HomeMy WebLinkAbout04 JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT NOISE ABATEMENT QUARTERLY REPORTDocuSign Envelope ID: 89AB5F7E-7024-41 E5-8A70-595E64F5D32A
nda
AGENDA REPORT Reviewed: m 4
DS
W, City Manager
Finance Director N/A
MEETING DATE: NOVEMER 16, 2021
TO: MATTHEW S. WEST, CITY MANAGER
FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT NOISE ABATEMENT QUARTERLY REPORT
SUMMARY:
This agenda report transmits the John Wayne Airport (JWA) Noise Abatement Quarterly
Report for the second quarter of 2021. The average noise level measured at Tustin's
monitoring station (NMS 1 ON), located at Columbus Tustin Middle School on Beneta Way
(Figure 1), remained consistent with prior quarters. Average daily noise levels during the
second quarter continued to remain well below the City, County, and State criteria of 65
decibels (dB) Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) for residential uses. Residential
noise sensitive areas exposed to an average Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL)
of more than 65 dB define the "Noise Impact Area."
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council receive and file this report.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No fiscal impact.
Figure 1
DocuSign Envelope ID: 89AB5F7E-7024-41 E5-8A70-595E64F5D32A
JWA Noise Report
November 16, 2021
Page 2
CORRELATION TO THE STRATEGIC PLAN:
Staff's analysis and report of the quarterly JWA Noise Abatement Report falls under Goal
D of the Strategic Plan pertaining to strong community and regional relationships. The
City of Tustin strives to work collaboratively with agencies both within and outside Tustin
on issues of mutual interest and concern, and in this instance, on matters of airport traffic
and noise.
DISCUSSION:
Following the conclusion of each calendar quarter, JWA staff prepares a Noise
Abatement Program Quarterly Report and posts a copy of the report on their website.
Attached is the quarterly report for the second quarter of 2021, which includes the months
of April through June. An overview of the information contained within the JWA Noise
Abatement Report includes measured noise levels and an analysis of noise complaints.
Measured Noise Levels
Aircraft noise is most noticeable during airplane takeoffs and landings, primarily due to
engine noise. Although engines produce a significant amount of aircraft noise, many other
factors may influence the perception of noise including: proximity; weather — in bad
weather, engine noise is reflected off of the atmosphere making jets appear louder than
on clear days; routes — non-scheduled operations which could include military or private
aircraft and may be louder than commercial aircraft; emergencies; and, weight — a heavier
load may affect an aircraft's rate of ascent. In addition, higher aircraft noise level
measurements may have been noted during this reporting period, as the air -travel
throughout the region has begun to increase to pre -pandemic levels at 65% - 70% of the
2019 passenger levels.
During the second quarter of 2021, the average CNEL at Tustin's monitoring station on
Beneta Way was 56.4 dB while the average from the previous quarter was 53.7 dB. The
average noise levels remained well below the City, County, and State criteria of 65 dB
CNEL for residential uses. Figure 2 (below) provides a visualization of Tustin's CNEL
levels for each month during the second quarter of 2021.
Daily Community Noise Equivalent Levels (CNEL) in
Tustin - April - June 2021
70
►zi
10
0
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31
Date
Figure 2
April
May
- June
Noise Impact Area Level
(65 dB)
DocuSign Envelope ID: 89AB5F7E-7024-41 E5-8A70-595E64F5D32A
JWA Noise Report
November 16, 2021
Page 3
Noise Complaints
The role of the John Wayne Airport (JWA) Access & Noise Office (ANO) is to enforce
the operational and noise restrictions set forth in the 1985 Settlement Agreement, Phase
2 Commercial Airline Access Plan & Regulation (Access Plan) and General Aviation
Noise Ordinance (GANO). The ANO receives and investigates noise calls and complaints
from local citizens and other sources. During the second quarter of 2021, there were forty-
eight (48) Tustin area concerns submitted. Forty-six (46) of the concerns were submitted
by one (1) Tustin resident, through pressing a button in the mobile app reporting system.
This resident did not request any follow-up from JWA staff regarding the noise concerns
reported. Two (2) noise concerns were received via telephone call, and JWA staff
responded to each resident, providing follow-up information as requested.
During the June 22, 2021 JWA Quarterly Noise Meeting, a north Tustin resident
expressed that the aircraft noise is louder within the past year and asked if there was a
way to get the daily noise readings from Noise Monitoring Station (NMS) "10N" and
asked about the noise limits. JWA staff responded by referring the resident to the "Daily
Noise Reports" available on the JWA website. JWA staff also explained that there are
no noise limits on the approach path for commercial aircraft, but General Aviation has a
nighttime noise limit of 86.9 dB at all three NMS on the approach path. The resident
further inquired if the City of Tustin is involved with JWA aircraft noise concerns and
JWA staff informed the resident that complaint information is sent to the City of Tustin
on a quarterly basis, and the information is then presented to their City Council.
The use of the mobile app reporting button is the reason for the increase in noise concerns
submitted during recent quarters. The mobile app/reporting system is operated
independently from JWA, and does not require their follow-up or assistance to manage
the complaints (unless follow-up is specifically requested by the complainant); however,
JWA staff does track the data received from the system. Countywide, there has been
significant increase in the number of noise complaints received by the Noise Office during
recent reporting periods (average of 138 complaints received per day), which are also a
result of the new reporting method that is available to residents. It has been discovered
that a small number of residents utilized this service, through submitting multiple requests.
To provide an understanding of the trend in Tustin area complaints throughout the years,
a chart displaying the number of noise complaints for the past three (3) years is displayed
below (Figure 3).
Noise Complaints - Tustin
60
c
f6 40
0.
E
0 20
0
v 0
E Q2/2019 Q3/2019 Q4/2019 Q1/2020 Q2/2020 Q3/2020 Q4/2020 Q1/2021 Q2/2021
Z Quarter/Year
Figure 3
DocuSign Envelope ID: 89AB5F7E-7024-41 E5-8A70-595E64F5D32A
JWA Noise Report
November 16, 2021
Page 4
CONCLUSION:
Since noise issues are of considerable importance to the City of Tustin, the Community
Development Department will continue to monitor operations at JWA. The public are
additionally welcome to participate in JWA's Quarterly meetings held by the Access and
Noise Office. The next quarterly meeting will be held on December 28, 2021, at 2:00 p.m.
in the Eddie Martin Administration Building located at 3160 Airway Avenue in Costa Mesa.
Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file this report.
ED—usig—d by:
aj,�iMJAL 04"
MUDE5ECDAME3...
Adrianne DiLeva
Management Analyst I I
CD—Signed byC�. K)
ED45DA2623B5:4A5...
Justina L. Willkom
Community Development Director
Attachment: John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Quarterly Report for April 1, 2021 through June 30, 2021
DocuSign Envelope ID: 89AB5F7E-7024-41 E5-8A70-595E64F5D32A
ATTACHMENT
John Wayne Airport Noise Abatement Quarterly Report for
April 1, 2021 through June 30, 2021 (Second Quarter)
DocuSign Envelope ID: 89AB5F7E-7024-41 E5-8A70-595E64F5D32A
JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT j A=
ORANGE COUNTY qV
NOISE ABATEMENT PROGRAM
QUARTERLY REPORT
For the period:
April 1, 2021 through June 30, 2021
Prepared in accordance with:
AIRPORT NOISE STANDARD
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
California Code of Regulations
Airport Noise Standards
Title 21: Public Works
Division of Aeronautics (Department of Transportation)
Chapter 6. Noise Standards
Submitted y:
2-
Barry A. Rondinella, A.A.E./C.A.E.
Airport Director
John Wayne Airport, Orange County
INTRODUCTION
This is the 1941h Quarterly Report submitted by the County of Orange in accordance with the
requirements of the California Airport Noise Standards (California Code of Regulations, Title 21:
Public Works, Division 2.5, Division of Aeronautics (Department of Transportation), Chapter 6.
Noise Standards). Effective January 1, 1986, the criteria for defining "Noise Impact Area" was
changed from 70 dB to 65 dB Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL). Under this criteria,
John Wayne Airport currently has a "Noise Impact Area."
NOISE IMPACT SUMMARY
Caltrans' Aeronautics Program has established guidelines in the California State Noise Standard
to control residential area noise levels produced by aircraft operations using the State's airports.
Under those guidelines, residential noise sensitive areas exposed to an average Community
Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) of more than 65 dB define the "Noise Impact Area." John Wayne
Airport uses ten permanent remote noise monitoring stations (NMS) located in Newport Beach,
Santa Ana, Tustin and Irvine to measure noise levels, at the following locations:
MONITOR STATIONS
NMS -1 S: Golf Course, 3100 Irvine Ave., Newport Beach
NMS -2S: 20162 S.W. Birch St., Newport Beach
NMS -3S: 2139 Anniversary Lane, Newport Beach
NMS -4S: 2338 Tustin Ave., Newport Beach
NMS -5S: 324'/2 Vista Madera, Newport Beach
NMS -6S: 1912 Santiago, Newport Beach
NMS -7S: 1131 Back Bay Drive, Newport Beach
NMS -8N: 17372 Eastman Street, Irvine
NMS -9N: 1300 S. Grand Avenue, Santa Ana
NMS -10N: 17952 Beneta Way, Tustin
The map in Figure 1 shows the general location of each permanent remote monitor station.
Figure 2 shows the Airport's "Noise Impact Area" for the previous year (July 1, 2020 - June 30,
2021). The Figure 2 information was developed by Harris Miller Miller and Hanson Inc., in
consultation with John Wayne Airport. CNEL values measured for the period and current digitized
land use information were utilized to calculate the land area acreages, number of residences and
estimated number of people within the "Noise Impact Area".
FIGURE 1
NOISE MONITORING STATIONS (NMS)
LOCATION MAP
L� ��v Ile
]�I R,
SANTA ANA -IF
Cq i 9
--11 11 L.11 I IT
I 1r V;
'eo,rx.Tn ti�
I z z
nv L4I a
TUSTIN
Y
9e
py NAiN O
51
)N
-JOHN �WAYNE AIRPORT,
ORANGE COUNTI�
COSTA MESA
({2 1 .' 11I{nv NNyy F v4L_
IT
IRVINE
v
FYy X60/ a
H
_ NEWPORT BEACH N
0 1 2 3 4 5
Scale In miles
FIGURE 2
Noise Impact Area Map
Residential Use
IJ Hospital
by
6lulti-Family Residential Use
School
Compatible Use
- Highway
;
Public Lisa (Noise Sensitive)
— Major Roads
Public Use
Recraa6onal; Open Space
Minor Local Roads
l +
Waher Stream ! River
-rs
ORANGE CO
wia r•9 - .
Ftv
fiT• NMS
�f
NMB4
t7tHtl$tIC$:
Incornpatible Land Use: 0.0001 Sq. Mi.
Number of Dwelling Units: 2
Population- 5 rSased an 2.5 PenplelDweiling Unit)
3
N. I
* RW Location Airpar! Property Mpiamxt
21321 Seawd Ouarte165 d8 CNEL Comw — Rummys i Taxiways
Il! Incompatible Sin* Family Residential 1M. Airpon Buildings
Incompati6leMullr•FamilyResidential
0 1.0m 2,x16 Feel
JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT
ORANGE COUNTY
2021 Second Quarter 65 dB
Community Noise Equivalent Level
(CNEL� Contour
AIRCRAFT TRAFFIC SUMMARY
The Airport traffic summary for this quarter is shown in Table 1 below. Air Carrier operational count
histories and average daily departure counts are illustrated in Tables 9 & 11.
TABLE 1
LANDING AND TAKEOFF OPERATIONS
April - June 2021
Period
Air Carriers
Jet
..
GA Jet (1)
Total
•.-
Average Daily
Operations
April
5,822
0
3,555
26,798
313
May
6,112
0
3,839
27,591
321
June
6,924
0
4,175
29,153
370
Second Quarter
18,858
0
11,569
83,542
335
Twelve Months
107/01/20 - 06/30/21
57,6820
38,832
278,258
264
NOTE: (1) GA Jet figures include a 5% factor for operations not identified by the JWA noise monitor stations.
(2) Counts in this column are based upon records provided by the local FAA representatives.
COMMUNITY NOISE EQUIVALENT LEVELS
The monthly, quarterly and twelve month Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) average values
for each monitor station are shown in Table 2, while daily CNEL values are shown in Tables 3
through 5. Insufficient data is indicated by VWX entries in each table. Also, "*#N/A" entries in each
table indicate there were no aircraft related noise events.
Average Single Event Noise Exposure Level (SENEL) values for Air Carrier and General Aviation
Jet aircraft are shown in Tables 6 through 8.
ACOUSTICAL INSULATION PROGRAM
Four hundred eighteen residences in the Santa Ana Heights area have been sound attenuated and
an avigation easement reserved through the County's Acoustical Insulation Program, which closed
in December 2009. The County has also acquired 46 residences as part of the Purchase Assurance
Program, many of which were acoustically insulated, an avigation easement reserved and then
resold. Among these County acquired homes, those located within areas designated for Business
Park uses were razed, avigation easements were reserved, and the land resold for compatible
Business Park uses. A total of 464 residences in the Santa Ana Heights area have been purchased
or otherwise made compatible through the County's Purchase Assurance and Acoustical Insulation
Programs. Two dwelling units in Santa Ana Heights remain in the "Noise Impacted Area" (within 65
dB CNEL contour).
COMPLAINT TOTALS (April 1, 2021 -June 30, 2021)
The Airport's Access and Noise Office receives and investigates noise complaints from local citizens
and all other sources. During the April 1, 2021 through June 30, 2021, the Office received 57,197
complaints from local citizens. This is a 141.3% increase from the 23,699 complaints received last
quarter. It is a 200.8% increase from the 19,018 complaints received during the same quarter last
year. Figure 4 shows the distribution of the quarterly complaints from local communities.
4 -
FIGURE 3
HISTOGRAM BY COMMUNITY
Submissions - Heatmap
_uowney
+ Norwalk
p — . Bellflower
Lakewood
Cypress
Signal Hill
ng Beach
SeaL Beach
a
32386
N u r r•:,
Fullerton Carona
.•
Anaheim
0161, Beeks Place
Grange ,
. i l ...
Santa Ana silveradc
ntington ,144LPprtola Hills
B ach
`I Lake Forest
Ne rt �;•
Mission Viejo
\J \ I
CNLadera Rancn
,na Niguel 74
The i � ay
na Point
qan Morninnlri
Leaflet I OpenSlreeltlap contrihulo•s
Top Locations
N 50
o
25
0
Newport Anaheim Irvine Costa Mesa Laguna Laguna Orange Santa Ana Huntington Other
Beach Niguel Beach Beach
Note:
• Newport Beach — 41,778 submissions from 50 different points of contact.
• Anaheim — 7,167 submissions from 17 different points of contact.
• Irvine — 1,938 submissions from 17 different points of contact.
• Costa Mesa — 1,919 submissions from 12 different points of contact.
• Laguna Niguel — 1,650 submissions from 4 different points of contact.
• Laguna Beach — 1,323 submissions from 2 different points of contact.
• Orange — 423 submissions from 8 different points of contact.
• Santa Ana — 393 submissions from 7 different points of contact.
• Huntington Beach — 310 submissions from 10 different points of contact.
• Other — 296 submissions from 17 different points of contact.
0 24% of submissions were from a complaint subscription service.
TABLE 2
LONG TERM MEASURED LEVELS
Aircraft CNEL from 07/01/20 through 06/30/21
Values in dB at Each Site
Period
NMS
Site
is
2S
3S
4S
5S
6S
7S
8N
9N
1ON
Ju12020
63.3
63.0
62.1
55.8
54.7
56.0
51.4
64.2
40.4
52.2
# Days
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
25
31
Aug 2020
63.7
63.3
62.6
55.7
54.8
56.3
52.1
64.5
42.2
52.5
# Days
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
22
31
Sep 2020
63.7
63.3
62.8
55.1
54.2
55.6
51.2
64.0
39.4
51.9
# Days
1 30
30
301
30
30
301
30
30
271
30
Q-3 2020
63.6
63.2
62.5
55.5
54.6
56.0
51.6
64.2
40.7
52.2
# Days
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
74
92
Oct 2020
63.7
63.1
63.1
55.5
54.7
56.3
52.5
64.2
43.7
52.6
# Days
31
31
31
31
31
31
30
31
21
31
Nov 2020
63.5
63.3
62.5
56.1
55.2
56.1
52.6
64.3
41.1
52.0
# Days
30
30
281
30
30
30
30
30
23
30
Dec 2020
62.9
62.6
62.4
55.7
54.4
56.4
51.9
63.4
43.0
51.5
# Days
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
29
27
31
Q-4 2020
63.4
63.0
62.7
55.8
54.8
56.3
52.3
64.0
42.7
52.1
# Days
92
92
90
92
92
92
91
90
71
92
Jan 2021
62.6
62.3
62.0
55.7
54.7
56.352.3
63.4
42.2
52.2
# Days
31
31
31
31
31
31
30
24
15
31
Feb 2021
62.9
60.0
62.3
55.9
55.1
56.4
51.9
63.3
42.3
52.5
# Days
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
22
27
Mar 2021
64.8
61.7
63.7
57.8
57.1
57.9
54.4
65.8
43.5
55.4
# Days
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
23
31
Q-12021
63.6
61.5
62.7
56.6
55.8
56.9
53.1
64.4
42.8
53.7
# Days
90
90
90
90
90
90
891
83
60
89
Apr 2021
65.7
62.2
64.5
58.4
57.4
58.0
54.5
66.0
41.1
55.7
# Days
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
25
30
May 2021
66.2
62.7
65.1
59.0
57.7
58.8
54.8
66.7
41.7
56.3
# Days
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
27
31
Jun 2021
67.1
63.6
66.0
59.3
58.459.7
55.3
67.5
44.6
57.2
# Days
30
30
30
30
30
301
30
30
22
30
Q-2 2021
66.4
62.9
65.2
58.9
57.9
58.9
54.9
66.8
42.6
56.4
# Days
1 91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
74
91
Q-3 2020 thru Q-2 2021
Total
64.4
62.7
63.5
56.9
56.0
57.2
53.1
65.0
42.2
54.0
# Days
1 365
365
363
365
365
365
363
356
279
364
Q-2 2020 thru Q-1 2021 (Previous 4 Quarters)
Total
62.9
62.1
62.0
55.5
54.5
55.8
51.8
63.7
42.4
52.1
# Days
1 365
365
363
365
365
365
363
356
281
364
Change from Previous 4 Quarters
1.5
0.6
1.5
1.4
1.5
1.4
1.3
1.3
-0.2
1.9
TABLE 3
DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION
April 2021
Date
1
is
64.4
2S
60.8
3S
62.8
4S
54.4
NMS Site
5S
54.0
6S
54.1
7S
49.5
8N
65.2
9N
*#N/A
1ON
52.3
2
66.7
63.0
65.3
59.6
57.5
58.8
54.3
67.1
28.0
57.0
3
65.2
61.3
63.7
56.5
55.8
56.7
51.5
65.3
40.7
54.4
4
65.9
61.9
64.6
58.1
57.3
57.6
54.0
66.8
41.2
56.1
5
66.9
62.8
65.8
59.7
58.9
59.5
55.9
67.0
35.9
57.3
6
65.9
62.2
64.8
58.6
57.9
58.6
55.3
66.0
40.4
55.9
7
65.6
62.2
64.7
58.6
57.5
58.1
54.7
65.8
47.5
55.4
8
66.2
62.7
65.1
59.1
58.2
59.0
55.5
67.1
*#N/A
56.2
9
66.4
63.2
64.9
59.5
58.6
59.2
55.6
67.0
*#N/A
56.5
10
65.2
62.0
64.1
58.0
56.9
58.0
54.4
66.0
*#N/A
55.6
11
67.1
63.3
66.0
59.9
58.4
59.6
56.3
67.6
38.5
57.4
12
66.3
62.5
65.3
59.3
58.1
58.8
54.8
66.8
30.3
56.5
13
64.4
61.2
63.6
58.6
57.1
57.9
54.4
65.5
45.2
55.3
14
65.4
61.9
64.0
59.3
57.3
57.6
55.0
65.8
40.9
56.0
15
66.2
63.0
65.0
58.7
58.4
58.0
55.7
66.1
40.3
56.8
16
66.3
62.9
65.3
59.1
58.4
58.6
55.7
66.7
34.3
56.0
17
65.0
61.6
63.5
57.8
57.0
57.2
52.4
65.1
34.7
55.2
18
62.8
59.1
63.1
54.3
53.8
57.5
46.4
64.1
45.5
52.5
19
65.4
62.0
62.4
57.0
56.6
56.1
52.5
66.3
32.7
55.2
20
65.0
61.4
63.7
59.0
56.7
58.2
53.6
65.0
29.4
55.6
21
65.4
62.0
64.3
58.8
57.5
57.9
55.3
65.6
35.9
55.7
22
65.9
62.8
64.8
58.8
58.3
58.3
55.6
65.9
*#N/A
56.3
23
66.4
62.9
65.1
59.1
57.8
58.8
55.6
66.5
36.8
56.3
24
64.6
61.5
63.3
57.5
57.0
56.7
53.6
65.3
27.8
55.3
25
66.1
62.8
64.9
58.8
58.3
58.6
55.6
67.2
33.0
56.6
26
65.6
62.6
64.2
58.4
58.4
58.6
56.0
66.3
44.9
56.5
27
65.0
61.6
63.5
57.4
57.3
57.3
54.6
65.1
42.1
54.5
28
65.1
61.9
64.1
57.1
56.9
57.1
53.7
64.2
44.9
53.2
29
66.5
63.2
65.6
57.5
57.2
57.9
52.8
65.0
31.4
53.7
30
65.7
62.3
64.5
56.9
56.1
56.8
52.9
65.4
44.2
55.0
Days
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
25
30
En. Avg
65.7
62.2
64.5
58.4
57.4
58.0
54.5
66.0
41.1
55.7
#N/A indicates insufficient data.
*#N/A indicates no aircraft -related noise events.
TABLE 4
DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION
May 2021
Date
1
is
64.6
2S
60.9
3S
63.3
4S
57.7
NMS Site
5S
55.4
6S
56.4
7S
52.5
8N
64.9
9N
28.9
1ON
55.3
2
66.0
62.4
64.5
59.0
57.1
58.3
55.2
66.8
40.4
56.2
3
65.8
62.7
64.7
58.5
58.0
58.0
55.6
65.8
46.2
55.7
4
65.0
61.6
64.1
56.9
56.7
57.3
52.9
65.4
45.0
54.9
5
65.0
61.9
64.3
57.8
56.5
56.7
53.0
65.3
37.9
55.6
6
66.2
62.7
65.1
59.0
57.7
58.6
54.8
66.6
34.3
56.5
7
66.6
63.3
65.6
59.1
58.2
59.0
54.2
67.3
*#N/A
56.8
8
64.9
61.2
63.2
58.2
56.6
56.9
54.0
65.2
41.3
54.4
9
66.1
62.6
64.8
59.0
57.9
58.8
53.9
67.5
29.0
57.3
10
66.6
62.5
65.2
59.8
58.4
59.6
55.5
67.3
33.7
56.4
11
65.3
62.4
64.6
60.5
57.2
57.5
52.8
66.1
39.4
55.5
12
65.5
62.6
65.1
58.6
57.7
58.6
54.5
65.2
42.4
55.4
13
66.8
63.6
65.7
58.7
58.2
59.0
54.0
66.6
*#N/A
56.5
14
66.6
63.2
65.5
59.4
58.6
59.8
55.5
67.2
37.3
56.9
15
65.0
61.4
63.3
57.9
57.0
57.8
54.3
65.3
44.4
54.8
16
67.2
63.6
66.0
60.3
59.1
59.9
56.2
67.7
38.0
57.3
17
66.5
63.1
64.9
58.4
57.9
58.9
55.2
67.1
47.2
56.9
18
66.2
62.6
65.1
58.6
57.9
58.3
55.2
65.8
45.2
55.1
19
66.4
62.7
64.9
59.0
58.0
59.1
55.1
66.3
38.7
56.3
20
67.4
63.5
66.2
60.6
58.7
60.8
56.7
68.3
45.1
57.7
21
66.9
63.6
65.5
59.7
58.7
59.8
56.4
67.2
38.9
57.0
22
65.4
61.7
63.9
58.0
56.9
58.0
55.0
65.4
*#N/A
55.1
23
66.7
63.3
65.5
58.8
58.3
59.1
55.3
67.5
42.0
57.0
24
66.7
63.2
65.6
57.8
57.5
58.6
54.8
66.3
*#N/A
55.0
25
65.9
62.3
64.7
58.0
56.8
58.2
54.4
65.9
34.5
55.2
26
66.5
62.6
65.1
59.4
57.2
58.6
54.8
66.5
32.2
56.6
27
67.2
63.9
66.1
59.9
58.6
60.0
56.0
67.7
34.9
57.5
28
67.4
63.8
66.3
59.9
58.7
60.2
56.3
68.4
43.6
57.9
29
65.6
61.6
64.6
58.4
56.7
58.1
52.6
65.5
40.8
55.8
30
65.5
62.1
64.5
58.5
57.1
58.1
53.7
67.1
36.4
57.2
31
67.3
63.6
66.5
59.7
58.1
59.8
54.7
67.9
44.0
57.2
Days
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
27
31
En. Avg
66.21
62.71
65.1
59.01
57.71
58.8
54.81
66.71
41.7
56.3
#N/A indicates insufficient data.
*#N/A indicates no aircraft -related noise events.
TABLE 5
DAILY CNEL VALUES AT EACH MONITOR STATION
June 2021
Date
1
is
66.6
2S
62.9
3S
65.2
4S
58.0
NMS Site
5S
57.0
6S
58.3
7S
53.1
8N
66.6
9N
35.7
1ON
55.5
2
66.0
62.6
64.8
57.6
56.7
58.0
52.5
66.5
*#N/A
55.6
3
66.6
63.2
65.6
59.4
57.9
59.2
54.2
66.7
33.3
56.5
4
67.0
63.4
66.4
59.8
58.9
60.2
55.7
66.8
41.7
57.2
5
65.8
62.3
64.5
57.5
56.1
56.9
51.7
65.6
39.2
55.4
6
67.1
63.5
66.0
60.7
58.9
60.3
56.3
68.3
53.4
58.0
7
67.5
63.6
66.3
60.9
59.0
60.5
57.5
68.3
*#N/A
58.6
8
66.1
62.4
64.7
59.0
58.1
58.8
56.0
66.6
40.5
56.8
9
66.3
63.3
65.2
59.0
58.8
59.1
56.1
67.1
41.1
57.1
10
67.2
63.9
65.8
59.4
58.7
59.7
55.7
67.4
34.3
56.9
11
67.4
63.9
66.0
59.7
59.0
59.9
55.7
68.2
42.6
57.6
12
66.0
62.5
65.0
58.3
56.8
58.1
53.5
66.5
27.4
55.7
13
67.3
64.0
66.1
58.7
57.9
59.2
54.4
68.1
42.2
57.6
14
67.6
64.1
66.8
59.6
59.0
60.3
55.8
66.9
35.7
56.1
15
66.9
63.0
65.6
57.3
57.1
58.0
54.2
66.8
48.1
55.7
16
67.3
63.5
65.7
59.6
58.1
59.9
55.2
67.7
35.9
57.2
17
67.4
63.9
66.3
59.6
58.5
59.9
54.9
68.0
45.1
57.3
18
67.5
64.0
66.3
59.5
58.3
59.6
55.3
67.9
49.0
58.4
19
66.1
62.9
65.0
58.0
57.7
58.8
53.3
66.9
47.4
56.2
20
67.4
63.9
66.0
58.7
57.8
59.4
55.0
69.0
44.9
58.1
21
68.1
64.7
67.1
60.7
60.2
61.2
56.3
68.0
39.9
57.7
22
66.8
63.8
66.0
58.6
59.0
59.7
55.2
67.6
*#N/A
57.3
23
67.1
63.8
66.4
59.6
59.2
60.3
56.3
64.5
42.7
57.3
24
67.8
64.6
66.6
59.3
59.7
60.6
56.3
68.3
*#N/A
57.4
25
68.0
64.7
66.9
60.1
59.7
60.8
57.1
67.6
*#N/A
58.0
26
66.5
62.8
65.3
57.8
57.0
58.6
54.8
66.8
42.5
56.5
27
67.2
63.6
66.5
59.6
58.4
60.4
55.1
68.2
38.4
57.8
28
67.6
64.1
66.6
59.6
59.0
60.2
55.1
68.5
*#N/A
57.9
29
67.7
64.0
66.7
60.0
58.2
59.8
55.2
67.6
*#N/A
57.7
30
68.0
64.4
66.8
59.6
58.7
60.7
55.1
68.2
*#N/A
57.3
Days
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
22
30
En. Avg
67.1
63.6
66.0
59.3
58.4
59.7
55.3
67.5
44.61
57.2
#N/A indicates insufficient data.
*#N/A indicates no aircraft -related noise events.
TABLE 6
MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS
Commercial Class A I April - June 2021
Carrier
AC
Deps
NMS
Site
is
2S
3S
4S
5S
6S
7S
8N
9N
1ON
Alaska Air
A320
644
Average
95.1
91.9
93.5
87.4
85.3
86.7
83.7
87.2
#N/A
#N/A
Count
(637)
(621)
(626)
(630)
(627)
(587)
(607)
(1)
(0)
(0)
B737
5
Average
94.0
90.5
93.0
86.5
87.4
87.7
83.9
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
Count
(5)
(5)
(5)
(4)
(5)
(4)
(5)
(0)
(0)
(0)
B738
43
Average
96.4
92.8
94.5
88.5
88.5
89.5
85.7
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
Count
(42)
(42)
(43)
(42)
(42)
(39)
(42)
(0)
(0)
(0)
Allegiant
A319
164
Average
92.5
88.8
91.7
86.9
85.1
86.1
80.5
85.6
#N/A
#N/A
Count
(158)
(157)
(159)
(156)
(155)
(1.
(123)
(1)
(0)
(0)
A320
54
Average
94.1
90.5
92.5
87.7
86.2
87.1
82.4
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
Count
(54)
(54)
(54)
(54)
(52)
(49)
(54)
(0)
(0)
(0)
American
A21 N
29
Average
89.5
86.6
88.3
82.0
80.5
81.0
78.3
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
Count
(29)
(29)
(29)
(26)
(19)
(25)
(1)
(0)
(0)
(0)
A319
70
Average
93.8
90.7
92.5
86.7
85.3
85.6
81.1
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
Count
(67)
(70)
(69)
(68)
(68)
(64)
(54)
(0)
(0)
(0)
A320
58
Average
95.1
91.9
93.8
86.8
85.1
85.4
81.6
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
Count
(56)
(56)
(54)
(55)
(53)
(50)
(42)
(0)
(0)
(0)
A321
129
Average
98.6
95.5
97.5
89.9
88.1
88.0
83.5
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
Count
(126)
(127)
(127)
(123)
(123)
(113)
(118)
(0)
(0)
(0)
B38M
2
Average
91.6
88.3
90.7
84.2
84.4
85.1
83.2
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
Count
(2)
(2)
(2)
(2)
(2)
(2)
(1)
(0)
(0)
(0)
B738
1019
Average
98.5
94.9
97.1
90.2
89.7
90.4
86.7
96.3
88.6
81.0
Count
(994)
(962)
(981)
(979)
(965)
(891)
(939)
(5)
(7)
(4)
Delta
A220
459
Average
88.1
85.4
87.1
80.8
79.3
80.1
79.7
#N/A
80.1
#N/A
Count
(454)
(444)
(448)
(403)
(251)
(307)
(17)
(0)
(1)
(0)
A319
65
Average
96.2
92.7
95.7
89.3
87.6
87.9
82.8
95.0
87.7
#N/A
Count
(63)
(63)
(63)
(63)
(62)
(57)
(59)
(1)
(1)
(0)
B752
150
Average
96.4
93.1
96.0
89.0
87.8
88.3
83.5
94.9
85.5
81.1
Count
(142)
(139)
(141)
(143)
(144)
(132)
(136)
(4)
(3)
(1)
FedEx
A306
64
Average
96.7
93.9
94.4
89.1
88.4
89.7
85.7
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
Count
(64)
(64)
(63)
(64)
(64)
(61)
(63)
(0)
(0)
(0)
Frontier Airlines
A20N
171
Average
88.2
85.3
87.6
81.9
79.8
82.1
79.0
81.1
#N/A
#N/A
Count
(168)
(167)
(166)
(152)
(109)
(149)
(44)
(1)
(0)
(0)
A319
22
Average
94.3
91.0
92.8
87.4
86.0
87.7
84.2
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
Count
(22)
(22)
(21)
(22)
(21)
(21)
(21)
(0)
(0)
(0)
A320
36
Average
94.7
91.6
92.3
86.6
84.9
86.9
83.8
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
Count
(36)
(34)
(35)
(36)
(36)
(34)
(35)
(0)
(0)
(0)
Horizon Air
E175
526
Average
92.6
89.1
90.3
85.6
84.8
86.9
83.4
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
Count
(521)
(508)
(503)
(514)
(518)
(484)
(489)
(0)
(0)
(0)
Southwest
B38M
49
Average
90.0
86.5
88.3
80.9
81.7
83.7
80.1
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
Count
(47)
(45)
(48)
(44)
(40)
(46)
(27)
(0)
(0)
(0)
B737
1203
Average
93.0
89.7
90.9
85.6
85.5
86.5
83.2
90.8
#N/A
#N/A
Count
(1184)
(1176)
(1156)
(1174)
(1167)
(1076)
(1099)
(5)
(0)
(0)
B738
416
Average
93.0
89.8
90.1
84.6
84.9
85.8
82.8
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
Count
(410)
(404)
(399)
(408)
(412)
(381)
(379)
(0)
(0)
(0)
Spirit
A20N
64
Average
88.1
85.1
87.9
82.4
80.7
82.1
78.8
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
Count
(64)
(61)
(60)
(62)
(50)
(59)
(23)
(0)
(0)
(0)
A320
41
Average
91.5
88.8
90.0
85.1
83.4
84.9
81.0
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
Count
(41)
(41)
(39)
(39)
(38)
(37)
(27)
(0)
(0)
(0)
Sun Country Airlines
B737
26
Average
95.6
92.1
95.1
89.9
89.4
89.8
84.7
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
Count
(25)
(26)
(26)
(25)
(24)
(25)
(26)
(0)
(0)
(0)
United
A319
146
Average
94.5
90.8
93.3
86.9
85.6
86.6
82.2
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
Count
(144)
(137)
(139)
(142)
(139)
(124)
(128)
(0)
(0)
(0)
A320
49
Average
95.3
92.0
94.0
86.9
85.8
86.5
82.3
91.8
#N/A
#N/A
Count
(48)
(46)
(48)
(48)
(45)
(43)
(47)
(1)
(0)
(0)
B737
201
Average
96.7
92.6
96.6
90.6
90.3
90.8
86.0
95.5
88.0
82.1
Count
(198)
(193)
(191)
(193)
(195)
(175)
(188)
(1)
(2)
(2)
B738
217
Average
98.8
94.8
98.2
90.2
89.9
90.3
86.7
93.5
89.2
81.2
Count
(210)
(202)
(211)
(208)
(206)
(184)
(200)
(2)
(2)
(1)
UPS
B752
51
Average
95.0
92.3
93.4
87.1
86.7
87.6
82.3
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
Count
(50)
(50)
(51)
(51)
(51)
(48)
(49)
(0)
(0)
(0)
10 -
TABLE 7
MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS
Commercial Class E
April - June 2021
TABLE 8
MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS
Commuter
April - June 2021
TABLE 8 -GA
MEASURED AVERAGE SINGLE EVENT NOISE EXPOSURE LEVELS
General Aviation
April - June 2021
TABLE 9
AIR CARRIER OPERATIONAL HISTORY
Carrier
Alaska Air
AS
AC . -
A319
2017
2018
64
Year
2019
244
020
314
2021
A320 262 3,403 1,733
2,337
B734 24
B737 1,233 384 160 14
10
B738 6,420 8,260 5,247 767
110
Alleqiant
G4
A319
482
A320
162
American
AA
A21 N
2
2
64
A319 332 722 432 474
204
A320 266 78 634 488
337
A321 56 4 214 571
502
B38M
4
B738 11,556 11,457 10,972 5,201
3,195
B752 4 4 36
Compass
CP
E17078
E175 2,726 3,188 3,150 656
Delta
DL
A220
851
1,954
1,673
A223
4
A319 2,053 1,979 1,987 828
293
A320 94 12 11 8
1
B712 3,267 3,379 2,495
B737 1 146 188 8 24
B738 40 18 40 2
B739 2
B752 2,137 2,889 2,889 1,065
583
MD90 2
FedEx
FM
A306
506
508
5101
512
248
Frontier Airlines
F9
A20N*
600
900
550
511
A319 356 190 100 2
80
A320 628 654 428 392
145
A32N* 438
Horizon Air
QX
DI -18D
1,456
728
12
E175 339 2,716 4,2571 2,986
1,807
SkyWest Coml.
SC
CRJ9
1,440
6
2
E175 4,761 6,960 7,686 3,535
1,814
Southwest
WN
B38M
2
14
10
265
B737 35,971 32,380 29,360 14,268
7,401
B738 58 64 134 3,780
5,315
Spirit
NK
A20N*
1
180
413
A320 19
161
Sun Country Airlines SY
B737
52
United
UA
A319
1,470
999
1,216
590
453
A320 3,957 3,927 3,151 1,227
306
B737 4,044 2,987 2,816 999
584
B738 3,302 5,154 5,6271 2,645
912
B752 2 4
UPS
5X
A306
45
22
12
18
B752 369 394 404 404
200
WestJet
WS
B736
30
10
58
34
B737 644 666 618 126
Total
90,250
91,875
90,074
46,370
30,628
*In 2018, the code for the Airbus A320neo was changed from A32N to A20N.
TABLE 10
AIRCRAFT OPERATIONAL HISTORY
Aircraft
A20N*
2017
2018
600
Year
2019
900
020
730
2021
924
A21N
2
2
64
A220
851
1,954
1,673
A223
4
A306
551
530
522
530
248
A319
4,211
3,954
3,979
2,208
1,512
A320
4,945
4,933
7,627
3,867
3,449
A321
56
4
214
571
502
A32N*
438
B38M
2
14
10
269
B712
3,267
3,379
2,495
B734
24
B736
30
10
58
34
B737
42,038
36,605
32,962
15,431
8,047
B738
21,376
24,953
22,020
12,395
9,532
B739
2
B752
2,512
3,291
3,329
1,469
783
CRJ9
1,440
6
2
DHBD
1,456
728
12
E170
78
E175
7,826
12,864
15,093
7,177
3,621
MD90
2
Total
90,250
91,875
90,074
46,370
30,628
*In 2018, the code for the Airbus A320neo was changed
from A32N to A20N.
TABLE 11
AIR CARRIER AVERAGE DAILY DEPARTURE HISTORY
Carrier
Alaska Air
AS
AC . -
A319
2017
2018
.088
Year
2019
.334
020
.432
2021
A320 .359 4.660 2.363
3.200
B734 .033
B737 1.693 .526 .219 .022
.014
B738 8.789 11.315 7.189 1.046
.151
Allegiant
G4
A319
.660
A320
.222
American
AA
A21 N
.003
.003
.088
A319 .455 .989 .592 .648
.274
A320 .364 .107 .868 .664
.471
A321 .077 .005 .293 .779
.685
B38M
.005
B738 15.827 15.696 15.030 7.107
4.375
B752 .005 .005 .049
Compass
CP
E170
.107
E175 3.734 4.367 4.315 .896
Delta
DL
A220
1.164
2.667
2.293
A223
.005
A319 2.811 2.712 2.723 1.131
.403
A320 .129 .016 .014 .014
B712 4.471 4.627 3.419
B737 .200 .258 .011 .033
B738 .055 .025 .055 .003
B739 .003
B752 2.926 3.959 3.956 1.454
.797
MD90 .003
FedEx
FM
A306
.693
.696
.699
.699
.340
Frontier Airlines
F9
A20N'
.822
1.233
.751
.699
A319 .488 .260 .137 .003
.110
A320 .860 .896 .586 .536
.200
A32N* .600
Horizon Air
QX
DI -18D
1.995
.997
.016
E175 .466 3.721 5.830 4.079
2.474
SkyWest Coml.
SC
CRJ9
1.975
.008
.003
E175 6.523 9.534 10.529 4.833
2.485
Southwest
WN
B38M
.003
.019
.014
.367
B737 49.274 44.351 40.216 19.497
10.134
B738 .079 .088 .184 5.161
7.279
Spirit
NK
A20N`
.246
.570
A320 .025
.216
Sun Country Airlines
SY
B737
.071
United
UA
A319
2.014
1.373
1.666
.806
.622
A320 5.422 5.375 4.315 1.675
.419
B737 5.534 4.093 3.855 1.366
.800
B738 4.526 7.058 7.712 3.612
1.247
B752 .003 .005
UPS
5X
A306
.060
.030
.016
.025
B752 .507 .540 .553 .552
.274
WestJet
WS
B736
.041
.014
.079
.046
IB737 .882 .912 .847 .172
Total
123.622
125.852 1
123.384 1
63.347
41.951
'In 2018, the code for the Airbus A320neo was changed from A32N to A20N.
TABLE 12
AIRCRAFT Glossary
AC Type
A20N
Make
Airbus
Model/Series
320-200 Neo
A220
Airbus
220-100
A223
Airbus
220-300
A306
Airbus
300-600
A310
Airbus
310-200
A319
Airbus
319
A320
Airbus
320
A32N
Airbus
320-200 Neo
B38M
Boeing
737-800 Max
A321
Airbus
321
A21
Airbus
321 Neo
B712
Boeing
717-200
B734
Boeing
737-400
B736
Boeing
737-600
B737
Boeing
737-700
B738
Boeing
737-800
B739
Boeing
737-900
B752
Boeing
757-200
CRJ7
Canadair Regional Jet
700
CRJ9
Canadair Regional Jet
900
DH8D
Bombardier
Dash 8
E135
Embraer
135
E145
Embraer
145
E170
Embraer
170
E175
Embraer
175
MD90
McDonnell Douglas
90
QUARTERLY NOISE MEETING
Date: June 22, 2021
Time: 2:00 PM
Place: Airport Commission Room/ Virtual Teleconference
ITEMS DISCUSSED
Nikolas Gaskins provided an update regarding the increase in passenger levels at JWA. Mr.
Gaskins mentioned that in recent weeks, the passenger levels are nearing pre -pandemic levels
(65%-70% of 2019 levels). Mr. Gaskins also provided a summary of the preliminary JWA airport
statistics for May 2021.
Mr. Gaskins presented an update on commercial airline service. He stated there continues to be
an increase in demand for leisure destinations at JWA as summer approaches. Mr. Gaskins
added that overall business travel is down at JWA, but business travel demand could increase as
pandemic -related restrictions are lifted. Mr. Gaskins discussed that Allegiant Air, Spirit Airlines,
and Sun Country Airlines have all began inaugural new entrant service in the past several months.
Mr. Gaskins also added that American Airlines would be adding service to New York (JFK) on
July 2nd and United Airlines began service to Honolulu (HNL) on May 61".
Mr. Gaskins advised that the Access & Noise Office will begin working through the capacity
allocation for Plan Year 2022, starting in August, and expect to send the Airport's
recommendations to the Board of Supervisors in November. He also mentioned the Airport's
ability to accept a new entrant for Plan Year 2022 will be dependent on capacity requests from
the incumbent carriers.
Mr. Gaskins provided information highlighting the Access & Noise Office plans to consolidate and
integrate ANOMS, Viewpoint, WebTrak, Detailed Noise Reports, and the ten Noise Monitoring
Stations (NMS) into one contract. The contract will be sent to the Board of Supervisors for action
in July.
David Asher, a resident along the approach path of JWA, asked if it was true that aircraft arriving
into JWA had to be higher than a minimum of 1,000 ft. according to FAA regulations. Mr. Gaskins
clarified that although aircraft have to fly above a minimum of 1,000 ft. over congested areas, this
does not apply to aircraft that are taking off or landing.
Kellie Cookson, a resident of East Orange, discussed her issues with the amount of aircraft noise
and the frequency of aircraft since before Covid-19. She asked if the arrival aircraft were abiding
to the elevation limitations and if the curfew regulations were being enforced at JWA. Mr. Gaskins
explained that the FAA has regulatory control of altitudes & flight paths, and the concentration of
flights is a result of the FAA SoCal Metroplex. Mr. Gaskins reassured that JWA enforces the
Settlement Agreement and curfew regulations.
Newport Beach Resident, Dennis Bress, had questions related to the Class E service, specifically,
if the airlines are held accountable for exceeding the Class E Single Event Noise limits at JWA.
Mr. Gaskins explained the Airport enforces what is outlined in the Access Plan and Settlement
Agreement, and no commercial airline has exceeded the noise limits since 2004.
16 -
QUARTERLY NOISE MEETING
Mr. Bress also expressed concerns regarding as what he described as the high rate of velocity of
some general aviation departures, and if the Airport could provide a report that includes the
velocity of each departure at JWA. Mr. Gaskins explained the Airport cannot enforce aircraft
velocity limits.
Newport Beach resident, Dr. Jim Mosher, asked how the passenger information in the JWA
monthly Statistics Report is calculated. Mr. Gaskins stated the Statistics Report reflects both
commercial and commuter carrier passengers, and not general aviation or military. Dr.. Mosher
also requested that the Quarterly Noise Report be published in a more timely fashion. Mr. Gaskins
responded by stating that once our office is fully staffed, the Airport should be able to publish the
Quarterly Report two weeks before the Quarterly Noise Meeting. Dr. Mosher also inquired if the
CNEL data from the Quarterly Noise Report could be posted on a daily basis. Mr. Gaskins
emphasized that the Noise Office has to go through the noise data daily to analyze events, which
requires a delay in publishing reports and data. Lastly, Dr. Mosher expressed his concern with
flights that operate under the 65 dB threshold that are not included in the CNEL data, thus making
the CNEL data inaccurate. Mr. Gaskins responded by stating that operations that are under the
65 dB threshold do not fall under the Title 21 guidelines, and that the information is accurate under
the Title 21 requirements.
Michael Venti, a resident of the North Tustin area, had concerns with what he described as an
annoying noise that is coming from the Airbus A220 aircraft's engines. Mr. Gaskins stated the
Airport is aware of the distinct noise from the Airbus A220, and that Airbus is aware of the issue
and is working with the engine manufacture to identify a solution. Justin Cook, from HMMH, added
that the tonal frequencies of the vortex generator is currently being retrofitted to mitigate the issue.
Mr. Venti also suggested for a bank angle study to be conducted on the approach path at JWA to
disperse the aircraft noise to other areas of the community. Mr. Venti stated that he works for
NASA and can provide the Noise Office with new research papers from studies that NASA,
Boeing, and Airbus are conducting. Mr. Gaskins said he could give Mr. Venti the information to
contact Mel Beale, Airport Working Group President. Lastly, Mr. Venti asked if the monetary
penalties from curfew violations go back to the community. Mr. Gaskins informed Mr. Venti that
the monetary penalties from curfew violations are paid to the County, but does not know where
the monies go from there.
Patricia Maas, a resident of East Orange, echoed the same concerns with the amount of aircraft
noise and the frequency of aircraft on the approach path over the past several years. Ms. Mass
also asked if the FAA have a contact to reach since the Airport does not have control of the flight
paths. Mr. Gaskins responded by stating the FAA has recently created a noise portal on their
website to address community concerns with aircraft noise, but not sure how community concerns
are addressed.
Matt, a resident of the City of Orange, had concerns that the frequency of flights on the arrival
path have increased, and that the noise is louder than before Covid started. Mr. Gaskins explained
that the frequency of aircraft operations at JWA in 2019 was at its highest level on record. Mr.
Gaskins added that there was a drastic decrease of operations in 2020 due to Covid, however,
within the past several months there has been significant month-to-month increases in operations
and these factors could contribute to the perception of increased aircraft noise.
QUARTERLY NOISE MEETING
Laurie Sherwood, a resident of North Tustin, expressed that the aircraft noise is louder since
Metroplex was implemented and increasingly louder within the past year. Ms. Sherwood asked if
there was a way to get the daily noise readings from NMS 10N and what are the noise limits. Mr.
Gaskins replied by referring Ms. Sherwood to the Daily Noise Reports available on the JWA
website. Mr. Gaskins explained that there are no noise limits on the approach path for commercial
aircraft, but General Aviation has a nighttime noise limit of 86.9 dB at all three NMS on the
approach path. Ms. Sherwood inquired if anybody from the City of Tustin is involved with the
aircraft noise concerns with the Airport. Mr. Gaskins informed Ms. Sherwood that complaint
information is sent to the City of Tustin at their request on a quarterly basis, and the information
is then presented to their City Council.
QUARTERLY NOISE MEETING ROSTER
June 22, 2021
NAME
ORGANIZATION
Joe August
Resident — Newport Beach
Dennis Bress
Resident — Newport Beach
Jim Mosher
Resident - Newport Beach
Kellie Cookson
Resident — East Orange / Tustin
Louisa Alvarez
Unknown
Lisa Champion
Unknown
Michael Venti
Resident — North Tustin
Robert Vusich
Unknown
Tracy Ettinger
Unknown
Patricia Maas
Resident - East Orange / Tustin
David Asher
Resident —Approach Path
Laurie Sherwood
Resident — North Tustin
Justin Cook
HMMH
Anthony Cangey
John Wayne Airport
Beatrice Siercke
John Wayne Airport
Cristina Magana
John Wayne Airport
Nikolas Gaskins
John Wayne Airport
Call-in Line—2
Unknown
Call-in Line—3
Unknown
Call-in Line—4
Unknown
Call-in Line—5
Unknown
Call-in Line—6
Unknown
Call-in Line—7
Unknown
Call-in Line—8
Unknown
QUARTERLY NOISE MEETING ROSTER
June 22, 2021
NAME
ORGANIZATION
Call-in Line
—9
Unknown
Call-in Line
-1 0
Unknown
Call-in Line
-1 1
Unknown
Call-in Line
-1 2
Unknown
Call-in Line -13
(Matt)
Resident — Orange
Call-in Line
14
Unknown
Call-in Line
-1 5
Unknown
Call-in Line
-1 6
Unknown
DocuSign Envelope ID: 89AB5F7E-7024-41 E5-8A70-595E64F5D32A
SUMMARY OF STATISTICAL INFORMATION
FOR
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1. Size of Noise Impact Area as defined in the Noise Standards (California Code of Regulations,
Title 21, chapter 2.5, Subchapter 6):
0.0001 Sq. Mi.
2. Estimated Number of dwelling units included in the Noise Impact Area as defined in the Noise
Standards:
2
3. Estimated number of people residing within the Noise Impact Area as defined in the Noise
Standards:
5 (Based on 2.5 People/Dwelling Unit)
4. Identification of aircraft type having highest takeoff noise level operating at this airport together
with estimated number of operations by this aircraft type during the calendar quarter reporting
period:
B737-800 — 4,878 (Arrivals+Departures)
5. Total number of aircraft operations during the calendar quarter:
83,542
6. Number of Air Carrier operations during the calendar quarter:
(Not mandatory)
18,858
7. Percentage of Air Carrier operations by aircraft certified under Federal Aviation Regulation
(FAR) Part 36, Stage III:
(Not mandatory)
100%
8. Estimated number of operations by General Aviation aircraft during the calendar quarter:
(Not mandatory)
64,581
9. Estimated number of operations by Military aircraft during the calendar quarter:
(Not mandatory)
103