The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About04 JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT NOISE ABATEMENT QUARTERLY REPORT• AGENDA REPORT Agenda Item 4 Reviewed: City Manager Finance Director N/A MEETING DATE: MARCH 17, 2020 TO: MATTHEW S. WEST, CITY MANAGER FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT NOISE ABATEMENT QUARTERLY REPORT SUMMARY: This agenda report transmits the John Wayne Airport (JWA) Noise Abatement Quarterly Report for the third quarter of 2019. The average noise level measured at Tustin's monitoring station (NMS 1 ON), located at Columbus Tustin Middle School on Beneta Way (Figure 1), remained fairly consistent with prior quarters during this third quarter reporting period. Average noise levels during the second quarter continued to remain well below the City, County, and State criteria of 65 dB Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) for residential uses. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file this report. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. Figure 1 JWA Noise Report March 17, 2020 Page 2 CORRELATION TO THE STRATEGIC PLAN: Staff's analysis and report of the quarterly JWA Noise Abatement Report falls under Goal D of the Strategic Plan pertaining to strong community and regional relationships. The City of Tustin strives to work collaboratively with agencies both within and outside Tustin on issues of mutual interest and concern, and in this instance, on matters of airport traffic and noise. DISCUSSION: Following the conclusion of each calendar quarter, JWA staff prepares a Noise Abatement Program Quarterly Report and posts a copy of the report on their website. Attached is the quarterly report for the third quarter of 2019, which includes the months of July through September. An overview of the information contained within the JWA Noise Report includes measured noise levels and an analysis of noise complaints. Measured Noise Levels Aircraft noise is most noticeable during airplane takeoffs and landings, primarily due to engine noise. Although engines produce a significant amount of aircraft noise, many other factors may influence the perception of noise including: proximity; weather — in bad weather, engine noise is reflected off of the atmosphere making jets appear louder than on clear days; routes — non-scheduled operations which could include military or private aircraft and may be louder than commercial aircraft; emergencies; and, weight — a heavier load may affect an aircraft's rate of ascent. During the third quarter of 2019, the average CNEL at Tustin's monitoring station on Beneta Way was 57.1 dB. This is .8 dB lower than the average of the previous quarter (Q-2: April — June 2019). Figure 2 (below) provides a visualization of Tustin's CNEL levels for each month during the third quarter of 2019. Daily Community Noise Equivalent Levels (CNEL) in Tustin - July through September 2019 W W 40 J J z 30 U 20 10 0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 Date Figure 2 -- July August September Noise Impact Area Level (65 dB) JWA Noise Report March 17, 2020 Page 3 Noise Complaints The Airport's Access and Noise Office receives and investigates noise calls and complaints from local citizens and other sources. During the third quarter of 2019, there were eight (8) Tustin area complaint calls, which is the same number of complaints as the previous quarter. Tustin staff has outreached to JWA staff to gather further details on the nature of the complaints, and to understand how JWA staff responded. The breakdown of the eight (8) complaints is as follows: Three (3) complaints were regarding general aircraft noise; three (3) complaints were regarding low-flying aircraft; one (1) complaint was regarding frequent aircraft noise; and, one (1) complaint was regarding the flight curfew. Each of these incidents requested no return phone call from JWA staff. To provide an understanding of the trend in Tustin area complaints throughout the years, a chart displaying the number of noise complaints for the past five (5) years is displayed below (Figure 3). Ln 16 c 14 a 12 E 10 u° 8 w 0 6 - 4 E 2 0 z n Noise Complaints - Tustin oti° oti° otic' oti1' oti1' otic' oti1 otio otio otio oti, otic (S' otic otic' otic' oti' oti1 otio otio QIP ti\T anti 5\T 1\ti -,\T �\T �\T t\ti ti\T �\T _\T 11Kti ti\T roti �\tiXT Iti\T -\ti 11,\r11o- a o- o- o- a o- o- 0- o- o- a 0- U a a o- U a a 0- Quarter/Year Figure 3 Countywide, there was a significant increase in the number of noise complaints received by the Noise Office during recent reporting periods. JWA has indicated that the increase is due to a new online noise reporting service which allows users to file a noise complaint through clicking a button. It was discovered that a small number of users utilized this service, through submitting complaints on a daily basis, as well as consistently throughout the day. General Aviation Improvement Program In 2019, JWA approved enhancements and modifications to their facilities. To provide further background on the General Aviation Improvement Program, the hangars currently on the airfield were constructed in 1990, and have come to the end of their useful life. The existing hangars will be torn down, and new hangar facilities better suited to the modern fleet of aircraft will be constructed. There are currently two full-service Fixed Base Operators (FBOs) operating three FBO facilities, also known as General Aviation terminals, at JWA; two (2) on the east side of the airfield and one (1) on the west side. JWA Noise Report March 17, 2020 Page 4 The improvements proposed under the General Aviation Improvement Program are contained within the existing General Aviation footprint on the airfield. The General Aviation Improvement Program is not an expansion of the General Aviation areas or Airport boundaries. On Tuesday, April 14, 2020, the Orange County Board of Supervisors (Board) is scheduled to review the proposals received in response to the Request for Proposal (RFP) approved by the Board on September 10, 2019. The Board agenda item for the April 14 meeting will request the Board to select a respondent for each available site. Then, following negotiations with selected respondents, FBO leases will be considered by the Board in July 2020. Since noise issues are of considerable importance to the City of Tustin, the Community Development Department will continue to monitor operations at JWA unless otherwise directed by the City Council. The public are additionally welcome to participate in JWA's Quarterly meetings held by the Access and Noise Office. The next quarterly meeting will be held on March 18, 2020, at 2:00 p.m. in the Eddie Martin Administration Building located at 3160 Airway Avenue in Costa Mesa. Adrianne DiLeva Elizabeth A. Binsack Management Analyst II Director of Community Development Attachment: John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Quarterly Report for July 1, 2019, through September 30, 2019. ATTACHMENT John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Quarterly Report for July 1, 2019 through September 30, 2019 (Third Quarter) NOISE ABATEMENT PROGRAM QUARTERLY REPORT For the period: July 1, 2019 through September 30, 2019 Prepared in accordance with: AIRPORT NOISE STANDARD STATE OF CALIFORNIA California Code of Regulations Airport Noise Standards Title 21: Public Works Division 2.5 Division of Aeronautics (Department of Transportation) Chapter 6. Noise Standards Su mitted by: Barry A. Rondinella, A.A.E./C.A.E. Airport Director John Wayne Airport, Orange County v4t �OFiV 1+IAlTE AIRPaOU ORANOt COUNTY This is the 187th Quarterly Report submitted by the County of Orange in accordance with the requirements of the California Airport Noise Standards (California Code of Regulations, Title 21: Public Works, Division 2.5 Division of Aeronautics (Department of Transportation), Chapter 6. Noise Standards). Effective January 1, 1986, the criteria for defining "Noise Impact Area" was changed from 70 dB to 65 dB Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL). Under this criteria, John Wayne Airport currently has a "Noise Impact Area." NOISE IMPACT SUMMARY Caltrans' Aeronautics Program has established guidelines in the California State Noise Standard to control residential area noise levels produced by aircraft operations using the State's airports. Under those guidelines, residential noise sensitive areas exposed to an average Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) of more than 65 dB define the "Noise Impact Area." John Wayne Airport uses ten permanent remote noise monitoring stations (NMS) located in Newport Beach, Santa Ana, Tustin and Irvine to measure noise levels, at the.following locations: MONITOR STATIONS NMS -1S: Golf Course, 3100 Irvine Ave., Newport Beach NMS -6S: 1912 Santiago, Newport Beach NMS -2S: 20162 S.W. Birch St., Newport Beach NMS -7S: 1131 Back Bay Drive, Newport Beach NMS -3S: 2139 Anniversary Lane, Newport Beach NMS -8N: 17372 Eastman Street, Irvine NMS -4S: 2338 Tustin Ave., Newport Beach NMS -9N: 1300 S. Grand Avenue, Santa Ana NMS -5S: 324 Y2 Vista Madera, Newport Beach NMS -10N: 17952 Beneta Way, Tustin The map in Figure 1 shows the general location of each permanent remote monitor station. Figure 2 shows the Airport's "Noise Impact Area" for the previous year (October 1, 2018 - September 30, 2019). The Figure 2 information was developed by Landrum and Brown, in consultation with John Wayne Airport. CNEL values measured for the period and current digitized land use information were utilized to calculate the land area acreages, number of residences and estimated number of people within the "Noise Impact Area". FIGURE 1 NOISE MONITORING STATIONS (NMS) LOCATION MAP JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT, Tf COSTA MESA ORANGE COUNTY ( v. & 2 3 Scale In miles N JOIN 1NAYM AIRPORT ORANGE COUNTY Noise Abatement Program Quarterly Report July—September 2019 AIRCRAFT TRAFFIC SUMMARY The Airport traffic summary for this quarter is shown in Table 1 below. Air Carrier operational count histories and average daily departure counts are illustrated in Tables 9 & 11. TABLE 1 LANDING AND TAKEOFF OPERATIONS July - September 2019 Period Jet .. O. Daily Operations July 8,242 0 3,068 27,520 365 August 8,266 0 3,381 29,921 376 September 7,805 0 3,100 26,218 364 Third Quarter 24,313 0 9,549 83,659 368 Twelve Months 10/01/18 - 09/30/19 95,517 190 36,286 310,585 361 NOTE: (1) GA Jet figures include a 5% factor for operations not identified by the JWA noise monitor stations. (2) Counts in this column are based upon records provided by the local FAA representatives. COMMUNITY NOISE EQUIVALENT LEVELS The monthly, quarterly and twelve month Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) average values for each monitor station are shown in Table 2, while daily CNEL values are shown in Tables 3 through 5. Insufficient data is indicated by "#N/A" entries in each table. Also, "*#N/A" entries in each table indicate there were no aircraft related noise events. Average Single Event Noise Exposure Level (SENEL) values for Air Carrier and General Aviation Jet aircraft are shown in Tables 6 through 8. ACOUSTICAL INSULATION PROGRAM Four hundred eighteen residences in the Santa Ana Heights area have been sound attenuated and an avigation easement reserved through the County's Acoustical Insulation Program, which closed in December 2009. The County has also acquired 46 residences as part of the Purchase Assurance Program, many of which were acoustically insulated, an avigation easement reserved and then resold. Among these County acquired homes, those located within areas designated for Business Park uses were razed, avigation easements were reserved, and the land resold for compatible Business Park uses. A total of 464 residences in the Santa Ana Heights area have been purchased or otherwise made compatible through the County's Purchase Assurance and Acoustical Insulation Programs. Sixty-seven dwelling units in Santa Ana Heights remain in the "Noise Impacted Area" (within 65 dB CNEL contour). COMPLAINT TOTALS (July 1, 2019 - September 30, 2019) The Airport's Access and Noise Office receives and investigates noise complaints from local citizens and all other sources. During the July 1, 2019 through September 30, 2019, the Office received 63,018 complaints from local citizens. This is a 44.0% increase from the 43,772 complaints received last quarter. It is a 1566.7% increase from the 3,781 complaints received during the same quarter last year. Figure 4 shows the distribution of the quarterly complaints from local communities. 4 FIGURE 3 HISTOGRAM BY COMMUNITY Anaheim Hills 59,450 Balboa Island Balboa Peninsula Bayshores Bayside Village Bell'Gard�ens Corona Del Mar Costa Mesa Dana Point Rover Shores EastblufF Fountain Walley Harbor Cove. Harbor Island Huntington Beach Irvine 20 Irvine Terrace Ladera Ranch c Laguna Beach Laguna. Hills E E Laguna Niguel Laguna Woods U Lake Forest Lido Isle Modjeska Canyon 1 Murrieta Newport Beach North Tustin Grange Panorama Heights 2,461 Placentia Redondo Beach San Clemente San, Juan Capistrano Santa Ana Santa Ana Heights ,781 Trabuco Canyon . Tustin Nulla Park Westcliff FIGURE 3 HISTOGRAM BY COMMUNITY 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,00C Number of Complaints Note: • City of Newport Beach — 38,439 total number of complaints. • 96% of complaints were from a complaint subscription service. • 58% of complaints from "Anaheim Hills" category were from one point of contact. • 95% of complaints from "Balboa Peninsula" category were from one point of contact. • 98% of complaints from "Corona del Mar" category were from one point of contact. • 84% of complaints from "Costa Mesa" category were from one point of contact. • 62% of complaints from "Dover Shores" category were from one point of contact. • 83% of complaints from "Laguna Beach" category were from one point of contact. • 53% of complaints from "Laguna Niguel" category were from one point of contact. • 64% of complaints from "Orange" category were from one point of contact. • 91% of complaints from "San Juan Capistrano" category were from one point of contact. 0 95% of complaints from "Westcliff' category were from one point of contact. 59,450 W16,732 5,999 20 30 1 2,461 ,781 54 11, 172 1,133 2 69 1, 35 15 65 1 2,559 4,295 1 79 40 1 470 1 2,175 1 26 1 755 70 102 7 183 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,00C Number of Complaints Note: • City of Newport Beach — 38,439 total number of complaints. • 96% of complaints were from a complaint subscription service. • 58% of complaints from "Anaheim Hills" category were from one point of contact. • 95% of complaints from "Balboa Peninsula" category were from one point of contact. • 98% of complaints from "Corona del Mar" category were from one point of contact. • 84% of complaints from "Costa Mesa" category were from one point of contact. • 62% of complaints from "Dover Shores" category were from one point of contact. • 83% of complaints from "Laguna Beach" category were from one point of contact. • 53% of complaints from "Laguna Niguel" category were from one point of contact. • 64% of complaints from "Orange" category were from one point of contact. • 91% of complaints from "San Juan Capistrano" category were from one point of contact. 0 95% of complaints from "Westcliff' category were from one point of contact. TABLE 2 LONG TERM MEASURED LEVELS Aircraft CNEL from 10/01/18 through 09/30/19 Values in clB at Each Site Period NMSSite is 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 1ON Oct 2018 68.4 67.2 66.9 59.9 59.8 60.9 56.9 68.0 43.3 56.8 # Days 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 30 31 Nov 2018 67.5 66.4 66.4 59.5 59.0 60.7 56.7 67.3 44.8 55.8 # Days 30 30 30 29 30 30 28 30 28 30 Dec 2018 67.6 66.6 66.8 59.6 59.6 61.4 57.0 67.6 45.0 56.3 # Days 31 31 311 31 311 31 30 311 30 31 Q-4 2018 67.9 66.8 66.7 59.7 59.5 61.0 56.9 67.6 44.4 56.3 # Days 92 92 92 91 92 92 89 92 88 92 Jan 2019 67.7 66.6 66.5 59.9 59.5 60.7 57.0 67.9 43.4 57.1 # Days 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 28 29 Feb 2019 67.9 66.7 66.6 60.2 60.0 60.8 57.7 68.6 45.4 57.9 # Days 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 27 28 Mar 2019 67.9 66.9 66.9 60.2 59.9 61.2 57.4 68.5 43.8 57.6 # Days 30 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 28 31 Q-12019 67.8 66.8 66.7 60.1 59.8 60.9 57.3 68.3 44.3 57.5 # Days 89 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 83 88 Apr 2019 68.1 67.2 66.6 60.3 59.6 61.1 57.4 68.6 42.2 57.7 # Days 30 30 30 301 30 30 30 30 25 30 May 2019 68.3 67.5 66.8 60.6 59.8 61.2 57.9 69.1 43.3 58.3 # Days 31 31 31 31 31 311 31 31 291 31 Jun 2019 68.5 67.6 67.1 60.3 59.2 60.8 57.0 68.9 41.4 57.7 # Days 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 25 30 Q-2 2019 68.3 67.5 66.8 60.4 59.5 61.0 57.5 68.9 42.4 57.9 # Days 91 91 91 911 91 91 91 91 79 91 Jul 2019 68.4 67.5 67.2 60.3 59.7 60.6 56.9 68.4 41.5 57.1 # Days 31 31 31 31 31 311 31 31 241 31 Aug 2019 68.4 67.5 67.3 60.2 59.6 60.4 56.1 68.3 41.0 56.9 # Days 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 21 31 Sep 2019 68.1 67.2 66.9 60.0 59.4 60.3 56.5 67.8 43.6 56.7 # Days 30 30 30 301 30 30 30 27 21 30 Q-3 2019 68.3 67.4 67.1 60.2 59.6 60.4 56.5 68.2 42.1 56.9 # Days 1 921 92 92 92 92 921 92 89 661 92 Q-4 2018 thru Q-3 2019 Total 68.1 67.1 66.8 60.1 59.6 60.9 57.1 68.3 43.5 57.2 # Days 1 364 365 365 364 365 365 362 362 316 363 Q-3 2018 thru Q-2 2019 (Previous 4 Quarters) Total 68.1 67.1 66.8 60.1 59.6 60.9 57.2 68.3 43.7 57.1 # Days 364 365 365 364 365 365 362 365 335 363 Change from Previous 4 Quarters 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.1 0.0 -0.2 0.1 6 TABLE 3 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION July 2019 Date 1 1S 68.0 2S 67.3 3S 66.7 4S 59.9 NMS Site 5S 58.7 6S 60.5 7S 56.5 8N 67.8 9N 39.4 , 56.2 2 68.2 67.3 66.6 60.3 59.6 60.4 56.9 68.1 42.7 57.1 3 68.2 66.9 66.7 60.9 59.9 61.1 57.8 68.6 40.8 57.9 4 66.2 65.5 64.8 58.3 58.2 59.4 55.7 65.7 39.9 55.2 5 67.31 66.3 65.9 59.71 59.0 60.21 56.6 67.8 42.31 56.4 6 67.9 66.9 66.5 59.5 59.2 60.1 55.7 67.4 39.8 56.3 7 68.8 67.8 67.2 60.9 60.1 61.3 57.5 69.4 *#N/A 58.5 8 68.6 67.8 67.4 61.0 60.3 61.1 58.2 68.7 *#N/A 57.6 9 68.4 67.7 67.1 60.6 60.4 61.1 57.8 68.4 42.6 57.4 10 68.41 67.8 67.2 60.2 60.1 60.61 57.4 68.5 32.2 57.0 11 68.8 68.0 67.5 60.2 60.0 60.1 57.4 69.0 *#N/Aj 57.5 12 68.5 67.6 67.5 60.0 59.6 59.7 56.7 69.0 43.0 57.1 13 66.9 65.9 65.3 57.8 57.3 57.5 54.6 67.1 *#N/A 55.4 14 68.7 67.9 67.5 60.1 60.2 60.3 56.6 69.3 44.7 58.0 15 68.6 67.7 67.1 59.7 59.3 59.1 56.3 68.5 31.8 57.4 16 68.1 67.3 66.9 60.5 59.2 60.3 56.2 69.0 *#N/A 57.6 17 68.9 67.8 67.5 61.5 59.8 61.3 57.5 68.9 36.9 57.5 18 69.2 68.4 68.0 61.11 60.8 61.9 56.5 69.2 *#N/A 58.1 19 69.0 68.0 67.8 61.2 60.2 61.91 58.0 68.9 34.2 57.7 20 67.4 66.5 66.1 59.0 59.1 60.0 56.7 66.8 35.9 55.5 21 69.0 68.3 67.9 60.6 60.6 61.6 57.5 68.91 48.3 57.3 22 68.7 67.9 68.1 60.4 60.1 61.2 57.3 68.6 37.4 57.2 23 68.3 67.6 67.4 59.9 59.6 60.2 56.3 68.1 38.8 56.6 24 68.6 67.8 67.5 60.2 59.3 60.21 56.5 68.7 40.2 56.8 25 68.5 67.6 67.1 59.9 59.5 60.1 56.6 69.0 38.9 56.6 26 68.5 67.8 67.9 60.2 59.9 60.9 56.8 68.4 *#N/A 56.2 27 67.2 66.1 66.1 59.0 58.3 58.9 55.3 66.6 39.8 55.0 28 68.5 67.7 67.5 60.8 60.0 61.1 56.8 68.6 38.8 57.2 29 68.8 68.1 67.7 60.8 59.5 60.81 56.3 68.4 46.3 57.0 30 69.1 68.0 67.7 61.4 60.5 61.6 57.5 68.8 38.41 57.6 31 69.1 68.3 67.9 61.01 60.2 61.3 57.6 68.9 40.7 57.7 Days 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 24 31 En. Avg 68.4 67.5 67.2 60.3 59.7 60.6 56.9 68.4 41.5 57.1 #N/A indicates insufficient data. *#N/A indicates no aircraft -related noise events. TABLE 4 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION August 2019 Date 1 is 68.8 2S 68.1 35 67.8 4S 60.1 NMS Site 5S 59.9 6S 60.4 7S 55.9 8N 68.7 9N 36.6 , 57.2 2 68.0 67.6 66.6 59.0 58.3 58.3 54.9 66.3 39.9 53.6 3 67.5 66.4 65.6 58.7 58.0 58.7 54.7 67.5 *#N/A 56.3 4 68.7 67.9 67.6 60.7 60.1 60.8 56.6 68.8 40.1 57.0 5 68.91 68.0 67.9 60.11 60.1 60.51 56.0 68.5 *#N/Al 57.2 6 68.7 67.7 67.7 61.1 60.3 60.9 56.4 69.2 37.7 58.6 7 68.3 67.7 67.3 60.7 59.8 60.7 56.6 69.2 45.3 57.5 8 69.0 68.3 68.2 60.8 60.3 61.1 56.7 69.2 41.9 57.5 9 68.8 67.9 67.3 60.7 59.8 60.6 56.6 69.1 *#N/A 58.0 10 67.5 66.5 66.1 59.2 58.7 59.5 56.1 66.7 *#N/A 54.9 11 68.5 67.7 67.4 60.7 60.3 61.2 57.2 69.0 45.7 57.1 12 68.3 67.8 67.5 60.4 60.0 61.1 56.7 68.5 *#N/A 57.6 13 68.6 67.9 67.7 60.2 59.7 60.2 55.6 68.3 *#N/A 57.3 14 68.9 68.1 67.9 60.2 59.4 59.8 54.2 68.5 41.2 57.5 15 68.8 68.0 67.7 59.5 58.5 58.4 53.5 68.6 32.8 57.1 16 68.9 67.8 67.7 60.7 59.5 60.5 55.6 68.9 *#N/A 57.6 17 67.5 66.4 66.3 59.8 58.5 59.7 55.3 66.6 43.1 55.5 18 68.6 67.9 67.4 60.7 60.2 61.5 57.4 68.8 38.5 57.3 19 68.5 67.8 67.5 60.4 60.1 61.0 56.3 68.1 29.5 57.4 20 68.31 67.6 67.2 60.2 59.8 60.2 56.2 67.9 44.3 57.0 21 68.5 67.6 67.6 60.1 59.6 60.9 56.7 68.1 41.8 56.7 22 69.0 67.8 67.8 61.4 60.1 61.7 57.3 68.6 40.8 57.1 23 68.5 67.3 67.3 61.2 59.6 61.2 57.3 68.8 42.6 57.1 24 66.8 66.0 65.9 58.5 58.0 58.9 55.1 65.7 38.7 53.9 25 68.2 67.4 67.0 59.6 59.1 59.8 56.2 67.6 *#N/A 56.4 26 68.3 67.3 67.2 60.0 59.3 60.1 55.8 68.6 *#N/A 57.1 27 68.2 67.3 67.1 60.5 59.3 60.6 55.6 68.4 38.5 57.2 28 68.5 67.4 67.4 61.0 59.9 61.0 56.5 68.7 39.5 57.3 29 68.7 68.1 67.9 60.5 60.4 61.5 57.4 68.0 35.8 57.1 30 68.4 67.4 67.5 60.1 59.9 60.4 56.4 69.1 *#N/A 57.3 31 67.0 65.9 66.0 57.6 57.7 58.5 53.9 65.2 32.8 53.5 Days 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 21 31 En. Avg 68.4 67.5 67.3 60.2 59.6 60.4 56.1 68.3 41.0 56.9 #N/A indicates insufficient data. *#N/A indicates no aircraft -related noise events. TABLE 5 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION September 2019 Date 1 is 66.7 2S 65.7 3S 65.6 4S 58.7 NMS Site 5S 57.9 6S 58.7 7S 52.6 8N 67.4 9N 35.5 1ON 55.8 2 68.1 67.0 66.8 60.1 58.9 60.0 56.2 68.0 49.7 55.8 3 68.1 67.3 66.9 59.4 59.0 59.8 56.2 67.3 *#N/A 55.8 4 67.8 66.1 66.8 59.3 58.6 59.5 55.7 67.8 44.9 55.7 5 67.7 66.9 66.4 59.4 58.8 59.9 56.0 67.6 *#N/A 56.5 6 68.4 67.5 67.0 59.7 59.2 60.1 56.1 67.7 *#N/A 56.5 7 66.7 65.9 65.5 58.6 58.3 59.1 55.5 65.8 *#N/A 54.6 8 68.5 67.6 67.3 60.6 60.1 61.1 57.7 68.8 *#N/A 57.7 9 68.2 67.1 66.9 60.8 59.7 60.9 57.3 68.2 *#N/A 57.0 10 67.9 66.8 66.6 60.8 59.8 60.6 57.3 68.2 39.7 57.4 11 67.9 67.4 67.0 60.3 60.1 60.9 57.3 68.3 38.9 57.0 12 68.9 67.9 68.3 60.5 60.4 61.2 56.9 68.7 39.1 56.8 13 68.2 67.5 67.3 58.9 59.2 59.5 55.7 44.3 38.7 55.9 14 66.6 65.7 65.4 57.4 57.0 57.8 53.1 #N/A *#N/A 53.2 15 68.6 67.7 67.4 59.7 59.1 59.8 56.0 #N/A 36.6 57.0 16 68.6 67.8 67.3 60.5 59.7 60.51 56.4 #N/A 46.2 57.5 17 67.9 67.0 66.6 60.0 59.8 60.7 56.9 69.9 43.1 56.7 18 68.2 67.1 66.6 60.3 59.7 60.5 56.6 68.0 46.8 56.4 19 67.9 67.3 67.0 60.7 60.1 61.0 57.5 68.5 44.0 57.8 20 68.5 67.7 67.4 60.3 59.9 61.1 57.8 68.5 43.1 57.4 21 66.9 66.1 65.8 58.8 58.5 59.01 55.4 65.6 45.6 53.8 22 68.5 67.5 67.4 60.1 59.0 60.1 56.1 68.5 38.6 56.6 23 68.6 67.7 67.2 60.5 59.9 61.1 56.9 68.3 45.3 57.0 24 68.0 67.2 67.0 59.2 59.5 60.1 56.4 67.4 37.2 55.8 25 68.3 67.2 66.8 60.3 58.4 60.3 56.1 68.4 *#N/A 57.4 26 68.7 67.9 67.4 61.0 60.1 61.31 57.3 68.8 45.6 58.2 27 68.5 68.0 67.4 60.8 60.5 61.4 57.8 64.1 *#N/A 58.3 28 66.6 66.0 65.4 58.8 58.4 59.2 55.5 66.1 43.5 56.2 29 68.4 67.9 67.1 60.7 60.1 60.9 55.9 68.5 37.0 58.0 30 68.3 67.7 67.0 60.4 60.2 61.0 57.5 67.7 40.7 57.3 Days 30 30 30 30 30 30 301 27 21 30 En. Avg 68.1 67.2 66.9 60.0 59.41 60.31 56.51 67.8 43.6 56.7 #N/A indicates insufficient data. *#N/A indicates no aircraft -related noise events. TABLE 6 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commercial Class A July - September 2019 Carrier AC Type # Deps NMS Site is 2S 3S 4S 5S I 6S 7S 8N SIN 1ON Alaska Air A320 447 Average 95.7 94.9 94.7 87.9 85.9 87.1 84.1 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (443) (438) (442) (438) (429) (433) (428) (0) (0) (0) B737 17 Average 95.7 94.8 94.5 89.4 88.4 89.0 84.3 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (17) (17) (16) (17) (17) (15) (14) (0) (0) (0) B738 685 Average 98.0 96.8 95.3 88.7 88.9 89.7 86.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (680) (667) (675) (654) (671) (670) (673) (0) (0) (0) American A21N 1 Average 89.9 89.9 88.4 82.7 81.3 83.2 81.9 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (0) (0) (0) A320 148 Average 94.9 94.2 93.3 85.9 85.1 86.6 84.1 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (147) (145) (146) (144) (140) (146) (139) (0) (0) (0) A321 24 Average 99.2 98.5 97.4 88.6 87.3 88.2 85.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (24) (23) (24) (24) (24) (24) (24) (0) (0) (0) B738 1447 Average 99.0 97.7 97.5 89.4 88.8 89.8 86.3 96.8 88.6 81.7 Count (1421) (1409) (1420) (1397) (1379) (1371) (1405) (8) (9) (1) Compass E175 427 Average 95.6 95.1 96.1 89.4 88.7 89.0 84.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (425) (412) (423) (415) (418) (409) (405) (0) (0) (0) Delta A220 19 Average 87.5 88.0 86.2 80.5 80.1 81.0 78.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (19) (19) (18) (19) (17) (19) (3) (0) (0) (0) A319 261 Average 96.1 95.3 95.3 88.1 87.2 88.1 83.5 94.3 87.2 81.2 Count (247) (241) (249) (236) (237) (237) (240) (12) (9) (3) A320 1 Average 96.6 95.7 96.1 86.6 85.3 86.5 84.9 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 1 (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (0) (0) (0) 8712 24 Average 92.4 92.6 88.2 79.7 79.1 81.0 78.4 #N/A #N/A #N /A Count (24) (24) (23) (14) (16) (22) (14) (0) (0) (0) B738 9 Average 95.7 94.8 93.3 87.6 88.2 89.0 86.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (9) (7) (9) (8) (9) (8) (9) (0) (0) (0) B752 400 Average 96.6 96.1 96.4 88.9 87.8 88.1 83.7 94.4 85.7 #N/A Count (393) (387) (391) (378) (381) (376) (384) (5) (6) (0) FedEx A306 64 Average 96.4 96.2 94.0 88.0 87.1 88.5 84.1 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (64) (64) (64) (63) (64) (61) (62) (0) (0) (0) Frontier Airlines A20N 126 Average 88.9 88.9 88.2 81.8 79.9 82.5 79.1 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (125) (122) (124) (110) (81) (112) (46) (0) (0) (0) A320 54 Average 95.4 94.9 93.3 86.7 85.6 87.6 85.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (53) (53) (52) (53) (49) (53) (51) (0) (0) (0) Horizon Air E175 218 Average 91.5 91.0 89.3 84.7 84.2 86.2 82.6 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (216) (205) (211) (216) (212) (216) (206) (0) (0) (0) Southwest 8737 1549 Average 92.8 92.3 90.3 84.8 85.0 85.7 82.5 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (1532) (1518) (1521) (1522) (1512) (1498) (1473) (0) (0) (0) B738 12 Average 92.4 92.1 89.4 84.1 84.2 84.9 81.8 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 1 (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (12) (0) (0) (0) United A320 580 Average 95.0 94.3 94.1 87.0 85.6 86.5 83.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (577) (567) (574) (556) (553) (552) (507) (0) (0) (0) B737 398 Average 96.9 95.5 96.6 90.1 90.2 90.4 86.1 96.5 88.6 82.8 Count (390) (383) (393) (391) (388) (375) (370) (4) (5) (2) 8738 702 Average 98.7 97.3 97.9 90.9 90.1 90.1 86.5 97.9 88.9 83.2 Count (686) (673) (683) (676) (666) (648) (665) (9) (9) (4) UPS 8752 52 Average 95.4 95.3 93.6 86.6 86.2 87.2 82.5 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (51) (51) (51) (51) (50) (50) (50) (0) (0) (0) West.let B737 92 Average 95.4 94.2 94.8 89.3 88.7 89.8 84.1 #N/A #N /A #N/A Count (90) (90) (91) (88) (89) (89) (91) (0) (0) (0) �.. �n 11,10010i TABLE 7 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commercial Class E July - September 2019 Carrier AC Type # DepsNMS Site IS 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N ION Delta B712 377 Average 92.3 92.5 88.4 80.1 79.7 81.7 78.9 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (374) (368) (373) (270) (272) (355) (208) (0) (0) (0) Horizon Air E175 327 Average 91.0 90.6 89.1 84.7 83.9 85.8 82.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (323) (313) (319) (319) (320) (307) (295) (0) (0) (0) SkyWest Com I. E175 958 Average 90.2 90.0 89.0 84.7 83.9 85.5 82.1 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (947) (911) (945) (937) (926) (926) (887) (0) (0) (0) Southwest 8737 1971 Average 91.7 91.5 89.7 84.7 84.7 85.5 82.1 94.2 #N/A84.5 Count (1955) (1894) (1928) (1932) (1929) (1896) (1874) (2) (0) (1) TABLE 8 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commuter July - September 2019 TABLE 8 -GA MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS General Aviation July - September 2019 TABLE 9 AIR CARRIER OPERATIONAL HISTORY Carrier Alaska Air AS AC Type A319 2015 2016 Year 2017 1 2018 64 0• 184 A320 262 3.016 B734 80 76 24 B737 2.666 3,258 1,233 384 126 B738 4,590 4,439 6,420 8,260 3,536 American AA A21N 2 A319 42 178 332 722 332 A320 344 868 266 78 324 A321 326 563 56 4 55 8738 9,090 10,538 11.556 11,457 8,471 B752 22 74 4 4 Compass CP E170 1521 78 E175 1,669 2,726 3.188 2.350 Delta DL A220 39 A319 1 3.352 3,444 2,053 1,979 1,470 A320 162 160 94 12 4 8712 3.267 3,379 2.495 B737 1 146 188 8 8738 4 40 18 28 B739 2 2 B752 2.130 2.128 2.137 2.889 2.190 M D90 2 FedEx FM A306 508 510 506 508 382 Frontier Airlines F9 A20N* 1 600 656 A319 1.497 6461 356 190 98 A320 154 740 628 654 326 A321 2 A32N* 12 438 Horizon Air QX DHBD 1.156 1,456 728 12 E175 339 2,716 3,199 SkvWest Coml. SC CRJ9 1.922 1.8991 1.440 6 E175 3,554 4.761 6.960 5,563 Southwest WN B38M 2 14 10 8737 37,101 41,806 35,971 32,380 22,322 8738 2.586 1.144 58 64 114 United UA A319 1,393 1,999 1,470 999 1.074 A320 3,207 2,6701 3,957 3.927 2,138 B737 4,523 5,246 4.044 2.987 2,100 B738 1,853 1,252 3.302 5.154 4.384 8752 44 2 4 UPS 5X A306 52 52 45 22 8752 366 370 369 394 310 US Airways AW A319 240 A320 1,476 A321 740 B752 98 West.let WS B736 32 30 10 14 B737 718 642 644 666 498 Total 81,288 1 91,279 90,250 1 91,875 67,830 *In 2018, the code for the Airbus A320neo was changed from A32N to A20N. TABLE 10 AIR CARRIER AIRCRAFT OPERATIONAL HISTORY Aircraft A20N* 2015 2016 Year 2017 2018 600 0• 656 A21N 2 A220 39 A306 560 562 551 530 382 A319 6,524 6,267 4,211 3,954 3,158 A320 5,343 4,438 4,945 4,933 5,808 A321 1,066 565 56 4 55 A32N* 12 438 B38M 2 14 10 8712 3,2671 3,379 2,495 8734 80 76 24 B736 32 30 10 14 8737 45,008 50,952 42,038 36,605 25,054 8738 18,123 17,373 21,376 24,953 16,533 B739 2 2 B752 2,660 2,572 2,512 3,291 2,500 CRJ9 1,922 1,899 1,440 6 DHBD 1,156 1,456 728 12 E170 152 78 E175 5,223 7,826 12,864 11,112 MD90 1 2 Total 81,288 91,279 90,250 1 91,875 67,830 *In 2018, the code for the Airbus A320neo was changed from A32N to A20N. TABLE 11 AIR CARRIER AVERAGE DAILY DEPARTURE HISTORY �Carrier Alaska Air AS AC Type A319 2015 2016 Yea r 2017 2018 .088 019 .252 A320 .359 4.132 8734 .110 .104 .033 B737 3.652 4.451 1.693 .526 .173 B738 6.288 6.066 8.789 11.315 4.844 American AA A21N .003 A319 .058 .243 .455 .989 .455 A320 .471 1.186 .364 .107 .444 A321 .447 .770 .077 .005 .074 8738 12.452 14.402 15.827 15.696 11.605 B752 .030 .101 .005 .005 Compass CP E170 .208 .107 E175 2.279 3.734 4.367 3.219 Delta DL A220 .052 A319 4.592 4.705 2.811 2.712 2.014 A320 .222 .219 .129 .016 .005 B712 4.471 4.627 3.419 B737 .200 .258 .011 8738 .005 .055 .025 .038 B739 .003 .003 B752 2.918 2.910 2.926 3.959 3.000 MD90 .003 FedEx FM A306 .696 .697 .693 .696 .523 Frontier Airlines F9 A20N* .822 .899 A319 2.052 .883 .488 .260 .134 A320 .211 1.011 .860 .896 .447 A321 .003 A32N* .016 .600 Horizon Air CU( DI -18D 1.5791 1.995 .997 .016 E175 .466 3.721 4.381 SkyWest Com I. SC CRJ9 2.633 2.593 1.975 .008 E175 4.855 6.523 9.534 7.622 Southwest WN B38M .003 .019 .014 B737 50.819 57.104 49.274 44.351 30.575 B738 3.542 1.563 .079 .088 .156 United UA A319 1.910 2.730 2.014 1.373 1.471 A320 4.395 3.648 5.422 5.375 2.929 B737 6.195 7.169 5.534 4.093 2.874 B738 2.537 1.710 4.526 7.058 6.008 B752 .060 .003 .005 UPS 5X A306 .071 .071 .060 .030 B752 .501 .505 .507 .540 .425 US Airways AW A319 .329 A320 2.022 A321 1.014 B752 .134 West.let WS B736 .044 .041 .014 .019 B737 .984 .877 .882 .912 .682 Total 111.351 124.699 1 123.622 1 125.852 92.915 *In 2018, the code for the Airbus A320neo was changed from A32N to A20N. TABLE 12 AIRCRAFT Glossary AC Type A20N Make Airbus Model/Series 320-200 Neo A21N Airbus 321 Neo A220 Airbus 220-100 A306 Airbus 300.600 A310 Airbus 310-200 '320 Airbus 320 A32N Airbus 320-200 Neo 838M Boeing 737-800 Max B712 Boeing 717-200 8733 Boeing, 737400 B734 Boeing 737-400 B736 Boeing 737-600 8737 Boeing 737-700 B738 Boeing 737-800 B739 Boeing 737-900 B752 Boeing; 757-200 CRJ7 Canadair Regional Jet 700 CRJ9 Canadair Regional Jet 900 DH8D Bombardier Dash 8 E135 Embraer 135 E170 Embraer 170 E175 Embraer 175 MD90 IMcDonnell Douglas 196 QUARTERLY NOISE MEETING Date: September 18, 2019 Time: 2:00 PM Place: Airport Commission Room ITEMS DISCUSSED Louie Ilustrisimo provided a summary of the JWA airport statistics for July 2019. Nikolas Gaskins stated that Alaska Airlines discontinued international service to Mexico on August 6, 2019, and thus international passenger and operation levels will decline in the coming months. Anthony Cangey presented an overview of Delta Air Lines Airbus A220 operations at JWA. Mr. Cangey explained that the Airbus A220 is a significantly quieter aircraft compared to other commercial aircraft in service at JWA. Mr. Cangey stated that Delta plans to replace its Boeing 8717 operations at JWA with the Airbus A220, which is qualified to fly both Class A and Class E capacity. David Cook of the Airport Working Group of Orange County asked if Delta's Boeing 8717 operations are being flown as Class E. Mr. Gaskins explained that Delta was utilizing the Boeing 8717 in both Class A and Class E categories. Mr. Gaskins discussed the Plan Year 2020 allocations. Mr. Gaskins stated there would be a decrease in seats allocated to commercial air carriers versus previous years and a withholding of supplemental Class A ADDS. Mr. Gaskins mentioned Delta would be operating commuter capacity through its partnership with SkyWest Airlines. Mr. Gaskins also explained that Delux's (JSX) Plan Year 2020 allocation is conditional based on their decision on continuing operations at the Fixed Based Operator (FBO) (95,070 passengers) or if they will begin operations at the passenger terminal (200,000 passengers). Mr. Gaskins discussed the status of the Viewpoint Noise Event Portal, which allows the community to submit noise events via their mobile or desktop devices and through an automated phone system. Mr. Gaskins also stated that a detailed noise event report would also be launched following the launch of Viewpoint. Newport Beach resident Dr. Mosher inquired as to whether the noise data included within the noise report would consist of non -aviation related noise events. Mr. Gaskins stated that only noise events correlated to an aircraft operation would be included in the report. Dr. Mosher advised that the community is interested in learning how the number of General Aviation jet departures during the nighttime curfew hours have changed over time. ,ti QUARTERLY NOISE MEETING ROSTER September 18, 2019 NAME ORGANIZATION Jim Mosher Resident — Newport Beach David Cook Resident — Newport Beach I AWG Nikolas Gaskins John Wayne Airport Bonnie Frisch John Wayne Airport Anthony Cangey John Wayne Airport Beatrice Siercke John Wayne Airport Louie Ilustrisimo John Wayne Airport Venus Benavides John Wayne Airport SUMMARY OF STATISTICAL INFORMATION FOR CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1. Size of Noise Impact Area as defined in the Noise Standards (California Code of Regulations, Title 21, chapter 2.5, Subchapter 6): 6.67 acres (or 0.010 square miles) 2. Estimated Number of dwelling units included in the Noise Impact Area as defined in the Noise Standards: 67 3. Estimated number of people residing within the Noise Impact Area as defined in the Noise Standards: 168 (based on 2.5 people per dwelling unit) 4. Identification of aircraft of type having highest, takeoff noise level operating at this airport together with estimated number of operations by this aircraft type during the calendar quarter reporting period: B737-800 — 5,718 (Arrivals + Departures) 5. Total number of aircraft operations during the calendar quarter: 6. Number of Air Carrier operations during the calendar quarter: (Not mandatory) 83,659 24,313 7. Percentage of Air Carrier operations by aircraft certified under Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 36, Stage III: (Not mandatory) 100% 8. Estimated number of operations by General Aviation aircraft during the calendar quarter: (Not mandatory) 59,023 9. Estimated number of operations by Military aircraft during the calendar quarter: (Not mandatory) 323