HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC RES 88-080Al
lO
12
19
RESOLUTION NO. 88-80
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THAT THE FINAL
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE EAST TUSTIN
SPECIFIC PLAN, THE FINAL EIR FOR THE NORTH-SOUTH ROAD
AND THE I-5/TUSTIN RANCH ROAD INTERCHANGE
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/NEGATIVE DECLARATION ARE
ADEQUATE TO SERVE AS THE PROJECT EIR FOR ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT 86-2 AND ALL FEASIBLE MITIGATION MEASURES
HAVE BEEN INCORPORATED INTO THE PROJECT AND
RECERTIFYING ALL THE ABOVE PREVIOUSLY PREPARED
DOCUMENTS.
The City Council of the City of Tustin does ,hereby resolve as follows:
I ·
The City Council finds and determines as follows:
Ae
Assessment District 86-2 ("the Project") is proposed to finance
certain improvements associated with development of the 1,740
acre Master Planned Community known as Tustin Ranch in the City
of Tustin, which development was previously examined in Final
EIR 85-2 for the East Tustin Specific Plan.
Be
Section 15168 of CEQA Guidelines allows for the use of a program
EIR for subsequent project related activities and Section 15153
of the Guidelines provides for the use of an EIR from a previous
project in evaluating a later project, if such projects are
essential ly the same i n terms of environmental impacto
Ce
The City completed an initial s. tudy for the proposed Project and
determined that the improvements to be funded by Assessment
District 86-2 were considered within previously certified
environmental documents, including Final EIR 85-2 for the East
Tustin Specific Plan {including all certified supplemental and
addendum documents), Final EIR 817-1 for the North-South Road,
and the I-5/Tustin Ranch Road Interchange Environmental
Assessment/Negative Declaration.
D ·
The Ctty provtded publtc notice of its initial study and of its
intent to rely on the afrorementioned EIR's for the Project. A
public review period of the initial study ended on July 16, 1988
and the City has responded to comments received during the
review peri od.
E ·
The initial study for the Project and previously certified
environmental documents identified in Section I.C of this
Resolution have been reviewed and comments and responses to the
initial study have been considered.
.
5
9
10
12
lO
1,%
19
21
9.2
23
24
Resolution No. 88-8O
Pa ge two
II.
Fe
All impacts, mitigation measures alld project alternatives
identifed in the previously certified environmental documents
identified in Section I.C of this Resolution have been reviewed
and considered, mitigation measures have been incorporated into
the proposed project that eliminate or substantially lessen the
Significant environmental effects as identified in each of the
previously certified documents and it is determined that any
remaining significant effects on the environment found to be
'unavoidable have been balanced against the benefits of the
Project and against the Project alternatives and those'benefits
have been found to be overriding on each significant impact
identified in the previously considered environmental
documents. Findings and a Statement of Facts supporting such
findings and mitigation measures are listed in Exhibit A of
Resolution No. 86-28 and Exhibit A of Resolution No. 87-76 and
are incorporated herein by reference.
The City Council does hereby certify that EIR 85-2 for the East
Tustin Specific Plan (including all certified supplemental and
addendum documents}, Final EIR 87-1 for the North-South Road, and the
I-5/Tustin Ranch Road Interchange Environmental Assessment/NegatiVem
Declaration are adequate to serve as the project EIR for Assessment
District 86-2 and that such documents have been completed in
compliance with State CEQA Guidelines.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of' the Tustin City Council,
the 18th day of July, 1988.
held on
R6nald B. H6es~cerey,
Mayor
Mary E. ~nn,
27[i Cit~ Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) §
CITY OF TUSTIN )
MARY E. WYNN, City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk
Tustin, California, does hereby certify that
the City Council of the City of Tustin is
Resolution No. 88-80 was duly and regularly
regular meetingTthe City Council held on
fol 1 owing vote'
AYES · COUNCILPERSONS' Hoesterey,
NOES · COUNC!LPERSONS' None
ABSTAINED' COUNCILPERSONS' None
ABSENT' COUNC!LPERSONS' None
of the City Council of the City of
the whole number of the members of
five; that the above and foregoing
introduced, passed and adopted at a
the 18th day of ~u_.~_~_, 198__..~8, by the
Edgar, Kelly, Kennedy, Prescott
iqARY E. WYNN, City Clerk
City of Tustin, California
by Val erie Whi teman
Deputy City Clerk