Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01 THIRD PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE INPUT REGARDING THE TRANSITION TO DISTRICT ELECTIONS DocuSign Envelope ID:4C37161 C-A77C-4554-A494-D594877AF3F0 Agenda Item Reviewed: DS AGENDA REPORT City Manager Finance Director N/A MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 9, 2021 TO: MATTHEW S. WEST, CITY MANAGER FROM: DAVID E. KENDIG, CITY ATTORNEY SUBJECT: THIRD PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE INPUT FROM THE COMMUNITY REGARDING THE TRANSITION FROM AT-LARGE TO DISTRICT ELECTIONS, THE CONTENT OF DRAFT MAPS, AND THE PROPOSED SEQUENCE OF DISTRICT ELECTIONS. SUMMARY The City received a letter from the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF) asserting that the City's at-large election system violates the California Voting Rights Act (CVRA). MALDEF threatens litigation if the City declines to voluntarily convert to district-based elections. On August 3, 2021 the City Council adopted Resolution 21-64 declaring its intention to transition from at-large to district-based elections, and to complete the transition in time for the 2022 General Municipal Election. By voluntarily proceeding to transition to district-based elections, the City benefits from a "safe harbor" provision in the CVRA that maximizes community control and self-determination over the process of establishing districts and district boundaries. The district transition process required two public hearings be held prior to consideration of any draft maps. The first two public hearings occurred on September 7th and September 17th. Additionally, two community workshops occurred on August 31St and September 22nd. Two additional public hearings on the draft map(s) are required and scheduled for 10:00 a.m. on Saturday, October 9th and 7:00 p.m. on October 25th. During this third public hearing, the public is invited to provide input regarding the content of the draft maps of proposed district boundaries (as posted on DrawTustin.org on October 1, 2021) and the proposed sequence of district elections. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council take the following three actions: 1. Receive a report on the districting process and permissible criteria to be considered to create district boundaries; and 2. Conduct a public hearing to receive public input regarding the content of the draft district maps and the proposed sequence of district elections; and DocuSign Envelope ID:4C37161 C-A77C-4554-A494-D594877AF3F0 Agenda Report— Third Public Hearing to Receive Input from the Community Regarding the Transition from At-Large to District Elections October 9, 2021 Page 2 3. Following input received during the public hearing, provide direction to the demographer regarding potential draft maps and proposed election sequencing to be considered at the fourth public hearing scheduled for Monday, October 25, 2021 at 7:00 p.m. FISCAL IMPACT Significant staff time is required to transition to district-based elections and to administer the process including the need for the public hearings. Transitioning to district-based elections also involves the services of a demographer. Additionally, the City will be required to reimburse MALDEF for its documented costs, up to $30,000. However, such expenses would likely be significantly lower than the costs of litigating the threatened lawsuit if district-based elections are not approved. BACKGROUND The City currently utilizes an at-large election system where voters citywide select each of the five City Council Members. By contrast, a district-based election system is one in which a city is divided into separate districts, each with one council member who resides in the district and is chosen solely by the voters residing in that district.' MALDEF's Demand to Convert to District Elections. On June 23, 2020, the City received a letter from Tanya G. Pellegrini, an attorney representing the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF) in Sacramento, California. The letter asserts that the "lack of success of Latino candidates results from the inability of Latino voters to elect candidates of choice due to racially polarized voting among the electorate, and that continued use of at-large elections therefore violates" the CVRA. The letter demands that the City convert to district-based elections and threatens litigation if the City declines to voluntarily convert to district-based elections. The California Voting Rights Act Imposes Significant Costs of Litigating The CVRA, codified as Elections Code sections 14025 et seq., became law on January 1, 2003. The declared purpose of the CVRA is to prevent the disenfranchisement of protected classes, which are broadly defined to include members of a race, color, or language minority group. Any voter who resides in a city and is a member of a protected class may file a lawsuit for a violation of the CVRA. To succeed, the plaintiff must only ' It is permissible for a Mayor to be elected on a City-wide basis along with district-based elections for the remaining Council members. DocuSign Envelope ID:4C37161 C-A77C-4554-A494-D594877AF3F0 Agenda Report— Third Public Hearing to Receive Input from the Community Regarding the Transition from At-Large to District Elections October 9, 2021 Page 3 show that, as a result of an at-large election, "racially polarized voting" has occurred. "Racially polarized voting" means there is a difference between the choice of candidates preferred by voters in a protected class and candidates preferred by voters in the remainder of the voting population. If the plaintiff prevails in the litigation, the CVRA allows for the recovery of significant attorneys' fees and expert witness fees. On the other hand, even if the city that is sued prevails in the lawsuit, it cannot recover either attorneys' fees or costs. In addition, the CVRA provides that if a court finds that a violation of the CVRA has occurred, the court shall implement appropriate remedies, including the imposition of district-based elections, that are tailored to remedy the violation. The remedy can include the imposition of district maps for the City. The CVRA "Safe Harbor" On September 28, 2016, the Governor signed into law AB 350, which enacted Elections Code section 10010. That legislation established a "safe harbor" from CVRA litigation for cities. Once a city receives a demand letter, it has a period of protection from litigation to assess its situation, and then to proceed with the transition to district-based elections. In Tustin's case, the initial CVRA safe harbor period of protection ran until August 14, 2021. But because the City Council adopted the resolution of intention to transition to district-based elections on August 3, 2021, a CVRA lawsuit may not be filed for an additional 90-day period, or until November 1, 2021. And under AB 350, the City's liability would be capped at approximately $30,000 if it adopts an ordinance establishing district- based elections by November 1, 2021. It is important to note, when the City Council adopted Resolution No. 21-64 on August 3, 2021, it did so in part based on indications from MALDEF that an agreement to extend the deadline by an additional 90 days would change the November 1, 2021 deadline to January 30, 2022 to provide additional time to conduct public outreach, encourage public participation, and receive public input. Unexpectedly, MALDEF conditioned its willingness to extend the deadline upon terms that raised significant issues of compliance with State and Federal law. Despite having had numerous communications with MALDEF over the preceding months regarding the City's utilization of an extension agreement, MALDEF previously made no mention of the extension being subject to additional material demands. z Ordinarily the initial period of protection is a 45-day period from receipt of the demand letter. However, due to the Governor's COVID-related emergency orders,that period of protection was effectively extended to August 14, 2021. DocuSign Envelope ID:4C37161 C-A77C-4554-A494-D594877AF3F0 Agenda Report— Third Public Hearing to Receive Input from the Community Regarding the Transition from At-Large to District Elections October 9, 2021 Page 4 The City is committed to engaging in the districting process in compliance with all applicable laws and encourages MALDEF to drop its demanded conditions on the extension agreement, and to simply agree to extend the 90-day term so that the City, the public and MALDEF will have additional time to thoughtfully engage in public outreach and education, public participation, and public input during the districting process. Given the uncertainty of reaching an agreement with MALDEF to extend the safe harbor period for public outreach and input beyond the November 1, 2021 deadline, the City adopted a new Resolution of Intent on September 7, 2021 reaffirming the City's intent to implement all required steps so that the process can be successfully completed before the end of the safe harbor period. Setting District Boundaries Prior to adopting an ordinance establishing district-based elections, the City Council is required to establish district boundaries and to establish the sequence of future district elections. California Elections Code section 10010 sets forth the City Council public hearing process for establishing district boundaries and the sequencing of district elections. This process requires a series of noticed public hearings during which the public has a right to provide input on proposed district boundaries and election sequence. Specifically, the City was required to hold at least two "clean slate" hearings at which the public could provide input on district boundaries before any maps were prepared. Then, after proposed maps are prepared and posted online, the City must hold at least two more public hearings to consider public testimony about the draft maps and election sequencing before adopting a map and determining the final sequence of district elections. The map and sequencing would be approved by City ordinance. According to the CVRA, a "community of interest" is a "contiguous population that shares common social and economic interests that should be included within a single district for purposes of its effective and fair representation." These may include a neighborhood or group that would benefit from being in the same district because of shared interests, views, cultures, histories, languages, and values and whose boundaries can be identified on a map. Possible community features include, but are not limited to: • Shared interests in schools, housing, community safety, transit, health conditions, land use, environmental conditions, and/or other issues. • Common social and civic networks, including churches, mosques, temples, home- owner associations, and community centers, and shared use of community spaces, like parks and shopping centers. DocuSign Envelope ID:4C37161 C-A77C-4554-A494-D594877AF3F0 Agenda Report— Third Public Hearing to Receive Input from the Community Regarding the Transition from At-Large to District Elections October 9, 2021 Page 5 • Racial and ethnic compositions, cultural identities, and households that predominantly speak a language other than English. • Similar socio-economic status, including but not limited to income, home ownership, and education levels. • Shared political boundary lines from other jurisdictions, such as school districts, community college districts, and water districts. In creating the district boundaries, the City must ensure compliance with the following federal and state mandated criteria: Federal Laws: 1. Each council district shall contain a nearly equal population (based on total population of residents as determined by the most recent Federal decennial Census and adjusted by the State to reassign incarcerated persons to the last known place of residence); and 2. Each council district shall be drawn in a manner that complies with the Federal Voting Rights Act. No council district shall be drawn with race as the predominate factor in violation of the principles established by the United States Supreme Court in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), and its progeny. California Criteria for Cities (to the extent practicable and in the following order of priority): 1. Geographically contiguous (areas that meet only at the points of adjoining corners are not contiguous. 2. Undivided neighborhoods and "communities of interest" (Socio- economic geographic areas that should be kept together for purposes of its effective and fair representation). 3. Easily identifiable boundaries. 4. Compact (do not bypass one group of people to get to a more distant group of people). 5. Prohibited: "Shall not favor or discriminate against a political party." DocuSign Envelope ID:4C37161 C-A77C-4554-A494-D594877AF3F0 Agenda Report— Third Public Hearing to Receive Input from the Community Regarding the Transition from At-Large to District Elections October 9, 2021 Page 6 Other Traditional Districting Principles: 1. Respect voters' choices/continuity in office. 2. Future population growth. Number of Districts and Format of Mayor After receiving community input during the first public hearing held September 7, 2021, the City Council decided to establish that proposed district maps will involve four (4) council districts and an at-large Mayor.3 However, final determination of the number of districts and whether the Mayor would be at-large or appointed by the City Council from among its members must occur as part of the adoption of the Ordinance Transitioning to District-Based Elections at the conclusion of the process, as outlined in the following section. Adopting an Ordinance Transitioning to District-Based Elections Transitioning to district-based elections is effectuated by the City Council enacting an ordinance pursuant to Government Code section 34886, provided that the ordinance includes a declaration that it is being adopted to further the purposes of the CVRA. Under this method, the City Council would need to determine whether it wants to have a mayor elected at-large, with the remaining seats chosen through a district-based election process (with four, six, or eight voting districts). If the City Council chooses not to have a mayor elected at-large, it has the option of establishing five, seven, or nine voting districts.4 These decisions will be made by the City Council based on information from the public hearings, and other appropriate considerations at its future meetings. Community Engagement The City has developed and has been implementing a comprehensive community engagement plan intended to maximize awareness, education and participation through each step of the district formation process. The aggressive outreach effort was designed to reach the entire Tustin community about the potential shift to by-district elections. Please see Attachment 1 for further details. 3 An "at-large" Mayor would be elected by the voters on a City-wide basis, and candidates for that office could come from any of the four council districts. 4 Cal. Gov't Code § 34871. DocuSign Envelope ID:4C37161 C-A77C-4554-A494-D594877AF3F0 Agenda Report— Third Public Hearing to Receive Input from the Community Regarding the Transition from At-Large to District Elections October 9, 2021 Page 7 DISCUSSION Draft Maps — Posted on DrawTustin.org October 2, 2021 Draft maps 101 through 114 were posted on DrawTustin.org along with a demographic profile of each map and determination of whether or not a proposed map results in balanced populations among the districts (see Attachment 2). These draft maps take into account all public input received by the September 29th deadline. This set of maps includes the following: • 3 demographer submitted maps: (112, 113, 114) • 1 map submitted by MALDEF: (109) • 10 community submitted maps: (101 — 108, 110, 111). Maps 101-108 and 110- 111 are not legally viable for actual adoption because they do not comply with the Federal law population balance requirement. During this public hearing, the City Council may only consider this set of draft maps (labeled as 101-114). Proposed District Election Sequencing by Draft Map Each of the population balanced maps also identifies proposed election sequencing in accordance with the requirement that there must be two districts up for election in 2022 and three in 2024; the Mayor seat counts as a district for this purpose. To the extent possible, the demographer's proposed sequencing scenarios attempt to coincide with the end of incumbent council members' terms. The boxes in the table below which include two years listed with a question mark, are districts with multiple incumbent Council Members whose current terms end in either 2022 or 2024. Vacant seats and the at-large Mayor are listed without question marks. District Map 109 Map 112 Map 113 Map 114 1 2022 or 2024 2024 2024 2022 or 2024? 2 2024 2022 or 2024 2022 or 2024 2022 or 2024 3 2024 2024 2022 or 2024? 2024 4 2022 or 2024? 2022 or 2024? 2022 or 2024? 2022 or 2024? Mayor 2022 or 2024 2022 or 2024 2022 or 2024 2022 or 2024 DocuSign Envelope ID:4C37161 C-A77C-4554-A494-D594877AF3F0 Agenda Report— Third Public Hearing to Receive Input from the Community Regarding the Transition from At-Large to District Elections October 9, 2021 Page 8 Additionally, draft maps may be viewed in an interactive viewing tool available at DrawTustin.org which includes census blocks, demographic information, and much more. Next Steps The dates for the remaining public hearings are as follows: • Public Hearing # 3: Saturday, October 9, 2021: 10:00 a.m. • Public Hearing # 4: Monday, October 25: 7:00 p.m. • Public Hearing # 5: Monday, November 1: 7:00 p.m. Public Hearings # 3, # 4 and # 5 will be held in-person/open to the public, inside the City Council chambers, and the public will continue to be able to view and provide verbal comments virtually via Zoom. Meetings can also remain available for viewing live via the City's website. Please check DrawTustin.org to stay informed of any scheduling changes or other additional information. Attachment 1 — Community Engagement to Date Attachment 2 — Draft maps 101 through 114 along with a demographic profile of each map and submitter notes or proposed election sequencing if applicable DocuSign Envelope ID:4C37161 C-A77C-4554-A494-D594877AF3F0 ATTACHMENT 1 Community Engagement: Regarding the Proposed Transition from At-Large to District Elections The City developed a comprehensive community engagement plan intended to maximize awareness, education and participation through each step of the district formation process. The aggressive outreach effort was designed to reach the entire Tustin community about the potential shift to by-district elections. District Map Boundary Tools To help community members provide their input on how potential district boundaries are drawn, the City provided a map tool available for downloading and printing from DrawTustin.org. Community members can use the maps to identify "communities of interest" and suggest where district lines should potentially be drawn. Community members can submit their ideas and proposed district maps to drawtustin(a)-tustinca.org. Additionally, draft maps may be viewed in an interactive viewing tool available at DrawTustin.org which includes census blocks, demographic information, and much more. Implemented outreach and engagement efforts September 10— October 5, 2021. • Email distributed September 14 to 10,037 recipients regarding meeting materials from Public Workshop #1 being posted to DrawTustin.org. • Second Public Hearing held on September 17 to educate community members about the process and solicit input on the composition of districts. • Updates to the districting website's "Draw A Map" page to include the District Map Boundary Tool, available to download as a PDF or JPG in multiple languages. • Email distributed September 20 to 10,024 recipients regarding the September 22 Public Workshop. • Distribution of a press release announcing the September 22 Public Workshop. • Public Workshop#2 held on September 22 to educate community members about the potential shift to by-district elections, provided an introduction to the District Map Boundary Tool, and encouraged residents to submit draft maps. DocuSign Envelope ID:4C37161 C-A77C-4554-A494-D594877AF3F0 • Email distributed September 27 to 10,004 recipients reminding residents to draw and submit a proposed district map by the first draft maps due date of September 29. • Email distributed September 28 to 9,993 recipients regarding updated materials being posted to DrawTustin.org, including the meeting materials from the Second Public Hearing and the Second Public Workshop as well as the District Map Boundary Tool. • Six social media posts on Facebook (including content in English, Spanish, Chinese (traditional), Korean and Vietnamese), including two boosted posts. The posts publicized the Second Public Hearing, the Second Public Workshop, the opportunity to submit a map with the District Map Boundary Tool, and the Third Public Hearing, and had a combined reach of 43,127. • Likewise, social media posts on Twitter, which provided the same information as the Facebook posts (including content in 5 languages), netted 7,456 impressions • Proactive email contact with more than 50 community leaders and community- based organizations regarding the Second Public Hearing, the Second Public Workshop, the availability of the District Map Boundary Tool, and the Third Public Hearing. • 33,500 postcards with the Public Hearing dates of October 9, October 25 and November 1, were mailed to all businesses and residents in Tustin • Public Notice of the October 9 Public Hearing posted/published. • Items drafted and ready to share October 6-8 to further publicize the October 9 Public Hearing (including a press release, social media, outreach emails, etc.). Implemented outreach and engagement efforts September 2— 10, 2021. • First Public Hearing held on September 7 to educate community members about the process and solicit input on the composition of districts. • Proactive email contact with more than 50 community leaders and community- based organizations regarding the September 7 Public Hearing. • Distribution of a press release announcing the September 7 Public Hearing. • Two posts on Facebook regarding the September 7 Public Hearing (including paid ad boosting) that together reached 9,024 community members and gained 381 post engagements. • Social media posts on Twitter with 520 impressions DocuSign Envelope ID:4C37161 C-A77C-4554-A494-D594877AF3F0 • Updates to the City's dedicated districting website, www.DrawTustin.org to include resources from the August 31 Public Workshop. These resources include video recordings of the workshop in English and Spanish, Public Comments from the workshop, and the workshop slides in English, Spanish, Chinese (traditional), Korean and Vietnamese. • Updates to the City's dedicated districting website, www.DrawTustin.org to include resources from the September 7 Public Hearing. These resources include video recordings of the hearing in English and Spanish, Public Comments from the hearing, and the hearing slides in English, Spanish, Chinese (traditional), Korean and Vietnamese. • Public Notice of the September 17 Public Hearing posted/published. Implemented outreach and engagement efforts August 24 — September 1, 2021. • Rollout of a new dedicated website, www.DrawTustin.org, serving as a one-stop shop for information and tools regarding potential district formation. Extensive resources are available for the public to learn about the process, access all the materials and meeting information, and to share feedback. • A Public Workshop was held on August 31 to educate community members about the potential shift to by-district elections and to answer questions about the process. The information session, facilitated by Tripepi Smith and featuring the National Demographics Corporation, had more than 20 participants. • Three social media posts on Facebook (in English, Spanish, Chinese (traditional), Korean and Vietnamese), reaching a total of 1,746 individuals. • Two social media posts on Twitter with 892 impressions • Over 10,000 Emails sent regarding the first workshop • Post to NextDoor with 751 impressions • A button on the City website homepage that links to www.DrawTustin.org • Workshop info posted to city Calendar • A featured News Flash on the homepage • Proactive email and/or phone contact with more than 50 organizations to outreach to community leaders and community-based organizations. DocuSign Envelope ID:4C37161 C-A77C-4554-A494-D594877AF3F0 • Placement of 210 lawn signs across the City of Tustin publicizing the potential shift to by-district elections in English, Spanish, Chinese (traditional), Korean and Vietnamese. • Media outreach including the distribution of a press release announcing the public workshop held on August 31 and the launch of the new dedicated website, www.DrawTustin.org. Publication of the August 31st Workshop Notice and the September 7th Public Hearing Notice in the Orange County Register. • Creation of an email subscription list, which community members can sign up for to receive regular updates on the process at www.DrawTustin.org. DocuSign Envelope ID:4C37161 C-A77C-4554-A494-D594877AF3F0 City of Tustin - Redistricting 2021 J Map 101 , 55 ' Not population-balanced� ,W■■y'Pete�R�Rl�yon RegionalPk�" ,E 17th St'�� ■ J +tt ++ + + } -� + �+ - coma 2 I 11V mom z+ j ■ �<<I I��\ LL l y , I�, / Golf Coursfi—> + i + ill 41 Map layers Map 101 Railroad � Streets VPP- - Landmark Point Map prepared 9/30/2021 by National Demographics Landmark Area ©2021 CALIPER DocuSign Envelope ID:4C37161 C-A77C-4554-A494-D594877AF3F0 Map 101 District 1 2 3 4 Total 2020 2020 Census Adjusted 16,931 20,161 27,778 15,282 80,152 Deviation from ideal -3,107 123 7,740 -4,756 12,496 %Deviation -15.51% 0.61% 38.63% -23.73% 62.36% %His 40% 18% 70% 19% 41% 2020 Total Po %NH White 37% 40% 13% 33% 29% P %NH Black 2% 3% 3% 2% 2% %Asian-American 17% 37% 13% 43% 26% Total 11,555 13,614 13,810 9,415 48,393 %His 30% 14% 51% 18% 29% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 54% 49% 28% 42% 43% %NH Black 3% 2% 5% 2% 3% %Asian/Pac.Isl. 13% 34% 16% 36% 24% Total 9,775 12,063 9,873 8,966 40,677 %Latino est. 30% 13% 53% 17% 28% Voter Registration(Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 27% 12% 48% 16% 25% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 9% 23% 10% 25% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 58% 62% 34% 50% 52% %NH Black 3% 2% 5% 2% 3% Total 6,101 7,447 4,799 5,263 23,610 %Latino est. 23% 11% 45% 15% 22% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 22% 10% 41% 14% 20% 2018) %Asian-Surnamed 6% 19% 10% 20% 14% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 67% 68% 40% 57% 59% %NH Black 2% 2% 6% 2% 3% Total 8,422 10,694 7,584 7,886 34,586 %Latino est. 28% 12% 51% 16% 26% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 26% 11% 46% 15% 23% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 9% 22% 10% 24% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 60% 63% 35% 51% 53% %NH Black est. 3% 2% 6% 1 2% 3% ACS Pop.Est. Total 16,600 19,963 29,158 14,114 79,835 age0-19 23% 26% 32% 27% 28% Age age20-60 57% 57% 57% 56% 57% a e60 lus 20% 17% 11% 17% 15% Immigration immigrants 26% 29% 40% 34% 33% naturalized 51% 72% 37% 1 46% 48% enghsh 59% 59% 32% 49% 48% Language spoken at home spanish 29% 11% 54% 17% 31% asian-lang 9% 21% 8% 26% 15% other la 3% 9% 5% 8% 6% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less 14% 12% 26% 13% 18% than Very Well" Education(amo those hs-grad 42% 22% 45% 28% 35% age 25+) bachelor 26% 39% 19% 36% 29% aduatede ee 13% 27% 5% 21% 15% Child in Household child-underl8 31% 38% 45% 36% 38% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 71% 75% 72% 67% 72% income 0-25k 11% 6% 15% 11% 11% income 25-50k 16% 8% 21% 15% 15% Household Income income 50-75k 16% 15% 26% 8% 17% income 75-200k 46% 43% 35% 48% 42% income 200k-plus 11% 27% 3% 18% 14% single family 54% 61% 32% 78% 53% HousingStats multi-family 46% 39% 68% 22% 47% rented 47% 42% 74% 28% 51% owned 53% 58% 26% 72% 49% Total population data from the California adjustment to the 2020 Decennial Census.Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. DocuSign Envelope ID:4C37161 C-A77C-4554-A494-D594877AF3F0 City of Tustin - Redistricting 2021 J Map 102 , Not population-balanced ,�■■ ' - Pete��llfiyon Regi onalPk��" Ao, - Aii16 ,E +tt + +' + + + - L 4- + 2%GolfCoursfi iris / / l +` ,/� ■� I������ ` i� —LL -L- '\y L 1 i isfip \ Z y / v IFF !Y `J Map layers Map 102 Railroad � Streets VPP- - Landmark Point Map prepared 9/30/2021 by National Demographics Landmark Area ©2021 CALIPER DocuSign Envelope ID:4C37161 C-A77C-4554-A494-D594877AF3F0 Map 102 District 1 2 3 4 Total 2020 2020 Census Adjusted 23,327 16,537 24,953 15,335 80,152 Deviation from ideal 3,289 -3,501 4,915 -4,703 9,618 %Deviation 16.41°/% -17.47% 24.53% -23.47°/% 48.00% %His 62% 16% 50% 19% 41% 2020 Total Po %NH White 22% 42% 23% 33% 29% P %NH Black 2% 2% 3% 2% 2% %Asian-American 11% 38% 21% 43% 26% Total 12,740 11,664 14,540 9,450 48,393 %His 45% 14% 35% 18% 29% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 42% 50% 38% 42% 43% %NH Black 3% 2% 4% 2% 3% %Asian/Pac.Isl. 10% 33% 22% 36% 24% Total 9,765 9,963 11,912 9,037 40,677 %Latino est. 42% 12% 37% 17% 28% Voter Registration(Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 38% 11% 34% 16% 25% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 7% 22% 14% 25% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 49% 63% 46% 50% 52% %NH Black 3% 2% 4% 3% 3% Total 5,540 6,143 6,651 5,276 23,610 %Latino est. 32% 10% 30% 15% 22% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 29% 10% 28% 14% 20% 2018) %Asian-Surnamed 7% 18% 12% 20% 14% %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 59% 69% 53% 57% 59% %NH Black 3% 2% 4% 2% 3% Total 7,987 8,846 9,831 7,922 34,586 %Latino est. 38% 12% 35% 16% 26% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 35% 11% 32% 15% 23% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 8% 22% 14% 24% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 51% 64% 47% 51% 53% %NH Black est. 3% 2% 4% 1 2% 3% ACS Pop.Est. Total 24,179 17,300 24,188 14,167 79,835 age0-19 30% 26% 27% 27% 28% Age age20-60 55% 57% 59% 56% 57% a e60 lus 15% 17% 14% 17% 15% Inunigration immigrants 34% 28% 36% 34% 33% naturalized 34% 72% 49% 1 46% 48% enghsh 43% 60% 43% 49% 48% Language spoken at home spanish 49% 10% 38% 17% 31% asian-lang 6% 22% 13% 26% 15% other la 3% 9% 6% 8% 6% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less 22% 11% 21% 13% 18% than Very Well" Education(amo those hs-grad 43% 22% 42% 28% 35% age 25+) bachelor 18% 39% 27% 36% 29% aduatede ee 9% 27% 9% 21% 15% Child in Household child-underl8 40% 38% 38% 36% 38% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 71% 76% 72% 67% 72% income 0-25k 15% 7% 10% 11% 11% income 25-50k 21% 9% 16% 15% 15% Household Income income 50-75k 23% 15% 20% 8% 17% income 75-200k 35% 41% 47% 48% 42% income 200k-plus 7% 28% 7% 18% 14% single family 42% 59% 43% 78% 53% HousingStats multi-family 58% 41% 57% 22% 47% rented 62% 43% 60% 28% 51% owned 38% 57% 40% 72% 49% Total population data from the California adjustment to the 2020 Decennial Census.Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. DocuSign Envelope ID:4C37161 C-A77C-4554-A494-D594877AF3F0 City of Tustin - Redistricting 2021 Map 103 , 55 ' Not population-balanced� ,O■ yo Pete� n Re�ionalPk�" L ,E 1 Rt, �_ ■ +tt + + + + _ L 77 coma 4Go/2L; � f aursp + L 11 isfip / `� / I /✓ (o/ 4 � . Map layers Map 103 Railroad � Streets VPP- - Landmark Point Map prepared 9/30/2021 by National Demographics Landmark Area ©2021 CALIPER DocuSign Envelope ID:4C37161 C-A77C-4554-A494-D594877AF3F0 Map 103 District 1 2 3 4 Total 2020 2020 Census Adjusted 16,931 20,161 33,882 9,178 80,152 Deviation from ideal -3,107 123 13,844 -10,860 24,704 %Deviation -15.51°/% 0.61% 69.09°/% -54.20°/% 123.29% %Hisp 40% 18% 62% 13% 41% 2020 Total Po %NH White 37% 40% 18% 28% 29% P %NH Black 2% 3% 3% 2% 2% %Asian-American 17% 37% 15% 54% 26% Total 11,555 13,614 17,990 5,235 48,393 %His 30% 14% 44% 17% 29% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 54% 49% 35% 29% 43% %NH Black 3% 2% 4% 3% 3% %Asian/Pac.Isl. 13% 34% 17% 50% 24% Total 9,775 12,063 13,952 4,887 40,677 %Latino est. 30% 13% 44% 13% 28% Voter Registration(Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 27% 12% 40% 12% 25% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 9% 23% 11% 33% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 58% 62% 42% 41% 52% %NH Black 3% 2% 4% 3% 3% Total 6,101 7,447 7,564 2,498 23,610 %Latino est. 23% 11% 35% 11% 22% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 22% 10% 32% 11% 20% 2018) %Asian-Surnamed 6% 19% 11% 29% 14% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 67% 68% 50% 46% 59% %NH Black 2% 1 2% 4% 3% 3% Total 8,422 10,694 11,234 4,236 34,586 %Latino est. 28% 12% 41% 12% 26% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 26% 11% 37% 12% 23% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 9% 22% 12% 33% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 60% 63% 44% 42% 53% %NH Black est. 3% 2% 4% 1 3% 3% ACS Pop.Est. Total 16,600 19,963 35,067 8,205 79,835 age0-19 23% 26% 31% 29% 28% Age age20-60 57% 57% 56% 58% 57% a e60 lus 20% 17% 13% 13% 15% Immigration immigrants 26% 29% 37% 42% 33% naturalized 51% 72% 39% 37% 48% english 59% 59% 37% 41% 48% Language spoken at home spanish 29% 11% 48% 14% 31% asian-lang 9% 21% 9% 34% 15% other lap 3% 9% 5% 11% 6% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less 14% 12% 23% 13% 18% than Very Well" Education(amon those hs-grad 42% 22% 43% 22% 35% age 25+)g bachelor 26% 39% 21% 40% 29% graduatedegree 13% 27% 7% 25% 15% Child in Household child-underl8 31% 38% 43% 38% 38% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 71% 75% 71% 69% 72% income 0-25k 11% 6% 14% 12% 11% income 25-50k 16% 8% 20% 14% 15% Household Income income 50-75k 16% 15% 23% 6% 17% income 75-200k 46% 43% 38% 47% 42% income 200k-plus 11% 27% 5% 20% 14% single family 54% 61% 43% 66% 53% Housing Stats multi-family 46% 39% 57% 34% 47% rented 47% 42% 63% 34% 51% owned 53% 58% 37% 66% 49% Total population data from the California adjustment to the 2020 Decennial Census.Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH white and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. DocuSign Envelope ID:4C37161 C-A77C-4554-A494-D594877AF3F0 City of Tustin - Redistricting 2021 J Map 104 , (55 ' Not population-balanced Pete�,O■ yo / n Reg ion, al,P,k�" �7_■r - ]MEQ / �E 7th St'�� L +tt + L 77 W �_ �- i ��2 ` rr L; - , �_ �/� - - - r" � AGOC4urs�.. t' T f i` r +41 )� Y i r r Map layers Map 104 Railroad !\' Streets VPP- - Landmark Point Map prepared 9/30/2021 by National Demographics Landmark Area ©2021 CALIPER DocuSign Envelope ID:4C37161 C-A77C-4554-A494-D594877AF3F0 Map 104 District 1 2 3 4 Total 2020 2020 Census Adjusted 20,540 16,552 33,882 9,178 80,152 Deviation from ideal 502 -3,486 13,844 -10,860 24,704 %Deviation 2.51°/% -17.40% 69.09°/% -54.20°/% 123.29% %Hisp 37% 16% 62% 13% 41% 2020 Total Po %NH White 36% 42% 18% 28% 29% P %NH Black 3% 2% 3% 2% 2% %Asian-American 20% 38% 15% 54% 26% Total 13,500 11,669 17,990 5,235 48,393 %His 28% 14% 44% 17% 29% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 53% 50% 35% 29% 43% %NH Black 2% 2% 4% 3% 3% %Asian/Pac.Isl. 16% 33% 17% 50% 24% Total 11,871 9,967 13,952 4,887 40,677 %Latino est. 28% 12% 44% 13% 28% Voter Registration(Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 25% 11% 40% 12% 25% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 12% 22% 11% 33% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 58% 63% 42% 41% 52% %NH Black 2% 2% 4% 3% 3% Total 7,402 6,146 7,564 2,498 23,610 %Latino est. 22% 10% 35% 11% 22% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 20% 10% 32% 11% 20% 2018) %Asian-Surnamed 9% 18% 11% 29% 14% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 66% 69% 50% 46% 59% %NH Black 2% 1 2% 4% 3% 3% Total 10,266 8,850 11,234 4,236 34,586 %Latino est. 26% 12% 41% 12% 26% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 24% 11% 37% 12% 23% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 12% 22% 12% 33% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 59% 64% 44% 42% 53% %NH Black est. 2% 2% 4% 1 3% 3% ACS Pop.Est. Total 19,252 17,311 35,067 8,205 79,835 age0-19 24% 26% 31% 29% 28% Age age20-60 56% 57% 56% 58% 57% a e60 lus 20% 17% 13% 13% 15% Immigration immigrants 27% 28% 37% 42% 33% naturalized 55% 72% 39% 37% 48% english 58% 60% 37% 41% 48% Language spoken at home spanish 28% 10% 48% 14% 31% asian-lang 10% 22% 9% 34% 15% other lap 4% 9% 5% 11% 6% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less 15% 11% 23% 13% 18% than Very Well" Education(amon those hs-grad 39% 22% 43% 22% 35% age 25+)g bachelor 27% 39% 21% 40% 29% graduatedegree 14% 27% 7% 25% 15% Child in Household child-underl8 31% 38% 43% 38% 38% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 71% 76% 71% 69% 72% income 0-25k 10% 7% 14% 12% 11% income 25-50k 15% 9% 20% 14% 15% Household Income income 50-75k 15% 15% 23% 6% 17% income 75-200k 48% 41% 38% 47% 42% income 200k-plus 13% 28% 5% 20% 14% single family 56% 59% 43% 66% 53% Housing Stats multi-family 44% 41% 57% 34% 47% rented 45% 43% 63% 34% 51% owned 55% 57% 37% 66% 49% Total population data from the California adjustment to the 2020 Decennial Census.Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH white and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. DocuSign Envelope ID:4C37161 C-A77C-4554-A494-D594877AF3F0 City of Tustin - Redistricting 2021 Map 105 , 55 ' Not population-balanced ,,� ' Pette�fiyon Regional Pk��" --IL ■ ,E I7'h St'� — 4VE +tt +. + + } _LW - �iv_ ■ —,i � �l� ✓ % ■■ ��F,j _I IL' - 11 ,j y / \ Golf C4ursfi ✓. i 2 q, VIII L71aSf M6sR\ *+` i 441 . s� Map layers Map 105 Railroad � Streets VPP- - Landmark Point Map prepared 9/30/2021 by National Demographics Landmark Area ©2021 CALIPER DocuSign Envelope ID:4C37161 C-A77C-4554-A494-D594877AF3F0 Map 105 District 1 2 3 4 Total 2020 2020 Census Adjusted 13,273 23,819 33,882 9,178 80,152 Deviation from ideal -6,765 3,781 13,844 -10,860 24,704 %Deviation -33.76°/% 18.87% 69.09°/% -54.20°/% 123.29% %Hisp 39% 21% 62% 13% 41% 2020 Total Po %NH White 39% 39% 18% 28% 29% P %NH Black 2% 3% 3% 2% 2% %Asian-American 16% 35% 15% 54% 26% Total 9,199 15,969 17,990 5,235 48,393 %His 29% 17% 44% 17% 29% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 57% 48% 35% 29% 43% %NH Black 2% 2% 4% 3% 3% %Asian/Pac.Isl. 11% 32% 17% 50% 24% Total 7,685 14,153 13,952 4,887 40,677 %Latino est. 29% 16% 44% 13% 28% Voter Registration(Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 27% 15% 40% 12% 25% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 8% 21% 11% 33% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 61% 60% 42% 41% 52% %NH Black 2% 2% 4% 3% 3% Total 4,921 8,627 7,564 2,498 23,610 %Latino est. 23% 13% 35% 11% 22% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 21% 12% 32% 11% 20% 2018) %Asian-Surnamed 6% 17% 11% 29% 14% %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 69% 66% 50% 46% 59% %NH Black 1% 1 2% 4% 3% 3% Total 6,676 12,440 11,234 4,236 34,586 %Latino est. 28% 15% 41% 12% 26% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 25% 14% 37% 12% 23% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 8% 21% 12% 33% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 62% 61% 44% 42% 53% %NH Black est. 2% 2% 4% 1 3% 3% ACS Pop.Est. Total 13,112 23,451 35,067 8,205 79,835 age0-19 23% 26% 31% 29% 28% Age age20-60 55% 57% 56% 58% 57% a e60 lus 22% 17% 13% 13% 15% Immigration immigrants 25% 29% 37% 42% 33% naturalized 51% 69% 39% 37% 48% english 62% 58% 37% 41% 48% Language spoken at home spanish 28% 14% 48% 14% 31% asian-lang 8% 20% 9% 34% 15% other lap 2% 8% 5% 11% 6% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less 13% 14% 23% 13% 18% than Very Well" Education(amon those hs-grad 43% 24% 43% 22% 35% age 25+)g bachelor 24% 38% 21% 40% 29% graduatedegree 13% 24% 7% 25% 15% Child in Household child-underl8 31% 37% 43% 38% 38% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 71% 75% 71% 69% 72% income 0-25k 10% 8% 14% 12% 11% income 25-50k 15% 10% 20% 14% 15% Household Income income 50-75k 16% 15% 23% 6% 17% income 75-200k 47% 44% 38% 47% 42% income 200k-plus 13% 24% 5% 20% 14% single family 58% 57% 43% 66% 53% Housing Stats multi-family 42% 43% 57% 34% 47% rented 44% 44% 63% 34% 51% owned 56% 56% 37% 66% 49% Total population data from the California adjustment to the 2020 Decennial Census.Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH white and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. DocuSign Envelope ID:4C37161 C-A77C-4554-A494-D594877AF3F0 City of Tustin - Redistricting 2021 J Map 106 , 55 ' Not population-balanced ,�■■ ' PeRe�ionalPk�" r _ ]■■L /� �✓ ,E 7th St'�� ■ +tt + + _ / I LNY + s ✓ AGolfCourse L L9 7� / L 4 f j 41 Map layers Map 106 Railroad !\' Streets VPP- - Landmark Point Map prepared 9/30/2021 by National Demographics Landmark Area ©2021 CALIPER DocuSign Envelope ID:4C37161 C-A77C-4554-A494-D594877AF3F0 Map 106 District 1 2 3 4 Total 2020 2020 Census Adjusted 14,668 19,162 26,236 20,086 80,152 Deviation from ideal -5,370 -876 6,198 48 11,568 %Deviation -26.80°/% -4.37% 30.93°/% 0.24°/% 57.73% %Hisp 37% 16% 72% 27% 41% 2020 Total Po %NH White 40% 41% 12% 30% 29% P %NH Black 2% 2% 3% 2% 2% %Asian-American 18% 38% 12% 38% 26% Total 10,214 13,138 12,157 12,885 48,393 %His 26% 14% 56% 22% 29% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 57% 50% 26% 40% 43% %NH Black 3% 2% 6% 2% 3% %Asian/Pac.Isl. 13% 34% 11% 35% 24% Total 8,775 11,621 9,275 11,006 40,677 %Latino est. 27% 12% 56% 21% 28% Voter Registration(Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 25% 11% 51% 19% 25% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 9% 23% 8% 23% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 61% 62% 32% 49% 52% %NH Black 3% 2% 6% 3% 3% Total 5,552 7,229 4,513 6,316 23,610 %Latino est. 21% 10% 48% 18% 22% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 19% 9% 44% 17% 20% 2018) %Asian-Surnamed 7% 19% 9% 19% 14% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 69% 68% 38% 56% 59% %NH Black 2% 1% 6% 2% 3% Total 7,626 10,344 7,104 9,512 34,586 %Latino est. 25% 11% 54% 20% 26% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 23% 11% 49% 18% 23% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 9% 23% 9% 23% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 62% 63% 33% 51% 53% %NH Black est. 3% 2% 6% 1 3% 3% ACS Pop.Est. Total 14,446 19,232 26,980 19,177 79,835 age0-19 23% 26% 33% 25% 28% Age age20-60 56% 57% 56% 58% 57% a e60 lus 21% 17% 10% 17% 15% Immigration immigrants 25% 29% 39% 35% 33% naturalized 51% 72% 36% 46% 48% english 61% 59% 32% 48% 48% Language spoken at home spanish 26% 11% 58% 20% 31% asian-lang 9% 21% 6% 25% 15% other lap 3% 9% 5% 7% 6% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less 13% 12% 26% 14% 18% than Very Well" Education(amon those hs-grad 42% 22% 45% 32% 35% age 25+)g bachelor 26% 39% 17% 35% 29% graduatedegree 13% 27% 6% 16% 15% Child in Household child-underl8 31% 38% 46% 35% 38% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 71% 75% 72% 69% 72% income 0-25k 10% 7% 16% 9% 11% income 25-50k 15% 8% 21% 16% 15% Household Income income 50-75k 16% 15% 26% 10% 17% income 75-200k 47% 42% 35% 47% 42% income 200k-plus 12% 28% 1% 17% 14% single family 56% 61% 29% 71% 53% Housing Stats multi-family 44% 39% 71% 29% 47% rented 45% 42% 76% 34% 51% owned 55% 58% 24% 66% 49% Total population data from the California adjustment to the 2020 Decennial Census.Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH white and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. DocuSign Envelope ID:4C37161 C-A77C-4554-A494-D594877AF3F0 City of Tustin - Redistricting 2021 Map 107 , ss ' Not population-balanced� ,r■ hyo Pete��llfiyn Re�ionalPk�" ,E�th St'�� ■ ■ +tt + ++ + + - - L LW �lvd - _- X� rm _ ' Golf Coursn" , + t' Nr - 7 3 \ L11is 4 - yy, / ,yey �✓ T, Map layers Map 107 Railroad Streets VPP- - Landmark Point Map prepared 9/30/2021 by National Demographics Landmark Area ©2021 CALIPER DocuSign Envelope ID:4C37161 C-A77C-4554-A494-D594877AF3F0 Map 107 District 1 2 3 4 Total 2020 2020 Census Adjusted 11,448 20,161 35,453 13,090 80,152 Deviation from ideal -8,590 123 15,415 -6,948 24,005 %Deviation -42.87°/% 0.61% 76.93°/% -34.67°/% 119.80% %Hisp 35% 18% 65% 16% 41% 2020 Total Po %NH White 42% 40% 16% 33% 29% P %NH Black 2% 3% 3% 2% 2% %Asian-American 17% 37% 14% 47% 26% Total 8,290 13,614 18,370 8,120 48,393 %His 26% 14% 47% 16% 29% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 59% 49% 32% 40% 43% %NH Black 2% 2% 5% 3% 3% %Asian/Pac.Isl. 12% 34% 16% 39% 24% Total 7,222 12,063 13,642 7,750 40,677 %Latino est. 26% 13% 49% 14% 28% Voter Registration(Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 24% 12% 44% 13% 25% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 9% 23% 10% 28% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 62% 62% 38% 49% 52% %NH Black 2% 2% 5% 3% 3% Total 4,703 7,447 7,014 4,446 23,610 %Latino est. 20% 11% 41% 13% 22% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 19% 10% 37% 12% 20% 2018) %Asian-Surnamed 6% 19% 9% 22% 14% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 70% 68% 46% 56% 59% %NH Black 2% 1 2% 5% 3% 3% Total 6,332 10,694 10,771 6,789 34,586 %Latino est. 25% 12% 47% 14% 26% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 23% 11% 42% 13% 23% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 9% 22% 10% 27% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 64% 63% 40% 51% 53% %NH Black est. 2% 2% 5% 1 3% 3% ACS Pop.Est. Total 11,343 19,963 36,322 12,207 79,835 age0-19 22% 26% 31% 26% 28% Age age20-60 54% 57% 58% 56% 57% a e60 lus 24% 17% 11% 17% 15% Immigration immigrants 24% 29% 38% 36% 33% naturalized 54% 72% 39% 43% 48% english 66% 59% 35% 49% 48% Language spoken at home spanish 23% 11% 51% 15% 31% asian-lang 8% 21% 9% 28% 15% other lap 3% 9% 5% 8% 6% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less 12% 12% 24% 13% 18% than Very Well" Education(amon those hs-grad 41% 22% 44% 28% 35% age 25+)g bachelor 25% 39% 21% 36% 29% graduatedegree 14% 27% 6% 22% 15% Child in Household child-underl8 30% 38% 43% 35% 38% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 70% 75% 72% 68% 72% income 0-25k 10% 6% 15% 10% 11% income 25-50k 12% 8% 21% 15% 15% Household Income income 50-75k 16% 15% 23% 8% 17% income 75-200k 47% 43% 38% 48% 42% income 200k-plus 15% 27% 3% 20% 14% single family 66% 61% 35% 76% 53% Housing Stats multi-family 34% 39% 65% 24% 47% rented 35% 42% 71% 29% 51% owned 65% 58% 29% 71% 49% Total population data from the California adjustment to the 2020 Decennial Census.Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH white and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. DocuSign Envelope ID:4C37161 C-A77C-4554-A494-D594877AF3F0 City of Tustin - Redistricting 2021 _ Map 108 P5 5 ��, Peters Canyon Regional Pkv"j ,E 7th St�� 7�— " + �� +tt + +' 7 \ l N / tustin Ranch Golf Course III13 F4- 4, ' r Map layers Map 108 Railroad \ Streets Map prepared 9/30/2021 by National Demographics Landmark Point ©2021 CALIPER Landmark Area DocuSign Envelope ID:4C37161 C-A77C-4554-A494-D594877AF3F0 Map 108 District 5 1 2 3 4 Total 2020 2020 Census Adjusted 16,463 15,861 15,990 15,835 16,003 80,152 Deviation from ideal 433 -169 -40 -195 -27 628 %Deviation 2.70°/% -1.06°/% -0.25% -1.22°/% -0.17°/% 3.92°/% %Hisp 40% 39% 16% 72% 37% 41% 2020 Total Po %NH White 29% 38% 42% 12% 21% 29% P %NH Black 2% 2% 2% 3% 2% 2% %Asian-American 26% 17% 37% 11% 38% 26% Total 10,353 10,956 11,227 7,663 8,194 48,393 %His 29% 29% 14% 57% 24% 29% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 44% 55% 51% 24% 31% 43% %NH Black 2% 3% 2% 7% 3% 3% %Asian/Pac.Isl. 25% 12% 33% 12% 40% 24% Total 9,266 9,292 9,660 5,364 7,095 40,677 %Latino est. 28% 29% 12% 56% 25% 28% Voter Registration(Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 25% 27% 11% 51% 23% 25% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 17% 9% 22% 8% 27% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 53% 59% 63% 32% 38% 52% %NH Black 2% 3% 2% 6% 3% 1 3% Total 5,627 5,866 5,973 2,629 3,515 23,610 %Latino est. 22% 23% 10% 47% 21% 22% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 20% 21% 10% 43% 19% 20% 2018) %Asian-Surnamed 14% 6% 18% 8% 25% 14% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 61% 67% 69% 38% 44% 59% %NH Black 2% 2% 1 2% 7% 3% 1 3% Total 7,947 8,025 8,581 4,092 5,941 34,586 %Latino est. 26% 28% 12% 53% 23% 26% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 23% 25% 11% 48% 21% 23% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 17% 8% 22% 9% 27% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 55% 61% 64% 33% 40% 53% %NH Black est. 2% 3% 2% 1 7% 3% 3% ACS Pop.Est. Total 15,331 15,734 16,649 16,797 15,324 79,835 age0-19 24% 23% 27% 34% 31% 28% Age age20-60 57% 56% 57% 57% 57% 57% a e60 lus 19% 20% 17% 10% 12% 15% Immigration immigrants 31% 26% 28% 39% 42% 33% naturalized 61% 51% 1 73% 31% 37% 48% english 49% 60% 60% 30% 39% 48% Language spoken at home spanish 29% 29% 10% 60% 28% 31% asian-fang 15% 9% 21% 5% 25% 15% other lap 6% 3% 9% 4% 8% 6% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less 18% 14% 11% 29% 15% 18% than Very Well" Education(amon those hs-grad 39% 43% 22% 47% 26% 35% age 25+)g bachelor 27% 25% 40% 15% 36% 29% graduatedegree 13% 13% 27% 5% 16% 15% Child in Household child-underl8 35% 31% 38% 47% 40% 38% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 71% 71% 76% 72% 69% 72% income 0-25k 7% 11% 7% 15% 15% 11% income 25-50k 15% 15% 8% 28% 12% 15% Household Income income 50-75k 17% 16% 15% 24% 15% 17% income 75-200k 50% 46% 41% 33% 42% 42% income 200k-plus 12% 12% 28% 1% 16% 14% single family 68% 54% 59% 29% 53% 53% Housing Stats multi-family 32% 46% 41% 71% 47% 47% rented 35% 47% 44% 76% 54% 51% owned 65% 53% 56% 24% 46% 49% Total population data from the California adjustment to the 2020 Decennial Census.Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age, Immigration,and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. DocuSign Envelope ID:4C37161 C-A77C-4554-A494-D594877AF3F0 City of Tustin - Redistricting 2021 Map 109 Peter nyon Regional pk' i F 7th Sr'_�� —r +tt +. y + s� 47 l �F- � � l + j 6�`-ILL L �� - �� � + Tustin Ranch Golfourse��` +4 4r Suggested Sequence: 2022 - Areas 1 & 4 2024 - Areas 2 & 3 (and Mayor) r J� Map layers Map 109 Railroad Streets VPP_ - Landmark Point Map prepared 9/30/2021 by National Demographics Landmark Area ©2021 CALIPER DocuSign Envelope ID:4C37161 C-A77C-4554-A494-D594877AF3F0 Map 109 District 1 2 3 4 Total 2020 2020 Census Adjusted 20,408 19,979 20,161 19,604 80,152 Deviation from ideal 370 -59 123 -434 804 %Deviation 1.85°/% -0.29% 0.61% -2.17°/% 4.01% %His 73% 44% 18% 28% 41% 2020 Total Po %NH White 12% 34% 40% 29% 29% P %NH Black 3% 2% 3% 2% 2% %Asian-American 10% 18% 37% 39% 26% Total 9,462 13,586 13,614 11,732 48,393 %His 60% 30% 14% 20% 29% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 25% 50% 49% 42% 43% %NH Black 5% 4% 2% 3% 3% %Asian/Pac.Isl. 10% 15% 34% 35% 24% Total 6,701 11,151 12,063 10,762 40,677 %Latino est. 57% 32% 13% 22% 28% Voter Registration(Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 52% 29% 12% 20% 25% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 7% 10% 23% 24% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% %NH White est. 33% 55% 62% 48% 52% %NH Black 5% 4% 2% 2% 3% Total 3,234 6,790 7,447 6,139 23,610 %Latino est. 49% 25% 11% 18% 22% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 45% 23% 10% 17% 20% 2018) %Asian-Surnamed 7% 8% 19% 19% 14% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% %NH White est. 40% 64% 68% 55% 59% %NH Black 5% 4% 2% 2% 3% Total 5,113 9,492 10,694 9,287 34,586 %Latino est. 55% 30% 12% 20% 26% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 50% 27% 11% 19% 23% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 8% 10% 22% 23% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 34% 57% 63% 50% 53% %NH Black est. 5% 3% 2% 1 2% 3% ACS Pop.Est. Total 21,267 20,050 19,963 18,554 79,835 age0-19 33% 24% 26% 28% 28% Age age20-60 57% 57% 57% 56% 57% a e60 lus 10% 19% 17% 16% 15% Immigration immigrants 38% 30% 29% 36% 33% naturalized 33% 52% 72% 1 42% 48% enghsh 32% 54% 59% 47% 48% Language spoken at home spanish 59% 31% 11% 22% 31% asian-lang 5% 10% 21% 24% 15% other la 4% 5% 9% 7% 6% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less 27% 17% 12% 13% 18% than Very Well" Education(amo those hs-grad 46% 44% 22% 30% 35% age 25+) bachelor 16% 24% 39% 36% 29% aduatede ee 6% 11% 27% 17% 15% Child in Household child-underl8 45% 34% 38% 37% 38% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 72% 72% 75% 68% 72% income 0-25k 17% 9% 6% 12% 11% income 25-50k 24% 15% 8% 15% 15% Household Income income 50-75k 25% 19% 15% 12% 17% income 75-200k 33% 47% 43% 45% 42% income 200k-plus 1% 10% 27% 17% 14% single family 27% 54% 61% 68% 53% HousingStats multi-family 73% 46% 39% 32% 47% rented 77% 47% 42% 39% 51% owned 23% 53% 58% 61% 49% Total population data from the California adjustment to the 2020 Decennial Census.Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. DocuSign Envelope ID:4C37161 C-A77C-4554-A494-D594877AF3F0 City of Tustin - Redistricting 2021 Map 110 , (55 ' Not population-balanced ,�■■4' Peta■r ,yon Regi onal,P,k - M116 / L ,E 7th St'�_ ■ ,> +tt + coma LNY ■ + 2 ■ /+ z + + SII mom ALI All 41 r 4 '� Map layers P Ma 110 ` + Railroad Streets Landmark Point Map prepared 9/30/2021 by National Demographics ©2021 CALIPER Landmark Area DocuSign Envelope ID:4C37161 C-A77C-4554-A494-D594877AF3F0 Map 110 District 1 2 3 4 Total 2020 2020 Census Adjusted 16,931 20,161 30,538 12,522 80,152 Deviation from ideal -3,107 123 10,500 -7,516 18,016 %Deviation -15.51°/% 0.61% 52.40°/% -37.51°/% 89.91% %Hisp 40% 18% 65% 19% 41% 2020 Total Po %NH White 37% 40% 16% 30% 29% P %NH Black 2% 3% 3% 2% 2% %Asian-American 17% 37% 15% 46% 26% Total 11,555 13,614 15,860 7,365 48,393 %His 30% 14% 46% 19% 29% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 54% 49% 31% 38% 43% %NH Black 3% 2% 5% 3% 3% %Asian/Pac.Isl. 13% 34% 17% 39% 24% Total 9,775 12,063 11,839 7,000 40,677 %Latino est. 30% 13% 47% 17% 28% Voter Registration(Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 27% 12% 43% 16% 25% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 9% 23% 11% 27% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 58% 62% 39% 46% 52% %NH Black 3% 2% 5% 3% 3% Total 6,101 7,447 6,171 3,891 23,610 %Latino est. 23% 11% 38% 15% 22% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 22% 10% 35% 14% 20% 2018) %Asian-Surnamed 6% 19% 11% 22% 14% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 67% 68% 47% 53% 59% %NH Black 2% 1 2% 5% 3% 3% Total 8,422 10,694 9,367 6,103 34,586 %Latino est. 28% 12% 44% 16% 26% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 26% 11% 40% 15% 23% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 9% 22% 12% 27% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 60% 63% 41% 47% 53% %NH Black est. 3% 2% 5% 1 3% 3% ACS Pop.Est. Total 16,600 19,963 32,083 11,189 79,835 age0-19 23% 26% 31% 28% 28% Age age20-60 57% 57% 57% 56% 57% a e60 lus 20% 17% 12% 15% 15% Immigration immigrants 26% 29% 39% 36% 33% naturalized 51% 72% 38% 42% 48% english 59% 59% 35% 45% 48% Language spoken at home spanish 29% 11% 50% 17% 31% asian-lang 9% 21% 9% 28% 15% other lap 3% 9% 5% 9% 6% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less 14% 12% 24% 13% 18% than Very Well" Education(amon those hs-grad 42% 22% 44% 27% 35% age 25+)g bachelor 26% 39% 20% 37% 29% graduatedegree 13% 27% 7% 21% 15% Child in Household child-underl8 31% 38% 44% 37% 38% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 71% 75% 72% 67% 72% income 0-25k 11% 6% 14% 12% 11% income 25-50k 16% 8% 20% 15% 15% Household Income income 50-75k 16% 15% 25% 6% 17% income 75-200k 46% 43% 36% 48% 42% income 200k-plus 11% 27% 5% 17% 14% single family 54% 61% 38% 73% 53% Housing Stats multi-family 46% 39% 62% 27% 47% rented 47% 42% 68% 31% 51% owned 53% 58% 32% 69% 49% Total population data from the California adjustment to the 2020 Decennial Census.Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH white and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. DocuSign Envelope ID:4C37161 C-A77C-4554-A494-D594877AF3F0 City of Tustin - Redistricting 2021 Map 111 , 55 ' Not population-balanced ,�■■ ' Pete��llfiyon RegionalPk�" ,E 7th St'�� + i + + } L 77 L � - '• - - Imo ■ �/ �✓ \ Golf C4ursfil c 41 OF > \1`✓ j; 4jjL r �� + �✓ Map layers Map 111 Railroad Streets VPP- - Landmark Point Map prepared 9/30/2021 by National Demographics ©2021 CALIPER Landmark Area DocuSign Envelope ID:4C37161 C-A77C-4554-A494-D594877AF3F0 Map 111 District 1 2 3 4 Total 2020 2020 Census Adjusted 13,273 23,819 22,660 20,400 80,152 Deviation from ideal -6,765 3,781 2,622 362 10,546 %Deviation -33.76% 18.87% 13.09% 1.81% 52.63% %Hisp 39% 21% 72% 30% 41% 2020 Total Po %NH White 39% 39% 12% 29% 29% P %NH Black 2% 3% 3% 2% 2% %Asian-American 16% 35% 12% 37% 26% Total 9,199 15,969 10,622 12,603 48,393 %His 29% 17% 51% 26% 29% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 57% 48% 27% 38% 43% %NH Black 2% 2% 6% 3% 3% %Asian/Pac.Isl. 11% 32% 15% 32% 24% Total 7,685 14,153 7,572 11,267 40,677 %Latino est. 29% 16% 55% 23% 28% Voter Registration(Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 27% 15% 50% 21% 25% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 8% 21% 9% 22% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 61% 60% 32% 48% 52% %NH Black 2% 2% 6% 3% 3% Total 4,921 8,627 3,646 6,416 23,610 %Latino est. 23% 13% 46% 20% 22% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 21% 12% 42% 18% 20% 2018) %Asian-Surnamed 6% 17% 10% 18% 14% %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 69% 66% 39% 55% 59% %NH Black 1% 1 2% 6% 3% 3% Total 6,676 12,440 5,797 9,673 34,586 %Latino est. 28% 15% 52% 22% 26% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 25% 14% 48% 20% 23% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 8% 21% 10% 22% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 62% 61% 34% 49% 53% %NH Black est. 2% 2% 6% 1 3% 3% ACS Pop.Est. Total 13,112 23,451 23,916 19,356 79,835 age0-19 23% 26% 34% 27% 28% Age age20-60 55% 57% 56% 57% 57% a e60 lus 22% 17% 10% 16% 15% Immigration immigrants 25% 29% 40% 35% 33% naturalized 51% 69% 33% 49% 48% english 62% 58% 32% 45% 48% Language spoken at home spanish 28% 14% 56% 24% 31% asian-lang 8% 20% 7% 22% 15% other lap 2% 8% 4% 8% 6% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less 13% 14% 26% 16% 18% than Very Well" Education(amon those hs-grad 43% 24% 43% 35% 35% age 25+)g bachelor 24% 38% 19% 30% 29% graduatedegree 13% 24% 5% 17% 15% Child in Household child-underl8 31% 37% 46% 37% 38% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 71% 75% 71% 69% 72% income 0-25k 10% 8% 16% 10% 11% income 25-50k 15% 10% 22% 15% 15% Household Income income 50-75k 16% 15% 25% 13% 17% income 75-200k 47% 44% 33% 47% 42% income 200k-plus 13% 24% 3% 15% 14% single family 58% 57% 30% 68% 53% Housing Stats multi-family 42% 43% 70% 32% 47% rented 44% 44% 78% 35% 51% owned 56% 56% 22% 65% 49% Total population data from the California adjustment to the 2020 Decennial Census.Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH white and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. DocuSign Envelope ID:4C37161 C-A77C-4554-A494-D594877AF3F0 City of Tustin - Redistricting 2021 Map 112 Petah nyon Regiong1Pk'j �t■■r ,E I St'�� +tt + + �+ ✓ - z� + � 3 stin Ranch Golfoursel�` + i + L /!�/ ✓�,��� � � �. L 11 i�siqITY 7Y / / 4 Suggested Sequence: 2022 - Areas 2 & 4 2024 - Areas 1 & 3 and Mayor) r J� Map layers ++ ✓ ;,'!+� Map 112 Railroad Streets VPP- - Landmark Point Map prepared 9/30/2021 by National Demographics ©2021 CALIPER Landmark Area DocuSign Envelope ID:4C37161 C-A77C-4554-A494-D594877AF3F0 Map 112 District 1 2 3 4 Total 2020 2020 Census Adjusted 19,748 20,639 20,161 19,604 80,152 Deviation from ideal -290 601 123 -434 1,035 %Deviation -1.45% 3.00% 0.61% -2.17% 5.17% %Hisp 43% 73% 18% 28% 41% 2020 Total Po %NH White 34% 12% 40% 29% 29% P %NH Black 2% 3% 3% 2% 2% %Asian-American 17% 11% 37% 39% 26% Total 13,372 9,676 13,614 11,732 48,393 %His 31% 58% 14% 20% 29% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 50% 24% 49% 42% 43% %NH Black 3% 6% 2% 3% 3% %Asian/Pac.Isl. 15% 11% 34% 35% 24% Total 11,009 6,843 12,063 10,762 40,677 %Latino est. 31% 57% 13% 22% 28% Voter Registration(Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 29% 52% 12% 20% 25% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 9% 7% 23% 24% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% %NH White est. 56% 32% 62% 48% 52% %NH Black 3% 6% 2% 2% 3% Total 6,695 3,329 7,447 6,139 23,610 %Latino est. 24% 49% 11% 18% 22% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 23% 45% 10% 17% 20% 2018) %Asian-Surnamed 7% 7% 19% 19% 14% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% %NH White est. 65% 38% 68% 55% 59% %NH Black 3% 1 7% 2% 2% 3% Total 9,381 5,224 10,694 9,287 34,586 %Latino est. 29% 55% 12% 20% 26% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 27% 50% 11% 19% 23% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 9% 8% 22% 23% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 58% 33% 63% 50% 53% %NH Black est. 3% 6% 2% 1 2% 3% ACS Pop.Est. Total 19,646 21,671 19,963 18,554 79,835 age0-19 24% 33% 26% 28% 28% Age age20-60 57% 56% 57% 56% 57% a e60 lus 19% 10% 17% 16% 15% Immigration immigrants 29% 39% 29% 36% 33% naturalized 53% 33% 72% 42% 48% english 55% 32% 59% 47% 48% Language spoken at home spanish 31% 59% 11% 22% 31% asian-lang 10% 6% 21% 24% 15% other lap 5% 4% 9% 7% 6% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less 16% 27% 12% 13% 18% than Very Well" Education(amon those hs-grad 44% 45% 22% 30% 35% age 25+)g bachelor 24% 16% 39% 36% 29% graduatedegree 11% 6% 27% 17% 15% Child in Household child-underl8 33% 46% 38% 37% 38% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 72% 72% 75% 68% 72% income 0-25k 10% 16% 6% 12% 11% income 25-50k 15% 24% 8% 15% 15% Household Income income 50-75k 19% 24% 15% 12% 17% income 75-200k 46% 34% 43% 45% 42% income 200k-plus 10% 1% 27% 17% 14% single family 52% 29% 61% 68% 53% Housing Stats multi-family 48% 71% 39% 32% 47% rented 47% 77% 42% 39% 51% owned 53% 23% 58% 61% 49% Total population data from the California adjustment to the 2020 Decennial Census.Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH white and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. DocuSign Envelope ID:4C37161 C-A77C-4554-A494-D594877AF3F0 City of Tustin - Redistricting 2021 Map 113 ss PetemnY on Regional Pk`, - ARMIES' ,E_ +tt ++ ,� + + + + - z ;z CSim JLLhi - �C � now -7--4Tustin Ranch Golf Course' I � 'For, I rri v u v L11isiq 4 Suggested Sequence: 2022 - Areas 3 & 4 2024 - Areas 1 & 2 (and Mayor) Map layers ++� Map 113 Railroad Streets - Landmark Point Map prepared 9/30/2021 by National Demographics ©2021 CALIPER Landmark Area DocuSign Envelope ID:4C37161 C-A77C-4554-A494-D594877AF3F0 Map 113 District 1 2 3 4 Total 2020 2020 Census Adjusted 19,227 20,971 20,095 19,859 80,152 Deviation from ideal -811 933 57 -179 1,744 %Deviation -4.05°/% 4.66°/% 0.28°/% -0.89°/% 8.70% %Hisp 39% 75% 18% 29% 41% 2020 Total Po %NH White 36% 11% 40% 28% 29% P %NH Black 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% %Asian-American 19% 10% 37% 38% 26% Total 12,795 9,449 13,699 12,451 48,393 %His 29% 60% 15% 21% 29% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 53% 23% 50% 39% 43% %NH Black 3% 5% 2% 4% 3% %Asian/Pac.Isl. 15% 11% 32% 35% 24% Total 10,987 7,079 12,134 10,477 40,677 %Latino est. 29% 58% 14% 22% 28% Voter Registration(Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 27% 53% 13% 20% 25% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 10% 8% 22% 24% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 58% 31% 62% 47% 52% %NH Black 3% 6% 2% 3% 3% Total 6,826 3,347 7,549 5,888 23,610 %Latino est. 23% 51% 12% 18% 22% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 21% 46% 11% 16% 20% 2018) %Asian-Surnamed 7% 8% 18% 20% 14% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% %NH White est. 66% 37% 68% 54% 59% %NH Black 2% 1 6% 1% 3% 3% Total 9,467 5,371 10,778 8,970 34,586 %Latino est. 27% 56% 14% 20% 26% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 25% 51% 13% 18% 23% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 10% 8% 21% 24% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 60% 33% 62% 48% 53% %NH Black est. 3% 6% 2% 1 3% 3% ACS Pop.Est. Total 18,281 21,885 20,231 19,438 79,835 age0-19 23% 34% 27% 27% 28% Age age20-60 57% 56% 56% 58% 57% a e60 lus 20% 10% 18% 16% 15% Immigration immigrants 27% 39% 28% 38% 33% naturalized 54% 35% 71% 42% 48% english 58% 30% 59% 45% 48% Language spoken at home spanish 29% 60% 12% 23% 31% asian-lang 10% 5% 21% 24% 15% other lap 3% 5% 9% 7% 6% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less 14% 27% 12% 16% 18% than Very Well" Education(amon those hs-grad 40% 46% 23% 32% 35% age 25+)g bachelor 28% 15% 38% 33% 29% graduatedegree 13% 5% 26% 16% 15% Child in Household child-underl8 31% 48% 38% 36% 38% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 71% 72% 74% 69% 72% income 0-25k 10% 15% 8% 11% 11% income 25-50k 15% 23% 9% 15% 15% Household Income income 50-75k 15% 27% 15% 13% 17% income 75-200k 49% 34% 42% 44% 42% income 200k-plus 11% 1% 27% 17% 14% single family 55% 28% 63% 64% 53% Housing Stats multi-family 45% 72% 37% 36% 47% rented 47% 77% 40% 41% 51% owned 53% 23% 60% 59% 49% Total population data from the California adjustment to the 2020 Decennial Census.Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH white and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. DocuSign Envelope ID:4C37161 C-A77C-4554-A494-D594877AF3F0 City of Tustin - Redistricting 2021 Map 114 y51 55 Peters Canyon Regional,P,k" +tt +. -17 Ws J i LIL -T-4, '% / Tustin Ranch Golf Course +4z + + +, 3 III 'i L 11 isiq M6spA +� �/ y / OV A 41 j, �✓ .� Suggested Sequence: 2022 - Areas 1 & 4 2024 - Areas 2 & 3 (and Mayor) Map layers Map 114 Railroad \\ Streets Map prepared 9/30/2021 by National Demographics Landmark Point ©2021 CALIPER Landmark Area DocuSign Envelope ID:4C37161 C-A77C-4554-A494-D594877AF3F0 Map 114 District 1 2 3 4 Total 2020 2020 Census Adjusted 19,789 20,343 20,161 19,859 80,152 Deviation from ideal -249 305 123 -179 554 %Deviation -1.24°/% 1.52°/% 0.61°/% -0.89°/% 2.76% %Hisp 43% 73% 18% 29% 41% 2020 Total Po %NH White 35% 12% 40% 28% 29% P %NH Black 2% 3% 3% 2% 2% %Asian-American 17% 11% 37% 38% 26% Total 12,913 9,416 13,614 12,451 48,393 %His 30% 59% 14% 21% 29% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 53% 25% 49% 39% 43% %NH Black 3% 5% 2% 4% 3% %Asian/Pac.Isl. 14% 11% 34% 35% 24% Total 11,400 6,737 12,063 10,477 40,677 %Latino est. 32% 57% 13% 22% 28% Voter Registration(Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 29% 52% 12% 20% 25% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 9% 8% 23% 24% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% %NH White est. 57% 32% 62% 47% 52% %NH Black 3% 5% 2% 3% 3% Total 7,011 3,264 7,447 5,888 23,610 %Latino est. 25% 49% 11% 18% 22% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 23% 45% 10% 16% 20% 2018) %Asian-Surnamed 7% 7% 19% 20% 14% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% %NH White est. 65% 39% 68% 54% 59% %NH Black 2% 1 6% 2% 3% 3% Total 9,779 5,143 10,694 8,970 34,586 %Latino est. 30% 55% 12% 20% 26% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 27% 50% 11% 18% 23% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 9% 8% 22% 24% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 58% 34% 63% 48% 53% %NH Black est. 3% 6% 2% 1 3% 3% ACS Pop.Est. Total 19,133 21,300 19,963 19,438 79,835 age0-19 25% 33% 26% 27% 28% Age age20-60 56% 57% 57% 58% 57% a e60 lus 19% 10% 17% 16% 15% Immigration immigrants 27% 39% 29% 38% 33% naturalized 54% 33% 72% 42% 48% english 56% 32% 59% 45% 48% Language spoken at home spanish 31% 59% 11% 23% 31% asian-lang 9% 6% 21% 24% 15% other lap 4% 4% 9% 7% 6% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less 15% 27% 12% 16% 18% than Very Well" Education(amon those hs-grad 42% 45% 22% 32% 35% age 25+)g bachelor 26% 16% 39% 33% 29% graduatedegree 12% 6% 27% 16% 15% Child in Household child-underl8 34% 46% 38% 36% 38% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 71% 72% 75% 69% 72% income 0-25k 10% 17% 6% 11% 11% income 25-50k 15% 24% 8% 15% 15% Household Income income 50-75k 17% 25% 15% 13% 17% income 75-200k 48% 33% 43% 44% 42% income 200k-plus 10% 1% 27% 17% 14% single family 57% 28% 61% 64% 53% Housing Stats multi-family 43% 72% 39% 36% 47% rented 45% 77% 42% 41% 51% owned 55% 23% 58% 59% 49% Total population data from the California adjustment to the 2020 Decennial Census.Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH white and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. DocuSign Envelope ID:4C37161C-A77C-4554-A494-D594877AF3F0 i I i i i I Notes for Draft Maps I a i Map 101- No notes Map 102 - No notes I Map 103 - "(1) "Old Town" -- Bordered on southwest by 1-5, on southeast by Browning. (2) "Red Hill" – Bordered on northeast by 1-5, on southwest by Edinger. (3) "Legacy District" – Bordered 3 on northeast by Edinger, with exception of Tustin Meadows. (4) "Tustin Ranch" – Bordered on northwest by Browning, on southwest by 1-5. Borders are based on an iterative multi-objective optimization between geographic area and population density, factoring projected growth (particularly in (3) "Legacy District") based on most recent Housing Element Update." Map 104 - "The consultants are knowledgeable and have done a great job with background information and the redistricting process. However, the DrawTustin/ redistricting process feels very rushed with a compressed two-three month process. Small numbers of community members have attended/participated in the public workshops and council meetings. Redistricting is very important for Tustin, and the community will not have an ;opportunity for 10 years to revise the districts. Additional efforts to include community members is needed, such as having printed maps available at City Hall, senior center, community center, community events, and schools for pick-up or in- person drawing/map submittal. There is a need for more than.fo.ur districts to better reflect the multitude of community assets and neighborhoods north and south of Interstate 5. An additional one or two districts would allow for greater representation and the opportunity for more a more equitable distribution of socioeconomic and ethnicity within each district. The Tustin Ranch Specific Plan and the Legacy (former MCAS Tustin) Specific Plan area do not have to be within a single district." Map 105 - "The 1-5 freeway is a main dividing line within the City's limits, since there are only 5 connections between areas to the northeast and areas to the southwest. These connections are SR-55 on the west, Jamboree Road on the east, and between them Tustin Ranch Road, Red Hill Avenue, and Newport Avenue. Newport Avenue is actually not a through road, since it does not connect to Edinger Avenue. The portion of the City lying southwest of 1-5 can be reasonably divided into two districts. My map labels these as Area 1 (southwest of Edinger Avenue, but including a small extension north of Edinger to the east of Jamboree Road) and Area 2 (between Edinger Avenue and 1-5). — Area 1 is a mixture of commercial-industrial and a small amount of generally high-density housing, with ample space for future high-density residential development. This area is under- served in terms of shops and small businesses catering to the general public, but there is a new I i DocuSign Envelope ID:4C37161C-A77C-4554-A494-D594877AF3F0 I shopping center just west of Tustin Ranch Road. The area's challenges and opportunities are distinctly different from the rest of Tustin, but have much in common with Irvine and Costa Mesa. -- Area 2 is dominated by residential uses, including single family dwellings and mainly high- density town home and apartment complexes. It is well-served by numerous groceries, and 3 restaurants, gas stations, small offices complexes, and various small businesses catering to the general public. There is some room for residential and mixed commercial-industrial growth in the southeastern part of this area, but future growth may largely depend on replacement of existing uses elsewhere in the area. Socioeconomically, this area represents a balance of ethnically and linguistically diverse people with primarily lower-middle to middle class status. It functions as a mostly self-sufficient unit within Tustin, and its challenges and opportunities are relatively distinct from other parts of the City. Northeast of the 1-5 freeway, Tustin seems comprised of two communities abutting Red Hill Avenue. Area 3 lies to the northeast, and Area 4 to the northwest of Red Hill. —Area 3 is dominated by residential uses,with a predominance of single family dwellings over high-density complexes. It seems under-served by businesses catering to the general public, but these are readily accessible by east-west connector roads within the City (Irvine Boulevard and Bryan Avenue) and by Jamboree Road with its access to areas in the City of Irvine. There is some room for future growth in the southeastern corner of this area, but that will almost certainly be restricted to residential uses. Future growth in most of Area 3 may largely depend on redevelopment, which seems unlikely to occur. Ethnically,the residents are dominated by white and Asian people. Socioeconomically,the residents range from middle or upper-middle class to mostly well-off. In many ways, the area is a semi-isolated community, having more internal interests than interests in common with other parts of the City, and more external links to Irvine and North Tustin than to other parts of the City. -- Area 4 is dominated by residential uses, especially single family dwellings. It appears somewhat under-served by businesses catering to the general public, but these are readily accessible by east-west connector roads within the City(17th Street, Irvine Boulevard, 1st Street, and Bryan Avenue) and by the SR-55 freeway on the west. There is little room for future growth, which may largely depend on redevelopment, but seems unlikely to occur. Socioeconomically, this area's residents are mostly middle class and not especially ethnically diverse. In many ways, the area is a semi-isolated community,having more internal interests than interests in common with other parts of the Tustin, and more external links to Santa Ana and Orange than to other parts of the City." i i Map 106 - "Note that as per the motion passed by the city council, the city is divided into four districts. Using some estimate data that I found for CVAP, I divided the districts into equal populations (within the 10% threshold). The northeastern district (in red) is highly contiguous and of a demographic sharing a common interest. The southern district (in purple) is highly compact and contiguous. I had heard people express during the first public hearing that Edinger j Ave might be a nice natural border for the district, but for equal population concerns, I included j Tustin Meadows, Peppertree, and Laurelwood. Northwestern Tustin (in orange) is nicely delineated with Newport Ave with roughly 1/4 of the Tustin population to the northwest of this DocuSign Envelope ID:4C37161C-A77C-4554-A494-D594877AF3F0 1 i I street. The remainder is allocated to a central district (in blue) which is also compact and contiguous. i Of particular note is the area north of Bryan Ave and surrounded by Heritage Way and Tustin i Ranch Rd. Ideally,this area should be allocated to the northeastern district, if population allows; j however, I strongly suspect that once accurate CVAP numbers are published this area won't fit into that district. In that case, it should be allocated to the central district. i Likewise, the area bounded by Walnut Ave on the north, Redhill Ave on the east, Sycamore Ave on the south and Newport Ave on the west might possibly fit in either the southern district or central district, depending on the final census numbers." i I Map 107- "Blue—Tustin Ranch Red —New housing and Planned Communities Green--Old town and older single-family homes. Yellow— 1960's housing boom" Map 108 - "This configuration would account for one majority-Hispanic district, one plurality- Hispanic district (which should address the issue of Latino representation which may have been brought up by MALDEF,) two plurality-White districts, and one plurality-Asian district. These districts individually reflect the differences in demographic makeup across the city, and as a whole, reflect the makeup of the whole city. Regarding partisanship, all districts lean Democratic, as Republican voters are too spread out to form a district of their own. Districts 1 through 4 are mostly built-up, while District 5 concentrates the majority of new growth in the Tustin Legacy district. Creating these districts would allow each councilmember to have a constituency to focus on. Residents of each district would have a member on whom to rely to act on their behalf. This decentralizes responsibility for neighborhood issues, which helps prevent communities from being underserved, and helps the council fully represent Tustin." I Map 109- No notes i Map 110- No notes i Map 111 - No notes i Map 112 - No notes { i Ma _p 113 - No notes Map 114- No notes