Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
08 AIRPORT NOISE REPORT 11-7-05
A G END A REPORT Agenda Item Reviewed: C", M'""" ~ Finance Director. ~ MEETING DATE: NOVEMBER 7, 2005 FROM: SUBJECT: WILLIAM HUSTON, CITY MANAGER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT TO: JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT NOISE ABATEMENT QUARTERLY REPORTS SUMMARY: This report transmits two John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Quarterly Reports for the first and second quarters of 2005. The average noise level measured at monitoring station NMS 10N, located at Columbus Tustin Middle School, remained relatively the same during the first and second quarters. Average noise levels during both quarters remained below the City, County, and State criteria of 65 dB Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) for residential uses. RECOMMENDATION That the City Council receive and file this report. FISCAL IMPACT No Fiscal Impact DISCUSSION Following the conclusion of each calendar quarter, John Wayne Airport prepares a Noise Abatement Program Quarterly Report and transmits a copy of the report to the City of Tustin. Attachment 1 contains the quarterly reports for the first and second quarters of 2005. A brief overview of the information contained within the attachment is as follows: Measured Noise Levels . During the first quarter of 2005, the average CNEL at Remote Monitoring Station (NMS) 10N, located at Columbus Tustin Middle School was 57.7 dB. This is a negligible 0.6 dB higher than the previous four quarters. However, for comparison, the CNEL was 0.4 dB lower (57.3) during the first quarter of 2004. JWA Noise Report Page 2 . During the second quarter of 2005, the average CNEL was 57.5 dB. This is a negligible 0.3 dB higher than the previous four quarters. For comparison, the CNEL was 0.1 dB lower (57.4) during the second quarter of 2004. . All measured noise levels are below the City, County, and State criteria of 65 dB CNEL for residential areas. Noise Complaints . During the first quarter of 2005, there were two (2) Tustin area complaints compared with three (3) complaints for the same period during 2004. . During the second quarter of 2005, there were four (4) Tustin area complaints cómpared with twenty-eight (28) complaints for the same period during 2004. . The number of complaints decreased during the first quarter and second quarter compared to the same periods in 2004. Since noise issues are of considerable importance to the City of Tustin, the Community Development Department will continue to monitor operations at John Wayne Airport unless otherwise directed by the City Council. ~~ Rya Swiontek Assistant Planner :it: 77I£r-4 ,;{;4 wú~ Elizabeth A. Binsack Community Development Director Attachment: John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Quarterly Reports for January 1, 2005, through March 31, 2005, and April 1 , 2005, through June 30, 2005. S:\CddlCCREPORT\JW A report to council 11-Q7-QS.doc ATTACHMENT John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Quarterly Reports for January 1,2005, through March 31, 2005, and April 1, 2005, through June 30, 2005. NOISE ABATEMENT PROGRAM QUARTERLY REPORT For the period: January 1, 2005 through March 31, 2005 Prepared in accordance with: AIRPORT NOISE STANDARD STATE OF CALIFORNIA California Administrative Code Title 21, Chapter 2.5, SubChapter 6: Division of Aeronautics Noise Standards Submitted by: Alan L. Murphy Airport Director John Wayne Airport, Orange County INTRODUCTION This is the 129th Quarterly Report submitted by the County of Orange in accordance with the requirements of the California Airport Noise Standards (California Administrative Code Title 21, Chapter 2.5, SubChapter 6: Division of Aeronautics Noise Standards). Effective January I, 1986, the criteria for defining "Noise Impact Area" was changed from 70 dB to 65 dB Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL). Under this criteria, John Wayne Airport currently has a "Noise Impact Area." NOISE IMPACT SUMMARY Caltrans' Aeronautics Program has established guidelines in the California State Noise Standard to control residential area noise levels produced by aircraft operations using the State's airports. Under those guidelines, residential noise sensitive areas exposed to an average Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) of more than 65 dB define the "Noise Impact Area." John Wayne Airport uses ten permanent remote noise monitoring stations (NMS) located in Newport Beach, Santa Ana, Tustin and Irvine to measure noise levels, at the following locations: MONITOR STATIONS NMS-3S: 2139 Anniversary Lane, Newport Beach NMS-4S: 2338 Tustin Ave., Newport Beach NMS-5S: 324 V, Vista Madera, Newport Beach NMS-6S: 1912 Santiago, Newport Beach NMS-7S: 1131 Back Bay Drive, Newport Beach NMS-8N: 17372 Eastman Street, Irvine NMS-9N: 1300 S. Grand Avenue, Santa Ana NMS-10N:17952 Beneta Way, Tustin NMS-1S: Golf Course, 3100 Irvine Ave., Newport Beach NMS-2S: 20152 S.W. Birch St., Santa Ana The map in Figure I shows the general location of each permanent remote monitor station. Figure 2 shows the Airport's "Noise Impact Area" for the previous year (April I, 2004 - March 31,2005). The Figure 2 information was developed by Mestre-Greve Associates, Inc., in consultation with John Wayne Airport. CNEL values measured for the period and current digitized land use information were utilized to calculate the land area acreages, number of residences and estimated number of people within the "Noise Impact Area". -1- F re1 JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT NOISE MON ITORI NG STATIONS (NMS) LOCATION MAP -..- + ,JO..o.i_,.j..ttJ:<mv..-Imn,._.dgn STAT¡SncsLOmlV.m 135,'\Ç,.., 02j .quar."",",-,. + 00 NJno,oor "j f'eo::ÜJ to",,",' p". ¡: ;¡ Pø'¡¡¡", ~"" 0"...11"'9 un:,.. AIRCRAFT TRAFFIC SUMMARY The Airport traffic summary for this quarter is shown in Table I and Figure 3 below. Air Carrier operational count histories and average daily departure counts are illustrated in Tables 9 & 11. TABLE I LANDING AND TAKEOFF OPERATIONS Januar - March 2005 Period Air Carriers GAJet(1) Total Average Daily Jet Prop Onerations 12 Jet Ooerations Januarv 8.268 335 1,964 26,557 330 Februarv 7,477 312 1.978 25,464 338 March 8,342 358 2,304 29,137 343 First Quarter 24,087 1,005 6,246 81,158 337 Twelve Months 100,424 4,148 23,503 348,471 340 04/01/04 - 03/31/05 FIGURE 3 QUARTERLY AIRPORT TRAFFIC SUMMARY (Landing and Takeoff Operations) January - Maoch 2005 Jet CarTier 24,087 Military 60 Prop Carrier 1,005 GAJet 6.246 GA Other 49,760 10.000 20,000 30,000 40,000 Number of Operations 50,000 60.000 ~---- - , - ----- - - ----,---- NOTE: (J) GA Jet figures include a 5% factor for operations not identified by the JW A noise monitor stations. (2) Counts in this column are based upon records provided by the local FAA representatives. COMMUNITY NOISE EOUIV ALENT LEVELS The monthly, quarterly and twelve month Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) average values for each monitor station are shown in Table 2, while daily CNEL values are shown in Tables 3 through 5. Insufficient data is indicated by "#N/A" entries in each table. Average Single Event Noise Exposure Level (SENEL) values for Air Carrier and General Aviation Jet aircraft are shown in Tables 6 through 8. For the twelve month period ending March 31, 2005, 99 dwelling units in Santa Ana Heights were in the "Noise Impacted Area" (within the 65 dB CNEL contour); this represents an increase of one unit in the -4- 6/22/05 number of dwelling units in the "Noise Impacted Area" from the previous twelve month period ending December 31, 2004. The State has approved several remedies of aircraft noise levels for noise sensitive property in the "Noise Impact Area": homes can be acoustically insulated, purchased by the County, or rezoned for "other non-noise sensitive uses." As part of the County's Santa Ana Heights Land Use Compatibility Program, approximately 77 general agriculture (A-I) properties with residential land uses on Orchard, Acacia and Birch Streets were rezoned for Business Park Use in October, 1986. Each property was individually sold and subsequently converted to compatible land use. Between 1986 and 1993, 124 residences have been purchased or otherwise made compatible through the County's Purchase Assurance Program, Acoustical Insulation Program or Housing Relocation Program. In September 1993, the FAA approved a grant to fund a voluntary Accelerated Acoustical Insulation Program (AAlP) in Santa Ana Heights. (The current AAIP has been renamed "Santa Ana Heights Acoustical Insulation Program" with the acronym "SAH AlP".) During the first quarter of2005 , no additional residences have been made compatible through the County's SAH AlP. A total of 473 residences in Santa Ana Heights have been purchased or otherwise made compatible through the County's Purchase Assurance Program, Housing Relocation Program, Acoustical Insulation Program or SAH AlP. TELEPHONE COMPLAINT CALLS (January 1.2005 - March 31. 2005) The Airport's Access and Noise Office receives and investigates noise calls and complaints from local citizens and all other sources. During the period January I, 2005 through March 31, 2005, the Office received 166 complaints from citizens. This is a 1.8% decrease from the 169 complaints received last quarter. It is a 19.4% decrease from the 206 complaints received during the same quarter last year. Figure 4 shows the distribution of the quarterly telephone calls and complaints from local communities. FIGURE 4 HISTOGRAM BY COMMUNITY 60 50 40 30 25 20 10 51 .~~ ,,~ ~'I> ~-t ~'I> ""~ ~$- .,$oø iJ' ",w ,,~ ,-," iJ' <Þ ,,'I> ""~ iY" .",X' ,,? .,$o~ w ~ø x-w~ .f' ,<:' 'èø'li ~~ ,:;.'Ii """~ 'èø'li &' ,;,'I>?' w~ ø'if ",ø"ff"I>ø""'"<:!~"I>,,'v'l> "'I>,,'I>.,~o,¡,,o" c,'I>"'I>X'~ ","'Ii 'è'ìf 'ff"I>'< v'l' (,0 (l'li ,if! ..;ÿô,'" v .¡...r<:i ,ø of' ~ 4 Community -5- TABLE 2 LONG TERM MEASURED LEVELS Aircraft CNEL from 4/04 through 3/05 Values in dB at Each Site Period NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N Apr 2004 67.6 66.8 65.5 59.7 60.2 61.9 57.2 68.3 49.8 57.1 # Days 29 20 29 13 16 1 16 29 10 20 May 2004 67.4 66.7 65.3 59.7 61.0 61.0 57.7 68.3 49.2 57.3 # Days 30 27 30 5 1 1 15 30 8 16 Jun 2004 68.1 67.1 66.6 59.9 60.2 61.3 58.1 68.9 50.8 57.9 # Days 29 29 29 13 10 3 15 29 5 16 Q-22004 67.7 66.9 65.8 59.8 60.2 61.4 57.7 68.5 49.8 57.4 # Days 88 76 88 31 27 5 46 88 23 52 Jul2004 67.9 66.9 66.5 59.4 60.1 60.5 57.9 68.5 51.3 56.5 # DaYS 30 28 30 27 27 22 21 29 4 30 Aug 2004 68.5 67.1 66.5 59.3 60.4 60.6 58.1 68.6 49.9 56.8 # Days 31 30 31 29 25 31 19 31 7 30 Sep 2004 68.0 66.9 65.7 58.6 59.9 60.0 57.5 68.0 50.8 56.3 # Days 27 21 29 28 20 23 21 28 15 26 Q-32004 68.2 67.0 66.3 59.2 60.1 60.4 57.9 68.4 50.7 56.5 # Days 88 79 90 84 72 76 61 88 26 86 Oct 2004 68.3 67.3 66.8 59.7 60.9 61.2 58.2 68.7 53.3 58.0 # Days 28 28 30 26 26 25 26 28 8 25 Nov 2004 67.6 67.4 66.4 61.4 59.9 61.0 57.9 68.1 52.0 56.8 # Days 21 24 28 27 27 20 20 26 13 25 Dec 2004 67.7 66.5 66.1 58.9 59.3 60.2 56.7 68.4 52.6 57.2 # Days 25 24 29 25 27 22 22 21 7 21 Q-42004 67.9 67.1 66.5 60.2 60.1 60.8 57.7 68.4 52.6 57.4 # Days 74 76 87 78 80 67 68 75 28 71 Jan 2005 68.2 66.9 66.1 59.4 60.1 60.5 57.5 68.6 52.3 58.1 # Davs 24 30 27 17 13 21 18 25 8 15 Feb 2005 68.1 67.5 66.6 60.0 59.7 60.6 57.3 68.7 51.8 57.5 # Davs 24 24 26 17 5 13 19 21 10 16 Mar 2005 67.7 68.2 66.2 59.9 59.8 61.4 58.0 68.7 52.3 57.7 # Davs 28 18 27 26 20 12 14 27 2 26 Q-1 2005 68.0 67.4 66.3 59.8 59.9 60.8 57.6 68.7 52.1 57.7 # Days 76 72 80 60 38 46 51 73 20 57 Q-2 2004 Tru Q-~12OO5 Total 67.9 67.1 66.2 59.7 60.1 60.7 57.7 68.5 51.4 57.2 # Days 326 303 345 253 217 194 226 324 97 266 Q-1 2004 Tru Q112OO4 <iiviOUS 4 Quarters) Total 67.9 66.8 66.0 59.5 59.9 60.5 57.7 68.4 51.8 57.1 # Days 329 301 345 254 236 199 212 327 105 258 Change trim pre71iOUS 4 ~uarters 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 -0.4 0.1 -6- TABLE 3 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION January 2005 Date NM8 8ite 18 28 38 48 58 68 78 8N 9N 10N 1 67.4 67.7 64.4 58.1 #N/A 58.8 57.3 67.0 52.1 56.0 2 68.5 66.7 66.1 60.6 #N/A 60.5 57.1 69.7 #N/A 59.0 3 68.9 68.0 67.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A 59.7 70.8 #N/A #N/A 4 69.0 67.5 67.1 #N/A #N/A #N/A 57.4 69.9 #N/A #N/A 5 68.1 67.4 66.3 59.9 #N/A 60.7 57.6 68.7 #N/A 58.3 6 67.5 66.7 65.4 59.2 #N/A 60.2 59.0 68.6 #N/A 58.2 7 68.5 67.1 66.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 69.7 #N/A #N/A 8 #N/A 64.7 #N/A 59.4 #N/A 62.6 #N/A 67.6 #N/A 59.0 9 68.8 68.5 66.9 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 70.8 #N/A #N/A 10 68.9 68.0 67.3 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 70.2 #N/A #N/A 11 67.5 67.5 65.7 59.8 #N/A 62.3 #N/A 69.0 #N/A 59.6 12 68.8 67.6 66.2 60.0 #N/A 60.8 57.4 67.7 50.5 58.0 13 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 14 68.6 67.4 66.2 58.7 #N/A 59.5 56.1 67.8 #N/A 55.8 15 #N/A 64.8 #N/A #N/A 61.5 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 16 67.9 66.3 64.7 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 66.9 #N/A #N/A 17 #N/A 66.7 67.5 #N/A 61.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A 53.9 #N/A 18 67.7 67.0 66.3 #N/A 58.3 60.1 #N/A 66.0 52.9 #N/A 19 #N/A 65.3 64.6 #N/A 58.6 58.6 58.2 67.2 #N/A #N/A 20 68.4 66.5 65.6 59.5 58.9 60.5 56.3 67.9 #N/A 56.4 21 68.1 67.5 66.0 59.3 59.4 60.5 57.1 68.4 50.4 58.8 22 66.3 65.6 64.7 #N/A 59.0 58.1 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 23 68.4 67.2 66.9 58.2 59.5 61.5 57.7 67.3 #N/A #N/A 24 68.4 66.9 66.1 59.3 59.6 59.8 55.9 68.0 51.3 57.0 25 67.6 66.1 65.4 59.1 60.0 60.3 57.1 68.4 #N/A 58.0 26 67.9 67.2 65.9 59.2 60.7 60.3 57.5 68.4 #N/A 58.2 27 68.3 67.5 66.6 60.4 61.9 61.2 #N/A 68.7 #N/A 57.6 28 67.4 66.8 65.3 58.6 #N/A 59.9 57.0 69.4 52.9 59.2 29 #N/A 65.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A 59.8 57.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A 30 68.1 67.4 66.0 59.3 60.9 61.4 #N/A 67.9 53.3 #N/A 31 #N/A 61.9 67.5 #N/A #N/A #N/A 58.1 #N/A #N/A #N/A Days 24 30 27 17 13 21 18 25 8 15 En.Ava 68.2 66.9 66.1 59.4 60.1 60.5 57.5 68.6 52.3 58.1 #N/A indicates insufficient data. -7- TABLE 4 DAILY CNEL V ALOES AT EACH MONITOR STATION February 2005 Date NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N 1 #N/A 64.6 66.6 #N/A 59.8 62.4 56.1 #N/A #N/A #N/A 2 #N/A #N/A 67.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 3 #N/A #N/A 67.5 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 4 66.2 64.9 64.8 #N/A 57.5 62.5 56.3 67.2 #N/A 57.0 5 65.6 65.0 #N/A 57.7 58.8 58.0 #N/A 66.0 50.0 #N/A 6 67.3 66.0 64.9 59.4 59.5 59.5 55.9 67.9 #N/A 57.4 7 68.1 66.4 66.1 59.8 #N/A 60.5 57.0 68.2 #N/A 58.2 8 68.1 66.9 66.1 59.6 #N/A 60.4 57.4 67.9 50.8 56.7 9 66.2 65.1 65.7 57.9 #N/A 60.1 55.1 68.3 53.9 55.6 10 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 56.1 70.2 #N/A #N/A 11 69.0 68.9 66.9 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 12 66.0 65.3 64.7 61.9 62.0 59.7 55.6 67.0 #N/A 56.1 13 67.7 66.9 65.8 58.7 #N/A 59.7 57.2 68.4 #N/A 56.8 14 67.6 67.8 65.7 59.3 #N/A 59.8 56.8 68.1 52.6 57.2 15 68.1 67.9 66.3 60.0 #N/A 60.4 56.9 68.4 50.3 57.5 16 68.4 68.3 66.8 60.9 #N/A #N/A 57.6 68.7 51.7 57.3 17 68.7 67.2 67.0 61.3 #N/A 61.3 56.3 69.7 #N/A 58.4 18 68.8 67.3 67.0 61.7 #N/A #N/A #N/A 70.7 #N/A #N/A 19 68.6 69.0 68.5 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 20 66.7 68.4 65.4 60.2 #N/A 61.9 58.0 70.1 #N/A #N/A 21 69.9 69.0 68.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 22 69.5 #N/A 67.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 23 69.1 69.1 68.1 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 70.9 #N/A #N/A 24 69.3 69.1 67.5 61.3 #N/A #N/A 59.5 69.1 53.9 57.7 25 69.1 67.7 67.7 #N/A #N/A #N/A 59.0 69.1 #N/A 59.4 26 66.5 67.4 64.8 58.9 #N/A #N/A 56.2 66.8 50.7 57.7 27 68.3 68.8 66.6 59.7 #N/A #N/A 59.6 68.4 50.3 57.1 28 68.0 68.0 66.0 59.5 #N/A #N/A 58.6 68.8 51.4 58.6 Davs 24 24 26 17 5 13 19 21 10 16 En.Ava 68.1 67.5 66.6 60.0 59.7 60.6 57.3 68.7 51.8 57.5 #N/A indicates insufficient data. -8- TABLE 5 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR ST A nON March 2005 Date NM8 8ite 18 28 38 48 58 68 78 8N 9N 10N 1 67.6 68.0 66.6 60.1 #N/A #N/A 56.6 67.8 #N/A 58.4 2 67.7 68.6 65.7 59.6 #N/A #N/A 58.1 69.1 #N/A 58.9 3 68.5 68.8 66.5 61.4 #N/A #N/A 59.4 69.0 #N/A 58.0 4 69.2 67.3 66.7 #N/A 59.8 #N/A #N/A 68.7 #N/A 58.8 5 66.8 68.6 64.9 61.7 #N/A #N/A #N/A 66.4 #N/A 55.1 6 67.9 #N/A 66.1 58.9 60.4 #N/A 56.7 68.4 #N/A 57.1 7 68.1 68.2 66.4 60.1 58.7 #N/A 56.9 69.0 #N/A 57.4 8 68.3 #N/A 66.7 59.7 60.1 #N/A #N/A 69.0 #N/A 59.2 9 68.1 67.9 66.7 59.4 59.4 #N/A 56.0 69.0 #N/A 58.3 10 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 60.6 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 11 68.7 68.5 67.1 59.4 59.2 62.2 #N/A 69.5 #N/A 58.7 12 66.3 68.2 64.9 58.1 #N/A #N/A 58.5 67.0 #N/A 57.5 13 67.5 68.3 65.7 59.0 58.6 61.4 #N/A 68.7 #N/A 58.7 14 #N/A #N/A #N/A 58.6 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 15 #N/A 68.9 #N/A #N/A 58.0 59.0 #N/A 67.3 #N/A 55.5 16 67.8 #N/A 65.7 59.9 59.1 #N/A 56.9 68.6 #N/A 57.5 17 68.5 68.0 66.8 #N/A 60.5 #N/A #N/A 69.6 #N/A 57.6 18 67.4 67.2 #N/A 59.4 59.2 #N/A 56.4 66.8 #N/A 57.4 19 66.8 67.8 65.0 58.7 #N/A 59.3 57.1 67.5 #N/A 56.5 20 67.8 #N/A 66.4 59.1 #N/A 61.8 59.1 69.1 #N/A 58.1 21 68.1 #N/A 66.7 60.1 59.6 #N/A 59.9 69.2 #N/A 57.7 22 67.4 67.9 65.7 #N/A 61.7 #N/A #N/A 70.3 #N/A #N/A 23 67.5 #N/A 66.0 59.8 60.2 #N/A #N/A 68.9 #N/A 57.7 24 68.9 68.7 67.0 61.5 #N/A 62.2 #N/A 69.6 53.5 58.7 25 68.1 #N/A 66.4 61.1 59.6 62.1 59.7 68.9 50.7 57.5 26 67.0 #N/A 65.7 59.6 58.0 60.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 27 67.1 #N/A 65.3 60.8 58.2 62.1 #N/A 68.4 #N/A 56.0 28 68.1 68.7 66.6 59.5 60.5 61.1 #N/A 68.7 #N/A 56.8 29 67.3 #N/A 65.7 59.8 61.9 62.9 #N/A 69.9 #N/A #N/A 30 67.6 #N/A 66.3 59.8 61.2 #N/A 58.3 67.7 #N/A 56.5 31 59.9 67.7 67.2 60.1 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 56.3 Days 28 18 27 26 20 12 14 27 2 26 En.Ava 67.7 68.2 66.2 59.9 59.8 61.4 58.0 68.7 52.3 57.7 #N/A indicates insufficient data. -9- TABLE 6 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commercial Class A January - March 2005 Carrier AC Type # Deps NMS Site 15 25 35 45 8N 9N 10N AlasKa Air 6(3(4 741 verage ~b. I~~;~ I~~; <!!IT 1:~48 8(.1 8b.4 ~¿8 82.~ 83. Count 1635 1641 (520 (620 (72 (78 (72 B7377 92 Average 92.1 91.4 88.7 82.8 83.8 83.1 81.6 89.7 79.0 75.7 Count (85) (82) (86) (83) (55) (61) (80) (6) (1) (2) Aloha B7377 355 Average 96.0 94.2 92.4 86.7 86.2 87.5 85.0 92.8 83.0 81.3 Count (309) (297) (309) (311) (205) (243) (303) (37) (29) (28) America West A320 462 Average 93.6 92.4 91.5 86.3 85.4 85.6 82.5 88.0 79.7 81.5 . Count 1404 (386 1406 (399 (239 (315 (374 (49 (23 (25 B7373 424 Average 95.6 94.0 92.3 86.3 86.1 87.0 84.0 91.7 81.7 82.2 Count (364) (348) (364) (364) (243) (283) (354) (47) (34) (33) American B7378 1036 Average 98.7 96.6 1~~;7 89.1 87.9 88.7 85.4 91.6 81.4 81.6 Count 1862 (838 (8'70 (559 (695 (862 (111 (92 (76 MD80 440 Average 100.3 99.3 99.1 92.5 92.8 93.7 90.9 99.3 86.9 87.1 Count (372) (353) (370) (363) (221) (289) (348) (43) (45) (44) Continental B7373 171 Average 96.0 94.4 94.2 88.0 88.0 89.6 86.5 94.3 81.6 82.2 Count (124 1118 (125 1124 (71 (96) (121 (33 (28 (28 B7377 421 Average 96.0 94.0 92.9 86.3 85.8 866 83.8 93.6 83.4 81.8 Count (336) (324) (335) (338) (216) (257) (333) (75) (38) (38) Delta B7373 148 Average 96.3 94.7 94.4 87.8 87.5 87.7 85.1 92.4 80.7 80.3 Count (118 (114) (116 (119 (82 (85 (114 (28 (18 (21 67378 31 Average 94.9 93.2 90.5 84.5 86.1 85.5 83.3 92.5 #NIA #N/A Count (29 129 (29) (28 17 (27 (28 (2 (0 (0 B7S7 496 Average 95.9 94.3 93.9 87.4 87.0 87.0 83.9 90.3 80.8 81.6 Count (412 (395 (410 (405 (250 (324 (408) (62 (39 (42 MD90 169 Average 92.1 91.1 91.0 84.1 84.7 85.1 84.0 90.8 93.7 79.0 Count (150) (136) (151) (144) (102) (117) (144) (17) (3) (g) FedEx A310 64 Average 100.1 98.4 97.8 92.3 91.5 92.6 89.4 95.8 85.5 83.5 Count (55) (57) (55) (57) (34) (45) (55) (6) (5) (4) Frontier Airlines A318 119 Average 92.6 91.1 91.1 85.6 84.5 84.7 80.8 86.5 #NIA 76.4 Count (111 1110 (110 (111 (78 (80 (105 (8 (0 (3 A319 144 Average 93.1 91.8 91.8 86.5 85.7 85.9 82.2 88.4 79.5 79.8 Count (118 (116 1118 (116) (69 (101 (105 (17 (14) (14 B7373 1 Average 93.7 90.5 93.5 88.6 #N/A 88.1 83.9 #N/A #NIA #NIA Count (1) (1) (1) (1) (0) (1) (1) (0) (0) (0) Mesa Airlines CRJ9 216 Average 92.6 91.2 93.5 86.2 85.2 87.5 80.9 89.8 79.8 81.5 Count (187) (179) (188) (187) (120) (153) (163) (19) (6) (6) Midwest B717 89 Average 91.6 90.7 93.1 84.4 84.7 84.8 81.4 893 76.3 79.1 Count (73) (76) (76) (77) (53) (58) (74) (12) (2) (1) Northwest A320 346 Average 95.8 94.1 93.9 87.5 86.3 86.6 83.2 92.0 80.7 81.5 Count (269) (256) (268) (267) (165) (211) (261) (57) (20) (28) Southwest 67377 268 Average 89.6 89.0 86.1 81.5 82.5 81.5 80.4 89.4 79.2 79.9 Count (239) (233) (238) (232) (163) (191) (198) (26) (6) (6) United A320 602 Average 91.9 91.2 1;1.2 85.6 85.1 85.7 83.6 87.4 80.3 79.9 Count (524 (510 527 (525 (333 (416 (510 (59) (31 (21 6757 337 Average 94.3 93.0 91.8 85.0 85.4 86.0 83.6 90.2 79.8 79.1 Count (281) (267) (280) (280) (184) (219) (281) (45) (23) (30) UPS B7S7 59 Average 95.0 93.8 92.3 85.8 86.3 86.2 83.6 88.0 #N/A #NIA Count (54) (54) (54) (54) (36) (42) (52) (5) (0) (0) -10- TABLE 7 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commercial Class E January - March 2005 Carrier AC Type # Deps NMS Site S 2S 3S 4S o~ 8N 9N ON Alaska Air 167377 616 Average 91.3 90.3 88.0 81.~ 84.0 83.2 81. 89.7 80.5 79.0 Count (551) (540) (552) (553) (379) (426) (540) (56) (17) (29) America West A320 173 Average 91.5 91.0 89.5 84.9 84.6 84.4 81.1 86.0 77.9 77.1 Count (151) (153) (88) (135) (84) (120) (123) (20) (4) (8) Southwest 67377 2409 Average 90.9 90.3 86.8 82.2 82.6 82.0 80.1 89.9 81.6 78.9 Count (2116) (2080) (2126) (2081) (1427) (1695) (1869) (247) (125) (94) United 6757 262 Average 91.4 90.3 89.0 83.2 83.7 84.0 82.3 88.1 81.9 79.4 Count (222) (216) (225) (229) (161) (181) (224) (29) (9) (11) -11- TABLE 8 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commuter January - March 2005 Carrier AC Type # Deps NMS Site 15 25 J5 45 55 65 75 8N 9N 1Ur mencan t:ag e 1t:14u 907 Average 87.1 86.3 88.8 80.5 81.3 81.C 80.0 85.2 79. 79. Count (786) (773) (781) (653) (450) (620) (101) (101) (2) (13) Atiantic Southeast CL60 142 Average 90.5 88.7 87.9 81.5 82.2 83.1 82.2 87.3 79.8 78.6 Count (125) (119) (125) (116) (65) (106) (110) (10) (5) (2) SkyWest CL60 119 Average 86.1 84.6 88.0 80.1 80.8 80.9 79.8 84.0 #N/A 78.6 Count (105 (104 (106 (59 (46 191 112 110 10 11 CRJ7 179 Average 89.5 88.1 88.3 81.9 81.8 82.9 79.8 87.4 #N/A 82.4 Count (161 (157) (155) 1144 198 1126 (137 (17 (0 14 E120 503 Average 82.4 82.9 82.7 80.0 82.8 79.4 83.0 82.2 79.9 78.9 Count (432) (427) (439) (98) (235) (331) (56) (55) (11) (8) MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS General Aviation January - March 2005 -12- Carrier AC Type Year 2001 20021 2003 2004 2005 Alaska Air AS 87374 3,269 4,3431 4,850 7,961 1,483 87377 6,906 7.1961 7,089 4,286 1,415 AIO a A(J IJI ,37 ,1821 2,910 3,399 710 America West AW A319 263 631 2,883 1,201 354 A320 2,062 1,888 2.955 3,390 916 87373 10,572 7,931 3.184 2,559 848 8757 339 208 26 2 American AA 87378 7,778 6,200 4.663 9,226 2,072 8757 6,415 7,670 7,612 691 MD80 3,178 2,606 1,048 2,820 879 MD90 1,254 Continental CO 87373 2 2 87375 1,350 1,744 1,640 1,303 341 87377 3,741 3.050 3,378 3,689 843 87378 2 4 8757 4 Delta DL 87373 1,016 296 87378 397 878 87 62 8757 2,034 2,105 2,503 4.077 993 MD90 4.039 3,610 2,597 1,524 338 FedEx FM A300 6 10 26 20 A310 490 496 476 481 128 Frontier Airlines F9 A318 2 70 237 A319 10 379 1,022 289 87373 214 1,046 2 Mesa Airlines YV CL60 1,208 2,266 456 CRJ9 2.375 432 Midwest 'X 67':7 3021 ,21 17 Northwest NW A319 503 854 2,790 2,814 688 A320 2,130 2.003 57 38 4 Southwest WN 87373 1,847 1,827 252 176 87375 8,873 8,744 8,231 1,358 87377 1.330 6,209 10,498 19,745 5,354 TWA TW 8757 1,479 MD80 8 UI-'::; 5;<. 'd7)1 4\,jtj 45 448 472 18 US Airways US A319 1,077 1,456 895 A320 2 4 A321 2 8757 348 United UA A319 1,569 2,384 2,211 1.556 829 A320 2,028 2,183 2,403 3,173 376 87373 779 70 10 9 87375 38 103 8 8757 7,181 6.045 6,492 6,498 1,198 TABLE 9 AIR CARRIER OPERATIONAL HISTORY -13- TABLE 10 AIRCRAFT OPERATIONAL HISTORY Aircraft Year 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 A300 6 10 26 20 A310 490 496 476 481 128 A318 2 70 237 A319 3,412 5,335 9,158 6.593 2,160 A320 6.222 6,074 5,419 6,601 1,296 A321 2 6717 302 1,210 178 67373 13,198 9.830 3,660 4.808 1.146 67374 3,269 4,343 4,850 7,961 1,483 67375 10,261 10,591 9,879 2,661 341 67377 13,355 18,637 23,875 31,119 8,322 67378 7,780 6,597 5,545 9,313 2,134 8757 18,292 16,480 17,085 11,740 2,309 CL60 1,208 2.266 456 CRJ9 2.375 432 MD80 3,186 2,606 1,048 2,820 879 MD90 5,293 3,610 2,597 1,524 338 FIGURE 5 AIRCRAFT OPERATIONAL HISTORY 35,000 [ 30.000 25.000 20,000 15,000 10.000 5,000 0 AI1l owLi. o_J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ æ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~o/~~~~~o/&ð~~ By Year -14- 112001 1112002 102003 i[]2004 112005 TABLE II AlRCARRlERAVERAGE DAILY DEPARTURE HISTORY Carrier AC Type Year 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Alaska Air AS 87374 4.477 5.942 6.644 10.866 8.233 87377 9.466 9.8661 9.710 5.863 7.867 ioha AQ ,67377 1.888 2.9861 3.984 4.645 3.944 America West AW A319 0.362 0.863 3.937 1.634 1.967 A320 2.822 2.578 4.047 4.634 5.089 67373 14.477 10.877 4.373 3.495 4.711 6757 0.466 0.285 0.036 0.003 American AA 67378 10.652 8.493 6.386 12.609 11.511 6757 8.789 10.507 10.430 0.945 MD80 4.353 3.575 1.433 3.852 4.889 MD90 1.723 Continental CO 67373 0.003 0.003 67375 1.852 2.386 2.247 1.781 1.900 67377 5.126 4.178 4.627 5.038 4.678 67378 0.003 0.005 6757 0.005 Delta DL 67373 1.385 1.644 67378 0.542 1.200 0.120 0.344 6757 2.786 2.882 3.425 5.571 5.511 MD90 5.523 4.937 3.562 2.082 1.878 FedEx FM A300 0.008 0.014 0.036 0.027 A310 0.671 0.679 0.652 0.656 0.711 Frontier Airlines F9 A318 0.003 0.096 1.322 A319 0.014 0.518 1.393 1.600 67373 0.293 1.432 0.011 Mesa Airlines YV CL60 1.655 3.104 0.623 CRJ9 3.238 2.400 ildwesl (X 717 0.41 .650 0.989 Northwest NW A319 0.690 1.173 3.822 3.844 3.822 A320 2.918 2.742 0.079 0.052 0.022 Southwest WN 67373 2.523 2.512 0.345 0.240 67375 12.153 11.981 11.279 1.855 67377 1.827 8.493 14.378 26.975 29.744 TWA TW 6757 2.027 MD80 0.011 UPS "'5)( 18757 0.679 0.61 0.614 0.645 0.6561 US Airways US A319 1.474 1.997 1.227 A320 0.003 0.005 A321 0.003 6757 0.477 United UA A319 2.159 3.277 3.038 2.126 4.600 A320 2.770 2.978 3.279 4.331 2.089 67373 1.066 0.096 0.014 0.011 67375 0.052 0.140 0.011 6757 9.844 8.288 8.896 8.891 6.656 -15- NOISE ABATEMENT COMMITTEE MEETING Date: March 23, 2005 Time: 2:00 PM Place: Eddie Martin Building AGENDA ITEMS AND ITEMS DISCUSSED: 1. Airport Statistics John Escobedo gave a summary of the Airport Statistics citing information published in the JW A Airport Statistics Report for February 2005. 2. Status of Santa Ana Hei!!hts Acoustical Insulation Pro!!ram (SAHAIP) Carl Braatz provided an update on the SAHAIP program. He explained that the last phase of the program (Phase 10) was complete, however the airport is addressing some defected materials. The airport is working with the architect, the contractor and the manufacture to resolve this problem. An agreement to resolve the problem should come by next month. Greg Carroll from the SAHRDA - PAC, asked when the airport was going to release the balance of funds back to the OCDA. Courtney Wiercioch, Deputy Airport Director, Public Affairs, responded that this information would be available to him before the next PAC meeting. 3. Additional topic discussion and/or comments and Questions Questions/comments: Richard Cox, Emerald Bay Consultant, gave the committee an update on his discussions with the local air carrier flight groups and the FAA. He specified several flights over Emerald Bay in February. He sent letters with flight altitude information to those air carriers involved with copies to the local station managers with no response to date. Copies were also given to the Access and Noise Office. Mr. Cox also expressed his disappointment that not one station manager was present at this meeting. Courtney Wiercioch responded that the possible reason station managers were not present was that they were all attending an airport meeting at the terminal. John Escobedo stated that the committee will continue its committed efforts to get the right parties to attend these meetings. -16- John Fox, Emerald Bay Resident, thanked the committee for this forum. He stated that the airport should make the committee meeting minutes more available to everyone and to distribute them out. John Escobedo explained that the minutes are distributed to all interested parties through the Quarterly Report. Marlena McDermott, Emerald Bay Resident, stated that lower altitude aircraft are ruining the coastal areas and what can be done and where does their complaints go. Charles Ullmann, FAA, John Wayne Control Tower, responded that air traffic controllers are directing aircraft traffic over the area and pilots then take that route with various altitudes. John Escobedo responded that all complaints are investigated and recorded and entered officially into the Quarterly Report and distributed to interested parties. John Fox asked does the airport investigate flight track complaints. John Escobedo responded that the airport investigates all complaints, though flight track concerns are not in the airport jurisdiction of responsibility. However, flight track data is stored on file for retrieval when requested. Betty Marie Schiapelli, Cowan Height Resident, asked why are planes coming over her home and not down the 55 freeway like they use too. She also complained about soot pollution over her home. Charles Ullmann responded that arrival patterns into JW A are either a visual approach coming over the 55 freeway or the ILS approach, which is used the majority of the time. John Escobedo also responded that the increase of air traffic in the local air space could be contributing to more flights over those areas. Richard Cox responded that a study was done years ago on soot pollution and was found not to be from jet aircraft. Courtney Wiercioch suggested to inquire with the South Coast Air Quality Management District to collect samples for an air pollution study. Victor Schiapelli asked what is the compass heading for approaches into JW A. Charles Ullmann responded that the runway heading is 190 degrees for the ILS. Greg Carroll asked what does the airport do about loud jet and prop aircraft operations over the Santa Ana Heights area. -17- John Escobedo explained that John Wayne Airport has a robust General Aviation Noise Ordinance (GANO) where noise violations are issued to aircraft operators and denial of use to the airport for continued violators are processed. Mr. Carroll was not aware of this ordinance. Greg Carroll asked what is the minimum noise abatement departure power cutback altitude used by the airlines. Courtney Wiercioch responded with an explanation that the FAA conducted a study with the airlines back in the early 1990's to develop departure profiles for each airline, each aircraft type and each noise class. A close-in power cutback profile was developed at 800' minimum altitude. 4. Tentative date for the next Noise Abatement Committee Meetinl! The date for the next quarterly Noise Abatement Committee meeting is tentatively set for Wednesday, June 22, 2005. A meeting announcement will confirm the next meeting date. -18- NAME Richard Cox John Fox Marlena McDermott Greg Carroll Charles Ullmann Betty Marie Schiapelli Victor Schiapelli Carl Braatz Courtney Wiercioch John Escobedo Ramey Gonzalez Irma Ortega NAC Roster March 23, 2005 ORGANIZATION Emerald Bay Community Assoc.l Consultant Emerald Bay Community Assoc.l Resident Emerald Bay Resident SAHRDA-PAC FAA - John Wayne Control Tower Cowan Heights Resident Tustin Resident John Wayne Airport John Wayne Airport John Wayne Airport John Wayne Airport John Wayne Airport -19- NOISE ABATEMENT PROGRAM QUARTERLY REPORT For the period: April 1, 2005 through June 30, 2005 Prepared in accordance with: AIRPORT NOISE STANDARD STATE OF CALIFORNIA California Administrative Code Title 21, Chapter 2.5, SubChapter 6: Division of Aeronautics Noise Standards Submitted by: Alan L. Murphy Airport Director John Wayne Airport, Orange County INTRODUCTION This is the 130th Quarterly Report submitted by the County of Orange in accordance with the requirements of the California Airport Noise Standards (California Administrative Code Title 21, Chapter 2.5, SubChapter 6: Division of Aeronautics Noise Standards). Effective January 1, 1986, the criteria for defining "Noise Impact Area" was changed from 70 dB to 65 dB Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL). Under this criteria, John Wayne Airport currently has a "Noise Impact Area." NOISE IMPACT SUMMARY Caltrans' Aeronautics Program has established guidelines in the California State Noise Standard to control residential area noise levels produced by aircraft operations using the State's airports. Under those guidelines, residential noise sensitive areas exposed to an average Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) of more than 65 dB define the "Noise Impact Area." John Wayne Airport uses ten permanent remote noise monitoring stations (NMS) located in Newport Beach, Santa Ana, Tustin and Irvine to measure noise levels, at the following locations: MONITOR STATIONS NMS-1S: Golf Course, 3100 Irvine Ave., Newport Beach NMS-6S: 1912 Santiago, Newport Beach NMS-2S: 20152 S.W. Birch St., Santa Ana NMS- 7S: 1131 Back Bay Drive, Newport Beach NMS-3S: 2139 Anniversary Lane, Newport Beach NMS-8N: 17372 Eastman Street, Irvine NMS-4S: 2338 Tustin Ave., Newport Beach NMS-9N: 1300 S. Grand Avenue, Santa Ana NMS-5S: 324 Y, Vista Madera, Newport Beach NMS-ION:17952 Beneta Way, Tustin The map in Figure I shows the general location of each permanent remote monitor station. Figure 2 shows the Airport's "Noise Impact Area" for the previous year (July 1, 2004 - June 30, 2005). The Figure 2 information was developed by Mestre-Greve Associates, Inc., in consultation with John Wayne Airport. CNEL values measured for the period and current digitized land use information were utilized to calculate the land area acreages, number of residences and estimated number of people within the "Noise Impact Area". -1- F re 1 JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT NOISE MONITORING STATIONS (NMS) LOCATION MAP -..- Nt .JO..o.i-'.i.,'t..".,~C_h."'.hnnmo...dgn FIGlJI~ ;] .0 No,..Monllol" I' .. 85 :m :::,NFL Comocr m-A11STIÇ.S' i '"",'n('n"~ ,-"rid '-J>e '5.4 krl>3 ,or .C24 "",ual'" ",ile, I NUm~el' c' CW<!Iling$ 105 i Number c, f'e: J1e: 262,5 (I""ed en 2.b DSCpl. per ,r./ell.":9..',1It:, + JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT 65 dB CNEL Impact Area July 2004 . June 2005 ."."'".,",ny'."'~."'" -0- AIRCRAFT TRAFFIC SUMMARY The Airport traffic summary for this quarter is shown in Table 1 and Figure 3 below. Air Carrier operational count histories and average daily departure counts are illustrated in Tables 9 & 11. TABLE I LANDING AND TAKEOFF OPERATIONS April - June 2005 Period Air Carriers GAJet(1) Total Average Daily Jet Pron Operations (2\ Jet Operalions Aprii 8,119 347 2,581 31,545 357 May 8,311 357 2,600 31,003 352 June 8,262 353 2,669 29,191 364 Second Quarter 24,692 1.057 7,850 91,739 358 Twelve Months 99,740 4,160 26,042 347,916 345 07/01/04 - 06/30/05 FIGURE 3 QUARTERLY AIRPORT TRAFFIC SUMMARY (Landing and Takeoff Operations) I Jet Carrier I '[ Prop Ca"ier GAJet April - June 2005 24.692 Military 41 1.057 7,850 GA Othe, 58,099 10,000 20.000 30,000 40.000 50,000 60.000 70.000 Number of Operations NOTE: (1) GA Jet figures include a 5% factor for operations not identified by the JW A noise monitor stations. (2) Counts in this column are based upon records provided by the local FAA representatives. COMMUNITY NOISE EQUIVALENT LEVELS The monthly, quarterly and twelve month Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) average values for each monitor station are shown in Table 2, while daily CNEL values are shown in Tables 3 through 5. Insufficient data is indicated by "#N/A" entries in each table. Average Single Event Noise Exposure Level (SENEL) values for Air Carrier and General Aviation Jet aircraft are shown in Tables 6 through 8. For the twelve month period ending June 30, 2005, 105 dwelling units in Santa Ana Heights were in the "Noise Impacted Area" (within the 65 dB CNEL contour); this represents an increase of six units in the number of dwelling units in the "Noise Impacted Area" from the previous twelve month period ending -4- 9/22/05 March 31, 2005. The State has approved several remedies of aircraft noise levelS for noise sensitive property in the "Noise Impact Area": homes can be acoustically insulated, purchased by the County, or rezoned for "other non-noise sensitive uses." As parT of the County's Santa Ana Heights Land Use Compatibility Program, approximately 77 general agriculture (A-I) properties with residential land uses on Orchard, Acacia and Birch Streets were rezoned for Business Park Use in October, 1986. Each property was individually sold and subsequently converted to compatible land use. Between 1986 and 1993, 124 residences have been purchased or otherwise made compatible through the County's Purchase Assurance Program, Acoustical Insulation Program or Housing Relocation Program. In September 1993, the FAA approved a grant to fund a voluntary Accelerated Acoustical Insulation Program (AAlP) in Santa Ana Heights. (The current AAlP has been renamed "Santa Ana Heights Acoustical Insulation Program" with the acronym "SAH AlP".) During the second quarter of2005, no additional residences have been made compatible through the County's SAH AlP. A total of 473 residences in Santa Ana Heights have been purchased or otherwise made compatible through the County's Purchase Assurance Program, Housing Relocation Program, Acoustical Insulation Program or SAH AlP. TELEPHONE COMPLAINT CALLS (Aorill. 2005 - June 30. 2005) The Airport's Access and Noise Office receives and investigates noise calls and complaints from local citizens and all other sources. During the period April I, 2005 through June 30, 2005, the Office received 227 complaints from citizens. This is a 30.5% increase from the 174 complaints received last quarter. It is a 27.5% decrease ftom the 313 complaints received during the same quarTer last year. Figure 4 shows the distribution of the quarTerly telephone calls and complaints from local communities. FIGURE 4 HISTOGRAM BY COMMUNITY 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 56 37 ~'~'~4~~~~æ-."~#~~ ,'i"Ii i/'~ AØo "'~. cl'" ",.if ,<f' ",.'Ii 0" ",.'Ii 0<'.<' A.X' 0'S',!þ '?' ~Øo" ",->~ .,èc (!>,,~ ",p ¿¡>.<'",viJ'ò 0() ;:."'.<'"," ;:.~ ",<'", "'¡;Pi:' ~ ",Q. é' (,0 J-<Ý r? v..' 0<" "'..¡.<' ~. -,-0 <Q ~o úo ú,'Ii ,,'Ii~. ",<1-'" <Q '" Community One household was responsible for 84% of the 56 complaints from Laguna Beach. -5- TABLE 2 LONG TERM MEASURED LEVELS Aircraft CNEL from 7/04 through 6/05 Values in dB at Each Sile Period NMS Site 1S 2S 3S 4S 5S 6S 7S 8N 9N 10N Jul 2004 67.9 66.9 66.5 59.4 60.1 60.5 57.9 68.5 51.3 56.5 # Days 30 28 30 27 27 22 21 29 4 30 Aug 2004 68.5 67.1 66.5 59.3 60.4 60.6 58.1 68.6 49.9 56.8 # Days 31 30 31 29 25 31 19 31 7 30 Sep 2004 68.0 66.9 65.7 58.6 59.9 60.0 57.5 68.0 50.8 56.3 # Days 27 21 29 28 20 23 21 28 15 26 Q-32004 68.2 67.0 66.3 59.2 60.1 60.4 57.9 68.4 50.7 56.5 # Days 88 79 90 84 72 76 61 88 26 86 Oct 2004 68.3 67.3 66.8 59.7 60.9 61.2 58.2 68.7 53.3 58.0 # Days 28 28 30 26 26 25 26 28 8 25 Noy 2004 67.6 67.4 66.4 61.4 59.9 61.0 57.9 68.1 52.0 56.8 # Days 21 24 28 27 27 20 20 26 13 25 Dec 2004 67.7 66.5 66.1 58.9 59.3 60.2 56.7 68.4 52.6 57.2 # Days 25 24 29 25 27 22 22 21 7 21 Q-42004 67.9 67.1 66.5 60.2 60.1 60.8 57.7 68.4 52.6 57.4 # Days 74 76 87 78 80 67 68 75 28 71 Jan 2005 68.2 66.9 66.1 59.4 60.1 60.5 57.5 68.6 52.3 58.1 # Days 24 30 27 17 13 21 18 25 8 15 Feb 2005 68.1 67.5 66.6 60.0 59.7 60.6 57.3 68.7 51.8 57.5 # Days 24 24 26 17 5 13 19 21 10 16 Mar 2005 67.7 68.2 66.2 59.9 59.8 61.4 58.0 68.7 52.3 57.7 # Days 28 18 27 26 20 12 14 27 2 26 Q.1 2005 68.0 67.4 66.3 59.8 59.9 60.8 57.6 68.7 52.1 57.7 # Days 76 72 80 60 38 46 51 73 20 57 Apr 2005 67.6 67.2 66.0 61.2 59.7 61.3 58.8 68.6 49.2 57.2 # Davs 29 20 29 7 23 17 17 30 12 27 May 2005 67.7 67.3 66.1 59.9 61.3 62.1 57.8 68.5 #N/A 57.3 # Days 29 21 29 13 4 11 25 30 0 22 Jun 2005 67.9 67.0 66.3 59.9 60.7 61.1 58.1 68.9 #N/A 57.9 # Days 29 30 29 18 8 25 20 26 0 21 Q.2 2005 67.7 67.2 66.1 60.2 60.1 61.4 58.2 68.7 49.2 57.5 # Days 87 71 87 38 35 53 62 86 12 70 Q-3 2004 thru Q-2 2005 Total 68'~1 67.2 66.3 59.8 60.1 60.8 57.8 68.5 51.6 57.2 # Days 325 298 344 260 225 242 242 322 86 284 Q-2 2004 trru Q-1:12OO5 (~rYiOUS 4 Quarters) Total 67.9 67.1 66.2 59.7 60.1 60.7 57.7 68.5 51.4 57.2 # Days 326 303 345 253 217 194 226 324 97 266 Change fTm pre~liOus 4 ~uarters 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 -6- TABLE 3 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION April 2005 Date NMS Site 18 2S 38 48 58 68 78 8N 9N 10N 1 67.2 #N/A 64.7 #N/A 57.8 #N/A #N/A 67.4 #N/A 56.4 2 66.7 #N/A 64.6 #N/A 60.8 #N/A 58.9 66.2 48.2 54.3 3 67.6 #N/A 65.8 #N/A 60.8 62.3 #N/A 69.6 #N/A 59.1 4 67.6 #N/A 65.7 #N/A 59.6 60.4 #N/A 68.6 #N/A 56.8 5 67.6 #N/A 65.7 #N/A 59.6 62.2 #N/A 67.5 #N/A 54.6 6 68.5 #N/A 67.1 61.7 58.3 61.9 #N/A 68.2 #N/A 55.9 7 67.7 68.8 65.8 #N/A 59.6 61.0 58.6 69.2 #N/A 56.8 8 68.0 #N/A 66.4 61.6 60.3 61.5 58.7 70.0 50.0 58.7 9 66.8 67.1 64.9 60.5 61.3 #N/A 56.7 66.8 47.0 53.9 10 67.7 67.7 66.4 61.2 58.9 #N/A #N/A 67.6 52.7 57.8 11 67.8 68.3 66.8 60.9 59.1 62.5 59.7 68.1 53.0 55.6 12 66.7 66.4 65.3 #N/A 58.5 62.2 58.3 68.2 #N/A 56.6 13 #N/A 66.5 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 59.6 69.2 50.2 #N/A 14 67.9 67.1 66.4 61.1 60.8 61.8 #N/A 68.4 46.6 56.5 15 67.9 #N/A 65.8 61.1 58.6 61.0 59.2 68.4 48.4 58.1 16 66.1 67.7 64.1 #N/A 58.1 58.3 58.3 66.9 #N/A 54.6 17 67.3 66.3 65.8 #N/A 58.7 60.7 #N/A 69.0 38.6 #N/A 18 67.7 68.0 65.7 #N/A 59.0 61.1 58.2 69.5 47.6 58.6 19 67.2 67.7 65.8 #N/A 61.3 #N/A 58.0 68.8 48.7 58.2 20 68.1 67.0 66.3 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 68.5 46.0 56.7 21 67.8 68.2 66.2 #N/A 60.8 #N/A #N/A 68.3 #N/A 56.6 22 68.2 67.3 66.6 #N/A 59.4 61.7 59.5 69.2 #N/A 58.6 23 66.1 65.1 64.1 #N/A 57.4 58.7 58.5 66.6 #N/A 55.7 24 67.3 66.7 66.0 #N/A 59.6 62.4 56.7 69.6 #N/A 57.2 25 67.6 66.3 66.0 #N/A 61.1 #N/A #N/A 69.0 #N/A 58.1 26 67.8 66.8 66.1 #N/A #N/A #N/A 59.7 69.4 #N/A 58.8 27 69.2 68.0 69.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 69.0 #N/A 58.7 28 69.0 #N/A 67.3 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 70.2 #N/A #N/A 29 68.3 #N/A 66.8 #N/A #N/A #N/A 60.8 68.6 #N/A 58.7 30 66.0 64.9 64.4 #N/A #N/A 60.7 58.2 67.2 #N/A 55.5 Days 29 20 29 7 23 17 17 30 12 27 En.Ava 67.6 67.2 66.0 61.2 59.7 61.3 58.8 68.6 49.2 57.2 #N/A indicates insufficient data. -7- TABLE 4 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATlON May 2005 Date NMS Site 1S 28 3S 48 5S 68 7S 8N 9N 10N 1 67.8 66.6 66.1 #N/A #N/A #N/A 59.0 68.6 #N/A #N/A 2 67.5 66.2 65.8 #N/A #N/A 62.1 57.5 68.6 #N/A 57.4 3 67.5 66.0 65.5 59.7 #N/A #N/A 58.6 68.5 #N/A 58.3 4 68.3 66.9 66.7 #N/A 61.2 61.4 57.8 69.1 #N/A 59.2 5 67.2 66.0 65.6 60.5 #N/A #N/A #N/A 69.5 #N/A #N/A 6 68.1 68.3 66.3 61.1 #N/A #N/A 57.7 69.3 #N/A #N/A 7 65.4 68.2 63.8 59.4 #N/A #N/A 58.8 66.6 #N/A 56.6 8 66.9 68.5 65.2 59.1 60.8 62.4 57.0 68.0 #N/A 56.6 9 67.7 67.4 66.0 59.9 #N/A #N/A 56.7 68.7 #N/A 58.9 10 66.6 #N/A 65.1 59.5 #N/A #N/A 57.9 68.7 #N/A 57.3 11 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 68.8 #N/A #N/A 12 #N/A #N/A 66.9 #N/A #N/A #N/A 57.2 68.4 #N/A 56.4 13 69.3 #N/A 66.6 #N/A #N/A 61.6 58.0 68.8 #N/A #N/A 14 66.6 #N/A 64.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A 57.6 66.7 #N/A 54.1 15 67.7 #N/A 67.0 #N/A #N/A #N/A 58.3 68.3 #N/A 56.3 16 68.0 #N/A 66.2 #N/A #N/A #N/A 57.0 69.0 #N/A 58.1 17 67.3 68.6 65.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A 57.8 68.3 #N/A 57.5 18 68.2 #N/A 66.4 #N/A #N/A #N/A 58.0 69.0 #N/A 57.1 19 68.3 #N/A 67.6 #N/A #N/A #N/A 59.5 68.5 #N/A 56.7 20 68.7 68.7 68.1 #N/A #N/A #N/A 57.5 68.0 #N/A 56.6 21 65.4 #N/A 65.6 #N/A #N/A #N/A 59.0 66.7 #N/A 54.7 22 67.6 67.3 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 68.4 #N/A 55.0 23 68.0 67.0 66.4 #N/A #N/A 62.3 55.7 #N/A #N/A 58.3 24 67.8 68.2 66.0 60.7 #N/A 61.6 56.4 68.7 #N/A 57.3 25 68.2 67.1 66.7 60.3 #N/A 62.6 57.4 69.2 #N/A 58.5 26 68.7 67.5 67.3 59.2 #N/A 62.2 56.8 68.9 #N/A #N/A 27 68.6 67.4 66.5 #N/A #N/A 62.4 57.8 69.8 #N/A #N/A 28 66.8 66.2 65.1 58.7 61.9 61.9 58.9 67.3 #N/A #N/A 29 65.4 65.2 64.4 58.1 61.0 #N/A #N/A 67.3 #N/A 57.7 30 67.4 66.1 65.7 61.7 #N/A #N/A #N/A 68.6 #N/A #N/A 31 68.1 67.0 66.6 #N/A #N/A 62.4 #N/A 68.9 #N/A 59.0 Davs 29 21 29 13 4 11 25 30 22 En.Ava 67.7 67.3 66.1 59.9 61.3 62.1 57.8 68.5 57.3 #N/A indicates insufficient data. -8- TABLE 5 DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR ST AnON June 2005 Date NMS Site 18 28 38 48 58 68 78 8N 9N 10N 1 67.7 68.5 65.7 #N/A #N/A 59.9 #N/A 69.0 #N/A 58.9 2 68.2 67.9 66.9 #N/A #N/A #N/A 59.5 69.2 #N/A 58.6 3 67.5 67.7 66.8 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 69.1 #N/A 59.0 4 65.8 64.6 63.5 #N/A #N/A 59.8 #N/A 67.2 #N/A #N/A 5 67.7 67.2 65.9 #N/A #N/A 61.5 #N/A 69.2 #N/A #N/A 6 67.5 67.1 66.2 #N/A #N/A 61.1 57.3 68.6 #N/A 58.4 7 67.3 66.6 65.8 #N/A #N/A 61.1 57.6 68.7 #N/A 58.3 8 68.3 67.9 66.6 #N/A #N/A 61.3 #N/A 69.1 #N/A #N/A 9 68.4 66.7 66.6 #N/A #N/A 62.7 #N/A 69.7 #N/A 59.1 10 68.7 67.5 66.7 60.3 #N/A 62.1 57.9 69.3 #N/A 59.6 11 66.3 64.9 64.0 60.2 #N/A #N/A 57.3 67.5 #N/A 57.0 12 67.4 66.0 65.8 59.2 #N/A #N/A 57.4 69.3 #N/A 58.7 13 68.3 66.1 65.7 59.7 #N/A 59.0 54.7 69.2 #N/A 57.7 14 67.7 66.0 65.6 58.5 #N/A 58.8 54.6 69.7 #N/A #N/A 15 #N/A 66.6 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 16 68.9 67.5 67.4 60.5 #N/A 61.6 57.6 #N/A #N/A #N/A 17 68.3 67.4 67.8 60.7 #N/A 62.6 #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A 18 66.1 65.1 64.4 #N/A #N/A 60.6 59.5 #N/A #N/A 57.1 19 67.0 66.0 65.5 58.3 #N/A 60.6 56.5 68.7 #N/A 58.1 20 68.1 67.2 67.2 59.4 #N/A 60.9 57.3 68.7 #N/A #N/A 21 67.4 66.6 66.0 59.3 #N/A 60.1 56.6 68.2 #N/A 57.2 22 68.4 67.2 67.0 59.9 60.0 60.7 59.7 69.6 #N/A 57.2 23 68.7 68.3 66.9 #N/A 61.8 61.8 59.2 69.0 #N/A 56.9 24 68.3 67.2 66.5 59.9 60.7 61.0 #N/A 68.9 #N/A #N/A 25 67.3 67.7 65.3 60.9 #N/A 60.3 57.2 65.9 #N/A 55.3 26 67.7 67.3 66.1 59.3 60.6 62.2 58.9 68.9 #N/A 56.7 27 68.4 66.9 66.7 61.4 60.8 61.1 59.0 69.6 #N/A 56.9 28 68.5 67.6 66.5 60.0 60.5 61.5 58.9 68.7 #N/A 57.8 29 68.6 67.3 66.8 60.2 60.0 62.2 59.8 69.4 #N/A 57.0 30 68.6 67.4 66.8 59.3 61.0 60.9 #N/A 69.7 #N/A 58.7 Davs 29 30 29 18 8 25 20 26 21 En.Ava 67.9 67.0 66.3 59.9 60.7 61.1 58.1 68.9 57.9 #N/A indicates insufficient data. -9- TABLE 6 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commercial Class A A ril - June 2005 Carrier lAC Type 1# Deps NM8 Site 18 28 38 48 58 6S 78 8N 9N 10N ",Iaska Air ~7374 791 verage (i~;S 94. 93. 86. 88. 87.9 I 1~6.0 94.2 84.1 83.6 ~ount 1774 1771 I 1626 11756 (765 756 13 (3 13 ~7377 17< verage 92.0 91.1 88.4 82.¡ 86. 84.4 81.E #N/~ #N/A #N/~ Count 1184 1172 1170 134 11168 1169 11159 10 10 10 87378 1 verage 96.! 95.1 95.1 87. 87.! 89.~ 86.~ #N/t #N/A #N/~ Count 11 11 11 11 (1 11 11 10 10 10 Aioha 187377 44S verage 96.0 94. 92.~ 86.7 86.ó 87.8 85.( #N/~ #N/A #N/~ Count 1432 1431 1447 1367 1(437 1433 (434 10 10 10 America West f'>.320 S3ó verage (;~O3 92. 91.4 86.6 85.1 85. 1~2E #N/~ #N/A #N/~ Count 1524 1527 1429 ,1508 1519 448 10 (0 10 87373 292 Average 95.( 93. 91. 86.4 86.( 86.6 83. 89. 78.! #N/~ Count 1280 1288 1289 1242 1286 1286 1275 11 11 10 8757 11 Average 94.0 94.0 90. 85.1 84.S 85. 1~~71 #N/~ #N/A #N/~ Count 1115 1115 1117 192 1111 (116 10 10 10 American 87378 69 Average 98.4 96.~ 9S.~ 89.1 87.S 88.S 85.2 90.2 77. 80.4 Count (663 1677 1679 1564 669 1(661 1663 (5 (1 (3 8757 33 f'>.verage 95. 94.1 92. 86.! 86.S 87-:1' 84.1 #N/t #N/A #N/t !count (322 1325 331 I 1269 1323 11320 1325 10 10 10 MD80 43 ",verage ;~~31 99. 98. 92.2 92.ó 93.6 (;O.s 99. #N/A #N/~ Count 1415 1427 ,1328 1425 11425 400 12 10 10 ontinental 87373 18 ",verage 95.9 94. 94.3 88.1 87. 88.1 85.2 95.0 #N/A 82. Count 1160 1161 1165 (136 (162 1157 1155 115 10 (11 87377 46S !Average 95.6 94. 92.6 86.2 85.4 86.ó 83.1 95. 79.1 81. ount (411 (418 1419 1345 1409 1410 1407 137 17 115 87378 1 verage 97.5 95. 93. 85.9 85. 85.1 83.4 #N/A #N/A #NI Count (1 (1 11 11 11 (1 11 (0 (0 (0 Delta 87373 181 verage 96.1 94. 94.0 86.! 87.1 87. 84.6 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 1173 1170 1181 1148 1175 1172 1173 (0 10 10 87378 verage 93.1 92.1 89.1 83.7 82.! 84. 81.3 #N/t #N/A #N/t ount 16 (7 (7 14 17 16 17 10 10 10 8757 49! verage 95. 94.4 93.S 87.6 87.1 87.1 83.S 91.1 #N/A 79.~ Count 1473 1488 1489 1405 11477 1487 1476 14 10 14 \1D90 19 verage 91.2 90. 90. 83.8 84.1 85.0 82.! #N/t #N/A #N/t Count (192 1194 11194 1151 1180 1193 (182 10 10 10 FedEx 300 1 Average 95.6 94.5 92.6 88. 8S.S 86.~ 85.2 #N/t #N/A #N/t Count 11 11 (1 11 (1 11 1 10 10 10 310 6( Average 99.3 97. 97.3 91.E 91.1 92.E 89.1 #N/A #N/~ #N/t ount 158 160 160 (49 158 160 155 10 10 10 Frontier Airlines 318 175 Average 92. 90.4 91.1 85.8 84. 84.7 80. #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 1171 1175 1175 1144 1171 1172 (154 10 10 10 ~319 9 Average 93.2 91. 9H 86.8 85. 85.6 81.4 88.6 #N/~ #NI Count 188 187 191 174 (89 190 177 12 10 10 Mesa Airlines CRJ9 172 !Average 91.9 90. 92.9 84.S 83.! 86.1 80.3 91.2 #N/~ #N/t !count (165 11168 1166 11138 1163 1165 1136 12 10 10 Midwest 8717 30!Average 91.1 90. 92.E 84.7 82. 85.1 82.1 #N/t #N/A #N/t Count 129 129 (29 129 130 130 128 10 10 10 Northwest A320 3SS !Average 9S.ó 93.S 94.0 87.8 86. 86.7 83. 93.3 78.8 82.2 Count 1322 ,1323 1328 1262 1316 1322 1315 (25 13 17 -10- TABLE 6 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Continued arrier C Type outhwest 7373 7377 United 320 8757 UPS 757 Commercial Class A A ril- June 2005 Deps -11- TABLE 7 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commercial Ciass E April - June 2005 Carrier AC Type # Deps NMS Site 1S ~~ 3~ 45 5~ 65 7~ 8N 9N UN Alaska Air 873, 451 Average 91.1 90.4 87.9 81.9 B4. 83.6 81.1 Count (438) (441) (446) (386) (445) (445) (428) (0) (0) (0) Aloha 87377 91 Average 90.9 90.0 87.0 82.0 81.3 82.4 79.9 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (88) (90) (90) (73) (88) (90) (87) (0) (0) (0) America West A320 186 Average 90.5 90.4 89.6 85.5 83.7 84.1 81.1 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (180) (182) (178) (151) (175) (181) (133) (0) (0) (0) Southwest 87377 2372 Average 90.4 89.8 86.5 82.1 81.9 82.0 80.1 91.6 80.7 #N/A Count (2303) (2334) (2352) (1878) (2236) (2326) (2027) (2) (1) (0) United 8757 282 Average 91.8 90.9 89.2 83.5 84.6 84.3 82.3 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (273) (278) (261) (236) (268) (277) (272) (0) (0) (0) -12- TABLE 8 MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS Commuter April - June 2005 Carrier AC Type # Deps NMS Site 18 28 38 8N "91'<' 10N mencan "agle "'4U 1013 verage 50.1 86.0 55.' 50.. (~;1) 51.1 81. #N/A Count (978) (995) (1004) (656) (989) (158) (0) (0) (0) Atlantic Southeast CL60 91 Average 90.3 88.7 88.2 81.1 82.6 83.0 81.1 85.7 78.3 #N/A Count (88) (87) (88) (65) (67) (80) (72) (1) (1) (0) SkyWest CL60 101 Average 85.2 83.6 87.6 78.3 79.2 80.7 78.3 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count (99) (101 (101) (30) (23 (101) (13) (0) (0) (0) CRJ7 178 Average 88.3 87.4 87.5 81.1 80.1 82.4 80.1 #N/A #N/A #N/A Count 1172 1175 1176 (132 (117 (173 (146 (0 (0 (0 E120 529 Average 81.8 82.1 82.3 82.0 83.7 79.4 80.6 86.0 #N/A 82.8 Count (504) (514) (519) (65) (299) (477) (71) (3) (0) (1) MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS General Aviation April - June 2005 -13- Carrier AC Type Year 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Alaska Air AS 87374 3,269 4,343 4,850 7,961 3,064 87377 6.906 7,196 7,089 4,286 2,661 87378 2 Aloha AU B7377 1,j(1I Il,ll1l l,H' 3;3!jg 1;788 America West AW A319 263 631 2,883 1,201 789 A320 2,062 1,888 2,955 3,390 1,927 87373 10,572 7,931 3,184 2,559 1,433 8757 339 208 26 2 234 American AA 87378 7,778 6,200 4,663 9,226 3,455 8757 6,415 7,670 7,612 691 670 MD80 3,178 2,606 1,048 2,820 1,747 MD90 1,254 Continental CO 87373 2 2 87375 1,350 1,744 1,640 1,303 705 87377 3,741 3,050 3,378 3,689 1,779 87378 2 4 2 8757 4 Delta DL 87373 1,016 656 87378 397 878 87 76 8757 2,034 2.105 2,503 4,077 1.990 MD90 4,039 3,610 2,597 1,524 732 FedEx FM A300 6 10 26 20 2 A310 490 496 476 481 247 Frontier Airlines F9 A318 2 70 587 A319 10 379 1,022 475 87373 214 1,046 2 Mesa Airlines YV CL60 1,208 2,266 456 CRJ9 2,375 775 lidwest YX 8717 3021 1.2' 238 Northwest NW A319 503 854 2,790 2,814 1,398 A320 2,130 2,003 57 38 12 Southwest WN 87373 1,847 1.827 252 176 87375 8,873 8,744 8,231 1,358 2 87377 1,330 6,209 10,498 19,745 10,811 TWA TW 8757 1,479 MD80 8 ut-'::; bX 'B757 4Hb 45 4411 47l 23ôl US Airways US A319 1,077 1,456 895 A320 2 4 A321 2 8757 348 Uniled UA A319 1.569 2,384 2,211 1,556 1,274 A320 2,028 2.183 2,403 3,173 970 87373 779 70 10 9 87375 38 103 8 8757 7,181 6,045 6,492 6,498 2,567 TABLE 9 AIR CARRIER OPERATIONAL HISTORY -14- TABLE 10 AIRCRAFT OPERATIONAL HISTORY Aircraft Year 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 A300 6 10 26 20 2 A310 490 496 476 481 247 A318 2 70 587 A319 3,412 5.335 9,158 6,593 3,936 A320 6,222 6,074 5,419 6,601 2.909 A321 2 6717 302 1,210 238 67373 13,198 9,830 3,660 4,808 2,091 67374 3,269 4,343 4,850 7,961 3,064 67375 10,261 10,591 9,879 2,661 707 67377 13.355 18,637 23,875 31,119 17,039 67378 7,780 6.597 5,545 9,313 3,535 6757 18.292 16,480 17,085 11,740 5.697 CL60 1,208 2,266 456 CRJ9 2,375 775 MD80 3,186 2,606 1,048 2,820 1,747 MD90 5,293 3,610 2.597 1.524 732 FIGURE 5 AIRCRAFT OPERATIONAL HISTORY 35,000 [' 30.000 25.000 20,000 15.000 10.000 5,000 0 ~4 , '112001 i 112002 '¡1[]2003 : []2004 , 112005 n.8I1o '"-I - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~#####~&~~~ By Year -15- TABLE 11 AIR CARRIER AVERAGE DAILY DEPARTURE HISTORY Carrier AC Type Year 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Alaska Air AS 67374 4.477 5.942 6.644 10.866 8.464 67377 9.466 9.866 9.710 5.863 7.359 B7378 0.006 IAloha AQ 7377 1.888 L.~!jb 3.~!j4 4.645 4.939 America West AW A319 0.362 0.863 3.937 1.634 2.182 A320 2.822 2.578 4.047 4.634 5.320 67373 14.477 10.877 4.373 3.495 3.956 B757 0.466 0.285 0.036 0.003 0.646 American AA B7378 10.652 8.493 6.386 12.609 9.552 B757 8.789 10.507 10.430 0.945 1.845 MD80 4.353 3.575 1.433 3.852 4.829 MD90 1.723 Continental CO B7373 0.003 0.003 67375 1.852 2.386 2.247 1.781 1.950 B7377 5.126 4.178 4.627 5.038 4.912 B7378 0.003 0.005 0.006 6757 0.005 Delta DL 67373 1.385 1.818 67378 0.542 1.200 0.120 0.210 B757 2.786 2.882 3.425 5.571 5.492 MD90 5.523 4.937 3.562 2.082 2.022 FedEx FM A300 0.008 0.014 0.036 0.027 0.006 A310 0.671 0.679 0.652 0.656 0.685 Frontier Airiines F9 A318 0.003 0.096 1.624 A319 0.014 0.518 1.393 1.309 B7373 0.293 1.432 0.006 Mesa Airiines YV CL60 1.655 3.104 0.623 CRJ9 3.238 2.144 idwest (X 717 u.41 .65 0.657 Northwest NW A319 0.690 1.173 3.822 3.844 3.862 A320 2.918 2.742 0.079 0.052 0.033 Southwest WN B7373 2.523 2.512 0.345 0.240 B7375 12.153 11.981 11.279 1.855 0.006 B7377 1.827 8.493 14.378 26.975 29.862 TWA TW 6757 2.027 MD80 0.011 UP::; 5X' Brt)r 0.67 0.61~ 0.61 0.64t) 0.6t);i US Airways US A319 1.474 1.997 1.227 A320 0.003 0.005 A321 0.003 B757 0.477 United UA A319 2.159 3.277 3.038 2.126 3.530 A320 2.770 2.978 3.279 4.331 2.669 67373 1.066 0.096 0.014 0.011 67375 0.052 0.140 0.011 B757 9.844 8.288 8.896 8.891 7.088 -16- NOISE ABATEMENT COMMITTEE MEETING Date: June 22, 2005 Time: 2:00 PM Place: Eddie Martin Building AGENDA ITEMS AND ITEMS DISCUSSED: 1. Airport Statistics Ramey Gonzalez gave a summary of the Airport Statistics citing information published in the JW A Airport Statistics Report for May 2005. 2. Status of Santa Ana Hei!!hts Acoustical Insulation Pro!!ram (SAHAIP) Ramey Gonzalez reported that the program has been completed. 3. Additional topic discussion and/or comments and Questions Comments: John Fox, Emerald Bay John Fox introduced Toni Schmidt, who is taking Mr. Fox's place as the general manager of Emerald Bay Community Assoc. Mr. Fox explained that he is moving out of the area. Comments: Richard Cox, Emerald Bay Consultant Richard Cox stated that he is continuing to monitor flight tracks. Mr. Cox described his recent efforts working with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). He stated that TRACON (Terminal Radar Control) has been helpful, and has rerouted some flights. Mr. Cox said he had written a letter to FAA officials in May 2005, and was awaiting a response. He stated that he was not getting carrier participation, and said that he may ask for increased JW A involvement in the future to try to increase carrier participation. Qnestions: Marlena McDermott, Emerald Bay Ms. McDermott asked Terry Schomburg of the FAA John Wayne Control Tower, about how far out departing aircraft go beyond the coastline before turning. Mr. Schomburg explained that it depends on factors such as traffic and altitude. Marlena McDermott asked Mr. Schomburg for advice on how Emerald Bay could get help with their situation. Mr. Schomburg said that TRACON is the best source. -17- 4. Tentative date for the Next Noise Abatement Committee Meetinl! The date for the next quarterly Noise Abatement Committee meeting will be announced by letter approximately two weeks before the meeting. -18- NAC Roster June 22,2005 NAME ORGANIZA nON Marlena McDermott Emerald Bay Community Assoc./resident Toni Schmidt Emerald Bay Community Assoc.lGeneral Manager John Fox Emerald Bay Community Assoc.lresident Richard Cox Emerald Bay Community Assoc.lconsultant Terry Schomburg FAA Santa Ana Air Traffic Control Tower Irma Ortega John Wayne Airport Ramey Gonzalez John Wayne Airport Bonnie Frisch John Wayne Airport Juan Gonzalez Orange County Supervisor Lou Correa's Office -19-