Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
02 2018-19 CLG REPORT
I AGENDA REPORT ITEM #2 MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 25, 2020 TO: PLANNING COMMISSION AS HISTORIC AND CULTURAL RESOURCES ADVISOR FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: 2018-2019 CERTIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENT ANNUAL REPORT BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION Attached for the Planning Commission's consideration is a copy of the City of Tustin's Certified Local Government (CLG) Annual Report for the reporting period between October 1, 2018, and September 30, 2019. The Annual Report summarizes the City's historic preservation efforts and describes how the City met all of the requirements of the CLG program during the 2018-19 reporting period. The Annual Report will be transmitted to the State Office of Historic Preservation upon approval by the Planning Commission Acting as Historic and Cultural Resources Advisor. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission, acting as Historic and Cultural Resources Advisor, direct staff to forward the Annual Report to the State Office of Historic Preservation. Y42� Elaine Dove, AICP, RLA Scott Reekstin Senior Planner Principal Planner a Ju0 ina Willkom, Assistant Director Community Development Department Attachment— 2018-2019 Certified Local Government Annual Report (D ui LL] C_ CO 61 O U Q N CD 0 LO o E Q N y 0 6i O o O L m ca ca O mE m a cnLO U U) M o a � , hm _o oo oO op o �na rn m N v N V �_ cz o 0- j Q o a � �. v D CD `� c � � �Q C) c c c E w N a o �' O � OU N (D - $ Q) o o O (D O Q) Q) °' CE ma ' °o N o 4 .L O Q1 cn O 6 � � U � U) '� U Q) C.. A Q o �G Q O O U c CU a U U O_ x L O E O J (D Cis CD ® `— ca Ul O O O 4) �-+ C0 CL 0 O 0. O o ® S Q o 0 moi.+ U U La °CO a) 3: >- 0 °m E 0 0 , Q)0 "'o — a) 0=3 3: Z ro CL) � o � m o a >' L- � c o � � C5 C) Q L ami >. ami m 1-1 r1 a� ami a� o o Q E v 07 a c � ¢ � ~ J OUB U sZo a� >1c) a) -0 Q� o � U (� C CB o m � w V o Q M a � e}On 4i U J W 2 N m LL L a> o .� w L L C-- 0 Q J � Q p LL O O C>3 m E m a� cu c ,v `o ma oma- co >< O `a a W zLLI m E 4 0 E o C= 0 0 .o tll a.) (D 7+ w a) W O L 0 0 ,, CD O O o 4 c6 Z Q L C vii o °+'' _n CD -� _ m w +' W � O D � .Y M — u w Q m � � c, z Quo a� czi � `� cnv Q � o ~ a c�i m U "a E -0 += D 0 u9 N N O O t 61.- i U) • • e j U W Z _ w d N m CO �( U _ o 2 L C) � C cu +J O O Q" a1 Qom' T U) Co U ❑ Z ca $ w ° CLL z � o � CL z sw CTS Co ON cn a CCS O Q d Q Q r L QU3 U z3 O -Q r. i C CD L � Q Q) _- Co � N r a� -O '� D o Z o } to O $ o � o Z Z m y Q c Lc � o Vic ' [V a) Uu)i a cu Ca a 0 CL 0 V c� O co M L— Cr O O p cC coCI, ❑ x Q) ,Q - Q) 0 i� CU Q 4- CL co O U) O = Q N O - Z Q C r � 47 CTS � Q v� U N O L a E N N O co O ;t (� �_ a � CD O #+ U d Cn N a N d C= Q) cu Cw J N U 4) c O 2 I o Cbti p s NN alas > .O tU p - C Z p U C i31 L O N a L a Q) C d � U ra � � � .L Oa CU y UI ro O j N vs Q o L O o Q )CQCl) Q m Q _o C) vi L co Q) 0 _ a� y Q :�• N RS .C3] � � � L ll7 U � w:.. � Uj C U) Q? o _Ile U co BUJ Q co Co a7 v Q CU d1 C N 4- o � �? Dm Q cai Qa Z 0 ° Q V 0) c E t CL-0 a> Z5 � 2 o s o Q cnz 4 Q) ca) O cl P O 3 CL p o N 0 m W a> O c Z ; m z b a = [0 ds Z C6 Z U a> Q) O ` U a U V O + +� C 7C) C O _ C N IA O Q) ul '� O -0 0 16. O O U j Nro 0 O O = o 'E O U a [3 O < U LM U L ® o N Q C O a p O � N O a> a) O Lu � ro N mCLJ C U) O •0 C a> Q) ro U 0 ON C j i 0- L) V C� O El 0 z7 a_ g- , W -0 O O c4 07 + C a) 0 CQ C i J (� � }- C U a) a L o �, .Q_ .Ui c ro v E L O to 0 C (D7 D d 'o O 0_ 5,0 -0C (n 0- M U m CO cB CO N E O O c O � U W O U 4 O r7 Q) N > > C3 O O U F— N U _ OO N O0& � > > 0 O N CO T— C/) . 0 M CD CD Q Q Q N U -OO C U7 r E -- N U 0 0 0 C Q O O 0O O E 4) a> a Uu E Coo ro � � ro Q � U � Ung U U (a U ?: ' 0) O - _z -� L bS U) O L. o C a> _ a a> o �_ a> > Q oo N o � a> -0 o co � � 3 c C o r, OL � OQQ � ° - E m � ro Q m � _ � Co C o U a q> 2D6 -o ° O O O 0 O g00 -0pE0 ca o - C � a> (n as ou) —°� •� L o ov) E `�° a "� t 0 0 C: as N c E N cn c-. a> as > L 'D ° v o 0 .a E c-0 °' a o 0 0 ) X C9 Q) O -0 Q U LLI > O r U -0 U � O N L W .o -O .> 70 U c - s E C O -a ro -O m N ro a> a> o . " x ro N � o © C ca m 2 o ° � Q � QQ o � chap c��n � (D o o O � ro � aa � � M0 oho ca Fa � � C3 � o EE Jv u, oma . m 0 } o m z Oa 0 � Q U } a> `�' c m U) E J- � a� a> Un a o `� L 0 0 a> o Qro 0 m c UU Q� O O` Cl. o ` Y *' O C- O 0 Q � coo c 3 s o C � Q > O U +� E W a> a- _ 0 c co -0 m a) U w E cn - u> E a) U m ro o Cl) v avi s a) cn E C � -a O U 0 L C1 p O O O O Q N m CI � �nQcnU 0) Q U U � � � � E E m L) Cn E z o 0 m r i C�i V ra a W Q E 0 E cu O A � v a,N ro00 ca C(S C L L C - ° -6 -=' co a) d U y Qj c� O O O Y a) O Co O o •O O C.- N (a Q Uy N O ci) co U � N .N � O � U � Q•� oa c . co oQo �, fi c c a) aU ,oU � cu (Bc .0 0 O N N N N r- p O) O 0 4) 'U �- 0 a) "= a) C O E C14 CA CA N a) = = - c � ocoQa) o 0 0 0 Q ; Q ecu . � LuU � ao � 0 C co co cT0 a) � m 0) N 4 Q) � N c O � 0 0 0 0 0 -- iib 0U0 • 4- C4 CV :3u a) o , co N o Q o m «s °° 0 a) C T N rn O7 w c9 - ( a V � }� a) 0) tv O r N N N N N N " E � O O 75 d L L co cn LO C1 N a) a) 0 -2 CD o N o oQ E 0 '� c Q C ca Co IL p d N N O') C') It L O a) O O U O O O O O O i— Q N - O -0 O O N > L Q C .� o U U fj p O N 0 U E U U O D Vi O O L U a) C [Q a) U 0 Z U fir_- Ui O cc O -t) 0-U O L Ua) o a) a) � a) (1) (1) o O Dcc UL - N OOEo '0 - - mQ2 Cj 0)o ac ) � NQ c 0 i0Fn -0 (D i vcz ;M >, p cn j .N a) u) ? cn Q cn a) cn �_ N a) v) fi O Q � E : � -EUE � � c � a 0 .0 Q- o �voi `�° o vdvwvwvwvQ) 0 a) � Lu ° E — 0 a) 00 0 L (D 0 (D L cc a c a Qc Z3 � m m o m c) (ha) -c C) � o ° � Q o a) 0 0 L -0 ° 0 0 U x 0 - � -C ai � c m jQ 4-4- a) k C L RS L -Z o O Q Co (D U C) I� fD fn L2 Q r Cn N Q J Q cn I] El CI x a El Q z ui ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ep N $ O p U) ma (a 1 L Q U U O E >N C C O „? 90 0 z ❑ z U) CL LW c70 � N p CT N Y > CD p v � o a a n ❑ a �- N O ( 0 Co N a) N T- (D p v Q) E E z ® Q a o C Z m 0 Li F1 mN El a o o U O- as m 75 P Cn N 0 Qi 0 (D i Q © a o E Q x❑ ❑x ❑ ❑D CL ;tf (D >, e o ❑X y c � Z5 :3 :3 ° z o 0 0 Wo a DXo ❑ a U U U �+ U /Jm U) 'NCDL J L L G L N O D fII E O U p p N O o E W m ❑x ❑ El ❑ x14 a E = E p C U (4 ❑ NT O _ CO 0 O m Q� 7O N C N C 0 C M M > ® '� N O ❑ o � (Lll o Z ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ m p (D _� U Q V 0 N O C o 0 U v ZZ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑D o � � u IL m D D Q U N Jp O cu p C: o C) 0 E 0 m N L CD- CL J co p 'G Cll ov — W © c� U. — E N 07 U aD a- Q cts N CL o m N UD E c m C u0i N 0 N (SS Q 0- 0 N � a3 L C p Y C7 rn .V) r CV N U O .p Q V �, N N � U W U cup a- ui 0 Q Cn C� Q Ed Q C) El M N PI as � ro 00 00 co 4-1 Ll Li Li m co r Y- v� co � O N N U t U p ❑ ® ® ® o Q. N ►. 00 CD 5 E Ll ❑ ® ® ® 0 L a. 0 a vU r 0 040 El ® ® v_, ro Q o . o U)co U> L j Co p Y 1 r U W U t3 O E El ® ® ® 0 � E CO (D m � c, cra elf 0) _ N mEl ® ® ® a o c o .c 0 P L E 00 ❑ ® ® ® U) 12 '� o 0 C) ro m L 04 c 0 0 0 L o ❑ LQ LQ cQ pL � U o o i a ;n ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ � 2 � i p +, ' C � U E 0 S� 0 c L 0 O ❑ E of 0 pvy Z ro '� a .O C "w U m 0 LL (B ( O U L ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ O 'N d a G Y � Q � � � L � � Oro � � �aoo � ,� L � °- o (� n N E 2 i= � ;� 3 co ac'i u) � a� a�'i v) EE o �v co iYQ � roam E CD ZN ZL co V0 O U -F O , O 0 4- CD -04- -F v0c (M- 1 p � N i 1 o) u) C c co coro 4) �O U ro C .J N 1 SG V � c� ro � � oU C d m `� � v� c t� � � ro pE c c U) C N O +� .0 � `L tl3 O CL - O O N O : 'U a) O U E D W Z 0 o N E uoi O ^� E u°) m O p E -� .rn � ❑ a � .E Yro ❑ Yocu *- � ❑ Yocoro ❑ < O _N ) ~ U) U) U) - ¢ W U) W U) U) W i r— r rn �3 CA rte-- N N N O O N N M O I.L c CL :3 C .0 p OL COV J N a � o ce) LL LL � ) U Uq) L U U U O N E cl 00 0 r � O N rn OQ p ; M rp O I_- -C O O LO lin lLO O t Or N O r r r L L N E 0 O C *+ V J J Q O _O ' 4 O N oZf 3 otf "O f� U J U i U) E (o Q m w pZ0 -0 - � ° U 00) C: ¢ Lo Q) 0m ¢ o0 (DpN cn O a �OCL pLLO , CL U E2 U -j U) � U c}a Uc� c cc � � � a�'ia� o c O _O a N N O < O cV i= .p w N Lo Q D m f p tf o ro u p cn 0) � J " = Ja ¢ c� a a. w waSU = tea u. ZWo zLLw = wo� Z z ¢ z V L w � za � � c~n � C m e c c cn c a� O H U C O W �--' � J In _ cow m Qc � ❑ ¢ ZO ¢ 0 0 o N = c m o as as o o 0 o E vp� W W ❑ — a zW � j � c � c c c O � � C � W ¢0 (a ~ -i F- wU i o — M N o •— o p •— N o ._ aw � J ZJCn ❑ U ❑ rn w u) ¢ �¢ w (nnw cn cnw wc") 4, < �¢ a ¢ UUWHQwQ ' I 00 r-i Cl) m a, � H 0 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ '� m m L to W .O ?• +�+ a c LL, o 4� Ow.. C ea m - o u Q CL Z7 u C u V i •� �_ V J CL VE Ln V � � a a o E (d U) L L L/1 V7 L L 3 CL F L C C? O VLn Ln 0 Ln F pa 0 r0 Lr; l p `� r I til L Z ho 7 +' C_ Z M Cc L� c Lil N F to y U bo Fs ] ►� Q LL � Q � C 00 0 4- C L c *' cn u Y (71 i O `17 f6 O E t QJ C fC C 7 0. t L 0 f° a u -0 c Go CL E p eV ++ p L10 '�, " c in p� c �+� C to O LU p O ++ 4l ^ Q N ` .0 4y C 0 a) cu } u C LL �^ O L1 CL Q! v 0 W ai Z `� � U w OG p u ,� LM aj C Ln a U y u r . a o 1 CJ d GC 0. ai Q <2 U Q d U p O -Q ¢ 'O dp 4' Q otf a) 3 4- - -p c c Q o a Ln c 3 t CL •� c c o .} .p O L vi mCf w O Ln O L 0 L V N L1 .Vcu 3 C IL- 01Q) u a 0 = V S > m V d Q) 7. cu 5. w cu j C O -!e CU �[ to Z 0 C QN Q 0.'- N 0 C j 0O tw O Y Q 0 Y � a ul ❑O r t !� Ln w E a Ln ? E a ° i o c ¢ @ Ln F M Ln F- ❑ L ad c F N w 1 m Y 7 a� w C7 _ > w y N f0 [[ L'0 p m 00 m •E Y O C ❑ C W £ LY 4Y7 .� U 7 M f6 N w In N LLJ W W W rn rn o 0 Lr) f OD 00 m `� E U U E U U W L L O 4 O C y � T o Y o V — U 3 m c m O O O Q m Q o� LL v ai U `^ U L d C. O M L O cN > tib-. av Z W 0 w ~ O ~ O W t Z e,o c Z M 00 N JA c w C C m c ul � L 0 '1'' .L `j �C bU m 5 E 41 G .D 0 N fl -a L 10 an d L U N 3 �" O C CC L C Q n1 O U , ,n as - L '_ U N '� a c r�ua 41 K L p O °�° l7 U 3 mai _' 4-1 r u ° e � om a n � a � p N E ++ GJ COO `� o H vi CA > CO p C p� O W t t �_+ O Q1 U S C +n ro C" b O 'N ti O D ap a O +_N' s Qi u ;� w O Ql L L1 O (A 'p U L A � U U '� fU Wu C G1 4M 'y, 7 U O 7 VI @ VT U m O p o aCL o H as Ln ' ,N vi do m ami sa ro 3 o ro O U O -A ,� u1 L ., � 0 �cu W V) U + Oa CL MCL 0 CO G Y z 0 �7 _Lc CL o L v' 0 -a '� a Q v o en ° ups i o ra 1 LL m x Q N 0 0 o > cu w � i � H � � 0 0 0 CN 0 0 0 00 k 00 rn rn L Ln LD I i u U U_ a),L L O U- C; y LL a LLa Ln N i c o U U +�+ U Q m V U U O U N � d C I G Q, : O 7 O 7 ° O rn 4) L s s ° > 0 0 0 0 a moa a) 0 Ln LALn o I n Lri H G 3 u O 0 Z C LO OC OG +' Z tko C Z M tai iH 'C i OCWJ r r4 Qa i-I 0 y ° b N C U G O C G 1 LM (a L7 m a a CL ° a) CL o Np Q N m vi O a) O Z + C V +.� al w C d4 aJ fl. L o U Y O p O O 7 O C fu 4! kn O C LUCL m L LO N E C u h0 r7 V LO C C a) ?� C N C I- o LL Q o 0 O -a w �0 a ,a„ C L C o +� 4f Q '~ +� ° a Q Ln ° U a) ri O sa o +� m c ra 'o U y 'c �L wrr U c +� m c a) a ?� LA LLI _ 4O O y al U 7 O d a) a) C ( C U ai tC ° p Q) m C > a) O ? a z 2 u ? � Ln a) a z m O o C ° ° p N w C O O H C 7• a a) > t-+ 7 m � _ O O � Z C N +J u v_i a O a) U L c Wp Ln Q CL a u yr ° o o a) ° y a� ° '^ tin 4J ra � w c m O C F a°o Y u ro �. to 0 1 LL. L •r L CL a) ° a c v o a a� v� Lnm H is ra � U a a 0 Y I C j C C E r- di 41C +, C I .Y (A Q ? �+ N SC al N Y Q) Y a' tY @ N C [6 N C ra CL) N O _ s O Y Ln Q L n s p Y r6 p Y ma a) m Y a,1 O 670 � � Y a,1 > � � ai � �tn � 1 @ ti Q ai Q t C aJ /1 C N l!1 V1 CO p vi Y0 m O O to m O O m t C a) CL t7 - d Q U ro W GI R a E � C E LL _G N ra a+ ca m fD s O N ~ N ~ LU N w w % $ $ q % I I r 00 L DO � t CL ± ƒ k ƒ o U U u • u 2 � � � k E \ _ § q $ 2 CL / / / $ f w _ � o o e o 0 a t ■ Ln @ 7 Lq L i g 3 4 Q e d Q LU c z / Z 3 q 2 k ~ LL I m U q / Im _7 g \ § / § ® ƒ 3 ± m g � 2 t 3 § \ § o \ •% / o c ai a < a 6 B $ ^ LU ~ / \ Qj u m / \ 5 — o y } $ / k $ 2 2 f ; xk ¢$ mƒ b w0 >b % § £� $ 4 . � f k ( a - % % ® k ( \ m0 cc m c toCL 0 CL ra E Ln to / k E � E ± \ f § CCI E / \ "u Q u % LU 7 / % � J � � 0 = t § : c o �e _ 2 2 k 2 W m / 3 ƒ u e 7 / # � k � %. � > \ \ $ i / k 0 � I O w m a Oz � = 0 vi v E O G m m © N Z CL 4 �r d c� c O w 40 d m M w Q Gs C O r O N Q? V O O ��• C CL Z = CV C O 2 CD .L r E d t Q NU d `. I +' .c 4. .3 c 0 3 GO CL "� m .r_ O ca a N Q T- () 93 _ Z or-: N c.— 2 c CL a, CL a) a E 00N _ CD +-' -4-1 o N L N CD w U co A Q Q Q 0 a) N cn N N"D a Q p G1 += ,C C j 0)-u 00 o o a N N N ¢ C 0 0 i tC CQ 4 C a N O O Q Q) p) a) > 0 0 ® � o ZL1J >- oo �a C O E Qo O N a 0 E 1.L U ) C Lo G7 �� (] U (6 3 U) O O to h E m m 0 }C- C C� UO a o L C. C0 cg CL -0m C N + CB a c o , C'• I— Cj �; L co Q) >, L V) o to x H a © to °J � � ~ o � � to E o �, a p ¢ a) cn a) c to � 0) 0) CD az c O c c � t � ° � 0 o c CF) ° °�' cn o c M c +, c _ c� M to ° 0 0 cLa 2 iL U (n �, ° to c O �, c Q W to F Q 0C Q) �, L `/ Q Q T- U) D Oc O L 0 � m U = M D u0i 0 -0 O 0 CC L c U@ -0 L c � L 0 U) � . ® (� a O f— U Q) C U C m c C S� a) Q) G 'O 0 Q - O nd ' c n _a c4 o a� o c c4 �, V) 'c m cn cc -o L CD -0 } L O7 L co U O c c D � [� c r '_ c E � '> C N j a C _� n c� C� co a- o L m �- E Q) v- 0 Q) Q L m U m w � U — U L Q) O O > O > C � �, 0 • >, O w O to O I� U 0 c O) U m c M O L o (D '0 I� �,O N '4-= U (n �--� L Q) C C U = Q] Q L O T V) m C2 to a .(D -0 � 0 -O m •C �_ L ,dam O 0 +, 0 •� iw!' U 1 tY L to '' O -I--' � O Qc oo 0 � .0 - o v 7 _ U o Q) oo o a E 73U o o a d CL _ Q 0 tz Q c� sz � [Y c4 U .�c� O cn � � a � c � ® Q a ° o o (1) 0 V 00- CL N J ma 0 L a) m (1) N L- t i r c CC ° Q Q a W Q (� U U Cl C C co (3) L C- Z) c C C C = 0 � a ; � 76 � � a � r � � o B � ._ o � r- � u a L- a o -0_ m o 0 U Od i 0 0 o I CL C ai a) ami I .� n a Q m `L,,� C;) CD C C) a C v C v c v a> cm c co coco Q ❑ 02 O OQ OQ Oma, 4-1 L N C U) Lir a) C j a N Q 41 v E N � (� (� o � p L .L -F- C p t� C t C C C +� v f6 w � cno � a � N = U .- o00 = v C ., a I� M Co C v v 0 p > v O C _ d) p N � E I CcV N = 00 ` E nCo "aEL n o =_ o `er N Q O C � +—�. (` Cv— Q C �' N •� N E0 d7Q co p0 cr) "� cv ] .0 U a 'E a ] 0 N in p pU p U 0 0 i N v c } O E o C v ¢ N v r v C C ca L +' U p N 4� N U v N _ O N N O p °-� � vNUOaai a (a -- 0 - CM - M � 0 ov _'W v N (D E 0 0 '"' C C � 'Q0 'N 2 v I 00 Q E E ca - U � �' o N + E C -a v v QQ'� C to r � EE E > vm -� v)- on Lo .g)20 73Q cc° 0 0 ZU � � cnC � � ❑ Ua) 0 � 'VL � Np7,U} 'U 4-1 - � N c vvi v -o +` m � ` ° 0 � o c N = >1 q-- c a OL 'C 07--a a) € Z' +J � O QO- N O Qv V O C co � � CpC W M0C CC1 CL 4) aV Eco cm (D Q (o N N ,� -d > U O O N , O 0 C T-- oD N-o � vE v ,°''� ca � v N0 U 0 N ~ .� '� `J a aCi O N Qi to a 1 N � N v a) (� O LGLv a Q O O 0 C � CD ` 0 y O v0 a . O) O 0 . C C Q O 0 O L O ON � O ` (D 0 U L S C N — 0 v NO ° 0 vO V 0 L) d_vnom 00 .0 - N o v 0, da 0oc C Eo N U Ctj En cc r 2 CL 'y o f o � � 0 E _a' EFo- B Q � v E v v E E 2 E L EO �� E 5 a v E o � a N �' E � E o v d co O f6 '' p O v O L p A L C t� 0 0 0 0 0 O Q G1 0 ❑ � U Q c .� U ;'; UCY_ � O � c� n U Q Q � .SU m cn .� L 0 CIL 0 a) v O v Q- 0 Q v c L J ca o a a C a c 0 L + - p o) v c o 0 v � 'a c � CL 3 Q cn �tS O D L � D) O L rN+ v a y 0 o v C Q C +' O U' ❑ 1- � I- 4- 0 0 M o a = E E .� L U c O� :3 �n 0 (D 0 co 0 N > > u, O c 0 u7 O �f 0) (� 0 c � 0) Q7 � (D c o QL 01- > ® O O - Q CDM U � L3 CL U) c ,� a CO C 0 O a i J o Oce QO J U! >� ° �'U O U " - NN c6 U N -_0 � -C ui 'C3 � V -0 O VS O 0 � U? Lo O n 0 _ a I-' � � O O � Qt � N E � � ca 0 � � � o � � 0 CO O� O O +, U O rs f— c M ? O ® � 0 � 0cavU) r tea) o � � a _ a CV (D �? » O U cB O LD N _0 F— } O 0 O U) Us N _0 . — 0 0 U L7 LL U o a� c .L O CCf Y n 73 C/) LL ui N - o c cI) .� CO O 'a c O moo.co u, O o � U = o_ � "0Ec � ca Z o oQ 0Nc -.;,(D o � cu C GZ Ul N O 7 � d -� 0 � (6 eo cn 0 c c > 3: i U _rn o LO C) ccL O L - O Z 4-ZCl)Vo Imo' N U M O _ ® � s0- Q u> cfi cn o U 'n ~ L U LiJ dCY co u _ O G 0 c .� N 43 p V L d CO c E- �- [� +� > E 'E ou CO o 0 .0 0- arc cn N �� O O C � L L W �� W .0 L Z _ `"� v Ou 0 U vii U)i 0 N ( a a 3 s. N (n NO C N U � '5 p + IL Z 3 O U) Q LL —1 coH � .� C72U cn Q O N o p 0) 'nn ° Z c' ' T •� � m Vo O (D i CJS F � Us 0 (B r� 0 s (� Z E 0 .— Q? � cG Q 0 O c0 4— M O � � U o J cn o °'.o a� Z - 000 >, a. paQ � o0) 0) ~ � L•� 0 � o - � - cn 0 a 0—_j LL41 O 43 N to 7 us J ('. O U J Cys o �'S -0 � i H � ~ �— -0 N Q o Q Za` r O 0 U a� Z o vii o ElN M O 00 O 0 E U N O Q e U V) Q) L L v, En O co c O m O > E ° os Z o O C O N N E O w= a) N C o N E C (ted XM ? O a) C-- � ❑ m 3 E U ) o ° tE e aE) c�i c.• E OU L -� U d N O O O O Q a) 0C5 E Or M a. L � oL- Lo a � a) *' I C L C � oo4- °� :36. U. m Q N Ea) ,� M L o c� m ti N o �- m L L �' L 00 ° U a o C t7 ° c o r ca) >, n a) •a T = a CF) s o N z oC t N s O ° c L o o N O O � Q O 41 O �- c N O N N o H o .0 w o m N m U) W E a) c � � Q � Zz � o z �. _a N H E O n �. C] •� a)ID I L o N cn t� a U) .0 }+ v N oo Co -� ao C O = o'cn r Q c) �- d E N m a N da o � o O 0 L- O X a TO '� a) 0) C d O O O Q O N 0 C p O q) v a a E z oQ. E, ID . O cO V 010 C: o O " M G O� cn El (cD Oo c �cc O 0 z o lCis 0) L _rZTvN p aaOo O 4- Q- - r rav cN r' C a o a) ca a)Q6 - rn z LL J co �+O 7, c� E C �+N R Q u) M � o U L O U) Z a) L = 0_ L n c a' L o L L m c Q a) mL C M c (D 4) c a) a) cs�t C �_ a) 0) w' _ N tm U 4- U) Fr D (n O L o E ter- N 0 V � Z J r N J N Z H 2 J CV z C o �+ �G N N z L 0 0 Q O O r E O O Z O N Ln O ❑X - w 0 C _ p� r O Q) Q) Ul !C Z3V .0 C O a) O aj �• O cra O 0 f. — Q V .0 W Q tea-.. U (37 O U C N a -0 c U .-' tU o70 > Om E aJ O L L U L a t d N w N !II p (1) cn L.L U � C asp ca N lu CV 0) L a) L N ++ U) 0 L N Cj O Q1 a O O Q1 Q r ++ o' c O C 0 � 0 E ® P 0 .0 N Cb D L ® (J} CD C L a/ L ® E O L Q 67 _0 N ® O O V C-4 EL O CDO O ai N .� Z = 0 U N •E L �_ O U o z EE1 c O U d G1 C7 .N - G3 CO V � � � a]"r 0 i- O O p E La) i- Q) r N .� C CD o Z m O C O Q O Z f4 C N S N a C�� c � 0 —O O' O co � O tC o C g c� p �- L N Q) 0 } cl � �— s n- W t� 0 w,, 0 cu 2 � U Lr- 0 .� N C Q V � O o " C�. o° (D o o � � � o E E N O co O_ N � O Z V r CD Q'i O m �= a) U �•cn L O 4L L C O Q C2 Q1 fB .41 L O �, L O a) _ Q O L � Q) c EL O a — L ' L -0 0) 0 n C Q) E -o p a E (D a a d O � � o � m o � a� �_ � _m � "r C UJ � ° ONo `� m � ° o N � Oc ¢ L � C) ca � � � � , d -0 U) CLL � a) ate, Q M N O � o ac's � L � �- aD .t= O J � 0 � t O Uj'C O V} Cn O U> m 41 +� N p O O J v o a Q S o .� �' N ZEn .. p as O L .— W M� L (D Z 1 N a) a 4a LO N m 0 L a m _CO Q O E L QS a * �' f6 C U a aJ C LU O i 0 Q _ (IICD Q -5O O .- N Z 0 � U 0-U . O Ell C Z D C L O d �U U O C O N fQ. CV L 4- CTS N L i C -p �J c� N t Q1 N f/} +O+ fs3 O si a N = U 'a 'V U ?, CD ° C2 0 C O 7, fC3 U O = O U +� C m M a) Q N 3 N U Q tm (D +; CD 'C O i 3 CS U N .s_+ `� N ) E r0+ z N O N C4 L U U C © CL N N O S m }; a3 m O E ' N � d Q O '8 N 'L m O 'a N N �r .0 C L O 0 Q' N .V L C Vl O U0 CD E U C N "" L += +r f, O N � � � = Q + �, O � •U N fCLcC � � oU C � N -0 M rt+ 'L M > �' O a) �+ y., N CLQ �� U O •L t `� N � C. �_ fJC ( 00 L o. C N U V1 'C1 E � d L W.O _ ++ '� m W \ « �� � ° m � cum ® � o N � -0U — U QVtQ O coQ4 C U Z, F tU Q U 0 7 0 tC E U y C U a1 L " 0 Q +� c� . Q N p ++ > Q? OCD E U >, C N !e cC C. CU N Q Cl ua 0 -0 +' 7 N +='' 'a O '6 C u� N 0 p 0 Q �'d C CD U y 0 U W +p+ •C O i ° r C y 0 Q A=_ Q fi C +, -+ ® E NUig ofOCZ0 � � Ci � � Q.CE °41 cm � ° � cn � 3 � E � U '(j Lin . N o• ;) cn � Q L }; 0-75= s — C c� as o — n C= M E N L m„ +� O O Q O M M — ++ O U � cn 0 0 C r Q � ca 0 0 (A0 ° � o N � c � N cs M W U m ® � +eU ¢U += Cw Oto CL x tLQ 0C "-' o) Qi 87 Q O U C3, >% N N ° U VCl L *p Q= C ° V O aiU o .0 o m = � 's � o aria o (D a0 aN �N � � r onL .r- c� ca a� � C o N C O C L � LL — ° CL 0ttI as o C N 0 Q M O +S-' �, � d � Cr C � O rL U � ,0 � U O d � 'L (p a3 Q C Ncu O ' V � cG ° L ° C ,� E r 4, to m ,? tCC O OQ aL O -0 E CV C M C d O t S 0) L- t; aY O C M N L ,� f0 r-. (D C a•+ r- (a.' �C L y.. C d Ca ' N +' M 'a C �w a°i7 QC1_'� N � 0 .9 U 0 M _ Q3 c1 - 'C z p O N .0 E (D mN GNi p p O U .0 C O cr N N C N �'� U CV a'cc rL+ E CL a1 N G C C >,"" p +C c U O N O O N Q as Q C � L u_ U(D M `1 i'' U '� O L O T3 v A d 'O U O 'C C: L \ t 4) EU N _ O U v `� ° 0 ay 0 C ++ O o N © O C; o �+ a? N V i C vi t 3 = N �s Q �'0 m j N " U •L U •��-, o O O o n a o vim- C Q > LD4w Q? L C2 a) Q 3 N O N U +, C C1 i- 0 %. m O U 0 m (Y �+ i31 r N C C= a? N f6 }� O7 Q) F., U V) a} r p N_ C N N �— C C 3: ( C at C cn C �. /6F�i of p "-' N 041 Mt 'U U 4-- — ,M -0 > L vsO mH ^ QGy C c ul 7 C O �+ Ccc c0a (n 2 Q� C o d � N O U Q N N L C 3 N E C) � O " C ,a p O ° Q p O 0 N J �+ +� +r 0 � L �' as ° o � � -C o m M v C- .C: � w �' a�z3 � � ? `� ,�0 (D L) E J c � N '� U a'= c � F- 4 " ° ` cUa o m o0 � .� � d Cam u� ,o o m o � 4 E Q N E arc,, m m c ' oy � a a3 m o m � tm 0- '.__ Q N p U N C L �, s C C C S +� o p n1 0 y C O C L U _ Q a a) C Cl_ 6 C y0 �0 ro (D 3 O O U L L m K >,- L N O N O >,,N .� L (fa) LU) 0 oLa ° � �, ° � � � 3 � EQ� WLQL a� � ws W a1 0 4> 'a L }. a) CL 'O L O O 4.1 E � � � 0 0 0 O N o � L � 0 O L L O L C 3 L L C ° 3 L L Q L L L CL L L Ci Ci� CLU m C!) U CZ'0 m >,v3 C2 a U � 0 U � U CZ C1 a 0 Q U) ca a 0 m U � X E t[S O U_ � O � C O O 0 a f6 � O U = O NE0L wE a a M � � a� O ° 0 C 2 ca a. ao ° o ° Q) Q c U) •'� 0 .— O � > 7, U cz Z70 E f�4 N d U r+ O O U s a O0 U- N Z7 E V ON O p Val "= O a) E CL i Q � a) 3 a o au co CD m � co Q m CD CL O (� C O O � _ O V} CO - Q) U) Ag O Q- a "- m N ? = O E o, ° Ear w O y °' > C C2 O > 'i v U O ° o (3 d C O c7 U U U p U Eco � pp� _ = a 7D O N ui U "" O U (� Vf N C V) N cy Eli C E L d O t9 fl � Cd LO U to a O O cA o N O U U L .N V = O .� C L a) `� o C �= � p sC ca IL s CD 0 U cv `F °' a) o r c� N O o > N c o LyE 6Q' � L O d D O a 0 0 N N c6 U [� L L- .N Lair = (D o L o, o o c (D ami o o u) o C7 +, N o a c� Q) m �. C� o �. V a a o C N aP o 0 o o (D Q) o W O ° y3Q Nom, . � ° z o �, o °' �' -aQ a� CO M a) o � p E 4- C: CO o N [si a Ur o W. U L az L o 0 o c, a a 0 L L B cu o 0- CD 0 'E0 tea' a o N o 0 0 Cr EE >5 N dam °a ' � cap ° ami u rn C) Cu _0 12 E p p ui ti -- d u ❑X 17El El E Q x Elizabeth A. Binsack i Director of Community Development City of Tustin i Elizabeth Binsack has been responsible for the leadership and administration of the Community Development Department and Planning Commission for the City of Tustin since 1996. Her responsibilities include: Advance, current,and environmental planning;structural building plan checks, permit issuance, and inspections; code enforcement and Community Development Block Grant management. In a career spanning over 30 years,Ms.Binsack has developed a diversified background in urban,regional, environmental planning;land use law;building construction practices;housing and demographics;historic i preservation; and survey research and program analysis. She has served the following cities and agency: • Tustin, Community Development Director-1996 to present i • Los Alamitos, Community Development Director/ Building Official/Planning Manager- 1991 anager-1991 to 1995 • Dana Point,Associate Planner—1989 to 1991 • Corona, Assistant Planner I and II—1988 to 1989 • U.S. Department of Interior—1987 to 1988 • City of Dayton, Planning Intern—1986 to 1987 During her tenure with the City of Tustin, Ms. Binsack has been instrumental toward initiating the build- out of the Tustin Ranch residential communities,Tustin Market Place and Auto Center,the preservation and development of the Old Town area along the historic EI Camino Real (Downtown Commercial Core Plan), and the initial development and construction at the former Marine Corps Station, Tustin (Tustin Legacy) including: Over 4,000 new homes,over 2 million square feet of nonresidential development,and several institutional uses. Ms. Binsack has served as past president of the Planning Directors'Association of Orange County and past Chair of the Management Oversight Committee for the Center for Demographic Research. She is a member of the Urban Land Institute, the National Trust for Historic Preservation, the California f Preservation Foundation, and the American Planning Association. I Ms. Binsack earned her Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Dayton and a Master of Public Administration degree from the California State University Long Beach. 3 1 7 i 3 i i SCOTT C. REEKSTIN EDUCATION: California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, CA Master of Urban and Regional Planning—June 1994, Selected Courses: Planning Theory & Practice, Graphics, Design, Research Methods, Planning Administration, Data Analysis, Housing, Environmental Factors, Social Planning, Implementation. Comprehensive Examination: Passed With Honors. Claremont McKenna College, Claremont, CA BA in Economics and Mathematics— May 1988. Selected Courses: Econometrics, Investments and Valuation, Marketing, Money and Banking, International Trade, Statistical Inference, Probability, Numerical Methods, Mathematics Clinic, Advanced Spanish Conversation. Thesis topic: Trends in the U.S. Lodging Industry. California State University, Fullerton, CA Certificate in Public Employee Leadership Development— February 2008 WORK i { EXPERIENCE:Principal/Senior Planner, Community Development Department, City of Tustin, CA ' Manage Department's Advance Planning Section personnel. Monitor budget and forecast revenues. Develop priorities, objectives, and goals. Manage consultant contracts. Perform complex advance planning functions, including demographics, environmental studies, and historic preservation. October 1999— present. Associate/Assistant Planner, Community Development Department, City of Tustin, CA Performed both current and advance planning work for the department. Trained staff members. Interpreted laws and regulations pertaining to city planning. Prepared comprehensive reports, resolutions, ordinances, and environmental analyses and presented these items to the Zoning Administrator, Planning Commission, and City Council. Reviewed plans for compliance with zoning, planning, subdivision, and design review standards. Interacted with the general public, j applicants, City staff, and outside agencies. Managed the comprehensive zoning code update j and business license regulations revisions. Prepared the City's Certified Local Government j Application, the MCAF Tustin grant application to the Trade and Commerce Agency, and the Supportive Housing Grant Application to HUD. Administered the City's Housing Rehabilitation Program, the Old Town Tustin Educational Video Project, and the Graffiti Removal Program. Developed consultant services agreements and requests for proposals for graffiti abatement i services, and the CLG video Project. Developed the City's first Wireless Communication Ordinance. Served as liaison to the City's Cultural Resource Advisory Committee and project expansion to the City's Cultural Resource Overlay District. Developed City's Mills Act Program. Prepared City's Consolidated Plan. October 1990—October 1999. i i Redevelopment Intern, Community Development Agency, City of Santa Ana, CA Reviewed and commented on site plans for consistency with Agency goals and objectives, advised project managers on planning issues related to redevelopment projects, acted as liaison to the Santa Ana Council of Arts and Culture, identified commercial properties to target for Economic Development rebate program, reviewed responses to requests for proposals, j developed Artists Live/Work Ordinance, assisted with SRO studies, advertised public meetings, acted as the Agency's United Way representative. January 1990 —October 1990. ACTIVITIES: Speaker,American Planning Association California State Conference, 1998. j Member, American Planning Association, 1990--present. Choir Singer, Orange County Master Chorale, 1989— 1997. Member, St. Paul's Players Community Theater Group, 1987, SKILLS: Spanish Fluency Elaine Dove, AICP, RLA Summary A unique blend of experience in the public and private sectors as a Planner for municipalities and a registered Landscape Architect. My experience in public/private arenas has given me a unique perspective on working with the public. As a paralegal, I honed my skills in analysis, research and writing. I am a strong believer in continuing education and take advantage of opportunities to improve my knowledge and skills. Experience February 2016—Present City of Tustin Senior Planner • Evaluate complex planning applications for land development or use changes including CEQA analysis and preparation of reports and presentations to decision makers. • Preservation Planning including analysis of proposals for rehabilitation and adaptive reuse of historic buildings and Cultural Resources District. • Provide guidance on developer, business and residential inquiries related to zoning regulations, General Plan compatibility and design character. Draft ordinances. Review and approve planning applications and building permits, including Certificates of Appropriateness for historic properties, establish conditions of approval, and draft environmental planning documents. • Coordinate planning activities with other City departments and outside agencies September 2012 to February 2016 City of Fullerton Associate Planner • Evaluate Planning applications for land development or use changes including project and CEQA analysis, interdepartmental coordination, preparation of staff reports, and presentation to Planning Commission/City Council. Recent projects include four residential tracts, multi- family housing, affordable housing, and preservation/conservation related applications, and Zoning Code amendments. • Assigned as Preservation Planner for Community Development Department including analysis of proposals in preservation zones and historic downtown for compatibility with Zoning Code, Design Guidelines and Secretary of Interiors Standards; responsible for landmark designations and preservation zone overlays; presentations to Design Review Committee and Landmarks Commission. • Consult with applicants and potential applicants about process, applications, zoning regulations, General Plan compatibility and design character for development projects. • Provide staff support to Council-appointed Energy and Resource Management Committee. • Coordinate and track Planning staff workflow in relation to Permit Streamlining Act deadlines. • Perform peer-related review of work in progress and provide input on zoning code revisions. • Plan check grading, building and landscape plans on planning projects. September 2010 to September 2012 City of Fullerton Assistant Planner • Drafted LandscapeMJater Conservation ordinance. • Met with architects, builders, homeowners, etc., regarding City Planning and Zoning process. • Analyzed projects, prepared staff reports and resolutions, and made presentations to Design Review Committee and Planning Commission for development projects; conditional use permits, variances, subdivisions, etc., and conducted onsite inspections before and during construction. March 2009 to September 2010 City of Fullerton Planning Technician • Provided full-time Planning/Zoning customer service at the public counter, including property research and analysis, plan checks, zoning verification letters, and excellent customer service. • Supervised two interns • Responded to inquiries in person,via telephone and in writing.. Elaine Dove, AICP, RLA April 1997 to March 2009 David Volz Design Landscape ArchitectlProject Manager • Project manager for design, construction documents including technical specifications, and construction management for public parks, streetscapes, and community centers. . Supervised design and clerical team. Prepared project budgets, coordinated schedules, responded to RFPs & RFQs, site plans, design concepts/construction drawings. • Drafted technical reports (master plans, design guidelines, strategic plans, feasibility studies and General Plan update). • Conducted community workshops. Education 1998 University of California, Irvine Cert. in Landscape Architecture 2012 CSU, San Marcos Environmental Leadership Academy 2014 USC School of Architecture Heritage Conservation Course CSU, Fullerton BA Communications, in progress Professional California Department of Consumer Affairs Registered Landscape Architect#4828 Memberships American Planning Association American Institute of Certified Planners May 2017 California Preservation Foundation Community City of Tustin, Parks & Recreation Commission 4 terms, including Chair&Vice Chair AMY KAVANAUG H MASON OVERVIEW Strategic,entrepreneurial and hands-on marketing and communications executive with more two decades of agency and in-house Ii experience building and guiding engagement teams for global consumer and technology brands.A trusted advisor to C-suite i executives and brand leaders, led internal and external communications for several high-profile brand turnarounds. Proven expertise in developing integrated marketing strategies and initiatives that drive sales, brand equity and growth. Leader of more than 150+high profile, insights driven and award winning product launches and service offerings for a variety of brands and organizations including Apple, Dine Brands, Microsoft(MSN), Netflix,The GRAMMY'S,the Motion Picture Association (MPA), Starbucks and Taco Bell Corp. Expertise in reputation management,narrative development and brand storytelling;developing and executing executive thought leadership platforms;digital,social and traditional media engagement;internal and external stakeholder and influericer relations;issues mitigation and crisis management. PROFESSIONAL i FORT ASHFORD FUNDS,LLC I Newport Beach,CA Venture Capital&Private Equity Managing Director—Restaurants, Retail and Technology 12/2019 to Present Strategic advisor and interim leadership for portfolio companies.. j DINE BRANDS GLOBAL, +INC I Glendale CA I The largest full-service restaurant company in the world;parent company of 1HOP and Applebee's j SVP Global Communications:CMO International 7/2016 to 11/2019 ' Recruited by CEO to help rebuild brand reputation and increase overall brand insights-and advocacy for IHOP and Applebee's restaurants around the world. Lead corporate affairs;research and insights via the Dine Research Institute;guest relations;brand communications;executive thought leadership;media relations;employee,team member and franchisee engagement. Primary lead of cross-functional teams that oversee crisis and issues mitigation, events, community affairs,and sustainability.Chief Marketing ' Officer of International reframing and relaunching brands in key markets. TACO BELL CORP. I YUM BRANDS I Irvine,CA $9B global quick service restaurant with more 7000 restaurants around the world Chief Public Affairs Officer 6/2013 to 7/2016 Executive Director, Taco Bell Foundation 1/2012 to 6/2016 Vice President, Public Affairs and Brand Engagement 6/2011 to 5/2013 Recruited by CEO as key member of the executive team responsible for building brand reputation and increasing overall brand advocacy. Reallocated existing resources to build integrated internal and external communications and public affairs teams to protect, promote and defend Taco Bell. Leading corporate affairs;brand communications;executive thought leadership;social and traditional media relations;team member engagement. Primary lead of cross-functional teams that oversee crisis and issues mitigation,events,community affairs,sustainability and ongoing purpose driven work. Highlights include. • Increased communications transparency,authenticity and relevance new approach to listening and engaging with stakeholders via digital,social, mobile and traditional channels;launched the Taco Bell Newsroom made up of nearly 40+cross functional content creators developing real-time brand content and story-telling. • Developed and executed 50+ break though and award winning integrated communications campaigns including 50th Anniversary, Doritos Locos Tacos,Cantina Bell, Breakfast, Mobile ordering/Payment, Live Mas Scholarships,ingredient transparency,Cage-free eggs, among others supporting 5 straight years of same store sales and transaction growth. • Led numerous public relations firsts in area of social engagement, leveraging emerging channels(eg Twitter, Periscope and Snapchat)as a means of driving visibility and recognition for marketing innovation. 1 • Visibility and outreach resulted in numerous awards for the brand including AdAge Marketer of Year(2013), Hottest Digital Marketer(2013, 2015), 3 Cannes Lions recognizing Public Relations,and Fast Company 10 Most Innovative Companies. • Initiated and extended ongoing engagement with key regulators(CDC, FDA,local health departments), policy makers(White House,Capitol Hill),and advocacy groups(CSPI, Humane Society,etc.) • Expanded Taco Bell Foundation fundraising from$4MM to$14MM a year to become one of the largest teen focused 501c3s. I EDELMAN I Los Angeles I Seattle I London I Singapore World's leading Independent communications marketing firm Public Engagement Co-Chair;EVP, Global Client Relationship Manager,Starbucks 6/2005 to 5/2011 SVP/EVP, Digital, Entertainment, Rights& Technology 8/2001 to 1/2005 Served in a variety of senior roles at Edelman,the world's largest communications marketing firm, leading several high-profile 1326 and 132C brand reputation campaigns and crisis engagements. Highlights include: • Tapped by Edelman CEO as one of 6 founding Global Client Relationship Managers(GCRM)to serve as senior counsel to Starbucks leadership team from 2005 to 2011 and expanded the firms reach and influence from two US offices to becoming the global Agency of Record and overseeing the work of 100+professionals, in over twenty-two Edelman offices around the world. • Primary and day to day agency counsel to CEO Howard Schultz and Starbucks leadership team during execution of transformation agenda from 2007-2011;Strategic corporate and consumer branding counsel,financial communications counsel, executive thought leadership,employee engagement;traditional,social and digital media and influencer engagement;new market entry planning and research; issues and crisis mitigation;and event management across the Americas,Asia Pacific, Europe,the Middle East and Africa. • Envision/manage Digital Entertainment, Rights and Technology practice(headquartered out of Los Angeles office,with expanded practice areas in London, NYC,Seattle and DC)P&L;capitalize on the proliferation of consumer technology,the accessibility of the web,growing demand for entertainment content and the emergence of social media platforms. • An integral part of the development and execution of:MySpace initial corporate narrative,working with Chris DeWolfe and Tom Anderson through rise and acquisition by News Corp.; motion picture industry's anti-piracy efforts(Rated I for Illegal)and member of communications counsel to MPA president Jack Valenti. I OHGOLLY.COM I HIGHTOWER TECHNOLOGY I Newport Beach,CA industry's leading provider of e-Commerce enabled,click and build websites for small and medium business Co-founder/Vice President of Marketing 1999-2001 Acquired, repositioned and relaunched this click and build website in 1999 to become the leading eCommerce solution for small businesses. i GEMPLUS(Now GEMALTO) I Redwood City,CA Industry's leading provider of e-Commerce enabled,click and build websites for small and medium business Director, Global Marketing and Communications 1997-1999 Recruited by CEO to join leadership team and help build awareness and understanding for smart card technology in the US and emerging markets;team efforts resulted in building a$150M business in 2 years and focused on the convergence between smart cards,the Internet,cellular telephony, network security, portable software applications and mobile payment.A division of Gemplus i SCA, now Gemalto$213),the world leader in smart cards. SHANDWICK-GOLIN HARRIS-HI-TECH PR(Now GOLIN) ( San Francisco Boston Sydney Vice President, Technology Accounts 1996-1997 APPLE I Cupertino,CA Power Macintosh Public Relations 1994-1996 I BACHELOR 'OF ARTS 1 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA Major.Communications Studies i Additional Experience: I Tustin City Planning Commission—March 2016-Present Member Board of Directors at DiscoveryCube Orange County-2012-Present National Board of Trustees at Boys and Girls Clubs of America 2013--2017 Schultz Foundation 100,000 Opportunities Initiative,Strategic Oversight Committee,August 2015 to 2017 (http://www.100kopportunities.org/Volunteer Experience) 2 Stephen Y,Kmak Jr. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS � 2017-Present I egislat7ve Be PoNryAmlysis M-awager, Otange County Pahlic Works Agency ■ Monitor,research,analy-ze,and interpret proposed state and fedexal legislative and regulatory bills and activities for potential impacts on the Agency. ■ Prepare and present accurate and timely reports and recommendations on pending legislative and policy issues and proposals to executive management. 2013-Present Management Cansul=4 Kozak Consu&dng Group ■ Provide strategic,management,and financial consulting services to government and non-profit agencies,including analysis of methods and practices,project planning, policies&procedures,budgeting and business plans,and administrative and operational j improvements. 2014-2015 Ad niraristwave Services 0,Wcvr,Fan2hyAssistancae Minismes ■ Planned and directed administrative and financial support operations,including budget planning and reporting,regulatory compliance,and audit coordination for a homeless and hunger prevention non-profit agency with a 26 bed women's transitional shelter, and food pantry serving 3,600 clients each month in south Orange County. 2012-2013 Finarxcid&IT Services Director,M14xtic4ml WatcrDistrlct ofrerrg+e County ■ Provided strategic leadership in developing, implementing, and sustaining best financial and business management practices including managing a $1.44 mullion aatnual operating budget and a$14 million fixed income investment program. I s Planned; organized, and directed full service finance and accounting departmcnt, including budget administration, investment management, banking and treasury operations, procurement and contracts,and lT systems and user support. i 2006-2012 UdefAdmhw&ativr Officer, Chlldtetx&Fm7z&es CoAuu4wov ofOhwgc County n Planned, organized, and directed administrative service support including program development and evaluation, financial, accounting and audit functions, contract administration, IT systems, procurement, and scheduling of administrative and internal support services. w Managed a$46 million annual operating budget and a$1.20 million fixed income investment � program,including portfolio benchmark performance evaluation and reporting, a Prepared and managed strategic plans, annual business plans and budgets, along with KPI performance measurement,monitoring,and reporting. 2005-2006 Controller,Los Angeles County Superior Court ■ Directed a compr6ensive progrem of financial management; accounting operations, and revenue functions, including administration of the. Court's $665 million annual operating budget, budget v. actual monitoring and reporting, revenue and expenditure forecasting, annual audit,administration of giants totaling$14 million,procurement,and collections. a Planned and directed development and implementation of a new revenue collection, allocation,accounting,and reporting structure for civil court fees totaling$12 million annually. I Stephen V Kozak,Jr, PROFESSIONAL.EXPERIENCE AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS (CONTINUED) 2000-2003 F4nand,dMavrager,Budget,Debt&Txeasmy,La Angel, Wor1dAh7,,u r Directed the Financial Planning Division,including Budget, R2tes, Fees & Charges, RAA Grant Programs,and Debt&Treasury Management activities. n Established and managed 1AWA's $300 million Commercial Paper (CP) capital improvement projects financing Program, ■ Planned,organized,and managed preparation,manito.ring,and reporting for a$465 million Annual Operating Budged and a$950 million Alulti-Year Capital Projects Budget, ' 1994-2000 Finaac#al Managiet,Finance&Ride Management,orange County Sanitation I3isbrict ■ Planned and directed$4-40 million fixed and variable rate Certificates of Participation (cop) financing program for capital projects,including refunding,and new money issues. ■ Controlled insurance and risk management programs for an asset base valued at $1.5 billion. w Initiated, implemented, and managed neve$350 million fixed income.investment program and treasury operations function, ADDITIONAL EXPERIENCE ■ Planning Commissioner,City of Tustin,2006-Present u Citizens Advisory Committee,OCTA,2016-present ■ SuCcessor Agcncy Board,City of Tustin,2016-Present ■ Board Member,CSD.A Finance Corporation,2012-2013 • Beard Nfember,Tustin Community Foundation,2010 Present ■ Tustin Police Department Citizen Academy Class No.30,2010 EDUCATION ■ M.B.A.,California state University,l7ullcrmn ■ M.P.A.,University of California,Riverside # BJL,Political Science,California State Pc,�tcchnic University,Pomona a Community College Instructor Credcntial,Public Services&Administration ■ Certified California Municipal Treasurer,(CCMI),Cal tvloinicipal Treasurers Association i I I i ' I I MR. AJ JHA SUMMARY: Over Eighteen Years of Experience In: • Marketing Channel Development • Brand Messaging • Project Management (Web/Direct) • Online Analytics • Positive Sales Growth , • Strategic Marketing Planning • Marketing Sales/Cost Analysis • Franchise Operations • Brand Development • Rebranding/Turnarounds • QSR Operations • Advertising and Communication • Public Relations EXPERIENCE: Tustin Auto Gas Works Tustin, CA Chief Executive Officer July 2010—Present • Executed purchase and turn-around of two Arco Gas Stations as a personal investment. • Analyzed and made decisions to increase profitability and appeal for both sites.Took two sites pumping 55k gallons per month to over 250k gallons of gas.Producing store sales of over 85k per month, i Incrediline Irvine,CA +; Marketing and Business Development Manager March 2008—July 2010 • Developed and implemented marketing plan and brand launch for a new consumer product. Managed branding guidelines and helped develop brand identity and messaging.Designed and launched website and created and managed direct mail and email marketing campaigns and post reporting analysis. i • Primary focus is B2B development and growth. Responsible for major account management and development which include: Amazon.com, Canadian Tire Company and Target. • Responsible for reviewing all online analytics and ROI reports to ensure campaigns are performing to expectation and to continue to tweak campaigns to ensure key ROI measures are achieved. Texas Pacific Group Irvine,CA Marketing Manager February 2008—December 2009 • Developed and implemented strategic marketing plan for a three year turnaround of national retailer and manufacturer, • Primary work responsibilities included channel development(direct,tv,radio,web, in-home and retail), brand rebranding, messaging and marketing ROI analysis. • Responsible for managing company launch of new brand identity in September of 2008. Managed creative resources and vendors to roll-out new collateral in time for fall re-launch.Scope of work included managing brand/creative direction and creating/modifying external copy for company deliverables and collateral in time for Sept launch. • Collected and analyzed data to evaluate existing and potential efficiencies within the channels to increase revenue,average order j size and ROL Oversaw direct marketing programs on web,direct mail, email,and license programs. Developed dashboard reporting systems for marketing/sales analysis and key metrics reporting. Helped increase the effectiveness and track ability of marketing,advertising, business development and communications programs internally to get an understanding of ROI. Recommended key areas to cut and or increase to maximize marketing spend. a • Redeveloped company e-commerce site and backend infrastructure to take advantage of highly trafficked site to direct and increase consumer conversion rate over the web. Implemented Google Analytics and Omniture into the site to effectively monitor and learn about consumer behavior online. Increased the web conversion rate by 25%over two months,which lead to increased estimated net sales by sixteen million a year. Developed tracking metrics for the site by understanding consumer traffic and adapting the site to maximize flow into key conversion areas and metrics. • Activated an aggressive SEM/SEO program which achieved a$35 cost per lead/conversion. Launched an aggressive email marketing campaign that resulted in the highest marketing R0l in company history. • Managed all consumer advertising/communication from kick off to in market.Areas of involvement included magazine/news paper advertising,direct mail,email marketing and website. • Created and activated marketing programs to take advantage of existing consumer database and initiated lead prospecting. Helped create and organize 3 Day Blinds 1.5 million customers database. Okay-Okay Laguna Niguel, CA Marketing Project Manager March 2006—March 2008 I • Worked for a full service marketing agency based in Orange County,CA.Major Clients included Microsoft,Indy Race League Dermalogica and Toyota. • Helped develop and execute channel specific communication/pr/marketing programs for clients,Coordinated product marketing, positioning and branding initiatives. Lead development with new website launches, lead/customer database creation/management, email marketing campaigns, lead generation campaigns and online affiliate campaigns. 11AJ J1ia EDUCATION: University of California Irvine,CA BS Social Ecology(2004)Minor Management September 2000—Dec 2004 ADVISOR/BOARD AFFILIATIONS: Federal Bureau of Investigation Los Angeles Citizens Academy Graduate Los Angeles,CA May 2019 Board Member of Orange County Boys and Girls Club Tustin,CA September 2018-Present Planning Commissioner of the City of Tustin Tustin, CA February 2019—Present City of Tustin Police Advisory Board Tustin, CA September 2016--September President of American India Foundation—Los Angeles Chapter Los Angeles, CA Largest Indian American NGO Based in the United States. September 2012—August 2015 Board Member—Executive Protection Specialists Orange, CA Advisor and Board Member September 2012—August 2014 Board Member--Unique Garage Doors Anaheim,CA Marketing and Business DeveiopmentAdvisor September 2010—Present I I I i a 1 I I 1 I 3AJ J h a LISA CHU EXPERIENCE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TAX AND FEE ADMINISTRATION Business Taxes Administrator I June 2016 to Present Irvine,CA Responsible for a variety of compliance and administrative functions; manage and control office operational functions such as reception, counter, lobby, registration, use tax clearance, etc.; oversee staff handling switchboard, account maintenance, incoming/outgoing mail, delinquencies, revocations, collections, advisory services, investigations, analyses, and evaluations of customer provided documents; direct staff to provide support functions such as ABC reports,security, cashiering, escrow, j etc.; responsible for motivating, training, developing staff, and monitoring employee performance; responsible for scheduling Tax Technicians in various functions to ensure optimum efficiency; review CLEAR report, Keld Receipt books, and How Are We Doing surveys; run the office's Service Time and Waiting 7Yme reports(when Qmatic was used)and record them on the District Database Report; CROS Point of Contact(CPOC) representing Irvine Office Compliance Supervisors; Chair and scribe for the ! CPOC Compliance Supervisors Group. Accomplishments: Secured a permanent BTAI position; developed skills to successfiilly manage the work of a multi-disciplinary team; lead the team through CROS implementation. BOARD OF EQUALIZATION Business Taxes Administrator I July 2014 to June 2016 Irvine,CA Implement the Student Assistant Program for the Irvine District Office, Compliance Department; develop, train, coordinate and monitor the work of the staff; manage and control operational functions and administrative activities relative to enforcing applicable laws, regulations,policies and procedures ' 1 across both compliance and audit functions;provide overall office administration and support, conduct or direct staff to conduct other functions including investigations,analysis and evaluations of taxpayer- 9 documents, books and records, and financial documents; motivate st P qff to meet the district's goals; monitor staff performance and provide feedback; hold weekly meetings;participate in the hiring process; handle Board,Member requests; respond to taxpayers' inquires; ensure quality services are provided to the taxpayers. Accomplishment: Uad the team to reach a 99% success rate in clearing delinquent accounts within four months of this new program. BOARD OF EQUALIZATION Business Taxes Compliance Specialist June 2009 to July 2014 Irvine,CA Conduct field inspections to ensure tax compliance; determine proper investigative techniques and procedures; document field observations, interviews, and inspection findings; prepare reports of non- compliance and take or recommend appropriate action to correct the situation; assist taxpayers to encourage voluntary compliance; address questions and concerns from the general public; respond to questions regarding tax laws and regulations. Accomplishments: Contributed to the program's over 95% positive feedback from the taxpayers that were visited; solicited amended returns that totaled over $86o,000.00 in revenue for the State; maintained outstanding performance reviews. BOARD OF EQUALIZATION Business Taxes Representative April 2006 to May 2009 Irvine,CA Contact tax payers to collect delinquent returns and taxes by phone and by mail; encourage voluntary compliance; take collection actions such as preparing and serving notices of levy and wage garnishments, requesting warrants, recording liens, seizing and selling liquor licenses, locating assets on which to levy, investigating and making recommendations for dual and jeopardy determinations, asserting successor's liability, investigating criminal violations, etc.; determine if liabilities should be written off when all efforts have failed or when they are not productive. Accomplishment: Promoted to Tax Compliance Specialist in three years, ANAHEIM HILLS ACADEMY Administrator February 2004 to April 2006 Anaheim, CA Manage all organizational activities for an after-school tutoring center. Recruit business partners, obtain working capital,handlefinances,devise and implement a marketing strategy,manage personnel I issues,provide customer service,etc, Accomplishment: Resolved the deficit problem within a month. I. 1 i WELLS F'ARGO BANK Service Manager August 2001 to November 2002 Laguna Niguel, CA Manage the teller services function to ensure prompt and efficient transactionprocessing as well as the i generation of sales through quality referrals; manage and direct workflow to ensure maximum efficiency; establish sales referral and service goals; train and coach the staff, responsible for maximizing resources and achieving service and sales goals; ensure compliance with audit and operational regulations and guidelines. WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK Operations Supervisor May 2000 to August 2001 Irvine,CA I i Resolve customer service issues and operations related problems; ensure compliance with Bank policy and government regulations by performing internal control certcfications/audits; provide teller transaction approvals and overrides; provide backup support to Teller staff as needed; train and evaluate staff, administer corrective actions; adjust staff lunch/break schedules to ensure optimum workflow is achieved;approve requisitions far supplies; cross-sell bank products and services. i Accomplishment: Won "lAghts, Camera, Actionl" award twice for obtaining l00% Secret Shopper customer satisfaction grating during 2000-2001. j I EDUCAITON I I California State University,Long Beach Bachelor of Science Degree: Business Administration concentrating in Marketing GPA:3.55 Degree; May, 1995 Dean's Honor List, Fall 1994 { 5 Artesia High School,Norwalk,CA High School diploma May, 1989 Graduated with Highest Honors and Seal Bearer i WATER WASTEWATER REUSE mkn Ryan Gallagher, for the past 13 years, Ryan has completed over 75 projects with 20 y public agencies in Southern California, serving as the Project Manager for the majority. The estimated construction value of the projects that have been planned, designed and/or constructed exceeds $250 million. Projects include planning through design for water, wastewater and recycled-water conveyance, pumping, storage, and treatment. Ryan specializes in complex multi-agency water supply programs, alternative delivery program management, master planning, and contract negotiations. Ryan Water Supply and Treatment Gallagher, Anaheim Valve Vault, Orange County Water District I Anaheim, CA Operations Project Manager for design of new valve vault for multiple bu ried valves(48-inch to 72-inch), adding gates to Atwood Channel discharge structure, and minor modification to OC-28. Identified opportunity to reduce cost by $300k during PDR stage. Total project cost Education estimated at$1M. California Polytechnic State Pressure-Reducing Station, Laguna Beach County Water District I Laguna Beach, CA University San Luis Obispo, Project Manager for the hydraulic analysis of existing conditions, utilities research, and California development of a preliminary design for a new pressure-reducing station to offset the need for alternative capital improvement projects. BS Civil Engineering Palos Verdes Recycled-Water Pipeline,West Basin Municipal Water District I Carson, CA Project Manager for preliminary design, environmental assessment, and final design for a Licenses&Registrations recycled-water pipeline conveying water through Torrance and Palos Verdes Estates. The California Professional Engineer project includes approximately 16,000 feet of 8-inch to 10-inch-diameter pipeline, a pump -Civil, No.74805 station,and a connection to the Palos Verdes Golf Course,several parks,schools,and other irrigation customers along the route. Established several options, which reduced overall Professional Associations project cost by approximately $750,000. Major project elements included easement Orange County Water Association assessment, hydraulics, pump station concept development, a California Department of (President 2020) Transportation (Caltrans) crossing, and an expedited schedule. Total project cost is estimated at$6.2M. American Society of Civil Water Operations Support I Oxnard, CA Engineers(Santa Barbara/Ventura Project Manager for operations support efforts for the City's water treatment and YMF President 2012) distribution system, which includes a 7.5 mgd brackish water desalination facility and five American Public Works blending stations,serving nearly 200,000 residents.Major tasks include design of emergency Association (Ventura County plant projects (chemical piping replacement and well improvements), operator training, Chapter President 2014) organization study, operations and maintenance (O&M) manual update, health and safety Association of Water Agencies training, regulatory and permitting support, brine optimization, and automated meter Ventura County(President 2013, reading (AMR) replacement project. Work also included start-up and refurbishment of the Board of Directors 2010-2016) City's offline brackish water desalination facility and evaluation of overall system operating scenarios to decrease costs and avoid charges from over-pumping groundwater allocations. Oxnard Water Business Plan I Oxnard, CA Technical Advisor for development of Agency road map for future use of recycled water assets. Includes interviews with City Council and staff, baseline development, and coordination with 11 regional agencies to develop potential use of 7,000 AFY of advanced treated recycled water. Recommendation based on financial impacts and alternatives analysis, provides projects for short term(5-10 years)and long term(10-20 years). knWATER WASTEWATER REUSE m HDPE Brine Pipeline,Water Replenishment District of Southern California I Pico Rivera, CA Principal-in-Charge for this project that included an approximately 2,000-foot, 16-inch-diameter, high-density polyethylene (HDPE) pipeline in the city of Pico Rivera. The pressurized pipeline conveyed brine from the Groundwater Reliability Improvement Project (GRIP) Advanced Water Treatment Facility (AWTF) to a 63-inch trunk sewer owned and operated by the Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County(IACSD).The work included both preliminary and final design. In addition,the preliminary design included evaluation of a turnout structure along a 66-inch reinforced-concrete pipe conveying tertiary effluent from the San Jose Creek Water Reclamation Plant.The objective of the turnout was to deliver influent water to the GRIP AWTF. Regional Desalter Feasibility,Water Replenishment District of Southern California I Lakewood, CA As Project Manager, evaluated previous documents and established criteria for identifying and screening potential options for a brackish water desalter(s), which could draw up to 20,000-acre feet per year(AFY) of groundwater from a plume of brackish water trapped in the West Basin. Efforts included project development and screening based on established criteria, site plan concepts to establish minimum land requirements,and Grant support. Electrodialysis Reversal(EDR)Replacement,Port Hueneme Water Agency I Port Hueneme, CA Project Engineer for a facility modification at the Brackish Water Reclamation Demonstration Facility operated by the Port Hueneme Water Agency.The scope included demolishing an existing EDR potable-water treatment system and designing a replacement 1 mgd nanofiltration system. The scope also included expansion of the existing bag-filter pretreatment system, improving the existing antiscalant chemical system,and replacing the existing raw water bypass pressure-regulating valve with an energy recovery turbine. BWRDF Facility Master Plan, Port Hueneme, Port Hueneme Water Agency I Port Hueneme, CA Project Manager for facility-wide condition assessment and CIP development for 3 MGD brackish groundwater water facility(BWRDF). The condition assessment included structural,electrical,operations,and process components. Effort included development of a five- year CIP, project descriptions, and cost estimates for $2.7M in rehabilitation and improvement projects. Developed a model to evaluate water supply impacts and associated costs related to changing groundwater allocations, operating scenarios,water quality targets,and cost of new water. Included coordination with various agencies and identification of potential partnerships. Prepared and presented results of the process and results to the PHWA Board of Directors. Groundwater Treatment Evaluations - Lynwood Well and Maywood Well, Water Replenishment District of Southern California Lakewood, CA Project Manager in charge of feasibility evaluations for groundwater treatment at three separate well sites, covering two services areas-the cities of Lynwood and Maywood-and various contaminants, including iron, manganese,tetrachloroethylene(PCE),and trichloroethylene(TCE). The evaluations included reviewing well data, providing a comparative analysis of well treatment options, conducting a life-cycle cost analysis of options,and providing recommendations for well treatment,The final report included a detailed cost estimate,schedule,and conceptual site plan.Treatments evaluated included the following:Greensand Plus, Layne-Ox, DMIGS water filtration technology, reverse osmosis (RO)for iron and manganese,granular activated carbon (GAC),air-stripping,and ultraviolet(Uv)oxidation for PCE. Granular Activated Carbon(GAC)Wellhead Treatment,Water Replenishment District of Southern California I Lynwood, CA Project Manager for the preliminary and final design of two 20,000-pound skid-mounted GAC contactvessels,backwash system,piping modifications, new sewer lateral, and other on-site improvements.Treated tetrachloroethylene/trichloroethylene (PCE/TCE)for an existing 700 gpm well in the City of Lynwood.The construction cost was approximately$900k. Iron and Manganese Wellhead Treatment,Water Replenishment District of Southern California I Maywood, CA Project Manager for the preliminary and final design of a 900 gpm Greensand Plus horizontal vessel filter system, backwash system (tank, pump and controls), piping modifications, and other on-site improvements.Treated iron and manganese at an existing well in the City of Maywood(Maywood Mutual#2).The construction cost was approximately$1.7M. Brine Optimization, Port Hueneme Water Agency I Port Hueneme, CA Project Manager for the preliminary design to optimize water recovery for the Agency's brackish water reclamation demonstration facility (BWRDF). The study included water quality and performance evaluations of the existing three 1 mgd membrane skids - 2 nanofiltration (NO)/1 reverse osmosis (RO)-and development of a brine optimization design.The design included two options for miWATER WASTEWATER - REUSE m inclusion of a third-stage skid to increase recovery to 90 percent from the current 80 percent. The evaluation included preliminary design drawings and an economic assessment. Environmental Review,Sativa Las Angeles County Water District I Los Angeles County, CA Project Manager for development of Initial Study-Mitigated Negative Declaration and supporting studies to assess the construction of a new iron and manganese oxidation-filtration treatment system at the District's Well No.5. Recycled-Water PS-1 Upgrades,Burbank Water and Power I Burbank, CA Project Manager on this project which included expansion of an existing recycled-water pump station at the Burbank Water Reclamation Plant,operated by Burbank Water and Power. Provided design support services for the development of the Preliminary Design Report, including evaluation of existing and future recycled-water demand, pump expansion phasing, facility piping, distribution system hydraulics,and analysis of pump configuration alternatives. 36-Inch Steel Pipeline and 5 MG Reservoir,Las Virgenes Municipal Water District(LVMWD) I Westlake Village, CA As Project Manager,prepared plan and profile drawings for 2,200 feet of 30-inch and 36-inch potable-water steel pipeline design for the LVMWD 5 MG potable water reservoir.Completed designs for open-cut installation using blasting and aboveground installation in 42-inch casing on pipe supports across the existing dam. Designs also included 8-inch, 16-inch, and 24-inch steel pipeline designs for overflow, drain line, and other potable-water improvements as part of the project. The project required coordination with the California Department of Water Resources, Division of Safety of Dams and the California Department of Public Health. Conducted extensive public outreach efforts, including a full-day open house with design experts,client staff,and workshop materials. Potable Water Pipeline Project,Ventura County Waterworks District I Somis, CA Principal-in-Charge overseeing the preparation of 4 miles of 12-inch pipeline design in the congested Los Angeles Avenue(State Route 118)and Somis Road(State Route 34)area.The project included extensive utility mapping in the state highway corridor and direct up- front coordination with the Calleguas Municipal Water District. Work involved investigating alternative pipe installation methods including open-cut, pipe-bursting, horizontal directional drill, replacement on existing alignment(using highline),jack-and-bore,and microtunneling methods. Saticoy Conditioning Facility Renovation I Ventura, CA Project Manager designed two chemical systems, sodium hydroxide and polyphosphate, as part of this water treatment facility upgrade.Additional responsibilities included various civil-related site improvements. Fluoride/Orthophosphate Building I Oxnard, CA Project Engineer in charge of coordinating the various disciplines and subcontractors throughout the design of this two-story chemical building/office space. Additionally designed all civil aspects and two chemical systems: fluorosilicic acid and zinc orthophosphate. Attended meetings with the City to evaluate and discuss design alternatives and make certain all needs were met throughout the design process. Blending Station No.5 1 Oxnard, CA Project Manager providing construction project management using Primavera Expedition software. Responsibilities included construction management services and coordination,including submittal review and responses to requests for information(RFI). Blending Station No. 1 Desalter Project I Oxnard, CA As Project Manager, provided construction project management using Primavera Expedition software for this $25 million brackish water desalter. Responsibilities involved all aspects of construction management services and coordination, including preparation of clarifications, requests for quote (RFQ), submittal review, requests for information (RFI) responses, and on-site construction monitoring and inspection.Additional duties included design of a chemical system upgrade at the City's chloramination building.This project is a component of the Groundwater Recovery Enhancement and Treatment (GREAT) Program. Managed the process for achieving Gold-level LEED certification for the facility. Reverse-Osmosis(RO)Optimization I Oxnard, CA Project Manager for an optimization evaluation of an existing 7.5 mgd RO brackish groundwater system at the City of Oxnard Blending Station No. 1. The evaluation included technical feasibility, economic assessment, and a piloting plan and implementation schedule for increasing existing 80 percent recovery to 85 percent-90 percent recovery. Sodium Bisulfite Tank Replacement,Central Coast Water Authority(CCWA) I Santa Ynez, CA knWATER WASTEWATER REUSE m Project Engineer for a facility modification at the Santa Ynez Pumping Facility owned by the CCWA.The scope included review of the existing horizontal storage tanks,development of replacement options,and design of the recommended alternative. Analysis of On-site Treatment,Jones Ranch I Oxnard, CA As Project Manager, analyzed independent water and wastewater on-site treatment options for the 165-acre Jones Ranch Development in north Oxnard.The scope included analysis of reverse osmosis(RO)technology to provide a drinking water supply of equivalent quality to that of the City of Oxnard Groundwater Recovery Enhancement and Treatment (GREAT) Program, a packaged on-site wastewater treatment facility with advanced tertiary treatment capable of meeting effluent quality equivalent to the future advanced water purification facility (AWPF) project, and a recycled-water pumping system to deliver the treated water throughout the development area and also to the northern reach of the City's recycled-water backbone system. Blending Station No.6 1 Oxnard, CA As Project Manager,oversaw the design of the City's newest blending facility, based on a concept to blend permeate from the City's nearby Groundwater Recovery Enhancement and Treatment (GREAT) Program Desalter with local groundwater to develop an imported water quality that can be pressurized and delivered into the imported water supply pipeline. The scope of work included design of booster pumps, development of the facility control strategy, modification to the existing chloramination systems, and integration with the City's GREAT Program Desalter. Preliminary Design for Desalter Facilities at Blending Station No.3 1 Oxnard, CA Project Manager for the development of 30 percent design drawings,design criteria,and an opinion of probable cost for constructing a new brackish water reverse-osmosis desalting facility at the existing Blending Station No.3 site.In charge of chemical system design, which includes sodium hydroxide, antiscalant, clean-in-place (CIP) tanks and pumps, fluorosilicic acid, and zinc orthophosphate;the design also included expanding the existing sodium hypochlorite and ammonia systems. Energy Solar Project Technical Support, Las Virgenes Municipal Water District I Las Virgenes, CA Project Manager providing technical support to District-related to 1 MW solar project being installed as Power Purchase Agreement. Technical support included submittal reviews, utility coordination, and on-site observations. Todd Road Solar Panel Feasibility Analysis,Ventura County Public Works Agency I Ventura, CA Project Manager for a general economic feasibility analysis of various solar panel facilities, approximately 1 MW in size, at the Todd Road Jail in Santa Paula.The analysis included site visits,review of existing planning documents,and development of alternatives using different panel technologies, locations, and configurations. Developed an economic model to compare alternatives and select the preferred alternative. Developed a Preliminary Design Report for the preferred alternative, including 30 percent design documents, cost estimates,and construction schedule. Cogeneration System and Solar Thermal Domestic Hot-Water Heating System Evaluation, Ventura County Public Works Agency Ventura, CA Project Manager for the evaluation to determine the economic and technical feasibility of constructing both a cogeneration system and a solar thermal domestic hot-water heating system at the Todd Road Jail facility in Santa Paula. Todd Road Jail 1 MW Photovoltaic(PV)System Design-Build,Ventura County Public Works Agency ( Ventura, CA Project Manager on this design-build project, in which AECOM functioned as the owner's representative,facilitated the design-build project development and procurement,and assisted in procuring a$1.25 million Grant from Southern California Edison.The estimated $5.2 million 1 MW PV system consists of fixed tilt modules and canopy-mounted modules over an existing parking lot.The installation also included coordination with a new building(design-bid-build),replacing portions of the existing security system,setting up capacity for future vehicle charging,and expanding the staff parking area. Moorpark Wastewater Treatment Plant(WWTP) 1 MW Photovoltaic(PV)System Design-Build,Ventura County Waterworks District No. 1 1 Moorpark, CA Project Manager for this design-build project, in which AECOM functioned as the owner's representative,facilitated the design-build project development and procurement, and assisted in procuring a $1.5 million grant from Southern California Edison. The project WATER WASTEWATER REUSE completed as part of the design-build was a $5.5 million 1 MW single-axis tracker PV system. The project was completed on an accelerated schedule and was partially funded by Southern California Edison's California Solar Initiative. Energy-Efficiency Study, Port Hueneme Water Agency(PHWA) I Oxnard, CA Project Manager for development of an energy-efficiency study focusing on the PHWA's brackish water reclamation demonstration facility (BWRDF). The study included an evaluation of several energy-recovery technologies (i.e., interstage turbocharger, isobaric pressure exchanger),existing booster pump efficiency,and solar panels.The evaluation included two workshops,a site visit,economic evaluation of each alternative,and recommendations. Wastewater Treatment Hill Canyon Treatment Plant Master Plan I Thousand Oaks, CA Project Manager for master plan of 9 MGD wastewater treatment plant. The plan includes three major components: process evaluation,energy evaluation,and water resource assessment.Effort includes a condition assessment,biological modeling,evaluation of FOG and Food Waste, biosolids drying alternatives,and advanced treatment for using plant effluent. Groundwater Reliability Improvement Project (GRIP), Program Owner's Engineer, Water Replenishment District of Southern California I Lakewood, CA Served as Deputy Project Manager for Program Management,Procurement,and Offsite Improvements.The overall program consisted of a$100 million advanced water purification facility(AWPF)located in Pico Rivera.The treatment train consists of a 10 mgd capacity microfiltration,reverse osmosis,and ultraviolet disinfection.Work included development of the procurement process and documents, including Request for Information(RFI),Request for Qualifications(RFQ),and Request for Proposals(RFP).The program management role included development of a document control system, master project schedule, task coordination, monthly reporting, and cost control. Dewatering Screw Press I Thousand Oaks, CA Project Manager for a screw press dewatering system to replace an existing belt press at the 9 mgd Hill Canyon Treatment Plant.The project included dewatering technology analysis, evaluation of struvite/filtrate impacts, ancillary systems, a preliminary technical memorandum,and detailed design. Dewatering Screw Press I Simi Valley, CA Project Manager for a screw press dewatering system to replace an existing belt press at the 9.5 mgd Simi Valley Water Quality Control Plant. The project included dewatering technology analysis (5 screw press manufacturers surveyed), evaluation of ancillary system improvements,and a preliminary technical memorandum. Coating Specification I Thousand Oaks, CA As Principal-in-Charge, provided technical peer review of City-provided coating specifications for use at the Hill Canyon Treatment Plant. Digester Improvements I Simi Valley, CA Task Lead for the Preliminary Design Report that included evaluation of alternatives for replacement of an existing digester mixing system,involving draft tube, linear motion, large bubble gas,and external pump.The evaluation also included review of primary feed and digested sludge transfer piping and sludge heating system alternatives. Served as Task Lead for cost estimate, construction sequencing,and piping. Dewatering Screw Press, Camrosa Water District I Camarillo, CA Project Manager overseeing development of a preliminary design report for a Class A screw press facility and associated equipment. The project included process modeling of the existing 2.25 mgd oxidation ditch water reclamation facility,evaluation of Class A filtrate impacts, and preliminary design of ancillary equipment such as a polymer system, open-air canopy, truck-loading area, conveyor system,and emergency storage capability. Centrate Treatment Evaluation I Thousand Oaks, CA Project Manager for development of a fatal-flaw-level analysis of using various technologies to increase the energy efficiency of the current centrate treatment(Basin 6),and to further reduce the ammonium loading to the main plant secondary process at the City of WATER WASTEWATER REUSE MIM Thousand Oaks' Hill Canyon Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP). Technologies included DEMON Sequencing Batch Reactor, Cleargreen Sequencing Batch Reactor,and a Moving Bed Biofifm Reactor.. Biodigester Feasibility Study,Ventura County Watershed Protection District I Ventura, CA As Project Manager,developed a report determining the feasibility of an anaerobic digester to convert local horse manure,food waste, and green waste into energy in the Ventura River Watershed area. Tasks included participation in multiple public workshops and development of the following four technical memorandums: (1)Feedstock Summary and Collection Methods,(2)Technology and site Analysis,(3)Conceptual Site Plan, Environmental/Permitting,and Delivery,and (4) Implementation and Business Plan. Electrical and Instrumentation Upgrades at Hill Canyon Treatment Plant I Thousand Oaks, CA Project Manager for the preliminary and final design of approximately$4 million in improvements at the Hill Canyon Treatment Plant. Upgrades included replacement of two motor control centers, FEB Pump Station replacements, new aqueous ammonia system, new fiber-optic network,and new supervisory control and data acquisition(SCADA)upgrades.The process included a 2-day workshop peer review, including specialized subconsultants and process/instrumentation and control(I&C)experts. Biosolids Drying Feasibility Study I Thousand Oaks, CA Project Manager for a feasibility study that included installing drying technology at the 9 mgd Thousand Oaks Hill Canyon Wastewater Treatment Plant. The project involved evaluation of available technologies, including direct, indirect, and combination dryers. The project also required evaluation of thickening and dewatering improvements, including bench-scale testing. A life-cycle cost analysis was provided for the recommended project. Force Main Rehabilitation,Channel Islands Beach Community Services District I Channel Islands Harbor, CA Project Manager providing construction management services related to cured-in-place lining for approximately 10,300 linear feet of 8-inch and 12-inch wastewater force main piping. Lift Station Condition Assessment,Channel Islands Beach Community Services District I Channel Islands Harbor, CA As Project Manager, evaluated seven existing raw wastewater lift stations in the District service area. Prepared a report with recommended improvements covering mechanical,structural,electrical,and instrumentation. Bioreactor Optimization I Thousand Oaks, CA Served as Project Manager for a preliminary design study of optimizing existing bioreactors at the 9 mgd Thousand Oaks Hill Canyon Wastewater Treatment Plant. The project included evaluation of blower replacement, instrumentation and control valve improvements, deammonification for filtrate treatment, hydraulic modeling of basins, computational fluid dynamic modeling, and process modeling. The preliminary design included a summary of improvements and life-cycle cost analysis for modifications to increase efficiency and performance of the City's bioreactor process train. Wastewater Operations Support I Oxnard, CA Served as Deputy Project Manager for operations support efforts at the City of Oxnard 25 mgd wastewater treatment plant. Major tasks include design of emergency plant projects, organization study, operations and maintenance (O&M) manual update, start-up and commissioning of the advanced water purification facility (AWPF) and recycled-water system, health and safety training, regulatory and permitting support, and staff augmentation. Start-up of the recycled-water system included retrofit coordination, design review,development of training and user manuals,regulatory coordination, and cross connection testing support. Recycled Water System Startup and Retrofit Support f Oxnard, CA Served as Task Leader for the start-up of the City's recycled-water backbone system and customer retrofits, as part of the larger Wastewater Operations Support Contract with the City of Oxnard. The task included retrofit of two 18-hole golf courses and cross- connection testing for the Riverpark development,which includes 33 separate recycled-water sites.Efforts included value engineering for existing retrofit designs, design of golf course retrofits, staff augmentation for cross-connection testing, coordination with DDW, development of user manuals and training program, hydraulic analysis, creation of start-up procedures for the advanced water purification facility(AWPF)finish water pumping station and backbone, and overall program management. Recycled-Water Retrofit I Simi Valley, CA Served as Project Manager for development of site-specific engineering reports for recycled-water customer retrofits in the City of Simi Valley. CIP Development,Las Virgenes Municipal Water District I Calabasas, CA miWATER WASTEWATER REUSE m Served as Project Manager for development of a 5-year capital improvement program for the District's Tapia Water Reclamation Facility and Rancho Composting Facility.Efforts included a workshop,data review,site visits,identification of 100+projects,screening, and cost estimating. Projects were focused on operations and maintenance (O&M), coating, and structures, intended to be covered by the District's annual maintenance budget. The projects were prioritized based on criteria and weighting established with the District. Wastewater Treatment Evaluation, Private Client I Beaumont, CA Served as Project Manager for wastewater treatment analysis for juice company in City of Beaumont. Efforts included analysis of treatment options, construction of treatment and operations costs,site investigations (including dye testing), and negotiations with City to define treatment levels, rate impacts, and schedule. Study identified $800,000 temporary system and $2M permanent treatment system. Hydraulic Modeling Water System Hydraulic Model, Channel Islands Beach Community Services District I Channel islands Harbor, CA Project Manager for a comprehensive study that included the following tasks: outline existing and future potable-water demands, identify and quantify reliable water sources,develop a steady-state hydraulic model,evaluate current and future distribution capacity, summarize required improvements,and estimate costs. Infrastructure Review(multiple),Channel Islands Beach Community Services District I Channel Islands Harbor, CA Project Manager for a water and sewer hydraulic modeling analysis of developments planned in District service area. [Fisherman's Wharf,Casa Sirena, Marina] Non-Potable Hydraulic Model,Camrosa Water District I Camarillo, CA As Project Manager, developed an extended-period simulation hydraulic model for the Camrosa Water District's non-potable water system.The Camrosa non-potable system includes several surface storage ponds, closed reservoirs, pump stations, and distribution piping to serve 350 customers throughout six pressure zones.The hydraulic model was developed using MWH H2onet. Ventura County Harbor Wastewater Modeling I Oxnard, CA As Project Manager, administered the development of a wastewater hydraulic model using SewerCAD. The project included development of land use duty factors, model development, flow monitoring, calibration, and analysis. The hydraulic system was integrated into the City of Oxnard's wastewater model. RiverparkWater System Evaluation i Oxnard, CA As the Riverpark Development completed partial build-out, it was observed that the potable water system was delivering relatively low-flow pressure, The City requested that our firm develop several model alternatives to increase water supply pressure and meet fire-flow requirements within the new development.Various designs were modeled using WaterCAD software,the alternatives were evaluated based on cost and overall system benefit,and a recommendation was provided. Wagon Wheel Development Infrastructure Review I Oxnard, CA Assessed the ability of the City's current and future water distribution system to handle the build-out of the proposed development by means of modeling within the WaterCAD software. Identified other proposed developments in the vicinity and designed a looped system, which could provide adequate potable-water pressure and fire-flow to the Wagon Wheel Development, and also prepared the City for other future developments. Ormond Beach Specific Plan Infrastructure Review I Oxnard, CA Evaluated the proposed development using WaterCAD software and determined pipeline improvements, provided recommended pipe sizes for piping within the development. Worked with the City to develop the most economic pipeline improvements by coordinating upgraded pipes with those already identified to be replaced by the City's Cast-Iron Replacement Program. Teal Club Development Infrastructure Review I Oxnard, CA Used WaterCAD software to determine whether the current and future potable-water systems could provide adequate potable-water pressure and fire-flow to this proposed development. Casden Development Infrastructure Review I Oxnard, CA kiWATER WASTEWATER - REUSE M Used WaterCAD software to determine whether the current and future potable-water systems could provide adequate potable-water pressure and fire-flow to this proposed development.The current and future wastewater system was evaluated based on the system's ability to handle the additional loads; pipeline improvements were identified. The feasibility of requiring a dual plumbed system capable of receiving recycled water from the future recycled-water system was also evaluated. Camino Real Business Park Development Infrastructure Review I Oxnard, CA Used WaterCAD software to determine whether the current and future potable-water systems could provide adequate potable-water pressure and fire-flow to this proposed development. A series of pipe improvements were identified along with a general recommendation of how the cost should be mitigated.The current and future wastewater system was evaluated based on the system's ability to handle the additional loads; pipelines that were pushed beyond capacity were identified and improvements were recommended.The feasibility of requiring a dual plumbed system capable of receiving recycled water from the future recycled-water system was also evaluated. Water System Design Reports, Las Virgenes Municipal Water District I Calabasas, CA As Project Manager, planned level infrastructure impacts studies related to water, wastewater,and recycled-water facilities.Studies included analysis of development, coordination with the District and developer,development of demands and generation, hydraulic modeling of impacts,and recommendations.Multiple documents have been prepared since 2012, including Sweetwater Mesa,Malibu Golf Course,and Triangle Ranch. Planning Recycled Water Master Plan I Oxnard, CA Project Manager for this project that consisted of developing a recycled-water system for the largest city in Ventura County. It also included preparing an implementation plan to serve as the 'road map' for the city, which addressed such institutional issues a: permitting; recycled-water ordinance and administrative code revisions; rates and financing; staffing needs and training; and public outreach strategies. Collaborated with City staff to develop phased expansions of the City's first recycled-water system, identified customers, analyzed storage and ASR opportunities,and created a steady-state and extended-period simulation hydraulic model for system sizing and evaluation. Water Master Plan Update I Oxnard, CA Project Manager for a plan to update an earlier plan and incorporate new Planning Department information on growth within the City, as well as new water-supply strategies. Completed various hydraulic modeling evaluations to determine necessary updates in both current and future conditions. Recycled-Water Facilities Plan I Oxnard, CA Project Manager for work including determination of potential recycled-water consumers, estimating demand, and creating several alternatives for routing the future recycled-water infrastructure. Maywood Consolidation Study,Water Replenishment District of Southern California I Lakewood, CA As Project Manager, prepared alternatives analysis comparing wellhead treatment project to consolidation for Maywood Mutual Water Company No.2,located in the City of Maywood.The consolidation analysis included development of screening criteria and life- cycle cost analysis of shortlisted agencies. Force Main Rehabilitation Constructability Review, Channel Islands Beach Community Services District I Oxnard, CA Project Manager for a constructability review of 90 percent design documents related to a sewer rehabilitation project.Improvements included cured-in-place pipeline(CIPP) lining for approximately 2 miles of 8-inch to 12-inch force main.The review included technical evaluation of design drawings and specifications and development of a summary table of comments. Freeman Diversion Dam Hardened Fish Passage Ramp, United Water Conservation District I Santa Paula, CA Project Manager for development of a physical model for a proposed fish ladder located adjacent to the existing Freeman Diversion. The scope of work included facilitating stakeholder workshops with team members, client, and regulatory agencies. Tasks included criteria development, alternative analysis,numerical modeling,and construction of a physical model. Hope Reservoir Feasibility Study, Las Virgenes Municipal Water District I Calabasas, CA knWATER WASTEVv AT ER REUSE m Project Manager for development of a feasibility analysis evaluating a proposed 3,000 acre-foot recycled-water reservoir in the city of Calabasas.The investigation included evaluation of access road alignments,dam types,geotechnical issues, necessary recycled-water infrastructure,operation, mixing, and sizing.An economic analysis was provided for the preferred alternative. Calabasas Tank Feasibility Study, Las Virgenes Municipal Water District I Calabasas, CA Project Manager for the investigation of removing the 8 M gallon Calabasas Tank Potahle Reservoir for service to allow for rehabilitation. The investigation included hydraulic modeling, review of temporary storage, development of preliminary shutdown procedures, and overview of challenges and mitigations. Las Virgenes Reservoir Access Road and Pipeline Feasibility Study, Las Virgenes Municipal Water District I Las Virgenes, CA Project Manager for a fatal-flaw analysis of an alternative access road and pipeline options from Triunfo Canyon Road to Las Virgenes Reservoir. The evaluation included development of a conceptual-level plan and profile drawings, hydraulic schematics, constructability,and opinion of probable construction cost. Wastewater Rate Study, Channel Islands Beach Community Services District I Channel Islands Harbor, CA Project Manager for development of an update to the District's wastewater service rate and connection fees. The effort included support in negotiating a revised service contract with the City of Oxnard.This effort, identified by the team during development of the study,is expected to result in significant savings to the District. Water Supply Assessment and Verification I Oxnard, CA Project Manager for development of various water supply assessment and verification reports for specific developments within the City of Oxnard, including Sakioka Farms, Ormond Beach, Channel Islands Harbor, and Jones Ranch. The reports were developed to meet the requirements of SB 610 and SB 221. In addition, an independent comprehensive update was developed in support of the City's General Plan Update. GRIP Program,Water Replenishment District of Southern California I Lakewood, CA Project Manager for an Alternatives Analysis and Preliminary Design of 5-mile, 42-inch recycled-water conveyance pipeline. The project includes an economic analysis comparing two alternative alignments, 30 percent design drawings, and Preliminary Design Report. The investigation addresses multiple trenchless crossing, utility coordination, hydraulics, traffic impacts, corrosion, residential/commercial impacts, geotechnical issues, and constructability. The estimated construction cost of the pipeline is $30 million. Storage Analysis I Lynwood, CA Served as Project Manager for evaluation of storage requirements for the City of Lynwood.Based on findings,evaluated the proficiency and condition of the existing storage and provided alternatives for replacing the existing concrete-buried storage. Options included a buried 2 Mgal prestressed-concrete tank and refurbishing the existing 3 Mgal storage tank. The final recommendations included a detailed plan for the next phase of analysis. RFP Development for W/WW Rate Study,Channel Islands Beach Community Services District I Channel Islands Harbor, CA Project Manager, developed procurement documents for a water and wastewater study for the District. The effort included identification, collection, and review of critical data for inclusion in the procurement document. Assisted with identification of consultants and distribution of the Request for Proposal(RFP). Procurement Support for AMI System,Channel Islands Beach Community Services District I Channel Islands Harbor, CA As Project Manager, assisted District with selection of cellular based advanced meter replacements, negotiated pricing and prepared procurement documents for public bid installation. Project included purchase and installation of approximately 1,900 ultrasonic meters and end points,with a total cost of approximately$800,000($650k materials and$150k labor). Hydraulics Analysis,Water Replenishment District of Southern California(WRD) I Long Beach, CA Served as the Task Lead for review of water supply conditions at the Long Beach Water Reclamation Plant, awned and operated by Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts.The evaluation included review of supply and operational data, existing agreements and on- site investigations in support of developing alternatives for increasing supply of tertiary supply to the adjacent advanced water purification facility, awned by WRD and operated by Long Beach Water Department (LEWD). Conducted additional analysis of recommended projects including a site assessment,sizing and cost estimate for an injection well, and a condition assessment for the El Dorado Backup Pump Station and the South Lake Pump Station, both owned by LBWD. knWATER WASTEWATER REUSE m Water Supply Analysis, Channel Islands Beach Community Services District(CIBCSD) I Oxnard, CA Project Manager serving as the District Engineer for CIBCSD.Developed 30 water supply alternatives incoordination with District staff. Conducted a board workshop using interactive audience response system (iClicker) to conduct a survey of current priorities and concerns and establish District goals. Assisted the District in initial screening and shortlisting of preferred concepts, including DPR, seawater desalination, and optimization of existing brackish water desalination systems. Recycled Water Alternatives Study, United Water Conservation District I Ventura County, CA As Project Manager, prepared an alternatives study of three options for delivering recycled water from the City of Oxnard to the District's spreading grounds and agricultural customers. The alternatives consisted of pipelines ranging in size from 16 inches to 24 inches for a range of miles to 6 miles,and an annual delivery of approximately 4,000 AFY.Analysis included hydraulic modeling,cost estimates,implementation schedules,operational integration,permitting,utility investigations,coordination with the City of Oxnard's Master Plan,and development of a business plan comparing alternatives against Master Plan alternatives. Water Supply Assessment and Council Facilitation I Port Hueneme, CA As Project Manager,prepared a Council presentation of the City water supply,water quality,cost of water,and contractual constraints. Conducted a Council workshop using an interactive audience response system (iClicker)to conduct a survey of current priorities and concerns and establish City goals.The survey data was analyzed,supply options prioritized,and the results presented to City Council, RFP Development for new Administration Building,Channel Islands Beach Community Services District I Channel Islands Harbor, CA As Project Manager, developed procurement documents for architectural services in support of a new headquarters building. The estimated cost for the new facility and associated site improvements is$1.35M. Regional Wastewater Conveyance and Treatment Agreement Negotiation I Channel Islands Harbor, CA Conducted analysis of existing wastewater service agreements between Channel Islands Beach Community Services District(CIBCSD) and City of Oxnard.Effort included evaluation of multiple service agreements dating back to 1966,development of scenarios for a new cost and service structure between the agencies,and preparation of schematics and figures illustrating the complex integration of the two systems within the Channel Island Harbor and surrounding areas. Well Failure Analysis,Pleasant Valley County Water District I Ventura County, CA Project Manager for well failure analysis included review of well performance and construction documents.Analysis identified mode of failure was due to well misalignment. Prepared report identifying options for replacement which included use of a smaller vertical turbine pump or submersible pump. Sewer Rehabilitation CIP Development,Channel Islands Beach Community Services District I Channel Islands Harbor, CA Project Manager for development of rehabilitation plan based on review of CCTV and inspection results. Prepared 5-Year CIP based on identification and grouping of priority rehabilitation projects,and conceptual cost estimates. Projects include both cured-in-place liners,spot repair projects,and manhole rehabilitation. Estimated construction is$750,000. RESUME OF JEFF R. THOMPSON January 2020 Key Skills • Team Management implementing infrastructure and building programs/projects totaling more than $2B for Rancho Mission Viejo,Walt Disney Company, and City of LA. • Leadership/Mentorship as Executive Director for private water board(2014-20); Adjunct Prof. for Cal Poly Pomona University(2018-20); and guest speaker for tech-workshops (2014-19) • Public Agency Management as city engineer for Los Alamitos,Villa Park, and Mission Viejo; Chief Engineer for Garden Grove Sanitary District; Prop. K Program Manager for City of LA. • Civic Leadership/Outreach as City of Tustin planning commissioner; OCTA Citizens Advisory &Environmental Committee member; ULI Council Member; former board member of LA Skid Row Central City Community Outreach and MESA/MEP for CSULB. Education HARVARD UNIVERSITY, BOSTON,MA 2016- 2019 Program for Leadership Development Alumni graduate; electives in Real Estate Management and Negotiation/Strategic Decision Making UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES, CA 2011 -2013 Master of Business Administration; Awarded Beta Gamma Sigma Honor Society CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, LONG BEACH, CA 1981 - 1989 Master of Science in Civil Engineering; Outstanding Achievement Award for thesis Bachelor's in civil engineering; Summa Cum Laude Experience Senior Vice President Development Engineering 2005-Present RANCHO MISSION VIEJO,LLC,SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CA Ranch Plan implementation for the historic lands of Rancho Mission Viejo-comprising 6 communities for 14,000 dwelling units and 5.2 million square feet of commercial uses. Responsible for: • Comprehensive planning and design for infrastructure of water, sewage,roadway, state highway, and power, including developing cooperative agreements with and funding from public agencies. • Community planning and development for commercial,office, and residential land uses. • Implementation of infrastructure resulting in construction of over 15 miles of roadway,bridges, pipelines, and utilities integrated within and to serve community development. • Obtaining over$150M of federal, state, and county grant funding for over$300M in projects. • Executive Director for Mutual Water Company; formation administration with a team of legal and technical experts; managing riparian water and infrastructure for domestic and irrigation uses. Program/Project Manger 2003-2005 WALT DISNEY CO.-DISNEYLAND RESORT,ANAHEIM,CA • 50`h Anniversary celebration—managed renovation for facilities within the Disneyland Resort such as Walt Disney's historic apartment,the railroad system, city hall, and security check. • Facilitated planning and logistics for daily attendance of up to 100K guests and 20K vehicles under Resort Guest Services,fleet management, and guest relations with special initiatives. ProgramlProject Manager 2002-2003 CITY OF LOS ANGELES &UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA,IRVINE,CA • City of LA$1.4B Prop.K management(via Harris&Associates)reporting to City Engineer for rehab and construction of over 60 community recreation facilities. Developed scheduling and Resume of Jc ff R. Thompson Page 2 reporting system for city financial and document control system. • UCI Medical Center$393M(Phase 1)facility expansion and replacement of university hospital and trauma center including planning,design,HMA, and construction for service utilities, central energy plant,traffic circulation,real estate acquisition,central park, and ER modifications. Senior Project Manager 1997-2002 WALT DISNEY CO.-WALT DISNEY MAGINEERING,ANAHEIM,CA Infrastructure implementation for$1.4B Disneyland Resort expansion, including: • Design and construction management for Downtown Disney retail spaces,utilities(SCE, City, PacBell, Gas Co., Navy Jet Fuel Line, etc.),Disneyland Drive&Disney Way roadways/bridges, 1-5 connections, over 60 property acquisitions, landscape, security systems, Back-of-House building relocations; leveraged over$100M public bond financing for$150M of improvements. • Supported 10,000 parking space expansion of Resort parking lots. • Collaborated with City of Anaheim for permit approvals,inspection, and acceptance. Project Manager/Deputy City Engineer/Engineering Services Manager 1995-1997 CH2M HILL,SANTA ANA, CA Contract project manager for Walt Disney Imagineering and City Engineer for the City of Los Alamitos; Engineering Services Manager for 24 miles of design/build with Silverado Constructors for the Eastem Transportation Corridor Agency SR-241 toll road, responsible for permitting with local public agencies. Design Engineer through Senior Vice President/Consulting City Engineer 1985-1995 BERRYMAN &HENIGAR,INC.,Santa Ana,CA Various responsibilities included plan check review or project management for public agency improvement projects for streets, highways,water, sewer, and drainage improvements. Administered master plans of drainage for agencies throughout California. Contracted as Chief Engineer for Garden Grove Sanitary District and City Engineer for Los Alamitos, Mission Viejo, and Villa Park. Managed Civil Engineering and Field Survey Services; Orange/LA County office manager with over 100 staff. Professional Registrations — Civil Engineer: CA,AZ, and WA; Land Surveyor: CA;Emergency Management Agency Safety Assessment Program(for Disaster Response)CA Commu ity & Civic Activities 2016 -2020 OCTA Environ. Cleanup Alloc. Com 2015 -2020 1 U LI National Comm. &Retail Council 2007-2019 Tustin Planning Commission 2005 —2020 OCTA Citizens Advis. Committee 2002—2009 Board Member of Central City Outreach 2002—2005 Church High School counselor 1999—2004 Student Prog's Kine-Drew Med. Univ. 1998—2005 Asst. Coach for baseball& softball 1995 —2001 Church Married Couples Leader 1993 - 1999 CSULB MEP student programs 1989. - 1997 Tustin Historic Resources Comm. Awards 2019 ASCE So Cal Transp. Pro'. of the Year 2016 &2011 ASCE Pro'. Achiev. &ACEC Excellence 2015 &2011 OCBC Partnership Award 2012 ASCE OC Land Dev. Engineer of the Year 2000 Outstanding Renovation for 1878 home 2000 OCEC Proj.Achiev. &ASCE Proj. of the Year Resjef200114 Tustin AUSTIN J. LUMBARD 2092EXPERIENCE Fluor Corporation Aliso lTiejo,CA Project Manager/Prime Contract Manager Apr 2w.6—pi!esem Leading negotiation and administration of prime contract terms and providing oversight for a program of nuclear projects. Responsibilities include negotiating and drafting terms and conditions, drafting contract summaries, administering project contractual obligations,mitigating project risk exposure,optimizing cost and schedule savings,implementing change management processes,and negotiating subcontracts. Previously responsible for executing multiple small to mid-cap refinery projects and for developing capital efficient strategies to leverage Fluor Technologies into long term engineering,procurement,fabrication,and construction relationships. Nein&Wilson Newport Beach,CA Litigation Associate Apr 2015--Apr 2016 Represented entities and organizations in complex business Iitigation,real estate,contract and professional negligence matters. Frequently appeared before courts throughout southern California and conducted and defended depositions. As a seasoned negotiator,led clients through complex discovery processes and advised on multi-million dollar settlement agreements. Fluor Corporation Aliso Viejo, CA Prime Contract Manager Aug 2014--Apr 2015 Managed the negotiation of a $1-2 billion engineering,procurement,and construction contract. This included drafting contract language,analyzing risk profiles,and face to face negotiation. Acted as the coordinating interface between in-house counsel,local state counsel,client outside counsel,and the project execution teams. i Sales Coordinator Mar 2013-Aug 2014 Coordinated pursuit of complex oil and gas engineering,procurement,and construction opportunities, Worked closely with in-house counsel to draft contract language and mitigate risk. Analyzed strategic opportunities, clients,and markets to maximize market visibility and profit. Managed technical and commercial proposals. Contracts Specialist Sept 2011-Mar 2013 Negotiated and administered engineering,procurement,and construction sub-contracts,including license agreements with domestic and international technology providers. This experience included leading procurement of over$400 million of photovoltaic modules while navigating Chinese price dumping tariff impositions. i United States Army Judge Advocate's General Corps Monterey,CA 1 Legal Intern Jun-Aug two Counseled military personnel in legal matters such as civil law,estate planning,landlord/tenant law,tax, bankruptcy,immigration and naturalization law,and military administrative law. Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office Los Angeles,CA Law Clerk-Preliminary Hearings Unit July-Jul 2011 Law Clerk-Major Narcotics Division May-Aug 2009 Assisted prosecution of high profile felony drug charges including interfacing with law enforcement(investigators and undercover officers),reviewing case files, and drafting Fourth Amendment briefs. Special assignments included authoring a marijuana prosecution manual in the context of changing state medical and dispensary laws. AUSTIN J. LUMBARD auslinjlunibard@gtnail.coni linkedin.com/in/austinlumbard (949)584-2092 OTHER EXPERIENCE City of Tustin Tustin,CA City Council Member Dec-2018-present Elected official responsible for setting city policy and strategy including development of Marine Corps Air Station at Tustin,managing$too million annual budget,and serving on regional boards including the Orange County Airport Land Use Commission,the Santa Ana River Mood Protection Agency. Planning Commissioner Mar 2015-DCC 2018 Appointed city official advising on capital improvement projects,permit applications,design guidelines,land use, zoning,and planning. Project highlights include development of the Marine Corps Air Station at Tustin- f approximately 1600 acres of government owned property planned for public and private development, I Orange County Transportation Authority—Citizens Advisory Committee Orange County,CA Committee Member 2017-2019 Appointed to committee responsible for identifying opportunities for community input,serving as liaisons between the public and OCTA,and participating in roundtable discussions. Advising on a broad spectrum of transportation projects,studies and outreach activities. i Orange County Sheriffs Department Orange County,CA. Reserue Deputy 2012-2015 Served as a uniformed peace officer in support of full time department operations,Duties included interviewing and screening department applicants,patrolling major events,search and rescue efforts, and as-needed support. Orange County Board of Supervisors Santa Ana,CA Legislative Aide May-Aug Zoog Served as a legislative analyst and constituent coordinator for Supervisor Patricia C.Bates. Drafted memoranda regarding county policy and administrative procedures and interfaced with senior staff on various matters. Fluor Corporation Aliso Viejo, CA Procurement Specialist ,Tan 2007-Aug 2008 Managed sourcing of project material and equipment from inquiry to field delivery. Negotiated supplier contract terms for high value critical path equipment and materials, EDUCATION Indiana University Maurer School of Law Bloomington,IN Doctor of Jurisprudence Other: Executive Editor-Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies;Trial Competition Champion;National Trial Competition Team; Moot Court Written and Oral Honors; Spring 2oio London Law Consortium I t i California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo,CA Bachelor of Science,Business Administration Other: Financial Management Concentration;Minor in Economics;Minor in Political Science; and President- Lambda Chi Alpha AUSTIN J. LUMBARD austinjlurnbard @ gmail,com liDkedin.com/in/austinlumbard (949)584-2092 LICESNSES & CERTIFICATIONS • Admitted to State Bar of California (2o11) • Admitted to U.S,District Court Central District of California(2015) • Graduate Orange County Bar Association College of Trial Advocacy(2015) • California state Peace Officer Standards and Training certification(2012) I i i i I I i i I i I I i I 1 t 1,I MINUTES REGULAR MEETING TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION i OCTOBER 23, 2018 l� I 7.00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER Given INVOCATIONIPLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Kozak All present ROLL CALL: Commissioners Kozak, Lumbard, Mason, Thompson None. PUBLIC CONCERNS: CONSENT CALENDAR: Approved the 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES— SEPTEMBER 25, 2018 September 25, 2098 Planning RECOMMENDATION: Commission meeting, as That the Planning Commission approve the Minutes of the September 25, 2018, amended. Planning Commission meeting as provided. Motion. It was moved by Mason seconded by Thompson to approve the Minutes of the September 25, 2018, as amended. Motion carried 4-0. PUBLIC HEARING: Adopted 2. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2017-04 & DESIGN REVIEW 2017-004 Resolution No. 4373. APPLICANT: Aric Gless Plump Group 814 E. Katella Avenue Orange, CA 92805 PROPERTY St. Cecilia Church OWNER: 13280 Chapman Avenue Garden Grove, CA 92840 i a LOCATION: 1301 Sycamore Avenue Tustin, CA 92780 j REQUEST: A request to construct a 9,936 square-foot two-story meeting room building, a 2,971 square-foot office building expansion, and 3,608 square feet,of office and assembly area improvements. 3 Minutes--Planning Commission October 23,2018—Page 1 of 4 ENVIRONMENTAL: This project is categorically exempt pursuant to Section 16332 (Class 32) of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA). i RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 4373 approving Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 2017-04 and Design Review (DR) 2017-004, authorizing the construction of a new 9,936 square-foot two-story meeting room building, a 2,971 square-foot office building expansion, and 3,608 square feet of office and assembly area tenant improvements at St. Cecilia Church at 1301 Sycamore Avenue. Reekstin Presentation given. Mason Mason had questions regarding the directional layout of the proposed building and screening from adjacent residences. She also asked for clarification about the existing foliage that provides screening of the building. Reekstin Reekstin further explained the building layout, via the aerial slide in the Power Point presentation.There is existing foliage at the rear of the residences and existing foliage on the church property, which would need to be removed. Thompson Pant of clarification with regards to the traffic study which actually uses the code requirements and mixes the various times when certain areas would be in use. '7.17 p.m. Opened the Public Comments Section. Aric Gless, applicant, thanked Planning staff with the thorough review of the project. Mason Mason asked the applicant about the plans for landscaping and what would be removed or replaced. She also asked if the surrounding neighbors were against or in support of the project. i Per Mr. Gless, most of the existing landscaped areas will be covered by the proposed building, except the portion along the street frontage will have some enhancements. The area to the north of the residences, the Orange County Fire Department has required the fire lane have turf block installed, in order to support the fire trucks, but also has greenery. Mr. Gless did reach out to two (2) neighbors and met with one of the neighbors to discuss the project. That neighbor was content with what was 3 discussed. Father Bao Tao spoke in favor of the project. He thanked the Planning Commission for their consideration and look forward to the project. Mr. William Prescott, resident of Old Town Tustin, spoke in favor of the project. Mr. Geo Flores, resident, voiced his concerns, which generally included: the height of the windows in the proposed project and people looking onto his property; the increase in noise with the construction; and the hours of construction being that he works at night and sleeps during the day. Minutes—Planning Commission October 23,2018--Page 2 of 4 i 7.•24 p.m. Closed the Public Comments Section. � umbard Lumbard asked staff to work with Mr. Flores's concerns. He mentioned the Tustin City Code as far as when construction can take place. Lumbard noted that the window height would alleviate the concern and the possibility,of people looking down onto Mr, Flores' property from the proposed, building. He also asked if the church would work with Mr. Flores as well in order to alleviate his concerns. Thompson Thompson asked staff about the City's Noise Ordinance with regards to the hours of construction allowed during the week and weekend. He suggested that the applicant coordinate construction schedules with the Mr. Flores. Reekstin Reekstin stated the construction hours allowed would be 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. and 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays, and no construction is allowed on Sundays, Mason Mason felt that as long as the construction follows the City's Noise Ordinance and the dialogue continues with the residents, that would help with cohcems mentioned. She suggested Bose earphones for the concerned resident to dance[ the noise during construction, 1 Kozak Kozak made favorable comments with regards to the project. Per the noise issue— he also echoed'the comments with regards to the church keeping an open dialogue with the neighboring residents. He also thanked Mr. Prescott for the history on St. Cecilia's church. umbard Lumbard also encouraged the church to work with the neighbors. He also made favorable comments regarding the church and the proposed project. Lumbard was in favor of the project. 1 Motion: It was moved by Lumbard, seconded by Thompson, to adopt Resolution No. 4378. Motion carried 4-0. 724 p.m, Closed the Public Hearing Item. None REGULAR BUSINESS STAFF CONCERNS: { Binsack Binsack reminded the Commission that the item is an appealable item to the City Council. She also reminded the Commission State of the City on October 24, 2018. l COMMISSION CONCERNS: I Mason Mason attended the Tustin Tiller Days Breakfast on October 6, 2018, She also Informed every one of the upcoming Tustin Boys & Girls Plub Gala on Sunday, October 28, 2018 from 4:00-9:00 p.m. in Newport Beach. r Minutes--Planning Commission October 23,2018—Page 3 of 4 Thompson Thompson returned from Harvard Business School in early October and attended the following events: • 10/16: OCTA Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) meeting • 10/23: Grand Opening of a 335th In N Out store in California Kozak Kozak thanked staff for their hard work and all that they dol He attended the following i events: I • 10/4: Tustin Tiller Days Reception • 1016: Tustin Tiller Days Breakfast & Parade * 10/15: Candidates Forum sponsored by the Tustin Chamber of Commerce • 10/16: OCTA CAC meeting « 10116: City Council meeting—the Red Hill Avenue Specific Plan was adopted. 10120: Old Town Tustin's Ark Walk Lumbard l_umbard attended the following: + 1014: Tiller Days Reception 1016: Tiller Days Breakfast Parade • 10/5; OCFA Open House • 10/10: National Walk to School Day * 10/15: Candidates Forum sponsored by the Tustin Chamber of Commerce • 10/16: OCTA CAC. meeting • 10/20: Old Town Tustin's Art Walk Upcoming events: 10/24: State of the City + 10/31: Happy Halloween Please remember to vote on November 6thl T:35 p.m. ADJOURNMENT: The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission is scheduled for Tuesday, j November 13, 2018,. at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chamber at 300 Centennial Way. i i TE OZAK Chair Pro Tem *I�BETH A. BINSACK Planning Commission Secretary , I i Minutes--Planning Commission October 23, 2018-Page 4 of 4 i MINUTES REGULAR MEETING TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 11, 2018 I 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 p.m. Given. INVOCATIONIPLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Thompson All present. ROLL_ CALL: Commissioners Kozak, Mason, Thompson None. PUBLIC CONCERNS i Approved the CONSENT CALENDAR: Consent Calendar. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES—OCTOBER 23, 2018 RECOMMENDATION: I That the Planning Commission approve the Minutes of the October 23, 2018 Planning Commission meeting as provided. 2. TUSTIN HISTORIC REGISTER NOMINATION — CALLAHAM HOUSE — 170 NORTH A STREET RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission approve the nomination of 170 North A Street to the City's Historic Register Plaque Program and select "Callaham House - 1923" as the most appropriate historical name and date of construction of the property. I Kozak Kozak made favorable comments to the property owners, who were sitting in the audience, The property owners thanked the City and Elaine Dove for their consideration. Motion: It was moved by Thompson seconded by Mason to approve the Consent Calendar. Motion carried 3-0. I PUBLIC HEARING: Item was 3. APPEAL OF PARK IN-LIEU FEE ASSESSMENT FOR 1381-1391 SAN withdrawn. JUAN STREET The project site was approved for five(5)condominium units and was subject I to payment of the park in-lieu fee on a per unit basis. The Parks& Recreation I Department has determined the amount of park in-lieu fees applicable to the ! project. The applicant/sub divider objected toy the determined fee and submitted an appeal request to the Planning Commission. Minutes—Planning Commission December 11,2018—Page 1 of 4 Bobak Bobak informed the Commission that the property owner and the City have reached an agreement on the amount of the park fees, pursuant to which the property owner has withdrawn the appeal. A withdrawal letter, dated Decembe 11, 201 B, was sent to City staff, which was received earlier today. I RECOMMENDATION: 3 That the Planning Commission uphold the Parks & Recreation Department's determination of the park fee in-lieu of dedication for the property at 1381- 1391 San Juan Street. REGULAR BUSINESS: j Adopted 4, MILLS ACT-- 124 NORTH B STREET Resolution No. 4374 The property at 124 North B Street is not currently listed in the City's official survey of historical resources. The property owner requested that the City add this property to the surrey to allow them to proceed with approval of a Mills Act commitment. APPLICANT/ Clay and Kristle Jorth PROPERTY 124 North B Street OWNER: Tustin, CA 92780 LOCATION: 124 North B Street ENVIRONMENTAL: This project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Sections 15301, 15308, and 15331 of the California. Environmental Quality Act. REQUEST: A request to add a property to the City of Tustin 2003 Historical Resources Survey by Addendum. Dove Presentation given. Mason Mason asked for the number of Mills Act homes in Tustin. Dove Dove stated there would now be twenty-two Mills Act homes in Tustin, which j includes the subject property. Thompson Thompson made favorable comments to the homes and the neighborhood on B Street, along with the subject property. He was in favor of the item. Mason Mason also made favorable comments regarding the development on B Street. She commended the property owners for applying for the Mills Act and thanked � City staff for their hard work on the project. Mason was also in favor of the item. Minutes--Planning Commission December 11,2018--Page 2 of 4 1 Kozak Kozak concurred with his fellow Commissioners concerning the favorable comments. Motion: It was moved by Mason, seconded by Thompson to adopt Resolution No. 4374. Motion carried 3-0. STAFF CONCERNS: Wifikom No concerns. Willkom wished everyone a happy holiday! COMMISSION CONCERNS: Mason Mason attended the following events. • 12!4118: City Council swearing in ceremony. Mason thanked former Mayor Murray and Mayor Pro Tem for their eight (8) years of service. She also congratulated the newly elected k Council Members — Mayor Chuck Puckett, Mayor Pro Tem Allan Bernstein, Council Members Austin Lumbard and Barry Cooper. Mason wished Austin Lumbard well on his new seat with the City Council. + 1216118: Special City Council meeting, Mason was pleased to hear there will be further discussion ori alternative homeless shelter locations would be considered. • 1218118: Habitat for Humanity Dedication Ceremony— Mason thanked the City for all of their hard work with the project. Happy holidays to City staff and a Happy New Year! Thompson Thompson attended the follovOn g events: a 10124118': ' State of the City E • 10131118: Orange County Business Council meeting • 1111118: Orange County Planning Forum • 1111118: Overview of Roberts Rules for Conducting Public Meetings 11113118: Key Note Speaker for the Society of Marketing E Professionals • 11/15/18: Mayor's Thanksgiving Breakfast • 11/28118: Real Estate Awards Luncheon • 11/30118: Vintage Neighborhood in Old Town Ribbon Cutting • 12/4/18: City Council Swearing-in Ceremony — Thompson echoed fellow Commissioners comments. • 12!7118: Tustin's Tree Lighting Ceremony, • 1218118: Habitat for Humanity Dedication Ceremony • 12/11118: OCTA Citizens Advisory Sub-Committee Meeting. E i Merry Christmas, Happy Hanukkah. Tustin Community Foundation -- "Adopt School Foundation" donating checks to two (2) of the five (5) Title I schools in Tustin. Minutes--Planning Commission December 11,2018—Page 3 of 4 Kozak Kozak attended the following events: 10124/18: Mayor Murray's State of the City * 1111/18: Orange County Planning Forum 1115!18: Public Workshop on the Proposed Temporary Homeles Shelter * 1116118: City Council Meeting 1117118: Overview of Roberts Rules for Conducting: Public Meetings « 1118118: Planning Focus Legislative Webinar * 11/12118: Veterans Fundraising Dinner at the Black Marlin • 11/15118: Mayor's Thanksgiving Breakfast 11130/18: Vintage Ribbon Cutting for Taylor Morrison Housing Project in Old Town * 12/2/18: Menorah lighting at the City Hall Courtyard 1 * 12/4/18: City Council Swearing-in Ceremony - Kozak also echoed his fellow Commissioners comments. * 1216/18: City Council Special Meeting to Discuss Alternative Sites for the Homeless Shelter Kozak, thanked City staff for their continued hard work for the City! Merry Christmas! Happy Hanukkah! Happy Holidays! Happy New Year! See you in 2019! 7,27 p,ni ADJOURNMENT: The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission is scheduled fo Tuesday, January 8, 2019, at 7:08 p.m. in the City Council Chamber at 30 Centennial Way. TE KOZAK Chairperson Pro Tem ZI ELIZABETH A. BINSACK Planning. Commission Secretary i i i Minutes-Planning Commission december 11, 2018-Page 4 of 4 MINUTES REGULAR MEETING TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 12, 2019 7.00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER i Given INVOCATION/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mason SLATING OF COMMISSIONERS GALLAGHER AND JHA Mayor Puckett The Mayor swore in Gallagher and Jha, i PLANNING COMMISSION REORGANIZATION i As a matter of standard procedure, the Planning Commission reorganizes once per year by appointing a new Chairperson and Chairperson Pro Tem, RECOMMENDATION: i That the Planning Commission elect a Chairperson and Chairperson Pro Tem pursuant to standard procedures. Motion: Thompson moved to nominate Kozak as Chairperson, seconded by Mason. Motion carried 5-0. Kozak moved to nominate Thompson as Chairperson Pro Tem, seconded by Mason. Motion carried 5-0. All present. ROLL CALL: Commissioners Gallagher, Jha, Kozak, Mason, Thompson None, PUBLIC CONCERNS: CONSENT CALENDAR: Approved the 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES— DECEMBER 11, 2018 3 December 11, 2018 Meeting RECOMMENDATION: i Minutes. That the Planning Commission approve the Minutes of the December 11, 2018, Planning Commission meeting as provided. Motion: It was moved by Kozak, seconded by Mason, to approve the Minutes of the December 11, 2018 Planning Commission meeting. Motion carried 3-0-2. Gallagher and Jha abstained from the vote. j Minutes—Planning Commission February 12,2019--Page i of 6 2, 2017-2018 CERTIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENT ANNUAL REPORT Directed Staff to The Annual Report summarizes the City's historic preservation efforts and forward the describes how the City met all of the minimum requirements of the CLG Annual Report program during the 2017/2018 reporting period. to the State Office of RECOMMENDATION: Historic Preservation. That the Planning Commission direct staff to forward the Annual Report to the State Office of Historic Preservation. Motion; It was moved by Kozak, seconded by Thompson, to direct staff to forward the Annual Report to the State Office of Historic Preservation. Motion carried 5-0. PUBLIC HEARING: 3 Adopted Reso. 3. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2018-00016 No. 4377. REQUEST: A request to continue the temporary long-term placement of a mobile magnetic resonance imaging (MR]) trailer at an existing medical building and hospital. i ENVIRONMENTAL: l This project is categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15304(e) (Class 4) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) i RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission.adopt Resolution No. 4377, approving CUP 201 B-00016, a request to continue the placement of a (MRI) trailer for a period of two (2) years at an existing medical office building and hospital located at 14642-14662 Newport Avenue. Aguilar Presentation given, a Gallagher Gallagherwas concerned with the original issuance of the first permit,which was good for one (1)year, and now this request is to allowfor two (2)years. He also asked about the timeline of the construction of the facility since originally, the facility was to be constructed in one (1) year. Aguilar In response to Gallagher's questions, Aguilar stated that all permitting would be processed through the California's Office of Statewide Health Planning and � Development(OSHPD)and she deferred his concern, with regards to the delay In construction, to the applicant. Binsack Binsack explained to the Commission that the OSHPD is the review authority through the State of California related to hospitals. Minutes—Planning Commission February 12,2019—page 2 of 8 i Mr. Jason Gray Per the applicant, Mr. Jason Gray, Corporate Project Manager for Alta, he (applicant) referred to the approval process through OSHPD being lengthy,as well currently in the process of working with the designer with reconfiguring a portion within the hospital to fit the MRI center within the hospital, along with the reconfiguration of the X-ray area. Thompson Thompson asked staff if there have been any noise complaints (i.e. people hanging around the trailer) or issues with parking, since1he trailer is taking up some of the existing parking. 3 Aguilar In response to Thompson's questions, Aguilar stated 'that the City has not received any complaints. 7.16 p.m. The Public Comments Section was Opened/Closed. i Thompson Thompson's made favorable comments regarding they application, including there being no impacts to the surrounding neighborhood, He was in favor of the item. 1 i Jha Jha had no comments. Mason Mason reiterated Thompson's favorable comments. Gallagher Gallagher originally had concern that the temporary facility was being used but I the permit was not proceeding, but that was not the ,case, per the update previously mentioned by the applicant. Kozak Kozak was in favor of the item and he made favorable comments as well. Motion: It was moved by Mason, seconded by Kozak, to adopt Resolution No. 4377. Motion carried 5-0. REGULAR BUSINESS: Received and 4. CITY OF TUSTIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT YEAR IN REVIEW 20'18 ' filed. Development highlights that occurred during 2098 which includes Current Planning, Advanced Planning, Planning Division Activity Summary, Code Enforcement, Building Division, and Building Division Activity Summary REQUEST: Receive and file. DiLeva- Presentation given. Johnson Gallagher Gallagher commended DiLeva-Johnson on her presentation. i E Minutes—Planning Commission February 12,20119—Page 3 of 5 ' Mason Mason commended DiLeva-Johnson on her presentation as well as favorable comments towards all City's projects. She asked If there were any issues with signage (i.e. post-election signs in the public right-of-way), and if there is any enforcement currently taking place. Binsack In response to Mason's question regarding signage, Binsack stated that there are always issues with signage in the City's public right-of-way. Staff intends to report back to the Planning Commission and the.City Council to address how temporary signage is being enforced, as well as addressing on-site signage, at a-future date. Jha Jha made favorable comments about the Tustin Legacy and he looks forward to seeing more development in 2019, j Thompson Thompson also made favorable comments on the evening's presentations, especially with the quality of photos taken by DiLeva-Johnson in her Year in Review report. The Year in Review is a "great marketing tool for the City of Tustin". Binsack Binsack commended DiLeva-Johnson with the Year in Review and informed the Commission that the report will be forwarded to all parties included in the report, just like we have done in the past, as well as to the Chamber of Commerce (to the Business and Economic Development Committee). Kozak Kozak also thanked DiLeva-Johnson with the Year in Review. He referred to the Housing crisis, and stated that City staff, City Planning Commission and the City Council reviewed and approved that the Vintage project (140 new homes), the Levity at the Legacy (218 townhomes, flats and single-family,homes). The item was received and filed. STAFF CONCERNS: i Binsack Binsack congratulated our new Commissioners, Gallagher and Jha along with our new Chair Kozak and Chair Pro Tem Thompson. On behalf of staff, "we look forward to working with you in 2019". i COMMISSION CONCERNS: I Gallagher Gallagher had no concerns. Mason Mason welcomed our new Commissioners Gallagher and Jha and congratulated Chairperson- Kozak and Chairperson Pro Tem Thompson. She reiterated all of the City's accomplishments and thanked staff for all of their hard work throughout 2018. Mason also suggested that the Year in Review be placed on the City's website, which it will be. Jha Jha had no concerns. He looks forward to working the Commission and. City staff. E f I Minutes-.Planning Commission February 12,2019—Page 4 of 5 Thompson Thompson also congratulated Commissioners Gallagher and Jha. He thanked his fellow Commissioners for selecting him as Chairperson Pro Tem. Thompson attended the following events: 1/15: Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting • 1119-211; Thompson graduated from Harvard Business School Leadership Program i * 2C7: Former City Manager, Jeff Parker's Retirement celebration i Kozak Kozak commended Dove and Reekstin for compiling the Annual CLC Report. He attended the following events: 212: Annual Paper Football Fundraiser sponsored by Tustin Community Foundation at Columbus Tustin School 215. City Council meeting -- Commissioner appointments — Congratulations and welcome to Commissioners Jha and Gallagher 41 217: Former City Manager, Jeff Parker's Retirement celebration I Kozak again welcomed new Commissioners Gallagher and Jha, He thanked his fellow Commissioners for their support and for selecting nim as the Planning Commission Chairperson, along with congratulating Thompson for being selected as Chairperson Pro Tem. 7:41 p,m- ADJOURNMENT: i The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission is scheduled for Tuesday, February 26, 2019, at 7:00 p,m. in the City Council Chamber at 300 Centennial Way. r T OZAK Chairperson 3 ELIZABETH A. BINSACK Planning Commission Secretary i i i I Minutes—Planning Commission February 12,2019—Page 5 of 5 MINUTES REGULAR MEETING TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 26, 20'19 7.03 p.m. CALL.TO ORDER Givers. INVOCATION/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Kozak � All present. ROLL CALL.: Commissioners Gallagher, Jha, Kozak, Mason, Thompson None. PUBLIC CONCERNS: Approved the CONSENT CALENDAR: Consent Calendar, as 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — FEBRUARY 12, 2019 amended. RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission approve the Minutes of the February 12, 2019, Planning Commission meeting as provided. I i I 2. 2018 GENERAL PLAN ANNUAL REPORT AND ANNUAL MITIGATION MONITORING STATUS REPORT FOR FEIS/EIR FOR MCAS TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN i California State Law requires that each city adopt a comprehensive, long- term general plan for its physical development and any land outside its boundaries, which bears a relationship to its planning activities. Section 65400 (b)of the Government Code requires that the City's planning agency provide an annual report to the City Council on the status of the General Plan and progress in its implementation. The City Council certified the Program Final Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (FEIS/EIR) for the Disposal and i Reuse of MCAS Tustin along with its Supplemental and Addendum. The FEISIEIR evaluated the environmental impacts of the reuse and disposal of MCAS Tustin, which included the adoption of a Mitigation Monitoring E and Report Program (MMRP) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15097. The attached MMRP is a review of actions performed by the City or other responsible agencies In implementing mitigation measures identified in the FEISIEIR. RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission review and authorize staff to forward the General Plan Annual Report and the Annual Mitigation Monitoring Status Report to the City Council for consideration. Agenda--Planning Commission February 25,2019-rage 1 of 7 Motion: It was moved by Thompson, seconded by Gallagher, to approve the Consent Calendar, as amended. Motion carried 6-0. 1 PUBLIC HEARING: 3, RESIDENTIAL ALLOCATION RESERVATION (RAR) 2019-00001; DESIGN REVIEW (DR) 2017-0015; CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2017-025; LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT (LLA) 2017-00002, AND DENSITY BONUS. i E A request to demolish an existing real estate office building at 13841 Red Hill Avenue, combining the lot with the existing adjacent vacant lot at 13751 Red Hill Avenue and constructing a new five-story up to 66'1" high ' mixed use building with 249 residential apartment units, a provision of 5 percent very low income housing on-site (11 affordable units), 7,000 square feet of commercial retail space with a six (6) level parking structure to accommodate the project. APPLICANT: CRAIG SWANSON IRVINE ASSET GROUP, LLC 4000 MACARTHUR BLVD., EAST TOWER, SUITE 600 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 l i LOCATION: 13751 & 13841 RED HILL AVENUE ENVIRONMENTAL: Pursuant to Section 15270 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the project is statutorily exempt from CEQA requirements. CEQA Section 15270 states that"CEQA does not apply to projects which a public agency rejects or disapproves." RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 4378, denying a Residential Allocation Reservation (RAR) 2019-00001; Design Review (DR) 2017-0016; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 2017-025; and Lot Line Adjustment (LLA) 2017-00002 for a mixed-use project containing 249 residential units and 7,000 square feet of retail commercial. Chairperson Kozak informed the Commission and audience of the supplemental items Kozak received at the dais, which included correspondence received from the applicant's attorney Nossaman, along with the City's response letter to Nossaman,from Woodruff, Spradling and Smart(WSS). He then turned to Ms. Binsack and Ms. Bobak for further direction on how the Commission should proceed. I Elizabeth In response to Kozak's previous question, Binsack stated that the applicant wa Binsack requesting a continuance of the item to either March 26, 2019 or April 9, 2019. Staff did not think there was a deed to continue the project for more than two (2) weeks. As noted in the City Attorney's response letter to the applicant's Agenda—Planning Commission February 26,2019—Page 2 of 7 attorney(Nossaman), notice was provided but staff does need to provide notice to the applicant, as well as the applicant's representatives in order to meet the March 12, 2019 deadline. This would allow adequate time for staff to prepare for a supplemental staff report, compile any public comments and respond to any other inquiries from the Commission and the public. She said there is adequate time to address the item at the March 12, 2019 hearing. Binsack suggested that the Commission should not receive any public comments this I evening, if they were going to recommend a continuance. She also stated that ' it was not staffs intention to provide a presentation because staff did not want the Commission to consider the merits of the project. For those individuals unable to be present at a future nearing date, Binsack stated they would accept comments (i.e. letter, email, or if they prefer to meet with a staff Planner, an interest list to be compiled, and will include the speaker forms given that evening). Staff could also provide a copy of the staff report to anyone that was j interested. Binsack informed the Commission, for their consideration, if the item was continued to March 12, 2019, the Commission could take advantage of a presentation as well as a public hearing at that meeting, and if the Commission chose to do so, they could continue the item again, to April 9, 2019. Lois Bobak Bobak explained to Kozak that the Public Hearing item should be opened in order to continue the item to a date certain. She also stated that the noticing process would not have to be done again and would remain valid as long as the item is continued to a certain date. Bobak further explained that the formal written notice would be provided to the applicant and the applicant's representatives, as they requested, for the March 12, 2019 hearing date. 7:13p.m. Opened the Public Hearing. Commissioner Gallager was concerned with the applicant's request for the March 26 and April Gallagher 9, 2019 continuance dates. He asked if the request was in order for the applicant to provide updated information or if the Commission would expect the same packet and same concept. Gallagher also wanted to know why the applicant was requesting a continuance. He also asked if the Commission could hear from the applicant to find out if they are able to provide updated Information within the timeframe or if the Commission would be in violation of the open discussion. Gallagher added that it would be helpful to hear from the applicant before the Commission makes a decision on the continued hearing date, Binsack In response to Gallagher's questions, Binsack stated it was not clear as to why the applicant requested new hearing dates and that it would be difficult to provide anything substantially different than what was already provided to the Commission, other than the applicant may be responding to informatlon that was provided in the staff report. i Bobak Per Gallagher's last question, Bobak informed him that the Commission could ask the applicant why the continuance to a specific date, but since staff is not providing any comments, along with the public's comments on the merits of the project until the next meeting; the applicant should limit his comments to the date of the next meeting. Agenda—Planning Commission February 26, 2019--Page 3 of 7 Pamela Ms. Pamela Sapetto, representing Irvine Asset Group, stated that the reason Sapetto the applicant and representatives asked for the April 9, 2019 hearing date is that they believe they have significant new information they can provide to th Commission that would assist in their deliberations, Including the project itsel i and the alternatives in the project. She requested the Commission' indulgence to let them return with the item on April 9, 2019. i Kozak Kozak asked Sapetto to explain the three (3) dates requested within the letter including the applicant and their representatives' suggestion to continue the item to April 9, 2019. He also asked if there was more information that the applicant and/or representatives need to develop. Sapetto In response to Kozak's previous question, Sapetto stated that the April 9, 2019 hearing date was included in the last letter from their attorney, Nossaman to the City's Attorney, WSS, which is the date they confirmed would be preferred. She also stated that there is more information that needs to be developed. Chair Pro Thompson's comments generally included: there being an expediency in this Tem matter, the challenges of continuing the item; ff it is a substantially different Thompson package, then it would be a new application; and six (6) weeks would be problematic because the expectation from the audience is more expedient and that the Commission needs to be sensitive to that. Commissioner Mason wants the project to move forward and was in favor of the March 12 Mason 2019 hearing date. She added that if there were something of a significan difference, the.process would have to be revisited. Kozak Kozak was also in favor of the March 12, 2019 date. He asked his fellow Commissioners If they would like to present a motion to continue the item to the March 12, 2019 hearing date. Mr. Neil Sherman, Vice President of the Tustin Meadows Community Association, spoke from his seat (in the audience) and then approached the podium stating his concern with the March 12, 2019 hearing date, since he has to attend a board meeting on that same evening. Kozak Kozak further explained to Mr. Sherman that If the item was to be continued to March 12, 2019, in order to consider any new information from the applicant and ff more time is needed,the Commission could request another continuance to a date certain. He suggested to Mr. Sherman that a representative attend the March 12, 2019 hearing date If he is unable to attend. Bobak Bobak interjected into Mr. Sherman and Kozak's dialogue and informed the Commission that Mr. Sherman was getting into the merits of the application rather than the question of the continuance date. She reminded Mr. Sherman to only address the question of the continuance date. Thompson Thompson suggested the item be addressed at another public hearing date i order to make it more convenient for those audience members that cannot attend the March 12, 2019 hearing and to help the applicant. He suggested continuing the item to the March 26, 2019 meeting. Agenda—Planning Commission February 26,2019—Page 4 of 7 J Mason Mason's final comments generally included: first major development.since they voted on the Red HIII Specific Plan; numerous discussions have already taken place; the item needs to be presented to the Commission as soon as possible; causing distress to others in the community; she stayed with the March 12, 2019 hearing date; and she asked staff to educate the audience on the process if the applicant submits any additional materials to the City. Binsack Per Mason's question on the process, Binsack stated the following: if it is a substantially different project, the applicant has to submit an entirely new application after withdrawing the original application; any minor modifications would be provided and then submitted to the Commission to identify those differences at whichever meeting the Commission recommends; everything is always public and staff would identify what those differences are; if the item is substantially different, staff would not be able to bring the item back to the Commission in two (2) weeks, one (1) month, or six (6) weeks; and if the item is substantially different, it would have to be re-routed to the various agencies and utilities for review and input. d if the C' received a substantial) different project, would the item Mason Mason asks �Y Y p J � � be pulled immediately and removed from the Planning counter. { Binsack Per Binsack, if the applicant submits a substantially different project, City staff would have to make a determination of moving the current proposed project forward before the Commission, if the applicant did not withdraw the application or request an indefinite continuance. City staff is in a difficult position because j they have already deemed the application "complete" which leads to other issues to address. Bobak Per Bobak, one of the reasons the Commission cannot consider a substantially modified project is because staff has given notice on the project which is the subject of the staff report presented that evening. if there is a substantial modification, staff would not be able to notify members of the public, far enough in advance, to give them the opportunity to come in and have meaningful input on the new application. Staff wants to make sure the public receives proper notification as to what the applicant is requesting. } f Kozak Kozak mentioned one important aspect, which is the public notice that has E already been posted and if that public notice would remain effective for the March 12, 2019 meeting. He questioned if the further out the meeting is held, would the public hearing notice become less effective and would staff have to re-notice. E Binsack Binsack further informed the Commission that as long as they continue to a date certain, that notice remains active, but whether or not it remains effective 1 are two (2) different things (i.e. the public might lose track of the continuance i date). Staffs intent is, whatever meeting the Commission continues the project E to, staff will re-post the notice at the property. Binsack added that approximately 2,500 notices were mailed to the public. Staff will re-post the notice at the property, City's website and FaceBook page (the City will not post on Tustin Buzz—it is not administered by the City), including any other locatlons that we formerly noticed, without sending the notice out to all of those 2,500 Agenda—Planning Commission February 26,2019—Page 5 of 7 individuals. To the greatest intent possible, staff will let the public know and will send out a mass email to the interest list. Mason Mason asked if the City has the completed application, as the Commission ha reviewed, available for public review. She also asked if there are an i substantial changes to the plans, when they would be available for review. Binsack Per Binsack, anyone from the public can review the completed application either on the City's website or at the Planning counter. She also added that if anyone from the public wants to meet with staff, they could meet with Ms. 4 Qemkowicz. Regarding any substantial changes to the plans, the applicant j has not yet provided any revised plans to the City. Binsack also stated that any changes to the plans given to staff would be made available at the Planning counter the same day received. k Thompson After hearing further dialogue, Thompson stated that if information is important to those providing input, it would be difficult if information came in the day of the next meeting. He suggested that perhaps if the meeting was to be postponed one (1) month, within three (3) weeks the applicant has to provide that information to the City in order to make available for one (1) week in advance to the public. Thompson felt it would be stressful to move the meeting two (2) weeks. Binsack Per Thompson's comments, Binsack stated that four (4) weeks is not a sufficient amount of time for staff to obtain substantially new information an prepare another report to provide to the Commission. Thompson Thompson asked if the idea is that whatever the cut-off date is, the public has at least one(1)week to respond, He felt that if the meeting was to be continued to March 12, 2019, there would not be enough time for the entire process. Kozak Kozak asked what the March 26, 2019 Planning Commission agenda looks like. Binsack Binsack stated that as of now, the March 26, 2019 meeting agenda is fairly full. Mason Mason stated that this submission of this application was already deemed complete. She would like the item to be presented at the March 12, 2019 Planning Commission meeting. Mason added that if there are significant changes to the plans, then there needs to be an entirely different conversation when that takes place. Gallagher Gallagher reiterated comments previously made by his fellow Commissioners. Whether new information comes in or not, remains relevant because if it is so significant that it changes the project, then it is a different application. Per Gallagher, he was in support of continuing the item to the March 12, 201 hearing. I Commissioner Jha's final suggestion was that staff obtain the audience's information to keep Jha them in the loop for those interested in being notified. Agenda--Planning Commission February 26,2019—Page 6 of 7 Bobak Bobak informed the audience of the speaker forms received that evening at the dais. She suggested that their email addresses be included in order to be added to the list of interested parties. E Motion: It was moved by Mason, seconded by Gallagher, to continue the item to the March 12, 2019 Planning Commission meeting. Gallagher, Kozak and Mason i were in favor. Thompson and Jha opposed. Motion carried 3-2. E i t 7:34 p.m. Public Hearing Closed. ! I None. REGULAR BUSINESS ' i STAFF CONCERNS: i Binsack None. COMMISSION CONCERNS: Gallagher None. Mason Mason had a few questions regarding where staff is with the parkland as well as the Newport Avenue/Edinger Avenue fundraising, which she will wait for a follow-up on from staff. dha None. Thompson Thompson thanked staff on all of their hard work on Item #2 (i.e. yellow highlights helpful). On February 21, 2019, he attended the Transportation of the Year Award for the American Society of Civil Engineers, Thompson is expecting his first grandchild on April 2, 2019 4 Wesley James DeGracia. Kozak Congratulations to Grandfatherhoodl On February 23, 2019, Kozak attended the Tustin Community Foundation Tustin Sip & Swirl. He thanked staff for all the hard work that goes into the agenda reports. 7:40 p.m. ADJOURNMENT: The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission is scheduled for Tuesday, March 12, 2019, at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chamber at 300 Centennial Way. I i STE OZAK i Chairperson l ELIZABETH A. Bi SACK Planning Commission Secretary ' E Agenda—Planning Commission February 26,2019—Page 7 of 7 i MINUTES i REGULAR MEETING TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 12, 2019 i 7:00 p.m. CALL TO ODDER i Given INVOCATION/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Gallagher Alf present. ROLL CALL: Commissioners Gallagher, Jha, Kozak, Mason, Thompson � i PUBLIC CONCERNS: Kozak Kozak informed the members of the audience that the applicant for Item #3 withdrew his applications, therefore there would not be a presentation, but if members of the audience wanted to speak on that item, they were invited to address the Commission at this time. Ms. Joann Shelly, resident, voiced her concern with the Red Hill project,which generally included: parking is already an issue in the. Tustin Meadows area; ' any new apartment project will impact surrounding neighborhood negatively (crime rate will increase); and traffic will be impacted near and around the Red Hill Avenue areas. CONSENT CALENDAR: Approved the 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES— FEBRUARY 26, 2019 Minutes of the February 26, 2019, as amended RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission approve the Minutes of the February 26, 2019, Planning Commission meeting as provided. Motion: It was moved by Mason, seconded by Gallagher, to approve the Minutes of the February 26, 2019, as amended. Motion carried 5-0. 3 3 i� f 1 Minutes—Planning Commission March 12,2019—Page 1 of 6 REGULAR BUSINESS: Directed staff to 2. COMMENDATION ON TUSTIN HISTORIC REGISTER NOMINATION forward the FOR THE DEL. RIO BUILDING commendation to the City Council with a recommendation to explore plaque differentiation before the 3 recognition. RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission as Historic and Cultural Resources Advisor, approve the nomination of 195 EI Camino Real to the City's Commendation Program and forward the commendation to the City Council for recognition, Dove Presentation given. Binsack Binsack referred the Commission to the Tustin Preservation Conservancy's email correspondence, dated February 13, 2019. In response to the email, she noted the project is one of the first buildings of a more modern nature that was i submitted for the commendation program. Per Binsack, it was not staffs desire to create a false sense of history, but to commend a building as an example of good infill development into the Old Town area. She added that the intent was not to mimic the architecture, but to complement the architecture for the Old Town area. The commendation program just happens to be the Historic Register and the Commendation Program. Binsack stated that in prior commendations, it just so happened that they were historic buildings, If the Commission recommends forwarding the commendation to the City Council, and they approve the commendation, it is proposed that the building would receive a plaque, The plaque would identify the Del Rio building - 2014, but the building would not be placed on the City's historic register until presumably 2064. t Thompson Thompson's comments generally included: agreed with Binsack's previous statement; the building complements the area, empathized with the letter submitted; and he agreed it was appropriate to bring new buildings to the commendation program to complement the Old Town area. Mason Mason referred to the work already placed in the Downtown Commercial Core Specific Plan (DCCSP). She made favorable comments to the work done with the Del Rio building, and how it"fits" in Tustin. Mason was also in favor of the commendation. Minutes—Planning Commission March 12,2019—Page 2 of 5 Gallagher Gallagher's comments generally included: the building is a good example for the DCCSP; the City's commendation program was established in order to recognize buildings that meet the City's vision; hopefully this commendation encourages future development to follow suit; and he was in favor of the commendation. Kozak Kozak was in support of the commendation. He was in agreement with the comments his fellow Commissioners made. He also made favorable comments to the property owner and building. Binsack Binsack added that although the item was not a public hearing item, members j of the audience were welcome to step forward to address the Commission on the item. I i Mr. Mark I711ken Mr, Mark Willken, resident, commented on the item: he asked who nominated the building and if there were any other modern buildings that received this recognition; he asked about the distinction between historic and modem buildings receiving plaques or if the plaques would be identical; he had no objection to the building being recognized, but suggested there needs to be a differentiation between the historic buildings and the newer buildings rather than collectively; and he asked the Commission to consider slightly different plaques to differentiate between historic and newer structures/buildings. Binsack To answer Mr.Wlllken's question, Binsack stated that City staff nominated the building. She added that all of the plaques in the program look the same, but the identifiers are different. How they are attributed are different (i.e. historic nature of the buildings could be different — the person that built the building, the person who lived there, etc.); and if approved the building will be identified on the plaque as the Del Rio building along with the year of construction. i Thompson Thompson also commented on the plaques being different, but did not diminish the program or the commendation. He suggested staff look into plaque differentiation. Binsack Per Binsack, if it is the consensus of the Commission regarding the plaque differentiation, the Commission could make a recommendation to the City Council with a modified plaque and staff could explore alternatives. f Mason Mason concurred with Thompson on differentiating between the historic and newer building plaques. Kozak Kozak agreed with Mason on asking staff to look at alternatives for differentiation and then bring back to the Commission for their consideration, but was concemed with the commendation being held up. j I Minutes—Planning Commission March 12,2018--rage 3 of 5 Binsack In response to Kozak's suggestion, Binsack informed the Commission that they could still make the recommendation to the City Council and propose that staff took at alternative plaques, which staff could bring back to the Commission as well. She added that it would not stop the commendation i program going forward since staff would still have to order the plaques, which would take time to prepare the plaque. Motion; It was moved by Mason to forward the item to the City Council with the caveat that staff will look at visual distinction between historic and newer buildings, seconded by Kozak. Motion carried 5-0. PUBLIC HEARING: MFE_Mdf-H RR.INN ASy0R°MA1:; CFI; B:_2619 Item was 3. CONTINUED ITEM FROM FEBRUARY 26, 2019: RESIDENTIAL Withdrawn. ALLOCATION RESERVATION (RAR) 2019-00001; DESIGN REVIEW (DR) 2017-0016; CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2017-026; LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT (LLA) 2017-00002, 20% DENSITY BONUS, VARIANCES FOR OPEN SPACE AND BUILDING HEIGHT AND A WAIVER OF PARKLAND DEDICATION IN-LIEU FEES FOR A MIXED USE PROJECT CONTAINING 249 RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND 7,000 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL. COMMERCIAL SPACE APPLICANT: CRAIG SWANSON E IRVINE ASSET GROUP, LLC 4000 MACARTHUR BLVD., EAST TOWER, SUITE 600 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 LOCATION: 13751 & 13841 RED HILL AVENUE ENVIRONMENTAL: Pursuant to Section 16270 of the California Environmental Quality Act j (CEQA),the project is statutorily exempt from CEQA requirements. CEQA Section 15270 states that"CEQA does not apply to projects which a public agency rejects or disapproves." i RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 4378, denying Residential Allocation Reservation (RAR) 2019-00001; Design Review i (DR) 2017-0016; Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 2017-025; Lot Line Adjustment(LLA) 2017-00002, and a Density Bonus request for a mixed- use project containing 249 residential units and 7,000 square feet of retail commercial. Minutes—Planning Commission March 12,2019—Page 4 of 5 Binsack Binsack clarified that the applicant did withdraw the various applications and the applicant does anticipate resubmitting an application in the near future. STAFF CONCERNS: I Binsack None. COMMISSION CONCERNS: Gallagher None. Mason Masan asked staff about the possibility of electric scooters in Tustin. Binsack In response to Mason's previous comment, although electric scooters Mould be a great mode of transporation, they have been problematic in some cities. She will work with staff on gathering information on the scooters then bring it back to the Commission at a later date. 3 Jha None. Thompson Thompson attended the following meetings:s: + 316— ULI Capital Market's Annual Insight Overview • 3112 -- ULI Planning Session —Attainable Housing Program Kozak Kozak attended the following meetings. 1 2127 City's Mandated Harassment Prevention Training • 2/28 -- CDBG Committee Meeting —Grant Funding • 315 — City Council Meeting - 2018 General Plan Annual Report T29 p.m. ADJOURNMENT: The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission is scheduled for Tuesday, March 26, 2019, at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chamber at 300 Centennial Way, ,18TtVIQKOZAK i Chairperson 1 ELIZABETH A. BIN ACK r Planning Commission Secretary Minutes—Planning Commission March 12, 2019—Page 5 of 5 i MINUTES REGULAR MEETING TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 25, 2019 I 7:00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER Given. INVOCATION/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Jha All present, ROLL CALL: Chair Kozak i Chair Pro Tem Thompson Commissioners Gallagher, Jha, Mason None. PUBLIC CONCERNS: CONSENT CALENDAR: Approved the 1, APPROVAL OF MINUTES — MARCH 12, 2019 Minutes of the March 12, 2019 RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission That the Planning Commission approve the Minutes of the March 12, meeting. 2019, Planning Commission meeting as provided. Motion: It was moved by Thompson seconded by Mason to approve the Minutes of the March 12, 2019 Planning Commission meeting. Motion carried 5-0. PUBLIC HEARING: Tabled the 2. GENERAL PLAN CONFORMITY, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT SchoolsFirst 2018-00001, LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 2018-00003, CONCEPT Headquarters PLAN 2018-00001, DESIGN REVIEW 2018-00023, AND project. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2018-00015 APPLICANT: SCHOOLSFIRST FEDERAL CREDIT UNION ATTN: CHRISTINA QUINTERO 1200 EDINGER AVENUE TUSTIN, CA 92780 PROPERTY OWNERS: SCHOOLSFIRST FEDERAL CREDIT UNION ATTN: CHRISTINA QUINTERO 1200 EDINGER AVENUE TUSTIN, CA 92780 3 CITY OF TUSTIN 300 CENTENNIAL WAY TUSTIN, CA 92780 Minutes—Planning Commission March 26,2019—Page 1 of 7 LOCATION: 15332 NEWPORT AVENUE, 15442 NEWPORT AVENUE, 15222 DEL AMO AVENUE, 1200 EDINGER AVENUE, AND PARCEL 6 OF ! PARCEL MAP NO. 2010-127 (APN 430-251-28) i The project is a proposal to construct a new headquarters office building, a new retail bank branch building, a new parking structure and associated site improvements for the SchoolsFirst Federal Credit Union. The applicant and the Tustin Economic Development Division have been working on the business terms of the real estate transaction associated with the Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) and Development Agreement 2018-00001. The terms of the DDA and associated reimbursement agreement have not been completed; therefore, the Economic Development Division has requested the item be tabled to allow for sufficient time to finalize the DDA and reimbursement agreement. RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission table the SchoolsFlrst Headquarters project. Gallagher Since the request is for the item to be tabled, Gallagher asked why the item was being presented to the Commission. Binsack Per Binsack, the public hearing item was presented to the Commission due to noticing of the public hearing item in the Tustin News newspaper; however, the notices were not mailed to property owners within 500 feet being that Economic Development was desirous of tabling the item. Binsack added that if staff knew of a date certain, they would ask that the Commission continue the item to a date certain, but they are not certain of that date, as of yet, Binsack informed the Commission that they could take public comment on the item even though there are no materials or a presentation at this time. None. Public Comments. i Motion. It was moved by Gallagher seconded by Jha to table the SchoolsFirst Headquarters project. Motion carried 5-0. Approved 3. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2018-00017 i Resolution No. 4381. PROPERTY OWNER: KAISER PERMANENTE FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN, INC. 1 KAISER PLAZA, FLOOR 15 OAKLAND, CA 94612 Minutes—Planning Commission March 26,2019—Page 2 of 7 APPLICANT: GRETCHEN SIEMERS KAISER PERMANENTE NATIONAL FACILITIES SERVICES 393 E. WALNUT STREET PASADENA, CA 91188 LOCATION: 2521 MICHELLE DRIVE } f ENVIRONMENTAL: f l This project is categorically exempt (Class 1) pursuant to Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act. REQUEST: Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to authorize joint-use parking at an existing medical facility. i RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission approve Resolution No. 4381 approving CUP 2018-00017 to authorize joint-use parking at an existing medical facility located at 2521 Michelle Drive. Reekstin Presentation given. Gallagher Gallagher asked for clarification on Section 2.1 of the Conditions of Approval referencing the traffic study, which identifies a need for 426 parking spaces with the portion of the 6,000 square feet expansion when there are currently 427 parking spaces available. He added that should the applicant return in the future for the expansion of the remaining shell space, the parking study states the applicant would need to build the parking structure within the existing parking lot while still maintaining 426 parking spaces, per Section 2.1. Gallagher also asked that during that period of construction, how the applicant would handle the loss of parking spaces. Reekstin Per Reekstin, the applicant could choose not to meet the full requirement code, and choose to use joint-use parking instead in the future, in order for the parking structure to not be as large, the applicant would need to go through the conditional permit use process. He added that the applicant may propose a multistory parking structure and would be able to retain a lot of the existing parking underneath and additional parking above. During construction, which could be several months, the applicant would have to submit some type of plan to accommodate the parking before converting any of the space over. Currently,the applicant is using less than 300 of the parking spaces, but the interim conditions would need to be included in the parking study as well. 3 Kozak Kozak asked that if the applicant should request a parking structure in the future, then that request would go along with a new parking study. Minutes--Planning commission March 26,2019—Page 3 of 7 Reekstin in response to Kozak's question, Reekstin stated that the applicant would need to look for parking on another site, if necessary. Gallagher Gallagher asked if staff was concerned if the applicant were to return, in the future, requesting to expand the parking. E Binsack Binsack reiterated to the Commission that the item being presented at the meeting was the first step and not the next step. She added that when the i applicant returns to the City with another application, the applicant would need to submit an overall plan to address new plans and it could require site mitigation in the temporary term (Le. busing, valet, or phasing). Binsack stated that the Commission would presumably have another opportunity to look at the master plan of the overall parking for the larger improvements when the time comes. Mason Mason referred to the City's standard on square footage when determining parking and medical office use and the use of warehousing space. She questioned the warehouse space being 27,000 square feet and asked if staff would still treat the requirement based on square footage versus use. Reekstin Reekstin confirmed Mason's previous comment and added that the parking requirement was allowed to be part of the storage rate versus a warehouse rate. He added that all of the parking that was required, for the occupied area of the building, was based on the Tustin City Code. The parking study does address other parking requirements for medical uses primarily and that other rates could be applied, but staff did not feel that it should be applied at this time since it is not necessary. Reekstin stated that in the future, when the applicant chooses to occupy the entire building, the applicant can use a new analysis and try to justify their position. 7.19 p,m. Opened the Public Hearing Section. Ms. Gretchen Ms. Gretchen Siemers, applicant, addressed the Commission and asked if Siemers they had any questions. She thanked Reekstin and City staff for their efforts. Gallagher Gallagher asked the applicant if the request would create new jobs, j Ms. Siemers Per Ms. Siemers, the proposed project will create new jobs, along with there being a high demand for primary care. 7:20 p.m. Closed the Public Hearing Section. Thompson Thompson made favorable comments regarding the item. ! i Motion: It was moved by Thompson, seconded by Gallagher, to adopt Resolution No. 4381. Motion carried 5-0. Minutes—Planning Commission March 26, 2019—Page 4 of 7 REGULAR BUSINESS: Approved 4. PLANNING COMMISSION AS THE HISTORIC AND CULTURAL Resolution No. RESOURCES ADVISOR PROGRAM AND 2019 WORK PROGRAM 4376, On November 6, 2018, the City Council adopted Resolution 18-78 affirming the Planning Commission as the Historical and Cultural Resources Advisor to the City Council and establishing a program defining the Planning Commission roles, responsibilities and annual work program. This report identifies activities for the 2019 Work Program. RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission approved Resolution No. 4376 establishing the 2019 Planning Commission as the Historic and Cultural Resources Advisor Work Program. Dove Presentation given. Mason Mason asked what the six (6) hour training would entail. She would like the opportunity to engage with the community on certain items to provide an opportunity to allow the community to be vocal on either issues or opportunity. Dove Per Dove, depending on the Commission's ability to engage in training (i.e. lunchtime webinars, conferences, etc.) the Commission would have to complete six (6) hours of training in order to meet the requirements of the State Office of Historic Preservation. Binsack Binsack added to Dove's previous comments, which generally included: suggested the Commission expand on their training (i.e. change up training from prior year); staff would suggest appropriate upcoming training to the j Commission; public outreach education (i.e. Historical Society and Tustin Preservation and Conservancy) and tours of Old Town (Totally Tustin); the goal of the City Council was public outreach and engagement(she referred to the work program within the staff report) which is a significant commitment and public undertaking; the Commission will need to identify what type of public outreach they will do (i.e. Bust Program); and the importance of collaborating with the Tustin Historical Society as well as the Tustin Preservation Conservancy. Gallagher Gallagher referred to the picture of the Hangar in the PowerPoint presentation. He thought the Hangars should be part of the Work Program or integrate it within the Work Program, Binsack In response to Gallaghees previous statement, Binsack mentioned the history on the Hangars along with the structural analysis on the southerly Hangar taking place for the last several years. She suggested the Hangar be on a future Planning Commission agenda in order to discuss the efforts Minutes—Planning Commission March 26,2019—Page 5 of 7 Binsack of the Hangars, the closure of the Marine Corps. Air Station and the evolution of the Hangars. Kozak Kozak suggested the Hangars be part of the first presentation with recommendation of follow-up action, in the work program. Mr. Brian Mr. Brian Sjoberg, President of the Tustin Preservation Conservancy Sjoberg (TPC), voiced his concern over the qualification of the Commission acting as the Cultural Resources Advisory committee and suggested the residents of Tustin be appointed. He added that the committee should be a separate group other than the Planning Commission. Mr. Sjoberg read a section of the SHPO guidelines to the Commission. Gallagher Gallagher asked Mr. Sjoberg if he thought the 2019 Work Program being proposed was acceptable to him. Mr. Sjoberg Mr. Sjoberg mentioned various training sites to cove"r historic preservation. He would hope it would not just be a tour of Old Town but further training. Mr. Sjoberg also mentioned to the Commission of the TPC's meet and ! greet planned for May/June at the McCharles House to meet the residents of Old Town. Kozak Kozak thanked Mr. Sjoberg for coming forward and his participation in Old Town Tustin. He asked that if Mr. Sjoberg had any suggestions with the Work Program, to please bring to City staff. Thompson Thompson asked for clarification participating in the local events(i.e. Home and Garden Tour, Chili Cook-Off) and if the Commission's attendance to a the local events would qualify. He encouraged the Commission to find j what works for them and their busy schedules. Binsack Per Binsack, in response to Thompson's previous statement, staff includes all local events the Commission attends in the CLG reporting. She added that the local events in the CLG report were listed as "educational", but were not viewed by others as such (i.e. 90th Anniversary of the City's Birthday). Binsack stated that attending tours and local events would be "above and beyond" what the Commission is required to do. She added that staff will ensure the Commission meets the requirements of the Work Program. Kozak Kozak added that the Commission is involved with the Old Town and ! encouraged Mr. Sjoberg to work with staff on the Work Program. ' Motion. It was moved by Thompson, seconded by Kozak to approve Resolution No. 4376. Motion carried 5-0. STAFF CONCERNS; Binsack None. Minutes—Planning Comrniss}on March 26,2019—page 6 of 7 COMMISSION CONCERNS; Gallagher Gallagher asked if staff is tracking any legislation, specifically SB 50 related to Zoning. Mason Kozak attended the following events: 0126 CPF Webinar "Brown Act" New Homeless Shelter Experience — favorable comments to City staff Masan stated that there is a need for engagement other than social media (i,e, NextDoor). She suggested the City consider getting more creative by creating different forums in order to meet the needs of the community, i Jha Jha attended the following events: i 3113 Tustin Legacy Magnet Academy Groundbreaking 3114 Opening of the Tustin Temporary Homeless Shelter Thompson Thompson attended the following events: 3113 Honored at the Community Recognition Dinner by the TUSD 3114 Opening of the Tustin Temporary Homeless Shelter + 3126 OCTA Citizens Advisory — Bicycle and Pedestrian Meeting Thompson will be attending a ULI Conference in Nashville, TN mid-April. Kozak Kozak attended the following events: • 3113 Tustin Legacy Magnet Academy Groundbreaking + 3114 Opening of the Tustin Temporary Homeless Shelter • 3121 Mayor Puckett's Birthday Celebration at the Boys & Girls Club 1' 3126 California Preservation Foundation Webinar— Brown Act ' 8:40 p,m. ADJOURNMENT: i The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission is scheduled for Tuesday, April 9, 2019, at 7:00 p.m, in the City Council Chamber at 300 Centennial Way. /STEACKOZAK ! Chairperson ELIZABETH A. BINSACK Planning Commission Secretary I Minutes—Planning Commission March 26,2019--Page 7 of 7 MINUTES REGULAR MEETING TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 9, 2019 I 7:03 p.m. CALL TO ORDER c Given. INVOCATION/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Thompson Present. ROLL CALL: Chair Kozak � Chair Thompson Commissioners Gallagher, Mason I ABSENT: Commissioner Jha None. PUBLIC CONCERNS: 1 CONSENT CALENDAR: i Approved the 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES—MARCH 26, 2019 March 26, 2019 Planning RECOMMENDATION: Commission meeting That the Planning Commission approve the Minutes,of the March 26, 2019, Minutes, Planning Commission meeting, as provided. Motion: It was moved by Thompson seconded by Gallagher to approve the Minutes of the March 26, 2019 Planning Commission meeting. Motion carried 4-0-1. PUBLIC HEARING: Adopted 2. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2019-00003 Resolution No. 4382. APPLICANT: DAVID BIEHL PM PEDIATRICS MANAGEMENT GROUP ONE HOLLOW LANE, SUITE 301 LAKE SUCCESS, NY 10042 PROPERTY OWNER: B-K TUSTIN PROPERTY, LLC ATTN: PAUL STRAUSS P.O. BOX 1818 MONROVIA, CA 91017 LOCATION: 14971 HOLT AVENUE I Minutes—Planning Commission April 9,2019—Page 1 of 6 i I ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS; This project is categorically exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 15301, Class 1 pertaining to existing facilities, REQUEST: Establish a 5,420 square foot pediatric urgent care office within an existing commercial building. I RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 4382 approving CUP 2019400003 authorizing the establishment of a pediatric urgent care within an existing 5,420 square foot building located at 14971 Halt Avenue within the Tustin Courtyard Shopping Center. Beier Presentation given. Thompson Thompson asked about ambulatory services for the project. Binsack Binsack stated that emergency services are not being proposed for the project. Kozak Kozak asked if there are plans to modify the building. Beier Beier responded that the project consists only of interior tenant improvements. In the future, the applicant may look at exterior modifications, but no modifications at this time. 7:19 p.m. Opened the Public Hearing Item. Dr. Joshua Dr. Joshua Sherman, pediatrics MD, representing the applicant, commended Sherman staff and the Commission for their consideration, and he looks forward to helping the community. Mr. Richard Mr. Richard Ramer, architect, representing the applicant, introduced himself Ramer and he asked the Commission if they had any questions regarding the project. Gallagher Gallagher commended Mr. Ramer on the renderings and the concept of the project. Mason Mason voiced her concern with regards to the windows visibility from the street view and she asked if the interior windows would be covered for privacy. I Dr. Joshua Per Dr. Sherman, material will be placed on the interior windows in order for Sherman people to be able to see out but no one would be able to see inside the building, in order to allow privacy. Mr. Paul Strauss MI. Paul Strauss, representing the owner of the center, thanked staff and the Commission for their consideration. Minutes—Planning Commission April 9,2019--Page 2 of 6 7:14 p.m. Closed the Public Hearing Item. Thompson Thompson was in favor of the project and pleased there would be no noise or parking impacts. ' Mason Mason concurred with Thompson's comments and she'"was also in support of I the project. Gallagher Gallagher was in favor of the item. Kozak Kozak was in favor of the item and was pleased the project would fit in with the DCCSP. Sinsack Binsack clarfed Condition 2.2 of the Conditions of Approval (hours of operation) and informed the Commission that the resolution would be updated to include the complete hours of operation. Motion: It was moved by Mason seconded by Gallagher, to adopt Resolution No. 4382, as amended. Motion carried 4-0-1. REGULAR BUSINESS: Approved the 3. TUSTIN HISTORIC REGISTER NOMINATION: BOUCHARD HOUSE — nomination. 255 SOUTH A STREET RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission, as Historic and Cultural Resources Advisor, approve the nomination of 255 South A Street to the City's Historic Register Plaque Program and select"Bouchard House— 1923"as the most appropriate historical name and date of construction of the property. Willkom Presentation given. Thompson Thompson made favorable comments (i.e. history, nostalgia, highlighting the architectural features). Mason Mason commended the property owner and she thanked the owner for maintaining the historic nature of the house. Kozak Kozak commended the property owner regarding the craftsman style bungalow. GleeAnne Jeffries, property owner, thanked the Commission for their consideration and staff for the report and presentation. i Mason Mason asked staff for an update on the plaque differentiation, which was discussed at the last meeting. d Minutes—Planning Commission April 9,2019—Paye 3 of 6 i i Binsack Per Binsack, at the last City Council meeting, Chair Kozak made a presentation j regarding the nomination of the Del Rio building. A recommendation was made to the City Council differentiating plaques for new or historic structures by using different shapes and identifying Old Town Tustin rather than the Historic ' Register Program, which the City Council did approve. Binsack added that staff will be presenting a prototype to the Commission at a future date. Motion: It was moved by Thompson, seconded by Kozak, to approve the nomination of 255 South A Street to the City's Historic Register Plaque Program and select "Bouchard House— 1923" as the most appropriate historical name and date of construction of the property. Motion carried 4-0-1. 4. WORKSHOP: CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT I The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Workshop will include many aspects in understanding the role of CEQA on actions taken by the Planning Commission. The Workshop will cover the goals, purpose, framework, process and procedures, application process, and timeline of the CEQA. Bobak Bobak introduced Mrs. Ricia Hager to the Commission, along with Hager's experience in teaching CEQA guidelines to various agencies throughout the county. Ricia Hager, Presentation given. WSS Mason During the presentation, Mason asked Hager about Indian burial grounds and if they would qualify for exemptions and if not, how would this be addressed. Hager Hager stated that A1352's consultation with Native American tribes requirement, requires the City to consult with the appropriate tribes and if the tribes request consultation with the City regarding that project, then City would have to meet before the City can approve the project, which is more of a procedural requirement. Thompson Thompson asked Hager what would happen when a document (i.e. EIR) becomes outdated and regulations have changed. Binsack In response to Thompson's questions, Binsack stated that City staff would review the Initial study (list of impact areas) look at the existing document and review to see how relevant that document is with the action the City is going to undertake. If necessary, a supplemental or addendum may be necessary. Mason Mason commended Ricia on the presentation. She asked who would absorb the cost of updates(i.e. EIRs) when a project is submitted to the City. and the Ci is the applicant, the Binsack Per Binsack, if an E1R has been prepared, tY pp City would absorb the costs. If a private entity comes forward with a development project, then the developer would absorb the costs. Overall, City staff needs to ensure the CEQA procedures are done correctly for the project and for the City. Minutes—Planning Commission April 9,2019—Page 4 of 6 I ' Binsack added that whenever a staff report is presented to the Commission, staff identifies environmental analysis in compliance with the CEQA guidelines. Gallagher Gallagher referred to the E1R's that were completed for the Red Hill Specific Plan and the Downtown Commercial Core Specific!j Plan and the formal process. He also asked Binsack if an EIR would automatically need an addendum. I Binsack Binsack stated that the desire of both specific plans was to do a Program EIR. When individual development projects are submitted, staff will conduct an Initial Study and an evaluation to ensure the original EIR covered the project and if it did, then the Mitigation Measures that were identified would be included into the proposal. If not, then staff would need to evaluate and include or update that environmental document and add mitigation associated with that project's specific application. Binsack also spoke on the East Tustin Specific Plan's(aka; Tustin Ranch) Mitigation Monitoring Report, which generally included: the Mitigation Monitoring Report Program (MMRP) took place long after the final development project took place; the City was required annually to do an analysis to ensure that those mitigations and improvements were done in a timely manner and if they were not done, the City needed to identify why they were not done, or why they were deferred; and she explained the reason for the annual MMRP for the Tustin Legacy. Hager Hager added that recently a case upheld a document that was 20 years old. 1 t Bobak Bobak also added that it would depend on how good the 20 year old document was and whether or not it analyzed all of the potential environmental impacts and they have not changed, and there are no new significant impacts that could occur from the project,then under CEQA there is no reason to do any additional environmental review because there are no additional environmental impacts. Kozak Kozak added to Binsack's comments on the MMRP that the report has to do with the progress of the measures taken for the MMRP and their implementation. Thompson Thompson complemented Hager on her presentation and he suggested Hager prepare a one page outline showing the flow of the CEQA guidelines, as a handout. i STAFF CONCERNS: Binsack Binsack again informed the Commission that staff will be presenting a prototype of the new plaque to the Commission at a future date. COMMISSION CONCERNS: j Thompson 3/27: Swearing-In Ceremony for Supervisor Don Wagner 3128: Mayor's Dinner at Greenwood 415: Empty Saddles Ceremony-- Mission Inn in San Juan Capistrano 418; Haberdashery Fundraiser—Sacred Heart JesuslRetreat in Santa Ana Minutes--planning Commission April 9,2019—Page 5 of 6 Thompson 418: OGBC — OC Moves — Overview of Metrolink's by CEO Stephanie Wiggins Thompson's first grandson, Wesley James ❑eGracia, was born on March 29, 29101 Congratulations Thompson familyi j : Mason Nene, i Gallagher None, Kozak 3128: Mayor's Dinner at Greenwood i 412: City Council Meeting — Kozak presented the commendation for the Del Rio building i 8:11 p.m. ADJOURNMENT: The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission is scheduled for Tuesday, April 23, 2019, at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chamber at 300 Centennial Way. S VE WJAK Chairperson ZABETH A. BINSAC K Planning Commission Secretary l Minutes-Planning Commission April 5, 2019- Page 6 of 6 MINUTES REGULAR MEETING TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 14, 20'19 7:00 p.m. CALL-TO ORDER Givers, iNVOCATIONIPLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mason Present ROLL CALL: Chair Kozak Commissioners Gallagher and Mason Absent. Chair Pro Tem Thompson and Commissioner Jha j None. PUBLIC CONCERNS: Approved the CONSENT CALENDAR: Consent Calendar as presented Motion. It was moved by Gallagher, seconded by Mason, to approve the Consent Calendar as presented, Motion carried 3-0-2. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES--APRIL 9, 2019 RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission approve the Minutes of the April 9, 2019, Planning Commission meeting as provided. 2. FISCAL YEAR 2019-2020 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FINDING OF CONFORMANCE WITH THE GENERAL PLAN 3 The Planning Commission is required to review the projects in the Capital Improvement Program(CIP)and verify their conformance with the General Plan. The City Council will soon be adopting the Fiscal Year 20192020 budget and appropriate funding for the ensuing year CIP projects. There are new projects proposed in this years CIP, as well as carry-over projects from prior years. ' RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 4384 finding the proposed FY 2019-2020 CIP is in conformance with the General Plan pursuant to Section 65401 of the California Government Code. f 3. SENATE BILL 50 (SB 50) At the March 26, 2039, Planning Commission meeting, Commissioner Gallagher asked staff to report back to Commission on SB 50 as it relates Minutes—Planning commission May 14, 2019--Page 1 of 5 to impacts on local zoning authority. The League of California Cities and the American Planning Association oppose SB 50. Following the League of California Cities and the American Planning Association: California Chapter, staff recommends opposition to SB 50, unless modified. i RECOMMENDATION: i That the Planning Commission receive and file this report. 4. HISTORICAL RESOURCES SURVEY UPDATE On March 26, 2019, the Planning Commission as Historic and Cultural Resources Advisor, approved a Work Program for 2019. Included in the Work Program is an update of the City's Historic Resources Survey. This report is to provide the Planning Commission of the timeline of the Request for Proposals (RFP). RECOMMENDATION, That the Planning Commission receive and file this report. PUBLIC HEARING: 5. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP)2019-00002 Adopted APPLICANT/ PRISCILLA uBO" MARCONI Resolution No. PROPERTY MARCONI FOUNDATION FOR KIDS 4383. OWNER: 1302 INDUSTRIAL DRIVE TUSTIN, CA 92780 LOCATION: 1302 INDUSTRIAL DRIVE ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: This project is categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15311 (Class 1)of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA). i REQUEST: To install an approximately thirty-two (32) square foot double-sided monument sign with a seven and one half foot (7.5) square foot electronic changeable copy sign area. RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 4383 approving CUP 2019-00002 to install a double-sided monument sign, approximately six(6) feet in height and thirty-two (32) square feet in sign area with a seven and one half (7.5) square foot electronic changeable copy sign area for Marconi's Automotive Museum. Minutes—planning Commission May 14,2019—Page 2 of 6 Aguilar Presentation given. 7.07 p.rn. Opened the Public Hearing Item, I Ms. Priscilla Ms. Priscilla Marconi, the applicant/owner, provided background information Marconi regarding Marconi and provided her input on the need for the sign. She thanked the Commission for their consideration. I Mr. Jim Cross Mr.Jim Cross, Best Signs Inc., asked the Commission if they had any questions regarding the architectural or structural aspect of the sign. He added that it was a pleasure working for the City's Planning Department. Kudos to Ms. Aguilar for a job well donel I Mason Mason asked Mr. Cross, in terms of the placement of the sign, if the sign would be easily seen from the street view. j Mr. Jim Cross In response to Mason's question, Mr. Cross stated that the sign will be more of a commercial, contemporary,application. The actual sign will be a lit monument sign and more of a substantial presentation (point of entry) instead of informational signage. The sign will have a small information the to add event information which will assist the public when passing by Marconi or driving into. Mr. Cross also stated that the sign will not be obnoxious, but it will be noticeable. 7.11 p.m. Closed the Public Hearing Item, Mason Mason was in favor of the item and had favorable comments regarding Marconi. Gallagher Gallagher was also in favor of the project and in support of staffs recommendation. He also had favorable comments. Kozak Kozak agreed with the favorable comments previously stated. He, too, had favorable comments regarding Marconi. Motion. It was moved by Mason, seconded by Gallagher,to adopt Resolution No, 4383. Motion carried 3-0-2. REGULAR BUSINESS: fi. SUMMARY OF PROJECTS The following report provides a summary of projects and activities since the Year in Review report was presented at the February 12, 2019, Planning Commission meeting. The report focuses on the status of projects that the Planning Commission, Zoning Administrator, or staff approved; major improvement projects; Certificates of Appropriateness; Code Enforcement activities; and, other items which may be of interest to the Commission. E I RECOMMENDATION: E That the Planning Commission receive and file this item. Minutes—Planning Commission May 14,2018—Page 3 of 6 DiLeve,lohnson Presentation given. Mason Mason made favorable comments regarding the project summary. She thanked staff and DiLeva-Johnson on a job well done with the presentation. She was concerned with the recent high-profile graffiti incident in Tustin but pleased that the graffiti numbers were still lower than the previous project summary. Gallagher Gallagher asked if the Tustin Legacy Linear Park would be opening same time as the Flight and If it was still on schedule. He also asked about the occupancy of the Phase One of the Flight and if there has been any success in securing the occupancy. { i Willkom In response to Gallagher's question, Willkom stated that Phase One and Two of Linear Park (corner of Red Hill Avenue and Barranca Parkway) are anticipated to be completed as scheduled and that Linear Park will be opening in conjunction with the Flight. Per the occupancy,Willkom stated there are two (2)tenants that have submitted their tenant improvement plans to the City. She added that Lincoln Properties is in negotiation with several other potential , tenants. Kozak Kozak stated the information was very helpful and he was happy to be able to report back to concerned residents on the progress being made regarding Rock & Brews. STAFF CONCERNS: l661llkom Willkom introduced Michael Daudt, Deputy City Attorney, who will be attending future Commission meetings. She reminded the Commission of an email recently sent to them regarding the amended rules for Conflict of Interest and that in the near future, Daudt will assist staff with a presentation for the Commission on Conflict of Interest rules. Per Willkom,for all future staff reports, staff will be including new radius maps.-which will include 500 and 1000 square foot radius, so that the Commission has that information before participating on an item at future Planning Commission meetings. COMMISSION CONCERNS: Mason Mason's commentslconcems generally included: she thanked staff for the SB 50 information; she mentioned there being no clear objectives within the Bill, and provide no regard to the City's General Plan; and she asked to be educated I in terms of understanding what it is the State is solving. E Gallagher Gallagher stated the report regarding SB 50 was informative and the bill has been evolving quickly. He encouraged staff to continue tracking this Bili to ensure the City takes any action, to mitigate its impacts, if the Bill does pass, Kozak Kozak agreed with the previous comments; this is a matter of great concern; at appropriate times staff needs to report back to the Commission on the status of SB 50. Thanked staff for the detailed staff reports, Minutes—Planning Commission May 14,209—Page 4 of 5 Kozak Kozak attended the following events: i 4113: Tustin Exchange Club's "Flamingo Bingo". 4116: OCTA Citizens Advisory Committee. 4125: ULI sponsored tour of the Flight at the Tustin legacy. 518-5116: California Preservation Foundation Conference in Palm Springs 5116: Kozak and his son flew in a World War 1I B-17 flight fortress which his father flew, as a combat veteran. i 7.30 p.m. ADJOURNMENT,, 3 I The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission is scheduled for Tuesday, May 28, 2619, at 7:04 p.m. in the City Council Chamber at 300 Centennial Way, -*'STeVKXOZAK Chairperson `-ELIZABETH A. BINSACK Planning Commission Secretary E i i I I Minutes—Planning Commission May 14,2019—Page 5 of 5 MINUTES REGULAR MEETING TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION ` JUNE 11, 2019 7.09 p.m. CALL TO ORDER i Given. INVOCATIONIPLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Kozak i Present. ROLL CALL: Commissioners Gallagher, Jha, Kozak, Mason, Thompson i PUBLIC CONCERNS; Ms. Adrienne Adrienne Gladson, a representative for the Planning Directors Association Gladson of Orange County, provided brochures to the Commission inviting them to participate in an upcoming program ("Leadership on the Dias'). CONSENT CALENDAR: Thompson requested the Consent Calendar items be considered separately. Approved the 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES—MAY 14, 2019 Minutes of the May 14, 2099 Planning Commission meeting. RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission approve the Minutes of the May 14, 2019, Planning Commission meeting as provided. Nixon Library forum in October. Motion: It was moved by Mason, seconded by Gallagher,to approve the Minutes of the May 14, 2019 Planning Commission meeting. Jha and Thompson abstained from the vote due to their absences. Motion carried 3-0-2. Adopted 2. GENERAL PLAN CONFORMITY DETERMINATION 2019-00001 Resolution No. 4386. APPLICANT/ PROPERTY OWNERS: COUNTY OF ORANGE LOCATION: PETERS CANYON REGIONAL PARK ' I i Draft Minutes—Planning Commission June 11, 2019—Page I of 14, ENVIRONMENTAL: General Plan Conformity determinations required by Government Code Section 65402 are not "projects" requiring environmental review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. E REQUEST: { General Pian Conformity finding for the conveyance of two (2) permanent easements for existing pipeline facilities access. RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No, 4386, determining that the location, purpose, and extent of the proposed conveyance for E the dedication of two (2) permanent easements for access to existing pipeiine facilities is in conformance with the Tustin General Plan. k Motion: It was moved by Thompson, seconded by Kozak, to adopt Resolution No. 4386. Motion carried 5-0. Mason Mason suggested to the Commission that Item #6 be considered early in case there were members of the public wanting to speak on the item. Binsack Binsack informed the Commission that if they wanted to consider continuing Item #6, then the Public Comments Section would need to be opened at 'that time. Kozak Kozak addressed the audience to see if there were any speaker forms, 7:19 p.m. which there were none. The public comments section was open/closed. Item Continued to 3. APPEAL OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENTS the July 9, 2019 DECISION RELATED TO PLAN CHECK CORRECTIONS RELATED Planning TO CODE CASE NO. CE-2018-0243 AND BUILDING PERMIT NO, Commission COMBR-2018-00299 meeting. APPELLANT: HELEN AND ERIK LINDGREN 525 WEST SECOND STREET TUSTIN, CA 92780 LOCATION: 525 WEST SECOND STREET TUSTIN, CA 92780 , 1 ENVIRONMENTAL: This project is categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15301@ of the 1 Califomia Code of Regulations (Guidelines for California Environmental Quality Act). 1 Draft Minutes—Planning Commission June 11,2019—Page 2 of 14 h 1 REQUEST: Removal of corrections and conditions related to Code Case No. CE-2018- 0243 and Building Division Permit No. COMBR-2018-00299. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission uphold the Community Development Director's corrections and conditions associated with Code Case No. CE-2018-0243 and Permit No. COMBR-2019-00299 by adopting Resolution No. 4387 as follows: 1) Uphold the requirements related to: 3 a. Record the Deed Restriction prior to permit issuance; b. Provision of interior dimensions of 20 feet by 20 feet of the detached two-vehicle garage; c. Provision of screening the roof-mounted air conditioning (AIC) unit; and 2) Remove the requirement to screen the water softener. Motion. It was moved by Mason,seconded by Gallagher, to continue the item to the July 9, 2019 Planning Commission meeting. Motion carried 5-0. PUBLIC HEARING: Adopted 4, GENERAL PLAN CONFORMITY, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Resolution Nos. (DA) 2018-00001, LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT (LLA) 2018-00003, 4379 & 4380. CONCEPT PLAN (CP) 2018-00001, DESIGN REVIEW (DR) 2018- 00023 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT(CUP) 2018-00015 APPLICANT: SCHOOLSFIRST FEDERAL CREDIT UNION ATTN: CHRISTINA QUINTERO 1200 EDINGER AVENUE TUSTIN, CA 92780 PROPERTY SCHOOLSFIRST FEDERAL CREDIT UNION OWNERS: ATTN: CHRISTINA QUINTERO 1200 EDINGER AVENUE TUSTIN, CA 92780 i CITY OF TUSTIN j 300 CENTENNIAL WAY TUSTIN, CA 92780 ' LOCATION: 15332 NEWPORT AVENUE, 15442 NEWPORT AVENUE, 15222 DEL AMO AVENUE, 1200 EDINGER AVENUE AND PARCEL 6 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 2010-127 (APN 430-251-28) Draft Minutes--Planning Commission June 11,2019--Page 3 of 14 ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS. The City Council Certified Final Environmental Impact Report 90-1 (FEIR) for the PCESP on December 17, 1990, and Supplement#1 to [ Final EIR 90-1 for the PCESP was adopted on May 5, 2003. The FEIR is a Program EIR under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), The FEIR considered the potential environmental impacts associated with the development of the PCESP. An Environmental Checklist was prepared and concluded that the proposed actions do not result in any new significant environmental impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of any previously identified significant impacts in the FEIR and Supplement#1 for FEIR. Moreover, no new information of substantial importance has surfaced since certification of the FEIR and Supplement#1 to FEIR. 1. REQUESTS: i A request to develop of a 3-story office building, retail bank branch building, 4-level parking structure and associated improvements within planning areas 7, 9, 11 and 14 of the Pacific Center East Specific Plan (PCESP). RECOMMENDATION: 1. That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 4379, determining that the location, purpose, and extent of the proposed disposition of an approximate 1.8-acre site within PCESP for the development of the three-story office building, parking structure and retail bank building, is in conformance with the approved General Plan. 2. That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 4380, recommending that the City Council approve: a. DA 2018-00001 (Ordinance No. 1501) to facilitate the development and conveyance of an approximate 1.8-acre ,site within the boundaries of PCESP. b. LLA 2018-00003 to modify parcel lines to accommodate the proposed project. c. CP 2018-00001 for the overall concept of the office campus facility including building design, site layout and public and private improvements. d. DR 2018-00023 for the design and site layout of the 180,000 square foot office building, 5,000 square foot retail bank building, parking structure and associated site improvements. Draft Minutes—Planning Commission June 11,.2019—Page 4 of 14 e. CUP 2018-00015 for the establishment of joint use parking as required by the PCESP for parcels that do not provide required parking within its boundaries. Hutter Presentation given. Gallagher Gallagher's commentstquestions generally included: Resolution No.4380:— referenced two (2) different square footage amounts; the, Traffic Impact Study appeared to only address the proposed development, as is, and seemed to exclude approximately 69,000 square feet for future development; and he asked if the Commission approves the developer i agreement, as it stands, could the developer move ahead with the expansion without doing an additional traffic study. Hutter In response to Gallagher's question, Huffer stated that 451,000 square feet is to document the maximum square footage that would be allowed within the planning areas. W1llkom Willkom added to Huttees response stating that the entire campus consists of four (4) planning areas and for each of the planning areas, the Specific Plan identifies the development capacity, The City's Development Agreement ensures the maximum potential of development capacity with the entire campus, She added that currently, only 382,040 square feet are being utilized with the remaining square footage to be used for future development. Per Willkom, at the time of the future development, the developer would still need to return to the City with their proposal and traffic analysis. Thompson Thompson's questions/comments generally included: he asked if the City is also a part of the application process, in reference to the parcel of land being abandoned; he asked if the parcel of land is part of;the conveyance or If the City would sell that land to the developer; parking surplus, parking stalls, and parking structure being reduced by one (1) foot, he asked why it would be acceptable to reduce the parking (i.e. concern with emergency vehicles getting onto the campus); parking arrangements with the shared parking-- wanted to ensure It was adequately addressed; did CalTrans concur with the traffic study?; and he asked about the traffic mitigation requirements, specifically the one intersection with a level of service "E" and why no mitigation was done for that. Flutter In response to Thompson's first question, Hutter stated that Parcel 6 of the project is currently owned by the City. The City would be considered an applicant since there is an entitlement proposed for that property. Per Huffer,the parking space stalls are shorter(from 19 to 18 feet) but the drive aisles are a minimum 24 feet, which is the requirement. She added that the applicant is not requesting a reduction to the drive aisles and the shared parking is addressed within the Conditions of Approval. Hutter stated the City is working with the applicant to finalize the CC&R's regarding the parking requirements to ensure the parking is being shamed within the entire campus. Draft Minutes--Planning Commission June 11,2019—Page 6 of 14 W1iikom In response to Thompson's question regarding the abandoned parcel of land, Willkom stated that the remnant parcel would be conveyed to SchoolsFirst and'the real.estate transaction would be considered by the City Council. The proposed project is within the development capacity of the Specific Plan. Willkom added that there are several traffic related issues which have been analyzed when the City did the EIR for the entire Specific j Plan. Certain studies were required of certain intersections to ensure that the level of service is complied with, as it is identified within the General Plan and the study does indicate the developer is within the acceptable level of service with the condition of the traffic signal at the project's entrance. i Binsack' Binsack provided further explanation with Thompson's concern with the reduction of the parking stall standards. The difference is that it is an open area versus a closed garage. She added that typically, the City's standard dimension in a clpsed garage is IOx20 and is typical-when you do not have ' additional room to maneuver. a Nishikawa In response to Thompson's question regarding Level of Service E", Nishikawa stated that,within the traffic study, Level Service E had to dowith the entry into the project off of Newport Boulevard. There will be a,traffic signal which will mitigate the level of Service E. Nishikawa added that costs will also be shared with the .applicant since the City owns the property across the street.as well. Gallagher Gallagher also mentioned Parcel 6 (Newport and Del Amo Avenues) and a Master Sign Plan going forward. He stated that it would be an ideal place to have a 'Welcome to.Tusfin" sign and would it need to be considered at that meeting before the parcel is sold, W7ilkom Willkom stated that staff did take a look at a "Welcome to Tustin" sign, and similar monumentation. Staff will be working with the applicant since the City has the ability to negotiate with the applicant to have them consider some of the signage for the City. Willkom added that signage will be included with the.negotiation of the parcel. 7.38 p.m. Opened the Public Comments Section. Mr. Ryan Davis Mr. Ryan Davis, SchoolsFirst representative, introduced himself to the Commission and audience members, and asked if there were any further questions. 7.40 p.m. Closed the Public Comments Section. Thompson Thompson had favorable comments and was in favor of the project. i Jha Jha had favorable comments for the,project. j Kozak Kozak had favorable comments for the project. I Draft;Minutes—Planning Commisslon June 11,2019--Page 6 of 14 Mason Mason requested further background information from the applicant regarding SchoolsFirst. She asked if SchoolsFirst anticipated having a Phase 2 (headquarters) in the same area. Mason was in favor of the project. She did request that the applicant work closely with the City with the CC&R's and traffic issues. She, too, suggested the Welcome sign, Ms. Christina Ms. Christina Quintero, SchoolsFirst representative, came forward and Quintero provided further background regarding SchoolsFirst. She stated that the project will add an additional 750 team members. Ms. Quintero added that j SchoolsFirst leased another property off of Red Hill Avenue, where the consumer lending offices are currently located, and that they would relocate f those offices to the new project site, along with the Santa Ana office. She added that they would still keep their Santa Ana leased building. j Gallagher Gallagher thanked the applicant for bringing in the model and he welcomed i them to the City. He made favorable comments towards staff and he was in support of the project. Motion: It was moved by Thompson, seconded by Jha, to adopt Resolution Nos. 4379 and 4380. Motion carried 5-0. 5. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 201800018 & DESIGN REVIEW 2018- 00026 APPLICANT: TERRY ODLEIMG2 3333 MICHELSON DRIVE, SUITE 100 IRVINE, CA 92612 PROPERTY OWNER: DIANA SALAZAR COSTCO DIRECTOR.OF REAL ESTATE COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION 9 CORPORATE PARK, SUITE 230 IRVINE, CA 92606 LOCATION: 2641 AND 2655 EL CAMINO REAL ENVIRONMENTAL: This project is categorically exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 15332, Class 32, REQUEST: i A request to demolish the existing Goodyear Tire Center and adjacent parking area at 2541 EI Camino Real and replace with 56 new parking stalls and construct a new 16 pump Costco gasoline fuel station with canopy and related equipment at 2655 EI Camino Real. I Draft Minutes—Planning Commission June 11,2019—Page 7 of 14. RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No, 4385, approving Conditional Use Permit. (CUP) .2018-00018 and Design Review (DR) 2018-00026 to demolish the existing Goodyear Tire Center and adjacent Goodyear parking area at'2541 EI Camino Real and replace with 56 new parking stalls and to construct a new 16 pump Costco Gasoline fuel station with canopy, related equipment and landscaping at 2655 EI , Camino Real. Jha Jha recused himself from this item due to a competing financial interest. I Demkowicz Presentation given, Gallagher Gallagher referred to the traffic analysis and the comment in the Summary Findings related;to the need for adjusting the signal timing and if it was a requirement for the City or the applicant. Nishikawa In response to Gallagher's question, Nishikawa referred to the applicant's traffic sturdy(Bryan Avenue& Market Way) and one of the requirements for the applicant is that they include a dedicated right tum on El Camino Real, and is park of the project. Per Nishikawa, there is also a separate project proposal at the intersection of El Camino Real (ECR) and Tustin Ranch Road (TRR) and is part of the City's Capital Improvement Program and the Notice to Proceed is scheduled for June 17, 2019. He added that right turn pockets, on all four (4) directions at ECR and TRR. In addition, there will be two (2) left turn lanes from ECR onto TRR because currently there is congestion in that area; with these improvements, the City will take a look at the impacts and whether the timing changes will be necessary on Bryan Avenue. If it is, City staff can control the timing since but wanted to see if the improvements will alleviate the concern of any back up traffic. Thompson Thompson asked if the Costco Tire Center access would be blocked by the queue line. His concern was that there would be an impact to the Costco Tire Center parking spaces. Thompson asked staff to explain further the 5:00 a.m.to 10:00 p.m. business hours and how it works with the approvals that already exist for the project site and what the business hours for surrounding businesses. Demkowicz Demkowicz referred the Commission to. the stacking plan within the PowerPoint presentation that Costco is proposing, She explained that the queuing would take place in the middle aisle where there are rows of trees, not the same drive aisle as the Costco Tire center, Demkowicz stated that Costco was requesting the 5:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. business hours. Typical hours for other Costoo stores in Orange County are 5:30 a.m. to 9:30 p.m. j The other hours for businesses within the shopping center are 5:30 a.m. to 9,30 p.m, with the exception of McDonald's which is open 24 hours. Draft Minutes—Planning Commission.tune 11,2019—Page 8 of 14 Mason Mason voiced her concern with the queuing causing congestion to the parking lot, referencing the Costco at the District. She asked if the queue set up would cause back up in the parking lot. Mason requested more assurances that the queuing issue is going to be addressed so as not to be similar to the Costco at the District. Mason asked about Costco's current operating hours and wanted to ensure staff can re-address the hours of operation if there are issues with exceeding noise limits, and impacts of traffic patterns during rush hour. She also asked if there would be any audio or marketing monitors at the gas pumps. W111kom In response to Mason's concern, Wilikom stated that staff has worked extensively with the Costco Traffic Engineer to ensure no impacts. Willkom invited the traffic engineer to the podium to explain further on the queuing ; program they are proposing. Ms. Neelam Dorman, Traffic Engineer with Kittelson and Associates local traffic engineering firm in Orange, responded to Mason's concern with the queuing. Her response generally included: the proposed project has 32 pumps versus the District,which has 22 which will move people a lot quicker through the queue's (i.e.the red light/green light system and the Costco pay system); more queue space than at the District; she provided further explanation of the added right tum lane onto ECR so as not to interfere with street traffic; trying to create as much space on/off site to not interfere with any other movements that are not intending to come to the shopping center; the queue management plan does take into account closing out the north access to allow more space to allow an additional eight(8) cars of stacking; will have additional attendants directing traffic; should anything go wrong and there be any additional monitoring needed, Costco would provide it after site opening; Costco has a significant site in Temecula (30 pumps) which is a similar location next to their mail and is not as close to a freeway on-ramp as the proposed location and queues decreased to 26 cars waiting at the Temecula location. Demkowicz Per Demkowicz, the current Costco store hours are 10:00 a.m. to 8:30 p.m. The applicant is requesting the hours of operation, for the gas station only, to be 5.00 am. to 10;00 p.m. In response to Mason's question on the audio/marketing monitors at the pumps, Demkowicz stated it was not indicated on the applicant's plan. W111kom Willkom explained to Mason and the Commission that the City can revisit any concerns with hours of operation and traffic, which are within the Conditions of Approval. 8:77 p.m. Opened the Public Comments. i Ms. Veronica Ms. Veronica Barker, Tustin Ranch resident, spoke in opposition of the item Barker and her concerns generally included: impact on the humanistic side of the plan, traffic impacts; not in favor of the Good Year store being demolished to add more parking; and she would prefer the old Kmart building be demolished because of the current homeless issue, trash, and darkly .lit parking lot. Draft Minutes—Planning commission June 11,2019--Page 9 of 14, Mr. Stephen Mr. Stephen McNamara spoke in opposition of the item and his McNamara commentslconcems generally included: referred to a Google photo of a i parking lot for the Commission to point out traffic concerns currently at the Costco at fhe District; negative impacts to the right turn lane onto ECR; noise concern from multiple cars idling; and poor air quality which will be CEQA concern. Mr. Aaron Peter's Mr. Aaron Peters, Tustin resident, spoke in opposition of the item and his comments/concerns generally included: 'traffic consuming fueling station"; no traffic control; students heading to school could be in danger of traffic; the Temecula gas station previously mentioned is 32 miles away from ' Interstate 215 freeway and the proposed project is less than 2 miles from the Interstate 5 freeway; the addition of a gas station will hurt local gas stations; and the proposed gas station will be exclusive to Costco members only. Mr. Ka!Patel Mr. Kal Patel, resident, spoke in opposition of the item and his concerns generally included: gas lines; also referred to the Costco at the District; hours of operation; proximity of the project to the freeway; and the Costco gas station will take away from surrounding small gas stations. Mr. Charlie Mazza Mr. Charlie Mazza, resident in Irvine, owner of Shell station in Tustin Ranch, spoke in opposition of the project and his concerns generally included: the plan does not include the number of gallons Costco will sell; future traffic congestion on ECR and Bryan Avenue; also referred to the District's Costco; and will harm surrounding business owners. Ms. Anayeli Garfras Anayeli Carfias,Santa Ana resident, spoke in opposition of the item and her concerns generally included: increase in traffic on Market Street and Tustin Ranch Road; no need for another Costco since there is already one at the District; and the Costco gas station will take away from small businesses. Ms. Diana Salazar Ms. Diana Salazar, Real Estate Development Manager for Costco, spoke in response to the comments previously made which generally included: thanked City staff for working with Costco during the application process; she provided background information regarding Costco at the District (2007); areas of the current parking site are underutilized;40 percent of the customers at the District are from the Tustin Ranch Road zip code area which means traffic will be taken away from the streets by reducing the distance that the drivers are driving to pump gas; hours of operation—most Costco locations are open 5:30 a.m. to 9:30 p.m. however, they would like the flexibility to serve Costco customers before regular business hours and after closing hours which will hopefully balance out the heavy traffic during store hours. Ms. Valerie Ms. Valerie McNamara, resident, spoke in opposition of the item and her McNamara concerns generally included: traffic impacts at the site; early moming traffic to Beckman High School and after school; traffic impacts from the gas station near Bryan Avenue and ECR. i i 7 Draft Minutes—Planning Commission June 11,2010—Page 10-of 14 Mr Daniel Sushel Mr. Daniel Sushel, resident, spoke in opposition of the item and his concerns generally included: traffic impacts; what will determine the amount of traffic is people's tolerance for traffic jams; air pollution from cars in line at the gas pumps; and the project will affect current Costco members,who live in the area, negatively and will affect their quality of life. Mr. Sany Mr. Barry Harbayan, lives across from Costco near Bryan Avenue, spoke in Harbayan opposition of the item and voiced his concern with regard to traffic, noise and exhaust fumes affecting Bryan Avenue. } 8:48 p.m. Closed the Public Comments Section. Thompson Thompson's final comments after public input generally included: he thanked the public for their input and echoed the same concerns; there are some concerns within the purview of the Commission that need to be addressed (the District and ongoing challenges - what has the City learned?) and there are some concerns outside the Commission's purview (i.e. the impact on other gas stations);; how does this proposal differ/corrects and improves what is being done at the District's Costco; operating hours -- is this operating model consistent with the other businesses and within the land use regulations; start off with shorter amount of operating hours to see how it works and ensure it is working responsibly, and if it is, revisit at a later date; parking when the queue is in full operation, it appears to take out three (3)aisles of parking, not just one (1)—how does it calculate into the code requirements for Costco?; unfair 'to use McDonald's parking spaces as surplus; need a better explanation of the shared parking and what happens when the businesses are in full operation (i.e. how many parking spaces are lost, what happens to traffic?); if there is a shared parking arrangement, both parties need to be responsible for the cleanup of the parking lot and homeless issue, and if not shared parking, do j not count as part of the inventory. Gallagher Gallagher's final comments after public input generally included: he agreed With a lot of the public's concerns, including the District's Costco; traffic to/from the 1-5 Freeway to Costoo; the reason Costco is busy is because it is providing a service to the Tustin residents; if and when the Kmart building is in full service, was the parking considered?, safety concern with the deliveries —was that considered?; did not see a reduction in the levels of service. in the traffic study, but there is concern there will be (what percentage in increase is expected and does it reflect what is being projected?; in favor of shorter operating hours to start off with; and having a stronger back stop — if everything the City was told by the applicant goes wrong, and the proposed Costco gas station ends up like the District's Costco, there should not be any question as to what the resolution is and what can be done to address it. 1 Mason Mason thanked the community for their input and her final comments generally included: the Commission needs to judge this item's met of what was presented to the Commission; the City is replacing a business with another; the Costco gas station will help thrive the shopping center; need to consider the hours of operation; look at this project from the perspective of Draft Minutes—Planning Commission June 11,2019—page 11 of 14 Mason the students/residents in the area; and she asked who owns the parcel at the shopping center because it is a big, empty space and it is becoming a blight. Kozak Kozak thanked the public for their input. Kozak's concerns generally included: hours of operation; impacts to level of service may be impacting j the surface streets; the shared parking impacts; and the project has merit j but the issues previously mentioned need to be addressed before the I Commission can make an action and viable recommendation for the community to the City Council. Thompson Per Thompson, collectively, the Commission would Irate to continue the item to get some additional information that could also affect additional conditions for approval to move forward. Again, the issues the Commission collectively touched on were: parking during operations; operating hours; deliveries and how they play into the operating hours; [earnings from the District and how the City will apply those to the proposed project; corresponding local level of service in traffic; and the quality of life issue dealing with,the panting lot and who has responsibility. Binsack Per Binsack, if it is the consensus of the Commission to continue the item, staff will summarize.the issues both from the public and the Commission, and return to the Commission with concise responses to those comments and concems. Staff will meet with Costco as well. If the consensus is to continue the item, she recommended continuing to the July 9, 2019 Planning Commission meeting to ensure the Commission is continuing to a date certain in order to provide enough time to respond to those comments and concerns. If staff does not feel that is sufficient amount of time,the item can always be continued from the July 9, 2019 meeting as well Kozak Kozak added that when staff goes through the areas of concern, if in the analysis, there are some alternatives, than staff would mitigate these impacts that were discussed which would be helpful in the Commission's deliberations. Mason Mason also added,that the Commission and staff are trying to be thoughtful of the concerns previously stated. Motion: It was moved by Mason, seconded by Thompson, to continue the item to the July 9, 2019 Planning Commission meeting. Motion carried 5-0. 6. CONDITIONAL. USE PERMIT (CUP) 2019-00006 APPLICANT/ BRETT HAMARA PROPERTY OWNER: LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA, INC. 15131 ALTON PARKWAY, SUITE 355 IRVINE, CA 92618 LOCATION: LOT 1 AND 6 OF TRACT 18125 i Draft Minutes—Planning.Commission June 11,2019 Page 12 of 14 ENVIRONMENTAL, This project is categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15304(e) (Class 4) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). REQUEST. A request to establish a temporary home sales center including a 2,100 square foot sales office trailer, parking lot and landscaping for new home l sales activities at the Levity at Tustin Legacy subdivision. RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 4388, approving CUP 2019-00006, a request to establish a temporary home sales center including sales office trailer, parking lot and landscaping, for I new home sales activities in the Levity at Tustin Legacy community until December 2022. Nutter Presentation given. 9:12 pm Opened/Closed the Public Comments Section. Gallagher Gallagher had no concerns and he was in support of the item. Mason Mason had favorable comments regarding the item and was in support of the item. Kozak Kozak also had favorable comments regarding the item and he, too, was in support of the item. Thompson Thompson was in favor of the item. Motion: It was moved by Thompson, seconded by Jha, to adopt Resolution No. 4388. Motion carried 5-0. i None.. REGULAR BUSINESS ' STAFF CONCERNS: 4,1 . ,r Binsack Binsack infoimed theCommission of the following upcoming events: i o 6/18: CPF webinar in the CDD Conference Room (12-1:30 p.m.) • 6/20: Mayor's Business Recognition Luncheon. • 7116: CPF webinar—"Part Two"in the CDD,Conference Room (12- 1:30 p.m.) COMMISSION CONCERNS: Jha Jha participated in an FBI program. Welcome back! Go US Women's Soccer for the World Cups Draft Minutes--Pianning Commission Jude 11,2019—Page 13 of 14 Thompson Thompson attended the following events. * 418. OCBC OC Moves Committee 4125: Tour of the Tustin Flight • 4128: Film Premiere of Chapman University's Senior Thesis Films (filmed in Old Town Tustin) • 5130: APA Awards Ceremony — Congratulations to the City and staff for the DCCSP • 5f31: Luncheon with the LA Union Rescue Mission Gallagher No comments. Mason Mason thanked staff for all of the work that was involved with the staff I reports and presentations. Congratulations to staff for the DCCSP award! She requested an update on the progress with the homeless shelter at a future Planning Commission meeting. Kozak Kozak thanked staff for job well done on the agenda packet and presentations. Congratulations to staff for the DCCSP award! He attended the following events: • 5119: BBQ at the Veterans Outpost in Tustin 4 5127; Memorial Day Ceremony at Fairhaven Cemetary * 5131-5f1: Air Force Change of Command Ceremony at Travis Air Force Base in Fairfield for his brother, Colonel Ray Kozak, where he served as Commander of the 349th Air Mobility Wing and he was promoted to Staff Director for 41h Air Force at March Air Force Base. Congratulations! 9:19 p.m. ADJOURNMENT: The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission is scheduled for Tuesday, June 25, 2019, at 7:00 p.m, in the City Council Chamber at 300 Centennial Way. 3 I a ST OZAK Chairp rson I i ELIZABETH A. BINSACiK 3 Planning Commission Secretary s Draft Minutes--Planning Commission,dune 11,2019—page 14 of 14 MINUTES REGULAR MEETING TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 9, 2019 I TOO p.m. CALL TO ORDER Given INVOCATION/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. Thompson Present. ROLL CALL: Chair Kozak Chair Pro Tem Thompson Commissioners Gallagher, Jha, Mason None, PUBLIC CONCERNS: l CONSENT CALENDAR: Approved the 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES --.TUNE 11, 2019 Minutes of*the June 11, 2099 Planning Commission meeting, as amended. RECOMMENDATION. That the Planning Commission approve the Minutes of the June 11, 2019, Planning Commission meeting as provided. Motion: It was moved by Thompson, seconded by Mason, to approve the Minutes of the June 11, 2019 Planning Commission meeting, as amended. Motion carried 5-0. Kozak With the concurrence of his fellow Commissioners, Kozak stated that Item #3 was withdrawn and if there was anyone in the audience present for Item #3, they were welcome to approach the podium, which there were none. Kozak also asked for the Commission's concurrence to move the Regular Business Item #4 out of order to manage the agenda and time, given the significant number of speaker forms received. The Commission concurred with Kozak's suggestion, Item was 2. CONTINUED ITEM- APPEAL OF CORRECTIONS AND CONDITIONS withdrawn. RELATED TO CODE CASE NO. CE.-2018-0243 AND PERMIT NO. COMBR-2018-00299 (ITEM #3 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA) i APPELLANT: HELEN LINDGREN AND ERIK LINDGREN 1 525 WEST SECOND STREET TUSTIN, CA 92780 i I M€nules—Planning Commission July 9,2019—Page 1 of 12 LOCATION: 525 WEST SECOND STREET TUSTIN, CA 92780 REQUEST: Removal of corrections and conditions related to an illegal conversion of a two-car garage into a living unit and unpermitted addition to an existing j single family dwelling. ENVIRONMENTAL: l This project is categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15301(E) of the California Code of Regulations (Guidelines for California Environmental Quality Act). RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission uphold the Community Development Director's corrections and conditions associated with Code Case No. CE- 201870243 and Permit No. COMER-2018-00299 by adopting Resolution No. 4387 as follows: 1) Uphold the Community Development Department policy to record the Deed Restriction as shown without modifications in Attachment A of the agenda report, prior to permit issuance, 2) Uphold the Tustin City Code (TCC) requirements regarding: a. The interior dimensions of 20 feet by 20 feet of the detached two- vehicles garage; and b. Screening of the roof-mounted air conditioning (A1C) unit. REGULAR BUSINESS: Approved the 3. TUSTIN HISTORIC REGISTER NOMINATION, TOLIN HOUSE - 165 nomination of NORTH A STREET (ITEM! #4 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION 165 North A AGENDA) Street to the City's Historic Register Plaque Program, RECOMMENDATION: i That the Planning Commission approve the nomination of 165 North A Street to the City's Historic Register Plaque Program and select "Tolin House - 1923" as the most appropriate historlical name and date of construction,of the property, Dove Presentation given. j II I Minutes—Planning Commission July 9,20 19—Page 2 of 12- 3' l Motion: It was moved by Thompson, seconded by Kozak, to approve the nomination of 165 North A Street to the City's Historic Register Plaque Program. Motion carried 5-0. PUBLIC HEARING: Adopted Reso. 4. CONTINUED ITEM: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT(CUP) 2018-00018 & No. 4385. DESIGN REVIEW (DR) 2018-00026 (ITEM #2 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA) APPLICANT: TERRY ODLEIMG2 3333 MICHELSON DRIVE, SUITE 100 IRVINE, CA 92612 3 PROPERTY OWNER: DIANA SALAZAR COSTCO DIRECTOR OF REAL ESTATE COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION 9 CORPORATE PARK, SUITE 230 IRVINE, CA 92606 LOCATION: 2541 AND 2655 EL CAMINO REAL REQUEST: A request.to demolish the existing Goodyear Tire Center and adjacent Goodyear parking area at 2541 EI Camino Real and to construct a new 16 pump Costco gasoline fuel station with canopy and related equipment at 2655 EI Camino Real. ENVIRONMENTAL: This project is categorically exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 15332, Class 32. ! RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No.4385, approving the project. Jha Jha recused himself from this item due to a competing financial interest. I Demkowlcz Presentation given. Thompson Thompson stated that the Level of Service (LOS) remains the same. He referred to the Rutan & Tucker- letter and asked Demkowicz to clarify the number of acres on the project site in comparison with the PowerPoint presentation (i.e. is the Costco warehouse included?), Thompson asked Nishikawa to provide clarity as to the relevancy of the traffic engineering ! comments within the letter from Rutan & Tucker, along with the email from Veronica Barker regarding traffic circulation and fuel track delivery. He also Minutes--Planning Commission July 9,2019—Page 3 of 12 Thompson asked about the wait time signs ("similar to Disneyland") being added to the i management plan, Demkowicz In response to Thompson's question regarding the number of acres, Demkowicz stated that the overall project area is less than three (3) acres. ` The warehouse building is not part of the submitted application. Nishikawa In response to Thompson's question, Nishikawa referred to a section of the Tom Brohard and Associates letter where they insinuated that there was substantial evidence that the proposed project would have adverse traffic and transportation impacts that were not properly disclosed, analyzed, and mitigated. Nishikawa did not concur with those statements, In terms of the items mentioned within the Tom Brohard and Associates letter, he responded as follows: credit on the traffic volume from the Goodyear Tire Center that no longer exists, is irrelevant as the applicant looked at the center being fully operational;with the project, the intersection still shows the LOS A or B, and that is what they are today; the TCC allows a LOS D and still would not require traffic mitigation; with the project, there will be additional traffic, but as far as the analysis and the LOS that one can expect, it is still right along the same capacity that we see today; in order to get to LOS D, for instance, 400 left turn trips from EI Camino Real onto Tustin Ranch Road would need to be added than what is shown today; an additional 1,000 through trips from EI Camino Real crossing Tustin Ranch Road in order to get to LOS D at the intersection; Nishikawa again referred to the letter that a weekend analysis, during peak hours,was not conducted (Table 6 of the traffic analysis); City staff analyzed the traffic volume(on streets and intersections) in the traffic report, which is heavier on weekdays, especially during rush hour(7:00 to 9:00 a.m. or4:00 to 6:00 p.m.); the queuing analysis is a different subject, which is why Costco analyzed weekend hours because that is when traffic is heaviest for them; right turn pockets that Costco is providing on El Camino Real, are not a required item by the City; the project will include Costco right turn pockets to facilitate through traffic; there not being enough room for the extra twelve (12) foot lane that the City wants, is not the case; the site has no physical improvements needing to be made out and it can all be accommodated with striping on EI Camino Real; the angled parking spaces near the fuel stations are for employee parking only; double stacking north of the fueling stations are also for employee parking only; if Management Plan 2 has to be implemented, it would only affect employee parking; pop-up ba[lards are not going to be an issue but there is an alternative (manual ballards); per the fuel delivery trucks comment from Veronica Barker email, the delivery trucks will deliver to the east side of the property, which is away from the fueling station and outside of the queue area; and in response to Thompson's comment on the wait time sign, Nishikawa mentioned the Frequency Operated Button (FOB) reader helping to speed up the process (and new technology). 7:50 p.m. Opened up the Public Comments Section. i I I Minutes—Planning Commission July 9.2019—Page 4 of 12 Mr Sean Sean Henderson, representing the applicant, clarified the part of the Rutan & Henderson Tucker letter that stated that the site area versus the project area (grading/drainage plans identify disturbed area which is approximately 2,5 acres and is the actual project area) coincides and -supports CEQA Exemption. Ms. Diane Diana Salazar, applicant, stated the following in general: she thanked staff Salazar, for their work efforts on the project; the goal of the project is to provide fuel applicant service at this location;currently there are 535 Costco warehouses in the U.S. and 470 of those warehouses have gas stations; Tustin Ranch Costco warehouse includes members from north Tustin, Cowan Heights, Lemon Heights, Orange Park Acres and part of Santa Ana; the Costco at the District is serving the Tustin Ranch member base and 40 percent of the gas transactions are from the Tustin Ranch area; The District has circulation j issues and trips would be reduced at that location with the construction of the Tustin Ranch site; the proposed project would help with the demand at the District and reduce trips, etc.; in response to the concerns at the last meeting, Ms. Salazar agrees with the revised Conditions of Approval; site congestion and parking availability—.the applicant and her team made two (2) site visits to the project site, and discovered the parking, where they are proposing to put the gas station, is underutilized (currently the parking is ten (10) percent in use); and an independent study was completed in 2014 and 2018 on ` existing Costco warehouses in shopping centers, which showed that 46 percent of the members shopping at Costco made purchases the same day in the same shopping center and based on that study, members currently shopping at the Tustin Ranch Costco, plus the added traffic at the gas station, will likely make additional purchases in the Tustin Market Place and nearby businesses. Thompson Thompson requested clarification regarding the parking lot sharing relationship between the businesses through the CC&Rs and the maintenance (landscaping) being specific to the property line. Salazar Per Ms. Salazar, she confirmed Thompson's statement previously made. There is a reciprocal easement, as far as use, but each parcel needs to comply with the CC&Rs parking ratio, which is five (5) per 1,000 which exceeds the City's parking ratio of 4.5 per 1,000. She added that each individual parcel has to provide the required-parking, per the CC&Rs (5 per 1,000). Masan Mason had additional questions regarding the queueing, specifically the employee parking stalls and the access to and from the proposed gas station. She also asked that if the applicant had to restrict the parking due to a"special circumstance", the applicant could potentially close off the parking, as a queuing area, and not be outside of the required parking spaces. I Minutes—planning Commission July 9,2019—Page 5 of 12 Ms. Neelam Ms. Neelam Dolan, Kittleson and Associates Traffic Engineer with Costco, Dolan, Kittleson responded as follows; the parking north of the proposed gas station would be and Associates employee only parking 2417; employee parking spots will be filled before Costco warehouse opens and will not interfere with members arriving after Costco warehouse opens; there will be no designated parking to the stalls on the opposite side of the employee parking; Queue Management Plan 2,is not an expected or needed condition; looking at both transactions and data at the Costco at the District, and the number of gas pumps, the applicant anticipates that operation at the proposed project site would be 45 percent more efficient; in Kittleson and Associates study and the Temecula Costco location,which is the biggest Costco in the region with 30 gas pumps, queues much less than the queuing capacity within the fuel area; Queue Management Plan 1 is the worst-case scenario; the goal of restricting the employee parking spaces to employees only is to ensure adequate circulation around the gas station; and there is adequate parking to address Costco member needs if additional employee parking is designated; Ms. Neelam"s response to Mason's question regarding "restricted parking'; she stated they do have the capacity to accommodate parking on-site if the employee spaces were unavailable, i In favor. Mr. Scott Couchman, Tustin resident, commented on the following in general: need for additional gas stations in north,Tustin area; Costco is burdening other local gas stations with free water and air (Resolution No. 4385, l Condition No. 2.5 of the Conditions of Approval - pages 105 and 182 of the agenda report) and asked that Costco provide these same services; and Mr. Couchman was in favor of the project. In favor. Mr. John Takasha, resident and business owner in Tustin Ranch, commented on the following, in general: Costco contributes to the economy;fears Costco may close this location if gas station not provided; limited amount of commercial property to generate tax revenue; EI Camino property is a blight to the community and will further impact the neighborhood; staff answered all of his questions and he had no concems; he liked the proposed design and, traffic flow; and Mr. Takasha was in favor of the project. Opposed. Mr. Aaron Peters, Tustin resident and former specialist in the queueing at Disneyland commented on the following, in general: Queue Management Plan 2 will be needed since there is only one (1) exit; there are already traffic related concerns to Tustin Ranch Road and Bryan Avenue and EI Camino Real without the addition of a high traffic gas station; there are several accidents near project location due to traffic, poor visibility and driver neglect; ; the traffic study was completed after a holiday and a rainy day; there are potential conflicts with the school nearby; impacts to neighboring gas stations/small businesses; and Mr. Peters opposed the item. 3 Opposed Ms. Suzanne Lowenthal, Tustin resident, commented on the following, in general: concern with traffic volume data and the date it was collected; impact to traffic; queues would exceed the one (1) exit; left tum lane off of Bryan Avenue into shopping center is already short; concern with cars entering and exiting the proposed gas station; and Ms. Lowenthal opposed the item. Minutes—Planning Commission July 9,2019—Page 6 of 12 n In favor, Mr. Tim Woolsey, North Tustin resident, spoke in favor of the project; the queueing problem at the District will not be repeated at the proposed project site being that there is an adequate circulation area. ? In favor. Mrs. Wendy Woolsey, North Tustin resident, spoke in favor of the project -- local gas station at an existing Costco is a great idea; and the proposed project will increase sales tax revenue and will benefit the City of Tustin, Opposed. Ms. Jacqueline Hibbs, Tustin resident, commented on the following, in general, concern with the future sale of her home as FHA loans are not an option if you live within 400 meters of a gas station; more transparency needed with public notification (i.e. City website, Facebook, not just newspaper), an accident study is needed; gas vapors not good for human element; and Ms. Hibbs opposed the project. In favor. Mr. Steve McArthur, Irvine resident, commented on the following, in general: queuing will not be problematic; the proposed project will lessen the traffic at the District; tax revenue will increase in the City of Tustin; and Mr. McArthur spoke in favor of the item: In favor. Mr. Sean Painter, Tustin resident and Costco employee, commented on the following, in general: the proposed project would bring more jobs to Tustin; reduce traffic at the District; will help the community; and Mr. Painter was in favor of the item. In favor. Ms. Renee Krause, commented on the following, in general: two (2) completely different situations with the District's Costco and the proposed project; different traffic circulation; more vehicles will use Jamboree Road; convenient location at Tustin Ranch Road since Ms. Krause Eines near the project site location; cheaper gas; and Ms. Krause was in favor of the project. In favor. Mr. Jon Goetz, Tustin Ranch resident and Costco member, commented on the following, in general: in favor of cheaper, high-quality gas; the proposed gas station location would cut his commute'when buying gas by three (3) miles; did not agree with those who opposed; and Mr. Goetz was in favor of the project. Opposed. Mr. Andrew Krenz, Sycamore Community, commented on the following, in general: Tesla car sales and electric vehicle use; and he asked for the Commission to consider long-term consequences when there are less people with gas vehicles. In favor. Mr. Tom Key, Tustin resident, commented on the following, in general: Americans love cars and traveling; Costco sells high-quality gas at reduced prices; Costco is a good company; and Mr. Key was in favor of the item. In favor. Ms. Patricia Davis, Santa Ana resident, commented on the following, in general: she frequents the District and hopes this proposed project will alleviate the queuing problem at the District; would increase revenue for the City of Tustin; would improve the shopping center's security; staff is attempting to avoid the same issues at the District with the proposed project; Minutes—Planning Commission July 9,2019—Page 7 of 12 j level the business load between the two (2) sites; take lessons learned from the District's Costco and apply to the proposed project site; concern with the left turn lane; local.traffic will improve; and Ms. Davis was in favor of the item. E In favor, Ms. Rebecca Burton, Tustin Meadows resident, Costco member, would like to see a gas station and store combined for a more rational shopping I experience. Ms. Burton was in favor of the item. i Opposed. Mr. Matt Molkara, Irvine resident, stated"how many more Costco warehouses does Tustin need?" He was concerned with impact to traffic and stated that the project was not the answer to the homelessness situation. Mr. Molkara was opposed to the item. Opposed. Mr. Charlie Mazza, Shell gas station owner near the project site, who hired Rutan & Tucker, spoke on the following, in general: traffic study was not adequate; queueing entrance/exit issue; concern with delivery trucks access; and Mr. Mazza was opposed to the item. Opposed. Ms. Lisa McMains, Irvine resident, commented on the following, in general: she urged the Commission to not adopt the project and reminded the Commissioners their role and balance between commercial and residents; asked the Commission to not make a decision to change Tustin with the proposed project; would affect residents quality of life with increase in accidents; concern with the left hand turn; and Ms. McMains was opposed to the item. Opposed. Ms. Anna Garfias, Santa Ana resident, commented on the following, in general: increase in traffic; no need for two (2) Costco warehouses within three (3)miles apart; taxpayers money will go to street widening; LOS grades and actual impacts; roads are not an existing LOS A or B; and Ms. Garfias was opposed to the item. In favor. Mr. Marvin Watson, Tustin resident and Costco employee, stated that the City of Tustin is growing and that the proposed project would help the Tustin Legacy. Mr. Watson was in favor of the item. In favor, Mr. Michael Okuma, Santa Ana resident, commented on the following, in general: proposed project would alleviate pressure at the District; project site is more convenient; kudos to staff for the analysis; site has been vacant and this project would help;tax revenue for the City of Tustin; and Mr. Okuma was in favor of the item. In favor. Mr. Leonard Sirmopouios, Tustin resident, stated that`eve" need to accept our share of gas stations and that the proposed project is the most efficient-way to get gas at Costco. Mr. Sirmopoulos was in favor of the item. In favor. Vasanthi Okuma, Santa Ana resident, stated that traffic is already an issue at the project site and she was in favor of the item. . l I Minutes—Planning Commission July 9,2019—Page 8 of 12 Opposed. Ms. Linda Lewotsky, Tustin resident, commented on the following, in general: she shops for gasoline at all Costco locations throughout the state; supports other gas stations in Los Angeles and San Diego; suggested the applicant reduce the number of pumps to keep within small community of Tustin (keep quaintness); more homework needed; and Ms. Lewotsky was opposed to the item. Opposed. Mr. John Forbes, Tustin resident, commented on the following, in general: queueing will add to the traffic congestion; increase in air pollution; two (2) Costco gas stations in Tustin is too many; will decrease the quality of life; compared the project to the John Wayne Airport; will decrease the value of the homes in the neighborhood; and Mr.Forbes opposed the item. 8:58 p.m. Closed the Public Comments Section. 1 Thompson Thompson's questions/comments generally included: he asked Nishikawa to comment on the time that data was acquired for the traffic study; and to clarify the right turn lane going into the Costco parking lot, he asked if the parking attendants would be required to manage the traffic.within the gas station; if consistent with the General Plan and zoning, what are the other factors that can be considered (i.e. traffic — biggest Issue I quality of life); if issues are bundled —traffic and LOS has been checked and re-checked and it is good; spoke on emissions from queuing vehicles, which staff has analyzed; concerned about hours of operation and in-line gas station hours with other tenants; concern with the shared parking agreement and maintenance of the property; Costco should provide security to the entire shopping center and everyone should pick up trash within the parking area; need clarification with regards to queuing and Impacts to employee parking; Quality Management Plan —posting of vehicle wait times for drivers waiting for gas to help reduce traffic impacts; and modify the Conditions of Approval with regards to the posting of vehicle wait times. Nishikawa In response to Thompson's questions, Nishikawa stated, in general: the weekday analysis would approximate the worst conditions; weather does play a factor in the analysis; data taken during the holiday season means there should have been more traffic; the exiting concern from the gas station at the District is that there is only one way out, which is onto Park Avenue and at the proposed location, the concern is the left tum movement leaving the gas station and returning to El Camino Real and the proposed project has a few exits (3 access points for major roadways); turning movements —the City is in the process of doing improvements at El Camino Real and Tustin Ranch Road, which has nothing to do with the proposed project and had to do with {` monies available when the Market Place was built long ago (adding right tum pockets in all four(4) intersections and increasing left tum pockets and adding a second left turn lane from El Camino Real onto Tustin Ranch Road in order to get to the freeway because that has been a problem area; and Costco [ funds the right turn lane going into Costco. Qemkowicz Per Thompson's question regarding the parking attendants, Demkowicz stated that the plan is to help facilitate the queueing and stacking. Minutes—Planning Commission Juty 9,2019--Page 9 of 12 Kozak Kozak also asked about the left hand turn pocket off of El Camino Real into the shopping center and if there is space to accommodate the left hand'tum pocket, which Nishikawa stated previously that there would be a dedicated left hand tum pocket. Thompson Thompson's final comments generally included: the Commission is not here ; to.consider the finances of the City of Tustin and it is not motivation for the Commission and their deliberation; if it affects other businesses and it is consistent with the general land use designation of the property, the properly owner has the right to develop within the context of what that general plan zoning has been established and if there is consistency,then otherfacts have to be considered (some may not work-- i.e. quality of life); it is not within the j Commission's purview with regard to gas station competition; the operating hours -- start out with hours more consistent with the shopping center; the shared parking arrangement and Costco should expand beyond the security line (anybody can pick up trash); should not count employee parking as part of the surplus; employee parking and surplus parking need to be clarified; there should be signs post showing what the wait times are in order to reduce traffic impacts; and lastly, Thompson suggested some modifications to the appropriate conditions within the Conditions of Approval. Gallagher Gallagher's final comment was that the Commission should focus on the following issues in general: traffic and queueing —deferred to the experts on the adequacy of the traffic study; referenced the Costco on Alton Parkway and not seeing any impacts, there are two (2) gas stations off of Red Hill Avenue near Tustin High School and did not see any issues there; human element and home values — FHA loan — there already is a gas station near the speaker who mentioned this; the size of the proposed gas station — it is not the largest gas station the applicant is trying to build, it is the best and by adding more pumps, traffic will flow quicker, limiting hours of operation could have an adverse effect (leave the hours of operation restriction to a future meeting if there are adverse impacts); security limitation (agreed with Thompson's comments); document the concepts previously stated by Thompson to use in the future; spoke of public comments and opposition argument; concurs with Thompson on added security; and save the Thompson's suggested concepts for consideration at a later date, should it not be as anticipated (i.e. queueing signs). Mason Mason thanked the residents for coming out and speaking. Her comments generally included: modification of the hours can.be changed and altered by the Community Development Director, if need be; Plan 2 mitigation of the queueing — make sure it does not impact the parking requirements by the business; she trusts that what has been addressed by City staff has demonstrated that there is no material impact to traffic, noise and pollution, and that the addition of a gas station will make it better, stated Thompson's concerns were valid but they need to be addressed in the future, if need be; important to consider the worst case scenario— mitigation included is good; spoke of modifications suggested by Thompson, but did not feel the need to implement now, but acknowledge for future additional mitigation; she asked if j the item was appealable; and she was in support of staffs recommendation, as is, with the modifications. Minutes--Planning Commission July 9,2019--Page 10 of 12 I 61nsack Per Mason's comment on-the item being appealable, Binsack confirmed that it is an appealable item and if not appealed, the Commission's determination is final. Kozak Kozak thanked the audience for coming out and sharing their comments and concerns. His final comments generally included: visited both sides of the entrance to the shopping center-- right hand turn lane is a viable use of the property; his focus was the ability to focus on approving or disapproving the plan and is consistent with the General Plan and East Tustin Specific Plan; the proposed use does work in the site location; with regard to the LCIS analysis, they have received and reviewed the LOS with a minor exception of A and B, with A being the highest most free traffic flow; the applicant comes up with two (2) management plans to mitigate queuing on-site and in-place in case needed; there is a dedicated left and right tum entrance from EI Camino Real onto project site; staff has modified the recommendations to be consistent with other Costco warehouse service stations; he agreed with his fellow commissioners; and was also in support of the project. Binsack Reminded the Commission of the recommended action which was to adopt Resolution No. 4385, approving the item. Thompson Thompson moved to approve the item, with the following modifications; j I) Security condition and the maintenance issue (trash pick-up and homelessness) is addressed and include the shared parking area. 2) The City still retains the ability to change the operating hours and that the proposed operating hours remain the same for now. 3) The traffic management plan be considerate of parking spaces that are blocked and signage to help patrons understand if the wait time is lengthy. Masan Mason was concerned with the respective property owner not maintaining the property which is their responsibility and it should not be the City's responsibility and Costco's. Kozak Kozak added that there are multiple property owners within the shopping center and they need to do a better job of cleaning and maintaining their property. Gallagher Gallagher added that he was concerned with adding a condition that could be a liability to one owner as to the condition of another owner's property. STAFF CONCERNS: i Binsack Per Galla&ee.s last comment, Blnsack stated that City staff shares the liability I concern as well as Thompson's concern. She added that Condition 2.7 and 2.8 will take care of some of the issues addressed (i.e.trash, homeless issue) which requires patrol of the premises. Cannot hold Costco responsible for those issues, but can hold the property owners responsible, as well going forward. Minutes—Planning Commission July 9,2019—Page 11 of 12 Motion: It was moved by Thompson, seconded by Gallagher, to adopt Resolution No. 4385. Motion carried 4-0-1. COMMISSION CONCERNS: Gallagher No concerns, i i Mason Mason had no concerns. She attended Tustin's Concerts in the Parr (80's band) on July 3, 2019. Jha No concerns. Thompson Thompson attended the following events: i i • 0118 OCTA CAC Bicycle Advisory Committee Meeting 012.0 Mayor Puckett's Business Recognition Luncheon o 714 Tustin's 4th of July Celebration at Tustin High School f In September Thompson will be stepping down as Planning Commission Chair Pro Tem, Thompson has served on the Planning Commission for 12 years as well as serving 8 years on the Cultural Resources Advisory Committee. Kozak Kozak congratulated staff for their hard work on making the meeting run smoothly. He attended the following events: • 6112, 6119, 6126 Tustin's Concerts in the Park 6114 City's Flag Day Ceremony in the Library Courtyard • 6115 Tustin Police Department's Open House 6118 California Preservation Foundation Webinar • 6/20 Mayor Puckett's Business Recognition Lunch 6126 ACC-OC Seminar hosted by the City of Tustin at the Tustin Library 714 Tustin Meadows Parade 3 714 Tustin's 4th of duly Celebration at Tustin High School • 716 Celebrated their 34th Wedding Anniversary i 9:44 p.m. ADJOURNMENT: The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission is scheduled for Tuesday, July 23, 2019, at 7:00 p.m, in the City Council Chamber at 300 Centennial Way. km 44 j I i I I TE ZAK I Chairperson I J�B2EIITH A. BINSACK Planning Commission Secretary Minutes—Planning Commission July 9,2019—Page 12 of 12 i i MINUTES REGULAR MEETING I TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 10, 2019 I 7:00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER Given. INVOCATION/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Gallagher Present, ROLL CALL; Chair Kozak Chair Pro Tem Thompson Commissioners Gallagher, Jha Absent. ABSENT: Commissioner Mason � Given, PRESENTATION: Commendation for Chair Pro Tem, Thompson i /Bone. PUBLIC CONCERNS: CONSENT CALENDAR: Approved the 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES —JULY 9, 20'19 Consent Calendar, as amended. RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission approve the Minutes of the July 9, 2019, Planning Commission meeting as provided. 2, SUMMARY OF PROJECTS The report provides a summary of projects and activities since the 'last Summary of projects report was presented at the May 14,2019, Planning Commission meeting. The report focuses on the status of projects that the Planning Commission, Zoning Administrator, or staff approved; major improvement projects; Certificates of Appropriateness; Code Enforcement activities; and, other items which may be of interest to the Commission, Motion: It was moved by Gallagher, seconded by Jha, to approve the Consent E Calendar, as amended. Motion carried 4-0-1. PUBLIC HEARING: Adopted Rena. 3. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (TTM) 18197 Na. 4392. APPLICANT/ City of Tustin PROPERTY OWNER: 300 Centennial Way I Tustin, CA 92780 Minutes--Planning Commission September 10,2019—Page 1 of B i LOCATION: Project site generally bounded by Warner Avenue to the north, Legac Road and Tustin Ranch Road to the east, Barranca Parkway to th'i south, and Armstrong Avenue to the west. ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: The final Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (EISIEIR) and addendum certified on January 16, 2001 and April 3, 2006, respectively, in conjunction with the Tustin Legacy Reuse and Specific Plan, adequately addressed environmental considerations associated with development of the site. The proposed Tentative Tract Map for finance and conveyance purposes will not have environmental impacts and a checklist has been prepared for TTM 18197. REQUEST: TTM 18197 subdividing a 11 4.3-acre site into fifteen (15) numbered lots and seven (7) lettered lots for finance and conveyance purposes, RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 4392 approving TTM 18197 to Subdivide a 114.3-acre site into fifteen (15) numbered lot and seven (7) lettered lots for the purpose of finance and conveyan purposes. Beier Presentation given. Gallagher Gallagher referred to the Tract Map, and mentioned that the linear park was originally suppose to extend through. Now it appears the way the tracts are being set up, the linear park is no longer going to cut through diagonally to a portion to the north corner. Gallagher asked if the plan was still to .have a connection between the linear park starting at the Flight and continuing through the Tustin Legacy. Beier In response to Gallagher's question, Beier referred the Commission to the Lot Summary Table (LST) which identified two (2) areas for open space and the location of the future linear park. The linear park is shown in the LST as "Lot A" and "Lot B", Beier confirmed the connection between the linear park beginning at the Flight through the Tustin Legacy. Iillkom Willkom also added that the map shown is only showing the area south Warner Avenue and the linear park will also include the area north of Warner Avenue (an updated map to follow at a later date), 7:15 p.m. Opened/Closed the Public Comments Section. Minutes—Planning commission September 10, 2019—Page 2 of 8 Thompson Thompson stated that since there is no development aspect that the j Commission is voting on, and it is solely for finance purposes, and the- Environmental Checklist is not changing, he supported the item. Motion: It was moved by Thompson, seconded by Gallagher, to adopt Resolution No. 4392. Motion carried 4-0-1. { i. i Adopted Reso. 4. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2019-00012 No. 4390, as amended. APPLICANT: Edward S. Miguel, EdD, f BCBA, President Port View Preparatory, Inc. 23705 Via Del Rio Yorba Linda, CA 92887 PROPERTY OWNER: Jerry Yahr, Manager KWT Valencia, LLC 17755 Sky Park East, Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92614 LOCATION: 1361 Valencia Avenue ENVIROMENTAL STATUS: This project is categorically exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 15301, Class 1, REQUEST: A request for a CUP to establish a day care, rehabilitation and training facility for disabled children and young adults and port view preparatory office headquarters and associated interior,improvements within the existing (approx. 75,226 square foot) building. RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 4390, approving CUP 2019-00012 to. establish a day care, rehabilitation and training facility for disabled children and young adults and associated interior improvements within the existing (approx. 75,226 square foot building). i Demkowicz Presentation given. Thompson Thompson asked the applicant what type of measures would be taken to 3 address the security for clients trying to leave the facility or likewise people that should not be going into the facility that do not belong at the facility (i.e. type of security cameras) to ensure the overall safety of the clientele. Minutes—Planning Commiasion September 10,2019—Page 3 of 8 Demkowicz Per Demkowicz, there Is a gate proposed, which is shown on the submitted plans, located towards the front half of the property along the east side of the existing building. As per the security cameras, they may be part of th operational characteristics, which the applicant can explain further. 7.25 p.m. Opened the Public Comments Section. r Donald Lamm Mr. Donald Lamm, representing the applicant, complimented City staff for the j "extraordinary customer service in Tustin". He thanked Commissioner Thompson for his years of service. Mr. Lamm provided further history on the proposed use and its clientele (i.e. different types of disabilities, including autism). Currently, there are services in Yorba Linda and Ontario which deal with children who are disabled but were labeled with "special needs". Mr. Lamm also explained the different types of services offered at the facility. He added that all activities would be indoor therefore there will be security, cameras, onsite trained staff, and secured doors. He also stated that this project would bring a new service to the community, along with employment opportunities. Melaura Erickson Melaura Erickson Tomaino, PhD, BCBA-D, and co-founder, stated she has Tomaino, PhD, been working with individuals with autism for over 15 years and she is very 13CBA-D passionate and dedicated to this population to help them live their best lives so that they may increase their quality of life. She also hopes to provide this service in the City of Tustin. Dr. Edward S. Dr. Edward S. Miguel, the cofounders and applicant, has been working wit Miguel students with disabilities in all different types of settings in schools for the last 10 years. The proposed location allows them the opportunity to remove the stigma associated with "special ed" or "special needs" or "clinical services" because of the site's look and location and allows the applicant to address the security concems, and to be transparent to the customers and clients. Dr. Miguel stated the goal is to make the clients employable adults in the community and Tustin is a good fit. Thompson Thompson asked Dr. Miguel what inspired him to start this type of business. Dr. Miguel Mr. Miguel shared his struggles with growing up being hearing impaired due to meningitis, along with the difficulties associated with overcoming a disability. He stressed the importance of occupational, speech therapy, and other clinical services available in one location which will help with .the children's development. Gallagher Gallagher voiced his concern with the clients leaving with the staff, especially near the high traffic areas. Dr. Miguel Dr. Miguel explained the loading process to the Commission and that it woul have to be very fluid and efficient. He explained the reasons behind why they i is not an outdoor area, When dealing with clients with developmenta disabilities, playground equipment would be more appealing to the clients versus working, exercise and learning. He further explained that people Minutes—Planning Commission September 10,2019—Page 4 of 8 n i Dr. Miguel would be arriving in the morn ingMftemoon. if and when clients would be leaming shopping skills at markets, the clients would be transported in the- 'facility vehicles (no walking), i i Thompson Thompson asked about there being some minimum level of security system at the facility (i.e. cameras externallyrnternally) for safety reasons. i Lamm Mr, Lamm offered to the Commission that the applicant would add a votuntary condition to the Conditions of Approval stating that a security plan would be created and that the condition would be submitted to the Community Development Director, subject to review and approval. 7:38 p.m. Closed the Public Comments Section. Jha Jha suggested there being some type of security gate for incomingloutgoing traffic into the facility. Thompson Thompson made favorable comments regarding the project and having the security system in place would be ideal. Kozak Kozak concurred with his fellow Commissioners and he was in support of the project. Motion: It was moved by Thompson, seconded by Gallagher, to adopt Resolution No. 4390, as amended. Motion carried 4-0-1. Adopted Reso. 5. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2019-00008 No. 4391. PROPERTY OWNER/ APPLICANT: Brett Hamara Lennar Hames of California, Inc. 15131 Alton Parkway, Suite 365 Irvine, CA 92618 LOCATION: Tract 18125 at Tustin Legacy (Levity) ENVIRONMENTAL: This project is categorically exemptpursuant to Section 15311 (Class 11) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). REQUEST: i A request to establish a Master Sign Plan for Levity at Tustin Legacy. RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 4391 approving CUP 2019-00008 to authorize the establishment of a master sign plan for the Levity at Tustin Legacy residential development. Minutes--Planning commission September 10, 2019—Page 5 of 8 i Salman Presentation given. Jha Jha asked if the wayfinding sign would be illuminated. , i Salman Salman confirmed the wayfinding sign would be illuminated. i Thompson Thompson referred to the Levity project and asked if there will be a public park. He also asked how the public park is designated and how the public would access the public park. Thompson suggested signage, in general,for both the public and private access points of the parks(Le. map, signage). 3 Hamara In response to the previous questions, Brett Hamara, the applicant, stated that there will be a public park on the northwest side of the site called the Plaza, along with a common area, associated with the Levity project. Wiftom. Willkom added that within the Tustin Legacy, many of the privately-owned parks, which are accessible to the public, are spread out through Tustin Legacy. For the most part, none of the public parks are identified, although, legally with the final map, it would allow the public to access them. Per Thompson's request, City staff will look into signage at the parks and return to the Commission with further information. Gallagher Gallagher asked if the model homes were open yet. Hamas Mr. Hamara stated that the grand opening of the model homes is schedule for September 28, 2019. 7:51 p.m. Closed the Public Comments Section. Motion: It was moved by Jha, seconded by Kozak, to adopt Resolution No. 4391. Motion carried 4-0-1. Adopted Meso. 6. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2019-00015 No. 4393 APPLICANT: US Auto Trust Newport Beach, LLC 10250 Constellation Blvd., Suite 2850 Los Angeles, CA 90067 PROPERTY OWNER: Joseph Kazeml Chambers Road, LLC 1111 Bell Avenue Tustin, CA 92780 ` LOCATION: 14332 Chambers Road ENVIRONMENTAL: This project is categorically. exempt pursuant to the Californi Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 15301, Class 1. i Minutes—Planning Commission September 10,2019—Page 6 of 8 REQUEST: A request to establish and operate an automotive service and repair center within an existing 20,348 square foot industrial building. RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No.4393, approving the establishment of an automotive service and repair center within an existing 20,348-square-foot industrial building located at 14332 Chambers Road, Beier Presentation given. 7.56 p.m. Opened/Closed the Public Comments Section. i Thompson Thompson was in favor of the item. Kozak Kozak made favorable comments regarding the item. Motion: It was moved by Thompson, seconded by Kozak, to adopt Resolution No. 4393. Motion carried 4-0-1. None. REGULAR BUSINESS STAFF CONCERNS: Willkom Willkom informed the Commission that the State of the City is scheduled for September 26, 2019. On behalf of the Community Development Department, thank you Thompson for your service and best wishes! COMMISSION CONCERNS: Jha Congratulations Thompson on your years of service! Kozak Kozak made additional favorable comments to Thompson's years of service. Thompson Thompson reiterated his enjoyment working for the City of Tustin and his future plans. 8:02 p.m. ADJOURNMENT: i i The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission is scheduled for Tuesday, September 24, 2019, at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chamber at i 300 Centennial Way. i i Minutes—Planning Commission September 10,2019—Page 7 of 8 /STOY"07-AK Chairperson iffal7ABETH A. BINSACK Planning Commission Secretary Mlnu(es—Planning CDmmlsslon September 10, 2019—Page 8 of 8 MINUTES REGULAR MEETING TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 24, 2019 i 7.,00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER Given, INVOCATIONIPLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mason Mayor Puckett 1. SEATING OF COMMISSIONER CHU Item to be 2. PLANNING COMMISSION REORGANIZATION continued to the next regularly scheduled meeting. As a matter of standard procedure, the Planning Commission reorganizes once per year by appointing a new Chairperson and Chairperson Pro Tem. RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission elect a Chairperson and Chairperson Pro Tem pursuant to standard procedures. Motion: It was moved by Kozak, seconded by Mason, to continue the item to the next regularly scheduled meeting being that there were only three (3) out of five (5) Commission members in attendance. Motion carried 3-0-2. Present ROLL CALL: Chairperson Kozak Commissioners Chu and Mason Absent Commissioners Gallagher and Jha PUBLIC CONCERNS: Mr. Phil Cox Mr. Phil Cox provided his background living in Tustin. He also provided background information on a new restaurant opening up in Old Town Tustin. Mr. Cox provided pictures of water irrigation equipment he is proposing in Old Town Tustin to the Commission (he provided handouts to the Commission). Item to be CONSENT CALENDAR: continued to the next regularly scheduled meeting. lh I Minutes--Planning Commission September 24, 2019--Page 1 of 3 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — SEPTEMBER 10, 2019 RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission approve the Minutes of the September 10, 2019, Planning Commission meeting as provided. i Motion: it was moved by Kozak, seconded by Chu, to continue the item to the next regularly scheduled meeting so that all Commissioners can discuss. Motion carried 3-0-2. 1 REGULAR BUSINESS: 4. COMMENDATION NOMINATION FOR 355-365 EL CAMINO REAL i RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission approve the nomination of 355365 El Camino Real to the City's Commendation Program and forward the commendation to the City Council for recognition. Dove Presentation given. Masora Mason made favorable comments regarding the renovation of the Swinging Door and the addition of the American Grub, including the aesthetics and care of the building. Chu Chu also made favorable comments regarding the commendation nomination and she was also in support of the item. Kozak Kozak congratulated the property owners and provided favorable comments as well. Motion: It was moved by Chu seconded by Mason to approve the nomination to the City's Commendation Program and forward the commendation to the City Council for recognition. Motion carried 3-0-2. Ms. Kimberly Ms, Kimberly Conroy, property owner of the Swinging Door/America Grub, Conroy thanked Dove for the research she did on the history of the building and on the commendation. She provided background information on her inspiration of the building as well. Ms. Conroy has plans, in the future, to have a mural applied to the back of the building. I STAFF CONCERNS, Binsack Binsack welcomed and congratulated Commissioner Chu to the Commission. She also informed the Commission of the upcoming Planning Officials Forum on October 17, 2019 and the State of the City on September 26, 201'9. Minutes—Planning Commission September 24, 2019—Page 2 of 3 COMMISSION CONCERNS: Mason Mason thanked Mr. Phil Cox for providing the photos to the Commission and she welcomed Commissioner Chu on the Commission. Chu Chu thanked her fellow Commissioners and City staff and thanked them for the opportunity to serve the community, Kozak Kozak welcomed Commissioner Chu to the Commission, He attended the following events: • 8/6 Tustin P.D. National Night Out + 8/7 TACFA Broadway in the Park (West Side Story) • 8/17 Grand Opening Elks Lodge in Santa Ana • 8/18 Annual Enderle Center Car Show • 9/7 Honor a Hero Eventat the Elks Lodge • 9/25 Economic Benefits of Historic Preservation Seminar 7.36 p,m. ADJOURNMENT: The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission is scheduled for Tuesday, October 8, 2919, at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chamber at 390 Centennial Way, Chairperson 4 ELIZABETH A. BINSACK Planning Commission Secretary f Minutes—Punning Commission September 24,2019— Page 3 of 3