HomeMy WebLinkAboutPublic Input - AnonymousWoodward, Carrie
From: noreply@granicusideas.com
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2020 10:16 AM
To: Yasuda, Erica; Woodward, Carrie; City Clerk
Subject: New eComment for Special Closed Session Meeting of the City Council
New eComment for Special Closed Session
Meeting of the City Council
Guest User submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: Special Closed Session Meeting of the City Council
Item: 1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — ANTICIPATED LITIGATION - Significant
exposure to litigation pursuant to Government Code § 54956.9(d)(2): (1 case)
eComment: Councilmembers, I am curious to why City Manager West believed there was a
"local emergency" in the city when there were no clear signs of any threats to life or property in
Tustin. I would like to know how this was determined, with specific language regarding his
decision making. I would like him to answer to the public and I encourage you, the City Council,
to hold him accountable. I would also like to know why City Attorney Kendig supported the
curfew despite it being a clear violation of citizens' First Amendment rights. It is worryingly similar
to what might occur in an autocracy. There needs to be public accountability for both of these
men for this particular decision. I would like the City to publicly comment on why the curfew was
announced on Facebook at 7:15 p.m. on June 1, just 45 minutes before the curfew began.
Social media is not an effective nor acceptable broadcast system for local "emergencies." I
would expect that these issues be publicly addressed at the next open session.
View and Analvze eComments
This email was sent from https://granicusideas.com
Unsubscribe from future mailings