HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC RES 86-3210
11
12
13
1.4
15
16
17
18
1.9
~0
21
23
25
27
2~
ii
.i
i,
ii
RESOLUTION NO. 86-32
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION, BY RESOLUTION
OF THE COUNCIL, SECTIONS 1.0 AND 2.0 OF THE EAST TUSTIN
SPECIFIC PLAN (SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 8).
TUSTIN
The Ci'ty Council of the city-of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows'
Ie
The City lCOUn¢tl finds and determines as follows'
Ae
That a joint application was filed by the city of Tustin, and
Monica Fl orian on behalf of the I rvine Company for the purposes
of adopting a comprehensive land use plan for the property
indicated in Exhibit A attached hereto, commonly known as East
Tusti n.
C ·
That a comprehensive land use study
property was commissioned and completed.
covering the subject
That as a
prepared i n
California
attached.
result of the land use study, a Specific Plan was
accordance with Sections 65450 through 65457 of the
Government Code. The plan is detailed in Exhibit B
De
That a public hearing before
Specific Plan was duly called,
the Ctty Counctl to consider the
nott ced and held.
That pursuant to the California Environmental .Quality Act Final
EIR 85-2 has been prepared, certified and considered which
adequately addresses the general environmental setting of the
proposed project, its significant environmental impacts, and the
alternatives and mitigation measures related to each significant
environmental effect for the proposed project. The City
Council, having final approval authority over this project has
reviewed and considered the information contained in Final EIR
85-2 prior to approval of this project.
Changes or alterations have been incorporated into the project
which mitigate or avoid certain of the significant environmental
effects thereof. Pursuant to Sections 15091 and 15092 of the
State CEQA Guidelines all significant environmental effects and
corresponding mitigation measures together with the requisite
findings and facts related thereto have been comprehensively set
forth in Attachment A to Resolution 86-28 which is incorporated
herein by this reference. Conditions have been adopted as part
of this project or will be incorporated at the appropriate level
That establishment and implementation of the plan as submitted,
of development review which incorporate all of the mitigation
measures identified in the EIR. The benefits of the project
have been balanced and considered against
unavoidable environmental risks and against
alternatives identified in the final environmental
and those benefits are found to be overriding, all
in Attachment A to Resolution 86-28, which is
herein by this reference.
its possible
the project
impact report
as set forth
incorporated
i.
10
]2
]3
16
]?
.]9
2O
21
22
23
2~
25
26
27
Resolution No..86-32
Page two
F®
Ge
He
,i ·
That establishment and implementation of the plan as submitted,
under the circumstances of this case, will not be detrimental to
the health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the
persons' residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed
use, evidenced by the fol lowing findings:
1. The proposed residential and commercial development is
consistent with the Tustin Area General Plan as adopted.
2. Reasonable alternatives to the plan and their implications
have been considered.
The .scope and depth of
the level of detail
speci fi city of land
authorizes.
plan analysts are commensurate with
contained tn the plan and the
use enti tl ement i ts adop ti on
The various components of the plan as well as
its entirety are sensitive to the environmental
policy limpacts of the proposed development.
the plan tn
and publ t c
·
Appropriate mitigation measures are incorporated in the
plan to ensure that concerns identified at this level of
planning are resolved as part of the more detailed site
plan review which must be completed before private
development may proceed.
Administration of the plan ts thoroughly
the city's development processing system.
Integrated tnto
All subjects required in a specific plan by the California
Government Code and applicable city ordinances are
appropriately and.adequately covered.
1
Adequate time and opportunities have been afforded
interested organizations and members of the public to
comment on or propose changes to the plan if they so
desired.
e
ge
That the establishment, maintenance, and operationI of the plan
as submitted will not be injurious or detrimental to the
property and improvements in the neighborhood of the subject
property, nor to the general welfare of the city of Tustin, and
should be approved.
That Sections 1.0 and 2.0 of the East Tustin Specific Plan as
prepared {Exhibit B) are intended to be informational in nature,
to provide conformance with specific plan regulations, yet also
establish policy guidelines by which the project area should be
developed. As such Sections 1.0 and 2.0 should be adopted by
Resolution Ofm . the City Council, subject to the recommended
changes encl ose~--'--as ...... ~..t_a.c~,mo,,t "A"
"~ ' ' *-'-'-'-'-'-'-'-'~-* ..t.*..~..::..: ........ ·
10
11
17
2O
Resolution No. 86-32
page three
I. That the Planning .Commission approved Resolution No. 2297,
recommending the adoption of Section 1.0 and 2.0 of the East
Tustin Specific Plan by resolution by the City Council.
..
II. The Ctty Counctl hereby adopts Sections 1.0 and 2'.0 of the East
Tustin Specific Plan as presented in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and
adopted as a policy document, subject to the changes enclosed as
Attached "A".
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular ~eting of the Tustin City Council, held on
the 17th day of March . , 1986.
Attest-.
MARY E.~YNN, ~I,~RK
FRANK GREINKE, MAYOR
.i
Attachment "A"
.
EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS
AS REQUESTED BY TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL
·
2~
3~
e
·
®
Be
Page 1-6, Second "bullet" under Seismic Safety. Change
retardant to fire resistant roofing, as defined by
Underwriter's Laboratory, Chicago, Illinois.
fi re
the
Page 2-16, Change "stucco or woodensiding" to read
earthtone stucco and/or w°odensiding."
"off-whi te or
Page 2-16, Letter B Change to read "Fire resistant roofing
materials must be used on structures occurring within the
Hillside District." "Class A minimum as rated by the
Underwriter' s Laboratory, Chi cago, I 11 i noi s."
Page 2-19, Add to second "bullet" whichI begins "Include only
..." "fire resistant plant materials, Where feasible."
Page 2-43, Add' to 'Letter C, "The Planning Commission should
prepare a plan stipulating and regulating the hours when sports
lights can be used."
·
That no sector plansj tentative tract maps, or building permits
be issued in the East Tustin Specific Plan area until a
Development Agreement for said area is considered and adopted .by
the city of Tustin.
That Racque~ Hill Drive shall be
for the East Tustin Specific Plan.
deleted from the Land Use Map
Council hereby authorizes staff to correct typographic errors
and clarifications in the Specific Plan text. Staff shall not
be authorized to alter any policy, regulation or use as a result
of these' corrections.
Add 2.14.4 A. ddtt.i, onal..Implementa..tio, n.Policies.and..Measures.
Potenti a 1 fi nanci ng mechanisms to fund major publ i c
infrastructure improvements in East Tustin were examined in the
Report entitled "Financing Concept for the East Tustin Specific
Plan Area", prepared by Anges Mc Donald & Associates and Stanley
R. Hoffman & Associates, dated May, 1985. That Report is
incorporated herein by this reference. Further studies will be
requi red to determi ne whi ch fi nanct ng mechanisms are
appropriate. The City is currently studying the feasibility of
o ·
-...Commurlityl DeveloPment Department
i.
.i
· ·
,i
ii i,
ii
i,
Resolution 86-32
Attachment "A"
Page two
establishing an assessment district in a portion of East Tustin
that would fund certain major public improvements, (circulation
and flood control) that must be in place before final approval
of initial development under the Specific Plan. It is intended
that the -fi nancial and construction of infrasl~ructure
improvements required by the Specific Plan will precede
development approvals.
Additions to Sector 8 policies, Section 2.14.3 of the East
Tustin Specific Plan.
E®
The distance between the edge of the western right-of-way
of the "Future Road" and the closest point of the
foundation of the closest residence of Pavillion/Saltair
shall be a minimum of 1,000 feet plus or minus 100 feet
measured on a horizontal plane. The noise impacts of the
Future Road on the existing residences to the west of the
SpeCific Plan area shall be further mitigated by a
continuous noise barrier consisting of a combination of
berm, soundwall, and residences adjacent to the Future
Road. This requirement for a continuous nois'e barrier
applies along the western side of the Future Road adjacent
to the medium density residential development in Sector 8
and the low density development in between. The noise
barrier in this area shall be high enough to prevent a
direct line-of-sight from the residences along-Saltalr and
Pavillion to vehicles traveling along the Future Road
behind such noise barrier. In addition, in designing and
orienting the residences in the two medium-density
residential areas in Sector 8 and the low-density
development in between, the developer shall, to the maximum
extent feasible and consistent with other sound planning
practices, construct multi-story structures which further
mitigate the noise impacts of the Future Road on the
existing residences to the west of the Specific Plan. A
design goal impact of 55 or less CNEL for the existing
residences at the foundation is hereby established. At
such time that further noise analysis is done in this area
(at the Tentative Tract stage), this analysis will model
the projected CNEL level at these existing residences to
confirm that the noise of level of 55 CNEL will be met.
F®
·
Residential development that adjoins the existing homes of
the Speci'fic Plan boundary and includes the first row of
residential lots will be limited to a single story
structure with a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet.
In all remaining areas of Sector 8, the regulations and
standards of the low density and medium density designation
will apply.
i.
· i.
.i
..
i.i.
.i
..
.i
..
Resolution 86-32
Attachment "A"
Page three
11.
The use of cluster development
3.6.C of the Spectftc Plan wt
denstty designation tn sector
..
as descrlbed tn Section
not be permitted for
Within the low density designation, the maximum allowable
dwelling units per gross acre has been defined as 5.0.
Within Sector 8, this standard will be limited to 4.0
dwelling units per gross acre maxium, in lieu of the 5.0
standard. Additionally, no units may be transferred into
Sector 8 for low density, which is shown in Table 2.4 and
the East Tustin Statistical Analysis in Section 3.0 as 349
units. There is no limitation on transferring dwelling
units out of Sector 8 into another sector, in accordance
with Specific Plan requirements.
Letter G of Sector 8 and letter D of Sector 9 policies.
It is the explicit intent of the East Tusttn Plan that La
Colina Road in the Specific Plan area connect to the
existing La Colina Road and to the major arterial known as
"Future Road." It is anticipated that this road will not
exceed a four lane residential street, and should be
incrementally improved, beginning wi th a two lane road.
The roadway should not exceed a total right-of-way of 80
feet, and the first two lanes should be built at the edge
of the right-of-way, with a raised landscaped median making
up the rest of the potential right-of-way.
The precise alignment of La Colina Road will be determined
at the Tentative Tract stage. The City and County will
prepare a joint study, examining the impacts and mitigation
measures of the connection, and recommending specific
measures to deter through traffic.
The Ctty Counctl hereby authorizes staff
Tusttn Specific Plan in the following areas'
to amend the East
A®
Sector 8, as shown in section 2.14.3, beginning on page
2.39, will be modified to include radium density dwelling
units within the Sector as shown on the land use map.
Be
The East Tusttn land use map will
medtum denstty In Sector 8, which
acres adjacent to "Future Road,"
Exhi bi t "C."
be modified to include
includes aproximately 26
as shown in enclosed
i,
' i'
Resolution 86-32
Attachment "A"
Page four
C. Table 2.4 shall be ~dtfied to include twenty-six (26)
acres .of ~dium density in Sector 8, with a total allowable
unit count of 233 units. The ~dium density residential in
Sector 7 shall be equally reduced to the acreage and unit
count added to Sector 8.
iI ·
, .
:..'.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE
CITY OF TUSTIN
)
)§
)
MARY E. WYNN, City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of
Tustin, California, does hereby certify that the whole number of the members of
the City Council of the City of Tustin is five; that the above and foregoing
Resolution No. 86-32 was duly and regularly introduced, passed and adopted at a
regular meeting of the City Council held on the 17.th day of March_...___~, 1986, by the
fol 1 owing vote'
AYES ·
NOES ·
ABSENT'
COUNCILPERSONS'
COUNCILPERSONS'
COUNC ILPERSONS'
Edgar, Greinke, Hoesterey, Saltarelli
Kennedy
None
MARY E. ~~N, ~it~ Clerk
City of tin California