Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC RES 06-76 RESOLUTION NO. 06-76 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL FINDING THAT THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT/FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE DISPOSAL AND REUSE OF MCAS TUSTIN ("FEIS/FEIR") AND ADDENDUM IS ADEQUATE TO SERVE AS THE PROJECT EIS/EIR FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 17026 FOR CONVEYANCE PURPOSES WITHIN PLANNING AREAS 7, 8, 9,10,11,12,13,14, AND 15 OF THE MCAS TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN, GENERALLY BOUNDED BY EDINGER AVENUE TO THE NORTH, JAMBOREE ROAD TO THE EAST, BARRANCA PARKWAY TO THE SOUTH, AND RED HILL AVENUE TO THE WEST. I. The City Council of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows: A. That Tentative Tract Map 17026 for conveyance purposes (Planning Areas 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15) is considered a "Project" pursuant to the terms of the California Environmental Quality Act; B. That the FEIS/FEIR was certified by the City Council on January 16, 2001, an Addendum was certified on April 3, 2006. The FEIS/EIR is a program EIR under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). The FEIS/FEIR and Addendum considered the potential environmental impacts associated with development on the former Marine Corps Air Station, Tustin, including the development of residential, commercial, office, and public uses within Planning Areas 7, 8, 9,10,11,12,13,14, and 15; and, C. That an environmental checklist, attached as Exhibit A hereto, was prepared to evaluate the potential environmental impacts associated with the Project. The environmental analysis checklist demonstrates that the proposed conveyance map has no potential for environmental impacts and all impacts for development of the site were addressed by the certified FEIS/FEIR and Addendum. D. That on June 26, 2006, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended that the City Council find). that the project is within the scope of the previously approved Program FEIS/FEIR and Addendum. E. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed, and held for said map on July 3, 2006, by the City Council. Resolution No. 06-76 Page 1 of 27 II. The City Council hereby finds that the project is within the scope of the previously approved Program FEIS/FEIR and Addendum, and that pursuant to Title 14 California Code of Regulations Sections 15168 (c) and 15162, no new effects could occur and no new mitigation measures would be required. Accordingly, no new environmental document is required by CEQA. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Tustin, at a regular meeting on the 3rd day of July, 2006. kd- PA LA STOKER CITY CLERK STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS CITY OF TUSTIN ) I, Pamela Stoker, City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of the members of the City Council of the City of Tustin is five; that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 06-76 was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin City Council, held on the 3rd day of July 2006, by the following vote: COUNCILMEMBER AYES: COUNCILMEMBER NOES: COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT: DAVERT, HAGEN, AMANTE, BONE, KAWASHIMA (5) NONE (0) NONE (0) NONE (0) lanoC20~ PAMELA STOKER CITY CLERK Resolution No. 06-76 Page 2 of 27 EXHIBIT A TO RESOLUTION NO. 06-76 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 573-3100 ENVIRONMENT AL ANALYSIS CHECKLIST For Projects With Previously Certified/Approved Environmental Documents: Environmental Impact StatementlEnvironmental Impact Report (EISIEIR) and Addendum for the Disposal and Reuse of Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) Tustin This checklist and the following evaluation of environmental impacts (Attachment I of Exhibit A of Resolution No. 4026) takes into consideration the preparation of an environmental document prepared at an earlier stage of the proposed project. The checklist and evaluation evaluate the adequacy of the earlier document pursuant to Section 15162 and 15168 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. A. BACKGROUND Project Title(s): Tentative Tract Map 17026 for Conveyance Purposes Lead Agency: City of Tustin, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California 92780 Lead Agency Contact Person: Matt West Phone: (714) 573-3118 Project Location: Planning Areas 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and IS, MCAS-Tustin Specific Plan, generally bounded by Edinger Avenue to the north, Jamboree Road to the east, Barranca Parkway to the south, and Red Hill Avenue to the west. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: SimonJ. Whitmey c/o Tustin Legacy Community Partners, LLC. 250 Commerce, Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92602 General Plan Designation: MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Zoning Designation: Planning Areas 7,8,9,10, II, 12, 13, 14, and 15 Project Description: Approval of Tentative Tract Maps 17026 to subdivide 805.5 gross acres for conveyance purposes only. Surrounding Uses: North: Residential and Commercial East: Residential, Commercial, and Industrial South: Commercial and Light Industrial West: Public & Institutional, and Industrial Previous Environmental Documentation: Program Final Environmental Impact StatementlEnvironmental Impact Report (Program FEIS/EIR) for the Disposal and Reuse of Marine Resolution No. 06-76 Page 3 of 27 Corps Air Station (MCAS) TusIin (State CleariD&bouse #94071005) certified by the Tustin City Council on January 16,2001, and an Addendum WIllI ~fied by the Tustin City Council on April 3, 2006. B, ENVIRONMENTAL FACI'ORS POTENTIALLY AFFECl'ED The environmental factors cheeked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the chcclclist in Section D below. OLand Use and Planning DPopulation and Housing BGeology and Sciils Hydrology and Water Quality OAir Quality BTransPOrtation & Circulation Biological Resources OMineral Resources OA&ricu1tural Resources OHazards and Hazardous Materials []Noise BPubliC Services ~~=::d Service Systems Cultural Resources ation andatory Findings of Sisuificanc:e C. DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation: o I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a siillificant effect on the environment, and a NEOA TIVE DECLARA nON will be prepared. o I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project A NEOA TIVE DECLARA nON will be prepared. o I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. o I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but atlwt one effect I) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the ewer analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potential1y Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. [8J I find that although the proposed project could have a siillificant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a signifIcant effect in this case because all potentially siillificant effects I) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR p\ll'suant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR. including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. o I flOd that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potelltially significant effects I) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have -. Resolutiorr No. 06.76 Page 4 of 27 been avoidcd or mitigaled pursuant to that earlier NEOA TIVE DECLARA nON, including revisions or mitigation measures that arc imposed upon the proposed project. Prqwcr: I/~ _ Mah W~~4iate PIam1er ~~ ~~.( Elizabeth A. Binsaclc, Community Development Director Date: h/15/D&' Date l./"S'. ~ D. EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL lMPACfS See Attached Resolution No. 06-76 Page 5 of 27 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACI'S No Sob.rtQllJJQ/ N_ M_ e""". F'rHII Sizni/IcDnI s..-. Pnvlmt.f I. AESTHETICS - Would tha JM'oject: 1_ Impaca A1U1/yJ/t a) Have a substantial adverse effect OIl a scenic vista? 0 0 181 b) Subslonlially cIamop ocenic: I'IIOW'C11, lneludif1&, but nol limiled to, trees, rock 01ltCnlppiDp, IIld historie bulldinp wilhin a stale scenic hiib_y? 0 0 18I c) Substanlially degrade the axisting visual chllllClCr or quality of the sita and its sull'Olllldinp? 0 0 18I d) CrOlla a now S01ll'Ce of substanlialliibt or &lite which would adversely affect day or oiahllimo views in tho .....? 0 0 18I IL AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In detctmining whelber implClJ to agricullural rcsourc.. .... ,lgnifiClDl environmOlltal affects, laid ....cios may refor to tho California Agricullural Lone! Eval..tion 8IIlI Site Assessment Model (1997) propored by the California Dept, of Conservation u an optiooal model to use in ......Ing impocta on agriculNI'C and fannlancl. Would tha project: a) Convert Prima Formland, Unique Farmland, or Formlllld ofStalewidalmportanca (Farmlllldl. . shown on the mlp5 prepared punuant to 1he Formland Mapping and Monitoring ProEJ'801 of the California ROIOUI'cos A&oncy, to non- agricull1lnl UH? 0 0 181 b) Contlict wilh existing %Gning for agricullInl...., 01 . Willlornson Act contrlct'l 0 0 181 c) Involve othor change, ill the exbting aovlronmact which, duc 10 their Iocalion or nalUJ'a, could result in COIIveniOll of Farmland, to non-agrlcultural use? 0 0 18I m. AIR OUALITY: Where avaUabla, tha liplficanca criwia established by tho applicable air quality man.........t or air pollution control district may be relied upon to malee 1he following datanninatio... Would 1he projact: a) Conflict with or obstruct implemenwion ofdl. applicabl. air quality plan? 0 0 181 b) Violate any air quality standard or conbibute lubstanlially 0 0 18I 10 an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable Dat incr.... of any criteria pollulaDl for which the project region Is nOll- attainment under an applicabl. ftderaI 01 state ItDbienl air quality standltd (iIleluding releuing emissiona which exceed 0 0 181 quantitatiVI lhresholds fOl own. procUtSOtI)? d) Expose sensitiva RCCJlIDI'S 10 substantial PDUutant 0 0 181 COl\CentratiDnS? .) Creat. objectionable odora affecting a auballlnlial numbO< 0 0 181 of people? Resolution No. 06-7-6 -.-.. . Page 6 of 27 No SubslanlUzl N"" Mo... Ch_F'roM 1$1...1/1"'''' s.v.... p,- IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOUR~ - Would the projeot. /mpocl lmpocll Nra/JoIlr a) Have a substllntial advone etTec~ either directly or tbrou&h habitat modilicatiOlll, on lIlY .pecies idOllti1lod as a candidate. SOAsitiv., or special starus apcc:ies In local or regional plan5, poUci... or fCCUlali..... or by the California Depal1lllent of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Serviee? 0 0 181 b) Have a .ubstantial advone elTect on any riparian habitat or oIhcr sensitive notutll commuaily iclon~1\od in local or rePoDaI piano, polioi... reculations Dr by the California Department ofFish and Oame or U.S. Fish aod Wildlife Service? 0 0 181 c) Have a substantial odvenc effect OIl federally protected WClIaDds as defined by Sccllllll 0404 of tho CI.... Water Act (includina, but IlOllimitod to, ......... vemaI poo~ coastal, etc.) tIuou&h direct remnval, llilin&. bydroloaical inlcnuplilll1, or 0 other means? 0 181 d) Interfere subJlandally with lbe movomont of lilY native resident or mip'atllry flsh or wildlifa SJlCcl.. or with es..blished native resident or milfltory wildlife eorridon. or impede the use of native wildlife D'usery sites? 0 0 18I e) Conflict with any local polloies or ordinances problCli1la bioloaical rcaour.... SIlCh as a tree preservation polley or 0 18I orclinan.e? 0 f) Conflict with Ibe provWons of III adopted Habitat eonservation Plan, NotutII Community Coaservatioa Plan, or other approved loca~ rtaiona~ or slala habilll conservation 0 0 181 plan? V. CULTURAL RESOURCES, . Would the project: a) Cause a .ubstantial odv.... chao.e in the sipliflClllCO of 0 0 181 a historical re.ource II defined in f 1'064.'? b) Cause a substaotial advcnc chanae in the si&nifiCIIICC of 0 0 181 III archaoolopcal rcsourc. PUlSuaotto f 1'064.'7 c) Directly or indiRctly destroy a unique paleontoloaica! 0 0 181 resource or 'site or unique aco1oaic feature? d) Disturb any hUlll8ll remains, includiDa those inrcm:d 0 C!:I outside of formal cemoleri..? 0 VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS: - Would the proj.ct; .) Expose people or sINClUr.. to potential substanlial adv..... effects, includiDg the risk of lou, iqjury, or death involvinz: Resolution No. 06-76 Page 7 of 27 No Subllanl/QI N... Mor. CIumg. FriJIII ~ !In_ Pm/ow i) Rupcure of a knOWD car1bq1llke fllll~ u doIiDe_ an the JlrlJHlCt lm/XICI$ ,1""""11 most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthqwtke Fault ZoniD& Map issued by the Slato Oooloaist for tho area or based III ocher ,ubstantialovldellce of a known l'oull? R.t.r to Division of Mines and GooloCY Special Public:atioo42. 0 0 181 ii) Slrong ..ismic around shaking? 0 0 181 iii) Seismic-relalocl ground failure, including liquefaction? 0 0 181 iv) LlllCIIlid..? 0 0 181 b) Reauh in subslanlial.oilerosion or the 10.. of topsoil? 0 0 181 0) Be 100000d on I geolO&io unit or soil that Is WISllblo, or thai WCl\IId become unstabl. as a nsuk ofChe proj.~ nnd potentially resuh in on- or off-site IlIldslide, 1aIeralspreading. subsidence, Iiqu.faction or collapse? 0 0 181 d) B.localed on lXJlIIl.lv. soil, IS detlnod In Tob.. l8-I-B of tho Unifonn Builclina Code (1994). creatina sub.llllllial riaks to Iif. or ptllpIl'ly? 0 0 181 e) Hive ,oils lncapoblo of Idequalely oupportioa the ... of septic tanks or eltenllllv. .._wlllr dIsposallyllelllS ..heft sewen ore not availobl. for the disposal of wlSle WIIIr? 0 0 181 VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Would lbe project: a) Create a signiflc:ant hazard to lbe public or !he environmlol tIIrough the rolltlne trIIlsport, us.. or disposal of 0 h.....dou. mahrlaIs? 0 181 b) Create a signiflClllt hazard 10 the public or the environm.nt throu&h reasonably forcsccobl. upaelllld accident conditions involving the ..Ieu. ofhezardous metcrials into lb. envUolllllent? 0 0 181 c) Emit hazard.... emissions or handl. hazardOUJ or ..utely hazardous materials, IIlbstIJlCCS, or WIlle wilhlD OJIeoQUIllCr mil. of an existing or proposed school? 0 0 181 d) Be 10Cll0d 00 a ,II' wbicb ia inclulied on e list of hllZllrdous IDIleriaIJ sites compiled pun1lllll to GovCllllllClll CoG. Section 65962.5 and, U I nsult, woulcl it create I signifiClllI hllZllrd to the public or the environmenl? 0 0 181 .) Fonproj.ct located withilll/l alrport IIDII... plln or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within !wo mlIes of I public lirport or public us. lirport, woulci the project Rlull ill I safety hazard for people resiclina or workine in the project 0 181 area? 0 f) For I project w1lhin Che vicinity ola privalc airstrip, would lb. project ....11 In I safely hazard for poopl. ...idin& q 0 181 or working III the project arel? ReSolution No. 06-76 .-. - .., .~- .-...--.... .--..." Page 8 of 27 No Sub.sID1lllol N"" MOl" ChDIf/P From S/grIjflctmI s...,. Pr..,ioUJ g) Impair implementation of or physically intcrfcn with 1ft IlllfJaeI ImpaetJ AlUilYlu adopted eme'lency rapollSe plan or cmoraCCcy evll:aatiOll plan? 0 0 ~ b) Jlxposo pooplo or attuc/IIIes 10 . S/&nillcanl risk of loss, i1UWY or death involvin. wildland rim, iac1udina wllero wildlands are adjacent to urboniDd IIleIII or wbere residences are inlennixed with wildlands? 0 0 181 VIII. HYDROLOGY AND W A TIR OUALITY: - Would the projccl: .) Viol... any w.ter quality standards or wuto disoh.... requlremerlll'l 0 0 181 b) SubltanliaUy deplete lI'oundwater supplies or interfere subltantially with aroundwater rcchll1e such that 1hcR would be . net delieit in aquifer vDlum. at .lowcriD& oftholoc:al groundwatertablelcvol (...., tho production l'lIlC ofpro- existin8 nearby weIll would drop to . level wbich would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which pcrmitJ hove been aramed)? 0 0 181 c) SubstanlioJly aher tho exUtiag drainap pattern of lbe silo or ..... iDc1udina throuab tho .lteratioD of the couna DCa stream or river, in . manner which would reouk in subataolioJ erosion or siltation on- or off-site? 0 0 181 d) SubstanliaUy alter the exiaina drain"e pattern of the site or..... includiD& rbrouab lbe a!tcrIliOD of tho course oca s........ or river, or sub.....liolly inc:rcuo lbo role at omouat of surf..e nlDol!' in . manner whlc:h would re..1t in lIoodina 011- or off-site? 0 0 ~ c) C..... or contribute I'UllDIfWaler which would exceed lbo cap..ity of cxlsIIna or planned stormwater cblual systems 0 0 jgI or provide subslinlial addiliooal sources of polluled runofl'l f) Otberwiso sublllUllially deande water quaIity'I 0 0 181 g) Place housina within. I CO-year flood hazard .... as m""ped on . federal Flood Hazard Boundat)l or Flood 0 0 181 Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delJnealioo m",,? h) Place within. I()()"year flood bazord ar.. structures whlcb would impede or rcdirc<l flood lIows? 0 0 181 i) Expose poople or structlnS 10 . slgoiflcllll risk of 10.., injury or death involvin. fIoodina as . rosu1t oflbe failur. ora 0 G levee or dam? 0 J) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudnow? 0 0 ~ IX. LAND U'iE AND PLANNING - Would the projoct: a) Physically divide an established community'/ Resolution No. 06-76 Page 9 of 27 No SrIbIIDnl/o/ N... Mor. Clumtl. Fro," S/611iJ1ctmr Snu, P,nioIu b) ConlliCl wilb any appli<ible land .... plan, policy, or l_ Imp_ Analysis regulatiOll of an agency with jurisdicllOll oyer the project (including, but not limited to the &oneral plan, specific plan, local coU1al p_, or zonlna OIdi......) adoptocI for lho pwpolCl of a.oldin& or miliptin& an OII.in>nmeatal effect? 0 0 181 c) Conflict with any applicable habitat eonscrvation plan or nalUIIl community CClIISOrYlllon plan? 0 0 181 X. MINERAL RESOURCES - Would the project: 0) Result io the I... of availability of a known miDeral resource that would be of value to the re&ioo and the residents of the state? 0 0 181 b) Result in Ibe loss of a.ailability of a locally-important mineral reaource recovery site cIcIineetecl on a local &caeraI plan. specific plan or other land use pi...? 0 0 181 XI. NOISE- Would the project rcsuk in: 0) Exposun of peI!/Jnslo 0< &CDeratiOll ohol.. Ie.els in excess of standards eatablisbccl in 1M local &aneral pI... 0< noise ordinance. or applicable IlandardJ of Olher l&on.1es' 0 0 181 b) Exposure of persons to or leneration of excessl.e srounclbome vibration or aroundbom. naile levels? 0 0 ~ c) A sub5l1ntlaJ pennonent increas. in ambi8llt ""iN 1...ls in the project vicinity abo.e I..els exlslinl without Ibe 0 181 project? 0 d) A sub5l1nlial temporeI')' or periodic iDc.... in ambient nol.. le.ell in 1M pIOjcec vicinity Ibo.elevell existins withoulthe pIOject? 0 0 181 0) For a projcellocatecl within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan hu not been acIopcecl. wilhlD two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would !be project expose people residio& or workina In lb. project area 10 exe...lv. 0 181 noise levels? 0 t) For a prole<< within the Yicinity of a priYllc IiDtrip, woulcl the pIOjcet expose people midi.. or wortln& in the 0 0 181 project area 10 exce.. noise levels? XlI.POPULATION AND HOUSING - Would the project: a) Ioduce substantial population srowth ill an area, eilher directly (for eXllllpIe, by proposin& now bom.. and businesses) or indirtclIy (for example, lIlrouah exlalsion of 0 0 181 ronds or other in6'utnK:ture)? b) DisplICc lubstonlial numbers of cxisting houln&. n.....italing the conslnlctlon of replacement bousin& 0 0 ~ elsewhere? Resolution No. 06-76 Page 10 of 27 No SuIIII4nIIQ/ N". Mor. Cluznll' From SIPIfICDnt s.-w PrlVlmu C) Di.lplace sublltlltill nW1lben of people, lItCtS.italing the J_ct Impoct.J A."Q/y.ru construction ofrepllCtll\eDl bousing elJewbm? 0 0 ~ XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES e) Would tile project resullln substanliallldvmc physical impacts usociIled with the provision of DeW or physically altered i"YOl1IlIIClItal facilities, need for new or physically altered Kovcmmental filcilili.., the conslNClion of which ecoid cau.. '!JIIili"""t enviroruncnlll impact., in crder to maintain lCCeptabl. service ratios, "'poII" limes or other pafOnDIDCe objecti_ for my or the public services: Fire protection? 0 0 181 Polioo proteCllon? 0 0 IllI Schaab? 0 0 181 Pork.? 0 0 IllI Other poblic facilities? 0 0 IllI XIV. RECREATION- a) Would the project increase the use of existin. neighborhood md lOIiOnal pIIk. or other reaadonll facilities sucb that .ubetanliAl physical deterionli... oflbe facility would occur or be accelerated? 0 0 IllI b) Does the projectlncludc reclClllionll filcillti.. ct require the COIIStJucti... or expansion of rec:reatlcxIIl facilhleo which might have an tdvelH phYIlc:a1 effect on the environment? 0 0 181 XV. TRANSPORT ATIONfl'RAFFlC - Would the projecl: a) Cau.e an in...... I. InIflic which lJ aubetantiaJ in relalion to the existinJ nme load and capacity of the 1lr0Cl .ystem (i.e. mult in a sublllDtitl incteue in citbcr the number of vehicle trips, the volW1lelo capacity lIlio on roW, or 0 0 181 cODKeslion at In_ioos)? b) Exceed, olthcr individually 01 cumulalively, a level of service standard establilhad by the cOUllly """pion managelDOl1la.ency for dnignoted roads or biihwIY'? 0 0 181 c) Re.ult in a cbange in air traffic paIlems, including either an lncl'C8Se in traffic levels or e chan.ein location that results in luh$!4ntiaJ safety risks? 0 0 181 d) Substantially increase hazards due to a deJign feaIurc (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible use. (e.g., farm equipmenl)? 0 0 ~ .) R.esult in inadequare emerecnc)' ""CSI? 0 CJ 181 t) Resull in inadequate padcina capacity? 0 CJ ~ Resolution No. 06-76 Page 11 of 27 No SlIlnttur1;a/ N.... Moro CIumc. From SlptflC4lll s",.,. Pr...,iOMl g) Conflict with adopted polic:ia, plans, or prognurui Impact /mP<Kb 4/IQ/y.r;" supporting allemalive trWPOl1ltiOll (e.&-, bus turnouts, bicyol. racks)? 0 0 181 XVI, UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS- Would the project: a) Ex~eed wulOW_ tralmenl requirements of the appli<ab1e Re&ional Water Qualil)l Conlrol Board? 0 0 181 b) Require or resuk in the collSDUClion ohew water or wastewater _ent facilities or explllSion of maling fil<:i1iti... the cOllStruction of whioh could c:awe sl&nificant environmental effects? 0 0 181 c) Require or resull in the construction of new stann wiler draiuap facilities or expansion of exifliDg faoUill... the construction ofwhloh c:ouId cause si&nificant environmonla1 elfcc:ts? 0 0 I8J d) Have IUffaeitn.1 water ".pplies a.,.ilable to ICI'VC the project ftom existing entitlements and moun:es, or are new or expUlded entitlements needed? 0 0 I8l 0) Rosuk in a detonnillallon by the waslewllcr_ provider whloh serves or may serve the project that II bas adequete capecily to serve the project's projected demUld in addition to the provider's exisliDa commltm.....? 0 0 181 f) Be served by a landfill with sufflc:lenl permitted capaoil)l to ICcommodate the project's solid Wille dlsposaI ueeds? 0 0 I8l &> Comply with federal. Slste, Uld local slllUles and reFlations relaled to soUd Wille? 0 0 I8l XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS O.-SIGNlFICANCE e) Does the projecl have Ihe potenlisllo degrade the qUllity or the envirmmcn~ subslsnlis11y reduce the habilal of I fISh or wildlife specl... causes f.... or wildlife population to cirIlp below ulf-suslliolog levels, threllen to eliminate I pIlAt or 8IlimallXllDmunil)l, ",duoc lbe number or restrict thelllllgc of I ...... or endanpred pIlAt or lDimal or ellminole ImporllDI exampl.. of the major periods of California hiolory or 0 0 I8l prehistory? b) Doa the project have impKIs that are individual1y limilcd, bill ownulotively considereble? ("Cumulatively eoo.idcnb1e" means lbaclbe irlcranenlll effects of I project are COD.idcrable when vlewad in cooncdon wllb lbe effects of past projects, the eITec:ls of other clllTOlll projcc1s, and thl 0 181 e<<ects of probable future projects)? 0 c) Does the project have environmental e<<eCII whidl will cause SIIbslintial advenc effects 011 human bemp, either ~ dircc:tly Of'indireclly? 0 0 Resolution No', 06~76 ._.,~"...... . Page 12 of 27 ATTACHMENT 1 TO EXHIBlT A OF RESOLUTION NO. 06-76 EV ALUA TION OF ENVIRONMENT AL IMPACTS TENTATIVE TRACT MAPS 17026 PLANNING AREAS 7, 8, 9,10,11,12,13,14, AND 15 - MCAS TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN BACKGROUND The project site is comprised of 805.5 acres (gross) within Planning Areas 7,8,9,10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15 of the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan and generally bounded by Edinger A venue to the north, Jamboree Road to the east, Barranca Parkway to the south, and Red Hill Avenue to the west. On January 16, 2001 and April 3, 2006, the City of Tustin certified the Program Final Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report and Addendum, respectively, for the Reuse and Disposal of MCAS Tustin (FEIS/EIR). An environmental check list was prepared for the development of the site that concluded no additional environmental impacts for the project than the impacts considered and addressed in the FEIS/EIR and Addendum. The proposed project includes subdivision of the 805.5 gross acre area into thirty-six (36) parcels for financing and conveyance purposes only. No development is proposed with the project and therefore no environmental impacts are anticipated. The following information provides background support for the conclusions identified in the Environmental Analysis Checklist. I. AESTHETICS - Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) SubstantiaUy damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and bistoric buildings within a state scenic highway? c) SubstantiaUy degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? The proposed subdivision is for financing and conveyance purposes only. No development plan is proposed with the subdivision and therefore the project will have no substantial adverse effects on a scenic vista. The proposed project has no potential for substantially damaging scenic resources, degrade the existing visual character, or create a new source of substantial light or glare. Consequently, no substantial change is expected from the analysis previously completed in the FEIS/EIR and Addendum for MCAS Tustin. Mitigation/Monitoring Required: None Sources: FEIS/EIR and Addendum for Disposal and Reuse ofMCAS Tustin MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Tustin General Plan Resolution No. 06-76 Page 13 of 27 Attachment 1 to Exhibit A of Resolution No. 06-76 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Tentative Tract Map 17026 Page 2 II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use? The proposed subdivision is for financing and conveyance purposes only. No development is associated with the project. The project would not convert prime farmland, unique farmland or farmland of statewide importance as shown on maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Managing and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultura1 use. Also, the property is not zoned for agricultural use or a Williamson Act Contract, nor does the proposed subdivision involve other changes in the existing environment that could result in the conversion of farmland to non-agricultura1 use. The project site is not zoned or used as agricultural land; consequently, no substantial change is expected from the analysis previously completed in the FEISIEIR and Addendum for MCAS Tustin. Mitigation/Monitoring Required: No mitigation is required. Sources: FEISIEIR and Addendum for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Tustin General Plan III. AIR QUALITY: Where available, the signifieance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Resolution No. 06-76 Page 14 of 27 Attachment 1 to Exhibit A of Resolution No. 06-76 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Tentative Tract Map 17026 Page 3 e) Creat e objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? The proposed project is a request for subdivision of the site for ftnancing and conveyance purposes only. No development is proposed and no impacts are anticipated. The conveyance tentative tract map has no potential to violate air quality standards, or contribute to a cumulatively considerable increase of any criteria pollutant for the project region. The project will not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentration or create objectionable odor. On January 16, 2001 and April 3, 2006, the City of Tustin certifted the Program Final Environmental Impact StatementlEnvironmental Impact Report and Addendum, respectively, for the Reuse and Disposal of MCAS Tustin (FEISIEIR). Consequently, no substantial change is expected from the analysis previously completed in the FEISIEIR and Addendum for MCAS Tustin. Mitigation/Monitoring Required: Mitigation measures have been adopted by the Tustin City Council in the FEISIEIR and Addendum; these measures were included as conditions of approval for development of the site. No mitigation measures are required for subdivision of the site for conveyance purposes. Sources: FEISIEIR and Addendum for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin MCAS Tustin Speciftc Tustin General Plan IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: - Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as dermed by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, fdling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? Resolution No. 06-76 Page 15 of 27 Attachment 1 to Exhibit A of Resolution No. 06-76 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Tentative Tract Map 17026 Page 4 e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? t) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional or state habitat conservation plan? The proposed project is a request for subdivision of the site for financing and conveyance purposes only. No development is proposed and no impacts are anticipated. The project has no effect on riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communities identified in local or regional plans, or a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. The conveyance map will not interfere with movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources. The FEISIEIR and Addendum found that implementation of the Reuse Plan and MCAS Tustin Specific Plan would not result in impacts to federally listed threatened or endangered plant or animal species. Consequently, no substantial change is expected from the analysis previously completed in the FEISIEIR and Addendum for MCAS Tustin. Mitigation/Monitoring Required: No mitigation is required. Sources: FEISIEIR and Addendum for Disposal and Reuse ofMCAS Tustin MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Tustin General Plan V. CULTURAL RESOURCES: - Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in ~15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to ~ 15064.5? e) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside formal cemeteries? The proposed proj ect is a request for subdivisilln of the site for financing and conveyance purposes only. No development is proposed and no impacts are anticipated. The project has no potential to change the significance of a historical resource, or destroy a unique paleontological resource. On January 16, 200 I and April 3, 2006, the City of Tustin certified the Program Final Environmental Impact StatementlEnvironmental Impact Report and Addendum, respectively for the Reuse and Disposal of MCAS Tustin (FEISIEIR). Consequently, no substantial change is expected from the analysis previously completed in the FEISlEIR and Addendum for MCAS Tustin. Mitigation/Monitoring Required: Mitigation measures have been adopted by the Tustin City CoWlcil in the FEISIEIR and Addendum; these measures were included as conditions of Resolution No. 06-76 Page 16 of 27 Attachment 1 to Exhibit A of Resolution No. 06-76 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Tentative Tract Map 17026 Page 5 approval for development of the project. No mitigation measures are required for subdivision of the site for conveyance purposes. Sources: FEISIEIR and Addendum for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Tustin General Plan VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS: - Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including tbe risk of loss, injury, or death involving: . Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning map, issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. . Strong seismic ground shaking? . Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? . Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss oftopsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? The proposed project is a request for subdivision of the site for financing and conveyance purposes only. No development is proposed and no impacts are anticipated. The FEISIEIR and Addendum indicates that impacts to soils and geology resulting from implementation of the Reuse Plan and MCAS Tustin Specific Plan would "include non-seismic hazards (such as local settlement. regional subsidence, expansive soils, slope instability, erosion, and mudflows) and seismic hazards (such as surface fault displacement, high-intensity ground shaking, ground failure and lurching, seismically induced settlement, and flooding associated with dam failure." In addition, since no development is proposed, the project has no potential to result in soil erosion, development on expansive soil, or expose people to risk of loss or injury involving rupture of an earthquake fault or liquefaction. On January 16, 200 I and April 3, 2006, the City of Tustin certified the Program Final Environmental Impact StatementlEnvironmental Impact Report and Addendum, respectively, for the Reuse and Disposal of MCAS Tustin (FEISIEIR). Consequently, no substantial change is expected from the analysis previously completed in the FEISIEIR and Addendum for MCAS Tustin. Resolution No. 06-76 Page 17 of 27 Attachment 1 to Exhibit A of Resolution No. 06-76 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Tentative Tract Map 17026 Page 6 Mitigation/Monitoring Required: Mitigation measures have been adopted by the Tustin City Council in the FEIS/EIR; these measures were included as conditions of approval for development of the project. No mitigation measures are required for subdivision of the site for conveyance purposes. Sources: FEIS/EIR and Addendum for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Tustin General Plan VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: - Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonable foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not heen adopted, within two miles or a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? The proposed subdivision is for financing and conveyance purposes only. No development is proposed and no impacts are anticipated. On January 16, 2001 and April 3, 2006, the City of Tustin certified the Program Final Environmental Impact StatementlEnvironmental Impact Report and Addendum, respectively, for the Reuse and Disposal of MCAS Tustin (FEISIEIR). Consequently, no substantial change is expected from the analysis previously completed in the FEIS/EIR and Addendum for MCAS Tustin. Resolution No. 06-76 Page 18 of 27 Attachment 1 to Exhibit A of Resolution No. 06-76 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Tentative Tract Map 17026 Page 7 The proj ect will not create a significant hazard to the public through the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials, nor are there reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions at the property. In addition, the project site is located within the boundaries of the Airport Environs Land Use Plan; however, it is at least four (4) miles from John Wayne Airport, and does not lie within a flight approach or departure corridor and thus does not pose an aircraft-related safety hazard for future residents or workers. Consequently. no substantial change is expected from the analysis previously completed in the FEISlEIR and Addendum for MCAS Tustin. Mitigation/Monitoring Required: Mitigation measures have been adopted by the Tustin City Council in the FEISIEIR; these measures were included as conditions of approval for development of the project. No mitigation measures are required for subdivision of the site for conveyance purposes. Sources: FEISIEIR and Addendum for Disposal and Reuse ofMCAS Tustin pages MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Tustin General Plan. VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: - Would theprojed: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially witb groundwater recbarge, such tbat there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., tbe production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level wbich would not support existing land uses or planned uses for whicb permits bave been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including tbrough the alteration of tbe course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? d) Substantially alter tbe existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including tbrough tbe alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase tbe rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, wbicb would result in flooding on- or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? g) Place housing witbin a tOO-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood bazard Boundary of Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood bazard delineation map? h) Place within a tOO-year flood hazard area structures, which would impede or redired flood flows? Resolution No. 06-76 Page 19 of 27 Attachment I to Exhibit A of Resolution No. 06-76 Evaluation of EnvironmentaJ Impacts Tentative Trect Map 17026 Page 8 i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk ofloss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? The proposed proj ect is a request for subdivision of the site for financing and conveyance purposes only. No development is proposed and no impacts are anticipated. The proposed project will not impact groundwater in the deep regional aquifer or shallow aquifer. The project is not located within a 100-year flood area and will not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury and death involving flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam, nor is the proposed project susceptible to inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow. Consequently, no substantial change is expected from the analysis previously completed in the FEIS/EIR and Addendum for MCAS Tustin. Consequently, no substantial change is expected from the analysis previously completed in the FEISIEIR and Addendum for MCAS Tustin. On January 16, 2001 and April 3, 2006, the City of Tustin certified the Program Final Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report and Addendwn, respectively, for the Reuse and Disposal ofMCAS Tustin (FEIS/EIR). Mitigation/Monitoring Required: Mitigation measures have been adopted by the Tustin City Council in the FEIS/EIR; these measures were included as conditions of approval for development of the project. No mitigation measures are required for subdivision of the site for conveyance purposes. Sources: FEIS/EIR and Addendum for Disposal and Reuse ofMCAS Tustin MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Tustin General Plan IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING: Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited, to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? The proposed project is a request for subdivision of the site for financing and conveyance purposes only. No development is proposed and no impacts are anticipated. Also, the proposed project does not conflict with any applicable land use plan, or conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan. On January 16, 2001, the City of Tustin certified the Program Final Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report for the Reuse and Disposal of MCAS Tustin (FEISIEIR). On April 3, 2006, the City of Tustin approved Zone Change 05-002, which generally adjusted Planning Area boundaries and Resolution No. 06-76 Page 20 of 27 Attachment 1 to Exhibit A of Resolution No. 06~76 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Tentative Tract Map 17026 Page 9 redistributed and/or eliminated planned land uses within the Specific Plan area, and certified an Addendum to the FEISIEIR. Consequently, no substantial change is expected from the analysis previously completed in the FEISIEIR and Addendum. Mitigation/Monitoring Required: Mitigation measures have been adopted by the Tustin City Council in the FEIS/EIR and Addendum; these measures were included as conditions of approval for development of the project. No mitigation measures are required for subdivision of the site for conveyance purposes. Sources: FEIS/EIR and Addendum for Disposal and Reuse ofMCAS Tustin MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Tustin General Plan X. MINERAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be a value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? The proposed subdivision is for financing and conveyance purposes only. No development is proposed and no impacts are anticipated. The proposed project will not result in the loss of known mineral resources. On January 16, 2001 and April 3, 2006, the City of Tustin certified the Program Final Enviromnental Impact StatementlEnviromnental Impact Report and Addendum, respectively, for the Reuse and Disposal of MCAS Tustin (FEIS/EIR). Consequently, no substantial change is expected from the analysis previously completed in the FEISlEIR and Addendum for MCAS Tustin. Mitigation/Monitoring Required: Mitigation measures have been adopted by the Tustin City Council in the FEIS/EIR and Addendum; these measures were included as conditions of approval for development of the project. No mitigation measures are required for subdivision of the site for conveyance purposes. Sources: FEIS/EIR and Addendum for Disposal and Reuse ofMCAS Tustin MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Tustin General Plan XI. NOISE: Would the project: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of nolse levels in exeess of standards established in the local general plan or nolse ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground borne vibratioll or ground borne noise levels? Resolution No. 06-76 Page 21 of 27 Attachment 1 to Exhibit A of Resolution No. 06-76 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Tentative Tract Map 17026 Page 10 c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? t) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? The proposed project is a request for subdivision of the site for fmancing and conveyance purposes only. No development is proposed and no noise impacts are anticipated. The proposed project will not expose person to noise levels in excess of local standards, or excessive ground borne vibration, nor does the project has a potential for substantial temporary increase in ambient noise levels. In addition, the project site is located within the boundaries of the Airport Environs Land Use Plan; however, it is at least four (4) miles from John Wayne Airport, and the site is not located within the vicinity of a private airstrip. On January 16, 200 I and April 3, 2006, the City of Tustin certified the Program Final Environmental Impact StatementlEnvironmental Impact Report and Addendum, respectively, for the Reuse and Disposal of MCAS Tustin (FEISIEIR). Consequently, no substantial change is expected from the analysis previously completed in the FEISIEIR and Addendum for MCAS Tustin. Mitigation/Monitoring Required: Mitigation measures have been adopted by the Tustin City Council in the FEISIEIR and Addendum; these measures were included as conditions of approval for development of the project. No mitigation measures are required for subdivision of the site for conveyance purposes. Sources: FEISIEIR and Addendum for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Tustin General Plan XII. POPULATION & HOUSING: Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement bousing elsewhere? The proposed project is a request for subdivision of the site for fmancing and conveyance purposes only. No development is proposed and no impacts are anticipated. The project has Resolution No. 06-76 Page 22 of 27 Attachment 1 to Exhibit A of Resolution No. 06-76 Evaluation ofEnvironmentallmpacts Tentative Tract Map 17026 Page 11 no potential to induce population growth, displace existing housing, or displace substantial number of people. On January 16, 2001 and April 3, 2006, the City ofTustin certified the Program Final Environmental Impact StatementlEnvironmental Impact Report and Addendum, respectively, for the Reuse and Disposal of MCAS Tustin (FEISIEIR). Consequently, no substantial change is expected from the analysis previously completed in the FEISIEIR and Addendum for MCAS Tustin. Mitigation/Monitoring Required: Mitigation measures have been adopted by the Tustin City Council in the FEISIEIR and Addendum; these measures were included as conditiom of approval for development of the project. No mitigation measures are required for subdivision of the site for conveyance purposes. Sources: FEISIEIR and Addendum for Disposal and Reuse ofMCAS Tustin MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Tustin General Plan XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts assodated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically' altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable sen'ice ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the public services: The proposed subdivision is for financing and conveyance purposes only. No development is proposed and no impacts are anticipated. The project will not impact governmental facilities or public services. On January 16, 2001 and April 3, 2006, the City of Tustin certified the Program Final Environmental Impact StatementlEnvironmental Impact Report and Addendum, respectively, for the Reuse and Disposal of MCAS Tustin (FEISIEIR). Consequently, no substantial change is expected from the analysis previously completed in the FEISIEIR and Addendum for MCAS Tustin. Mitigation/Monitoring Required: Mitigation measures have been adopted by the Tustin City Council in the FEISIEIR and Addendum; these measures were included as conditions of approval for development of the project. No mitigation measures are required for subdivision of the site for conveyance purposes. Sources: FEISIEIR and Addendum for Disposal and Reuse ofMCAS Tustin MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Tustin General Plan XIV. RECREATION a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities, such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Resolution No. 06-76 Page 23 of 27 Attachment I to Exhibit A of Resolution No. 06-76 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Tentative Tract Map 17026 Page 12 b) Does the project inc:lude recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on tbe environment? The proposed project is a request for subdivision of the site for financing and conveyance purposes only. No development is proposed and no impacts are anticipated. The project will not increase use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or require construction of recreational facilities. On January 16,2001 and April 3,2006, the City of Tustin certified the Program Final Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report and Addendum, respectively, for the Reuse and Disposal of MCAS Tustin (FEIS/EIR). Consequently, no substantial change is expected from the analysis previously completed in the FEIS/EIR and Addendum for MCAS Tustin. Mitigation/Monitoring Required: Mitigation measures have been adopted by the Tustin City Council in the FEIS/EIR and Addendum; these measures were included as conditions of approval for development of the project. No mitigation measures are required for subdivision of the site for conveyance purposes. Sources: FEIS/EIR and Addendum for Disposal and Reuse ofMCAS Tustin pages Reuse Plan and MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Tustin Parks and Recreation Services Department Tustin General Plan xv. TRANSPORTATIONffRAFFIC: Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic, wblch Is substantial In relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in eitber the number of vebicle trips, tbe volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard establisbed by tbe county congestion management agency for designated roads or bighways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an Increase in traffic levels or a cbange in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase bazards due to a design feature (e.g., sbarp curves or dangerons intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? t) g) Result in inadequate parking capacity? Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? supporting alternative The proposed project is a request for subdivision of the site for financing and conveyance purposes only. No development is proposed and no impacts are anticipated. The project has no potential to cause an increase in traffic, or result in inadequate emergency access or Resolution No. 06-76 Page 24 of 27 Attachment I to Exhibit A of Resolution No. 06-76 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Tentative Tract Map 17026 Page 13 parking capacity. On January 16, 200 I and April 3, 2006, the City of Tustin certified the Program Final Environmental Impact StatementlEnvironmental Impact Report and Addendwn, respectively, for the Reuse and Disposal of MCAS Tustin (FEISIEIR). Consequently, no substantial change is expected from the analysis previously completed in the FEISlEIR and Addendwn for MCAS Tustin. Mitigation/Monitoring Required: Mitigation measures have been adopted by the Tustin City Council in the FEISIEIR and Addendwn; these measures were included as conditions of approval for development of the project. No mitigation measures are required for subdivision of the site for conveyance purposes. Sources: FEISIEIR and Addendwn for Disposal and Reuse ofMCAS Tustin Reuse Plan and MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Tustin General Plan XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could caulIe significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serve. or may .erve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project'. projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulation. related to solid waste? The proposed subdivision is for financing and conveyance purposes only. No development is proposed and no impacts are anticipated. The proj ect has no impacts on waste water treatment facilities, nor does the project require construction of new water, waste water and storm drain facilities. On January 16,2001 and April 3, 2006, the City of Tustin certified the Program Final Environmental Impact StatementlEnvironmental Impact Report and Addendwn, respectively, for the Reuse and Disposal of MCAS Tustin (FEISIEIR). Consequently, no substantial change is expected from the analysis previously completed in the FEIS/EIR and Addendwn for MCAS Tustin. Resolution No. 06-76 Page 25 of 27 Attachmenl1lo Exhibit A of Resolution No. 06-76 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Tentative Tract Map 17026 Page 14 Mitigation/Monitoring Required: Mitigation measures have been adopted by the Tustin City Council in the FEIS/EIR and Addendum; these measures were included as conditions of approval for development of the project. No mitigation measures are required for subdivision of the site for conveyance purposes. Sources: FEIS/EIR and Addendum for Disposal and Reuse of MCAS Tustin Reuse Plan and MCAS Tustin Specific Plan Tustin General Plan XVII. MANDA TORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fISh or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) c) Does the project have environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? The proposed project is a request for subdivision of the site for financing and conveyance purposes only. No impacts are anticipated and no impacts are anticipated. On January 16, 2001 and April 3, 2006, the City of Tustin certified the Program Final Envirorunentai Impact StatementlEnvirorunental Impact Report and Addendum, respectively, for the Reuse and Disposal of MCAS Tustin (FEIS/EIR). Mitigation/Monitoring Required: Mitigation measures have been adopted by the Tustin City Council in the FEIS/EIR and Addendum; these measures were included as conditions of approval for development of the project. No mitigation measures are required for subdivision of the site for conveyance purposes. Sources: Field Observations FEIS/EIR and Addendum for Disposal and Reuse ofMCAS Tustin (pages 5- 4 through 5-11) Reuse Plan and MCAS Tustin Specific Plan (pages 3-145 through 3-154). Tustin General Plan Resolution No. 06-76 Page 26 of 27 Attachment 1 to Exhibit A of Resolution No. 06-76 Evaluation of EnvironmentaI Impacts Tentative Tract Map 17026 Page 15 CONCLUSION The swmnary concludes that the proposed financing and conveyance map will have no environmental impacts and all environmental effects of the development project were previously examined in the FEIS/EIR and Addendum for MCAS Tustin, and that no new effects would occur, that no substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects would occur, that no new mitigation measures would be required, that no applicable mitigation measures previously not found to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and that there are no new mitigation measures or alternatives applicable to the project that would substantially reduce effects of the project that have not been considered and adopted. S:\Cdd\MATI\Tustin Leaacy\TIM 17026 (Sector A)\TIM 17026 Initial Study-anaIysis.doc Resolution No. 06-76 Page 27 of 27