The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About06 JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT NOISE ABATEMENT QUARTERLY REPORTAgenda Item 6 c;f�:- AGENDA REPORT Reviewed. City Manager 6)- Finance Director N/A MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 15, 2019 TO: MATTHEW S. WEST, CITY MANAGER FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT NOISE ABATEMENT QUARTERLY REPORT SUMMARY: This agenda report transmits the John Wayne Airport (JWA) Noise Abatement Quarterly Report for the second quarter of 2019. The average noise level measured at Tustin's monitoring station (NMS 1 ON), located at Columbus Tustin Middle School on Beneta Way (Figure 1), remained fairly consistent with prior quarters during this second quarter reporting period. Average noise levels during the second quarter continued to remain well below the City, County, and State criteria of 65 dB Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) for residential uses. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file this report. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. Figure 1 JWA Noise Report October 15, 2019 Page 2 CORRELATION TO THE STRATEGIC PLAN: Staff's analysis and report of the quarterly JWA Noise Abatement Report falls under Goal D of the Strategic Plan pertaining to strong community and regional relationships. The City of Tustin strives to work collaboratively with agencies both within and outside Tustin on issues of mutual interest and concern, and in this instance, on matters of airport traffic and noise. DISCUSSION: Following the conclusion of each calendar quarter, JWA staff prepares a Noise Abatement Program Quarterly Report and posts a copy of the report on their website. Attached is the quarterly report for the second quarter of 2019, which includes the months of April through June. An overview of the information contained within the JWA Noise Report includes measured noise levels and an analysis of noise complaints. Measured Noise Levels Aircraft noise is most noticeable during airplane takeoffs and landings, primarily due to engine noise. Although engines produce a significant amount of aircraft noise, many other factors may influence the perception of noise including: proximity; weather — in bad weather, engine noise is reflected off of the atmosphere making jets appear louder than on clear days; routes — non-scheduled operations which could include military or private aircraft and maybe louder than commercial aircraft; emergencies; and, weight —a heavier load may affect an aircraft's rate of ascent. During the second quarter of 2019, the average CNEL at Tustin's monitoring station on Beneta Way was 57.9 dB. This is .4 dB higher than the average of the previous quarter (Q-1: January — March 2019). Figure 2 (below) provides a visualization of Tustin's CNEL levels for each month during the second quarter of 2019. v J J UJ Z U 66 64 62 60 58 56 54 52 50 48 Daily Community Noise Equivalent Levels (CNEL) in Tustin April through June 2019 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 Date Figure 2 April May June Noise Impact Area Level (65 dB) JWA Noise Report October 15, 2019 Page 3 Noise Complaints The Airport's Access and Noise Office receives and investigates noise calls and complaints from local citizens and other sources. During the second quarter of 2019, there were eight (8) Tustin area complaint calls, which is seven (7) more complaints than the previous quarter. Tustin staff has outreached to JWA staff to gather further details on the nature of the complaints, and to understand how JWA staff responded. The breakdown of the eight (8) complaints is as follows: Four (4) complaints were regarding general aircraft noise; two (2) complaints were regarding the flight curfew; one (1) complaint was regarding frequent aircraft noise; and, one (1) complaint was regarding low-flying aircraft. Each of these incidents were either discussed over the phone with the complainant, received and responded via phone -call, or received via voicemail with no return phone call requested. To provide an understanding of the trend in Tustin area complaints throughout the years, a chart displaying the number of noise complaints for the past five (5) years is displayed below (Figure 3). LA 16 c 14 n 12 E 10 U 8 0 6 L 4 E 2 Z Noise Complaints - Tustin °° ccc'-' c1c11c'c111c otioti(S' otiotioti61- otiotiotiotiotiotiootiotiotiotioti �, 1�1 0ti\ti �Kti t-titi ��ti lb\" X" 1\ti -\ti ,\T _, _�T �\ti ti�ti -,\,T \ti a o- aCtia�o- a a a a a a a�o- a o- a o- a o- o- o tic Quarter/Year Figure 3 Countywide, there was a significant increase in the number of noise complaints received by the Noise Office during the second quarter reporting period. JWA has indicated that the increase is due to a new online noise reporting service which allows users to file a noise complaint through clicking a button. It was discovered that a small number of users utilized this service, through submitting complaints on a daily basis, as well as consistently throughout the day. Since noise issues are of considerable importance to the City of Tustin, the Community Development Department will continue to monitor operations at JWA unless otherwise directed by the City Council. The public are additionally welcome to participate in JWA's Quarterly meetings held by the Access and Noise Office. The next quarterly meeting will be held on December 18, 2019, at 2:00 p.m. in the Eddie Martin Administration Building located at 3160 Airway Avenue in Costa Mesa. JWA Noise Report October 15, 2019 Page 4 Adrianne DiLeva Management Analyst II Elizabeth A. Binsack Director of Community Development Attachment: John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Quarterly Report for April 1, 2019, through June 30, 2019. ATTACHMENT John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Quarterly Report for April 1, 2019 through June 30, 2019 (Second Quarter) NOISE ABATEMENT PROGRAM QUARTERLY REPORT For the period: April 1, 2019 through lune 30, 2019 Prepared in accordance with: AIRPORT NOISE STANDARD STATE OF CALIFORNIA California Code of Regulations Airport Noise Standards Title 21: Public Works Division 2.5 Division of Aeronautics (Department of Transportation) Chapter 6. Noise Standards Sub itted by: Barry A. Rondinella, A.A.E./C.A.E. Airport Director John Wayne Airport, Orange County , r lf�'a )IR VAYM 0011401 4010x10 INTRODUCTION This is the 186th Quarterly Report submitted by the County of Orange in accordance with the requirements of the California Airport Noise Standards (California Code of Regulations, Title 21: Public Works, Division 2.5 Division of Aeronautics (Department of Transportation), Chapter 6. Noise Standards). Effective January 1, 1986, the criteria for defining "Noise Impact Area" was changed from 70 dB to 65 dB Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL). Under this criteria, John Wayne Airport currently has a "Noise Impact Area." NOISE IMPACT SUMMARY Caltrans' Aeronautics Program has established guidelines in the California State Noise Standard to control residential area noise levels produced by aircraft operations using the State's airports. Under those guidelines, residential noise sensitive areas exposed to an average Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) of more than 65 dB define the "Noise Impact Area." John Wayne Airport uses ten permanent remote noise monitoring stations (NMS) located in Newport Beach, Santa Ana, Tustin and Irvine to measure noise levels, at the following locations: ►�IiPiI11Zej%k l r_we]k NMS -1S: Golf Course, 3100 Irvine Ave., Newport Beach NMS -6S: 1912 Santiago, Newport Beach NMS -2S: 20162 S.W. Birch St., Newport Beach NMS -7S: 1131 Back Bay Drive, Newport Beach NMS -3S: 2139 Anniversary Lane, Newport Beach NMS -8N: 17372 Eastman Street, Irvine NMS -4S: 2338 Tustin Ave., Newport Beach NMS -9N: 1300 S. Grand Avenue, Santa Ana NMS -5S: 324 % Vista Madera, Newport Beach NMS -10N: 17952 Beneta Way, Tustin The map in Figure 1 shows the general location of each permanent remote monitor station. Figure 2 shows the Airport's "Noise Impact Area" for the previous year (July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2019). The Figure 2 information was developed by Landrum and Brown, in consultation with John Wayne Airport. CNEL values measured for the period and current digitized land use information were utilized to calculate the land area acreages, number of residences and estimated number of people within the "Noise Impact Area". FIGURE 1 NOISE MONITORING STATIONS (NMS) LOCATION MAP Fr v SANTA ANA �R? TUSTIN j 2• " a l JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT, COSTA MESA , ORANGE COUNTY 0 1 3 4 5 Scale In miles r FIGURE 2 I O Noise Monitors Single -Family Residential 65 dB CNEL Contours Multi -Family Residential Incompatible Land Use: 6.67 Acres or .010 square miles Number of Dwellings: 67 Number of People: 168 (based on 2.5 people per dwelling unit) 44 1 JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT 65 dB CNEL Impact Area July 2018 - June 2019 Landrum & B nlrr1 AIRCRAFT TRAFFIC SUMMARY The Airport traffic summary for this quarter is shown in Table 1 below. Air Carrier operational count histories and average daily departure counts are illustrated in Tables 9 & 11. TABLE 1 LANDING AND TAKEOFF OPERATIONS April -June 2019 Period April Jet 8,004 .. 0 2,871 •.Jet 26,922 Daily Operations 362 May 8,426 0 2,930 26,509 366 June 7,966 0 3,085 25,531 368 Second Quarter 24,396 0 8,886 78,962 366 Twelve Months 07/01/18 - 06/30/19 95,662 374 36,348 314,000 362 NOTE: (1) GA Jet figures include a 5% factor for operations not identified by the JWA noise monitor stations. (2) Counts in this column are based upon records provided by the local FAA representatives. COMMUNITY NOISE EQUIVALENT LEVELS The monthly, quarterly and twelve month Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) average values for each monitor station are shown in Table 2, while daily CNEL values are shown in Tables 3 through 5. Insufficient data is indicated by "#N/A" entries in each table. Also, "*#N/A" entries in each table indicate there were no aircraft related noise events. Average Single Event Noise Exposure Level (SENEL) values for Air Carrier and General Aviation Jet aircraft are shown in Tables 6 through 8. ACOUSTICAL INSULATION PROGRAM Four hundred eighteen residences in the Santa Ana Heights area have been sound attenuated and an avigation easement reserved through the County's Acoustical Insulation Program, which closed in December 2009. The County has also acquired 46 residences as part of the Purchase Assurance Program, many of which were acoustically insulated, an avigation easement reserved and then resold. Among these County acquired homes, those located within areas designated for Business Park uses were razed, avigation easements were reserved, and the land resold for compatible Business Park uses. A total of 464 residences in the Santa Ana Heights area have been purchased or otherwise made compatible through the County's Purchase Assurance and Acoustical Insulation Programs. Sixty-seven dwelling units in Santa Ana Heights remain in the "Noise Impacted Area" (within 65 dB CNEL contour). COMPLAINT TOTALS (April 1, 2019 - June 30, 2019) The Airport's Access and Noise Office receives and investigates noise complaints from local citizens and all other sources. During the April 1, 2019 through June 30, 2019, the Office received 43,772 complaints from local citizens. This is a 93.7% increase from the 22,594 complaints received last quarter. It is a 8,449.2% increase from the 512 complaints received during the same quarter last year. Figure 4 shows the distribution of the quarterly complaints from local communities. FIGURE 3 HISTOGRAM BY COMMUNITY 43 170 5,819 4,442 j 20 1 � I 771 3,545 1,216 11,03 1 1, i 15 2 I I I 14 1,491 19 198 27 � 2,950 54 6.898 1 30 1 44 356 1 2 3 1,811 3 544 17 I 41 9 8 4 665 5 0 2,000 4,000 ) ) 8,000 10,000 12,00 Number of Complaints Note: • City of Newport Beach — 24,837 total number of complaints. • 98% of complaints were from a complaint subscription service. • 51% of complaints from "Balboa Island" category were from one point of contact. • 74% of complaints from "Balboa Peninsula" category were from one point of contact. • 94% of complaints from "Corona del Mar" category were from one point of contact. • 91% of complaints from "Costa Mesa" category were from one point of contact. • 92% of complaints from "Dana Point" category were from one point of contact. • 72% of complaints from "Dover Shores" category were from one point of contact. • 74% of complaints from "Eastbluff' category were from one point of contact. • 100% of complaints from "Irvine Terrace" category were from one point of contact. • 67% of complaints from "Laguna Beach" category were from one point of contact. • 52% of complaints from "Laguna Niguel" category were from one point of contact. • 68% of complaints from "Orange" category were from one point of contact. • 62% of complaints from "San Juan Capistrano" category were from one point of contact. • 93% of complaints from "Westcliff' category were from one point of contact. Aliso Viejo Anaheim Hills Balboa Island Balboa Peninsula Bayshores Bonita Canyon Brea Corona Del Mar Costa Mesa Dana Point Dover Shores Eastbluff Fountain Valley Harbor Cove Harbor Island Huntington Beach Irvine Irvine Terrace Ladera Ranch = Laguna Beach E Laguna Hills E Laguna Niguel 0 Laguna Woods Q Lido Isla Mission Viejo Modjeska Canyon Newport Beach Newport Coast Newport Heights North Tustin Orange Panorama Heights Rancho Santa Margarita San Juan Capistrano Santa Ana Santa Ana Heights Trabuco Canyon Tustin Unknown Westcliff Yorba Linda FIGURE 3 HISTOGRAM BY COMMUNITY 43 170 5,819 4,442 j 20 1 � I 771 3,545 1,216 11,03 1 1, i 15 2 I I I 14 1,491 19 198 27 � 2,950 54 6.898 1 30 1 44 356 1 2 3 1,811 3 544 17 I 41 9 8 4 665 5 0 2,000 4,000 ) ) 8,000 10,000 12,00 Number of Complaints Note: • City of Newport Beach — 24,837 total number of complaints. • 98% of complaints were from a complaint subscription service. • 51% of complaints from "Balboa Island" category were from one point of contact. • 74% of complaints from "Balboa Peninsula" category were from one point of contact. • 94% of complaints from "Corona del Mar" category were from one point of contact. • 91% of complaints from "Costa Mesa" category were from one point of contact. • 92% of complaints from "Dana Point" category were from one point of contact. • 72% of complaints from "Dover Shores" category were from one point of contact. • 74% of complaints from "Eastbluff' category were from one point of contact. • 100% of complaints from "Irvine Terrace" category were from one point of contact. • 67% of complaints from "Laguna Beach" category were from one point of contact. • 52% of complaints from "Laguna Niguel" category were from one point of contact. • 68% of complaints from "Orange" category were from one point of contact. • 62% of complaints from "San Juan Capistrano" category were from one point of contact. • 93% of complaints from "Westcliff' category were from one point of contact. TABLE 2 LONGTERM MEASURED LEVELS Aircraft CNEL from 07/01/18 through 06/30/19 Values in clB at Each Site Period NMS Site is 2S 35 4S 5S 6S 8N 9N 1ON Jul 2018 68.5 67.5 66.8 60.1 59.6 60.6 57.0 68.2 42.6 56.2 # Days 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 30 31 Aug 2018 68.7 67.7 67.0 60.3 59.8 61.0 57.1 68.3 43.4 56.7 # Days 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 30 31 Sep 2018 68.3 67.4 66.7 60.0 59.7 60.7 56.6 67.9 43.5 56.5 # Days 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 25 30 Q-3 2018 68.5 67.5 66.8 60.1 59.7 60.8 56.9 68.1 43.2 56.5 # Days 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 85 92 Oct 2018 68.4 67.2 66.9 59.9 59.8 60.9 56.9 68.0 43.3 56.8 # Days 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 30 31 Nov 2018 67.5 66.4 66.4 59.5 59.0 60.7 56.7 67.3 44.8 55.8 # Days 301 30 30 291 30 30 28 30 28 30 Dec 2018 67.6 66.6 66.8 59.6 59.6 61.4 57.0 67.6 45.0 56.3 # Days 31 31 31 31 31 31 30 31 30 31 Q-4 2018 67.9 66.8 66.7 59.7 59.5 61.0 56.9 67.6 44.4 56.3 # Days 92 92 92 91 92 92 89 92 88 92 Jan 2019 67.7 66.6 66.5 59.9 59.5 60.7 57.0 67.9 43.4 57.1 # Days 31 31 31 311 31 31 31 31 28 29 Feb 2019 67.9 66.7 66.6 60.2 60.0 60.8 57.7 68.6 45.4 57.9 # Days 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 271 28 Mar 2019 67.9 66.9 66.9 60.2 59.9 61.2 57.4 68.5 43.8 57.6 # Days 30 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 28 31 Q-12019 67.8 66.8 66.7 60.1 59.8 60.9 57.3 68.3 44.3 57.5 # Days 891 90 90 901 90 90 90 90 83 88 Apr 2019 68.1 67.2 66.6 60.3 59.6 61.1 57.4 68.6 42.2 57.7 # Days 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 25 30 May 2019 68.3 67.5 66.8 60.6 59.8 61.2 57.9 69.1 43.3 58.3 # Days 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 29 31 Jun 2019 68.5 67.6 67.1 60.3 59.2 60.8 57.0 68.9 41.4 57.7 # Days 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 25 30 Q-2 2019 68.3 67.5 66.8 60.4 59.5 61.0 57.5 68.9 42.4 57.9 # Days 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 79 91 Q-3 2018 thru Q-2 2019 Total 68.1 67.1 66.8 60.1 59.6 60.9 57.2 68.3 43.7 57.1 # Days 1 364 365 365 364 365 365 362 365 335 363 Q-2 2018 thru Q-12019 (Previous 4 Quarters) Total 68.2 67.2 66.7 60.2 59.7 60.9 57.1 68.2 44.7 57.0 # Days 1 364 365 365 364 362 365 3621 365 337 363 Change from Previous 4 Quarters 0.1 -0.1 0.1 -0.1 -0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 -1.0 0.1 6 = TABLE 3 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION April 2019 Date 1 67.9 66.1 3S 66.3 4S 59.7 NMS Site 5S 58.9 65 59.8 7S 56.5 8N 67.7 9N 40.7 , 56.0 2 67.9 66.8 66.3 60.7 60.2 60.6 57.9 68.8 44.3 58.6 3 68.0 66.9 66.7 60.9 60.2 61.3 58.3 69.2 41.5 58.9 4 68.6 67.4 67.2 61.4 60.9 61.8 58.5 69.5 43.3 58.5 5 68.51 67.1 67.5 60.81 61.0 61.81 58.7 69.3 35.51 58.6 6 66.9 65.3 66.0 59.4 58.8 60.6 56.7 67.4 39.6 56.8 7 68.6 67.7 67.5 60.5 60.2 61.4 57.4 68.8 42.5 57.3 8 68.4 67.4 67.0 59.7 58.2 60.4 57.1 68.9 43.0 57.1 9 67.7 67.0 68.1 59.3 59.1 63.7 56.7 67.0 42.3 56.2 10 65.9 65.7 65.3 57.2 56.6 60.3 55.0 68.3 44.2 56.0 11 68.8 67.9 67.2 61.1 60.3 61.5 57.9 69.2 41.81 57.5 12 68.7 68.0 67.3 60.6 59.4 61.7 58.1 69.1 40.7 57.9 13 66.3 65.4 65.1 58.3 57.0 59.0 55.6 65.9 43.9 54.5 14 67.5 66.9 66.4 59.0 58.6 60.5 56.7 68.2 38.1 56.8 15 68.6 67.9 67.2 61.2 59.6 61.1 57.5 69.3 29.1 59.0 16 68.1 67.5 66.7 60.7 59.7 61.1 58.2 68.6 40.21 58.1 17 68.0 67.1 66.7 60.3 59.2 60.8 57.6 68.4 45.3 57.1 18 68.6 67.7 67.1 60.3 60.0 61.1 57.1 68.6 47.0 57.0 19 68.1 67.5 66.7 60.7 60.0 60.8 56.7 69.3 39.8 58.4 20 66.01 65.5 64.6 59.5 58.6 59.3 55.6 66.6 #N/A 56.4 21 67.7 67.3 66.1 60.3 59.7 61.1 57.4 68.1 #N/A 57.2 22 68.8 68.1 67.2 60.9 60.7 61.9 58.4 69.1 #N/A 58.1 23 68.3 67.5 66.3 59.9 60.4 61.1 57.7 68.5 #N/A 57.5 24 68.0 67.3 66.0 60.1 59.4 60.5 56.6 68.9 *#N/A 57.8 25 68.81 68.0 66.7 60.8 60.3 61.3 57.3 69.2 40.8 58.2 26 68.5 67.7 66.6 60.5 59.9 61.0 57.1 69.3 39.5 58.0 27 66.4 66.0 64.5 58.8 57.9 59.1 55.1 66.6 42.7 56.0 28 68.5 67.4 66.6 61.2 60.1 61.4 58.0 69.4 41.6 58.9 29 69.1 68.2 67.3 61.3 60.7 61.9 58.7 69.4 40.6 59.0 30 68.2 67.6 66.6 60.5 60.3 60.9 58.3 69.3 42.9 58.8 Days 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 25 30 En, Avg 68.1 67.2 66.6 60.3 59.6 61.1 57.4 68.6 42.2 57.7 #N/A indicates insufficient data. *#N/A indicates no aircraft -related noise events. TABLE 4 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION May 2019 Date I 1 68.7 68.0 67.5 61.1 NMS Site 60.8 61.7 58.4 68.9 46.4 , 58.1 2 68.6 67.7 67.4 60.8 60.7 61.6 58.2 68.9 43.8 58.3 3 68.4 67.7 67.0 60.8 60.3 61.4 57.6 69.5 41.1 59.3 4 66.6 65.8 65.1 59.3 58.3 59.6 55.8 66.9 34.8 56.3 5 68.41 67.5 66.6 60.41 60.3 61.21 58.0 69.2 40.1 58.4 6 68.5 67.8 66.9 60.5 60.5 61.2 57.9 68.9 41.8 58.2 7 68.3 67.4 66.4 61.0 60.3 61.1 58.4 68.8 42.5 58.0 8 68.6 67.9 67.0 61.1 60.6 61.5 58.4 69.1 46.9 58.3 9 69.4 68.4 67.7 61.5 61.2 62.2 59.1 69.9 41.9 59.4 10 69.1 68.1 67.7 61.5 60.6 61.9 58.6 69.6 42.8 58.7 11 67.1 66.4 65.8 59.1 59.1 59.71 56.7 67.6 46.9 56.0 12 68.1 66.9 66.3 60.4 59.5 60.7 57.2 69.2 36.6 58.3 13 68.6 67.7 67.1 60.4 59.4 61.0 57.5 69.1 32.8 58.5 14 68.1 67.5 66.6 60.0 58.8 60.8 56.7 69.0 43.4 57.9 15 68.7 68.0 67.1 60.7 57.7 61.4 57.3 69.5 45.4 58.9 16 69.1 68.5 67.2 61.0 60.9 61.81 59.1 70.3 *#N/A 59.6 17 68.8 68.0 67.2 60.8 59.1 61.5 58.2 69.5 40.3 58.8 18 67.2 66.5 65.8 59.1 56.9 60.0 56.9 67.0 43.5 56.1 19 68.9 68.2 67.2 60.8 59.9 61.8 59.1 70.0 *#N/A 59.6 20 68.9 68.3 67.4 60.6 59.7 61.6 58.8 69.7 39.9 59.3 21 68.0 67.5 66.4 60.5 60.0 60.9 58.6 69.4 49.9 58.8 22 67.7 66.8 66.9 60.4 58.8 61.9 57.5 70.1 45.1 58.7 23 69.4 68.1 67.5 61.6 60.4 61.9 59.0 69.7 37.5 59.0 24 68.9 68.3 67.5 60.9 60.5 61.7 58.5 69.4 43.9 58.4 25 66.5 65.6 64.8 59.1 57.8 59.3 56.5 66.6 38.9 55.6 26 66.0 65.6 64.5 58.6 58.2 59.2 56.7 68.1 36.4 57.5 27 67.7 67.1 66.2 60.4 59.7 60.8 57.5 69.1 41.6 57.8 28 68.5 67.5 67.0 60.6 59.5 61.4 58.0 69.0 46.9 57.8 29 68.1 67.3 66.6 60.8 60.1 61.4 57.9 68.5 40.6 56.9 30 68.61 67.7 67.2 60.6 59.8 61.31 57.1 69.4 36.8 58.1 31 68.8 68.0 67.5 61.4 59.7 60.9 56.5 69.5 30.9 7 581583 Days 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 29 En. Avg 68.3 67.5 66.8 60.6 59.8 61.2 57.9 69.1 43.3 #N/A indicates insufficient data. *#N/A indicates no aircraft -related noise events. TABLE 5 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION June 2019 Date 1 is 66.7 2S 66.0 3S 65.3 4S 59.4 NMS Site 5S 58.6 6S 59.8 7S 56.3 8N 66.6 9N *#N/A ION 55.8 2 68.8 68.0 67.3 61.1 60.5 61.7 58.5 69.2 39.0 58.7 3 68.7 68.0 67.4 60.9 60.3 61.5 58.2 68.7 42.0 58.2 4 68.2 67.2 66.8 60.5 59.3 60.4 56.7 68.8 43.3 58.0 5 68.51 67.6 66.8 59.31 58.8 60.11 55.8 69.5 32.0 58.1 6 69.1 67.9 67.3 60.0 58.7 60.2 56.0 69.5 34.5 57.7 7 68.5 67.7 67.4 60.3 59.5 60.9 56.8 69.7 *#N/A 58.3 8 67.4 66.6 66.3 59.6 58.8 60.0 55.9 67.0 *#N/A 55.7 9 68.4 67.8 67.2 59.9 59.3 60.8 57.5 69.2 44.3 56.9 10 68.2 67.3 67.1 59.3 58.7 59.4 56.0 68.9 48.0 57.5 11 67.8 67.4 66.7 59.4 58.9 59.9 56.2 68.7 31.8 57.0 12 68.5 67.5 67.0 60.1 59.6 60.4 56.7 69.5 29.7 57.5 13 69.2 68.4 67.9 60.5 59.9 60.71 56.9 69.0 35.9 57.6 14 69.2 68.0 67.5 61.2 60.1 61.2 57.8 68.9 43.8 58.5 15 65.41 64.5 64.6 57.1 55.7 59.7 54.5 68.4 45.0 56.1 16 68.6 67.8 67.2 60.3 58.3 60.8 56.4 69.1 32.8 57.6 17 69.1 68.0 67.6 61.0 57.9 61.3 57.4 69.2 38.9 58.4 18 69.1 68.1 67.6 60.9 58.5 61.6 57.8 68.9 37.8 58.5 19 68.6 67.9 67.4 60.5 58.8 61.0 57.3 68.8 45.8 57.7 20 68.9 68.0 67.3 60.9 59.6 61.4 57.3 69.8 *#N/A 58.7 21 68.8 67.8 67.3 61.4 59.5 61.4 57.9 69.4 33.0 58.8 22 67.4 66.6 65.7 59.4 58.2 60.0 56.7 67.5 40.8 56.4 23 68.2 67.7 66.9 60.3 59.1 61.2 57.6 69.4 45.5 58.3 24 69.3 68.5 67.9 60.2 59.6 61.0 56.5 69.2 *#N/A 58.2 25 68.6 67.6 67.0 60.8 59.2 60.9 57.1 69.4 30.2 58.0 26 68.8 68.0 67.4 60.8 59.8 61.6 58.4 69.4 34.4 58.2 27 69.2 68.4 67.8 61.2 60.2 62.1 58.5 69.1 40.9 57.9 28 68.3 67.5 67.4 60.6 59.6 61.6 56.9 68.7 33.2 57.8 29 68.0 67.0 66.3 58.9 58.2 59.7 55.6 67.5 41.8 55.4 30 68.2 67.6 66.9 60.0 59.3 60.6 56.4 68.6 37.1 57.6 Days 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 25 30 En. Avg 68.5 67.6 67.1 60.3 59.2 60.8 57.0 68.9 41.4 57.7 #N/A indicates insufficient data. *#N/A indicates no aircraft -related noise events. TABLE 6 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commercial Class A April - June 2019 Carrier AC Deps NMS Site is 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 8N I 9N ION Alaska Air A320 542 Average 95.9 95.2 94.8 88.3 86.5 87.6 84.5 92.1 80.3 80.1 Count (533) (517) (523) (507) (454) (512) (525) (8) (2) (1) B737 13 Average 95.6 95.0 94.3 89.4 89.1 89.5 85.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (13) (12) (13) (12) (11) (12) (13) (0) (0) (0) B738 608 Average 97.9 96.8 95.2 89.1 89.2 90.0 86.6 94.4 80.6 81.6 Count (591) (574) (591) (577) (517) (578) (597) (6) (2) (3) American A320 86 Average 95.0 94.4 93.1 86.5 85.6 87.1 84.4 91.7 #N/A #N/A Count (81) (81) (80) (81) (66) (77) (80) (3) (0) (0) A321 2 Average 98.4 98.0 96.8 88.9 86.8 86.9 83.9 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (0) (0) (0) B738 1454 Average 99.0 97.8 97.3 89.8 89.4 90.2 86.8 95.9 87.9 81.9 Count (1423) (1354) (1398) (1389) (1219) (1355) (1408) (22) (13) (10) Compass E175 415 Average 96.0 95.4 96.2 90.0 89.2 89.6 85.3 95.8 #N/A 79.1 Count (407) (383) (398) (388) (342) (386) (399) (5) (0) (1) Delta A319 244 Average 96.3 95.6 95.4 88.8 88.0 88.9 84.3 93.7 86.0 76.1 Count (233) (212) (231) (225) (196) (221) (226) (10) (8) (1) A320 1 Average 97.3 96.7 96.8 88.7 #N/A 88.5 84.1 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count M (1) (1) (1) (0) (1) (1) (0) (0) (0) B712 66 Average 93.4 93.7 89.5 81.5 80.7 82.7 80.0 85.9 #N/A #N/A Count (65) (57) (63) (60) (50) (59) (51) (1) (0) (0) B738 1 Average 94.5 94.8 92.4 86.4 88.6 89.0 86.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (0) (0) (0) B752 360 Average 96.6 96.2 96.4 89.1 88.3 88.6 84.6 95.6 86.5 81.2 Count (352) (339) (350) (341) (304) (335) (342) (5) (4) (3) FedEx A306 64 Average 96.4 96.4 93.7 88.4 88.0 89.0 85.1 95.0 82.4 85.3 Count (63) (63) (62) (63) (60) (61) (63) (1) (1) (1) Frontier Airlines A20N 127 Average 89.6 89.3 88.8 82.6 80.8 83.5 79.9 87.1 #N/A #N/A Count (123) (114) (121) (115) (102) (112) (79) (3) (0) (0) A320 50 Average 95.8 95.4 93.8 87.2 86.2 87.9 85.3 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (50) (47) (50) (47) (39) (47) (49) (0) (0) (0) Horizon Air E175 181 Average 92.1 91.5 89.8 85.6 85.0 86.8 83.8 93.1 #N/A 78.9 Count (177) (166) (171) (177) (157) (174) (170) (2) (0) (2) Southwest 8737 1516 Average 93.2 92.7 90.7 85.5 85.9 86.4 83.5 92.9 80.5 80.8 Count (1491) (1426) (1459) (1471) (1308) (1454) (1424) (15) (2) (3) B738 28 Average 93.6 93.3 90.0 84.7 85.0 85.6 83.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (27) (28) (26) (28) (25) (27) (27) (0) (0) (0) United A320 568 Average 94.3 93.6 92.5 86.5 86.2 88.5 86.0 93.8 87.1 83.7 Count (546) (519) (541) (533) (472) (525) (548) (12) (4) (2) B737 353 Average 96.9 95.7 96.3 89.5 90.4 90.9 86.8 95.6 88.5 82.5 Count (344) (336) (341) (339) (300) (331) (342) (5) (3) (1) 8738 714 Average 98.6 97.3 96.5 89.4 90.0 90.8 87.4 95.4 88.7 79.6 Count (686) (663) (677) (670) (593) (665) (682) (18) (12) (7) UPS B752 52 Average 95.9 95.9 93.6 87.2 86.6 87.7 83.3 92.8 #N/A #N/A Count (51) (50) (51) (49) (41) (51) (51) (1) (0) (0) West,let B736 1 Average 95.2 92.4 93.8 89.4 86.6 87.7 83.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (0) (0) (0) 8737 86 Average 95.8 94.8 95.2 89.9 89.6 90.3 85.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (86) (82) (85) (84) (73) (81) (84) (0) (0) (0) 10 = TABLE 7 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commercial Class E April -June 2019 Carrier AC .- # Deps NMS Site is 2S 3S 4S I 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N ION Delta B712 364 Average 92.4 92.7 89.1 80.8 80.8 82.5 79.7 89.6 #N/A #N/A Count (357) (338) (350) (287) (282) (339) (268) (5) (0) (0) Horizon Air E175 359 Average 91.3 90.9 89.4 85.7 84.8 86.3 83.5 92.0 #N/A #N/A Count (350) (329) (337) (341) (299) (334) (341) (4) (0) (0) SkyWest Com]. E175 967 Average 90.5 90.3 89.3 85.6 84.6 85.9 83.2 92.1 #N/A 77.9 Count (944) (866) (922) (925) (817) (912) (896) (6) (0) (2) Southwest B737 2291 Average 91.7 91.6 89.81 85.2 85.2 85.7 83.0 92.9 80.3 80.5 Count (2238) (2132) (2169) (2212) (1958) (2151) (2139) (24) (5) (5) TABLE 8 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commuter April -June 2019 TABLE 8 -GA MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS General Aviation April -June 2019 TABLE 9 AIR CARRIER OPERATIONAL HISTORY Carrier Alaska Air AS AC Type A319 2015 2016 Year 2017 2018 64 0• 134 A320 262 2,172 B734 80 76 24 8737 2,666 3,258 1.233 384 92 B738 4.590 4,439 6.420 8,260 2,164 American AA A319 42 1781 332 722 252 A320 344 8681 266 78 108 A321 326 563 56 4 6 8738 9.090 10.538 11,556 11.457 5.576 8752 22 74 4 4 Compass CP E170 152 78 E175 1,669 2,726 3,188 1,496 Delta DL A319 3,352 3,4441 2.053 1,979 947 A320 162 160 94 12 2 B712 3,267 3,379 1,694 8737 146 188 8 8738 4 40 18 10 B739 2 2 8752 2,130 2,1281 2.137 2,889 1,390 MD90 2 FedEx FM A306 508 510 506 508 254 Frontier Airlines F9 A20N* 600 402 A319 1,497 646 356 190 98 A320 154 740 628 654 216 A321 21 1 A32N* 121 438 Horizon Air QX DHBD 1,156 1,456 728 12 E175 339 2,716 2,109 SkvWest Coml. SC CRJ9 1,922 1,899 1,440 6 E175 3,554 4,761 6,960 3.647 Southwest WN B38M 2 14 10 8737 37,101 41,806 35,971 32,380 15,273 B738 2,586 1,144 58 64 90 United UA A319 1,393 1,999 1,470 999 801 A320 3,207 2,670 3,957 3,927 1,253 8737 4,523 5,246 4.044 2,987 1,301 B738 1,853 1,252 3,302 5,154 2,979 B752 44 2 4 UPS 5X A306 52 52 45 22 B752 366 370 369 394 206 US Airways AW A319 240 A320 1,476 A321 740 8752 98 WestJet WS B736 32 30 10 14 B737 718 642 6441 666 314 Total 1 81,288 91,279 90,250 1 91,875 45,030 *In 2018, the code for the Airbus A320neo was changed from A32N to A20N. TABLE 10 AIRCRAFT OPERATIONAL HISTORY Aircraft A20N* 2015 2016 Year 2017 ] 2018_ 600 0• 402 A306 560 562 551 530 254 A319 6,524 6,267 4,211 3,954 2,232 A320 5,343 4,438 4,945 4,933 3,751 A321 1,066 565 56 4 6 A32N* 12 438 B38M 2 14 10 B712 3,267 3,379 1,694 B73A 80 76 24 B736 32 30 10 14 8737 45,008 50,952 42,038 36,605 16,988 B738 18,123 17,373 21,376 24,953 10,819 B739 2 2 8752 2,660 2,572 2,512 3,291 1,596 CRJ9 1,922 1,899 1,4401 6 DHBD 1,156 1,456 728 12 E170 152 78 E175 5,223 7,826 12,864 7,252 M D90 2 Total 81,288 91,27990,250 1 91,875 45,030 *In 2018, the code for the Airbus A320neo was changed from A32N to A20N. TABLE 11 AIR CARRIER AVERAGE DAILY DEPARTURE HISTORY Carrier Alaska Air AS AC .- A319 2015 2016 Year 2017 2018 .088 .184 A320 .359 2.975 8734 .110 .104 .033 8737 3.652 4.451 1.693 .526 .126 B738 6.288 6.066 8.789 11.315 2.964 American AA A319 .058 .243 .455 .989 .345 A320 .471 1.186 .364 .107 .148 A321 .447 .770 .077 .005 .008 B738 12.452 14.402 15.827 15.696 7.638 B752 .030 .101 .005 .005 Compass CP E170 .208 .107 E175 2.279 3.734 4.367 2.049 Delta DL A319 4.592 4.705 2.811 2.712 1.299 A320 .222 .219 .129 .016 .003 B712 4.471 4.627 2.321 B737 .200 .258 .011 B738 .005 .055 .025 .014 B739 .003 .003 B752 2.918 2.910 2.926 3.959 1.904 MD90 .003 FedEx FM A306 .696 .697 .693 .696 .348 Frontier Airlines F9 A20N* .822 .551 A319 2.052 .883 .488 .260 .134 A320 .211 1.011 .860 .896 .296 A321 .003 A32 N * .016 .600 Horizon Air QX DHBD 1.579 1.995 .997 .016 E175 .466 3.721 2.888 SkyWest Coml. SC CR19 2.633 2.593 1.975 .008 E175 4.8551 6.523 9.534 4.997 Southwest WN B38M .003 .019 .014 B737 50.819 57.104 49.274 44.351 20.921 B738 3.542 1.563 .079 .088 .123 United UA A319 1.910 2.730 2.014 1.373 1.096 A320 4.395 3.648 5.422 5.375 1.715 8737 6.195 7.1691 5.534 4.093 1.781 8738 2.537 1.710 4.526 7.058 4.085 8752 .060 .003 .005 UPS 5X A306 .071 .071 .060 .030 8752 .501 .505 .507 .540 .282 US Airways AW A319 .329 A320 2.022 A321 1.014 B752 .134 WestJet WS 8736 .044 .041 .014 .019 6737 1 .984 .877 .882 .912 .430 Total 1 111.351 124.699 123.622 1 125.852 61.685 *In 2018, the code for the Airbus A320neo was changed from A32N to A20N. TABLE 12 AIRCRAFT Glossary AC Type A20N Make Airbus Model/Series 320-200 Neo A306 Airbus 300-600 A310 Airbus 310-200 A320 Airbus 320 A32N Airbus 320-200 Neo B38M Boeing 737-800 Max B712 Boeing 717-200 B733 Boeing 737-300 B734 Boeing 737-400 B736 Boeing 737-600 8737 Boeing 737-700 8738 Boeing 737-800 8739 Boeing 737-900 B752 Boeing 757-200 CRJ7 Canadair Regional Jet 700 CRJ9 Canadair Regional Jet 900 DH8D Bombardier Dash 8 E135 Embraer 135 E170 Embraer 170 E175 jEmbraer 175 MD90 iMcDonnell Douglas 90 QUARTERLY NOISE MEETING Date: lune 20, 2019 Time: 1:00 PM Place: Airport Commission Room ITEMS DISCUSSED A summary of the JWA airport statistics for the month of April 2019 was provided by Anthony Cangey. Louie Ilustrisimo presented an overview of the soon-to-be released JWA noise complaint management system supported by Bruel & Kjaer called Viewpoint. Nikolas Gaskins added that John Wayne Airport is planning to do community outreach before the launch of Viewpoint with coordination from the City of Newport Beach. Mr. Gaskins advised that the Access & Noise Office has sent the capacity allocation request letters to each of the carriers to begin the Plan Year 2020 capacity allocation. Mr. Gaskins mentioned the Access & Noise Office will be working through the Plan Year 2020 capacity allocation in July, and expect to send the Airport's recommendations to the Board of Supervisors in September. Newport Beach resident Dr. Jim Mosher asked for an update on the detailed noise reports that will be made available to the public. Mr. Gaskins advised that the detailed noise reports will be made available to public within the next couple of months. Mr. Gaskins also mentioned that the reports will be accessible in an Excel spreadsheet format on a monthly basis, and that the reports will be delayed approximately one month to ensure the flight matching process has been completed before distribution. Dr. Mosher asked for an update with the General Aviation Improvement Program (GAIP) and if there were any changes to the GAIP. Mr. Gaskins advised that he was not aware of any modifications to the current GAIP proposal and the ASR will stay the same. Mr. Gaskins mentioned that the Board will make a decision on the GAIP proposal on June 25, 2019. Dr. Mosher inquired if the Airport has the authority to not allow a carrier to land at midnight if the Settlement Agreement went away. Mr. Gaskins explained that if there was no Settlement Agreement, carriers would be permitted to land at midnight, and it would be a violation of ANCA if carriers were not permitted to land. Dr. Mosher also inquired if the Airport reviews the federal funds for ANCA, and Mr. Gaskins advised he was not sure. Dr. Mosher also asked if the Airport knew what flight procedures are being flown by General Aviation. Mr. Gaskins advised the Airport does not have direct access to that information, but the Airport does have the ability to request that information. Carol Anne Dru of the Cliff Haven community of Newport Beach expressed her concerns with respect to passengers on JetSuiteX being able to fly on a private jet whenever they want, and that those operations should be considered commercial flights because commercial flights are not designed for 24 hour operations. Mr. Gaskins advised that JetSuiteX is considered a commercial carrier at JWA; therefore, JetSuiteX passengers are counted against the MAP limitation, and JetSuiteX is not permitted to operate outside of the Permitted Commercial Operations Hours. Mr. Gaskins also explained the differences between Regularly Scheduled Commercial User at JWA as defined in the Access Plan, and General Aviation operations. QUARTERLY NOISE MEETING Ms. Dru asked if the flight patterns and elevations have changed within the past year. Mr. Gaskins explained that an altitude analysis was completed after the implementation of Metroplex, and the Airport had concluded there has been no significant change in altitude of departing aircraft regarding pre Metroplex and post Metroplex departure procedures, and the Airport continues to monitor the flight paths. Newport Beach resident Joe August expressed his concerns with his observation of aircraft taking off east of Jamboree & PCH, and if there was a requirement or regulation for small aircraft to fly over noise monitor 6S. Mr. Gaskins advised that the County does not require aircraft to fly in the middle of the Back Bay. Mr. Gaskins explained that the FAA has control if the pilot deviates from the published procedure, and that there are several factors as to why a deviation may occur. Mr. Gaskins emphasized that since the implementation of the FAA Metroplex there has been an increased concentration to the departure flight path with little deviation. Mr. August inquired as to why the noise limits in the Settlement Agreement were increased when the noise monitoring stations were replaced. Mr. Gaskins explained that because the old noise monitors were being replaced with noise monitors that were more sensitive as a result of a more advanced technology than the previous ones, the noise limits had to be adjusted for parity. Mr. Gaskins explained that a side-by-side analysis was conducted to determine the current noise limits. QUARTERLY NOISE MEETING ROSTER June 20, 2019 NAME ORGANIZATION Jim Mosher Resident— Newport Beach Joe August Resident — Newport Beach Eastbluff Allan Beak Resident —Newport Beach SPON Luke Dru Resident —Newport Beach Cliff Haven Carol Anne Dru Resident —Newport Beach Cliff Haven Nikolas Gaskins John Wayne Airport Bonnie Frisch John Wayne Airport Anthony Cangey John Wayne Airport Beatrice Siercke John Wayne Airport Louie Ilustrisimo John Wayne Airport Cristina Magana John Wayne Airport SUMMARY OF STATISTICAL INFORMATION FOR CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1. Size of Noise Impact Area as defined in the Noise Standards (California Code of Regulations, Title 21, chapter 2.5, Subchapter 6): 6.67 acres (or 0.010 square miles) 2. Estimated Number of dwelling units included in the.Noise Impact Area as defined in the Noise Standards: 67 3. Estimated number of people residing within the Noise Impact Area as defined in the Noise Standards: 168 (based on 2.5 people per dwelling unit) 4. Identification of aircraft of type having highest takeoff noise level operating at this airport together with estimated number of operations by this aircraft type during the calendar quarter reporting period: B737-800 — 5,618 (Arrivals + Departures) 5. Total number of aircraft operations during the calendar quarter: 78,962 6. Number of Air Carrier operations during the calendar quarter: (Not mandatory) 24,396 7. Percentage of Air Carrier operations by aircraft certified under Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 36, Stage III: (Not mandatory) 100% 8. Estimated number of operations by General Aviation aircraft during the calendar quarter: (Not mandatory) 54,346 9. Estimated number of operations by Military aircraft during the calendar quarter: (Not mandatory) 220