HomeMy WebLinkAbout12 AIRPORT NOISE ABATE 06-20-05
8.....:'..:....
"'..
AGENDA REPORT
Agenda Item
Reviewed:
City Manager
--12-
J1t
Finance Director ~
MEETING DATE:
JUNE 20, 2005
FROM:
WILLIAM HUSTON, CITY MANAGER
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
TO:
SUBJECT:
JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT NOISE ABATEMENT QUARTERLY REPORTS
SUMMARY:
This report transmits two John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Quarterly Reports for the
third and fourth quarters of 2004. The average noise level measured at monitoring station
NMS 10N, located at Columbus Tustin Middle School, slightly decreased during the third
quarter and slightly increased during the fourth quarter compared to the previous four
quarters. Average noise levels during both quarters remained below the City, County, and
State criteria of 65 dB Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) for residential uses.
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council receive and file this report.
FISCAL IMPACT
No Fiscal Impact
DISCUSSION
Following the conclusion of each calendar quarter, John Wayne Airport prepares a Noise
Abatement Program Quarterly Report and transmits a copy of the report to the City of
Tustin. Attachment A contains the quarterly reports for the third and fourth quarters of
2004. A brief overview of the information contained within the attachment is as follows:
Measured Noise Levels
.
During the third quarter of 2004, the average CNEL at Remote Monitoring Station
(NMS) 10N, located at Columbus Tustin Middle School, was 56.5 dB. This is a 0.5
dB lower than the previous four quarters. However, for comparison, the CNEL was
.4 dB lower (56.1) during the third quarter of 2003.
JWA Noise Report
Page 2
During the fourth quarter of 2004, the average CNEL was 57.4 dB. This is a 0.3 dB
higher than the previous four quarters. For comparison, the CNEL was the same
(57.4) during the fourth quarter of 2003.
.
All measured noise levels are below the City, County, and State criteria of 65 dB
CNEL for residential areas.
Noise Complaints
.
During the third quarter of 2004, there were seven (7) Tustin area complaints
compared with thirty-four (34) complaints for the same period during 2003.
.
During the fourth quarter of 2004, there was one (1) Tustin area complaint
compared with four (4) complaints for the same period during 2003.
.
The number of complaints decreased during the third quarter and fourth quarter
compared to the same periods in 2003.
Since noise issues are of considerable importance to the City of Tustin, the Community
Development Department will continue to monitor operations at John Wayne Airport
unless otherwise directed by the City Council.
~~d-/~,~L
Elizabeth A. Binsack
Community Development Director
Attachment:
John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Quarterly Reports for July 1, 2004, through
September 30, 2004, and October 1,2004, through December 31,2004.
S,\Cdd\Ryao\JWA report to cou""il-û5.doc
ATTACHMENT A
John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Quarterly Reports for
July 1, 2004, through September 30, 2004 (third quarter) and
October 1, 2004, through December 31, 2004 (fourth quarter).
NOISE ABATEMENT PROGRAM
QUARTERLY REPORT
For the period:
July 1, 2004 through September 30,2004
Prepared in accordance with:
AIRPORT NOISE STANDARD
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
California Administrative Code Title 21,
Chapter 2.5, SubChapter 6:
Division of Aeronautics
Noise Standards
Submitted by:
{lf1!:,
Airport Director
John Wayne Airport, Orange County
F~ECEI\!EO
1 8 2[;[4
INTRODUCTION
This is the 1 27th Quarterly Report submitted by the County of Orange in accordance with the
requirements of the California Airport Noise Standards (California Administrative Code Title 21,
Chapter 2.5, SubChapter 6: Division of Aeronautics Noise Standards). Effective January 1,
1986, the criteria for defining "Noise Impact Area" was changed from 70 dB to 65 dB
Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL). Under this criteria, John Wayne Airport currently
has a "Noise Impact Area."
NOISE IMPACT SUMMARY
Caltrans' Aeronautics Program has established guidelines in the California State Noise Standard
to control residential area noise levels produced by aircraft operations using the State's airports.
Under those guidelines, residential noise sensitive areas exposed to an average Community Noise
Equivalent Level (CNEL) of more than 65 dB define the "Noise Impact Area." John Wayne
Airport uses ten pennanent remote noise monitoring stations (NMS) located in Newport Beach,
Santa Ana, Tustin and Irvine to measure noise levels, at the following locations:
MONITOR STATIONS
NMS-IS: Golf Course, 3100 Irvine Ave., Newport Beach
NMS-2S: 20152 S.W. Birch St., Santa Ana
NMS-3S: 2139 Anniversary Lane, Newport Beach
NMS-4S: 2338 Tustin Ave., Newport Beach
NMS-5S: 324 Yz Vista Madera, Newport Beach
NMS-6S: 1912 Santiago, Newport Beach
NMS-7S: 1131 Back Bay Drive, Newport Beach
NMS-8N: 17372 Eastman Street, Irvine
NMS-9N: 1300 S. Grand Avenue, Santa Ana
NMS-ION:17952 Beneta Way, Tustin
The map in Figure 1 shows the general location of each pennanent remote monitor station.
Figure 2 shows the Airport's "Noise Impact Area" for the previous year (October 1,2003 -
September 30, 2004). The Figure 2 infonnation was developed by Mestre-Greve Associates,
Inc., in consultation with John Wayne Airport. CNEL values measured for the period and current
digitized land use infonnation were utilized to calculate the land area acreages, number of
residences and estimated number of people within the "Noise Impact Area".
-1-
FIGURE 1
JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT
NOISE MONITORING STATIONS (NMS)
LOCATION MAP
Nt
---
JW M,I,looP,o j" tlGo,tLCommR"otlool oboomo,Ld9°
-2-
FIGURE 2
0 Noise Monitors D Single Famiiy Residentiai
65 dB CNEL Contour =::J Muiti-Famiiy Residential
N
STATISTICS: +
Incompatible Land Use: 11.9 Acres or .0186 square miles
Number of Dweliings: 98
Number of People: 245 (based on 2.5 people per dwelling unit)
JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT
65 dB CNEL Impact Area
October 2003- September 2004
M~I" Gme A"oc"'"
-3-
AIRCRAFT TRAFFIC SUMMARY
The Airport traffic summary for this quarter is shown in Table I and Figure 3 below. Air Carrier
operational count histories and average daily departure counts are illustrated in Tables 9 & II.
TABLE 1
LANDING AND TAKEOFF OPERATIONS
Julv - September 2004
Period Air Carriers GAJet(1) Total Average Daily
Jet Proo Ooerations (2 Jet Operations
July 8,626 356 2,029 32,026 344
AuQust 8,770 368 2,058 31,058 349
September 8,335 343 1,922 28,422 342
Third Quarter 25,731 1,067 6,009 91,506 345
Twelve Months 101,214 4,161 22,051 356,453 337
10/01/03 - 09/30/04
FIGURE 3
QUARTERLY AIRPORT TRAFFIC SUMMARY
(Landing and Takeoff Operations)
-- ------ - --------- --
July - September 2004
Jet Carrier
Military 58
Prop Carrier 1,067
GAJet
GA Other
25,731
6,009
58,640
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
Number of Operations
NOTE: (I) GA Jet figures include a 5% factor for operations not identified by the JW A noise monitor stations.
(2) Counts in this column are based upon records provided by the local FAA representatives.
COMMUNITY NOISE EOUIV ALENT LEVELS
The monthly, quarterly and twelve month Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) average values
for each monitor station are shown in Table 2, while daily CNEL values are shown in Tables 3 through
5, Insufficient data is indicated by "#N/A" entries in each table,
Average Single Event Noise Exposure Level (SENEL) values for Air Carrier and General Aviation Jet
aircraft are shown in Tables 6 through 8,
For the twelve month period ending September 30, 2004, 98 dwelling units in Santa Ana Heights were in
-4-
]2/15/04
the "Noise Impacted Area" (within the 65 dB CNEL contour); this represents an increase of eight units in
the number of dwelling units in the "Noise Impacted Area" from the previous twelve month period
ending June 30, 2004.
The State has approved several remedies of aircraft noise levels for noise sensitive property in the "Noise
Impact Area": homes can be acoustically insulated, purchased by the County, or rezoned for "other
non-noise sensitive uses." As part of the County's Santa Ana Heights Land Use Compatibility Program,
approximately 77 general agriculture (A-I) properties with residential land uses on Orchard, Acacia and
Birch Streets were rezoned for Business Park Use in October, 1986. Each property was individually sold
and subsequently converted to compatible land use. Between 1986 and 1993, 124 residences have been
purchased or otherwise made compatible through the County's Purchase Assurance Program, Acoustical
Insulation Program or Housing Relocation Program. In September 1993, the FAA approved a grant to
fund a voluntary Accelerated Acoustical Insulation Program (AAIP) in Santa Ana Heights. (The current
AAIP has been renamed "Santa Ana Heights Acoustical Insulation Program" with the acronym
"SAH AlP".) During the third quarter of 2004, no additional residences have been made compatible
through the County's SAH AlP. A total of 473 residences in Santa Ana Heights have been purchased or
otherwise made compatible through the County's Purchase Assurance Program, Housing Relocation
Program, Acoustical Insulation Program or SAH AlP.
TELEPHONE COMPLAINT CALLS (Julv 1. 2004 - Seutember 30. 2004)
The Airport's Access and Noise Office receives and investigates noise calls and complaints from local
citizens and all other sources. During the period July 1,2004 through September 30, 2004, the Office
received 324 complaints from citizens. This is a 3.5% increase from the 313 complaints received last
quarter. It is a 37.1 % decrease from the 515 complaints received during the same quarter last year.
Figure 4 shows the distribution of the quarterly telephone calls and complaints from local communities.
FIGURE 4
HISTOGRAM BY COMMUNITY
60 57
50
40
30 24
20
10
45
"ò ~'I> ~q} ,,'I> ,§:- .,'1 ~ .~" .:ti-" ~'!- ~ rf 0' ,,'I> ",-P ~'!- ð~
,Iit'l' iF" <:;¡" ~0 #' ",ò'O <0°'1' .,~ O'!- <-"," qf'l' 0"1><' <:f' >fÞ"r' ~il' <-"", .\0iá'
&'1> o<' ., ,}'I> <v'l> 0"1' ,,'I> ~<' 0'f' .... -O{- ,,:>'1><'., "'-
~ .,Q. 0<' cP <v'f' ~ ,,'I' v..." '<?-<'
'O;¿."f c,d' ..:J' ...° .,<fÞ
'0 ":>
Community
-5-
TABLE 2
LONG TERM MEASURED LEVELS
Aircraft CNEL from 10/03 through 9/04
Values in dB at Each Site
Period NM8 8ite
18 28 38 48 58 68 78 8N 9N 10N
Oct 2003 67.2 65.2 65.2 57.9 58.8 59.6 57.4 68.5 53.6 57.6
# Davs 29 22 29 26 4 24 21 30 6 24
Nov 2003 67.3 65.7 65.2 58.5 59.6 60.3 58.4 68.5 53.1 57.3
# Davs 28 26 25 23 18 27 20 26 7 21
Dec 2003 67.2 65.5 64.7 58.1 59.1 59.4 58.0 68.3 53.7 57.3
# Davs 27 23 29 25 21 25 17 27 13 18
Q-4 2003 67.3 65.5 65.0 58.2 59.3 59.8 57.9 68.4 53.5 57.4
# Days 84 71 83 74 43 76 58 83 26 63
Jan 2004 67.0 65.7 65.1 58.5 59.1 59.9 58.1 68.2 53.2 57.1
# Davs 25 26 27 22 27 25 11 26 11 21
Feb 2004 67.3 66.3 65.3 58.9 59.2 60.1 58.1 68.4 53.2 57.4
# Davs 24 24 25 15 20 15 11 22 11 10
Mar 2004 68.6 66.7 65.4 58.9 58.9 61.3 57.2 68.5 52.8 57.6
# Davs 30 20 28 24 10 11 15 28 6 18
Q-1 2004 67.8 66.2 65.3 58.7 59.1 60.3 57.7 68.3 53.1 57.3
# Days 79 70 80 61 57 51 37 76 28 49
Apr 2004 67.6 66.8 65.5 59.7 60.2 61.9 57.2 68.3 49.8 57.1
# Davs 29 20 29 13 16 1 16 29 10 20
May 2004 67.4 66.7 65.3 59.7 61.0 61.0 57.7 68.3 49.2 57.3
# Davs 30 27 30 5 1 1 15 30 8 16
Jun 2004 68.1 67.1 66.6 59.9 60.2 61.3 58.1 68.9 50.8 57.9
# Days 29 29 29 13 10 3 15 29 5 16
Q-22004 67.7 66.9 65.8 59.8 60.2 61.4 57.7 68.5 49.8 57.4
# Days 88 76 88 31 27 5 46 88 23 52
Ju120O4 67.9 66.9 66.5 59.4 60.1 60.5 57.9 68.5 51.3 56.5
# Days 30 28 30 27 27 22 21 29 4 30
Aug 2004 68.5 67.1 66.5 59.3 60.4 60.6 58.1 68.6 49.9 56.8
# Days 31 30 31 29 25 31 19 31 7 30
8ep 2004 68.0 66.9 65.7 58.6 59.9 60.0 57.5 68.0 50.8 56.3
# Davs 27 21 29 28 20 23 21 28 15 26
Q-32004 68.2 67.0 66.3 59.2 60.1 60.4 57.9 68.4 50.7 56.5
# Days 88 79 90 84 72 76 61 88 26 86
Q-4 2003 thru Q-;rO04
Total I 67.7 66.5 65.7 58.9 59.7 60.2 57.8 68.4 52.1 57.1
# Days 339 296 341 250 199 208 202 335 103 250
Q-3 2003 tiru Q-1rO04 (~rYiOUS 4 Quarters)
Total 67.4 66.1 65.3 58.6 59.1 59.9 57.7 68.4 52.4 57.0
# Days 340 298 340 249 181 213 228 339 134 254
Change frlm pre~iOus 4 ~uarters
0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.0 -0.2 0.1
-6-
TABLE 3
DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION
July 2004
Date NMS Site
1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N
1 68.9 67.8 67.7 60.6 61.1 #N/A #N/A 68.7 #N/A 57.4
2 68.5 67.4 67.1 60.1 61.1 #N/A 58.7 69.1 #N/A 56.6
3 66.5 65.1 64.7 58.4 58.7 59.8 #N/A 66.7 #N/A 55.1
4 64.4 63.1 62.3 59.8 56.4 57.8 59.3 65.6 #N/A 57.0
5 67.6 66.6 66.1 58.6 59.6 60.1 #N/A 68.7 #N/A 57.6
6 68.1 67.4 66.7 59.5 60.0 61.3 #N/A 69.1 #N/A 58.0
7 67.9 #N/A 66.4 59.4 60.3 61.0 57.0 69.3 #N/A 56.9
8 68.0 #N/A 66.3 #N/A 61.0 60.7 57.6 68.4 #N/A 58.2
9 67.8 67.1 66.6 59.4 60.3 60.9 57.8 68.7 #N/A 56.9
10 66.5 66.0 65.3 58.2 #N/A 60.3 #N/A 66.8 #N/A 54.2
11 67.8 66.9 66.3 60.1 60.2 60.3 #N/A 68.7 #N/A 56.0
12 68.0 67.8 66.9 #N/A 60.1 60.8 57.1 68.7 #N/A 55.3
13 67.7 66.8 66.8 58.9 60.4 60.6 #N/A 68.3 #N/A 56.9
14 67.6 67.2 66.5 58.8 60.1 60.3 56.3 #N/A #N/A 57.5
15 67.9 67.2 67.1 59.9 60.2 60.9 57.5 68.8 #N/A 55.9
16 68.0 66.9 66.2 58.8 #N/A #N/A #N/A 68.4 #N/A 54.7
17 67.0 65.8 65.0 58.8 57.9 #N/A 57.7 67.1 #N/A 53.2
18 67.2 66.6 66.0 58.5 61.1 #N/A 56.8 68.2 #N/A 54.3
19 68.3 67.5 67.5 #N/A 60.8 #N/A 58.1 68.4 #N/A 56.2
20 67.7 67.1 66.6 59.7 60.6 #N/A 59.2 68.6 #N/A 56.5
21 68.0 67.4 67.8 59.6 60.2 #N/A 57.6 68.9 #N/A 56.8
22 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
23 69.0 67.6 67.3 59.8 60.4 60.9 58.8 69.5 54.0 57.2
24 67.7 66.3 65.9 60.0 58.4 59.5 57.7 67.4 #N/A 55.3
25 68.0 66.8 66.6 58.8 59.8 60.4 56.8 69.1 #N/A 56.5
26 68.4 66.9 66.6 59.0 59.6 60.6 57.0 69.2 50.5 57.5
27 68.6 67.2 66.3 59.4 #N/A 60.3 57.7 69.0 49.6 57.7
28 68.5 67.0 66.8 59.8 60.1 61.3 59.9 68.5 49.1 56.2
29 69.2 67.4 66.9 60.0 60.9 61.2 57.4 68.8 #N/A 56.3
30 69.0 67.2 67.1 60.1 60.2 61.1 #N/A 69.2 #N/A 57.2
31 67.6 65.9 65.8 59.8 59.9 59.5 58.3 67.3 #N/A 55.4
Davs 30 28 30 27 27 22 21 29 4 30
En.Ava 67.9 66.9 66.5 59.4 60.1 60.5 57.9 68.5 51.3 56.5
#N/A indicates insufficient data.
- 7-
TABLE 4
DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION
August 2004
Date NMS Site
1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N
1 69.2 67.2 67.2 60.2 60.8 61.3 57.8 69.3 #N/A 57.9
2 69.1 67.4 67.2 #N/A 60.5 61.5 58.8 69.0 #N/A 56.9
3 68.5 67.0 66.6 59.6 59.9 60.7 57.2 68.6 #N/A 56.4
4 69.3 67.5 67.0 #N/A 60.4 61.5 59.2 69.2 #N/A 58.0
5 69.1 67.1 66.8 59.9 60.3 60.8 #N/A 69.3 #N/A 57.1
6 69.0 67.6 66.8 59.1 60.2 61.0 #N/A 68.4 #N/A 56.3
7 67.2 66.3 65.1 58.4 60.6 59.6 #N/A 67.5 #N/A 54.8
8 68.3 67.9 66.8 58.6 #N/A 60.5 58.9 68.6 #N/A 56.4
9 68.2 67.0 66.6 59.2 #N/A 60.3 56.3 68.8 #N/A 56.0
10 67.2 66.3 65.9 59.0 #N/A 59.7 57.1 68.2 #N/A 55.8
11 68.8 67.2 67.2 59.6 #N/A 61.3 57.6 69.1 53.6 56.6
12 69.2 67.4 66.5 58.9 60.8 60.3 #N/A 68.8 #N/A 54.4
13 68.8 67.3 66.8 59.5 #N/A 61.1 58.2 68.5 #N/A 55.1
14 67.5 66.2 65.8 58.8 59.9 59.6 56.7 67.3 #N/A 54.5
15 68.8 67.3 66.9 59.3 #N/A 60.8 #N/A 68.5 43.6 56.7
16 68.7 67.0 66.9 59.6 60.9 60.8 #N/A 69.0 #N/A 57.0
17 68.6 67.1 66.5 59.0 59.6 60.4 59.4 68.8 45.0 57.7
18 68.7 67.0 66.4 59.3 59.6 60.1 #N/A 68.8 46.6 57.6
19 69.0 67.5 67.1 60.2 60.2 61.1 58.4 69.8 46.5 58.9
20 69.3 67.5 67.1 60.4 60.7 61.3 #N/A 69.0 48.5 57.5
21 67.3 65.5 65.2 58.4 58.7 59.2 #N/A 67.2 #N/A 55.4
22 67.9 67.4 66.2 59.2 59.9 60.6 #N/A 68.6 #N/A 57.0
23 68.2 67.5 66.2 59.3 59.7 60.7 59.6 69.3 #N/A 57.6
24 69.6 67.4 68.6 61.1 60.9 62.4 59.3 68.9 #N/A 57.5
25 68.3 67.8 66.3 59.6 62.9 60.9 #N/A 68.7 53.8 56.9
26 69.1 66.9 66.8 60.4 60.7 61.4 58.7 69.0 #N/A 57.8
27 68.8 66.9 66.3 60.2 60.9 60.8 #N/A 68.4 #N/A 55.7
28 68.1 65.5 64.7 57.5 59.5 57.7 57.5 67.5 #N/A 55.3
29 68.3 67.2 65.7 58.3 59.9 59.6 59.5 68.5 #N/A 56.1
30 67.6 67.1 65.9 58.6 60.5 59.5 55.4 68.3 #N/A 57.4
31 66.6 #N/A 65.2 57.0 60.3 57.9 54.9 68.0 #N/A #N/A
Days 31 30 31 29 25 31 19 31 7 30
En.Ava 68.5 67.1 66.5 59.3 60.4 60.6 58.1 68.6 49.9 56.8
#N/A indicates insufficient data.
-8-
TABLE 5
DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION
September 2004
Date NMS Site
1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N
1 67.2 66.0 65.7 57.6 60.0 59.0 54.5 67.8 53.5 #N/A
2 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
3 69.0 66.9 66.5 61.0 59.6 61.1 59.0 68.8 #N/A 58.3
4 #N/A #N/A 64.2 58.0 59.6 58.2 54.9 66.1 #N/A 52.2
5 #N/A 64.8 61.1 54.4 #N/A 55.6 #N/A 65.8 #N/A 54.4
6 68.4 68.0 65.9 58.9 #N/A 60.0 58.7 68.3 52.1 55.6
7 68.3 #N/A 66.3 58.7 #N/A 59.9 56.8 68.1 #N/A 56.6
8 68.0 67.0 65.7 58.5 #N/A 60.0 57.7 68.6 #N/A 55.4
9 68.1 67.7 66.3 59.1 60.1 59.9 #N/A 68.7 #N/A 55.8
10 68.1 #N/A 66.1 59.1 59.9 59.9 #N/A 68.8 42.5 55.3
11 66.0 66.3 63.9 57.2 59.2 57.6 #N/A 65.9 47.9 53.1
12 68.0 #N/A 65.8 58.5 #N/A #N/A 58.2 68.5 47.9 57.4
13 68.1 66.8 65.3 59.3 #N/A 60.0 57.2 68.5 #N/A 57.0
14 67.6 66.3 65.2 59.2 60.4 60.7 59.0 68.0 50.8 57.4
15 68.9 67.6 66.8 59.8 #N/A 61.5 58.6 68.6 49.4 58.1
16 68.5 68.2 66.4 59.3 60.1 61.1 57.6 69.1 #N/A 57.3
17 68.7 67.5 66.6 59.6 #N/A 61.3 59.4 68.7 50.6 58.1
18 66.8 65.5 64.3 58.1 59.0 58.6 58.2 66.9 #N/A 55.5
19 68.5 #N/A 66.3 59.4 60.8 #N/A 58.8 69.3 #N/A 59.0
20 68.5 #N/A 65.9 59.3 60.9 #N/A 56.7 68.0 #N/A 56.8
21 64.8 67.3 65.6 53.7 59.2 60.8 #N/A 66.3 54.0 53.7
22 66.6 65.5 65.3 56.2 58.9 59.6 55.1 67.2 #N/A 54.0
23 67.4 66.6 65.1 57.2 59.9 60.4 #N/A 68.4 50.8 55.0
24 69.1 #N/A 66.6 59.2 60.7 #N/A #N/A 68.0 52.0 55.1
25 66.8 66.1 64.1 57.0 57.8 58.9 56.0 65.7 40.3 52.9
26 68.6 #N/A 66.3 58.3 59.4 60.2 58.3 68.2 #N/A 56.7
27 68.6 67.4 66.5 58.7 60.2 59.9 54.9 68.3 #N/A 57.2
28 68.2 67.2 65.8 59.7 59.7 61.5 56.7 69.0 54.0 #N/A
29 68.4 67.1 66.1 60.2 60.6 #N/A 57.1 68.6 45.6 57.4
30 69.0 67.5 66.8 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 51.6 #N/A
Davs 27 21 29 28 20 23 21 28 15 26
En.Ava 68.0 66.9 65.7 58.6 59.9 60.0 57.5 68.0 50.8 56.3
#N/A indicates insufficient data.
-9-
TABLE 6
MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS
Commercial Class A
July - September 2004
Carrier AC Type # Deps NMS Site
15 25 3~ 45 55 65 75 8N 9N 10N
AlasKa Air 167374 1081 IAverage 95.2 93.6 92.4 85.3 87.5 87.0 84. 92.4 80.6 81.0
Count (1057 (1038 (1056\ (1052 (1038 (1053 (1032 (16 (8 (17
87377 13 Average 90.7 89.6 87.4 81.3 83.8 82.5 81.7 #N/A #N/A #N/A
Count (13) (13) (13) (12) (12) (13) (13) (0) (0) (0)
Aloha 87377 433 Average 95.9 94.1 92.2 85.5 85.7 87.0 83.7 93.2 80.5 80.9
Count (421) (415) (421) (425) (416) (422) (411) (5) (3) (6)
America West A320 559 Average 94.0 92.7 91.2 85.6 84.6 84.8 81.2 87.0 87.0 78.2
Count (545 (540) (543 (545) (533 (546 (458 (5 (3 (3
87373 175 Average 95.9 94.0 91.9 85.5 85.3 86.5 83.0 90.5 82.8 78.2
Count (160 (160 (164) (163 (164) (163 (160 (7 (3 (6
8757 1 Average 93.7 94.1 89.3 83.3 83.5 82.7 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
Count (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (0) (0) (0) (0)
American 87378 1131 Average 98.7 96.5 96.0 88.4 87.6 88.6 84.7 91.4 82.8 79.1
Count (1078 11071 11092 11089 (1070\ 11081 (1058 (27 119 122
8757 1 Average 90.2 89.8 88.6 81.4 #N/A 86.0 77.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A
Count (1 11 11 (1 (Q 11) (1 (0 (Q (Q
MD80 524 Average 100.6 99.8 99.4 92.2 93.4 94.1 91.1 98.7 84.1 85.9
Count (506) (499) (508) (505) (491) (506) (486) (8) (2) (6)
Continental 87373 143 Average 96.0 94.1 94.2 88.0 87.9 89.1 85.1 94.2 60.3 80.6
Count (131 (124 1131 (130) (128 1128 1122 (10 (8 (7
87377 486 Average 96.0 94.2 92.9 85.7 85.8 86.9 83.4 95.1 85.5 82.8
Count (428) (423) (430) (431) (424) (428) (417) (44) (23) (22)
Delta 87373 185 Average 96.0 94.4 93.9 86.7 87.5 87.8 84.5 90.6 #N/A 74.9
Count (181) (182 (183 (179 (178 (180 (179 (1 (0 (1
87378 1 Average 94.5 92.9 8~;8 83.9 84.7 85.7 8~;2 #N/A #N/A #N/A
Count (1 (1 (1 (1 (1 (Q 10 (0)
8757 516 Average 96.2 94.6 94.3 86.8 87.0 86.8 83.6 92.3 81.1 78.0
Count 1461 (451 1465 (465 (444 1461 1454 142 119 124
MD90 167 Average 91.4 90.3 90.3 82.7 83.8 84.8 84.5 89.3 80.2 76.2
Count (160) (160) (162) (151) (156) (161) (147) (3) (1) (2)
FedEx A310 1 Average 99.8 98.1 97.6 91.5 91.3 92.7 88.7 #N/A #N/A I#N/A
Count (62) (62) (63) (62) (62) (63) (60) (0) (0) (0)
Frontier Airlines A319 12 Average 93.3 91.3 91.6 85.9 84.9 84.6 80.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A
Count 112) 111 (12 (12) (12 112) 111 (0 (0 (0
87373 262 Average 93.9 92.1 92.6 86.7 87.0 88.1 84.1 90.7 81.3 77.6
Count (256) (252) (257) (257) (251) (255) (245) (4) (3) (2)
Mesa Airlines CRJ9 448 Average 92.2 90.6 92.9 85.3 84.4 86.5 80.0 88.7 #N/A 78.4
Count (436) (429) (439) (438) (433) (433) (333) (8) (0) (1)
Midwest 8717 166 Average 91.3 90.2 91.6 83.6 83.1 82.9 84.1 86.3 #N/A #N/A
Count (157) (150) (157) (152) (152) (156) (92) (3) (0) (0)
Northwest A320 364 Average 95.6 93.8 93.8 86.6 85.7 86.0 81.6 92.4 79.5 79.6
Count (320) (323) (326) (326) (317) (323) (309) (36) (5) (13)
Southwest 87373 5 Average 93.0 91.7 89.2 83.5 84.7 85.0 81.5 #N/A #N/A #N/A
Count (5 (5 15 (5 15 (5 (5 (0 (0 (0
87377 268 Average 90.2 89.4 86.2 81.1 82.4 81.5 79.2 89.3 88.2 75.3
Count (263) (254) (263) (258) (256) (264) (211) (4) (2) (2)
United A320 438 Average 91.9 90.8 90.6 84.7 84.4 85.2 83.2 85.8 #N/A 73.8
Count (423 (419 1427 (422 (420 (427 1416 (8 (0 (2
8757 418 Average 93.9 92.6 91.7 84.8 85.4 86.2 83.0 91.4 79.8 77.9
Count (398) (394) (405) (397) (396) (404) (396) (12) (4) (8)
UPS 8757 57 Average 95.1 93.4 91.8 85.2 85.7 86.4 83.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A
Count (57) (56) (57) (56) (56) (57) (53) (0) (0) (0)
-10-
TABLE 7
MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS
Commercial Class E
July - September 2004
Carrier AC Type # Deps NMS Site
IS 2S 3S 0::' 0::' 7S 8N 9N 10N
¡AlaSKa At( 87377 ~u;¿ Average ~1. 90.2 87.6 I:>U.' I:>~.O I:>¿ 81.6 89.4 77.7 fS.3
Count (488) (477) (489) (484) (488) (485) (461) (7) (1) (4)
America West A320 b6 Average 90.5 90.0 89.1 83.8 83.2 82.3 79.4 87.0 85.3 75.7
Count (63) (63) (54) (64) (63) (63) (32) (2) (1) (1)
Southwest 87373 1 Average 93.5 92.7 #~~ e;;3 81.6 87.1 83.4 #N/A i#N/A i#N/A
Count (1 (1 (1 (1 (1 (0 (0 (Q
87377 2403 Average 90.7 89.8 86.4 81.2 62.0 81.5 80.1 89.0 85.7 77.8
Count (2344) (2318) (2348) (2282) (2324) (2349) (1882) (27) (16) (9)
United 8757 575 Average 90.3 89.5 88.2 82.1 82.7 83.4 81.3 86.5 ,#N/A 76.1
Count (553) (557) (533) (546) (551) (557) (528) (8) (0) (3)
-11-
TABLE 8
MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS
Commuter
July - September 2004
Carrier AC Type # Deps NMS Site
18 28 ~" 4" 58 " tiN >IN ~ON
Amencan~agle :14U ~4U ¡Average tib. tib. titi.b f~. tiU.U tiU.ö 7~.b I ti4. /lNfl' 80:2
Count (915) (903) (908) (621) (795) (902) (64) (14) (0) (1)
Atlantic Southeast CL60 273 Average 90.5 89.1 88.2 79.9 80.6 82.6 80.3 86.9 #N/A 77.1
Count (258) (255) (261) (207) (245) (259) (230) (7) (0) (2)
SkyWest CL60 183 Average 85.6 84.0 87.9 78.5 78.4 80.5 82.1 84.4 #N/A #N/A
Count 1173 1165 (173 (54 (111 (171 (3 (5 10 10
E120 534 Average 82.2 82.5 82.4 79.9 82.3 78.9 80.5 81.0 #N/A #N/A
Count (512) (505) (518) (67) (448) (474) (69) (8) (0) (0)
MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS
General Aviation
July - September 2004
-12-
Carrier AC Type Year
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Alaska Air AS B7374 4,242 3,269 4,343 4,850 6,057
B7377 5,658 6,906 7,196 7,089 3,102
Alona AU 1737 2,91 2,673
America West AW A319 746 263 631 2,883 890
A320 1,575 2,062 1,888 2,955 2,629
B7373 10,892 10,572 7,931 3,184 1,747
B757 471 339 208 26 2
American AA B7378 655 7,778 6,200 4,663 6,843
B757 8,621 6,415 7,670 7,612 689
MD80 4,931 3,178 2,606 1,048 1,951
MD90 7,276 1,254
Continental CO B7373 2 2 2
B7375 2,030 1,350 1,744 1,640 984
B7377 3,189 3,741 3,050 3,378 2,737
B7378 2 4
B757 4
Delta DL B7373 4 712
B7378 397 878 22
B757 2,086 2,034 2,105 2,503 3,076
MD90 4,121 4,039 3,610 2,597 1,192
FedEx FM A300 82 6 10 26 6
A310 404 490 496 476 373
Frontier Airlines F9 A318 2 10
A319 10 379 559
B7373 214 1,028
Mesa Airlines YV CL60 1,208 2,266 456
CRJ9 1,753
MIQWest YX 8717 ;jU;¿1 ~tj;¿1
Northwest NW A319 481 503 854 2,790 2,123
A320 2,554 2,130 2,003 57 38
Southwest WN B7373 1,566 1,847 1,827 252 166
B7375 7,977 8,873 8,744 8,231 1,358
B7377 280 1,330 6,209 10,498 14,322
TWA TW B757 1,730 1,479
MD80 314 8
UI-'::¡ oX B757 5Utj 4~6 4o;¿ 44tj ;j46
US Airways US A319 1,455 1,077 1,456 895
A320 2 2 4
A321 2
B757 348
United UA A319 797 1,569 2,384 2,211 1,184
A320 1,785 2,028 2,183 2,403 2,435
B7373 882 779 70 10 9
B7375 38 103 8
B757 7,522 7,181 6,045 6,492 4,865
TABLE 9
AIR CARRIER OPERATIONAL HISTORY
-13-
TABLE 10
AIRCRAFT OPERATIONAL HISTORY
Aircraft Year
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
A300 82 6 10 26 6
A310 404 490 496 476 373
A318 2 10
A319 3,479 3,412 5,335 9,158 4,756
A320 5,916 6,222 6,074 5,419 5,102
A321 2
6717 302 982
67373 13,346 13,198 9,830 3,660 3,664
67374 4,242 3,269 4,343 4,850 6,057
67375 10,007 10,261 10,591 9,879 2,342
67377 9,132 13,355 18,637 23,875 22,834
67378 655 7,780 6,597 5,545 6,865
6757 20,938 18,292 16,480 17,085 8,978
CL60 1,208 2,266 456
CRJ9 1,753
MD80 5,245 3,186 2,606 1,048 1,951
MD90 11,397 5,293 3,610 2,597 1,192
FIGURE 5
AIRCRAFT OPERATIONAL HISTORY
___~_n__- -------- ---~
~~ [..~
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
J.p,
J
m 2000
.2001
[]2002
[]2003
, .,L.ddd, "'-, . ..., .-
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ æ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~~~~~o/#####o/&ð~~
By Year
-14-
TABLE 11
AIR CARRIER AVERAGE DAILY DEPARTURE HISTORY
Carrier AC Type Year
2000 2001 2002 1 2003 2004
Alaska Air AS 87374 5.806 4.477 5.9421 6.644 11.044
87377 7.719 9.466 9.8661 9.710 5.668
Aloha AU 8737 0.014 1.888 2.9861 3.984 4:88U
America West AW A319 1.019 0.362 0.863 3.937 1.617
A320 2.150 2.822 2.578 4.047 4.799
87373 14.874 14.477 10.877 4.373 3.186
8757 0.642 0.466 0.285 0.036 0.004
American AA 87378 0.893 10.652 8.493 6.386 12.496
8757 11.779 8.789 10.507 10.430 1.259
MD80 6.743 4.353 3.575 1.433 3.558
MD90 9.932 1.723
Continental CO 87373 0.005 0.003 0.004
87375 2.776 1.852 2.386 2.247 1.799
87377 4.352 5.126 4.178 4.627 4.993
87378 0.003 0.005
8757 0.005
Delta DL 87373 0.005 1.299
87378 0.542 1.200 0.040
8757 2.850 2.786 2.882 3.425 5.613
MD90 5.628 5.523 4.937 3.562 2.175
FedEx FM A300 0.112 0.008 0.014 0.036 0.011
A310 0.552 0.671 0.679 0.652 0.679
Frontier Airlines F9 A318 0.003 0.018
A319 0.014 0.518 1.015
87373 0.293 1.880
Mesa Airlines YV CL60 1.655 3.104 0.832
CRJ9 3.190
1 Midwest YX It:!( 0.414 T788
Northwest NW A319 0.656 0.690 1.173 3.822 3.872
A320 3.492 2.918 2.742 0.079 0.069
Southwest WN 87373 2.142 2.523 2.512 0.345 0.303
87375 10.893 12.153 11.981 11.279 2.478
87377 0.383 1.827 8.493 14.378 26.135
TWA TW 8757 2.366 2.027
MD80 0.429 0.011
ut-'::> 5X 1757 U.6~ U.6n U.619 ~ lf63T
US Airways US A319 1.989 1.474 1.997 1.227
A320 0.003 0.003 0.005
A321 0.003
8757 0.477
United UA A319 1.082 2.159 3.277 3.038 2.164
A320 2.432 2.770 2.978 3.279 4.442
87373 1.202 1.066 0.096 0.014 0.015
87375 0.052 0.140 0.011
8757 10.298 9.844 8.288 8.896 8.887
-15-
NOISE ABATEMENT COMMITTEE MEETING
Date: September 8, 2004
Time: 2:00 PM
Place: Eddie Martin Building
AGENDA ITEMS AND ITEMS DISCUSSED:
1. Airoort Statistics
Bonnie Streeter gave a summary ofthe Airport Statistics citing infonnation published in the
JW A Airport Statistics Report for August 2004.
2. Status of Santa Ana Heil!hts Acoustical Insulation Prol!ram (SAHAIP)
Carl Braatz provided an update on the SAHAIP program. He explained that the last phase ofthe
program was underway, and that this phase will provide acoustical insulation improvements for
14 dwellings. Construction began on August 16, 2004; completion is expected in late November
2004. The estimated cost of this phase is $567,000.
3. Additional topic discussion and/or comments and Questions
Questions/comments: Richard Cox, Emerald Bay Consultant
Mr. Cox asked if the air carriers are on the distribution list for the minutes to the Noise
Abatement Committee (NAC) meetings. Mr. Cox said he has sent letters to the air carriers
advising them ofthe situation in the Emerald Bay community and requesting that the air carriers
be mindful to cross over the shore line at higher altitudes. He gave an example he was aware of
in which an air carrier crossed over Crystal Cove at 3,000 feet. He said that while many flights
are crossing over their community at acceptable altitudes, some are crossing over too low.
Mr. Cox also mentioned an article he saw in the "Independent", regarding a meeting between
Congressman Cox's office, FAA and city representatives from Laguna Beach, and wondered if
representatives from JW A would be attending the meeting.
Eric Freed explained that carriers do receive copies of the Quarterly Reports, which contain the
minutes from the NAC meetings. He also stated that as of the current time, JW A will not be
attending the meeting mentioned in the Independent article. Mr. Freed noted that conclusions
reached in the article were mostly the opinions of the city of Laguna Beach.
Mr. Cox mentioned he had spoken to Kathym Higgins of the FAA regarding these issues, and
asked if there is any influence the Access and Noise office can bring to bear on achieving greater
participation by the FAA and the air carriers at the NAC meetings. Mr. Cox said that he believed
-16-
the local air carrier stations were a good area for input, as they can help increase crew awareness.
Eric Freed explained that the FAA and air carrier representatives from the local stations are
invited to the NAC meetings, and attend occasionally.
Questions/comments: Joe Deaton, Newport Beach
Mr. Deaton said he wanted to know of any meetings involving the FAA and air carriers on these
issues, as Newport Beach would be interested in changes that would impact their community.
Mr. Deaton asked if any of JWA's published data showed daily operations counts for Class A
and Class E, so that the public can find out if the air carriers are complying with the regulatory
operational limits.
Eric Freed explained that these limits are tracked with internal controls and reporting.
Mr. Deaton asked what date was scheduled for the beginning of construction on the new gates at
the JW A tenninal.
George Urch said that the schedule was in discussion right now, and that no specific date was
available at this time.
Questions: Richard Miller, Emerald Bay
Mr. Miller asked if there had always been ten noise monitors.
John Escobedo explained that JWA started with four monitors in the early 1970's and built up to
the current ten. Mr. Escobedo also explained how noise data is used, and how the equipment is
calibrated and maintained for accuracy. He explained how the Access and Noise office monitors
operations 24 hours a day, and explained the enforcement of general aviation and commercial
regulations.
Mr. Miller asked about the possibility of placing noise monitors in Laguna Beach.
Eric Freed explained that if noise monitors were to be placed in Laguna Beach, there would be no
regulatory noise limits associated with them. He also explained that monitors located so far from
the airport would have difficulty distinguishing aircraft noise from the ambient noise level.
Mr. Cox agreed that ambient noise would be a problem, and gave an example of such a problem
that LAX had with a noise monitor located in Palos Verdes.
Eric Freed explained limitations imposed by the Airport Noise and Capacity Act of 1990, and
how that legislation restricted the creation of new or more stringent noise regulations at u.S.
airports.
Questions/comments: Marlena McDennott, Emerald Bay
-17-
Ms. McDennott asked if the newer generations of aircraft are quieter.
John Escobedo responded that the newer aircraft are quieter and more efficient.
Ms. McDennott said she has noticed an increase in the amount of residue caused by jet fuel from
aircraft since the number of overflights have increased.
Eric Freed explained that studies of such residue have shown that it contains material such as
rubber from vehicle tires, particulate matter, and biologics, and is not caused by jet fuel.
Questions/comments: John Fox, Emerald Bay
Mr. Fox explained that he had significant concerns about the current noise impact on quality of
life. Mr. Fox stated that because the FAA regulates airline activity, it would be helpful if an FAA
representative could attend the NAC meetings. Mr. Fox described the wide variability he has
observed in the way aircraft cross the coast, ranging from community-friendly to very intrusive.
He asked if JW A can track flights.
Eric Freed explained that JW A does have flight tracking capabilities, and that we have provided
the FAA and communities with such data in the past. He noted that JW A had recently provided
Richard Cox of Emerald Bay with such data.
Mr. Fox expressed Emerald Bay's willingness to work with whoever they need to in order to
resolve the current problems.
Question: Mrs. Christine Deaton, Newport Beach
Mrs. Deaton asked how JW A acquires infonnation on the 65 dB CNEL (Community Noise
Equivalent Level).
Eric Freed explained that it is compiled from yearly noise data.
-18-
NAME
Marlena McDennott
Richard Miller
Richard Cox
John Fox
Joseph C. Deaton
Christina Deaton
Carl Braatz
John Escobedo
Eric Freed
Ramey Gonzalez
Inna Ortega
Bonnie Streeter
George Urch
NAC Roster
September 8, 2004
ORGANIZATION
Emerald Bay Community Assoc./
resident
Emerald Bay Community Assoc./
resident
Emerald Bay Community Assoc.l
consultant
Emerald Bay Community Assoc./
General Manager
Newport Beach resident
Balboa Island resident
John Wayne Airport
John Wayne Airport
John Wayne Airport
John Wayne Airport
John Wayne Airport
John Wayne Airport
John Wayne Airport
-19-
NOISE ABATEMENT PROGRAM
QUARTERLY REPORT
For the period:
October 1,2004 through December 31,2004
Prepared in accordance with:
AIRPORT NOISE STANDARD
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
California Administrative Code Title 21,
Chapter 2.5, SubChapter 6:
Division of Aeronautics
Noise Standards
Submitted by:
L~
Alan L. Murphy?' I
Airport Director
John Wayne Airport, Orange County
INTRODUCTION
This is the 128th Quarterly Report submitted by the County of Orange in accordance with the
requirements of the California Airport Noise Standards (California Administrative Code Title 21,
Chapter 2.5, SubChapter 6: Division of Aeronautics Noise Standards). Effective January I,
1986, the criteria for defining "Noise Impact Area" was changed from 70 dB to 65 dB
Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL). Under this criteria, John Wayne Airport currently
has a "Noise Impact Area."
NOISE IMPACT SUMMARY
Caltrans' Aeronautics Program has established guidelines in the California State Noise Standard
to control residential area noise levels produced by aircraft operations using the State's airports.
Under those guidelines, residential noise sensitive areas exposed to an average Community Noise
Equivalent Level (CNEL) of more than 65 dB defme the "Noise Impact Area." John Wayne
Airport uses ten pennanent remote noise monitoring stations (NMS) located in Newport Beach,
Santa Ana, Tustin and Irvine to measure noise levels, at the following locations:
MONITOR STATIONS
NMS-IS: Golf Course, 3100 Irvine Ave., Newport Beach
NMS-2S: 20152 S.W. Birch St., Santa Ana
NMS-3S: 2139 Anniversary Lane, Newport Beach
NMS-4S: 2338 Tustin Ave., Newport Beach
NMS-5S: 324 y, Vista Madera, Newport Beach
NMS-6S: 1912 Santiago, Newport Beach
NMS- 7S: 1131 Back Bay Drive, Newport Beach
NMS-8N: 17372 Eastman Street,lrvine
NMS-9N: 1300 S. Grand Avenue, Santa Ana
NMS-ION:17952 Beneta Way, Tustin
The map in Figure 1 shows the general location of each permanent remote monitor station.
Figure 2 shows the Airport's "Noise Impact Area" for the previous year (January I, 2004 -
December 31, 2004). The Figure 2 infonnation was developed by Mestre-Greve Associates, Inc.,
in consultation with John Wayne Airport. CNEL values measured for the period and current
digitized land use infonnation were utilized to calculate the land area acreages, number of
residences and estimated number of people within the "Noise Impact Area".
-1-
FIGURE 1
JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT
NOISE MONITORING STATIONS (NMS)
LOCATION MAP
,t
"'" -"...
JW AdI,I"o.P,o ¡" t/Go,"CommR"otiool oboomo,t.d9°
-2-
,
FI GORE 2
0 Noise Monitors D Single Famiiy Residential
65 dB CNEL Contour D Multi-Family Residential
STATISTICS: +
Incompatible Land Use: 13.1 Acres or .02 square miles N
Number of Dwellings: ga
Number of Peopie: 245 (based on 2.5 peopie per dwelling unit)
JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT
65 dB CNEL Impact Area
January 2004 - December 2004
M<s'" a"w A"oäa",
-3-
AIRCRAFT TRAFFIC SUMMARY
The Airport traffic summary for this quarter is shown in Table I and Figure 3 below. Air Carrier
operational count histories and average daily departure counts are illustrated in Tables 9 & 11.
Period Air Carriers GAJet(1) Total Average Daily
Jet ProD ODerations (2) Jet ODerations
October 8,542 354 2,234 29,219 348
November 8,201 339 1,926 27,168 338
December 8.487 338 1,777 27,126 331
Fourth Quarter 25,230 1,031 5,937 83,513 339
Twelve Months 101,383 4,168 22,608 354,598 339
01/01/04 - 12/31/04
TABLE I
LANDING AND TAKEOFF OPERATIONS
October - December 2004
.._---.-.
FIGURE 3
QUARTERLY AIRPORT TRAFFIC SUMMARY
(Landing and Takeoff Operations)
- ---- -- --- .
October - December 2004
Jet Carrier
25,230
Military 13
Prop Carrier
1.031
GAJet
5,937
GA Other
51,304
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
Number of Operations
NOTE: (I) GA let figures include a 5% factor for operations uot identified by the IW A noise monitor statious.
(2) Counts in this column are based upon records provided by the local FAA representatives.
COMMUNITY NOISE EOUIV ALENT LEVELS
The monthly, quarterly and twelve month Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) average values
for each monitor station are shown in Table 2, while daily CNEL values are shown in Tables 3 through
5. Insufficient data is indicated by "#N/A" entries in each table.
Average Single Event Noise Exposure Level (SENEL) values for Air Carrier and General Aviation Jet
aircraft are shown in Tables 6 through 8.
For the twelve month period ending December 31, 2004, 98 dwelling units in Santa Ana Heights were in
-4-
4/5/05
the "Noise Impacted Area" (within the 65 dB CNEL contour); this represents no change in the number of
dwelling units in the "Noise Impacted Area" from the previous twelve month period ending September
30, 2004.
The State has approved several remedies of aircraft noise levels for noise sensitive property in the "Noise
Impact Area": homes can be acoustically insulated, purchased by the County, or rezoned for "other
non-noise sensitive uses." As part of the County's Santa Ana Heights Land Use Compatibility Program,
approximately 77 general agriculture (A-I) properties with residential land uses on Orchard, Acacia and
Birch Streets were rezoned for Business Park Use in October, 1986. Each property was individually sold
and subsequently converted to compatible land use. Between 1986 and 1993, 124 residences have been
purchased or otherwise made compatible through the County's Purchase Assurance Program, Acoustical
Insulation Program or Housing Relocation Program. In September 1993, the FAA approved a grant to
fund a voluntary Accelerated Acoustical Insulation Program (AAIP) in Santa Ana Heights. (The current
AAIP has been renamed "Santa Ana Heights Acoustical Insulation Program" with the acronym
"SAH AlP".) During the fourth quarter of 2004 , no additional residences have been made compatible
through the County's SAH AlP. A total of 473 residences in Santa Ana Heights have been purchased or
otherwise made compatible through the County's Purchase Assurance Program, Housing Relocation
Program, Acoustical Insulation Program or SAH AlP.
TELEPHONE COMPLAINT CALLS (October 1. 2004 - December 31. 2004)
The Airport's Access and Noise Office receives and investigates noise calls and complaints from local
citizens and all other sources. During the period October I, 2004 through December 31, 2004, the
Office received 169 complaints from citizens. This is a 47.8% decrease from the 324 complaints
received last quarter. It is a 12.0% decrease from the 192 complaints received during the same quarter
last year. Figure 4 shows the distribution of the quarterly telephone calls and complaints from local
communities.
FIGURE 4
HISTOGRAM BY COMMUNITY
- ~--- -~---
25
21
20 18
15
10
21
16
17
15
12
13
~,~,~#,~,.~~~~.,,~~p~#
".,~,~,~~~,~ð~#'~~~,
,,~,~ø ",~þ ~~4 ,~~
iF </ 0'" (j ,0< ¡i' v -""~,, ~'" -<;
~ .§"" (,0' ~'f" ...;,'P "'- ~0 ,!þ
~ (j 4
Community
-5-
TABLE 2
LONG TERM MEASURED LEVELS
Aircraft CNEl from 1/04 through 12/04
Values in dB at Each Site
Period NMS Site
1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N
Jan 2004 67.0 65.7 65.1 58.5 59.1 59.9 58.1 68.2 53.2 57.1
# Days 25 26 27 22 27 25 11 26 11 21
Feb 2004 67.3 66.3 65.3 58.9 59.2 60.1 58.1 68.4 53.2 57.4
# Days 24 24 25 15 20 15 11 22 11 10
Mar 2004 68.6 66.7 65.4 58.9 58.9 61.3 57.2 68.5 52.8 57.6
# Days 30 20 28 24 10 11 15 28 6 18
Q-1 2004 67.8 66.2 65.3 58.7 59.1 60.3 57.7 68.3 53.1 57.3
# Days 79 70 80 61 57 51 37 76 28 49
Apr 2004 67.6 66.8 65.5 59.7 60.2 61.9 57.2 68.3 49.8 57.1
# Days 29 20 29 13 16 1 16 29 10 20
May 2004 67.4 66.7 65.3 59.7 61.0 61.0 57.7 68.3 49.2 57.3
# Davs 30 27 30 5 1 1 15 30 8 16
Jun 2004 68.1 67.1 66.6 59.9 60.2 61.3 58.1 68.9 50.8 57.9
# Days 29 29 29 13 10 3 15 29 5 16
Q-220O4 67.7 66.9 65.8 59.8 60.2 61.4 57.7 68.5 49.8 57.4
# Days 88 76 88 31 27 5 46 88 23 52
Ju120O4 67.9 66.9 66.5 59.4 60.1 60.5 57.9 68.5 51.3 56.5
# Davs 30 28 30 27 27 22 21 29 4 30
Aug 2004 68.5 67.1 66.5 59.3 60.4 60.6 58.1 68.6 49.9 56.8
# Days 31 30 31 29 25 31 19 31 7 30
Sep 2004 68.0 66.9 65.7 58.6 59.9 60.0 57.5 68.0 50.8 56.3
# Davs 27 21 29 28 20 23 21 28 15 26
Q-32004 68.2 67.0 66.3 59.2 60.1 60.4 57.9 68.4 50.7 56.5
# Days 88 79 90 84 72 76 61 88 26 86
Oct 2004 68.3 67.3 66.8 59.7 60.9 61.2 58.2 68.7 53.3 58.0
# Davs 28 28 30 26 26 25 26 28 8 25
Nav 2004 67.6 67.4 66.4 61.4 59.9 61.0 57.9 68.1 52.0 56.8
# Davs 21 24 28 27 27 20 20 26 13 25
Dec 2004 67.7 66.5 66.1 58.9 59.3 60.2 56.7 68.4 52.6 57.2
# Davs 25 24 29 25 27 22 22 21 7 21
Q-4 2004 67.9 67.1 66.5 60.2 60.1 60.8 57.7 68.4 52.6 57.4
# Davs 74 76 87 78 80 67 68 75 28 71
Q-1 2004 rru Q-4 2004
Total 67'~1 66.8 66.0 59.5 59.9 60.5 57.7 68.4 51.8 57.1
# Days 329 301 345 254 236 199 212 327 105 258
Q.4 2003 thru Q.3 2004 (~iViOUS 4 Quarters)
Total I 67'~1 66.5 65.7 58.9 59.7 60.2 57.8 68.4 52.1 57.1
# Days 339 296 341 250 199 208 202 335 103 250
Change fr¡m pre~iOus 4 ~uarters
0.1 0.4 0.3 0.6 0.2 0.3 -0.1 0.0 -0.3 0.0
-6-
TABLE 3
DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION
October 2004
Date NMS Site
1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N
1 68.4 68.0 66.9 59.8 61.3 62.0 59.4 69.0 57.6 59.3
2 66.1 65.0 64.1 57.8 #N/A 59.1 59.5 66.5 #N/A 57.3
3 67.9 67.0 66.6 59.2 60.1 #N/A 57.7 68.5 #N/A 58.7
4 68.3 67.0 66.9 59.2 60.0 60.9 57.8 68.9 #N/A 59.3
5 68.3 67.9 66.9 59.1 60.9 60.8 57.4 68.5 #N/A 58.5
6 67.8 66.7 66.3 61.4 59.8 60.6 55.5 68.9 #N/A 58.5
7 68.9 67.8 67.5 59.5 60.2 60.9 56.2 67.8 #N/A 57.9
8 68.3 67.5 67.1 58.1 60.2 60.1 56.9 68.8 50.1 58.2
9 66.5 65.6 64.7 57.6 59.5 58.7 56.3 66.8 #N/A 56.1
10 68.3 67.3 66.5 60.2 61.2 61.1 59.4 68.9 #N/A 57.8
11 68.8 67.6 67.5 61.1 61.9 62.2 59.6 68.8 53.5 56.7
12 67.5 66.7 66.2 59.0 60.9 62.4 58.3 68.6 #N/A 60.3
13 67.8 67.1 66.4 59.8 61.7 61.4 58.5 67.8 53.5 56.3
14 68.0 67.7 67.8 59.0 62.1 60.6 59.2 69.3 #N/A 58.5
15 68.4 67.3 67.0 61.1 61.6 61.3 57.5 69.4 51.2 59.5
16 66.7 65.4 64.9 59.0 59.9 58.0 58.3 66.7 #N/A 56.2
17 69.5 69.7 68.9 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 71.9 #N/A #N/A
18 69.8 68.1 67.7 #N/A 63.2 #N/A 60.6 69.8 52.6 59.6
19 68.6 67.3 66.7 60.6 62.4 61.3 #N/A 70.4 #N/A #N/A
20 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
21 69.0 67.2 67.4 60.4 61.3 62.4 58.4 69.2 52.0 58.4
22 69.4 68.0 67.4 60.9 61.2 61.2 58.6 69.3 #N/A 58.4
23 66.5 65.9 65.1 58.0 59.1 59.3 55.7 66.3 50.9 55.1
24 68.7 67.8 67.8 60.9 61.6 62.8 58.9 69.4 #N/A 59.1
25 67.7 67.3 66.3 60.0 60.4 60.6 57.3 68.9 #N/A 57.9
26 #N/A #N/A 66.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
27 69.3 #N/A 68.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
28 68.8 67.9 67.3 60.5 61.6 62.5 58.8 69.4 #N/A #N/A
29 68.8 67.7 67.0 60.1 61.2 62.3 58.2 68.2 #N/A 56.2
30 66.0 65.7 64.2 57.6 58.6 59.5 54.7 65.7 #N/A 53.8
31 #N/A 66.3 65.4 58.6 59.2 62.9 57.9 67.9 #N/A 55.5
Days 28 28 30 26 26 25 26 28 8 25
En.Ava 68.3 67.3 66.8 59.7 60.9 61.2 58.2 68.7 53.3 58.0
#N/A indicates insufficient data.
-7-
TABLE 4
DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION
November 2004
Date NMS Site
1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N
1 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 53.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
2 65.4 65.2 64.1 55.8 58.7 58.4 53.3 67.3 51.3 55.5
3 68.1 67.7 65.9 60.8 61.9 62.3 #N/A 69.0 52.1 58.0
4 #N/A #N/A 66.9 70.9 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
5 68.8 68.2 66.5 60.2 60.2 #N/A 59.4 68.3 52.9 57.1
6 66.3 65.9 63.9 57.9 59.1 #N/A 57.0 66.2 #N/A 53.6
7 #N/A 69.4 66.4 59.9 59.9' 60.9 57.9 68.8 #N/A 56.7
8 68.3 67.1 66.4 62.0 61.8 62.6 #N/A 68.5 50.2 57.8
9 68.2 67.0 66.5 60.3 60.5 61.6 #N/A 68.2 #N/A 58.6
10 68.7 67.9 66.8 60.2 61.0 61.0 59.6 68.7 #N/A 57.4
11 68.7 68.1 66.9 60.2 60.9 62.2 59.3 68.8 54.5 57.0
12 68.5 #N/A 66.8 59.7 60.9 61.6 58.7 68.6 #N/A 56.5
13 67.4 66.1 65.7 58.5 60.0 59.9 57.8 66.2 #N/A 54.9
14 #N/A #N/A 68.8 #N/A 56.8 #N/A 58.2 64.8 52.6 #N/A
15 #N/A 67.7 67.3 58.0 58.5 #N/A 55.4 67.4 #N/A 56.7
16 #N/A 68.1 66.2 58.9 61.3 #N/A 57.8 68.3 52.6 56.8
17 #N/A 67.2 66.6 58.7 60.1 60.3 #N/A 68.0 53.8 55.5
18 69.0 67.9 67.5 60.1 60.6 #N/A 58.3 68.8 #N/A 56.0
19 68.8 66.9 66.9 60.3 60.3 61.1 57.7 69.0 50.0 58.3
20 66.7 66.6 64.5 58.3 58.4 59.4 55.6 66.9 50.6 56.1
21 #N/A #N/A #N/A 65.7 #N/A #N/A #N/A 69.2 #N/A #N/A
22 #N/A 67.6 65.6 59.2 60.1 60.4 57.0 68.1 #N/A 56.6
23 69.1 68.2 66.9 60.7 61.4 63.0 #N/A 69.0 50.0 59.6
24 69.1 68.5 67.1 59.2 60.9 61.1 60.1 69.0 #N/A 56.2
25 65.6 67.6 63.4 56.8 58.9 58.1 54.7 #N/A 50.7 55.3
26 66.5 65.7 65.0 58.7 58.3 58.8 59.6 67.3 #N/A 56.2
27 67.2 66.4 65.9 59.6 59.2 58.8 57.2 68.3 #N/A 57.8
28 63.6 68.9 68.3 53.5 57.7 #N/A #N/A 65.6 #N/A 53.5
29 61.5 #N/A 67.8 #N/A #N/A 63.7 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
30 66.7 66.0 65.1 57.0 58.8 58.7 57.0 68.0 51.7 56.3
Days 21 24 28 27 27 20 20 26 13 25
En.Ava 67.6 67.4 66.4 61.4 59.9 61.0 57.9 68.1 52.0 56.8
#N/A indicates insufficient data.
-8-
TABLE 5
DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION
December 2004
Date NMS Site
1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N
1 67.6 #N/A 66.1 58.9 60.7 59.6 58.3 67.4 #N/A 55.2
2 65.9 65.1 67.7 57.1 58.3 #N/A 54.1 #N/A #N/A #N/A
3 65.5 66.9 64.1 57.1 57.3 58.7 53.7 67.6 #N/A 55.1
4 65.3 65.1 63.3 57.7 58.3 58.4 55.0 66.0 #N/A 56.6
5 #N/A #N/A 66.1 56.4 56.2 #N/A 55.4 68.7 #N/A #N/A
6 68.3 66.5 66.0 60.6 60.3 60.2 57.1 69.2 51.7 58.1
7 68.2 67.0 65.8 59.9 59.7 #N/A 56.7 68.6 #N/A 59.1
8 68.1 67.0 66.1 59.6 60.7 60.9 #N/A 68.6 #N/A 58.0
9 68.6 67.6 66.6 60.0 60.9 61.0 57.5 69.1 #N/A 57.1
10 69.0 68.2 68.0 59.5 60.5 60.6 57.4 68.5 #N/A 56.8
11 65.4 65.2 63.1 56.9 57.6 57.2 54.4 #N/A #N/A 53.6
12 68.3 67.0 66.3 58.2 59.6 60.2 56.9 68.7 #N/A 56.9
13 65.3 65.3 65.8 58.4 57.9 61.4 55.5 69.0 53.5 57.7
14 67.9 67.1 65.6 58.3 59.3 59.5 55.9 68.2 #N/A 56.7
15 68.0 66.9 68.7 59.4 59.9 #N/A 57.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A
16 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 56.5 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 56.1
17 #N/A 65.5 67.5 #N/A 57.6 62.8 57.7 #N/A 51.9 55.3
18 66.8 65.1 64.7 56.7 56.6 58.8 58.6 #N/A 54.7 #N/A
19 66.0 65.9 63.9 55.6 56.4 58.2 #N/A 66.9 50.6 #N/A
20 68.3 66.6 66.2 59.8 59.3 60.1 56.8 68.8 #N/A 57.5
21 69.2 67.8 67.1 60.9 60.7 61.3 58.1 69.0 #N/A 57.5
22 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
23 #N/A #N/A 67.6 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
24 #N/A 64.1 63.9 56.0 57.7 59.0 #N/A 66.8 #N/A 54.3
25 66.0 65.1 63.6 57.2 57.5 60.8 54.2 66.3 #N/A #N/A
26 68.3 67.4 66.0 59.7 59.8 60.5 57.1 69.3 52.8 58.0
27 68.5 66.5 65.7 60.6 59.6 60.5 56.9 69.8 51.5 58.4
28 69.1 #N/A 67.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
29 68.9 #N/A 67.1 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A
30 68.6 67.2 66.2 60.2 61.6 60.9 58.0 69.4 #N/A 58.2
31 67.7 67.6 65.0 60.0 61.7 60.6 #N/A 68.4 #N/A 59.4
Davs 25 24 29 25 27 22 22 21 7 21
En.Ava 67.7 66.5 66.1 58.9 59.3 60.2 56.7 68.4 52.6 57.2
#N/A indicates insufficient data.
-9-
Carrier AC Type # Deps NMS Site
1S 2S . 3S 4S 5S 6S {::¡ ðN 9N 10N
AlaSkaAir ¡87M4 9~ IAverage 95. (:~, 92.8 85.8 87. (:~;U 85.2 93.5 83.9 ~~53
Count 1811) 1821) (826 1815 (815 (1071 {88
67377 20 Average 91.7 90.7 88.4 81.2 84.2 83.2 81.4 89.7 #N/A 80.0
Count (18) (16) (18) (18) (18) (18) (17) (2) (0) (1)
Aloha 167377 363 Average 96.1 94.1 92.5 86.4 86.5 87.4 85.0 92.5 81.0 79.7
Count (303) (290) (306) (307) (306) (300) (298) (49) (28) (37)
America West A320 424 Average 93.6 92.4 91.3 86.2 85.6 85.4 82.3 87.7 80.7 78.8
Count (357 1336 1355 (344 (341 (352 (334 (61 (16 126
67373 406 Average 95.6 94.1 92.1 86.0 86.3 87.0 84.2 91.4 81.6 80.8
Count (338) (330) (337) (340) (342) (336) (341) (53) (33) (35)
American 87378 1188 Average 98.6 "ít5 95.8 BIS.9 88.1 88.7 85.u 91.5 8~.4 (80.4
Count (976 (951 I {992 (991 (987 (978 (982 (157 (86 104
6757 1 Average 91.2 91.5 90.7 85.5 86.1 87.3 83.6 #N/A #N/A #~~
Count (1 (1 (1 (1 (1 (1 (1 CO (0
MD80 432 Average 100.5 99.6 99.6 92.4 93.3 94.1 91.4 99.3 87.0 86.8
Count (355) (341) (360) (360) (330) (355) (342) (51) (55) (37)
Continental 67373 159 Average 96.0 94.3 94.2 87.7 88.0 88.4 85.7 94.2 81.7 82.2
Count 1118 (112 1119 (118 (116 1114 (116 137 (29 129
67377 476 Average 95.6 93.8 92.4 85.7 85.7 86.5 83.4 94.0 81.7 81.0
Count (366) (361) (367) (365) (368) (368) (358) (86) (53) (49)
Delta 67~7~ 151 Average 95.9 94.3 93.8 86. 87.6 87.2 84.6 92.3 82.4 . 8~96
Count 1137 (136 (137 (135 (136 1133 (134 (13 19
67378 33 Average 94.0 92.0 90.0 84.6 85.6 84.8 82.5 90.8 79.4 80.2
Count (25 (25 (25 (24 (24 124 (23 (8 (4 (3
6757 501 Average 95.8 94.4 93.8 87.2 87.4 86.8 84.1 90.6 82.1 ~~.5
Count (415 (405 (419 (418 (414 (410 (416 (71 (35 46)
MD90 166 Average 91.2 90.0 89.7 82.3 83.6 84.1 83.9 91.4 81.7 80.1
Count (140) (140) (143) (130) (138) (138) (131) (22) (6) (17)
FedEx A300 7 Average 98.4 96.6 94.4 89.3 88.6 89.5 86.6 92.1 I#N/A #N/A
Count 16' 16 (6 (6 16 (6 (5 (1 CO CO
A310 54 Average 99.9 98.4 97.7 91.7 91.7 92.5 89.3 94.3 81.1 #N/A
Count (48) (49) (49) (49) (47) (49) (48) (4) (3) (0)
Frontier Airlines A318 30 Average 92.3 90.4 9O.9 85.2 84.7 84.4 81.2 87.7 #N/A #N/A
Count 128 (27 (28 (28 128 128 (25 (2 CO (0
A319 232 Average 92.9 91.5 (?1.6 86.2 85.6 85.4 81.4 88.4 81.1 79.1
Count (191 (185 190 1189 (187 1185 (181 (36 (9 (11
67373 9 Average 94.2 92.8 93.3 86.8 87.2 88.4 84.7 #N/A #N/A #N/A
Count (9) (9) (9) (8) (9) (9) (9) (0) (0) (0)
Mesa Airlines CRJ9 311 Average 92.2 90.6 93.2 85.5 85. 86.8 80.9 89.5 80.6 76.9
Count (271) (268) (272) (271) (272) (268) (232) (33) (3) (3)
Midwest 6717 114 Average 91.5 90.4 92.2 84.C 84.7 84.2 80.7 89.0 #N/A 75.1
Count (101) (97) (100) (101) (100) (99) (gO) (13) (0) (1)
Norlhwest A320 345 Average 95.5 93.7 93.7 87.2 86.4 86.5 82.8 91.7 80.4 81.1
Count (260) (252) (256) (261) (256) (253) (250) (77) (19) (31)
Southwest 67373 5 Average 91.4 92.6 89.0 83.4 83.8 83.7 81.3 #N/A #N/A #N/A
Count (5 (5 (5 (5 (5 (4 (4 (0 (0 (0
67377 262 Average 90.6 89.8 86.5 81.5 82.5 81.5 79.3 89.5 83.7 76.9
Count (226) (220) (224) (218) (226) (225) (185) (34) (9) (3)
United A320 544 Average 91.1 90.4 90.4 85.0 84.9 85.2 83.4 87.4 82.1 79.6
Count (465 (454 1468 (468 1465 (460 (458 166 (20 125
6757 420 Average 93.3 92.1 90.8 84.4 84.9 85.4 83.0 89.9 80.2 80.6
Count (348) (335) (349) (346) (350) (340) (342) (62) (20) (37)
UPS 6757 62 Average 94.8 93.7 91.9 85.0 86.1 86.3 8~.4 86.9 #N/A #N/A
Count (55) (56) (56) (56) (55) (56) (52) (6) (0) (0)
TABLE 6
MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS
Commercial Class A
October - December 2004
-10-
TABLE 7
MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS
Commercial Class E
October - December 2004
Carrier
as a "
AC Type # Deps
8757
verage
Count
112 Average
Count
2450 Average
Count
8 Average
Count
399 Average
Count
NMS Site
-11-
TABLE 8
MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS
Commuter
October - December 2004
CarTier
AC Type # Deps
NMS Site
E120
verage
Count
9 Average
Count
179 verage
Count
32 Average
Count
517 Average
Count
MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS
General Aviation
October - December 2004
CarTier
AC Type # Deps
NMS S~e
enera via Ion
-12-
TABLE 9
AIR CARRIER OPERATIONAL HISTORY
Carrier AC Type Year
2000 2001 20021 2003 2004
Alaska Air AS 87374 4,242 3,269 4,3431 4,850 7,961
87377 5,658 6,906 7,1961 7,089 4,286
IAloha AU IB73ff :, ,3(t! :¿,1t!:¿1 :¿,91U 3,3991
America West AW A319 746 263 631 2,883 1,201
A320 1,575 2,062 1,888 2,955 3,390
87373 10,892 10,572 7,931 3,184 2,559
8757 471 339 :¿08 26 2
American AA 87378 655 7,778 6,200 4,663 9,226
8757 8,621 6,415 7,670 7,612 691
MD80 4,931 3,178 2,606 1,048 2.820
MD90 7,276 1,254
Continental CO 87373 2 2 2
87375 2,030 1,350 1,744 1,640 1,303
87377 3,189 3,741 3,050 3,378 3,689
87378 2 4
8757 4
Delta DL 87373 4 1,016
87378 397 878 87
8757 2,086 2,034 2,105 2,503 4,077
MD90 4,121 4,039 3,610 2,597 1,524
FedEx FM A300 82 6 10 26 20
A310 404 490 496 476 481
Frontier Airlines F9 A318 2 70
A319 10 379 1,022
7373 214 1,046
Mesa Airlines YV CL60 1,208 2,266 456
CRJ9 2,375
Mlowest Yl<. tS(l( 3u¿1 1,210
Northwest NW A319 481 503 854 2,790 2,814
A320 2,554 2,130 2,003 57 38
Southwest WN 87373 1,566 1,847 1,827 252 176
87375 7,977 8,873 8,744 8,231 1,358
87377 280 1,330 6,:¿09 10,498 19,745
TWA TW 8757 1,730 1,479
MD80 314 8
ut-'S :>l<. 13(:'( :'Ut!1 49ël 4:':¿ 44ö 4(
US Airways US A319 1,455 1,077 1,456 895
A320 2 2 4
A321 2
8757 348
United UA A319 797 1,569 2,384 2,211 1,556
A320 1,785 2,028 2,183 2,403 3,173
87373 882 779 70 10 9
87375 38 103 8
8757 7,522 7,181 6,045 6,492 6,498
-13-
TABLE 10
AIRCRAFT OPERATIONAL HISTORY
Aircraft Year
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
A300 82 6 10 26 20
A310 404 490 496 476 481
A318 2 70
A319 3,479 3,412 5,335 9,158 6,593
A320 5,916 6,222 6,074 5,419 6,601
A321 2
8717 302 1,210
87373 13,346 13,198 9,830 3,660 4,808
87374 4,242 3,269 4,343 4,850 7,961
87375 10,007 10,261 10,591 9,879 2,661
87377 9,132 13,355 18,637 23,875 31,119
87378 655 7,780 6,597 5,545 9,313
8757 20,938 18,292 16,480 17,085 11,740
CL60 1,208 2,266 456
CRJ9 2,375
MD80 5,245 3,186 2,606 1,048 2,820
MD90 11,397 5,293 3,610 2,597 1,524
FIGURE 5
AIRCRAFT OPERATIONAL HISTORY
~~r
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ A~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
¥~ ~ -~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ G G ~ ~
By Year
~ JUOO
.2001
[J2002
[J2003
; .2004
, . .IL, 8,Þ,
-14-
TABLE 11
AIR CARRIER AVERAGE DAILY DEPARTURE HISTORY
Carrier ACType Year
2000 2001 I 2002 I 2003 2004
Alaska Air AS 87374 5.806 4.4TIT 5.9421 6.644 10.866
87377 7.719 9.4661 9.8661 9.710 5.863
,Aloha AU Itj(;j( 0.014 1.8881 z.!l1Iö1 ;j.!lt14 4.040
America West AW A319 1.019 0.362 0.863 3.937 1.634
A320 2.150 2.822 2.578 4.047 4.634
87373 14.874 14.477 10.877 4.373 3.495
8757 0.642 0.466 0.;¿85 0.03b 0.003
American AA 87378 0.893 10.652 8.493 6.386 12.609
8757 11.779 8.789 10.507 10.430 0.945
MD80 6.743 4.353 3.575 1.433 3.852
MD90 9.93 1.723
Continental CO 87373 0.005 0.003 0.003
87375 2.776 1.852 2.386 2.247 1.781
87377 4.352 5.126 4.178 4.627 5.038
87378 0.003 0.005
6757 0.005
Delta DL 87373 0.005 1.385
87378 0.542 1.200 0.120
8757 2.850 2.786 2.882 3.425 5.571
MD90 5.628 5.523 4.937 3.562 2.082
FedEx FM A300 0.112 0.008 0.014 0.036 0.027
A310 0.552 0.671 0.679 0.652 0.656
Frontier Airlines F9 A318 0.003 0.096
A319 0.014 0.518 1.393
87373 0.293 1.432
Mesa Airlines YV CL60 1.655 3.104 0.623
CRJ9 3.238
MiOwest YX 671/ 0.414 .6501
Northwest NW A319 0.656 0.690 1.173 3.822 3.844
A320 3.492 2.918 2.742 0.079 0.052
Southwest WN 87373 2.142 2.523 2.512 0.345 0.240
87375 10.893 12.153 11.981 11.279 1.855
87377 0.383 1.827 8.493 14.378 26.975
TWA TW 8757 2.366 2.027
MD80 0.429 0.011
UPS 5X !757 0.694 0.679 U.O11:l U.O14 0.645
US Airways US A319 1.989 1.474 1.997 1.227
A320 0.003 0.003 0.005
A321 0.003
8757 0.477
United UA A319 1.082 2.159 3.277 3.038 2.126
A320 2.432 2.770 2.978 3.279 4.331
87373 1.202 1.066 0.096 0.014 0.011
87375 0.052 0.140 0.011
8757 10.298 9.844 8.288 8.896 8.891
-15-
NOISE ABATEMENT COMMITTEE MEETING
Date: December 29,2004
Time: 2:00 PM
Place: Eddie Martin Building
AGENDA ITEMS AND ITEMS DISCUSSED:
1. Aimort Statistics
John Escobedo gave a summary of the Airport Statistics citing infonnation published in the JW A
Airport Statistics Report for November 2004.
2. Status of Santa Ana Heie:hts Acoustical Insulation Proe:ram (SAHAIP)
Carl Braatz provided an update on the SAHAIP program. He explained that the last phase of the
program was underway (Phase 10), and that this phase will provide acoustical insulation
improvements for 14 dwellings. Construction began on August 16,2004 and a notice of
completion is expected to be filed in February 2005. The estimated cost of this phase is
$567,000.
3. Additional tooic discussion and/or comments and Questions
Questions/comments:
Richard Cox, Emerald Bay Consultant, recapped the discussion at the last Noise Abatement
Committee (NAC) meeting regarding the possibility of local air carrier stations talking to flight
crews about the problem Emerald Bay is having with over flights. He said that he had
information indicating that between June and December of 2004, there were 700 flights over
Emerald Bay, with 99% receiving navigational assistance.
Mr. Cox recapped his meeting with FAA officials on this matter. He explained that he had sent
emails to operating offices of all air carriers earlier in 2004 regarding pilot technique, and that he
felt progress was being made, but that the problem was still occurring. He expressed
disappointment that no representative from the FAA had attended today's NAC meeting.
Eric Freed explained that the JW A Access and Noise Office had issued invitations to today's
NAC meeting earlier than usual in an effort to give the FAA enough time to schedule attendance
by their representatives. He asked Diana Hatfield, Frontier Airlines Station Manager, for her
thoughts on the best way to deal with this issue in the air carrier organizations.
Ms. Hatfield explained that she could communicate the situation to her carrier's headquarters,
but noted that she represents only one carrier.
-16-
Mr. Cox asked Ms. Hatfield are there bulletin boards in air carriers' operations areas at the
airport.
Ms. Hatfield stated that Frontier does not have one and that their pilots do not pass through the
operations area on their way to their flights, but go directly to the airplanes. She noted that some
other carriers do have bulletin boards. She went on to say that within carrier organizations, the
chief pilots would probably be best suited to deal with these issues.
Mr. Cox stated that he would continue to work with the carriers to seek a resolution to the
situation.
John Fox, Emerald Bay resident, thanked the attendees for being at the NAC meeting to represent
the beginning of a forum through which these things can be worked through. He explained that
the focus of the Emerald Bay representatives was not narrow, but broad, noting that the
communities of Crystal Cove and Newport Beach have related interest as well.
Mr. Fox described the effects of the over flights from his perspective as a resident, and cited
previous research indicating that aircraft are making very tight turns and coming over Emerald
Bay at about 5000'.
Mr. Fox stated that if the JW A Access and Noise Office can agree to help by providing a forum,
the Emerald Bay representatives would be very appreciative, but if it turns out that other relevant
parties don't want to participate, Emerald Bay would have to fmd other means of making
progress and that it would not be as pleasant.
4. Tentative date for the next Noise Abatement Committee Meetinl!
The date for the next quarterly Noise Abatement Committee meeting is tentatively set for
Wednesday, March 23, 2005. A meeting announcement will confinn the next meeting date.
-17-
NAME
Richard Cox
John Fox
Diana Hatfield
Carl Braatz
Eric Freed
John Escobedo
Ramey Gonzalez
Bonnie Streeter
Richard Cox 11
NAC Roster
December 29, 2004
ORGANIZATION
Emerald Bay Community Assoc.l
consultant
Emerald Bay Community Assoc.l
resident
Frontier Airlines
John Wayne Airport
John Wayne Airport
John Wayne Airport
John Wayne Airport
John Wayne Airport
Visitor
-18-