The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC RES 87-3814 10 11 15 10 17 18 2O RESOLUTION NO. 87-38 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE DESIGN OF A RESTAURANT TO BE LOCATED AT 13741 NEWPORT BOULEVARD The City Council of the City of Tustin, California hereby resolves as follows- I · That pursuant to Conditional Use Permit 85-9, the City Council shall approve all site pl~tns and architectural designs of project~ proposed within the Tustin Plaza shopping center. ® That a proper project submittal Council on behalf of Spoons for restaurant at 13741 Newport Blvd. has been transmitted to the a proposed 5,252 square foot ® That the Council has reviewed, the proposed project and makes the fol 1 owl ng fi ndings' a® be The design of the building is compatible with other structures in the immediate area. The project will be a positive addition to the shopping center, aesthetically as well as economically. That a Negative Declaration was previously certified accordance wi th the Cali forni a Environmental Qual i ty Act. in Be ® Final development plans shall r. equire the review and approval the Community Development Department. of The City Council of the City of Tustin does hereby approve the design of a restaurant to be located at 13741 Newport Blvd. subject to Conditions attached hereto as Exhibit "A". PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin City Council at Tustin, California, held on the 16th day of March, 1987. i~ichard B. Edgar, Mayor Mary E ,~nn ct ..ci ' EXHIBIT 'A' RESOLUTION NO. 87-38 SITE PLAN CONDITIONS ~mmmmmmm ~mmmmm A. The proposed restaurant project shall conform to submitted site plans, date stamped March 16, 1987, on file with the Department of Community Development, as herein modified, or as modified by the Director of Community Development in accordance with this resolution. B. Unless otherwise specified, the following conditions shall be complied with subject to review and approval by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits for the proposed project' 1. The proposed beige wall color shall be replaced by the cream color previously submitted {shown on color board dated 3/16/87) or a lighter tone of peach-pink (Frazee No. 4350W Light Peach) to establish more compatabt 1 i ty wi th Center. 2. The proposed avocado green color (Mission Green shown on color board dated 3/16/87) shall be replaced by aqua-green color previously submitted or turquoise green color to match the Center (Dunn-Edwards No. 011-49 D "Whirlpool"). The Director of Community Development .shall determine that the proposed color is relatively consistent with turquoise green used in the center. 3. Awning colors shall include aqua green and cream color to function as a 1 ink between the storefront and the building wall s, yet to be contrasting and attractive. Introduction of light peach or dark peach (Frazee No. 435W) would also be acceptable. Provide two or three awning samples to be approved by Director. While contrasting colors are not undesirable, they should be compatible with the Center and not garish. In the event that no agreement on awning color can be reached between Spoon's and the Director within 30 days of approval of this resolution, determination, of awning color shall be made by the Redevelopment Agency at their next scheduled meeting. 4. Vertical mouldings shown in a terracotta color shall not be painted in a contrasting color but have a fine plaster finish to match main building and to add vertical variation to elevations. 5. Redesign roof slope of pitched roof in patio area and in the service area so that tile would be visible from front and side elevations of said roof similar to the roof of the center. 6. Extend enclosure wall of service area to be aligned with wall of patio area to increase balance. Also correct new elevations to indicate the height of such wall. On each elevation incorporate reveals below roof cornices and as noted on walls in larger center. 7. Roqf lines and cornices shall generally resemble the center roof cornice wil~h'oUt having to do sloping roofs on all roof lines. (See sample detail of roof cornice similar to the center attached as Exhibit 'B'.) Reveals Resolution No. 87-38 Exht bil: 'A' Page two . Should also have same design as on the center. Color accent of the recessions on these reveals should be ladded as in the larger center. Acceptable colors in accenting these areas would be aqua green or turquoise and light or dark peach consistent wi th the center. The -~terracotta proposed Currently does not add to the integration with the larger center. 8. The Newport elevation needs to incorporate additional decorative elements so that the building does not appear as a typical side elevation. Additional real or fake window details, use of red brick as well as possible pop-out variations may add additional relief and improve this elevation. Same consideration shall be given the rear elevation so that this elevation does not have complete appearance of a rear elevation. 9. Provide note on construction plans indicating all colors and materials proposed. Exterior plastering materials and textures shall match the larger center. All walls shall be plastered and have a trowel finish. 10. Glass windows shall be clear or tinted sunglass green consistent with the Carver Center. .11. Roof tile used on sloping roofs shall be compatible with tile used on the center (U. S. Tile Company one piece Mission tiles, 18" long "Standard Red" ). 12. Reduce entrance walkway by 2' in width, and restripe the parking to have compact car stalls of a dimension of 17' X 8' instead of 15' X 8'. 13. Compact parking stalls shall be marked as such with a detail for stripping and labeling shown on plans. 14. The NW elevation may have another 25 sq. ft. sign. 15. Awning sign on SW elevations is hereby permitted as a sign code exception and is limited to the awning valance and shall not exced 15 sq. ft. No o.ther awning signs are permitted. 16. No product or identification window signs shall be permitted thereby reducing clutter and avoiding a garish vi sual appearance. 17. Umbrellas used in the outdoor seating area shall not display product names. 18. "No Parking" signage and red curbing shall be installed on the main drivewa¥ ai sl e. 19. Any gas and electric meters shall be enclosed in boxed areas that match mal~6rials, "colors used on main buildings. Resoluti on 87-38 Exht bt t "A" Page thffee 20. 2'1 · 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. CAS 'per A final landscaping plan shall be submitted and approved by Director of Community Development prior to issuance of any building permits' A complete irrigation plan is required which should indicate the fol 1 owl rig' me Points of connection Backflow prevention device(s) Location and types of valves Location and sizes of piping Sprinklerhead types and location The applicant shall comply with all requirements construction of the Orange County Fire Department. pertaining to The subject butldtng will sprl nkl er sy stem. be required to be equipped with an automatic Submt tta 1 structural Tt'tl e 24. of all structural plans for the project including,building calculations and energy calculations necessary to comply with All construction plans shall Federal Laws and Regulations. meet requirements of City Ordinances, S tate, A civil site plan will publ t c ri gh t-of-way. to the fol 1 owl ng- be required depicting any improvements within the These improvements will include but not be limited ae Domestic water service/meter. Fi re service wi th detector check Sanitary sewer service lateral. ,, valve and easements as required. Payment of Orange County Sanitation District No. a.t the time a building permit is issued. 7 sewer connection fees Payment of East Orange County Water District fees at the time a building permit is issued. Contact Earl Rowenhorst at Tustin Water Service for fee amounts. ' Payment of the Foothill/Eastern Transporation and Bridge Fee Program at $1.05 per sq. ft. will be required at the time a building permit is issued. Payment of school fees at $.25 per sq. ft. requ. ired prior to issuance of a bui 1 ding permit. , for new construction is 'i . I I .. . Il i. ., STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) § CITY OF TUSTIN ) MARY E. WYNN, City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, does hereby certify that the whole number of the members of the City Council of the City of Tustin is five; that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 87-38 was duly and regularly introduced, passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 16th day of March, 1987, by the ,m following vote- AYES · NOES" ABSENT- COU NC I LP ERSONS · COUNC I LPERSONS · COUNC I LP ERSO NS · Edgar, Hoesterey, Kelly, Saltarel'li Kennedy None City of Tuski~tn Cal ornia