 II 11111 0.1111'11 0.1111'11 0.1\11'11 11'11111
11111 NT 11111 011 011111 011 011111 011 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
11111 NR 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 7411 II 11111 0.0411 II 0.0411 II 0.0411 II II 11111
11111 SL 11111 011 011111011 011111 011 11' 11111 1111,1111 1111 1111111
11111 ST 11111 011 011111 011 011111 011 n 11111 11'11 11"11 11'11 11'11111
11111 SR 11111 011 011111 011 011111 011 11 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
11111 EL 11111 III 011111 170011 011111 011 11 11111 0.0011'11 0.0011'11 0.0011'11 11'11111
11111 ET 11111 211 011111 34OQ1I 011111 56911 II 11111 0.1711 II 0.1711 11 0.1711 11 11 11111
11111 ER 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 14011 11 11111 0.0811 II 0.0811 II 0.0811 II 1111111
11111 WL 11111 III 011111 170011 011111 lIOn 11 11111 0.0611 II 0.0611 II 0.0611 11 11 11111
11111 WT 11111 211 011111 340011 011111 mil II 11111 0.2311' II 0.2311' 11 0.2311' 11 11'11111
IIIIIWRIIIII 011 011111 011 011111011 II 11111 IIn 1111 1111 1111111
- -- ---- ---------IIIII~ =--- --=- --=- .-11111
NORTH/J¡OlllH CRITICAl SUMS = 11111 0.11 I 0.11 I 0.11 I 0.00 11111
f 11111--------------"':'11111
11111 0.23 I 0.23 I 0.23 I 0.00 11111
11111--- -------- ---- ---- 11111
11111 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 11111
11111- =--==- =-=-= -------- - -11111
11111 0.39 I 0.39 I 0.39 I 0.05 11111
11111--- ---- ---- ----11111
11111 A, I A I A I A 11111
-=--------------=---~.-==-~--
ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME ECR & 101 2020 wlo prof
N = NORTHBOUND, S = SOUTHBOUND
E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND
L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R. RIGHT
N,S: = NOT SIGNALIZED,
LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE
. DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS
EASTIWEST CRITICAl. SUMS-
ClEARANCE -
ICUVALtJE-
LOS-
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS
PROJECT:
INTERVAl.;
INTERSECTION:
CIty of TusUn-EI C8Irino Real RedassUlcaIlon
PM PEAK HOUR
EI eamo"" Real & ,.. Street YEAR 2020 Wlthoul PROJECT
-- ---- ---,--------- --- ---- ---- -----
iiiïl -, 11111 II 11111 II 11111, II 'II 11111 /I II EXISTING /I II EX.+OTHER /I /I EX.+OTHER /I 111/1
11111 MOVEMENT /1111 EXIST /I PROP 111/1 EXISTING II PROPOSED 111/1 YEAR 2020 /I OTHER II PROJECT 11111 EXISTING /I II + OTHER /I II +PROJECT /I II 'PROJECT /I 11111
11111 11111 lANES /I lANES 11111 CAPACITY II CAPACITY /1111 VOLUMES /I VOI,UME II VOLUME 11111 Vtc II II VtC /I II Vtc /I /I VIG-W_IMP /I 11111
IIIII=C--====IIIII='/I---III/I--/i~/lIII-II-II-IIIII-II-U===II=/i=/i=/I- -11=111/1
11111 NL 11111 111 11111 1700/1 011111 319/1 /I /11/1 0.19/1'11 0.19/1'/1 0.1911'/1 /1'11111
11111 NT 11111 011 11111011 01/111 0/1 II 11111 /1/1 /1/1 /1/1 1111111
IIIIINRIIIIII/l 11111 170011 011111 164/1 II 111110.1011/1 0.10/111 0.1011/1 /111111
IIIIISLIIIII 011 11111 011 0111/1 0/1 II 11111 1111 /1/1 11/1 /111111
IIIlIsT1ll1l 011 1111/ 011 0111110/1 II 11111 /1"/1 /I'll 11'11' /1'11111
/1111 sR 11111 011 11111 011 0/1111 OU II 11111 1111 1111 /11111/1111
IIIIIEL/lIIIII1 11111 170011 011111 0/1 II /1111 0.0011110.001111 0.0011/1 /1'11111
11111 ET 11111 211 11111 340011 011111 95211 II 11111 O.28U'1I 0.28/1' II 0.28/1' II /I 11111
IiIIIERI/IiIII/ 1111/ 170011 01111/ 22711 /I 1111/ 0.131111 0.131111 0.131111 1111111
/1111 WL 11111 111 11111 170011 Olilll 11911 /I 1111/ 0.071/' II O.OTII'II 0.0711' /I II 111/1
11111 WT /1111 211 11111 340011 011111 76811 II ¡ 11111 0.2311 II 0.2311 II 0.2311 II 11'11111
IIIIIWR/II/IOI/ 111/1 01101111/ on II /1111 1111 /III /III 111111/
- -- ---- ---,--- ----------.IIIII=- -=-=======; -==-== -==---- ==11111
NORTHISOUTH CRmCALsUMS = 11111, 0.19 I 0.19 I 0.19 I 0.00 11111
IIIII~---_~---------/lill
11111 0.35 I 0.35 I 0.35 I 0.00 11111
11111----__---------1/111
11111 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 1111/
IIIII-=====- = = - ~ = = = -== - = = == = = 11111
II/II 0.59 I ' 0.59 I 0.59 I 0.05 111/1
11111- - - - ----..,... - - - - - '- - - ., - 11111
1l1li A I A I A I A 11111
=- =-===-=== ==----== =-=--====- ===
ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME ECR & 1812020 w/o pro¡
N = NORTHBOUNO, S = SOUTHBOUND
E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND
L = LEFT. T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT
N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED
LOS - LEVEL OF SERVICE
, DENOTES CRITICAl MOVEMENTS
EAliTIWEST CRITiCAl SUMS-
ClEARANCE =
ICU VAlUE.
LOS-
IIITERSECTION CAPACfTY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS
PROJECT:
IIITERÍfAL:
INTERSECTION:
CIty of T usUn-EI Carrino Real Redasstftcatlon
AM PEAK HOUR
EI Carrino Real & MaIn S- YEAR 2020 Wlthoot PROJECT
;¡¡¡1-;¡¡¡I-iî~;¡¡¡I-iî-;¡¡¡I-iî-iî-iiîl1-iî-ii~ii-ii~ii-ii~iï-iiîl1
11111 MOVEMENT 11111 EXIST 11 PROP 11111 EXISTING II PROPOSED 11111 YEAR 2020 II orHER II PROJECT 11111 EXISTING II II + OTHER II II +PROJECT II II +PROJECT II 11111
11111 11111 LANES II LANES 11111 CAPACfTY II CAPACfTY 11111 VOLUMES II VOLUME II VOLUME 11111 VlC II 11 VIe II 11 VIe 11 11 v/C.W_IMP II 11111
11111 ======= 11111===='11=====11111-= II ~ 11111 ~~,II -II --=== 11111-======11=11 ===== 11==11 = 11=11 ==== 11=11111
IIIIINLIIIII 011 011111 011 011111 8011 II 11111 1111 1111 1111' 11"11111
11111 NT 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 18411 II 11111 0.1811"11 0.1811"11 0.1611"'11 II 11111
11111 NR 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 5411 II 11111 0.0311 II 0.0311 II 0.0311 II 1111111
11111 SL 11111 011 011111 011 011111 1511 II 11111 11"11 11"11 11"11 1111111
I11I1STIII11111 011111 170011011111 18111 II 11111 0.121111 0,121111 0.121111 11"11111
11111 SR 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 2911 II 11111 0.0211 II 0.0211 II 0.0211 11 11 11111
11111 EL 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 3511 11 < 11111 0,0211" II 0.0211" II 0.0211" II 11"11111
11111 ET 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 38811 II 11111 0.2811 11 0.281111 0.2811 II II 11111
11111 ER 11111 011 011111 011 01111110211 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
11111 WL 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 8411 II 11111 0.0411 II 0.0411 11 0.<>411 II I
11111 WT 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 44811 11 11111 0.3011"11 0.3011"11 0.3011"11 I:":::::
IIIIIWRIIIII 011 011111 0110111115711 II 11111 1101111 1111 1111111
- --- ---- ---- -~----,--IIIII~ a-a-- a=_=-=== =======- = =11111
NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAl S\JMS = 11111 0.19 I 0.16 I 0,16 I 0.00 11111
11111--- ---- ---- -~--IIIII
11111 0.32 I 0.32 I 0.32 I 0,00' 1110
11111----__---------11111
I 11111 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 11111
11111- a__-==--== -=--===-= -----==- = =11111
Ilin 0.56 I 0.53 I 0.53 I 0,06 mil
11111--- ---- -'----- ----11111
11111 A I A I A I A 11111
---=--------=====-=======-===
ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME ECR & Main 2020 wJo pn>
N =NORTHBOUND,S= SOUTHBOUND
E = EASTBOUND, W = WEsTBOUND
L = LEFT, T. THROUGH, R . RIGHT
N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED
LOS. LEVEL OF SERVICE
. DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS
EAST /WEST CRITICAL suMs .
CLEARANCE-
leU VALUE.
LOS-
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UT1UZATION ANALYSIS
PROJECT:
INTERVAL:
INTERSECTION:
CUy of T ustln-EI Canino Real -
PM PEAK HOUR
EI Canino Real & Main Slreet YEAR 2020 WIthout PROJECT
- ---- ---- ------ --- ---- ---- -----
--1-- 11111 II 11111 II 11111 II II 11111, II II EXISTING II ,II EX-OTHER II II EX+OTHER II 11111
::::1 MOVEMENT 11111 EXIST II PROP 11111 EXISTING II PROPOSED 11111 YEAR 2020 II OTHER II PROJECT 11111 EXISTING II II + OTHER II II +PROJEcr II II +PROJECT II 11111
11111 ' 11111 lANES II LANES 11111 CAPACITY II CAPACITY 11111 VOlUMES II VOlUME II VOlUME 11111 VlC ,1111 VlC II II VlC II II VlC-W ~IMP II 11111
11111 ===== 1l1II~1I-- --11111 == II ==ë="1II1I =-===-" ~-II -=-IIIII-==-= II-II -II-II =-=-= 11"""11 ====-11-11111
lllliNL1II1I Oil 11111 °Il 01111116311 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 11.11111
11111 NT 11111 '11 11111 170011 011111 32111 II 11111 0.2811.11 0.2811. II 0_2811. II II 11111
11111 NR 11111 '11 11111 170011 011111 12711 II 'Hili 0.0711 H q.07H H 0.0711 H II 11111
IIIIISLIIIII °H 11111 °Il 011111 3911 II Hili H"H 11.11 11.11 1111111
11111 ST Hili 111 Hili 1700H 011111 24811 II Hili 0.1711 II 0.1711 II 0.1711 H 11.11111
11111 SR Hili 111 11111 170011 011111 2811 II 11111 0.02 II II 0.02 H H 0.02 II H II 11111
11111 EL 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 4911 II 11111 0,0311 II 0.03" II 0.0311 II 11.11111
11111 ET 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 34411 H 11111 0.2711. II 0.27 II. II 0.27'11. II II 11111
11111 ER 11111 Oil IIIH 011 011111 12011 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
11111 WL 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 8511 II 11111 0.0511.11 0,0511.11 0.0511.11 II 11111
11111 WT 11111 111 11111 170011 011111.43411 II 11111 0.2811 II 0.2811 II 0.2811 H H.IIIII
IIIIIWRIIIII Oil 11111 011 011111 SOil II Hili 11'11 1111 1111 1111111
- ~- ---- ---- -----IIIII=- -_0- =------- ===- =-11111
- NORTHISOUTH CRITICAl SUMS = 11111 0.35 I 0.28 I. 0.28 I 0.00 11111
ICU SPREAOSHEET FILE NAME ECR & Main 2020 wIo pro¡ , 11111- - - - - -..,. - ----,- - - - - - - 11111
- EASTIWEST CRITICAl SUMs = I 11111 O.~ I 0.32 , I 0.32 I 0.00 11111
N = NORTHBOUNO, S = SOUTHBOUND 11111- - - - - :- - ,... - - - - - - - 11111
E = EASTI!OUND, W = WESTI!OUND CtEARANCE - 11111 0.05 I 0,05 I 0:05 I 0.05 11111
L= LEFT, T=THROUGH, R= RIGHT 11111-==== ----- =-----= =----- 0-11111
N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED leU VALUE - 111" . 0.72 I 0.85 I 0.85 I 0.05 11111
LOS = LEVEL OF SERVIeE 11111----__---------11111
. OENOTES CRmCAL MOVEMENTS LOS - III" C I BIB I A 11111
-------------------======-==-
INTERSECTION CAPAcny UTILIZATION ANALYSIS
PROJECT: CIIy 01 Tustln-EI Camno Real Rod-
INTERVAL: AM PI;AK HOUR
INTERSECTION: EI Caoino Real & Newport Avenue YEAR 2020 Wnhout PROJE~
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---,- - - - - - -,.-- - - - - - - - - ,- - -
11111 11111 II 11111 II . 11111 II II 11111 II II EXISTING II II EX.+OTHER II II EX.+OTHER II III
11111 MOVEMENT 11111 EXIST II PROP 11111 EXISTING II PROPOSED 11111 YEAR 2020 II OTHER II PROJECT 11111 EXISTING II II + OTHER II II +PROJECT ' II II +PROJECT II 111
11111 11111 lANES II lANES 11111 CAPACITY II CAPACITY 11111 VOlUMES II VOLUIAE II VOlUIAE 11111 VIe II II VIC II II V/C II II VIC-W_IMP II III
1II1I==="="IIIII=="II=~IIIII-~II-=IIIII-=-==11 ~II-IIIII~II-li ~-II-II--II=II ---11=111
11111 Nl 11111 '11 011111 170011 011111 11411 II 11111 0,0711'11 0.0711'11 0.0711'11 11"111
11111 NT 11111 211 011111 340011 011111 51611 II 11111 0.1511 II 0.1511' II 0.1511 II II III
IIIIINRIIIII '11 011111 170011 011111 19011 II 111110.111111 0.111111 0.1'1111 11111
11111 SL 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 15911 II 11111 0.0911 II 0.0911 II D.0911 II II III
11111 ST 11111 311 011111 510011 011111 90011 II 111110.1811"11 0.1811'11 0.1811'11 11'111
lllliSR1ll1l 011 011111 011 011111 1011 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 11111
11111 El 11111 '11 0,11111 170011 011111 2011 II 11111 0.0111 II 0.0111 II 0.0111 II 11'111
IIIIIETIII1I111 011111 170011 011111 19111 II 111110.1111'11 0.1111'11 0.1111'11 11111
11111 ER 11111 '11 011111 170011 011111 60111 II 11111 0.2911 II 0.2911 II 0.2911 II II III
11111 WL 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 14011 II 11111 0.0811' II 0.0811' II 0.0811' II II III
11111 WT 11111 211 011111 340011 011111 15211 II 11111 0.0611 II 0.0611 II 0.0611 II 11'111
IlIllWRIllIl 011 011111 011 0111115811 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 11111
- -- ---- ---- -----IIIII=-==- -----=-== ---===-== -==== -=111
NORTHISOIJTH CRITICAl. SUUS - 11111 0.25 I 0.25 I 0.25 I 0.00 III
11111----__---------111
11111 0.19 I 0.19 I 0.19 I 0.00 III
11111--- ---- -",----,-- --'--111
11111 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 III
1110- ---- ------ ---- --III
11111 0.49 I 0.49 I 0.49 I 0.05 III
AIII--- ---- ---- -- -- UI
RIA A I A I A I A HI
-------~-----=-=-==--==------
ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAMIECR & Newport 2020 w/o pro¡
N = NORTHBOUND. S = SOIJTHBOUND
E - EASTBOUND, W= WESTBOUND
L = lEFT. T = THROUGH, R - RIGIfT
N,S, = NOT SIGNAlIZED
LOS - lEVEL OF SERVICE
. DENOTES CRITICAl. MOVEIAENTS
EASTIVVEST CRIT1CAl.5UIAS -
ClEARANCE -
leu VAlUE -
LOS-
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTRJZA TION ANAl. YSIS
PROJECT:
INTERVAL:
INTERSECTION:
, Cny of T uslin-EI CamIno Real RecIaosIflcaIIon
PM PEAK HOUR
EI Camno Real & Newpo<t Avenue YEAR 2020 WIIhouI PROJECT
- ----'-- ---------- ------- ---- -----
ïrul - 11111 II 11111 II '11111 II II 11111 II II EXISTING II II EX.+OTHER II II EX.+oTHER II III
11111 MOVEMENT 11111 EXIST II PROP 11111 EXISTING 11 PROPOSED 11111 YEAR.202O 11 OTHER 11 PROJECT 11111 EXISTING 11 11 . OTHER 11 II .PROJECT II II .PROJECT II III
11111 11111 lANES II lANES 11111 CAPACITY 11 CAPACITY 11111 VOlUMES 11 VOlUME 11 VOlUME 11111 VlC 11 11 Vie 11 11 Vie 11 11 VIC-W_IMP 11 111
11111 ==-=== 11111===-11-==--11111 ~- II ~ 11111 - II ~ II -- 11111 ~ 11-11 =-===- 11=11 ====== 11=11 -=- 11-111
11111 NL 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 41711 II 11111 0.2511°11 0.2511°11 0.2511°11 11"111
11111 NT 11111 211 11111 340011 011111 117311 II 11111 0.3511 II 0.3511 II 0.3511 II II III
11111 NR 11111 111 Illil 170011 011111 4011 II 11111 0.0211 11 0.0211 11 0.0211 II II III
11111 SL 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 9911 11 11111 0.0611 II 0.0611 II 0.0611 II II 111
11111 ST 11111 311 11111 510011 011111 91611 II 11111 0.1911°11 0.1911°11 0.1911°11 11°111
11111 SR 11111 011 11111011 011111 6011 .11 11111.1111 1111 '1111 Dill
11111 EL 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 6011 II 11111 0.0411°11 0.O411~1I 0.0411°11 11°111
11111 ET 11111 111 11111 170011 01111123211 II 11111 0.141111 0.141111 0.141111 11111
11111 ER 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 41411 II 11111 0.2411 II 0.2411 II 0.2411 II 11111
11111 WL 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 10011 II Rill 0.0611 11 0.0611 II 0.0611 II II III
11111 WT 11111 211 11111 340011 011111 58811 II 11111, 0.2I! 11° 11 0.26 UO 11 0.2811" II 11° III
11111 WR 11111 011 11111 011 01111128211 II 11111 11.11 1111 1111 11111
- ~- ---- ---------IIIII~ ------ ---- ----==== ==111
NORTHISOUTH CRITICAl SUMS - 11111 0.44 I 0.44 I 0.44 I 0.00 III
11111----__---------111
11111 0.30 I 0.30 I 0.30 I 0.00 III
1II1I----~_---------111
11111 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 III
11111 - - - - ............. - - - =-=== = = = -==-= = - 111
11111 0.79 I 0.79 I 0.79 I 0.05 III
11111--- ---- ---- ----III
nlll C I C . I CIA 111
-------------------==-----=-=
ICU SPREAOSHEET FILE NAMIECR & Newport 2020 wlo pro¡
N = NORTHBOUND. S - SOUTHBOUND
E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND
L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R - RIGHT
N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED
LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE
. OENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS
EASTIWEST CRITICAL SUMS -
ClEARANCE -
ICU VALUE =
LOS-
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS
PROJECT:
INTERVAL:
INTERSECTION:
CIty at Tuslln-EI CarTlno Reel _lion
AM PEAK HOUR
Newport Avenue & MaIn SbMI YEAR 2020 Without PROJECT
001 '-- 001 :-- ii - 001 - ii - iñil - ii - ii - iñil - ii - ii EXimiG ii - iï EX. <OTHER iï - iï ~ iï - ìiiíl
11111 MOVEMENT 11111 EXIST II PROP 11111 EXISTING II PROPOSED 11111 YEAR 2020 II OTHER II PROJECT 11111 EXISTING II II + OTHER II II +PROJEcr II II +PROJECT II 11111
11111 11111 LANES II LANES 11111 CAPACITY, II CAPACITY 11111, VOLUMES II VOLUME II VOlUME 11111 VlC II II VlC II II VlC' II II VIC-W_'MP II 11111
11111 ~====~~ 11111===='11 ==-11111 -~= II =~ 11111 ~.- II - II .............. 11111 ~ ,II ~ II ~-_. II-II ~ II-II -- II -11111
11111 NL 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 22211 II 11111 0.1311'11 0.1311'11 0.1311'11 '11'11111
11111 NT 11111 211 011111 340011 011111 34011 II 11111 0.1111 II 0.1111 II 0.1'11 II II 11111
IlIIINRIIIII 011 011111 011 011111 50,11 II 11111 1111 11'11 1111 1111111
11111 SL 11111 111 011111 ,170011 011111 3011 II 11111 .0.0211 II 0.0211 II 0.0211 II II 11111
11111 ST 11111 211 011111 340011 011111 101011 II 11111' 0.3011'11 0.3011'11 0.3011'11 11'11111
11111 SR 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 13011 II 11111 0.080 II 0.0811 II 0.0811 II 1111111
11111 EL 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 4011 II 11111 0.0211 II 0.0211 II 0.0211 II 11'11111
11111 ET 11111 211 011111 340011 011111 24 )1I II 11111 0.0711" II 0.0711' II 0.0711' II II 11111
11111 ER 11111 '11 011111 170011 011111 13311 II 11111 0.0811 II 0.0811 II 0.0811 II II 11111
11111 WL. 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 18011 II 11111 0.0911' II 0.0911' II 0.0911' II 11 11111
IIIIIWTII1II211 011111 340011 01111138011 II 11111 0.11 A II 0.111111 0.111111 11"11111
IIIIIWRIIIIIII1 011111 170011 011111 1011 II 11111 0.011111 0.011111 0.011111 1111111
- -- ---- ~--- -----11111- ---- -=-- ---- =-11111
- NORTHISOurH CRITICAl. SUMS - 11111 0.43 I 0.43 1 0.43 I 0.00 11111
ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAMlflowpor1 & Main 2020 wfo prq 11111- - - - ~ -:... - ~ - - - --,- - - 11111
El,STIWEST CRITICAl SUMS = 111110.16 I 0.16 I 0.16 1 0,00 11111
11111------'-----------11111
11111 , 0.05 1 ,0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 11111
III\I~ ---"""-==- --=- ----- --11111
11111 0.64 1 0.64 I 0.64 I. 0.05 11111
IIIII---~--,--- ---,--- ----11111
Alii BIB I B I A ,11111
--=- ---- -_aa-- =-._~ --..
N = NORTHBOUND, S a SOUTHBOUNO
E . EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND
L = LEFT, T - THROUGH, R a RIGIfT
N.S. - NOT SIGNAlIZED
LOS - LEVEL OF SERVICE
, DENOTES CRrnCAl MOVEMENTS
ClEARANCE a
ICUVAlUEa
LOS-
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTUJZATION ANALYSIS
PROJECT:
INTERVAl:
INTERSECTION:
CRy 01 Tustl...EI Carrino Reel -lion '
PM PEAK HOUR
~ Avenue Ii Main BIreot YEAR ZOZO WI1I1oUI PROJECT
-'---- ---- --------- ---- ---- -~---
¡¡ill - 11111 II 11111 II 11111 II II 11111 II II EXISTING II II EX.+OTHER II II EX.+OTHER II 11111
11111 MOVEMENT 11111 EXIST II PROP 11111 EXISTING II PROPOSED 11111 YEAR ZOZO II OTHER II PROJECT 11111 EXISTING II II . OTHER II II .PROJECT II II .PROJECT II 11111
11111 11111 LANES II LANES 11111 CAPACITY II CAPACITY 11111 VOlUMES II VOLUME II VOlUME 11111 VIGil II V/C II II V/C II II Vlc.W_IMP II 11111
11111 C='===== 11111====-11===11111 ~ II -===;== 11111-11 - II =- 11111-====== II-II --==-=== II-II -== II-II =~~ 11-11111
11111 NL 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 4511'.11 11111 0.0311 II 0.0311 II 0.0311 II 11'11111
11111 NT' 11111 211 11111 340011 011111 109011 II 11111 0.37,11' II 0.3711' II 0.3711' II II 11111
IIIIINRIIIII 011 11111 011 01111116011 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
11111 SL 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 7011 II 11111 0.0411' II 0.0411' II 0.0411' II II 11111
11111 ST 11111 211 11111 340011 011U1 78011 II 11111 0.2311 II .0.2311 II 0.2311 II 11'11111
11111 SR 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 12011 II 11111 0,0711 II 0.0711 II 0.0711 II II 11111
11111 EL 11111111 11111 170011 011111 6011 II 11111 0,0411"11 0.0411'11 0.0411'11 11'11111
11111 ET 11111 211 11111 340011 011111 49011 II 111110.141111 0.141111 0.141111 1111111
11111 ER 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 3211 II 111110.021111 0.021111 0.021111 1111111
11111 WL 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 0011 II 11111 0.0511 II 0.0511 II 0.0511 II II 11111
11111 WT 11111 211 11111 340011 011111 52011 II 11111 0.1511'11 0.1511'11 0.1511'11 11'11111
IIIIIWRIIIIIII1'1I1II 170011 011111 1011 II 11111 0.011111 ,0.0111110.011111 1111111
- -- ---- ---- -----IIIII=======- =-=- =-a- ===~==-- --11111
NORTHISOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = 11111 0.41 I 0.41 I 0.41 I 0.00 11111
11111----__---------11111
11111 ,0.19 I 0.19, I 0.19 I 0.00 11111
11111----__---------11111
11111 0.05 I 0.05 J 0.05 I 0.06 11111
11111= ===............- a-a-==- ===-~~ =-11111
11111 0.65 I 0.65 , I 0.65 I 0.06 11111
11111--- ---- -'--- ----11111
11111 BIB I B I A 11111
------------a_a----_-=----a_-
ICU SPREAOSHEET FILE NAM8!lewpof1 & MaIn 2020 wIG pro¡
N = NORTHBOUND. S = SOUTHBOUND
E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND
L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGI-IT
N.S. - NOT SIGNALIZED
LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE
, OENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS
EASTIWEST CRITICAl.. SUMS .
ClEARANCE =
ICUVALUE=
. LOS a
INTERSECTION CAPACITY l1T1lIZATION ANAl. YSIS
PROJECT: Citý';'Tuotln-ElCamnoReoIRedaosIIIcaIlcn
INTERVAL: IoN. PEAK HOUR
. iNTERSECTION: Piospecl Avo & MaIn - YEAR 2020 WIIhout PROJECT .
.- -- ---- ---------- ------- ---- -----
11111 11111' II 11111 II ,11111 II II 11111' II II EXISTING II II EX.+OTHER II II EX.+OTHER II 11111
11111 MOVEMENT 11111 EXIST II PROP 11111 EXISTING II PROPOSED 11111 YEAR 2020 II OTHER II PROJECT 11111 EXISTING II II + OTHER II II +PROJECT II II +PROJECT II 11111
11111 11111 lANES II LANES 11111 ÇAPACnY II CAPACnY 11111 VOLUMES II VOLUME II VOLUME 11111 Vie II II Vie II II VlC II II VlC-W_IMP II 11111
11111 ======== 11111===="11===11111 ===-=- 11= 11111 ~ II ~ II ~ 11111-11-11 .--11-11 ====== 11=11 ==~--= 11==11111
IIIIINLIllIl 011 011111 011 011111 011 II 11111 11°11 11°11 11°11 11°11111
11111 NT 11111 011 011111 011011111.011 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
IIIIINRIIIII 011011111 011 011111 on II 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
IIIIISLIIIII 011 011111 011 011111 7711 II 11111 1111 ,1111 1111 1111111
11111 ST 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 011 II 11111 0.1011°11 0.1011°11 0.1011°11 11°11111
IIIIISRIIIII 011 011111 011 011111 9311 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
11111 EL 11111 'II 011111 170011 011111 8711 II 11111 0.0511°11 0.0511°11 0.0511°'11 11°11111
IIIIIETIIIII'1i 011111 170011 011111 32311 II 11111 0.191111 0.191111 0.191111 1111111
IIIIIERIIIII 011 011111 011 011111 011 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 11'11111
IIIIIWLIIIII 011 011111 011 011111 011 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
11111 WT 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 -II II 11111 0.2411° II 0.2411° II 0.2411° II 11° 11111
11111 WR 11111 111 QIIIII 170011 011111 9111 ,II 11111 0.05,11 II 0.0511 II 0.0511 II 1111111
- -- ---- ---------IIIII~ =--~ =-==?==== ======--= = = 11111
- NORTWSOltrH CRITICAL SUMS. 11111 0.10 I, 0.10 I 0.10 I 0.00 11111
ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAM!1mspecl & Main 2020 wI. pro 11111- - - - -,---- - - - - - - - - - - 11111
EASTIWEST CRITICAl SUMS . 11111 0.29 I 0.29 I 0.29 I 0.00 11111
0111--- ---- ---- --~- 11111
11111 0.011 I 0.05 I OJ)!! I 0.05 11111
11111- =-=-=- --======== ======== a=11II1
11111 0.« I 0.« I 0.44 ' I 0.05 11111
11111---------------11111
11111 A I A I A, I. A 11111
-~ '-,=- .-.-- --.-- ---
N = NORTHBOUND,S = SOUTHBOUND
E - EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND
L = LEFT, T - THROUGH, R' RIGHT
N.S, = NOT SIGNALIZED
LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE
° DENOTES CRrTlCAL MOVEMENTS
CLEARANCE'
ICU VALUE =
LOS-
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS
PROJECT:
INTERVAL:
INTERSECTION:
CIty of TusUn-Ei CamIno Real Reclassification
PM PEAK HOUR
ProspecI Ave & -. SI1eet YEAR 2020 Wilhoul PROJECT
-- ---- ------------- ---- -----
iíiîl - iíiîl- " 11111. II 11111 II II 11111 II II EXISTING II II EX.+oTHER II II EX.+QTHER II 11111
11111 MOVEMENT 11111 EXIST' II PROP 11111 EXISTING II PROPOSED 11111 YEAR 2020 II OTHER II PROJECT 11111 EXISTING II II + OTHER II II +PROJECT II 11 +PROJECT II 11111
11111 11111 LANES 11 LANES 11111 CAPACITY II CAPACITY 11111 VOLUMES II VOLUME II VOLUME 11111 VlC II II VlC II II VlC II II VlC-W _IMP II 11111
11111 ===== IIIII~~ II ==='11111 -~ II -- 11111 - II - II -==-- 11111 == II-II --= II == II = II = II === II = 11111
11111 NL 11111 011 11111 011 011111 011 11 11111 11'11 11'11 11'11 11'11111
11111 NT 11111 011 11111 011 011111 011 11 11111 1111 1111, 1111 1111111
IIIIINRIllIl 011 11111 011 011111 011 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
IIIIISLIIIII 011 11111 011 011111 1080 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
IIIIISTIIIIIII1 11111 170011 011111011 11 111110.1011'11 0.1011'11 0.1011'11 11'11111
11111 SR 11111 011 11111 011 011111 6611 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
11111 EL 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 13211 II 11111 0.0811'11 0.0811'11 0.0811'11 11'11111
11111 ET 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 43311 II 11111 0.2511 II 0.2511 II 0.2511 II II 11111
11111 ER 11111 011 11111 011 011111 011 11 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
IIIIIWLIIIII 011 11111 011 011111011 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
11111 WT 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 29011 II ,11111 0.1711'11 0.1711'11 0.1711'11 11'11111
11111 WR 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 13211 II 11111 0,08.11 II 0.0811 II 0.0811 11 II 11111
- ~- ---- ---- -----IIIII-====- =-=-== ====~= =====-=== ==11111
NORTHISOUTH CRITICAL SUMS = 11111 0.10 I 0.10 I 0.10 I 0.00 11111
11111----__---------11111
11111 0.25 I 0.25 I 0.25 I 0.00 11111
11111--- ---- ---- ----11111
11111 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 1111\
11111 =======-- = - = ======- = = = == = = = ====--- = = 11111
11111 0.40 I 0.40 I 0.40 I 0.05 11111
11111--- ----c--- ---- ---- 11111
Ilin A I A I A I A 11111
-=-===------=-----===========
ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME'rospect & Main 2020 wlo pro¡
N = NORTHBOUNO, S = SOUTHBOUND
E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND
L.LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT
N,S. = NOT SIGNALIZED
LOS = LEVel OF SERVICE
, OENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS
EASTIWEST CRITICAL SUMS =
ClEARANCE =
ICU VALUE.
LOS =
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UT1l1ZA TION ANAL VSIS
PROJECT:
INTERVAL:
INTERSECTION:
City of T uslln-EI C8mIno Real Reclasslftcallon
AM PEAK HOUR
Prospect Ave & 101 S- YEAR 2020 WIthout PROJECT
iï'1o -- rnll- ñ- rnll-ñ-rnll-ñ-ñ-rnll-ñ- ñ~ñ- ñ EX..:ornER ñ- ñ~ ii- ¡¡¡¡
1110 MOVEMENT 11111 EXIST II PROP 11111 EXISTING II PROPOSED 11111 YEAR 2020 II OTHER II PROJECT 11111 EXISTING II II + OTHER II II +PROJECT II II +PROJECr II 101
1011 1110 LANES II lJ\Io(ES 1011 CAPACITY II CAPACITY 1110 VOLUMES II VOLUME II VOLUME 11111 VlC II 11 VlC II II VlC II II V/c-W_IMP II 1111
1011 ====== 11111='11="",,='11111 =- -- II --'-- 11111 ~- II - II - 11111 - II-II -- II-II ==-- 11=11 = 11=1111
11111 NL 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 42'1\ II 11111 0.0211'11 0.0211'11 0.0211'11 11'1111
11111 NT 1110 111 01011 170011 011111 1~1I II 11111 0.12.1111 0.121111 0.121111 111111
11111 NR 11111 011 01011 011 01110 3911 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 111111
IIIOSLIIIII 011 01011 ,011 01110 19411 II 1011 1111 1111 1111 '11101
11111 ST 11111 2+ 011111 340011 011111 19711 II 11111 0.1211'11 0.1211'11 0,1211'11 11'101
1110 SR 1101 111 011111 170011 011111 16111 .11 11111 0.0911 II 0.(1911 II 0.0911 II II 110
1011 EL 11111111 011111 170011 011111 16611 II 1101 0.1011'11 0.1011'11 0.1011'11 11'1111
11111 ET 1011 211 011111 340011 011111 50211 II 1011 0.1611 II 0.1611 II 0.1611 II 111111
IIIIIERIIIII 011 011111 011 011111 :¡Oil II 11111 1111 1111 1111 111111
11111 WL 11111 'II 011111 170011 011111 5411 II 11111 0.0311 II 0.0311 II 0.0311 II II 1111
1011 WT 11111 211 01011 340011 011111 64111 II 11111 0.1911'11 0.1811'11 0.1811'11 11'1111
11111 WR 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 130" II 11111 0.08 II U 0.08 U 11 0.08 11 II II 1111
- -- ---- ~--- -----11111==-=== =--~- =-== =..==-- --1111
- NORTHISOUTH CRITICAl SUMS = 11111 0.14 \ 0.14 I 0.14 I 0,00 1111
leU SPREADSHEET FILE NAMEProspect & 1st 2020 w/o prof IIIn - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - III
EASTIWEST CRITICAl SUMS . 11111 0.29 I 0.29 I 0.29 I 0.00 III
11111--- --:----- ---- ----III
11111 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 \ 0.05' III
J II~ ---- ---- ---- --III
11111 0.48,' ,I 0.48 I 0.48 I 0.05 III
IIIn-----------"----1II
UlnA IA IA ìA 111
..~ -..-=-=--= -==~ ....-..,... ---
N = NORTHBOUND, S = SOUTHBOUND
E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND
L = LEFT, T = THROUGH. R = RIGHT
N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED
LOS = LEVel OF SERVICE
. DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENrS
(+) REPRESENrS LEFT AND LEFT I THROUGH LANES
NOTE: SPLIT PHASED N-8
ClEARANCE -
IC\J VALUE-
LOS =
I::
INTERSECTION CAPACIlY UfR.IZATION ANALYSIS
PROJECT:
INTERVAL:
INTERSECTION:
City of Tustin-EI CamIno ReaI-
PM PEAK HOUR
P""""",, Ave & 181 8- YEAR 2020 WiIhQUt PROJECT
---- ------------- ---- -~-- -~---
WI - WI II 11111 II' 11111 II II 11111 II II exISTING II II EX.+OTHER II II EX.+oTHER II 11111
11111 MOVEMENT 11111 EXIST II PROP 11111 EXISTING II PROPOSED 11111 YEAR 2020 II OTHER II PROJECT 11111 EXISTING II II + OTHER II II +PROJECT II II 'PROJECT II 11111
11111 ' 11111 LANES II LANES 11111 CAPACIlY II CAPACIlY 11111 VOLUMES II VOLUME II VOLUME 11111 wC II II WC II II WC II II V/C.W_IMP II 11111
11111 ==== 11111== II ~'IIIII ~-~ II - 11111 ~ II -- II ==>==- 11111 ===--- II = II --== II-II -=- II-II ~ 11-11111
11111 NL 11111 111 11111 170011 0\1111 9811 II 11111 0.0611 II 0.0611 II 0.0611 II 11"11111
11111 NT 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 29411 II 11111 0.2211" II 0.2211" II 0.2211" II II 11111
IIIIINRIIIII 011 \1111011 011111 8511 II 11111 1111 11,11 1111 1111111
IIIIISLIllIl 011 11111011 011111 .22511. II \1111 11"11 11"11 11"11 1111111
IIIIISTIII1I2+ 11111 340011 01111113511. II 111110,111111 0.111111 0.111111 11"11111
11111 SR 11111 111 1111\ 170011 011111 12311 II 11111 0.0711 II 0.07'11 II 0.Q111 II II 11111
11111 EL 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 25011 II 111110.1511"11 0.1511"11 0.1511'11 11"11111
11111 ET 11111 211 11111 340011 011111 88211 II 11111 0.2711 II 0.2711 II 0.2711 II II 11111
IIIIIERIllIl 011 11111 011 011111 3811 II 11111 I111 1111 1111 1111111
IIIIIWLIIIIIII1 11111 170011 011111 2411 II 11111 0.011111 0.011111 0.011111 1111111
11111 WT 11111211 11111 340011 011111 69911 II 11111 0.2111"11 0.21\\"11 0.2111"11 11"11111
IlIIIWRIIII1'111 11111 17001101111124411 n 11111 0.141111 0.141111 0.141111 1111111
- ~- ---- --'----------11111=-==-= .-=-==-==-; a_=-===-=;: a===. ==11111
NORTHISOlIrH CRITICAL SUMS a 11111, 0.22 I 0.22 I 0.22 I 0.00 \1111
11111--- ---- -~-- -~--IIIII
11111 0.38. I 0.36 \ 0.38 I 0.00 \111\
IIIII----__------~--IIIII
11111 0.05 I, 0.05 . I 0.05 I 0.05 11111
11111- -=----=-= -=--= =-== ==11111
~ ~ I '~ J ~ I ~ ~
11111--- ---- ------ ------11111
11111 8 I '8 I 8 I A 11111
-==-- a,_'- -====--= =--===-=- -==
ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAMEPIooped & 181 2020 wlo pro)
N = NORTHBOUND, S = SOllrHBOUND
E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND
L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT
N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED
LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE
" DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS
(+ REPRESENTS LEFT AND LEFT 'THROUGH LANES
NOTE: SPLIT PHASED N-S
EAST/WEST CRIT1CAI. SUMS a
CLEARANCE.
ICUVALUE.
LOS a
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTIlIZA TtON ANAlYSIS
PROJECT:
INTERVAL:
INTERSECTION:
CIty of Tuslln-EI Camino Real R_1Ioo
AM PEAK HOUR
EI CamIno Real & 1st SImet YEAR 2020 With PROJECT
-- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----'-- - - - - - - -
11111 11111 II 11111 II 11111 . II II 11111 II II t;XISTlNG II II EX.+OTHER II II EX,+OTHER II 11111
11111 MOVEMENT 11111 EXIST II PROP 11111 EXISTING II PROPOSEO 11111 YEAR 2020 II OTHER II PROJECT 11111 EXISTING II II + OTHER II II +PROJECT II' II +PROJECT II 11111
11111 11111 LANES II lANES 11111 CAPACITY II CAPACITY 11111 VOLUMES II VOlUME II. VOLUME 11111 VlC II II VlC II II VlC II II VJC.W_IMP II 11111
11111 ======= 11111 == II ==== 11111 ====- II = 11111 = II -- II ~ 11111 ~ II -II ~ II -II ~ II =11 ~= II = 11111
11111 NL 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 17011 II 11111 0.1011'11 0.1011'11 0.1011'11 11'11111
11111 NT 11111 Oil 011111 Oil 011111011 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
11111 NR 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 7011 II 11111 0.0411 II 0.0411 II 0.0411 II II 11111
IIIIISLIllIl 011 011111 011 011111 011 II 11111. 1111 1111 1111 1111111
IllIlSTIIIII Oil 011111 Oil 011111 011 II 11111 11'11 11'11 11'11 11'11111
IllIISRIIIII 011 011111 011 011111011 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
11111 EL 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 011 II 11111 0.0011'11 0.0011'11 0.0011"11 11'11111
11111 ET 11111 211 011111 340011 011111 57011 II 11111 0.1711 II 0.1711 II 0.1711 II II 11111
11111 ER 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 12811 II 11111 0.0811 II 0.0811 II 0.0811 II II 11111
11111 WL 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 10711 II 11111 0.0611 II 0.0611 ,II 0.0611 II II 11111
11111 WT 11111 211 011111 340011 011111 77811 II 11111 0.23 II' II 0.23 II' II 0.23 II' II II' 11111
IllIlWRIIIII 011 011111011 011111011 II 11111 1111 1111,.1111 1111111
- --- ---- ~--- -----IIIII~ =_.~= ===~~ ==.-- - -11111
- , NORTHlSOVTHCRITICALSUMS. 11111 0.10 I 0.10 I 0.10 I 0.00 11111
ICUSPREADSHEErFILENAME ECR&lst2020wlpro 11111--- ---- ---- ----11111
EASTIWEST CRITICAl SUMS = 11111 0.23 I .0.23 I . 0.23 Î 0.00 11111
IIIII---------------IIJII
IIJII 0.05 1 0.05 I 0.05 1 0.0511111
IIIII~ ======-= ---==-=--= =-,=-=-==- .,=11111
.0111 0.38 I 0.38 I 0.38 I 0.05 11111
11111----------'-------11111
11111 A 1 A 1 A I A '11111
. -==--- a_====- ====-== =_a-====- -=.=
N = NORTHBOUNO, S a SOUTHBOUND
E = EASTBOUND, W - WESTBOUND
L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT'
N,S. = NOT SIGNALIZED
LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE
" DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS
CLEARANCE =
ICU VALUE a
LOS.
IfoITERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS
PROJECT: City Of Tuslln-EI CarrIno Real _lion
INTERVAL: PM PEAK HOUR
IfoITERSECTION: B Can"/no Real & 1st Street YEAR 2020 With PROJECT
- --~- --'------':""_~----'--- ~-- ----.j.-- ---- -----
mll-lilil II 11111 II 11111 II II 11111 II II EXISTING; II II EX.+oTHER II II EX.+OTHER II ' 11111
11111 MOVEMENT 11111 EXIST II PROP 11111 EXISTING II PROPOSED 11111 YEAR 2020 II OTHER II PROJECT 11111 ExISTING II II + OTHER I II II +PROJEcT II II <PROJECT II 11111
11111 11111 lANES II lANES 11111 CAPACITY II CAPACITY 11111 VOLUMES II VOLUME II VOLUME 11111 VlC II II VlC: II II VlC II II VIC-W_IMP II 11111
11111 ======= IIIII=II~=IIIII - II - 11111 - 11"""""" II - 11111 ====-= II~II ===< II-II ===== 11=11 11=11111
11111 NL 11111 111 11111 110011 011111 26111 II 11111 0.1511:11 0.1511'11 '0.1511'11 11'11111
11111 NT 11111 011 11111 011 011111 011 II 11111 1111 ,1111 1111 1111111
IIIIINRIIIIIII1 11111110011011111 14911 II 11111 0.091111 O.~IIII 0.091111 1111111
IIIIISLIIIII 01111111 011 011111 011 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
IIIII.STIIIII 011 11111 011 011111011 II 11111 11'11 '11'11 11'11 11'11111
IIIIISRIllII 011 11111 011 011111 011 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
11111 El 11111 111 11111170011 011111 011 II 11111 0,001111 O.~IIII 0.001111 11'11111
11111 ET 11111 211 11111 340011 011111 ,95411 II 11111 0.28 11'11 0,28111' II 0.28 II' II II 11111
11111 ER 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 20711 II 11111 0.121111 0.1211111 0.121111 1111111
11111 WL 11111 111 11111 110011 011111 11511 II 11111 0.0711'11 0.07111'11 0.0711'11 II 11111
11111 WT 11111 211 11111 340011 011111 77811 II 11111 0.2311 II 0.231,11 II 0.2311 II 11'11111
11111 WR 11111 011 11111 011 011111 011 II 11111 1111 ,1111 1111 1111111
- '-- ---- ----,-- --"'-----11111- -_.~ --====== =-====- ==11111
NORTHlSOtITH CRITICAI.8UMS = 11111 0.15' I 0.11> I . 0.15 I 0.00 11111
' 11111-------;'_"'--------11111
EASTIWEST CRITICAL SUMS - 11111 0.35 I O.as¡ I' 0.35 I 0.00 11111
11111--- ----;.-- -~--'----IIIII
11111 0.05 I 0.051 I 0.05' I 0.05 11111
IIUI-===- --=--====! =========== ======- --11111
lUll 0.55 I O.SS¡ I 0.55 1 0.05 11111
11111- -- --:---t -- ---'-- -- -- -- 11111
11111 A I A , I A I A 11111
-===-===~-=.=._.===-===
ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME ECR & 1st 2020 wIproj
N = NORTHBOUND, S - SOUTHBOUND
E = EAST1!OUND, W = WEST1!OUND
l = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT
N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED
LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE
, DENOTES CRITICAl MOVEMENTS
CtEARANCE-
leU VAlUE.
lOS=
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS
PROJECT:
INTERVAL:
INTERSECTION:
CIty of Tustln-B Carrino _I R-
Mt PEAK HOUR
B Co""" Roo! & MaIn S- YEAR 2020 With PROJECT
- -- ---- ---- --------- -'----- ----,-----
11111 11111 II 11111 II 11111 II II 11111 II II EXISTING II II EX.+OTHER II II EX.+OTHER II 11111
11111 MOVEMENT 11111 EXIST II PROP 11111 EXISTING II PROPOSED 11111 YEAR 20ZO II DTHER II PROJECT 11111 EXISTING II II + OTHER II II +PROJECT II II +PROJECT II 11111
11111 11111 LANES II LANES 11111 CAPACITY II CAPACITY 11111 VOLUMES II VOLUME II VOLUI,IE 11111 VlC II II VIC II II VIC II II V/C-W_'MP II 11111
11111 =='"=== 1I1II~'I1'==1I1II ~ II =~ 11111 ~ II ~'1I - 11111 - II-II - II-II - 1I~1I ~ 11-11111
11111 NL 11111 011 011111" 011 011111 7311 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 11'11111
11111 NT 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 16411 II 11111 0.1411'11 0.1411'11 0.1411'11 II 11111
11111 NR 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 5011 II 11111 0.0311 II 0.0311 II 0.0311 II II 11111
IIIIISLIIIII 011 011111 011 011111 1511 II 11111 11'11 11'11 11'11 1111111
IIIIISTIII1I111 011111170011 011111 16611 II 11111 0.111111 0.111111 0.111111 11'11111
11111 SR 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 2911 II 11111 0.0211 II 0.0211 II 0.0211 II II 11111
11111 EL 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 3511 II. 11111 0.0211'11 0.0211'11 0.0211'11 11'11111
11111 ET 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 36611 II 11111 0.2111 II 0.2711 II 0.2711 II II 11111
11111 ER 11111 011 011111011 0111119811 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
11111 WL 11111 111 011111 '170011 011111 .6111 II 11111 0.0411 II 0.0411 II 0.0411 II 1111111
11111 WT 11111111 011111 170011 011111 44811 II 11111 0.3011'11 0.3011"11 0.3011'11 11'11111
IIIIIWRIIIII 011 011111 011 0111115711 0 11111,110 1111 1111 1111111
-. -- ---- -,----------11111- ---~ a__~ === - - -11111
, - NORTHISOIITHCRfTICAlSUMS- 11111. 0.17 I 0.14 I 0.14 I 0.00 11111
ICU SPREADSHEEr FILE NAME ECR & MaIn 2020 wfpro 11111- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 11111
. - EASTIWEST CRITICAl. SUMS = 11111 0.32 I 0.32 I 0..32 I 0.00 11111
N=NORTHBOUND.S-SOUTHBOUND 11111--- -,--- ---- ----11111
. E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND CLEARANCE - 11111 0.05 I 0.05 .' I 0.05 I ' 0.05 11111
L=LEFT, T= THROUGH, R= RIGHT IIIII-===- a_a-- a._a~=--= .=.~- - -11111
N.S. . NOT SIGNALIZED ICU VALUE = 1110 0.54 I 0.51 I 0.51 I 0.05 11111
LOS = LEVEl OF SERVICE 11111---------------11111
, DENOTES CRITICAl. MOVEMENTS LOS . II111 A I A I A I A 11111
-------------.a-====_.----_--
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTß.IZATION ANALYSIS
PROJECT:
INTERVAl:
INTERSECTION:
CIty 01 Tuslln-B CamIno Real R~
PM PEAK HOUR
EI Camno Reel & MaIn Street YEAR 2020 WIIh PROJECT
---- ---- ----------~-- ---'- -----
iiiil - iiii, II 11111 II 11111 II II 11111 II II EXISTING II II EX.+OTHER II II EX.+oTHER II 11111
11111 MOVEMENT 11111 EXIST II PROP 11111 EXISTING II PROPOSED 11111 YEAR 2020 11 OTHER, II PROJECT 11111 EXISTING II II . OTHER II II 'PROJECT II II 'PROJECT II 11111
11111 11111 lANES II LANES 11111 CAPACITY 11 CAPACITY 11111 VOLUMES 11 VOLUME 11 VOLUME 11111 Vie II 11 Vtc 11 II VtC' II 11 VIC-W_IMP 11 11111
11111 ======= 11111== II ===-"11111 ~-- II ~ 11111 ~ 11 - II -==- 11111 --= 11- 11 -- 11 -II == 11 = 11 = II = 1111
11111 NL 11111 0 II 11111 0 II 0 11111 1;13 II . II 11111 II II II II II II II" 1111
11111 NT 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 24811 II 11111 0,2211" II 0.2211" II 0.2211' II II 1111
11111 NR 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 11211 II 11111 0.0711 II 0.0711 II 0.0711 II II 1111
11111 SL 11111 011 11111 011 011111 3911 11 11111 11"11 11"11 11'11 111111
11111 ST 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 22511 II 11111 0.1611 11' 0.1611 II 0.1611 11 11'1111
11111 SR 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 2811 II 11111 0.0211 II 0.0211 II 0.0211 II 11 1111
11111 EL 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 4911 II 11111 0.0311 II 0.0311 II 0.0311 II 11' 1111
11111 ET 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 34411 0 11111 0.2711' 11 0.2711' 11 0.27 II" II II 1111
IIIIIERIllIl 011 11111 011 Oilin 11511 11 11111 110 ,1111 1111 111111
11111 WL 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 8211 11 11111 0.0511' U 0.0511' II 0.0511' 11 II 1111
11111 WT 11111 111 11111 1700U 011111 43411 II 11111 0.2811 II 0.2611 II 0.2611 II 11'1111
IIIIIWRIIIII 011 11111 011 011111 SOli II 11111 ,1111 1111 1111 111111
- -- ---- ---- -----11111==-=== === - -======== ==--~ --1111
NORTWSOUTH CRITICAl. SUMS = 11111 0.29 I 0.22 I 0.22 I 0.00 1111
11111--- ---- ---- ---'----1111
11111 0.32 I 0.32 I 0.32 I 0.00 1111
11111--- -- -- -- -- --,--- -- 1111
11111 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 1111'
11111== =-== =====-== ='-.~-- --1111
11111' 0.66 I 0.58 I 0.59 I 0.05 1111:
11111--- ---- ---- ---- 11111
11111 ,8 I A I A '1 A /11/1
= == = -. """"-" - - - -- - =,= ----= - "= =
ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME ECR & Main 2020 w/pmJ
N = NORTHBOUND, S . SOUTHBOUND
E = EASTBOUND, W . WESTBOUND
L = LEFT. T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT
N.S. = NOT SIGNALIZEO
LOS = lEVEL OF SERVICE
, DENOTES CRITICAl MOVEMEt-tTS
EASTIWEST CRITICAl SUMS =
ClEARANCE =
leU VALUE .,
LOS-
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANAlYSIS
PROJECT:
INTERVAL;
INTERSECTION:
City of TusUn.EI Canii1o Real Reda-
AM PEAK HOUR
EI Camk1o Real & Newport Avenue YEAR 2020 WMh PROJECT
- -----~----------:--------------------
11111 11111 ' II 11111 II 11111 II II 11111 II II EXISTING II II EX+OTHER II II EX<OTHER II 11111
11111 MOVEMENT 11111 EXIST II PROP 11111 EXISTING II PROPOSED 11111 YEAR 2020 II OTHER II PRDJECT 11111 EXISTING II II + OTHER II II +PROJECT II II <PROJECT II 11111
11111 11111 lANES II lANES 11111 CAPACITY II CAPACITY 11111 VOLUMES II VOLUME II, VOLUME 11111 VlC II II VlC II II V/C II II WC-W_IMP II 11111
11111=-=-==== 1I1II="II=IIIII=II.~IIIII~=11 ~II ~IIIII~II=II ~ -=11-11 ==-==11-11--11-=11111
11111 NL 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 11011 II 11111 0.0611 II, 0.0611 II 0.0611 II II" 11111
11111 NT 11111 211 011111 '340011 011111 52011 II 11111 0.1511" II 0.1511" II 0.1511" II II 11111
IIIIINRII1II111 011111 170011 011111 19011 II 11111 0.111111 0.111111 0.111111 1111111
11111 SL 11111111 011111 170011 011111 17011 II 11111 0.1011"11 0,1011"11 0.1011"11 II 11111
11111 ST 11111 311 011111 510011 011111 90011 II 11111 0.1811 II 0.1811 II 0.1811 II 11"11111
IIIIISRIIIII 011 011111011 0111111011 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
IIIIIEL.1I1II111 011111 170011 011111 2011 II 11111 0.011111 0,011111 0.011111 11"11111
IIIIIETIIIIIII1 011111 170011 011111 10011 II 11111 0.1111"11 0.1111"11 0.1111"11 1111111
11111 ER 11111 111 011111 110011 011111 49011 II 11111 0.2911 II 0.~911 II 0.2911 II II 11111
11111 WL 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 14011 II 11111 0.0811" II 0.0811" II 0.0811" II II 11111
11111 WT 11111 211.011111 340011 011111 14011. II 11111 0.0811 II 0.0811 II 0.0811 II 11"11111
IIIIIWRIIilI 011 011111011 Onll17011 II 11111 1111 1111,1111 1111111
- .-- ---- ---------IIIII~ ---~ ==== ==== ==11111
NORTHISOUTH CRJllCAl. SUMS = 11111 0.25 I 0.25 1 0.25 1 0.00 11111
11111- - - - ,.,.---..- - - - ----'-- - - - - - - 11111
11111 0.19 10.19 10.19'10.00 11111
111"---------------11111
1111/ 0.05, I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0,05 11111
11111- -"'--"""" ---- ---- --11111
11111 0.49 I 0.49 1 0.49 1 0,05 11111
11111- - - - - - - - ---.:.- - - - - - - 11111
11111 A I A I A I A 11111
-===--=---=-_.._----=.._~._-
ICU SPREADSHEET FloE NAMEECR & Newport 2020 w/proJ
N = NORTHBOUND, S . SOUTHBOUND
E = EASTBOUND, W . WESTBOUND
L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R. RIGHT
N.S. . NOT SIGNALIZED
LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE
" DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS
EASTIWEST CRITIGAL SUMS .
ClEARANCE .
ICU VALUE.
LOS-
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTilIZATION ANALYSIS
PROJECT: CIty of Tuslin-EI CamIno Real RecIassIftcatIo
INTERVAL: PM PEAK HOUR .
INTERSECTION: EI Calrino Rear & Newporl Avenue YEAR 2020 With PROJECT
- -- '------ -------+----~-----,---- ---- ---- -----
11111 11111 II 11111 II 11111 II; II 11111 II II EXISTING II II EX.OTHER II II EX.+OTHER II 11111
11111 MOVEMENT 11111 EXIST II PROP. 11111 EXISTING II PROPOSED 11111 YEAR 2020 II bTHER' II PROJECT 11111 EXISTING II II . OTHER II II .PROJECT II II .PROJECT II 11111
11111 11111 LANES II LANES 11111 CAPACITY II CAPACITY 11111 VOlUMES II VOLUME II VOLUME 11111 VIC II II VIC II II VIC II II VIC-WJMP II 11111
11111 ======== 11111--11 ==--11111 ~ II --= 11111 ~= II ~ II -=-= 11111 ~ II-II - II-II -- II-II --== II = 11111
11111 NL 11111 111 11111 110011 011ll1:!W1I II 11111 0.2311"11 0.2311'11 0.2311"11 11'11111
11111 NT 11111 211 11111 340011 011111 120011 II 11111 0.3511 II 0.3511 II 0.3511 II II 11111
IIIIINRII1II111 11111 170011 0111114011 II 111110.021111 0.021111 0.021111 1111111
11111 SL 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 10011 II 11111 0.061111 0.0611 II 0.0611 II II 11111
11111 ST 11111 311 11111 510011 011111 93011 II 11111 0.1911"11 0,1911"11 0.1911"11 11"11111
IIIIISRIllIl 011 11111 011 011111 6011 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
11111 EL 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 6011 II 11111 0.0411"11 0.0411"11 0.0411"11 11"11111
IIilIETIIIIIII1 11111 170011 011111 23011 II 11111. 0.141111 0.141111 0.141111 1111111
11111 ER 11111 '11 11111 170011 011111 40011 II 11111 0.2411 II 0.2411 II 0.2411 II II 11111
11111 WL 11111 111 11111 110011 011111 10011 II 11111 0,0611 II 0.0611 II 0.0611.1111 11111
11111 WT 11111 211 11111 340011 011111 55011 II 11111 0.26 II" II 0.26 II" II 0.26 II" II II" 11111
IIIIIWRIIIIIOIl 11111 011 011111;12011 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
- -- ----------,--- -----IIIII~ ----=====-~ --=-==-=- ---- '-1111
NORTlWOUTli CRITICAl SUMS - 11111 0.42 I 0.42 I 0.42 I 0.00 1111:
11111--- ---- ----'-- ----1111
11111 0.30 I 0.30 I 0.30 I 0.00 1111
11111--- ---- ---- ---- 1111
11111 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 IIIli
11111== =-== ======== ="-,=--=== '=11111
11111 0.77 I 0.77 I 0.77 I 0.05 11111
11111--- ---- ---- ----11111
11111 C I C I C I Allin
==- --=........... -=--===== .==..-= ===
ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAMEECR & Newporl2020 w/proj
N = NORTHBOUND. S = SOUTHBOUND
E = EASTBOUND. W = WESTBOUND
L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT
N.S. . NOT SIGNALIZED
LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE
. DENOTES CRITICAl MOVEMENTS
EAST/WEST CRITICAl SUMS =
ClEARANCE.
leU VAlUE =
LOS.
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UrillZA TION ANAL VSIS
PROJECT:
INTERVAL:
INTERSECTION:
C"v 01 Tuslin-EI Camino Real RecIassIfIcatton
AM PEAK HOUR
Newport Avenue & Main SITeet YEAR 2020 With PROJECT
îïiil-îïiil-iï~îïiil-iï-iiïl1-iï-iï-îïiil-iï-iï EXISTING iï-iï~iï-'ii~ii-iiïll
11111 MOVEMENT 11111 EXIST 11 PROP 11111,' EXISTING 11 PROPOSED 11111 VEAR 2020 11 OTHER 11 PROJECT 11111 EXISTING 11 11 + OTHER II 11 +PROJECTI1 11 +PROJECT 11 11111
11111 11111 lANES 11 LANES 11111 CAPACITY 11 CAPACITY 11111 VOLUMES 11 VOLUME 11 VOLUME 11111 VII:, 11 11 VIC 11 11 VlC 11 11 VlC-W_'/J¡M' 11 11111
"111""'.'-- 11111-----'11=-=='11111---=- 11 ==0-11111 == 11 ----11 ~ 11111 ~ 11=11 ~= 11=11 ~= 11=11 =-= 11-11111
11111 Nl 11111 111 011111 170011,' 011111 24011 11 11111 0.1411'11 0.1411'11 0,1411'11 11'11111
11111 NT 11111 211 01llll:wJOil 01111134011 11 11111 0.111111 0.111111 0.111111 1111111
IlIIINRIllIl 011 011111 011 011111 5011 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
11111 Sl 11111 111 OUIII 170011 011111 3011 II 11111 0.0211 11 0.0211 11 0,0211 11 11 11111
11111 ST 11111 211 011111 :wJO1l 011111 101011 11 111110.3011'11 0.3011'11 0.3011'11 11'11111
11111 SR 11111 111 011111 110011 011111 13011 11 11111 0.0811 11 0.0811 11 0.0811 11 11 11111
11111 El 11111 '11 011111 170011 011111 4011 11 11111 0.0211 II 0.0211 II 0.0211 II 11'11111
Ilili ET 11111 211 011111 340011 011111 24011 II 11111 0.07 II' 11 0.07 II' 11 0.07 II' 11 11 11111
11111 ER 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 14011 11 11111 0,0811 11 0.0811 II 0.0811 11 11 11111
11111 Wl 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 15011 II 11111 0.0911' 11 0.0911' II 0.0911' 11 11 11111
I1IIIWTIIII1 211 01llll:wJOil 011111 38011 11 11111 0.111111 0.111111 0.111111 11'11111
IIIIIwRIII1I111 011111170011011111 1011 II 111110.011111' 0.011111 0.011111 1111111
- -- ---- ---- -----11111- a_a- a__----==- -__a_- - -=11111
- NORlWSOUTH CRITICAL SUMS a 11111 0.404 I 0.44 I 0.404 I 0.00 11111
ICU SPREADSHEET FilE NAMENawport & Main 2020 w/proJ 11111- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 11111
EASTIWESTCRfTICAlSUMS- 11111 0.18 I 0.18 I 0.16 I 0.00 11111
11111---------------11111
11111 0.061 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 11111
11111~ =--- ._=====-= =----... --11111
11111 0.65 I 0.65 I 0.65 I 0,05 11111
11111--- ---- --,---- ---- 11111
DIll BIB 1 B I A 11111
=-= ._.~ a_.--=-=- --0'_'__-
N = NORTHBOUND, S - SOUTHBOUND
E - EASTBOUND, W - WESTBOUND
l - lEFT. T. THROUGH, R - RIGHT
N,S. - NOT SIGNAlIZEO
lOS - lEVEL OF SERVICE
, OENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS
CtEARANCE.
ICU VAlUE.
LOS-
I/ITERSECTION CAPACITY UTLIZATION ANALYSIS
PROJECT:
INTERVAL:
INTERSECTION:
CIty ofT uslln-EI CamIno Real Reclasslftcallon
PM PEAK HOUR '
Newport Avenue & Main Sheet YEAR 2020 Wfth PROJECT
-- ----- ---- -------'---- --- ---- ---- ---'----
¡iill -- 11111 11 11111 '11 11111 11 11 11111 11 II EXISTING II 11 EX.+OTHER II II EX.+OTHER II 11111
11111 MOVEMENT 11111 EXIST 11 PROP 11111 EXISTING II PROPOSED 11111 YEAR 2020 II OTHER II PROJECT 11111 EXISTING II II + OTHER II II +PROJECT II II +PROJECT II 11111
11111 11111 LANES II LANES 11111 CAPACITY 11 CAPACITY 11111 VOlUMES II VOlUME 11 VOlUME 11111 VlC, II II VlC II II VlC II II VJC.W_IMP 11 11111
11111 ======== 11111=-11=11111=11 ~1II1I=--11 ==--=11 ~IIIII= II-II "='==11=11 === 11=11 --=11=11111
11111 NL 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 8011 11 11111 0.0511 II 0.0511 II 0.0511 II 11° 11111
11111 NT 11111 211 11111 340011 011111 l090n II 11111 0.3711° II 0.3711° II 0.3711° II II 11111
11111 NR 11111 Oil 11111 ,°Il 011111 18011 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
11111 SL 11111 '11 11111 170011 011111 7011 II 11111 0.0411° II 0.0411° II 0.0411° 11 11 11111
11111 ST 11111 211 11111 340011 011111 78011 II 11111 0.23.11 II 0.23 II II 0.23 II II II' 11111
11111 SR 11111 '11 11111 170011 011111 12011 II 11111 0,0711 II 0.0711 II 0.0711 11 II 11111
11111 EL 11111 '11 11111 170011 011111 6011 II 11111 0.0411"11 0.0411°11 0.0411°11 11'11111
IIIIIETIIIII 211 11111 340011 01111149011 II 11111 0.141111 0.141111 0.141111 1111111
11111 ER 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 4°11 II 11111 0.0211 II 0.0211 II 0.0211 11 II 11111
IIIIIWLIII1I111 11111 170011 011111 9011 II 11111 0.05,.1111 0.051111 0.051111 1111111
11111 WT 11111 211 11111 340011 011111 52011 II 11111 0.1511°11 0.1511°11 0.1511°11 11°11111
IIIIIWRIIIIIII1 11111 170011 0111111011 n 111110.0111110.011111 0.011111 1111111
---'---- ---- -----11111- ~-=====- =--==~ ===~~== ==11111
~ NORTHISOUTHCRlTICALSUMS. 11111 0.41 I 0.41 I ,0.41 I 0.00 11111
ICU SPREADSHEET,FILE NAMENewport & Main 2020 wlpro 11111--:--- - - - --,--..:-- - - - - - - - - - - 11111
EAST/WESTCRITICALSIJMS= 11111 0.19 I 0.19 I 0.19 I 0.00 11111
11111--- ---- ---- ---- 11111
11111 . 0.05 I , 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 11111
11111=- --=- --=====- =...=~-==== ==11111
11111 0.65 I 0.65 I 0.65 I 0,05 11111
11111----__---------11111
11111 9 IS. I S I A 11111
-----~=-=--=--==--===------==
N = NORTHSOUND, S ~ SOUTHSOUND
E = EASTSOUND, W - WESTSOUND
L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R - RIGHT
N,S. = NOT SIGNAlIZED
LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE
° DENOTES CRITICAl MOVEMENTS
ClEARANCE -
ICUVALUE-
LOS-
-/-
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANAlYSIS
PROJECT: City of Tustln-EI Carrino Real Reda-
INTERVAL: AM PEAK HOUR
INTERSECTION: PmopecI AV8 & MaIn S- YEAR 2IJ2O With PROJECT
-- --'---- --~------ --c----- -----~
mll-.rnll- ii 11111 II. 11111 II II 11111 , II II ~TlNG II II EX.+OTHERII II EX.'OTHER iI- iiill
11111 MOVEMENT 11111 ,EXIST II PROP 11111 EXISTING II PROPOSED 11111 YEAR 2020 II OTHER II PROJECT 11111 S<l5TING II II + OTHER II II +PROJECT II II +PROJECT II 11111
11111 11111 LANES II LANES 11111 CAPACITY II CAPACITY 11111 VOlUMES II VOLUME II VOlUME 11111 VIe II II VIe II II VIC II II Vlc.W IMP II 11111
11111 ====== illll==II=IIIII-=-===II-- 11111==-11-11 ~IIIII-II-II-ll-li """'='=all-II ~II-IIIII
11111 NL 11111 011 011111 011 011111 011 II 11111 lI'n 11"11 11'11 1\"11\11
11111 NT 11111 011 011111 011 011111 011, II 11111 1111 1111' 1111 1111111
IIIIINRIllIl 011 011111 011 011111 011 11 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
IIIIISLIIIII 011 011111 011 011111 8311 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
11111 ST 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 011 II 11111 0.1011'11 0.1011'11 0.1011'11 11'11111
IllIISRIIIII 011 011111 011 011111 9011 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
11111 EL 11111111 011111 170011 011111 8311 II 11111 0.0611'11 0.0611'11 0.0511'11 11'11111
IIIIIETIIIIIII1 011111170011 011111 32311 II 111110.191111 0.191111 0.191111 '1111111
IIIIIERIllIl 011 011111 011 011111, 011 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
IlllIwL1II1I 011 011111 ,011 011111.011 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
11111 WT 11111 111 011111 110011 011111 40811 II 11111 0.2411'11 0.2411'11 0.2411"11 11'11111
11111 WR 11111' 111 011111 170011 .011111 98" II 11111 0.0811 II 0.0811 11 0.061111 ' 1111111
,- -- ---- ---- -----11111---......- .-'-" .-.--- .-.-- --11111
NORTHISOUTH CRITICAl. SUMS . 11111 0.10 I 0.10 I 0.10 I 0.00 11111
IIIII--~-_----------IIIII
11111 0.28 I 0.28 I 0.28 I 0.00 11\11
11111--- --c--- -- -- -- -- -- 11111
11111 0.06 I 0.05, I 0.05 10,06 11111
11111- .-.- ._=-==- .-.-=- --11111
nlA 0.44 I , 0.44 I 0.44 I 9.05 11111
11111---------------11111
IIAA lA, lA, IA DIU
-===-._.~._=~=_.-------
leu SPREADSHEET FILE NAMlProsped oS MaIn 2O2Q wfpro
N . NORTHBOUND, S = SOUTl1BaUND
E . EASTBOUND. W . WESTBOUNl)
L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R = RIGHT
N.S. . NOT SIGNALIZED
LOS = LEVEl OF SEIMCE
. DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS
EASTIWEST CRITICAl. SUMS .
ClEARANCE .
ICUVAlUE.
LOS.
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS
PROJECT:
INTERVAL:
INTERSECTION:
ClIy of- Tustin-Eil Gamloo Real RectasstiJcauoo
PM PEAK HOUR
Prospect Ave & Main St- YEAR 2020 Wllh PROJECT
-- ---- ---- ------ ~-- -------- ---- -----
mil' 11111 II 11111 II 11111 II II 11111 II 'II EXISTING II II EX.+0THER II II EX.+OTHER II 11111
11111 MOVEMENT 11111 EXIST 11 PROP 11111 EXISTING 11 PROPOSED 11111 YEAR 2020 11 OTl-iER II PROJECT 11111 EXISTING II II . OTHER II II 'PROJECT II 11 'PROJECT 11 11111
11111 11111 LANES 11 LANES 11111 CAPACITY II CAPACITY 11111 VOLUMES II VOLUME II VOLUME 11111 VlC . II II VlC II II VIC II II Vlc.VUMP II 11111
11111 -======== 11111===-'11--.-"'11111 =-<=- II ~===IIIII ~ II ~ II ~ 11111 ~ 11=11 ---= 11-"11 ~==. 11""11 -~== 11=11111
11111 Nl 11111 011 11111 011 011111 011 II 11111 11'11 11"11 11'11 11'11111
11111 NT 11111 011 11111 011 011111011 II 11111 1111 11'11 1111 1111111
IIIIINRIIIII 011 11111 011 011111 011 11 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
11111 Sl 11111 011 11111011 011111 11511 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
11111 ST 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 011 II 11111 0.1011'11 0.1011'11 0.1011'11 11'11111
11111 SR 11111 011 11111 011,0111116311 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
11111 EL 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 11711 II 11111 0.0711 11 0.0711 11 0.0711 II II'III!!
11111 ET 11111 '11 11111 170011 011111 43311 II 11111 0.2511' II 0.2511' II 0.2511' II II IIIii
11111 ER 11111 011 11111 011 011111 011 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
11111 WL 11111 011 11111 011011111011 11 11111 11'11 11'11 11'11 111111
IIIIIWTIIIIIII1 11111 170011 011111211011 II 11111 0.171111 0.171111 0.171111 11'1111
11111 WR 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 10511 II 11111 .°.0611 II 0.0611 II O.lJOIl II 11 1111
-" -- ---- ---------IIIII=======- -..---===- -..,---- .=== ==1111
- NORTHlSOtJTHCRmCALSUMS- 11111 0.10 I 0.10 I 0,10 I 0.00 1111
ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAMI3'ro5pect & Main 2020 wlproj 11111- - - - ----- - -, - - - - - - - - '1111
EASTIWEST CRITICAl SUMS.' 11111 0.25 I 0.25 I 0.25 I 0.00 1111
11111----------'-----1111
11111 0.05, I O.O!! I 0.05 I 0.05 1111
1I1II~= -=-.....~--= -====-==== ===== '-1111
11111 0.40 I 0.40 I 0.40 I 0.05 1111
11111-..,- -------- -------- ----1111
11111 A I A I A' I A 1111
=------.---=-_.----.-.----_..~
N = NORTHBOUND, S. SOUTHBOUND
E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOUND
l = lEFT, T ; THROUGH, R' RIGHT
N.S. . NOT SIGNAlIZED
LOS - lEVEL OF SERVICE
. OENOTES CRITICAl MOVEMENTS
GLEARÞ.NCE -
ICUVAlUE -
LOS =
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTft.IZATION ANALYSIS
PROJECT:
INTERVAl:
INTERSECTION:
CIty of Tuslif>.El Carrino Real RecIassIfIcaIIo
ÞN. PEAK HOUR
Ptœpect Ave & 1st Street YEAR 2020 Willi PROJECT
.- -- ---- ------------- ---- ---- -----
11111 11111 II 11111 . II 11111 II II 11111 II II EXISTING II II EX.+OTliER II II EX.+OTliER 11 11111
1111\ MOVEMENT 1111\ EXIST II PROP 11111 EXISTING II PROPOSED 11111 YEAR 2020 II OTHER II PROJECT 11111 EXISTING II II + OTHER II II +PROJECT II II +PROJECT 11 11111
11111 111\1 LANES II LANES 1111\ CAPACITY II CAPACITY 11111 VOLUMES II VOlUME II VOlUME 11111 VlC II II VlC II II V/C II II VIC-W_IMP II 11111
11111 ======== 11111==11====11111 = II ~ 11111 --- II ~ II - 11111 ~. 11--11 -= II-II = 11=11 = 11=11111
11111 NL lIiII 111 011111 170011 011111 4311 ,II 11111 0.0311' II 0.0311' II 0.0311' II 11'1111
11111 NT 11111 111 011111 170011 01111\ 16811 II 11111 0.121111 0.121111 0.121111 111111
11111 NR 11111 011 011111 011 0111113911 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 111111
IIIIISLIIIII 011 011111 011 011111 198.11 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 111111
11111 ST 11111 2+ O!IIII 340011 011111 19311 II 11111 0.1211'11 0.1211"11 0.1211'11 11'1111
11111 SR 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 16111 II 11111 0.091111 0.091111 0.091111 111111
11111 EL 11111 111 011111 170011 0111\1 16411 II 111110,1011'11 0.1011'11 0.1011'11 11'1111
11111 ET lIiII 211 011111 340011 011111 50211 II 11111 0.1611 II 0.1611 II 0.1611 II 111111
11111 ER 11111 011 011111011 011111 3111 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 111111
1111\ WL 11111 111 011111 170011 011111 5411 II 11111 0.0311 II 0.0311 II 0.0311 II 111111
111\1 WT 1111\ 211 011111 340011 011111 64111 II 11111 0.1911'11 0.1911'11 0.1911'11 11'1111
11111 WR 1111\ 111 01111\ 170011 011\11 13111 II 11111 0.0611 n 0.0611 II 0.0811 II '11 1111
- .-- ~--- ---------IIIII~ ....~ ._.~ '_0- --1111
- NORTHI5OUTH CRITICAl SUMS. 11111 0.15 I 0.15' I 0.15 I 0.00 1111
ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME Prospect & 1st 2020 wfpro 11111- - ~ - - - - - - - - - --,.-- - - 1111
EAST/WEST CRITICAl SUMS. .11111 0.29 I 0.29 I 0.29 I 0.00 ' 1111
1I1II-------"~------1Ii
11111 0.05 I 0.05 I 0.05 1 0.05 III
nlll~ ._.~ .~--=====-= ==-- '~III
11111 0.49 I 0.49 I 0.49 I 0.05 ßI
11111--- ---- ---- -~--III
ftlUA IA IA IA 111
-~ .--- .-.-==--== ._.~ ==0'
N = NORTHBOUND, S . SOUTHBOUND
E . EASTBOUNO. W . WESTBOUND
L = LEFT, T = THROUGH. R = RIGHT
N.S. . NOT SIGNAlIZED
LOS . LEVEL OF SERVICE
. DENOTES CRITICAl MOVEMENTS
ClEARANCE .
ICUVALUE-
LOS-
(+) REPRESENTS LEFT AND LEFT I THROUGH LANES
NOTE: SPLIT PHASED N-S '
INTERSECTION CAPACnv UTIlIZATION ANAlYSIS
PROJECT:
INTERVAL:
INTERSECTIÖN:
CIty 01 Tuslln-EI camino Real R_1Ion
PM PEAK HOUR
Prospect Ave' &)st street YJ:AR 2020 WIIh PROJEcr
-- ---- ~--- --------- -~-- -~-- -~---
iiiil 11111 II 11111 II IIiII II II 11111 II II EXISTING II II EX. >OTHER II II' EX. >OTHER II 11111
11111 MOVEMENT 11111 EXIST II PROP 11111 EXISTING II PROPOSED 11111 YJ:AR 2020 II OTHER II PROJECT 11111 EXISTING II II . OTHER II II +PROJEcr II II >PROJECT II 11111
11111 11111 LANES 11 LANES 11111 CAPACITY II CAPACnv 11111 VOlUMES II VOlUME II VOlUME 11111 VtC II U VtC 11 II VtC II 11 VfC.W_1MP II 11111
11111 -===== IIIII~ 11--- 11111 ~ II """--== 11111 -....". 11 ~ 11 - 11111 ~ U -II ~ 11-11 - 11-11 - 11-11111
11111 NL 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 10611 n 11111 0.0611 11 0.0611 II 0.0611 II 11'11111
11111 Nt 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 29911 II 11111 0.2311' II 0.23 11'11 0.23 11'11 II 11111
IIIIINRIIIII 011 11111011 011111 8511 II 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
lllliSL1I1II 011 11111 011011111 22911 II 11111 11'11 11'11 11'11 1111111
11111 ST 11111 2+ 11111 340011 011111 13111 II 11111 0.1'1111 0.111111 0.111111 11'11111
11111 SR 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 12311 II 11111 0.0711 II 0,0711 11 0.0711 II II 11111
11111 EL 11111 111 11111 170011 011111 23511 II 11111 0.1411'11 0.1411'11 0.1411"'11 11'11111
11111 ET 11111 211 11111 340011 011111 88211 II 11111 0.2711 II 0.271111 0.2711 II II 11111
I11IIERIIIII 011 11111 011 011il14O1I 11 11111 1111 1111 1111 1111111
11111 WL 11111 111 11111 170011 0111112411 II 11111 0.0111U 0.011111 0.011111 1111111
11111 WT 11111 211 11111 340011 011111 69911 II 11111 0.2111'11.0.2111'11 0.2111'11 11'11111
IllilWRIII1I111 11111 170011 01111125111 II 11111 0.151111 0.151111 0.1511,11 1111111
- --- ---- ---------IIIII~ -~-,==-=- -=-= ==-==-=== ==11111
- NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL S~ - 11111 0.23 I 0.23 I 0.23 I 0.00 11111
ICU SPREADSHEET FR.E NAMÉ Prospecl & 1s1202Owlpm 11111-,---- ---- ---,---- ---- 11111
EASTIWEST CRITICAl SUMS = 11111 0.36 I 0.$ I 0.36 I 0.00 11111
1I1II------------~--11il1
UIII 0.05, I 0.05, , f 0.05 I 0.05 11111
1I1I1~ ---= ---===-=- ==-~ -=11111
11111 0.63 I 0.63 I 0.63 I 0.05 11111
11111--- --'----'--- ---- ----11111
IUUB IB, IB fA IIII!
= -===-- - ~ - -===-;== = = - -==== - = = ====== = = =
N = NORTHBOUND, S . SOUTHBOUND
E = EASTBOUND, W . WESTBOUND
L = LEFT, T = THROUGH, R - RIGHT
N.S, = NOT SIGNALIZED
LOS = LEVEL OF SERVICE .
, DENOTES CRITICAl MOVEMENTS
(» REPRESENTS LEFT AND LEFT I THROUGH LANES
NOTE: SPLIT PHASED N-5
CLEARANCE =
ICUVALUE-
LOS-
APP'E N'D1X C
TRAFFI,C COUNTS
Traffic Data Services, Inc.
TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICULAR TURNING MOVEMENTS
N/S STREET: EL CAMINO 'REAL E/WSTREET: 1ST CITY: TUSTIN
, ST
DATE: 11/01/00 DAY: WEDNESDAY FILENAME: 1100201A
----------------------------~----------------------------------------~-------
15 Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Period
Beginning NL NT NR SL ST SR EL 'ET ER' WL WT WR ,TOTAL
. '
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
LANES:
6 :00 AM
FS AM
30 AM
45 AM
7:00 AM
15 AM
30 AM
, 45 AM
8:.00 AM
15 AM
30ÃM
45 AM
9:00 AM
1'5 AM
30 AM
45 AM
10:00 AM
15 AM
3,0 AM
45 AM
2
2
23
26
38
40
33
28
31
23
6
12
14
16
12
15
11
19
88 21 7 85 230
III 29 12 93 283
136 30 15 158 391
122 24 25 182 . 409
110 27 28 168 378
99 24 20 130 316
95 24, 20 148 329
119 30 32 107 330
--------~--------------------------------------------------------------------
AM Peak Hr
Begins at
730
VOLUMES ~ 139
COMMENTS:
0
57
0
0
0 467 105
0
1494
88 638
0
Traffi~ Data Services, Inc.
TABULAR SUMMARr OF VEHICULAR TURNING MOVEMENTS
N¡S STREET: EL CAMINO REAL E/W STREET: 1ST
sT
DATE: 11/01/00 DAY: WEDNESDAY
CITY:, TUSTIN
FILENAME: 1100201P
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
IS Mi.n
Period
Beginning
NL
Northbound
Southbound
Westbound
Eastbound
NT
NR
S1
ET ' ER
WTWR
TOTAL
SR
EL
WL
SL
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
LANES:
2:00 PM
IS PM
3ÐPM
45 PM
3:00 PM
IS PM
30 PM
45 PM
4:00 'PM
15 PM
30 PM '
45 PM
5:00 PM
15 PM
3D PM
45 PM
6:00 PM
IS PM
30 PM
45 PM
55
46
48-
57
41
56
60
63
2
1
2
30'
29
24
42
28
25
27
32
177 27 28 95 412
146 38 15 103 377
1'65. 29 26 101 393
185 30 29 137 480
,197 37 25 166 494
203 63 26 168 541
191 40 15 165 504
. 150 43 21 H8 457
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
PM Peak Hr
Begins at
1645
VOLUMES- 214
COMMENTS:
0 122
. 0
0 782 170
2019
95 636
0
0
0
Traffic Data Services, Inc.
TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICULAR TURNING MOVEMENTS
N/S STREET: EL CAMINO REAL E/W STREET: MAIN
'5T
DATE: 11/01/00 DAY: WEDNESDAY
CITY: TUSTIN
FILENAME: 1100202A
-----------------c---------------~-------~------------------------,-----.----
. .
15 Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Period
""Beginning NL. NT NR SL ST. SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
LANES:
6:00 AM
.15 AM
30 AM
45 AM
7:00 AM
, 15 AM
30 AM
. 45 AM
8:00 AM
15 AM
30 AM
45 AM
g:OO AM .
IS.AM
3ÐAM
45 AM
10:00 AM
IS AM
30 AM
45 AM
0
0
1
0
0
1
15 15 8 I 23 0 5 42 15 8 ' 35 10 177
13 22 12 1 33 4 10 67 24 8 67 11 272
19 44 7 1 32 5 6 84 19 12 81 11 .321
13 31 15 5 ' 39 7 10 80 16 15 125 13 369
15 37 7 5 32 8 3 69 21 15 94 12 318
14 31 6 1 33 2 3 51 29 8 65 12 255
14-- 48 12 9 24 3 5 31 15 8 64 21 254
19 40 16. 7 . 46 3 7 45 19 10 62 9 283
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AM Peak Hr
Begins at
715
VOLUMES. 60 134
COMMENTS:
41
12 136
24
1280
29 300
50 367
80
47
Traffic Data Services, Inc.
TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICULAR TURNING MOVEMENTS
NIS STREET-: EL CAMINO REAL EIW STREET: MAIN CITY: TUSTIN
5T
DATE: 11/01/00 DAY: WEDNESDAY FILENAME: llOO2a2P
. '
---------------------------"-------------------------------~-----------------
15 Min Northbound ' Southbound Eastliound Westbound
Peri ad
Beginning NL, NT NR SL. ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
LANES: 0 0 0 1 0
2 :00 PM
15 PM
30 PM
45 PM
3:00 PM
15 PM
30 PM
45 PM
4:00 PM 30 48 24 9 39' 5 17 65 24 12 80 9 362
15 PM 29 55 19 7 49 6 13 48 22 20 93 8 369
30 PM 22 55 20... 9 41 2 8, 67 21 13 82 7 347
4"5 PM 28 67 33 10 37 6 16 80 18 23 107 10 435
5:00PM 25 44 21 7 49 7 6 54 22 14 83 12 . 344
15 PM 24' 37 13 9 44 1 11 78 28 14 78 13 350
30 PM 32 55 25 6 54 9 7 70 26 16 88 6 394
45 PM 34 66 16 9 ' 46 9 15 65 23 20 92 17 412
6:00 PM
15 PM
30 PM .
45 PM
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
PM Peak Hr
Begins at
1645 .
VOLUMES K 109 203
92
32 184
23
40 282
94
67 356
41
1523
COMMENTS:
Traffic Data Services, Inc.
TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICULAR TURNING MOVEMENTS
N/S STREET: PROSPECT
AVE
DATE: II/01/00
E/W STREET: 1ST
. ST
. DAY: WEDNESDAY'
CITY: TUSTIN
FILENAM~: 1100203A
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
15 Hin . Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
. Period
Beginning NL NT NR SL S1 SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
LANES: . 1 . 0 1.5 0.5 2 0 1. 2 0
6:00 AM
15 AM
30 AM
45, AM
7:00 AM 5 19 6 27 35 17 21 75 5 3 77 9 299
IS AM 7 32 10 38 34 18 32, 98 12 10 99 26 416
30 AM 8 56 5 26 42 30 54 92 6 8 128 32 487
45 AlII 10 26 5 48 36 41 20 106 0 5 134 27 458
8:00 AM 10 24 12 50 46 43 28 115 7 21 164 22 542
15 AM 1 20 16 34 28 23. 19 89 5 8 129 28 400
30AM 6 31 ~ 45 40 24 13 111 6 6 124 25 443
45 AM 4 28 7 35 27 20 23 113 9 19 106 28 419
. 9:00 AM
15 AM
30 AM
45 AM
10:00 AM
15 AM
30 AM
45 AM
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AM Peak Hr
Begins at
715
- VOLUMES - 35 138
32 162 158 ,132 134 411
25
44 525 107
1903
COMMENTS:
, Traffic Data Services, Inc.
TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICULAR TURNING MOVEMENTS
N/S STREET: PROSPECT
AVE
DATE: 11/01/00
E/W STREET: 1ST
ST
DAY: WEDNESDAY
CITY: TUSTIN
FILENAME: 1l0O203P
--ïŠ-Mi~-----Ñ~;thb~~~d-----s~~t1b~~~d-"---E;;tb~~~d--._--W;;tb~~~d----------
Period
Beginning NL NT NR SL 5T 5R EL. ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
LANES: 0 1.5 0.5 l' 1 2 0 2 0
2:00 PM
15 PM
30 PM
45 PM
3:00 PM
15 PM
30 PM
, 45 PM
4:00 PM 11 52 27 39 24 23 40 142. 9 5 126 35 533
15 PM 16 42 29 47 25 21 38 165 5 6 133 29. 556
:w I'M 13 45 23 51 ~ 38 40 175 6 5 129 46 595
45 PM 18 48 28 54 22 22 41 173 6 8 129 50 599
5:00 PM 30 79 13 56 32 26 62 183 10 4 146 54 6-95
15 PM 17 64 14 46 24 25 49 194 8 4 148 49 642
30 PM 22 54 15. 32 29 28 41 173 9 4 150 53 ,15'10
45 PM 17 ' 53 13 35 28 39 37 142 8 7 136 48 563
6:00 PM
15 PM
30 PM
45 PM
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
PM Peak Hr
Begins at
1645
VOLUMES = 87 245
70188 107 101 193 723
33
20 573 206
2546
COMMENTS:
Traffic Data Services; Inc.
TABULAR SUMMARY 'OF VEHICULAR,TURNING MOVEMENTS
'N/S STREET: PROSPECT
AVE
DATE: 11/01/00
EfW STREET: MAIN
. ST
Df\Y: WEDNESDAY
CITY: TUSTHf
FILENAME: 1l00204A
15 Iotin
Period
Beginning
Northbound
---- -.-- u- -- __n_- ---------- -- __on u_------------ - _un ---_--____n_-u---n
Westbound
NL
NT
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1
0
LANES:
6:00 AM
15 AM
30 AM
45 AM
7:00 AM
15 AM
30 AM '
45 AM
8:00 AM
15 AM
-3ÓAM
45 AM
9:00 AM
15 AM
30 AM
45 AM
10:00. AM
15 AM
30 AM
45 AM
NR
Southbound
Eastbound
ER
WL
WT
WR
TOTAL
SL
5T
EL
ET
16 8 15 34 51 9 133
14 12 30' 50 81 7 194
18 20 35 65 74 17 229
12 24 12 79 145 22 294
17 16 10 75 109 17 244
21 14 11 46 81 24 197
23 - 10 10 49 79 20' 191
16 10 13 48 .71 33 191
0
SR
0
1
0
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AM Peak Hr
Begins at
730
VOLUMES -
0
0
COMMENTS:
68
0
74
68 265
0
0 409
80
964
T~affic Data Services, Inc.
TABU~AR SUMMARY OF VEHICULAR TURNING MOVEMENTS
NIS STREET: PROSPECT
, AVE
DATE: 10/26/00
E/W STREET: MAIN
ST
DAY: THURSDAY
CI1'Y:. TUSTIN
FILENAME: 1100Z04P
----~----------------------------------------------------------.-------------
15 Min Northbound Southboùnd Eastbound Westbound
Period
~eginning NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER Wl WT WR TOTAL
C - i:ÃÑËš; ~ - - - - --- - -- ~ -- - --- -- Õ - - - -ï - - -- Õ - - - - ï --- -ï - - --- - - - - -- -- --- - - -Õ- -- _u--
2 :00 PM
, 15 PM
30 PM
45 PM
3:00PM
15 PM
30 PM
45 PM
4:00 PM
15 PM
30 PM
45 PM
5:00 PM
15 PM
30 PM
45 PM
6:00 PM
15 PM
30 PM
45 PM
15 11 13 77 29 27 172
16 19 17 81 14 27 174 "
17 18 -27 87 41 24 214
19 14 30 96 50 30 239
31 ' 16 '28 90. 50 19 234
21 10 17 83 72 17 220
23 12 21 86 66 20 228
12 6 20 85 29 22 174
,....
-------"---------------------------------------------------------------------
PM Peak Hr'
'. Begins at
1645
VOLUMES - 0
0
0
94
0
52
96 355
0
0 238
86
921
COMMENTS:
I
, .
Trafric Datæ Services, Inc.
TABULAR SUMMARY OF. VEHICULAR TURNING MOVEMENTS
NIS STREET: NEWPORT
AVE
DATE: 9/18/00
E/W, STREET:
DAY': MONDAY
MAIN
ST
CITY: TUSTIN,
FILENAME: 0900703A
n__- - - ---- ---- - --- n_- -- - --- ---- - ---- --.- --,- - - - -.- - -- - --- - --- - - ----.- - --- - ---
IS Min ' ,Northbound, Southbound Eastbound Westbound' ,
Period'
Beginning NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR, TOTAL
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
LANES: 2 0 1 2 2 1 1 2
6:00 AM
15 AM
".30 AM
45 AM
7: 00 AM 14- 92 5 1 160 20 3 27 19 18 37 6 402
15' AM 29 101 12 3 179 19 22 25 27 35 53 5 510
30 AM 31 208 61 5 328 23 25 41 52 54 84 8 920
45 AM 36 144-. 21 5 320 33 23 37 63 57 105 6 850
8:00 AM 44 161 , 15 7 336 33 12 54 69 43 114 5 893
IS AM 29 106 6 6 218 23 . 16 23 ,34 25 66 3 555
30AM- 25 114 11 7 254 3()-'" 28 26 47 23 59 2 626
45 AM 50' 148 9 16 261 '41 20 39 36 27 79 6 732
9:00 AM
15- AM
30 AM
45 AM
10:00 AM
15 AM
30 AM
45 AM
----------------------------------------------------~------------------------
AM Pe.ak HI"
Begins at
730 .
VOLUMES. 140 619 103
23 1202. 112
76 155 218 179 369
22
3218
COMMENTS:
. Traffic Data Services, Inc,
TA£ULAR SUMMARY O~ VEHICULAR TURNING MOVEMENTS
NIS STREET: NEWPORT
AVE
DATE: 9/20/00
EjW STREET: EL CAMINO CITY: TUSTIN
. I REAL
DAY: WEDNESDAY. FILENAME: 0900704A
-- -- ---- ---- - __n- -- - -- - - - - ____n n - - - - ~-- -- - - ----- - - - -- - - -- _n ---.--- --- -- ---
15 Min
Period
Beginning
Northbound
Southbound
Westbound
Eastbound
NL
NT
ST
WR
TOTAL
EL
ET
ER
WL
WT
SL
SR
NR
-------------------------------------------------------------------~-------~-
LANES:
6:00 AM
15 AM
,30 AM
45 AM
7:00AM
15 AM
30 AM
,45 AM
8:00 AM
. 15 AM
30 AM
45 AM
9:00AM.
. 15 AM
30 AM
45 AM
10:00 AM
15 AM
30 AM
45 AM
I
I 2.5 0,5
I
1
1
2
2
0
0
35 97 46 13 189 1 7 13 39 39 31 13 523
33 136 83 29 253 B . 6 30 34 25 28 12 677
38 160- 68 11 277 5 3 19 83 40 59 10 773
42 173 56 8 391 11 4 13 62 . 51 67 5 883
38 151 21 26 359 4 4 21 57 26 43 10 760
36 147 17. 18 284 5 4 11 48 24 57 12 663
35, 144 -12 15 264 3 4 10-... 47 22 41 11 608
43 123 17 18 210 11 7 20 39 18 52 11 569
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AM Peak: Hr
8egins at
715
VOLUMES a 151 620 228
COMMENTS: .
74 1280
28
83 236 142 197 . 37
3093'
17
Traffic Data Services, Inc.
TABULAR SUMMARY O~ VEHICULAR TURNING MOVEMENTS
N/S STREET: NEWPORT
AVE
DATE: 9/11/00
E/W STREET:
DAY; MONDAY
El CAMINO CITY: TUSTIN
REAL.
'FILENAME: 0900704P'
----.-----------------------------------------.----------------.----------.--
15 Min Northbound Southbound
Period
Beginning. NL . NT NR ,SL ST SR
EL
Eastbound
ET
Westbound
ER
WL
WI
WR
TOTAL
---------------------------------------------------------------------~-------
. .
LANES:
2:00 PM
15 PM
. 3D PM
45 PM
3:00 PM
15 PM
30 PM
, 45 PM
4:00 PM
15 PM
3D, PM
45 Pili
5:00 PM
15 Pili
30 PM
45 PM
6:00 PM
15 PM
30 PM
45 PM
2
62 250 16
59 215 13
52 24r 34
76 272 28
73 321 35
'76 338 33
67 319 45
66 315 32
0
1 2.5 0.5
9
19
11
21
15
20
16
31
5
14
6
11
14
15
14
12 '
1
32 69
29 56
31i 72
27 51
41 103
44 73
52 99
43 81
1
28 ' 47
15 55
19 43.'
31 70
2854
38 73
32 63
42 76
2
0
40
40
29
33
37
39
26
20
779
720
746
862
1005
1000
949
. 952
2.0 201
24 181
22182
27 215
30 254
23 228
15 201
37 197
----------------_._-------~--------------------------------------------------
PM Peak Hr
8egins at
1700
VOLUMES - 282 1293 145 105 880
COMMENTS:
82'
55 180 356 140 266 122
3906
~
TRAFFIC DATA SERVICE$, INC. , LOCATION CœE 10012.02'
-*****,.... ...." .**_.. ,......,..........., ...-............ ................................................ .......-.... .-.....................
lOCATION' 0 EL CAMINO REAl-BTN NEWPORf/HAIN AVERAGED VOLUMES FOR' TUESDAT 10/24/00 TO, WEDNESCAY 10/25/00
...............-............ AM ............--...-. ..........................,;..... PM _..............*...._~.
TIME NI 51 TOTAL TIME NI 58 TOTAL
......-_.-.............._.__......._.................~._..................._.........-........-...............
12:00 - 12:15 6 3 9 12:00 . 12:15 95 86 1B1
12:15 . 12:30 5 .7 12 12<15 . 12:30 69 as 154
12:30 . 12:45 6 8 14 12:30 . 12:45 64 76 140
12:45' 1:00 2 19 4 22 6 '41 12:45. 1:01) 76 304 70 317 146 621
1:00. 1:15 2 8 1:00. 1:15 B6 72 158
1:15. "30 2 3 1:15 0 1:30 92 61 153
1:30 - 1:45 I 2 1:30'. 1~45 70 74 144
1:45 0 2:00 10 2 7 4 17 1:45. 2:00 7S 326 60 267 138 593
2:00. 2:15 4 2:00' 2:15 72 7S 150
2:15 '. 2:30 2 2:15 0 2:30 58 74 132
2:30' 2:45 3 2:30'0 2:45 75 60 135
2:45 - 3:00 6 4 1 10 2:45 0 3:00 77 282 75 287 152 569
3:00' 3:15 1 2 3:00' 3:15 71 .57 128
3:15. 3:30 ,2 3 3:15 0 3:30 67 63 130
3:30' 3:45 1 4 3:30' 3:45 9B 70 168
3:45' 4:00 0 4 7 2 11 3:45' 4:00 92 32B 67 257 159 585
4:00" 4:15 2 5 4:00' 4:15 94 88 182
4:15. 4:30 0 5 4:15' 4:30 95 70 165
4:30' 4:45 2 10 4:30' 4:45 84 7S 162
4:45. 5:00 4 8 24- 12 32 4:45. 5:00 ~7 370 73 309 170 679
5:00' 5:15 2 6 å 5:00' 5:15 96 101 197
5:15' 5:30 5 5, 10 5:15. 5:30 B5 95 ISO
5:30. 5:45 4 21 25 5:30' 5:45 94 76 "1"10
5:45. 6:00 17 28 10 42 27 70 5:45 0 6:00 94 369 90 362 184 731
6:00. 6:15 10 27 37 6,00' 6:15 69 97 166
6:15. 6:30 20 26 46 6:15' 6:30 93 83 176
6:30' 6:45 20 28 48 6:30 - 6:45 84 64 148
6:45 - 7:0Cl 24 74 44 125 68 199 6:45' 7:00 56 302 68 312 124 614
7:00' 7:'5 3' 50 81 7:00' 7:15 56 62 '18
7:15' 7:30 48 65 "3 7:15' 7':30 58 47 105
7:30 - 7:45 75 83 15B 7:30. 7:45 5' 41 92
7:45. B:OO 58 212 69 267 127 479 7:45 - 8:00 33 198 34 '84 67 382
8:00 . ,8: IS 64 70 '34 8:00' 8:15 36 30 66
8:'5 - 8:30 49 59 108 8:15' B:30 2B 22" SO
8:30 - 8:45 54 SO '04 8:30' 8:45 33 32 65
8:45 - 9:00 63 230 54 233 117 463 8:45. 9.00 35 132 24 108 59 240
9:00. 9:15 51 43 94 9:00' 9:15 25 31 56
9:15' 9:30 58 54 '12 9:'5. 9:30 38 22 60
9:30 - 9:45 50 39 89. 9:30, 9:45 26 33 59
9:45 - 10:00 46 205 52 188 98 393 9:45 - 10:00 28 117 26' 112 -54 229
10:00 - 10:'5 68 56 '24 '0:00 - 10:15 20 '13 33
'0:15 - '0:30 52 54 '06 10:15 . 10::50 '6 10 ,26
10:30 " '0:45 47 63 1'0 10:30 - '0:45 7 8 IS
'0:45 - '1:00 46 2'3 54 227 '00 440 10:45 . 11:00 10 53 6 37 16 90
11 :00 - 1':'5 71 57 128 ":00 . '1 :'5 10 7 '7
":15 - '1:30 68 61 '29 1,.'5 . 1':30 7 6 '3
":30-":45 70 88 158 1':30 . l' :45 10 7 '7
11 :45 - 12:00 70 279 76 282 '46 561 11:45 . '2:00 13 40 2 22 15 62
...... .......... ... - ........... . ..... . .......... . ........... ..... ..... .... ..-....... ...... ......-..... .............. ........
TOTALS ',288 ',428 2,716 2,821 2,574 5,395
AOTIS 4,109 4,002 8,'"
.. ... ..... .............. .......... ..... .... ** ....... .......... .............. .... ............. .... ....,........ ............. .........
TRAFF.IC'DATA SERVICES, INC.' lOCArJOIICOOE 10012.02;
..... -.. ....-... .... .... ... - .*_... ... ..... ......- ....- ..*...*..._..*- -....- ---.. -*_.*-**. - -.....
lOCATIoN -' El CAMINO REAl-S'TN MAIN/1ST ST AVERAGED VOl!JHES FOR. TUESDAY 10/24/00 TO' IlEDNESDAY 1 O/25/DO
.*-*-**...-_.*.._*** AM ***..*.......*.******..*- -**_.._..*..***- PM *...........*_.*..*-
TIME NS SB TOTAL TIME NS SB TOTAL
._...*..*.**.**...*.._*.*--."...._**..._.....*-*..*......._...*.****--**._*..*--_.*-**..
12:00 - 12:15 2 .0 .2 12:00 - '-2:1,5 58 64 122 i
12:15 - 12:30 3 2 5 12:15 - 12:30 10 56 126
12:30 . 12:45 4 5 9 12:30 - 12:45 62 52 114
12:45 - 1:00 5 14 1 8 6 22 12:45 - 1.00 '76 266 56 228 132 494.
1:00 - 1:15 2 5 1:00 - 1:15 51 41 98
1:15 - 1:30 0 1 1 :15. 1:30 80 40 120
1:30 - 1:45 1 2 1:30. 1:45 63 49 112
1:45 - 2:00 ..1 4 6' 2 10 1:45. 2:00 56 256 40 110 96 426
2:00 - 2:15 0 2 2:00 - 2:15 66 44 110
2:15 - 2:30 0 0 2:15. 2:30 62 52 114
2:30.- 2:45 0 0 2:30 - 2:'45. 54 52 106
2:45 - 3:00 ~ 0 1 3 2:45 - 3:00 58 240 42 190 100 430
3:00. 3:15 1 3':00 - 3:15 66 42 108
3:15 - 3:30 4 3:15 - 3:30 78 44 122
3:30. 3:45 1 ,3:30. 3:45 56 52 108
3:45 - 4:00 2 3:45' - 4:00 92 292 42 1SO 134 472
4:00. 4:15 1 4:00 - 4:15 60 51 111
4:15 - 4:30 1 4:15. 4:30 10 49 119
4:30 - 4:45 . 4 4:30 - 4:45 64 58 122
4:45. 5:00 -4-0 4 16 4:45 - 5:00 -92 286 54 212 146 498
5:0D - 5:15 4 4 8 5:00. 5:15 90 62 152
5:15. 5:30 2 2 4 5:15 '- 5:30 10 83 153
5:30. 5:45 I 14 15 5:30 - 5:45 74 63 137
5:45. 6:00 7 14 3 23 10 37 5:45 - 6:00 80 314 44 252' 12"4 566
6:00 - 6:15 10 8 18 6:00. 6:15' 64 70 134
6:15 - 6:30 14 11 25 6:15 - 6:30 62 59 121
6:30. 6:45 14 1B 32 6:30 - 6:45 76 49' 125
6:45. 7:00' 20 58 20 57 40 115 6:45. 7:00 51 253 50 228 101 481
7:00 - 7:15 24 34 58 7:00. 7:15 42 42 84
7:15. 7:30 42 38 80 7:15 - 1:30 32 22 54
7:30. 7:45 50 47 97 7:30 - 7:45 41 23 70
7:45 - S:OO 5S 174 48 167 106 341 7:45 - 8:00 31 152 22 109 53 261
8:00. 8:15 48 40 88 8:'00. 8:15 27 23 50
8:15 - S:30 46 52 98 8:15 - 8:30 25 18 43
8:30. 8:45 44 37 81 8:30 -.. 8:45 24 18 42
8:45 - 9:00 47 185 45 174 92 359 8:45 - 9:00 26 102 17 76 43 178
9:00 - 9:15 46 34 80 9:00 - 9:15 32 16 48
9:15 - 9:30 38 56 94 9:15 - 9:30 34 14 48
9:30 - 9:45 50 24 74 9:30 - 9:45 22 16 . 38
9:45 - 10:00 32 166 3ó 150 6B 316 9:45 . 10:00 20 108 12 58 32 166
10:00 . 10:15 36 39 75 10:00 . 10:15 II i2 23
10:15 - 10:30 44 28 72 10: 15 - 10:30 9 2 II
10:30 - 10:45 53 45 98 10:30. -10:45 10 3 13
10:45 . 11:00 34 167 40 152 74 319 10:45 - 11 :00 11 41 4 21 15 62
":00 . 11:15 53 58 111 11:00 . 11:15 7 12
11:15 . 11:30 62 45 107 11:15 - 11:30 6 11
'1:30 - 11:45 42 46 88 11,30 - 11:45 4 10
":45 - 12:00 58 215 44 193 102 408 11:45 - 12:00 21 1 18 6 39
* ** .... *........ .............* ...*... .*....*........... ....... .... .... ..... ....*........._.. .--..* .... ...*. **.... **** *
TOTALS 1,010 944 ',954 2,331 ',742 4,075
ADT'S 3,341 2,686 6,027
*.*"..*'."'.**.*.'.*""."""'."""""""""'."".....................*................**............".........
TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC. . LOCATION 'CODE 10012.095
-.-.....---.--......................................................*<:...............-........-....-....... ~.. ....
LOCATION' PROSPECT-8TN MAIN/1ST 51
AVERAGED VOLUMES FOR' THURSDAY 11/9/00 TO FRIDAY 11/10/00
.............-........-........ AM ................................*
................-.............. PM ........-....""............-.
TIME . NI SI TorAL TIME NB SI TOTAL
..........-.....................-..............................-...........-...............-......-....-.-.-...............-
12':00 . 12: 15
12:15 - 12:311
12:30' 12:45
12:45' 1:00
1 :00 - 1:15
1:15 - 1:30
1:30' 1:45
1:45' 2:00
2:00' 2;15
2: 15 - 2:30
2:30' 2:45
2:45' 3:00
3:00' 3:15
3:15' 3:30
3:30' 3:45
3:45 - 4:00
4:00' 4:15
4:15' 4:30
4:30 - 4:45
4:45' 5:00
5:00 - 5:15
5:15 - 5:30
5:30 - 5:45
5:45 - 6-:00
6:00 - 6:15
6:15 - 6:30
6:30 - 6:45
6:45 - 7:00
7:00 - 7:15
7:15 - 7:30
7:30 - 7:45
7:45 - 8:00
8:00 - 8:15
8:15 - 8:30,
8:30 - 8:45
8:45 - 9:00
9:00' 9:15
9:15 - 9:30
9:30 - 9:45
9:45 - 10:00
10:00 - 10:15
10:15 - 10:30
10:30 - 10:45
10:45 - 11:00
2
3
0
1
0
1
6
2
0
0
0
0
0
3
2
3
1
2
1
3
5
. 8
26
26
27
49
58
40
174
6
7
65
126
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
3
2
,
0
0
0
3
2
3
2
6
6
7
9
16
20
28
Z5
42
52
64
66
53
49
40
50
40
30
37
24
46
Z8
47
8
21
73
183
298
157
145
2
3
2
2
0
1
6
5
12
9
12:00 - 12:15 .
12: 15 . 12:30
12:30 . 12:45
12:45 . ' 1:00
55
60
. 45
54
54
56
49
62
38
50
41
38
36
49
38
33
167
156
89
40
32
16
68
50
60
56
234
106
100
101
94
79
44
41
29
401
88
99
76
77
340
34
Z5
23
34
116
2
1
0
0
2
2
1
0
0
6
4
6
1~-
1:00' 1:15
1:15' 1:30
1:30 - 1:45
1:45' 2:00
2:00 - 2: 15
2:15 - 2:30
2:311' 2:45
2:45' 3:00
3:00 - 3:15
3:15' 3:30
3:30 - 3:45
3:45 - 4:00
4:00 - 4:15
4:15 - 4:30
4:30' 4:45
4:45 - 5:.00
5:00 - 5:15
5:;5' 5:30
5:30' 5:45
5:45 - 6:00
6:00' 6:15
6:15' - 6:30
6:30 - 6:45
, 6:45 - 7:00
7:00 - 7:15
7:,15 - 7:30
7:30 - 7:45
7:45 - 8:00
8:00 - 8:15
8:15 - 8:30
8:30' 8:45
8:45 - 9:00
9:00 - 9:15
9:15' 9:30
9:30 - 9:45
9:45 - 10:00
10:00 - 10:15
10: 15 - 10:30
10:30 - 10:45
10:45 - 11:00
214
221
52
57
55
71
235
52
50
38
44
184
94
96
\12
114' 416
106
96
96
110
408
38
31
29
19
117
3
8
7
10
28
64
61
76
67
58
34
Z5
23
268
140
39
36
67
60 202
52
40
47
48
187
48
52
49
~
50
43
52
40
201
185
100
109
104'
123
436
42
29
24
31
14
24
46
54
138
26
22
19
22
8
11
8
13
8
7
8
9
1
7
4
4
37
35
31
24
127
114
104
128
107
453
52
91
110
104
357
24
18
13
24
12
8
8
16
10
12
8
11
8
13
4
4
95
69
56
47
267
100
78
72
74
88
71
59
56
324
274
50
40
32
46
168
66
75
52
78
271
20
19
16
29
84
18
19
16
20
73
9
20
8
8
45
'1:00-11:15 Z5 40, 65 11>00-11:15 7 7 14
11:15-11:30 29 34 63 11:15-11:30 0 3 3
11:30-11:45 34 46 80 11:30-":45 4 2 6
11:45 . 12:00 3D 118 38 158 68 276 11:45 - 12:00 3 14, 5 17 . 8 31
.............................................................."..".",.."",...,..".....'.."'..""".'.'."""".'.'."
TOTALS
749
964
1,713
1 ,592
1,530
3,122
ACT'S 2,341 2,494 4,835
.................................................................................................................-.....
TI\AFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC. LOCATION COOS 10012.052
"".""""""""""'_.""""'_._.""'""",,-""""""'.."""'...""""'-~-"""...--...............
LOCATION - MAIN ST-BTN NEIIPORT/EL CAMINO AVERAGED' VOLUMES FOR -' THURSOAY,11/9/00 TO FRIDAY 11/10/00
.................................. AM ...................*......... ................~..~.............. PM -.......-................
TIME EB lIB TOTAL TIME EB \AI 'TOTAL
'.""'."""..""""""""""""""""""'-"".""""'.""'.'".............-........................--............
12:00 - 12:15 3 2 5 12:00 - 12:,15 102 102 204
12:15 . 12:30 3 1 4 12:15 - 12:30 98 92 190
12:30 - 12:45 2 7 9 12:30 - 12:45 102 91 193
12:45 - 1:00 3 11 0 10 3 21 12:45 - 1:00 106 4OB, 101 386 207 79'4
1:00,- 1:15 2 2 4 1:00' 1:15' 86 103 189
1:15 - 1:30 1 1 2 1:15 - 1:30 S9 113 202
1:30 - 1:45' 3 1 4 1:30 - 1:45 SO S8 168
1:45' 2:00 2 8 2 6 4 14 1:45 - 2:00 72 , 327 87 391 159' 718.
2:00 - 2:15 2 0 2 2:00 - 2:15 96 7B ,174
2f15 - 2:30 1 0 1 2:15 - 2:30 66 92. 158
2:30 - 2:45 1 0 1 2:30 - 2:45 SO 113 193
2:45 - 3:00 3 7 0 0 3 7 2:45' 3:,00 S8 330 118 401 206 731
3:00-- 3:15 0 1 3:i)0 - 3:15 79 133 212
3:15 - 3:30 1 1 3:15 - 3:30 91 107 198
3:30 - 3:45 3 3 3:30 - 3:45 85 111 196
3:45' 4:00 0 4 2, 1 6 3:45' 4:00 S8 343 136 487 224 830
4:00 - 4:15 1 2 3 4:00 - 4:15 94 146 240
4:15 - 4:30 2 3 5 4:15 - 4:30 97 150 247
4:30' 4:45 1 4 5 4:30 - 4:45 103 122 225
4,:45' 5:00 6 10 3 12 9- 22 4:45' 5':00 105 399- 152 570 257 969
5:00' 5:15 6 ;. '10, 5:00 - 5:15 106 150 256
5:15 - 5:30 10 8 IB 5:15 - 5:30 1OS 156 261
5:30 - 5:45 30 2 32 5:30 - 5:45 106 15B 264
5:45' ,6:00 34 BO IS 29 49 109 5:45' 6:00 104 421 172 636 276 1057
6:00' 6:15 42 8 50 6:00 - 6:15 66 140 206
6:15 - 6:30 '47 22 69 6:15 - 6:30 76 96 172
6:30' 6:45 49 31 BO 6:30 - 6:45 63 97 160
6:45' 7:00 42 1BO 48 109 90 2B9 6:45 - 7:00 50 255 SO' 413 130 668
7:00' 7:15 4B 48 96 7:00 - 7:15' 57 59 116
7:15 - 7:30 64 66 130 7:15 - 7:30 48 5B 106
7:30 - 7:45 90 lOB 19B 7':30 - 7:45 35 39 74
7:45' 8:00 100 302 134 356 234 658 7:45' B:OO SO 190 40 196 90 386
8:00 - B:15 B6 11s' 201 8:00 - 8:15 42 36 7B
8: IS - 8:30 82 98 IBO 8:15 - 8:30 39 41 80
8:30' 8:45 59 81 140 8:30' 8:45 29, 22 51
8:45 - 9:00 56 283 103 397 159 6BO B:45' 9:00 35 145 37' 136 72 2B1
9:00 - 9:15 73 67 140, 9:00 - 9:15 25 31 56
9:15 - 9:30 42 6Ð 102 '9:15 - 9:30 24 23 47
9:30' 9:45 52 56 lOB 9:30. 9:45 23 '19 42
9:45 . 10:00 56 223 58 241 114 464 9:45 - 10:00 42 114 23 96 65 210
10:00 - 10,15 56 64 120 10:00 . 10:15 17 11 28
10:15 . 10:30 57 65 122 10:15 - 10:30 19 10 29
10:30 - 10:45 53 54 107 10:30 - 10:45 5 11 '16
10:45 . 11:00 56 222 92 275 148 497 10:45 . 1 I :00 9 50 10 42 19 92
" :00 . 11:15 71 65 136 ":00 . 11:15 8 15 23
II :15 - 11:30 65 85 150 11:15 - 11:30 3 9 12
11 :30 - 11 :45 101 79 180 ":30 - 11:45 0 8 8
11:45 . 12:00 95 332 74 303 169 635 I I :45 - 12:00 10 2' 4 36 14 57
..............................................................................................................................
TOTALS 1,662 ' ,740 3,402 3,003 3,790 6,793
ACT'S 4,665 5,530 10,195
...............................................................................................................-...............
TRAFFIC DATA SERVICëS, INC. LOCATION CODE 10012.05
****_.......**..**......**.**............._........_..~.................._..........*............... .........--..
LOCATION " MAIN ST-8TN EL CAMINO/WILLIAMS AVERAGED VOLUMES FOR - TUESDAY 11/141.00 TO" WEDNESDAY 11/15/00
.....*...""!-*..*........... AA .....***...*.............. ""-."*."..'-.."" PM -...--.......*.....
TIME EB lIB TOTAL TIME EB lIB TOTAL
*.........,,;...._......-........--........*..............*....._............*.........*.....__._._*._..
12:00 . 12:15 10 12:00 . 12:15 BI 77 158
12:15 . 12:30 2 12:15 . 12:30 74 72 146
, 12:30 .' 12:45 4 12:30 . 12:45 '74 sa 162
12:45. 1:00 11 3 19 12:45 - 1:00 62 291 80 317 142 608
1:00. 1:15 I .1 2 1:00 - 1:15 54 76 130
1:15' 1:30, 2 3 5 1:15. 1:30 63 65 128
1,30' 1:45 4 2 6 1:30 - 1:45 55 71 126
1:45. 2:00 0 7 0 0 13 1:45 - 2:00 76 24B 73 285 149 S33
2:00 - 2:15 3 3 2:00. 2:15 99 81 180
2:15 - 2:30 0 I 2:15 .' 2:30 B2 71 153
2:30. 2:45 I 4 2:30 - 2:45 99 87 186
2:45. 3:00 I 5 2 10 2:45 - 3:00 IDS 388' 59 328 197 716
3:00- 3:15 1 I ,2 3;00 - 3.:15 124 136 260
3:15 - 3:30 1 I 2 3:15.. 3:30 9Ð 137 227
3:30. 3:45 2 0 2 3:30 - 3:45 106 130 236
3:45' 4:00 5 5 7 10 16 3,45. 4:00 100 420 112 515 212 935
4:00 - 4:15 3 3 6 4,00. 4:15 120 138 2S8
4:15 - 4:30 2 I 3 4:15. 4:30 128 145 273
4:30. 4:45 10 4 ,14 4:30. 4:45 144 130 274
4:45 - 5:00 8 23 5 13 13 3~ 4':45 - 5,00 132 524 108 521 - 240 1045
5:00 -' 5,15 8 ~5 23 5:00 - '5,15 162 176 338,
5:1S'. 5:30 6 12 18 5:15. 5:30 ,173' 133 306
5:30. 5:45 23 8 31 5:30 - 5:45 150 114 264
5:45 - 6:00 40 77 16 51 56 128 5:45. 6:00 1'12 597 99 522 211, 11.19
6,00 - 6:15 41 27, 68 6:00' 6:15 73 101 174
6:15' 6:30 52 26 78 6:15 - 6:30 7D 68 138
6,30. 6:45 6D 39, 99 6:30 - 6:45 70 59 129
6:45. 7:00 64 217 74 166 138 383 '6:45. 7:00 61 274 59 287 120 561
7,00. 7:15 74 66 140 7:00. 7:15 62 56 118
7:15' 7:30 126 89 215 7:15. 7:30 38 62 100
7:30 - 7:45 162 130 292 7:30 . , 7:45 28 44 72
7:45' 8:00 122 484, 162 447 284 931 7:45. 8:00 22 ISO 43 205 65 355
8:00 - 8,15' 107 '67 274 8:00. 8:15 ~1 43 74
8:15. 8:30 55 112 167 8:15. 8:30 '35 29 64
8:30. 8:45 SO 90 140 8:30 - 8:45 34 28 62
8:45. 9:00 51 263 75 444 126 707 8:45 - 9:1)0 30 130 30 130 60 260
9:00'- 9:15 45 51 96 ,9:00 - 9:15 21 37 ,58'
9:15' 9:30 43 40 83 9:15. 9:30 12 30 42
9:30 - 9:45 44 46 90 9:30' 9:45 18 29 47
9:45 . 10:00 49 181 59 196 IDS 377 9:45 . 10:00 18 69 24 120 42 189
10:00 . 10,15 SO 36 86 10:00 . 10:15 15 16 31
10:15 - 10:30 55 47 102 10:15 - 10:30 ' 7 18 2S
10:30 - 10:45 41 47 88 10,30 - 10,45 8 15 23
10:45 . 11:00 48 194 43 173 91 367 10:45 - 11 :00 4 34 12 61 16 95
11:00 . 1,1:15 64 44 108 11:00 . 11 :15 10 9 19
11:15 - 11:30 66 48 114 11:15 . 1,,30 10 13 23
11:30 - 11:45 78 58 136 11:30 . II :45 6 5 II
11:45 - 12:00 82 290 46 196 128 486 I' ,45 . 12:00 2 28 5 32 7 60
.**. * *.. ....... ** *...* **... * *. * * *. *. * ..* ****. *.**.... *.. *.....* *.. * .... **.. ... .....*.. ..**.....*.. **....*.....* ...****.*
TOTALS ',758 1,715 3,473 3,153 3,323 6,476
ADT'S 4,911 5,038 9,949
..* .** ..** *.* ** * * * ...*..*... *. *..... * * **.. **. * * *. *.. ..... **..... *.. *. **. * *.... ... ..**... * **... ..*.. **.. *....... * *.. **. *..
TRAfFIC DATA SERVICES, INC. LOCATION CDDE 10012.027
.....-..*-*...........--..--...-..........--*--.---..-....--....*..----........
LoCATION - 1ST ST-BTN PROSPECT/YORBA AVERAGED VOLUMES FOR' IlEDNESOAY 11/8/00 TO THURSDAY 11/9/00
.*..*-*...*..*.......-- AM ...*.....**...__.****- .,¡*.__.._.*._.**-*- PM -**-.--......-.
TIME EB WB TOTAL TIME EB WB TOTAL
....*...*.....*.-**.*....-_...-..........*.*...._....._*..*...__..*---.-.-..-****---.--....-...
12:00 - 12:15 4 6 10 12:00 . 1?:15 252 163 415
12:15 . 12:30 5 10 IS 12:15 . 12:30 230 170 400
12:30 . 12:45 12 7 19 12:30 . 12:45 232 204 436
12:45' 1:00 7 28 9 32 16 60 12:45' 1:00 224 938 218 755 442 1693
1:0Ô' 1:15 6 6 12 1:00. 1:15 203 1911 401
1:15 - 1.:30 4 7 " 1:15' 1:30 176 206 382
1:30' 1":45 4 5 '9 1:30' 1:45 142 195 337
1:45' 2:00 4 18 8 26 12 44 1:45. 2:00 176 697 167 766 343 1463
'2;00 . ,2ill 3 4 7 Z,:Qo . ..2,1~ 1:10 17.Q, 329..,
hIS' 2:30 4 3 7 2:15. 2:30 ISO 186 336
2:30 - 2:45 I 3 4 2:30' 2:45 158 189 347
2:45' 3:00 3 11 I 11 4 22 2:45. 3:00' 144 602 192 737 336 1339
3:00' 3:15 3 I 4 3:00' 3115 ISO 182 332
3:15' 3:30 5 2 7 3:15. 3:30 162 189 351
3:30 - 3:45 5 3 8 3:30' 3:45 162 174 336
3:45' 4:00 a 21 I 7 9 28 3,45. 4100 173 647 178 723 351 1370
4:00' 4:15 8 7 IS 4:00 - 4:15 164 204 368
4:15 - 4:30 4 6, 10, 4:15. 4:30 192 202 394
4:30 - 4:45 6 4 10 4:30' 4:45 176 238 414
4:45 - 5:00 28 46 9 26 37 72 _4:45' 5:00, 191 723 212 856,-. 403 1579
5:00' 5:15 IS ,9 24 5:00' 5:15 236 254 490
5':15 - 5:30 18 12 30 5:15 - 5:30 248 '230 478
5:30 - 5:45 " 16 43 5:3"C. 5:45 216 228 444
5:45 - 6:00 48 108 21 58 69 166 5:45 - 6:00 166 866 194 906 360 1772
6:00 - 6:15 48 20 68 6:00' 6:15 148 211 359
6:15 - 6:30 67 35 102 6:15' 6:30 152 190 342
6:30 - 6:45 74 64 138 ,6:30' 6:45 120 158 278
6:45' 7:00 104 293, 76 195 180 488 6:45 - 7:00 110 530 136 695 246 1225
7:00' 7:15' 114 103 217 7,00 ,- 7:15 100 132 232
7:15' 7:30 118 lOB 226 7:15' 7:30 lID 102 212
7:30 - 7:45 174 177 351 7:30' 7:45 ,70 94 164
7:45 - 8:00 144 550 202 590 346 1140 7:45' - 8:00 76 356 7B 406 154 762
8:00 - 8:15 140 202 342 8:00' 8:15 60 72 132
8:15' 8:30 ISO 165 315 8:15 - 8:30 74 62' 136
8:30' 8:45 150 148 '298 8:30' 8:45 59 72 131
8:45 - 9:00 146 586 118 633 264 1219 8:45' 9:00 45 238 56 262 101 500'
9:00 - 9:15 134 145 279 9:00 - 9:15 52 44 96
9:15' 9:30 126 128 254 9:15' 9:30 31 53 B4
9:30 - 9:45 126 127 .253 9:30. 9:45 " 48 75
9:45 - 10:00 134 520 '10 510 244 1030 9:45 - 10:00 36 146 30 175 66 321
10:00 - 10:15 '38 144 282 10:00 - 10:15 30 35 65
10:15 - 10:30 132 138 270 10:15 - 10:30 29 26 55
10:30 . 10:45 116 '28 244 10':30 . '0:45 21 32 53
10:45' 1':00 '44 530 126 536 270 1066 10:45 - 11:00 8 88 19 112 27 200
I' :00 - 11,15 148 148 296 11 :00 . II :15 IS 20 35
11:15 . 11:30 161 '46 307 11:15 - 11:30 II 20 31
I' :30 - II :45 202 158 360 11:30 . 11:45 12 17 29
II :45 . 12:00 196 707 146 598' 342 1305 11:45' 12:00 9 47 7 64 16 1'1
....*.***......***.......*.*.-.._****._**..*..**......*.**..****-*........**........**..*.......*.._*..*..*...**......*.
TOTALS 3,418 3,222 6,640 5,878 6,457 12,335
ADT'S 9,296 9,679 18,975
**.. **. *.. *.. * * * * ***.*. _....* . .... .....*. .** *. * *.. ** * ..*. * .-. *-*. ****** * *.*- ** * *.... **- .*. d.- **-* * .*.* ** *.... **
RESOLUTION NO. 05-62
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN
APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 05-001 TO ESTABLISH A
COLLECTOR ARTERIAL DESIGNATION AND TO RECLASSIFY EL
CAMINO REAL BETWEEN FIRST STREET AND NEWPORT AVENUE
FROM A SECONDARY ARTERIAL TO A COLLECTOR ARTERIAL.
The City Council does hereby resolve as follows:
I.
The City Council finds and determines as follows:
A. That in November 1997, the City, in coordination with the Orange County
Transportation Authority (OCT A), approved a demonstration project to reduce
the number of travel lanes on EI Camino Real between Second Street to
Sixth Street (one block south of First Street and west of Newport Avenue)
from a four-lane undivided Secondary Arterial street to a two-lane undivided
collector street with diagonal parking along both sides of the street.
B. That following the success of the demonstration project and the preparation
of a traffic study, the OCTA approved an amendment to the Master Plan of
Arterial Highways (MPAH) to change the status of the street segment of EI
Camino Real between First Street and Newport Avenue from a four-lane
secondary arterial to a two-lane local collector roadway.
C, That the proposed General Plan Amendment would similarly reflect the two-
lane collector status of the roadway on the City's Circulation Element and
ensure consistency between the City's General Plan and OCTA's MPAH.
D, That General Plan Amendment 05-001 will achieve consistency with the
MPAH designation.
E. That General Plan Amendment 05-001 will reflect the existing and future
traffic levels on the roadway segment.
F, That General Plan Amendment 05-001 will ensure consistency between the
roadway and the adjacent land uses by supporting the pedestrian-friendly
character of the Old Town commercial district.
G, That a public hearing was duly called, noticed, and held on said application on
April 11, 2005, by the Planning Commission and was recommended for
approval.
H. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed, and held on said application on
April 18, 2005, by the City Council.
Resolution No, 05-62
Page 2
I. That General Plan Amendment 05-001 is consistent with and implements the
following policies of the General Plan:
Circulation Element Policy 1.3: Coordinate roadway improvements with
applicable regional, state, and federal transportation plans and proposals.
Circulation Element Policy 1.14: Enhance the important role that
streetscapes play in defining the character of the City by expanding street
planning and design procedure to include aesthetic and environmental
concerns, as well as traffic considerations. Develop a circulation system
which highlights environmental amenities and scenic areas.
Circulation Element Policy 3,1: Support the completion of the Orange County
Master Plan of Arterial Highways.
Land Use Element Policy 8.8: Maintain and improve, where necessary, the
City's infrastructure and facilities,
II.
The City Council hereby approves General Plan Amendment 05-001 to establish a
collector arterial designation and to reclassify EI Camino Real between First Street
and Newport Avenue from a secondary arterial to a collector arterial as identified in
Exhibit A attached hereto.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Tustin, at a regular meeting
on the 18th day of April, 2005.
LOU BONE
Mayor
PAMELA STOKER
City Clerk
Resolution No, 05-62
Page 3
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF ORANGE)
CITY OF TUSTIN )
CERTIFICATION FOR RESOLUTION NO. 05-62
SS
PAMELA STOKER, City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Tustin,
California, does hereby certify that the whole number of the members of the City Council of
the City of Tustin is five; that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 05-62 was duly passed
and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin City Council, held on the 18th day of April,
2005, by the following vote:
COUNCILMEMBER AYES:
COUNCILMEMBER NOES:
COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAINED:
COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT:
PAMELA STOKER
City Clerk
EXHIBIT A OF RESOLUTION NO" 05-62
Secondary: A four-lane undivided roadway, with a typical right-of-way
width of 80 feet and a curb-to-curb pavement width' of 64 feet. These
roadways serve as collectors, distributing traffic between local streets, and
major and primary arterials. For the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan, 80-foot
right-of-way was modified to a 92-foot right-of-way to provide a painted
median for two-way left turn lanes and Class IT bicycle lanes,
Collector: A two-lane undivided roadwav. with a minimum right-of-wav
width of 66 feet and a minimum curb-to-curb width of 50 feet. The width
mav be increased to accommodate roadway features such as bicycle lanes. on-
street parking. and turn lanes. At LOS "C." this road tVDe accommodates UP
to approximately 10.000 vehicle trips per day. This road functions as a
collector facilitv.however it tends to move traffic between two arterials rather
than between local streets. it has been added to the City's arterial highway
svstem because it provides network continuitv and is regionallv significant.
'and mav serve through traffic demand where projected volumes do not
warrant a higher classification such as Secondary.
The Circulation Element roadway classification system does nót include
pri vate streets. Private street widths and cross-sections will vary from those
described for roadways in this Element. Standard cross-sections represent the
obvious and accepted answer to most situations. However, the standard
cross-sections do not always provide the best solution to any given'need or
set of objectives. Reasonable flexibility and variety is provided for in the
City's private street standards.
Fig\Jre C-1 shows schematic cross sections of each category of arterial
roadway. These sections represent desirable standards, but variation in right-
of-way width and specific road improvements will occur in certain cases due
to physical constraints and/or right-of-way limitations. In particular, the
median width in eight-lane, six-lane and four-lane roadways will vary
according to the area being served and the available right-of-way constraints
and turn lane requirements. Hence, any of the arteria] classifications may
deviate from the standards where physical constraints exist or where
preservation of community character dictates special treatment. Bikeway
facilities are another factor which affect the specific standards applied for
vario\Js facilities,
The desirable goal for every classified street section is that it carry the
designed volume of traffic at the desired level of service, Within this
req\Jirement, descriptions of width and facilities are offered as basic
gtlidelines and as noted above, variation in design is expected, depending on
CITY OF TUSTIN
GENERAL PLAN
20
CIRCULATION ELEMENT
April 18,2005
.:'
50'
--r-J
')
~I
~L
",
72'
56'
m
n'
.--
r---::-I
-, ~ ",v
.. '*' ¡---'
ß,LANE MAJOR ARTERIAL 144' RJW!
~
~
00'
44'
If¡
60'
, 44'
rl
~
6-LANE MAJOR ARTERIAL 120' R/W
ur-
h
50'
35'
1-tI
, 50'
35'
14
PRIMARY ARTERIAL 100' Rrw,
.H
¡ ,::: I-L-\
~---.r-
, SECONDARY ARTERIAL 92' RlW ' '
(WITH CLASS II BICYCLE LANES)
40'
30'
'~
sECONDARY ARTERIAL 80' R/W
H' 33' 33' rl
25', 25',
~ -- - ----r-
..~
COLLECTOR ARTERIAL 66' R/W
SOURCE: Austin,FoustAssociates, Inc,
CityofTustin '
, Figure C-1
Typical Cross-Sections
)
II~U!
-~--_._-
--' -------'----' -----,------- ,-----~-,------ ----- --'---
Mmh'21,2005
2\
, Table C-4
LAND USE AND TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY
-,- 1993 --. '-- Future --
Land Use Category Units Amount ADT Amount ADT
I. CITY OF TUSTIN 1. Res;dential DU 17,604 148,213 29,790 250,672
2, ConimerciaVOfficelInd, TSF 11,926 275,434 28,555 625.744
3, Other 43,241 79,197
Sub-Total 466,888 955,613
2. SPHERE OF INFLUENCE 1. ResIdential DU 8.146 101,043 8.363 103.343
2, CommerciaVOfficelInd, TSF 75 2.513 113 2.467
3. Other 19,089 19.635
Sub.Total 122.645 125,445
TOTAL 1. Residential DU 25.750 249,256 38,153 354,015
2, CnmmerciaVOfficeJlnd. TSF 12.001 277,947 28.668 628,211
3, Other 62.330 98.832
Sub,To..l 589.533 1,081,058
Note: DU = Dwelling Units, TSF = Thousand'Square Fee~ ADT = Average Dally Traffic
The "Other" land nse category refers to schoo~, churches, hospitals. hote~, parks, etc" which do not have a square foot based trip
rate (see trip rates in Appendix A), The square footage, equivalents are shQltn in parenthesis to provide consistency with the cia..
given in the Land Use Element
Source: City o!Tustin General Plan Amendment Tñfic Study, Austin-Foust Associates. October 1995,
GENERAL PLAN CmCULATION SYSTEM
The goals and policies included in this Element emphasize the need for a circulation
system that is capable of serving both existing and future residents while preserving
community values and character. The location, design, and constituent modes of the
circulation system have major impacts on air quality, noise, community appearance, and
other elements of the environment. '
The highway network designated in the Arterial Highway Plan is illustrated in Figure C-
2, and indicates all of the designated Major arterials, Primary arterials, Secondary
arterials, Collector arterials, and the sections of roadway designated for modified right-
of-way or augmented capacity. Table C-5 provides an additional description of the
Artelial Highway Plan links. Discussions on sections of roadway for which these two
qualifiers are propo~ed as follows:
CITY OF TUSTiN
GENERAL PLAN
27
CIRCULATION ELEMENT
April 18.2005
~V£
~' -
m
,.
"""'A""
AV£
i
~
"",,^
2
~ ~
1-
NORTH not 10 scale
SOURCE: Austin-Foust Associates, InG,'
City ofTustin
'.~q;
LEGEND
... Major(8tanes)
-- Major (6 lanes)
_W- Modified Major (6 lanes)
----.; Primary (4 lanes)
_w_' Modified Primary (4 lanes)
--i, Secondary (4 or 2 lanes)
. . ; Augmented Roadways
~~ City Boundary
... , , ...i Planning Area Boundary
"""'C;';'" Collector (2 lanes)
Figure C-2
Arterial Highway Plan
D ~.A"L' ~
--,,;,,":' , 2005,_=---===~----==---,-----------,---
-----,------
7.8
(
(
, TABLE C-5
ARTERIAL IDGHWA Y
, .'
Link Classification Link Classification
Armstrong/so Loop Rd N Secondary Irvinewlo Yorba ,Major(A)
ArmStrong slo Warner Secondary Irvine wlo Prospect Majo,(A)
ArmStroog wo Bananca ' Secondary Irvine do Prospect Major
Irvine do Holt Major
Bammca do Red Hill Major Irvine do Newport Major(M,A)
BaITanca wlo Yon Karman ~or Irvine wlo Red Hill Major(M, A)
Barranca wlo Jarnboree Major Irvine wlo Browning Major (M,A)
Irvine wlo Tustio Ranch Major (A)
Browning slo Irvine Secoadary Irvine do Tustin Ranch Major
Browning slo Bryan Secondary Irvine wlo Jamboree Major
Browning nlo Nisson Secondary Jamboree nlo Tustin Ranch Rd, Major
Browniag slo Nisson Secondary Jamboree slo Tustin Ranch Road Major
Bryan do'Newport Secondary
Bryan wlo Red Hill Secondary Jamboree slo PortoJa Major
Bryan wlo Browning Secondary Jamboree slo'Irvine Major (A)
Bryan wlo Tustin Ranch Primary Jamboree slo Bryan Major (A)
Bryan wlo Myford Primary lamboree slo E1 Camino Major (A)
Bryan wlo Jamboree Primary Jamboree slo Walnut Major
Jamboree slo Edinger Major
Del Amo slo Edinger Secondary lamboreesioWarner -, Major
East Connector slo Edinger Secondary Loop Rd <10 Red Hill Secondary
Loop Rd N do Annstrong Secondary
Edinger wlo Del Amo Majnr Loop Rd wlo Tustin Ranch Secondary
Edingerwlo Red Hill Major Loop Rd N do Tustin Ranch Secondary
Edinge'-do Red Hill Majo, Loop Rd slo Warn.. Secondary
Edinger wlo Tustin Ranch Majo> Loop Rd S do Tustin Ranch Secondary
Eding.. do Tustin Ranch Major Loop Rd S do Annstrong Secondary
Eding.. wlo Jamborce MajOJ'
Edinger <10 lamboree Majo, Main wlo El Camino Real Primary
Main <10 EI Camino Real Primary
E1 Caminn slo 1" Collectnr Main <10 Prospect Secondary
EI Camino slo Main ~ Main do Newport Primary
E1 Camino do Newport Secondary Primary
EI Camino do Red Hill Secondary McFadden wlo Williams Primary
EI Camino do Browning Secnodary McFadden do Williams
EI Camino do Tustin Ranch Secondary
E1 Caminn do Myford Primary McFadden wlo Walnut Primary
McFadden wlo Newport Primary
l"wloYorba Primary
l"doYorba Frimary Myford slo Irvine Secondary
I" win Prospect 'Primary Myford slo Bryan Secondary
I"wlo Newport Primary Myford slo El Camino Real Secondary
M»dord wO Walnut Secondary
Harvard wo ICD Secondary
Harvard slo ICD Primary Newport wO Irvine Primary (A)
Harvard wO Warner Primary Newport wo Holt Primary (A)
Newport slo Holt Primary (A)
Holt slo 17" Secondary Newportslo I" Primary (A)
Holt slo Irvine Blvd, Secondary Newport wO Mnin Primn1y(A)
Newport wo EI Camino Real Primary (A)
Newportslo El Cnmioo Primary (A)
CITY OF TUSTIN
GENERAL PLAN
29
CIRCULATION ELEMENT
APRIL 18, 2005