The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About06 OCTA INVESTMNT PLAN 07-18-05 AGENDA REPORT Agenda Item 6 Reviewed: JAJ- City Manager Finance Director ----'::!lL. MEETING DATE: JULY 18, 2005 FROM: WilLIAM A. HUSTON, CITY MANAGER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT/ENGINEERING DIVISION TO: SUBJECT: ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY INVESTMENT PLAN SUMMARY The Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) recently conducted a survey of all 34 cities within the County and the County to determine what projects local officials would like to see included in an Investment Plan for a Measure M extension. The survey results are attached. RECOMMENDATION Receive and file. FISCAL IMPACT None at this time. DISCUSSION OCTA staff combined a recent survey regarding the extension of the Measure M Program with the comments received through individual personal interviews in late 2004 with each City Manager and Public Works Director. Attachment A reflects the city-specific projects proposed through the recent surveys and prior interviews. It includes all projects listed on that survey and any other location-specific projects proposed within a single city. Attachment B is a report summarizing the key results of the survey and identifying the highest and lowest ranked transportation priorities of the survey respondents. It reflects respondents' views on programs for multiple jurisdictions and regional project priorities. Ultimately the Measure M Investment Plan must be formally approved by a majority of Orange County cities representing a majority of the incorporated population, the Orange County Board of Supervisors, and the OCTA Board before it can be placed on the ballot. ~9~ Director of Public Works/City Engineer TDS: ccg: OCTA investment Plan.doc m OCTA BOARiJ OF DIRECTORS BIll Campball ChaIrman ArlhurC.Brown VIce. ChaIrman Madlyn C. B_ar OI,."tor Carolyn Cavaccha OI,."tor Lou Cwaa DI,."tor Richard 1: DIxon DIrector Mlchaal Duvall DIrector Cathy Green Director Gary Monahan DIrector Chds Norby DIrector Curl Pringle Dlrec/or Mlgual A. Pulido OI,."tor Susan Rltschal DIrector Mark Rosen DIrector James W Sliva Dlreclor Thomas W Wilson DIrector Gregory T Wln/elbo"om DI,.,,/or CIndy Quon Governors Ex-Dtticlo Member :HIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICE Arthur ILeahy Chlet Execullva Dfflcer June 29, 2005 The Honorable Lou Bone City of Tustin P.O. Box 1089 Tustin, CA 92781-1089 Dear Mayor Bone: On behalf of the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), we want to thank you for participating in the recent survey regarding the Measure M program. This is an important first step in your involvement in developing an Investment Plan that all can support. We received survey responses from all 34 cities, plus the County of Orange, and have learned a great deal about what city officials like and don't like about Measure M and what city leaders would like to see included in an Investment Plan for a Measure M extension. OCT A staff combined this survey input with the comments received through individual personal interviews in late 2004 with each City Manager and Public Works Director. Attachment A reflects the city-specific projects proposed through the recent surveys and prior interviews. It includes all projects listed on that survey and any other location-specific projects proposed within a single city. We would appreciate a careful review of the projects on the enclosed list. Please check to be sure that we have recorded all of the projects that are most important to your City Council. Likewise, let us know if we have incorrectly recorded anything that is not a high priority, or your City Co\Jncii does not support. We also welcome any suggestions that might clarify language or project descriptions. Attachment B is a report summarizing the key results of the survey and identifying the highest and lowest ranked transportation priorities of the survey respondents. It reflects respondents' views on programs for multiple jurisdictions and regional project priorities- Omrtqe County Transcar/atian Au/horih' .'i50 Sou';, Main Sime. . 1'0 Box 1418410ranoe iCalifornia 92863~1584i (714j 560-0CTA (6282) June 29, 2005 Page 2 Please notify Dave Simpson, Manager, Local Government Relations, with any changes, updates or refinements to Attachment A by July 20, 2005. Dave can be reached at (714) 560-5570 by fax at (714) 560-5795 or via email at dsimpson@octa.net. Again, thank you for your participation with this survey effort. Ultimately the Measure M Investment Plan must be formally approved by a majority of Orange County cities representing a majority of the incorporated population, the Orange County Board of Supervisors, and the OCTA Board before it can be placed on the ballot. We believe that listening and responding to the priorities and concerns of each local jurisdiction is the only way to achieve this objective. We look forward to working with you and your communities as we move forward together to address Orange County's transportation future. Sincerely, ~a,&t Bill Campbell Chairman, OCT A Board of Directors rk-Iþ Curt Pringle Chair, OCTA Transportation 2020 Committee æ~1f)~ Richard Dixon Chair, OCTA Transportation 2020 Committee, Local Government Subcommittee c: Members of the City Council City Managers Public Works Directors Enclosures CITY PROPOSED PROJECTS-MEASURE M INVESTMENT PLAN LOCAL NOMINA T/ONS (WRITE-/N PROJECTS FROM SURVEYS AND /NTERV/EWS) SOURCE 1 Aliso Viejo 2 Anaheim 3 Anaheim 4 Anaheim 5 Anaheim 6 Anaheim 7 Anaheim 8 Brea 9 Brea 10 Brea 11 Brea 12 Brea 13 Buena Park 14 Buena Park 15 Buena Park 16 Buena Park 17 Costa Mesa 18 Costa Mesa 19 Costa Mesa 20 Costa Mesa 21 Costa Mesa 22 Costa Mesa 23 Costa Mesa 24 Costa Mesa 25 Costa Mesa 26 Costa Mesa 2T Cypress 28 Cypress 29 Dana Point 30 Fountain Vailey 31 Fountain Valiey 32 Fountain Vailey 33 Fountain Valiey 34 Fountain Vailey 35 Fountain Vailey 36 Fountain Vailey 37 Fountain Vailey 38 Fulierton 39 Fuilerton 40 Fuilerton 41 Garden Grove 42 Garden Grove 43 Garden Grove 44 Garden Grove 45 Huntington Beach 46 Huntington Beach 47 Huntington Beach 48 Huntington Beach 49 Huntington Beach 50 Irvine 51 Irvine 52 Irvine 53 Irvine 54 La Habra 55 La Habra 56 La Palma 57 La Palma DESCRIPTION Complete Glenwood/SR-73 interchange Expand 5/22/57 interchange Widen Brookhurst Street Widen Kateila Avenue Extend Gene Autry Way (west) Construct Anaheim intermodal transportation center Construct SR-57 HOV drop ramp at Cerritos Improve SR-57/Lambert interchange Widen Carbon Canyon Improve intersection at Associated/Imperial Highway Reciassify Brea Bouievard Implement Imperial Highway Smart Street improve SR-91 Nailey View interchange Add Beach Boulevard bus turnouts Add capacity to Beach/SR-91 on/off-ramps Improve Vailey View/La Palma, Knott/Lincoln, Vailey View/Lincoln Intersections Improve SR-55 access (i.e., tunnel connection) Construct SR-73 HOV lanes Construct 1-405/SR-73 HOV connectors Construct Bear St. drop ramp Construct 1-405 southbound Bristol St. braid Improve SR-55 frontage roads Resolve Santa Ana River bridges issues Alieviate northbound Newport Boulevard congestion Rehabilitate 17th Street Widen Wilson Street Add Lexington to MPAH Improve Holden Street bridge Widen PCH and Del Prado Improve 1-405fTalbert Avenue interchange Improve Harbor and Beach Boulevards Improve BrookhursUI-405 interchange Widen Bristol Street Improve EliisiEuclid interchange Make up gap between freeways and Beach Boulevard Construct Garfield/Gisler bridge over the Santa Ana River Re-construct 1-405 bridgeslinterchanges and widen to MPAH Expand Metrolink parking Include Orangethorpe as a Smart Street Construct grade separations at Raymond and State Coliege Improve Dale Street from Garden Grove Bouievard to Chapman Widen Chapman and Haster Include Harbor Boulevard as Smart Street Improve access to the SR-22 at Brookhurst Street Improve PCH and Wamer intersection Banning and Garfield bridge Widen PCH and replace parking Improve 1-405 interchanges implement Bolsa Chica smart street Construct Sand Canyon grade separation Deveiopment of Irvine Transportation Center and Business Complex Extend Jeffrey Parkway. from Portola Parkway to Foothiil Transportation Corridor Streamline Jamboree Boulevard/SR-261 Improve Harbor/Lambert, HarborlWhittier, Whittier/Beach intersections Implement Imperiai Highway Smart Street Improve Walker and La Palma bridges at Coyote Creek Widen Orangethorpe/South Street 6/28/2005 ATTACHMENT A Page 1 CITY PROPOSED PROJECTS.MEASURE M INVESTMENT PLAN 58 Laguna Beach 59 Laguna Hills 60 Laguna Hills 61 Laguna Hills 62 Laguna Hills 63 Laguna Hills 64 Laguna Hills 65 Laguna Niguel 66 Laguna Niguel 67 Laguna Niguel 66 Laguna Niguel 69 Laguna Niguel 70 Laguna Niguel 71 Laguna Woods 72 Laguna Woods 73 Laguna Woods 74 Lake Forest 75 Lake Forest 76 Lake Forest 77 Lake Forest 76 Los Alamitos 79 Los Alamitos 80 Los Alamitos 81 Los Alamitos 82 Los Alamitos 83 Mission Viejo 84 Mission Viejo 85 Mission Viejo 86 Mission Viejo 87 Mission Viejo 88 Mission Viejo 89 Mission Viejo gO Mission Viejo 91 Mission Viejo 92 Newport Beach 93 Newport 8each 94 Newport Beach 95 Newport Beach 96 Newport Beach 9T Orange 98 Orange 99 Orange 100 Orange 101 Orange 102 Orange 103 Piacentia 104 Piacentia 105 Piacentla 106 Piacentia 107 San Clemente 108 San Clemente 109 San Clemente 110 San Clemente 111 San Clemente 112 San Clemente 113 San Juan Capistrano 114 San Juan Capistrano 115 San Juan Capistrano 116 San Juan Capistrano 117 San Juan Capistrano Construct additional peripherai parking lots to expand tram service Improve 1-5/La paz interchange Re-construct i-5/EI Toro interchange Construct auxiliary lane between Alicia and La Paz Improve Paseo de Vaiencia and Cabot Construct 1-5 auxiliary lanes Add new Los Alisos Interchange Upgrade 1-5/Avery interchange Widen Golden Lantern Add Avery Smart Street Construct CaboUCamino Capistrano connection Widen Crown Valley Parkway (Cabot to 1-5) Widen Niguel Road Improve EI Toro Road Widen EI Toro Road/Aliso Creek intersection Add capacity to Moulton Parkway overpass at EI T oro Road Add capacity to EI Toro Roadll'5 interchange Add Poriola Parkway connection to freeway Complete Alton Parkway Complete Trabuco Road and Rancho Parkway as part of MPAH Improve Lexington Road Connect Cerritos Boulevard to 1-605 Improve 1-A05/Seal Beach Boulevard interchange Provide freeway access at Katella and Cerritos Re-construct 1-A05/Seal Beach Boulevard overcrossing Widen Oso Parkway (Marguerite to 1-5) Construct CaboUCamino Capistrano connection Extend Crown Valley to SR-241 Improve Crown Valley/Saddieback College interchange Improve OsolMargarita intersection Widen La Paz between Muirland and 1-5 Upgrade I-SlAvery interchange Build a direct non-toll connection between SR-73 and SR-241 implement senior mobility program improve PCH between Dover Drive and Newport Bouievard Improve MacArthur Bouievard and Jamboree Boulevard intersection Improve Bristoi couplet areas and SR-73 ramps Improve Newport Boulevard from PCH to SR-55 Improve 19th Street bridge Construct SR-55/Meats Avenue interchange Construct Walnut Avenue bridge at Santiago Creek Improve SR-22/Lawson Way crossing Construct SR-57/Metropolitan off-ramp Extend Eckhoff SI. to Katella Avenue Improve Main Street from Palmyra to Culver Improve Orangethorpe/Ridgefield intersection Construct Placentia Metrolink Station Improve SR-57/Chapman interchange Construct grade separations Improve 1-5/Pico Interchange Extend Avenida La rata Extend Avenida del Rio Improve 1-5/Camino de Estrella interchange Construct PCH pedestrian crossing Construct pedestrian crossing at Metrolink station Improve 1-5/0rtega Highway interchange Widen Ortega Highway Extend Alipaz Street to Oso Road Improve Stonehill off-ramp off the i-5 Widen Lanora and I.a Novia bridges 6/28/2005 Page 2 CITY PROPOSED PROJECTS-MEASURE M INVESTMENT PLAN 118 San Juan Capistrano 119 San Juan Capistrano 120 San Juan Capistrano 121 Santa Ana 122 Santa Ana 123 Santa Ana 124 Santa Ana 125 Santa Ana 126 Santa Ana 127 Seai Beach 128 Stanton 129 Tustin 130 Tustin 131 Tustin 132 Tustin 133 Tustin 134 Tustin 135 Villa Park 136 Westminster 137 Westminster 138 Westminster 139 Westminster 140 Yorba Linda 141 YorbaLinda 142 Yorba Linda 143 County of Orange Extend La Pata south of Ortega Highway Widen Del Obispo Widen Camino Capistrano Widen Bristol Street Widen Fairvlew Street from Civic Center to Trask Construct SR-55/Alton overcrossin9 and HOV drop ramps improve 1-5/SR-55 and 1-405/SR-22 interchanges (backup on city streets) Widen Grand Avenue between 1st and 17th streets Construct transportation corridor on Pacific Eiectric right-of-way Re-construct i-405lSeal Beach Boulevard overcrossing Improve CerritosiMain Street intersection Extend Newport Avenue to Edinger Avenue Construct Redhill Avenue grade separation Expand parking at Tustin Metrolink station Construct Tustin Avenue/Edinger Avenue overpass Widen Jamboree Widen EI Camino Real between Red Hill and Browning Avenues improve medians on Katella Avenue Improve Beach/Edinger/i-405 interchange Widen Newland and McFadden bridges over i-405 Widen Bolsa Chicali-405 Widen Goldenwestli-405 Improve imperiallYorba Linda intersection Widen Bastanchury Grade separate railroad at Imperiai Highway Build out of MPAH iimits to include: Santiago Canyon Road- La Pata Road Crawford Canyon Road-Ortega Highway, Crown Valley Parkway Tonner Canyon Road-Santa Clara Avenue, Hewes Avenue Esplanade Avenue- Prospect Avenue, Foothill Avenue, Holt Avenue Jeffrey Road 6/28/2005 Page 3 SURVEY APPROACH Distribution of the city surveys began in May 2005. aCTA collected 34 surveys plus one from the County of Orange. Multiple responses were received by the following cities: . Dana Point (2) Each response worth .5 . Fountain Valley (2) Each response worth .5 . Fullerton (2) Each response worth .5 . Newport Beach (2) Each response worth .5 . Santa Ana (2) Each response worth .5 . Seal Beach (4) Each response worth .25 For the city proposed project list, all responses were inventoried. ATTACHMENT B ON A SCALE OF 1 TO 5, WITH 5 BEING VERY SATISFACTORY, HAVE MEASURE M FUNDS BEEN SPENT IN ABOUT THE RIGHT PROPORTIONS TO MEET YOUR CITY'S TRANSPORTATION NEEDS: 5 6.00 3 3.75 .25 PLEASE RANK THE FOLLOWING FUTURE TRANSPORTATION PRIORITIES, WITH 1 BEING MOST IMPORTANT AND 10 BEING LEAST IMPORTANT: 2 LISTED BELOW ARE SOME IDEAS FOR PROPOSED HIGHWAY PROJECTS TO IMPROVE TRANSPORTATION IN ORANGE COUNTY. PLEASE CHECK THE FIVE PROJECTS YOU THINK ARE MOST IMPORTANT: 3 LISTED BELOW ARE SOME IDEAS FOR PROPOSED TRANSIT PROJECTS TO IMPROVE TRANSPORTATION IN ORANGE COUNTY. PLEASE CHECK THE FIVE PROJECTS YOU THINK ARE MOST IMPORTANT: 4 LISTED BELOW ARE SOME IDEAS FOR PROPOSED STREETS AND ROADS PROJECTS TO IMPROVE TRANSPORTATION IN ORANGE COUNTY. PLEASE CHECK THE FIVE PROJECTS YOU THINK ARE MOST IMPORTANT: 5 LISTED BELOW ARE SOME IDEAS TO ENHANCE THE SAFETY OF THE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM AND LOCAL COMMUNITIES IN ORANGE COUNTY. PLEASE CHECK THE FIVE PROJECTS YOU THINK ARE MOST IMPORTANT: Provide safer access to I schools with better drop oft and pick up areas, cross: walKs, stoplights and sidewalks 1 33.50 3 Maintain and expand the i existing freeway service: patrol tow trucks ' 25.75 5 Traffic signal priority for' i emergency vehicles I 23.25 6 LISTED BELOW ARE SOME IDEAS TO OFFSET COMMUNITY IMPACTS OF TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS IN ORANGE COUNTY. PLEASE CHECK THE FIVE PROJECTS YOU THINK ARE MOST IMPORTANT: Improvements to stop I polluted runoff from roadsl reaching the ocean ì 28.75 3 More soundwalls along: freeways and major roads 27.75 5 Fèes on new housing and commercial development Ito pay a share of new i transportation improvements 17.75 7 BASED ON WHAT IS KNOWN TODAY, DO YOU THINK IT IS A GOOD IDEA OR A BAD IDEA TO PUT A PROPOSAL TO EXTEND MEASURE M ON THE NOVEMBER 2006 BALLOT: GOOD IDEA 30.50 . DON'T KNOW 4.25 8