Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02 FOURTH PUBLIC HEARING RE TRANSITION TO DISTRICT ELECTIONS DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B Agenda Item 2 Reviewed: os AGENDA REPORT City Manager Finance Director MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 25, 2021 TO: MATTHEW S. WEST, CITY MANAGER FROM: DAVID E. KENDIG, CITY ATTORNEY SUBJECT: FOURTH PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE INPUT FROM THE COMMUNITY REGARDING THE TRANSITION FROM AT-LARGE TO DISTRICT ELECTIONS, SELECTION OF A DISTRICT MAP, SELECTION OF THE SEQUENCE OF DISTRICT ELECTIONS, AND FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, ADDING SECTION 1309 TO CHAPTER 3 OF ARTICLE 1 OF THE TUSTIN CITY CODE IMPLEMENTING BY-DISTRICT ELECTIONS OF FOUR COUNCIL MEMBERS AND ESTABLISHING THE OFFICE OF THE MAYOR TO BE ELECTED AT-LARGE. SUMMARY The City received a letter from the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF) asserting that the City's at-large election system violates the California Voting Rights Act (CVRA). MALDEF threatens litigation if the City declines to voluntarily convert to district-based elections. On August 3, 2021 the City Council adopted Resolution 21-64 declaring its intention to transition from at-large to district-based elections, and to complete the transition in time for the 2022 General Municipal Election. By voluntarily proceeding to transition to district-based elections, the City benefits from a "safe harbor" provision in the CVRA that maximizes community control and self-determination over the process of establishing districts and district boundaries. The district transition process required two public hearings be held prior to consideration of any draft maps. The first two public hearings occurred on September 7th and September 17th. Additionally, two community workshops occurred on August 31St and September 22nd. A third public hearing on the draft maps was held 10:00 a.m. on Saturday, October 9th and a fifth public hearing is scheduled for 7:00 p.m. on November 1 st During this fourth public hearing, the public is invited to provide input regarding selection of one of the proposed district maps labeled 101 through 121 as posted on DrawTustin.org (see Attachment 1) and regarding the proposed sequence of district elections. After receiving community input, the City Council will consider selection of one of the population-balanced proposed maps. Following selection of a district map and sequencing of district elections, the City Council will consider introduction and first reading of Ordinance No. 1518 (see Attachment 2) implementing a transition from at-large to district-based elections for four Council Members and the Mayor elected at-large. Agenda Report— Fourth Public Hearing to Receive Input from the Community Regarding the Transition from At-Large to District Elections October 25, 2021 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Receive a report on the districting process and permissible criteria to be considered to create district boundaries and determine sequence of district elections; and 2. Conduct a public hearing to receive public input regarding selection of a district map and the sequence of district elections; and It is further recommended, following input received during the public hearing, that the City Council take the following actions in the following sequence: 3. Approve a motion to select a district map and determine the sequence of district elections; and then 4. Approve a motion to introduce and have first reading of Ordinance No. 1518, An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, Adding Section 1309 to Chapter 3 (City Council) of Article 1 (Administration) of the Tustin City Code Implementing By-District Elections of Four Council Members and Establishing the Office of the Mayor to be Elected At-Large. FISCAL IMPACT Significant staff time has been required to transition to district-based elections and to administer the process including the need for the public hearings. Transitioning to district- based elections also involves the services of a demographer. And redistricting will require similar services when census data is updated every ten (10) years. Additionally, the City will be required to reimburse MALDEF for its documented costs, up to $30,000. However, such expenses would likely be significantly lower than the costs of litigating the threatened lawsuit if district-based elections are not approved. BACKGROUND The City currently utilizes an at-large election system where voters citywide select each of the five City Council Members. By contrast, a district-based election system is one in DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B Agenda Report— Fourth Public Hearing to Receive Input from the Community Regarding the Transition from At-Large to District Elections October 25, 2021 Page 3 which a city is divided into separate districts, each with one council member who resides in the district and is chosen solely by the voters residing in that district.' MALDEF's Demand to Convert to District Elections. On June 23, 2020, the City received a letter from Tanya G. Pellegrini, an attorney representing the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF) in Sacramento, California. The letter asserts that the "lack of success of Latino candidates results from the inability of Latino voters to elect candidates of choice due to racially polarized voting among the electorate, and that continued use of at-large elections therefore violates" the CVRA. The letter demands that the City convert to district-based elections and threatens litigation if the City declines to voluntarily convert to district-based elections. The California Voting Rights Act Imposes Significant Costs of Litigating The CVRA, codified as Elections Code sections 14025 et seq., became law on January 1, 2003. The declared purpose of the CVRA is to prevent the disenfranchisement of protected classes, which are broadly defined to include members of a race, color, or language minority group. Any voter who resides in a city and is a member of a protected class may file a lawsuit for a violation of the CVRA. To succeed, the plaintiff must only show that, as a result of an at-large election, "racially polarized voting" has occurred. "Racially polarized voting" means there is a difference between the choice of candidates preferred by voters in a protected class and candidates preferred by voters in the remainder of the voting population. If the plaintiff prevails in the litigation, the CVRA allows for the recovery of significant attorneys' fees and expert witness fees. On the other hand, even if the city that is sued prevails in the lawsuit, it cannot recover either attorneys' fees or costs. In addition, the CVRA provides that if a court finds that a violation of the CVRA has occurred, the court shall implement appropriate remedies, including the imposition of district-based elections, that are tailored to remedy the violation. The remedy can include the imposition of district maps for the City. The CVRA "Safe Harbor" On September 28, 2016, the Governor signed into law AB 350, which enacted Elections Code section 10010. That legislation established a "safe harbor" from CVRA litigation for ' It is permissible for a Mayor to be elected on a City-wide basis along with district-based elections for the remaining Council members. DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B Agenda Report— Fourth Public Hearing to Receive Input from the Community Regarding the Transition from At-Large to District Elections October 25, 2021 Page 4 cities. Once a city receives a demand letter, it has a period of protection2 from litigation to assess its situation, and then to proceed with the transition to district-based elections. In Tustin's case, the initial CVRA safe harbor period of protection ran until August 14, 2021. But because the City Council adopted the resolution of intention to transition to district-based elections on August 3, 2021, a CVRA lawsuit may not be filed for an additional 90-day period, or until November 1, 2021. And under AB 350, the City's liability would be capped at approximately $30,000 if it adopts an ordinance establishing district- based elections by November 1, 2021. It is important to note, when the City Council adopted Resolution No. 21-64 on August 3, 2021, it did so in part based on indications from MALDEF that an agreement to extend the deadline by an additional 90 days would change the November 1, 2021 deadline to January 30, 2022 to provide additional time to conduct public outreach, encourage public participation, and receive public input. Unexpectedly, MALDEF conditioned its willingness to extend the deadline upon terms that raised significant issues of compliance with State and Federal law. Despite having had numerous communications with MALDEF over the preceding months regarding the City's utilization of an extension agreement, MALDEF previously made no mention of the extension being subject to additional material demands. The City is committed to engaging in the districting process in compliance with all applicable laws and encourages MALDEF to drop its demanded conditions on the extension agreement, and to simply agree to extend the 90-day term so that the City, the public and MALDEF will have additional time to thoughtfully engage in public outreach and education, public participation, and public input during the districting process. Given the uncertainty of reaching an agreement with MALDEF to extend the safe harbor period for public outreach and input beyond the November 1, 2021 deadline, the City adopted a new Resolution of Intent on September 7, 2021 reaffirming the City's intent to implement all required steps so that the process can be successfully completed before the end of the safe harbor period. Setting District Boundaries Prior to adopting an ordinance establishing district-based elections, the City Council is required to establish district boundaries and to establish the sequence of future district z Ordinarily the initial period of protection is a 45-day period from receipt of the demand letter. However, due to the Governor's COVID-related emergency orders,that period of protection was effectively extended to August 14, 2021. DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B Agenda Report— Fourth Public Hearing to Receive Input from the Community Regarding the Transition from At-Large to District Elections October 25, 2021 Page 5 elections. California Elections Code section 10010 sets forth the City Council public hearing process for establishing district boundaries and the sequencing of district elections. This process requires a series of noticed public hearings during which the public has a right to provide input on proposed district boundaries and the sequence of the district elections. Specifically, the City was required to hold at least two "clean slate" hearings at which the public could provide input on district boundaries before any maps were prepared. Then, after proposed maps were prepared and posted online, the City was required to hold at least two more public hearings to consider public testimony about the draft maps and election sequencing before adopting a map and determining the final sequence of district elections. To become effective, the map and sequencing must be approved by City ordinance. According to the CVRA, a "community of interest" is a "contiguous population that shares common social and economic interests that should be included within a single district for purposes of its effective and fair representation." These may include a neighborhood or group that would benefit from being in the same district because of shared interests, views, cultures, histories, languages, and values and whose boundaries can be identified on a map. Possible community features include, but are not limited to: • Shared interests in schools, housing, community safety, transit, health conditions, land use, environmental conditions, and/or other issues. • Common social and civic networks, including churches, mosques, temples, home- owner associations, and community centers, and shared use of community spaces, like parks and shopping centers. • Racial and ethnic compositions, cultural identities, and households that predominantly speak a language other than English. • Similar socio-economic status, including but not limited to income, home ownership, and education levels. • Shared political boundary lines from other jurisdictions, such as school districts, community college districts, and water districts. In creating the district boundaries, the City must ensure compliance with the following federal and state mandated criteria: Federal Laws: 1. Each council district shall contain a nearly equal population (based on total population of residents as determined by the most recent DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B Agenda Report— Fourth Public Hearing to Receive Input from the Community Regarding the Transition from At-Large to District Elections October 25, 2021 Page 6 Federal decennial Census and adjusted by the State to reassign incarcerated persons to the last known place of residence); and 2. Each council district shall be drawn in a manner that complies with the Federal Voting Rights Act. No council district shall be drawn with race as the predominate factor in violation of the principles established by the United States Supreme Court in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), and its progeny. California Criteria for Cities (to the extent practicable and in the following order of priority): 1. Geographically contiguous (areas that meet only at the points of adjoining corners are not contiguous. 2. Undivided neighborhoods and "communities of interest" (Socio- economic geographic areas that should be kept together for purposes of its effective and fair representation). 3. Easily identifiable boundaries. 4. Compact (do not bypass one group of people to get to a more distant group of people). 5. Prohibited: "Shall not favor or discriminate against a political party." Other Traditional Districting Principles: 1. Respect voters' choices/continuity in office. 2. Future population growth. Preliminary City Council Votes At its September 7t" meeting, after receiving community input during the first public hearing, the City Council decided that district maps will involve four (4) council districts and an at-large Mayor.3 However, final determination of the number of districts and whether the Mayor would be at-large or appointed by the City Council from among its 3 An "at-large" Mayor would be elected by the voters on a City-wide basis, and candidates for that office could come from any of the four council districts. DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B Agenda Report— Fourth Public Hearing to Receive Input from the Community Regarding the Transition from At-Large to District Elections October 25, 2021 Page 7 members must occur as part of the adoption of the Ordinance Transitioning to District- Based Elections at the conclusion of the process, as outlined in the following section. At its October 9th meeting, after receiving community input during the third and prior public hearings, the City Council specifically requested the following Maps and/or associated election sequencing remain as options for consideration at the October 25th public hearing: • Map 113 —2022: Mayor and District 3. 2024: Districts 1, 2 and 4. • Map 109 • Map 112 Similarly, final selection of the district map and district election sequencing must occur as part of the adoption of the Ordinance Transitioning to District-Based Elections at the conclusion of the process, as outlined in the following section. Adopting an Ordinance Transitioning to District-Based Elections Transitioning to district-based elections is effectuated by the City Council enacting an ordinance pursuant to Government Code section 34886, provided that the ordinance includes a declaration that it is being adopted to further the purposes of the CVRA. Under this method, the City Council would determine whether it wants to have a mayor elected at-large, with the remaining seats chosen through a district-based election process (with four, six, or eight voting districts). If the City Council chooses not to have a mayor elected at-large, it has the option of establishing five, seven, or nine voting districts.4 These decisions will be considered by the City Council based on information from the public hearings, and other appropriate considerations. Community Engagement The City has developed and has been implementing a comprehensive community engagement plan intended to maximize awareness, education and participation through each step of the district formation process. The aggressive outreach effort was designed to reach the entire Tustin community about the potential shift to by-district elections. Please see Attachment 3 for further details. 4 Cal. Gov't Code § 34871. DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B Agenda Report— Fourth Public Hearing to Receive Input from the Community Regarding the Transition from At-Large to District Elections October 25, 2021 Page 8 DISCUSSION Draft Maps — Second Round Publication Draft maps 115 through 121 have been posted continuously since October 18, 2021 on DrawTustin.org along with demographics and the demographer's determination of whether or not a proposed map results in the Federally-required balance of populations among the districts or other viability considerations. The draft maps posted on DrawTustin.org since October 18th take into account all public input received by the October 14th deadline. This set of maps includes the following: • 2 demographer submitted maps: (120 and 121) • 5 community submitted maps: (115 — 119) It should be noted that: o Maps 116 and 117 are not legally viable for actual adoption because they do not comply with the Federal law population balance requirement. o Map 118 would require completion of an extensive Census Block splitting analysis prior to determination of conformance with the Federal population balance requirement, o Map 119 was submitted after the October 14th community input deadline but before the 7-day map posting window. Draft Maps — First Round Publication Draft maps 101 through 114 were posted on DrawTustin.org along with a demographic profile of each map and determination of whether or not a proposed map results in balanced populations among the districts. These draft maps have been posted on DrawTustin.org continuously since October 1, 2021 and take into account all public input received by the September 29th deadline. This set of maps includes the following: • 3 demographer submitted maps: (112, 113, 114) • 1 map submitted by MALDEF: (109) DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B Agenda Report— Fourth Public Hearing to Receive Input from the Community Regarding the Transition from At-Large to District Elections October 25, 2021 Page 9 • 10 community submitted maps: (101 — 108, 110, 111). Maps 101-107 and 110- 111 are not legally viable for actual adoption because they do not comply with the Federal law population balance requirement. During this October 25 public hearing, the City Council may only consider draft maps labeled as 101-121 (see Attachment 1). However, only drafts maps determined by the demographer to be population balanced may be selected by the City Council as the final district map. There are seven proposed four-district maps that comply with the Federal population balance requirement, which are listed in the table below and shown graphically in Attachment 4: POPULATION BALANCED PROPOSED 4-DISTRICT MAP COMPARISON Map 109 112 113 114 115 120 121 Total Population 4.01% 5.17% 8.70% 2.76% 3.17% 3.68% 8.58% Deviations Districts Crossing D1 & D2 D1 & D2 D3 D1 & D2 D1 & D2 D1 & D2 D1 5 Freeway Highest 60% 58% 60% 59% 57% 57% 54% Latino (D1) (D2) (D2) (D2) (D2) (D2) (D2) CVAP Highest 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 34% Asian (D4) (D4) (D4) (D4) (D4) (D4) (D3) CVAP 34% 34% 32% 34% 34% 34% 32% D3 D3 D3 D3 D3 D3 D4 Proposed District Election Sequencing by Draft Map Each of the population balanced maps also identifies suggested election sequencing in accordance with the requirement that there must be two districts up for election in 2022 and three in 2024; the at-large Mayor seat counts as a district for this purpose. To the extent possible, the demographer's proposed sequencing scenarios attempt to coincide with the end of incumbent council members' terms. 5 "Population deviation"refers to the percentage difference in population between the district with the largest population and the district with the smallest population. Under Federal law,the deviation may not exceed ten percent(10%). DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B Agenda Report— Fourth Public Hearing to Receive Input from the Community Regarding the Transition from At-Large to District Elections October 25, 2021 Page 10 Additionally, draft maps may be viewed in an interactive viewing tool available at DrawTustin.org which includes census blocks, demographic information, and much more. Next Steps The dates for the remaining public hearings are as follows: • Public Hearing # 4: Monday, October 25: 7:00 p.m. • Public Hearing # 5: Monday, November 1: 7:00 p.m. Public Hearings # 4 and # 5 will be held in-person/open to the public, inside the City Council chambers, and the public will continue to be able to view and provide verbal comments online and by phone via Zoom. Meetings will also remain available for viewing live via the City's website. Please check DrawTustin.org to stay informed of any scheduling changes or other additional information. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 — Draft maps 101 through 121 along with demographics and submitter notes or proposed election sequencing if applicable Attachment 2 — Ordinance No. 1518 Attachment 3 — Community Engagement to Date Attachment 4 — Summary of the Proposed Four-District Population Balanced Maps Attachment 5 — NDC CVAP Latino and CVAP Asian-American Population Density Maps DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B City of Tustin - Redistricting 2021 J Map 101 , 55 ' Not population-balanced� ,W■■y'Pete�R�Rl�yon RegionalPk�" ,E 17th St'�� ■ J +tt ++ + + } -� + �+ - coma 2 I 11V mom z+ j ■ �<<I I��\ LL l y , I�, / Golf Coursfi—> + i + ill 41 Map layers Map 101 Railroad � Streets VPP- - Landmark Point Map prepared 9/30/2021 by National Demographics Landmark Area ©2021 CALIPER DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B Map 101 District 1 2 3 4 Total 2020 2020 Census Adjusted 16,931 20,161 27,778 15,282 80,152 Deviation from ideal -3,107 123 7,740 -4,756 12,496 %Deviation -15.51% 0.61% 38.63% -23.73% 62.36% %His 40% 18% 70% 19% 41% 2020 Total Po %NH White 37% 40% 13% 33% 29% P %NH Black 2% 3% 3% 2% 2% %Asian-American 17% 37% 13% 43% 26% Total 11,555 13,614 13,810 9,415 48,393 %His 30% 14% 51% 18% 29% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 54% 49% 28% 42% 43% %NH Black 3% 2% 5% 2% 3% %Asian/Pac.Isl. 13% 34% 16% 36% 24% Total 9,775 12,063 9,873 8,966 40,677 %Latino est. 30% 13% 53% 17% 28% Voter Registration(Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 27% 12% 48% 16% 25% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 9% 23% 10% 25% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 58% 62% 34% 50% 52% %NH Black 3% 2% 5% 2% 3% Total 6,101 7,447 4,799 5,263 23,610 %Latino est. 23% 11% 45% 15% 22% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 22% 10% 41% 14% 20% 2018) %Asian-Surnamed 6% 19% 10% 20% 14% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 67% 68% 40% 57% 59% %NH Black 2% 2% 6% 2% 3% Total 8,422 10,694 7,584 7,886 34,586 %Latino est. 28% 12% 51% 16% 26% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 26% 11% 46% 15% 23% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 9% 22% 10% 24% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 60% 63% 35% 51% 53% %NH Black est. 3% 2% 6% 1 2% 3% ACS Pop.Est. Total 16,600 19,963 29,158 14,114 79,835 age0-19 23% 26% 32% 27% 28% Age age20-60 57% 57% 57% 56% 57% a e60 lus 20% 17% 11% 17% 15% Immigration immigrants 26% 29% 40% 34% 33% naturalized 51% 72% 37% 1 46% 48% english 59% 59% 32% 49% 48% Language spoken at home spanish 29% 11% 54% 17% 31% asian-lang 9% 21% 8% 26% 15% other la 3% 9% 5% 8% 6% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less 14% 12% 26% 13% 18% than Very Well" Education(amo those hs-grad 42% 22% 45% 28% 35% age 25+) bachelor 26% 39% 19% 36% 29% aduatede ee 13% 27% 5% 21% 15% Child in Household child-underl8 31% 38% 45% 36% 38% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 71% 75% 72% 67% 72% income 0-25k 11% 6% 15% 11% 11% income 25-50k 16% 8% 21% 15% 15% Household Income income 50-75k 16% 15% 26% 8% 17% income 75-200k 46% 43% 35% 48% 42% income 200k-plus 11% 27% 3% 18% 14% single family 54% 61% 32% 78% 53% HousingStats multi-family 46% 39% 68% 22% 47% rented 47% 42% 74% 28% 51% owned 53% 58% 26% 72% 49% Total population data from the California adjustment to the 2020 Decennial Census.Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B City of Tustin - Redistricting 2021 J Map 102 , Not population-balanced ,�■■ ' - Pete��llfiyon Regi onalPk��" Ao, - Aii16 ,E +tt + +' + + + - L 4- + 2%GolfCoursfi iris / / l +` ,/� ■� I������ ` i� —LL -L- '\y L 1 i isfip \ Z y / v IFF !Y `J Map layers Map 102 Railroad � Streets VPP- - Landmark Point Map prepared 9/30/2021 by National Demographics Landmark Area ©2021 CALIPER DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B Map 102 District 1 2 3 4 Total 2020 2020 Census Adjusted 23,327 16,537 24,953 15,335 80,152 Deviation from ideal 3,289 -3,501 4,915 -4,703 9,618 %Deviation 16.41°/% -17.47% 24.53% -23.47°/% 48.00% %His 62% 16% 50% 19% 41% 2020 Total Po %NH White 22% 42% 23% 33% 29% P %NH Black 2% 2% 3% 2% 2% %Asian-American 11% 38% 21% 43% 26% Total 12,740 11,664 14,540 9,450 48,393 %His 45% 14% 35% 18% 29% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 42% 50% 38% 42% 43% %NH Black 3% 2% 4% 2% 3% %Asian/Pac.Isl. 10% 33% 22% 36% 24% Total 9,765 9,963 11,912 9,037 40,677 %Latino est. 42% 12% 37% 17% 28% Voter Registration(Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 38% 11% 34% 16% 25% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 7% 22% 14% 25% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 49% 63% 46% 50% 52% %NH Black 3% 2% 4% 3% 3% Total 5,540 6,143 6,651 5,276 23,610 %Latino est. 32% 10% 30% 15% 22% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 29% 10% 28% 14% 20% 2018) %Asian-Surnamed 7% 18% 12% 20% 14% %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 59% 69% 53% 57% 59% %NH Black 3% 2% 4% 2% 3% Total 7,987 8,846 9,831 7,922 34,586 %Latino est. 38% 12% 35% 16% 26% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 35% 11% 32% 15% 23% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 8% 22% 14% 24% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 51% 64% 47% 51% 53% %NH Black est. 3% 2% 4% 1 2% 3% ACS Pop.Est. Total 24,179 17,300 24,188 14,167 79,835 age0-19 30% 26% 27% 27% 28% Age age20-60 55% 57% 59% 56% 57% a e60 lus 15% 17% 14% 17% 15% Inunigration immigrants 34% 28% 36% 34% 33% naturalized 34% 72% 49% 1 46% 48% english 43% 60% 43% 49% 48% Language spoken at home spanish 49% 10% 38% 17% 31% asian-lang 6% 22% 13% 26% 15% other la 3% 9% 6% 8% 6% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less 22% 11% 21% 13% 18% than Very Well" Education(amo those hs-grad 43% 22% 42% 28% 35% age 25+) bachelor 18% 39% 27% 36% 29% aduatede ee 9% 27% 9% 21% 15% Child in Household child-underl8 40% 38% 38% 36% 38% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 71% 76% 72% 67% 72% income 0-25k 15% 7% 10% 11% 11% income 25-50k 21% 9% 16% 15% 15% Household Income income 50-75k 23% 15% 20% 8% 17% income 75-200k 35% 41% 47% 48% 42% income 200k-plus 7% 28% 7% 18% 14% single family 42% 59% 43% 78% 53% HousingStats multi-family 58% 41% 57% 22% 47% rented 62% 43% 60% 28% 51% owned 38% 57% 40% 72% 49% Total population data from the California adjustment to the 2020 Decennial Census.Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B City of Tustin - Redistricting 2021 Map 103 , 55 ' Not population-balanced� ,O■ yo Pete� n Re�ionalPk�" L ,E 1 Rt, �_ ■ +tt + + + + _ L 77 coma 4Go/2L; � f aursp + L 11 isfip / `� / I /✓ (o/ 4 � . Map layers Map 103 Railroad � Streets VPP- - Landmark Point Map prepared 9/30/2021 by National Demographics Landmark Area ©2021 CALIPER DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B Map 103 District 1 2 3 4 Total 2020 2020 Census Adjusted 16,931 20,161 33,882 9,178 80,152 Deviation from ideal -3,107 123 13,844 -10,860 24,704 %Deviation -15.51°/% 0.61% 69.09°/% -54.20°/% 123.29% %Hisp 40% 18% 62% 13% 41% 2020 Total Po %NH White 37% 40% 18% 28% 29% P %NH Black 2% 3% 3% 2% 2% %Asian-American 17% 37% 15% 54% 26% Total 11,555 13,614 17,990 5,235 48,393 %His 30% 14% 44% 17% 29% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 54% 49% 35% 29% 43% %NH Black 3% 2% 4% 3% 3% %Asian/Pac.Isl. 13% 34% 17% 50% 24% Total 9,775 12,063 13,952 4,887 40,677 %Latino est. 30% 13% 44% 13% 28% Voter Registration(Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 27% 12% 40% 12% 25% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 9% 23% 11% 33% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 58% 62% 42% 41% 52% %NH Black 3% 2% 4% 3% 3% Total 6,101 7,447 7,564 2,498 23,610 %Latino est. 23% 11% 35% 11% 22% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 22% 10% 32% 11% 20% 2018) %Asian-Surnamed 6% 19% 11% 29% 14% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 67% 68% 50% 46% 59% %NH Black 2% 1 2% 4% 3% 3% Total 8,422 10,694 11,234 4,236 34,586 %Latino est. 28% 12% 41% 12% 26% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 26% 11% 37% 12% 23% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 9% 22% 12% 33% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 60% 63% 44% 42% 53% %NH Black est. 3% 2% 4% 1 3% 3% ACS Pop.Est. Total 16,600 19,963 35,067 8,205 79,835 age0-19 23% 26% 31% 29% 28% Age age20-60 57% 57% 56% 58% 57% a e60 lus 20% 17% 13% 13% 15% Immigration immigrants 26% 29% 37% 42% 33% naturalized 51% 72% 39% 37% 48% english 59% 59% 37% 41% 48% Language spoken at home spanish 29% 11% 48% 14% 31% asian-lang 9% 21% 9% 34% 15% other lap 3% 9% 5% 11% 6% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less 14% 12% 23% 13% 18% than Very Well" Education(amon those hs-grad 42% 22% 43% 22% 35% age 25+)g bachelor 26% 39% 21% 40% 29% graduatedegree 13% 27% 7% 25% 15% Child in Household child-underl8 31% 38% 43% 38% 38% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 71% 75% 71% 69% 72% income 0-25k 11% 6% 14% 12% 11% income 25-50k 16% 8% 20% 14% 15% Household Income income 50-75k 16% 15% 23% 6% 17% income 75-200k 46% 43% 38% 47% 42% income 200k-plus 11% 27% 5% 20% 14% single family 54% 61% 43% 66% 53% Housing Stats multi-family 46% 39% 57% 34% 47% rented 47% 42% 63% 34% 51% owned 53% 58% 37% 66% 49% Total population data from the California adjustment to the 2020 Decennial Census.Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH white and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B City of Tustin - Redistricting 2021 J Map 104 , (55 ' Not population-balanced Pete�,O■ yo / n Reg ion, al,P,k�" �7_■r - ]MEQ / �E 7th St'�� L +tt + L 77 W �_ �- i ��2 ` rr L; - , �_ �/� - - - r" � AGOC4urs�.. t' T f i` r +41 )� Y i r r Map layers Map 104 Railroad !\' Streets VPP- - Landmark Point Map prepared 9/30/2021 by National Demographics Landmark Area ©2021 CALIPER DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B Map 104 District 1 2 3 4 Total 2020 2020 Census Adjusted 20,540 16,552 33,882 9,178 80,152 Deviation from ideal 502 -3,486 13,844 -10,860 24,704 %Deviation 2.51°/% -17.40% 69.09°/% -54.20°/% 123.29% %Hisp 37% 16% 62% 13% 41% 2020 Total Po %NH White 36% 42% 18% 28% 29% P %NH Black 3% 2% 3% 2% 2% %Asian-American 20% 38% 15% 54% 26% Total 13,500 11,669 17,990 5,235 48,393 %His 28% 14% 44% 17% 29% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 53% 50% 35% 29% 43% %NH Black 2% 2% 4% 3% 3% %Asian/Pac.Isl. 16% 33% 17% 50% 24% Total 11,871 9,967 13,952 4,887 40,677 %Latino est. 28% 12% 44% 13% 28% Voter Registration(Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 25% 11% 40% 12% 25% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 12% 22% 11% 33% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 58% 63% 42% 41% 52% %NH Black 2% 2% 4% 3% 3% Total 7,402 6,146 7,564 2,498 23,610 %Latino est. 22% 10% 35% 11% 22% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 20% 10% 32% 11% 20% 2018) %Asian-Surnamed 9% 18% 11% 29% 14% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 66% 69% 50% 46% 59% %NH Black 2% 1 2% 4% 3% 3% Total 10,266 8,850 11,234 4,236 34,586 %Latino est. 26% 12% 41% 12% 26% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 24% 11% 37% 12% 23% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 12% 22% 12% 33% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 59% 64% 44% 42% 53% %NH Black est. 2% 2% 4% 1 3% 3% ACS Pop.Est. Total 19,252 17,311 35,067 8,205 79,835 age0-19 24% 26% 31% 29% 28% Age age20-60 56% 57% 56% 58% 57% a e60 lus 20% 17% 13% 13% 15% Immigration immigrants 27% 28% 37% 42% 33% naturalized 55% 72% 39% 37% 48% english 58% 60% 37% 41% 48% Language spoken at home spanish 28% 10% 48% 14% 31% asian-lang 10% 22% 9% 34% 15% other lap 4% 9% 5% 11% 6% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less 15% 11% 23% 13% 18% than Very Well" Education(amon those hs-grad 39% 22% 43% 22% 35% age 25+)g bachelor 27% 39% 21% 40% 29% graduatedegree 14% 27% 7% 25% 15% Child in Household child-underl8 31% 38% 43% 38% 38% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 71% 76% 71% 69% 72% income 0-25k 10% 7% 14% 12% 11% income 25-50k 15% 9% 20% 14% 15% Household Income income 50-75k 15% 15% 23% 6% 17% income 75-200k 48% 41% 38% 47% 42% income 200k-plus 13% 28% 5% 20% 14% single family 56% 59% 43% 66% 53% Housing Stats multi-family 44% 41% 57% 34% 47% rented 45% 43% 63% 34% 51% owned 55% 57% 37% 66% 49% Total population data from the California adjustment to the 2020 Decennial Census.Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH white and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B City of Tustin - Redistricting 2021 Map 105 , 55 ' Not population-balanced ,,� ' Pette�fiyon Regional Pk��" --IL ■ ,E I7'h St'� — 4VE +tt +. + + } _LW - �iv_ ■ r.T ✓ ;� / _I IL' - 11 ,j y / \ Golf C4ursfi �I ✓. i 2 q, VIII L71aSf M6sR\ *+` i 441 . s� Map layers Map 105 Railroad � Streets VPP- - Landmark Point Map prepared 9/30/2021 by National Demographics Landmark Area ©2021 CALIPER DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B Map 105 District 1 2 3 4 Total 2020 2020 Census Adjusted 13,273 23,819 33,882 9,178 80,152 Deviation from ideal -6,765 3,781 13,844 -10,860 24,704 %Deviation -33.76°/% 18.87% 69.09°/% -54.20°/% 123.29% %Hisp 39% 21% 62% 13% 41% 2020 Total Po %NH White 39% 39% 18% 28% 29% P %NH Black 2% 3% 3% 2% 2% %Asian-American 16% 35% 15% 54% 26% Total 9,199 15,969 17,990 5,235 48,393 %His 29% 17% 44% 17% 29% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 57% 48% 35% 29% 43% %NH Black 2% 2% 4% 3% 3% %Asian/Pac.Isl. 11% 32% 17% 50% 24% Total 7,685 14,153 13,952 4,887 40,677 %Latino est. 29% 16% 44% 13% 28% Voter Registration(Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 27% 15% 40% 12% 25% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 8% 21% 11% 33% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 61% 60% 42% 41% 52% %NH Black 2% 2% 4% 3% 3% Total 4,921 8,627 7,564 2,498 23,610 %Latino est. 23% 13% 35% 11% 22% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 21% 12% 32% 11% 20% 2018) %Asian-Surnamed 6% 17% 11% 29% 14% %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 69% 66% 50% 46% 59% %NH Black 1% 1 2% 4% 3% 3% Total 6,676 12,440 11,234 4,236 34,586 %Latino est. 28% 15% 41% 12% 26% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 25% 14% 37% 12% 23% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 8% 21% 12% 33% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 62% 61% 44% 42% 53% %NH Black est. 2% 2% 4% 1 3% 3% ACS Pop.Est. Total 13,112 23,451 35,067 8,205 79,835 age0-19 23% 26% 31% 29% 28% Age age20-60 55% 57% 56% 58% 57% a e60 lus 22% 17% 13% 13% 15% Immigration immigrants 25% 29% 37% 42% 33% naturalized 51% 69% 39% 37% 48% english 62% 58% 37% 41% 48% Language spoken at home spanish 28% 14% 48% 14% 31% asian-lang 8% 20% 9% 34% 15% other lap 2% 8% 5% 11% 6% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less 13% 14% 23% 13% 18% than Very Well" Education(amon those hs-grad 43% 24% 43% 22% 35% age 25+)g bachelor 24% 38% 21% 40% 29% graduatedegree 13% 24% 7% 25% 15% Child in Household child-underl8 31% 37% 43% 38% 38% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 71% 75% 71% 69% 72% income 0-25k 10% 8% 14% 12% 11% income 25-50k 15% 10% 20% 14% 15% Household Income income 50-75k 16% 15% 23% 6% 17% income 75-200k 47% 44% 38% 47% 42% income 200k-plus 13% 24% 5% 20% 14% single family 58% 57% 43% 66% 53% Housing Stats multi-family 42% 43% 57% 34% 47% rented 44% 44% 63% 34% 51% owned 56% 56% 37% 66% 49% Total population data from the California adjustment to the 2020 Decennial Census.Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH white and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B City of Tustin - Redistricting 2021 J Map 106 , 55 ' Not population-balanced ,�■■ ' PeRe�ionalPk�" r _ ]■■L /� �✓ ,E 7th St'�� ■ +tt + + _ / I LNY + s ✓ AGolfCourse L L9 7� / L 4 f j 41 Map layers Map 106 Railroad !\' Streets VPP- - Landmark Point Map prepared 9/30/2021 by National Demographics Landmark Area ©2021 CALIPER DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B Map 106 District 1 2 3 4 Total 2020 2020 Census Adjusted 14,668 19,162 26,236 20,086 80,152 Deviation from ideal -5,370 -876 6,198 48 11,568 %Deviation -26.80°/% -4.37% 30.93°/% 0.24°/% 57.73% %Hisp 37% 16% 72% 27% 41% 2020 Total Po %NH White 40% 41% 12% 30% 29% P %NH Black 2% 2% 3% 2% 2% %Asian-American 18% 38% 12% 38% 26% Total 10,214 13,138 12,157 12,885 48,393 %His 26% 14% 56% 22% 29% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 57% 50% 26% 40% 43% %NH Black 3% 2% 6% 2% 3% %Asian/Pac.Isl. 13% 34% 11% 35% 24% Total 8,775 11,621 9,275 11,006 40,677 %Latino est. 27% 12% 56% 21% 28% Voter Registration(Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 25% 11% 51% 19% 25% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 9% 23% 8% 23% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 61% 62% 32% 49% 52% %NH Black 3% 2% 6% 3% 3% Total 5,552 7,229 4,513 6,316 23,610 %Latino est. 21% 10% 48% 18% 22% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 19% 9% 44% 17% 20% 2018) %Asian-Surnamed 7% 19% 9% 19% 14% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 69% 68% 38% 56% 59% %NH Black 2% 1% 6% 2% 3% Total 7,626 10,344 7,104 9,512 34,586 %Latino est. 25% 11% 54% 20% 26% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 23% 11% 49% 18% 23% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 9% 23% 9% 23% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 62% 63% 33% 51% 53% %NH Black est. 3% 2% 6% 1 3% 3% ACS Pop.Est. Total 14,446 19,232 26,980 19,177 79,835 age0-19 23% 26% 33% 25% 28% Age age20-60 56% 57% 56% 58% 57% a e60 lus 21% 17% 10% 17% 15% Immigration immigrants 25% 29% 39% 35% 33% naturalized 51% 72% 36% 46% 48% english 61% 59% 32% 48% 48% Language spoken at home spanish 26% 11% 58% 20% 31% asian-lang 9% 21% 6% 25% 15% other lap 3% 9% 5% 7% 6% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less 13% 12% 26% 14% 18% than Very Well" Education(amon those hs-grad 42% 22% 45% 32% 35% age 25+)g bachelor 26% 39% 17% 35% 29% graduatedegree 13% 27% 6% 16% 15% Child in Household child-underl8 31% 38% 46% 35% 38% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 71% 75% 72% 69% 72% income 0-25k 10% 7% 16% 9% 11% income 25-50k 15% 8% 21% 16% 15% Household Income income 50-75k 16% 15% 26% 10% 17% income 75-200k 47% 42% 35% 47% 42% income 200k-plus 12% 28% 1% 17% 14% single family 56% 61% 29% 71% 53% Housing Stats multi-family 44% 39% 71% 29% 47% rented 45% 42% 76% 34% 51% owned 55% 58% 24% 66% 49% Total population data from the California adjustment to the 2020 Decennial Census.Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH white and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B City of Tustin - Redistricting 2021 Map 107 , ss ' Not population-balanced� ,r■ hyo Pete��llfiyn Re�ionalPk�" ,E�th St'�� ■ ■ +tt + ++ + + - - L LW �lvd - _- X� rm _ ' Golf Coursn" , + t' Nr - 7 3 \ L11is 4 - yy, / ,yey Map layers Map 107 Railroad Streets VPP- - Landmark Point Map prepared 9/30/2021 by National Demographics Landmark Area ©2021 CALIPER DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B Map 107 District 1 2 3 4 Total 2020 2020 Census Adjusted 11,448 20,161 35,453 13,090 80,152 Deviation from ideal -8,590 123 15,415 -6,948 24,005 %Deviation -42.87°/% 0.61% 76.93°/% -34.67°/% 119.80% %Hisp 35% 18% 65% 16% 41% 2020 Total Po %NH White 42% 40% 16% 33% 29% P %NH Black 2% 3% 3% 2% 2% %Asian-American 17% 37% 14% 47% 26% Total 8,290 13,614 18,370 8,120 48,393 %His 26% 14% 47% 16% 29% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 59% 49% 32% 40% 43% %NH Black 2% 2% 5% 3% 3% %Asian/Pac.Isl. 12% 34% 16% 39% 24% Total 7,222 12,063 13,642 7,750 40,677 %Latino est. 26% 13% 49% 14% 28% Voter Registration(Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 24% 12% 44% 13% 25% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 9% 23% 10% 28% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 62% 62% 38% 49% 52% %NH Black 2% 2% 5% 3% 3% Total 4,703 7,447 7,014 4,446 23,610 %Latino est. 20% 11% 41% 13% 22% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 19% 10% 37% 12% 20% 2018) %Asian-Surnamed 6% 19% 9% 22% 14% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 70% 68% 46% 56% 59% %NH Black 2% 1 2% 5% 3% 3% Total 6,332 10,694 10,771 6,789 34,586 %Latino est. 25% 12% 47% 14% 26% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 23% 11% 42% 13% 23% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 9% 22% 10% 27% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 64% 63% 40% 51% 53% %NH Black est. 2% 2% 5% 1 3% 3% ACS Pop.Est. Total 11,343 19,963 36,322 12,207 79,835 age0-19 22% 26% 31% 26% 28% Age age20-60 54% 57% 58% 56% 57% a e60 lus 24% 17% 11% 17% 15% Immigration immigrants 24% 29% 38% 36% 33% naturalized 54% 72% 39% 43% 48% english 66% 59% 35% 49% 48% Language spoken at home spanish 23% 11% 51% 15% 31% asian-lang 8% 21% 9% 28% 15% other lap 3% 9% 5% 8% 6% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less 12% 12% 24% 13% 18% than Very Well" Education(amon those hs-grad 41% 22% 44% 28% 35% age 25+)g bachelor 25% 39% 21% 36% 29% graduatedegree 14% 27% 6% 22% 15% Child in Household child-underl8 30% 38% 43% 35% 38% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 70% 75% 72% 68% 72% income 0-25k 10% 6% 15% 10% 11% income 25-50k 12% 8% 21% 15% 15% Household Income income 50-75k 16% 15% 23% 8% 17% income 75-200k 47% 43% 38% 48% 42% income 200k-plus 15% 27% 3% 20% 14% single family 66% 61% 35% 76% 53% Housing Stats multi-family 34% 39% 65% 24% 47% rented 35% 42% 71% 29% 51% owned 65% 58% 29% 71% 49% Total population data from the California adjustment to the 2020 Decennial Census.Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH white and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B City of Tustin - Redistricting 2021 _ Map 108 P5 5 ��, Peters Canyon Regional Pkv"j ,E 7th St�� 7�— " + �� +tt + +' 7 \ l N / tustin Ranch Golf Course III13 F4- 4, ' r Map layers Map 108 Railroad \ Streets Map prepared 9/30/2021 by National Demographics Landmark Point ©2021 CALIPER Landmark Area DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B Map 108 District 5 1 2 3 4 Total 2020 2020 Census Adjusted 16,463 15,861 15,990 15,835 16,003 80,152 Deviation from ideal 433 -169 -40 -195 -27 628 %Deviation 2.70°/% -1.06°/% -0.25% -1.22°/% -0.17°/% 3.92°/% %Hisp 40% 39% 16% 72% 37% 41% 2020 Total Po %NH White 29% 38% 42% 12% 21% 29% P %NH Black 2% 2% 2% 3% 2% 2% %Asian-American 26% 17% 37% 11% 38% 26% Total 10,353 10,956 11,227 7,663 8,194 48,393 %His 29% 29% 14% 57% 24% 29% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 44% 55% 51% 24% 31% 43% %NH Black 2% 3% 2% 7% 3% 3% %Asian/Pac.Isl. 25% 12% 33% 12% 40% 24% Total 9,266 9,292 9,660 5,364 7,095 40,677 %Latino est. 28% 29% 12% 56% 25% 28% Voter Registration(Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 25% 27% 11% 51% 23% 25% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 17% 9% 22% 8% 27% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 53% 59% 63% 32% 38% 52% %NH Black 2% 3% 2% 6% 3% 1 3% Total 5,627 5,866 5,973 2,629 3,515 23,610 %Latino est. 22% 23% 10% 47% 21% 22% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 20% 21% 10% 43% 19% 20% 2018) %Asian-Surnamed 14% 6% 18% 8% 25% 14% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 61% 67% 69% 38% 44% 59% %NH Black 2% 2% 1 2% 7% 3% 1 3% Total 7,947 8,025 8,581 4,092 5,941 34,586 %Latino est. 26% 28% 12% 53% 23% 26% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 23% 25% 11% 48% 21% 23% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 17% 8% 22% 9% 27% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 55% 61% 64% 33% 40% 53% %NH Black est. 2% 3% 2% 1 7% 3% 3% ACS Pop.Est. Total 15,331 15,734 16,649 16,797 15,324 79,835 age0-19 24% 23% 27% 34% 31% 28% Age age20-60 57% 56% 57% 57% 57% 57% a e60 lus 19% 20% 17% 10% 12% 15% Immigration immigrants 31% 26% 28% 39% 42% 33% naturalized 61% 51% 1 73% 31% 37% 48% english 49% 60% 60% 30% 39% 48% Language spoken at home spanish 29% 29% 10% 60% 28% 31% asian-fang 15% 9% 21% 5% 25% 15% other lap 6% 3% 9% 4% 8% 6% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less 18% 14% 11% 29% 15% 18% than Very Well" Education(amon those hs-grad 39% 43% 22% 47% 26% 35% age 25+)g bachelor 27% 25% 40% 15% 36% 29% graduatedegree 13% 13% 27% 5% 16% 15% Child in Household child-underl8 35% 31% 38% 47% 40% 38% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 71% 71% 76% 72% 69% 72% income 0-25k 7% 11% 7% 15% 15% 11% income 25-50k 15% 15% 8% 28% 12% 15% Household Income income 50-75k 17% 16% 15% 24% 15% 17% income 75-200k 50% 46% 41% 33% 42% 42% income 200k-plus 12% 12% 28% 1% 16% 14% single family 68% 54% 59% 29% 53% 53% Housing Stats multi-family 32% 46% 41% 71% 47% 47% rented 35% 47% 44% 76% 54% 51% owned 65% 53% 56% 24% 46% 49% Total population data from the California adjustment to the 2020 Decennial Census.Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC.Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age, Immigration,and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B City of Tustin - Redistricting 2021 Map 109 Peter k nyon Regionop ' i Fr 7th S _� — +tt +. y + s� -ILL -�- - �� � + hrstin Ranch Golfourse��` +4z / + 4r Suggested Sequence: 2022 - Areas 1 & 4 2024 - Areas 2 & 3 (and Mayor) r J� Map layers ++ 'i+ Map 109 + !. Railroad Streets VPP_ - Landmark Point Map prepared 9/30/2021 by National Demographics Landmark Area ©2021 CALIPER DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B Map 109 District 1 2 3 4 Total 2020 2020 Census Adjusted 20,408 19,979 20,161 19,604 80,152 Deviation from ideal 370 -59 123 -434 804 %Deviation 1.85°/% -0.29% 0.61% -2.17°/% 4.01% %His 73% 44% 18% 28% 41% 2020 Total Po %NH White 12% 34% 40% 29% 29% P %NH Black 3% 2% 3% 2% 2% %Asian-American 10% 18% 37% 39% 26% Total 9,462 13,586 13,614 11,732 48,393 %His 60% 30% 14% 20% 29% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 25% 50% 49% 42% 43% %NH Black 5% 4% 2% 3% 3% %Asian/Pac.Isl. 10% 15% 34% 35% 24% Total 6,701 11,151 12,063 10,762 40,677 %Latino est. 57% 32% 13% 22% 28% Voter Registration(Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 52% 29% 12% 20% 25% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 7% 10% 23% 24% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% %NH White est. 33% 55% 62% 48% 52% %NH Black 5% 4% 2% 2% 3% Total 3,234 6,790 7,447 6,139 23,610 %Latino est. 49% 25% 11% 18% 22% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 45% 23% 10% 17% 20% 2018) %Asian-Surnamed 7% 8% 19% 19% 14% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% %NH White est. 40% 64% 68% 55% 59% %NH Black 5% 4% 2% 2% 3% Total 5,113 9,492 10,694 9,287 34,586 %Latino est. 55% 30% 12% 20% 26% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 50% 27% 11% 19% 23% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 8% 10% 22% 23% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 34% 57% 63% 50% 53% %NH Black est. 5% 3% 2% 1 2% 3% ACS Pop.Est. Total 21,267 20,050 19,963 18,554 79,835 age0-19 33% 24% 26% 28% 28% Age age20-60 57% 57% 57% 56% 57% a e60 lus 10% 19% 17% 16% 15% Immigration immigrants 38% 30% 29% 36% 33% naturalized 33% 52% 72% 1 42% 48% english 32% 54% 59% 47% 48% Language spoken at home spanish 59% 31% 11% 22% 31% asian-lang 5% 10% 21% 24% 15% other la 4% 5% 9% 7% 6% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less 27% 17% 12% 13% 18% than Very Well" Education(amo those hs-grad 46% 44% 22% 30% 35% age 25+) bachelor 16% 24% 39% 36% 29% aduatede ee 6% 11% 27% 17% 15% Child in Household child-underl8 45% 34% 38% 37% 38% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 72% 72% 75% 68% 72% income 0-25k 17% 9% 6% 12% 11% income 25-50k 24% 15% 8% 15% 15% Household Income income 50-75k 25% 19% 15% 12% 17% income 75-200k 33% 47% 43% 45% 42% income 200k-plus 1% 10% 27% 17% 14% single family 27% 54% 61% 68% 53% HousingStats multi-family 73% 46% 39% 32% 47% rented 77% 47% 42% 39% 51% owned 23% 53% 58% 61% 49% Total population data from the California adjustment to the 2020 Decennial Census.Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B City of Tustin - Redistricting 2021 Map 110 , (55 ' Not population-balanced ,�■■4' Peta■r ,yon Regi onal,P,k - M116 / L ,E 7th St'�_ ■ ,> +tt + + + _ +LNY coma ■ + 2 ■ /+ z + + SII mom ALI All 41 r 4 '� Map layers P Ma 110 ` + Railroad Streets Landmark Point Map prepared 9/30/2021 by National Demographics ©2021 CALIPER Landmark Area DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B Map 110 District 1 2 3 4 Total 2020 2020 Census Adjusted 16,931 20,161 30,538 12,522 80,152 Deviation from ideal -3,107 123 10,500 -7,516 18,016 %Deviation -15.51°/% 0.61% 52.40°/% -37.51°/% 89.91% %Hisp 40% 18% 65% 19% 41% 2020 Total Po %NH White 37% 40% 16% 30% 29% P %NH Black 2% 3% 3% 2% 2% %Asian-American 17% 37% 15% 46% 26% Total 11,555 13,614 15,860 7,365 48,393 %His 30% 14% 46% 19% 29% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 54% 49% 31% 38% 43% %NH Black 3% 2% 5% 3% 3% %Asian/Pac.Isl. 13% 34% 17% 39% 24% Total 9,775 12,063 11,839 7,000 40,677 %Latino est. 30% 13% 47% 17% 28% Voter Registration(Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 27% 12% 43% 16% 25% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 9% 23% 11% 27% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 58% 62% 39% 46% 52% %NH Black 3% 2% 5% 3% 3% Total 6,101 7,447 6,171 3,891 23,610 %Latino est. 23% 11% 38% 15% 22% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 22% 10% 35% 14% 20% 2018) %Asian-Surnamed 6% 19% 11% 22% 14% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 67% 68% 47% 53% 59% %NH Black 2% 1 2% 5% 3% 3% Total 8,422 10,694 9,367 6,103 34,586 %Latino est. 28% 12% 44% 16% 26% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 26% 11% 40% 15% 23% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 9% 22% 12% 27% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 60% 63% 41% 47% 53% %NH Black est. 3% 2% 5% 1 3% 3% ACS Pop.Est. Total 16,600 19,963 32,083 11,189 79,835 age0-19 23% 26% 31% 28% 28% Age age20-60 57% 57% 57% 56% 57% a e60 lus 20% 17% 12% 15% 15% Immigration immigrants 26% 29% 39% 36% 33% naturalized 51% 72% 38% 42% 48% english 59% 59% 35% 45% 48% Language spoken at home spanish 29% 11% 50% 17% 31% asian-lang 9% 21% 9% 28% 15% other lap 3% 9% 5% 9% 6% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less 14% 12% 24% 13% 18% than Very Well" Education(amon those hs-grad 42% 22% 44% 27% 35% age 25+)g bachelor 26% 39% 20% 37% 29% graduatedegree 13% 27% 7% 21% 15% Child in Household child-underl8 31% 38% 44% 37% 38% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 71% 75% 72% 67% 72% income 0-25k 11% 6% 14% 12% 11% income 25-50k 16% 8% 20% 15% 15% Household Income income 50-75k 16% 15% 25% 6% 17% income 75-200k 46% 43% 36% 48% 42% income 200k-plus 11% 27% 5% 17% 14% single family 54% 61% 38% 73% 53% Housing Stats multi-family 46% 39% 62% 27% 47% rented 47% 42% 68% 31% 51% owned 53% 58% 32% 69% 49% Total population data from the California adjustment to the 2020 Decennial Census.Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH white and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B City of Tustin - Redistricting 2021 Map 111 , 55 ' Not population-balanced ,�■■ ' Pete��llfiyon RegionalPk�" ,E 7th St'�� + i + + } L 77 L � - '• - - Imo ■ �/ �✓ \ Golf C4ursfil c 41 OF > \1`✓ j; 4jjL r �� + �✓ Map layers Map 111 Railroad Streets VPP- - Landmark Point Map prepared 9/30/2021 by National Demographics ©2021 CALIPER Landmark Area DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B Map 111 District 1 2 3 4 Total 2020 2020 Census Adjusted 13,273 23,819 22,660 20,400 80,152 Deviation from ideal -6,765 3,781 2,622 362 10,546 %Deviation -33.76% 18.87% 13.09% 1.81% 52.63% %Hisp 39% 21% 72% 30% 41% 2020 Total Po %NH White 39% 39% 12% 29% 29% P %NH Black 2% 3% 3% 2% 2% %Asian-American 16% 35% 12% 37% 26% Total 9,199 15,969 10,622 12,603 48,393 %His 29% 17% 51% 26% 29% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 57% 48% 27% 38% 43% %NH Black 2% 2% 6% 3% 3% %Asian/Pac.Isl. 11% 32% 15% 32% 24% Total 7,685 14,153 7,572 11,267 40,677 %Latino est. 29% 16% 55% 23% 28% Voter Registration(Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 27% 15% 50% 21% 25% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 8% 21% 9% 22% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 61% 60% 32% 48% 52% %NH Black 2% 2% 6% 3% 3% Total 4,921 8,627 3,646 6,416 23,610 %Latino est. 23% 13% 46% 20% 22% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 21% 12% 42% 18% 20% 2018) %Asian-Surnamed 6% 17% 10% 18% 14% %Filipino-Surnamed 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 69% 66% 39% 55% 59% %NH Black 1% 1 2% 6% 3% 3% Total 6,676 12,440 5,797 9,673 34,586 %Latino est. 28% 15% 52% 22% 26% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 25% 14% 48% 20% 23% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 8% 21% 10% 22% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 62% 61% 34% 49% 53% %NH Black est. 2% 2% 6% 1 3% 3% ACS Pop.Est. Total 13,112 23,451 23,916 19,356 79,835 age0-19 23% 26% 34% 27% 28% Age age20-60 55% 57% 56% 57% 57% a e60 lus 22% 17% 10% 16% 15% Immigration immigrants 25% 29% 40% 35% 33% naturalized 51% 69% 33% 49% 48% english 62% 58% 32% 45% 48% Language spoken at home spanish 28% 14% 56% 24% 31% asian-lang 8% 20% 7% 22% 15% other lap 2% 8% 4% 8% 6% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less 13% 14% 26% 16% 18% than Very Well" Education(amon those hs-grad 43% 24% 43% 35% 35% age 25+)g bachelor 24% 38% 19% 30% 29% graduatedegree 13% 24% 5% 17% 15% Child in Household child-underl8 31% 37% 46% 37% 38% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 71% 75% 71% 69% 72% income 0-25k 10% 8% 16% 10% 11% income 25-50k 15% 10% 22% 15% 15% Household Income income 50-75k 16% 15% 25% 13% 17% income 75-200k 47% 44% 33% 47% 42% income 200k-plus 13% 24% 3% 15% 14% single family 58% 57% 30% 68% 53% Housing Stats multi-family 42% 43% 70% 32% 47% rented 44% 44% 78% 35% 51% owned 56% 56% 22% 65% 49% Total population data from the California adjustment to the 2020 Decennial Census.Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH white and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B City of Tustin - Redistricting 2021 Map 112 Petah nyon Regiong1Pk'j �t■■r ,E I St'�� +tt + + �+ ✓ - z� + � 3 stin Ranch Golf, oursel�` + i + L /!�/ ✓�,��� � � �. L 11 i�siqITY 7Y / / 4 Suggested Sequence: 2022 - Areas 2 & 4 2024 - Areas 1 & 3 and Mayor) r J� Map layers ++ ✓ ;,'!+� Map 112 Railroad Streets VPP- - Landmark Point Map prepared 9/30/2021 by National Demographics ©2021 CALIPER Landmark Area DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B Map 112 District 1 2 3 4 Total 2020 2020 Census Adjusted 19,748 20,639 20,161 19,604 80,152 Deviation from ideal -290 601 123 -434 1,035 %Deviation -1.45% 3.00% 0.61% -2.17% 5.17% %Hisp 43% 73% 18% 28% 41% 2020 Total Po %NH White 34% 12% 40% 29% 29% P %NH Black 2% 3% 3% 2% 2% %Asian-American 17% 11% 37% 39% 26% Total 13,372 9,676 13,614 11,732 48,393 %His 31% 58% 14% 20% 29% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 50% 24% 49% 42% 43% %NH Black 3% 6% 2% 3% 3% %Asian/Pac.Isl. 15% 11% 34% 35% 24% Total 11,009 6,843 12,063 10,762 40,677 %Latino est. 31% 57% 13% 22% 28% Voter Registration(Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 29% 52% 12% 20% 25% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 9% 7% 23% 24% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% %NH White est. 56% 32% 62% 48% 52% %NH Black 3% 6% 2% 2% 3% Total 6,695 3,329 7,447 6,139 23,610 %Latino est. 24% 49% 11% 18% 22% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 23% 45% 10% 17% 20% 2018) %Asian-Surnamed 7% 7% 19% 19% 14% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% %NH White est. 65% 38% 68% 55% 59% %NH Black 3% 1 7% 2% 2% 3% Total 9,381 5,224 10,694 9,287 34,586 %Latino est. 29% 55% 12% 20% 26% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 27% 50% 11% 19% 23% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 9% 8% 22% 23% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 58% 33% 63% 50% 53% %NH Black est. 3% 6% 2% 1 2% 3% ACS Pop.Est. Total 19,646 21,671 19,963 18,554 79,835 age0-19 24% 33% 26% 28% 28% Age age20-60 57% 56% 57% 56% 57% a e60 lus 19% 10% 17% 16% 15% Immigration immigrants 29% 39% 29% 36% 33% naturalized 53% 33% 72% 42% 48% english 55% 32% 59% 47% 48% Language spoken at home spanish 31% 59% 11% 22% 31% asian-lang 10% 6% 21% 24% 15% other lap 5% 4% 9% 7% 6% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less 16% 27% 12% 13% 18% than Very Well" Education(amon those hs-grad 44% 45% 22% 30% 35% age 25+)g bachelor 24% 16% 39% 36% 29% graduatedegree 11% 6% 27% 17% 15% Child in Household child-underl8 33% 46% 38% 37% 38% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 72% 72% 75% 68% 72% income 0-25k 10% 16% 6% 12% 11% income 25-50k 15% 24% 8% 15% 15% Household Income income 50-75k 19% 24% 15% 12% 17% income 75-200k 46% 34% 43% 45% 42% income 200k-plus 10% 1% 27% 17% 14% single family 52% 29% 61% 68% 53% Housing Stats multi-family 48% 71% 39% 32% 47% rented 47% 77% 42% 39% 51% owned 53% 23% 58% 61% 49% Total population data from the California adjustment to the 2020 Decennial Census.Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH white and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B City of Tustin - Redistricting 2021 Map 113 ss PetemnY on Regional Pk`, - ARMIES' ,E_ +tt ++ ,� + + + + - z ;z CSim JLLhi - �C � now -7--4Tustin Ranch Golf Course' I � 'For, I rri v u v L11isiq 4 Suggested Sequence: 2022 - Areas 3 & 4 2024 - Areas 1 & 2 (and Mayor) Map layers ++� Map 113 Railroad Streets - Landmark Point Map prepared 9/30/2021 by National Demographics ©2021 CALIPER Landmark Area DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B Map 113 District 1 2 3 4 Total 2020 2020 Census Adjusted 19,227 20,971 20,095 19,859 80,152 Deviation from ideal -811 933 57 -179 1,744 %Deviation -4.05°/% 4.66°/% 0.28°/% -0.89°/% 8.70% %Hisp 39% 75% 18% 29% 41% 2020 Total Po %NH White 36% 11% 40% 28% 29% P %NH Black 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% %Asian-American 19% 10% 37% 38% 26% Total 12,795 9,449 13,699 12,451 48,393 %His 29% 60% 15% 21% 29% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 53% 23% 50% 39% 43% %NH Black 3% 5% 2% 4% 3% %Asian/Pac.Isl. 15% 11% 32% 35% 24% Total 10,987 7,079 12,134 10,477 40,677 %Latino est. 29% 58% 14% 22% 28% Voter Registration(Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 27% 53% 13% 20% 25% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 10% 8% 22% 24% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 58% 31% 62% 47% 52% %NH Black 3% 6% 2% 3% 3% Total 6,826 3,347 7,549 5,888 23,610 %Latino est. 23% 51% 12% 18% 22% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 21% 46% 11% 16% 20% 2018) %Asian-Surnamed 7% 8% 18% 20% 14% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% %NH White est. 66% 37% 68% 54% 59% %NH Black 2% 1 6% 1% 3% 3% Total 9,467 5,371 10,778 8,970 34,586 %Latino est. 27% 56% 14% 20% 26% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 25% 51% 13% 18% 23% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 10% 8% 21% 24% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 60% 33% 62% 48% 53% %NH Black est. 3% 6% 2% 1 3% 3% ACS Pop.Est. Total 18,281 21,885 20,231 19,438 79,835 age0-19 23% 34% 27% 27% 28% Age age20-60 57% 56% 56% 58% 57% a e60 lus 20% 10% 18% 16% 15% Immigration immigrants 27% 39% 28% 38% 33% naturalized 54% 35% 71% 42% 48% english 58% 30% 59% 45% 48% Language spoken at home spanish 29% 60% 12% 23% 31% asian-lang 10% 5% 21% 24% 15% other lap 3% 5% 9% 7% 6% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less 14% 27% 12% 16% 18% than Very Well" Education(amon those hs-grad 40% 46% 23% 32% 35% age 25+)g bachelor 28% 15% 38% 33% 29% graduatedegree 13% 5% 26% 16% 15% Child in Household child-underl8 31% 48% 38% 36% 38% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 71% 72% 74% 69% 72% income 0-25k 10% 15% 8% 11% 11% income 25-50k 15% 23% 9% 15% 15% Household Income income 50-75k 15% 27% 15% 13% 17% income 75-200k 49% 34% 42% 44% 42% income 200k-plus 11% 1% 27% 17% 14% single family 55% 28% 63% 64% 53% Housing Stats multi-family 45% 72% 37% 36% 47% rented 47% 77% 40% 41% 51% owned 53% 23% 60% 59% 49% Total population data from the California adjustment to the 2020 Decennial Census.Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH white and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B City of Tustin - Redistricting 2021 Map 114 y51 55 Peters Canyon Regional,P,k" +tt +. -17 Ws J i LIL -T-4, '% / Tustin Ranch Golf Course +4z + + +, 3 III 'i L 11 isiq M6spA +� �/ y / OV A 41 j, �✓ .� Suggested Sequence: 2022 - Areas 1 & 4 2024 - Areas 2 & 3 (and Mayor) Map layers Map 114 Railroad \\ Streets Map prepared 9/30/2021 by National Demographics Landmark Point ©2021 CALIPER Landmark Area DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B Map 114 District 1 2 3 4 Total 2020 2020 Census Adjusted 19,789 20,343 20,161 19,859 80,152 Deviation from ideal -249 305 123 -179 554 %Deviation -1.24°/% 1.52°/% 0.61°/% -0.89°/% 2.76% %Hisp 43% 73% 18% 29% 41% 2020 Total Po %NH White 35% 12% 40% 28% 29% P %NH Black 2% 3% 3% 2% 2% %Asian-American 17% 11% 37% 38% 26% Total 12,913 9,416 13,614 12,451 48,393 %His 30% 59% 14% 21% 29% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 53% 25% 49% 39% 43% %NH Black 3% 5% 2% 4% 3% %Asian/Pac.Isl. 14% 11% 34% 35% 24% Total 11,400 6,737 12,063 10,477 40,677 %Latino est. 32% 57% 13% 22% 28% Voter Registration(Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 29% 52% 12% 20% 25% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 9% 8% 23% 24% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% %NH White est. 57% 32% 62% 47% 52% %NH Black 3% 5% 2% 3% 3% Total 7,011 3,264 7,447 5,888 23,610 %Latino est. 25% 49% 11% 18% 22% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 23% 45% 10% 16% 20% 2018) %Asian-Surnamed 7% 7% 19% 20% 14% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% %NH White est. 65% 39% 68% 54% 59% %NH Black 2% 1 6% 2% 3% 3% Total 9,779 5,143 10,694 8,970 34,586 %Latino est. 30% 55% 12% 20% 26% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 27% 50% 11% 18% 23% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 9% 8% 22% 24% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 58% 34% 63% 48% 53% %NH Black est. 3% 6% 2% 1 3% 3% ACS Pop.Est. Total 19,133 21,300 19,963 19,438 79,835 age0-19 25% 33% 26% 27% 28% Age age20-60 56% 57% 57% 58% 57% a e60 lus 19% 10% 17% 16% 15% Immigration immigrants 27% 39% 29% 38% 33% naturalized 54% 33% 72% 42% 48% english 56% 32% 59% 45% 48% Language spoken at home spanish 31% 59% 11% 23% 31% asian-lang 9% 6% 21% 24% 15% other lap 4% 4% 9% 7% 6% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less 15% 27% 12% 16% 18% than Very Well" Education(amon those hs-grad 42% 45% 22% 32% 35% age 25+)g bachelor 26% 16% 39% 33% 29% graduatedegree 12% 6% 27% 16% 15% Child in Household child-underl8 34% 46% 38% 36% 38% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 71% 72% 75% 69% 72% income 0-25k 10% 17% 6% 11% 11% income 25-50k 15% 24% 8% 15% 15% Household Income income 50-75k 17% 25% 15% 13% 17% income 75-200k 48% 33% 43% 44% 42% income 200k-plus 10% 1% 27% 17% 14% single family 57% 28% 61% 64% 53% Housing Stats multi-family 43% 72% 39% 36% 47% rented 45% 77% 42% 41% 51% owned 55% 23% 58% 59% 49% Total population data from the California adjustment to the 2020 Decennial Census.Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH white and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B City of Tustin - Redistricting 2021 Map 115 Petah nyon Regionopk'j �t■■r ,E1I th st + + + + Lw 3L, Omerm - _.A -T� � + usRanch Golf Course Oppr LsIl�spA l; x' /a�' i Suggested Sequence: / 2022 - Areas 1 & 4 2024 - Areas 2 & 3 (and Mayor) + Map layers Map 115 / Railroad Streets VPP_ Landmark Point Map prepared 10/18/2021 by National Demographics _ ©2021 CALIPER Landmark Area DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B Map 115 District 1 2 3 4 Total 2020 2020 Census Adjusted 20,148 20,239 20,161 19,604 80,152 Deviation from ideal 110 201 123 -434 635 %Deviation 0.55°/% 1.00°/% 0.61°/% -2.17°/% 3.17% %Hisp 45% 72% 18% 28% 41% 2020 Total Po %NH White 32% 14% 40% 29% 29% P %NH Black 2% 3% 3% 2% 2% %Asian-American 18% 10% 37% 39% 26% Total 13,544 9,504 13,614 11,732 48,393 %His 32% 57% 14% 20% 29% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 47% 29% 49% 42% 43% %NH Black 4% 5% 2% 3% 3% %Asian/Pac.Isl. 16% 9% 34% 35% 24% Total 10,965 6,887 12,063 10,762 40,677 %Latino est. 34% 54% 13% 22% 28% Voter Registration(Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 31% 49% 12% 20% 25% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 10% 7% 23% 24% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% %NH White est. 54% 36% 62% 48% 52% %NH Black 3% 5% 2% 2% 3% Total 6,643 3,381 7,447 6,139 23,610 %Latino est. 27% 44% 11% 18% 22% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 25% 40% 10% 17% 20% 2018) %Asian-Surnamed 8% 7% 19% 19% 14% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% %NH White est. 62% 45% 68% 55% 59% %NH Black 3% 1 5% 2% 2% 3% Total 9,294 5,311 10,694 9,287 34,586 %Latino est. 32% 51% 12% 20% 26% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 29% 46% 11% 19% 23% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 10% 8% 22% 23% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 56% 38% 63% 50% 53% %NH Black est. 3% 5% 2% 1 2% 3% ACS Pop.Est. Total 20,319 20,998 19,963 18,554 79,835 age0-19 25% 32% 26% 28% 28% Age age20-60 57% 56% 57% 56% 57% a e60 lus 18% 11% 17% 16% 15% Immigration immigrants 30% 38% 29% 36% 33% naturalized 51% 34% 72% 42% 48% english 52% 33% 59% 47% 48% Language spoken at home spanish 33% 58% 11% 22% 31% asian-lang 10% 5% 21% 24% 15% other lap 5% 4% 9% 7% 6% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less 17% 27% 12% 13% 18% than Very Well" Education(amon those hs-grad 45% 45% 22% 30% 35% age 25+)g bachelor 24% 16% 39% 36% 29% graduatedegree 11% 7% 27% 17% 15% Child in Household child-underl8 35% 44% 38% 37% 38% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 72% 72% 75% 68% 72% income 0-25k 9% 17% 6% 12% 11% income 25-50k 16% 23% 8% 15% 15% Household Income income 50-75k 18% 25% 15% 12% 17% income 75-200k 47% 33% 43% 45% 42% income 200k-plus 9% 2% 27% 17% 14% single family 53% 29% 61% 68% 53% Housing Stats multi-family 47% 71% 39% 32% 47% rented 49% 75% 42% 39% 51% owned 51% 25% 58% 61% 49% Total population data from the California adjustment to the 2020 Decennial Census.Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH white and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE613 116 �viap City of Tustin Districting 2021 RECEUVED NOT POPULATION BALANCED np on, �nzi Draw Your I CHER 5 OFFICE , Community" 55 .h. 4 17TH STj J Map IRVINE-ft D r " ,W 1ST ST E 1ST,ST qp,� 55 MCFADDEN AVE 0 v Draw on the map & 9G� describe your communi o FO,r ti 9Gcp. ti 6 4116 VE TUSTIN RP�o 7P Q Municipal Boundaries 0 City of Tustin Parks TUSD Schools 7771 Mile N w w DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B p 117 ...ter. City of Tustin Districting 2021 "LCI.EAVREtD NOT POPULATION BALANCED SFS' ` 3 2021 j; TUSTIN " Draw Your CLERKS OFFICE Community" 55 fl, . 17TH ST z Map r r I IRVINE-BLVD I_ W 1ST ST E 15T ST t AOS r rQ� �Qa QF' ADDEN:AVE i Draw on the map & describe your community: qLF �qR ti �R AVF ey. O TUSTIN RP��'� Municipal Boundaries City of Tustin Parks 1 % 0 TUSD Schools Mile (v DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B 118 ivies City of Tustin Districting 2021 RECE-EDD REQUIRES BLOCK SPLITTING SEP ` C 2121 TUSTIN " Draw CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Community' k17�11THS�T Map L VINE-BLVD r '— W 1ST ST E 1ST i QOM , i 551J j f•92� j ?�, �OQ- MCFADDEN IAVE O Draw on the map & _ describe your community: FOl 2 cFR ?2 �R4VF TUSTIN RPN Q Municipal Boundaries [� City of Tustin Parks 1 ' L�� TUSD Schools Mile N DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B u y or ustin Districting zuzl Map 119 NOT POPULATION BALANCED " Draw Your a � _ CJL�j W 7,T4$T-; Map ;t�L IRVINE I3[VC? SIA —f 1ST ST E 1-T ST MuADDEN AVE FI-.- l y 1: :. �P o�fi ? 4 {� Draw on the map & i t :} describe your community: I �3 V,~ N �fI• NN� FUST I Pi RF�a`• Q Municipal Boundaries City of Tustin Parks TUSD Schools Mile N DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B City of Tustin - Redistricting 2021 Map 120 ii PeAlI nyon RegionalPk�" r JOE ,E 17th St'—L— - F-I' �� ' ' . _� stirs Ranch Golf Course QW v ion y ice. Suggested Sequence: 2022 - Areas 1 & 4 2024 - Areas 2 & 3 (and Mayor) r > Map layers Map 120 Railroad Streets Map prepared 10/18/2021 by National Demographics ©2021 CALIPER Landmark Area DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B Map 120 District 1 2 3 4 Total 2020 2020 Census Adjusted 20,294 19,557 20,161 20,140 80,152 Deviation from ideal 256 -481 123 102 737 %Deviation 1.28°/% -2.40% 0.61°/% 0.51°/% 3.68% %His 43% 71% 18% 31% 41% 2020 Total Po %NH White 33% 14% 40% 27% 29% P %NH Black 2% 3% 3% 2% 2% %Asian-American 18% 10% 37% 38% 26% Total 13,603 9,450 13,614 11,727 48,393 %His 31% 57% 14% 21% 29% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 50% 28% 49% 39% 43% %NH Black 3% 5% 2% 4% 3% %Asian/Pac.Isl. 16% 10% 34% 35% 24% Total 11,280 6,826 12,063 10,508 40,677 %Latino est. 32% 54% 13% 23% 28% Voter Registration(Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 29% 49% 12% 21% 25% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 10% 7% 23% 24% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% %NH White est. 56% 36% 62% 45% 52% %NH Black 3% 5% 2% 3% 3% Total 6,924 3,418 7,447 5,821 23,610 %Latino est. 25% 45% 11% 19% 22% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 23% 41% 10% 17% 20% 2018) %Asian-Surnamed 8% 7% 19% 20% 14% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% %NH White est. 64% 44% 68% 53% 59% %NH Black 3% 5% 2% 4% 3% Total 9,635 5,304 10,694 8,953 34,586 %Latino est. 30% 51% 12% 21% 26% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 27% 46% 11% 20% 23% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 10% 8% 22% 24% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 58% 38% 63% 47% 53% %NH Black est. 3% 5% 2% 1 3% 3% ACS Pop.Est. Total 20,061 20,337 19,963 19,474 79,835 age0-19 25% 33% 26% 28% 28% Age age20-60 57% 56% 57% 58% 57% a e60 lus 18% 12% 17% 14% 15% Immigration immigrants 29% 38% 29% 38% 33% naturalized 54% 33% 72% 1 40% 48% english 54% 33% 59% 45% 48% Language spoken at home spanish 31% 58% 11% 25% 31% asian-lang 10% 6% 21% 22% 15% other la 5% 3% 9% 7% 6% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less 16% 26% 12% 15% 18% than Very Well" Education(amo those hs-grad 44% 44% 22% 33% 35% age 25+) bachelor 24% 16% 39% 34% 29% aduatede ee 11% 6% 27% 16% 15% Child in Household child-underl8 35% 43% 38% 38% 38% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 71% 71% 75% 70% 72% income 0-25k 10% 17% 6% 11% 11% income 25-50k 15% 24% 8% 15% 15% Household Income income 50-75k 18% 24% 15% 13% 17% income 75-200k 47% 32% 43% 45% 42% income 200k-plus 10% 2% 27% 16% 14% single family 56% 31% 61% 61% 53% HousingStats multi-family 44% 69% 39% 39% 47% rented 45% 74% 42% 46% 51% owned 55% 26% 58% 54% 49% Total population data from the California adjustment to the 2020 Decennial Census.Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B City of Tustin - Redistricting 2021 Map 121 Petah nyon Regionopk'j �t■■r ,E�1I th St 3 LSI . r WT,,,tinPnh - acGolfCourse 211 v T `- ' 41 4fy�\ Suggested Sequence: / 2022 - Areas 1 & 4 2024 - Areas 2 & 3 (and Mayor) Map layers Map 121 Railroad Streets Map prepared 10/18/2021 by National Demographics ©2021 CALIPER Landmark Area DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B Map 121 District 1 2 3 4 Total 2020 2020 Census Adjusted 20,655 18,936 20,161 20,400 80,152 Deviation from ideal 617 -1,102 123 362 1,719 %Deviation 3.08% -5.50% 0.61% 1.81% 8.58% %His 44% 74% 18% 30% 41% 2020 Total Po %NH White 33% 11% 40% 29% 29% P %NH Black 2% 3% 3% 2% 2% %Asian-American 18% 11% 37% 37% 26% Total 13,455 8,722 13,614 12,603 48,393 %His 31% 54% 14% 26% 29% Citizen Voting Age Pop %NH White 50% 28% 49% 38% 43% %NH Black 4% 4% 2% 3% 3% %Asian/Pac.Isl. 14% 14% 34% 32% 24% Total 11,302 6,045 12,063 11,267 40,677 %Latino est. 32% 57% 13% 23% 28% Voter Registration(Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 30% 51% 12% 21% 25% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 9% 9% 23% 22% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% %NH White est. 55% 33% 62% 48% 52% %NH Black 4% 5% 2% 3% 3% Total 6,891 2,856 7,447 6,416 23,610 %Latino est. 25% 47% 11% 20% 22% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 24% 43% 10% 18% 20% 2018) %Asian-Surnamed 7% 10% 19% 18% 14% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% %NH White est. 63% 39% 68% 55% 59% %NH Black 3% 5% 2% 3% 3% Total 9,640 4,579 10,694 9,673 34,586 %Latino est. 30% 54% 12% 22% 26% Voter Turnout (Nov %Spanish-Surnamed 28% 49% 11% 20% 23% 2020) %Asian-Surnamed 9% 9% 22% 22% 17% %Filipino-Surnamed 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% %NH White est. 57% 34% 63% 49% 53% %NH Black est. 3% 5% 2% 1 3% 3% ACS Pop.Est. Total 20,466 20,050 19,963 19,356 79,835 age0-19 25% 34% 26% 27% 28% Age age20-60 57% 55% 57% 57% 57% a e60 lus 18% 10% 17% 16% 15% Inunigration immigrants 29% 40% 29% 35% 33% naturalized 48% 32% 72% 1 49% 48% english 55% 31% 59% 45% 48% Language spoken at home spanish 32% 58% 11% 24% 31% asian-lang 9% 7% 21% 22% 15% other la 4% 4% 9% 8% 6% Language Fluency Speaks Eng."Less 17% 26% 12% 16% 18% than Very Well" Education(amo those hs-grad 44% 41% 22% 35% 35% age 25+) bachelor 25% 19% 39% 30% 29% aduatede ee 12% 5% 27% 17% 15% Child in Household child-underl8 33% 46% 38% 37% 38% Pct of Pop.Age 16+ employed 72% 71% 75% 69% 72% income 0-25k 11% 17% 6% 10% 11% income 25-50k 16% 23% 8% 15% 15% Household Income income 50-75k 16% 27% 15% 13% 17% income 75-200k 47% 29% 43% 47% 42% income 200k-plus 10% 3% 27% 15% 14% single family 51% 29% 61% 68% 53% HousingStats multi-family 49% 71% 39% 32% 47% rented 51% 79% 42% 35% 51% owned 49% 21% 58% 65% 49% Total population data from the California adjustment to the 2020 Decennial Census.Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates.NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop.,Age,Immigration,and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data. DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B i I i i i I Notes for Draft Maps I a i Map 101- No notes Map 102 - No notes I Map 103 - "(1) "Old Town" -- Bordered on southwest by 1-5, on southeast by Browning. (2) "Red Hill" – Bordered on northeast by 1-5, on southwest by Edinger. (3) "Legacy District" – Bordered 3 on northeast by Edinger, with exception of Tustin Meadows. (4) "Tustin Ranch" – Bordered on northwest by Browning, on southwest by 1-5. Borders are based on an iterative multi-objective optimization between geographic area and population density, factoring projected growth (particularly in (3) "Legacy District") based on most recent Housing Element Update." Map 104 - "The consultants are knowledgeable and have done a great job with background information and the redistricting process. However, the DrawTustin/ redistricting process feels very rushed with a compressed two-three month process. Small numbers of community members have attended/participated in the public workshops and council meetings. Redistricting is very important for Tustin, and the community will not have an ;opportunity for 10 years to revise the districts. Additional efforts to include community members is needed, such as having printed maps available at City Hall, senior center, community center, community events, and schools for pick-up or in- person drawing/map submittal. There is a need for more than.fo.ur districts to better reflect the multitude of community assets and neighborhoods north and south of Interstate 5. An additional one or two districts would allow for greater representation and the opportunity for more a more equitable distribution of socioeconomic and ethnicity within each district. The Tustin Ranch Specific Plan and the Legacy (former MCAS Tustin) Specific Plan area do not have to be within a single district." Map 105 - "The 1-5 freeway is a main dividing line within the City's limits, since there are only 5 connections between areas to the northeast and areas to the southwest. These connections are SR-55 on the west, Jamboree Road on the east, and between them Tustin Ranch Road, Red Hill Avenue, and Newport Avenue. Newport Avenue is actually not a through road, since it does not connect to Edinger Avenue. The portion of the City lying southwest of 1-5 can be reasonably divided into two districts. My map labels these as Area 1 (southwest of Edinger Avenue, but including a small extension north of Edinger to the east of Jamboree Road) and Area 2 (between Edinger Avenue and 1-5). — Area 1 is a mixture of commercial-industrial and a small amount of generally high-density housing, with ample space for future high-density residential development. This area is under- served in terms of shops and small businesses catering to the general public, but there is a new I i DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B I shopping center just west of Tustin Ranch Road. The area's challenges and opportunities are distinctly different from the rest of Tustin, but have much in common with Irvine and Costa Mesa. -- Area 2 is dominated by residential uses, including single family dwellings and mainly high- density town home and apartment complexes. It is well-served by numerous groceries, and 3 restaurants, gas stations, small offices complexes, and various small businesses catering to the general public. There is some room for residential and mixed commercial-industrial growth in the southeastern part of this area, but future growth may largely depend on replacement of existing uses elsewhere in the area. Socioeconomically, this area represents a balance of ethnically and linguistically diverse people with primarily lower-middle to middle class status. It functions as a mostly self-sufficient unit within Tustin, and its challenges and opportunities are relatively distinct from other parts of the City. Northeast of the 1-5 freeway, Tustin seems comprised of two communities abutting Red Hill Avenue. Area 3 lies to the northeast, and Area 4 to the northwest of Red Hill. —Area 3 is dominated by residential uses,with a predominance of single family dwellings over high-density complexes. It seems under-served by businesses catering to the general public, but these are readily accessible by east-west connector roads within the City (Irvine Boulevard and Bryan Avenue) and by Jamboree Road with its access to areas in the City of Irvine. There is some room for future growth in the southeastern corner of this area, but that will almost certainly be restricted to residential uses. Future growth in most of Area 3 may largely depend on redevelopment, which seems unlikely to occur. Ethnically,the residents are dominated by white and Asian people. Socioeconomically,the residents range from middle or upper-middle class to mostly well-off. In many ways, the area is a semi-isolated community, having more internal interests than interests in common with other parts of the City, and more external links to Irvine and North Tustin than to other parts of the City. -- Area 4 is dominated by residential uses, especially single family dwellings. It appears somewhat under-served by businesses catering to the general public, but these are readily accessible by east-west connector roads within the City(17th Street, Irvine Boulevard, 1st Street, and Bryan Avenue) and by the SR-55 freeway on the west. There is little room for future growth, which may largely depend on redevelopment, but seems unlikely to occur. Socioeconomically, this area's residents are mostly middle class and not especially ethnically diverse. In many ways, the area is a semi-isolated community,having more internal interests than interests in common with other parts of the Tustin, and more external links to Santa Ana and Orange than to other parts of the City." i i Map 106 - "Note that as per the motion passed by the city council, the city is divided into four districts. Using some estimate data that I found for CVAP, I divided the districts into equal populations (within the 10% threshold). The northeastern district (in red) is highly contiguous and of a demographic sharing a common interest. The southern district (in purple) is highly compact and contiguous. I had heard people express during the first public hearing that Edinger j Ave might be a nice natural border for the district, but for equal population concerns, I included j Tustin Meadows, Peppertree, and Laurelwood. Northwestern Tustin (in orange) is nicely delineated with Newport Ave with roughly 1/4 of the Tustin population to the northwest of this DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B 1 i I street. The remainder is allocated to a central district (in blue) which is also compact and contiguous. i Of particular note is the area north of Bryan Ave and surrounded by Heritage Way and Tustin i Ranch Rd. Ideally,this area should be allocated to the northeastern district, if population allows; j however, I strongly suspect that once accurate CVAP numbers are published this area won't fit into that district. In that case, it should be allocated to the central district. i Likewise, the area bounded by Walnut Ave on the north, Redhill Ave on the east, Sycamore Ave on the south and Newport Ave on the west might possibly fit in either the southern district or central district, depending on the final census numbers." i I Map 107- "Blue—Tustin Ranch Red —New housing and Planned Communities Green--Old town and older single-family homes. Yellow— 1960's housing boom" Map 108 - "This configuration would account for one majority-Hispanic district, one plurality- Hispanic district (which should address the issue of Latino representation which may have been brought up by MALDEF,) two plurality-White districts, and one plurality-Asian district. These districts individually reflect the differences in demographic makeup across the city, and as a whole, reflect the makeup of the whole city. Regarding partisanship, all districts lean Democratic, as Republican voters are too spread out to form a district of their own. Districts 1 through 4 are mostly built-up, while District 5 concentrates the majority of new growth in the Tustin Legacy district. Creating these districts would allow each councilmember to have a constituency to focus on. Residents of each district would have a member on whom to rely to act on their behalf. This decentralizes responsibility for neighborhood issues, which helps prevent communities from being underserved, and helps the council fully represent Tustin." I Map 109- No notes i Map 110- No notes i Map 111 - No notes i Map 112 - No notes { i Ma _p 113 - No notes Map 114- No notes DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B Notes for Draft Maps Map 115- One of the largest problems is that most of the maps currently proposed appear to try to put the maximum number of Latino voters into one district, creating an artificial and improper segregation of 40%of our City's population. This proposed map maximizes the integration of the Latino population, while ensuring a majority/minority district. This map also keeps Old Town Tustin intact, which is a goal expressed by numerous community members and the City Council. Historically, Old Town existed on both sides of what is now 1-5, and there remain numerous pre-war buildings, including craftsman-style bungalows, in the Old Town area south of 1-5. This map also keeps the Newport Avenue commercial corridor mostly intact (including Larwin Square), running on both sides of the 1-5. Old Town here is combined with the area around St. Saint Jeanne school and parts of SW Tustin. This makes more sense than other alternatives because the smaller lots, apartments, and commercial areas (including Larwin Square) fit in with the dense housing and commercial areas on Newport Avenue than with the larger lots of mostly SFR residential tracts in the northern parts of the City. Meanwhile,those parts of areas (outside of Tustin Ranch) but in the northern part of the City remain together. (This area, along with the neighboring parts of unincorporated North Tustin, form their own community of interest.) This map also achieves multiple additional goals. It keeps Tustin Ranch and Tustin Legacy intact as distinct communities of interest. It uses major streets in Tustin as boundaries, as much as possible. It creates four geographically compact districts that keep communities of interest intact. Map 116- No proposed election years or demographic profile Map 117 - No proposed election years or demographic profile Map 118- No proposed election years or demographic profile Map 119 - *Map submitted after draft map due date but before the 7-day map posting window. No proposed election years or demographic profile. Map 120- No notes Map 121 - No notes DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B ORDINANCE NO. 1518 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, ADDING SECTION 1309 TO CHAPTER 3 (CITY COUNCIL) OF ARTICLE 1 (ADMINISTRATION) OF THE TUSTIN CITY CODE IMPLEMENTING BY-DISTRICT ELECTIONS OF FOUR COUNCIL MEMBERS AND ESTABLISHING THE OFFICE OF THE MAYOR TO BE ELECTED AT-LARGE. City Attorney Summary This Ordinance adds Section 1309 to Chapter 3 of Article 1 of the Tustin City Code to establish "by-district" elections of council members from four electoral districts and a mayor elected at-large. The Ordinance requires that four members of the City Council be elected by the voters of each of the four districts. The Ordinance further establishes the boundary lines for each of the four districts, with district[s]to be elected at the regular municipal election to be held in November 2022 and district[s] to be elected at the regular municipal election to be held in November 2024. The Ordinance provides for the Mayor to be elected to a term of [two] [four]years at the municipal election to be held in November WHEREAS, members of the City Council of the City of Tustin are currently elected in at- large elections, in which each of the five Councilmembers is elected by voters of the entire City, and the City Council elects one council member to serve as Mayor each year; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to shift from its current at-large election system to a by-district election system where four Councilmembers reside within a designated district boundary and is elected only by the voters in that district, plus the Mayor to be elected by voters at-large; and WHEREAS, on August 3, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 21-64, declaring the City's intention to transition from at-large to district-based elections pursuant to California Elections Code Section 10010(e)(3)(A); and WHEREAS, the City retained an expert demographer and community organizers to assist the City with the process of analyzing the City's population, developing draft district maps consistent with the California Voting Rights Act and the Federal Voting Rights Act, implement a community participation plan to gather public input from residents and to facilitate the development of preliminary district map proposals; and WHEREAS, the City established a dedicated webpage containing notices and information on the district elections mapping process with information in English, Spanish, Korean, Traditional Chinese and Vietnamese; City staff provided information to the public on the Ordinance No. 1518 Page 1 DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B district mapping process through the City's social media accounts, press releases, posting notices in the City's regular posting locations, listings on the City's events calendar, emails to local community groups and residents, two virtual public workshops via Zoom on August 31, 2021 and September 22, 2021. WHEREAS, in accordance with California Elections Code Section 10010(a)(1), in addition to the public workshops, the City Council held two public hearings on September 7, 2021 and September 17, 2021 where the public was invited to provide input regarding the composition of the City's voting districts before any draft maps were drawn; and WHEREAS, in accordance with California Elections Code Section 10010(a)(2), the City Council held two additional public hearings on October 9, 2021 and October 25, 2021 where the public was invited to provide input regarding the content of the draft maps and the proposed sequence of elections; and WHEREAS, at its October 25, 2021 meeting, the City Council selected its preferred district map, determined its preferred sequence of district elections, and introduced this Ordinance for adoption at its regular meeting scheduled for November 1, 2021; and WHEREAS, in accordance with California Government Code Section 34886, it is declared that the change in the method of electing members of the City Council of the City of Tustin made by this Ordinance is in furtherance of the purposes of the California Voting Rights Act of 2001 (Chapter 1.5 (commencing with Section 14025) of Division 14 of the Elections Code) and to implement the guarantees of Section 7 of Article I and Section 2 of Article II of the California Constitution. Now, therefore, the City Council of the City of Tustin does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION I. Section 1309 is hereby added to Chapter 3 (City Council) of Article 1 (Administration) of the Tustin City Code to read as follows: 1309— Qualifications of the Members of the City Council a. Members of the City Council, generally. Beginning with the November 2022 general municipal election, the City Council shall consist of five members with the Mayor elected at-large and four Council Members elected by-districts. b. Mayor. The person elected to serve in the office of Mayor shall be elected by the voters City-wide (at-large). A person is not eligible to hold office as Mayor unless he or she is at the time of seeking nomination or appointment to office an elector of the City. If, during his or her term of office he or she moves his or her place Ordinance No. 1518 Page 2 DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B of residence outside of the City limits or ceases to be an elector of the City, his or her office shall immediately become vacant. c. Council Member (Other than Mayor). Beginning with the November 2022 general municipal election, a person elected as a member of the City Council other than the Mayor shall be a resident of his or her respective Council District created under subdivision (c), as may be subsequently reapportioned as provided by applicable law, and shall be nominated and elected only by the voters of his or her respective Council District. A person is not eligible to hold office as Council Member unless he or she is at the time of seeking nomination or appointment to office an elector of the City, residing in the District from which he or she is elected or appointed. If, during his or her term of office he or she moves his or her place of residence outside of the District boundaries or ceases to be an elector of the City, his or her office shall immediately become vacant. However, no Council Member shall be deemed to have moved outside of his or her District as a result of District boundary changes which may occur during his or her term of office, and such Council Member shall continue to serve until his or her term is complete or the office otherwise becomes vacant. d. Council Districts. 1. BOUNDARIES. The boundaries for each of the four Council Districts and their numbering are as shown on the district map entitled "City of Tustin District Map" attached as Exhibit "A," a copy of which shall be on file in the City Clerk's office. 2. TRANSITION. (a) Nothing herein shall affect the terms of office of the five members of the City Council in office at the time the ordinance codifying this section establishing district elections takes effect, who shall continue in office until their respective terms expire and until their successors are elected and qualified. Recall proceedings, if any, of such City Council members serving the remainder of an at-large elected term and an election of a successor to such City Council member to complete that term, shall be conducted at-large in accordance with applicable law. (b) The Mayor shall be elected at-large for a term of [two] [four] years at the general municipal election in November and at the general municipal election every [two] [four] years thereafter. Ordinance No. 1518 Page 3 DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B (c) Council Members shall be elected in Council District[s] [and ] at the general municipal election in November 2022 and at the general municipal election every four years thereafter. (d) Council members shall be elected in Council District[s] [and ] at the general municipal election in November 2024 and at the general municipal election every four years thereafter. 3. FUTURE REDISTRICTING. (a) Future adjustments to the boundaries of the Districts established herein shall be made in accordance with federal and state law applicable to general law cities, including, but not limited to, the provision of California Elections Code §§ 21600 et seq. requiring the adjustments of the boundaries of any or all of the Districts following each decennial federal census. (b) Pursuant to Elections Code §21606, the term of office of any Council Member who has been elected and whose term of office has not expired shall not be affected by any change in the boundaries of the District from which he or she was elected, whether or not that Council Member is a resident within the boundaries of the District as adjusted. At the first election for Council following adjustment of the boundaries of the District, a person meeting the requirements of Government Code § 34882 shall be elected to the City Council for each District under the readjusted District plan that has the same District number as a District whose incumbent's term on the Council is due to expire. 4. ANNEXATIONS. At the time of any annexation of territory to the City, the City Council shall designate, by resolution adopted by a vote of at least a majority of the City Council, the contiguous District or Districts to which the annexed territory shall be a part and shall amend the District boundaries if necessary in accordance with Elections Code § 21603, as it may be amended from time to time. SECTION II. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect on the 31St day after its adoption. The City Clerk or his or her duly appointed deputy shall certify to the adoption of the Ordinance and cause this Ordinance to be published as required by law. SECTION III. Severability. If any section, sub-section, clause or phrase in this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstances is for any reason held invalid, the validity of the remainder of this Ordinance or the application of such provisions to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected. Ordinance No. 1518 Page 4 DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B PASSED AND ADOPTED, at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Tustin on this day of , 2021. LETITIA CLARK, Mayor ATTEST: ERICA N. YASUDA, City Clerk Ordinance No. 1518 Page 5 DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B EXHIBIT A CITY OF TUSTIN DISTRICT MAP The City of Tustin District Map is attached, and a copy shall be on file in the City Clerk's office. Ordinance No. 1518 Page 6 DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss CITY OF TUSTIN ) CERTIFICATION FOR ORDINANCE NO. 1518 ERICA N. YASUDA, City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of the members of the City Council of the City of Tustin is five; that the above and foregoing Ordinance 1518 was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin City Council held on the day of , 20217 by the following vote: COUNCILMEMBER AYES: COUNCILMEMBER NOES: COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT: ERICA N. YASUDA, City Clerk Ordinance No. 1518 Page 7 DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B A TTA CHMENT 3 Community Engagement: Regarding the Proposed Transition from At-Large to District Elections The City developed a comprehensive community engagement plan intended to maximize awareness, education and participation through each step of the district formation process. The aggressive outreach effort was designed to reach the entire Tustin community about the potential shift to by-district elections. District Map Boundary Tools To help community members provide their input on how potential district boundaries are drawn, the City provided a map tool available for downloading and printing from DrawTustin.org. Community members can use the maps to identify "communities of interest" and suggest where district lines should potentially be drawn. Community members can submit their ideas regarding district boundaries, district election sequencing and proposed district maps to drawtustiN(Oustinca.org. Additionally, draft maps may be viewed in an interactive viewing tool available at DrawTustin.org which includes census blocks, demographic information, and much more. Implemented outreach and engagement efforts October 5— October 19, 2021: • Email distributed October 7 to 9,935 recipients regarding the October 9 Public Hearing. • Distribution of a press release announcing the October 9 Public Hearing. • Third Public Hearing held on October 9 to consider the first publication of draft maps and gather feedback from members of the public and City Council Members. • Email distributed October 11 to 9,918 recipients sharing meeting materials from the Third Public Hearing and reminding residents to draw and submit any additional proposed district maps by the second draft maps due date of October 14. • Animated video published via YouTube (including captions in English, Spanish, Chinese (traditional), Korean and Vietnamese), explaining the districting process and how to participate. DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B • Two social media posts on Facebook (including content in English, Spanish, Chinese (traditional), Korean and Vietnamese). The posts publicized the Third Public Hearing and the second draft maps deadline and had a combined reach of 1,723. (Note that a boosted post publicizing the Fourth Public Hearing is scheduled to be advertised October 20-25 and is expected to have a reach of approximately 23,000.) • Likewise, social media posts on Twitter, which provided the same information as the Facebook posts (including content in 5 languages), netted 7,456 impressions • Public Notice of the October 25 Public Hearing posted/published. • Items drafted and ready to share October 20-25 to further publicize the October 25 Public Hearing (including a press release, social media, outreach emails, etc.) Implemented outreach and engagement efforts September 10— October 5, 2021: • Email distributed September 14 to 10,037 recipients regarding meeting materials from Public Workshop #1 being posted to DrawTustin.org. • Second Public Hearing held on September 17 to educate community members about the process and solicit input on the composition of districts. • Updates to the districting website's "Draw A Map" page to include the District Map Boundary Tool, available to download as a PDF or JPG in multiple languages. • Email distributed September 20 to 10,024 recipients regarding the September 22 Public Workshop. • Distribution of a press release announcing the September 22 Public Workshop. • Public Workshop #2 held on September 22 to educate community members about the potential shift to by-district elections, provided an introduction to the District Map Boundary Tool, and encouraged residents to submit draft maps. • Email distributed September 27 to 10,004 recipients reminding residents to draw and submit a proposed district map by the first draft maps due date of September 29. • Email distributed September 28 to 9,993 recipients regarding updated materials being posted to DrawTustin.org, including the meeting materials from the Second Public Hearing and the Second Public Workshop as well as the District Map Boundary Tool. • Six social media posts on Facebook (including content in English, Spanish, Chinese (traditional), Korean and Vietnamese), including two boosted posts. The DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B posts publicized the Second Public Hearing, the Second Public Workshop, the opportunity to submit a map with the District Map Boundary Tool, and the Third Public Hearing, and had a combined reach of 43,127. • Likewise, social media posts on Twitter, which provided the same information as the Facebook posts (including content in 5 languages), netted 7,456 impressions • Proactive email contact with more than 50 community leaders and community- based organizations regarding the Second Public Hearing, the Second Public Workshop, the availability of the District Map Boundary Tool, and the Third Public Hearing. • 33,500 postcards with the Public Hearing dates of October 9, October 25 and November 1, were mailed to all businesses and residents in Tustin • Public Notice of the October 9 Public Hearing posted/published. • Items drafted and ready to share October 6-8 to further publicize the October 9 Public Hearing (including a press release, social media, outreach emails, etc.). Implemented outreach and engagement efforts September 2 — 10, 2021- • First Public Hearing held on September 7 to educate community members about the process and solicit input on the composition of districts. • Proactive email contact with more than 50 community leaders and community- based organizations regarding the September 7 Public Hearing. • Distribution of a press release announcing the September 7 Public Hearing. • Two posts on Facebook regarding the September 7 Public Hearing (including paid ad boosting) that together reached 9,024 community members and gained 381 post engagements. • Social media posts on Twitter with 520 impressions • Updates to the City's dedicated districting website, www.DrawTustin.org to include resources from the August 31 Public Workshop. These resources include video recordings of the workshop in English and Spanish, Public Comments from the workshop, and the workshop slides in English, Spanish, Chinese (traditional), Korean and Vietnamese. • Updates to the City's dedicated districting website, www.DrawTustin.org to include resources from the September 7 Public Hearing. These resources include video recordings of the hearing in English and Spanish, Public Comments from the DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B hearing, and the hearing slides in English, Spanish, Chinese (traditional), Korean and Vietnamese. • Public Notice of the September 17 Public Hearing posted/published. Implemented outreach and engagement efforts August 24 — September 1, 2021: • Rollout of a new dedicated website, www.DrawTustin.org, serving as a one-stop shop for information and tools regarding potential district formation. Extensive resources are available for the public to learn about the process, access all the materials and meeting information, and to share feedback. • A Public Workshop was held on August 31 to educate community members about the potential shift to by-district elections and to answer questions about the process. The information session, facilitated by Tripepi Smith and featuring the National Demographics Corporation, had more than 20 participants. • Three social media posts on Facebook (in English, Spanish, Chinese (traditional), Korean and Vietnamese), reaching a total of 1,746 individuals. • Two social media posts on Twitter with 892 impressions • Over 10,000 Emails sent regarding the first workshop • Post to NextDoor with 751 impressions • A button on the City website homepage that links to www.DrawTustin.org • Workshop info posted to city Calendar • A featured News Flash on the homepage • Proactive email and/or phone contact with more than 50 organizations to outreach to community leaders and community-based organizations. • Placement of 210 lawn signs across the City of Tustin publicizing the potential shift to by-district elections in English, Spanish, Chinese (traditional), Korean and Vietnamese. • Media outreach including the distribution of a press release announcing the public workshop held on August 31 and the launch of the new dedicated website, www.DrawTustin.org. Publication of the August 31st Workshop Notice and the September 7th Public Hearing Notice in the Orange County Register. • Creation of an email subscription list, which community members can sign up for to receive regular updates on the process at www.DrawTustin.org. DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B POPULATION BALANCED MAPS (4-DISTRICTS WITH AT-LARGE MAYOR) City of Tustin-Redistricting 2021 City of Tustin-Redistricting 2021 Map 109 Map 112 . M q, q. A a � .1• a � 1 Suggested Sequenee. ^ 2022 Areas 1&4 Sugges 2022-A,,-2&1 Sequence: 2024-Areas 2&3 and Mayor)( > ) 4,1111111111PI114i 2024-Areas 1&3(and Mayor) nrous w,« City of Tustin-Redistricting 2021 City of Tustin-Redistricting 2021 City of Tustin-Redistricting 2021 Map 113 1 Map 114 Map 115 , 3 - A A �.. ' Suggested Sequence: 4 Suggested Sequence: --� Suggested Sequence: 2022-Areas 3&4 2022-Areas,1&4 2022-Areae 1&4 a 2074-Areae 1&2(and Mayor) 2024-Arcs 2&3(and Mayor) 2024-Arcs 2&3(and Mayor) f' sws..e�a �ma rytp.✓r/n/w,yluw.an�w .�,.ppp..as/n/x1,yNr..rn�rya.. .wpy�.w,o/u/x},ywe✓a.Byav City of Tustin-Redistricting 2021 City of Tustin-Redistricting 2021 Map 120 Map 121 owaro.�m.rn 3 r qn iv e A A Suggested Sequence: Suggested Sequence: 2022-Arcae 1&4 2022-Am.1&4 2024-Arcas 2&3(and Mayor) 2074-Arcus 2&3(and Mayor) ro n/aur ".. kY assl�+ / y n..s.fe+. sys.p�rro/,r/mnyxr'Wc.�, DocuSign Envelope ID: F81 F8372-9CA9-432D-966F-B822B865CE6B z.l Latino CVAP Latinos are concentrated - - in the western part of I_ the city, particularly - Ga1�ayPak�Pa�a,,_ PIv LrR Gree a�P Pr(vat 1 - R around I-5 -� i 0%_ 10% 10%-25% 25%-35% 35%-50% 50%- 75% .- ®2017CALIPER 75%-100% NDCDrawTustin.arg Asian-American CVAPPeters Canyon PeglandlFk �y Asian-Americans are - - concentrated in the south Galley Pak(P vate) and eastern parts of the city , r�1 �',Tustin Hose - y — There are no significant concentrations of Native / 0%-10% American or Black/African- C &.10%-25% \ 25%-35% American population 35%-50% 50%- 75% 02017 CALIPER M/_1O0% NDCDrawTustin.arg