The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About06 CITRUS RANCH PARK 01-16-06 AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: JANUARY 16, 2006 TO: WilLIAM A. HUSTON, CITY MANAGER FROM: PATRICK SANCHEZ, DIRECTOR, PARKS & RECREATION SERVICES SUBJECT: CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR CITRUS RANCH PARK CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT - CIP NO. 2046 SUMMARY The Agreement between the City and Hall & Foreman, Inc. will provide construction management services to oversee the completion of the construction of the Citrus Ranch Park project. Construction management services will include an on-site construction manager, on-call construction services, materials and testing services and supplemental survey services. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve a Consultant Services Agreement with the firm of Hall & Foreman, Inc., to provide construction management services for the Citrus Ranch Park project in an amount not to exceed $109,760.00, and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the contract subject to approval by the City Attorney. FISCAL IMPACT The Consultant will be compensated on an hourly basis for providing a Construction Manager for the project. The Citrus Ranch Project is estimated to be a $4.9 Million capital improvement to a 17-acre site. Construction management services are approximately 2.4% of the construction estimate for the project. Funding for construction management services is included in the Capital Improvement Program Budget for the Citrus Ranch Park (CIP No. 2046). BACKGROUND In December 2000 the City Council approved the Master Plan for the Citrus Ranch Park project. Plans and specifications are currently being prepared. The request for authorization to bid is scheduled for the first City Council meeting in March. This project provides for the development and improvement of the 17 -acre site into a community park. The park will include group specific tot lots, a restroom facility, picnic shelters, a water play feature, parking for 67 vehicles, a vista point, picnic areas and the improvement of the 160 trees in the grove. Page 2 The Construction Manager will be responsible for keeping the project on schedule and within budget. The Manager will coordinate the construction activities of all aspects of the project under the oversight of the City's Parks and Recreation Department. Supplemental services to be provided on an as-needed basis will include inspection and surveying. The City's Inspection Division and Engineering Division will be utilized for the majority of inspection services. The Parks and Recreation Department requested proposals from three firms with experience in managing construction projects of this magnitude. Hall & Foreman, Inc. was selected based upon their vast experience in the construction management field and high recommendations received from other agencies and other City of Tustin project managers. The fee proposal was consistent with other proposals and exhibited a more thorough understanding of the work task and effort required to successfully perform the construction management services. Hall & Foreman, Inc. has completed the submittal of the insurance requirements as prescribed in Section 7 of the Agreement. It is recommended the City Council approve the Consultant Services Agreement with Hall & Foreman, Inc. for the Construction Management Services for the Citrus Ranch Park project, subject to approval by the City Attorney. tion Services ATTACHMENT: CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES, is made and entered into this - day of , 20_, by and between the CITY OF TUSTIN, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City", and Hall & Foreman. Inc. hereinafter referred to as "Consultant". RECITALS WHEREAS, City requires the services of a consultant to furnish the necessary [engineering or other] services for the [described project] hereinafter referred to as "Project"; and WHEREAS, City has prepared a Request for Proposal dated Januarv 11. 2005. a copy of which is attached hereto, marked as Exhibit "A" and is by this reference incorporated into this Agreement; and WHEREAS, Consultant has submitted to City a proposal dated Auaust 10. 2005, a copy of which is attached hereto marked as Exhibit "B" and is by this reference incorporated into this Agreement; and WHEREAS, Consultant is qualified to provide the necessary services for the Project and desires to provide said services; and WHEREAS, City desires to retain the services of Consultant for said Project. NOW, THEREFORE, for the consideration and upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows: AGREEMENT Section 1: Scope of Consultant's Services Consultant shall perform all work necessary to complete in a manner satisfactory to City, the services set forth in Exhibit "A". Section 2: Order of Precedence In the event of a conflict between or among any of the documents comprising this Agreement, the following order of precedence shall govern the provision in question: 1. This Agreement 2. City's Request for Proposal (Exhibit "A") 3. Consultant's Proposal (Exhibit "B") S:ICITAUS AANCH PAAKlC"""ructioo Maoagemeot Ag,eemeotlCSA Hell & Fooemao.doc Section 3: Time for Completion The time for completion of the work to be performed by Consultant is an essential condition of this Agreement. Consultant shall prosecute regularly and diligently the work of this Agreement according to reasonable schedules established by the City for various items described and as outlined within Consultant's proposal. Consultant shall not be accountable for delays in the progress of its work caused by any condition beyond its control and without the fault or negligence of Consultant. Section 4: Compensation A. The compensation to be paid under this Agreement shall be as set forth in Exhibit "B", not to exceed a total cost of $109.760.00 B. Consultant shall submit detailed invoices, based upon the actual work performed accompanied by backup documentation as requested by the City. C. Progress payments for work completed shall be paid by City as the work progresses, within thirty (30) days of the date of Consultant's invoice. D. Consultant shall provide City with a monthly itemization of all work performed, and the fees accrued thereon, in complete and sufficient detail to fully apprise City thereof Section 5: Independent Contractor Consultant's relationship to City in the performance of this Agreement is that of an independent contractor. Consultant's personnel performing services under this Agreement shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control and shall be employees of Consultant and not employees of City. Consultant shall pay all wages, salaries and other amounts due its employees in connection with this Agreement and shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting them, such as social security, income tax withholding, unemployment compensation, workers' compensation and similar matters. Section 6: Indemnification Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold City, its officers, agents, employees, successors and assigns harmless from any loss, damage, injury, sickness, death, or other claim made by any person and from all costs, expenses and charges including attorney's fees caused by or arising out of Consultant's, its officers', agents', subcontractors', or employees' negligent acts, negligent errors, or negligent omissions or willful misconduct, or conduct for which the law imposes strict liability on Consultant in the performance or failure to perform this Agreement. S:ICITAUS AANCH PAAKlCo"""cti"" Maoagemeot Ag,eemeotlCSA Hall & Fo'emaodoc Section 7: Insurance A. Consultant shall maintain in full force and effect during the term of these Agreement policies of commercial general liability and automobile liability insurance (each of which shall include property damage and bodily injury) and each with limits of at least $1,000,000 combined single limit coverage per occurrence. B. Consultant shall maintain in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement a policy of professional liability insurance coverage with limits of at least $1,000,000 combined single limit coverage per claim or per occurrence. If Consultant provides claims made professional liability insurance, Consultant shall also agree in writing either (1) to purchase tail insurance in the amount required by this Agreement or to cover claims made within five (5) years of the completion of Consultant's service under this Agreement, or (2) to maintain professional liability insurance coverage with the same carrier in the amount required by this Agreement for at least five (5) years after completion of Consultant's services under this Agreement. Consultant shall also provide evidence to the City of the purchase of the required tail insurance or continuation of the professional liability policy by executing the attached Letter Agreement on Consultant's letterhead. C. Consultant shall carry and pay for such workers' compensation insurance as is required fully protect Consultant and its employees under California Worker's Compensation Insurance Law. The insurance company shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City for losses paid under the policy, which losses arose from the work performed by the named insured. D. Other applicable insurance requirements are: (1) Name the City, its officials and employees as an additional insured on the commercial, general and automobile policies. (2) The insurance shall be issued by a company authorized by the Insurance Department of the State of California and rated A, VII or better (if an admitted carrier) or A-, X (if offered, by a surplus line broker), by the latest edition of Best's Key Rating Guide, except that the City will accept workers' compensation insurance rated B-VIII or better or from the State Compensation Fund. (3) The Insurance shall not be cancelled, except after thirty (30) days written prior notice to the City; and (4) The commercial general and automobile liability insurance shall each be primary as respects the City, and any other insurance maintained by the City shall be in excess of this insurance and not contribute to it. E. Upon execution of this Agreement, Consultant shall provide to City certificates of insurance showing the names of the insurers and the amounts of coverage and insurer endorsements evidencing the required insurance provisions. Insurer endorsements (or a copy of the policy binder if applicable) shall be provided as evidence of meeting the requirements of Subsections (1 )(3) and (4) of Section 7D above and the waiver of subrogation requirement in Section C above. If self- insured for worker's compensation, Consultant shall submit to City a copy of its certification of self-insurance issued by the Department of Industrial Relations. S:ICITAUS AANCH PAAKlCtioo Menegemeot Ag'eemeotlCSA Hall & Fooemaodoc Section 8: Termination of Agreement A. City and Consultant shall each have the right to terminate any or all of the services covered by this Agreement at any time for any reason by giving ten (10) business day written advance notice to the other party. B. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant shall be paid for services rendered by the effective date of the termination. C. Upon termination of this Agreement or completion of the Project, all documents relating to the Project shall become the sole property of City. Should City terminate this Agreement pursuant to subparagraph A. of this Section, Consultant shall, within ten (10) business days of receipt of notice of termination, provide City with all documents within Consultant's possession relating to this Agreement and the Project, including but not limited to all completed documents and all drafts of uncompleted documents. Section 9: Notices Any notice allowed or required to be given shall be effective upon personal delivery thereof, or upon depositing thereof in the United States Postal Service, certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: To City: City of Tustin Attn.: Patrick Sanchez, Director, Parks & Recreation 300 Centennial Way Tustin, CA 92780 To Consultant: Hall & Foreman. Inc. Attn: Robbie Mahmood 420 Exchanae. Suite 120 Irvine. CA 92602-1301 Section 10: Miscellaneous Provisions A. Consultant shall proceed immediately and diligently to perform the services provided for in this Agreement upon receipt of notice from City to proceed therewith. B. No part of this Agreement may be assigned by Consultant without the prior written approval of City. C. This Agreement shall extend to and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the respective parties hereto. S:ICITAUS AANCH PAAKlC",,"ructioo Maoagamaot Ag..amaotlCSA Hall & Fooamao.doc D. Consultant shall perform all services' required under this Agreement using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar conditions in similar localities, and shall be responsible for all errors and omissions for services performed by Consultant under the terms of this Agreement. E. Consultant certifies that there shall be no discrimination against any employee who is employed in the work covered by this Agreement, or against any application far such employment, because of race, religion, color, sex or national origin including but not limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment, or recruitment advertising, lay-off or termination, rate of payor other forms of compensation, and selection for training, including apprenticeship. F. This Agreement shall be interpreted in accordance with California Law. The parties agree that the Orange County Superior Court is the exclusive venue for any lawsuits by either party regarding this Agreement IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement was executed by the parties on the day and year first above written. "CITY" CITY OF TUSTIN By , [Title] ATTEST: Pamela Stoker, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Lois E. Jeffrey, City Attorney "CONSULTANT" By Title S:ICITAUS AANCH PAAKlCoo""ctioo Maoagemeot Ag,eemeotlCSA Hall & Fooemaodoc EXHIBIT A Parks and Recreation Services January 11, 2005 City of Tustin 300 Centennial Way Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 573-3326 FAX (714) 838-4779 Tustin Family & Youth Center 14722 Newport Avenue Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 573-3370 FAX (714) 734-9421 Tustin Area Senior Center 200 South "C" Street Tustin, CA 92780 Columbus Tustin Gym 17522 Beneta Way Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 573-3009 Robbie F. Mahmood, P.E., Project Director Hall and Foreman, Inc. 420 Exchange, Ste. 100 Irvine, CA 92602-1301 Dear Mr. Mahmood: The City of Tustin is interested in receivrng a Request for Proposal for Professional Construction Management Services for the City of Tustin Citrus Ranch Park Capital Improvement Project. The City is in the process of developing the Citrus Ranch Park site, a neighborhood park identified in the City's Conservation/Open Space/Recreation Element. The park site is located at the comer of Portola and Jamboree Road. Citrus Ranch Park is currently in the design development phase. RJM Design Group, Inc. of San Juan Capistrano has prepared the park master plan. It is anticipated that 90% of the design plans will be complete by April 30, 2005. The City is seeking a finn to provide constructability reviews, construction inspection, and contract administration services to the City. Some pre-bid support services and review of the contractor's work schedule for public bid compliance and constructability are also required. The specific constructability review portion of the proposal should include a review of the plans and specifications in compliance with standard specifications for public works construction and the City of Tustin standard drawings. The proposal should include identifying costs for: . Bid Document Review . Construction Management . Pre-Construction Services . Contractor Weekly Meetings . Perfonnance Reviews . Utility Coordination . Labor Compliance . Progress Payments . Construction Confonnance . Drawings of Record The proposal should include a specific section on the proposed fee, listing the tasks cited above. Please identify hourly rates for Project Managers, Project Engineers, Inspectors, etc. Enclosed, please find a copy of the Design Development Report for the future park site at Citrus Ranch Park. The deadline to submit your proposal with a fee schedule is Monday, January 31, 2005, at 5:00 p.rn. Please submit your proposal to: Mr. Patrick Sanchez Director, Parks and Recreation Services 300 Centennial Way Tustin, CA 92780 If can answer any further questions, do not hesitate to contact me at (714) 573-3331. Patrick Sanchez Director, Parks and Recreation Services sc S:\CITRUS RANCH PARK\RFP - Construction Management\RFP-HFI.doc '- ... .... . ~ .... -DRAFT- .. ',~ . DESIGN DEVELOPMENT REPORT ;. FOR . ~ FUTURE PARK SITE - . MASTER PLAN . TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA PORTOLA & JAMBOREE J::~::::OI .. RJM DESIGN GROUP, INC. .. Plarming & Landscape Architecture .. 31591 Camino Capistrano San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 949/493-2600 . fi ... ~ ...~ .... ~.... '+ + ,. PREPARED FOR: fHE CITY OF TUSTIN 300 CENTENNIAL \VA Y TUSTIN, CA 92780 CII'YOFTusTlN ~ ACKNOWLEDGMENTS TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL Tracy Wills Worley, Mayor Jeffery M. Thomas, Mayor Pro Tern Mike Doyle Lou Bone Tony Kawashima PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION Judith Peterson, Chair Ray Desselle, Vice Chair Elaine Dove Adrian Morton Al Murray Hank Nunez PLANNING COMMISSION Stephen V. Kozak, Chainnan Cheryl Bell Linda Jennings Bernard Miller Leslie Pontious CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE William A. Huston, City Manager Christine Shingleton, Assistant City Manager INTERDEPARTMENTAL PROJECT TEAM Patrick Sanchez, Parks & Recreation Director Gary Magill, Superintendent Doug Anderson, Senior Project Manager Transportation Jerry Otteson, Associate Civil Engineer Sam Altowaiji, Field Services Manager George Vallevieni, Community Resources Officer ii TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION NO. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Design Principles Selection of Park Facilities Design Recommendations INTRODUCTION Authority Purpose History Budget Planning Process Site Assessment Traffic Park Lighting & Public Safety Noise 2 DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT Program Design Requirements General Requirements Parking and Vehicular Circulation Landscape and Irrigation Master Plan/Site Plan Narrative POSSIBLE CONSTRUCTION PHASING 4 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS Preliminary Master Plan, Statement of Probable Construction Cost For Tota] Park Site Improvements 5 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION COSTS 6 PROJECT SCHEDULE 7 REPORTSANDWORKSHOPS~Y LIST OF EXHIBITS A B C D E F G Vicinity Map Opportunities and Constraints Sector Concept Plan Preliminary Master Plan Possible Construction Phasing Plan Preliminary Statement of Probable Construction Costs - Possible Construction Phasing Preliminary Statement of Probable Construction Costs - Total Park Site Improvements iii PAGE iii iv iv iv I I I I 3 4 8 8 9 10 II 13 13 13 17 24 30 31 33 2 6 7 16 18 19 25 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DESIGN PRINCIPLES This report describes the existing site, proposed development, and process used to reach the recommendations for the Future Park Site, a community park as defined in the Conservation/Open Space/Recreation Element (COSR) of the General Plan in the City of Tustin, located on Portola Parkway between Jamboree Road and Tustin Ranch Road. (Exhibit A) The City has identified the following design principles to guide the design studies and concepts: . Maintain the natural profile and landfonn character ofthe knoll portion of the site. Maintain panoramic views from the knoll top. . Provide functional, aesthetic design. The aesthetics of the park design should be sensitive to the existing residential developments and bordering streetscapes. . Maintain site character. . Emphasis on passive park uses. . Coordinate design with adjacent residential developments to assure the greatest mutual benefit and a unified design. SELECTION OF PARK FACILITIES Choices of facilities for the park were based on the compilation of data from the Community Public Workshop, City Staff, and consultants. During the public workshop held on April 1, 2000, a list of existing park facilities throughout the City was reviewed. Existing and proposed City parks and facilities were assessed based on the City of Tustin Conservation, Open Space, and Recreational Elements of the General Plan, and the East Tustin Specific Plan. The impact of construction cost and cost of maintenance and operation were estimated. The final selection of park facilities is described in Section 2, of this report. In general, the park will include on-site parking, trails, playgrounds, thematic water amenities, picnic areas, open play meadows, restroom/maintenance storage building, and basketball. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS The following design recommendations with respect to general park planning principles, and site-specific factors were developed: . The park facilities will serve the immediate neighborhood and the East Tustin area. The park neighbors will have the visual advantage of open space, . Existing hillside citrus grove should be preserved and integrated with the park design. Controlled access into the grove will be maintained by providing a perimeter wood rail fence around the grove with access for maintenance and harvesting of the fruit. Interpretive display would describe the agricultural significance of Orange County and iv the Tustin area. These displays would be located at the park entrance and trail heads at the base of the knoll. . Park access should be coordinated with the regional trail system along Portola Parkway. A horse corral is recommended to be located directly off the equestrian trail to provide access for the equestrian user. The corral will be located at Tustin Ranch Road and Portola Parkway and will be constructed by others. . Views into the park from Portola Parkway, Tustin Ranch Road, and Jamboree Road should be maintained for security, and maintained within driveway sight1ines by utilizing low shrub/ground cover materials. Provide benning to screen parking facilities along Portola Parkway and keep benns to a minimum along the edges of the park to maintain clear views. Maintain height ofbenns to 3 feet maximum. . Landscape treatment should blend with the landscape heritage of the City of Tustin in order to create an infonnal, rustic character as defined by the existing hillside citrus grove, the existing eucalyptus windrow, Tustin Ranch Golf Course, the regional trail, and streetscape edge. The COSR describes the eucalyptus grove as a unique natural feature. "The eucalyptus groves and remaining eucalyptus windrows in East Tustin lend a nostalgic rural and agricultural character to the local landscape. U . Landscaping and lighting fix~e design and placement along all sides of the park should mitigate light spill onto adjacent residential property. Security lighting for parking lot and walkways will e designed to meet the Illuminating Engineering Society minimum standards. . The architectural theme of park structures should be compatible with the architectural style and character of the neighborhood per the East Tustin Specific Plan guidelines. . Parking, and vehicular and pedestrian circulation should be designed to City standards. Sight distance must be maintained pursuant to City standards. Emergency and maintenance vehicle access should be accommodated. . Outdoor furniture, fencing, light standards, etc., should be carefully selected to be vandal resistant, low maintenance, and compliment the park character. v SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION AUTHORITY On January 3, 2000, the City of Tustin entered into an agreement with RJM Design Group, Inc. to furnish master planning services for the Future Park Site, The scope of work for the project included the preparation of a Design Development Report to establish the extent and nature of the improvements for the park to meet the needs of Tustin residents. PURPOSE The Design Development Report is an association of planning functions composed specifically to meet the needs of the public agency in processing the initial design of any facility. Its purpose is to establish a Master Plan that depicts the ultimate development of the proposed park through a planning process that encourages citizens, user groups, city officials and staff to participate effectively in the decisions on scope, function, and phasing priorities. The Design Development Report identifies neighborhood impacts, investigates site constraints and opportunities, and promotes community understanding and support for the development program. A primary purpose of this report is to review basic recreation needs; study alternative solutions to facility requirements; and recommend actions that will protect the integrity of diverse recreation activities while preserving the quality of the experiences within all interest areas. HISTORY The Open Space, Conservation and Recreation Element of the City of Tustin's General Plan requires "a variety of open space areas to accommodate diverse needs related to recreation".. and visual amenities for residents of the community". To implement the General Plan in the East Tustin area, the East Tustin Specific Plan was prepared and adopted by the City in November, 1986 and subsequently amended a number of times, with the last revision in November 1997. The Specific Plan provides policies, guidelines, development standards and administrative procedures for East Tustin. It establishes several recreation open space categories including community parks, neighborhood parks, hiking/biking trail linkages, streetscape standards, and a golf course which together offer diverse passive and active recreational opportunities. The Hillside District Guidelines of the specific plans sets forth guidelines representing specific design objectives or perfonnance criteria that are to be achieved in the implementation of development within the hillside district. BUDGET Total project construction cost is estimated at $4,300,000,00 and would be phased as funds become available for construction. Funds for design, engineering services and construction of the park will be appropriated in the future. On a large project such as this, an outside construction manager/project manager can be critical in keeping costs down, having a greater level of expertise available to ensure a balance between design issues and construction costs. ! ~ VICINITY MAP FUTURE PARK SITE CITY OF TUSTIN 2 ~ üi..1i EXHTRTT A PLANNING PROCESS Every effort was made to generate input and reaction to the planning program from affected individual citizens, government agencies, and City staff. This Master Plan process began with research and fact finding, The project team, consisting of the project manager, City staff and consultants, first met to review the approach and methodology, Data col1ection began to establish a comprehensive database through a comprehensive review and analysis of existing pertinent infonnation, A detailed site analysis reviewed the existing site and adjoining land uses. The critical region of investigation focused upon the immediate site and those sites physical1y adjacent to Future Park Site. Upon completion of the detailed site analysis, a comprehensive opportunity and constraint exhibit was prepared taking into consideration adjacent land use and circulation, site utilities, site- specific environmental conditions, and land fonn (see Exhibit B and C). Following the initial data collection, review and site analysis, a site awareness tour/workshop was conducted on April 1, 2000 to meet with members of the Community, City Staff, and Park and Recreation Commission to discuss the master plan process, project schedule, site opportunities and constraints, and to solicit input through a project questionnaire (project workbook) and "Hands-on" design workshop as to their goals regarding the development of Future Park Site, The workshop participants were divided into several small groups to develop a list of elements that could be considered for inclusion in the park, as wel1 as a list of concerns that might influence its development. Based upon community and staff input, six (6) alternatives were prepared by the participants of the workshop, Both individual1y and within each group, the participants answered questions related to the site, and col1ectively were asked to indicate their major concerns and design ideas related to "Likes/Dislikes", "Issues", and "Facilities", Each group was asked to take these ideas and issues and utilize their creative energy, to develop a plan for the park, The following is a brief summary of workshop exercises: 1. Workshop participants were asked what characteristics they liked about the park site: . Views . Lemon Trees . Location . Trails 2. Workshop participants were asked what characteristics they disliked about the park site: . Traffic . Proximity to Homes . Flood Control 3. Participants identified the folJowing issues related to park development: . Parking . Preservation of Natural Beauty . Active vs, Passive Use 4, Participants identified the following facilities they would most like to see at the 'Future' Park site: . Trails . Playground . Water Feature . Picnic . Nature Center Plan alternatives were drawn based upon the plan alternatives developed by each group participating at the workshop indicating proposed park facilities to include: playground areas, restroom/maintenance building, parking, basketball, water features, picnic areas, access opportunities, trails, interface with adjacent residential developments, and integration/preservation of the existing hillside citrus grove, The diagrammatic consensus plan was presented to and reviewed by the City staff and presented to workshop participants at the Parks and Recreation Commission meeting on May 18, 2000, A master plan, with refinements incorporating the input from the community, staff and parks commission was developed based upon the consensus plan during the commission workshop, The Master Plan concepts were refined with continual evaluation of what uses are best suited for the Future Park Site, A preliminary master plan was prepared and submitted to the City for review and comment. The Master Plan was presented at the Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting on June IS, 2000, A draft of the Design Development Report was produced, The preliminary master plan was reviewed by City Managers Office and the following City departments: . Community Development Department . Community Services Department . Police Department . Public Works Department SITE ASSESSMENT The park site is located on approximately 16.9-acres in the East Tustin Ranch area and is bounded by Tustin Ranch Road on the north, Portola Parkway on the east, Jamboree Road on the south, residential development and Tustin Ranch Golf Course on the west. Residential development exists across each of the streets which bound the site. 4 The park site lies in proximity to a number of other City park and open space facilities, A portion of the west boundary of the park faces onto the Tustin Ranch Golf Course, To the north along Tustin Ranch Road is Pioneer Middle School and a quarter of a mile to the northeast off Pioneer Road is Cedar Grove Park and Peters Canyon Elementary School. Approximately three quarters of a mile to the south on Jamboree Road is the 20-acre Tustin Sports Park. The various types of faciliÜes existing at the nearby parks may impact the type of facilities appropriate for the Future Park site, Portola Parkway is a primary arterial highway and access for off-street parking will be along this frontage. On-street parking is prohibited on all adjacent streets, Both Tustin Ranch Road and Jamboree Road are identified as major arterial highways, Staff does not recommend park access from either of these two arterials due to the high vehicular speed of travel. The City of Tustin General Plan Master Bikeway Plan indicates a class II bikeway on all three arterial highways bounding the site, In addition, a county regional equestrianlbikeway trail exists along the park side of Portola Parkway and extends south on Jamboree Road. The regional trail extends to the north into Peters Canyon Regional Park and continues south along a portion of Jamboree Road and follows the alignment of the Eastern Transportation Corridor, A 40' wide storm drain easement, dedicated to the Orange County Flood Control District, with access ITom Tustin Ranch Road is located along the northwesterly border, running ITom Tustin Ranch Road paralleling residential uses and terminating at the northerly boundary of the Tustin Ranch Golf Club, In general, large trees or permanent structures will not be allowed within the OCFCD easement. Turf, shrubs, and trails may be allowed depending on the design of the improvements and potential impact to any OCFCD facilities and accessibility for maintenance to the outfan of a large underground concrete box culvert that channels Peters Canyon Wash to the golf course. Three distinct areas can be identified on the site with the knoll being the predominant natural feature in the center of the site, and consisting of approximately 8 acres of the total park acreage, The knoll maintains a ridgeline extending ITom north to south with a high point elevation of279.5' with an approximate elevation change of 50 vertical feet at the north end and 65 vertical feet on the south. The citrus grove covers the majority of the knoll, except at the north end where a portion of the knoll is covered by native vegetation and a eucalyptus grove that creates a windrow along the north side of the citrus grove. Two relatively flat areas exist at the corner of Portola Parkway/Tustin Ranch Road and Portola Parkway/Jamboree Road, The area at Portola Parkway and Tustin Ranch Road currently slopes ITom north to south at approximately 3% and drops approximately 14 vertical feet. The area at Portola Parkway and Jamboree Road currently slopes north to south ranging ITom I % to 4% and drops approximately 19 vertical feet. The soil characteristic of the site is a dark brown colored surface soil fairly high-to-high silt plus clay content with deeper subsoil light brown color and slightly sandier. The soil analysis for both surface and subsoil samples taken are non-saline and non-sodic in nature, Lime content is low throughout with baron concentrations below the toxic range posing no hazard to plant growth. The soils agronomic report as prepared by Soil and Plant Laboratory. Inc. dated March 12, 1988 is included in the appendix of this document. However, an updated soil reports should be prepared SITE ANALYSIS / OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS FUTURE P ARK SITE CITY OF TV S TIN "COLUMBIA" RESIDENTIAL . ~----~'WES-'fMeNT" RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL ol.¿ ~ TUSTIN RANCH \J!!J GOLF COURSE , r=I RJM DESIGN GROUP. INC. PLANNING AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITEC'I'URE """"",o,..,.",.",.",ru"""'m..,".a~" """',,"',...,.,,-- "",...""-",, (9 rutrI NORTH 0 50 100 200 EXHIBIT B II I ;., . + FENCE 1I.ANOSCAPE BARRIER ¡- { . 500' GOLF . COURSE KNOLL COMMUNITY P",RK CONCIPT PORTOLA P",RKWAY SECTION SECTOR CONCEPT PLAN SECTORS 7,8 &9 II£OIOHAL~ 1000STNAH TAM.. IMTH ..0Rt.tIIL DAtFT$ 01 £UCAL VPTU$ f~ ~ /rrIMTH CAN""" ISLAND PIN£ 10$ ACCEHt WtCN! ......-.u~r. ~'o. WIœ II£~ 8I<E rAAI. . .' S'~ . ~ J. r '.' v.TR£~-ALK , 0""" ( :. ~¡'~.:~ '~1 \¡ (? ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ : -' ¡ ';~'. ~ {:4.' ~, .;: KNOLL ':,REOIONALJ J CO'::'TY IR"1I. r J""80REE 8LVD. . SECTION FUTURE P ARK SITE CITY OF TUSTIN ~RJM DESIGN GROUP, INC. . PLANNING AND '-"'DSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ".""."""""""",....'"..,"""""',."",,, """"',.. ,.." ..,-.... ". "'" ."-a~ EXHIBIT ( during construction document preparation for bidding purposes, with a final report prepared recommending soil amendments following rough grade construction. Perimeter curbs, gutters, streets, and sidewalks are complete on Tustin Ranch Road, POliola Parkway and Jamboree Road. Vehicular access to the site for off-street parking will be from Portola Parkway at Allen Street, which has been part of the long-range planning for the park site. Left turn pockets in the median on Portola Parkway already exist. All utilities necessary for the park, including non-potable water for irrigation, electricity, sewer and domestic water for the restroom building, are available from Portola Parkway. Storm drainage for the site exists on-site at the south end of the flat area located at Portola Parkway and Tustin Ranch Road just outside of the OCFCD easement and at the far south corner of the site at Jamboree Road. Utility service connections will be required to the park facilities The existing citrus grove located on the knoll consists of approximately 6.7 acres. The Conservation, Open Space, and Recreation Element (COSR) of the General Plan states to "maintain the natural profile and land form character of the "knoll" park site in east Tustin." Development policies related to the knoll are included in the East Tustin Specific Plan to minimize land form alterations to retain the scenic resources. Implementation guidelines are included under Section 2 - Development Concept of this Design Development Report. Currently, the City retains a lease agreement with the Irvine Company who still harvests the citrus. Sensitive planning, design and construction to limit access will preserve the character and health of the citrus grove. TRAFFIC Both Jamboree Road and Tustin Ranch Road are major arterial highways with access to the Santa Ana Freeway (Interstate 5) which carries a significant volume of traffic now and when future development occurs. Portola Parkway is a primary highway providing direct access to the west leg of the Eastern Transportation Corridor - State Highway 261, a quarter of a mile east of the site. Primary vehicular park access will occur at Portola Parkway. The entrance drive to the off-street parking lot (100 stalls) will be located on Portola Parkway across from Allen Street. The approximate number of parking lot spaces is calculated based upon facilities and total park acreage as determined by Public Works staff and with NRPA standards, as follows: Facilities . Playgrounds (2 each) w/moderate facilities . Basketball Court (back to back half court) . Picnic Tables (13 each) . 17 acres of open space @ 5 spaces/acre Number of Spaces 4 2 l3 85 104 spaces PARK LIGHTING & PUBLIC SAFETY Existing street lighting provides standard illumination levels along the perimeter of the park. Parking lot and walkway lighting will be designed to meet Illuminating Engineering Society recommended minimum standards for safety and security and required parking lot and walkway 8 lighting standards contained in the Uniform Security Code, as amended by the City of Tustin, Lighting of parking lot and security lighting needs to be sensitively designed to minimize impact to surrounding properties. Mitigating measures should include directing light away ITom neighboring residences toward the park and utilize cut-off type fixtures, The placement of trees at the perimeter of the park should also help to filter light. Adequate visibility will be required throughout the park for safety and security by maintaining open sight lines from the parking lot and bordering streets, Careful landscape planting and on-going maintenance must be considered in order to maintain site visibility, The park will be open to the public from dawn to dusk and applicable park curfews may be enforced, NOISE Due to the nature of the proposed park facilities, noise should have little or no impact on the adjacent land uses. Traffic noise on Portola Parkway, Tustin Ranch Road and Jamboree Road are all within 65 :t: CNEL levels as identified in the Tustin Noise Element of the General Plan, however parks are not considered "sensitive use and should not pose a compatibility issue." 9 SECTION 2 DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT The design concepts developed and included in this report are based on the principles and recommendations identified in the Executive Summary and elsewhere in this report, They incorporate the playgrounds, water feature, picnic areas, open play areas, restroom/maintenance building, basketball, parking, landscape and utilities listed below, PROGRAM DESIGN REQUIREMENTS Picnic Facilities . Three (3) picnic shelters with two picnic tables each. . Individual uncovered family picnic tables are located throughout the park (approximately 7 picnic tables). . All picnic tables shall be wheel chair accessible at one end, Children's Plavground Areas (Ages 3 - 12) . Children's play areas are located adjacent to picnic areas for adult supervision. The play areas will contain play equipment to encourage independent and interactive play and be physically challenging. All children's playgrounds shall meet Americans With Disabilities Act and the Consumer's Product Safety Commission. Open Turf Play Areas (meadows) . Approximately three acres of open, infonnal play area, . Site buildings to maximize public visual exposure to the knoll. Restroom / Storage . Approximately 580 SF building for toilets for both men and women, storage, and outdoor sink. Park Trails . The park trails skirt the base of the knoll to provide access to the park facilities, The preliminary layout for the 8- foot wide concrete walk has been reviewed and approved by City staff to accommodate maintenance and emergency vehicles. The existing knoll ridgeline trail will be maintained in decomposed granite to accommodate maintenance and emergency access. . All trails shall meet Americans with Disabilities Act requirements with the exception of the decomposed granite maintenance and emergency access which runs along the knoll ridgeline. ADA access is not economically feasible due the existing gradient. Access to the knoll top is provided ITom the spiral walkway ITom the north parking lot. 10 The Knoll and Citrus Tree Grove . Limit public access to prevent compaction and disturbance to tree grove, . Utilize the grove for interpretive activities in limited areas. . Maintain views into and out from the citrus groves with selective removal of trees to take advantage of long distance views and for security surveillance. . Future park improvements may necessitate a removal of a portion of the grove up to 20 % ofthe total area, . Shade structures shall be sited so that the top of the structures do not project above the tree canopy along the ridgeline of the knoll, . Minimal grading of the knoll is encouraged, Where re-contouring is proposed on the lower, flatter portions of the knoll, the concept of contour grading should be used, . Ifuses are developed on the crest of the knoll they should be such as not to require significant grading. . Landscape on the knoll should reinforce its natural profile and character, Basketball Court . Two (2) half-court, back-to-back, basketball courts are more conducive to a passive park favored by the community consensus. Full court basketball facilities will be planned in other parks with more active oriented facilities, GENERAL REQUIREMENTS Design Criteria . Park development to be consistent with East Tustin Specific Plan and City Zoning Ordinances. Lighting . Equipment should be coordinated with the City to ensure compatibility to citywide maintenance program. . Selected equipment should shield adjacent property from parking lot security and walkway lighting. . Foot candle levels may vary according to function and shall comply with Illuminating Engineering Society minimum recommendations. . Lighting shall comply with provisions of the Uniform Security Code, as adopted/amended by the City, 11 Park Access and Access for the Disabled . Park facilities will be designed to comply with ADA and Title 24 requirements. . Park access from regional trail will be provided, . ADA consultant may be retained during subsequent design development and construction documentation phases. Grading / Drainage . Project grading will be balanced on site to the extent possible. . All turf areas will be graded with two percent minimum with a 3: 1 maximum slope gradient. . Shrub/Groundcover areas will be graded at a 2: I maximum slope gradient. . All paved areas will have a one percent minimum and 4.9 percent maximum for handicap accessibility (non-ramp condition), . Site grading will respect the existing knoll and site topography that falls from north to south, Architectural . Compatible with California architecture with a residential character and may utilize: -Hipped roofs with extended eaves to shade entry and windows, -Tile or clay shake-type roofs, -Use of arbors and shade structures as visual features that direct pedestrian traffic, -Masonry columns where feasible, -Large exposed wooden beams. -Skylights where appropriate and conforming to good energy conserving design practices, -Off-white or earthtone plaster finish and/or wood siding. Signage and Monumentation . One (1) park entry sign will be located on Portola Parkway at the park entrance across from Allen Street. 12 PARKING AND VEHICULAR CIRCULATION The park acreage and facilities proposed for the park will generate the need for approximately 104 parking spaces based on five spaces per acre and facility specific parking. Parking calculations were prepared by Public Works staff (refer to page 8, under 'Traffic'). LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION Landscaping will continue the character set forth in the East Tustin Specific Plan. The intent of the overall landscape design is to draw upon the existing street landscaping on Tustin Ranch Road, Jamboree Road, Portola Parkway and the landscape heritage of the City of Tustin, to create a unique, identifiable element of the park. Plant material selections will promote water conservation and minimize maintenance requirements, Plant material will be compatible with the character of the East Tustin Specific Plan area and create focal point opportunities, Care will be taken to maintain good visibility to the park from the street for security as well as for general aesthetic appreciation of the park. Where possible, trees at the perimeter will be planted to mitigate the effect of any proposed park lighting. Irrigation infrastructure will be provided to maximize water efficiency and promote a healthy landscape fabric. The park is located in Zone B of the Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) water system and is being supplied by Irvine Lake water, which is classified as non-potable water. A non- potable water line is available from Portola Parkway. According to IRWD, the hydraulic grade line for non-potable water is 460 feet, which will provide approximately 99 psi of pressure for the irrigation design, The installation of the new irrigation system will be an automatic system compatible with the City's existing computerized "Maxi com" central control system, and shall conform to IR WD reclaimed water regulations, to include installation methods, warning labels, equipment type, purple piping, performance and maintenance. A pressure regulator and strainer will be required at the meter. MASTER PLAN / SITE PLAN NARRATIVE For the purposes of describing the Master Plan/Site Plan, the park site narrative is broken down into three distinct areas as follows and represents the community workshop and consensus plan: 1, South Park Area to include the flat area at Jamboree Road and Portola Parkway south of the park entry. 2. North Park Area to include the flat area at Tustin Ranch Road and Portola Parkway north ofthe park entry, 3. The Knoll and citrus grove, South Park Area Vehicular access to the off-street parking for the park is located at the mid-block of Portola Parkway across from Allen Street. Configuration for a portion of the parking lot extends to the south parallel to Portola Parkway with 62 standard spaces and 3 handicap spaces, A drop-off and turn around zone is provided at the end of the parking lot for convenience and a more fluid 13 vehicular circulation patterns. Pedestrian access will be provided at the park entrance and from the regional trail at the location of the parking lot turnaround and from the southeast comer of the site at Jamboree Road. At this same location (Jamboree Road) maintenance vehicular access will be provided for harvesting of the fTuit, with temporary traffic control provided on Jamboree Road as required. A windmill water feature and the park identification sign are located at the park entrance drive to enhance the agrarian theme. A dry streambed extends south between the parking lot and hillside to create a buffer to collect storm drain runoff from the hillside, and to discourage direct pedestrian access into the citrus grove, The dry stream terminates at the children's playground area, The restroom/storage building, children's playground area, and family picnic shelter creates a passive activity zone in the south area. An "orchard-like" tree grid provides the setting for the picnic plaza and playground, The children's playground elements will take on an agricultural theme reminiscence of the historical land use of the East Tustin area. "Meadow" turf areas expand beyond the picnic and playground for open play. Two half-court, back-to-back, basketball courts are south of the playground and are buffered from the playground area with berming and landscape. North Park Area Additional off-street parking extends north from the park entrance drive, parallel to Portola Parkway, with 37 standard spaces and 2 handicap spaces. Pedestrian access on the north end of the park will be provided at the park entrance, from the regional trail at the end of the parking lot and from the shared use with the flood control district access at the northwest comer of the site from Tustin Ranch Road, The flood control district maintenance drive will be decomposed granite with gated access to the storm drain structure. A horse corral provided by others, located south of the intersection of Tustin Ranch Road and Portola Parkway, could allow park access for the equestrian user and will be buffered from other park facilities through berming landscape and fencing. The stream water feature will continue north from the windmill structure located at the park entrance drive and will parallel the parking lot and driveway, This water feature transitions into a dry streambed section located beyond the parking lot terminating at the horse corral. A bridge crosses over the stream water feature from the parking lot to the 'Golf theme picnic area and children's playground, Two (2) family picnic shelters overlook the playground areas located within simulated "sand traps" of the 'golf theme area. Elements of the golf game will become sculptural features or play apparatuses, Sculptured landforms will add to the interest and playfulness ofthis activity area, The turf 'fairways' become areas for open play. The Knoll The knoll and citrus grove are the predominant landform features and will be preserved. A paved spiral trail for pedestrian and maintenance/emergency vehicles will provide access to the hilltop from the northern parking lot. An overlook plaza and shade structure could be situated on top with interpretive displays to describe the history of the local area, the citrus grove, and a description of views of the surrounding landscape. The existing ridgeline access will be a decomposed granite 14 trail to serve as a maintenance access and hiking trail. Due to the steepness of the grade this trail will not be handicap accessible. Shade structures will occur intennittently as rest stops and places for viewing. The citrus grove will be fenced for its protection and to reduce erosion of the slopes. The fencing will be designed to blend with rustic character of the park and surrounding area. 15 I I I I CITY OF TV S TIN "COLUMBIA" RESIDENTIAL I I I "WESTMONT" RESIDENTIAL I I I I I I I I I I I I RESIDENTIAL /, I / I I I I f-~~-J I I J I TUSTI:~ RANCH GOLF COURSE PRELIMIN AR Y MASTER PLAN FUTURE P ARK SITE RESIDENTIAL I ~RJM DESIGN GROUP. INC. PWlNlNG "'R..."WlDSC",", ARCHITEC7UAE ~'¡'~_'I' ,",~.,'Io':-::"t~,;:.,}::~ (9 ru1.ri EXIDBIT D NORTH 50' 100' 200' 16 '"",15. "00 SECTION 3 POSSIBLE CONSTRUCTION PHASING POSSIBLE CONSTRUCTION PHASING If the City should wish to begin construction as soon as possible with available funds, the park could be developed in phases, Working drawings and bid documents could be developed in a way that would allow the City of make the financial decisions regarding phasing at the bid date and during construction. To accomplish this the park could be developed in the following phases as shown on Exhibit E: . Phase I, could be the southern area and would include picnic facilities, restroom building, children's play area, basketball, parking lot, turnaround, landscape, irrigation, rough grading for Phase II and III and interim irrigation and turf in the northern area. The preliminary estimated construction cost for Phase I of the Master Plan is approximately $2.5 million. . Phase II could be the northern area, and would include additional parking, picnic facilities, playground and related landscape and irrigation, The preliminary estimated construction cost for Phase II of the Master Plan is approximately $1.3 million. . Phase III could be development of the knoll and would include overlook, shade structures and trails, The preliminary estimated construction cost for Phase III of the Master Plan is approximately $750,000, 17 POSSIBLE CONSTRUCTION PHASING FUTURE P ARK SITE CITY 0 F ~U S TIN "COLUMBIA" RESIDENTIAL "WESTMONT" RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL I I I I I J 1-~~-1 I I I I TUSTIN RANCH GOLF,;OURSE RESIDENTIAL [JRJM .. DESIGN G.ROUI.'~..lNC. PLANNINO AND LANDSCAPE 'K""",,<=RE .~,..._.~-_.~~ ......- "'I~,m-.. .....-- Q rutrI NORTH 50' 100' 200' J'HI~1"" 18 EXHIBIT E I POSSIBLE CONSTRUCTION PHASING PRELIMINARY STATEMENT OF PROBABLE COST LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS FOR FUTURE PARK SITE MASTER PLAN City of Tustin, California 11/27/00 I MOBILIZATION I LS Allow $ 50,000,00 II, ROUGH GRADING Clear and Grub-South 240,000 SF $ 0,03 $ 7,200.00 Clear and Grub-North 205,000 SF $ 0,03 $ 6,150.00 Earthwork (2' cut & fill)-South 20,000 CY $ 3,00 $ 60,000.00 Earthwork (2' cut & fill)-North 16,000 CY $ 3.00 $ 48,000,00 Earthwork (2' cut & fill)-Knoll 1 LS Allow $ 20,000,00 Erosion Control-North 240,000 SF $ 0.03 $ 7,200,00 Erosion Control-South 205,000 SF $ 0.03 $ 6,150.00 Surveymg and constructIOn stakmg J LS Allow $ o,uuu.uu Subtotal for Rough Grading $ 160,700.00 III. UTILITIES Domestic Water Meter/Backflow 1 LS $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000,00 Reclaimed Water POC 1 LS $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 FireLine 405 LF $ 25.00 $ 10,125.00 Fire Hydrant 1 EA $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 Domestic Water to Restroom 445 LF $ 12.00 $ 5,340.00 Domestic Water to Drinking Fount. 235 LF $ 6.00 $ 1,410.00 Domestic Water to Play Structure 1 LS $ 6,500.00 $ 6,500.00 Sewer Line to Restroom 650 LF $ 30,00 $ 19,500.00 Join to Existing Sewer 1 ALLOW $ 1,000,00 $ 1,000.00 Electrical Service 1 LS $ 2,500,00 $ 2,500.00 Electrical Meter and Panel I LS $ 7,000.00 $ 7,000.00 Telephone Service to Restroom 580 LF $ 10,00 $ 5,800.00 Subtotal for Utility Connections $ 71,175.00 IV SITE DRAINAGE 12" x 12" Catch Basin 26 EA $ 500,00 $ 13,000.00 Drain Inlet at Parking Lot 1 EA $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 4" Atrium Drains @ Tree wells 15 EA $ 110.00 $ 1,650,00 12" Drain Pipe 2,000 LF $ 20.00 $ 40,000.00 8" Drain Pipe @ Tree wells 400 LF $ 16.00 $ 6,400.00 Stmm Drain Manhole 4 EA $ 2,200.00 $ 8,800.00 Trench Drain @ Knoll Base 500 LF $ 18,00 $ 9,000,00 Playground Drainage -4" Pertorated Dram PIpe ~5 LF :$ 16,00 $ 1,360,00 -6" Solid Drain Pipe 50 LF $ 12.00 $ 600.00 Subtotal for Site Drainage $ 84,810.00 19 EXHIBIT F V CONSTRUCTION Off-Site Street Improvements 1 LS $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 Concrete Circular Drive 5,700 SF $ 7.00 $ 39,900.00 Concrete Parking Lot Turnaround 6,395 SF $ 7.00 $ 44,765,00 Asphalt Parking Lot 22,280 SF $ 2.00 $ 44,560.00 Concrete Curb 1,220 LF $ 12.00 $ 14,640.00 Concrete Curb & Gutter 360 LF $ 13,00 $ 4,680.00 Concrete Ribbon Gutter 415 LF $ 13.00 $ 5,395.00 Concrete Walkways- Pedestrian 17,445 SF $ 2.50 $ 43,612.50 Concrete Walkways- Vehicular 13,370 SF $ 3.50 $ 46,795.00 Concrete Picnic Pad 3 EA $ 700,00 $ 2,100.00 Concrete Mow Strip 1,475 LF $ 8.00 $ 11,800,00 Rock/Boulder Stream Feature (rock 5,735 SF $ 18,00 $ 103,230,00 Restroom / Maintenance Building 1 LS $ 164,000,00 $ 164,000,00 Half-Court Basketball 1 LS $ 15,500,00 $ 15,500.00 Children's Playground -Bulkhead 200 LF $ 35.00 $ 7,000,00 -Resilient Surfacing 4,420 SF $ 18,00 $ 79,560.00 -Washed Plaster Sand 160 CY $ 35.00 $ 5,600.00 -Play Equipment 1 ALLOW $ 110,000,00 $ 110,000.00 Site Furniture -Picnic Tables 5 EA $ 1,000,00 $ 5,000.00 -Benches 9 EA $ 900,00 $ 8,100.00 -Waste Receptacles 5 EA $ 650.00 $ 3,250.00 -Drinking Fountain 1 EA $ 3,500,00 $ 3,500,00 -Bike Racks 2 EA $ 1,200,00 $ 2,400,00 -Flagpole 1 EA $ 2,500,00 $ 2,500,00 Llghtmg -Relocated Street Light 1 EA $ 3,500.00 $ 3,500.00 -Parking Lot Lighting 14 EA $ 3,500,00 $ 49,000,00 -Site Walkway Lighting 15 EA $ 3,200.00 $ 48,000,00 -Sign Uplight 8 EA $ 1,300,00 $ 10,400.00 -Windmill Uplight 4 EA $ 1,000.00 $ 4,000,00 -Tree Uplight 4 EA $ 800.00 $ 3,200.00 -Flagpole Uplight 2 EA $ 1,000.00 $ 2,000.00 -Basketball Court Lighting 1 LS $ 5,500.00 $ 5,500.00 Trash Enclosure 1 LS $ 8,000.00 $ 8,000,00 Windmill 1 LS $ 15,500.00 $ 15,500,00 Water Tank 1 LS $ 21,000.00 $ 21,000,00 Monument Sign 1 LS $ 34,000,00 $ 34,000,00 Picnic Shelter 1 EA $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 Signage 1 ALLOW $ 1,000,00 $ 5,000.00 Water Feature (includes pump, and 1 ALLOW $ 40,000,00 $ 40,000,00 Subtotal for Construction $ 1,056,987.50 VI IRRlGA TION/PLANTING-South Soil Preparation 158,500 SF $ 0.30 $ 47,550,00 20 EXHIBIT F Turf (Stolons) 70,000 SF $ 0.08 $ 5,600,00 Shrub / Groundcover Area 88,500 SF $ 2.50 $ 221,250.00 Wood Mulch-South 1,081 CY $ 30.00 $ 32,430.00 Trees Palms 23 EA $ 1,000.00 $ 23,000,00 48" Box 15 EA $ 1,220.00 $ 18,300,00 36" Box 40 EA $ 560.00 $ 22,400.00 24" Box 100 EA $ 220.00 $ 22,000.00 15 Gallon 100 EA $ 75,00 $ 7,500.00 Irrigation 158,500 SF $ 0,65 $ 103,025,00 90 Day Maintenance 158,500 SF $ 0,03 $ 4,755,00 Subtotal for Irrigation / Planting $ 507,810.00 V IRRI GA TION/PLANTING- North Soil Preparation 205,000 SF $ 0,30 $ 61,500,00 Turf (Stolons) 205,000 SF $ 0.08 $ 16,400,00 Irrigation 205,000 SF $ 0.65 $ 133.250,00 90 Day Maintenance 205,000 SF $ 0.03 $ 6,150.00 Subtotal for Irrigation / Planting $ 217,300.00 SUBTOTAL $ 2,148,782.50 15% Contingency $ 322,317.38 SOUTH PARK TOTAL $ 2,471,099.88 I. MOBILIZATION 1 LS Allow $ 26,000.00 II. ROUGH GRADING Clear and Grub 205,000 SF $ 0,03 $ 6,150.00 Surveying and construction staking 1 LS Allow $ 6,000.00 Subtotal for Rough Grading $ 12,150.00 III. SITE DRAINAGE 12" x 12" Catch Basin 24 EA $ 500.00 $ 12,000,00 Drain Inlet at Parking Lot I EA $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 12" Drain Pipe 1,625 LF $ 20.00 $ 32,500.00 Stonn Drain Manhole 2 EA $ 2,200.00 $ 4,400.00 Domestic Water to Drinking Fount. 475 LF $ 6.00 $ 2,850.00 Playground Drainage -4" Perforated Dram Pipe 300 LF $ 16.00 $ 4,800.00 -6" Solid Drain Pipe 60 LF $ 12.00 $ 720,00 Subtotal for Site Drainage $ 61,270.00 IV. CONSTRUCTION Asphalt Parking Lot 15,730 SF $ 2.00 $ 31,460,00 Concrete Curb 750 LF $ 12.00 $ 9,000.00 Concrete Curb & Gutter 200 LF $ 13.00 $ 2,600.00 Concrete Ribbon Gutter 230 LF $ 13.00 $ 2,990,00 Concrete Walkways- Pedestrian 17,290 SF $ 2.50 $ 43,225.00 Concrete Walkways- Vehicular 640 SF $ 3.50 $ 2,240.00 21 EXHIBIT F Concrete Stairs 90 LF $ 40.00 $ 3,600.00 Concrete Mow Strip 675 LF $ 8,00 $ 5,400.00 Concrete Picnic Pad 4 EA $ 700.00 $ 2,800.00 Rock Boulder Stream Feature 4,225 SF $ 18.00 $ 76,050.00 Decomposed Granite 13,000 SF $ 2,00 $ 26,000.00 Children's Playground -Bulkhead 600 LF $ 35.00 $ 21,000.00 -Resilient Surfacing 2,090 SF $ 18.00 $ 37,620.00 -Washed Plaster Sand 415 CY $ 35.00 $ 14,525,00 -Play Equipment 1 ALLOW $ 110,000.00 $ 110,000.00 Park Furniture -Picnic Tables 8 EA $ 1,000.00 $ 8,000.00 -Benches 8 EA $ 900.00 $ 7,200,00 -Waste Receptacles 6 EA $ 650.00 $ 3,900.00 -Drinking Fountain 1 EA $ 3,500.00 $ 3,500.00 -Bike Racks 2 EA $ 1,200.00 $ 2,400.00 Lighting -Parking Lot Lighting 6 EA $ 3,500.00 $ 21,000.00 -Site Walkway Lighting 17 EA $ 3,200.00 $ 54,400,00 Wood Rail Fence 400 LF $ 35.00 $ 14,000.00 Picnic Shelter 2 EA $ 30,000.00 $ 60,000.00 Bridge 1 EA $ 10,000,00 $ 10,000.00 Signage 1 ALLOW $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 Corral Shade Structure 1 EA By Others $ - Wood Rail Fence @ Corral 40 LF By Others $ - Subtotal for Construction $ 573,910.00 V. lRRIGA TlON/PLANTING Soil Preparation 151,500 SF $ 0.30 $ 45,450.00 Turf (Stolons) 57,000 SF $ 0.08 $ 4,560.00 Shrub I Groundcover Area 94,500 SF $ 2.50 $ 236,250.00 Wood Mulch 1,155 CY $ 30.00 $ 34,650.00 Trees 48" Box 10 EA $ 1,220.00 $ 12,200,00 36" Box 30 EA $ 560.00 $ 16,800,00 24" Box 78 EA $ 220.00 $ 17,160.00 15 Gallon 100 EA $ 75.00 $ 7.500,00 Irrigation 151,500 SF $ 0.65 $ 98,475.00 90 Day Maintenance 151,500 SF $ 0.03 $ 4,545.00 Subtotal for Irrigation I Planting $ 477,590.00 SUBTOTAL $ 1,150,920.00 15% Contingency $ 172,638.00 NORTH PARK TOTAL $ 1,323,558.00 Mobilization Surveying and construction staking Concrete W alkways- Vehicular 15,000.00 3,000.00 29,260.00 22 EXHIBIT F Concrete Overlook Plaza 3,756 SF $ 7.00 $ 26,292.00 Concrete Drainage Curb and Swale 1,025 LF $ 13.00 $ 13,325.00 Concrete Stairs @ Plaza Overlook 30 LF $ 40.00 $ 1,200.00 Decomposed Granite 20,000 SF $ 2.00 $ 40,000,00 Wood Rail Fence 5,075 LF $ 35.00 $ 177,625.00 Rest Area Shade Structures 2 Allow $ 30,000,00 $ 60,000.00 Overlook Shade Structures 1 Allow $ 35,000,00 $ 35,000.00 View Planter Walls 744 LF $ 150.00 $ 111,600.00 Overlook Plaza Walls 100 LF $ 150.00 $ 15,000,00 Rest Area Walls 150 LF $ 150.00 $ 22,500.00 Benches 15 EA $ 900.00 $ 13,500.00 Waste Receptacles 3 EA $ 650.00 $ 1,950.00 Planter Walls (View corridor) 300 LF $ 70.00 $ 21,000,00 Walkway Bollard Lighting 14 EA $ 3,200.00 $ 44,800,00 Shelter Lighting 1 LS $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 Wall Niche Lights 8 EA $ 350.00 $ 2,800.00 Soil Preparation 3,800 SF $ 0.30 $ 1,140.00 Shrub/Groundcover 3,800 SF $ 2.50 $ 9,500.00 Irrigation (see note 'D' on page 20) 3,800 SF $ 0,80 $ 3,040.00 Wood Mulch 46 CY $ 30.00 $ 1,380.00 SUBTOTAL $ 650,912.00 15% Contingency $ 97,636.80 KNOLL & CITRUS GROVE TOTAL $ 748,548.80 THE ESTIMATE DOES NOT INCLUDE PERMITS OR FEES. RJM HAS PREPARED THIS ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST ON THE BASIS OF ITS BEST PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENT AND EXPERIENCE WITH THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY. THE ESTIMATE, HOWEVER, REPRESENTS ASSUMPTIONS AND OPINIONS OF THE CONSTRUCTION MARKET AND CONTRACTOR'S METHODS OF DETERMINING ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS COSTS OVER WHICH RJM HAS NO CONTROL, IF THE OWNER WISHES GREATER ASSURANCE AS TO THE CONSTRUCTION COST, HE SHALL EMPLOY AN INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATOR. THE ABDVE STATEMENT OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS IS BASED UPON THE PRELIMINARY MASTER PLAN DATED JUNE 15, 2000 FOR BUDGET PURPOSES ONLY AND INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING ASSUMPTIONS: D. E. PROPOSED AREA DRAIN SYSTEM IS PREPARED FOR BUDGET PURPOSED ONLY. AREA DRAIN SYSTEM IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED UPON SITE SPECIFIC HYDROLOGY STUDY. EARTHWORK QUANTITIES ARE BASED UPON NO ANTICIPATION OF SUBSTANTIAL OVEREXCAVATION. AND REMOVALS. AVAILABLE ELECTRICAL SERVICE IS ASSUMED TO BE IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF THE PROJECT. ELECTRICAL SWITCHBOARD AND PANELBOARDS ARE ASSUMED TO BE LOCATED IN THE RESTROOM I MAINTENANCE BUILDING, IRRIGATION FOR EXISTING CITRUS GROVE TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE IRVINE COMPANY. THE ABOVE COST ESTIMATE DOES NOT INCLUDE IRRIGATION AND EROSION CONTROL PLANTING ON THE TERRACED SLOPE AREAS WITHIN THE CITRUS ORCHARD, A. B. C. 23 EXHIBIT F SECTION 4 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS The following estimate of probable construction costs for the entire project, as shown on Exmbit D & G, is approximately $4,300,000.00 and provides a means to detennine the amount offunding required and to identify phased construction of the project. 24 TOTAL PARK SITE IMPROVEMENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT OF PROBABLE COST LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS FOR FUTURE PARK SITE MASTER PLAN City of Tustin, California 11/27/00 c¡:",.¡ "i:""",::,!,'", . ',i, ,.,' .-, .'" ,,;, . I MOBILIZATION I LS A'l1ow $' 73,000,00 II, ROUGH GRADING Clear and Grub 240,000 SF $ 0.03 $ 7,200.00 Earthwork (2' overall cut & fill) 20,000 CY $ 3,00 $ 60,000.00 Erosion Control 240,000 SF $ 0.03 $ 7,200.00 Surveying and construction staking I LS Allow $ 8,000.00 Subtotal for Rough Grading $ 82,400.00 III. UTILITIES Domestic Water Meter/Backflow I LS $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 Reclaimed Water POC I LS $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000,00 FireLine 405 LF $ 25,00 $ 10,125,00 Fire Hydrant I EA $ 2,000,00 $ 2,000.00 Domestic Water to Restroom 445 LF $ 12.00 $ 5,340.00 Domestic Water to Drinking Fount. 235 LF $ 6.00 $ 1,410.00 Domestic Water to Play Structure I LS $ 6,500.00 $ 6,500.00 Sewer Line to Restroom 650 LF $ 30,00 $ 19,500.00 Join to Existing Sewer I ALLOW $ 1,000,00 $ 1,000.00 Electrical Service I LS $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 Electrical Meter and Panel I LS $ 7,000.00 $ 7,000.00 Telephone Service to Restroom 580 LF $ 10.00 $ 5,800.00 Subtotal for Utility Connections $ 71,175.00 IV SITE DRAINAGE 12" x 12" Catch Basin 26 EA $ 500.00 $ 13,000.00 Drain Inlet at Parking Lot I EA $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 4" Atrium Drains @ Tree wells 15 EA $ 110,00 $ 1,650,00 12" Drain Pipe 2,000 LF $ 20,00 $ 40,000,00 8" Drain Pipe @ Tree wel1s 400 LF $ 16.00 $ 6,400.00 Stonn Drain Manhole 4 EA $ 2,200.00 $ 8,800.00 Trench Drain @ Knol1 Base 500 LF $ 18.00 $ 9,000.00 Playground Drainage -4" Períorated lJram Plpe 85 LF $ 16.00 $ 1,360.00 -6" Solid Drain Pipe 50 LF $ 12.00 $ 600,00 Subtotal for Site Drainage $ 84,810.00 V CONSTRUCTION Off-Site Street Improvements I LS $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000,00 25 EXHIBIT G Concrete Circular Drive 5,700 SF $ 7.00 $ 39,900.00 Concrete Parking Lot Turnaround 6,395 SF $ 7.00 $ 44,765.00 Asphalt Parking Lot 22,280 SF $ 2,00 $ 44,560.00 Concrete Curb 1,220 LF $ 12.00 $ 14,640.00 Concrete Curb & Gutter 360 LF $ 13.00 $ 4,680.00 Concrete Ribbon Gutter 415 LF $ 13.00 $ 5,395.00 Concrete Walkways- Pedestrian 17,445 SF $ 2.50 $ 43,612.50 Concrete Walkways- Vehicular 13,370 SF $ 3.50 $ 46,795.00 Concrete Picnic Pad 3 EA $ 700.00 $ 2,100,00 Concrete Mow Strip 1,475 LF $ 8,00 $ 11,800.00 Rock/Boulder Stream Feature (rock 5,735 SF $ 18.00 $ 103,230,00 Restroom / Maintenance Building 1 LS $ 164,000,00 $ 164,000,00 Half-Court Basketball 1 LS $ 15,500,00 $ 15,500.00 Children's Playground -Bulkhead 200 LF $ 35.00 $ 7,000.00 -Resilient Surfacing 4,420 SF $ 18,00 $ 79,560.00 -Washed Plaster Sand 160 CY $ 35.00 $ 5,600.00 -Play Equipment 1 ALLOW $ 110,000,00 $ 110,000.00 Site Furniture -Picnic Tables 5 EA $ 1,000.00 $ 5,000.00 -Benches 9 EA $ 900,00 $ 8,100.00 -Waste Receptacles 5 EA $ 650.00 $ 3,250.00 -Drinking Fountain 1 EA $ 3,500.00 $ 3,500.00 -Bike Racks 2 EA $ 1,200.00 $ 2,400,00 -Flagpole 1 EA $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 Lightmg -Relocated Street Light 1 EA $ 3,500.00 $ 3,500.00 -Parking Lot Lighting 14 EA $ 3,500.00 $ 49,000,00 -Site Walkway Lighting 15 EA $ 3,200.00 $ 48,000.00 -Sign Uplight 8 EA $ 1,300.00 $ 10,400.00 -Windmill Uplight 4 EA $ 1,000.00 $ 4,000.00 -Tree Uplight 4 EA $ 800.00 $ 3,200.00 -Flagpole Uplight 2 EA $ 1,000,00 $ 2,000.00 -Basketball Court Lighting 1 LS $ 5,500,00 $ 5,500.00 Trash Enclosure 1 LS $ 8,000,00 $ 8,000.00 Windmill 1 LS $ 15,500.00 $ 15,500.00 Water Tank 1 LS $ 21,000.00 $ 21,000.00 Monument Sign 1 LS $ 34,000.00 $ 34,000.00 Picnic Shelter 1 EA $ 30,000,00 $ 30,000.00 Signage 1 ALLOW $ 1,000.00 $ 5,000.00 Water Feature (includes pump, and 1 ALLOW $ 40,000.00 $ 40,000.00 Subtotal for Construction $ 1,056,987.50 VI IRRIGATION/PLANTING Soil Preparation 158,500 SF $ 0.30 $ 47,550.00 Turf (Stolons) 70,000 SF $ 0.08 $ 5,600.00 Shrub / Groundcover Area 88,500 SF $ 2,50 $ 221,250.00 26 EXHIBIT G Wood Mulch 1,081 CY $ 30.00 $ 32,430.00 Trees Palms 23 EA $ 1,000.00 $ 23,000,00 48" Box 15 EA $ 1,220,00 $ 18,300.00 36" Box 40 EA $ 560.00 $ 22,400.00 24" Box 100 EA $ 220.00 $ 22,000,00 15 Gallon 100 EA $ 75.00 $ 7,500.00 Irrigation 158.500 SF $ 0.65 $ 103,025,00 90 Day Maintenance 158,500 SF $ 0,03 $ 4,755.00 Subtotal for Irrigation / Planting $ 507,810,00 SOUTH PARK AREA TOTAL $ 1,876,182.50 1. ROUGH GRADING Clear and Grub 205,000 SF $ 0.03 $ 6,150.00 Earthwork (2' overall cut & fill) 16,000 CY $ 3.00 $ 48,000,00 Erosion Control 205,000 SF $ 0.03 $ 6,150.00 Subtotal for Rough Grading $ 60,300.00 II, SITE DRAINAGE 12" x 12" Catch Basin 24 EA $ 500,00 $ 12,000.00 Drain Inlet at Parking Lot 1 EA $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 12" Drain Pipe 1.625 LF $ 20,00 $ 32,500,00 Stonn Drain Manhole 2 EA $ 2,200.00 $ 4,400,00 Domestic Water to Drinking Fount. 475 LF $ 6.00 $ 2,850,00 Playground Drainage -4" Perforated Uram PIpe 3UU L!< $ ló.UU ;$ 4,MUU.UU -6" Solid Drain Pipe 60 LF $ 12.00 $ 720.00 Subtotal for Site Drainage $ 61,270.00 Ill. CONSTRUCTION Asphalt Parking Lot 15,730 SF $ 2.00 $ 31,460.00 Concrete Curb 750 LF $ 12.00 $ 9,000.00 Concrete Curb & Gutter 200 LF $ 13.00 $ 2,600.00 Concrete Ribbon Gutter 230 LF $ 13.00 $ 2,990.00 Concrete Walkways- Pedestrian 17,290 SF $ 2.50 $ 43,225.00 Concrete Walkways- Vehicular 640 SF $ 3.50 $ 2,240.00 Concrete Stairs 90 LF $ 40,00 $ 3,600.00 Concrete Mow Strip 675 LF $ 8.00 $ 5,400.00 Concrete Picnic Pad 4 EA $ 700,00 $ 2,800.00 Rock Boulder Stream Feature 4,225 SF $ 18,00 $ 76,050.00 Decomposed Granite 13,000 SF $ 2.00 $ 26,000.00 Children's Playground -Bulkhead 600 LF $ 35.00 $ 21,000.00 -Resilient Surfacing 2,090 SF $ 18.00 $ 37,620,00 -Washed Plaster Sand 415 CY $ 35.00 $ 14,525.00 -Play Equipment 1 ALLOW $ 110,000,00 $ 110,000,00 Park Furniture 27 EXHIBIT G -Picnic Tables 8 EA $ 1,000.00 $ 8,000.00 -Benches 8 EA $ 900.00 $ 7,200,00 -Waste Receptacles 6 EA $ 650.00 $ 3,900.00 -Drinking Fountain I EA $ 3,500,00 $ 3,500.00 -Bike Racks 2 EA $ 1,200,00 $ 2,400,00 Lighting -Parking Lot Lighting 6 EA $ 3,500.00 $ 21,000.00 -Site Walkway Lighting 17 EA $ 3,200.00 $ 54,400.00 Wood Rail Fence 400 LF $ 35.00 $ 14,000.00 Picnic Shelter 2 EA $ 30,000.00 $ 60,000.00 Bridge 1 EA $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000,00 Signage 1 ALLOW $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000,00 Comù Shade Structure 1 EA By Others $ - Wood Rail Fence@Corral 40 LF By Others $ - Subtotal for Construction $ 573,910.00 Vl. IRRIGATION/PLANTING Soil Preparation 151,500 SF $ 0.30 $ 45,450.00 Turf (Stolons) 57,000 SF $ 0.08 $ 4,560.00 Shrub / Groundcover Area 94,500 SF $ 2.50 $ 236,250.00 Wood Mulch 1,155 CY $ 30.00 $ 34,650.00 Trees 48" Box 10 EA $ 1,220,00 $ 12,200.00 36" Box 30 EA $ 560.00 $ 16,800.00 24" Box 78 EA $ 220.00 $ 17,160.00 15 Gallon 100 EA $ 75.00 $ 7,500.00 lITigation 151,500 SF $ 0.65 $ 98,475.00 90 Day Maintenance 151,500 SF $ 0.03 $ 4,545.00 Subtotal for 1rrigation / Planting $ 477,590.00 NORTH PARK AREA TOTAL $ 1,173,070.00 Rough Grading 1 LS $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 Concrete Walkways-Vehicular 8,360 SF $ 3.50 $ 29,260,00 Concrete Overlook Plaza 3,756 SF $ 7.00 $ 26,292,00 Concrete Drainage Curb and Swale 1,025 LF $ 13.00 $ 13,325.00 Concrete Stairs @ Plaza Overlook 30 LF $ 40.00 $ 1,200,00 Decomposed Granite 20,000 SF $ 2.00 $ 40,000,00 Wood Rail Fence 5,075 LF $ 35.00 $ 177,625.00 Rest Area Shade Structures 2 Allow $ 30,000.00 $ 60,000.00 Overlook Shade Structures 1 Allow $ 35,000.00 $ 35,000,00 View Planter Walls 744 LF $ 150,00 $ 111,600.00 Overlook Plaza Walls 100 LF $ 150.00 $ 15,000,00 Rest Area Walls 150 LF $ 150.00 $ 22,500.00 Benches 15 EA $ 900.00 $ 13,500.00 Waste Receptacles 3 EA $ 650.00 $ 1,950,00 Planter Walls(View corridor) 300 LF $ 70.00 $ 21,000.00 Walkway Bollard Lighting 14 EA $ 3,200.00 $ 44,800.00 28 EXHIBIT G Shelter Lighting 1 LS $ 2,000,00 $ 2,000.00 Wall Niche Lights 8 EA $ 350.00 $ 2,800.00 Soil Preparation 3,800 SF $ 0.30 $ 1,140,00 Shrub/Groundcover 3,800 SF $ 2,50 $ 9,500.00 Inigation (see note 'D' on page 20) 3,800 SF $ 0.80 $ 3,040.00 Wood Mulch 46 Cy $ 30,00 $ 1,380.00 KNOLL/CITRUS ORCHARD TOTAL $ 652,912.00 SOUTH PARK AREA TOTAL $ 1,876,182.50 NORTH PARK AREA TOTAL $ 1,173,070.00 KNOLL/CITRUS GROVE TOTAL $ 652,912.00 SUB-TOTAL $ 3,702,164.50 15% Contingency $ 555,324.68 GRAND TOTAL $ 4,257,489.18 THE ESTIMATE DOES NOT INCLUDE PERMITS OR FEES, RJM HAS PREPARED THIS ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST ON THE BASIS OF ITS BEST PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENT AND EXPERIENCE WITH THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY. THE ESTIMATE, HOWEVER, REPRESENTS ASSUMPTIONS AND OPINIONS OF THE CONSTRUCTION MARKET AND CONTRACTOR'S METHODS OF DETERMINING ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS COSTS OVER WHICH RJM HAS NO CONTROL IF THE OWNER WISHES GREATER ASSURANCE AS TO THE CONSTRUCTION COST, HE SHALL EMPLOY AN INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATOR, THE ABOVE STATEMENT OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTiON COSTS IS BASED UPON THE PRELIMINARY MASTER PLAN DATED JUNE 15, 2000 FOR BUDGET PURPOSES ONLY AND INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING ASSUMPTIONS: D, E. PROPOSED AREA DRAIN SYSTEM IS PREPARED FOR BUDGET PURPOSED ONLY. AREA DRAIN SYSTEM IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED UPON SITE SPECIFIC HYDROLOGY STUDY. EARTHWORK QUANTITIES ARE BASED UPON NO ANTICIPATION OF SUBSTANTIAL OVEREXCAVATION , AND REMOVALS. AVAILABLE ELECTRICAl SERVICE IS ASSUMED TO BE IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF THE PROJECT. ELECTRICAL SWITCHBOARD AND PANELBOARDS ARE ASSUMED TO BE LOCATED IN THE RESTROOM I MAINTENANCE BUILDING. IRRIGATION FOR EXISTING CITRUS GROVE TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE IRVINE COMPANY, THE ABOVE COST ESTIMATE DOES NOT INCLUDE IRRIGATION AND EROSION CONTROL PLANTING ON THE TERRACED SLOPE AREAS WITHIN THE CITRUS ORCHARD. A. B. C. 29 EXHIBIT G SECTION 5 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE MAINTENANCE & OPERATION COSTS ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE MAINTENANCE & OPERATION COSTS The parks operation/maintenance costs are based upon average annual parks operation/maintenance costs for other surrounding communities for community and neighborhood parks costs range between $10,000 to $18,000 per acre per year which includes labor, materials and administration for mowing, fertilization, pruning, trimming, irrigation monitoring and clean-up, Following are estimated annual maintenance and operations costs for the park and excludes the citrus grove. For budget purposes, we suggest utilizing $14,000 per acre per year. ITEM PARK SITE (10.2 Acres - excludes citrus grove) 1. Estimated Annual Maintenance/Operations Costs for Park Site (10.2 acres) $142,800. 2. Estimated Annual Water Costs (7.2 acres) 1 $ 7,880. 3. Estimated Annual Electrical Costs (10.2 acres) 2 $ 7,548. 4. Estimated Annual Maintenance/Operations/ Water Costs for Citrus Grove * Total Annual Maintenance/Operations Costs $158,228, 1 Costs based upon lower tier rate obtained from Irvine Ranch Water District (IR WD) of $ 0.58 per 100 cubic feet at 100% allocation (1" per week or 52" per year). Total square feet of irrigated areas equals 313,800 square feet (7.2 acres) and does not include the citrus grove. The following formula was used to determine estimated annual water costs: 313,800 s,f. x 4,33 feet/year (52" per year as allowed by IRWD) ~ 1,358,754 cu. ft./acre x $0,58/100 cu, ft. ~ $7,880. acre/year 2 Electrical utility costs are based upon the average annual cost for existing parks in the City of Tustin at $740./ac per year per "Parks Operation and Maintenance Summary", dated 11/7/95, *to be verified with The Irvine Company, 30 SECTION 6 TENTATIVE PROJECT SCHEDULE ~RJM DESIGN GROUP, INc. . PLANNING AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Tustin "Future" Park PROJECT SCHEDULE (8/02/00) We suggest the follawing as schedule for your review: TASK 1- PROJECT FAMILIARIZATION --J . Submit infonmation request to City --J . Kick-off Meeting. --J . Acquire base map, --J . RJM begin preparation of base plan -,J . Meeting with City to Review Scope, Site Conditions and Workshop Process -,J . City to provide available background data --J . RJM begin review of available data. TASK 2 - DETAILED SITE ANALYSIS --J . RJM Photo Document Site Conditions --J . RJM begin preparation of preliminary site analysis --J . Meeting with City to discuss Preliminary Analysis and Workshop Arrangements TASK 3 -CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN -,J . RJM to begin preparation of draft Workshop Scores and Awareness Tour Workbook --J . City send notification to potential workshop participants, request LS.V.p. -,J Completed Tasks 31 TARGET DATE February 9, 2000 (Wednesday) February 9, 2000 (Wednesday) February 9,2000 (Wednesday) February 9, 2000 (Wednesday) February 9, 2000 (Wednesday) March 1, 2000 (Wednesday) March 1, 2000 (Wednesday) March 1,2000 (Wednesday) TASK 3 -CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN (Cont'd) .,¡ . Meeting with City staff, project organization and coordination, review preliminary workbook, and workshop arrangements. .,¡ . RJM to refine Workshop Scores and Awareness Tour Workbook .,¡ . City call potential workshop participants if required .,¡ . Community Workshop I, "Awareness Walk", Issues, Program, Diagrammatic Alternates .,¡ . .,¡ . .,¡ Meeting with City to review workshop results Meeting with City staff to review consensus plan Meeting with City Departments to review refined consensus plan .,¡ . Presentation of workshop results and refined consensus plan to Parks and Recreation Commission TASK 4 - PROJECT BUDGETING .,¡ . Prepare Conceptual Master Plan and Cost Estimate TASK 5 - FINAL MASTER PLAN .,¡ . Meeting with City staff to review Master Plan .,¡ . Refine conceptual Master Plan .,¡ . Presentation of Conceptual Master Plan to Parks and Recreation Commission .,¡ . Prepare Design Development Report . Refine Master Plan and Design Development Report . Presentation of Final Master Plan and Design Development Report to City Council for approval .,¡ Completed Tasks 32 TARGET DATE March 8, 2000 (Wednesday) March 8, 2000 (JI ednesday) April 1,2000 (Saturday) April 24, 2000 May 4, 2000 May 15,2000 May 18, 2000 July 10,2000 June 12,2000 June 12,2000 June IS, 2000 July 10,2000 SECTION 7 REPORTS AND WORKSHOP SUMMARY ~ Santa Ana Office Lab. No. 9498 ~1arch 12, 1988 SOIL AND PLANT LABORATORY, INC. ".mb~ 01 Toe C~;lo,". _""" 01 Ag,i~II",", Labooal",ie, Irvine canmunity Developnent Co. P. O. Box 1, Dept. N. Newp:>rt Beach, Ca 92658 Attn: Wes Nowa, Mariager Landscape Architectural Services LOI' 23 PUBLIC PARK, WSTIN AANŒ, mASE III - TENTATIVE TRACI' 12870 Following is a report 011 our inspection and soil sampling of the above site on 2-24-88. eanposite surface and subsoil samples were collected iran the two general areas ðesignated on the attached plan. General Inspection The œrk brown colored surface soil at locations 1 is fairly high to high in silt plus clay content. Portions of this area had been slightly cut with deeper subsoil light brown in color and slightly sandier in texture than the surface horizon. The location 2 soil area varies fran daylight to approximately 5 feet of fill. Again, the native surface soil is œrk brown in color .and faidy high to high in silt plus clay content with subsoil lighter brown in color and slightly sandier in texture. The major portion of this area consist of a mix- ture of surface and subsoil strata. Soil Analysis Soil reaction is slightly alkaline in location 1 surface and location 2 subsoil, slightly acid in location 1 subsoil and location 2 sùrface. '!he salinity (Eee) levels are satisfactorily low and based on the SAR values soluble sodi1.1!t is adequately balanced by calçium and magnesi1.Ill. Lime content is low throughout with borcn concentrations below the toxic range. In summary,. both surface and subsoil in the two . areas sampled are non-saline and non-sodic in nature. Available nitrogen is low while ¡:hos¡:horus ranges fran low at location 2 to moderately low at location 1. With the exception of location.l subsoil which is fairly low, potassilJ!\ is well supplied throughout. Calcium and magnesi1.Ill levels are satisfactory in all cases. It should be noted that we ran soil fertility analyses on all samples since sane areas did not appear .to be at final grade. ReCCllllll1Ì:ndations To the extent possible all areas to be landscaped should be crossri~ or otherwise tilled to a depth of 9 - 12 inches. P,O. Box 11744, Banta Ana. California 92711-1744 (714) 558-8333 Telex Numbe, 5101000505 ANSBI<: Soil Plant SA P,O. Box 153, Santa.clara. CalKomia 95052-0153 (408)727-0330 P.O. Box 1548, Belle.,"" Washington 98009-1~48 (205174~-ßSß5 .~. SOIL AND PLANT LABORATORY,INC. "embe, 01 The Celllo,.i. Au.e'elioo 01 A.,ie.II.,,' Lebo,elo,'e. Page 2 IrvineCanmunity DeVel~t March 1, 1988 For turf and grOlmdcover planting the following amendments should be uniformly broadcast and thoroughly incorporated to a depth of 6 inches by means of roto- tiller or equal: AMJUNI' PF.R 1000 ED. FT. 6 cu. yds. nitrogen stabilized organic amenànent derived . fran redwood, fir or œdaJ; sawdust 15 lbs. 16-20-0 ammonillll )';hos¡;ilate 'Ihe planting pits for container gr<Ml1 trees and shrubs should be excavated twice the diamter and onea nd one-half times the depth of the root ball. Cb--site surface anò,lor subsoil should be. used without amendin9 for backfill to the èepth of the root ball. 'Ihe backfill mix for use around the root ball should be prepared as follCMs: 6 parts by volume onsite soil 4 parts by volume nitrogen stabilized organic amendment 1 lb. 16-20-0 per cu. yd. of mix 2 Ibs. Iron sufI ate per cu. yd. of mix The above materials should be thoroughly blended prior to use for backfill purposes. Also, the iron sulfate should not contact cement surfaces since severe staining could occur. If the 16-20-0 is incorporated prep1ant as recamnended the postplant maintenance for the first year can consist of a nitrogen only fertilizer program. Beginning approximately 30 days after planting ammonium sulfate should be applied at the rate or 5 lbs. per 1000 s;¡. ft. on a monthly basis. When plants have becane well established the frequenqy. of fertilizer applications can be èecreased.. Also, as with all soluble materials, the ammonium sulfate should be unifornù.y broadcast aver dry landscaFE! and fol1CMed with a normal irrigation. Please ~l ~ any ~qUèsti~. c:v-~ FORREST FULLMER FF:ac . ~ : : i : i I gO[Q andCPQant ~aboftafolt~, 9nc. ,1.0, Box 11744, 8ama ».na, c;allldrnia 9u 11'1744/11 ,,¡'5S8-bJJJ P.O. Box 153, Santa Clara, Calitornia 95052-0153/(408) 727-0330 P.O. Box 1648, Bellevua, Washington 98009-1648/(206) 746-6665 Irvine Canmunity Developnent Co. SOIL FERTILITY AND ~RIQJL'IURAL SUITl\BILITY P. O. Box 1 Dept.N ... (l\O4) ..' Newport Beach,Ca 92658 Santa Ana Office Lab. NO. 9498 March 1, 1988 Lot 23, Public Park, TUstin Ranch Phase III, Tentative tract 12870- soil samples taken 2"'"24-88 _Saturation Extract Values- Sam Half _Parts Per Million Dry Soil- I Ca Mg Na K B I SM QUIlL pIe Sat. I N03-N m4-N R)4-p K Ca ~lg I pH IEee Me/I Me/I Me/I Me/I PPM I LIME: -*_% I I I I 1 19 6 7 14 210 1640 387 6.1 0.5 2.3 1.4 0.6 0.4 0.17 0.4 u:w 2 19 4 3 4 70 2260 565 6.9 0.3 1.1 0.6 0.7 0.1 0.14 0.8 u:w 3 17 11 4 11 140 2180 390 7.5 1.1 5.2 2.9 3.6 0.3 0.15 1.8 u:w 4 16 9 3 13 150 2040 349 7.3 1.2 6.0 3.1 3.5 0.4 0.11 1.6 u:w Half Saturation %-approx. field moisture capacity. Salinity = ECe (II1IIhos/an at 25 degrees C.). SAR - Sodiun Msorption Ratio. 1. LoCation 1, 0-12" 2. " 1, 36-48" 3. " 2, 0-12" 4. " 2, 36-48" :¡: u z « CL:o z~ -N 1-,... (J). ~I-: ~I- , . , ,I¡ !IIi I lillddJl¡¡lill,llldl" ...!III .. "".".."""..."" ..~.". .. ,...." " I"""" ....... ...."" ~ ; '. .". . I! .J\'I r H {= :11 .1,,\ 'b .4.¡ V)::-I .J~ ;;~ \.n~ LI RJM DESIGN GROUP, INC. 'L.\.I\¡\lf\I.1,; "f\l1I 1,",\-n;,c..."Pr.4RCHITECTlIRE M3y 8. ~OOO FUTURE PARK SITE City QfTusún; CaliforlÙa SUß1mary of facilities and square foot; consensus plan. FACTIITIES Parlting- 75 cars .,. driveways Rcstroon1'- 2 ul:h @ 700 S.F.) . )"nllo[- 2 each @ 8,000 S.f.) . Hasketbal1 COllrt- Back to back half court . Picn.ic sh~ltc.!'s- 6 c;>¡::h @ 750 S.F.)-." 2 picnic tabk'S' shclter = 12 tables lotal linrsc cQml - 24,200 $)'. 1,400 S.F. 16.000S.F. - !).S\IO S.l'. - 4.500 S.fi. - ~. vt<'ht"crt"~ LI..,.".,') ;;:>. v-(' .lird..... ()?A..) /¿;J-....,..ht"~ é/.øA.. 700 S.f. ()!'"f.:-! S,EACE Hill Mc;¡dnw (opcn play) Water fealure 1>ogpaTk Comnll,uulY gllldcns OCFCD c:ucme-nl Open space I trails 340,000 S.f. ...- 82,000 S.f. - 10,800$.1'.--' 27,4UO $.1'. ...- 25,300$.F."'- 23,000 S.F. ...- 173,100 S.F. ...- Total pnrk square f(1OlIlgc 137.900 S.f, (16.9 acres) / 7/9c "'. S ...,..~<". =- £~ r//¿( ;;r..7Ji!I¿.r /0/ ;::¡".P""'~S O;:;:>C/fJÖ ~~ fØ4,4~ ('URrORAn:oH1n: '~I~')I t:^~W<U<':AI'IS 11t.'o.:OOO -Si\:o<JL.'o.:-; CIIYIS'TR,\NO.C ^ 92.1S -.'4'lIJ9.>.Z.þ<I. CAS ("'149\-'." SOll'riER" (-,~I.II:UIU'I.'"H"in;' ¥II> LI:-Il.OLN \\AY.~LlIt: 104.\' .\l'lll:RN.(A '~\ð,I' (S.lO,U.I-<l"'" FAX (S)ÞI Ml.1.L'7'J ZO'd 065>2 e:6~ 6~6 ~NI'dnOH~ N~IS30 w~~ d~O'VO oo-ao-^ew rOOd ro:60 oo-gr-~~ WORKSHOP SUMMARY rl RJM DESIGN GROUP, INC. PLANNING AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE CITY OF TUSTIN, "FUTURE" PAIU( GROUP WORKSHOP CONSENSUS 81 What are the top "likes" about the site? JOßS\GOO\G] 5-05\(;1Ou1' COI1SCI1SlIs.doc 81 What are the top "dislikes" about the site? g - size Barren Buildings JOBS\600\615-05\Group Consensus. doc S2 What do you believe are the most important issues related to the development ofllle Future Park Site? Group 5 No vehicle access Provide trails Protection of neighbors JOI3S16OO16J S-OSIGroup COI1SC!1sus.doc Group 6 ~ Privacy Residential - walking S3 What Facilities would you like to see at the Future Park Site? Group 3 JonS\GOO\1í 15-05\Grnl1¡J ColJsensl1s.LÌoc Benches Adult play (exercise course, Frisbee course, lawn bowling, horseshoe pits, shuffle board) CITY OF TUSTIN / "FUTURE" PARK "TAKING PART"AWARENESS TOUR - APRIL 1,2000 WORKBOOK SUMMARY - 44 Participants SI SECONDARY ACCESS / TUSTIN RANCH ROAD The gate on Tustin Ranch Road is for Orange County flood control access. There is no median break at this location on Tustin Ranch Road. A right-in/right-out entry may be possible. . What opportunities/constraints does a secondary vehicular entry from Tustin Ranch Road present? 1iI\ 4 4 4 4 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Would Increase Traffic Needs Right Hand Turn Lane Difficult Because of Center Divider Would Cement Natural Terrain/Loss of Park Space Difficult to Exit Preferred/Good Idea Slow Traffic Bad for Neighbors D- Turn on Tustin Ranch Road Would Need Another Access Provides Easy Access Good Area for Parking Lot Would Alleviate Allen Street Traffic Parking Overflow to Allen Street Allen Street Entrance is Easy, D- Turns Shouldn't be Problem Would Interfere with Right Turn on Portola Parking Noise Would Interfere with Neighbors May Have to Widen Entrance Dangerous Special Event Access Only Provide Access to a Dog Park Only Bicycle Access Only Provide Access to a Small Parking Lot JOBS\600\61S-0S\Workbook Sununary.àoc Sl Several homes are adjacent to the park site in this area. EXISTING RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT . What issues/concerns related to the existing residential development might be associated with activities in this area? S2 Privacy/Trespassing Traffic No Organized Sports Leagues Loss of View Needs Buffer Litter Need to Honor Montecito Homeowners Agreement (No Parking/"Tree Park") Trees Would Help Insulate Noise Heighten Wall Impact on Property Value BallsIFrisbees Thrown Over Wall are Irretrievable ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL EASEMENT You are walking down the Orange County Flood Control easement providing access to the outfall of a large underground concrete box culvert that channels Peters Canyon Wash to the golf course. . What opportunities!constraints does the Orange County Flood Control access easement present for the Park? 4 4 2 2 2 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Should be Quiet Environment City Access Only No Access Here Emergency Access Only Good Access for South Homes Should be Gated to Protect Kids Safe Area for Kids (not next to busy streets) Needs Barrier to Prevent Trespassing Ugly Fencing Needs Benches Picnic Area Parking Area Too Small for Parking Access Here May Interfere with Neighbors Access Should Be OffPortola Entrance for Transients Maintenance JOBS\600\615-05\Workbook Summary.doc 2 . S2 What opportunities/constraints does the Orange County Flood Control access easement present for the Park (Continued)? 1 1 1 1 Flooding Drainage Impact on Park Development Mosquitoes EUCALYPTUS The steep slope ahead is topped by a windrow of eucalyptus trees. The East Tustin Specific Plan sets forth landscaping guidelines for streets and entries within the East Tustin area. Eucalyptus varieties are the primary tree of choice to create an informal, rustic character to expand the existing "eucalyptus character of Tustin Hills" . . How would you describe the vegetation on the slope at this location? 6 6 4 4 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Rustic Keep As Is Love the Trees Brush Desert Like Eucalyptus Trees Cactus May Be Hazardous Good for Hiking Trails Trees Provide Natural Windbreak Trees are Stable/Support for Slope Mature Trees Necessary for Wildlife Eucalyptus Trees are Diseased More Eucalyptus Trees Needed Lemon Trees Some Dead Trees Mediterranean Scrub Sage Scrub Bamboo Physically Sharp Potentially Painful If Accessible Rough Dry Fire Hazard Install Irrigation System JOBS\600\615-05\Workbook Summary,doc S3 TOPOGRAPHY There are two large flat areas in the park, one in the north and one at the southeast corner, with a large knoll area in the middle. . Note below any potential uses you feel might be appropriate in the northern flat area you have just walked around. 5 5 5 5 4 4 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Parking Exercise Stations/Course Basketball Courts Tennis Courts Ballfield LakelPond Add Trees Park Benches Dog Park Garden Pathways Hiking Trail Jogging Trail Restrooms Frisbee Golf Roller Hockey Rink Team Sports No Sports Active Uses as Long as Residential Buffer Provided Close to Residential Quiet Area, my House is Right Across the Street Hill is Good Workout for Jogging Gazebo Fountain Waterfall Add Small Hills No Lights AcceSs to Knoll Area Redirect Flood Control Access to Follow Along Bottom of Hill See Park Inside North Park Area in Irvine Relocate Historic Villa Park Schoolhouse and Barnyard House JOBS\600\615-05\Worlcbook Summary.doc 4 84 KNOLL Numerous city documents deal with this unique landform in the park. The Conservation, Open Space, and Recreation (CO8R) Element ofthe General Plan states "Maintain the natural profile and landform character of the 'knoll' park site in East Tustin". Development policies related to this knoll are included in East Tustin Specific Plan to minimize landform alterations to retain scenic resources such as the knoll. You are standing at the highest point on the site, approximately 74' above the outfall of Peters Canyon Wash. Look at the views to the north, south, east (hills) and west (golf course). . Are there any significant view opportunities from this location? . 6 6 6 5 5 4 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Beach/Ocean Do Not Block Views Add Picnic Tables Add Benches Hiking Trail Up Top Observation Deck North Add Gazebo South Catalina Quiet Place to Sit & Relax City Lights Entire Tustin Ranch Marine Base Should be Focal Point Educational Opportunity Point Out Landmarks Add Telescope View for Burglars to Adjacent Homes No Benches Needs Shade Needs Better Access Needs Handicap Access No Cars Allowed Sketch your idea afthe best view and/or describe it. (sketches are on the following pages) JOBS\úOO\61S-0S\Workbook Summary. doc S5 TUSTIN RANCH GOLF COURSE As you walk through the grove to S5, the open space to your right is the Tustin Ranch Golf Course. The small building at the bottom of the slope is a restroom, Please watch-out for errant golf balls. . What issues or concerns might be associated with the golf course? . 3 3 2 2 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 Safety Maintain View Need Screen Trail Opportunities Leave All the Trees Adds to Beauty Should Tie Into Park Access to Park for Golfers Erosion Vandalism Coyotes What potential uses could you envision for the sloped area above the golf course? Sitting/Relaxing Area Picnic Area Natural Trial Nature Area Stream (with waterfall) Arboretum/Garden Add More Fruit Trees Erosion Control Bike Trail Concert Amphitheatre Enclosed Dog Park Add More Eucalyptus Trees Get Rid of Some Lemon Trees and Add Better Vegetation Buffer Between Park and Golf Course Tot Lot JOBS\600\615-05\Workbook Surnmary,doc 6 Please be silent, close your eyes for a few moments and listen. . What do you hear? S5 6 4 2 2 1 1 1 I Slight/Muffled Traffic Birds Talking Children Playing Children Crying Laughter Golfers Peace CITRUS GROVE As you walk through the grove, notice the character ofthe existing landscape. . What recreational/educational/interpretive opportunities does the citrus grove provide? - 15 . . .Intcrprctivc/Edllcational Signs (limning hist()ry. citrus grovcs, agricllltural)_- '.' '." p. .. " ;í.~..,...5 ' ."ÐW~.&ìì!¡;¡~1~ifí~lj1¡'~if¡:111J¡~3íf¡':7.-...-!~¡,..f~..~.,t'!".',:':':-",)~'"!¡',-;,II_'_.~'i'I,... "'-";:'",',~î.t.:,'~".t!-..~-,.¡¡¡...t-- 4 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 Beautiful View Guided Educational Tours Trail Through Lemon Groves Science Field Trips Smells Great Benches (rock benches) ContemplationlMeditation Spot Outdoor Amphitheatre Limited Public Picking Of Lemons Fruit Stand Needs Regular Maintenance (picking up of fruit) Public May Destroy Fruit Trees Trees Should Be Fenced Off For Protection No Recreation Garden with Bronze Structures No High Structures Bike Riding Rock Climbing JOBS\600\615-05\Workbook Summary.doc 86 RlDGELlNE You are now on the ridgeline in the southern portion of the site. Look around you to the north, south, east and west. Note the proximity of the residential development in each direction. 9 Residcntial Arcas , ,.. . What areas may be affected by jitture park development at this location? 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 Westmont/Columbla Housmg Development Houses OffPortola Increased Traffic/Noise Will Lower Property Values Community Demonstration Gardens Golf Course Security Issues Noisy Area Residential Area to the South Montecito Tract Apartments OffJamboree Ridgeline Lemon Groves If Parking on Jamboree & Portola Condos are Buffered with Lemon Trees More Trees to Protect Golf Course Area is Visible to Public Should be a Jogging Trail A terraced slope exists along both sides of the ridgeline. These upper areas were graded for the citrus grove. . What potential park uses could be accommodated on the hillside areas? 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 1 I 1 I 1 I I Outdoor Amphitheater Water Feature Jogging Trails Nature Trails Bike Trails Walking Trails Keep As Is Climbing Trails Small Playground Slides' Park Benches Meditation Area Dog Park Don't Let Tr-ees Block Views JOBS\600\615-05\Workbook Summary.doc 87 MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL To your right at the bottom of the knoll are two and three story multi-family residential units with two small play areas near the edge ofthe park site. . What issues/concerns might be associated with the adjacent multi-family development? 7 3 2 2 2 2 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 Lighting Increase in Traffic Litter Overflow Parking to Residential Areas Good Area for Parking Lot Access for Residents Good for Homes to Have Park Nearby Safety Kids Running Across Jamboree Would be Dangerous Children Need Play Area Park Setting Should be CalmlPeaceful Need Trees for Wind Breakers Make Land Part of Hiking Trail Dog Park The County regional trail for equestrian, hiking, and biking continues to the south along Jamboree Road. . What opportunities and/or constraints does this regional trail create for the park site? 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Trail Access from All Comers Allows Access to Nature "After Hours" Access Access to Street Contributes to Park Atmosphere Keep Area Small and Intimate Future Connection to Cedar Grove Park Youth Guided Tours from Park to Beach Playground Could be Located Next to Condo Playground Danger to Children PedestrianlBike Safety Less Parking Required Put Parking Near Rental Apartments JOBSI600161S-OSIWorkbook Summary,doc 9 S8 FLAT AREA A flat area is located at the southeast corner of the park site near the intersection of Jamboree Road and Portola Parkway. 7 Trame -.-_d n. . ..... ... -. .. .. 15 Parking Lot ... .. ... ... .... ... .. .... , .' ..,., I . ,.,,' . 4 4 3 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . What are your impressions of this area? Needs Trees to Insulate Noise Open Beautiful Grass Busy Corner Good Area for Adult Activities Picnic Area Good Open View Drainage Could Be a Problem Don't Want Kids Going Into Street Access for Pedestrians Good Area for Traditional Park Amenities Pool Area Sports Play Avoid Sports Fields Tot Lot Wildlife Area Nature Trails Peaceful Surroundings Don't BlockViews Big Low Windy Flat What are some potential uses in the flat area of the park? 6 4 4 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 Ballfield Restrooms Sports Outdoor Amphitheatre Dog Park Tennis Courts Basketball Entry Sign Horseshoes Pool JOBS\600\61 5-05\ Workbook Summary ,doc 10 . S9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 What are some potential uses in the flat area of the park (Continued)? Volleyball Roller Skating/Roller Hockey Skate Park Bocchiball Croquet Shuffleboard Open Play No Dog Park (smells bad for nearby homes) Lake Waterfall Don't Block Current Pathway Leave As Is SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION - PORTOLA P ARKW A Y AND JAMBOREE ROAD There are signalized intersections at the northeast and southeast corners of the park. . What opportunities or constraints might be associated with the signalized intersections? 4 4 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Busy/Loud Controlled Access to a Parking Lot Not a Good Area for Children Add Trees to Block Noise Remove Fencing to Allow Pedestrian Access Pedestrian Safety Auto Access to Portola I Don't Want to Wait a Long Time to Get to My House Controls Traffic Parking on North Side of Tustin Ranch Road Add Trees to Block Signal Lights Lights & Parking Here Would Affect Homes Put Noisy Activities Here Dog Park Could be Separate from the Rest of the Park Not a Good Entrance Area JOBS\600\615-0S\ Workbook Summary.doc 11 . What direction will most people come from when they visit the Park? S10 4 3 3 3 2 2 1 1 From Surrounding Homes From Allen North From All Directions Walking Only South East From Patriot PORTOLA PARKWAY I PRIMARY VEHICULAR ACCESS The median break at Portola Parkway provides access to the residential development to the east and a potential main vehicular access point to the park site. . What opportunities/constraints does the main park entry at this location create? I! 3 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , . , , ' Good Access Because of Central Location Logical Area for Entry No Traffic Problems Good Area for Parking Would Encourage People to Park in Residential Area Prefer No Access on Portola Would Need Another Signal Traffic Signal is Not Acceptable Left Turn from Park on Portola is Dangerous Left Turn Would be Easy, Not Much Traffic Accidents Safe Turns Have Parking at Portola & Jamboree Parking Should Be on South Side of Park Allen Street Access Blocked Direct Access to All Areas ofthe Park Easiest Vehicular Access Good Area for Pedestrian Access More Pedestrians Have to Add Retaining Wall Would Take Away Natural Feel HalfWay Between Site Causes Break in Path, Not Desirable Would Divide Park in Half Not Good Use of Space Don't Like It JOBS\600\615-05\Workbook Summary,doc 12 . What are some potential uses in this location? 9 Parking . 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Entry Monument Entry Drive Information Booth Concession Stand Restrooms Playground Picnic Area Walking or Bicycle Access Only Crosswalk "Well Hidden" Parking Lot Handicapped Parking Only Vehicular Access Need Open Access to Park Off of Allen No Parking on Tustin Ranch Road No Lighting (would affect houses) Leave Path AJ> Is Trail Up Knoll Could Start Here Jogging Trail You arrived by bus, what other modes of transportation might people use to get to the park? Sll 7 6 1 1 Roller Blades/Skate Horse Bus Stroller REGIONAL TRAIL You are walking along the county regional trail for equestrianfhikinglbiking. It connects the "Future" park to the Pioneer Middle School, Cedar Grove Park, Peters Canyon Elementary School, and Peters Canyon Regional Park to the north. The trail parallels the north/east and south boundaries of the park site along Portola Parkway and Jamboree Road. 10 Love It/Beautiful/Great/Wonderful . What are your impressions of the trail? 2 2 2 Good Horse TraIl Add Vegetation Rural Atmosphere JOBS\600\615-O5\Workbook Summary,doc 13 7 ... Needs Entry/Access Points into the Park.. . ... .. . ", , ,... . , ',...', ...,', \. " . . . . 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 What are your impressions of the trail (Continued)? CalmlSerene Scenic Used A Lot Easy HikinglJoggingIBiking Not Good for Skating Narrow Needs More EntryÆxit Points Should Connect to Park Distinguishes Tustin Ranch from Surrounding Community Creates a "Fenced" Park Need Trees for Shade Hot in the Summer Traffic from Portola Would Have a Negative Affect Should Mark Distance on Trail (for joggers, walkers, etc.) What suggestions would you have to improve the relationship of the trail to the park site? 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 TraIl Should Cut Through the Park Site Encourage Equestrian Use Add Lights Add Trees Remove Fence Paint Fence White Separate Lanes for Walking vs. Bike/Roller Blade/Jogging Widen Leave It Separate from the Park Overview: . A lot participants do not want parking and if required, minimal parking Most participants want a quiet, passive, natural park JOBS\600\615-05\Workbook Swnrnary.doc 14 r "WESTMONT" RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL TUSTIN RANCH GOLF COURSE FUTURE P ARK SITE CITY OF TUSTIN r:JR,JM DESIGN GROUP, INC- - ~1it,,~:~~;;'1.f~r;:~" r:. r1.J1J- <;r ""r g~~¥':~~'¥~?'~:d]j~. ,.' "-\:, RESf9ENTIAL i, 1 " '. ': " L I,! ': co~ FJAN. FUTURE P ARK SITE CITY OF TUSTIN r..'1 I"¡ r"", "" ; Iooi ... ~HJM I>ESIGi\ GROU'. lAC. ~,;r.!\"~"~!"':1'rf .'.1i'~'::'J" "COLUMBIA" RESIDENTIAL ^-. ~~ 4j ^oJ ^oJ ... "WESTMONT" RESIDENTIAL ill .1: r --- "COLUMBIA" RESIDENTIAL RESIDE::"iTlAL 6Fa.P 2- FUTURE PARK SITE CITY OF TUSTIN r=lHm IJI;S)C;;': GW)l'I', I:\L ;~,-'t'q!~',i':è~l,5 ê\";!::c?'~ í --- f...' ¡ .::t ... "WESTMONT" RESIDENTIAL eFaJP 3 FUTURE PARK SITE CITY OF TUSTIN "COLUMBIA" RESIDENTIAL "WESTMONT" RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL ~ [W! nESW:>; C;HOCf'. 1:>;(", ""2J;t ,." "'.:."'i":!f 'W'~')~ . r --- - - RESIDENTIAL 6FalP 4- FUTURE P ARK SITE CITY OF TUSTIN rJ1f1HI IJESIGi'i GHOt:!. INC. ,~I:\:i'<,~"~;:~:"¡[.'I:~"'~:" í --- {o.,' ..;.~ 'oJ' '"-J '"-J " "WESTMONT" RESIDENTIAL ¡ I "COLUMBIA" RESIDENTIAL t " I!~ I/~ f IJ::: /J V i:t::/f '~;.'! l~l1 I' ;.- r , s-v/ . f... "I ,1 "" 1.'1 I! ;;;//.," li{o.;.,! ,/I---.j/ ':. ---- "WESTMONT" RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL r=llml DES(;~ (;1«)\'1', 1\[, -- ,"".'.'.:'" .o"'::'::"')""" :~1'T,"', r --- ... - ," !;\ ~!:i ::íO:i¡ '! ;:0;1", :' ~ i:: !, ¡; Hi Ij. If 11 :1 'I :i; -JLJ æctJF~ FUTURE PARK SITE CITY OF TUSTIN "WESTII10NT" RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL TUSTIN RANCH GOLF COURSE r=ll{J~1 DE~H;i\: GIW!'P. I~C. ~~:~,9;'è~!,~,"m \'J'~"'~~ r ---. - - FOURTH ST. FIRST ST. MAIN ST. McFADDEN AVENUE SR22 GARDEN GROVE FREEWAY EDINGER AVENUE ~., ,it '"3 v~'t A .fI. V #~ ð<IU """""'" h .þ "<1~ ~~ß1 LEGEND: ~fREEW A Y/INIERCHANOE <)( ):PROPOS£D TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR <}= MAJORARTI!IUAL ~t::t PRIMARY ARTE.RIAL ~ £XJSTINOIPROPOSED SCHOOLS 0 £X1STINGCOMMUNITYFACIUI'Y IÆ ~~':.T:.O:~CPARK'" 0 PRIVATEIœCRl!ATION @@@ REGIONALMULTI.USETRAIL 000 MASTI!llPLANBoœwAYROUTES ::ci:"-" ¡;¡¡:¡:¡:¡.:;;;;",~-;::';:;::::':"~,. .- -. M __M_-'~- -- -.------- -,_._-~-~, -~._~ ""..",- ........ w -,~~.~ ""'" ,"'., """""""".............""'" , ..................""""_..",. ~"--""- ~-~._---, ~~--,~ :::.-==...--:::::~ ,.....- ,-- -. u _._-~._'u- m- :=""..:::r"....::::::::::::::'" ----......- .= =. u -......-.- ,- -.. u -~._-~- --,~--- ~----- .-- -.-..... U ===£~-== ~~--... -~.- 'æ~ ::~ u =-~~ ~""'uu --. __,_n .....-.- :""':' '"::::1""'" =. ...moo- __A .- -." :".:-...:::::\:=""" u =.'::..~===- ~ =====-- ==::-.~.- -~. ~~,- '-- .... -.- COMMUNITY CONTEXT FUTURE PARK SITE CITY OF TUSTIN L1i.-Ji l' r=lR - ""..~, """'.... u --.,,"'~~""'u.... .- :::~_n' ~~~~:::.-::.....- "æ-':=-""" U -- EXHIBIT B ==":ILillc\:I\\'l'll'o'll.lllc Enginelring. SuMyIng. Plannò1' la'Ido:apo - August 10, 2005 Mr. PatrIck Sanchez Director of Parks and Recreation Services City ofTustin 300 Centennial Way Tustin, CA 92780 Re: Professional Construction Management and Inspection Services for the City of Tustin's Citrus Ranch Park Capital Improvement Project. Mr. Sanchez: Hall & Foreman, Inc. (HFI) appreciated the opportunity to meet with you personally on January 10, 2005 and on August 8, 2005, to discuss the City's Citrus Ranch Capital Improvement Project. In response to those meetings and to your RFP dated January 11, 2005, HFI is submitting this proposal to provide professional Construction Management Services for the new Citrus Ranch Project. Having already provided construction management services for the City of Tustin's Pioneer Road Park Capital Improvement Project, HFI understands and is fully knowledgable of the City of Tustin's staffing, policies, and procedures and is ready to proceed on this exciting project on the City's behalf. It is HFI's understanding that the City is in the process of developing the Citrus Ranch Park project site, a 17-acre neighborhood park, as defined in the Conservation/Open Space/ Recreation Element located at the corner of Portola Parkway and Jamboree Road. Currently a citrus grove resides at the site and 90% of that grove will remain. It is anticipated that the construction costs will be approximately $4,300,000.00. RJM Design Group, Inc. prepared the Future Park Site Master Plan and will deliver the design plans at 90% complete to the City. HFI's roe will include: constructability review, construction management and inspection, and contract administration. The construction schedule will be approximately 145 calendar days. Construction at the park will Include, but not be limited to, a traffic signal at Allen Street Intersection with Portola Parkway, site grading, domestic and reclaimed water, sewer, electrical service, storm drainage, picnic facilities, shade structures, fencing, children's playground areas, a rest room, a basketball court, a parking lot, park entry sign, landscaping, and site lighting. It is HFI's understanding that the sidewalks at the grove site will not be constructed at this stage. HFI's provides the City of Tustin with the benefit of a project team that has over 50 years of Construction Management and Inspection Service Experience. The assigned team will consist of: Robbie Mahmood,P.E. - Project Manager Mr. Mahmood has over 20 years of public works engineering/construction management experience. He will be responsible for the day-to-day activities and scheduling and is the daily point of contact on this project. Pavel Horn, P.E. - Constructabllity Review Mr. Horn is a Project Engineer who currently provides on-call plan checking services to the City and knows the City's standards. Mr. Hom will provide the constructability review as he did for the City's Pioneer Road Park project. Les Brooks, P.E., P.LS., - Construction Management/Inspection Mr. Brooks will provide on-site project inspection. Mr. Brooks was the inspector on the Pioneer Road Park project and knows City staff and understands the City's policies and procedures. He will report directly to Mr. Mahmood on the day-to-day progress and serve in the community's best interest while out at the project site. S,\OS256\Adm;o\Co"""ct5\C"",,, """ CIP project 081ooS."'" ==:":ll.tlIL\/IIIC'lII,IILIIIC EnginooriIg. SurY8ing . ~ . L8'Idocapo -.. It has been HFI's pleasure to serve the Oty of Tustin by providing services on the Pioneer Road Park project, the City's acquisition of the former USMC Tustin Air Station property, on-call plan checking, and in the design of the Village of Hope, as well as on-call projects for the City's Engineering Department. The firm looks forward to continuing this working relationship with the Oty on the Citrus Ranch Park Project. Attached please find a scope of services and fee schedule, which HFI has provided for your consideration. The estimated fees shown in the attached pages are based on a construction schedule of 145 calendar days. Should you have any Questions please feel free to contact Robbie Mahmood at (714) 665-4506. Sincerely, Hall. Foreman, Inc. ð~?~ Alan Palermo, P.E. President-South Coast Division/Principal di ~ e--S¿ , Aobble Mahmood, P.E. Project Director/Associate S:\OS256\Ad",O\Co"""cts\Qtru, PO" qp - 08100S.doc ==""1-111,'-: 1 ,lll'lll,lll.llll EI1gÌM8Í1. SuMyIng. PIønning . L8"d8capo - SCOPE OF WORK TASKS HFI's Project Manager will be responsible for coordinating the efforts throughout the project and will be the focal point in all meetings and contacts with the City of Tustin. HFI's work plan for Construction Management Services is detailed as follows: TASK 1: Design and Constructability Reviews 1.1 Reviews - HFI Will perform design and construetability reviews of the plans and specifications. Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (Green Book) and the City of Tustin's Standard Drawings will be used as guidelines for HFI's review. HFI anticipates one initial preliminary review, one completed detailed review of the Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E), and a follow-up review to verify the corrections by the designer. At the conclusion of each review phase, HFI's reviewers will be available to meet and confer with the designer to discuss and verify proposed corrections or to clarify any review comments. 1.2 Cost Estimate Review. HFI will review the quantities and cost estimate for the project. The review will also include a check of the Bid Proposal Form for consistency and completeness. 1.3 Bid Document Review - HFI will review the PS&E bid package for conformance with standard public works bidding practices, the City's format, and the City's contract responsibilities. 1.4 Recommendation for AClœptanœ - At the completion of HFI's Design and Construetability Review Services, a written recommendation for acceptance will be provided to the City signifying that the Construction Bid Documents are ready for advertising and/or award for the Construction Contract. TASK 2: Pre-Construction Services 2.1 Pre-Bid Services - HFI will assist the City, as requested during the Pre-Bid Phase. Assistance may include attending the Pre-Bid Meetings, preparation of addenda, answering bidder's questions, providing analysis of bid results, and furnishing a recommendation on the award of the construction contract. 2.2 Pre-Construction Conference - HFI will hold a pre-construction meeting. Pre-Construction Services will include; inviting affected utility companies and the Designer of Record to the meeting, reviewing the Contractor's Construction Schedule, and preparing the Pre-Construction meeting agenda and meeting minutes. During the Pre-Construction Meeting, the project's scope of work, utility coordination, project schedule, and neighborhood communication and community relations' efforts will be reviewed with the City's Contractors. TASK 3 - Construction Inspection 3.1 Inspection - HFI's inspection efforts will consist of providing on-site inspection. HFI has estimated four hours per day, five days per week for 104 working days (145 calendar days) for our Inspection Services during construction of the site improvements. During the Plant established period (assumed to be 90 calendar days), HFI has estimated a maximum of two site visits per week to monitor the Contractor's efforts to maintain the project's site improvements and landscaping in an acceptable manner. HFI has also assumed that a maximum of three Contractor meetings may be required during this period to coordinate project-related issues during the Landscape Maintenance Period. 3.2 Contractor Weekly Meetings - HFI's Inspector will meet with the Contractor at the beginning of each workweek and review proposed work plans. S,\O52S6\Admio\Conb'1lcts\CitNs "'" CIP "'"J'" O81oo5,doc II"': I Lilt C\: 1"le'I]],IIL Ille EngjrøIng. SuMying .1'I8IIIq . L81dIcapI- 3.3 Performance Reviews - HFI will review actual Contractor performance and discuss discrepandes with the Contractor as they occur. HA will ensure the Contractor maintains construction progress in conformance with the project schedule. 3.4 Construction COnformance - HA will inspect the construction improvements to ensure that the construction conforms to the design plans, Green Book standards, and Oty of Tustin Standard Drawings. 3.5 COmmunity Relations - HA will assist the Oty of Tustin to ensure that good relations are maintained with the adjacent residents and businesses in the surrounding neighborhood. HA will ensure construction notices are provided to property owners as applicable and provide prompt responses to all property owners concerns. 3.6 Workbooks - HFI will maintain bound field file workbooks during construction, which will include permits, quantities constructed, daily and weekly reports, change order documentation, corrective notices, and other documentation and photographs, as necessary. HFI will evaluate work in progress and provide status reports, as necessary, to the City of Tustin. 3.7 Change Orders - HFI will review, evaluate, and discuss with the City of Tustin and the Designer all requests for changes of work, including costs involved, and assist the Oty in preparing change orders. 3.8 On-Site Maintenance - HA's Inspector will maintain detailed records of workers, hours, equipment, and materials utilized under force account change orders. 3.9 Final Inspection - HFI will recommend and schedule, with the City of Tustin and any other applicable agencies, the final inspection. Also, HA will prepare, distribute, and inspect corrections on the final punch list for completion and acceptance of the project by the City. 3.10 SWPPP Inspections - HA will ensure that the Contractor complies with the Regional Water Quality Control Board regulations for construction activities for the project. 3.11 Final Inspection Report - HFI will provide a final inspection report to the Oty of Tustin stating that the installation services and improvements were completed in accordance with the plans and specifications, as applicable for the services provided by HFI. TASK 4 - COntract Administration 4.1 UtIlity Coordination - HA will provide coordination of utility agencies along with the Contractor for this project during construction. 4.2 Drawings of Record - HFI will coordinate with the Contractor, Field Inspectors, and Designer to ensure that as-built revisions are made to the original plans and the Drawings of Record are submitted to the City. 4.3 Labor Compliance - HA will review the contractor's certified payrolls, weekly certified payrolls list of contractor employees, and list of staff classifications on a monthly basis. 4.4 progress Payment Review - HFI will review the Contractor's progress payment submittal for payment quantities, contractual compliance, and submit a recommendation to the City for processing payment to the Contractor. S,\O52S6\Admio\Co_dS\atn5 Pa'" C!' "'"J'" O81oo5.doc 4 DI"':ll:tll,\:I"lc'III,I'LIIIc E~. SuMyIng. PI81ning. Landocape-' 4.5 Stop NotIces . HFI will consult with the City of Tustin regarding disposition of Stop Notices unless the Notice is required to protect the safety and welfare of the public and construction workers. 4.6 Contract Closeout - HFI will issue the final inspection and payment reports to the City at the completion of HFI's services. It is assumed that the City's Staff will coordinate the project's closeout process and final City acceptance of the work. S:\O5256\AdmioICo"""",\Crtrus Pwk CIP Project 08'00S,doc City of Tustin - Citrus Ranch Park Improvement Project FEE PROPOSAL 8/100005 Task Project Project Const. Project No. D..criDtion Mllnager Engin- Inspector Anistan! TOTAL HOURS TOTAL COSTS Hourtv Rate $145 $135 $105 $75 1.0 Desian 6 Constructllbilitv Reviews 1.1 Reviews 32 132 16 4 184 $ 24 440.00 1.2 Cost Estimate Review 4 16 2 22 S 2 890.00 1.3 Bid Document Review 8 12 20 $ 2 780.00 1.4 Recommendation for AcceD\ance 2 2 4 $ 440.00 Subtotlll Task No. 1 46 160 16 8 230 $ 30,550.00 2.0 Pre-Construction Services 2.1 Pre-Bid Services 8 2 2 12 S 1 580.00 2.2 Pre-Construction Conference 8 4 3 15 $ 1 805.00 Subtotal Task No.2 16 2 4 5 27 $ 3,385.00 3.0 Construction Mamt. 6 InsDection 3.1 Insoection 24 273 297 $ 32 145.00 3.2 Contractor Weeklv Meetinos 21 42 63 $ 7 455.00 3.3 Performance Reviews 21 21 42 $ 5 250.00 3.4 Construction Conformance 3 42 45 $ 4 845.00 3.5 Communitv Relations 13 13 $ 1 365.00 3.6 Workbooks 2 21 16 39 $ 3 695.00 3.7 Chance Orders 4 11 4 19 $ 2 035.00 3,8 On-Stte Maintenance 7 7 $ 735.00 3.90 RnallnsnAction 4 13 17 $ 1 945.00 3.10 SWPPP Insoections 10 21 31 S 3 655.00 3.11 Rnallnsoection Reoort 2 4 4 10 $ 1 010.00 Subtotal Task No.3 91 0 468 24 583 $ 64,135.00 4.0 Contract Administration 4.1 UtilitY Coordination 1 8 4 13 $ 1 285.00 4.2 Drawinos of Record 4 4 $ 420.00 4.3 Labor ComDlIance 13 13 S 1 365.00 4.4 PrDDress Pavrnent Review 13 26 39 S 4615.00 4.5 Sloo Notices 1 4 1 6 $ 840.00 4.6 Contract Closeout 1 4 4 9 $ 865.00 Subtotlll Task No.4 16 0 59 9 84 $ 9,190.00 TOTAL $ 107,260.00 Direct Costs $2,500.00 TOTAL FEE $ 109,760.00 Our estimated fee is based upon the following project construction duration assumptions and may need to be adjusted based on the final project requirements. Construction Project Schedule: Plant Establishment: Total Construction Duration: 145 Calendar Days 90 Calendar Days 235 Calendar Days 104 Working Days 66 Working Days 170 Working Days = 21 weeks = 13 weeks 34 weeks Const. Inspection =(Average 4 hours per day x 130 working days = 520 hours)+ (Average 4 hours per week x 13 plant establishment weeks = 52 hours) for a total of 572 hours S:105256lAdminIContractsl081005 fee Update.xls