HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC RES 97-058 1 RESOLUTION NO. 97-58
2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN,
CALIFORNIA, RECERTIFYING FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
3 REPORT 85-2, AS MODIFIED BY ADDENDUM N0. 6 RELATED TO
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 96-003, ZONE CHANGE 96-003,
4 THIRD AMENDMENT OF THE TUSTIN DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 15380 AND DESIGN REVIEW 96-
5 050 AS REQUIRED BY THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
ACT.
6
The City Council of the ~ity of Tustin does hereby resolve as
7 follows:
8 I. The City Council finds and determines as follows:
9 A. That an application has been 'filed by the Irvine
Company, requesting approval of General-Plan
10 Amendment 96-003, Zone Change 96-003, Amendments
to the East Tustin Specific Plan, and Third
11 Amendment to the East Tustin Development
Agreement. In addition, an application has been
12 filed by Richmond American Homes requesting
approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 15380
13 and Design Review 96-50.
14 B. That an Initial Study was prepared during the
review process which determined that no
15 significant environmental impacts beyond that
previously considered would occur as a result of
16 the propo'sed project and that an addendum to
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) 85-2 would be
17 required for this project.
18 C. That Addendum No. 6 to EIR 85-2 was prepared in
compliance with Section 15164 of the California
19 Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
20 D. That pursuant to CEQA, EIR 85-2 has previously'
been prepared and certified and adequately
21 addresses the general environmental setting of the
project, significant environmental impacts, and
22 the alternatives and mitigation measures related
to each significant environmental effect and that
23 no additional environmental impacts or mitigation
measures were identified in Addendum No. 6 to EIR
24 85-2.
25 E. That Addendum No.6 to EIR 85-2 prepared for the
project addresses only minor technical changes or
26 additions and none of the conditions described in
Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines have
27 occurred.
28
Resolution No. 97-58
Page 2
1
2
3 tI. The Irvine Company shall pay City's defense costs
(including attorneys' fees) and indemnify and hold City
4 harmless from and against any claims, losses,
liabilities or damages assessed or awarded against City
5 by way of judgement, settlement or stipulation
(including awards for costs, attorneys' fees, and
6 expert witness fees), arising from actions filed
against the' City-challenging the City's approval of
7 Addendum No. 6 to EIR 85-2.
8 III. The East Tustin Specific Plan Final Environmental
Impact Report (85-2), previously certified on March 17,
9 1986, as modified by subsequently adopted supplements
and addenda, was considered prior to the City Council
10 approval of this project. The City Council hereby
finds: this project is within the scope of the East
11 Tustin Specific Plan previously approved, the effects
of this project, related to grading, drainage,
12 circulation, public services and utilities, were
examined in the Program EIR, particularly in the
13 traffic analysis contained in the technical Appendices
of said EIR, as modified by subsequently approved
14 supplements and addenda, and Addendum No. 6 to EIR 85-2
addressing the proposed amendments incorporated herein
15 by-reference° All feasible mitigation measures and
alternatives developed in the Program EIR, are
16 therefore determined to be adequate to serve as a
Program EIR for this project and satisfies all
17 requirements of the California Environmental Quality
Act.
18
Applicable mitigation measures identified in the Final
19 EIR have been incorporated into this project which
mitigates any potentially significant environmental
20 effects thereof. The mitigation measures are
identified as Conditions of Approval related to the
21 Third Amendmenn to the East Tustin Development
Agreement, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 15380 and
22 Design Review 96-050.
23 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Tustin, at
24 a regular meeting on the 21st day of July, 1997. ~yy~
25 THOMAS
26
27 ~ELA ~OKE~
CITY CLERK
28
Resolution No. 97-58
Page 3
1
2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
3 COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS
CITY 'OFTUSTIN )
4
5 CERTIFICATION FOR RESOLUTION NO. 97-58
6 PAMELA STOKER, City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk' of the City
Council of the City of Tustin, California, does hereby-certify
7 that the whole number of the members of the City Council of the
City of Tustin is five; that the above and foregoing Resolution
8 No. 97-58 was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin
City Council, held on the 21st day of July, 1997.
9
COUNCILMEMBER AYES: Thomas, Saltarelli, Doyle, Potts, Worley
10 COUNCILMEMBER NOES: None
COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAINED:None
11 COUNCILMEMBERABSENT: None
13 PA~4ELA STOKER ~ \' V
CITY CLERK
'14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28