HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC RES 05-61
RESOLUTION NO. 05-61
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE FINAL NEGATIVE
DECLARATION AS ADEQUATE FOR GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT 05-001, AS REQUIRED BY THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
The City Council of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows:
I.
II.
The City Council finds and determines as follows:
A.
That General Plan Amendment 05-001 is considered a "Project" pursuant
to the terms of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA");
B.
That an Initial Study and a Negative Declaration have been prepared for
this project and distributed for public review. The Initial Study/Negative
Declaration evaluated the implications of the proposed project.
C.
That the Initial Study/Negative Declaration was advertised for public review
for 20 days in compliance with Section 15105 of the State CEQA
Guidelines.
D.
That at a regularly scheduled meeting on April 11, 2005, the Planning
Commission considered the proposed Final Negative Declaration before
considering a recommendation to approve General Plan Amendment 05-
001.
E.
The City Council of the City of Tustin has considered evidence presented
by the Community Development Director and comments received during
the public review process with respect to the proposed Final Negative
Declaration at the April 18, 2005, meeting.
A.
A Final Negative Declaration, attached hereto as Exhibit A, has been
completed in compliance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. The
City Council finds that, on the basis of the whole record before it (including
the initial study and any comments received), there is no substantial
evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment
and that the proposed Final Negative Declaration reflects the City's
independent judgment.
B.
The City Council hereby adopts the Final Negative Declaration for the
purpose of approving General Plan Amendment 05-001.
Resolution No. 05-61
Page 1 of 145
C.
The record of proceedings upon which this decision is based is located at
City Hall, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California, Attention: Director of
Community Development.
III.
The City Council finds that the project involves no potential for any adverse effect,
either individually or cumulatively, on wildlife resources as defined in Section 711.2
of the Fish and Game Code.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin City Council held on
the 18th day of April, 2005.
~I~
LOU BONE
MAYOR
~}ntcCb~R r
P MELA STOKE
CITY CLERK
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF ORANGE) SS
CITY OF TUSTIN )
I, Pamela Stoker, City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Tustin,
California, do hereby certify that the whole number of the members of the City Council of
the City of Tustin is five; that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 05-61 was duly
passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin City Council, held on the 18th day
of April, 2005, by the following vote:
COUNCILMEMBER AYES:
COUNCILMEMBER NOES:
COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAINED:
COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT:
'1m~ r
PAMELA STOKER
City Clerk
Resolution No. 05-61
Page 2 of 145'
EXHIBIT A OF RESOLUTION NO. 05-61
Resolution No. 05-61
Page.3 qf 145
$
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
300 Centennial Way, Tustin, CA 92780
(714) 573-JJOO
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Project Title: El Camino Real General Plan Amendment
Project Location: EI Camino Real between First Street and Newport Avenue, Tustin
Project Description: Amend the Circulation Element of the Tustin General Plan to redesignate EI Camino
Real between First Street and Newport Avenue &om a Secondary Arterial to a Collector
Arterial.
Project Proponent: City of Tustin
Lead Agency Contact Person: Scott Reekstin
Telephone: 714/573-3016
The Community Development Department has conducted an Initial Study for the above project in accordance
with the City of Tustin's procedures regarding implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act,
and on the basis of that study hereby finds: '
!81
0
That there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment.
That potential significant effects were identified, but revisions have been included in the project plans
and agreed to by the applicant that would avoid or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly'no
significant effects would occur. Said Mitigation Measures are included in Attachment A of the Initial
Study which is attached hereto and incorporated herein.
Therefore, the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report is not required.
The Initial Study which provides the basis for this determination is attached and is on file at the Community
Development Department, City of Tustin. The public is invited to comment on the appropriateness of this
Negative Dec1aration during the review period, which begins with the public notice of Negative Declaration and
extends for twenty (20) calendar days. Upon review by the Community Development Director, this review
period may be extended if deemed necessary.
REVIEW PERIOD ENDS 4:00 P.M. ON APRIL 11, 200S
&.~ ~k
E beth A. Binsack
Community Development Director
Date $'.;Z/ 05'
INITIAL STUDY AND NEGA TIVE
DECLARA TION
CITY OF TUSTIN
EL CAMINO REAL GENERAL PLAN' AMENDMENT
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
L SA
March 2005
Resolution No, 05-61
Page 5 of 145
LOA "'OCUT", INC,
M"C. ....
.un 'OIT"L non
TonlN/n CAMINO OI.U.. PLAO AM"""NT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""..........................1-1
1.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE ...................................................................................................1-1
1.2 FINDINGS OF THIS INITIAL STUDY.......................................~....................................I-I
1.3 EXISTING DOCUMENTS TO BE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE ..................... 1-2
1.4 CONTACT PERSON....................................................................... ..................................1-3
2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .................................................................;......................................... 2-1
2.1 PROJECT SITE SETIING ...................................................................:............................ 2-1
2.2 PROPOSED DISCRETIONARY ACTION ........................................................"............ 2-1
2.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................2-3
3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM.....................".......................................................... 3-1
4.0 EXPLANATIONS TO THE CHECKLIST FORM...................................................................... 4-1
4.1 AESTHETICS..,.........................................................................................,.................:::-.:.4-1
4.2 AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES """"""'.........................................................."............ 4-1
4.3 AIR QUALITY ,.................................................................................................................4-2
4.4 BIOLOGICAL ..RESOURCES.......................................................................................... 4-5
4.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES...............................................................................................4-6
4.6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS....................................................................................... ............4-7
4.7 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ..............................................................4.9
4.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY .....................................................................4-12
4.9 LAND USE AND PLANNING .............................................................................."....... 4-15
4,10 MINERAL RESOURCES..............................................................................................4-17
4.11 NOISE.............,..............................................................................................................4-17
4.12 POPULATION AND HOUSING .................................................................................,4-19
4.13 PUBUC SERVICES """""""""""""""""""""""""............................................"...... 4-20
4.14 RECREATION ....................................,.......................................................................... 4-20
4.15 TRANSPORTATIONrrRAFFIC...................................................................................4-20
4.16 UTILITIES .................................................................................,...................................4-26
4.17 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.....................................;.................. 4-27
APPENDICES
A: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
B: TRAFFIC STUDY
P,'=33O\F1,.1 Soln'TOe.doc ,000lllO~,
LOA Auoel..... lNe,
.ARCH ",.
""T 'NITIAL ITUDY
TUITIN'" CAMINO .'Nn.. PL'N 'M..DMlNT
FIGURES
Figure 2.1: Project Location ............................................................................................................... 2-2
Figure 4.1: Existing Daily Volumes (two lanes)............................................................;.................. 4.22
Figure 4.2: Year 2020 Peak.Hour Volumes (with project. two lanes).............................................. 4-23
TABLES
Table 4.A: Intersection Analyses Summary ...............................................................;..................... 4-24
P,I<1,,330IF;..1 SentlTOC,d", """II/OS..
ii
Resolution No, 05-61
Page 7 of 145
LtA ..,oeIAT... INC,
"ueH '"II
DRAFT ""TIAL ITC.Y
TUITINIEL CAMINO .""AL PLAW AM"""'T
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE
This Initial Study (IS) is being prepared to analyze the environmental effects of a proposed
amendment to the City of Tustin General Plan. The proposed project is to reclassify El Camino Real
between First Street and Newport Avenue &om a secondary arterial to a coUector roadway in the
Circulation Element of the General Plan. The proposed reclassification is cónsistent with a parallel
change that has already been made to the County of Orange Master Plan of Arterial Highways
(MPAH) and reflects the current conditions of the affected roadway segment.
The Circulation Element is one of seven mandated elements of the General Plan and is intended to
guido:: the development of the City of Tustin (City) circulation system in a manner that is compatible
with the Land Use and other Elements of the General Plan. The purpose of the Circulation Element is
to provide a safe, efficient, and adequate circulation system for the City. To meet this purpose and the
requirements of Government Code Section 65302 (b), the Circulation Element addresses the
circulation improvements needed. to provide adequate capacity for future land uses. Corresponding
. goals and policies are designed to improve overall circulation in the City and to address circulation
issues that concern the City. For highway transportation, the physical attributes involve a network of
existing and future roadways defined according to designated roadway types, each with specific
design standards. Other modes are defmed by appropriate physical attributes (e.g.. bicycle trails).
The County of Orange MP AH fonDS part of the Orange County General Plan and designates the
arterial system in the Circulation Element of the County General Plan. Defined according to specific
arterial functional classification, the MPAH serves to define the intended future road system within
the County., Cities within the County are expected to achieve consistency with the MP AH in their
individual General Plan Circulation Elements.
The purpose of the proposed amendment to the City of Tustin Circulation Element is to: I) achieve
consistency with the MPAH designation, 2) to reflect the existing and future traffic levels on the
roadway segment, and 3) to ensure consistency between the roadway and the ádjacent land uses by
supporting the pedestrian-friendly character of the Old Town commercial district in the City of
Tustin. The two lane configuration and on-street diagonal parking is consistent with the
revitalization goals for Old Town by contributing to a pedestrian-oriented environment.
This Initial Study has evaluated each of the environmental issues contained in the checklist provided
in Section 3.0 of this document.
1.2 FINDINGS OF THIS INITIAL STUDY
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the State CEQA Guidelines, this
Initial Study has been prepared to determine whether implementation of the City's proposed General
Plan Amendment to the Circulation Element (proposed project) will result in significant
P:lctU33O\Fin.1 ""t\Section l.doc <001128/05.
1-1
... AllaCI..". 'NC,
..AlCR ""
Dun 'NITIAL ITVDT
TUlT'N,n CA..,NO .""AL .... A".ND""T
environmental impacts that would require mitigation or the preparation of an Environmental Impact
Report (EIR) if significant impacts cannot be avoided.
This Initial Study is.based on an Environmental Checklist Form, as suggested in Section 15063 (dX3)
of the State CEQA Guidelines. The completed Form is found in Section 3.0 of this Initial Study. It
contains a series of questions about the proposed project for each of the listed environmental areas.
The Form is used to evaluate whether or not there are any significant environmental effects associated
with implementation of the proposed project and, if there are, whether or not mitigation can be
attached to the project to lessen or avoid such impacts. .
Section 4.0 provides an explanation for each an.swer indicated on the Form. The Form and
accompanying evaluation provide the information and analysis upon which the City may make its
determination as to whether or not an EIR must be required for the project The Form is used to
review the potential environmental effects of the proposed project for each of the following areas:
Aesthetics
Agricultural Resources
Mineral Resources
Noise
Popu1ationIHousing
Recreation
Air Quality
Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
Public Services
Trans portad onrr raffi c
Utilities/Service Systems
Mandatory Findings of Significance
Geology/Soils
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Hydrology/Water Quality
Land UselPlanning
1,3 EXISTING DOCUMENTS TO BE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Section 15150 of the State CEQA Guidelines permits an environmental document to incorporate by
reference other docwnents that provide relevant data.
The docwnents outlined in this section are hereby incorporated by reference, and the pertinent
material is summarized throughout this Initial Study, where that information is relevant to the analysis
of potential impacts resulting &om the project Any document incorporated by reference is available
for review at the following public service counter:
City of Tustin
Community Development Department
300 Centennial Way
Tustin, California 92780
City of Tustin General Plan, 2001
County of Orange General Plan. 2000
P",",330IFi.ol S",.lSoct'.. I.doc ..o112810S"
1-2
Resolution No, 05-61
Page 9 of 145
... ..,oCIATII, 'HC,
MARCH ....
...,T 'HITIAL ITU..
TUIT'H'" C...,OO'O"...L PLAM 'M'HO..'HT
Master Plan of Arterial Highways. Orange County (acTA)
1.4 CONTACT PERSON
The Lead Agency for the Initial Study for the proposed project is the City of Tustin. Any questions'
about the preparation of this Initial Study, its assumptions, or its conclusions should be referred to the
following:
Mr. Dana R. Kasdan
Engineering Services Manager
City ofTustin
Public Worlcs Department
300 Centennial Way
Tustin, California 92780
(714) 573-3150
tM. Scott Reekstin
Senior Planner
City of Tustin "
Commwlity Development Department/Planning Division
300 Centennial Way
Tustin, California 92780
(714) 573-3106
P:Ic"330\FinaJS"'tlS""¡oo'.d<>",011281{)5,,
1-3
La' ",.cln... 'HC,
""CH ",.
.un UlTlAL nun
T"TlHln C""H. .'HUAL H.. """""T
2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2.1 PROJECf SITE SETTING
The City of Tustin is located in central Orange County and encompa,çses an area of 11.01 square
miles, The City is bound on the south by the Cities of Irvine and Santa Ana, on the north by the
wiincorporated portion,s of the County of Orange and the City of Orange, on the west by lamboree
Road, and on the east by unincorporated County tenitory and the City of Irvine. Tustin is located
approximately two miles north of Orange County's lohn Wayne Airport. There are two fi'eeways that
transect the City, the Interstate S (I-S) (Santa Ana) freeway dividing the City into north and south and
the State Route SS (SR-SS) (Costa Mesa) fi'eeway transecting the western portions of the City. The
City has an Old Town commercial area, which is one of the oldest historical commercial areas in
Orange County. '
The proposed project is the reclassification ofEI Camino Real between First Street and Newport
Avenue as shown on Figure 2.1. This segment ofEI Camino Real is located north ofI-S within the
Old Town commercial district. The City is proposing to reclaSsify this portion ofEI Camino Real
ftom a four-lane Secondary Arterial to a two-lane Local Collector in the Circulation Element of the
City's General Plan. This segment ofEI Camino Real is currently two lanes with on-street diagonal
parking.
2.2 PROPOSED DISCRETIONARY ACTION
The proposed discretionary action is the approval of an amendment to the Circulation Element of the
City's General Plan by the City CoUncil. The proposed amendment includes text, tables, and map
changes to reflect a redesignation ûom a Secondary Arterial to a Collector Arterial.
Specifically, the General Plan Amendment includes the following:
Add a definition of Collector to the Circulation Plan
Add a cross section ofa Collector roadway to Figure C-I, Typical Cross Sections
Amend Figure C-2 to add Collector to the Legend and to redesignate El Camino Real between
First Street and Newport Avenue '
Amend Table C-S to reclassify EI Camino Real south of First Street and El Camino Real south of
Main from Secondary to Collector
The proposed General Plan Amendment is included as Appendix A of this document.
P'\clu330'.F;..' 5"'tlS",I;0. 2.doc .01/28105.
2.]
Resolution No, 05-61
Page 11 of 145
FIGURE 2.1
0
,.........,
JUT
SOURCE, USGS '-"QUADS- TUSTIN & ORANGE. CALIFORNIA
TustinlEl Gamino
Project Location
1,\CTU3301G\L0~,;o.."" (711"") .
". .U.C,...,. ,.C.
URCH ,n'
_..n '"'T". nu_.
Tun'"" CA"'.. ....... >.AN A.........T
2.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Circulation Element is one of the seven General Plan elements mandated by the State of
California, as articulated in Sections 65580 to 65589.S of the Government Code.
The proposed project is a General Plan Amendment to the City's Circulation Element to reclassify a
street segment ofEI Camino Real between First Street and Newport Avenue ftom a four-lane
Secondary Artcrial to a two-lane collector roadway. The roadway segment ofEl Camino Real has a
north-south ali tUllent before it transitions to a northwest-southeast ali tUllent between Sixth Street
and Newport Avenue. This portion ofEI Camino Real is located within the City's Old Town
commercial dis1rict, which supports a mixture of retail and commercial uses and includes various
public improvements to provide a more pedestrian-oriented environment.
In November 1997, the City, in coordination with the Orange County Transportation Authority
(OCTA), approved a demonstration project to reduce the number of travel lanes on EI Camino Real
between Second Street to Sixth Street ( one block south of First Street and west of Newport Avenue)
ftom a four-lane undivided Secondary Arterial street to a two-lane undivided collector street with
diagonalparking along both sides of the street. The purpose of the demonstration project was to
document the existing and define the future impacts of the redesignation on other nearby streets and
intersections. A subsequent traffic study (Appendix B.ofthis IS) was prepared by WPAlWilIdan in
May 2001 that concluded that 2020 traffic conditions, both with and without the project, would result
in acceptable daily traffic levels and intersection operations.
Following the success of the demonstration project and the preparation of the traffic study, the
OCT A approved an amendment to the MP AH to change the status of the street segment of El
Camino Real between First Street and Newport Avenue from a four lane secondary arterial to a two
lane local collector roadway. The proposed General Plan Amendment would similarly reflect the
existing and planned two-lane collector status of the roadway on the City's Circulation Element and
ensure consistency between the City's General Plan and aCTA's MPAH.
The proposed action is limited to the amendment to the Circulation Element of the General Plan.
Since the physical changes to the roadway have already been implemented, the proposed project does
not include changes to the existing physical environment. The changes that occurred in the past are
included as part of the environmental setting defined as the physical conditions existing at the time
environmental analysis is commenced (CEQA Guidelines Section 15125).
The purpose of the proposed amendment to the City's Circulation Element is to (I) achieve
consistency with the MPAH designation, (2) reflect the existing and future traffic levels on the
roadway segment, and (3) ensure consistency between the roadway and the adjacent land uses by
supporting the pedestrian-friendly character of the Old Town commercial district. The two-lane
configuration and on-street diagonal parking are consistent with the revitalization goals for Old
Town by contributing to a pedestrian-oriented environment.
P,Ict,330\F;,.1 S,."\Sect;",, 2 doc .01/28/05"
2-3
Resolution No. 05-61
Page 13 of 145
~
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
300 Centennial Way. Tustin, CA 92780
(714) 573-3100
INITIAL STUDY
A.
BACKGROUND
Project Title: EI Camino Real General Plan Amendment
Lead Agency:
City of Tustin
300 Centennial Way
Tustin, California 92780
Lead Agency Contact Persons: Mr. Dana R Kasdan
Mr. Scott Reekstin
Phone: (714) 573-3150
Phone: (714) 573-3106
Project Location:
EI Camino Real between First Street and Newport Avenue
Project Sponsor's Name and Address:
City ofTustin, 300 Centennial Way
General Plan Designation:
Secondary Arterial
Zoning Designation: Not Applicable
Project Description: Amend the Circulation Element of the General Plan to redesignate this portion of
El ClIIÌlÌno Real to a Col1ecter Arterial
Surrounding Uses:.
Project is located in the Old Town Commercial District
Other public agencies whose approval is required:
0
0
0
0
Orange County Fire Authority
Orange County Health Care Agency
South Coast Air Quality Management
District
Other
0
0
0
City of Irvine
City of Santa Ana
Orange County
EMA
P'\ctuJ30\Fìnal S"'\\Section 3 Chec'1i" do<
B. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at
least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist in Section D
below.
0 Aesthetics
0 Air Quality
0 Cultura1 Resources
0 Hazards & Hazardous Materials
0 Land Use/Planning
0 Noise
0 Public Services
0 Transportationffraffic
0 Mandatory Findings of Significance
0 Agriculture Resources
0 Biological Resources
0 Geology/Soils
0 HydrologylWater Quality
0 Mineral Resources
0 PopulationIHousing
0 Recreation .
0 UtilitieslService Systems
C. DETERMINATION:
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
[8J I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
0 I find that although the proposed project could have a sigriificant effect on the environment, there will
not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by
the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
0 I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. .
0 I find that although the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially
significant unless mitigated impact" on the environment, but at least one effect I) has been adequately
analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by
mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described in the attached sheets. An.
ENVIRONMENT AI.. IMP ACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to
be addressed. .
0 I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all
potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR OR NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to
that earlier EIR OR NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are
imposed upon the proposed project, and no further documentation is required.
Preparer: Sc.oft ReeLSh;" ,
zg~~~~
Elizabeth A. Binsack, Community Deve pment Director
Title $&¡,òr Planner
Date .,?,'Z/- oÇ
P'\c\u330\F;.., 500\1.._;00 3 Ch"kh~doc
Resolution No, 05-61
Page 15 of 145
D. EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Directions
1)
A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the
information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses foIlowing each question. A "No Impact" answer is
adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects
like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact"answer should be
explained where it is based on project-specific factors and general standards (e.g., the project wiIl not expose
sensitive receptors to poIlutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis).
2)
All answers must take into account the whole action involved, including off-site, on-site, cumulative project level,
indirect, direct" constructi°!l, and operational impacts.
Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur,then the checklist answers must
indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant.
"Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If
there are one or more "PotcntiaIly Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, and EIR is
required.
3)
4)
"Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of
mitigation measures has reduced an effect &om "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less than Significant
Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect
to a lèss than significant level (mitigation measures !Tom Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross-
referenced).
5)
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has
been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063 (c) (3)(D). In this case, a brief
discussion should identifY the foIlowing:
a) Earlier Analysis Used. IdentifY and state where they are available for review.
b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. identifY which effects &om the abOve checklist were 'within the scope of
and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether
such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis.
c) Mitigation Measures, For effects that are "Less than Significant withMitigation Measures Incorporated,"
describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the
extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project.
6)
Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to infonnation sources for potential
impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously preparedòr outside document should,
where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated.
7)
Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals
contacted should be cited in the discussion.
8)
This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are &ee to use different formats; however, lead agencies
normaIly address the questions &om this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in
whatever format is selected.
9)
The explanation of each issue should identifY:
a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and,
b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance.
P:\clu330IF;nal S"'tlS,";"" 3 Chockl;',do<:
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPAcrs Leu TIrDn
Signiftcanl
Potentially With Less TIrDn
Signiftcanl Mlt/gallOIÌ Significant
I. AESTHETICS - Would the project: Impact Incorporation Impact No Impact
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? 0 0 0 181
b) Substanlially damage scenic resources, including, but not
limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings .
within a stale scenic lúgbway?' 0 0 0 181
c) Substanûally degrade the exiSting visual charocter or
quality of the site and its SIDTOWldings? 0 0 0 181
d) Create a new source of substanûalligbt or glare wbJch
would adversely affect day or nigbttime views in the area? 0 0 0 181
n. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In detenninin¡
whether impacts to agricultural resow-ces ere si¡nificant
environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the
California AgriculturaI Land Evaluation and Site Assessment
Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of
Conservation as an optional model to use In assessing impacts
on agriculture and farmland. Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique FañìiJand, or FaririJand
of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on tile maps
prepared pursuant to the FarmJand Mapping and Monitoring
Program of tile California Resources Agency, to non-
agricultural use? 0 0 0 181
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or .
Williamson Act contract? 0 0 0 181
c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which,
due to their location Ot nature, could result in conversion of
Farmland, to non-agricultural use? 0 0 0 181
Ill. AIR OUALITY: Where available, the significance
criteria established by the applicable air quality management
or air pollution con1ro1 district may be relied upon to make the
following determinations, Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable tJ
air quality plan? 0 0 181
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially
to an existing or projected air quality violation? 0 0 0 181
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net Increase of any
criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-
auainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air
quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed
quantitative thresholds for ozone precunors)? 0 0 0 181
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations? 0 0 0 181
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number
of people? 0 0 0 ~
Pclc1U330IFinal .en'\Sect;"" 3 Check¡;stdoc
Resolution No, 05-61
Page 17 of 145
-----~-- -----.-.
Le.r. Than
Significant
Potentially With Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant
IV BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: - Would the project: Impact Incorporation Impact No Impact
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or
through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a
candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or
regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California
Department ofFish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service? 0 0 0 181
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat
or other sensitive natural community identified in local or ,
regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California
Department ofFish and Game or U.S, Fish and Wildlife
Service? 0 0 0 181
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected
wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(including, bUt not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.)
through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or
other means? 0 0 0 181
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native "
resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory wildlife coJTidors, or
impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? 0 0 0 181
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting
biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or
ordinance? 0 0 0 181
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or
other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation
plan? 0 0 0 181
v. CULTURAL RESOURÇES: . Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of
a historical resource as defined in § 15064,5? 0 0 0 181
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of
an archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? 0 0 0 181
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological
resource or site or unique geologic feature? 0 0 0 t8I
d) Disturb any human remains, including those inteJred
outside of fonnal cemeteries? 0 0 0 181
VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS: - Would the project:
a) Expose poopJe or structures to potential substantial
adverse effects, including the risk ofloss, injury, or death
involving:
P'\ctu33O1Firu,] S",'Secti" 3 Checkli.doc
i) RuplW'e of a !mown eørtbquoke fanlt, os delinoated on the
most recent AlqlÙst-Priolo EørthqWllœ Foult Zoning Mop
issued by the State Geologist for the 8rCII or bued on other
substontioI evidence of a known foul!? Refer to Division of
Mines and Geology Spec:ioI PubliCBtion 42.
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
iii) Seismic-reløted ground failure, including liquofàction?
iv) Landslides?
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?
c) Be loœted on a geologic unit or soil that ¡s unstable, or
that would become unstable os a result of the project, and
potentiolly result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral sproøding,
subsidence, liqueføction or coUøpse?
d) Be lO<:ated on expansive soil, os deemed in Table IS-l-B
of the Uniform Building Code (1994), Cl'CBting substantioI
risks to life or property']
e) Have soils iœøpabJe of adequately supporting the uŠe of
septic tanks or oltemotive WBSte water disposal systems where
sewers I\I'C not avoilable for the disposal of woste water?
VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS:
Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine træISpOrt, use, or disposal of
hazardous materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident conditions involving the release ofhazardous
materiaJs into the environment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely
hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-< uarter
mile of an existing or proposed school?
d) Be loœted on a site which is included on a list of
hazardous materiols sit.. compiled pUl'SUlUlt to Government
Code Section 6S962.S and, os a result, would it create a
significant hazard to the public or the environment?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a
public airport or public use airport, would the project result in
a safety hazard for people residing or WOtking in the project
.rea?
t) For a project withio the vicinity of a privote airstrip,
would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing
or working in the project area?
P,IGtu33O\F;n.' S""\S",,,inn 3 Ch",k¡;~.dnc
Less Than
Significant
Potentially With Less Than
Significant MIllgotion. Significant
Impact I"corporal/on Impoct No Impoct
0 0 0 ~
0 0 0 ,~
0 0 0 ~
0 0 0 ~
0 0 0 ~
0 0 0 ~
0 0 0 ~
0 0 0 ~
0 0 0 ~
0 0 0 ~
0 0 0 ~
0 0 0 ~
0
0
0
~
0
0
0
~
Resolution No, 05-61
Page 19 of 145
Less Than
Significant
Pot.ntlally Wllh Less Than
Signffu;anJ Mitigation SlgnificanJ
g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an Impact Incorþoratlon Impact No Impact
adopted emergency response plan or emer¡ency evacuation
plan? 0 0 181 0
h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss,
injury or death involving wlldlllld fires, including where
wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences
are intermixed with wildlands? 0 0 0 181
VllL HYDROLOGY AND WATER OUALITY: -Would
the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge
requirements? 0 0 0 181
b) Substalltially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere
substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would
be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local
groundwater table level (e.g" the production rate of pre-
existing nearby wells would drop to a level whIch would not
support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits
have been granted)? - 0 0 0 181
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site
or area, including through the alteration of the cou... of a
stream or river, in a marmer whIch would result in substantial
erosion or siltation on. or off-site? 0 0 0 181
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site
or area, including through the alteration of the coune ora
stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of
surfàce nmoff in a manner which would resuh in flooding on-
or off-site? 0 0 0 181
e) Create or contribute runoff water whIch would exceed the
capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems
or provide substantial additional sources of polluted nmofl'l 0 0 0 181
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality'? 0 0 0 181
g) Place housing within a IOo-year flood hazard area as
mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood
Insurance Rate Map or other t100d hazard delineation map? 0 0 0 181
h) Place within a IOo-year t100d hazard area structures
which would impede or redirect flood flows? 0 0 0 ~
i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk ofloss,
injury or death involving flooding as a result of the failure of a 181
levee or dam? 0 0 0
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow'l 0 0 0 181
k) Potentially impact stormwater runoff fi'om construction
activities? 0 0 0 181
0.\olu330\F;",1 s..t\S"";on 3 Check!;. doc
Loss Than
Signif'wtl1lt
Poten1iaJly Wilh Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant
Potentially impact stormwatcr nmoff 1Jom post- Impact Incorporation Ilft/KIct Nolinpacl
I)
construction activities? 0 0 0 t8I
m) Result in a potentia] for discharge of stonnwater
pollutants 1Jom areas ofmaterial stora¡e, vehicle or equipment
fuelmg, vehicle or equipment maintenance (including
washing), waste handling, hazardous materials handling or
storage, delivery areas, loading docks or other outdoor work
areas? 0 0 0 t8I
n) Result in a potential for discharge of stormwater to affect
the beneficial uses of the receiving waters? . 0 0 0 t8I
0) Create the potential for significant changes in the flow
velocity or volume of stormwater nmoff to cause
environmental harm? 0 0 0 t8I
p) Create significant increases in erosion of the project site
or surrounding areas? 0 0 0 t8I
IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING - Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community'? 0 0 0 t8I
b) Conflict with any applicable land use pJan, policy, or
regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project
(including. but not limited to the general plan, specific plan,
local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the
purpose ofavoidmg or mitigating an environmental effèct? 0 0 0 t8I
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or
natural comnumity conservatiOn plan? 0 0 0 t8I
X. MINERAL RESOURCES - Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral
resource that would be of value to the region and the residents
of the state? 0 0 0 t8I
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important
mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general
plan, specific plan or other land use plan? 0 0 0 ~
XI. NOISE-
Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in
excess of standards established in the local general plan or
noise ordiDance, or applicable standards of other agencies? 0 0 0 ~
b) Exposure of persons to or genention of excessive
groundbome vihration or groundbome noise levels? 0 0 0 I8J
Polc!U33QIF;",,) S",'Section 3 Chock';..do,
Resolution No, 05-61
Page 21 of 145
Less Than
Significant
Potentially With Leu Than
Significant Mitigation SignifICant
c) A substantial ponnancnt increJlS4' in IIDbient noise levels Impacr IncDf1)orøtion Impact No/mpacl
in tho project vicinity above levels existing without the
project? 0 0 181 0
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient
noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing
without the. project? 0 0 181 0
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan bas not been adopted, within two miles of a
public airport or public use airport, would the project expose
people residing or working in the project anoa to excessive
noise levels? 0 0 0 181
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,
would the project expose people residing or working in the
project orea to excess noise levels? 0 0 0 181
xn,POPULA TION AND HOUSING - Would the project:
a) induce substantial population growth in an area, either
~ctly (for example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of
roads or other infrastructure)? 0 0 0 181
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing,
necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere? 0 0 0 181
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing elsewhere? 0 0 0 181
xm. PUBLIC SERVICES
a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical
ùnpacts associated with the provision of new or physically
alterod governmental facilities, need for new or physically
altered governmental facilities, the construction ofwhicb
could cause significant environmental impacts, Ù1 order to
maintain acceptable service ratius, response times or other
performance objectives for any of the public services:
Fire protection? 0 0 0 181
Police protection? 0 0 0 181
Schools? 0 0 0 181
Parks? 0 0 0 181
Other public facilities? 0 0 0 181
p,\ctu3J()\FinoJ SentlSect;Q" J Ch"kli~.d",
Less Than
SlgntfK:anl
PotenllalJy With Les.s Than
Significant Millgatlon SIgnificant
XIV. RECREATION - Impact Incorporation Impact No Impact
a) Would the project increase the use of oxisting
neighborhood and regional parlcs or other recreational
facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the 0 0 0 181
fàcility would occur or be 1ICCO1erated?
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require
the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which 0 0 0 181
might have an adverse physical effect on the environment?
XV. TRANSPORTATIONfl'RAFFIC - Would the project:
a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation
to the existing traffIc load and c:apacity of the street system
(i.e. resuh in a substantial increase in either the number of
vehicle trips, the volume to c:apacity ratio on roads, or 0 0 181 0
congestion at intersections)?
b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of
service standard establisbed by the county congestion 0- 0 0 181
-management agency for designated roads or highways?
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either
an increase in traffic levels or a change mlocation that results 0 0 0 181
in substantial safety risks?
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g.
shatp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses 0 0 0 181
(e.g., farm equipment)?
0 0 181 0
e) Result in inadequate emergency access?
0 0 0 181
f) Result in inadequate parking capacity?
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs
supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus twnouts, 0 0 0 181
bicycle racks)?
XVI. UTlLffiES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS -
Would the project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the 0 0 0 181
applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?
b) Require or result in the COnstructiOD of new water or
was1ewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction ofwhicb could cause significant 0 0 0 181
environmental effects?
c) Require or result in the construction of new stonn water
drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, tbe
construction of which could cause significant environmental 0 0 0 181
effects?
P'\cIUJ3O\Final S""\SoClio. 3 ChockH.d.o
Resolution No, 05-61
Page 23 of 145
Lis. Than
Signijù;ant
Potentially With Less Than
Significant Miligation Significant
ImfXICl Incorporation Impact No Impact
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the
project ftom existilig entitlements and resources, or are new or
expanded entitlements noeðed? 0 0 0 181
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment
provider which serves or msy serve the project that it has
adequa~ capacity to serve the project's projected demand in
-addition to the provider's existing commitments? 0 0 0 181
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient pcnniued capacity
to accoinmodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? 0 0 181
g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and
regulations related to solid waste? 0 0 0 181
h) Would the project include a new or retrofiUod stann water
treatment control Best Management Practice (BMP), (e.g.
water quality treatment basin, constructed treatment wetlands),
the operation of which could result in significant 0 0 0 181
environmental effeCts (e.g.lncreued vectors and odors)? -
XVU. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or
wildlife species, cause a fISh or wildlife population to drop
below self-sustaining levels, 1hrcaten to eliminate a plant at
animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of
a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important
examples oCthe major periods of California history or
prehistory? 0 0 0 181
b) Does the project have impacts thet are individually
limited, but cu!nulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" .means that the incremental effeCts of a project
arc considorablewhen viewed in connection with the effects
of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the
effects of probable future projects)? 0 0 0 181
c) Does the project have environmental effects which will
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either
directly or indirectly? 0 0 0 181
P:\ctuJ3OIFIn~ SontlS",!;on J Chcckli"d",
.OA A"OC"T", INC,
"A.CN 10..
Dun IXITI.. ITUDT
TunlNfn CA,,'NO .aN".. P.A' A..a......T
4.0 EXPLANATIONS TO THE CHECKLIST FORM
4.1 Aesthetics
Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse eft'ect OD a IlCeDlc vista?
No Impact. AccordiDg to the County General Plan's Resources Element, no open space/scenic
resources are located within or near the project study area, The Conservation/Open SpaceIRecreation
Element of the City's General Plan states that lI1e Peters Canyon ridgeline is a prominent visual
feature in east Tustin that should be protected. The proposed General Plan Amendment will have no
effect on this or any other visual!natural resource within the City or the COWlty.
b) SubltaDtially damalle scenic resources, IDcludiDlI. but Dot limited to, tl'eell, rock
outcroppings, aDd biBtoric bußdiDp wlthiD a State SeeDic ffighway?
~o Impact. There are no natural scenic resources located within the projCÇ! study area (EI Camino
¡teal between First Stre« and Newport Avenue [see Figure 2.1], nor is the project site located within
a State Scenic Highway. Part of El Camino Real, however, is within a historic resource area of the
City called the Cultural Resources Overlay District. It also passes through the Old Town commercial
district. The proposed project is to reclassifY a portion ofE! Camino Real ftom a four-lane Secondary
Arterial to a two-lane collector in the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan. Reducing the
designated number of lanes wiIl not adversely impact scenic resources, On the contrary, the proposed
General Plan amendment may benefit lI1e historic resource by maintaining a two-lane, pedestrian-
oriented roadway.
c) SubstaDtJalIy degrade the exiltiDg visual character or quality of the site aDd ita
lurrouDdings?
No Impact. Please refer to discussion 4.1(a), above.
d) Create a Dew aouree of lubstaDtiallight or glare that would adversely affect day or
Dighttime views iD the area?
No Impact. The proposed project does not involve construction of any kind and does not involve aný
change to the existing street lighting. Therefore, the proposed project will not affect day or Dighttime
views in the area relating to light, glare, shadows, or shading.
4.2 Agrlculturlll Reaourcea
ID determining whether impacts to 8&ricultural relourcea are IllDlflcant environmental effects,
lead agencies may refer to the CaUCol"llia Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment
Model (1997) prepared by the CanCornia Department of ConservatioD as an optional model to
UI in assessiug impacts on agriculture aud farmland. Would the project:
",10",330\Fh",' S..tlSe~;oo 4.doo ,,"!noIOS-
4-1
Resolution No, 05-61
Page 25 of 145
LOA A"OCO"". 'RC.
MA'CR ....
DRA" "'TIAL lTun
TUITIR,"L CAMIRO GEN".. PLA. A".DM"RT
a) Convert Prime Farmland, U Dlque Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance
(Farmland) as shown on the mapa prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Progl'RDl of the California Resource Aleney, to non-agrlenltural use?
No Impact. As described in Section 2, the proposed project will n.ot result in any changes to the
existing two-lane conditions of this portion ofEl Camino Real. The City ofTustin (City) General
Plan and Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (State Department of Conservation, 2000) do
not identify any designated farmland in the project study area. Therefore, the proposed project will
not have an impact to designated farmland.
h) ConIDct with exlating zoning for aarieultural use, or a Williamson Act contract?
No Impact. There is no agriculturally zoned land, or land protected by a Williamson Act contract,
within the study area. Therefore, there will be no impact to agriculturally zoned or protected lands.
c) InvolVè'other changes in the exlating environment which, due to their loeatio;or nature,
could result in conversion of Farmland to nonagriculture?
No Impact. The proposed project is a General Plan Amendment to reclassify a portion ofEI Camino
Real that will result in maintàiningthe existing two-lane configuration of the roadway, consistent
with the future two-lane build out condition identified in the MP AH. The proposed project will not
result in changes in the existing environment and therefore will not lead to the conversion of existing
farmland.
4.3 Air Quality
Would the project:
a) Coufllct with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan?
No Impact. California is. divided into 15 air basins for the purpose of managing the air resources'of
the State on a regional.basis. Areas within each air basin are considered to share the same air masses
and are therefore expected to have similar ambient air quality. Additionally, the State is divided into
35 Air Pollution Control Districts (APeD) and Air Quality Management Districts (AQMD), which
are county or regional authorities that have primary responsibility for controlling air pollution. Air
basin boundaries may fall within the jurisdiction of one or more APCD! AQMD.
The City is geographically located within the South Coast Air Basin (Basin). Air quality conditions in
the Basin are und.er the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD).
The SCAQMD regulates stationary sources of pollution throughout its jurisdiction area, Direct
emissions from motor vehicles are regulated by the California Air Resources Board (CARB). The
SCAQMD governing Board approved the 2003 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) in August
2003 and submitted itto the California Air Resources Board and the U.S. Environmental Planning
Agency for approval. The SCAQMD also establishes construction and operational emissions
thresholds for the Basin,
P:\ctU3JOIFinal ScntlSection ..doc «01128105"
4-2
.u ...oel"". 'Ne.
M..ey ,""
...n '"'TIA. ITU.Y
TUITIN,n C.M'". .u.u. P.....M"'MUT
The proposed projeCt is a General Plan Amendment to .reclassify EI.Camino Real between First Street
and Newport Avenue. The General Plan Amendment deaignates the roadway a two-Iane collector,
, consistent with existing conditions. Therefore, tho proposed project will not result in a physical
change to existing conditions. The proposed Genoral Plan Amendment is consistent with the adopted
MPAH.
New development within the City shall comply with tho density and intensity standards outlined in
the Land Use Element and the City's current Zoning Ordinance. Implementation of the proposed
amendment to the Circulation Element will be consistent with the Land Use Element of the City's
General Plan. The City's Land Use Element, along with the pla¡¡s of other cities and counties in the
region, are reflected in the assumptions for the land use, traffic, population, and air quality projections
, used to develop the AQMP. Therefore, the proposed project will not conflict with or obstruct
implementation, of the AQMP.
In addition, the proposed project is intended to ensure consistency between the affected portion of EI
Camino Real and the adjacent land uses by supporting the pedestrian-fiiendly ~ of the Old
Town commercial district. The two-lane roadway configuration and on-street diagonal parking are
consistent With the revitalization goals for Old Town by contributing to a pedestrùÙi-oriented
environment. The proposed project will support continued and increased pedestrian activity in this
area of the City, and is therefore consistent with the goal of the AQMP to implement land use patterns
that reduce overall vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled.
b) VIolate any air quality atandard or eontribute aubatantially to an emtiDl or projected air
quaUty violation? .
No Impact. New development within the City is required to comply with the density and intensity
standards outlined in the Land Use Element and the City's current Zoning Ordinance. Implementation
of the proposed amendment to the Circulation Element will be consistent with the Land Use Element
of the City's General Plan, which is reflected in the assumptions for the projections used to develop
the AQMP.
The AQMPidentifies a number of air pollution reduction goals, measures, and policies. Local
jurisdictions have been mandated to reduce a fair share proportion of vehicle pollution through the
adoption of a menu of optional transportation control measures (rCMs) that have been identified by
the local agency to be politically and economically feasible. In addition, the 200 I City General Plan,
Conservation/Open SpacelRecreation Element, includes air quality goals and policies intended to
reduce emissions through proper land use and transportation planning, implementation of
Transportation Demand Management (1DM) programs, alternative transporia!Ïon modes, and reduced
energy consumption.
The proposed project is consistent with the Land Use and Conservation/Open SpacelRecreation
Elements of the City's General Plan and with the MPAH. It will not result in a change to the existing
physical environment. It will result in the reclassification of the existing designation of this portion of
El Camino Real to one that accommodates lower traffic volumes. Some traffic that would have used
El Camino Real will be redistributed to adjacent, parallel streets; however, the overall traffic volumes
P:\cIU330\F;nol S",tIScct;on 4.doc ..01/28/0'"
4-3
Resolution No, 05-61
Page 27 of 145
u' ",.CI"", INC,
"UCR ....
...n ..,T,.. ITUDY
TUITIRIIL C""R. ....... PL" ."'RD"'RT
in the vicinity of the project will remain essentially the same. In other words, the increased traffic
volume on adjacent streets would offset the lower traffic volumes on EI Camino Real. Total vehicular
emissions within the study area would remain similar before and after the proposed project. In
addition, the County of Orange is in attainment with the State CO standard, and no monitoring
stations in the County have recorded any CO exceedances in the,past five years. Therefore, the
proposed project is not expected to result in new, or contribute to existing, air quality violations.
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the
project reelou is aoaattainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality
standard (including releasing emwlons, whicb exceed quantitative thresholcb for ozone
precunol'll)?
No Impact. The proposed project is consistent with Land Use and Conservation/Open
SpacelRecreation ElementS of the City's General Plan and with the MPAH. It will not result in a
change to the existing physical environment. It wíl1 result in the downgrade of the existing
designation of this portion ofEI Camino Real. Total vehicular emissions within the study area would
remain similar before and after the proposed project. Therefore, the proposed project will not
contribute to advene, ~ulative air quality conditions.
d) Expose sensitive receptOI'll to substantial pollutant concentrations?
No Impact. The proposed project is a General Plan Amendment to the City's Circulation Element
that will match existing conditions with proposed future conditions for the portion of EI Camino Real
between First Street and Newport Avenùe. The project will not require construction activities;
therefore, there will be no construction air quality impacts to nearby uses. There will be no physical
change to the existing roadway configuration.
Changes in the number of vehicular trips associated with the proposed project would affect the traffic
at intersections and along roadway segments in the project vicinity. The primary mobile source
pollutant of local concern is carbon monoxide (CO). CO concentration is a direct function of vehicle
idling time and, thus, traffic flow conditions. CO dispenes rapidly with distance from the source
under nonua! meteorological conditions. Typically, high CO concentrations are associated with
roadways or intersections operating at unacceptable levels of service or with extremely high Ù'affic
volumes.
The Traffic Study (Appendix B) addressed 2020 traffic conditions in the study area under "with
project" conditions (EI Camino Real at two lanes between First Street and Newport A venue) and
"without project" conditions (EI Camino Real at four lanes between' First Street and Newport
Avenue). The traffic study found that under both conditions, the daily traffic levels on the street
segment and the study intersections would continue to maintain acceptable levels of service.
Therefore, the project is not expected to result in a substantial increase in pollutant concentration as a
result of traffic congestion. The County of Orange is in aitainment with the State CO standard, and no
monitoring stations in the County have recorded any CO exceedances in the past five years. The
proposed project is not expected to result in any substantial changes in CO concentrations. Because
no CO hotspots are anticipated, no sensitive receptors would be affected by project-related local air
quality impacts.
P:\ctu330\F;n.' Sent\Section 4.'00 «01128105.
4-4
LO. "'O.IA"'. '.C,
MU.. ....
oun "'TIAL nuDY
.un,.,n CAM'.O ......L PL.. An.oM'"
e) Create objectionable odors aft'ecting a subltantial number of people?
No Impact. The proposed project will not require construction activity; therefore, there will be no
odors from the application of asphalt or paint The project will not result in a change to existing
physical environment; therefore, no odors will be created.
4.4 Biological Resources
Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat moditicadons, on any
species Identified as a caudidate, scuitive, or special status species In local or regional plans,
policies, or regaladolll, or by the CaIlfol'llia Department ofFiJh aDd Game or U.S. Flah and
Wildlife Service?
No Impact. The project site is currently a two-lane road located in an urban area. There are no known
animal species inhabiting the site. The City and County General Plans (2001, 2000) do not indicate
any sensitive or special status species on the project site.
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural
commuuity identifIed in local or regional piau, policies, reguladons or by the Califonia
Department ofFlah and Game or US Fish and WUdlife Service?
No Impact. According to Figure COSR-2 in the City's General Plan, the site has not been i@ntified
as being the location of an important natural resource (i.e., a sensitive natural community). Peter's
Canyon Regional Park is identified as a significant natural resource in the City, and the site of the
proposed project is not located in or adjacent to the park.
c) Have a substantial adverse effect ou federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404
of the Clean Water Aet (IncludIng, but not limited to, marsh, vel'llal pool, coastal, etc.)
through direct removal, ¡¡Ding, hydrological interruption, or other means?
No Impact. The Lower Peters Canyon Retarding Basin contains a small amount of riparian habitat.
However, the wetlands are not in close proximity to the proposed project site and would not be
affected by the project. .
d) Inteñere subltantially with the movement of any native resident or mi¡ratory fIs.h or
wildlife species or wIth established native resident or mi¡ratory wildlife corridors, or
impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
P:",..3301F;n.i SentlSoction 4.doc «01/28105"
4-5
Resolution No. 05-61
Page 29 of 145
LO. 'U.COAT", 'HC.
MUC. ....
.un 'NITIAL ITU..
TUIT'H'" CAM'H. ....... .... AM'..".T
No Impaet. The project site is an existing roadway. It has not been identified as a crucial portion of
the migratory path of any animal species. Its usefulness to migratory species would be limited,
considering that it has no natura1 water sources or habitat.
e) CoD1llet with any local pondes or ordinances protecting biological reIOnrcel. luch as a tree
prese"ation policy or ordinance?
No Impact. Two tree groups that are identified in the General Plan as important to the City are
eucalyptus windrow and redwood grove. The proposed project would not result in the removal' of; or
otherwise adversely impact, these tree communities. No specific local policies or ordinances would be
violated by the proposed project.
f) Conniet with the provl8lonl of an adopted Habitat CoIlSe"ation Plan, Natural Community
Conse"ation Plan. or other approved local, regioual. or .tate habitat conoervation plan?
No Impact. The Natural Community Conservation Plan (NCCP), !IS prepared by the County of
Orange Environmental Managemèììt Agency, covers a large portion of Orange County, including
portions of the City of Tustin. The proposed project is located outside the NCCP and will not conflict
with its policies.
4.5 Cultural Resources
Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial advent change in the slllDific:auce of a hiitorical resource al defined In
CEQA Guidelines Section 15O64.5? .
No Impact. Cultural resources are places, structures, or objects that are important for scientific,
historic, and/or religious reasons to cultures, communities, groups, or individuals. Cultural resources
include historic and prehistoric arobacological sites, arohitectural remains, engineering structures, and
artifacts that provide evidence ofpast human activity. They also include places, resources, or items of
importance in the traditions of societies and religions.
CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5 defines historic resources as any object, building, structure, site,
area, place, record, manuscript, or other resource listed or determined to be eligible for listing by the
State Historical Resources Commission, a local register of historic resources, or the Lead Agency.
Generally, a resources is considered to be "historically significant" if it meets one of the following
criteria:
is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of
California\~ history and cultural heritage;
is associated with the lives of important persons in the past;
embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or
represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values; or
P:\ctu3JO\F;"i Sent\Section '.doc «01128/05,
4.6
.OA ",.C"T", ,"C,
IIUCH ...,
Ph" "'T". ITV..
TVITI",". C.MI.. "...... P.'" '",..MUT
has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history.
E1 Camino Real between First Street and Newport Avenue is within an area of the City known as Old
Town. The Old Town District characterizes the City's historical and architectural focus.
The area south of First Street, and on either side of Camino Real, is a City designated Cultural
Resources District The purpose of the district is to provide a Û'IIIIcWork for recognizing. preserving,
and protecting culturally significant struc!lU'es, natural features, sites, and neighborhoods within the
City of Tustin. .
The proposed reclassification of this portion of El Camino Real is intended to allow for the
continuation of the existing on-street diagonal parking and to support the pedestrian focus of the Old
Town District. The pedestrian-fiiendly nature of the street is consistent with the historical and
architectural context of the adjacent land uses, including Old Town and the adjacent Cultural
Resources District Therefore, there are no adverse effects associated with maintaining El Camino
Real in current conditions on the historic character and historic resources in Old Town.
b) Cause a substantial adveneChange In the sipifieanCB of an archaeolopca1 resource punu.
ant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5?
No Impact. The proposed project will not result in any construction activities, including grading, and
therefore will not impact any archaeological resources.
c) DIreet1y or Indirectly destroy auuique paleontolocJca1 resource or site or unique &eolocJc
feature?
No Impact. The proposed project will not result in any construction activities, including grading, and
therefore will not impact any paleontological resources.
d) Disturb any human remains, IDcludlD& those IDterred outside oUormal cemeteries?
No Impact. The proposed project will not1'eSuIt in any construction activities, including grading, and
therefore will not impact any interred human remains.
4.6 Geology nnd Soils
Would the project:
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial advene effects,lnclnding the risk of
loss, Injury, or death IDvolvlng:
(i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquiat-Priolo
Earthqualce Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologbt for the area or based on other
P'\clu330IFina] S","Sect", 4 do, ,,01/28/050>
4-7
Resolution No, 05-61
Page 31 of 145
LIA ...oeu..., ..e,
MAReH ....
.U.. "'TIAL nu.y
TDnIN'OL C"".o G"U.L PL'" .".......
8UbttaDtl8I evideDCè8 of ImOWD fault? Refer to DivillioD of Mines ADd Geoio&ieai Special
PubUeatioD 42.
No Impact. The Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zones Act was signed into law in 1972. In 1994, it
was renamed the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act (A.P Act). The primary purpose of the
Act is to mitigate the hazard of fault rupture by prohibiting the location of struct1U'es for human
occupancy across the trace of an active fault. The A-P Act requires the State Geologist (Chief of the
California Geology Survey) to delineate "Earthquake Fault Zones" along faults that are "sufficiently
active" and "well-defmed." The boundary of an "Earthquake Fault Zone" is generally about 500 feet
from major active faults and 200 to 300 feet from well-defIned minor faults. The A-P Act dictates that
cities and counties withhold development penriits for sites within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault
Zone until geologic investigations demonstrate that the sites are not threatened by surface
displacements from future faulling. There are no known active or suspected potentially active faults
within the City ofTustin (City General Plan, Public Safety Element, 2001).
(H) StroDe seismic groundsbaking?
No Impact. No faults have been mapped immè!liately near the City, although several major faults lie
within 10 to 45 miles of the City. Therefore, the City would experience decreased magnitude or lesser
ground shaking from an adjacent fault rupture, Development within the City will be designed and
constructed in accordance with requirements of the latest edition of the Uniform Building Code
standards and applicable City requirements. Adherence to these requirements will reduce potential
impacts associated with new construction to a less than significant level, The proposed project does
not result in new construction but rather a General Plan Amendment to maintain existing conditions.
The segment ofEI Camino Real does not include any bridges or overpasses that would be subject to
seismic evaluation and retrofit. The portion of Interstate 5 adjacent to El Camino Real was upgraded
in the mid-1990s and is in compliance with seismic safety requirements. Therefore, the proposed
project will not expose people or struct1U'es to substantial adverse effects associated with strong
seismic ground shaking.
(iü) Seismic-related ground failure, iDeluding liquefaction?
No Impact. Liquefaction is a process by which water-saturated materials (including soil, sediment,
and certain types of volcanic deposits) lose strength and may fail during strong ground shaking.
Liquefaction is defined as "the transformation of a granular material from a solid state into a liquefied
state as a consequence of increased pore-water pressure,"
The project study area is not located within an area subject to liquefaction as defined in the County of
Orange General Plan Safety Element (Figure IX-12). Therefore, the proposed project is not expected
to expose people or struct1U'es to potential substantial adverse effects associated with liquefaction.
(Iv) LandsUdes?
No Impact. The study area's flat topography minimizes the potential for landslides, liquefaction,
settlement, or other seismically related hazards. Furthermore, new development within the City will
P'\ctu330\Flnal Sent\Sect;on ',doc ,01/2810S»
4-8
... AII.coAT". IHe,
....eR '"'
"'PT "'T'AL ITU"
TUSTlNln eA""O ...n.. PLA' A""""'T
be designed and constructed to meet the most current safety standards included in the Unifonn
Building Code and/or standards eatablished by the City. The proposed project does not involve new
construction and wiII not increase any risks associated with landslides.
b) ReSult In substantial soil erosion or tbe loss of topsoU?
No Impact. The proposed project will not require earthmoving activities, which would expo~soils
and thereby increase the potential for erosion or loss of topsoiL Therefore, the proposed project will
not result in soil erosion 'or loss of topsoil.
c) Be located on a Ceolopc unit or soU that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a
result of the project, and potentially result in 00- or oß'-slte lancbolides, lateral spreadioll,
subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
No Impact. Refer to Responses 6a(iii) and 6a(iv).
d) Be located on eIpauive soil, as defined iu Table 18-1-B of the Uniform BuUdinc Code
(1994), creatio& lub.tantiaJ risks to life or property?
No Impact. Expansive soils have a significant amount of clay particles that can give up water
(shrink) or take on water (swell). The change in volume exerts stress on buildings and other loads
placed on these soils. The occurrence of these soils is often associated with geologic units having
marginal stability. The distribution of expansive soils can be widely dispersed, and they can occur in
hillside areas as well as low-lying alluvial basins.
Expansive soils are not identified in the County General Plan. The proposed project will result in the
maintenance of the existing two-lane condition of this segment of El Camino Real. The proposed
project does not involve any new construction and therefore will not create risks associated with
expansive soil.
e) Have soils incapable of adequately SUpportiDC the DIe of septic tanks or alternative
wastewater dlsposall}'stems wbere lewen are Dot available for the disposal of wastewater?
No Impact. The proposed project will result in the maintenance of the existing two-lane condition of
this segment ofEI Camino Real and will have no effect on sewer availability.
4.7 H878rcbo and Hazardous Materials
Would tbe project:
a) Create a sipiftc:aJlt b878rd to tbe public or the environment through the routine trauport,
use, or disposal of h878rdoDl materials? '
P:\ctu;3OIFlnal S",\\'<o"i"" ',doc .01128105.
4-9
Resolution No, 05-61
Page 33 of 145
... ."OCIATI', INC.
MUea '"'
.un 'OIT'.. nu..
TVITIN'.. CAMINO GENII.. '..0 .M"."OT
No Impact. The proposed project involves a General Plan Amendment to reclassify a portion of
EI Camino Real ftom a four-lane Sècondary Arterial to a two-lane local collector roadway to be
consistent with the MP AH. The proposed project will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of
hazardous materials, nor demolition or construction activity.
The City of Tustin is concerned with hazardous materials that are transported through the planning
area either by abovegi'ound transport or via underground pipeline. The City follows the Orange
County Hazardous Waste Management Plan (1991), which contains policy direct:ion and action
programs to deal with incidences of hazardous waste emissions goals to prevent hazardous material
emergencies include having transportation routes to safely transport any hazardous materials.
The Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS), located on Barranca Parkway between Jamboree Road and
Red Hill Avenue in Tustin, is identified as a source of hazardous materials. Identification and clean
up of hazardous waste disposal sites on military bases occurs under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation Liability Act (CERCLA). The Depllrtment of the Navy
would implement CERCLA policies for the MCAS. The MCAS is located over two miles from the
project site and poses no threat to the site.
b) Create a si¡¡nificant haard to the public or the environment throu¡¡h rea8Onably
fomeeable upset and accident conditioD.l involving the release of haardous materials into
tbe e"vironment?
No Impact. Refer to Response 4.7(a), above.
c) Emit bazardous em\S8lons or handle bazardous or acutely bazardous materials, substances,
or waste witbln oluHlnarter mUe of an eIistln& or proposed scbool?
No Impact. According to Thomas Brothers Maps (2003), there are no existing school sites within
one-quarter mile of the project site. Therefore, there are no impacts associated with this issue, Also,
refer to Response 4.7(a), above.
d) Be IDeated on a site whicb Is Inclnded on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled
pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a mnlt; would It create a sl¡¡nlficant
bazard to tbe public or tbe environment?
No Impact. The proposed project involves a General Plan Amendment to reclassify a portion of
El Camino Real from a four-lane Secondlll)' Arterial to a two-lane collector roadway to be consistent
with the MP AH. The project does not involve grading, demolition, or construction; therefore, a search
ofknoWD hazardous material sites in the vicinity of the project site is not warranted.
e) For a project located within an airport land..... plan or, wbere lucb a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, wonld tbe project molt
In a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area?
Po'<lUJJO\Final SentlSootiuo ',doc ,<QI/28"'5>,
4-10
LOA AUOCIATU. 'NC.
"ARCH U..
DurT INITIAL ITUDY
TVITIN/.L tA"'NO ..NUAL 'LAN A"..."."
No Impact. The proposed project location is over four miles &om John Wayne Airport and is not
located within the John Wayne Airport land use plan. The landing flight path of aircraft, however, is
near or over the project site location. Generally, if a site is greater than two miles away &om an
airport and it is not under a direct flight path, then the impact and safety threat &om the airport is
negligible. Safety hazards related to this issue are anticipated to be less than significant.
f) For a project within the viclnlty or a private airstrip, wonld the project result in a safety
hazard for people residing or working in the project area!
No Impact. There are no private airstrips identified in close proximity to the proposed project
location. The proposed project will not affect or be affected by private airstrips.
g) Impair implementation of or physically IDterfere with an adopted emel'8ency response plan
or emergency evacuation'plan!
Leu Than SI¡nIIlc:ant Impact. EI Camino Real is an existing Evacuation Route, according to Figure
PS-l of the Public Safety Element of the City's Generall>tan. The City's Emergency Operations Plan
identifies routes through the City tþat are suitable for use as evacuation routes. The Public Safety
Element of the General Plan states that the extent and severity of a disaster will determine which
routes and which directions people may take in order to escape the afflicted areas. El Camino Real is
identifJed as an existing evacuation route that tenninates at First Street and Jamboree Road. EI
Camino Real does not provide a direct connection to ml\Íor fteeways or to major arterials in other
communities, and as such is the only evacuation route that is entirely contained within the City limits.
While the reconfiguration of the affected portion ofEI Camino Real reduces its capacity, its current
status as an evacuation route will not be adversely impacted. As the Public Safety Element of the
General Plan states, the extent and severity of a disaster will determine which routes and which
directions people may take in the event of an emergency; therefore, the reconfiguration of one of
many existing evacuation romes will not impair implementation of or physically interfere with the
adopted emergency response/evacuation plan.
The proposed project does not involve demolition or new construction, nor will it induce population
growth. The area immediately surrounding the project site is fulJy built om and is not anticipated to
increase in occupancy. Therefore, it is not anticipated to increase a need for emergency response or
the re-routing of evacuation plans.
h) Expose people or structures to a slgnlficant risk of loss, iujury or death invoMng wildland
fires, lncludlng where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized aM or where residences are
intermixed with wildlands?
No Impact. The projeCt site is located in an urban area with no wildlands in close proximity. The
project does not involve the construction of any residential or commercial areas. Therefore, the
project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or delith &om
wildfires, '
P:1ctu33O1Fi".1 Scnt\SecdOl1 4.doc ,01/28/05»
4-11
Resolution No, 05-61
Page 35 of 145
La. ...oel"", 'Ne,
MUCH ....
Ou.. INITIAL ITVDY
Tun"'"L e'MI NO OI.IR.L ..., .MI.OMlNT
4.8 BydrololD' and Water Quality
Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality staadards or waste discharge requirements?
No Impact. The proposed project is a General Plan Amendment that will allow the continuation of
the ~sting roadway configuration. There will be no change to existing water quality or discharge
requirements as a result of the project.
b) Substantially deplete Il'Oundwater supplies or Inteñere substantially with groundwater
reehal'Ke such that there would be a net deficit In aquif'er volume or a lowering of the local
groundwater table level (e.II" the production rate ofpre-eJiating nearby wells would drop to
a level which would not support existing land uøes or plaaned UBeII for which permits have
been aranted)?
No Impact. The proposed project is a General Plan Amendment to reclassifY a portion ofEI Camino
Real &om a four-lane Secondary Arterial to a two-lane collector roacWay to be consistent with the
MP AH. The proposed project would not cause any long-term interference with groundwater recharge
or affect existing aquifer volumes because the project does not involve construction. Therefore, there
are no impacts associated with depletion of groundwater supplies. '
c) Substantially alter the nistlnl drainaae pattern of the site or area, Includin¡: through the
alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would resuit In snbstaDtial
erosion or siltation on- or off.slte?
No Impact. The project site is an existing road located on relatively level topography. The site is not
in close proximity to a stream or river, nor would runoff from it be expected to enter a stream or river
and alter its course. The existing drainage pattern would remain unchanged as a result of the proposed
General Plan Amendment. The proposed project would not alter existing drainage, and no significant
impacts associated with erosion or siltation are antici¡iated.
d) Substantially alter the e:dstilll drainage pattern of the site or area, Includin¡: through the.
alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of
surface mnoff in a manner which would result In t100dln¡: on- or off..lte?
No Impact. The proposed General Plan Amendment would not alter existing drainage conditions nor
would it cause flooding to the area.
e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity ofexistlnl or plaDned
stormwater drainace systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted mnoff?
No Impact. The proposed project is a General Plan Amendment to allow the maintenance of the
existing roadway configur¡¡tion. It will not create or contribute runoff water. Existing storm drain
";Ie",3JO\Final S",.\Seàion 4,do"OI1281OS.
4-12
... "'OClAT... lOCo
"'.CH ..11
".rT ,"IT'" ITU.Y
TUITIO", C."'OO .'OU.. .... ""'.""T
capacity will not be affected, nor will the project increase pollu1ed runoff. The proposed project will
not substantially increase sources of polluted runoff.
f) Otberwise substantially deer-de water quality?
No Impact. The proposed project is a Gene.raJ Plan Amendment to reclassifY a portion ofEl Camino
Real from a four-lane Secondary Arterial to a two-lane collector roadway to be consistent wi1h 1he
MP AH. The proposed project will not cbange or degrade water quality.
g) Place housing withlD a lOO-year .flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard
Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map?
No Impact. The proposed project does not include the addition of new housing. According to the
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood rD.surance Rate Map (FIRM), 1he project
site is not located in a special flood hazard area (I DO-year or less floodplain); therefore, 1here are no
impacts associated with bousing and flood hazards. Source: FIRM Map No. 06059COO30 E,
September IS, 1989. -.
h) Place within a lOO-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood
flows?
No Impact, While the proposed project site is located in a 500-year floodplain, it does not include the
addition of new structures. Therefore, there are no impacts associated with structures redirecting flood
flow. Source: FIRM Map No, 06059C0030 E, September IS, 1989.
i) Expose people or structures to a significant ri8k ofloas, injury or death involving flooding,
including floodIDg as a result of the failure of a levee or. dam?
No Impact. The project site is not located in 1he vicinity of a large body of water with a levee or a
dam, nor does 1he project involve the construction of bomes or any other structures, Therefore, there
is no impact associated wi1h damage from the failure of a levee or a dam associated with the proposed
~~ .
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudfiow?
No Impact. A seiche is an oscillation of a landlocked body of water that can causewàter damage to
buildings, roads, and infi'astructure that surround the body of water. There is no such body of water
located in 1he City of Tustin. Therefore, impacts to 1he project study area associated with seiches will
not occur. The project site is over 20 miles from the Pacific Ocean or any body of water that could
cause tsunami, also know as a tidal wave, to the area. There is no risk of tsunami associated witb the
project. The project is located on relatively level topography, is not adjacent to hills or mountains that
could be the source of mud flow or landslide, and is therefore not at risk for mud flow damage.
p,\ctu33O\F;na' S",!\Sec,ion 4 doc ,OII2SJ()5"
4-13
Resolution No, 05-61
Page 37 of 145
.u ,..OCIAT... INC,
""CH ""
DRAn 'NITIA. ITUD.
TUITINln C""NO GIN",. PL.N ""'."'NT
k) Potentially Impact stormwaterrunofffrom construction activities?
No Impact. The proposed project is a General Plan Amendment to allow the maintenance of the
existing roadway configuration. There are no new construction activities associated with this action.
The proposed amendment will not result in a change to existing runoff conditions.
I} Potentially impact.stormwater runoff from po.st-construction activitieS?
No Impact. The proposed project is a General Plan Amendment that will allow the continuation of
the existing roadway configuration. There will be no change to existing stonnwater runoff as a result
of the project.
m) Result In a potential for dlsc:harge of stormwater pollutants from areu of materialltorage,
vehicle or equipment fueling, vehicle or equipment malDtenance (including wubing), waste
handUng, hazardous materials handUng or storage, delivery areas,loadlng docks or other
outdoor work areas?
The proposed project is a General Plan Amendment to reclassify a.portion ofE! Camino Real from a
four-lane Secondary Arterial to a two-lane collector roadway to be consistent with the MPAH, The
project does not include areas of material storage, vehicle or equipment fueling, vehicle or equipment
maintenance, waste handling, hazardous materials handling or storage, delive¡y areas, loading docks
or other outdoor work areas. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in a potential for
discharge ohtonn water pollutants as a result of these uses.
n) Result in a potential for discharge of stormwater to affect the beneficial uses of the receiving
waters?
No Impact The proposed project is a General Plan Amendment that will allow the continuation of
the existing roadway configuration. There will be no change to existing stonnwater runoff as a result
of the project, and therefore no potential to affect the beneficial uses of the receiving waters.
0) Create the potential for significant changea in the now velocity or volume of stormwater
runoff to caue environmental harm?
No Impact. The proposed project is a General Plan Amendment that will allow the cOntinuation of
the existing roadway configuration. There will be no change to existing stonnwater flow velocity or
volume as a result of the project.
p) Create significant increases in erosion or the project site or surrounding areas?
No Impact The proposed project is a General Plan Amendment that will allow the continuation of
the existing roadway configuration. There will be no change to existing stormwater runoff as a result
of the project; and therefore no increase in erosion potential for the project site or surrounding areas.
P,ICIU3JOlFi.al SenllSoc!i.. 4.doc «01128/0'"
4-14
... "'OC'AT", INC,
M"CN "..
.un 'N"'.. nuov
vunlN/n C.MINO C""" P..N .M".M'.T
4.9 Land Use and PJanDing
Woald the project:
a) Physically divide an eatabl18hed commualty?
No Impact. The proposed project would resuh in the maintenance of the exi$tiDg roadway
configuration as a two-lane undivided roadway with on-street diagonal parking. Previously, this
roadway segment of EI Camino Real was a four-lane undivided arterial street with parallel on-street
parking. The reconfiguration and downgrading of the roadway was undertaken by the City and the
acTA in November 1997 asa demonstration project. The purpose of the proposed amendment to the
City's Circulation Element is to (I) achieve consistency with the MP AH designation, (2) reflect the
existing and future traffic levels on the roadway segment, and (3) ensure cOnsistency between the
roadway and the adjacent land uses by supporting the pedestrian-ftiendIy character of the Old Town
commercial district. The purpose of the demonstration project was to document the existing and
define the future impacts of the redesignation of the roadway. The results of the Traffic Study
(Appendix B) indicate that 2020 traffic conditions, both with and without. the p¡:oject, would maintain
acceptàble daily traffic levels and intersection operations.
The proposed project is an amendment to the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan to
institutionalize existing conditions and the MPAH designation of the roadway. The two-lane
configuration and on-site diagonal parking are consistent with the revitalization goals for Old Town
to create a pedestrian~riented environment. The proposed project does not divide an established
community;' rather, it creates a stronger connection between the land uses on both sides of the street
by creating better pedestrian access.
b) Conflict with any applic:able land use plan, policy or regalation ofan a¡ency with
jurisdiction over the project (Inclndin¡¡, but not lImited to the general plan, specific plan,
local COBltal program, or HnIDg ordiDanee) adopted for the purpoae of avoldlDg or
mltigatin¡¡ an environmental effect?
No Impact. EI Camino Real between First Street aÌ1d Newport Avenue lies within an area that is
designated as Old Town Commercial on the City's Land Use Policy map, The Old Town Commercial
designation includes retail, professional office, and service-oriented business activities that serve Old
Town and surrounding areas. The proposed project is consistent with, and furthers the intent of,
several goals of the Land Use Element of the General Plan.
Goal 3: Ensure that new development is compatible with surrounding land;"es in the community. the
City's circulation network, availability of public facilities, existing development constraints, and the
City's unlqùe characteristics and resources.
By downgrading the classification ofEl Camino Real within the Old Town district, the roadway
classification will be compatible with the surrounding Old Town commercial uses, chll1'8Cterized by
historic buildings and a ped~strian orientation.
P,'<tu330\Hnal ScnllSccûon 4,do< ,01128105.
4-15
Resolution No, 05-61
Page 39 of 145
LSA "OOC""O, 'NC,
"UCH 10"
.UPT 'NITIAL ITU"
TUITI.,U C""RO ."'.AL PLAN ..".""T
Goal 5: Revitalize older commercial, industrial, and residential uses qnd properties,
The proposed General Plan Amendment to maintain the existing configuration of EI Camino Real in
the Old Town district will support the revitalization efforts that rely on the historic character and
pedestrian orientation of this unique commercial area.
Goal 10: Improve and strengthen the Tustin Old Town/Firsr Street area with a lI1Iique pedestrian
environment and a dÍVerse mix of goocú, services, and uses.
The Land Use Element of the General Plan (page 21) states, "The development character of Old
Town and the First Street area can be significantly enhancèd by greater integration of residential uses
and physical renovations to existing buildings and street &ontages which promote a pedestrian
orientation." The proposed reclassification ofEI Camino Real &om a Secondary Arterial to a
collector in order to maintain the existing street configuration furthers the intent of this goal by
maintaining a pedestrian-fi'iondly environment, A collector street is characteri¡ed by slower speeds
than the speeds of a Secondary Arterial. Additionally, the provision of on-street diagonal parking bas
a traffic calming effect and reduces travel speeds due to parking and backing-out maneuvers. The
future street width wiII be two lanes instead of four lanes, which wiD allow for eàSier pedestrian street
crossing. Finally, on-street parking provides convenient access to commercial establishmentS'Dnd
reduces the need to provide additional public parking away from Old Town land uses,
In addition to the general goals and policies in the Land Use Element, specific development guidance
is provided for this area through the First Street Specific Plan and the Town Center Redevelopment
project. The First Street SpecÍÍlc Plan encompasses approximately one mile along the First Street
commercial corridor from central Tustin at Newport Avenue to the SR-55 treeway. The plan is
intended to define the entry into Tustin fi'om the west and to provide access to Old Town and the
Civic Center. All development activities within this area of the City are subject to the provisions of
the First Street Specific Plan. All development within the redevelopment project area is subject to
design review and conformity with the redevelopment plan by the Redevelopment Agency.
The proposed project is located within the Town Center Redevelopment Plan area. The Town Center
Redevelopment Plan was approved in 1976 and bas been amended several times since then. The
objectives of the plan include creating a mixed-use town center, revitalizing the EI Camino Real
section of the redevelopment area, and increasing the level of capital improvements. The proposed
redesignation of EI Camino Real to a two-lane collector roadway is consistent with the redevelopment
plan's intent of". . . encouraging business development, attracting new customers to the area,
alleviating pass-through traffic congestion and conflict, and improving safety."
The portion ofEl Camino Real that intersects with First Street is located within the First Street
Specific Plan (1985) area, which extends from Newport Avenue to the Newport Freeway. The
Specific Plan provides the land use regulations and design guidelines to maintain and enhance the
uses along First Streot,create an attractive entrance to the City, rehabilitate facades and signage,
improve vehicular circulation, and maximize pedestrian movement and access, As noted previously,
the proposed General Plan Amendment to reclassifY a portion ofEl Camino Real from a four-lane
Secondary Arterial to a two-lane collector is consistent with the pedestrian-orientation of the area
wbere it intersects with First Street and furthers the intent of the First Street Specific Plan.
P:",""OIFI,,' S",tIS...l.n 4doo «01/28/05»
4.16
U' ...ael..... 'Ne,
....c. u..
OUFT 'NITI'. nuDY
TunlNIIL C""NO c...... P... .."""'T
c) ConØict with any appUcable habitat couervadon plan or natural communities?
No Impact. The City does not have a habitat conservation plan, and there are no natural comm\lllities
in the study area. No impact would occur &om the implementation on the proposed project.
4.10 MInerai Resources
Would the project:
a) Result In the loss of avaUabWty of a known mineral resource that wòuld be of value to the
regioD and the residents of the state?
No Impact. According to Figure VI-3 found in the County's General Plan Resources Elemen~ no
mineral resources are located in the project site. There are no impacts .associated with mineral
resources.
b) Result In the 1011 of availablUty of a locally-Important mineral resource reeovery"lite
delineated on a loc:al eeneral plan, speeific plan or other Iud use plan? .
No Impact. According to the County General Plan, there are no loc:aily important mineral resource
sites on the project site. There are no impacts associated with this issue.
4.11 Noise
Would the project result In:
a) Exposure of persons to or een~ration of noise levels In CXCCII of standards estabUshed In the
local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
No Impact. The Noise Element of the General Plan identifies the noise contours for the build out
conditions of the Land Use Policy Map. The General Plan noise contours were developed based upon
existing and future traffic conditions, train operations, and other environmental conditions. The Noise
Element defmes the 60 dB CNEL contour as the noise impact area. Any proposed new noise sensitive
land uses, sucbas residences, hospitals, schools, and churches, within the contour are to be evaluated
on a project-specific basis.
The 20]0 Noise Map (Noise E]ement Figure N-l) identifJeS the study area for the EI Camino Road
redesignatiòn as within the 60+ CNEL dB area. The Noise Element also notes that residences next to
. a number of major and secondary arterials in Tustin are exposed to a CNEL in excess of 65 dB,
including EI Camino Real. Noise levels below 65 dB are generally considered compatible with
residential uses, and noise levels up to 70 dB are generally considered compatible with most
commercial uses (Noise Element, Table N-2; Land Use Noise Compatibility Matrix).
The proposed redesignation of this segment of El Camino Road will allow the maintenance of the
existing roadway configuration. Some residences along the street &ontage may currently experience
noise in excess of 65 dB, However, noise levels on the road are not expected to change as a result of
P:lctu330IFi,.IS",tlSect'",,4.doc«O1128IOS,
4-]7
Resolution No, 05-61
Page 41 of 145
... "IOe14"'. 'HC.
MUCR ,..,
Dun '.ITI.. ITGDY
TUI"H/I. CAMIH. .'H"" fLA' AMUDMUT
the project. Noise levels with the project may be less than wbat is accommodated for in the 2010
General Plan noise conditions if the 20 I 0 noise modeling reflected the planned four-lane roadway
configuration. The proposed project will not result in a substantive increase in noise levels compared
with existing conditions; therefore, there will be no increase in noise exposure.
b) Expoaure of penoos to or leneration of exc_lve lroundborue vibration or grDundborue
noise levels?
No Impact. The proposed project involves a General Plan Amendment to reclassify a portion of
EI Camino Real &om a four-lane Secondary Arterial to a two-lane collector roadway. The
downgrading of the roadway to match existing conditions will not result in an increase in
'groundbome vibration or noise levels.
c) A subltaDtiaI Ìermanent Increue in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels
emtinl without the project?
Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed General Plan Amendment will allow the existing
roadway configuration to continue in the future. Small increases in traffic may occilr within the
existing roadway as a result of growth and deveiopment in the surromtding areas; however,the
proposed project will not cause land use growth beyond what is already planned for in the General
Plan. Therefore, the project will not result in an increase in overall ambient noise levels. Some traffic
that would have used EI Camino Real when it was four lanes will now use parallel streets as a result
of the reduction of travel lanes, The increased traffic on parallel streets will result in an increase in the
traffic-related noise levels on those parallel streets. The Traffic Study (Appendix B) indicates that
South B Street experiences a 5 to 10 percent increase in dc as a result of the reconfiguration ofEI
Camino Real. South C Street and Prospect Avenue experience a1 percent increase in traffic. A 10
percent increase in traffic volumes would result in an increase ofO.~ clBA in traffic noise; wruch is
not perceptible to the human ear. The incremental nature oÎthe change in traffic levels is further
documented in the Traffic Report, Figures 9 and 10, which illustrate an average daily traffic level of
5,800 in 2020 without the project and 5,900 in 2020 with implementation of the project (continuation
of existing conditions). The increase of the daily traffic volumes tTom 5,800 to 5,900 would result in
less than a 0.1 dBA increase in traffic noise, a negligible change. The incremental changes to traffic
levels on streets that currently handle relatively low volumes of traffic is not sufficient to result in
significant changes in traffic-related noise levels.
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increalle in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity
above levels existing without tbe project?
LeIS Than SignIficant Impact. see Response 4.1 I (c) above.
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan bas not been
adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose
people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
P",tu330\F'", ,..!\Sea;o. 4."" ,01128105"
4-18
... 'UOCI..... 'HC,
"U'H IO..
.00n .HIT... nu..
Tun'N'IL C""H. .".OA. P..N ""'.".NT
No Impact. The project area is withiD two miles of the former Marine Corps Air Station Tustin
(MCAS- Tustin); however, the former base was conveyed by the Department of the Navy to the City
of Tustin, the LocaJ Redevelopment Authority as designated by federal law. Nonaviation reuse plans
are currently underway for the former base.
The project is located over three miles &om John Wayne Airport and is well outside the 60 dB and 65
dB aviation noise contour. The project is not within the airport land use plan or within two miles of
the airport and will have no impact on aircraft noise exposure levels.
f) For a project within the vIduity of a private aintrip, would the project expose people
residing or worlduclu the project area to eueuiveno!oe levels?
No Impact. The propOsed project is not located within the vicinity of a private airstrip.
4.12 Population and Housing
Would the project:
.a) Induce substantial population I'OwtJi in an area, either direc:tJy (for example, by proposinc
new homcs and bulncslIeI) or Indirectly (for example, through exterulou of roads or other
Infrastructure)?
No Impact. The proposed project involves a General Plan Amendment to reclassify a portion of
El Camino Real from a four-lane Secondary Arterial to a two-lane collector roadway. The
downgrading of the roadway to match existing conditions will not result in an increase in roadway
capacity or traffic levels that could have growth-inducing effects. Future growth and development of
the City is defined in the General Plan, including the Land Use and Growth Management Elements.
The proposed project is consistent with these EJements and will not result in a change to the future
population growth of the City.
b) Displace substantial uumben of exIs1Iug housing, ueCessitating the coll8truction of
replacement holl8lnC elsewhere?
No Impact. 'The proposed project will allow the maintenance of the existing two-lane configuration
of this portion ofEI Camino Real with on-street diagonal parking. The project does not involve any
Dew construction; therefore, DO housing units will be displaced.
c) Displace substantial nnmben of people, necessitating the construction of replacement
housing elsewhere?
No Impact. Please refer to the response 12(b).
P:\c1u33O\F1M' S<n1lSe«ion 4.doo ,<)ln8lO",
4-19
Resolution No, 05-61
Page 43 of 145
... ...OCUT". '"c.
...'CH un
..... '.,T... aTU'Y
TUITI",n C"""O Gun.. PL,. AMU"""T
4.13 Public Services
a) Would'the project result In substantial advene physical Ílnpactl UIOCÎatecl with the
proviJion of new or physically altered lovernmentaJ (aclßtles, need for new or phYJIicaJly
altered governmental facllItles, the construction of which could cause Illnlflcant
environmentallmpaCU, In order to maintain acceptable serVice ratIos, responae times or
other performance objectives for FIre Protection, Police Protection, Schools, or Parks?
No Impact. The proposed project is to reclassifY a portion ofEl Camino Real &om a four-lane
Secondary Arterial to a two-lane collector in the Circulation Element of the City's OeneralPlan. The
proposed project will not add new structures to the area or induce population growth. Therefore,
governmental facilities will not be affected by the proposed project.
4.14 Recreation
a) Would the project increaue the use of eDsting neighborhood ,and regional parks or other
reereatioDal facßIties luch that substantial physical deterioration of the faclßty would occur
or be aecelerated ' '
No Impact. The proposed project will not increase population and housing in the area, and the
demand for recreational facilities will not increase. Therefore, existing recreational facilities in the
area will not be impacted by the proposed project
b) Does the project inclade reereational facilities or require the construction or expansion of
recreational facllItiesthat might have an adverse phYJIical effect on the environment?
No Impact. The project site is not located in or adjacent to a City or County recreational facility and
will not require the construction or expansion of recreational faciijties. Therefore, implementation of
the project will not have a physical environmental impact relating to recreational facilities.
4.15 TransportationlI'raffic
Woald the project:
a) CaDle aa increase in traflic which is Illbstantial in relation to the exlstlnl tramc load and
capacity olthe street system (i.e., result in a substantial increue in either the umber of
vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or conleadon at Intenections)?
Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed General Plan Amendment to reclassify a portion of
El Camino Real will not cause an increase in traffic. The Traffic Study (Appendix B) addressed 2020
conditions with El Camino Real as a two-lane roadway ("with project", conditions) and as a four-lane
roadway ("without project" conditions). The study considered other changes.to land use and traffic
conditions that would occur over this period, including the redevelopment of Marine Corps Air
Station (MCAS) Tustin base and the extension of Newport Avenue to the south. The traffic study
assumed MCAS traffic model projections where possible (two locati,:ms) and a traffic growth rate of
1.0 percent per year to existing volumes at four study intersections. The growth rate was considered
P,"",330IFi.01 s,.tlSoclion 4,do, .01/28/0'.
4-20
'U A"O."T". ...,
MA'.. ....
""T '."'" nuDY
TUn'N,n ..MINO .u.... PL" AMINDMSNT
. conservative to represent a "worst-case" projection. A midblock arteria] volume-to-capacity (vie)
analysis provided a general overview of roadway operation under both "with" and "without project"
conditions. Intersection capacity utilization (lCU) analyses were conducted based on a.m. and p.m.
peak-hour intersection turn volumes and the intersection approach lanes. Six study intersections were
analyzed in order to address the potential impact of maintaining EI Camino Real at two lanes on other
streets and intersections. The selected study intersections were:
EI Camino Real/First Street
EI Camino Real/Main Street
EI Camino Real/Newport Avenue
Main Street/Newport Avenue
Main StreetlProspect Avenue
Prospect Avenue/First Street
See Figure 4.1 for infonnation regarding existing traffic volumes and the location of study
intersections. Figure 4.2 illustrates 2020 peak-hour traffic volumes with the project (two lanes), and
Table 4.A summarizes the intersection analysis.
The traffic study concluded the following:
All of the study intersections currently operate at acceptable levels of service (LOS) during the
a.m. and p.m. peak hours.
Year 2020 traffic conditions "without project" were evaluated and showed that acceptable LOS
values for the daily traffic analyses and the six study intersections are maintained.
Under "with project" conditions where the MPAH Amendment (two lanes on EI Camino Real) is
assumed to be in place, the street segment (daily traffic analyses) and study intersections continue
to operate at an acceptable LOS, No significant traffic impacts are anticipated as a result of the
EI Camino Real redesignation.
No significant traffic-related impacts are expected for any jurisdictions outside of the City.
b) Exceed, either indIvidually or cumulatively, a level ohervice standard establÙlhed by the
CIty congestion ma.acement agency for despted roads or highways?
No Impact The OCT A is the congestion management agency for Orange County. The Orange
County Congestion Management Plan (CMP) generally consists of a composite of submittals from
local agencies, in which each local jurisdiction develops the required data in accordance with the
guidelines established by the acTA. The OCT A compiles the data and submits the results to the
Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) for a finding of regional consistency. Based
on the success of the demonstration project and the results of the traffic study, the aCTA approved an
amendment to the MPAH to reclassify EI Camino Real between First Street and Newport Avenue to a
two-lane collector road. The proposed project is a General Plan Amendtnent to the City's Circulation
Element to create consistency with the adopted, countywide MP AH, Therefore, the proposed project
is consistent with the standard established by the congestion management agencies.
P:lctu33O\F;"oJ ""tlS..t;o" 4.doc ,01128/05"
4-2]
Resolution No, 05-61
Page 45 of 145
1STST
1900 ôE@I
,~ i~
¡¡
MAIN IT
IDQ[] ~
~
LeQend
. Study Intel'll8CllolÌ8
~ C811yTramc Volumllll
L S ^
FIGURE 4.1
NO sc.w:
Twtin/El Camino
Ezjoting Daily Volumes
(2 Lanes)
SOURCE: T<om, Study For th, Idl"" PI.. At",I.1 H;,bw.y (MPAH)
Amondmen' utE! C.mlnoR..I. WPA WJld.n,MlY 10, ¡OOI.
1:\cru33O\GID.;¡, Vol."" (711/03)
~~ I ~ ~0I244
-1- mn68 - -- -1- 641""
,1101119 -1ST IT ~t\t... ,54124
S6919R -+- ~ ¡r 16~~ ~+¡r
140/227",\ .,.: 301~ ~~@
!:! ~
i ~ ~ !II ,i;3;¡¡ I;
"':9
I i
~!~m :s~
' Ill! ~r.:;:M
~ t "'- , 64/85 ¡ r:: \. 91/132
MAIN IT .JI "'- -1- 409/etO
3=¿' ~ + ¡r 87/132.1
323143:1-+-
102/120", ~@~
i¡i'i
Legend
. Study Intel'88ctlDl1l
10/15 AMJPM Peek Hour VolulMI
LSA
FIGURE 4.2
NO 0""'"
SOURCE: Tnm, Stud, '",b. Mu", PI.. Art,,¡o! Hi,hw., (MPAH)
Amondm."orEl CaminoR.a'. WPA Wildon.Ma, 10,2001.
1:\C1U330'G\2020 Puk_", (711103)
Tustin/EI Camino
2020 Peak Hour Volume.
(With Project 2 Lane.)
Resolution No, 05-61
Page 47 of 145
LSA
1AC U330AMAmlysis S=MWYM&(71M)
TABLE 4.A
7utHn/fl Camino
Intersection Analysis Summery
City of Tustin
.SA .UOCI.TU. ,HC,
MUCH ....
...n 'H'T". nuDY
Tun'H'.. C.M,.O .O."'L PL'. 'MUDn.T
c) Result In a chance In air framc pIItterns, Ineludinc either an Increase In trafIIc levels or a
chu j:e In location that results in subitantiaJ safety risks?
No Impact. The proposed project will result in the maintenance of the existing roadway com¡guration
ofEI Camino Real between First Street and Newport Avenue. Maintaining the existing roadway
configuration will have no impact on air traffic patterns.
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous
Inteneetions) or incomplltlble uses (e.g., farm equipmeut)?
No Impet. The proposed project will result in the maintenance of the existing roadway configuration
aiEl Camino Real between First Street and Newport Avenue, There will be no change to the existing
roadway geometries or to the existing intersections. Therefore, there will be no increase in traffic
hazards.
e) ~ult lu iDadequate emel'leney accesa?
Leas Than Significant Impact. El Camino Real is identified as an existing Evacuation Route
according to Figures PS-I of the Public Safety Element of the City's General Plan. The proposed
project will result in the maintenance of the existing roadway configuration between First Street and
Newport Avenue. Current emergency access and evacuation conditions would not change as a result
of the project. Please see also response to 4.7 (g).
f) Result in Inadequate parking capacity?
No Impact. Additional pwking has been created as a result of changing El Camino Real ft'Om a four-
lane roadway to a two-lane roadway with on-street diagonal parking. The proposed General Plan
Amendment will result in the maintenance of the existing roadway configuration and therefore has a
beneficial effect on parking in the Old Town commercial district
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or prognms supportinc alternative transportation
(e.g., bUll turnouts, bicycle neks)?
No Impllct. The City provides access to several forms of alternative transportation such as buses,
walking trails, and bike paths. The Circulation Element of the City's General Plan identifies existing
public bus routes and existing and proposed bikeways. El Camino Real betw.een First Street and
Newport A venue is clllTeJ1tly served by a bus route; however, it is neither an existing or proposed
bikeway. The existing two-lane configuration with on-street diagonal parking is a more pedestrian
fi'iendly environment than the four traffic lanes that existed prior to the demonstration project. The
proposed project will maintain the existing pedestrian-oriented conditions and will not preclude
continued bus service to the study area.
P,\ctu330IFin~S""\SOC1ion4.d"",OII28IOS,
4-25
Resolution No. 05-61
Page 49 of 145
.IA A.,OC14.". 'NC.
""CH ....
Dun IN'TlA' STUDY
'US..N'" C."'NO D'N".. PLA' AM'ND"'H'
4.16 Utilities
Would the project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Rectonal Water Quality
Control Board
No Inlpact. The proposed project is to reclassify a portion of El Camino Real &om it four-lane
Secondary Arterial to a two-lane collector in the Circulation Elementoftlie City's General Plan. The
proposed project will not add new structures in the area, increase population in the area, or require
construction. Therefore, utilities will not be affected by implementation of the proposed project,
b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or
expansion of existing fadUties, the construction of which could cause significant
environmental efl'eetJ?
No Impact. Refer to Response 4. I 6(a), above.
c) Reqnire or result in theconstrnction of new storm water drainage facilities'or expansion of
existing facl.lities. the construction of whicb could canae significant environmental effects?
No Impact. Refer to Response 4. I 6(a), above.
d) Have sufficient water luppliCII available to serve the project from eDIting entitlements and
resourees, or are new or expanded entitlemenu needed?
No Impact. Refer to Response 4.16(8), above.
e) Resnlt in a determination by the wastewater treat~ent provIder whicb serves or may serve
the project that It has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition
to tbe provider's exi.tting commitments?
No Impact. Refer to Response 4.16(a), above.
f) Be served by a landrlll with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid
waste diaposal needs?
No Impact. Refer to Response 4.16(a), above,
g) Comply with federal. state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste?
No Impact. Refer to Response 4.16(a), above.
P:\ctu33O\Finaj Sen¡ISoct;on 4.do< «OlnBlOS»
4-26
LOA n'.CIAT". INC,
MUCH IOU
"A" 'NITIAL ITVD'
TVlTlNln CAMINO ."0'" PLAN AMONOMONT
h) Wollld the project Include a new or retrofitted storm water treatment control Belt
Maluq:ement Practice (BMP) (e.e. water quality treatment bula, constructed treatment
wetlands), the o~ration ofwbich collld result in lipiflcant environmental effem (e.g.
Increased vecton and odon)?
No Impact. The proposed project is a General Plan Amendment that will allow the continuation of
the existing roadway configuration. There will be no change to existing storm water runoff_ent
as a result of the project, and therefore no implementation of new or retrofitted stonn water treatment
control measures.
4.17 Mandatory Findings of Significance
a) Does the project have the potential to deerade the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause .. fish or wildlife popnlation to drop
below self-sustaining levels, threaten to elimInate a plant or animal community, rednce the
number or"'l'eltrict the range of a rare o.r endanllered plant or animal or eliminate
Important examples oethe major periods of California hÎltory or prehlatory?
No Impact. The proposed project will result in the maintenance of the existing ro8dway configuration
fòr the segment ofEI Camino Real between First Street and Newport Avenue. Sensitive species and
cultural resources are not present within the existing right-of-way of the roadway.
b) Does the project have impacta that are Individually limited, but cumnlatively considerable?
Cumulatively considerable meaJIII that the l.acremental effecta of a project are considerable
when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current pro-
jects, and the effects of probable future projects)?
No Impact. The proposed General Plan Amendment wilI allow the existing configuration of the street
to remain, without adversely affecting nearby streets or intersections. The project will not make any
substantial adverse contributions to cumulative impacts. The project may result in beneficial effects
on land uses adjacent to the roadway and bas been demonstrated to enhance revitalization of the Old
Town area by supporting pedestrian orientation of the commercial district
c) Does the project have environmental effects, which will cause snbstantial adverse effecta on
human beings, either directly or l.adlrectly?
No Impact The proposed downgrading of this segment ofEI Camino Real will further the goals of
the Land Use Eletnent of the General Plan and support the continued revitalization of the Old Town
district. There are no substantial direct or indirect adverse effects.
P:\c!u33O\F',,' SentlS",tloo 4.'°' ""12810S»
4-27
Resolution No. 05-61
Page 51 of 145
.IA UIOCI"". INC.
""CN '"'
.un INITIAL ITODT
TUITINII. CAMINO 0""'. ..,. ""'.""T
APPENDIX A
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
P,ICTU3301SENl\Ap"..dix.doc «0311 512005"
Secondary: A four-lane undivided roadway, with a typical right-of-way
width of 80 feet and a curb-to-curb pavement width of 64 feet. These
roadways serve as collectors, distributing traffic between local streets, and
major and primary arterials. For the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan. SO-foot
right-of-way was modified to a 92-foot right-of-way to provide a painted
median for two-way left turn lanes and Class n bicycle lanes.
Collector: A two-lane undivided roadwav. with a minimum ri!!ht-of-wav
width of 66 feet and a minimum curb-to-curb width of 50 feet. The width
mav be increased to acCommodate roadwavfcatures such as bicYCle lanes. on-
street parkin!!. and turn lanes. At LOS "C." this road Me accommodates UP
to apmoximatelv 10.000 vehicle trips Der dav. This road functions as a
collector facilitY. however it tends to move traffic between two arterials rather
than between local streets. it has been added to the CitY's arterial hillhwav
svstem because it orovides network continuitY and is rel!ÌonaJIv sil!Dificant.
and mav serve throu!!h traffic demand where nroiected volumes do not
warrant a hil!hcr classification such as Secondary.
The Circulation Element roadway classification system does nÓt include
private streets. Private street" widths and cross-sections will vary from those
described for roadways in this Element. Standard cross-sections represent the
obvious and accepted answer to most situations. However, the standard
cross-sections do not always provide the best solution to any given need or
set of objectives. Reasonable flexibility and variety is provided for in the
City's private street standards.
Figure C-l shows schematic cross sections of each category of arterial
roadway. These sections represent desirable standards, but variation in right-
of-way width and specific road improvements will occur in certain cases due
to physical constraints and/or right-of-way limitations. In particular, the
median width in eight-lane, six-lane and four-lane roadways will vary
according to the area being served and the available right-of-way constraints
and turn lane requirements. Hence, any of the arterial classifications may
deviate from the standards where physical constraints exist or where
preservation of community character diCtates special treatment. Bikeway
facilities are another factor which affect the specific standards applied for
various facilities.
The desirable goal for every classified street section is that it carry the
designed volume of traffic at the desired level of service. Within this
requirement, descriptions of width and facilities arc offered as basic
guidelines and as noted above, variation in design is expected, depending on
CITY OF TUSTIN
GENERAL PLAN
20
CIRCULATION ELEMENT
Aprl118,2oo5
Resolution No. 05-61
Page 53 of 145
~I
~
.':
. '
72'
sa'
rfj'
¡----¡ ,
, 72'
50' '
I~
'~
i-LANE MAJOR ARTBRIAL 144' :R/V!!
H
~
::
I~
::
rl
r-
r--J
6-LANB MAJOR ARTBRIAL 120' RIW
r-I
----..
:~:
Ibl
:~:
rl
r-.
,~
PRIMARY AR'l'BRlAL 100' RIW,
)
-h
--,."",
-
48'
38'
:
I
48'
3(1'
rl
~
, SECONDARY ARTBRIAL 92' RIW
(WmI CLASS IT BICYCLB LANES)
rt-::
-
I
:: j:J
-
SECONDARY AR'l'BRlAL so', R/W ,
h' ~:
~
~. ,rl
---.r-
COLLEC;OR ARTERIAL 66' RIW
SOURCE: Aus~o-Foust Associates, tnc,
City ofTus~n '
)
IIlJJ~Dn~
GENERAL PLAN ~
Marohl!,2005
21
. Figure C-1
Typical Cross-Seqtions
TlbleC4
LAND US! AND TRIP G!!NI!RATION SUMMARY
-1993 - -PIIIuno.-
Loa4 U.. Colopy Ullill AmouIII ADT -. ADT
1. crTYOPTUSTIN 1. Raid..llw DU 17,604 148.213 Z9,790 :/50,67Z
2, CommaciII/OftIœ, TSI' 1l.9Z6 27'.434 28"55 625.744
3, 01her 43,241 79,197
Sub-Toll! 466.888 955.613
Z- SPHBRBOPINPLUBNCE 1. Residcoda1 DU 8.146 101.043 8.363 103.343
2, Common:iIVO!!\o, !SP 7S 2"13 113 2,4ßl
3, Oilier 19.089 19.635
Sub-Toll! 1Z2,645 12S,445
TOTAL 1,- DU 25,750 249,2S6 38.1S3 3S4,01S
2, CommerciaJIOffid, !SF 12.001 'r/7,947 Z8.668 628,211
3. Other 6Z-330 98.832
SIIb-TocaI 589"33 I.OBI.as8
N"': DU = DwdIiD¡UullI, !SF = _dS~ Pee<, ADT. A_Daily Tnffic
'[be "OdI""_...~ refcn 10_, cI1111'd1D1, boIpiIIII,boIds, >lID. eJc., whic;h douotba...aquareroutbued!rip
.... (... trip.... in AppcadIx A). '[be - fDDllp, 0I 1Ii'I8I00II1JO oIIDwII in pu"'-' 10 provide """'~1aIcy widl the dall
pv," in the Loa4 U..1!IemaII.
Source: Cityof'IUl1inOt:ocn!PiaD _TrIllo SJudy, _Foul_, 0cI0b0r 1m.
GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION SYSTEM
The goals and policies included in this Element emphasize the need for a circulation
system that is capable of serving both existing and future residents while preserving
community values and character. The location, design, and constituent modes of the
circulation system have major impacts on air quality, noise. community appearancé. and
other elements of the environment.
The highway network designated in the Arterial Highway Plan is illustrated in Figure C-
2, and indicates all of the designated Major arterials, Primary arterials, Secondary
arterials, Collector arterials, and the sections of roadway designated for modified right-
of-way or augmented capacity, Table C-S provides an additional description of the
Arterial Highway Plan links. Discussions on sections of roadway for which these two
qualifiers are proposed as follows:
CITY OF TUSTIN
GENERAL PLAN
Z7
CIRCULATION ELEMENT
April 18,2005
Resolution No. 05-61
Page 55 of 145
II .
,... ~ .,.
r-.,.""
J
I
. E
.1
! I 1"1
~
~.
~
LEGEND
- Major (8 la..,)
- Major (6Ia.0$)
-.- Modified Major (6Ia....)
--- 'rimuy (4 Ja...)
-.- Modified Pri¡nary (4 I....}
-; Secondary (4 or 2 Jane.)
---t AUSJllODted RoadwlY'
~ City Boundary
... , , ..¡ PI&DIIÎI1g Area Boundary
-.C-- Collector (2 lanes)
1-
NORTH nollo scale
SOURCE: Austin-Foust Associates, Inc.
City of Tustin
Figure 0-2
Arterial Highway Plan
Ole!! II
!:'~~2', 2005
28
(
. TABLEC.S
ARTERIAL HIGHWAY
Unk Classification Link Classification
Armslroll¡/ro Loop Rd N S.......wy 1M.. wlo Varba M~or (A)
AnnoUOlll 11o W..... SC<Olldary lrviDe wlo ProIpect M~or (A)
AnIII"""I Dlo Bunn'" ' Sec:œdlry Irvine elD Proopoct Majœ
lrvineeioHait Major
IIaITaaca 010 Red Hill M~or 1M.. 010 Newport ~(M.A)
- WID Vœ Køman ~or 1M.. wlo Red Hill ~or(M.A)
Bamoca WiD Jomboroe Major Iriioe WID Browaioa ~or(M,A)
Iriioe wlo TuIdD - ~or(A)
BrowDiD¡ 110 Irvine SccœdIry Irvine 010 Tuslin - Ml,jor
BrowDiD¡ liD Bryu ScccxØry Irvinew/oJamboree M~or
BrowDiD¡ DID Nisson SecoadaI)' Jomboroe DID Tuldn Ranch RAt Major
BrowDiD¡ 110 N;"œ Secoadory Jambor.. 110 TuIIiD - Rood Ml,jor
8ryu oIoNewport SC<OIIdary
Bryu WiD Red Hill SecoadaI)' J- % PortoIa ,~or
Bryu wID IkowoiD¡ SC<Olldary Jamboree liD Iriioe M~or(A)
B.,an wID TuIdD - Primory Jamboree liD IIryu Major (A)
B.,an wiD MyfonI Primory J- liD EI Camino ~or(A)
B.,an wiD Jamboree Primory JomboreelloWalmJt Ml,jor
JomboRoJ/oBdiD¡a' Ml,jor
001 A11!IJ liD BdiD¡a' SccœdIry - J_IIoWomer ~or
BasI Coomcctor J/o I!<ÜIIF SecoadaI)' Loop Rd 010 Red Hill S.......wy
Loop Rd N elo AnIII-1 SC<OIIdary
I!<ÜIIF wID Del Amo Major Loop Rd wID TuIIiD - Soooodary
I!<ÜIIF wID Rod mu Major Loop Rd N 010 Tuslia - Sccœduy
EdiDgeroioRedHill Major Loop Rd J/o Wamer Soc:œdary
I!<ÜIIF WiD Tu.1iI' - ~or Loop Rd S elD Tullio RsDch SccoIIdary
Edinaer 010 Tullio Rsøch Major Loop RdS do Anns1rOl1l Secoadaiy
Bdin¡e< WID Jambor.. ~or
I!<ÜIIF elo Jam- Major Maio wiD BI Camino Real Primory
Maio elo EI Camino Real Primory
BI Camino 11o I" ~ Maio do Prospect Secœdlry
BI eam;oo liD Main ~ Maio do Newport Primary
BI Camino riD Newpon Secoadory Primory
EI Camino do Rod Hill Sccoodlry McPaddeo WiD Wi\IiIms Primory
EI Camioo 010 BJ'OWIIÌD¡ SC<OIIdary McI'sddeoeloWdJiams
EI Camino olD TuIdD Rancb SecoadaI)'
II! Camino riD MyfonI Primory M- wlo Wainot Primory
M_w/oNewport Primory
I" WiD V- Primory
I" elo Varba Primory Myfordllolriioe SOOODduy
I" wID Proopect Primory MyfonIIID 8.,an Secoadory
I' wID Newport Primory M)'forð 110 BI Camino Real Secoadory
M~DlDWainDt Secoodary
Horvuð Dlo ICD Socoodlry
H.....SId J/o ¡CD Primory Newport elD Irvine Primory (A)
Horvud Dlo W""'" Primory Newport % HoI! Primary (A)
NewportJ/oHoII Primory (A)
HoitJ/o 17" S=mdary Newport 110 1. Primory (A)
Holt J/o Irvioe 8lvð. SecoadIry Newport elD Malo Primory (A)
Newport 010 BI CamiDo Roa! Primal)' (A)
Newport 11o BI Camino Primory (A)
CITY OF TUSTIN
GENERAL PLAN
29
CIRCULATION ELEMENT
APRIL 18, 2005
Resolution No, 05-61
Page 57 of 145
LOA "..C"".. '.C.
MAa.K "..
.un '.ITln noOY
TOn,.,n C'MO.. .'."AL PL,. .M'..M'.T
'-
APPENDIX B
TRAFFIC STUDY
P.,cru330\SENT\Appendix.doc ,O311SI200S,
TUSTIN PUBUC WORKS DEPT.
TRAFFIC STUDY
FOR THE , ,
MASTER PLAN OF ARTERIAL .HIGHWA Y(MPAH)
AMENDMENT OF EL CAMINO REAL
Prépared for:
City of Tùstln. & . OCT A
P~pered by:
WPAlWIliden '
27042 Towne Centre Drive, Suite 270'
Foothill Rench, California 92610 .
May 10, 2001
Resolution No, 05-61
Page 59 of 145
W ~~~u~R~~
27042 Towne eon.. Driw, Suite 270
foothill !lancÞ,Clllfomil92610
9491470-88o<O/ox 949/770-9041
www,wllldaÌl.com
May 10, 2001
Mr. Douglas Anderson
Senior Project Manager - Transportation
City of Tustin '
300 Centennial Way
Tustin, CA 92680
SUBJECT:
TRAFFIC STUDY FOR THE MASTER PLAN OF ARTERIAL HIGHWAYS
(MPAH) AMENDMENT OF EL CAMINO REAL '
Dear t,IIr. Anderson:
The enclosed Traffic Study presems a summary of our traffic analyses arid fb1dJngà related to
the propos~ MPAH Am,endment 01 EI Camino Reàl for the section ,?ted between FIrst
Street and Newport Avenuè, 'In the City of Tustin. The8a analyses are based upOn field '
studies conductSd by our staff, Information provided by the, City of Tustin, long range traffic
mode,l data, previously completed ,studies and standard reference materials. The primary,
purpose of this evaluation is to Identify any potential traffic Impacts that may result from the
project and recommend mitigation measures as may be nec;essary., These ,analyses can
serve to determine If acceptable traffic operations can be maintained 'for' both current and
future conditions, If the proposed project Is implemented.
We appreciate the opportunity to serve you, through our work on this Important project. If we
can be of further assista~ or need to respond to any questions, please do not hesitate to
contact us. W é trust that this study wilt be of assistance to 'oCT A and the CIty of Tustin.
Respectfully submitted,
WPA TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
A Division of Willdan
,~~ d~.
¡;'t"e~~. Sasak!, P.E. .
Registered Professional Engineer,
State of Callfomla NumberS C52768 & TR1462
TABLE OF CONTENTS
DESCRIPTION
PAGE NUMBER
INTRODUCTION.....................................................""""""""',"""""""" ......1
PROJECT DESCRIPT/ON............................;...................................................1
EXIST/NGDESCRIPTION............. ........... ~.. ............ ..,... ...... ........................ .....4
EI Camino Rea/.............".......................~...............................................4'
Newport Avenue...... .................. ........................ ....................................4
Main Street.... ...........................................,.............. ..;.........,....... .........7
First Street....... .............. .....................................,.. ............... .....,. ........7
- -
Prospect Avenue................................. ..................................................7
Dally Traffic Analyses...... """""""""""""""""""'" "","""""""" .... .....8
Intersection Analyses.................. ............................ .............................. 13
FUTURE CONDITIONS WITHOUT PROJECT............;....................................... 14
Traffic ProjectIon Methodology........ ........................... ....... .......... .... ........ '15
Daily Traffic Analyses...........................................................................20
Intersf!ctlon Analyses..............."""""""""""""""""",;"""""............,.20
FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT..........................................................2O
Daily Traffic Anatyses..............................""",;""""""""""".................24
Intersection Analyses................................................................... .........24
IMPACTS TO OTHIERJURISDIQTIONS............................................................24
SUMMARY................................,..........................,...................'...................25
WPA Traffic EnglnHring
(A Division of Wllidan)
Job # 12680
EI CamIno Rul MPAH AmandlHÐt
City of Tuslln
Resolution No, 05-61
Page 61 of 145
I
FIG. NO.
I'
1
2
3 '
4
5
6
"7
8
9
10
11
12
LIST OF RGURES
DESCRIPTION
PAGE NO.
SITE MAP....................................................................................2
EL CAMINO REAL ROADWA Y CONFIGURATION..............................3
, ' , '
EXISTING MPAH ROADWAY NETWORK..............................:..........5
. ÒLD TOWN COMMl=RCIAL DISTRICT BOUNDARIES........................6
STUDY INTERSECTION LOCATIONS.............................................9
EXISTING DAIL Y VOLUMES (2 LANES).........................................10
EXISTING PEAK HOUR VOLUMES (2 LANES).................._............11
REDISTRIBUTION OF FUTURE TRIPS (4 LANES)..................:........ 17
YEAR 2020 DAILY VOLUMES (WIO PROJECT. 4 LANES)................. 18
YEAR 2Ò20 PEAK HOUR VOLUMES (W/O PROJECr'- 4 LAÀlES)......19
YEAR 2020 DAILY VOLUMES (WIPROJECT -2L.ANES)................,..22
YEAR 2020 PEAK HOUR VOLUMES (W/PROJECT - 2 LANES)........ .23
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE NO. DESCRIPTION
PAGE NO.
1
2
DAILY TRAFFIC ANAL YSES SUMMARY....................:................... 12'
INTERSECTION ANAL YSES SUMMARY........................................21
/I
ëJ CamIno Re.' MPAH Amendm8l'lt
City of Tu8tln
WPA Tl'8fflc engineering
(A Dlvl.lon of Wllld.n)
Job /I 72680
INTROOUCTION
This report present¡ a summary of our traffic analyses and findings related to the proposØd
MPAH Amendment of 8 Camino Real for the section located between First Street and Newport
Avenue, In the City of Tustin. These analyses are based upon field studies conducted by our
staff, Information, provided by the City of. Tustin, long range traffic model data" previously
completed studies and standard reference materials. The primary purpose Of this evaluatiçm Is
to Identify any pot6l'!tlal traffic impacts that may result from the project and, recommend
mitigation. measures as may be necessary. It Is important to determine If. acceptable traffic
operations can bè maintained for both current and future conditions, If the proposed project Is
Implemented. .
,PROJECT DESCRIPTION ,
This report analyzes the effects of amending a stres! segment of 8 ~o Real between First
Street and Newport Avenue from a four lane .Secondary" arterial to a two lane "local" coilector
roadway. This rolRÌway ,segment of EI Camino Real has a north-south afignment before It
transitions to a northwest-southeasterly alignment between Sixth Street and Newport Avenue.
The overall study street segment, of 8. Camino Real Is also located within the" City of Tustin's
Old Town Commercial District, which supports a mixture of retail and ~mel'åaJ uses Including
various public Improvementa to provide a more pedestrian oriented' environment FlgUl'f 1
illustrates the location of the pròposed project In relationship to the surrounding strest system.
In November 1997, the City of Tustin, In coordination with the Orange County Transportation
Authority (OCT A), approved a demonstration project to reduce the number of traveUanes on EJ
Camino Real between Second Street to Sixth Street from a four lane undivided Secondary
arterial street to a two lane undivided Local collector street with diagonal parking along both
sides of the street (Figure 2 provides a representation of the EI Camino Real study section).
With more than three years at experience sInce Its Implementation, the existing and future
Impacts of the proposed Amendmsnt are better defined.. The potential operations of EI Camino
Real and the surrounding roadway. network, resulting from the proposed Amendment and
change In the roadway capacity (on EI Camino Real) is documented and. summarized In the
following sections of this report.
WPA Traffic engIneering
(A Division of Wllldan)
Job # 12680
EI Csmlno R.., MPAH Amandmant
Cily of TuaUn
Resolution No, 05-61
Page 63 of 145
D
,H STRIMT.. i S
E L CAM 1.N.Cr R E AL
4—� ■
1 i i
j
FIGURE 2
EL CAMINO RE ROADWAY CONFIGURATION
.CITY OF TUS7'IId. CAI�OR?TIA- AI-
1°��"O1Y"� DSPAR7Li17T'OF.PUDLk' vomm FlRST.STREET iQ) SOUTH of SIXTH STREET
,Lf)
I�
L�
00
0 L
Z
zz ca
-5 a
0
N
N
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The existing conditions serve to provide a .prevfew" of the effects of the proposed MPAH
, '
Amendment (two lanes) on EI Camino Real. This roadway has been operating under geometry,
consistent with. the proposed MPAH Amendment conditions, for sE!veral years. This allows '
'stronger documentation of the potential Impacts of the project, since the future operations
presently exist and the analyses are based on conditions measured In the field (through counts),
which are representative of the proposed MPAH Amendment conditions.
The existing MPAH Is Illustrated ,In FIgure 3, which reflects a four-lane roadway for the study
section. This also pròvldes an overview of the atudy section and Its relationship to other Master
Plan roadways. The number of lanes and candfttons Indicated In FlguÍ'8 3 ara not necessarily
representative of _existing field conditions, but show the ,current long-range plan. The current
status of some pertineÌ1t study area rcads and their operations, are further addressed below.
It is also Important to note 'that EI Camino Fl9alls central to the Old Town commercial district as -,
Illustrated In FIgure 4. A revitalization plan for the Old Town area was developed by the City of
Tustin In approximately 1991 and many elements can -presently be seen in the area. There are
on-going efforts to continue, Implementation' of the plans and a significant element Is the
, proposed MPAH Amendment for EI Camino Real, There was a significant amount of focus on
this roadway and the development, which, Is and would be adjacent to EI CamIno Real.
EI Camino Real presently has two undivided lanes from Sixth Street to Second Street and has
a general north-south alignment. Four travel lanes are provided north and south of this section.
On-street diagonal parking is available on both sides of EI Camino Real through the two-Iane
section, with some restrictions. EI Camino Real south of Sixth Street curves into a nor!hwest-
southeast alignment and is a four lane undivided roadway with no on-street parking. A speed
limit of 25 miles per hour (MPH) Is posted. The proposed project would result In maintenance of
this roadway configuration as a two-lane undivided roadway with on-street diagonal parking.
Previously, this roadway segment on EI Camino Real was a four-lane undivided arterial street
with parallel on-street parking.
NewIJort Avenue is it four-lane divided roadway In the study area and has a general northeast-
southwest direction. A raised median divides the four travel lanes with 35 miles per hour (MPH).
WPA ,Traffic Engineering
(A Divis/on of Wllldln)
Job 1/12680
4
EI CimIno Rul MPAH Amendment
City of Tuelln
en
....
-~
No !c81.
~
Ii; 2ND I ~
~ 2C
.. () 9J
I, " ..
3RD
0 ~ ~ 2C
N
E MAIN In..
4P 4P
t) 9J I
N
61H aT
2C . 2C
01
IRVINE B~VO
6M
.8M
:~
z
¡.:¡
'!11
ì ~
4P
4P ,
E 1STST
4P
I
Legend
8M MAJOR (6 LANES)
4P PRIMARY (4 LANES, DIVIDED)
4S SECONDARY (4 LANES, UNDIVIDED)
2C LOCAL COLLECTOR (2 LANES)
EI Camino Real MPAH Amendment
I ~DRjfJlL~NG WEERrnG
FIGURE 3
Existing MHAH Roadway Network
Resolution No. 05-61
Page 67 of 145
speed limit posted. No on-street parking Is allowed. Newport Avenue provides ramp
connections at the 1.5 Freeway for ,travel to and from the north. The Southem terminus of
Newport Road is presently south of Sycamore Avenue, Just northof the railroad tracks.
Main StrHtis a two-lane undivided roadway In the Immediate study ar$a and has an east-west
direction. The posted speed limit IS 35 miles per hour (MPH). On-street parking Is allowed with
some restrictions. To thewest, Main Street becomes Chestnut Avenue In the City Of Santa Ana
and terminates at Grand AvenLie. In an easterly direction, there' are four travel lanes ,east of
Preble and Main Street transitions to become Bryan Avenue.
First Stre.t Is a' four-lane divided roadway 111 the study area and has a general east.west
direction. A two-way lefttUm ,lane divide!! the four travel'lanes In the stL¡dy area and the posted
speed limit Is 30 miles per hour (MPH). On-street parking Is allowed with some restrictlons~ To
the west, Arst Street ccmtlnues through the City of -šanta Ana and eventUally becomes Boisa
Avenue. To the east, First Street terminates In Tustin at Red Hili Avenue.
Pro,øect Avenue Is a' two-Iane undivided roadway between Main :::¡treet \me southerly
tennlnus) and first Street WIth a north.south alignment. A speed limit of 25 miles per hour
(MPH) Is posted. On-street parking is allowed with no restrictions in the two-lane section. To
the north 01 First Street, Prospect continues as a four lane divided roadway to 17" Street, where
there is an .offset" before It continues further to the north.
Prior to evaluation of the existing conditions, It Is necessary to determlnè the scope of work for
the proposed,pro!ect. In compliance with OCTA procedures and policies regardIng reque$lSfor
MPAH Amendments, the City of Tustin developed a scope of work with OCTA as part of the
Cooperative Study Agreement. Pursuant to the agreed upon scope betWeen the aCTA and
City Staff, six study intersections were analyzed In order to address the potential Impact of the
project. Th,e study Intersections are:
WPA T,,"lc Englneetlng
(A Dlv/s/an af WlIIdan)
Jab # 12680
7
EI Camino Real MPAH Amendment
City at Tustin
Resolution No, 05-61
Page 69 of 145
.
.
.
.
.
.
EI Camino Real I First Street
EJ Camino Real ¡ Main Street
EI Camino RealI Newport Avenue
Main Street I Newport Avenue
Main Street I Prospect Avenue
Prospf¡Ct Avenue I First Street,
ExIsting field data were collecte(j'for use In the analyses, which Included the Infonnatfon shown
. '
In FIgure 5. These existing approach lanes (FiguTfI 5) at the study Intersections are critical to
the Intersection analyses and In addition, factors such as driveway locations; type of adjacent
development, general circulation patterns and other related information were noted but not
illustrated. The existing conditions analYlles, also required collection of existing dally traffic
volumes and AMlPM peak hour counts at the six study intersections, which can be referenced In
FIgures 6 snd 7, Fespectlvely.. The dally traffic count information serves to provide more
general evaluations of roadway operations to supplement the more detailed existing (and future)
intersection analyses.
DaIlY TTflfflc AI1IIIv...
The dally volume traffic analyses provide a general assessment of the current roadway
conditions and can serve as a "baseline" for evaluation of the project related Impacts~ ThesÈl
analyses were based on current dally traffic volumes, compared to the existing roadway
capacities established by the County of Orenge, as well as previously Included In the Orsnge
County Congestion Management Program (CMP) document. The CMP previously råqulred mid-
block analyses as a part of the CIty's annual reporting proCedures. The existing dally volumes
used are based on the most recent counts conducted by the City of Tustin. Tsble 1 includes
the County daily traffic "Capacities", applicable to the varying types of existing roadway
segments found In the study area.
The dally capacities shown In Tabla 1 are representative of maximum roadway operations
(Level of Service "Ej and serves as a base for volume to capacity reviews. The street segment
roadway operations are typically evaluated through 'Comparison of existing. dally traffic volumes,
divided by the theoretical (LOS E) capacities in order to provide a volume to capacity (VlC) ratio.
This V/C ratio then provides a measure for evaluating the roadway performance. Ranges of
V/C ratios relate to varying Leve!s of Service (LOS), which is further explained below. For the
WPA Tflfflc; Eng/noerlng
(A Dlvlalon of WI/ldan)
Job' 12680
B
EI Camino Rea/ MPAH Amendlllllnt
. City of Tustin
-- \..
--
-- ~~'" 7
(" 1STST
~. "I" .¿. . ,,~
~ T'
'i
~
I, I !
ïiI
~ ~ ..),.., ^ \..
. (" MAIN ST . --
I, f --11" .J
~
¡ -
Legend
. Study Interse'Ctlons
EI Camino Real MPAH Amendment
I F~J!GINE~RrnG
FIGURE 5
, Study Intersections
Resolution No, 05-61
Page 71 of 145
, ,
19000
1STSI'
119,0001
~~.
I~
III
i~
Œ@]
MAIo! IT
~
I:
I
I,
.\
)
¡
]
I
I
!
]
, EI Camino Real MPAH Amendment
I wprÏRAFFI~ ENGINEERING
I A DIVISION OF WlLLDAN
~
Legend,
. Study Interaectlon8
~ Dally Traffic Volumes
FIGURE 6 '
Existing D"aily Volumes
(2 Lanes)
N
O
0 ,p O
m �
wo
0 0
-T
A m
U1 �
TABLE 1
DAILY TRAFFIC ANALYSIS SUMMARY
(a) If the MPAH Amendment "Project' Is nol Implemented, there are four lanes.
(b) If the MPAHAmendment'ProW is Implemented, there are two lanes.
(c) SOURCE: County of Orange and Orange County CMP documents.
El Camino Real ffgjR
--NeW ort to Main
• Two Lanes, Undivided
• Four Lanes Undivided
—Main to 1
15,000
25,000
8,100
ti,i00
0.54-A.
0.32-A
11,400
(a)
0.46A
9,900
p,g�g
b
• Two Lanes, Undivided
• Four Lanes Undivided
15,000
25,000
6,000
6,000
0.40-A
0.24-A
-6,000.
(a
0.32-A
7,300
0.48.A
b)
Pros ecf Avenue
--Main to 1
• Two Lanes, Undivided
15,000
4,800
0.32,A
5,800.
0.39 A5,900
0.39-A
Main Street
—ECR to Prospect
• Two Lanes, Undivided
• Four Lanes, Divided
15,000
37,500
10,200
10,200
0.68-B
0.27 A
12,700
2,700
0.85-D
0.34-A
12,400
12,400
0:83-D
6,33-A :
1s St►eet
—ECR to Prospect
• Four Lanes, Divided
37,500
19,000
0.51-A.
22,500
0.60-A
23,200
0.62-B
(a) If the MPAH Amendment "Project' Is nol Implemented, there are four lanes.
(b) If the MPAHAmendment'ProW is Implemented, there are two lanes.
(c) SOURCE: County of Orange and Orange County CMP documents.
!
City of Tustin; a VlC ratio of 0.90, which relates to a Level of Service "0" (LOS D), has been
established as the maximum acceptable level of service for the roadway system. '
The purpose of these performance criteria Is to specify target levels of service 'on the arterial
highway system. Traffic LOS values arequalltativedescriptfons of roadway operations and
designated in terms of letters oK through of; with LOS °A" representing free flow conditions and
LOS .p representing severe traffic congestion. The portion of the overall capacity used by the
existing (and future) traffic determines the LOS assigned to a particular roadway. The City of
Tustin requirements are consistent with generelly recognized standards'of acceptable roadway
operations (LOS D, which relates to about 90 percent of the capacity). The qualitative, technical
roadway operation description for each of the LOS "'etters" Is contained In AppendIx A.
The results ofthe dally traffic-analyses are shown In T"b/e1. The VlC ratios for the study area
street system! based on the existing volumes and existing road geometry, show acCeptable
LOS results. This Is of particular relevance to the' proposed MPAH Amendment, "1¡¡nce the
reduction of roadway capaclly on EI Camino Real from a four-lime Secondary,arterlal to a two-
lane LocàI collector roadway has been In existence for several years and the effects are
reflected In Table 1. "In other words, the present roadway capacities (whiCh Include the two
lanes on EI Camino Real) provide acceptable levels 01 service lor the area streets. Table 1
shows that EI Camino .Rea! and the surrounding roadways are all operating at LOS D or better.
It should be recognized that the street seginent (mid-block) analyses are more general
indicators of uafflc operations due to the various inherent assumptions Included In these'
evaluations. The intersection analyses provide a more detailed verlflcation 01 tl'afflc conditions.
A summary of the analyses lor the study Intersections, agreed to be the focus of the evaluation
within this cooperative study between the acTA and the City of Tustin, is presented below.
IntersectIon Anlllvses
The recent AM and PM peak hour intersection counta conducted by'the City of Tustin, at the six
study intersections, served as bases for documenting existing conditions. These existing traffic
volumes were' combined with the current intersection geometric Inlormatlon, then incorporated
into the Interseciion Capàcity Utilization (ICU) methodology of intersection analysis. The ICU
methodology is the required procedure lor Orange County CMP evaluations and widely utilized
in the Southem California area.
WPA Trafflc Engineering
(A Division of Wl/ldln)
Job' 12680
13
EI CamIno Real MPAH Amendment
City of Tustin
In this methodology, the critical Intersection volumes are divIded by the available lane capacitIes
and other "lost" time Is considered, resulting I~ an .ICU value for the study location. The .ICU
value is then related to a Level of Service (LOS), which ranges from "A" (the best) to"F" (the
worst). This procedure Is very similar to the dally traffic "\lie- eVliluatlon, although the ICÙ
contains more analysis factors since the evaluation 01 intersection operations Is inherent~ more'
complex than the street segments. 'It is the City policy that LOS resultS A through D represent
acceptable opel'\!tions, while LOS E and F are considered over capacity.
The leu analyses for the existing conditions are utlnzed to determine If any elgnlflcant traffic'
impacts presently exist at the studY, area Intersections. These ICU evaluations reflect present
operations through the recent counts and current Intersection approach lanes. It shoùld be
remembered the exiSting analyses actually provide a base condition that reflects the proposed
MPAH Amendment, given the existence of the approved ECR demonstration project (two lanes
exist for the majority of the study section of ECR). '
Table 1 summarizes the results of the ICU analyses at tha six study Intersections under existing
conditions. As shown in Table 1, all the study Intarsectlons are operating at LOS e or b~r
. ,
which documents acceptable existlngoperatlona (LOS D or better) during both tha AM and PM
peak hours. Based upon the fIndIngs for existing condliJons, with EI Camino Real currently
operating as a two lane Local collector, there are no present adverse impacte or deficiencies In
peak hour performance at all study intersections. The supporting Intersection analysis
worksheets are contained in Appendix B of this study. The existing count data, which were
utilized In the analyses, can be referenced It! Appendlx.C.
FUTURE CONOmONS WITHOUT PROJECT {Current MPAH - Four Lanes on ECRJ
The evaluations of future conditions under tha current MPAH referenced previous year 2020
trl!ffic modeling efforts perfonned for the City of Tustin and also include separate analyses of
the Intersections more "intemal" to the project area. Extensive traffic modellnQ efforts wera
undertaken as a part of the Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) Tustin Disposal and Reuse Traffic
Study'. The year 2020 traffic modeling assumptions for the MCAS project included the currant
MPAH road system for the study area (I. a., ECR at four lanes) and specifically analyzad two of
the study intersections agreed to be evaluated as a part 01 this MPAH Amendment project.'
WPA r,.mc EngIneering
(A DIvIsIon of WllldlJn)
Job 1/12680
14
EI Camino Re81 MPAH Amendment
. City of rust/Ii
Resolution No, 05-61
Page 75 of 145
TrBfflc Prefect/on ~thodo/OCIf
Two study intersections (NewportlECR and Newport/Main) previously modeled and analyzed In
the MCAS report were referenced directly for the 'Without (MPAH) Project" condition. It was
determined the other four study Intersections, however, required detailed evaluations and
considerations In order to reflect future conditions 'Without the Project". These four
InterseCtions are more "internal" to the City, of Tustin and their future traffic Increases are not
expected to be as significantly Influenced by traffic generated outside the City of Tustin.
The projection of Mure 1raffic for the four "internal" intersections were determined'to be best
reflected through use of a reasonably conservative growth factor. Given the configuration of the
street system and the relatively built outcondltfon of the surrounding areas, It Is anticipated the
present traffic movements' would provide the best representation of future traffic patterns. ,The
traffic growth documented In the MCAS analyses, lit the NeWport Avenue study InterseCtions, is
shown to be In the 1.2 to 2.9 percent per year range. The Newport Avenue Intersections,
however, are antIcipated to be subject to, significantly greater through traffic Increasel;
especiallY when factors such as the extension/connection of NewpOrt Avenue to the south is
considered.
In order to provIde an accurate ,evaluation of pre-project conditions, eppropriate growth rateS
over Ii twenty-year growth perIOd were utß/zed in this study. A traffic growth rate of 1.0 percent
per year was applied to the existing volumes at the study Intersections of 1:1 Camino ReaV111
'Street and EI Camino ReaVMaln Street In these traffic analyses. A traffic growth rate of 1.0
percent per year was also applied to the existing volu~es at the ~tiJdy intE!rsØctions of Prospect
Avenue/1Jt Street and Prospect Avenue/Main Street in these analyses. These groWth rates are
intended to address ,the potential traffic Increases due to various potential projects and/or
general traffic growth In the study area. ,This provides a conservative growth rate and is
anticipated to be representative of .wom casd' projections.
For purposes of evaluating the four "intemat" study Intersections, It Is anticipated that application
of the one percent per year growth factor through the year 2020 will provide a conservative
projection of the Mure traffic volumes at these study locations. The growth factor, however, is
, "Marine Corps Air'Statlon (MCAS) Tustin Disposal and Reuse Traffic Study" Appendix B
WPA Trame EnglnHrlnll
(A Division ofWllfdanj
Job' 12680
15
EI Camino Real MPAH Amendment,
CIty at Tustin
not the only consideration required. It must be recognized the existing Intersection counts
Included the cond'rtion where EI Camino Beal has two undivided lanes for most of the study
sections. Adjustments were, therefore, required to ,assure the volumes used In these 'Without
Project" analyses .reflect four travel lanes on ECR. (It can be noted the 'Newport Avenue
Intersections' do not require adjustment for these conditions since the MCAS modeling
incorporated a four-lane condition for ECR).
Trip origin and destination patterns for traffic using ECB as a through route were developed
based upon the street system configuration" review of ECR. related traffic volumes,
consideratlÒn of the types of area land uses, potential regional attractors, the current roadway
confIguratIons, and the changes planned for the project street classification. Numerous
Individual travel routes were, examined and evaluated. An overview of, the trip ~sslgn~ent
patterns Included In the origin/destination evaluations is Rlustrated In FIgure B. .
The numerous travel routes considered specifically examined the traffic. that would be "drawn" to
ECR If four lanes were t.o be proVIded. These' "Without ProJect" analyses for the four 'nterna1'
Intersections must consider the "draw" to, ECR; since the existing counts rsfleèt ECR at. Its
present two-lane configuration (and the growth factor Is applied to these volumes). It shoulcl be
recalled, the two-modeled InterSections already included the assumption of four lanes on ECR.
and so the Figure 8 "âdJustments~ are not applicable to the' Newport Avenue IntersectIons for
the 'Without Project" conditions. '
These same principals anti considerations were also applied to the dally traffic voIum9i. The
resuttlng deny and peak hour traffic volumes are Illustrated In Flgurell 9 8nd 10. respectively.
These vplumes were then Incor¡JOrated in the same analyses that were, performed for the
, existing conditions. These evaluations will show how the future conditions compare to. the
existing operations and also will serve to provide a baseline .to measure the 'With" project
operations against.
WPA 1,a"/e Engln..rlng
(A DivisIon 0' WII/dan)
Job' 126BO
16
Eil camIno Raa¡ MPAH Amendment
CIty 0' TusUn
Resolution No, 05-61
Page 77 of 145
� � 1
m � 1
Z -2
1 1
' 1 1
-5 j -1 1 +9
t
� 0 1 � 1
< "
rl 1
1
1 1
1 1
1 +$ 1 +4
r- - - �
1
� 1
70 1 +f5
10
El Camino, Real MPAH Amendment
JOB# 126x0
M10 NNGINNNRING
A DIVISION OF WILLDAN
2ID
1
1
1
1
1
1
2 1
aT
1
1
1
1
1
1
i
3RD V
1
1
1
1
i
-3
1
+2
E IMM! T
1
-3
Edi
s
+4
I
Legend
Existing Cut -Through Route
- - - With ProJect Cut -Through
Route
N025 Percentage of El Camino Real Traffic
(Exists as 2 lanes so added traffic Is
'aWacted" for the 4 lane condlUons)
FIGURE 8
Redistribution of Future
Trips (4 Lanes)
1STST
22 500 122,5001
~~ . ~.~
t; 0
i ~ i ~
iii
MAIN ST
I ~
~
Leç¡erid
. Study Intersections
~ Dally Tre1IIc Volumes
t,
EI Camino Real MPAH Amendment
I R[~N~jJ!Gm]NG
FIGURE 9
Year 2020 Daily Volumes
Without Project 14 Lanesì
Resdlution Ño, 05-61
Page 79 of 145
\: 010 ;~@ \: 130/244
~~!
~ 777nse .-oIt" ~ .641/",
I ,. 1101'119 ,. 541'24
1STST
0/0.1 "'\ t ¡r 16~~~ "'\ t ¡r
e69l'92 -+-
1401'227, !!:~: 3D/3~~~@
, ~o=::
~' ~ ;! !11 ~:8 !;
" "','
I .' I
1D~",¡¡f i!~
~¡¡;~ \:57150 ,," I
Ie... n -+- 44Bl434 ~,~ ._>~-;,. lMD
.-01 r..... ., we , II' .... \: 91/13 ! )I ~3-
IAAlIlST ' ~ \.... ~ 4D'J/UD 160/90
35/49 ~ ~ +1"" 87/132~
3611.'3+4 -- 323/433 --
102/120, ~@~
Ì' iii;:;
Legend
. Study InterseCtIons
lD/15 AM/PM Peak Hour Volumea
'I
,I
,i
II
,I
,I
,I
,I WP Ä1RAmC ~NGINEERING
EI Camino Real MPAH Amendment
I A DNISION OF WlLLDAN
FIGURE 10
Year 2020 Peak Hour Volumes
(Without Project - 4 Lanes)
Dallv Trame Ana/vsss
Table 1, )Nhich was presented earlier in this study, provides B summary of the dally traffic
. analyses r~ults for year 202j) 'Without Project" conditions. It can be seen the study locations
maintain acceptable (LOS D or better) operations for conditions where four lanes ilre provided
on EI Camino Real; It can also be noted, these dally traffic analyses were p.erfonned based on .
both the existing road configurations and the future MPAH lanes. Acceptable operations are
noted under both geometric conditions. For EI Camino Real, only the four-lane condit/on Is
shown to clarify this Is the "Without Project" scenario.
Intersactlon Ànalv8811
The ICU worksheets çlocumel"ll the traffic volumes, approaèh lanes and analyses of the "Without
Project" traffic conditions, while the approach lanes sndvolumes used In these analyses are
also shown In FIgures 5 end S, respectively. The existing .Intersection approach lanes ara
maintained to reflect a "worst case" and the volumes provide well-documented evaluation of the .
two Newport Avenue intersections and conservative analyses of the four '1nternar Intersections.
The ICU worksheets Can be referenced In Appendbc B. As shown In Tabl. 2, acceptable LOS
results are maintained at all of the study Intersections for year 2020 "Without Project" conditions.
FUTURE CONomONS WITH PROJECT (ProDNed MPAH Amendment - 2 Lenes on ECRJ
The proposed MPAH Amendment Is considered .In this section through evaluatión of the dally
traffic conditions and detailed evaluation of the six study intersections. AS was described ,earlier,
In this study, there is a high level of confidence in the results of these "With Project" analyses,
which Include the two lane configurations. on EI Camino Real. In part. this Is due to counts that
could be taken while this configuration Is actually '1n place", aa well as considerstion of other
pertinent trsfflc related factors (i.e., the layout of the surroundIng street system, the relative built
out condition 01 the surrounding areas, etc.).
FIgures 11 end 12 present the dally and AM/PM peak hour volumes; which resulted from the
same type of analyses and considerations applied In the 'Without Project" analyses. This
serves to assure that the comparison of "With" to "Without" the Project is valid. These volumes
were then Incorporated in the same analyses that were perfòrmed for the previously considered
conditions.
WPA Traffic Engineering
(A DIvisIon of Wl/ldan)
Job Ii 12680
20
EI Camino Real MPAH Amendment
CIty 01 Tustin
Resolution No. 05-61
Page 81 of 145
TABLE 2
INTERSECTION ANALYSES SUMMARY
City of Tustin
l d
1
1st
TI&
A
0.32
A
0.47
A ...
0.39
A
0.59
A
0.38
A
0.55
Et t d
2
A
p 4,t
A
0.54
A
0.56
C
0.72
A
0.54
B
066
E Camino Rea
3
Newport Avenue
A
0.53
B
0.68
A
0.49
C
0.79
A
0.49
C'
0.77
Main Street 6
4
Ne Avenue
g
0.84
B
0.62
B
0.65
B
0.65
B
0,64
g
0.65.
Main Street &
5
Pros Avenue
A
0.39
A
0.52EA
0..48
B
0.83
A
p 44
A
0.40
PrvgpeetAvenned
A
0.43
A
0.580.52
B
1st $treatB
0.70
A
0.496
0.63
"~I
1STST
2 200 123,2001
~~ I~
, I ~
III
MAIN aT
ôbIQID 112,4001
~
Legend
. . Study Intersections
~ DaDY Tratrk: VolumllS
EI Camino Real MPAH Amer:\dment
I ~[~N~l!GIERllfG
FIGURE 11
Year 2020 Daily Volumes
With ~~~Å~t\6hß,~~-~rs)
Page 83 of 145
--'77n68
,. 110/119
,STST.
~.~~
:à Iì\ ¡y; \... 130/2+4
';;1 \... -- 64V699
T .,. 54/24
16~~ ~ + "...-
'30/38, ~~~
~ ...:g~
I -
S6'~ -..- " "...-
140/227, !!:;::¡
~ -::
! ~
~
m i
l6ì1i~¡¡ '
,::;~ ""
Ie!!!!:! ,,-57150
) -- 448/434
~t\.... ,64/95
3S/49.1 .....1.-
36'-'344-"- -, T r
1021120" ~~!!!
~~~
"'!
MAIN 8T
\Om
~~
~ ¡:: \... 91/132
..; \.... -- 4nt2!1O
97113e.J
323/433-"-
#.~~
..,..>~(I 10/10
-,/ -- 3BOI3O
, 160/90
I
I
Legend
. Study Intaraectfona
lOllS AMJPM Peak Hour Volume.
EI Camino Real MPAH Amendment
'r~lRAFfl~ ~NGrnEERrnG
A DIVJSION OF WlLlDAN
FIGURE 12
Year 2020 Peak Hour Volumes
(With Project .. 2 Lanes)
DailY Trame Analysee
The same as for the 'Wlthout Project" analyses, evaluations are provided based on bOth the
existing lanes and the future MPAH geometries. Of course, for EI Camino Real the .Proj8er Is
to provide a two-Iane configuration, so only this condition Is analyzed,for the study segments.
Table 1, which was presented ea:rt1er in this study, shows the proposed ìwo-Iane configuration
for EI Camino Real would provide ecceptable Levels of .Servlce. This Is shown to be the case
for all of the study locations under both the existing roadway and future MPAHcondltions.
Intersect/on AnalvaN
The estimated traffic growth was applied to the existing traffIC volumei so the study
Intersecti,ons could be analyzec for the 'With Project" conditions. The proper adjustments to the
study Intersections were applied, depending on their locations, as was èlescrlbed in the 'Without
projece. conditions. The volumes in FIgure 12 were then used in the IOU analyses, which were
calculated for these 'With Project" (two lanee on EI Ca~ln~ Real) analyses.. The existing
Intersection approach lanes (FIgure 5) were also utlllzåd to consIder the "worst case".
The results for these 'With Project" conditions can be referenced In Table 1. The mid-block.
, .
arterial volume-to-capaclty (V/C) analysis provides a more general overview of roadway
operations, while these Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) analyses results In 'detailed
evaluations of the intersections, which are the critical loCations of the street system. The
. '
combination of the mid-block analysis component (utHizing the daily traffic volumes and
capacities) and the ICU analyses (based on AM and PM peak hour Intersection turn volumas
and the. Intersection approach lanes) serve to provide wen documented evalustlons of the
anticipated operations and whether the proposed MPAH Amendment Is feasible and can result
In acceptable operstions for the street system. For the. proposed MPAH Amendment, !!Q
deficiencies are forecast, based on daily traffic V/C ratios or the datalled intersection analyses.
IMPACTS TO OTHER JURiSDICTIONS
Given the location of the proposed MPAH Amendment of EI Camino Real, there Is not expected
to be very significant traffic impacts on any other jurisdiction. The changes In travel due to the
proposed Amendment Eire .shown to be "local" to the City of Tustin. In addition, sinoethe
proposed . project configuration presently exists, there are well defined indications of the future
operations.
WPA TT8",C Englne.,lnl1
(A Dlvlelon of Willden)
Job /I 12680
24
EI Camino Real MPAH Amandtllflnt
City of TusUn
Resolution No, 05-61
Page 85 of 145
SUMMARY
This study has e)(8mlned traffic factors related to the reclassification (MPAH Amendment) of EI
Camino Real between FIrst Street and Newport Avenue In the City of Tustin. The project Is to
change th~ section of EI Cemlno Real from a future four-Iami Secondary arterial to a'proposed
two-lane Local roadway. It Is noted, however, the pres.ent cqnfiguratlon of EI Camino Real
between SiXth Street and Second Street Is as a two-Iane roadway.
I'
This study addresses the potential project traffic Impacts at the six designated study
Intersections, Identiflèd through agreement between OCT A and the City ofTustin. ExIsting traffic
conditions were reVIewed and quantified to provide a basis for this study. Potential year ;!O20
traffic conditions, both 'With. and 'Without" the Project were considered. ,Evaluations were
made of these future conditions and the ability of the street system to accommodate the trips
evàluated.
The following are the principal findings of these analyses:
(1) All of the study imersectlons currently operate at acceptable Levels of Service
during the AM and ,PM peak houRI:
I. EI Camino Real & 111 Street
II. EI Camino Real & Main Street
iii. EI Camino Real & Newport Avenue
Iv. Main Street & Newport Avenue
v. Main Street & Prospect Avenue
vi. Prospect Avenue & 111 Street
(2)
Year 2020 traffic conditions 'Without Project" were evaluated and It showed that
,acceptable LOS values for the daily traffic analyses and the six study
intersections are maintained.
(3)
A "worst case" analysis was used, In evaluating the future traffic impacts at the
study segments and Intersections. A -conservative growth rate was applied In the
evaluation of fUture conditions and analyses were shown for lane geometries that
presently exist.
WPA Tr8ff1c Engineering
(A DIvision of WIllden)
Job # 12680
25
EI Camino Resl MPAH Amendment
City of Tustin
(5)
(4)
Under "With Project" conditions where the MPAH Amendment (two lane on EI
Camino ReaQ Is assumed to be in plaCe, the street segment (dally traffic
analyses) study. Intersections continue to operate at acceptable Levels of
Service. No significant traffic impaéts are anticipated ae' a result of the 8
Camino Real Reclassification. . '
No significant traffic related impacts are ~xpected for any Jurisdictions outside of
the City of Tustin.
.*
WPA T,.ff/c 1;ngln.."n/l
(A alvIs/on of WI/ldsn)
Job # 12680
26
E/ CamIno Rea/ MPAH Amendm.nt
CIty of Tustin
Resolution No, 05-61
Page 87 of 145
. AP:;ÞENDIX A
EXPLANATION OF
INTERSECTiON CAPACITY UTtLIZA TION
AND
LEVEL OF SERVICE
APPENDIX A
EXPLANA nON OF INT~RSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION
The capa'city of a. street is nearly always greater between' int~ections and less at
intersections. The reason for thilt is thàt the traffic flows continuously betWeen
intersections and only part of the time at Intersections. To study InterSection capacity, a
technique known as Intersection Capacity UtIJlZaUon (ICU) has been developed. ICU
analysis consists of (a) determlolng the proportion öfsignal time neede( "fo serVe each ,
,conflicting movement; (b) summing the times, for the movements;'and (c) comparing the: .
total time required to the' time available.- For example, If for north-soUth traffic the
northbound traffic ìs 1,.0.0.0 vehicles per"hour, the southbound traffic Is 8.00 vehIcles per
hour, and'~he capacity of either approach Is 2,.0.0.0 vehicles per heur of green, then
northbound trefflc is critical and requires ,1 ,.0.00.012,.000' or 5.0 percent of the signal time.' If'
for the east-west traffic, 4.0 percent ofthe signal time Is required, then It'can be seen that
the ICU is 5.0 plus 40, or 9.0 percent. When left-tum phases exist, they are Incorporated
. Into the analysis. As ICtJ's approach 1.0.0 percent, the quality of traffic servlce'spproaches
'Level of Servlœ (LOS) E, as defi~ed In the HléJhw8Y, CsoscltV Menua/, Special Report 87,
Highway Research Board, 1 ~5.
Level of Service Is'used to describe quality of traffic flow. Levels of Service A to C operate
quite well. Level of Service D Is typicellythe Level of Service for Which an urban street is
designed. Level of Service E is the maximum volume a facUlty can accommodate and will
result In possible stoppages of momentary duration. Level of ServiceF occurs when a
facility is overloaded an~ is chsracterlz!"d by stop,-and.:.go traffic with stoppages of long
duration. A description of-the various Levels of Service appears on the-following, page.
,The ICU calculations assume that an intersection II! signalized and that the. signal Is Ideally
timed. It is possible to have an ICU well below'1.0, yet have severe ~c congestion.
This would occur because one or more movements is' not getting enough time to satisfy Its
demand, with excess time existing on other moves. Although calculating leu for an
unsig"alized intersection is not necessarily valid, Itcal'1 be performed with the presumptlQn
that s signal can be installed and the calculations show whether the geometries are.
capable of accommodating the expected volumes. .
Capacity is often defined in terms of roadway width. However, standard lanes have
approximately the same capacity whether they are .11 foot or 14 foot lanes. Our data
indicates that a typical lane, whether a through lane or a left-turn lane, has a capacity as
high as approximately 22.0.0 vehicles per lane per,hour of green time. The 1985 Hiahwav
Csoacitv Manuaifound capacities of 1800 vehicles per lane per hour of green time. These
studieS show that values in the 160.0 to 1700 range should result In a conservative
analysis.
Resolution No, 05-61
Page 89 of 145
APPENDIX A
LEVEL OF SERVICE DESCRIPTIONS
FOR INTERSECTIONS
A
B
I,-
c
D
E
F
, 'Low volumes; high speeds; speed not restricted by other vehicles; elf
slgnat cycles clear with no vehicles; all, signal cycles cleer with no'
vehicles waiting through more than one signal cycle.
OpereUng speeds beginning to be affected byothertrafflc; between
one and ten percent of the' signal cycles have one or more vehicles
which walt through more than one signal cycle during peak trefflc
periods.' '
OperaUng speeds and maneuverability closely controlled "yother
'traffic; between 11 and 30 percent of the signal cycles have one or
'more vehicles which walt through more than 'one signa/ cycle during
peak traffic periòds; recommended Ideal design standard.
Tolerable operating speeds; 31 to 70 percent of the signal cycles
have one or more vehIcles which walt through more than one signal
cycle during traffic periods; often used as design standard in urben
arees. '
Capacity; the maximum traffic volumes an intarsectlon can
accommodate; restricted speeds; 71 to 100 percent of the signal
cycles have one or more vehicles which walt through more than one
signal cycle during peak traffic periods. ' '
Long queues of traffic; unstable flow; stoppages of long' duration;
traffic volume and traffic speed can drop to zero; traffic volume, will be
less than the volume which occurs at Level of SeNice E.
, 0.O~0.60
0.61-0.70
0.71-0.80
0.81-0.90
0.91-1.00
Not Meaningful
(a)
ICU (Intersection Capacity Utilization) at various Levels of Service versus Level of Service E
for urban arterial streets.
SOURCE:
HiGhway CaDacity Manua/; Special Report 87; Highway Research Board; 1965.
AP PEN,DlX B
INTERseCTION ANALYSES
WORKSH'EETS
Resolution No, 05-61
Page 91 of 145
WTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS
ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME
TTKsH Cmrdm Red Reder9Y�a'
11wi
PROJECT:
.rY=ie.e=iN9I
NTERVAL-
ECR a td •
1 -
NTERSECTION:
OAS 1
-- _
lull
0.00
pill II
AAI
1111 MOVEMIENT 1111 EMT 0 PROP Op
1111
0.19
NII LANES N LAWS 111
WI •----
111-m-• 1
— 111
1111
NL
111 1 II
0. IN
PIN
HT
NI0 01
01110
IIB
NR
11111 ' 1 N
OWN
101
SL
101 01
0100
IIII
ST
101 OR
01011
Ilia
SR
101 0 1
011111
11111
EL
101 t1
0011
011
ET
lull 2 1
0 011
1101
ER
001 1 N
coal
IIIA
WL
10 t-1
0011
Iw
WT
0 z 1
0111
MA
WR
tl11 0 1
0 AIR
ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME
TTKsH Cmrdm Red Reder9Y�a'
11wi
m .. Y®YiY
001
.rY=ie.e=iN9I
ECR a td •
1 -
I
OAS 1
-- _
ACM PEAK
0.00
pn
/
IIII
0.119 1
0.19
_—
EI Carta Red a td sk" Ebsav coxamme
--
I
0.19 I
OAO
CLEARANCE.
0.01 I
OAS
DOSTING A PROPOSED II I �
EXISTING I OTHER
p PROJECT
IA
D09TIN0 N
M
I a On1FEIR 1
II E7L+OTHER II
p +PROJECT
1 EX+OTHER 1 �
IIM
CAPACITY R CAPACITY IN
VOLUME N VOLUME
p VOLUME
NIR
Vic p
N
Vie N
R
N Vic I
A -PROJECT
V/Gw
,
IAII
AIA
1
1
A0
A�1
N-� R
A IAP
Il s l ®''�
A
tT•000 as MMR
139 N
1.
OAS A'
1
0.09 A•
1 0.01 N•
p
1
A .
.010
0
tt0O N 0 A0
6T 1
A
In
0.00 1
p
OAS N
0.079 1
1
1
AAI
ON 01111
ON
1
01
1
1
A
1 1
N
a
ILII
oll 0001 0 MR
ON
p
A'
A
R'
1. A'
II
1•
IMNtl
1700 I 0 RN
34001 01111
ON
4171
- N
1
lull
A11
-
0.00 1•
I
0-00 N•
N 0.00 p •
p
p
II
N'
011
NAI
- I?W N o
651
All
0u A
A
p
0.0 q
p o -tap
().Do N
_
N
e
11w
N
NM
am 1
moos 1
I
I
34W0
. ON
an
1
A
A
10
0.19 1•
0.19 1•
N ata N•
;
N•
_
AN
I
N - NORTHBOUND. S - SOUTHBOUND
E - EASTSOUND. W - WESTBOUND
L - LEFT. T - THROUGH, R - RIGHT
H.S. = NOT SIGNALIZED
LOS a LEVEL OF SERVICE
DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS
HORTFYSOUTH IOTICALRUM6= '
11wi
m .. Y®YiY
001
.rY=ie.e=iN9I
ECR a td •
1 -
I
OAS 1
-- _
aoS 1
0.00
pn
. FJI9TN EST CRITICAL SUMS-
IIII
0.119 1
0.19
_—
R4
--
I
0.19 I
OAO
CLEARANCE.
0.01 I
OAS
=�...
I
0.09 1
0.06
�
ICU VALUE-
LAI
i •
0.11 I
am I
®- i
0.32
iYY.Yr.
= i
,
I
OA6
NN
=4.011
INTERSECTION CAPACITY unuzATIDN ANALYSIS
Cay of Tub&rEi Ceeilo Red Radom
PM PEAK HOUR
M Cwdw Reel 8 1d S6w1 E•Wdq Cadlb
EXISTING PROPOSED Am EXISTING
CAPACITY p CAPACITY W VOLUME
A In
17001 o Pn 2I4
00 0An 0
1700 1 0 m 122
ON Olin 0
ON o mN 0
of GIN 0
I
PROJECT:
11
I OUSTING . p
WERSECTIOR
INTERVAL•
mal
Bill
I PROJECT
IRI I
—y IIm
INN MOVEMENT INN Dtl3T I
PROP 1110
INN
{PROJECT I
Nil LANES N
LANES Nm
In
—
am—a--am
VMC I
Im
NL
NIA 1 N
MR
IIIII
NT
NIA o n
NIA
IIIA
NR
PIN 111
NIA
PIN
SL
OIN Oil
1111
IIIA
ST
am 011
NNf
IIIN
SR
IIIN 011
qm
IPA
EL
Nm 111
Nil
Ni
PIN
ET
Alm 211
mil
Nm
ER
PIN 1 a
n
IIIII
WL
1111 1 a
INS
PIA
WT
pill 21
I
IIIII
WR .
Mill a tl
A
AAI
nil
NA
Mm
I
m1
11
I OUSTING . p
p OL440THE R 1
II Ex+oTHER A
mal
A OTHER
I PROJECT
m1.
OUSTING Y
1 •OTHER A
a *PROJECT 1
II
{PROJECT I
am
II VOLUME
A VOLUME
PIN
VIC 1.1
VMC I
1 VAC p
p
vr-w IMP A
mA
A
n
mI
Ie1
1-1
Yet
A.Min
1
A
1700 1
0 all
A 0.13 N'
3+00 N
o VIII
0 •
I7oo 1
a a
1
17001
08111
1 A
3+001
oil
0
o1
a�
a
ICU SPREADSHEET PLE NAME ECR S 1d I
N. NORTHBOUND, S r SOUTHSOUdD
E • EASTBOUND. W • WESTBOUND
L • LEFT. T • THROUGH. R. RIGHT
N.S.. NOT SIGNNRED
LOS • LEVEL OF SERVICE
• DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS
A
o
701
%
/x1
of Y
I
m1
11
I OUSTING . p
p OL440THE R 1
II Ex+oTHER A
mal
A OTHER
I PROJECT
m1.
OUSTING Y
1 •OTHER A
a *PROJECT 1
II
{PROJECT I
am
II VOLUME
A VOLUME
PIN
VIC 1.1
VMC I
1 VAC p
p
vr-w IMP A
mA
A
n
mI
Ie1
1-1
Yet
A.Min
1
A
m0
0.13 1'
A 0.13 N'
0 M13 A'
0
0 •
Nm
1
M
mil
I
1 A
II N
II
0
010
a
a
mil
0.07 p,
p 0.07 1
1 oar II
n
I
Ulu
A
1
mN
11
I
I N
0
A
Pm
A
I
mW
A'
W a'
0 p
1
I'
np
A
p
mil
I
A n
Y II
N
1
AIA
II
a
IN
0.00 1
p 0.00 1
n 0.00 0
A
A'
1m
A
0.10a
1
A
Im
.0.10 p•
g 0.100p
1
N
A
am
On
y
j ole
N
110
A
am
we
11j•
N 0.19 p
1
I'
lm
N
pm
A
1 A
A
Nil
NORTWSOUIH CRITICAL SUMS. Jul �• a. ..s' , s Nm
Am ata � I OAS� 1 0.13 I aao pn
EASTAVEST CRITICAL SUMS._—_
kY 0-20 _— I 0.20 -- I am I am mA
CLEARANCE' 1 Inl � OAS I 0.05 I OAS -- — I 0.03 mA
e am
ICI1 VALUE • ma O.q • I 0.47 I owl • e I am
111----- — --- Bin
Los. pm A I A I .A I A — In
IPJ.A ICIFXUWVj m
PROJECT:
CRT OITuelhfl Denim Reel RedaulRotlol
INTERVAL'
AM PEAK HOUR
.
INTERSECTION:
a Ceatm Reel & Min SkW bd*o Cmdid"
Hill
Hill II
INA
II
010
N
I
AU
A
A
E700NG p
1 EX *OTMR 1
p E)L+OTHER
N —AIR
Hill
MOVEMENT IAA EXIST N. PROP ON
MOSTNO p
PROPOSEDIN
EXISTNO I
OTHER 1 PROJECT
ANI
EMTM 1
1 *OTHER
N
A 4PROJECT
Hill
'NII LANES p LANES AIA
CAPACITY 11
CAPACITY 110
VOLUME 11
VOLUME A VOULIM,
pip
WC A
N
Vic p
N
V/C p
j V� �..
u to
NII
AN
NA—N—NW
NL NR ON
O AIA
— A
on
AW
0 NA
I
601
— N --L
p
ill
NI
Ami
II N
ASN
IIIA
I.NAI
IRP
NT Na - in
0 1111
17001
a ran
1341
1
M.
0.11 A •
N
A
0.11 p •
A
I
A
Om 1 •
N
p
1' flN
IRq
NR LIN IN
n NII
11760 N
010
411
1
NI
0.02 II
A
a02 p
p
a.OZ A
II
1 pill
I LIN
LIN
sL UIO 0, A
O ILII
� 01
on
121
A
pA
I'
1
I'
a
A•
p
sr NN in
ON
17001
on
-
1351
1
IpI
Om 1
1
Om A
H
Om 1
1
1 Hill
1• Nil
Ilia
SR Ilia in
o NR
1700 A
oil
241
1
NN
MCI 1
1
0.01 fl '
R
0.01 1.
A
Ilia
EL 1111 Ill
0 RIN
11700, 0
0 AA
, to 1
1 -
IRI
- 0.02 0 •
q
Om p •
1
0.02 p
p
U VIII
N • pill
IIN
ET All IN
01111
171111
0 pal
9001
1
AN
Ort 0
1
M22 1
_
1
0x1 p
p
Ilia
ER NN 011
O NN
01
O NN
SO N
I
AA
I
tl
fl
1
A
ANTI
Ilia
RM 1 A
O NA
I70a 1
0 pill
SO 1
1
INN
Om 1
1
0.03 1
1
oa11 l
A
N
1
N
IIIA
wr NA 11 A
O NN
1700 1
011N
]67 1
1
AA
O.z4 i
p
0.N A •
1
024 •
IN[
1 ' ANI
IIN
WR Ilia ON
O NI
ON
O AA
471
1
B
A
N
I HN
NORTwsourH
'raSMa -
0.11S
ata
1
0.11 1
.e.
0.11I
ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME
ECRB IAIn i
n
-w
-
oaS
Ilia
FASTIWEST CRITICAL 8UM8.
am
I.
0."
I
0.2
II
Ilia
- NORTHBOUND, S - SOUTHBOUND
-
IN
--
1 0.00
pill
E a EASTBOUND. W . WESTSOUND
CLEARANCE-
1q
0.06
1
0.05
I
OAS
-_ NII
L= LEFT, T- THROUGH. R -RIGHT
NA
- •v•
•v.
1 0.06
gill
N.S. - NOT SICNALUMID
IGl VALUE.
_
a44
I
0.42
(
0.4 a
.®a.0,
I 0.06
1pl
LOS.- LEVEL OF SERVICE.
- _
_ —
m
• OENOTEI CRITICAL MOVEMENTS
-
LOS •
IA
A
I
. -A
A — _ _
I
_ -- No
A
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS
PROJECT: Cly of TudhtEl C Wdw Red RKbodlroAm
INTERVAL' FM PEAK HOUR
INTERSECTION: B Canino Red 8 Mon Shod FENIYq Condlll l
INTI 11111 II Ilia 1 IN
INI MOVEMENT INTI EXST A PROP IIIA E.)USTM I PROPOSED IN
MINI 11111 LANES A LANES 1111 CAPACITY I CAPACITY JIM
IIIA ate-- NAIL—A—Nlt
1
pill
N
— NI
IAN
NL
1101
on
VIII
Oil
ON
INI
INT
NN
1 0
III
iToo 1
o NII
ILIO
NR
III
II
VIII
17001
0111
In
SL
IIID
ON
VIII
ON
011111
In
ST
INq
I 0
NN
-1701f 1
01N
IO
SR
1011
1 A
UN
17M A
o IN
INTI
EL
010
III
IIID
1700P
on
INI
ET
ON
I 1
0
17051
on
fill
ER
ON
ON
0111
of
o Ip
IIID
WL
III
I I
pN
17001
0 tlN
IIII
WT
III
1' p
IIII
17001
a IN
1110
WR
IIN
on
t0
op
00
ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME ECR 6 Main I
N - NORTHBOUND. S - SOUTHBOUND
E - EASTBOUND. W - WESTSOUND
L - LEFT. T- TNROLKIH, R - RINNT
N.S. - NOT SIGNALIZED
LOS - LEVEL OF SERVICE
• DENOTES CRITI.AI. MOVEMENTS
N
CD
N
O
N
co 0 O
(D =
to Z
Cr O
00
01
A
NII
DWTM OTHER
1
pill
I
N EXISTM N
p EX+OTHER ry
O EI.+OTRFR p 1110
N
p PROJEG7
Nq
EXISTING p
p
+OTHER p
I +PROJECT
q
I -PROJECT
A 11111
VOLUME p- VOLUME
I VOLUME
NA
Vic p
p
VIC N
N
We A
A yr w
p Ilia
A
A
pill
Awn
0—I
-AAP
1.e0111
1001
1
041
M
A
II
NN
A
1•. NAIL
2o3 I
t
IN
a.1A p •
p
aIe p •
1
o.te II '
A
1 IN
921
1
pip
0.m 1
p
0.05 II
I
o p
05
p
A IIID
321
1
Nn
1'
.1
II'
p
A
N
II pill
.1841
N
NIA
ata 1
p
ata p
ry
0.13 II
t
II' VIII
231
1
INI
0.01 1
1
0.01 p
p
0.01 p
A
q fllll
401
I
IN
0.02 p
p
0J02 p
p
0.02 11
N
1' OIA
212 0
I
0I
0.22 p•
p
ORP tl•
II
0.22 A
ry
A NN
04 A
1
n
N
1
A
A
1
II
1 nN
071
p
NI
0.1m p•
tl
0.04 U'
N
0.04 p•
q
1 NII
3501
N
NA
0.23 p
p
023 1
1
0.23 II
N
1• Np
411
1
IIA
A
1
N-
- U_
1
N Nn
NORIWSOUTH CRITICAL SCAN
1
III
0.23 I
a1s . I
0.18 I 0.00
IN
INA
EASTANEST CRITICAL BUMS -
Hill
am
I
_ 026.
I
020
I 0.00
qA
CLEARANCE-
NN
---
0.05
i
---
a05
I '
---
OAS
I- 0A5
--Np
IN
IOU VALUE-
tlN
0.54 • e I
. OAR -
I
CAN q I 0.05
s
.NN
LOB -A
I
A _ I
A I A
-- m
iqq
=12-77-74=15
CNy dTWInB Cain RNI fNdwMlwBon
AM PEAK HOUR
B Cadno RW 8 NwvpoA Awn» E1dWq Co dubs
11111 hill II JIM
11111 MOVEMENT IIID EXIST 11 PROP IIIII
A No
EXISTING p PROPOSED 1111
N -
EXISTING Y OTHER
N -
Y PROJECT
Mn
JIM
A
EXISTING A
1 EXIBTNO q
p +OTHER 1
p FX+OTHFR A
0 +PROJECT H
A EX+OTHER Y I91
+PROJECT
IIIII
IIIII LANES II LAMES 0111
CAPACITY I
CAPACITY IN
VOLUME VOLLW
A
A VOLULIF
AM
VA Y
A
VIC
III
Vicy
II
p NMI
IAII
— NHI'�—A®NM
N
ANI
1
1
AAI
tlmp
IIIA
1 victN_r n=
ISI
Y AIA
NIA
HL NM IR 0 rill
p
CIO
tat 1
I
IAA
0.16 A•
p
0603
q
0.08 p•
p
110
NT Yin A O MN
3700
17001
o n
310 N
p
AR
ata A
N
1'
0113 . p
q
0611 1
p
A. PIN
MR
I
NR AIN t 1 010
17W A
I
O AM
x74 A
A
NM
013 p
A.
ata N
A
OAS
1 NIIN
nip
SL IMI 1 n a Mp
1700 N
o M
r4 Y
q /
IMI
0.04 1
A
0.04 1
tl
0.04 M
p
i SII
HIll
ST NM 3 A 0 Jim
51001
on
12501
A
011
0.x3 Y •
N
01x3 tl •
p
� 01x3 p •
q
•
IIIII
SR IIIII ON 0 gin
ON
0 M
261
1
1
A IM
IIIII
EL IHII t 1 011111
Imo 1
Olin
171
1
M
0101 p
l
O.ot
I IAN
IIIII
ET INN I 1 0 NIH
1700 I
o INP
110
1
IIA
OAS I '
I
OAS I '
A
PAS N •
II
I MN
IIIII
ER BIN 1 1 0 MA
17001
0 qM
236 II
A
WI
0.14 I
1
0614 1
Y
0.14 N
1
I Rill
p
IMI
WL lull Y OMA
17001
oil"
1421
1
NM
001 p •
p
Om A •
A
O.oe
IINI
IIIH
wr M 21 0 HAI
3100 1
o M
tar 1
1
IIA
OA7 p-
Y
0.07 I
1
0.07 j•
g
1•
JIM
WR mn ON 0 PAI
0 R.
O INN
371
1
M
A
N
A
A
1
IM
—
— — - — —
-
—
YM
• ••
tl
Y MIA
NORrHISONrrH CRITICAL sIa46.
•
0. I
®... .
0:16 1
a.�..eMA
ICU SPREADSHEET FIE NAME ECR a IMv4n 1
_ —
.0.35.
I 0.00
IIIII
EASTANEBT CRRICAL SIrAS
0.13
1
0.13
I
0.11
N - NORTHBOLIN0, 6 - SOUTHBOUND
_im
1 0.00
M
E - EASTBOUND. W - WESTBOUND
-
CLEARANCE.
0.06
1
0.03
i
L a LEFT. T - THROUGH. R. RIGHT
�
. s
s
�
1M
N.S.. NOT SIGNNJUEO
ICU VALUE- -
M
0.53
I
053
1
0.63
. _
NM
LOS - LEVEL OF SERVICE
.
--
I 0.05
NM
' DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENIM
LOS.
M
A
I
A
A --
�
--
A
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS.
PROJECT: Gly Of TuNYI45 C@WW Rad R9tltlMCa0011
INTERVAL: PM PEAK "OUR
INTERSECTION: - 13 Crain Red 8 Nawpwl Av ExWYq CddNdr
pill IIIII N IAg
1111 MOVEMENT gill EXIST I PROP nm
Hill IIA LANES n LANES H1H
Will--.pmn—Ilm
pill
1111
NL
mil
t q
AAI
Ing
NT
mil
2 A
am
INn
NR
mil
I H
nm
AN
SL
1111
I A
nil
IIAI
ST
ANI
3 N
Nip
IIAI
SR
Hill
0 A
AIN
Inn
FL
Ant
1 II
Ain
ON
ET ET
AIA
t N
411
INTI
ER
lull
11
am
AIR
WL
lull
I N
Hill
IBI
WT
mil
s 1
/m
INH
WR
Im
01
_ m1
1
pill
EXISTING A
PROPOSED IN
CAPACITY 'A
CAPACITY 110
4
luN
17W 1
o lug
34001
o No
1700 A
0 on
17M A
0 mil
st A
01111
01
0 mil
17001
o Nil
17001
0111
17001
01111
1700 A
9110
3400 A
0 111
o1
0170
ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME ECR 8 Nwrpu I .
N = NORTHBOUND. S . GOUTHBOLINTJ
E - EASTBOUND. W . WESTBOUND
L. LEFT, T - THROUGH. R. RIGHT
N.S. • NOT SIGNALIZED
LOS• LEVE. OF SERVICE
DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS
x
CD
0
0
mm
CD 0 0
CD =)
c0 Z
4 O
O C3
T
A 0)
N --`
I OTHER A PROJECT
VOLUME A VOLUME
A VOL.IIME
A
A
A
Nil
12933
A /
1459
n
1
n Nm
vMGw NMP A IIIA
ROOM
Y
558,
11
1®mn
11
ISDN
n
3541
A
�
A •am
i
A
1221_
A
NORTWSOUT" CRITICAL SUMS.
EASTANEST CRITICAL SUMS .
CLEARANCE•
ICU VALUE..
LAS•
lull
NIA
0
EXISTING p
A EXISTING p
A +OTHER N
1 EXL+OTHER N
I +EJECT p
n EXCwTHER q 170
q +PROJECT
Nil
Vic A
1
we A
p Vic p
1
n Nm
vMGw NMP A IIIA
N
Hill
1 1
0.35 A 1
•� A °A
o.n A 1
>. qmA
1®mn
IIIII
0.09 n •
1
0.36 N'
o.n.1
1 0.39 1
II
H
A •am
Hill'
0.09 A
1
0.09 A
A. 0.09 p
1
Nm
A AIH
NIII
aae A '
A
0.09 1 `
A 0.00 A '
II
M Am
Hill
a19 A
A
0.19 A
A 0.t91
II
II ' nm
IIIA
ILII
I
0.03 I
.1
A
N
0.03 M
A A
N 0.03 A
n
II
N �
`
am
att 1 •
p
0.11 A'
1 o.tt 1 •
A
II IIAI
N Ilm
no
oat 1
A
021 M
A ost q
p
MIN
9.09 p a
p
a09 A•
I 0.08 1•
A
A Am
mil
0.11 1
A
I.1t A
A 0.11 I
N
A• Nm
MA
•� l e l
A� 1
A
A
0 No
NO
OAN
I
0.44-99
I 0.44 e 1
0.00
0.19--I
0.18—
Am
us
I
0.05
I a0s
I
0.00 jo
Ai
am--
aNM _. I
0.611I
gm
—
em IN
NO
B
I
A
e --
—
-- all
r. r.
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS
PROJECT: CRY of Tae" C"w Red Redeellm6m. - -
INTERVAL: AAA PEAK HOUR - .
WTERSECTKMt NswpMAw iMein SWAP Ie6p CaidRms
IIIII
I
NIA
1
N1y
N
INN
1
" - A
lull MOVEMENT NII EXIST N PROP AIN
ExurNO 1
PRO008E0 tlM
EIRBTINO N OTHER
p PROJECt
NAI
I
IN LANES I LANES MN
CAPAaTY I
CAPACITY IM
VOLUME I VWW
A VOIAIME
ANI
®-®
mA
N •
NM
V-
MN
tl
I �-
Ila
NL
IIA
I y
0 NIA
1700 y
ON
140l
-
I
IIA
NT
- IIIN
2 N
0 NN
31001
0 MN
5191
1
INN
NR
IIIA
o R
o AM
ON
0 NM
1031
I
lull
SL
IIIII
1 N
0 MA
imp
0 INN
231
1"
toll
ST
IRR -
211
0 IMI
34W I
0 M
12021
1
IIIII
SR
IIIII
111
0111
1700 N
0 MA
to I
I
IIIII
EL
AIR
10
0110
Imo 1
01N
701
1.
IIIc
ET
IIII
21
on
34M 1
OMI
1001
1
lull -
ER
lull
111
0 IRI
17001
ON
2101
1.
MR
WL
MR
f N
- o MA
- 17001
DISK
- 1701
1
NIII
WT
m
21
0 MI
3401
o INN
3001
1
NM
WR
IM
i A
O MR
1700 I
O MI
221
1
003
I
OAS
-
M1
IM
.i••
NORTFISOUTH CRITICAL SUMS -
KW SPREADSHEET PRE WME Newport a Mdn
N - NORTHBOUND, S • SOUTA60U1D -
E • EASTBOUND. W • WESTBOUND,
L = LEFT, T • THROUGH, R • RIGHT
KS. • NOT SIBNN.CZED
LOS • LEVEL OF SERVICE
• DENDTES ORITCAL MOVEMENTS
EASTAMEST CRITICAL SUMS
CLEARANCE •
ICU VALUE.
LOS •
IM
I
A
OoBTMB y
I IX+OTHER y
A DL*0TH R p tlM
M
MWTM p
I •OTHER
p
1 +PROJECT p.
I .PROJECT
I . MI
IMI
VAC 1
I
VIC A .
II
Vic y
1 VC—WW
I MN
IN
1-9
Nal
J� pN
MN
0.08 I •
I
am I •
1
0.18 II •
1
1 • IIN
MI
021 1
I
0.21 I
A
oat I
N
I AM
pp
p
p
A
N
1 HIM
0.01
0.01 A
1
oAt 11
I IIIII
MN
0JB I •
A
ILS p.
p
0.35
MI
OM1
p
0.07 A
R
0.07 N
1• m
IMI
0.04 1
1
0.04 1
p
0.04 I
p
1ON
MI
OAS 1'
N
CLOS I'
I
D.00 y•
q
N NM
IVA
0.13
Ip
0.13
1•
p
0.13
1
M
a/1 •
I
alt
all R -
A
pq
I I
NM
ILII I
1
IL11 A
I
0.11 1
1
1• uM
IN
oJ„ I
i
0.01 I
I
0.71 I
.I
1 lull.v.
MN
0a3 I
Q.
au I
....
0.43 I OAA
`•MIH
1M
MI
--
ate
-
I
---
ate -
I .
---
0.16
I BAD
--MN
IM
IM
0A6
I
003
I
OAS
I OAS
M1
IM
.i••
sas
ai•
vN11
Mr
OJN
I
OJIa
I
0.84
I O.N6
Ipl
MI
B
I
B
e
--NAI
�
•v.
I
.v•ave.vs.a•
I A
.sv
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTLMATION ANALYSIS
;rl
CD
N
O
N O
Io Z
Io O
0 0
A m
Ut �
PROJECT:
Cey of TU3w •8 Cee4ro Rmd Redr.IS 0,n
INTERVAL:
PM PEAK FK)ilfi
-
INTERSECTMN:
Newppt Arno d Mob sk" P N CarxWw
/
IIIR
Hill
mY 4 Rill-
MovFI.ENr ilm EJ86T I PROF VIII
-
E783TNG I PROPOSED Nill
EXISTING 1
OTHER " R PROJECT
ql
1
E MTV10 R
N ---
II '
-
R ExwTHQi II '�
-
1 ocwTrER
N
Nlo
HIS
110 LANES 1 LANES
hill
CAPACITY 1
CAPACITY IN
VOLUME p
VOL.INIl6. 1 VOI.wE
Ilo
VA:
1
•EXISTINKIOTHER
1
1 4�y'�
N
Inn
Hill
Ilhi
��-_- IN—ARIR
NL mR t N pill
,7001
0
zIt 1
1 •
Nlo
p N
1—A
VA;
•—
A N
p N CT
m
1 q
A�INN
nim
NT IR 21
pin
34001
on
toes 1
1
�
ax A •
1
-0.tx p
p o.fz 1
IN
Rill
NR Rin ON
Inn
all
0 loo
1451
1
YII
1
1
8.30 N •
_
R 8JM 1.
1
1
AIA
IIA
ST mil 2 l 1 B
JIM
Sion 1
o I11 pm
,u�41
� �'
�
� 1 •
N
0.04 q '.
R 0.04 1 •
1
1
Hill
mq
OR 1101 t 1
loll
thio 1
0 lop
les 1
1
1
827 A
N 027 1
1
N
p.
hill
mN
EL VIII t 1
loll
17001
GIN
1321
p
IAN
HAS 1 •
A
o.to N
0 0.10 N
1
1
IRI
MR
MR
ET loll 21
ER
log
34001
o No
W71
p
III
OAS I
1
OAS A •
R eDe p •
N
0 `
INN
Hill
loll
pm ,
WL pin in
1
/
tIO N
oo.•atee
OASI
III
log
IRII
wr hip z II
ON
mY
1700 A
34001
o loY
0 M
,
30, 1
1
o 1
_A
N
q
N
1 A
N 8A7 N
1
1
N0
Npl
IMI
WR RIR IN _
No
17W 1
01m
2d 1
A
- A
0
0
an
am 1 •
I
Om
II •
A 0.00 N •
1
p
11
IN
phi
N ! 1
OAZ
, e
N
A
I
Nip
ICU SPREADSHEET PILE NAME
H.wponal4�
NORTW8OUIHCRITICAI.&
8.
Iql
a4o
GAO
m
I 0.40
lot
--
► 0.80
hip
N. NORTH60ULC. 8 • SOUO180INO
-
FASTNYE87 CRITICAL SIII�.
NII.
.
0.17 '
I
_ _
. 0.17
1 0.47
•—
Rm
E • EASTBOUND, W • WEST000ND
CLEARANCE•
im
__
_
_
1 0.00
Rip
L•LEFT, T=Ttpi0l10tA R=R1014T
loll
SAS
1
QO6
I 8.86_--
--11R
K.S. - NOT SIGNAL®
ICU VALM •
Ill�•er�.
Nlo
.
'.
. A2GA2 • m
1 0.88
• �•�
• e
Rill
hill
LOS • LEVEL OF SERVICE
• OF1107ES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS
a
0.82
--
I
-
OA2
I
S
e'er
Rin
LOS
m1
8
1.
_ _
B
_ _ _
I B
- —
hill
�.v..ve
....
I A
INA
;rl
CD
N
O
N O
Io Z
Io O
0 0
A m
Ut �
INTERSECTION CAPAGRYUTLIZATIONANALYSIS
PROJECT: ply d Tuv&G Cw*p Reel Red.wBo,lon
INTERVAL: AM PEAK HUN
IKIERSECTION: Plumed Ave B Mob Sasel EWia ConMm
Nil
NII
IIID I IN p All
MOVEMENT pill EXIST l PROP 0 EXISTING PROPOSEDDOST
A
NO
A
OTHER
IN
III
A
DUSTING 1
p DOSTNO A
q.OTHER 'p
p EX40THER N
p OL+OT}ER
--_
pp
NAI
AIN LANES N LANES IN CAPACRY. 1
CAPACITY N
VOLUME 1
VOLUME VOLUME
Y1
VICR
VIC
p+PROJECT
1 +PROJECT
N
IIID
�•--� 1111®Ilam 1
-
� n1
A ®�
BIN
�•.� p�1
1�1
C IMP
Iffipyl
11111
NL qui o N 0 Nll ON
o NAI
- ON
p
MI
A'
1 A'
N
R-11vFCw
R Nilow
HT IWI ON o alp ON
o NW
o 8
I
R
1
II ' 1111
Hip
NR AIA ON 01911 ON
o lin
oil
N i
NIN
A
1 1
1
i
n m
1111
Sc iNq ON o EI o f
0 Mil
001
1
IN
A
A
IIIA
IIIII
ST Illq t I 0119 17W I
SR 11111 OB o RA 111
0 ul
0
ON
74
q
AN
OJOS 1'
II 0.00
l
0.06 I'
A
A
l nil
l' IIAI
III
EL IN IN o pill Wool
NNN�
o �A
N
66 II
N
p
qUl
IAI
I
o.a p •
11 1
p 0.00 1 •
1
p
0.04 N •
I
11
ET qlq - IN O pip 1Too N
001
2551
1
0
ate Ip
0.10 1
A
1.
N , IW
RIII
IIUI
Ea NIl o N a Ito 0 l
0 NR
o p
1
IW
A
M
0.10
q M1
AI11
WL 11l on 0 Nil ON
0 m
- ON
I
Ipl
1
II IW
Alli
1111
WT IIIN 14 o NII 17oo N
WR Ipl 1 11 on 1700 I
a 110
o Iq
toe I
Sol
. q
qAM
021 1.
1 1'
0.24
I•
IN
n
1
to
OAS
I 1•
0.05
1
as' p
1
C MWAL
am I
OAS
�.a.*..��.�
IN
KCl SPREADSHEET RENAME - Pmeped i Mdn
Is
-_
_
I
_
am
I Om
111
–
N - NORTHBOUND. S - SOUTHBOLM
EASTARESToRIT1CALSums.---
/
■
0.71
I 011
I
020
I O.dl
--RI
E.TBOUND.W. WESTBOUND
C�JVtA110E �
111
0.06
--;
..
--�
L - LEFT. T r THROUGH. R � RK9Hf
.
_ � .T...O.Os�
. :
OJXi
005�
N.S. - NOT SIGNAUMD
ICU VALUE .•
OAt
s
I 0.11
e
•
.
LOS -LEVEL OF SERVICE.
'
:
.
_—
I
OAt
I 066
'III
DENOTES CRITICAL MWEMBWTS-
LOS.
A
A _—
e
A
.
s a s sssssssss
a v . stc®sa
: ss . �
s �
A
m
fA
O
C_
O
7
Z
O
O
T
m
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTLIZATIM ANALYSIS
PROJECT: CRY d TUBI -8 CWft Red Redrdlatlal
-
INTERVAL PM PEAK HOUR
NTERSECTIM Pffloped AH 8 Mdn Sbw1 F�dnip CWKMIOr
-
-
Hill
VIII
lull N IN A IIII
MOVEMENT IN EMT I PROP pN E)WTRIO p PROPOSED NIA
R
BOSTNG. p
1
OTHER N PROJECT
IE
N1
1
ElaBTW p
A ucISTY1G I
N *DTNER A
I OL+OTHM A
N+PROJECT
p eX.OTHER 1 NS
VIII
1191 LANES II LANES JIM CAPACITY I
CAPACITY AAI
VOLUME N
VOLLiE I VOLIY4E
Ull
VR', p
q
WC 1
B
q
Vic
N
+PROJECT A VIII
Illll
�� UIII�••�II�BII 1 .
1q
1
A
.' IUA
�.� N�1
q�•p
1 q
11°.11
v�vr 1 NU
VIII
NL UIII o I Inn - ON
am
- 01
I
10
1 •N
1 •
U
1.N11
NT IIII on BN o N
ON
ON
p
INI
A • HillVIII
VIII
IIB O N IIIA ON
o IN
ON
p
Al
NR
u
.l
1
R
1•
A
n INN
In
SIL mill oil U1 ON
DIM
041
A
NII
U
1
n
0
A
IIII
NII
ST NIU 11 IN 17006
SR UIII ON Al ON
o U1
0111
OR
52-1
I
UN
a00 R .
A
O.oY A •
1
1
0.w 1 •
U
q
IRA
II • INI
IAA
EL UIII IN AIR 17001
0111
go 1
1
A
U1
Al
- 1
OM N
1
1
OAS U
II
OAS I
j
•
NII
ET IIN IN W 17001
u IN
R93 p
1
pN
ost 1 •
A
021 R •
II
021 p •
p
_ p am
UIII
ER Nn oil nIN 01
O IIA
01
1
IAI
A IIID
UIII
WIL lip OR IN ON
0111
o N
i
Al
g
p
A.
A
.1 •
1
1 NU
BIH
WT 11111 1 1 UN 17001
0 N1
236 1
1
N1
. 0.H 1
1
0.14 N
R
om N
N
A IAB
NII
WR AN IN N 1700 I
on
Ib I-
1
n1
OAS 1
1
OAS 1
1
OAS j
j
1
—
. ----- —
—
1N
.�.
e.®....
N INI
NORT RYYCIRII
QITICAL RMAB •
.
0.0Y
I
DAY
I
Ow
ICU
ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAE Plolpeti 6. moan
iI1N
(
0.00 1111
EAeTAYEBT � TICA' OtIAR3 •
WIN
021
I
021
I
021
_ — AIU
N • NORTHBOUND, S • SOUTHBOUND
--_
--'
I
CLOD Hill
E- EASTSOUND, W. WESTHOUID
CIPARANCE.
I1
0.06
I
0.06
- ---
- — NU
L • LEtT, T= THROUGH, R • RIGHT
-
y
• s •
I
•�•a •
OJ16
I
0.06. 111
N.S. • NOT SIGNALED
tcuvALUE•
026
I
••
•
• a
•
®• e IN
LOS • LEVEL OF SERVICE
_ —
.025 —
_
I
0.35
-
' DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS
Los •
pp(
A
_
A
-- NA
A IN
INTERSECTION CAPACITY vrILaATIOH ANALYSE
CAy d Tugn-FJ Can kw PA1 Re<iriuAOn
AM PEAK HOUR
Pfwpstt A"81RSWdF'N,C, IN,
ExISTMA INI l
1 PROPOS® AN E%ISTMIO I OTHER
1on
I PROJECT
PROJECT:
1
E)aSTMq I
N POSTING I
1 +OTHER 1
A ExwTHM tl
l +PROJECT
INTERVAL
NI
CAPACRY A
IMERSECTIOft
A VOLUME
VOLUME
A
IIIII
v 1
A:
Ing g
HUI
111H MOVEMENT All EXIST I PROP IIIII
IOU
A •PR'OJECT
AIA LANES N LANES AN
AN
vtxuME
AIN•--+g,ON
Hill
NL
Illl 1 U
OHIO
HUl
NT
IIIII 11
OIOU
UIU
NR
AUI 0 g
0 NII
IIIU
SL
UIII a N
0 NII
Hill
ST
gill 2+
0 NII
UIII
SR
All t 1
0 NI
IIIII
EL
Nil t 11
0 Ng
NU
ET
NII 29
0 ilii
NII
ER
Bill ON
0 AN
NII
WL
gill III
a M
NII
WT
Nl 21
0 Nl
Nl
WR
IN t U
0 NII
CAy d Tugn-FJ Can kw PA1 Re<iriuAOn
AM PEAK HOUR
Pfwpstt A"81RSWdF'N,C, IN,
ExISTMA INI l
1 PROPOS® AN E%ISTMIO I OTHER
1on
I PROJECT
51
1
E)aSTMq I
N POSTING I
1 +OTHER 1
A ExwTHM tl
l +PROJECT
A Ex+OTHM 11
NI
CAPACRY A
CAPAcrry MR
A VOLUME
VOLUME
A
NA
v 1
A:
1
vac A
0
1
vac
A •PR'OJECT
1700
vtxuME
_—
.
A .II
1-1
vrcw_Aw N sll
1
tTaO g
o IIIA
as U
top
U
Ng
0m A'
1
0.02 p•
p
0,02 1.
1
0.00
u BII
AN
A
0.00
0.10 1
1
1
1
0.10 1
A
ata II
l p
IAgI
91
01111
tae A
A
Np
4ag
A
A
N
tl
N
A
N A
AN
17009
0 ON
02 A
1
IN
LOS-
Y
A I
-
A
A
I
A'
oil
IIN
1
0
ta4 N
N
IN
OAS 1
OAS I
1
0.06 A•
OAS p•
A
i
aa0.�e j
OAS
1 g
IN
1
°
41111
N
ata A
1
0.ta A
A
tl
p N
IN
1
ata
IN
ittp p
U
0 WN -
o AA
441
an 1
A
' 1N
0.03ji
0.03a4W
1
0-03
tlA pA
qItl
iT001
.a
a0
41s
Ota AIgI
•N
IN
ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAM gwpad a 1011
N - NORTHBOUND. S - BOUYHSOUND
E. EASTBOUND. W . WESTUOUND
L- LEFT. 7 s TFMLOIIOH. R- RKtNT
U.S. - NOT SIGNALIZED
LOS - LEVEL OF SERVICE
DENOTES CRRBJIL MOVEMENTS
(+) RLP11ESENTS LEFT AND LEFT I THROIM LANES
NOTE: SPLIT PHASED NS
om
�ehs—
NI
�'—�Ar'
��—�
ftORnYSO17Rtt]aT1CAL SUMP-
aft I
0.11
_—
EASTWEST CRTHCAL SUMS s
am
_—
I
030 I
023
0.00
CLEAl1ANCE�--•—_—_
AN
Pas )
0.00
-- IN
IN --+—ease
s v s
I
am0.06
I
NN
ICU VALUE •rsvv
IN
4ag
vsm-v s s s
. v
®s
v uN
_— I
0.30 _— I
030 I
am
IN
LOS-
/ INI
A I
-
A
---
--IN
6 ssmsv
. o s
I
a�sr
A I
A
. v
—w� . v
o- • t r �,� F1.
(+) REFRFSEMS LEFT AND LEFT ITHROWN LANES
NOTE: SPLIT PHASED N41
A
m
w
m c
0
m 0�
o Z
w0
0 CD
�Y,
A m
N —
111
m
PROJECT: Coy dTOeArE1 C@ff*w Real RltlB1eAICM9m
A oasTiNe d
+O�
N Ex+OTHER I
INTERVAL: PM PEAK HOUR
ISTDMrc N
� NI
I A
WERSECTIOR Pipped A" 6 lst Stmd E*"
Cwxlkl o
NAI
IIIII
ala A All
- II
In
e
a
Ills
MOVEMENT IAII EXIST 1 PROP sal
EXOTNG 11 PROPOSED N
EIOSTINO p OTHER
I PROJECT
Ilia
JIM LANES A LANES AAI
CAPAC7TV A
CAPACITY aN
VOLUME 1 VOLUME
p VOLUME
IIII
III®I—lml
q
0
1
1
IIIA
NL IIN 1 n Np
t7001
0 a
all
p
11111
NT ad 1 1 NIA
1700 1
oma
2451
p
Idll
NR IIIN Go III
o If
- a IIAI
701
p
1111
SL IIID OR NIII
-O on
O 1N-
1551
,p
Ilia
ST Ilia 24 MII
34001
0 IG
1071
ON
11111
SR .IIIII I 1 1111
1700 A
OHM
toil
A • NI
1110
EL JIM i 1 Np
17W 1
o qN
1931
p
hill
ET sill 21 Ili
34W n
0 AAI
727 1
1
IIIII
ER IIN 0 a 1111
Oil
0 Hat
331
p
IIN
WL IIN 1 1 Ra
1700 0
an
20l
1 -
ill
WT IIN 21 Nn
3400 A
on
573 1
Not
wit NI i I _ IN
1700 1
0 No
7051
j
_
I
0.05MR
NORTWSOUTH gp7ICAL SUMS
A
SPREADSHEET FIE NAME RnDec1 &101
I A - -_
.
I
EAST7WEFT CRITICAL SUMS
N - NORTHBOUND, S - SOUTHBOUND
E - EASTBOUND. W - VVESTBOU D
CLEARANCE -
L - LEFT, T - THROUGH, R - RIGHT
N.S.-NOT SIGNALIZED
ICU VALUE.
/
LOS - LEVEL OF SERVICE
-
• DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS
LOS -
-
(+) REFRFSEMS LEFT AND LEFT ITHROWN LANES
NOTE: SPLIT PHASED N41
A
m
w
m c
0
m 0�
o Z
w0
0 CD
�Y,
A m
N —
111
m
A
E
A oasTiNe d
+O�
N Ex+OTHER I
1 EX.+OTHE R 1 No
ISTDMrc N
� NI
I A
1
+PROJECT p NIA
NAI
q -1A
1
y�–� N Nq
IM
hos A
1 ass 1
qmA
A O.Os
d--�Alll
A'
NII
a19 I'
a 0.10 A'
A 0.19 j •
p
MI
m
N•
11 A
N A
N
q pp
u
am 1
A 0.09 A•
A owe
dN
Onp
•
p 0 a5 A
N 0.00 p
p
N
®
on Y
g o'er A '
1 0.11 a •
1
N ' NN
NI
I
n
1 012 q
1
A AN
IN
oat 1
A q
N 9.01 A
A
1 '0.01
ON
In
0.17 1 '
1 0.17 A •
A 0.117 1 •
A
A • NI
0.12 A_1
ISN
0.17 1
N
1 IN
0.19 I
�0.17
0.19
0.19
'
a
--
--)
l
0.00 NA
1N
0.25
I 0.79
( om --
–
I
-- Nm
o.Oo--IIiiA
1N
0.06
l CAS
006
I
0.05 JIM
am
OSI
0.St l
s a i
OS7
svia� i v No
_
I
0.05MR
No
A
I A
I A - -_
I
A
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTLIZATION ANALYSIS
CRY of Tm&fE1 Canino Real Rsdummntlon
AM PEAK HOUR
El Cwdro Red A td SYed YEAR 2020 Wmawt PROJECT
II ON 11
j PROPOSED 0 YEAR 2020 11
u
OTHER PROJECT
PROJECT:
1
D061Vq N
1 E=TINGEXISTING 1
p.OTHER 1
1 vcwTHEJt N
N -+PROJECT
INTERVAL:
Up
CAPACITY N
INTERSECTMNt
LU
VOLUME N VOLUME
IW
VIC p
MMI u
um
NI MOVEMENT MMI EXIST N PROP em
MMI
11PROJ6CT
-Mm LAWS N LANES nm
Ulm --®-
1700p
1119 -M—m1
s N
Illn
NL
all t 1
01N
Im
NT
11N Oil
0 wo
1111
NR
Ulm 1 1
0111
Ill
SL
Nm Oil
o IN
MMI
ST
1111 01
011111
1111
SR
1111- Do
01111
IIII
EL
hill 1 II
o UMI
IIIA
ET
Ulu 2u
o m1
IIII
ER
III I 1
o MIN
11111
WL
IIIM 1 1
o mil
MIM
- WT
VIII 2 1
0 NO
ION
WR
MIII ON
on
CRY of Tm&fE1 Canino Real Rsdummntlon
AM PEAK HOUR
El Cwdro Red A td SYed YEAR 2020 Wmawt PROJECT
II ON 11
j PROPOSED 0 YEAR 2020 11
u
OTHER PROJECT
mn
NI
1
D061Vq N
1 E=TINGEXISTING 1
p.OTHER 1
1 vcwTHEJt N
N -+PROJECT
N PJL+oTHen --
p
Up
CAPACITY N
CAPACITY -Nm VOLUMES N
LU
VOLUME N VOLUME
Am
VIC p
p
WC p
N
N
Vic
11PROJ6CT
rip
1700p
N
s N
®~
_ ill
CLEARANCE •
em
p N v LMP
_��
I
PRO
ON
0
ONO.
ON
N
m
all p�1
Moll I
0.11 Y
1
0111 I -j
M.S. - NOT SIGNALOM
N.am
N•
Nm
17001
o NI
741
1
n
ml
0.0+ N
N
n
oJx
n
1
ooa
1
N
ON
OR
o NII
OR
N
on
1
R,
p
N
U
n
N
Ulm
ON
o ml
oil
1
NII
N•
A
0•
N
N•
N
1
Nm
ON
0 M
oil
1
NNI
N•
me
17001
34001
o mN
o Nl
ON
sea I
1
N
mA
0.00 p•
p
OAo N
1
0.110 e•
1
N
n'
mA
Nm
1700 p
o em
1401
N
Nil
0.17 .1
OAS
1
0.17 1
GAASS
n
0.117
p
j
1
Nm
1700 e
o IN
1101
n
m
0
1
1
1
0.08
1
Nm
O N
° N
O N
1
OJT
0.x3 �
9
om N•
p
N
1 •
me
um
,-- • •
N
p
iuln
NORHYSOITIH
CRITICAL $I1M6.
0.11
••
-min
ICU SPREADSHEET FIE NAME ECR & 181 2010 Wo pq
/
0.11 I
0.111 I
BAD
pm
_
EASTAVESTCRITICAL&Uw- -
_ —
°- I
O.2&
�
N - NORTHBOUND. S - SOUT1&iO11ND
III--
I
pZy I
0.00
ON
E - EASTBOUND. W - WESTBOUND
CLEARANCE •
em
0A6
_ -
_ - _
� - FA
L -LEFT. T - THROUGH, R- RIGHT
I
-- -
Moll I
OAS l
OAS
M.S. - NOT SIGNALOM
ICU VALUE-
mn
0.38
e
•
®•
•.
LOS -LEVEL OF SERVICE -
_- I
IL3S I
0.30 I
0.05
Nm
• DENOTES CRrnCAL MOVEMEWM _
LOS-
0
A
_-
-
-am
I
A I
A'-'— '
A
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS
PROJECT-.
CIy d Tu5*M EI CaTto Reel RKWftDodon
' INTERVAL
PM PEN( HOUR
.
HTERSECTION:
EI CWMM Reil S 1M 86MM YEAR 2020 W WwI PROJECT
IAN
11111
DIN A INp
MOVEMENT ION. EXIST N PROP IN
I
EXISTING A PROPOSED
IOW
IN
N
YEAR 2070 p OTHER
A
I PROJECT
IRR
RIR
N
ExmTW N
'I EXIBTOIG R
I+OTHER
1 EX.+OTHER R 0 -
- N
t -
I
-
JIM
Alp
101 LAWS A LANES RIR
CAPACITY I CAPACITY NA
VOLUMES 1 VOLUME
N VOLUME
DIA
WC 1
1
1 VACII
I +
p
1
PRWE T
MR
all
1p1�1�NA
A
W1
1
A
NII
ImA
1
ImA
VIC
vM-w_Idp R
NII
IOU
NL IMI 11 Nil
NT
17001
o nil
3191
1
1p
a10 R •
1 0.19 p •
p
ImI
n •
1=Ip
'
ION
ION DR RIR
ON
ON
OR
N
NI
A
A I
.OLIO
R
R
AIN
11111
NR IAM in RII
SL
1700 I
owl
- 1611
1
NI
- a10
0.10 N
R
1
n
0.10 R
A
n
II
IAN
IIIII
IIIA O N pn
o 1
o qp
o p
A
1111
M
1
1
nil
-IIIN
ST III1 ON NN
oil
" 0 1N
ON
N
Nil
1•
1 II •
A
N
Ills
OR IIID o R. Rl1
o A
0 pan
ON
N
NII
.
N
N
n
u
I•
ON
IIIA
EL 11111 in NII
Imo A
o am
o 1
1
m
0.00 q
R
1 0.00 1
A
p
a00
g
MR
Illy
ET IIIII 21 1p
7100 1
001
S52 1
A
®
0.25 1 ".
1 0.26 N '
1
p
1
Nil
IIIA
ER IMI I p n
1700
0
N
0.13
0.29 N'
A
iiiWTl
WT la2 a Min�
5 a
0MR
75 11
YA
a •
iNoI
07 Rp
aIa
ANI
WR AIN an NN
DO
o ANI
01
1
IN
0-23
0-23 R
p
A
IY
AIN
1 A
R 1
Rom
ICU SPREADSHEET FIE (LAME ECR
A IM 2020 VWO pq
NORCRITICAL80UTH CRITICAL SAHIB
•
AIN
AN—
0.10
---
I 0.19
_--
I
0.10. I
OJII ...n
EA3TIWFJGT CRITICAL BlNA6-
0.75
0.75
---
--am
N . NORTHBOUND, S - SOUTHBOUND
-
--
_
i
0.76
I
aoo
NI
E s EASTBOUND. W - WESTBOUND
CRF.ARAHCE
0.06
-
I 0'00
--
-
_
L = LEFT. T - THROUGH. R s RIGHT
-
. I
OAS
I
GAS
NII
N.S. - NOT SIGNALIZED�.
yIy,UE.
0.60
1 0.00 a
a =No
`
LOS - LEVEL OF SERVICE
_-
I
OmI
OAS
In
• DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS
LOS.
A
.I A
A _----NA
-No
!
A
1N
.s®• a
a
N
N
01
0
OI O
O Z
N O
00
� Ut
A 01
Ut � . .
N - NORTHBOUND, S - SOUTHBOUND
E - EASTBOUND, W - WESTBOUND
L - LEFT, T -THROUGH, R - RIGHT
N.S. - NOT SIGNALWED
LOS - LEVEL OF SERVICE
• DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS
EASTAYEST CRITICAL SUMS
CLEARANCE -
ICU VALUE -
LOS -
AIA
Y
PROJECT:
WWTM q'
City or7uaen-EI Cw*m Reel RsdommoNon
N EX+OTHER N— NO
NNI
EXIBTWG
INTERVAL•
O+PROJECT A
AM PEAK HOUR
II m
u�
-
Vicu q
INTERSECTION:
"®N
EI Camino Real B MOM Sha 'YEAR 2020 WBIaA PROJECT
-
IIIp
IINI 0
IIIA
A
AN
1
p
IIM
MOVEMENT INA EXIST N PROP Illy
EXISTING A PROPOSED Nil[
YEAR 2020 1 OTHER
1 PROJECT
JIM
• NII
11 Rio
JIM LANES N LANES JIM
CAPACITY N CAPACITY 0
VOLUMES 1 VOLUME
q VOLUME
JIM
-- IIIII-1-01"
1
N
in
1
N ®�
IIIII
NL
JIM 00
0 Rig
01
o NIP
SOA
A
Bill
NT
Np in
011111
17001
0 NW
1641
1
IIIII
NR
pin 1 p
0 pill
1700 1
0 IOU
541
p
MR
SL
nip on
00111
0 1
o IMI
151 -
N
NIII
ST
INN 1 II
o pill
1700 1
OWN
1611
N
JIM
SR
IIIII 1 11
0 Kill
17001
0 ppl
291
0
IOu
EL
RIK Ill
O pill
17001
0 ON
961
N
IIIII
ET
Ina 1 II
0 NO
17001
0 NN
. 966 p
t
1
IIIII
ER
MR Oil
OAR
on
o IN
1020
O
JIM
WL
- MR in
0 TNI
17W 1
010
041 -
p
Kill
WT
pN 10
0 ON
- 1700 N
0 TIN
MS 1
p
IIIA
WR
IIIII ON
0 NI
ON
0 pN
671
N
IN
ANI
ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME ECR 8 Main 2010 w/o poJ
-
NORHYSOUTH CRITICAL SUITS
• .
N - NORTHBOUND, S - SOUTHBOUND
E - EASTBOUND, W - WESTBOUND
L - LEFT, T -THROUGH, R - RIGHT
N.S. - NOT SIGNALWED
LOS - LEVEL OF SERVICE
• DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS
EASTAYEST CRITICAL SUMS
CLEARANCE -
ICU VALUE -
LOS -
AIA
Y
N
WWTM q'
1 EX -OTHER —
N EX+OTHER N— NO
NNI
EXIBTWG
+OTHER II
O+PROJECT A
N+PRDeECT
II m
u�
vIC u n
Vicu q
-- "�— i—�u
"®N
fall>e
IN
I
I
R
U NI
m
N
0.166p•
A
• NII
11 Rio
Mil
oa'ae,u•
.
o09�,,�
N
1
p
IAO
It
0.12 A
p
A
1,
0.12 1
N
A
0.12loll
ION
N
0.02 1
A
0.02 t
A
0.02 N
1
NII
pOz 1'
A
0,02N'
A
0.02
N BI
Bp
0.26 1
II
0.26 A
1
029 p-
1
m
0.04 N
A
0.a N
A
0.04 p
j
Kill
0.90
;
0.90 I •
0.90 •
pp
A NAI
N •
MSN
A
1
III
�I
�i-�•�••��
1ON
IAA
0.11
0.16
NII
--_
---
I 006
ON
NA
OS2 --
1
11.92 _—
092
I moo
-- NO
nae
I
OAS
I
o ae
I 0.05
— —
WRIK
-e-
• e
IN
IN
ANI
aIB _ —
069
!
OJ19 - I 0.03
NO
ON
A
I
A
I
A --
A
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS
PROJECT.
INTERVAL
MTERSECTK*t
Hill lull I UN
IUII MOVEMENT III EXIST R PROP M
IIII
A
OTHER I PROJECT
MITI LANES I LANES AMI
IND
1 E)USTRTo A
1 . OTHER
Mm®I—III
N EK.+OT}IER - —
R
—
Inn
IN
NL
IMI
01
Nn
III
NT
lull
1I
ai
In
NR
IIHI
1 a
IIIII
III
SL
III
01
Alp
INTI
ST
MII
i I
IIII
HILI
SR
RA
11
IIIA
Hill
EL
IRI
II
HII
Hill
ET
IRI
1I
Ulu
UN
ER
III
ON
IIIA
Rn
WL
MI
I 1
IIIII
lull
WT
NIR
i p
III
IRI
WR
IRI
ON
_ Illy
Cary Of TUOKWO Ca•iv Reel RecleeWFaOm
PM PEAK HOUR
a C.ni» Rol 8 Mdn BM.e, YEAR 2D20 WMIpe PROJECT
N. RII 1
DOSTl10 1 PROPOSED IIN YEAR 20M 1
A
OTHER I PROJECT
NII
IR
I
EIOSTM6 1
1 E)USTRTo A
1 . OTHER
.R L7CaOTHER p
N EK.+OT}IER - —
R
—
Inn
CAPACITY 1
CAPACITY NR VOLUMES 1
VOLUME I voLwE
'
v�
1
1 +PROJECT R
II •PROJECT
---
H
ON
0.00
I
a
Wa
1-8
�� 1"
1—ft
Vic N
11 Wo-W_w,P
N
NN
w
010
1631
1
lullR
/
II*sA
®R-�Rp1
_--
'
__
1701)1
Doo 1
01N
0111
321111
1271
1
a
m
o.2e 1•
p 320 Y'
A o 2e
N
U•
lI
ION
01
Oul
�1
a
m
m
1)m 1
1.
1 (LOT I
1
N ooT p
1
U
NII
NII
17001
on
2481
1
111
D.17
p.
0.117
p N'
N
1
IIN
HI
MSN
1
AN
0
1N
ooz 11
NN
0N
m
Np
jI
N••inmo
,Too
i
_
1
u
0o
�
1)moii44"
NN
1
A
1)X
m
al6
aw
Doo N 0
DIN
a
434 N
a
IN
0.05 A'
n 0.00 A•
Naos A•
p
1Nil
1)1
Bal
80 1
N
IN
C28 1
1 o.2n N
1 om
N•
1
1 1
1 N
N
ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME ECR i MOM 2011) Wb Pq
N. NORTHBOUND, S. 80UFHI 0DUNO
E - EASTBOUND. W . WESTHOUND
L • LEFT, T • THROUG.K R • RANT
NS.. NOT SIGNALIZED
LOS • LEVEL OF SERVICE
' DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS
• e
e
mn
I'
NORTHIBOUTN CRITICAL BUMS .
AR
0.!S I
om
'
®
a al
---
o'er I
0.00
NN
EASiIWFST CRITICAL 8UM8.
/ nN
oa3
_—
---
-- NA
w
I
---
oat I
oat
0.00
CLEARANCE. -
W
oJle
_--
'
__
-- NUI
I
��
' —'
1)00 I
®'
1)00 1
OAS
NR
EU VALUE •
2
•� •
. e MR
.0.72 -- 1
.0.817 I
0.86 1 .
0.06
IIY
LOS.
Com
_—
I
A
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSS
City d Tus*rE! C dw Real RedmodemOm
14n
aq
PROJECT:
A COSTING a
p +OTHER II
a EX+OTHER p
1 •PROJECT' p
8 Cor" Red 8 Naw9cd Avenge YEAR 2020 WNW PROJEC
INTERVAL• .
Bq
VAI A
INTERSECTIO!:
CAPACITY p
IIIII
i
IIIA 1
MR
11111 MOVEMENT INN E)XT p
PROP NII
IIIII
3400 A
INN LANES A
LANES NIR
IIIII
—
Nm— p
®11111
inn
HL
am 1 p
_ 0 1411
Mal
NT
INN 2 a
a Mal
Nall
MR
Ilia 10
Ow
Rol
SL
pill IN
0 ANI
lull
ST
bill 30
0 0
INTI
SR
pill Oil
0 me
oil
a
INN .10
a -14N
no
Er
pin 1 11
0 me
Wil
ER
pill t N
on
Nan
WL
pin I II
0 Iglu
Rol
WT
Nap 211
o IAA
N
WR
pm 0 1
00
City d Tus*rE! C dw Real RedmodemOm
14n
aq
AM PEM HOUR
A COSTING a
p +OTHER II
a EX+OTHER p
1 •PROJECT' p
8 Cor" Red 8 Naw9cd Avenge YEAR 2020 WNW PROJEC
A WxUJE
Bq
VAI A
EXISTING p PROPOSED 0 YEAR 2020 p OTHER
CAPACITY p
CAPACITY NM VOLUMES p VOLUME
i
eA
1
WOO
0
11} 1
3400 A
o am
6161
1700 II
ON
1001
17M II
0 plu
1591
51001
0 IAA
000 II
011
0111n
101
1 A
0
A NI
700 NI
NIDA
19 p
p
am
0
A 0.12 � •
1700 -
INN114
0 A
34001
0 all
1821
01
Dam
wp
ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAMECR 8 Newpmt 2021a WA/ PM
N - NORTHBOUND. 8 - SOUTHBOUND
E • EASTBOUND, W'. WESTBOUND
L•LEFT. T=THROUGH. R-IBGHT
N.S. = NOT SIGNA JZED
LOS. LEMS- Or Sf3TVICE
'DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS
N
p PROJECT
.
14n
aq
1
WOST*4 p
A COSTING a
p +OTHER II
a EX+OTHER p
1 •PROJECT' p
I E 40TFER A lu
p ♦PROJECT
A WxUJE
Bq
VAI A
p
VIC p
p V/C A
A waw W
II AI
p NI
1
am
a.m p• p
0.07 N' A
0.07 A' A
1
15
1
b
a» 1
t
A
t R
am
__ _
NAI om
u
A NI
Atl
OAS (
ote p •
j '
ae M '
A 0.12 � •
A
N . 11
1
Nap
1
p
p
p
0
ANI
A� 14
N
� • ••
all
apaiiii
' n
aiiHI
1
N
A
W
Ap
Dasa
'
a
Das t
A 0.29
_�
A ■
oosA
II
0.00 1 '
A 0.08 R •
p
e S
A
AIN
0.08 N
1
N
0.08 I
N 0.08 p
p
INA
1
A
v
I e
A
t i
NOR HISOUTH CREIWAL SUMS
pM
025
s• s
�
• a 0
1
OaD (
0.28 I
0.00
p
EAST/WEBT CRIfIGV.NLI11A6 •
p(p
0.10
— p
(
0.10 I
0.70 I
- Om
0
__ _
CLEARANCE.
Atl
OAS (
_
OAS
.__ _
_ —A
(�
0A5
I
QW
ICU VALINE •
0
ANI
—
GAO
� • ••
a
' n
1
0.40
0.10 I
0.06
0
Rol
__ _
_�
LOS
.v
.vsvvavvssv••vw
.v.
L;u�73�•i1 �;L.L�7T�iG [4i-�rJyi'•7:Il:n�<1
PROJECT' . CRY of Tudin61 Cw" Red RKbmr xft
INTERVAL: PM PEAK ROUT -
CATERSECUOW 19 Cwn VW Rwel 5 Nswpon Ar YEAR 7020 WOMA PROJECT
IIIII
YIA 1 Mil
A
Ulu
1
t
MY
A
N
OUSTING A
A FX+OTHER p
p EX -OTHER p III
IIIA
MOVEMENT IM DOST 1 PROP MI FXa4TWG
p PROPOSED IM
YEAR 2= Y
OTHER p PROJECT
N
F=TWG 1
1 +OTHER p
p +PROJECT Il
1 +PROJECT
p M
INTI
@p LANES p LANES Mil CAPACITY 1 CAPACITY IN
VOLUMES p
VOLUME 1 VOLUTE
Will
VIC
j�p
» 1
1
p
1 V/C w I P
I. III
NIII
9111
— 91II�®N- om
NL OM in ANI
p
77001
MI
o NM
A
417l
A ��
p
NIN
oil
0.25 A' 1
0.25 j p
025 l a j
_
NIII
N IIIII 2H IN
0400 p
0 Illi
' 1173 1
A
m
025 p
II
- 0.W 1
A
0.35
1111
NR MII IIININ
17oo 1
0 9M.
40
1
Mil
0. p
II
o.0z p
p
aaz p
p
1 ill
NIII
IN
sl NIII II NN
00 p
1Kill
o AI
w1
Y
A
Ail
o.06ae Y
N
0.00 p
q
oAe
SR 3 Y YIN
5100 1 �
0111111
9161
tl
W
0.10 p •
q
� 0.10 1 •
1
0.19 p •
p
� • 11
toil
SR Ilia
IIIII ON NB
ON
0 N
5009
BI,
p
p
A.
N
1
p
NIII
EL INTI + p MINI
ET -
+700 p
o pill
eo y
p
19Y
O.a N. •
1
0.04 1 .
Y
0.04 p •
p
1 B
p '
MR
UM IN Ilia
+700 II
0 pM
2371
1
NO
0.14
N M
p91
ER pM 10 IIN
170011
O NM
4141
1
111
021 p
p
024 p
A
024 p
p
p1A
WL Ulm + Y INN
tion p
o NM
too 1
N
No
0.05 N
A
a05 1
1
0.05 p
p -
p pi
INN
WT NIII 2 p NM
WR
3400 1
0111
sea 1
1
4
. 020 1 •
1
020 1 •
1
028 p •
p
Y • ill
NJ
Mil ON NM
ON
0 ON
7521
N
A
A
Y
Y Y
.
NORTWBOUiR
CRITRSV. NUMB-� �
-M�p
0.44
1
0.44
I
0.44
ICU SPREADSHEET FNA: NAMECR B Aowm 20TO vWb prq
--
I OAU
Y
FABiNYEST CRITICAL SlNltl-
0.90
0.30
1
0.30
N - NORTHBOUND S - SOUTFISOUND
R
_—
_
_ —
_
I OAO
E - EASTBOUND. W - WESTBOUA
CLEARANCE.
all
M
0.055
1
0 .05
1
5
L - LEFT. T - THROUGH,- RIOHT
R
`
w. w
i OAS
M
N.S. - NOT SIGNN.QED
ICU VALUE-
AM
0.79
0.76 _—
1
. es
O.TY
LOS - LEVEL OF SERVICE
-
! _
--
l OAS
M
'DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEIABlfS
-
Los •
111
C
I
C
.e+-�A.e.III
m
N
O -0j C
0] O
01D
O Z
07 O
00
— T
A a)
Ut �
WERSECTION CAPACRY LMMTION ANALYSIS
PROJECT: 0117 of TuIrm Cw "Red Recomemicaewn
INIERVAL: AM PEAK HOUR
INTERSECTION: Newpal Av i Mein SMI YEAR 210 WMM* PROJECT
NII IIII 1 BI A
Hill MOVEMENT 111 EMT A PROP IBI E)USTI N3 I
NII
II
AN LANES A LANES NA
CAPACITY. II
1110
n Ex+oT1NER II AN
11 *PROJECT
AN�II�
m A
m
' 1
IBI
NL -
NI
111
o IN
17001
MR
NT
NII
21
0 IN
-3100 N
LIN
NR
dN
on
0110
on
IIIN
SL
INN
t I
o In
I?W I
nip
ST
INN
211
0 NI
340011
1111
SR
INN
1 A
OWN
1700 I
IN
EL
LIN
t 1
0 AN
1700 1
IIIA
ET
LIN
21
o LIN
3400 I
IIII
ER
IIIA
1 N
011111
1700 I
IIII
WL-
IIII
- 11
011111
17001
IIIA
WT
NA
21
OHIO
34W I
NA
WR
NI
1 1
0 NN
1700 N
LIN
II
PROPOSED N YEAR2 0 I
CAPACITY MR. VOLUMES 1
mA
n Ex+oT1NER II AN
11 *PROJECT
0
m A
0 nB
3401
0M
301
d vlaw w
I AIN
I BA
0 IN
1010
0 IIII
1301
o.ta 1 1
I'
N—Jim
0 o
1401
IIil
10001
a
oat
0 IN
3001
ON
101
ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAMHewporl S Mdn 22 w!o pro!
N - NORTHBOUND, 8. SOUTN6pUND
E - EASTBOUND. W - WESTBOUND
L = LEFT. T. THROUON, R. RIGHT
N.S.. NOT SKPI1AL D
LOS . LEVEL OF SERVICE
. DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS
II
HER II
IIA
BII
A
R90STINO I
d E70STM fl
1:OTHER I
fl DL*OTHER 1
d *PROJECT U
n Ex+oT1NER II AN
11 *PROJECT
VOL N
I
VOLUME NN
®+
vIo 1
1 v�
1
We • N
d vlaw w
I AIN
I BA
II
BIA
IN
0.13 ASI
ata 0-1
o.ta 1 1
I'
N—Jim
N
N
AM
0.11 I
1 0.11 A
N
oat
.0.10 !
Nd
fl BA
IN
NNNI
I
9.021
d
N 0.ozU
I
II
A
aoz 1
A
1
-- I
INN
mi-
0.30•
j•
A
� A
1
II NNNAiI
II ' Id
A
n
o.00 A
d 0.011
11 In
0.00
IN
IN
0.02 1
7
1 0.02 1
O -OT•
N
302 6
0-07 1 '.
tl
II
11 ' NAI
1
III
OAS 1
U 0.06 A
1
0.00
----
I! NB
1
I
0.00A•
0 aii 1•
1
0.00 j
j
I� 11111
A
NNNN
Nd
0.01 1
I 0.01 j
1
001
10
� _•
Him
q
NORTWSOUTH CRITICAL SUMS •
AN
ou
� •...s.ee
•�!
�
N
I
---
au
_— I
343
I
0
o.ao
BA
EASTNWEST CRITICAL SUMS-
.0.10 !
O.te
--
—^
-- I
ale
O,pp
CLEARANCISAN
300 1
uaS
1
'
0.00
I
0.00
ICU VALUE .
&64 ' . I
e
OM
+�••�
•• AAI
IN
----
--
O.B4
I
OAS—
A11
LOS=
B
I
B
— 0
10
I
A
���asa
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION AHALYSIS
Fv
C
e) O
! Q /
0 CD
A m
Cn !
PROJECT: Cny of Tuedn•E7 Cano10 PAW RedWldon'
INTERVAL PM PEAK HOUR
94TERSECTXW Neepnt Aveele 9 Me1n S9ee1 YEAR 2020 WIN PROJECT
Illn
1119
Ilnl N IIIN d Nq
MOVEMENT 1UI EXIST A PROP 1110 EXI9TWG I PROPOSED MN
A
YEAR 2020 1 OTHER
AFA
N PROJECT
1N1
N
EIOSTHO N
A D06TWO I
1 +OTHER
I EX+OTHER I
I
EX+OTHER II INN
1110
N0 LANES N LANES IIID CAPACITY I CAPACITY MA
VOLUMES I VOLUME
N VOLUME
NI
VIC 1
q
1
A •PROJE�
n
N UTA
Ulu
114-0—III4 1 �
MII
1
N
1111
-
NmA
®Amtl
A Y
VAI 1
7C W W
_ 11 IIID
N� Rol 19 Rol 17991
on
451
.p
0.03
A-�Y
IImNN
Illd
Hof
NT' MII 21 IIIA 34001
NR 1111 ON Off
on
10901
N
Np
o�.33i
y
q•
A
0.03 q
1
d' UTA
UIN
on
1591
p
- NI
1
1A•
IINI
AIM
sL NM 1 N AIM 1700 1
ST 110 21 IIIN 3400 N
o IN
0 W
701
7801
N
NI
0.04 1 •
1
oJN p '
0.04
N
o 04 II
p
U
1 IIIN
1111
SR IMI 1 N VIII 1700 p
0 MA
12D 1
1
1
NM
MA
0.23 1
0.07
1
p
N
0.24 - p
9
t• VIII
1141
EL 1 d IIIA 170D 1
o MIO
ee p
A
NM.
0.04 A •
0.04 8 ,
0
0W II
•
A
N %1%
LIN
Jlawim
ET LIN 2 N IMI 34001
o N11
4901
A
M1
' 0.14
q
A
LL • nnl
IIIN
ER VIII 1 N Ip9 17001
o NMI
321
1
NA
0.02 N
1
om R
0
002
gill
LIN
0111
WL Ind 1 U IIID 1700 1
WT UIN z N am 34001
o MU
o M0
oo 1
6291
p
MI
aas A
A
0.13 1
R
p
0.06m p
1
N
NN
VIII
IAM
WR NN 1 N IOM 1700 N
o MIO
101
p
1
NI
•
0-1410.13
-0.o
1 '
A
0.15p •
1
A IIUI
p • pill
1 1
= Q-�I�N
aot
0.011
1
N VIII
ICU SPREADSHEET FILE KWWW ppt 31Mn 2020 wM3 prof
NORTWOUTH CRITICAL SUMS -
m
OA1
-
I
0.41 _ I
DAI = I
0.00 Non
N. NORTHBOUND. S -SOUTHBOUND -
EASTIWEST CRITICAL SUMS.
MN
0.19
I
_
0.19
I
0.19
1
--NM
OAO 911
E = EASTBOUND, W = WESTBOIIID -
0.FARANCE _
W
qM
_-_
OJ6
_-
-
-
-- NIO
L-LEFT.T=THROLOKR=RIGHT
NM
I
s Q
OJI6
I
0.05
I
0.05 M1
N.S. - NOT 8K*L& WEDICU
VALUE =
0.86
=
I
- !- i
- Q06
sssQs . s .
, s nu
LOS - LEVEL OF SERVICE - -
•
IN
--
-
--
I.
0.95
I
0.06 1M
DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS
•
LOg.
INN
B
I
B
_
--
_
-
.A -- "in
Q
f tl • .QQ�Q-
!
I
qW
. Q
sOQ = Y i
Q.tlOI i .S
Fv
C
e) O
! Q /
0 CD
A m
Cn !
INITERSECTION CAPACITY.UIIRATIDN ANALYSIS
PROJECT: Cel of TW*i-8 CmM Reel Reim
INTERVAL AM PEAK HOUR
• NTERSECTION: Pmeped Am i Moln SYeM YEAR 7020 WNWA PROJECT
-
Ilia
NIII II UNI U
NM
1
tl
Iw
- II
tl
EXISTING 1
N EX40T7IER N
p OL40THER I MIN
IIIA
MOVEMENT 1111 EAST II PROP I11 E%ISTM 1 PROPOSED 01
YEAR 2020 1 OTHER
1 PROJECT
IN
EXISTNO p
p .OTHER
1
1 +PROJECT N
II
+PROJECT N Nm
IIIII
Nal LANES p LANES INN. CAPACITY p CAPACITY nN
VOLUMES p VOLUME
A VOLUME
1IU
VA; II
1
VTC
®.. 190
VAS A�11
WN
olliR Nom I �
IN'
t
A
1A
q�U
p—.p
1 u
n 11
MR
NL wU Oil o NIA o q
0 171
01
A
NW
I•
A
0
N
n1101
NT Kill 01 0 RN ON
on.
O p
1
Im
N
1
N
N
1'
1U
INN
NR INN 01 o Him O N
0111
a Q
II
mN
1
1.
A
N
I p1
INN
SL BN ON 011111 ON
0 N1
771
p
n1
1
q
A
1
II AIA
IIII
sr 111 10 011111 170p A
O All
ON
I
In
0.10 U•
1
min -1.
1
- 0.10 1•
1
pI -hill
• MR
IIIII
SR IIIb ON o INN ON
o Am
930
U
Iw
I
I
I-
II
1
A
IIIA
EL Ilia 11 - 0 pm 17001
0 NIII
871
1
IN
0.05 p •
1
0.05 K •
a
0.05 N •.
II
I p1
I • w1
[III
ET Ilia in OWN 17001
0 Kill
3231
A
INN
0.10 n
N
0-19 1
1
0.19 q_
1
tl
INN
ER gin Oil o NIN 01
0 Iw
ON
A
NII
0
A
N
A-
mA
InK
WL NII ON 0 Kia ON
o ON
ON
N
1111111
I
N' Mil1
Ina
WT .Inn in 0 wA � 17001 _
0 1A
. 4001
1
mI
031 1 •
1
Oso U '
1
U.•
Oso .
N
• nN
IIIII
WR Intl 1 N 4 Im 17001
O Iw
oil
1
Ill
0.05 ;1
1
0.05 1
A
0.05 1
1
1
1go
1
ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAMEmeped i Moh 2020 eeTO pmI
NORTTV8OUTH CRITICAL
SUMS.-
M1
N1
0.10
- — I
=.s.'
0.10 - d 1
_—
0.10 I
IN
OAO 11
EASTIWEAT CRRICFI. SUM
0.b
I
0.20
I
_—
0.20
-' 0
N-NORTHBOl1ND.8-SOVT}N30WiO -
--_
--
I
0.00
E -EASTBOUND. W-WESTSOM
CLEARANCE -
DAI
0.05
---
--
L - LEFT. T. T1*tOUGH. R - RIGHT
-
s e !
... I
OAS
I
OAS
N.S. - NOT SIGNALIZED
ICU VALUE=
m0.M
I
OA4
- a
'
LOS - LEVEL OF SERVICE
_ _
--
I
_
OA4
I
OA5 W
• DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS
Los.
Is
A
I
A
_ —
_
_ —
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION A14ALYSS
00
cn
A QI
Ln —
INN
PROJECT: COY at Tueanfl CemfnO ROY Rednttl®Ym
I
FJ09TIq I
INTERVAL. PM PEAK HOUR
II EX+OTHER II NIA
III
EXISTING 1
INTERSECTK tt f MPW Ave 8 Mein Sl YEAR 2020 Wlou1 PROJECT
p -+PROJECT H
IIII
III a 1111
I
am B
R
IMI
MOVEMENT 1111 EXISTp PROP 1111
EASTING I PROPOSED NY YEAR 2020 p OTHER
p PROJECT
UNI
III LANES 1 LANES IIIA
CAPACITY 1. CAPACITY 0 VOLUMES I VOLUME
p VOLUME
lint
III -111111
N
MR I
p
IIIII
NL URI 0 1 1111
ON
01N of
p
1141
NT Ila 01 IIIII
on
0 III 01
NA
INA
NR HUI o A 1411
OR
0 am ON
IIIII
SL NII 0 1 1111
ON
0 NN 109 1
1111
ST IIII 1 N IIII
1700 I
o Nal 01
.1
INN
SR Ills OI IIII
an
901 eel
I
Ilia
EL IIIA 1 N IIIA
1700 I
on 1321
IIII
ET IIIA 1 A IIRI
17001
0 MN 4331
A
Ilia
ER HAI ON IIIA
01
ON ON
p
IIII
WL Nn Go Ilia
01
0 NN 01
I
Ills
WT III t I IIII
17001
0 ME 2901
N
III
—
WR NN I I NII
— — - --
17001
-
0 1321
_
1
o
ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAIAEioeped 6.MeOi 2020 Wo pori
NORT108OUT71 CRITICAL SURAS -
n
N II NII
Kul K
EASTANEST CRITICAL SUMS-
H- NORTHBOUND, S-SOUTHBOVNO
R
'
I II NA
`
NI
NAS
E - EASTBOUND, W - WFSTSOUND
-
CLEARANCE - .
II
000 n
LI!LEFT. T -THROUGH. R-RKMTT -
NN
0.10
1
Q -masa
ato - I
N.S. - NOT SDNNJ2ED
ICU VALUE -_
–_
–
LOS - LEVEL OF SERVICE
I 0.01) INN
NN
• 0040TES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS
1
Los.
00
cn
A QI
Ln —
INN
I
I
FJ09TIq I
I EXOTHER Il
II EX+OTHER II NIA
III
EXISTING 1
II +OTHER n
p -+PROJECT H
II +PROJECT A NIA
IRI
VIC Y
n
VIC p
A
Vic 1
II WSW–Rw p YIY
U-1-1
- Y-1
>"..� pap
IN
1'
I
I•
N
N
A
Y
II
n
II N• 101NA
NA
I pill
Nn
n
II AllIi
p
0.10 •
0.10 i•
N
0.10.I•
1 no]on
11 I IAIIY
1 IIIINW
Ono
0.09 1 '
1
0.08 •
p
p 1 IllaN
0.25 I
II
029 A
11 A Ilia
am
n
1
Y
II
II
I
m1
Y'
o
n
N II NII
Kul K
my
an p •
R
ail I •
I II NA
`
NI
NAS
0.00: 111
-+a
1
II
000 n
p II RIII
1 IIII
NN
0.10
1
Q -masa
ato - I
ato
Na
–_
–
_ _
I 0.01) INN
NN
025
1
023
om --
– -- YII
i
_--
---
0.01) NII
■
045
1
Ono--
�•�!�•'!
– --
S MR
NI
ago-�
°�°
oMo
NI
–_
1 oao Nil
NN
A
I
A
I
A--
-- Na
• O
- a
�YiY - -- f
A
L Y mu
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS
PROJECT: COY W Tm*1 El Cw1ft RW Redo platin
INTERVAL: AM PEAK HOUR
lITERSECTIOR PiAw i 101 Sh" YEAR 2@0 WMM11 PROJECT
IIIII
OTTauERAE 1 PROJvowAECTE
IIIN
I
AID
IIIA MOVEMENT IAp EMT p
PROP IIID
IIID
vp
IIII LANES p
LAWS IAA
IIID
]fill—I-
p
MINI
IIIII
NL
IIIN
1 n
0 1111
IIIII
NT
IIID
1 If
0 DIII
11111
NR
IIIA
Oil
0 oil
11111
. SL
Ilia
Oil
0 No
(111
ST
IDD
2+
0 IN
IIII
SR
pill
I D
0 m
pill
EL
Hill
/ N
O 111
pill
ET
Din
211
0119
Pill
ER
Pill
Oil
0INN
11111
V&
IIII
1 II
0 01
Hill
WT
MII
211
010
0111
WR
oil
11
0 g
EXISTING
CAPACITY 1
N
1700 p
IT00 1
ON
ON
3400 p
Im 1
17001
34001
011
1700 p
340011
17001
IIID
PROPOSED INR
CAPACITY pill
Om
on
0 AN
004
OM
0 ON
0 pry
0 AIN
01111
0111
ago
0 No
ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAAIrOepsa S tq 2020 W/o pml
N = NORTHBOUND. 8 - SOUTHBOUND
E - EASTBOUND. W - WESTBOUND
L - LEFT. T- THROUGH. R - RIGHT
N.S. - NOT SIGNALIZED
LOS - LEVEL OF SERVICE
(+) REPRESENTS LEFT AND LEFT / THROUGH LANES
NOTE: SPLIT PHASED" -
YvEaARuMEs 1020 1p
OTTauERAE 1 PROJvowAECTE
pill
dpip q
EXISTNIG A
EXISTINGN
i +OT1ERR
N ExMTHER N
JPROJECT p-
II EX.+OTHE4 A No
p +PROJECT
vp
Vic
1
p
p vlcm MP
11 0
II on
� 1
42-9
U
N
IIA
AAI
0.02 A • (
0.02 A • A
0.02 1 • p
1-.•10
•
Ito A
Y
Mn
0.12 p
p
0.11 I
p
0.01
II BI
A NII
3011
1
MII
A
A
p
p
1
19411
16T d
1
N
of
pip
0.12 •
•
1 Iil
•
1e1 p
1
IIIA
0.w 1
01w2 1
1
o.0e
1
p 9A
A
go
o 1e 1 •
(
0.10 A '
11
0.10
lea 1
n
D
1
ate A
11
one
301
1
(
1
m
d
003(
1
1
A
0.031
1
1
N
am p
A
1
1 Iltl
n
641 j.
AM
1•
1
OAS Y'
A
0.16 1'
A
AI
II ' 111
1301
A
IN
0.0e
d
1
0.06as 1.
1
A n
NORTHPSOUTH CRITICAL SUMS-
■
A
Ont I
0.14 = I
0.14—RD
__
__
I 0190
111
EASTNVEST CRITICAL SUMS-
d
am
0.26
016 --
on
__ n
CLEARANCE
No
am I
-
0.03
I
0.05
I am
N
ICU VALUE-
pn
OAS
I
0.43
I
OAS
I OAS
LOS-
A
A
I
A
INTERSECTION CAPACITY U'R¢ATION ANALYSIS
PROJECT: CNyd T>BMHCWWWRWRe I IN' 00n
INTERVAL: PM PEAK HOUR
MTERSECTIOW.. PIORPed AVS i 141 Sk" YEAR 2020 WMqul PROJECT
Din n uW
NAI L"A- ENT am SWT N PROP pW DUSTING N
111
IN
Ill LANES N LANES NW
CAPACITY I
fill
'--
WA—A-..;—III
A• OTHER N
0111 961
I
INN
RL
IMI
In
WI
1+001
IIIA
NT
IWI
, 1
AW
170D 1
IIIN
NR
IWI
ON
INN
ON
IIW
SL
IN.
01
IIW
0 1
IIW
ST
m
2+
1 I.
.1'
N
file
SR
IIW
1 1
KIP
17W I
IIII
- EL
IW
I 1
IWI
1700 I
IWI
ET
WA
2 q
Iilll
- 34W I
INN
ER
IIW
01
ION
ON
IIII
WL
NII
I N
WII
17001
IIAI
WT
-IIW
21
M
34001
TAI
WR
w-
11
m
,7001
kW n
IN
PROPOSED Wq YEAR 2020 1 OTHER
y PROJECT
CAPACITY IN VOLUMES I VOLUME
y VOLUME
EXISTM A
A• OTHER N
0111 961
q
Olin 204 1
A
O Alll 331 -
p
01W 2251
1
0 M 13s1
p
1•••I
1�1
0 WA 2301
j
0 AW 51121
1
0 MR 380
1
0 M 241
1
0M We
1
ON 2441
1
ICU SPREADSHEET FLE NAMIfteped S IN 2020 w/o prcj
N - HORTFBOUPD, S - SOUTHOOIIND
E-1JSTSOUND, W - VVFSTHOIMD
L - LEFT T • THROUGH, R • RIGHT
N.S.-NOT SKINALIZF.D .
LOS • LEVEL OF SERVICE
• DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS
(+) REPRESENTS LEFT AND LEFT I THROUGH LANES
NOTE: SPLIT PHASED NS
X
CD
fA
M O
01 �
Z
(n O
O p
� N
A0)
Ln
HORTHISOU HCRITICAL sums
EASTAVEST CRITICAL SUMS
CLEARANCE• .
ICH VAUIE -
LOS •
IIIA
1
1 DOBTMKR 1
N EX+OTH R p
N D(.+OTHER I Me
NW
EXISTM A
A• OTHER N
A +PROJECT p
p +PROJECT 1 NAI
TNI
VFG A
N VIC 1.
1 .
vc tl
A
INw A IIIA
IIA
1•••I
1�1
A
BYUS
1sWN
1'
10
tl
DAIS A
N
V' IWI
Adl
0,22
1 0-v
o32
I fiW
A
1 I.
.1'
N
A
1 am
NW
1.
1
1 NAI
IN
0.11
om I
1' NW
AW
0.07 I
tl 0.07. 1
1
OA7 p
p
N
111
0.151'
N o.ts J.
N
0.15 p•
p
N• n
AIN
0.27 A
A uy A
A
0.27 p
1
RUN
1
A p
n
A
A
W dIA
m
0.01
0.01
0.01
NW
0.211'
1 0.21 p'
N
alt N•
p
TNI' lilt
au I
1 au A
1
0.14 1
1
A NW
• v a
vs�a • s . •mem
a •
032_—
022
(
032
(
.. MR
OAO WA
--
ON
o38
-
0.38
I
AW
0.00 _— am
IIA
AW
0.05
OM
0.05—
I
aas -- NW
pill
111
0.63 (
.OS
0.1113 j
OAS WN
AW
--
- --
-
WN
-- WA
••
s�.v.....
A MW
�� . e
e
PROJECT: City of TwUn-8 CW t0 Rai RKMNF BM
INTERNAL' AM PEAK HOUR
INTERSECTIO!: 8 Comhw Red 6 1d S1Yr1 YEAR 2010 With PROJECT
lull
Hill I— Ilul U
pill
1
A
lu1
N
A
POSTM N
p OCAOTHFR I
IN PX•OTNER
p pp
MR
MOVEMENT lull MOST a PROP Ido E=TNB A PROPOSED NIM
YEAR PL'm p OTHER
p PROJECT
NTA
EKISTNO p
q .OTHER
p
II +PROJECT 11.
PROD
q PROJECT•
A AOI
MR
IAO LANES I LANES JIM CAPACITY I CAPACITY IIIN
VOLUMES A VOLUME
1. VOLUME
IN
V7C p
p
V/C
v� 11
1 IMP
AIR
NII[—U®NN A
W�
1
N
AIR
1'-I
NSW
M�'U ®�
p AIA
VIN
NL IAII 1 p o mi 17004
0 IAU
- 1701
1
Oto
;
0.f0 •
0.10 1 ,
I
A m pW
A•
Him
NT Hill O N 0 MR ON
o luA
ON
U
A
A
pill
Ilp
NR Hill. 11 011111 17001
0 PAI
701
W
M
asp
p
- 0.04 a-
1
N
Moa 1
N
A
A AIN
IIIA
tY Iglu 01 0 IAII 0 W
0 Ulu
o p
1
MA
n
t
II
II
A IIIN
IAII
sr Alp 0 n 0 gin 01
0 Win
o I
I
pill'
II '
1
1•
q
1
A
1 Nil
Hill
SR pill Oil 0 NII o p
0 No
on
I
NIA
II
A
1
1
U•
I
p
VIII
EL Hill III O NIA17W 1 -
0 =
- on
N
pin
0110 A '
1
oA0
p
1
W lint
VIII
ET JIM 2 H o 1111 3400 p
o M
5n W
1
AN
0.17 p
A
al? II
U
0• N
p
1 11111
Hill
ER pill - in 0 Np 1700 1
0 mi
1251
A
- NAI
0.00 W
N
D.Od 1
p
aa0 a
.N
A NIA
RIII
WL 11111 t N 0 IMI tTDo q
0 IBI
1071
1
NI
0.00 1
p
0.00 q
p
0.00
0 No
Np
WT 1111121 0 W ado 1
- 0 NU
AI 1
I
NM
aa9 p •
p
OM It •
N
023 t'
L
N • W
dill
WR AIN ON on on
o lingo
ON
p
ANI
N
1
1
I
N
1
.
-
- — -- - -
-
IN
a -10
• v • -�•
1 AIN
ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME ECR a td 207D WPFDJ
NORTH 03OUD1 CRITICAL
-
SUMS -
N�pl
Rio --
I
_ 0.10
_ —.
l
s
0.10 I 0.00
e Mil
IIY
FAS7YWE3T CRITICAL BUMS •
029
D29
am
"
N - NORTHBOUND. S - SOUTHBOUND
Him
I OA0
W
E- EASTBOUND.OI -WESTBOUND
'
CLEARANCE -
-
NAI
0.05
l
a05
I
oA6
-
l- LEFT, T-THH90UOFI,R- RIGHT
JIM-_
- — •ref
OAS
-NMI
Los
ICU VALUE -
O.7A
l
0.34
I
• �.1
-NOT oPLCEEDSERVICE
4106
.' DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS
LOS.
a
A
I
..A
�
A
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS
PROJECT: GlyoTTu6nFJ CamYq Red Re I Ilka0pl
i
INTERVAL PM PEAK HOUR
.
INTERSECTION: a Canea Rod 8 Id Sheet YEW 2020 WYh PROJECT
.
YIII Inn II INTI
HillMOVEMENT PINJIM p PROPLANES OR
N NII
EXISCAPACfM R PROPOSED M
N
YEAR 2020 1 OTHER
A
I PROJECT
M
M
N
EDOS7'IIG N
---~ --
A E%ISTMj A
tl •oTFFJi ! tl
-
II EK.OTHBt
II •PROJECT N
II
IIW
I�e
A M
VOLUMES 1 VOLUME
1 VOLUME
M
WC p
p VIC' . 1
A
VIC
I •PROJETMCTT
VIII-- woI ii—PI0
VIII NL III
A
M
A'
A
M
e..� 11.7-1
+�+j I'°"1
11 n v/cW_W
'� pr<I
N
Inl
IIII NIR
JIM NT M 011 M
17900
on
0 M
o M
gal 1
ON
1 -
M
ai0A
a,e l•
A
ais q•
A
s
p•
MI
IIII
1141 NR Nin 111 MR
'Mn
1700 1
0 MN
Ua A
1-
N
M
M
0.00 A
U a0wi A
II
u
R
IIIA
IIRI SL VIII 0 1
of
0 mu
O p
A
M
1
N A
II
aa0 II
j
YW
Hill. ST IINI ON IIII
OR
0 MI
01
N
NIII
A
it
11111 SR Jim OR NIII
01
0 BI
ON
A
M
A•
A 1•
i
A
R
A,
IM
(IIII EL Jim I N RR
ET 2
1700 I
0 M
0 1 -
A -
PIN
-0.00 N
1 O. a9 I
1
1
0.00
N
R
AIN
IIIN Hill N Rln
7400
p
0
m
A
Iom
A
N
IMI ER Hill III pill
1700
0
2m
q
. 0.12 p
p a. 1•
pN
029 o. A
A
R•
M
Hill WL Illn I A Nnl
WT
17001
0 lin
t1e p-
A
MN
0.m N•
A ami I'
I
0.0T A•
p
21 MnI
WWA
0 i
o
7760 R
R
" A
A
0.23
N
M
IIRI IA1 O A I
A
1
IN
1
A
A
II
A•
MR
— -----
—
—
Ink
A N
!rr.rrr®,r1
11111
NORI}118O GiIfICX SUM •. -
PIN
415
1 0.1&
M
ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME ECR S Id 2020 �/Pq
M
I
0.15
O:oO-
INN
N - NORTHBOUND. S - SOUTNOOUNO
EASTNVMCwUCAL SUMS.
036
I
_
1
_—I
0.76
a
_
I 0.00
III
E c EASTBOUND, W . WESTROUNO
- -
CLEAMNCE.
M
0.05
I O.OB
•'
-
M
L c LEFT. T c THROUGR R c RJGHT
M
I
p,06
I 0.06
NNI
N.S. NOT SIGNALIZED
IGl VALUE.
r .
036 I
. r c
i I
a r c ®c.r
035
LOS c LEVEL OF SERVICE
-
I 0.06
Ilu
• DENOTES CWTICAL MOVEMENTS
LOS.-
M---
I A �f
_
--RHI
I
A
I A
IN
. r
.Z1
N
N
-00
M C_
co W O
Z
V O
00
- T
A m
M �
NTERSECTN)N CAPACITY Uf1IIATION ANALYSIS
A
PROJECT: city of Tuwar Ee Cortin Rad Redomftivon
L:
INTERVAAM PEAK HOUR
-
- INTERSECTIOM EI CW&W Real s Mdn SYaa1 YEAR 20ID With PROJECT
NII
NII
MR A Nil
MOVEMENT IN EXIST II PROP IN EXISTING
- 1 - IN - II
1 PROPOSED PIN YEAR 2020 q
1
OTHER 1 PROJECT
INN
IN
1
OOSTA1o1 p
A E)OSTMp
q .OWER q
ry EJL+OTHER U
A +PROJECT II
A EX*Or*n
1 +PROIEI T
N Inn
NII
III LANES p LANES 0I WACITY A CAPACITY I1
VOLUMES A
. VOLUME N YOL.UIE
IN
Vic A
A VAC A
II
VAO 1
p V/GW_wv
y Np
p
NN
IN
-- pnl®II.®INN
NL IIAI OR 0 INN
N —
on
1111
0 NIA
p
TJ 1
1
N
IN
NI
I.p
1-1
ya•A
pin
A�01N
Inn
NT INN 1 1 o NIq
NR t 0
1700 1
0114
+a A
So
- A
NN
0.t! -2 •
•
1
N •
- y
A' INN
1 INTI
IIIn
III 1 NN
17W N
o AN
1
A
n
0m
0.14 A
q
0.01 N
A
Inn
nlll
SL INN o 1 0 AIN
01
01111
is 0
II'
NI
0 '
A A '
i
B '
y
INTI
ST 1110 1 p 01I
77001
0 Nil
1051
q
IN
0e1 1
1 0.11 p
A
om 1
1
1 pill
'
Illy
SR 111 111 011111
EL EL t 0
17001
0 M
291
1
INN
0.02 1
y 0-02III6
p
p
0.02 1
1
1
1 pill
Hill
Nil Nil
ET
17001.
0111
35 N
A.
No
ooz
1 •
•
1 on
0 .0p
1 •
11111
Nil t 1 0 II
1700 A
111
011111
2801
q
INN
027
1
1
0 7 p
N
NII
Inn
ER NUI 0 q O IIP
O 1
.17001
ON
a 1
A
Iq
1
A
II . IN
101
WL NIII + 1 0 110
o N1
all
q
■
0.01 N
A 0.07 1
1
0J04 1
A
IN
nri
R UN o 1 a Im
tmo 1
0
1
�
°'°
0.So •
010 1 •
1
N4
• NM
PIN
571_
1
1
_
I NI
• a
IN
ICU SPREADSHEET FILE K ME ECR 8 Mort 2071 wlpof
lIDRTM18O<JTM
BUYS •
-
0.17 -
I 0.1!
--
I
0.11 1 GAS
-
EAsrrvNPbTCRRICALSUMS.
O.r2
0.12
I
0.ffi
-- III
N-NORTNATOUN0,6•.SOlTf16OlAVD
MN
_-
� -
1 0.00
E - EASTBOUND. W - WESTBOUND
CLEARANCE •-
OJb
Om
DAN
- - NI
L+ LEFT. T. THROUGH, R - RIGHT
u
a!
i
5�
N.S. • NOT SNAL1D
Ii
I U VALUE •
O31
I 0.51
I
a!
oat
.�
LOS • LEVEL OF SERVICE
Iva.
OJ16
AI
•DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS
Los
NIN
A
A
A
AIN
IN
A
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS
MII AAI I Inn
pull MOVEMENT All EMT 1 PROP flM
1111
. II PRO.ECi
Intl LANES I LAWS 111
Am
N EXISTING) 1
p t OTHER
mu•�=n�Au
p EX+OTHER I AR
VOLUMES I
NM
NL
pup
on
M1
Inn
NT
1M
III
Mn
11111
NR
all
1 a
AIM
MII
SL
MII
o l
MN
MII
ST
lull.
1 1
Inn
MII
SR .
lull
I N
IMI
MII
EL
phi
1 A
INN
MII
ET
Hill
1 N
]III
Dill
ER
MII
o p
IIIA
Mill
WL
pun
1I
MI
RIK
WT
pip
11
INN
NIU
WR
IIII
08
1
CMF d TdhB Cl Rd RKWurcOm
PM PEAK HONK
8 C.m►n RON 6 NM SYad YEAR 2020 WIh PROJECT
ExISTING N
CAPACITY 1
oh
+7 N
+7go R
01
17000
+100 1
17001
17001
0
1911
+Mao p
01
Ill
PROPOSED Ulu
CAPACITY IgA
po
oN
0 IAA
0a
OMR
01M
o pM
o IMI
0 in*
0
ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME ECR S Mdn 2020 %Vr4
N! NORTHBOUND, S s SOUTHBOUND
E = EASTBOUND, W ! WESTBOUND
L! LEFT, T! THROUGK R! MOW
N.S.! NOT SIGNALIZED
LOS C LEVEL OF SERVICE
• DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS
O p
— N
A oX
M
YEAR 2920 1 OTHER
. II PRO.ECi
IMI
1
Ex sTHo 1
N EXISTING) 1
p t OTHER
1 EC+OTHER g
p EX+OTHER I AR
VOLUMES I
VOLUME - p VOLUME
W
VK: 1
I
II we
p •PROJECT II
1 +PROJECT 1 AIR
1
.ems RSA
q 1
1l..p
VIC * 1 R
®® Imp
view IMP 1 Mill
aa.aa
1511
NESAI
flmAA
218 1'
+
1
1
111
0.22 A `
1' 0.22 1 •
i 022 1
A
1 • Mn
1
A
111
om
1•
ao7 1
1 om 1
I
n ml
225
1
d
IIIA;
Ilp�l
1
1'
1 mill 1
1
1 j
1
1' an
49fl
1
oa+mS
M
A 0.02 1
a.te
A 0.02 A
g
N pA
M1
om
0211•
I o27 A•111*
l 1•
1
111
1
p
1
A 1
0.27
N Ip
4341
1
In
A•
0 om 1'
N
A o.os 1•
1
I Ap
fl 111
601
A
025
Ar
p
1 1
1. om g
q
fl. u
NIIRTHISOUTH CRRKX SUMS v
IIA
0.29 ! a �
2
A l
fl IN
0-22
OAD oil
FASTAVEST CRITICAL SUMS!
IN
- 0]2
I 0.321
w
a�-----�---1A
1
0.0111p
CLEARANCE
All
oJ76—lip
I I.OB
ICU VALUE -
I
Ons I
ans
+R
Up
0.68
1 O.W
LOS
AAI
9
_—
I A
A
— lull
a semva
s s!
aaeaa! s e i
A Ag
�!�la.
deo loa
IIIA
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS
.
1 EX+OTHER I
p EJI.WTHFR R NY
PROJECT.- CRY Of TUS11,03 Con" Rad ReddmoMmtlon
EXISTN0 y
1 +OTHER II
INTERVAL' AAA PEAK HOUR
i
+PROJECT. 1 NN
pN
VIC A
INTERSECTION: EI Cemho Red& impo1l Avam9
YEAR 2020 WBh PROJECT
vD
IIIII
IIIII N A01
1
UN
1
p
Bill
MOVEMENT IIIII EXIST p PROP ON
E70STM I PROPOSED NN
YEAR 2020 A OTHER
1 PROJECT
NIN
INTI LANES N LANES 1111
CAPACITY N CAPACITY NN
VOLUMES 1 VOLUME
1. VOLUME
Hill
IAM—,N---.NN1
I —in
U
1
1
loll
NL lug 7 N 0 N1
17W 1
0 NJ
1100
1
NM
NT DIB 20 o NII
-31001
o AIN
5201
1
NNI
NR INN 11 011111
17N 1
o NO
1801
II -
MR
SL INN 11 0 INN
1700 tl
o NII
1701
0
ANI
ST 11111 31 o INN
51001
o NN
0001
1
ANI
OR NUI 01 0 INN
of
0 IIN
101
1
loll
EL • ANI 1 1 0 NIA
17001
o NIA
201
1 -
INN
ET MR 1 1 00111
17001
0 RII
1901
p
fIIII
ER AIN t y 01141
17001
0 RII
100 N
A
NIN
WL NN I 1 011111
1700 1
o Apo
110 1
II
NN
WT on - 21 . 01011
34001
0 ply
_
1101
1
NM
WR INl 01 o IOU
ON
o IN
701
1
I
ICU SPREADSHEET FIEF NAI EECR 8 4spu12020 Wpb
NORTMOUTH CRITICAL $UMS .
_—
EAST/WW CRITICAL SUMS -
LlSAS..
N - NORTHBOUND, 8 - SOUTHBOUND
OAI
I
SAS
I
OAS NI
E - EASTSOLND, W - WESTBOUND
_
0.19
- _
I alp
CLEARANCE
•-
L - LIFT. T= THROUGH. R - RIGHT
1
DAG
I
N-
N.S. - NOT BIGNALIZED
-
I A
ICU VALUE.
.
LOS - LEVEL OF SERVICE
I
'DENOTES CRrrlCAL MOVEMENTS
-
LOB.
'.
IIIA
tl
N EXISTING N
1 EX+OTHER I
p EJI.WTHFR R NY
NA
EXISTN0 y
1 +OTHER II
1 'PROJECT A
i
+PROJECT. 1 NN
pN
VIC A
y VIGA
1
II
vD
1
Vn.W_I� II AAI
IIA
NI
A"N
Om A 1
— 1-1
0.05 1 1
A—U
1—AMY
IAq
0.15 1'
1 ats l'
A
Om 1
0.13 ll'
II
0.111 B
q 0.11 1
A
0.11 11
U
1 Bill111
q0.11(LI8
y•
A
M
A m
ate
1
oto j•
Ilj
11
N
11
A
p
In Tal
•
IAN
O.11 1 '
N cm A ' q 0.11
p •
In
N IN
IAN
NA
0 20 N
0-05
1 0.Ze A
A
0.20 II
N
1 IN
II
1 0.08 q'
N
0.05 1 •
N
1 AN
NN
pW
OAB 1
1 OAS p
A
O -W N
p
1.
A
1 1
tl
N
O.26 1
025
UY
IIN
_—_
_—
1
0, m
I
Om NN
MR
0.19
I.. ate
__
0.19
I
_—
_—
on
LlSAS..
OAI
I
SAS
I
OAS NI
NN
_
0.19
- _
I alp
_ 0.
•-
1
DAG
I
N-
I A
1
A
I
A p
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UT1.nTION AILLLYSIB
1=_ M=7
INTI NIII II INN
INTI MOVEMENT ANI EXIST A PROP JUN
VIII
tl
bTHER A PROJECT
NIA LAMS q LANES AM
INTI
—
Big
-11®
INN
NIII
NL
INN
f A
NIN
Ain
NT
Nil
21
IIIA
loll
NR
NIII
I A
IIIA
INN
SL
NIII
11
Hill
PIN
ST
NIII
311
IN
loll
SR
NIII
on
IIIA
INTI
EL
HIII
I H
IIAI
IRI
ET
NIN
I H
INA
INTI
ER
qIN
111
Ion
NAI
WL
NIN
111
INN
INN
WT
NIN
211
IAN
191
WR
Itln
on
_ IN
CRY NTu&lrws COW" PAW RedorNl dm
PM PEAK "OUR
0 Crain Rae1 i HSr Avers YEAR 2020 Wlah PROJECT
II MIN 1
OOSTM II PR�EO Ain YEAR 2020 Y
tl
bTHER A PROJECT
NAI
111
N
WST1
ING
A EXISTING q
A +OTTA3T
q EX -OTHER 1
q DUOTNER A -
CAPACITY II
C"ACIT?' AIH VOLUMES
U
VOLUME - H VOLUME
qll
VIC
N
V� A
A *PRO.IECT 1
1 VTC
A +PRo.IECT
I lull
- H
Ain
B
H
111
A �.1
aj
A A we w NAPA
HIII
WOO A
' 3100 N -
ON
o WI
300 A
talo H
A
A
IN
0.23 q•
q o2b � e
�
A Y'
0.23 •
U
H o Pill
1 • AIN
11700 N
o PaA
ora
N
AIA
AM
0.35 1
0.02
N � 0.36 n -
A o.3s p
A
A HIII
lirwSIOD
SIOD
0 Pan
100 U
ow
M
AAI
0.05 N
A 0.05 A
A 0.0026 A
A
N RN
N
0100
60 A
N
ilq
ata A
A 0.f0 q'
A o.t0 A'
n
It • mu
ITW 1
o AIH
230MH 1
I
IN
M14 A •
A aii A •
I 0.a A •
II
A . mp
17W q
o NIN
400 1
1
NIII-
1
1
1 024 A
II au A
II
n
If AIN
f70o 1
aroo q.
0 AAI
011"
100 1
ago A
0.08
1•
1 am Y
0.24 1
A am q
N
A
II NIN
A
01
0 0
3201
1
1
AM
IBIt
026
H•
A O.We q•
q
Alt
N• IAN
-
- --�
-
-
IN
t ` b A
i e
1 A
1
1 IN
•
NDR"YBOUTH CRITICAL SIMSNAI
0.42 I
OA2
�
ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAMEECR a Newport 2020 •QPM
N
1
0.42 1
_ a00
WN
N -NORTHBOUND. 8 -SOUTHBOUND
EASTAVEST CRITICAL SUMS-
IN
0.30 I
_ _
0.30 I
_— -
0.30
aj
E - EASTBOUND, W - WESTBOUND
aEARANCE`
111
_-
- a05
--
I
BAD
-- YH
L-LEFT'T- 200
Tf00H'R=RIGHT
I
005
.
ora
H.S. - NOT SKiNIALLow
ICU VALUE -aTT
N
.b!b
.e..�
R„i
Aq
=
LOS -LEVEL OF SERVICE
ERV
a77 Iam
0.77 I
ODS
• DENOTES CRRTCµ MOVEMENTS
LOIS.
--
C
---
--
AI
--N1
I
C I
C
A
N
N
� O
01 C
co OD
N D
N Z
O
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS
PROJECT: Cal of Tmfir 113 Cwkw Rad RedualkRim
INTERVAL AM PEAK HOUR
INTERSECTIO k Newpwi Aw 6 Mdn S1nM YEAR 2020 WINK PROJECT
Diu IIAI 11 Am 1
Ulm MOVEMEW mil DOST I PROP ]III- EXISTING I
All A n
PROPOSED ml YEAR2020 n OTHER n PROJECT
ilm
mp LANES 1 LANES pA CAPACITY q CAPACITY pm VOLUMES I
VOLUME I VOLUME
IIIA
— Kul----I—Pan
— 1
"I
1
1
till
NL iml I N 01111
170011.
0 IN
2401
1
IIII
NT IN. 21 D 1101
3400 n
0 Nil
3400
1
all
NR Ulm ON . Onto
Oil
0 mp
NO 1
1
11111
SL Ulm 1 p call
17001
0 mil
301
a
IIIII
ST IIIII 2 1 O NDI
34001
0 mil
10101
u
IIIII
SR III 1 N 01111
17001
0 I
1301
1
Ilia
EL 111 1 I Olin
17W A
0 pA
409
1
11111
ET IIII -2 N Olin
34001
0110
2+01
1
pill
ER 1111 1 u o Iiia
17001
0181
1401
p
Im
WL IIIA 1 q O m11
17001
0 mil
ISO I
p
nip
WT pill 21 000
34a 1
0 IN
3001
1
all
WR Ilm I N 0011
nap
0 Am
101
p
n' Dm
Ohl
0.07 p +
p
���
CRITICAL SlAAB
047 q •
ICU SPREADSHEET FLE NAMENswpal & Mob 2020 W/pq
II 111
Am
0.00 A
p
0.00 N1
- -
OMA
EASTNIEST CRITICAL SLIMa
11 m1
N . NORTHBOUND, S - SOUTHBOUND
O.w n•
p
0.01 1'
.
0.09 N•
E. EASTBOUND. W . WESTSOUID
I ]IN
NA
CLEARANCE.
a
0.11 1
L . LEFT. T. THROUGH. R . RIGHT
0.11 it
p
I Nm
Am
D of p
N.S. - NOT SMIALIZED
o of ISA
ICU VALUE
i
A ml
LOS - LEVEL OF SERVICE
0.44 I
0.44 I
q
044 I 000
o DA
Am
mq
• DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS
1
---
0.11
LOS.
'--
ata
Bnl
A
1
owTxlG p
1 1xwTIIER p
p EX -OTHER A pal
IM
EGISTWG p
p +OTHER
. n
p +PROJECT I
N +PROJECT
N Nm
Illmm
VIC A=1
Mac ;=e11
p
p vr—i IMP
I DIN
I® N
till
0.11 1 -
1
0.14
1
a Nil
Nil
0.11 p
1
0.11
p
0.11 A
9
N UW
Ulm
p
II
A
II
1
A
1 IN
mA
0.021
1
0.021
p
0.02
mA
0.30 p•
1
0.30 II '
1
0.30 p
A
y• Nil
All
0.w p
1
O.w II
1
MOB 1
I
I mIU
Nm
O -a p
1
042 u
1
0.02 4
n
n' Dm
Ohl
0.07 p +
p
O.o7 A '
1
047 q •
II
II 111
Am
0.00 A
p
0.00 N1
OMA
N
11 m1
mn
O.w n•
p
0.01 1'
I
0.09 N•
N
I ]IN
NA
0.11 A
a
0.11 1
1
0.11 it
p
I Nm
Am
D of p
p
o of ISA
CAI p
i
A ml
Ipq
a
0.44 I
0.44 I
q
044 I 000
o DA
Am
mq
0.1e
1
---
0.11
I
'--
ata
I oa
— 111
Fill
ON---
—
---
ml
Om
�.
0 .03
1
---
aos
I oos
--IIA
HILA
pm
IIIA
. v •
ass. I
.• •�
OAS • I
. e
OJ16 I OJIS
v Nm
NA
AA
--
-
--
-
--
-
-- AAI
v
A
IN
• •
v ! ay.v�•
. v
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS
NH
PROJECT:
COy ofTuWY EI Cwrft R" RedewNwtlm
tl EXwTHER i
p EX•OTIER 1 IIIN
WTERVAL•
PM PEAK HOUR '
A +OTHER A
A +PROJECT 1
1 *PROJECT
LMR
INTERSECTION:
NW4W At i MEai SbW YEAR mD With PROJECT
V�
N 1
IIIII
IIIII I
NA
I
hill
r
p
PIN
MOVEMENT NIA OUST I
PROP III ExWnNG
i PROPOSED IM
YEAR2020 I OTHER
A PROJECT
AIA
INN LANES I
LARDS IN CAPACITY I CAPACITY YN
VOLUMES N VOLUME
p VOLUME
NIII
INS1�III
1
0.04 1 •
n a
NA
p
I
NII
NL IN 1 A
NIN
17001
0 NH.
gal
N
OAM A'
INTI
NT 11111 21
AAI
34M1
0 NII
+0001
p
IAII
NR INN Oil
NN0
N
-i700101X11
0 AN
tee II
N
Ina
SL pill + N
all
M
n 1N
7011
n
NII
ST 11A 2 A
NII
3NOO p
0 MITI
7801
8
NII
SR NN + A
1111
+7001
0 HN
1201
p
IIII
EL NII 1 II
In
woo 1
0 NA
801
A
Alli
ET IIII 211
In
3100 1
0 IIN
4901
1
Hill
ER MITI 1 II
IN
17001
0 qN
401
I
IIII
WL NIA III
IM
+7001
0 hill
NO I -
q
NIII
WT MIN 2 A
In
31ao 1
0 NI
5301 -
p
HN
WR NN Ill
_ IN
+7001
01N
.10I
1
--Ntl
-
NORTHISOUTH CRITICAL BUMS
ICU SPREADSHEET FILE HAAIENr�o�l.8 RNeNI 1D20 a"
EASTAIMT CRITICAL SUMS '
N = NORTHBOUND, S a SOUTF60lND
-
E=EASTBOUND. W i WESTBOUND
_
CLEARANCE.
L- LEFT, T N THROUGH, GH, R i RIGHT
N.S. i NOT SIGNALIZED
ICUI VN UE a
LOS a LEVEL OF SERVICE
• DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS
LIS a
NH
N
ING
A EXISTN
tl EXwTHER i
p EX•OTIER 1 IIIN
NII
E)OSSTHO 1
A +OTHER A
A +PROJECT 1
1 *PROJECT
LMR
NIA
°n N
V�
N 1
n
Vic N
r vJCW ar
p
IAII
N�•A
OAS A N
N�1
OAS A A
.� Amp '�
0-00 1 p
I—Jim
0'37 1
AOX 1•
N
0.37 i•
I
N' AIA
A NIN
111
0.04 p'
p 0.04 A'
n
1
0.04 1 •
N
p
H 1111
II ANI
0
In
am. tl
0.07
A 0.23 1
A
0-2a 1
p
•
INN
NN
N
OAM A'
n Cor1
p 0.04 N'
n
N
oA7 1
0.04 1'.
p
1
A • NIN
AN
0.14 1
N au N
n
0.14 1
p
q Nltl
NN
0.02 A
q 0.02 1
N
oez 1
M
n 1N
pN
NH
0.a5.1
CIS p•
A 0.08 1
1 0.15 1
A
.p
OAS 1
CIO I,
p
q
II AN
'
NI
0.01 1
1 (Lot N
A
0.01 1
p
q N1
I
I
N1
0.41 J
0.41
MINppm.�..�.e.�..ae�iii
i Ill
IN
--
- - --
I
-
0.41
( 000
.�
0.10
I 0.1E
I
---
CIO
- COO
NII
-_
_—
UNI
NN
UNI
OAS I
OA6I
COO
I OAS
pip
OAS
i e a iee�a
OAS -- I
r i amm.ae
0.65 I OAS
a as pN
AN
M
Q
I B
I
B ---
--Ntl
I A
NN
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UILQATION ANALYSIS
PROJECT: -
C1ydTua&rE1Cw"Reel Retleee1%.1,
INTERVA'
AM PEAK HOUR
NTERSECTION:
Pgwd Aw A Mdm SY.eI YEAR
7070 WNh PROJECT
gill
-N0 tl
Rr
A
0tl
1
A
111
A
A
EIOSTNG 1
U EX40THM
II Ex,40THER
p
rR
MR
MOVEMENT Irl "EXIST N PROP qr
EMTING 1 PROPOSED Nnl
YEAR mw 1 OTHER
N PROJECT
111
EXWM 1
'VAC
N +drM N
A +PROJECT I
1 *PROJECT
Y
mi
INTI LANES N LANES R0
CAPACITY I CAFAMTY N
VOLUMES I VOLUME
I VOLUME
IIA
N
U.
vx 1
A
VIC N
N VIC-W w
II
101
Hill
mo—o—nm
IN
Ntll
— I
Y
an
til
ASA
- 1®N '
AiNAI
MR
lull
NL qr ON.
0 a
ON
on
ON
1
IN
Irl
NT lull o q
Goal
oil
0 r1
01.
1
an
A
A
A
A
A•
A -
_1RI
NRIIIA 0 q
0 tlln
0 q
0 wj
on
N
rl
1
M
A
A
001
SL NIN Oil
0 Rio
Oil
0 r1
u N
A
am
A
A
1
1
r.
-
q
r
UNo
RI
IIIN
ST IIIN 1 U
one
tTOO 1
O.rI
ON
1
rU
0.10 1 •
A
0.10 N •
N
A
0.10
A
r ,
rq
ull
SR IIID O N
0 MR
0 q
0 No
go N
N
an
N
INN
Rr
EL MR 1 U
o Ir
tTao II
0 an
Na10
A
qr
Om N
1
0.05 N'
A
0.05 R •
Y
A •.
IRA
MR
ET IRR I tl
0 MR
- 17001
on
3231
p
Ur
a10 N
1
at0 A
N
Jill
ER lull 0 p
0 IN
0.1
0111-
01
1
r1
A
1
tl
A
11
AIA
RIA
WL Hill O N
0 an
01
can.
ON
1
IN
N
1
1
n
ION
WT Ur / R
go
17001
0 MR
AIN 1
N
an
0.24 q •
1
021 A •
A
024 A •
A -
r
NII
IIIII
WR 1111 I 1
0 no
1700 N
0 an
00I
1
INNaa5
p
N
OAS 0
A
000
II'
Rr
NORTH50UTH CAITCAL SHHS- -
ON
0-10
I
0.10 I
0.10
s
ICU SPREADSHEET FILE.HAh*PMGPfd& Mob 202D WpIOI
-
--
I SAO
an
EASTAVEST CRITICAL SUMS.
0.29T
I
021
I
024
.
N • NORTHBOUND. S . SOUH�iXR"1)
In
_--
I Om
INN
E - EASTBOUND. W - YYESTBOUNO
CLEARANCE.
an
0.05_-_
10
T-THROUGK R•RT
RWIT
._
•_
5
N.S. • NOT SK+'NALI7ED
ICII VAIAIE %
an
0.M
I
OA4
I
•_
O '
_qr
LOS= LEVEL OF SERVICE
_ -
-
I 9.05
r1
• DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS
LOt •
E
A
I
A.
I
--
A
-
+ -Ar
I A
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS_
ICU SPREADSHEET FLE NIIAeftepect 6 Mdn 2020 wool
N . NORTHBOUND, 5 - SOUTHBOUND
E - EASTBOUND. W - WESTBOUND
L - LEFT. T • THROUGH, R - RIIiHT
N.S. - NOT SIGNALIZED
LOS - LEVEL OF. SERVICE
• DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS
X
N
N
N C_
a] O
N
N Z
U1 O
00
— Y,
A m
'j, --•
PROJECT
VOLUME
NORTHMOUTHI CRINCAL SUMS .
EASTIWEST CRITrAL SUMS.-
qLEAPANCE
IOU VALUE • .
LOS a
IMI
A
PROJECT:
City 01-TUBWI-IO Cddno Rad RadYdHcatlOn
p EIL+OTHER H
N EX.+OTMR l Nil
INTERVAL•
PM PEAK HOUR
II OTHER p
A ♦PROJECT p
IATERSECTION:
PmaPeG Am A, Mdn SOea1 YEAR 1020 WNh PROJECT
NIU
INA U
AAI A
11N 1 N
IIAI MOVEMENT Nil EXIST a
PROP ANI EXISTW0 I
Pte® Illp YEAR 2020.1 OTHER I
11111
I A
JIM LANES 11
LANES MR CAPACITY N
CAPACITY III VOLUMES I VOLUME 1
IIID __
A •
Hill—, 11—juN
II '
UUI p N
MU
NL
ME oil
ON .01
0 1111 0 p A
IIIII
NT
HIp on
IMI ON
0 pill 0 1 A
11111
NR
INN oil
1111 . of
09111 Oil I
IIIII
SL
INN Oil
IN Oil
011111 1101 1
IIIII
ST
IIIA 1 II
all 1700 A
0 AIR O
IIIII
OR
Hill 0 0
AIA ON_
N
oM N I
11111
EL
IIIII I if
file 17001
0 Mn 1171 A
UIU
ET
UUI I U
Hill 17001
Open 433 A A
Hill
ER
tll0 Oil
- IMI ON
0 AM - ON 11
IIIII
WL
ME Oil
pill ON
on ON p
pill
WT
Hill 1 A
1111 17001
0 MA 1001 N
Rill
WR
pM 1 A
MII 1700 A
Q 105 1 1
ICU SPREADSHEET FLE NIIAeftepect 6 Mdn 2020 wool
N . NORTHBOUND, 5 - SOUTHBOUND
E - EASTBOUND. W - WESTBOUND
L - LEFT. T • THROUGH, R - RIIiHT
N.S. - NOT SIGNALIZED
LOS - LEVEL OF. SERVICE
• DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS
X
N
N
N C_
a] O
N
N Z
U1 O
00
— Y,
A m
'j, --•
PROJECT
VOLUME
NORTHMOUTHI CRINCAL SUMS .
EASTIWEST CRITrAL SUMS.-
qLEAPANCE
IOU VALUE • .
LOS a
IMI
A
II
EXISTING I—
p EIL+OTHER H
N EX.+OTMR l Nil
INF7f
VTTM A.
II OTHER p
A ♦PROJECT p
n +PROJECT
N NIq
VIC
A
A
Vic
A VIG&W IMP
A wo
nM
I A
m
A e,
fill
A •
A
II '
A
fl •
II
A • ANI
AM
q
1
A'
II
II
U
N 0111
A11
n
N
II
U
11
n
N UNI
IMI
N
p
N
N
A
A
1. nM
e11
Oto p •
1
ata. l '
I
1X10 p
e
A • IIII
AN
AA
N,
A
I
A
n MN
INK
OLOT A
1
0.07 p
II
0.07 A
1
A• MA
0.25 N
;
025 A•
0 2S II '
A
I AM
B
Nrl
All
A'
A
II'
U
A
q
11 III
MN
an p
N
0.17 N
A
0.17 p
q
U IM
AM
OLDS A
A
0.06 A
A
Om 1
p
A 111
AM
A11
0.10 a I
e
0.10 I
e
0,10 I 0.00
• a lip
a
NM
oss —
I
". 020
I
025
I Om
lip
AM
IIA
--
aol
1
--
-
0.0N
—
I
_—
oos
_
I 0J15
-- UII
ell
Mtll
•v.+vvv..
v.
.o.
aMl
0.40
I
OA0
I
OAD
I 0.06
NII
O
—
A
I
--
A
I
—
A-
vvevw•.a•v��....
•v!w.eHE
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS
PROJECT:
INTERVAL'
INTERSECTION:
IN INR I ANI
INN MOVEMENT ANI EXIST II PROP IBI
IBI
NIN
JAI LANES I LANES BI
NII
BY
BA�N>®NB
1 EMTOM3 p
N EX+OTHER p
NIP
NL
IIB
I P
0 NB
1111
NT
IIIII
I N
011111
NIN
NR
IIW
OR
0 Inn
Inn
SL
Inn
ON
01111
[IIII
ST
IIIII
2+
ON NIII
Hill
SR
Hill
I N
0
pin
EL
pill
I p
0 NB
pill
ET
pill
2H
0 Aul
111
ER
pili
ON
0 Hill
113
WL
pill
111
0 Bp
BII
WT
NIII
21
0I N
BII
INR
BA
I p
a pB
Cpy d Tusks E] CeNM Reel Re0WUMC@BM
AM TEAK HOUR
Ramped An A lel SbW YEAR 1020 W h PROJECT
A
NIN
N
1
BY
1
1 EMTOM3 p
N EX+OTHER p
N E7C40THER II IN
0057TN0 I
PROPOSED IN YEAR 2020 p OTHER
I PROJECT
IN
EXISTING I
Y + OTHER I
N +PROJECT 11
A +PROJECT
Y BN
CAPACITY I
CAPACITY PIN VOLUMES I VOLUME
I VOLUME
N
VA; 1
A VA: A
p
VIC A
N view
A IRI
N
1B
fl
Y
Bq
n—N
NmA
-IMP
N—n
n—Rp
17001
0 IPI
431
1
1B
0.03 1
N 0-03 Y'
N
OJT3 N•
I
N' NN
1700 t
O Bn
1681
I
BN
0.12 N
p 0.12 N
1
0.12 A
I
---
ON
0 BII
38 q
II
MB
t
N A
N
A
N
p AA
ON
0 NB
IOs I
Y
INN
A
I A
1
N
N
NMI
0 IIA
1831
fl
NIA
0.12 A '
N 0.12 p •
1
0.12 N •
q
II • BII
17001
0 n
161 1
u
m
0.08 1
p 0.00 I
N
OOB p
I
N NII
17001
0 n
Isa A
1
NII
Min p•
1 0.10 I'
I
0.10 p -
u
Y' AN
31001
0 pB
W21
1
AB
ate I
1 0.16 1
Y
0.16 II
A
A No
01
ON -
31 N
1
■
11
1
1
Y
II
N qp
17001
o Pip
541
1
IN
am 1
1 0.03 I
p
0.03
In
34001
on
sat I
q
®
0.18 1
1 0.18 1•
1
0.18
BI
17001
—
on
—
131 N
—
N
—
NB
AB
OAB 1
1 0.06 N
fl
oJID P
1
A W
ICU SPREADSHEET FILE NAME Pmeped a lot 2020 WpraI
N i NORTHBOUND. S - SOUTHBOUND
E - EASTSOUND. W - VVESTBOUND
L i LEFT. T i THROUGH. R- RIGHT
N.S. - NOT SIGNALIZED
LOS - LEVEL OF SERVICE.
• DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS
-- -: ed . ea- -PIS• ens:
NORTHISOUTH CRITICAL SUMS.
pB
X0.15 r I
0.13 I
—
0.16
I
0.00
BI
EASTAVEOT CRITICAL SUMS-
-y
Oz J I
0.29 I
0.m
CLEARANCE -
BA
OAS I
0:06
0.06
I
0.06
�
AAI VALUE-
BA
O.N I
OAO `
e p
_
I
0.48 I
0.06
BN
---
---
---
LOS
BI
A I
A I
A
-
I
A
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTUM710N ANALYSIS
ICU SPREADSHEET FILE RAMS Pimped O id 2020ft"
N - NORTHEOUNO, S - SOUTHBOUND .
E. EASTBOUND, W - VVESTBOUND
L - LEFT, T -THROUGH. R - RIGHT
N.S. - NOT SIGNALUM
LOS a LEVEL Or SERVICE .
• DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS
(+) REPRESENTS LEFT AND LffT ITHROUGH LANES
NOTE: SPLIT PHASED WS
t10RT1ISOUM CIUUGL SUM
EASTMIEDT CRITICAL SIMM
CLEARANCE
K21 VALUE -
LOS -
ILII
A y
PROJECT:
COY 01 TtNUWB Cemtm Red RedveMmAan
A Ex+OTt1ER II
P-EX•OTHER 1 NA
INTERVAL
PM PEAK HHOIAT
1 +OTHER U
U QCT U
11 +PROJECT 1 IN
INTERSEGTtON:
Vic 1
1
Pexpect Ave &.118t Shed YEAR 2020 WII1 PROJECT
Hui -
Vic 1
MN
II
NII
N
NN
N t
NN MOVEMENT 1110 EXIST N PROP NN
EXISTING 1 PROPOSED 101 YEAR 7020 1. OTHER I
NPI
N
INN LANES N LANES 11
CAPACITY N
CAPACITY 0 VOLUMES I VOLUME 1
IIID
—
oil
-1-0P
p
023 1•
N1
N A
Kill
NL
Ilia
I N
1101
1700 I
ON -
log N 1
mill
NT
111
t 1
IN
1700 N
O NN
2991 N
Pill
NR
NII
Oil
am
OR
011
$51 1
NII
SL-
pill
ON
a10
ON
0 UN
2111 1 N
INT -
ST
AIU
2+
lnl
34001
- 0 IN
tat 1 N
MR
SR
Nall
1 P
IN
17001
ON
Ila 1 1
R1
EL
NII
1 II
KIN
17001
0 mu
235 1 1.
ON
ET
MA
2 P
am
34W 1
ON .
5521 U
Ilia
ER
NII
ON
1111
ON
0 IINI
a I - 1
IIIN
WL
NN
I I
NN
17001
011
241 N
am
WT
NO
21
NIN
3100 I
O IN
= I I
Ilia
WR
IN
I N
IN
1700 1
O N
2511 1
ICU SPREADSHEET FILE RAMS Pimped O id 2020ft"
N - NORTHEOUNO, S - SOUTHBOUND .
E. EASTBOUND, W - VVESTBOUND
L - LEFT, T -THROUGH. R - RIGHT
N.S. - NOT SIGNALUM
LOS a LEVEL Or SERVICE .
• DENOTES CRITICAL MOVEMENTS
(+) REPRESENTS LEFT AND LffT ITHROUGH LANES
NOTE: SPLIT PHASED WS
t10RT1ISOUM CIUUGL SUM
EASTMIEDT CRITICAL SIMM
CLEARANCE
K21 VALUE -
LOS -
ILII
A y
11
Dosiwo 1
A Ex+OTt1ER II
P-EX•OTHER 1 NA
N
EXISTM B
1 +OTHER U
U QCT U
11 +PROJECT 1 IN
NI
Vic 1
1
VIC. 1
N
Vic 1
U
yn-v w 1 pN
AN
1.1
Imp
U.1
I --I1
IN
OAS 1
N
OAS 1
1
OAS I
1
INN
m
M23 p•
p
023 1•
1
Oma 1•
1
1 IM
101
A
p
N
1
I
A
A pill
uN
1'
N
1'
N
I•
u
A 1l
NN
0.11 1
1
0.11 1
1
0.11 fl
tl
A' 1011
All
0.07 11
1
0.07 I
1
0.07 U
I
N in
NN
0.14 N •
1
OA4 1 •
p
0.14 p"
II
1 ' IAN
IN
O -V 1
I
OX N
A.
02T A
A
I NA
N1
I
1
N
N
11
N
I NA
111
0.01 1
1
"1 U
U
0.01 /
11
n 111
AN
0621 1 •
1
021 1 '
1
021 N •
N
u • NN
MR
MIS p
1
0.15 1
1
0.15 1
p
1 oil
W
023
I
0.23
1
023
I
0.00 AN
a
-------
---
--L35
L35
I
0.73
1
nae .
1
0.00 VIII
E----
---
---
-— aN
IN
0.05
I
OAS
1
0.05
1
0A am
111
`---
'a.
- _.
- -.111
■
OAS
1
0.63
1
0.53
1
OAS a
--'-
_—
—
_oil
s
M
B i
B
A
APP'ENDtX C
TRAFFIC COUNTS
Traffic Data Services, Inc.
, TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICULAR TURNING MOVEMENTS
HIS STREET: EL CAMINO 'REAL E/W STREET: 1ST CITY: TUSTIN
, - ST
DATE: 11/01/00 DAY: WEDNESDAY, FILENAME: 1100201A
- . - u --. nn _--_n -. -. -.. - n_-" --- --n- n_--" .._n -- - - unn- -- n. "-"0 .un
15 Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Period
Beginning
NL NT HR SL ST SR ELET ER - Wl WT - WR . TOTAL
. -
--lÃÑis ~--- ___n- - - _n. i' --- --- -- n__n .---- -.- '2-~ -- ~.~ - - -- --- 2------ .n_---
6 :00 AM
fSAM
30 AM:
45 AM
7:00 AM
15 AM
30 AM
,45 AM
8:.00 AM
15 AM
30AM
45 AM
9:00 AM'
1'5 AM
30 AM
45 AM
10:00 AM
15 AM
30 AM
45 AM
23
26
38
40
33
28
31
23
6
12
14
16
12
15
11
HI
88 21 7 85 230
111 29 12 93 283
13& 30 15 158 391
122 24 25 182 . 409
110 27 28 168 378
99 24 20 130 316
95 24, 20 148 329
119 30 32 107 330
-- _n..' .---'- _n- _n____n_-- -- _n.nn--_-_' .-.------ --. .-- ... ------. --_un
AM Peak HI'"
Begins, at
730
VOLUMES. 139
COMMENTS:
0
57
0 ' 0
0
0 467 105
1494
88 638
0
Resolution No, 05-61
Page 129 of 145
------- -~---,-----~-
Traffi~ Data Services, Inc.
TABULAR SUMMARY. OF VEHICULAR TURNING MOVEMENTS
NIS STREET: EL CAMINO REAL E/W STREET: 1ST
, ' , ,ST
DATE: 11/01/00 DAY: WEDNESDAY
CITY:, TUSTIN
FILENAME: llOO201P
- - - - - - - -.,.- - - - -. ---- -- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - -- -- - - -- - - -- - -- - - - - - - - - - - - -n - -- -- - - - - - - --
15 JIlin Northbound Southbound Eastbound WestBound
Period
8eg11111ing ,NL NT NR SL S1 SR EL ET' ER WL WT ' WR TOTAl
-- - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -'- -_h - - - - --,- -------
LANES: 2 1 2
2:00 PM
15 PM
3ÐPM
45 PM
3:00 PM
15 PM
30 PM
45 PM
4:00 'PM 55'
15 PM 46
30 PM' 48-
45 PM 57
5:00 Plot 41
15 PM 56
3'0 PM 60
45 PM 63
6:00 PM
'IS PM
30 PM
45 PM
30 .
29
24
42
28
25
27
32
177 '27
146 38
1'6& 29
185 30
.197 37
203 63
191 40
,150 43
28 95
15 103
26 101
29 137
25 166
'26 168
. 15 165
21 H8
412
377
393
480
494
541
, 504
457 '
-- ----- - --- -- - - --_on --- -- - - -- __00 - -- --- _h - -- _nnn__----_----- n__nn- -.-
PM Peak Hr
Begins at
1645
VOLUMES- 214
COMMENTS:
0 122
.0
0 782 170
0
0
95' 636
0
2019
Traffic Data Services, Inc.
TABULAR.SUMMARY OF VEHICULAR TURNING MOVEMENTS
NIS STREET: EL CAMINO' REAL E/W STREET: MAIN
'ST
DATE: 11/01/00 DAY: WEDNESDAY
- n- -- -- u _nn_- "------ uu_n__,- __--__n.n - _nn- n_------------,-- u- p----
15 Mln 'Northbound Southbound' Eastbound Westbound'
~~ . '
"Beginning NL, NT NR SL ST. SR Q. ET ER Wl WI WR TO'TAL
- -_u - -- __n----- -- -- "----- --- ---- _nn__nn____-- -n n- --_-un':- -- --n ----
LANES:
6:00' AM
,15 AM
30 AM
45 AM
7:00 AM
, 15 AM
30 AM
'45 AM
8:00 AM
15 AM
30 AM.
45 AM
9:0'0' AM"'
15..AM
3ÐAM
45 AM
10':0'0, AM
15 AM
30 AM
45 AM
CITY: TUSTIN
FILENAME: 1l00202A
0
0
1
0
0
15 15 8 . 1 23 0 5 42 15 8 '35 10 177
13 22 12 1 33 4 10 67 24 8 67 11 272
19 44 7 1 32 5 6 84 19 iz 81 11 .321
13 31 15 5' 39 7 10 80 16 15 125 13 369
15 37 7 5 32 8 3 69 21 15 94 12 318
14 31 6 1 33 2 3 '51 29 8 65 12 255
14- 48 12 9 24 3 , 5 31 15 8 64 21 254
19' 40 16: 7, 46 3 7 45 19 10 62 9 283,
- - u - - -- __--__n____--_- -- - u un_- -- --- -- _n n -- _n____n_n_- u- --- - --- n_-
AM Peak Hr
Begins at
715
VOLUMES. 60 13441 12 136 24 29 30'0 80 50 367 47 H80
COMMENTS:
Resolution No. 05-61
Page 131 of 145
Traffic Data Services, Inc.
TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICULAR TURNING MOVEMENTS
NIS STREE1': EL CAMINO REAL EfW STREET: MAIN
ST
DATE: 11/01/09 DAY: WEDNESaAY
CITY: TUSTIN
FILENAME: 1l0020ZP
00 -- ---- _n---"----_n- - - - -"- __----n- _nn_Un- --_nnn_-.- n_--n- - --_-on
15 Hin 'Northbound' Southbound EastDound Westbound
Period
Beginning 'NL, NT NR, SL, ST SR EL ET ER WL lIT WR TOTAl
-- - un------ - _n _nn- -- --- - ----- - -- ------ - - ---- - nn - - - n -------- -- __h -_n
LANES: 0 0 0 0
2 :00 PM
15 PM
30 PM
45 PM
3 :00 PM
15 PM
30 PM
45 PM
4 :00 PM 30 48 24 9. 39. 5 17 65 24 12 80 9 362
15 PM 29 .55 19 7 49 6 13 48 22 20 93, 8 S69
30 PM 22 55 29- 9 41 2 8.' 67 21 13 82 7 347
41) PM 28 67 33 10 37 6 16 80. 18 23 107 10 435
5 :00 ,PM 25 44 21 7 49 7 6 54 22 14 83 12 ,344
15 PM 24' 37 13 9 44 1 II 78 28 14 78 13 3~O
30 PM 32 55 25 6 54 9 7 7D 26 16 88 6 394
45 PM 34 66 16 9 ' 46 9 15 65 23 20 92 17 412
6:00 PM
15 PM
30" PM'
45 PM
- - -- -" - - - - -- - - -- - - - - - - - - -- -- - -- n- - - - - 00__- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - ---
PM Peak Hr
Begins at
1645 ,
VOLUMES - 109 2D3
92
32 184
23
40 282
94
67 356
41
1'523
COMMENTS:
Traffic Data Services. Inc.
TABUI,ARSUMMARY OF VEHICULAR TURNING MOVEMEN!S
H/S STREET: PROSPECT E/W STREET: 1ST CITY: TUSTIN
AVE ' , S1
DATE: 11/01/00 . DAY: WEDNESDAY . FILENAM.E: ¡H 0203A
- - - - - -. - - - - ~ - - - - - -- n - -. - - - - - - .,- - ~ -- ~ - -- - ~ - - - - - -- - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - - -.. - - - u_-
15 Hin Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
, Period
Beginning NL NT NR .5L 5T SR EL ET ER WL WT IiR ToTAL
--LÃÑËS~ --. -- - - - ~ -i - - ~ - õ - OJ: 5 - - Õ: 5 -- - - ---- - -- - -2 - - - - Õ - - u i -. - -- 2" - - -Õ - - - - - ---
6:00 AM
15 AM
30 AM
45-AM
7:00 At!
, 15 AM
30 AM
45 MI
8:00.AM
15 AM
30 ',AM
45 AM
, 9':00 AM
15 AM
30 AM
45 AM
10:00 AM
15 AM
30 AM
45 AM
5 19 6 27 35 17 21 75 5 3 77 9 299
7 32 10 38 34 18 32. 98 12 10 99, 26 416
8 56 5 26 42 30 54 92 6 8 128 32 487
10 26 5 48 36 41 20 106 0 5 134 27 458
10 24 12 50 46 .43 28 115 7 21 164 22, 542
1 20 16 34 28 23: 19 89 5 8 129 28 400
6 31 1-2 45 40 24 13 111 6 6 124 Z5 443
4 28. 7 35 27 20 23 113 9 19 106 28 419
-- - ----.-- --- - --- ---- -----------_u --_uu-- _n -- - -------- n __n n_n - -------
AM Peak Hr
Begins at
715
- VOLUMES - 35 138
COMMENTS:
32 162 158 .132 134 411
44 525 107
1903
25
Resolution No, 05-61
Page 133 of 145
Traffic Data Servtces, Inc.
TABUlAR SUMMARY OF VEHICULAR TURNING MOVEMENTS
HIS STREET: PROSPECT
AVE' .
DATE; 11/01/00
E/W STREET: 1ST
, .. S1
DAY: IrIEDNÉSDAY
CI1Y: TUSTIN
FILENAME: llOO203P
- - ïš - M j ~ - -- - - Ñ~rt¡;b~~~d - - -- - S~~tLb~~~d -" - - - E;;t~~~d - - -. - - W;;tb~~~d--'-- - -- - --
Period
Be9111'111ng' NL NT NR Sl ST SR .EL, ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL'
- - -- - - - - - - - - - - - -- - -- - - - - - - - - ----- - - -- - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - ---- - - - - - - - ---- - - - - - - --
LANES: 0 1.5 0.5 l' 1 2 0 2 0
2 :0'0 PM
15 PM
3D PM
45 PM
3:0'0 PM
15 PM
30 PM
, 45 ,PM
4:0'0 PM 11 52 27 39 24 23 40' 142. 9 5 126 35 533
15 PM 16 42 29 47 25 21 38 165 5 6 133 29' 556
I 30 'PM 13 45 23 51 M 38 40' 175 6 5 129 46 596
45 PM 18 48 28 54 22 22 41 173 6 8 129 50' 599
5:0'0' PM 3D 79 .U 56 32 26 62 183 10' 4 146 54 695
15 PM 17 64 l~ 46 24 25 49' 194 B 4 148 49 642
30 'PM 22 54 15' 32 29 28 41 173 9 4 ISO' 53 ,610'
45 PM 17 ' 53 13 35 28 39 37 142 8 7 136 48 563
6:0'0' PM
15 PM
30' PM
45 PM
- --- --- - - -- - --n- - -- ----- -- --- -- ------------------ - ----- - - --------- - _00_--__-
PM Peak Hr
Begins at
1645
VOLUMES. 87 245
70' '188 10'7 10'1 193 723
33
20' 573 20'6
2546
COMMENTS:
Traffic Data Services; Inc.
TABULAR SUMMARY ~F VEHICULAR, TURNING MOVEMENTS
'N/S STREET: PROSPECT
AVE
DATE: 11/01/00
u-- -,-- --- - -- -- _u _nn- n_- - - __on ------ _n--_n- - n- - - __nn_----- U n-un
15 Hin Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Period
~:~ ~ ~ ~~~- - - ~~ - -- ~ - - - ~ - - - ~~- - -~- -- ~~ - - - ~~- - - ~ - ~ -~~ - - -~ - - - ~- - - ~ -- - ~~~~
LANES: 0 0 0
6:00 AM
15 AM
30 AM
45 AM
, 7:00 AM
15 AM
30 AM '
45 AM
8:00 AM
15 AM
-aOAM
45 AM
9:00 ÀM
15 AM
30 AM
45 AM
10:00. AM
15 AM
30 AM
45 AM
E/W STREET: MAIN
, ST
D[1.Y: WEDNESDAY
CITY: TUSTIN
FILENAME': 1lO0204A
16 '
14
18
12
17
21
23' -
16
8'
12
20
24
16 '
14
10
, ' 10
. 15
, 30
35
12
, 1.0
11
10
13
34
50
65
79
75 .
46
49
48
51 9
81 7
74 17
'145 '22
109 17
81 24
79. 20'
.71 33
133
194
229
294
244
197
191
191 ,
- - n - - - -- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - -- - - _n -- - - - - - - - - - - -.. - --
AM Peak Hr
Begins at
730
VOLUMES -
0
0
0
68
0
74
68 265
0
0 409
80
964
COMMENTS:
I
Resolution No, 05-61
Page 135 of 145
HIS STREET: PROSPECT E/W STREET: MAIN CIl'Y:. TUSTIN
. AVE. . ST
DATE: 10/26/00 DA'Y: THURSDAY FIlENAME: llO0204P
- - -_.-.-- -- - - ---- --- n- - - - - nU nn- n_-.-- - -.-- un_n n- - un___--_-- - - --n-
15 Min
Period
~e9innin9 NL NT NR SL 5T SR .EL ET ER Ill. lIT WR TOTAL
- - __u_n- n__-_nn -- - n- _.--.n-- u_n- -_u-___n__--_- - - - n___-- -n n_n'--
'LANES: . 0 1 0 1. '1 0
2:00 PM
, 15 PM
30 PM
45 PM
'3 :00 PM
15 PM
30 PM
45 PM
4:00 PM
15 PM
30 PM
45 PM
5:00 PM
15 PM '
30 PIlI
45 PM
6:00 PM
15 PM
30 PM
45 PM
Tr:affic Data Services, Inc.
TABUI:.AR SUfflARY OF VEHICULAR TURNING MOVEMENTS
Northb~und
Southbound
Westbound
Eastbound
15 11 13 77 29 27 172
16 19 17 81 14 27 174 .
17 . 18 '27 87 41 24. 214
19 14 30 ?6 50 30 239
31, 16 '28 90. 50 19 234
21 10 17 83 72 17 220
23 12 21 86 66 20 228
12 6 20 85 29 22 17.4
....
- - _n- -- _n- n__--- __n--- - -- n- n - _--n- - - _n- _n-- -- n - --- nn_n_. - _n_n-
PM Peak Hr'
, Begins at
1645
, VOLUMES - 0
COI+IENTS:
0
0
94
0
96 355
0
921
0 238
86
52
I
I.'
. .'
Tnffic: DatI: Services, Inc.
TABULAR SUMMARY OF.. VEHICULAR TURNING MOVEMENTS
N/S STREET: NEWPORT
AVE
DATE: 9/18/00
E¡'W,STREET:
DAY': MONDAY
MAIN
ST
CITY: TUSTIN.
FILENAME: 0900703A
----- - - --.-- ---- - --- - n- -- - --- __n - __n n ~- --- - - - -,' - -- - --- - _n - - u - -~- - --. - - -- .
15 Min .Northbound" Southbound Eastbòunç! Westbound '
Period'
Beginning, NL lIT NR SL 51 SR El ET ER ilL WT Ir/R, TOTAL
-- -" - - - - - - - -- - - - --- ---- - - - -- - - - --- -- - --- ----- - - _n- ------ - _u - -- n - -- - - n _u-
. LAHI;S: 2' 0 1 2 2 1 ,1 ' Z'
6:00 AM
15 AM
..30 AM
45 AM
7:00 AM
15' AM
30 AM
45 AM
8: 00 AM
IS AM
30 AM-
45 AM
9:00 AM
15- AM'
30 AM
45 AM
10:00 AM
15' AM
30 AM
4'5 AM
14- 92 5 1 160 20 3 27 19 18 37 5 402
Z9 101 12, 3 179 19 22 25 Z7 35 53 5 510
31 208 1i1 5 328 Z3 25 41.52 54 84 B 920
36 144-. Zl 5' 320 33 ,23 37 63 57 105 6 850
,44 161 . 15 7 336 33 12 54 69 43 114 5' 893
Z9 106 6 5 2'18 23 , 16 23 .34 Z5' 66 3 555
25 -114 11 7 254 30-. 28 26 47 23 59 Z 626
50' 148 9 16 261 . 4-1 20 39 36 27 79 6 732
. .
- -- n n- - --- ----- u- n- - - - - --- -- n - --n - -- - __n ---- - ,,-- - - - - - - - - n_- - - ---- - ---
AM Pe.ak HI"
, Begins at
730 ,
VOLUMES. 140 619 103
23 1202 112
76 155 218 179 369
ZZ
3Z18
..¡.
C°M"!ENTS:
Resolution No, 05-61
Page 137 of 145
-'--'--~ ----'
, . Traffic Data Services, Inc,'
TABULAR SUMMARY OF.' VEHICULAR lURNING MOVEMENTS
HIS STREET: NEWPORT E/W.STRE£T: EL CAMINO CITY: TUSTIN
AVE' . I REAL'
DATE: 9/20/00 DAY: WEDNESDAY, FILENAME: 0900704A
-- eo --- _u- - - -oo- oo - -- - - - - ---.--- -- - - - - 0- - - - - - oo _u - - - - - - - -- n- - ..-oo- --- -- ---
15 M111 Northbound Southbound Eastbound' Westbound
Period
B !ginnil1g NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL Iff IIR TOTAL
-- -- - - - - -- - - - -- - - - - - --- - - -- -. - n-- - - - - - -- - - - -- ---- - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - -- - - - - - -'--
LANES: '1 2 0 12.5 0.5 1 1 1 2. II
6:00 AM'
15 AM
,30 AM
45 AM
7:00 AM
15 AM
30 AM
.45'AM
8:00 AM
. 15 AM
30 AM
45 AM
9:00 AM,
. 15 AM
30'AM
45 AM
10:00 AM
'lSAM
,30 AM
45 AM
35 97 46 13 189' 1 7 13 39 39 31 13
33 ]36 B3 29 253 B ,6 311 34 25 28 12
38 160 68 11 277 5 3 ]9 B3 40 59 10
42 173 56 8 391 11 4 13 62 ' 51 67 5
38 151 21 26 359 4 4 21 57 26 43 ]0
36 147 17. 1& 284 5 4 11 48 . 24 57 12
35. 144 -12 15264 3 4 10...., 47 22' 1.1 11
43 123 17 18 210 11 7 20 39 18 52 11
523
6"
773
B83
760
663
608
569
- - -- - - - __00 --. - - ----- -- -- - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - n- - - - -- - - -- -- -- - - - - - - - - - ---
AM Peak: HI>,
Begins at
715
VOLUMES - 151 620 228
COMMENTS: .
74 1280
28
B3 236 142 197 . 37
17
3093'
;.
Traffic Data Services, Inc.
TABULAR SUMMARY O~ VEHICULAR TURNING MOVEMENTS
HIS STREET: NEWPORT E/W STREET: EL: CAMINO CITY: TUSTIN
AVE REAL.
DATE: 9/11/00 DAY; MONDAY, . FILENAME: b900704'P
- - --~--- ---- - --- -. - - -- n - - -- - n- - ------ - - - - n- - - --- - - - _n - - n- - -.. -n- - - _n,_'-
15 Min. Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Period
Beginning, NI.: 'NT ,Hi . SL ST SR EL ET ER WL lIT WR TOTAL
- -LÃÑEŠ; - --- - - -- -"2 - -- ïì - -:--1- 2:Š "Ó:š" -"1- - -- - - - - - --- - - n -- - 2- - -Õ- -- __m'
2:00 PM
15 PM
. 30 PM
45 PM
3:00 PM
15 PM
30 PM
'45 PM
4:00 PM
. 15 p I\
30. PM
'i5 PM
5:00 PM
15 Pit
30 PM
45 PM
. 6:00 PM
15 PM
30 PM
45 PM
62 250 16
59 215 13
52 '241- 34
76 272 2B
73 321 35
'76 338 33
67 31!1 45
66 315 32
2.0 201
24 181
22 ..182
27 215
30 254
23 228
15 201
37 197
9
19
11
21
15
20
16
31
5 32 69
. 1429 56
6 3'5 72
11 27 51
14 41 103
15 44 73
14 52 99
12' 43 81
28' 47 ' 40
'15 55 40
, '19 43.' 29
31 70 33
2854 37
38 73 39
32 63 26
42 76 20
779
720
746
862
1005
1000
949-
. 952
-- -- - - - -. - -. _n - -. -- ----.- -'- - - - ---- - - - - --- - - - - - - - -- - - - -- - - - - - - - - -.. -- - - - - -- ---
PM Peak Hr
Begins at '
1700 .
VOLUMES. 282 1293 145 105 880
COMMEN:fS:
82'
55 180 356 14/t 266 122 ,3906
...
Resolution No, 05-61
Page 139 of 145
TwrlC DATA SERVlcn, INC. , LDCATIOli cœE '00'2.02.
-...........-..-...---..--.-... .., ... . , . .-....--.--.-.......
lDCATlOIf'. El CAMINO REAl-aTII NEllPDiT/HAIN AVER.\G!D YDLIJIES fOl. MillAY 10/24/00 YO, \Æl NUIIAY 10/23/00
------ All uuuuuuu.......- -.-----...... PM _,,'..u..,u_~.
TIME 118 II TarA\. TIME III,' 18 TOTAL
.........-..---- ...... ..j.. ....._~_._.._....---..._-..__._...
1hOG . 1Z:15 3 P 12,00 . 'Z,'5 P5 e4 18'
12,'5 . '2:30 ,7 12 12015 . 12:30 69 85 '54
12:30 . 1ZI45 8 14 12'30 . 12,45 64 76 140
12:45 - 1100 19 4 22 6 '41 12145. 1:00 76 304 711 317 146 621
1:00. 1 :15 2 I 1:00. ,,'5 16 72 158
1:'5. 1:38 2 3 1:15. ':30 92 61 153
1:30 - ,,45 I 2 1:30'. , ,.45 7D 74 '44
1:45. 2:00 10 2 7 4 '7 1:45. 2,00 78' 326 60 267 138 593
2:00. 2.15 4 2:00' 2:15 7Z 78 '50
2,'5 " 2,30 2 2:15. 2:3D 58 74 '32
'2:3D. 2:45 3 2:30'. 2:45 75 60 135
2,45' 3100 6 1 10 2:45. 3:00 T7 28Z 75 287 '52 569
3:00' 311S , 2 3,00. 3,15 71 ,$7 128
5,15 - 3130 ,2 3 3,'5. 3:30 67 63 '3D
3,30' 3,45 , 4 3,30. 3145 9a 7D '68
3:45' 4,CO D 4 7 2 11 3,45' 4,00 9Z 328 67 257 ,159 585
4100'. 4,'5 2 '3 5 4:00. 4,15 PI, 88 '82
4,15. 4130 D 5 5 4,15. 4:30 P5 7D '65
4,30, 4145 Z 8 1D 4,30. 4:45 114 78 '62 '
4,45 - 5:00 4 8 8 24- 12 52 4,45, 5,CO ~ 370 73 309 170 679
5:00' 51'S 2 6 ì 5:00' 5:'5 96 'D1 197
51'5'. 5130 5 5- '0 5,15. 5:30 ..85 P5 UIO
5,3D. 5,45 4 2' ,25 5:30' 5:45 PI, 76 170
5:45. 6,CO '7, 28 10 42 27 7D 5,45 - 6,00 V4 369 PC 362 1114 731
6:DO - 6:'5 10 Z7 37 6100- 6,'5 69 97 '66
6:'5' 6:3D zo 26 46 6,15. 6,30 93 83 '76
6,30' 6145 20 28 48 6:38 - 6:45 114 64 '48
6,45, 7.CO 24 74 44 125 68 199 6,45. 7,00 56 302 68 312 124 614
7,00. 7:15 31 50 81 7:00. 7115 56 62 111
7,15. 7,3D 48 65 113 7,,5. r,30 51 47 ,os
7,30' 7145 75 II! 158 7:30 - 7:45 51 41 ,92
7:45 - 8:00 58 212 69 267 1zr 479 7,45. a:oo 33 198 34 1114 67 382
8:00 - ,a:1S 64 70 134 8:OC. 8.15 36 30 66
.,15 - 8,30 49 59 108 8:15' I:!Ð 28 22" 50
8:30 - 8145 54 50 104 8,30' a,45 33 32 65
1:45 - 9,DO 63 230 54 233 117 463 8,45. 9100 35 '32 Z4 1C1S 59 24D
9100 - 9:15 51 43 94 9,00. 9.15 25 3' 56
9:15 - 913D 58 54 112 9,,5. 9,30 38 ,22 6D
9:3D' 9145 50 39 89. 913D. 9,45 26 33 59
9:45 . 'O:OD 46 zos 52 188 98 393 9145 . ID,OO 28 117 26' 112 ~ 229
10:00 - 10:15 68' 56 124 10,00 . IDI15 20 '13 33
'0:15 - 10:30 52 54 106 1n:15 . 10:30 16 10 ,26
10:30 - 10:45 47 63 110 10:30 . ID,45 7 a '5
10:45 - ":00 46 213 54 227 'DO 440 10145 - 11100 10 53 6 37 16 9D
"'00 - ":15 71 57 12a 11,00 - '1:15, '0 7 17
"'15 - '1:30 68 61 129 11:15 . 11130 7 6 13
11,30 - 111'5 70 aa 15B 11,30 . ",45 ID 7 17
11,45'12,00 70 ~79 762B2 146561 1',45.12:00 1340 2 ZZ '5 62
.... ...--... ............ ..-. ".-...... ...... ...."..... -.......-... -- -..... ...........-..-
TOTALS 1,288 1,'28 2,7'6 2,821 2,574 5,395-
ACT'S 4,109 4,002 B,'"
...".............."....-....."...."................................".".-..........".....-.....--..........
TWF,IC' OATA &ERVICE., INC; LCCATICII,IXI)E 10012.02;
--.--.....-".""- -. ..oo -"*** -oo.--oo- ...--..... . .. ... . , .. .. .......
, '
LCCATlDIÌ -' EL CAMIllO REAL'&TN MAIN/1ST ST AVERAGE!) 'IÞI.!JIEI FOR, TUEIOAY TO/24/00 TO IlEDIESDAY IOns/DO
"-""-".",~ Nt _oo._~......~ ~.._- ,.."u.... PM --.u,..",,"'-
TuE, 118 n, TOTAL TIME ,III n TOTAl.
- .----- --- -.-...--.....-..---. .--
12:IXI' 12.,5 2 ,0 ,2 121DO . "2115 58 64 122 ¡
IZ:15 ' 1Z:50 5 2 '5 12115 - 12,50 7U 56 126
12130 ' IZ:45 4 5 9 "Z,30 - 12145 62 52 114
12:45' 1:00' " 4 1 6 22 12:45 - "00 '76 266 56 228 132 494,
1:DO' 1:15 2 5 1:00' 1:15 57 41 9a
,,15 - 1:30 0 1 ,,15' 1130 80 4D 120
1:30, 1:45 I 2 , 1,30' '1145 ø 49 112
1:45' 2:00 .'1 4 6' 2 10 1,45. 2:00 56 2SiI 4D 170 96 426
,2:1XI- 2:15 2 0 2 21DO - Z115 " 44 110
2:15' 2:30 0 0 0 2,,5' 2:30 62 52 114
2:50 " 2145 0 ,0 0 2:30 - 2145- 54 52 106
2145 - 3:00 1 0 1 5 2145' 3:00 58 240 42 11'0 100 00
51DO' 5:15 I 3.00 - 5115 " 42 101
3:15 - 5,30 4 5,15. 3150 78 44 122
3:50. 5145 1 ,3150 - 3145 56 52 10a
5145, 4100 2 3145- ~ 4100 92 292 42 1eo '154 472
4:00' 4:15 0 1 4100. 4115 6D 51 111
4115, 4:50 2 7 4115' 4:30 7U 49 119
4;30' 4:45 2 '4 4,50 - 4145 64 58 122
4145, 5,00 2 ~ 4 16 4,45 - 5100 -92 216 54 212 146 491
5100' 5115 4, 8 5100 - 5115 1'0 62 152
5.,5. 5:50 2 4 5115 '. 5050 7U 83 153
51:50, 5:45 14 15 5,30' 5:45 74 ø 137
5145' 6100 14 3 25 10 37 5:45' 6100 110 314 44, 252' 174 566
6.00, 6:15 10 I 11 6100 - 6,15' 64 7U 154
6:15' 6130 14 1\ 25 6:15'. 61:50 62 59 121
6;30' 6:45 14 11 32 6,311, - 6145 76 49' 125
6145, 7:00 20 51 20 S7 40 115 6:45 - 7100 51 253 50 228 101, 481
7;00' 7115 24 54 51 7,00 - 7;15 ,42 42 810
7:15' 7:30 42 58 110 7:15' 7,30 32 22 56
7;30' 7:45 50 47 97 7130 - 7:45 ,47 23 70
7:45, a:oo 58 174 41 167 106 541 7:45,- 1:00 51 152 22 109 53 26'
1:00' a:15 48 40 II ':00' 8:15 27 23 50
8:15' a:30 46 52 9a IllS - a:3O 2S 18 48
8130, a:45 104 31 81 8:30 '. a,45 .. 24 18 42
8:45' 9:00 47 185 45 174 92 359 1:45' 9:00 26 102 17 76 43 178
9,00 - 9:15 46 54 110 9:00" 9,15 32 16 48
9115 ',9:30 38 56 94 9115. 9:30 54 14 48
9:30' 9145 50 24 74 9,30' 9:45 22 16 ,18
9;45 . 10:00 32 '66 36 ISO 68 316 9:45 - 10;00 20 108 12 58 32 166
10,00' 10:15 36 39 75 10,00 . 10:15 " ;2 25
10115 ,10130 104 211 72 lOllS . 10',30 P 2 11
10:30 - 10:45 53 45 91 10:30, -10145 10 3 15
10:45 ' 11:00 54 167 40 152 74 319 10:45 - 11:00 11 61, 4 21 15 62
",00 ' ,,;,5 53 58 111 11:00 . ":'5 5 7 12
11:15 . 11:30 62 45 107 11:15 - ",30 5 6 '11
"h30-1':AS 42 46 88 ",30 - 1,,65 6 4 10
11:45 . 12:00 51 215 104 '93 102 408 ,11:45 . 12:00 5 21 1 18 6 39
..._.."....."""-"'_."'.""..._."."~....""!"*"'..."."."'.."'.*._"..-......................-.....
TOTALS 1,010 944 1,954 2,331 ',742 4',073
ADT'S 3,341 2,686 6,027
. ......... .... .................. .-............... .... .....~.. ...... -..... ............ ..--....... ......... .......... ..... .......
Resolution No, 05-61
Page 141 of 145
-~-_._--
TRAFFIC OAT" SlAVIC", Ifc. ,LOCATICII 'CODE 10012.D95
A A A .. A.' .......---..-....-.......-.......... '.' .............-----....
LOCATICII. PROSPECT-an MAIN/1ST 51
AVERAGED VOLUMES FOR' THURSDAY ,,/9/00 TO fBIDAT 11/10/00
.--.---..... All ---...--......... -..--.......... PM ------
. TIM!' NI 51 TOTAl. TIME WJ 51 TOTAl.
.... --.. -............, ....-..-. ......... ---...........--.-.- .......-..........
12':00 . 12115
12,15 . 12,3V
12::50' 12145
12:45' 1:00
1:00' 1:15
1.15 - 1:30
1:30' 1:45
1:45. 2:00
2:00' 2i15
2.15 - 2130
2.30' 2:45
2:45 .' 3:00
3.00. 3.15
3:15, 3:30
3:30' 3145
3:45' 4,00
4,00 - 4:15
4:15' 4.30
4,30' 4:45
4.45. 5100
5:00 ~ 5/15
5:15 - 5:30
5:30' 5145
5:45. 6-000
6:00' 6,15
6,15. 6:30
6.30' 6:45
6,45 - 7:00
7,00, 7:15
7:15' 7,30
7130. 7:45
7:45 .' 8,00
aloo - a,I5
a:15 - 8:30,
8,30' 8:45
8:45 - 9,00
9,00' 9:15
9:15 - 9:30
9:30 - 9,45
9:45 - 10:00
10,00 - 10,15
10:15 - 10,30
'0:30 - 10,45
10:45 - I 1:00
2
3
0
,
0
,
6
2
0,
0
0
0
0
'2
I
0
0
3
2
3
I
2
I
3
5
. 8
26
26
27
49
58
40
174
6
7
65
116
126
0
0
2
,
0
0,
0
3
0
3
2
3
2
6
6
7
9
16
20
28
25
42
52
64
66
53
49
40
50
40
30
37 157
24
46
28
47
2
3
2
2
0
I
6
5
2
I
0,
0
2
a
0
6
4
6
3
'a
7
10 28
131
357
324
274
271
'2
12:00 . 12:15 .
12:15 . 12:30
12:30 . 12145
12:45 . ' 1:00
1:00. ,,15
,,15' 1,30
,,30' 1:45
1:45. 2:00
31
50
41
38
36
49
30
33
167
156
89
40
32
16
68
50
6D
56
52
50
31
44
234
'84
79
44
41
29
106
100
101
94
aa
99
76
77
401
340
34
25
23
34
31
31
29
19' 117
42
29
24
31
21
73
14
24
46
34
52
91
110
104
2.00' 2,'5
2,15 - 2.30
,2:30 - 2145
2:45' 3:00
3,00' 3:15
3:15. 3:30
3,30 - 3:45
3:45 - 4:00
,,-
4:00 - 4,15 "
4:15' 4:30
4:30' 4:45
4:45' 5',00
5.qo - 5:15
5:15' 5:30
5:30' 5145
5:45 - 6:00
55
6D
, 45
54
54
56
49
62
214
221
39'
36
67
6D 202
52
40
47
41
41
52
49
t!
117
201
94'
,96
"2
114' 416
106
96
96
110
4011
100
109
104-
123
114
104
128
107
'36
453
183
298
100
711
72
74
6:00. 6115
6:15" 6:30
6:30. 6:45
, 6:45' 7:00
7:00 - 7:15
7:15 - 7:30
7:30' 7:45
7,45 - a:oo
8,00 - a:15
8:15' 8,30
8,30 - 8:45
a:45 - 9:00
9:00. 9:15
9115' 9:30
9,30 - 9:45
9,45 - 10:00
10100 . 10:15
10:15 . 10:30
10:30 - 10:45
10.45 - 11:00
52
57
55
71
23S
50
43
52
40
185
95
69
56
47
267
aa
71
59
56
145
66
75
52
711
64
61
76
67
58
34
25
23
268
140
37
33
31
24
121
50
40
32
46
20
19
16
29
168
84
26
22
, 19
22
8
11
8
13
8
7
8
9
I
7
4
4
2~
18
13
24
12
8
8
16
10
12
8
II
8
13
4
4
18
19
16
20
9
20
8
a
73
4S
":00-1,,'525 40, 6S "'00-",,5 7 7 14
1',15-1':3029 34 63 ""5-11:30 0 3 3
1':30-1','S34 46 80 1I:30-1114S 4 2 6
11145 . 12.00 30 118 3a 158 611 276 11:45 - 12:00 3 14 ' 5 17 8 31
............................--.................--........,..............................-.....""'."-'-"""""",
TOTALS
749
964
1,713
1,592
1,530
3,122
AOT'S 2,541 2,494 4,835
... .................... ....-........ ........-.......... ........... .... -........ ... ....... ........-. -. ..-... .....
T~FflC DATA SERVICES, llIe. ' ' LOCATIDII CCDE 10012.058
......--....-......-'" ""'i'" ,.....,.i' ,... "'---"'.' ""i"'" ,...... .",....., ."'....-
LOCATIDII. MAIN aT.m NEIoPORT/EL C.lHIIIO AVERAGED' VOL1.ICU FOR ~ THURSÐAY, unlDO TO ,FRIDAY 11/'0/00
*........--.....-- All --.--.- _....._..~.......- PM -....:....-....**
TIME EI 18 TOTAL, TIll! . 9 \ . TOTAL
-................ ------ _.......-.-- ..-. ----_.......*...
12:00 - 12115 3 2 5 12:00 . 12:'1' 102 '02 2D4
12115 . 12:38 3 1 4 12:15 - 12:30 98 \12 190
12:30 . 12:45 2 ,7 9 12:30 '12:45 102 91 193
12:45 - hOD 3 II 0 10' 3 21 12:4~' 1:00 106 4011 101 3116 207 79'4
1:00.- 1115 2 2 4 1:00' 1:15' 86 103 189
",5 - 1:30 1 1 2 1:15' 1:30 89' 113 zæ
1:30 - h45" 3 1 4 1:30' 1,45 80 88 168
"45' 2100 2 2 4 4 14 1,45 - 2:00 72 , 327 17 391 159' 718.
2:00' 2:15 2 ., 0 2 2100 - 2115 V6 78 ',174
2rtS - 2:30 1 0 I 2,15. 2:30 66 \12. 158
Z:30. 2:45 1 0 1 21311 - 2:45 80 113 193
ZI45 - 3,00 3 7 0 0 3 '7 2145 .' 3',00 88 330 118 '401 206 731
3:00" 3,15 0 I 3:00 - 3:15 79 133 212
3:15' 3:30 I 1 3115. 3:30 91 107 198
,3:30' 3145 ,3 3 3,30' 3145 85 111 1\16
3,45. 4,00 0 4 2, 1 6 3,45' 4100 88 343 136 487 Z24 830
4,00. 4115 1 2 3 4,00 - 4,1' 94 '" 24D
4:15' 4:30 2 3 5 4:15 - 4:30 9T ISO 247
4:30' 4,45 1 4 5 4:30. 4145 103 122 225
4.45.. 5100 6 10 3 12 9- 22 4:45' 5'100 1OS , 399_. 152 570 257 969
5,00' 5:15 6 4 '10, 5:00. 5115 106 150 256
5115 - 5:30 10 8 18 5,,5. 5,30 105 156 261
5;30. 5145 30 2 52 5,30' 5:~ 106 158 264
5,45" ,6:00 34 80 15 29 49 199 5:45' 6:00 1114 421 172 636 276 1057
6:00' 6:15 42 8 50 6:00 - 6115 66 140 206
6:15. 6:30 47 22 69 6:15 - 6:30 76 96 172
6,30' 6145 49 31 80 6:30. 6:45 63 97 160
6:45 - 7,00 r.z 180 108 109 90 289 6:45. 7100 50 255 lilt 413 130 668
7:00' 7115 108 108 V6 7100 - 7:15' 57 59 116
7:15' 7:30 64 66 130 7: 15 .' 7130 108 58 106
7,30' 7:45 90 108 198 7:311, 7:45 35 39 74
7:45 - a:oo '00 302 134 356 ~ 658 7:45' a:oo 50 190 40 1V6' 90 386
5100 - 8115 86 115' 201 8,00' a,lS 4Z 36 78
5115 - a:30 82 98 180 8:15 - 8:30 39 41 80
8:30' 8:45 59 81 140 8:.30' 8:45 29, 22 51
5:45 - 9:00 56 zæ '03 397 159 680 8:~5' 9:00 35 145 37' 136 72 281
9:00. 9,15 73 67 140, 9100 - 9115 2S 31 56
9:15 - 9:30 42 60 102 '9,15. 9130 24 Z3 47
9:30' 9:45 52 56 108 9:30. 9145 23 '19 42
9:45 . 10100 56 223 58 241 114 464 9145 - 10100 42 114 Z3 96 65 210
10100 . 10: 15 56 64 120 1hoo . lOllS 17 11 28
10:15 . 10:30 57 65 122 10:15 . 10:30 19 10 29
.10:30 - '0:45 53 54 107 10:30 . 10:45 5 11 '16
10145 . 11100 56 .222 92 275 1108 '497 10145 . 11:00 9 50 10 42 19 92
":00 . ":15 71 65 136 11:00 . 11:'5 8 15 23
,",5. 11:30 65 as 150 11115 - 11:30 3 9 '2
":30 - 11:45 101 79 180 11:30 . 1"'5 0 8 8
11:.45 . 12:00 95 332 74 303 169 635 ":45 - 12:00 10 21 4 36 '4 51
..-.....- ... ... -.... ........ -............... -. ..-..-.. ....-. ....... ... --.......... -..-........... .......-
TOTALS 1,662 ',740 3,402 3,003 3,790 6,793
.\DT'S ' 4,665 5,530 10,195
...- ....... ... ........... ........... ...-..... ..-...... ...... .-............ ............ - -*-_....- ---
Resolution No, 05-61
Page 143 of 145
T...FFlC .ATA ""VIC1!I, INC. LOCATIIIII COÞE 10012.05
-..-..---.....--........,----........... ........--..
LOCATiON " MAIN ST-BTI/ EL CNUIIO/UILLINII
AVERAGED VOLIJ!ES FOR ~ TUESDAY 11/141.00 TO uEÐYESDAT 11/15/00
_.~_....-- NI ......---........ --...-.......- PI! ...-...........",,'
TIllE EI WI TOTAL TIME EI, WI lD'1AL
----............... ... ...-...........u.. .-.......... ....----.--..
12:00 .' 12, IS
12,15 . 12,30
, 12,30 " 12:45
12:45' 1:110
1:00. 1.1S
1,IS' 1:30.
1.30' ,,'"
1:45' 2:00
2,00, 2:15
2:15' 2,30
2,30' 2.45
2:45' 3,00
3,00' 3,15
3:1S - 3:3D
3,30 - 3,45
3,45. 4:00
4.OU - 4:15
4.15. 413D
4:30' 4145
4,45' 5100
5:00 ;' 5,'S
5115', 5.30
5:30' 5:45
5.45. 6tOO
6:00' 6:'5
6:15 - 6:30
6:3D' 6.45
6:45 - 7,00
7:0D' 7:15
7,15 - 7:30
7:3D' 7,45
7:45' B:oo
B:OO - B,'5'
a,'5' B,30
B:3D' B,45
BI45 , 9,00
"00" 9,15
9,15 - 9:30
9,30' 9:45
9:45 . 10,00
1D,00 . lOllS
10:15 . ID:3O
'0,30 ' 1DI45
10,45 . 1':00
I
2
4
D
3
2
'D
,
B
6
23
,40
4'
52
60
64
74
,U
'62
'22
107
55
50
S1
45
43
44
49
50
55
4'
"
- 9
"
I
D
5
3
,
4
5
II
7
'3
5'
173
10
2
4
3
2
5
6
0
3
I
4
2
,2
2
2
10
6
3
.14
13
23
I'
31
"
128
IP
'3
'0
16
~
'2:00 . '2,15
'2:15 - 12:3D
12:30 . 12,45
1t:45' 1:00
1:00. 1:15
,,'5 - ,,30
1:30. 1:45
1:45. 2,00
2:00 - 2:15
2:'5 .' 2':30
2,3D. 2,45
2:45. 3:00
3:'OD. 3:15
3:15.' 3,30
3,30. 3.45
3,45 - 4:00
4:00. 4:15
4.15. 4,30
4.30. 4:45
4':4S- 5:00
5100 . '5:15
5,'5, 5:30
5:30. 5:45
5:45' 6100
6,åo - 6,'5
6,15 - 6:30
6.30. 6:45
'6.45. 7100
7,00. 7.'5
7:15' 7:30
7.30 " 7.45
7:45' 8.00
8.00. 8:15
,.15. 8:30
8.30 - 8,4S
8:45 - 9:00
,9:00' 9,15
9.15. 9:30
9:30. 9:45
9.45 - '0:00
10:00 - '0:'5
10:15 . 10:30
1D:3O . 1D:45
ID:45 . 11:0D
81
74
'74
62
54
63
"
76
99
82
99
108
124
90
106
'00
'20
128,
144
132 524
162
173'
'15D
112 597
73
7Ð
7Ð
6' 274
62
38
28
22
~,
, 35
34
30
,it1
12,
18
18
15
, ' 7
8
4
291
248
388'
420
138
",
130
108
'176
I"
114
99
,so
130
69
34
17
'n
II
80
76
65
71
73
317
285
158
146
162
142
6Ò8
23
17
~5
12
8
16
27.
U
39,
74 '66
68
78
99
138
3113
'I
71
17
89
328
130
1211
126
149
'80
153
1~
197 716
533
260
zzr
236
2'2 935
23'
273
274
240 '045
~
306
264
2", n1'
'74
138
129
12D
561
217
484,
66
89
130
,62
447
'40
215
292
214
274
167
14D
,U
931
7OT
136
137
130
',2
5'5
"a'
IDa
72
65 355
74
64
62
60
260
Sit
42
47
42
189
263
'67
112
90
75
51
4D
46
59
196
96
83
90
108
86
1D2
88
'I
317
367
521-
522
101
68
59
59.
217
6'
3'
25
23
16
95
444
1'1
194
36
47
47
43
',,56
62
44
43
43
29
za
30
205
130
1':00-1"15 64 44 loa 11:oo'11:15'Ó 9 "
1"15'11:30' 66 48 114 '1:15"1:3D 1D 13 23
.\1,30-,,:4578 58 '36 11:30"1:45 6 5 "
\1:45 . 12:00 a2 290 46'96' '28 486 11:45 . 12100 2 28 5 32 7 60
.... ....-...... ..... .................. -. ....... ."". -...... .......... ....... .................. ----......
TOTALS
',758
1,7'5
3,473
3, '53
31
30
29
24 110
16
18
15
12
3,323
6,476
MY'S 4,9" 5,038 9,949
...... ..... ...... .......... .... ...... ............ ........ ... ""..... .... "". ........""...... .""..................... .........""
TRAfFIC OÞ.TA SERVICES, INC. LDCATlIII CIXIE' 10012.027
~.~.......-_....-....__........_._.,... ..u... ...---.... ........ .._a............. .~. ,..
LOCATION - 1ST ST-BTN PROSPECT/TORIA AVERAGED mlllEs '01' IlEDNEIOAT 11/8JQO TO rlUSDAr 11/9/00
-..-........-.. All ---...........- .._--~ PM .................-.-
TIME EI W. TOTAl., TIME II \/I TDTAI.
--."_b.o" . . .. . .-......--.....-..........----......----.
12:00 - '2:15 4 6 10 12,00 . "," 252 16'5 415
":15' 12,SO 5 10' 15 12,15 - 12130 230 1711 400'
b:so. 12:45 12 7 IP 12:SD . 12145 ZIZ, 204 436
12,45' 1:00 7 28 9 32 I' 6G 12:'" hOD 224 938 218 7S5 W 1693
"00- "1" 6 6 12 1100. "1' 21D 1l1li 401
1115 ," ":30 4 7 11 "15' 1:30 176 206 382
,,30 - 1'.45 4 5 '9 ,,30 - 1,45 142 195 337
1,45' 2,00 4 18 8 26 12 44 1:45. 2100 176 697 167' 766 343 146'5
,t!,I!!1~, ,z~ S 4 7 ,2.!Q!I ~ _J!l~ 'I~O, 1m SiD.,
2>15 - 2,30 4 3 7 2,15 - 2':30 "0 186 336
2:30 - 2,45 I 3 4 2:30 - 2145 158 I. 347
2:45 - 3.00 3 II 1 II 4 22 2,45 - 3,00' 144 6112 192 m 336 1339
3,00' 3:15 1 4 3,00 - 3,15 150 182' 332
3:15' 3:30 2 7 S,15' 3130 162 189 351
3:30" 3:45 3 8 3,3D - 3,45 162' 174 336
3:'" 4:00 21 I 7 9 28 3:'" hOD 173 647 178 m 351 13711
,:co. 4,'5 8 ,7 IS 4:00 - 411' 164 204 366
4,15 - 4,30 4 6' 10. 4,15 - 4130 '92 202 394
4:30 - 4,45 6' 4 10 4,30 - 4", 176 2311 414
4145 - 5100 ZI " 9 26 37 n, _4,45 - 5100, 11'1 m 212 856-:-, 41D 1579
5:00 - 5,15 15 .9 24 5,00 - 5,15 236 254 490
5115 - 5:SO 18 12 30 5115 - 5130 248 'DO 478
, 5130 - 5,45 iT 16 U' 5,3"0 -, 5:45 216 228 444
5145 - 6100 48 lOll 21 58 69 166 5,45 - 6:00' ," 166 a66 194 ~ 36D 1772
61DO - 6,15 45 211 66 6100 - ',IS 148 211 359
6:15" 613D 67 35 1D2 6:15' ':30 152 190 342
6130 - 6:45 74 64 138 .-6,30 - ,,45 12D 15a 2711
6:45 - 7,00 104 293, 76 195 180 4l1li 6:'" 7:00 110 SSD 136 69!i 246 1225
7:110 - 7:15', 114 lID 217 7,00.- 7:15 '00 132 D2
7.15. 7:30 l1a 1011 226 7,15 - 7:30 "0 '02 212
7:30' 7:45 174 177 351 7:30' 7,45 '711 94 164
7:45 - a:oo 144 550 202 590 346 114D 7"" - 8:00 '76 356 78 406 154 762
8:00 - 8:15 1411 202 342 8:00 - a:15 60 iz 132
8:15 - 8,30 150 . 165 315 8115' a:30 74 62' 136
':30 - a:45 15D 148 '298 8,SO' - 8,45 59 12 131
':45 - 9:00 '" 586 11a 633 264 1219 a,45' 9:110 45 238 " Z62 101 soil.
9,00' 9115 134 145 279 9100'- 9:1S ' 32 '" "
9:15, - 9:30 126 '28 254 9:15' 9:30 31 53 B4
9:30' 9:45 126 127 .253 9,SO. 9i45 iT 48 75
. 9:45 "ID:OO 134 520 lID 5'0 244 103D 9:45 - lO:OD 36 I" 3D 175 66 321
10:00 " 10:15 13a '" zaz 1D:00 - 'D:15 30 35 65
10:15 - 10,3D 132 138 270 '0:15 - 1D:30 29 26 55
10:30 "10:45 116 128 244 1D~3D - 10:45 21 32 SS
10:45 " 11:00 144 530 126 536 2711 '066 10:45 . I1:OD 8 l1li 19 "2 21 2DD
11:00 . "..,5 148 148 296 11:00 . 'hIS IS ZO, 35
11:15 - 11:30 161 ," 307 11:15 - 11:30 11 20 31
11:30 "11:45 202 '58 '360 11:]0 . 11:45 12 17 29
11145 . 12:00 '" 707 '46 598' 342 1305 11:45 . 12:00 9 47 7 64 16 "1
....._......................_..........~......-...._..................................-...............-..
TOUlS 3,~18 3,222 6,640 5,878 6,457 12,335
ACT'S 9,296 9,679 18,975
...... ...... ..... -....... ... ................... .... ...~...... ....._.......~~.... ~-..............- .........-..
Resolution No. 05-61
Page 145 of 145
,-- -,-'- - -,-----