HomeMy WebLinkAbout08 2020-2021 CERTIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENT ANNUAL REPORTDocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
MEETING DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
SUMMARY:
Agenda Item
—DS—
AGENDA REPORT Reviewed:
City Manager
��
Finance Director
APRIL 5, 2022
MATTHEW S. WEST, CITY MANAGER
JUSTINA L. WILLKOM, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
2020-2021 CERTIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENT ANNUAL REPORT
The 1980 amendments to the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 provided for the
establishment of a Certified Local Government Program (CLG) to encourage the participation
of local governments in the identification, evaluation, registration, and preservation of historic
properties and to promote the integration of local historic preservation into local planning and
decision-making processes. As a participant in the program, the City of Tustin is required to
submit an annual report to the State of California Office of Historic Preservation (OHP). The
attached annual report summarizes the City's historic preservation efforts and describes how
the City met the requirements of the program during the 2020-2021 reporting period. On
March 22, 2022, the Planning Commission, as Historic and Cultural Resources Advisor,
approved the Annual Report and directed staff to forward the Annual Report to the OHP. This
report is forwarded to the City Council for information only.
CORRELATION TO THE STRATEGIC PLAN:
Cultural and historic resources correlate to Goal A of the City of Tustin's Strategic Plan
pertaining to enhancing the vibrancy and quality of life in all neighborhoods and areas of the
community.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council receive and file the report.
DocuSigned by:
S"a,w
11ECE507A88E4E9...
Mary Salman
Assistant Planner
(DocuSigned by:
Ju �. o Q&ow�,
ED45DA2623B54A5...
Justina L. Willkom
Community Development Director
Attachment: 2020-2021 Certified Local Government Report
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Certified Local Government Program -- 2020-2021 Annual Report
(Reporting period is from October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2021)
INSTRUCTIONS: This a Word form with expanding text fields and check boxes. It will probably open as Read -Only. Save it to your computer before you begin
entering data. This form can be saved and reopened.
Because this is a WORD form, it will behave generally like a regular Word document except that the font, size, and color are set by the text field.
• Start typing where indicated to provide the requested information.
• Click on the check box to mark either yes or no.
• To enter more than one item in a particular text box, just insert an extra line (Enter) between the items.
Save completed form and email as an attachment to info.calshpo anparks.ca.gov. You can also convert it to a PDF and send as an email attachment. Use the
Acrobat tab in WORD and select Create and Attach to Email. You can then attach the required documents to that email. If the attachments are too large (greater
than 10mb total), you will need to send them in a second or third email.
Name of CLG
Citv of Tustin
Report Prepared by: Mary Salman Date of commission/board review: March 22, 2022
MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTIFICATION
I. Enforce Appropriate State or Local Legislation for the Designation and Protection of Historic Properties.
A. Preservation Laws
1. What amendments or revisions, if any, are you considering to the certified ordinance? Please forward drafts or proposals.
REMINDER: Pursuant to the CLG Agreement, OHP must have the opportunity to review and comment on ordinance
changes prior to adoption. Changes that do not meet the CLG requirements could affect certification status.
No amendments are being considered at this time.
1. Provide an electronic link to your ordinance or appropriate section(s) of the municipal/zoning code.
https:Hlibrary.municode.com/ca/tustin/codes/code of ordinances?nodeld=ART9LAUS CH2ZO PT5COOVDI 9252CURE
DICR
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Certified Local Government Program -- 2020-2021 Annual Report
(Reporting period is from October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2021)
B. New Local Landmark Designations (Comprehensive list of properties/districts designated during the reporting.
1. During the reporting period, October 1, 2020 — September 30, 2021, what properties/districts have been locally
designated?
Property Name/Address
Date Designated
If a district, number of
contributors
Date Recorded by County
Recorder
N/A
Type here.
Type here.
Type here.
REMINDER: Pursuant to California Government Code § 27288.2, "the county recorder shall record a certified resolution establishing
an historical resources designation issued by the State Historical Resources Commission or a local agency, or unit thereof. "
2. What properties/districts have been de -designated this past year? For districts, include the total number of resource
contributors?
Property Name/Address
Date Removed
I Reason
N/A
I Click or to here to enter text.
I Click or tap here to enter text.
C. Historic Preservation Element/Plan
1. Do you address historic preservation in your general plan? ❑ No
❑ Yes, in a separate historic preservation element. 0 Yes, it is included in another element.
Provide an electronic link to the historic preservation section(s) of the General Plan or to the separate historic preservation
element. Historic Preservation is addressed in the Land Use, Housing and Conservation, Open Space and Recreation Elements of the Tustin
General Plan. The link to the Tustin General Plan is: https.//www.tustinca.orgl396/General-Plan
D. Review Responsibilities
1. Who takes responsibility for design review or Certificates of Appropriateness?
❑ All projects subject to design review go the commission.
2
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Certified Local Government Program -- 2020-2021 Annual Report
(Reporting period is from October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2021)
❑x Some projects are reviewed at the staff level without commission review. What is the threshold between staff -only review and full -
commission review? Some projects are reviewed at the staff level without commission review. Most design reviews and certificates
of appropriateness are conducted at the staff level, and the Community Development Director is the approval authority. In addition,
Thirtieth Street Architects is periodically retained to perform independent and/or peer reviews. Design reviews of projects within some
specific plan areas and projects tied to other discretionary actions are reviewed by the Planning Commission as the City's Cultural
and Historic Resources Advisor.
2. California Environmental Quality Act
• What is the role of historic preservation staff and commission in providing input to CEQA documents prepared for or
by the local government? Environmental review and determinations are made by the Community Development
Director, Planning Commission and/or City Council, depending on the level of review required.
What is the role of the staff and commission in reviewing CEQA documents for projects that are proposed within the
jurisdiction of the local government? Environmental review and determinations are made by the approval body, either
by the Community Development Director, Planning Commission and/or City Council.
3. Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act
• What is the role of the staff and commission in providing input to Section 106 documents prepared for or by; the local
government? See responses above.
• What is the role of the staff and commission in reviewing Section 106 documents for projects that are proposed within
the jurisdiction of the local government? See responses above.
II. Establish an Adequate and Qualified Historic Preservation Review Commission by State or Local Legislation.
A. Commission Membership
Name
Professional Discipline
Date Appointed
Date Term Ends
Email Address
Amy Mason
Chairperson/Marketing
Communications Executive
12/18/2018
3/1/2023
amason(a)tustinca.org
7
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Certified Local Government Program -- 2020-2021 Annual Report
(Reporting period is from October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2021)
Steve Kozak
Chair Pro Tem/Public
4/16/2021
3/1/2025
skozak(@tustinca.orq
Administration
Lisa Chu
Commissioner/Business
8/20/2019
3/1/2023
Ichu(a)tustinca.org
Taxes Administrator
Eric Higuchi
Commissioner/Consultant
4/6/2021
3/1/2025
ehiguchi(a)tustinca.org
for Project Management
Services
Dave Mello
Commissioner/Business
4/6/2021
3/1/2025
dmello(a)tustinca.org
Vice President of Project
Management Group
AJ Jha
Commission/Chief
2/5/2019
3/01/2021
Executive Officer
Ryan Gallagher
Commissioner/Civil
2/5/2019
11/30/2020
Type here.
Engineer
Type here.
Type here.
Type here.
Type here.
Type here.
Type here.
Type here.
Type here.
Type here.
Type here.
Attach resumes and Statement of Qualifications forms for all members.
If you do not have two (2) qualified professionals on your commission, explain why the professional qualifications not been
met and how professional expertise is otherwise being provided. All seven (7) Planning Commissioners who served during
the reporting period have demonstrated interest, competence and/or knowledge in historic preservation. Former
Commissioner Thompson is a Civil Engineer and previously served on the City's Historic Resources Committee and is also a
docent for historic tours in Old Town Tustin. Former Commissioner Gallagher is a Civil Engineer. Commissioner Kozak is a
long-time member of the National Trust for Historic Preservation. The Tustin City Council takes professional expertise in the
areas of architecture, architectural history, etc., into consideration when reviewing submitted applications and appointing
members of the Planning Commission. Pursuant to City Council requirements, all appointed Planning Commissioners are
required to participate in training in historic preservation each year during their terms on the Planning Commission. Please
refer to Section D and Attached Training Continuation Sheet following Page 14 of this report for individual Commissioner
training experience during the reporting period.
2. If all positions are not currently filled, why is there a vacancy, and when will the position will be filled? Eric Higuchi and David
Mello were appointed on April 6, 2021; their first meeting as Planning Commissioners was April 27, 2021, with no absences.
4
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Certified Local Government Program -- 2020-2021 Annual Report
(Reporting period is from October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2021)
B. Staff to the Commission/CLG staff
1. Is the staff to your commission the same as your CLG coordinator? 0 Yes ❑ No If not, who serves as staff? N/A
2. If the position(s) is not currently filled, why is there a vacancy? N/A
Attach resumes and Statement of Qualifications forms for staff.
Name/Title
Discipline
Dept. Affiliation
Email Address
Justina L. Willkom
Urban and Regional Planning
Community Developmentjwillkom(a)tustinca.org
Apr
May
Jun
Director
AugSe
Irma Huitron
Urban and Regional Planning
Assistant Director of
ihuitron(a)tustinca.org
0
❑
Community Development
0
Scott Reekstin
Urban and Regional Planning
Principal Planner
sreekstin(c)-tustinca.org
Elaine Dove
Urban Planning and Landscape
Senior Planner
(retired)
0
Architecture
❑
0
C. Attendance Record
Please complete attendance chart for each commissioner and staff member. Commissions are required to meet four times a
year, at a minimum. If you haven't met at least four times, explain why not.
Commissioner/Staff
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
AugSe
Amy Mason
0
0
0
❑
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Steve Kozak
0
0
0
❑
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Lisa Chu
0
0
0
❑
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Eric Higuchi
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
0
0
0
0
0
0
David Mello
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
0
0
0
0
0
0
»1
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Certified Local Government Program -- 2020-2021 Annual Report
(Reporting period is from October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2021)
AJ Jha
0
0
0
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
Ryan Gallagher
0
0
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
Justina Willkom
0
0
0
❑
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Irma Huitron
❑
❑
❑
❑
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scott Reekstin
❑
0
0
❑
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Elaine Dove
❑
0
❑
❑
❑
0
0
0
0
❑
0
0
D. Training Received
Indicate what training each commissioner and staff member has received. Remember it is a CLG requirement that all
commissioners and staff to the commission attend at least one training program relevant to your commission each year. It is
up to the CLG to determine the relevancy of the training.
Commissioner/Staff
Training Title & Description
Duration of Training
Training Provider
Date
Name
(including method
presentation, e.g., webinar,
workshop)
Lisa Chu
Schindler's L.A. County
1 hour
California Preservation
3/16/2021
Scott Reekstin
(webinar)
Foundation (CPF)
Elaine Dove
Amy Mason
Historic Preservation Program
1 hour
Staff
3/23/2021
Steve Kozak
Workshop (live presentation)
Lisa Chu
Justina Willkom
Scott Reekstin
Elaine Dove
Lisa Chu
Where Wright Went Wrong
1 hour
California Preservation
3/23/2021
Elaine Dove
webinar
Foundation CPF
Justina Willkom
Modern Design and the
1.5 hours
California Preservation
3/25/2021
Lisa Chu
Sexual Revolution webinar
Foundation CPF
C.
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Certified Local Government Program -- 2020-2021 Annual Report
(Reporting period is from October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2021)
Justina Willkom
Since the 70's: Issues in
1 hour
California Preservation
4/13/2021
Elaine Dove
Saving More Recent Past
Foundation (CPF)
Lisa Chu
Resources (Prince and Paisley
Park): webinar
Justina Willkom
Law Walk -Downtown L.A.
1.5 hours
Public Counsel
7/27/2021
Elaine Dove
Legal History Virtual Tour; Part
1 webinar
Steve Kozak
Law Walk -Historic
1.5 hours
Public Counsel
7/29/2021
David Mello
Preservation Virtual Walking
Justina Willkom
Tour; L.A.'s Struggle Against
Elaine Dove
Racism and Exclusionism;
Part 2 webinar
David Mello
Rehabilitating Historic
1 hour
National Park Service
8/1/2021
Buildings webinar
Justina Willkom
Show Me the Money: Financial
1 hour
California Preservation
8/4/2021
Irma Huitron
Incentives for Historic
Foundation (CPF)
Scott Reekstin
Preservation (webinar)
Elaine Dove
Amy Mason, Steve
City of Tustin Historic
1.5 hours
Staff
8/10/2021
Kozak,
Resources Survey Update
Lisa Chu, Eric Higuchi,
(live presentation)
David Mello, Justina
Willkom, Irma Huitron,
Scott Reekstin, Elaine
Dove
Amy Mason
Pro Training: Sensible
3 hours
California Preservation
8/17/2021
Approaches to the Secretary
Foundation (CPF)
of Interior Standards webinar
David Mello
Mills Act (webinar)
1 hour
California Preservation
8/21/2021
Foundation CPF
Elaine Dove
Alan Hess on Frank Lloyd
1 hour
California Preservation
8/31/2021
Wright (webinar)
Foundation (CPF)
7
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Certified Local Government Program -- 2020-2021 Annual Report
(Reporting period is from October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2021)
Steve Kozak
Planes, Trains, and
1 hour
California Preservation
9/9/2021
Scott Reekstin
Automobiles, Part 2, Hop on
Foundation (CPF)
Elaine Dove
the Roadside Pop (webinar)
Amy Mason, Steve
Old Town Walking Tour of
1.5 hours
Staff and Tustin
9/28/2021
Kozak, Lisa Chu, Eric
Tustin (live presentation)
Preservation
Higuchi, David Mello,
Conservancy
Justina Willkom, Irma
Huitron, Scott Reekstin,
Elaine Dove
III. Maintain a System for the Survey and Inventory of Properties that Furthers the Purposes of the National Historic
Preservation Act
A. Historical Contexts: initiated, researched, or developed in the reporting year (excluding those funded by OHP)
NOTE: California CLG procedures require CI -Gs to submit survey results, including historic contexts, to OHP.
Submitted to OHP on 12/20/2021.
N.
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Certified Local Government Program -- 2020-2021 Annual Report
(Reporting period is from October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2021)
Context Name
Description
How it is Being Used
Date Submitted to
OHP
The Historic Context
This analyzes the historic contexts and
Tustin's built environment
12/20/2021
Statement
themes from pre -1870 through 1976
represents an array of
Properties
Completed
and more specifically:
architectural types and styles that
es/no
or Intensive
represent different periods in the
OHP
• The Tustin area, pre -1870.
City's development. Together,
Both
City-wide
• Establishment and early
these various architectural styles
December 20,
development, 1870-1913.
provide Tustin with distinctive
• Tustin becomes a City, 1914-
qualities and help to define the
1945.
community's character. The
• Postwar development in Tustin,
Historic Context Statement was
1946-1976.
used as the basis for the City's
• Architecture and Design, 1870-
Historic Survey Update and
1976.
provides historical information
about Tustin to the general
public.
B. New Surveys or Survey Updates (excluding those funded by OHP)
NOTE: The evaluation of a single property is not a survey. Also, material changes to a property that is included in a survey,
is not a change to the survey and should not be reported here.
Survey Area
Context
Level:
Acreage
# of
Date
Date
Based-
Reconnaissance
Properties
Completed
Submitted to
es/no
or Intensive
Surveyed
OHP
Street -by -street survey
Yes
Both
City-wide
330
August 10,
December 20,
2021
2021
How are you using the survey data? City staff uses the surveys to review applications for permits and development projects,
prepare certificates of appropriateness and guide applicants on how to comply with Secretary of Interior Standards and local
design guidelines. The surveys are located on the City of Tustin website at the following link.
7
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Certified Local Government Program -- 2020-2021 Annual Report
(Reporting period is from October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2021)
IV. Provide for Adequate Public Participation in the Local Historic Preservation Program
A. Public Education
What public outreach, training, or publications programs has the CLG undertaken? How were the commissioners and staff
involved? Please provide an electronic link to all publications or other products not previously provided to OHP.
Item or Event
Description
Date
Old Town Art Walk
Plein art competition and Old Town Tours, sponsored jointly by
Cancelled due to
the City of Tustin, Tustin Area Council for Fine Arts, Tustin Area
Covid 19.
Historical Society, Tustin Preservation Conservancy, and OC
participate/attend the event.
Old Town Tustin Architectural History and
An indoor presentation of architectural styles in Old Town Tustin
Cancelled due to
Walking Tour
and a one-hour walking tour. Commissioners and/or staff may
Covid 19.
participate/attend the event.
The Tustin Lighter Than Air Hanger is listed on the National
Hangar Half Marathon
Register and the event brings attention to Tustin's history and the
Cancelled due to
architectural and military importance of the structure.
Covid 19
Commissioners and/or staff may participate in the half marathon.
Citizen's Academy
Old Town Tustin History and Historic Preservation by Tustin City
Staff. Staff provides two (2) presentations regarding Tustin's
Cancelled due to
history and historic preservation in the City.
Covid 19
Old Town Historic Register Plaque Guide
Plaque Nomination and Commendation programs by City Staff in
coordination with the Tustin Preservation Conservancy, and
Ongoing (previously
Tustin Area Historical Society/Museum. A tri -fold color brochure
provided)
that describes the City's historic preservation programs and
names and locations of featured sites and buildings listed on the
Tustin Historic Register. Staff provides a presentation with
historical background for Plaque Nominations and
Commendations to the Planning Commission.
10
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Certified Local Government Program -- 2020-2021 Annual Report
(Reporting period is from October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2021)
Item or Event
Description
Date
Old Town Shopping, Dining and Event
A tri -fold brochure that highlights community events and the
Guide
names and locations of retail, service and dining establishments
Ongoing
in Old Town Tustin. The Guide is available at City Hall, on the
City's website, and is displayed in the City's Old Town Kiosk on
the northeast corner of Main Street and EI Camino Real.
Commissioners receive information in the form of The Year in
Review from staff. Community Development Department staff
regularly update the guide.
Daily Tree Lighting in Old Town
The lighting of street trees in the City's Old Town historic
commercial core to encourage pedestrian activity and highlight
Ongoing
Old Town during evening hours. Commissioners may participate
by attending events or visiting local businesses in the evening.
Tustin Pioneers Recognition Program
Old Town during evenings. Commissioners may participate by
Ongoing (previously
attending events or visiting local businesses in the evening. This
provided)
program honors Tustin pioneers with life-size bronze and plaques
on pedestals in public locations to honor the City's past, promote
cultural and historic significance, and recognize those individuals
who have contributed to the community. Commissioners would
receive staff presentation for nominations to the program.
Mills Act Flyer
A one-page flyer describing Mills Act benefits, eligibility and
Ongoing (previously
process for homeowners to apply for the Mills Act program. The
provided)
City website contains an online flyer, application and additional
information about the Mills Act. Staff provides a report to the
Commission as to the City Council decisions on Mills Act
applications.
Tustin Patriots and Pioneers Program
Street naming program to honor local heroes who lost their lives
Ongoing
in military service. Tribute celebrations are help to familiarize
residents with the patriots honored with street names throughout
11
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Certified Local Government Program -- 2020-2021 Annual Report
(Reporting period is from October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2021)
item or Event
Description
I Date
the community in partnership with the Tustin Community
Foundation.
City of Tustin Website
The City of Tustin website hosts dedicated pages for historic
preservation in Tustin.
https://www.tustinca.org/1026/Programs;
(including Mills Act, Historic Register Plaques and Tustin Pioneer
Program); https://www.tustinca.org/1039/Resources (including
Residential and Commercial Design Guidelines, Tustin City Code
Section 9252 Cultural Resources District, Secretary of Interiors
standards for the Treatment of Historical Properties; 1990 and
2003 Historic Resources Survey and links to the Tustin
Preservation Conservancy(http://www.tustinconservancy.org/)
and the Tustin Ara Historical Society
(http://www.tustinhistory.com/). Staff updates the city website as
needed.
Historic Preservation Workshop
March 23, 2021
This workshop highlighted and provided a status update on the
City's historic preservation programs.
The topics covered in this workshop included:
• Tustin's history;
• Historic preservation efforts;
• Cultural Resources Overlay District;
• Historical Resources Surveys;
• Certificate of Appropriateness process;
• Residential Design Guidelines;
• Commercial Design Guidelines;
• Overview of Downtown Commercial Core Specific Plan;
12
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Certified Local Government Program -- 2020-2021 Annual Report
(Reporting period is from October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2021)
Item or Event
Description
Date
Number of Properties added
• Historic Register Plaque Program;
Locally funded survey.
• Commendation Program;
• Pioneers Recognition Program; and
Old Tustin Walking Tour
• Mills Act Program.
September 28,
2021
A walking tour where the commissioner, staff and the public
learned about early Tustin History and architectural styles.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE ANNUAL PRODUCTS REPORTS FOR CLGS
NOTE: OHP will forward this information to NPS on vour behalf. CLG Inventory Proaram
A. CLG Inventory Program
During the reporting period (October 1, 2020 -September 30, 2021) how many historic properties did your local
government add to the CLG inventory? This is the total number of historic properties and contributors to districts (or your
best estimate of the number) added to your inventory from all programs, local, state, and Federal, during the reporting
year. These might include National Register, California Register, California Historic Landmarks, locally funded surveys,
CLG surveys, and local designations.
B. Local Register (i.e., Local Landmarks and Historic Districts) Program
13
Program area
Number of Properties added
Locally funded survey.
330 properties were surveyed in the 2021 survey.
B. Local Register (i.e., Local Landmarks and Historic Districts) Program
13
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Certified Local Government Program -- 2020-2021 Annual Report
(Reporting period is from October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2021)
During the reporting period (October 1, 2019 -September 30, 2020) did you have a local register program to create
local landmarks and/or local districts (or a similar list of designations) created by local law? ❑Yes x❑ No
2. If the answer is yes, then how many properties have been added to your register or designated from October 1, 2018
to September 30, 2019? N/A
C. Local Tax Incentives Program
1. During the reporting period (October 1, 2020 -September 30, 2021) did you have a Local Tax Incentives Program, such
as the Mills Act? N Yes ❑ No
2. If the answer is yes, how many properties have been added to this program from October 1, 2020 to September 30,
2021 ? Two (2)
Name of Program
Number of Properties Added During
Total Number of Properties Benefiting
N/A
2020-2021
from Program
Tustin Mills Act
Two (2)
Twenty-six (26) as of September 30,
Program
2021.
D. Local "bricks and mortar" grants/loan program
1. 20uring the reporting period (October 1, 2020 -September 30, 2021) did you have a local government historic
preservation grant and/or loan program for rehabilitating/restoring historic properties? ❑Yes x❑No
2. If the answer is yes, then how many properties have been assisted under the program(s) from October 1, 2020 to
September 30, 2021? N/A
Name of Program
Number of Properties that have Benefited
N/A
N/A
E. Design Review/Local Regulatory Program
14
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Certified Local Government Program -- 2020-2021 Annual Report
(Reporting period is from October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2021)
During the reporting period (October 1, 2020 -September 30, 2021) did your local government have a historic
preservation regulatory law(s) (e.g., an ordinance) authorizing Commission and/or staff review of local government
projects or impacts on historic properties? 0 Yes ❑ No
2. If the answer is yes, how many historic properties did your local government review for compliance with your local
government's historic preservation regulatory law(s) from October 1, 2020 to September 30, 2021? Fourteen (14)
Certificates of Appropriateness were issued during the reporting period.
F. Local Property Acquisition Program
During the reporting period (October 1, 2020 --September 30, 2021) did you have a local program to acquire (or help to
acquire) historic properties in whole or in part through purchase, donation, or other means? ❑Yes 0 No
2. If the answer is yes, then how many properties have been assisted under the program(s) from October 1, 2020 to
September 30, 2021 Type here.
Name of Program
Number of Properties that have Benefited
N/A
N/A
IN ADDITION TO THE MINIMUM CLG REQUIREMENTS OHP IS INTERESTED IN YOUR FEEDBACK ABOUT THE RECENT
CAMP TRAINING
• Did anyone from your local government participate in the free CAMP training opportunities in Fall 2021? No
• If yes, which training session(s) did you find the most informative and useful? N/A
• Whether or not you were able to take advantage of any of the CAMP trainings in 2021, would you like to see OHP to provide
free additional CAMPs in the future? N/A
XII Attachments (electronic)
15
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Certified Local Government Program -- 2020-2021 Annual Report
(Reporting period is from October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2021)
x❑ Resumes and Statement of Qualifications forms for all commission members/alternatives and staff
x❑ Minutes from commission meetings
❑ Drafts of proposed changes to the ordinance
❑ Drafts of proposed changes to the General Plan
❑ Public outreach publications
Email to: info.calshpo(a-)parks.ca.gov
16
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
AMY KAVANAUGH MASON
Strategic, entrepreneurial and hands-on marketing and communications executive with more two decades of agency and in-house
experience building and guiding engagement teams for global consumer and technology brands. A trusted advisor to C -suite
executives and brand leaders, led internal and external communications for several high-profile brand turnarounds. Proven
expertise in developing integrated marketing strategies and initiatives that drive sales, brand equity and growth. Leader of more
than 150+ high profile, insights driven and award winning product launches and service offerings for a variety of brands and
organizations including Apple, Dine Brands, Microsoft (MSN), Netflix, The GRAMMY'S, the Motion Picture Association (MPA),
Starbucks and Taco Bell Corp. Expertise in reputation management, narrative development and brand storytelling; developing and
executing executive thought leadership platforms; digital, social and traditional media engagement; internal and external
stakeholder and influencer relations; issues mitigation and crisis management.
FORT ASHFORD FUNDS, LLC I Newport Beach, CA
Venture Capitol & Private Equity
Managing Director — Restaurants, Retail and Technology 1212019 to Present
Strategic advisor and interim leadership for portfolio companies.
DINE BRANDS GLOBAL, INC I Glendale, CA
The largest full-service restaurant company in the world, parent company of 1HOP and Applebee's
SVP Global Communications: CMO international 712016 to 1112019
Recruited by CEO to help rebuild brand reputation and increase overall brand insights and advocacy for IHOP and Applebee's
restaurants around the world. Lead corporate affairs; research and insights via the Dine Research Institute; guest relations; brand
communications; executive thought leadership; media relations; employee, team member and franchisee engagement. Primary lead
of cross -functional teams that oversee crisis and issues mitigation, events, community affairs, and sustainability. Chief Marketing
Officer of International reframing and relaunching brands in key markets..
TACO BELL CORP. I YUM BRANDS I Irvine, CA
$98 global quick service restaurant with more 7000 restaurants around the world
Chief Public Affairs Officer 612013 to 712016
Executive Director, Taco Bell Foundation 112012 to 612016
Vice President Public Affairs and Brand Engagement 612011 to 512013
Recruited by CEO as key member of the executive team responsible for building brand reputation and increasing overall brand
advocacy. Reallocated existing resources to build integrated internal and external communications and public affairs teams to
protect, promote and defend Taco Bell. Leading corporate affairs; brand communications; executive thought leadership; social and
traditional media relations; team member engagement. Primary lead of crass -functional teams that oversee crisis and issues
mitigation, events, community affairs, sustainability and ongoing purpose driven work. Highlights include:
• Increased communications transparency, authenticity and relevance new approach to listening and engaging with stakeholders
via digital, social, mobile and traditional channels; launched the Taco Bell Newsroom made up of nearly 40+ cross functional
content creators developing real-time brand content and story -telling.
• Developed and executed 50+ break though and award winning integrated communications campaigns including 50th
Anniversary, Doritos Locos Tacos, Cantina Bell, Breakfast, Mobile Ordering/Payment, Live Mas Scholarships, ingredient
transparency, Cage -free eggs, among others supporting 5 straight years of same store sales and transaction growth.
• Led numerous public relations firsts in area of social engagement, leveraging emerging channels (eg Twitter, Periscope and
Snapchat) as a means of driving visibility and recognition for marketing innovation.
• Visibility and outreach resulted in numerous awards for the brand including AdAge Marketer of Year (2013), Hottest Digital
Marketer (2013,. 2015), 3 Cannes Lions recognizing Public Relations, and Fast Company 10 Most Innovative Companies.
• Initiated and extended ongoing engagement with key regulators (CDC, FDA, local health departments), policy makers (White
House, Capitol Hill), and advocacy groups (CSPI, Humane Society, etc.)
• Expanded! Taco Bell Foundation fundraising from $4MM to $14MM a year to become one of the largest teen focused 501c3s.
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
EDELMAN I Los Angeles I Seattle I London I Singapore
World's leading Independent communications marketing firm
Public Engagement Co -Chair; EVP, Global Client Relationship Manager, Starbucks 612005 to 512011
SVP/EVP, Digital, Entertainment, Rights & Technology 812001 to 112005
Served in a variety of senior roles at Edelman, the world's largest communications marketing firm, leading several high-profile 13213
and 132C brand reputation campaigns and crisis engagements. Highlights include:
• Tapped by Edelman CEO as one of 6 founding Global Client Relationship Managers (GCRM) to serve as senior counsel to
Starbucks leadership team from 2005 to 2011 and expanded the firms reach and influence from two US offices to becoming the
global Agency of Record and overseeing the work of 100+ professionals, in over twenty-two Edelman offices around the world.
• Primary and day to day agency counsel to CEO Howard Schultz and Starbucks leadership team during execution of
transformation agenda from 2007-2011; Strategic corporate and consumer branding counsel, financial communications counsel,
executive thought leadership, employee engagement; traditional, social and digital media and influencer engagement; new
market entry planning and research; issues and crisis mitigation; and event management across the Americas, Asia Pacific,
Europe, the Middle East and Africa.
• Envision/manage Digital Entertainment, Rights and Technology practice (headquartered out of Los Angeles office, with
expanded practice areas in London, NYC, Seattle and DC) P&L; capitalize on the proliferation of consumer technology, the
accessibility of the web, growing demand for entertainment content and the emergence of social media platforms.
• An integral part of the development and execution of: MySpace initial corporate narrative, working with Chris DeWolfe and Tom
Anderson through rise and acquisition by News Corp.; motion picture industry's anti -piracy efforts (Rated I for Illegal) and
member of communications counsel to MPA president Jack Valenti.
OHGOLLY.COM I HIGHTOWER TECHNOLOGY I Newport Beach, CA
lndustWs leading provider of e -Commerce enabled, click and build websites for small and medium business
Co founderlVice President of Marketing 1999-2001
Acquired, repositioned and relaunched this click and build website in 1999 to become the leading eCommerce solution for small
businesses.
GEMPLUS (Now GEMALTO) I Redwood City, CA
Industry's leading provider of e -Commerce enabled, click and build websites for small and medium business
Director, Global Marketing and Communications 1997-1999
Recruited by CEO to join leadership team and help build awareness and understanding for smart card technology in the US and
emerging markets; team efforts resulted in building a $150M business in 2 years and focused on the convergence between smart
cards, the Internet, cellular telephony, network security, portable software applications and mobile payment. A division of Gemplus
SCA, now Gemalto $2B), the world leader in smart cards.
SHANDWICK-GOLIN HARRIS -HI -TECH PR (Now GOLIN) I San Francisco I Boston I Sydney
Vice President Technology Accounts 1996-I997
APPLE I Cupertino, CA
Power Macintosh Public Relations
BACHELOR OF ARTS I UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA
Major: Communications Studies
Additional Experience:
Tustin City Planning Commission — March 2016 - Present
Member Board of Directors at DiscoveryCube Orange County - 2012 - Present
National Board of Trustees at Boys and Girls Clubs of America 2013 — 2017
1994-1996
Schultz Foundation 100,000 Opportunities Initiative, Strategic Oversight Committee, August 2015 to 2017
(http://www.100kopportunities.org/ Volunteer Experience)
a##
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Stephen V. Kozak, Jr.
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS
2017-2020 Legislative & Policy Analyst, Orange County Public Works Agency
■ Monitor, research, analyze, and interpret proposed state and federal legislative, regulatory, and
fiscal bills and activities for potential financial and operational impacts on the Agency.
■ Prepare and present accurate and timely reports and recommendations on pending legislative
and policy issues and proposals to executive management.
Management Consultant, Kozak Consulting Group
2015-2017 Provide strategic, management, and financial consulting services to government and
non-profit agencies, including analysis of methods and practices, project planning,
policies & procedures, budgeting and business plans, and administrative and operational
improvements.
Administrative Services Officer, FamilyAssistance Ministries
2014-2015 Planned and directed administrative and financial support operations, including budget
planning and reporting, regulatory compliance, and audit coordination for a homeless
and hunger prevention non-profit agency with a 26 bed women's transitional shelter,
and food pantry serving 3,600 clients each month in south Orange County.
Financial & IT Services Director, Municipal Water District of Orange County
2012-2013 ■ Provided strategic leadership in developing, implementing, and sustaining best financial and
business management practices including managing a $144 million annual operating budget and
a $14 million fixed income investment program.
■ Planned, organized, and directed full service finance and accounting department, including
budget administration, investment management, banking and treasury operations, procurement
and contracts, and IT systems and user support.
2006-2012 ChiefAdministrative Officer, Children & Families Commission of Orange County
■ Planned, organized, and directed administrative service support including program development
and evaluation, financial, accounting and audit functions, contract administration, IT systems,
procurement, and scheduling of administrative and internal support services.
■ Managed a $46 million annual operating budget and a $120 million fixed income investment
program, including portfolio benchmark performance evaluation and reporting.
■ Prepared and managed strategic plans, annual business plans and budgets, along with KPI
performance measurement, monitoring, and reporting.
2005-2006 Controller, Los Angeles County Superior Court
■ Directed a comprehensive program of financial management, accounting operations, and
revenue functions, including administration of the Court's $665 million annual operating budget,
budget v. actual monitoring and reporting, revenue and expenditure forecasting, annual audit,
administration of grants totaling $14 million, procurement, and collections.
■ Planned and directed development and implementation of a new revenue collection, allocation,
accounting, and reporting structure for civil court fees totaling $12 million annually.
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-lA743A3ADD90
Stephen V. Kozak, Jr.
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS (CONTINUED)
2000-2005 Financial Manager, Budget, Debt & Treasury, Los Angeles World Airports
■ Directed the Financial Planning Division, including Budget, Rates, Fees & Charges, FAA
Grant Programs, and Debt & Treasury Management activities.
■ Established and managed LAWA's $300 million Commercial Paper (CP) capital
improvement projects financing program.
■ Planned, organized, and managed preparation, monitoring, and reporting for a $465 million
Annual Operating Budget, and a $950 million Multi -Year Capital Projects Budget.
1994-2000 Financial Manager, Finance & Risk Management, Orange County Sanitation District
• Planned and directed $440 million fixed and variable rate Certificates of Participation
(COP) financing program for capital projects, including refunding, and new money
issues.
■ Controlled insurance and risk management programs for an asset base valued at $1.5 billion.
■ Initiated, implemented, and managed new $350 million fixed income investment program
and treasury operations function.
ADDITIONAL EXPERIENCE
EDUCATION
■ Planning Commissioner, City of Tustin, 2006 - Present
■ Citizens Advisory Committee, OCTA, 2016 - Present
■ Successor Agency Board, City of Tustin, 2016 - Present
■ Board Member, CSDA Finance Corporation, 2012 - 2013
■ Board Member, Tustin Community Foundation, 2010 - Present
■ Tustin Police Department Citizen Academy Class No. 30, 2010
■ M.B.A., California State University, Fullerton
■ M.P.A., University of California, Riverside
■ B.A., Political Science, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
■ Community College Instructor Credential, Public Services & Administration
■ Certified California Municipal Treasurer, (CCMT), Cal Municipal Treasurers Association
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
LISA CHU
SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS:
• More than 15 years of managerial/supervisory experiences.
• Wide range of knowledge on practical areas of business operations.
• Strong initiative in decision-making and assumption of responsibilities.
MANAGERIAL/SUPERVISORY EXPERIENCES:
Business Taxes Administrator, July 2014 — present
CA DEPARTMENT OF TAX AND FEE ADMINISTRATION, Irvine, CA
Oversee cashiering functions including arranging confidential payment appointments
with certain taxpayers. Manage and direct staff to provide various types of services
such as advisory services, assistance in return preparation, permit registration,
collection issues, etc. Direct staff to conduct investigations, review financial
documents, and make recommendations to meet compliance goals. Motivate, train,
develop and monitor staff performance.
Note: Prior positions within the same organization include Business Taxes
Compliance Specialist, June 2009 - June 2014, Business Taxes Representative, April
2006 — May 2009
Administrator, February 2004 —April 2006
ANAHEIM HILLS ACADEMY, Anaheim, CA
Manage all organizational activities for an after-school tutoring center; duties
include recruiting business partners, obtaining working capital, financing
responsibilities, business development, personnel management, customer service,
etc.; devise and implement a marketing strategy; responsible for recruiting,
motivating, training and monitoring staff, responsible for addressing to the
customers' concerns.
Service Manager, August 2001— November 2002
WELLS FARGO BANK, Laguna Niguel, CA
Manage the teller services function to ensure prompt and efficient transaction
processing as well as the generation of sales through quality referrals; manage and
direct workflow to ensure maximum efficiency, establish sales referral and service
goals, train and coach a successful service and referral team; responsible for staff
efficiency to maximize resources and achieve service and sales goals, ensure
compliance with audit and operational regulations and guidelines.
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Lisa Chu, p. 2
Operations Supervisor, May 2000 — August 2001
WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, Irvine, CA
Responsible for resolving customer service issues and operations related problems,
ensure compliance with Bank policy and government regulations by performing
internal control certifications/audits; provide teller transaction approvals and
overrides, provide back-up support to Teller staff as needed; train and evaluate staff,
administer corrective actions, adjust staff lunch/break schedules to ensure optimum
workflow is achieved, approve requisitions for supplies, cross -sell bank products and
services.
Assistant Operations Officer, September 1999 — May 2000
FAR EAST NATIONAL BANK, Irvine, CA
Oversee the smooth functioning of the branch; ensure compliance with audit and
operational regulations; staff supervision including training, writing performance
reviews and administering corrective actions; sell and cross -sell bank products and
services; participate in recruiting activities; resolve customer complaints; approve
transactions; control operating expenses; prioritize and coordinate work; assist in
locating teller differences; meet established deadlines; balance general ledger
accounts.
Assistant Operations Officer, August 1997 —August 1999
OMNI BANK, Irvine, CA
Supervise the branch Operations staff; serve as the backup for Tellers and New
Accounts Representative when needed, promote and cross -sell bank's products and
services; maintain knowledge of customers' account activities; meet with customers
to solve problems; evaluate employees' performances; ensure daily routine items are
completed and deadlines met, review and approve daily work and reports, assist the
Manager in the day-to-day operations of the branch facility; implement operational
policies and procedures; resolve operational problems.
Operations Supervisor, May 1995 — July 1997
GENERAL BANK, Monterey Park, CA
Assist the Officer with the daily operations of the branch adhering to policies,
procedures, and regulations; supervise Tellers, Customer Service Representatives, and
New Accounts Representatives; assist with the training of new employees; cross -sell
bank's products and services; review and approve daily reports to ensure callback
accuracy; accept other duties as deemed necessary by the Officer.
EDUCAITON:
California State University, Long Beach
Bachelor of Science Degree in Business Administration
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
ERIC HIGUCHI
Professional Experience
PRINCIPAL / FOUNDER, QTative, Inc., Irvine, CA (January 2017 - Current)
949.290.7510 • ehiguchi@gmail.com
Provide consultant and project management services including general ownership representation, entitlement management, and
financial analysis for residential and commercial developments throughout Southern California.
VICE PRESIDENT, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., Irvine, CA (January 2016 - December 2016)
Assistant Vice President, Irvine, CA (June 2012 - December 2015)
Responsible for the management, repositioning and disposition of approximately $250M in residential, commercial and resort
real estate assets held within Lehman Brothers' Western Land Portfolio. Recovery value of the total Western Land Portfolio was
approximately $1 Billion.
LAND ACQUISITION MANAGER, KB Home. Wildomar, CA (June 2011 - June 2012)
Land Acquisition Analyst, Wildomar, CA (June 2009 - June 2011)
Responsible for the acquisition of land for new home communities in the Los Angeles and Orange County markets for Southern
California's largest home builder (by unit deliveries from 2008 - 2012).
Duties included:
• financial underwriting and market research for +/-$200M in land acquisition transactions in Southern California;
• management of feasibility investigation for potential new land acquisitions;
• negotiation of land acquisition purchase and sales contracts;
• preparation of investment committee memorandums for internal transaction approval; and
• management of three member land search team.
DEVELOPMENT MANAGER, Emaar International, Irvine, CA (April 2008 - March 2009)
Responsible for the design of residential and hospitality projects and master planned communities in the Middle East/North
Africa (MENA) Region.
DEVELOPMENT PROJECT MANAGER, The Morgan Group, Carlsbad, CA (Jul 2007 - April 2008)
Managed the entitlement and design of for -rent, multifamily communities on the West Coast.
FORWARD PLANNER, KB Home, Los Angeles, CA (June 2006 - July 2007)
Forward Planning Associate, Irvine, CA (March 2005 - June 2006)
Intern, Irvine, CA (January 2005 - March 2005)
Managed the entitlement and design of multifamily, for -sale communities in the Los Angeles and Orange County markets.
Education
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA — IRVINE, Irvine, CA (2000-2005)
• Bachelor of Arts in Economics
• Bachelor of Arts in Political Science
Minor in Philosophy
Professional Designations
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
UNITED STATES GREEN BUILDING COUNCIL
Accredited Professional, Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED AP)
Awards & Service
BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF ORANGE COUNTY
Board of Directors (2011 — 2015)
HOMEAID ORANGE COUNTY
a 501 (c) 3 charitable non-profit organization that builds and renovates shelters for those in Orange County who find
themselves homeless due to sudden job loss, catastrophic illness, spousal desertion, and domestic violence
• Treasurer, Executive Committee (2014 - 2016)
• Member, Board of Directors (2013 - Present)
URBAN LAND INSTITUTE, ORANGE COUNTY
• Vice Chair of Outreach, Management Committee and Advisory Board (2015 - Present)
• Member, Sustainable Communities Initiative Council (2011 — 2015)
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE - ALUMNI ASSOCIATION
Member, Scholarship Committee (2009 — Present)
2
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
David J. Mello, Jr.
14621 Danberry Circle, • Tustin, CA 92780 • (951)538-8624 • LandEndeavors(c�gmail.com
HIGHLIGHTS OF QUALIFICATIONS
• Team building, mentoring the next generation's skill set in land entitlement, product and land planning,
acquisition, disposition, land development, budgeting, scheduling and deal structuring.
RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Landsea Homes, Irvine, CA
Vice President of Forward Planning — December 2017 — Present
• Direct Report to Division President leading department providing oversight and mentoring to
junior, mid-level Project Managers, Project Coordinators, while interfacing with other department
heads to support the Division's business plan.
• Assist Acquisitions with due diligence efforts and underwriting to present to BOD.
• Master Plan Design and Development/Entitlement
• Lead team to develop product for both MF and SFR product types.
• 2020 - $230MM annual division revenues and 458 sales 300 deliveries/year from zero in 2017.
The New Home Company, Aliso Viejo, CA
Director, Project Management — June 2014 — November 2017
• Direct report to Division President assisting with junior, mid-level Project Managers, Project
Coordinators and Contract Administrators.
• Regular interaction with COO, CMO and internal Design Review Committee leading project
development inclusive of award winning 54 attached duplex product (Amethyst) in the Parasol
Park PA of The Great Park (Five Points Community).
• Part of divisional senior team developing policies, procedures and BMP's for corporate wide
implementation.
• Part of the senior team resolving infill development sites land development constraints.
• Created separate scheduling and budgeting templates for TNHC Project Management Team and integrated
it into BMP for financial controls for public reporting.
• Entitled (2) 40 -unit communities in San Juan Capistrano and Orange, CA. Inclusive of full CEQA
processing of an EIR, Tentative Tract Map, Major Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit.
• Coordinated with Land Acquisition Department on Due Diligence project schedule and budget for
creation of Board Package.
Sabal Financial Group, LLP, Newport Beach, CA
ADC Asset Manager, — June, 2011— June 2014
• Disposition of over $50MM in assets with annual peak of $20MM in AZ and FL markets in 2012.
• Entitled 1288 acres in Southeast Florida for Master Plan Community as well as 233 unit subdivision
in Tampa with multiple phases including occupied residents, finished lots and raw dirt.
• Lead the underwriting for land acquisitions in California (1588 unit Master Plan) and Florida (418
unit subdivision)
• Senior Asset Manager responsibilities managing dispositions of REO assets as well as working out
performing and non-performing loans across the country for Mixed -Use subdivisions, SFR,
multifamily lots and partially developed projects.
• Created and presented business plans with recommended exit strategies including forward
planning of projects, economic feasibility and market analysis for projects to Investment
Committee members from Sabal, Oaktree and Gibraltar (Toll brothers) subsequently
implementing consensus. Numerous JV's outperforming proforma.
• Exposure and interaction with national, regional and custom homebuilders in numerous states
including CA, AZ, FL, ID, OR, GA, AL, TN, NC, SC, VA & TX.
• Portfolio Leader on underwriting of a $66MM acquisition of 7 subdivisions located in CA, NV,
ID, TX, SC & NC.
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-lA743A3ADD90
David J. Mello, Jr.
14621 Danberry Circle, • Tustin, CA 92780 • (951)538-8624 • LandEndeavorskarnail.com
Southern California Edison, Rosemead, CA (Contract Work through Midcom)
Senior Project Manager, MPP2 CW— March 2010 — September 2010
Temporary assignment working with senior management in Real Properties Strategic Planning Division.
• Long Range Strategic Planning for Real Estate Department (5Yr Strategic Plan)
• Creating Project Management Organization for Real Properties Division
• Integral part of team that developed Land Use & Land Acquisition Policies & Procedures
• Worked with multiple Business Units to make Business Case for Land Exchange between USFS and SCE
• Created a department budget template for tracking internal and external department costs.
• Created regional valuation model for budgeting interconnects land acquisition costs.
Centex Homes Southern California, Corona, CA
Director of Land Development — January 2004 — October, 2009
• Worked closely with Division President, Executive V.P., Regional CFO and other division
Directors to set strategic initiatives and meet key performance measures in business plan. Met
quarterly with Sales Team and Executives to measure individual neighborhood success.
• Managed department of up to 12 employees covering Southern California region
• Average annual department spending $15 to $20 MM
• Managed over $200MM in bonds/Exonerated $65MM
• Processed over $20MM in cash reimbursements
• Managed $45MM in CFD formations and Issuances
• Created CFD tracking model adopted by corporate finance to manage bond obligations across country
• Coordinated forward planning, entitlement and development of 3,000 lots in over 32
neighborhoods
• Reviewed and approved all Project Manager's Schedules, Budgets and Cash Flows monthly in
conjunction with Division Controller. Quarterly review with Regional CFO and Executive Vice
President.
• Division annual closings at 350 (2008) up to 2,800 (2006)
EDUCATION
Harvard Graduate School of Design, Cambridge, MA
Executive Education — Studied Project Management 2019
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
Master of Real Estate Development 2004
California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, CA
Bachelor of Science, Landscape Architecture 2002
• Cum Laude; Honors in Landscape Architecture
Notable
• California State Contractors Licenses "A" (General Engineering Contractor) Lie # 943027
• California State Real Estate Broker's License (ID # 01907368)
• Certified Urban Land Institute's Leadership Program for Planned Communities and Urban Infill
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Education
California Polytechnic State
University San Luis Obispo,
California
BS Civil Engineering
Licenses & Registrations
California Professional Engineer
- Civil, No. 74805
Professional Associations
Orange County Water Association
(President 2020)
American Society of Civil
Engineers (Santa Barbara/Ventura
VMF President 2012)
American Public Works
Association (Ventura County
Chapter President 2014)
Association of Water Agencies
Ventura County (President 2013,
Board of Directors 2010-2016)
WATER WASTEWATER - REUSE M
hn
Ryan Gallagher, for the past 13 years, Ryan has completed over 75 projects with 20
public agencies in Southern California, serving as the Project Manager for the majority.
The estimated construction value of the projects that have been planned, designed
and/or constructed exceeds $250 million. Projects include planning through design for
water, wastewater and recycled -water conveyance, pumping, storage, and treatment.
Ryan specializes in complex multi -agency water supply programs, alternative delivery
program management, master planning, and contract negotiations.
Water Supply and Treatment
Anaheim Valve Vault, Orange County Water District I Anaheim, CA
Project Manager for design of new valve vault for multiple buried valves (48 -inch to 72 -inch),
adding gates to Atwood Channel discharge structure, and minor modification to OC -28.
Identified opportunity to reduce cost by $300k during PDR stage. Total project cost
estimated at $1M.
Pressure -Reducing Station, Laguna Beach County Water District I Laguna Beach, CA
Project Manager for the hydraulic analysis of existing conditions, utilities research, and
development of a preliminary design for a new pressure -reducing station to offset the need
for alternative capital improvement projects.
Palos Verdes Recycled -Water Pipeline, West Basin Municipal Water District I Carson, CA
Project Manager for preliminary design, environmental assessment, and final design for a
recycled -water pipeline conveying water through Torrance and Palos Verdes Estates. The
project includes approximately 16,000 feet of 8 -inch to 10 -inch -diameter pipeline, a pump
station, and a connection to the Palos Verdes Golf Course, several parks, schools, and other
irrigation customers along the route. Established several options, which reduced overall
project cost by approximately $750,000. Major project elements included easement
assessment, hydraulics, pump station concept development, a California Department of
Transportation (Caltrans) crossing, and an expedited schedule. Total project cost is
estimated at $6.2M.
Water Operations Support I Oxnard, CA
Project Manager for operations support efforts for the City's water treatment and
distribution system, which includes a 7.5 mgd brackish water desalination facility and five
blending stations, serving nearly 200,000 residents. Major tasks include design of emergency
plant projects (chemical piping replacement and well improvements), operator training,
organization study, operations and maintenance (O&M) manual update, health and safety
training, regulatory and permitting support, brine optimization, and automated meter
reading (AMR) replacement project. Work also included start-up and refurbishment of the
City's offline brackish water desalination facility and evaluation of overall system operating
scenarios to decrease costs and avoid charges from over -pumping groundwater allocations.
Oxnard Water Business Plan I Oxnard, CA
Technical Advisor for development of Agency road map for future use of recycled water
assets. Includes interviews with City Council and staff, baseline development, and
coordination with 11 regional agencies to develop potential use of 7,000 AFY of advanced
treated recycled water. Recommendation based on financial impacts and alternatives
analysis, provides projects for short term (5-10 years) and long term (10-20 years).
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
WATER WASTEWATER - REl1SE m
kn
HDPE Brine Pipeline, Water Replenishment District of Southern California I Pico Rivera, CA
Principal -in -Charge for this project that included an approximately 2,000 -foot, 16 -inch -diameter, high-density polyethylene (HDPE)
pipeline in the city of Pico Rivera. The pressurized pipeline conveyed brine from the Groundwater Reliability Improvement Project
(GRIP) Advanced Water Treatment Facility (AWTF) to a 63 -inch trunk sewer owned and operated by the Sanitation Districts of Los
Angeles County (LACSD). The work included both preliminary and final design. In addition, the preliminary design included evaluation
of a turnout structure along a 66 -inch reinforced -concrete pipe conveying tertiary effluent from the San Jose Creek Water Reclamation
Plant. The objective of the turnout was to deliver influent water to the GRIP AWTF.
Regional Desalter Feasibility, Water Replenishment District of Southern California I Lakewood, CA
As Project Manager, evaluated previous documents and established criteria for identifying and screening potential options for a
brackish water desalter(s), which could draw up to 20,000 -acre feet per year (AFY) of groundwater from a plume of brackish water
trapped in the West Basin. Efforts included project development and screening based on established criteria, site plan concepts to
establish minimum land requirements, and Grant support.
Electrodialysis Reversal (EDR) Replacement, Port Hueneme Water Agency I Port Hueneme, CA
Project Engineer for a facility modification at the Brackish Water Reclamation Demonstration Facility operated by the Port Hueneme
Water Agency. The scope included demolishing an existing EDR potable -water treatment system and designing a replacement 1 mgd
nanofiltration system. The scope also included expansion of the existing bag -filter pretreatment system, improving the existing
antiscalant chemical system, and replacing the existing raw water bypass pressure -regulating valve with an energy recovery turbine.
BWRDF Facility Master Plan, Port Hueneme, Port Hueneme Water Agency I Port Hueneme, CA
Project Manager for facility -wide condition assessment and CIP development for 3 MGD brackish groundwater water facility (BWRDF).
The condition assessment included structural, electrical, operations, and process components. Effort included development of a five-
year CIP, project descriptions, and cost estimates for $2.7M in rehabilitation and improvement projects. Developed a model to
evaluate water supply impacts and associated costs related to changing groundwater allocations, operating scenarios, water quality
targets, and cost of new water. Included coordination with various agencies and identification of potential partnerships.
Prepared and presented results of the process and results to the PHWA Board of Directors.
Groundwater Treatment Evaluations - Lynwood Well and Maywood Well, Water Replenishment District of Southern California
Lakewood, CA
Project Manager in charge of feasibility evaluations for groundwater treatment at three separate well sites, covering two services
areas - the cities of Lynwood and Maywood - and various contaminants, including iron, manganese, tetrachloroethylene (PCE), and
trichloroethylene (TCE). The evaluations included reviewing well data, providing a comparative analysis of well treatment options,
conducting a life -cycle cost analysis of options, and providing recommendations for well treatment. The final report included a
detailed cost estimate, schedule, and conceptual site plan. Treatments evaluated included the following: Greensand Plus, Layne -Ox,
DM165 water filtration technology, reverse osmosis (RO) for iron and manganese, granular activated carbon (GAC), air -stripping, and
ultraviolet (UV) oxidation for PCE.
Granular Activated Carbon (GAC) Wellhead Treatment, Water Replenishment District of Southern California I Lynwood, CA
Project Manager for the preliminary and final design of two 20,000 -pound skid -mounted GAC contact vessels, backwash system, piping
modifications, new sewer lateral, and other on-site improvements. Treated tetrachloroethylene/ trichloroethylene (PCE/TCE) for an
existing 700 gpm well in the City of Lynwood. The construction cost was approximately $900k.
Iron and Manganese Wellhead Treatment, Water Replenishment District of Southern California I Maywood, CA
Project Manager for the preliminary and final design of a 900 gpm Greensand Plus horizontal vessel filter system, backwash system
(tank, pump and controls), piping modifications, and other on-site improvements. Treated iron and manganese at an existing well in
the City of Maywood (Maywood Mutual #2). The construction cost was approximately $1.7M.
Brine Optimization, Port Hueneme Water Agency I Port Hueneme, CA
Project Manager for the preliminary design to optimize water recovery for the Agency's brackish water reclamation demonstration
facility (BWRDF). The study included water quality and performance evaluations of the existing three 1 mgd membrane skids - 2
nanofiltration (N0)/1 reverse osmosis (RO) - and development of a brine optimization design. The design included two options for
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
WATER WASTEWATER - REUSE M
hn
inclusion of a third -stage skid to increase recovery to 90 percent from the current 80 percent. The evaluation included preliminary
design drawings and an economic assessment.
Environmental Review, Sativa Los Angeles County Water District I Los Angeles County, CA
Project Manager for development of Initial Study -Mitigated Negative Declaration and supporting studies to assess the construction of
a new iron and manganese oxidation -filtration treatment system at the District's Well No. 5.
Recycled -Water PS -1 Upgrades, Burbank Water and Power I Burbank, CA
Project Manager on this project which included expansion of an existing recycled -water pump station at the Burbank Water
Reclamation Plant, operated by Burbank Water and Power. Provided design support services for the development of the Preliminary
Design Report, including evaluation of existing and future recycled -water demand, pump expansion phasing, facility piping,
distribution system hydraulics, and analysis of pump configuration alternatives.
36 -Inch Steel Pipeline and 5 MG Reservoir, Las Virgenes Municipal Water District (LVMWD) I Westlake Village, CA
As Project Manager, prepared plan and profile drawings for 2,200 feet of 30 -inch and 36 -inch potable -water steel pipeline design for
the LVMWD 5 MG potable water reservoir. Completed designs for open -cut installation using blasting and aboveground installation in
42 -inch casing on pipe supports across the existing dam. Designs also included 8 -inch, 16 -inch, and 24 -inch steel pipeline designs for
overflow, drain line, and other potable -water improvements as part of the project. The project required coordination with the
California Department of Water Resources, Division of Safety of Dams and the California Department of Public Health. Conducted
extensive public outreach efforts, including a full-day open house with design experts, client staff, and workshop materials.
Potable Water Pipeline Project, Ventura County Waterworks District I Somis, CA
Principal -in -Charge overseeing the preparation of 4 miles of 12 -inch pipeline design in the congested Los Angeles Avenue (State Route
118) and Somis Road (State Route 34) area. The project included extensive utility mapping in the state highway corridor and direct up-
front coordination with the Calleguas Municipal Water District. Work involved investigating alternative pipe installation methods
including open -cut, pipe -bursting, horizontal directional drill, replacement on existing alignment (using highline), jack -and -bore, and
microtunneling methods.
Saticoy Conditioning Facility Renovation I Ventura, CA
Project Manager designed two chemical systems, sodium hydroxide and polyphosphate, as part of this water treatment facility
upgrade. Additional responsibilities included various civil -related site improvements.
Fluoride/Orthophosphate Building I Oxnard, CA
Project Engineer in charge of coordinating the various disciplines and subcontractors throughout the design of this two-story chemical
building/office space. Additionally designed all civil aspects and two chemical systems: fluorosilicic acid and zinc orthophosphate.
Attended meetings with the City to evaluate and discuss design alternatives and make certain all needs were met throughout the
design process.
Blending Station No.5 1 Oxnard, CA
Project Manager providing construction project management using Primavera Expedition software. Responsibilities included
construction management services and coordination, including submittal review and responses to requests for information (RFI).
Blending Station No. 1 Desalter Project I Oxnard, CA
As Project Manager, provided construction project management using Primavera Expedition software for this $25 million brackish
water desalter. Responsibilities involved all aspects of construction management services and coordination, including preparation of
clarifications, requests for quote (RFQ), submittal review, requests for information (RFI) responses, and on-site construction
monitoring and inspection. Additional duties included design of a chemical system upgrade at the City's chloramination building. This
project is a component of the Groundwater Recovery Enhancement and Treatment (GREAT) Program. Managed the process for
achieving Gold -level LEED certification for the facility.
Reverse -Osmosis (RO) Optimization I Oxnard, CA
Project Manager for an optimization evaluation of an existing 7.5 mgd RO brackish groundwater system at the City of Oxnard Blending
Station No. 1. The evaluation included technical feasibility, economic assessment, and a piloting plan and implementation schedule
for increasing existing 80 percent recovery to 85 percent -90 percent recovery.
Sodium Bisulfite Tank Replacement, Central Coast Water Authority (CCWA) I Santa Ynez, CA
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
WATER WASTEWATER - REUSE M
ki
Project Engineer for a facility modification at the Santa Ynez Pumping Facility owned by the CCWA. The scope included review of the
existing horizontal storage tanks, development of replacement options, and design of the recommended alternative.
Analysis of On-site Treatment, Jones Ranch I Oxnard, CA
As Project Manager, analyzed independent water and wastewater on-site treatment options for the 165 -acre Jones Ranch
Development in north Oxnard. The scope included analysis of reverse osmosis (RO) technology to provide a drinking water supply of
equivalent quality to that of the City of Oxnard Groundwater Recovery Enhancement and Treatment (GREAT) Program, a packaged
on-site wastewater treatment facility with advanced tertiary treatment capable of meeting effluent quality equivalent to the future
advanced water purification facility (AWPF) project, and a recycled -water pumping system to deliver the treated water throughout
the development area and also to the northern reach of the City's recycled -water backbone system.
Blending Station No. R 1 Oxnard, CA
As Project Manager, oversaw the design of the City's newest blending facility, based on a concept to blend permeate from the City's
nearby Groundwater Recovery Enhancement and Treatment (GREAT) Program Desalter with local groundwater to develop an
imported water quality that can be pressurized and delivered into the imported water supply pipeline. The scope of work included
design of booster pumps, development of the facility control strategy, modification to the existing chloramination systems, and
integration with the City's GREAT Program Desalter.
Preliminary Design for Desalter Facilities at Blending Station No. 3 1 Oxnard, CA
Project Manager for the development of 30 percent design drawings, design criteria, and an opinion of probable cost for constructing
a new brackish water reverse -osmosis desalting facility at the existing Blending Station No. 3 site. In charge of chemical system design,
which includes sodium hydroxide, antiscalant, clean -in-place (CIP) tanks and pumps, fluorosilicic acid, and zinc orthophosphate; the
design also included expanding the existing sodium hypochlorite and ammonia systems.
Energy
Solar Project Technical Support, Las Virgenes Municipal Water District I Las Virgenes, CA
Project Manager providing technical support to District -related to 1 MW solar project being installed as Power Purchase Agreement.
Technical support included submittal reviews, utility coordination, and on-site observations.
Todd Road Solar Panel Feasibility Analysis, Ventura County Public Works Agency I Ventura, CA
Project Manager for a general economic feasibility analysis of various solar panel facilities, approximately 1 MW in size, at the Todd
Road Jail in Santa Paula. The analysis included site visits, review of existing planning documents, and development of alternatives using
different panel technologies, locations, and configurations. Developed an economic model to compare alternatives and select the
preferred alternative. Developed a Preliminary Design Report for the preferred alternative, including 30 percent design documents,
cost estimates, and construction schedule.
Cogeneration System and Solar Thermal Domestic Hot -Water Heating System Evaluation, Ventura County Public Works Agency
Ventura, CA
Project Manager for the evaluation to determine the economic and technical feasibility of constructing both a cogeneration system
and a solar thermal domestic hot-water heating system at the Todd Road Jail facility in Santa Paula.
Todd Road Jail 1 MW Photovoltaic (PV) System Design -Build, Ventura County Public Works Agency I Ventura, CA
Project Manager on this design -build project, in which AECOM functioned as the owner's representative, facilitated the design -build
project development and procurement, and assisted in procuring a $1.25 million Grant from Southern California Edison. The estimated
$5.2 million 1 MW PV system consists of fixed tilt modules and canopy -mounted modules over an existing parking lot. The installation
also included coordination with a new building (design -bid -build), replacing portions of the existing security system, setting up capacity
for future vehicle charging, and expanding the staff parking area.
Moorpark Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) 1 MW Photovoltaic (PV) System Design -Build, Ventura County Waterworks District
No. 11 Moorpark, CA
Project Manager for this design -build project, in which AECOM functioned as the owner's representative, facilitated the design -build
project development and procurement, and assisted in procuring a $1.5 million grant from Southern California Edison. The project
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
WATER WASTEWATER - REUSE M
hn
completed as part of the design -build was a $5.5 million 1 MW single -axis tracker PV system. The project was completed on an
accelerated schedule and was partially funded by Southern California Edison's California Solar Initiative.
Energy -Efficiency Study, Port Hueneme Water Agency (PHWA) I Oxnard, CA
Project Manager for development of an energy -efficiency study focusing on the PHWA's brackish water reclamation demonstration
facility (BWRDF). The study included an evaluation of several energy -recovery technologies (i.e., interstage turbocharger, isobaric
pressure exchanger), existing booster pump efficiency, and solar panels. The evaluation included two workshops, a site visit, economic
evaluation of each alternative, and recommendations.
Wastewater Treatment
Hill Canyon Treatment Plant Master Plan I Thousand Oaks, CA
Project Manager for master plan of 9 MGD wastewater treatment plant. The plan includes three major components: process
evaluation, energy evaluation, and water resource assessment. Effort includes a condition assessment, biological modeling, evaluation
of FOG and Food Waste, biosolids drying alternatives, and advanced treatment for using plant effluent.
Groundwater Reliability Improvement Project (GRIP), Program Owner's Engineer, Water Replenishment District of Southern
California I Lakewood, CA
Served as Deputy Project Manager for Program Management, Procurement, and Offsite Improvements. The overall program consisted
of a $100 million advanced water purification facility (AWPF) located in Pico Rivera. The treatment train consists of a 10 mgd capacity
microfiltration, reverse osmosis, and ultraviolet disinfection. Work included development of the procurement process and documents,
including Request for Information (RFI), Request for Qualifications (RFQ), and Request for Proposals (RFP). The program management
role included development of a document control system, master project schedule, task coordination, monthly reporting, and cost
control.
Dewatering Screw Press I Thousand Oaks, CA
Project Manager for a screw press dewatering system to replace an existing belt press at the 9 mgd Hill Canyon Treatment Plant. The
project included dewatering technology analysis, evaluation of struvite/filtrate impacts, ancillary systems, a preliminary technical
memorandum, and detailed design.
Dewatering Screw Press I Simi Valley, CA
Project Manager for a screw press dewatering system to replace an existing belt press at the 9.5 mgd Simi Valley Water Quality Control
Plant. The project included dewatering technology analysis (5 screw press manufacturers surveyed), evaluation of ancillary system
improvements, and a preliminary technical memorandum.
Coating Specification I Thousand Oaks, CA
As Principal -in -Charge, provided technical peer review of City -provided coating specifications for use at the Hill Canyon Treatment
Plant.
Digester Improvements I Simi Valley, CA
Task Lead for the Preliminary Design Report that included evaluation of alternatives for replacement of an existing digester mixing
system, involving draft tube, linear motion, large bubble gas, and external pump. The evaluation also included review of primary feed
and digested sludge transfer piping and sludge heating system alternatives. Served as Task Lead for cost estimate, construction
sequencing, and piping.
Dewatering Screw Press, Camrosa Water District I Camarillo, CA
Project Manager overseeing development of a preliminary design report for a Class A screw press facility and associated equipment.
The project included process modeling of the existing 2.25 mgd oxidation ditch water reclamation facility, evaluation of Class A filtrate
impacts, and preliminary design of ancillary equipment such as a polymer system, open-air canopy, truck -loading area, conveyor
system, and emergency storage capability.
Centrate Treatment Evaluation I Thousand Oaks, CA
Project Manager for development of a fatal -flaw -level analysis of using various technologies to increase the energy efficiency of the
current centrate treatment (Basin 6), and to further reduce the ammonium loading to the main plant secondary process at the City of
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
WATER WASTEWATER - REUSE mkn
Thousand Oaks' Hill Canyon Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP). Technologies included DEMON Sequencing Batch Reactor,
Cleargreen Sequencing Batch Reactor, and a Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor.
Biodigester Feasibility Study, Ventura County Watershed Protection District I Ventura, CA
As Project Manager, developed a report determining the feasibility of an anaerobic digester to convert local horse manure, food waste,
and green waste into energy in the Ventura River Watershed area. Tasks included participation in multiple public workshops and
development of the following four technical memorandums: (1) Feedstock Summary and Collection Methods, (2) Technology and Site
Analysis, (3) Conceptual Site Plan, Environmental/Permitting, and Delivery, and (4) Implementation and Business Plan.
Electrical and Instrumentation Upgrades at Hill Canyon Treatment Plant I Thousand Oaks, CA
Project Manager for the preliminary and final design of approximately $4 million in improvements at the Hill Canyon Treatment Plant.
Upgrades included replacement of two motor control centers, FEB Pump Station replacements, new aqueous ammonia system, new
fiber-optic network, and new supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) upgrades. The process included a 2 -day workshop peer
review, including specialized subconsultants and process/instrumentation and control (I&C) experts.
Biosolids Drying Feasibility Study I Thousand Oaks, CA
Project Manager for a feasibility study that included installing drying technology at the 9 mgd Thousand Oaks Hill Canyon Wastewater
Treatment Plant. The project involved evaluation of available technologies, including direct, indirect, and combination dryers. The
project also required evaluation of thickening and dewatering improvements, including bench -scale testing. A life -cycle cost analysis
was provided for the recommended project.
Force Main Rehabilitation, Channel Islands Beach Community Services District I Channel Islands Harbor, CA
Project Manager providing construction management services related to cured -in-place lining for approximately 10,300 linear feet of
8 -inch and 12 -inch wastewater force main piping.
Lift Station Condition Assessment, Channel Islands Beach Community Services District I Channel Islands Harbor, CA
As Project Manager, evaluated seven existing raw wastewater lift stations in the District service area. Prepared a report with
recommended improvements covering mechanical, structural, electrical, and instrumentation.
Bioreactor Optimization I Thousand Oaks, CA
Served as Project Manager for a preliminary design study of optimizing existing bioreactors at the 9 mgd Thousand Oaks Hill Canyon
Wastewater Treatment Plant. The project included evaluation of blower replacement, instrumentation and control valve
improvements, deammonification for filtrate treatment, hydraulic modeling of basins, computational fluid dynamic modeling, and
process modeling. The preliminary design included a summary of improvements and life -cycle cost analysis for modifications to
increase efficiency and performance of the City's bioreactor process train.
Wastewater Operations Support I Oxnard, CA
Served as Deputy Project Manager for operations support efforts at the City of Oxnard 25 mgd wastewater treatment plant. Major
tasks include design of emergency plant projects, organization study, operations and maintenance (O&M) manual update, start-up
and commissioning of the advanced water purification facility (AWPF) and recycled -water system, health and safety training,
regulatory and permitting support, and staff augmentation. Start-up of the recycled -water system included retrofit coordination,
design review, development of training and user manuals, regulatory coordination, and cross connection testing support.
Recycled Water System Startup and Retrofit Support I Oxnard, CA
Served as Task Leader for the start-up of the City's recycled -water backbone system and customer retrofits, as part of the larger
Wastewater Operations Support Contract with the City of Oxnard. The task included retrofit of two 18 -hole golf courses and cross -
connection testing for the Riverpark development, which includes 33 separate recycled -water sites. Efforts included value engineering
for existing retrofit designs, design of golf course retrofits, staff augmentation for cross -connection testing, coordination with DDW,
development of user manuals and training program, hydraulic analysis, creation of start-up procedures for the advanced water
purification facility (AWPF) finish water pumping station and backbone, and overall program management.
Recycled -Water Retrofit I Simi Valley, CA
Served as Project Manager for development of site-specific engineering reports for recycled -water customer retrofits in the City of
Simi Valley.
CIP Development, LasVirgenes Municipal Water District I Calabasas, CA
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
WATER WASTEWATER - REUSE mkn
Served as Project Manager for development of a 5 -year capital improvement program for the District's Tapia Water Reclamation
Facility and Rancho Composting Facility. Efforts included a workshop, data review, site visits, identification of 100+ projects, screening,
and cost estimating. Projects were focused on operations and maintenance (O&M), coating, and structures, intended to be covered
by the District's annual maintenance budget. The projects were prioritized based on criteria and weighting established with the
District.
Wastewater Treatment Evaluation, Private Client I Beaumont, CA
Served as Project Manager for wastewater treatment analysis for juice company in City of Beaumont. Efforts included analysis of
treatment options, construction of treatment and operations costs, site investigations (including dye testing), and negotiations with
City to define treatment levels, rate impacts, and schedule. Study identified $800,000 temporary system and $2M permanent
treatment system.
Hydraulic Modeling
Water System Hydraulic Model, Channel Islands Beach Community Services District I Channel Islands Harbor, CA
Project Manager for a comprehensive study that included the following tasks: outline existing and future potable -water demands,
identify and quantify reliable water sources, develop a steady-state hydraulic model, evaluate current and future distribution capacity,
summarize required improvements, and estimate costs.
Infrastructure Review (multiple), Channel Islands Beach Community Services District I (-kkIn—pi ld=nr4c Y?rhOr CA
Project Manager for a water and sewer hydraulic modeling analysis of developments planned in District service area. [Fisherman's
Wharf, Casa Sirena, Marina]
Non -Potable Hydraulic Model, Camrosa Water District I Camarillo, CA
As Project Manager, developed an extended -period simulation hydraulic model for the Camrosa Water District's non -potable water
system. The Camrosa non -potable system includes several surface storage ponds, closed reservoirs, pump stations, and distribution
piping to serve 350 customers throughout six pressure zones. The hydraulic model was developed using MWH 112onet.
Ventura County Harbor Wastewater Modeling I Oxnard, CA
As Project Manager, administered the development of a wastewater hydraulic model using SewerCAD. The project included
development of land use duty factors, model development, flow monitoring, calibration, and analysis. The hydraulic system was
integrated into the City of Oxnard's wastewater model.
Riverpark Water System Evaluation I Oxnard, CA
As the Riverpark Development completed partial build -out, it was observed that the potable water system was delivering relatively
low -flow pressure. The City requested that our firm develop several model alternatives to increase water supply pressure and meet
fire -flow requirements within the new development. Various designs were modeled using WaterCAD software, the alternatives were
evaluated based on cost and overall system benefit, and a recommendation was provided.
Wagon Wheel Development Infrastructure Review I Oxnard, CA
Assessed the ability of the City's current and future water distribution system to handle the build -out of the proposed development
by means of modeling within the WaterCAD software. Identified other proposed developments in the vicinity and designed a looped
system, which could provide adequate potable -water pressure and fire -flow to the Wagon Wheel Development, and also prepared
the City for other future developments.
Ormond Beach Specific Plan Infrastructure Review I Oxnard, CA
Evaluated the proposed development using WaterCAD software and determined pipeline improvements; provided recommended
pipe sizes for piping within the development. Worked with the City to develop the most economic pipeline improvements by
coordinating upgraded pipes with those already identified to be replaced by the City's Cast -Iron Replacement Program.
Teal Club Development Infrastructure Review I Oxnard, CA
Used WaterCAD software to determine whether the current and future potable -water systems could provide adequate potable -water
pressure and fire -flow to this proposed development.
Casden Development Infrastructure Review I Oxnard, CA
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
WATER WASTEWATER - REUSE m
hn
Used WaterCAD software to determine whether the current and future potable -water systems could provide adequate potable -water
pressure and fire -flow to this proposed development. The current and future wastewater system was evaluated based on the system's
ability to handle the additional loads; pipeline improvements were identified. The feasibility of requiring a dual plumbed system
capable of receiving recycled water from the future recycled -water system was also evaluated.
Camino Real Business Park Development Infrastructure Review I Oxnard, CA
Used WaterCAD software to determine whether the current and future potable -water systems could provide adequate potable -water
pressure and fire -flow to this proposed development. A series of pipe improvements were identified along with a general
recommendation of how the cost should be mitigated. The current and future wastewater system was evaluated based on the system's
ability to handle the additional loads; pipelines that were pushed beyond capacity were identified and improvements were
recommended. The feasibility of requiring a dual plumbed system capable of receiving recycled water from the future recycled -water
system was also evaluated.
Water System Design Reports, Las Virgenes Municipal Water District I Calabasas, CA
As Project Manager, planned level infrastructure impacts studies related to water, wastewater, and recycled -water facilities. Studies
included analysis of development, coordination with the District and developer, development of demands and generation, hydraulic
modeling of impacts, and recommendations. Multiple documents have been prepared since 2012, including Sweetwater Mesa, Malibu
Golf Course, and Triangle Ranch.
Planning
Recycled Water Master Plan I Oxnard, CA
Project Manager for this project that consisted of developing a recycled -water system for the largest city in Ventura County. It also
included preparing an implementation plan to serve as the 'road map' for the city, which addressed such institutional issues a:
permitting; recycled -water ordinance and administrative code revisions; rates and financing; staffing needs and training; and public
outreach strategies. Collaborated with City staff to develop phased expansions of the City's first recycled -water system, identified
customers, analyzed storage and ASR opportunities, and created a steady-state and extended -period simulation hydraulic model for
system sizing and evaluation.
Water Master Plan Update I Oxnard, CA
Project Manager for a plan to update an earlier plan and incorporate new Planning Department information on growth within the City,
as well as new water -supply strategies. Completed various hydraulic modeling evaluations to determine necessary updates in both
current and future conditions.
Recycled -Water Facilities Plan I Oxnard, CA
Project Manager for work including determination of potential recycled -water consumers, estimating demand, and creating several
alternatives for routing the future recycled -water infrastructure.
Maywood Consolidation Study, Water Replenishment District of Southern California I Lakewood, CA
As Project Manager, prepared alternatives analysis comparing wellhead treatment project to consolidation for Maywood Mutual
Water Company No. 2, located in the City of Maywood. The consolidation analysis included development of screening criteria and life-
cycle cost analysis of shortlisted agencies.
Force Main Rehabilitation Constructability Review, Channel Islands Beach Community Services District I Oxnard, CA
Project Manager for a constructability review of 90 percent design documents related to a sewer rehabilitation project. Improvements
included cured -in-place pipeline (CIPP) lining for approximately 2 miles of 8 -inch to 12 -inch force main. The review included technical
evaluation of design drawings and specifications and development of a summary table of comments.
Freeman Diversion Dam Hardened Fish Passage Ramp, United Water Conservation District I Santa Paula, CA
Project Manager for development of a physical model for a proposed fish ladder located adjacent to the existing Freeman Diversion.
The scope of work included facilitating stakeholder workshops with team members, client, and regulatory agencies. Tasks included
criteria development, alternative analysis, numerical modeling, and construction of a physical model.
Hope Reservoir Feasibility Study, Las Virgenes Municipal Water District I Calabasas, CA
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
WATER WASTEWATER - REUSE M
hn
Project Manager for development of a feasibility analysis evaluating a proposed 3,000 acre-foot recycled -water reservoir in the city of
Calabasas. The investigation included evaluation of access road alignments, dam types, geotechnical issues, necessary recycled -water
infrastructure, operation, mixing, and sizing. An economic analysis was provided for the preferred alternative.
Calabasas Tank Feasibility Study, Las Virgenes Municipal Water District I Calabasas, CA
Project Manager for the investigation of removing the 8 M gallon Calabasas Tank Potable Reservoir for service to allow for
rehabilitation. The investigation included hydraulic modeling, review of temporary storage, development of preliminary shutdown
procedures, and overview of challenges and mitigations.
Las Virgenes Reservoir Access Road and Pipeline Feasibility Study, Las Virgenes Municipal Water District I Las Virgenes, CA
Project Manager for a fatal -flaw analysis of an alternative access road and pipeline options from Triunfo Canyon Road to Las Virgenes
Reservoir. The evaluation included development of a conceptual -level plan and profile drawings, hydraulic schematics,
constructability, and opinion of probable construction cost.
Wastewater Rate Study, Channel Islands Beach Community Services District I Channel Islands Harbor, CA
Project Manager for development of an update to the District's wastewater service rate and connection fees. The effort included
support in negotiating a revised service contract with the City of Oxnard. This effort, identified by the team during development of the
study, is expected to result in significant savings to the District.
Water Supply Assessment and Verification I Oxnard, CA
Project Manager for development of various water supply assessment and verification reports for specific developments within the
City of Oxnard, including Sakioka Farms, Ormond Beach, Channel Islands Harbor, and Jones Ranch. The reports were developed to
meet the requirements of SB 610 and SB 221. In addition, an independent comprehensive update was developed in support of the
City's General Plan Update.
GRIP Program, Water Replenishment District of Southern California I Lakewood, CA
Project Manager for an Alternatives Analysis and Preliminary Design of 5 -mile, 42 -inch recycled -water conveyance pipeline. The
project includes an economic analysis comparing two alternative alignments, 30 percent design drawings, and Preliminary Design
Report. The investigation addresses multiple trenchless crossing, utility coordination, hydraulics, traffic impacts, corrosion,
residential/commercial impacts, geotechnical issues, and constructability. The estimated construction cost of the pipeline is $30
million.
Storage Analysis I Lynwood, CA
Served as Project Manager for evaluation of storage requirements for the City of Lynwood. Based on findings, evaluated the proficiency
and condition of the existing storage and provided alternatives for replacing the existing concrete -buried storage. Options included a
buried 2 Mgal prestressed -concrete tank and refurbishing the existing 3 Mgal storage tank. The final recommendations included a
detailed plan for the next phase of analysis.
RFP Development forW/WW Rate Study, Channel Islands Beach Community Services District I Channel Islands Harbor, CA
Project Manager, developed procurement documents for a water and wastewater study for the District. The effort included
identification, collection, and review of critical data for inclusion in the procurement document. Assisted with identification of
consultants and distribution of the Request for Proposal (RFP).
Procurement Support for AMI System, Channel Islands Beach Community Services District I Channel Islands Harbor, CA
As Project Manager, assisted District with selection of cellular based advanced meter replacements, negotiated pricing and prepared
procurement documents for public bid installation. Project included purchase and installation of approximately 1,900 ultrasonic
meters and end points, with a total cost of approximately $800,000 ($650k materials and $150k labor).
Hydraulics Analysis, Water Replenishment District of Southern California (WRD) I Long Beach, CA
Served as the Task Lead for review of water supply conditions at the Long Beach Water Reclamation Plant, owned and operated by
Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts. The evaluation included review of supply and operational data, existing agreements and on-
site investigations in support of developing alternatives for increasing supply of tertiary supply to the adjacent advanced water
purification facility, owned by WRD and operated by Long Beach Water Department (LBWD). Conducted additional analysis of
recommended projects including a site assessment, sizing and cost estimate for an injection well, and a condition assessment for the
EI Dorado Backup Pump Station and the South Lake Pump Station, both owned by LBWD.
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
WATER WASTEWATER - REl1SE mhn
Water Supply Analysis, Channel Islands Beach Community Services District (CIBCSD) I Oxnard, CA
Project Manager serving as the District Engineer for CIBCSD. Developed 30 water supply alternatives in coordination with District staff.
Conducted a board workshop using interactive audience response system (iClicker) to conduct a survey of current priorities and
concerns and establish District goals. Assisted the District in initial screening and shortlisting of preferred concepts, including DPR,
seawater desalination, and optimization of existing brackish water desalination systems.
Recycled Water Alternatives Study, United Water Conservation District I Ventura County, CA
As Project Manager, prepared an alternatives study of three options for delivering recycled water from the City of Oxnard to the
District's spreading grounds and agricultural customers. The alternatives consisted of pipelines ranging in size from 16 inches to 24
inches for a range of 4 miles to 6 miles, and an annual delivery of approximately 4,000 AFY. Analysis included hydraulic modeling, cost
estimates, implementation schedules, operational integration, permitting, utility investigations, coordination with the City of Oxnard's
Master Plan, and development of a business plan comparing alternatives against Master Plan alternatives.
Water Supply Assessment and Council Facilitation I Port Hueneme, CA
As Project Manager, prepared a Council presentation of the City water supply, water quality, cost of water, and contractual constraints.
Conducted a Council workshop using an interactive audience response system (iClicker) to conduct a survey of current priorities and
concerns and establish City goals. The survey data was analyzed, supply options prioritized, and the results presented to City Council.
RFP Development for new Administration Building, Channel Islands Beach Community Services District I Channel Islands Harbor,
CA
As Project Manager, developed procurement documents for architectural services in support of a new headquarters building. The
estimated cost for the new facility and associated site improvements is $1.35M.
Regional Wastewater Conveyance and Treatment Agreement Negotiation I Channel Islands Harbor, CA
Conducted analysis of existing wastewater service agreements between Channel Islands Beach Community Services District (CIBCSD)
and City of Oxnard. Effort included evaluation of multiple service agreements dating back to 1966, development of scenarios for a new
cost and service structure between the agencies, and preparation of schematics and figures illustrating the complex integration of the
two systems within the Channel Island Harbor and surrounding areas.
Well Failure Analysis, Pleasant Valley County Water District I Ventura County, CA
Project Manager for well failure analysis included review of well performance and construction documents. Analysis identified mode
of failure was due to well misalignment. Prepared report identifying options for replacement which included use of a smaller vertical
turbine pump or submersible pump.
Sewer Rehabilitation CIP Development, Channel Islands Beach Community Services District I Channel Islands Harbor, CA
Project Manager for development of rehabilitation plan based on review of CCTV and inspection results. Prepared 5 -Year CIP based
on identification and grouping of priority rehabilitation projects, and conceptual cost estimates. Projects include both cured -in-place
liners, spot repair projects, and manhole rehabilitation. Estimated construction is $750,000.
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
MR. AJ J H A
SUMMARY:
Over Eighteen years of Experience In:
• Marketing Channel Development
(Web/Direct)
• Strategic Marketing Planning
• Brand Development
• Advertising and Communication
EXPERIENCE:
• Brand Messaging
• Online Analytics
• Marketing Sales/Cost Analysis
• Rebranding/Turnarounds
• Public Relations
1�I
• Project Management
• Positive Sales Growth
• Franchise Operations
• QSR Operations
Tustin Auto Gas Works Tustin, CA
Chief Executive Officer July 2010 — Present
• Executed purchase and turn -around of an Arco Gas Station as a personal investment.
• Analyzed and made decisions to increase profitability and appeal for both sites. Took a site pumping 55k gallons per month to over
275k gallons of gas. Producing store sales of over 70k per month. Current top ten site in Arco network.
Incrediline
Marketing and Business Development Manager
Irvine, CA
March 2008 —July 2010
Developed and implemented marketing plan and brand launch for a new consumer product. Managed branding guidelines and
helped develop brand identity and messaging. Designed and launched website and created and managed direct mail and email
marketing campaigns and post reporting analysis.
Primary focus is 1326 development and growth. Responsible for major account management and development which include:
Amazon.com, Canadian Tire Company and Target..
Responsible for reviewing all online analytics and ROI reports to ensure campaigns are performing to expectation and to continue
to tweak campaigns to ensure key ROI measures are achieved.
Texas Pacific Group
Irvine, CA
Marketing Manager February 2008 — December 2009
• Developed and implemented strategic marketing plan for a three-year turnaround of national retailer and manufacturer.
• Primary work responsibilities included channel development (direct, tv, radio, web, in-home and retail), brand rebranding,
messaging, and marketing ROI analysis.
• Responsible for managing company launch of new brand identity in September of 2008. Managed creative resources and vendors
to roll-out new collateral in time for fall re -launch. Scope of work included managing brand/creative direction and
creating/modifying external copy for company deliverables and collateral in time for Sept launch.
• Collected and analyzed data to evaluate existing and potential efficiencies within the channels to increase revenue, average order
size and ROI. Oversaw direct marketing programs on web, direct mail, email, and license programs. Developed dashboard
reporting systems for marketing/sales analysis and key metrics reporting. Helped increase the effectiveness and track ability of
marketing, advertising, business development and communications programs internally to get an understanding of ROI.
Recommended key areas to cut and or increase to maximize marketing spend.
• Redeveloped company e-commerce site and backend infrastructure to take advantage of highly trafficked site to direct and
increase consumer conversion rate over the web. Implemented Google Analytics and Omniture into the site to effectively monitor
and learn about consumer behavior online. Increased the web conversion rate by 25% over two months, which lead to increased
estimated net sales by sixteen million a year. Developed tracking metrics for the site by understanding consumer traffic and
adapting the site to maximize flow into key conversion areas and metrics.
• Activated an aggressive SEM/SEO program which achieved a $35 cost per lead/conversion. Launched an aggressive email marketing
campaign that resulted in the highest marketing ROI in company history.
• Managed all consumer advertising/communication from kick off to in market. Areas of involvement included magazine/news paper
advertising, direct mail, email marketing and website.
• Created and activated marketing programs to take advantage of existing consumer database and initiated lead prospecting. Helped
create and organize 3 Day Blinds 1.5 million customers database.
Okay -okay
Marketing Project Manager
Laguna Niguel, CA
March 2006 — March 2008
• Worked for a full-service marketing agency based in Orange County, CA. Major Clients included Microsoft, Indy Race League
Dermalogica, Sprint Wireless and Toyota.
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
r1C1PCU ucvcwp d11U UAULULU UldliliCfl �.PULIIIL w[IIIIIUIIILdLion/pr/marketing programs for clients. Coordinated product marketing,
positioning, and branding initiatives. Lead development with new website launches, lead/customer database
creation/management, email marketing campaigns, lead generation campaigns and online affiliate campaigns.
• Advised clients in productive ways of marketing to target consumers and helped them determine relevant
advertising/content/direct marketing to impact target demographics. Created detailed briefs, marketing plans, presentations and
calendars that helped to advise clients. Developed integrated marketing campaigns that were consistent in all media across the
board. Conducted analysis on marketing programs to account for R01 and financial viability.
• Managed creative in marketing and communications processes from conceptualization to creation. Created and edited all copy for
marketing deliverables and collateral for external use. Managed direct marketing programs that included customer list
management, merge/purge, budgeting, and overall implementation and analysis of direct marketing campaigns in direct mail and
email. Implemented customer database programs and executed a wide array of web based and dealer -based promotions to drive
traffic to websites, partner store websites and retailers. Spearheaded online affiliate and web -based lead generation programs.
Fox Racing Irvine, CA
Marketing/Web Coordinator July 2004 — March 2006
• Supported product marketing initiatives in Advertising, Branding, Communications, Direct Marketing, E -Commerce, PR, Media
Relations, Sales, Strategic Partnerships, and heavily trafficked E -Commerce Website. Advised and supported Fox's re -branding
movement within the organization.
• Managed Fox website group that included 12 micro site categories. Managed the web design/creative team in re -launching the
new website. Created search engine marketing and email marketing program from scratch. Handled 12 -month website content and
promotions calendar. Edited and reviewed all incoming copy, content, images, and videos for web. Worked with video/photo
teams, team managers and copy writers to implement easy to use content management system.
• Handled product placements customer and media relations for entire brand portfolio. Primary liaison with PR firms, Fuel TV, MTV
to place product and pitch stories on TV, Movies, Magazines and Hollywood personalities. Developed and maintained editorial
calendars and media contact lists. Coordinated product placement with celebrities, bands, television, movie, influential stylists, and
other types of opportunities.
• Managed 12 -month advertising media schedule. Initiated and managed creative teams to produce advertising/web content that fit
with company/brand direction and was ahead of the competition.
• Developed marketing strategy and yearly execution plans. Presented marketing strategy & campaign at company sales meetings.
Worked with product managers to ensure all events, athletes and programs were getting proper exposure with press, website and
consumer groups.
• Interfaced with domestic and international sales teams, internal marketing/pr personal to identify tradeshow objectives, strategies,
brand message and direction to create a unique synergy that would positively promote the brand.
• Managed/developed all special Fox events (Sundance Film Festival, South by Southwest, Tradeshows, US Open of Surf and X -
Games) and projects (Street Teams, Event Teams and Vehicle Fleet). Managed PR events, including press launches and tours,
parties, hospitality suites, and other company public relations driven events.
PR Domain Santa Monica, CA
Marketing Coordinator
January 2002 —April 2004
Created image, branding, and corporate identity direction for boutique events/pr firm and its partners. Provided on site support
activation and execution for high dollar and high impact events for consumers and VIPs. Entertained and worked as a publicist for
Hollywood Celebrities, NBA Basketball Players and Musicians and their corresponding interaction with members of the press and
media.
CB Richard Ellis
Web Developer
Newport Beach, CA
July 2003 — February 2004
Developed 132C & 13213 Websites for CB Richard Ellis. Helped CBRE expand web presence and helped create and manage CBRE's
complex website system. Created sites that were useful to tenants and future tenants and were consistent with brand message and
identity. Helped save CBRE save in web costs by creating CBRE template that was adopted nationwide at high end commercial
office space sites. Sample: http://www.cbretower.com
Infineon Technologies Formerly Morphics
Campbell, CA
Marketing Coordinator June 1998 —January 2001
• Helped develop marketing plans and projects for a fabless wireless semiconductor manufacturer.
• Developed key brand messaging, copy points and presentations for external use. Designed all corporate communications templates
and created copy for corporate messaging. Collaborated with legal to create investor and media/press releases for external use.
SKILLS:
• Microsoft Office, SQL and Project. Adobe Creative Suite (Photoshop, InDesign) and Adobe Dreamweaver.
• Programming Languages: Net, HTML and Java.
21
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
VVUU IULIIIILAL)glCJ: Uiiiii1LUIU, 3d1CJrU1I.C.LL)111, UUUglc Hlialytics, Campaign Monitor, Cheetah Mail and Web Trends.
• Advanced computer skills, able to troubleshoot and solve most problems
EDUCATION:
University of California
BA Social Ecology (2004) Minor Management
ADVISOR/BOARD AFFILIATIONS:
Irvine, CA
September 2000 — Dec 2004
Planning Commissioner of the City of Tustin
Tustin, CA
February 2019 — Present
Federal Bureau of Investigation Los Angeles Citizens Academy Graduate
Los Angeles, CA
May 2019
Board Member of Tustin —Tustin Community Foundation
Tustin, CA
December 2020 —
Present
Board Member of Tustin — Chamber of Commerce
Tustin, CA
September 2018 —July
2020
Board Member of Orange County Boys and Girls Club
Tustin, CA
September 2018 —July
2020
City of Tustin Police Advisory Board
Tustin, CA
September 2016 —
February 2019
President of American India Foundation — Los Angeles Chapter
Los Angeles, CA
Largest Indian American NGO Based in the United States.
September 2012 —August
2015
Board Member — Executive Protection Specialists
Orange, CA
Advisor and Board Member
September 2012 —August
2014
Board Member — Unique Garage Doors
Anaheim, CA
Marketing and Business Development Advisor
September 2010—
Present
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
City of Tustin
300 Centennial Way
Tustin, CA 92780
jwillkom@tustinca.org
PROFILE Responsible for the leadership and administration of the Community Development
Department and Planning Commission for the City of Tustin. Responsibilities include:
Current and Advance Planning; Historic Preservation, Building and Safety; Code
Enforcement; and Community Development Block Grant. Ina career spanning over 30
years, Justina has developed a diversified background in urban, regional, environmental
planning; land use law; housing and demographics; historic preservation; and survey
research and program analysis.
EXPERIENCE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, CITY OF TUSTIN
October 2020 -Present
ACTING DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, CITY OF TUSTIN
July 2020 - October 2020
Responsible for the leadership and administration of the Community Development
Department and Planning Commission for the City of Tustin. Responsibilities include: land
use and environmental planning; historic preservation; building and safety; code
enforcement, and Community Development Block Grant.
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - PLANNING,
CITY OF TUSTIN
2013 - July 2020
Responsible for Planning Division operation. Responsibilities include: Planning Division
budget; various current planning entitlement projects, advance planning related
projects/programs including historic preservation; Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) program; General Plan amendments and annual report; Housing Element update;
Tustin Legacy development and progress report; Redhill Avenue Specific Plan; Downtown
Core Specific Plan; various code amendments; AB 2766 Program; historic preservation
program; annexation, and emergency management.
Responsible and manage Planning Commission meetings including: Agenda, staff reports,
presentations, workshops, planning educations, and historic preservations.
Acting Zoning Administrator for entitlement projects.
PRINCIPAL PLANNER, CITY OF TUSTIN
2008-2013
Responsible for the Advance and Current Planning Divisions. Reviewed and approved staff
reports to Planning Commission, code amendments, Housing Element update, Specific Plan
amendments, historic preservation, progress reports, budget, and emergency management.
SENIOR PLANNER, CITY OF TUSTIN
2006-2008
Processed entitlement projects, managed CDBG program, prepared Housing Element
update and its progress reports, code amendments, and public counter.
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Justina Willkom
ASSOCIATE PLANNER, CITY OF TUSTIN
1998-2006
Managed CDBG program, processed entitlement projects, performed technical work in
current planning including public counter, AB 2766 annual report, County Island
Annexation and various surveys.
ASSOCIATE PLANNER, CITY OF LA HABRA
1990-1998
Managed CDBG program, Mortgage Credit Certificate (MCC) program, Air Quality Program,
Housing program; processed entitlement projects; performed technical work in current
planning including public counter, survey, and GIS application.
ACHIEVEMENTS HIGHLIGHTS:
Tustin Legacy SpecificPlan. Completed major amendment to the Tustin Legacy Specific
Plan by introducing a new vision to the Tustin Legacy emphasizing connectivity and
flexibility in land use management.
Downtown Core Specific Plan. Preservation and development of the Old Town area along
the historic El Camino Real (Old Town Tustin). Completed the adoption of the Downtown
Core Specific Plan by introducing mixed use in Old Town Tustin.
Redhill Avenue Specific Plan. Completed the adoption of the Redhill Avenue Specific Plan
by introducing mixed use development to the tired Redhill Avenue corridor.
Community Development Block Grant. Oversee approximately $900,000 in CDBG annual
allocation.
SB2 Grant and Local Early Action Planning Grant. Successfully obtained over $600,000
in grant funding.
Covid-19 Temporary Use Permits. Activated the Temporary Use Permits to assist
businesses to operate outdoors during the pandemic.
EDUCATION EDUCATION CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, FULLERTON
Bachelor of Arts in Business Administration
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, FULLERTON
Certificate in Public Employee Leadership
LEADERSHIP TOMORROW
Certificate in Leadership Program
WESTCOAST AND ZUCKER SYSTEMS
Certificate in The Complete Management Course for Planning Directors
OTHER CERTIFICATES:
Emergency Management (SIMS, NIMS, ICS)
Storm Water Management (Compliance and Inspection)
California Building Officials Training Institute (Historical Building Code)
ACTIVITIES American Planning Association
Planning Directors Association, Orange County
Association Environmental Professionals
Southern California Marine Moms
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
SCOTT C. REEKSTIN
EDUCATION: California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, CA
Master of Urban and Regional Planning — June 1994.
Selected Courses: Planning Theory & Practice, Graphics, Design, Research Methods, Planning
Administration, Data Analysis, Housing, Environmental Factors, Social Planning, Implementation.
Comprehensive Examination: Passed With Honors.
Claremont McKenna College, Claremont, CA
BA in Economics and Mathematics — May 1988.
Selected Courses: Econometrics, Investments and Valuation, Marketing, Money and Banking,
International Trade, Statistical Inference, Probability, Numerical Methods, Mathematics Clinic,
Advanced Spanish Conversation. Thesis topic: Trends in the U.S. Lodging Industry.
California State University, Fullerton, CA
Certificate in Public Employee Leadership Development — February 2008
WORK
EXPERIENCE: Principal/Senior Planner, Community Development Department, City of Tustin, CA
Manage Department's Advance Planning Section personnel. Monitor budget and forecast
revenues. Develop priorities, objectives, and goals. Manage consultant contracts. Perform
complex advance planning functions, including demographics, environmental studies, and historic
preservation. October 1999 — present.
Associate/Assistant Planner, Community Development Department, City of Tustin, CA
Performed both current and advance planning work for the department. Trained staff members.
Interpreted laws and regulations pertaining to city planning. Prepared comprehensive reports,
resolutions, ordinances, and environmental analyses and presented these items to the Zoning
Administrator, Planning Commission, and City Council. Reviewed plans for compliance with
zoning, planning, subdivision, and design review standards. Interacted with the general public,
applicants, City staff, and outside agencies. Managed the comprehensive zoning code update
and business license regulations revisions. Prepared the City's Certified Local Government
Application, the MCAF Tustin grant application to the Trade and Commerce Agency, and the
Supportive Housing Grant Application to HUD. Administered the City's Housing Rehabilitation
Program, the Old Town Tustin Educational Video Project, and the Graffiti Removal Program.
Developed consultant services agreements and requests for proposals for graffiti abatement
services, and the CLG video Project. Developed the City's first Wireless Communication
Ordinance. Served as liaison to the City's Cultural Resource Advisory Committee and project
expansion to the City's Cultural Resource Overlay District. Developed City's Mills Act Program.
Prepared City's Consolidated Plan. October 1990 — October 1999.
Redevelopment Intern, Community Development Agency, City of Santa Ana, CA
Reviewed and commented on site plans for consistency with Agency goals and objectives,
advised project managers on planning issues related to redevelopment projects, acted as liaison
to the Santa Ana Council of Arts and Culture, identified commercial properties to target for
Economic Development rebate program, reviewed responses to requests for proposals,
developed Artists Live/Work Ordinance, assisted with SRO studies, advertised public meetings,
acted as the Agency's United Way representative. January 1990 — October 1990.
ACTIVITIES: Speaker, American Planning Association California State Conference, 1998.
Member, American Planning Association, 1990 — present.
Choir Singer, Orange County Master Chorale, 1989 — 1997.
Member, St. Paul's Players Community Theater Group, 1987.
SKILLS: Spanish Fluency
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Summary A unique blend of experience in the public and private sectors as a Planner for municipalities and a
registered Landscape Architect. My experience in public/private arenas has given me a unique
perspective on working with the public. As a paralegal, I honed my skills in analysis, research and
writing. I am a strong believer in continuing education and take advantage of opportunities to
improve my knowledge and skills.
Experience February 2016 — Present City of Tustin
Senior Planner
• Evaluate complex planning applications for land development or use changes including CEQA
analysis and preparation of reports and presentations to decision makers.
• Preservation Planning including analysis of proposals for rehabilitation and adaptive reuse of
historic buildings and Cultural Resources District.
• Provide guidance on developer, business and residential inquiries related to zoning
regulations, General Plan compatibility and design character.
• Draft ordinances.
• Review and approve planning applications and building permits, including Certificates of
Appropriateness for historic properties, establish conditions of approval, and draft
environmental planning documents.
• Coordinate planning activities with other City departments and outside agencies
September 2012 to February 2016
Associate Planner
City of Fullerton
• Evaluate Planning applications for land development or use changes including project and
CEQA analysis, interdepartmental coordination, preparation of staff reports, and presentation
to Planning Commission/City Council. Recent projects include four residential tracts, multi-
family housing, affordable housing, and preservation/conservation related applications, and
Zoning Code amendments.
• Assigned as Preservation Planner for Community Development Department including analysis
of proposals in preservation zones and historic downtown for compatibility with Zoning Code,
Design Guidelines and Secretary of Interiors Standards; responsible for landmark designations
and preservation zone overlays; presentations to Design Review Committee and Landmarks
Commission.
• Consult with applicants and potential applicants about process, applications, zoning regulations,
General Plan compatibility and design character for development projects.
• Provide staff support to Council -appointed Energy and Resource Management Committee.
• Coordinate and track Planning staff workflow in relation to Permit Streamlining Act deadlines.
• Perform peer -related review of work in progress and provide input on zoning code revisions.
• Plan check grading, building and landscape plans on planning projects.
September 2010 to September 2012
Assistant Planner
City of Fullerton
• Drafted Landscape/Water Conservation ordinance.
• Met with architects, builders, homeowners, etc., regarding City Planning and Zoning process.
• Analyzed projects, prepared staff reports and resolutions, and made presentations to Design
Review Committee and Planning Commission for development projects; conditional use
permits, variances, subdivisions, etc., and conducted onsite inspections before and during
construction.
March 2009 to September 2010
Planning Technician
City of Fullerton
• Provided full-time Planning/Zoning customer service at the public counter, including property
research and analysis, plan checks, zoning verification letters, and excellent customer service.
• Supervised two interns
Responded to inquiries in person, via telephone and in writing.
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
April 1997 to March 2009 David Volz Design
Landscape Architect/Project Manager
• Project manager for design, construction documents including technical specifications, and
construction management for public parks, streetscapes, and community centers.
• Supervised design and clerical team.
• Prepared project budgets, coordinated schedules, responded to RFPs & RFQs, site plans,
design concepts/construction drawings.
• Drafted technical reports (master plans, design guidelines, strategic plans, feasibility studies
and General Plan update).
• Conducted community workshops.
Education 1998 University of California, Irvine
2012 CSU, San Marcos
2014 USC School of Architecture
CSU, Fullerton
Professional California Department of Consumer Affairs
Memberships American Planning Association
California Preservation Foundation
Cert. in Landscape Architecture
Environmental Leadership Academy
Heritage Conservation Course
BA Communications, in progress
Registered Landscape Architect #4828
American Institute of Certified Planners
May 2017
Community City of Tustin, Parks & Recreation Commission 4 terms, including Chair & Vice Chair
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-IA743A3ADD90
ACTION MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING
TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION
SEPTEMBER 28,2021
SPECIAL MEETING
WALKING TOUR OF OLD TOWN TUSTIN
DEPARTING FROM TUSTIN AREA SENIOR CENTER
200 SOUTH C STREET
TOUR DESTINATIONS*
245 South C Street (Tustin Blacksmith Shop) — 5:10 PM
Corner of Main Street & C Street (Artz Building) — 5:25 PM
455 West Main Street (Minnie Child House) — 5:45 PM
420 West Main Street (Vance House) — 6:00 PM
Intersection of Main Street & El Camino Real — 6:15 to 6:30 PM
*Arrival/departure times are approximate
Start of walking tour: 5:00 p.m.
Attendance: Chair Mason, Chair Pro Tern Kozak
Commissioners Chu, Higuchi and Mello
City staff: Justina Willkom (Community Development Director), Irma
Huitron (Assistant Director), Scott Reekstin (Principal Planner) and
Elaine Dove (Senior Planner), Felipe MorfinMartinez (Administrative
Intern)
Approximately nineteen (19) attendees participated in the walking
tour.
Mr. Brian Sjoberg, Tustin Preservation Conservancy, led the walking tour.
Purpose of the meeting: The meeting was intended to highlight various historic
resources and the architectural features of a variety of styles and local history as
part of the Planning Commissioners as Historic and Cultural - Advisors training in
historic preservation in Tustin as required by the City Council.
End of walking tour: approximately 6:30 p.m.
AMYWA8,9,N
Chairperson-'-
JUSTINA L. WILLKOM
Planning Commission Secretary
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
MINUTES
VIDEO CONFERENCING
j TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING
SEPTEMBER 14, 2021
6:01 p.m. CALLED TO ORDER.
Conducted. INVOCATION: Pastor Aaron Gehlken, Central Baptist Church of Orange
County
All present. ROLL CALL: Chair Mason
Chair Pro Tem Kozak
Commissioners Chu, Higuchi, Mello
None. PUBLIC CONCERNS:
CONSENT CALENDAR:
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES —AUGUST 24, 2021
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission approve the Minutes of the August 24,
2021 Planning Commission meeting, as provided.
Hurtado Hurtado confirmed no public input was received for this item.
Motion: It was moved by Kozak, seconded by Chu, to approve the Minutes of the
August 24, 2021 Planning Commission meeting. Motion carried 5-0.
PUBLIC HEARING ITEM:
2. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (GPA) 2021-0002
(HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE)
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
ENVIRONMENTAL:
City of Tustin
300 Centennial Way
Tustin, CA 92780
City -Wide
GPA 2021-0002 is considered a "project" subject to the terms of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Pursuant to the
Minutes — Planning Commission September 14, 2021 — Page 1 of 8
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
CEQA Guidelines
Study and prepar
Element.
REQUEST:
Section 15063, the City has completed an Initial
�d a Negative Declaration for the draft Housing
GPA 2021-0002 (6th Cycle Housing Element Update)
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 4439,
recommending that the City Council adopt a Negative
Declaration for GPA 2021-0002.
2. That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 4440,
recommending that the City Council approve GPA 2021-0002,
updating the Housing Element.
Demkowicz Staff presentation given.
Higuchi Higuchi's comments included questions about the required amendment to
the Tustin Legacy Specific Plan (TLSP) for the additional units that are
proposed and if amendments are also needed for the Red Hill Avenue
Specific Plan (RHASP) and the Downtown Commercial Core Specific Plan
(DCCSP).
Demkowicz In response to Higuchi's questions regarding the RHASP and DCCSP,
Demkowicz stated that neither of those specific plans would have to be
amended being that they have already been approved for a certain number
of units. The TLSP, however, would need to be amended.
Mello Mello's comments included questions about CEQA and how the Housing
Element update is considered a "project", the differences between the
planning period and housing element cycle timeframes and which planning
period gets credited for projects approved between June 30 and October
15, 2021. Commissioner Mello also asked about the City's plan on utilizing
the 120 days from the statutory due date of October 15, 2021 and the
criteria in using large and small sites in accommodating housing for lower
income listed in the Housing Element Appendix. Mello also asked about
Tustin Legacy and the allocation of units within Neighborhood D North and
whether or not it was designated for open space or park land at one time
and if that designation had changed.
Daudt To answer Mello's question regarding CEQA, Daudt stated that the CEQA
Guidelines specifically identifies general plan amendments and updates to
be subject to CEQA review. It is case law and also implemented
guidelines.
Minutes — Planning Commission September 14, 2021 — Page 2 of 8
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Demkowicz To answer Mello's question regarding the planning period dates,
Demkowicz responded that any projects completed between July 31 and
October 15, 2021 would be counted towards the sixth cycle.
Willkom Willkom responded to Mello's question indicating the statutory deadline for
cities to adopt a housing element is October 15, 2021. Following the
Commission's recommendation to the City Council and adoption of the
document by the City Council, staff will submit the draft Housing Element
to HCD. Following the City's submittal, HCD may provide the City with
additional comments or the City may receive a certification of its Housing
Element. She indicated that at that point, the City's Housing Element
would be in compliance with the current Housing Element law. The period
of 120 days will be utilized to obtain certification of the document from
HCD.
Demkowicz To address Commissioner Mello's question regarding the criteria for using
large and small sites, the revised document includes trends of parcels of
both sizes in the surrounding area of Tustin that have been developed.
Demkowicz also stated that the City uses the default density for those sites
in determining the number of units that can be accommodated.
Willkom To further address Mello's questions, Wilikom added that the current TLSP
does not allocate or assign residential units to Neighborhood D North. The
City is proposing to amend the specific plan and assign 430 units to
Neighborhood D North. A portion of Neighborhood D North is envisioned
to have some residential units.
Mello Mello followed up regarding the conversion of open space and whether or
not there would still be open space or green space allocated within that
area.
Willkom Willkom stated that there will be some open space/ green space and public
places within Neighborhood D North. The amendment to the Tustin
Legacy Specific Plan must be completed in three (3) years. At that time,
staff will be providing the Commission and the City Council with a concept
plan/master plan of the area that demonstrates various land uses including
open space and/or public space.
Chu Chu stated that she submitted questions to City staff prior to the meeting
and she received responses quickly and thoroughly. She thanked Justina
and Irma and indicated she did not have any further questions.
Kozak Kozak thanked staff and the consultant team for preparing the report and
the comprehensive presentation for the Housing Element. He added that
the affordability and availability issues were covered. Kozak did not have
any specific questions.
Minutes — Planning Commission September 14, 2021 — Page 3 of 8
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Mason For clarification, Mason asked who the City reached out to (i.e. the
community organizations that work with lower income individuals,
underserved groups and special needs households, etc.). She also
inquired about the direct outreach to the Tustin community and the number
of mailings/emails that were sent. Mason also referred to the second
community online survey, and asked if there was a significantly higher
engagement due to there also being a Spanish language version of the
survey. She also inquired as to next steps once the Housing Element is
forwarded to the City Council for submission on October 5, 2021, the next
three (3) years and what is expected of the Commission.
Demkowicz Demkowicz stated that the City developed an expansive interested party
list for the Housing Element update process. Included on the list were
specific housing support services groups, service providers, organizations,
housing advocacy groups, housing developers within the Orange County
area, CDBG providers, outside agency lists which include neighboring
cities, utility companies, etc., and others who requested to be added to the
list for notification. Altogether, there were approximately 350+ individuals
and/or organizations. Additionally, there was an email blast that went out
and included approximately 50 individuals on a separate email interested
party list. In some cases, individuals listed may have received duplicate
notices as hard copies of notices were also mailed via USPS. Post cards
were also utilized and mailed to residents, business owners, and
community groups. For the survey, there were 194 respondents from the
first survey, and 120 respondents from the second survey which is
approximately 300 responses in total. In response to Mason's question
regarding next steps, Demkowicz stated that City staff has outlined and
provided guidance in Section IV the programs section of the Housing
Element. Within the next three (3) years, staff will be working on
implementing the programs, refining them and looking to see what types
of resources and other partnerships will need to be formed to achieve the
City's allocation and ensure that there is compliance with Fair Housing
laws. There will be a sequence of steps that will take place within this
timeframe which will include public outreach and staff analysis as the
overlay zones are created within The Tustin Market Place and Enderle
Center and the TLSP is amended.
Willkom To respond further to Mason's question regarding notification, Willkom
added that the email blast reached over 10,000 subscribers. The post card
mailings went out to over 29,000 Tustin residents and 3,400 Tustin
businesses. Willkom also stated that what was before the Commission
that evening was the policy document. The implementation action plan
includes the amendment to the Specific Plan and also the creation of
overlay zones on some of those sites identified within the report and will
be brought to the Commission within the next three (3) years. The
Minutes — Planning Commission September 14, 2021 — Page 4 of 8
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Commission will have the ability to review the zone change and Specific
Plan amendments at that time.
6:55 p.m. Opened the Public Hearing item.
Willkom Willkom stated, for the record, City staff had received written comments
(sent via email) from the Tustin Planning Partnership and the Kennedy
Commission, which was provided to the Commission prior to the meeting.
The last email was received at 6:03 p.m.
Hurtado Hurtado added that no further input had been received.
Kimberly Adams Ms. Kimberly Adams, representing the Tustin Planning Partnership (TPP)
stated that TPP had been involved in the Housing Element planning
process and hoped that their recommendations were considered and
adopted. Adams further commented that: TPP felt that the City's public
participation efforts still lacked inclusion of the underserved, that a barrier
for the development of affordable housing is opposition, the TPP agreed
with HCD findings, TPP would like the City to support decision that affect
the most vulnerable, TPP will be steadfast in their commitment to support
any proposed developments. Adams further commented that affordable
housing should be a priority. Finally commented that the TPP recommends
that the Draft Housing Element not be adopted until the appropriate
changes recommended by HCD are incorporated and for meaningful
public participation prior to adoption.
Sheena Ms. Sheena Innocente representing TPP, concurred with Ms. Adams
Innocente comments and agreed that the City should not adopt the draft Housing
Element HCD's untiil all comments are addressed. Innocente described
being a survivor of unstable housing. She stated that Tustin residents are
deserving of affordable, stable and safe housing and states she supports
inclusionary housing and equitable distribution of affordable housing
throughout Tustin. Innocente commented she would like more public
participation and more outreach to vulnerable communities. She also
spoke of SB 10 legislation and stated that she would like the City to offer
an incentive to developers who want to purchase single-family homes and
turn them into multi -family housing and that single-family homeowners who
want to convert their homes into multi -family homes should be given some
type of incentive as well. She concluded that the City should help residents
with FHA loans to incentivize that type of development and educate the
"NIMBYs" about the detrimental impacts of unstable housing for children.
Lisa Talmage Ms. Lisa Talmage representing the TPP, concurred with her colleagues'
previous statements and commented about unaffordable housing,
exclusionary zoning within the City that prevents people from living in the
City and she emphasized the need for more public participation. She
stated that the survey shows the majority of respondents were
Minutes — Planning Commission September 14, 2021 — Page 5 of 8
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Lisa Talmage homeowners and that sending surveys to organizations that serve lower-
income residents is not enough. She suggested making phone calls,_
setting up meetings, and offering a raffle.
Hurtado Hurtado confirmed no additional public input was received.
7:07 p.m. Closed the Public Hearing item. Further discussion ensued as follows.
Higuchi Per Higuchi, his final comments regarding the item generally included;
RHNA and Sacramento are being "very heavy handed" and would like the
RHNA process to be an opportunity to enhance the City of Tustin's livability
and make it a standout city from the surrounding cities. With the last
Housing Element plan, all of the housing was located in the TLSP and this
update now includes areas outside of Legacy such as Enderle Center and
The Tustin Market Place. The inclusion of The Tustin Market Place in the
Housing Element mirrors the City of Irvine's Housing Element and their
RHNA requirements. Good planning is looking ahead at how our
neighboring cities are handling their RHNA requirements, such as Santa
Ana. Santa Ana has a similar housing element site north of Red Hill
Avenue which may have been a lost opportunity on the City's end to think
about high density. He added his disappointment with the city -owned land
along Newport Avenue and the 55 Freeway not being included in the City's
suitable sites inventory along with the universal inclusion of all city -owned
land or potential surplus property, which he viewed as a lost opportunity.
Higuchi further commented on the existing train station and how he would
have liked to see higher density housing products adjacent to the station
in order to benefit from local tax credits along with density bonuses that
would have been triggered at the transit center with more uses there, (i.e.
like San Diego and Los Angeles). He concluded by commending City staff
on the project.
Mello Mello echoed what Higuchi stated previously with regards to the land near
the 55 Freeway and the transit center. Overall, he was happy with the
responsiveness from the City Council and the Commission's comments to
reallocating units. Mello stated he was in support of the overlays and the
policy document. He was supportive of finding ways of making affordable
housing available as Tustin continues to grow.
Chu Chu thanked staff for the presentation and speakers for their input. She
stated that addressing housing issues can be very challenging. Chu
indicated that while the planning will not happen right away, the
Commission does hear everyone's concerns. The Commission has to
make tough decisions and there is a deadline to meet. Chu was in support
of the draft Housing Element.
Kozak Kozak thanked staff for the excellent work on the Housing Element update
and indicated that he recognized housing is a very difficult issue to resolve
Minutes = Planning Commission September 14, 2021 — Page 6 of 8
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
to everyone's satisfaction given the restraints the City operates under. He
stated that he was in support of the recommended action to move the item
forward to the City Council.
Mason Mason thanked the speakers for their input and agreed that everybody
deserves safe and decent affordable housing. She thanked staff for their
work gathering additional input and engagement with the public throughout
the entire community. Mason concurred with Higuchi and Mello regarding
the transportation center. She commented that the City is striving for
progress versus perfection at this time. Mason indicated that she is in
support of the item and that the discussion will continue over the next three
(3) years. Mason encouraged everybody watching and who attended to
continue the conversation.
7:19 p.m. Mason re -opened the Public Hearing item since there was another
individual who wished to comment.
Cesar Mr. Cesar Covarrubias, Kennedy Commission, stated that a letter had
Covarrubias already been submitted to the Commission regarding their comments and
that the main issue continues to be the creation of new housing
opportunities, policies and programs to ensure that affordable housing
gets built, especially on the sites identified for lower income. He also
encouraged this at the sites at The Tustin Market Place and Enderle
Center.
7:20 p.m. Closed the Public Hearing.
Motion It was moved by Mello, seconded by Higuchi, to adopt Resolution Nos.
4439 and 4440, as recommended. Motion carried 5-0.
None. REGULAR BUSINESS:
STAFF CONCERNS:
Willkom Willkom recognized the hard work of both City staff and consultants on the
Housing Element. She stated that at the last Council meeting, the City
Council had the second reading on the Development Agreement/Ordinance
approving the Red Hill Avenue mixed-use project.
COMMISSION CONCERNS:
Chu Chu commended staff and said she is looking forward to meeting everybody
again.
Higuchi Higuchi thanked staff and he is looking forward to the September 28, 2021
walking tour.
Minutes — Planning Commission September 14, 2021 — Page 7 of 8
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-IA743A3ADD90
Mello Mello thanked staff for the agenda item and he looks forward to continuing
working with City staff on the item.
Kozak Kozak commended staff as well. Great road ahead of us while continuing to
implement the Housing Element and he is looking forward to working with
staff on the implementation. On August 26, 2021, Kozak participated in an
online webinar given by California Preservation Foundation (CPF). Tustin
Tiller Days will be held on October 2, 2021.
Mason Mason also participated in the online webinar held by CPF on August 26,
2021. She was unable to participate on the September 9, 2021 parking
meeting and requested an access to the link to the meeting, if available.
Mason closed the meeting in honor of the 20th anniversary of 9/11. She
recognized all of those who served our country and those serving in the
Middle East. A reminder to all to appreciate the military service men and
women.
7:26 p.m. ADJOURNMENT:
The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission is scheduled for
Tuesday, September 28, 2021.
JU&INA L. VVILLKOM
k7
Planning Commission Secretary
Minutes — Planning commission September 14, 2021 — Page 8 of 8
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
MINUTES
VIDEO CONFERENCING
TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING
AUGUST 24, 2021
6:00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER:
All present. ROLL CALL: Chair Mason
Chair Pro Tem Kozak
Commissioners Chu, Higuchi, and Mello
None. PUBLIC CONCERNS:
CONSENT CALENDAR:
Approved the 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES —AUGUST 10, 2021
Minutes of the
August 10,
2021 Planning
Commission
meeting, as
amended.
RECOMMENDATION:
ITEM #1
That the Planning Commission approve the Minutes of the August 10,
2021 Planning Commission meeting, as provided.
Motion: It was moved by Mello, seconded by Kozak, to approve the Minutes of the
August 10, 2021 Planning Commission meeting, as amended. Motion carried
5-0.
PUBLIC HEARING ITEM:
Adopted Reso. 2. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP (TPM) 2021-115/SUBDIVISION (SUB)
No. 4438. 2021-0002
APPLICANT: Jake Lappert
DRC Engineering
160 S. Old Springs Road, Suite 210
Anaheim, CA 92808
PROPERTY
OWNER: Nikki Kazanawa
Kunkou, LLC.
609 Deep Valley Drive, Suite 200
Rolling Hills Estate, CA 90274
Minutes — Planning Commission August 24, 2021 — Page 1 of 4
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
LOCATION: 15041-15121 Newport Avenue
ENVIRONMENTAL:
This project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to Sections 15315
(Class 15) of Title 14, Chapter 3 of the California Code of Regulations
(Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act) pertaining to
minor land divisions.
REQUEST:
TPM 2021-115/ SUB 2021-0002 for the subdivision of an existing
1.76 -acre commercial parcel into two (2) separate lots for
conveyance purposes only. No new construction nor demolition
proposed.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 4438 approving
TPM 2021-115 and SUB 2021-0002, authorizing the subdivision of
an existing 1.76 -acre commercial parcel into two (2) separate lots for
conveyance purposes only.
Maldonado Presentation given.
Higuchi Higuchi asked if the proposed TPM was in compliance with the recorded
CC&R's and easements.
Maldonado In response to Higuchi's question, Maldonado confirmed that during the
review process, that aspect of the subdivision was analyzed by the City
attorney and it was determined that per the existing agreements (CC&R's),
the City would not need to record additional documents to preserve the
existing agreements. City staff would not need to record any additional
documents.
Mello Mello commended Maldonado's great presentation! All of his questions
were already answered during the presentation.
Chu Chu did not have any questions or concerns. She also commended
Maldonado on his presentation and welcomed him to Tustin.
Kozak Kozak echoed his fellow Commissioners' kudos to Maldonado. Great
presentation Jorge! He asked if there had been any expression of interest
of developing the northerly new parcel.
Minutes — Planning Commission August 24, 2021 — Page 2 of 4
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Maldonado In response to Kozak's question, Maldonado stated that staff was not aware
of any interest at this time. As of this week, no users or buyers had been
identified.
6:14 p.m. Opened the Public Hearing.
Jake Lappert The applicant, Jake Lappert, thanked Maldonado for a great presentation!
He also confirmed there is still no proposed buyer or development plan for
the northerly parcel.
6:15 p.m. Closed the Public Hearing.
Motion: It was moved by Chu, seconded by Higuchi, to adopt Resolution No. 4438.
Motion carried 5-0.
REGULAR BUSINESS:
Training 3. PLANNING COMMISSION TRAINING ON ENTITLEMENT TYPES,
received. CEQA AND DECISION-MAKING PROCESS
Daudt Presentation given.
STAFF CONCERNS:
Willkom No concerns.
COMMISSION CONCERNS:
Mello In the future, Mello suggested allowing more time for the Commission to
review the larger meeting packets.
Higuchi Higuchi encouraged the Commission to look at the League of California Cities
website for information provided in the previous training. He also asked staff
for an update on Tustin Meadows as a follow-up to his inquiry at the previous
Commission meeting.
Willkom Willkom stated there would be an update on the Tustin Meadows at a future
Commission meeting.
Chu Chu did not have any concerns.
Kozak Kozak again welcomed Maldonado to the City of Tustin and he commended
Daudt for the training.
Mason Mason also commended staff and Daudt for the training. She also welcomed
Maldonado to the City of Tustin.
Minutes — Planning Commission August 24, 2021 — Page 3 of 4
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
7:37 p.m. ADJOURNMENT:
The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission is scheduled for
Tuesday, September 14, 2021.
D/o/pc_u-Signedby-
AMY MASON
DocuSigned by: Chairperson
uu -. Ow,
ED45DA2623B54A5...
JUSTINA L. WILLKOM
Planning Commission Secretary
Minutes — Planning Commission August 24, 2021 — Page 4 of 4
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
MINUTES
VIDEO CONFERENCING
TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING
AUGUST 10, 2021
6:04 p.m. CALL TO ORDER: 6:00 p.m.
Given. INVOCATION: Reverend Ken Suhr, Aldersgate United Methodist Church
All present. ROLL CALL: Chair Mason
Chair Pro Tem Kozak
Commissioners Chu, Higuchi, and Mello
None. PUBLIC CONCERNS:
CONSENT CALENDAR:
Approved the 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES —JULY 27, 2021
Minutes of the July
27, 2021 Planning
Commission
meeting.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission approve the Minutes of the July 27,
2021 Planning Commission meeting, as provided.
Motion: It was moved by Kozak, seconded by Mello, to approve the Minutes of the
July 27, 2021 Planning Commission meeting. Motion carried: 5-0.
None. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS.
REGULAR BUSINESS:
Adopted the 2021 2. 2021 CITYWIDE HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY UPDATE
City of Tustin HRS REPORT
Update Report and
authorized the
Community
Development
Director to make
minor
modifications to
the final survey
report and forward
the report to the
City Council.
Minutes — Planning Commission August 10, 2021 — Page 1 of 8
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
The City's Historic Resources Survey (HRS) was originally
prepared in 1990 and was last updated in 2003. The survey update
is being prepared with the assistance of Architectural Resources
Group (ARG), a consulting firm with extensive preservation
planning experience. The Survey is now complete, subject to
minor modifications, and includes a historic context statement and
survey findings.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission, acting as the
HCRA, adopt the 2021 City of Tustin Citywide Historic Resources
Survey Update Report and authorize the Community Development
Director to make minor modifications to the final survey report and
forward the report to the City Council.
Dove Presentation given.
Mello Mello asked what resources ARG utilized regarding the historical context
statement. He also asked if more outreach to the community will be
conducted.
Mary Ringhoff In response to Mello's question, Ms. Mary Ringhoff, ARG, stated the
following, in general: resources included the previous surveys (i.e. Carol
Jordan, columns from the Historical Society and Tustin Preservation
Conservancy, secondary sources); several dates came from First American
Title Company online database, Orange County GIS Data, including historic
aerial photographs, historic photographs through the Orange County
Archives, members of the community and all of the newspaper articles found
via Newspapers.com; per the outreach, there is one (1) individual they are
still trying to obtain information from but overall, ARG is complete with their
outreach; and due to COVID-19, could not meet community members in-
person.
Higuchi Higuchi's questions/concerns generally included: if the report moves forward
to the City Council, what action would they be taking? ARG outlined
recommended next steps — what would those next steps be if the report is
adopted? Per the recommended action — ARG is recommending that the
City amend the ordinance to reduce the number of eligibility criteria - would
that be further detailed in the revised report or is there any further information
with the criteria we would be losing?
Willkom Per Willkom, if the report goes forward to the City Council, they will receive
and file the report. She reminded the Commission that staff is not asking the
City Council to adopt or designate any of the historic resources, it is just a
survey inventory for City staff to use and for the public and property owners
to utilize when they are proposing any improvements to their homes. If the
Commission adopts the survey, what is left for City staff to do is for ARG to
Minutes — Planning Commission August 10, 2021 — Page 2 of 8
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Willkom refine the survey then complete the DPR Forms which will have each of the
historic resources' detailed information (i.e. the significance of the resources,
character defining features, classification, category the historic resource
qualifies under, and other detailed information that is required for CLGs).
Then, City staff will upload the database to the City's website for the public
to access. The GIS map will be connected to the database as well. With the
completion of the survey, there may be some resources that will be dropped
off from the survey inventory and some that would be added.
Chu Chu asked staff if this survey overview would count towards the HCRA
training hours.
Willkom Willkom confirmed this survey overview does count towards the HCRA
training hours.
Kozak Kozak commended ARG and Dove for their hard work on this item. Very
thorough update of the historic resources survey. Kozak was in support of
the recommended action.
Mason Mason also commended staff and ARG for all of their hard work on this
historic resources survey. She requested the Planning Commission receive
a copy of what is sent to the City Council upon completion.
Hurtado Hurtado confirmed no public comments received.
Higuchi Higuchi expressed the importance and seriousness of historic and cultural
resources. His comments generally included: would like the Commission to
be very cognizant and aware when deciding to adopt the survey, it could be
taken out of context and used for other projects; with respect to Tustin, the
pillars of historic Tustin listing agricultural roots (i.e. Cox's Market & Arvida's
Book Store, and Old Town, MCAS); the survey potentially identifies multiple
historic resources (i.e. Tustin Meadows and the adjoining properties such as
the mobile home parks); how are they potentially a historic resource?; mobile
home parks are aesthetically unpleasing, although he was in support of
preserving them for affordable housing; did not understand the need to
designate every mobile home park or manufactured housing park as
potentially historic; he did not see how they contribute to the history in Tustin;
and Higuchi requested the opportunity to continue the item to the next
meeting in order to allow more time to review the item.
Daudt Since Higuchi asked for the opportunity to make a motion to continue the
item, Daudt asked the Commission if there was a second on that motion then
the Commission would take a vote or discuss the matter. Depending on the
outcome of the vote, the Commission can entertain additional motions or that
can be the final vote on the matter.
Minutes — Planning Commission August 10, 2021 — Page 3 of 8
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Mason Mason invited the other Commissioners to comment on Higuchi's proposal
and/or give him the opportunity to make a motion.
Willkom Willkom asked Mason if she would like staff to address Higuchi's
comments/concerns. Mason affirmed.
Mary Ringhoff In response to Higuchi's concerns with the mobile home parks being
included in the survey, Ringhoff stated the following, in general: there was a
revision ARG made to the findings after the July revision due to a
conversation with the City where it was decided that any newly identified
properties (i.e. mobile home parks) would be given a 7R Status code which
means identified in reconnaissance survey but not evaluated; these are
properties flagged for the future research, but they are not being called
eligible at this point; the reason why ARG identified the mobile home parks
is because in the research/analysis ARG conducted, they found that the
mobile home parks were actually pretty important in the post-war residential
development history in Tustin; this is when the population was growing
rapidly, the groves were becoming residential subdivisions but there still was
not enough housing for people; the reason why the City had to put together
this ordinance to restrict mobile home parks was because they were popping
up everywhere because people needed a place to live and everyone wanted
to live in Tustin; at this point, they are unevaluated and they are being
flagged; in the future, if somebody does more research on these properties,
they may find that mobile home parks are eligible, or they may find they are
not; ARG is confident the Sutliff Trailer Park is eligible, which was originally
the Hannaford Trailer Park located on West First Street and was established
in the 1940's before the end of World War II; Tustin Meadows was not
recommended as a potential historic district, but as a Planning District which
carries no weight, in terms of CEQA, or any other kind of compliance; it is a
way for ARG to tell the Planning Department "this is an area that is very
consistent", in terms of property types (i.e. scale of the building, general
setbacks, planning features, etc.) and to alert the Community Development
Department that this is an area that is a very distinctive place, not necessarily
historic, but to keep in mind for future planning.
Higuchi Higuchi asked if the homes in Tustin Meadows are subject to CC&R's or
HOA.
Mello Mello is a resident of Tustin Meadows and he confirmed there are CC&R's
and an HOA in Tustin Meadows. He was not aware of what it meant to be
an eligible property or a planned community. If designated as a planned
community will there be any impact to the HOA and would the HOA go to the
City for any changes to maintenance updates (i.e. light fixture changes, brick
veneers to the exterior of the community)? All properties being considered
as eligible properties, would there be a follow up investigation or further
public outreach?
Minutes — Planning Commission August 10, 2021 — Page 4 of 8
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Willkom In response to Mello's comments, Willkom stated the following, in general:
any exterior improvements will need to go through the Planning Division to
review the proposed improvements for compatibility with the character or
style of the building; regardless of whether the property has historic value or
designation, included in the survey or not; with respect to Tustin Meadows,
the survey does not designate any of the properties within Tustin Meadows
as historic; as far as the Planning District, it is not being suggested for the
Commission to adopt the area as a Planning District at this time, this is just
to alert staff and the community of the nature of the area; Tustin Meadows is
the first Irvine Company project, the first master planned community in
Orange County; if there is an interest to include Tustin Meadows as a historic
district or Planning District, there would need to be additional studies and
analysis; then staff would need to bring the item to the Commission for
consideration and potentially adoption; the resources and areas that ARG
has studied were all recommendations for inclusion within the survey update;
at this time staff is not proposing for the Commission to officially designate
any of the identified properties as historic resources; what is being asked of
the Commission is to adopt the survey inventory; and any designation will
need to be done separately or any adoption or expansion of the historic
district would be a separate action.
Mason Mason's questions to Willkom generally included: to confirm that this item is
a survey of all of the properties in the designated area; when staff says the
property is eligible, it does not change any process and/or procedure that
would occur when it comes to preservation in the areas identified; if further
research is needed to be done with Tustin Meadows, would that hinder the
Commission adopting this survey or is that something that would be a
separate work stream following the adoption of the survey; and the last
survey was done in 2003 - what was the reason for the large gap of time?
Willkom Willkom's response to Mason's questions generally included: when a
property is identified as eligible for State or Federal designation, that means
that potentially the property owner could file with the State or Federal offices
to designate their property as a landmark; at this time, the Tustin Meadows
is identified only as a potential Planning District; the adoption of the survey
is not going to designate Tustin Meadows as a Planning District or any of the
properties within it as a Historic Resource; and the reason for the large gap
between surveys is due to the cost and not being successful with obtaining
grants.
Daudt Daudt agreed with Willkom's assessment. The approval of the survey does
not do anything to change the characteristic of the neighborhood, in terms of
a planning approach or historical designation. That would require a separate
route of approvals by the City.
Minutes — Planning Commission August 10, 2021 — Page 5 of 8
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Chu Chu agreed with staff that adopting the survey would not change the status
of the properties. She reiterated that the Community Development Director
has the ability to make minor changes to the survey and staff and ARG are
not completely done with the survey. Chu was ready to move forward with
the adoption of the survey.
Higuchi Higuchi asked Ms. Ringhoff about Appendix C (Master Findings Map) within
the report and the three (3) color identifications. He asked about Ms.
Ringhoff's comment earlier stating that the report would be revised to
designate the mobile home parks as a further study category. Will the
Historic Resources Master Findings Map be updated as well? With respect
to identification of Tustin Meadows as a Planning District, he asked for an
example locally where a historic survey identified an area as a Planning
District and what came of that? Higuchi also asked Ms. Ringhoff about any
recent surveys identifying post-war subdivisions as potentially eligible or as
areas that need further study. He asked staff about the history of Tustin
Meadows being identified as a master planned community. Higuchi asked
for clarification: the plan is to amend Appendix C (Master Findings Map). If
so, he suggested the Commission should wait to adopt the survey.
Ms. Ringhoff [The Master Finds Map] does not just identify the mobile home parks but all
of the newly identified properties (both individual and districts) which were
identified in the reconnaissance survey and that were not identified in 1990
or 2003 surveys. All of those get the unevaluated code and are
recommended for further study and they are all on the findings map as newly
identified properties. At the request of the City, ARG will be making the
revisions by assigning different color codes to districts versus individual
properties. Several of ARG's city-wide surveys elsewhere have
recommended areas for special consideration in planning. For example,
Redlands conducted a context statement only, not a survey. ARG has done
surveys in San Marino and Los Angeles where they have recommended
areas as Planning Districts. Typically, the historic research finds they are
historically significant but they do not retain sufficient physical integrity to
convey that significance or to convey their association with historic events or
patterns of development. Some cities create an overlay zone or a specific
plan to address future development in those areas. ARG did identify nine
(9) or ten (10) potential historic districts, but as they are newly identified, they
are considered unevaluated. This was a big difference between this survey
and the previous survey. ARG was looking at everything up to 1976 to
capture the post-war development.
1St Motion: It was moved by Higuchi, seconded by Mello, to continue the item to the next
meeting. Motion failed 2-3. Chu, Kozak and Mason dissented.
Kozak Kozak asked that there be a review and better understanding of the Planning
Districts and bring back to the Commission for consideration.
Minutes — Planning Commission August 10, 2021 — Page 6 of 8
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Willkom Willkom clarified Kozak's intention, in that, only if the area is being proposed
to be adopted as a Planning District, then staff would need to bring the item
back to the Planning Commission.
Daudt Daudt understood the motion to approve staff's recommendation and adopt
the survey, but there is the direction embedded in the Commission's action
which is to return to the Planning Commission with information concerning
the Planning Districts once the report goes to the City Council. If the
Commission does want to communicate with the City Council, in terms of
reporting actions, he asked the Commissioners to identify they are speaking
on behalf of themselves, either as a resident of Tustin, or as an individual
member of the Planning Commission rather than a representative to speak
on behalf of the majority of the Planning Commission when they do go before
the City Council.
Willkom Willkom's point of clarification was, any of the recommendations for potential
historic district expansion or designation of a planning district could not be
acted on without the Planning Commission's separate consideration.
Willkom reiterated that the item before the Commission is a survey inventory
of potential historic resources. There is no designation included in the survey
if the Commission is to adopt the item. There is no expansion of the district.
There is no designation of the planning district in any shape or form proposed
with the adoption of the survey.
2nd Motion: It was moved by Chu, seconded by Mason, to adopt the 2021 City of Tustin
City-wide Historic Resources Survey Update Report and authorize the
Community Development Director to make minor modifications to the final
survey report and forward the report to the City Council. Motion carried 4-1.
Higuchi dissented.
STAFF CONCERNS:
Willkom Willkom reminded the Commission of the Chili Cook -Off on August 15, 2021
from 11:00 a.m. — 6:00 p.m.
COMMISSION CONCERNS:
Mello Mello had no concerns.
Higuchi See you at the Cook -off!
Chu Chu thanked staff for tonight's meeting/training. She completed the six (6)
hours of HCRA training!
Kozak Many thanks to staff and consultants for the work and report. This is an
important step in moving forward with Tustin's history. Kozak attended the
July 28, 2021 Concerts in the Park (Queen Nation). Looking forward to the
37th Annual Street Fair and Chili Cook -off in Old Town and traffic signal
Minutes — Planning Commission August 10, 2021 — Page 7 of 8
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Kozak cabinet wrap on Red Hill Avenue. Additional cabinet wrap sponsorships can
be arranged by calling (714) 573-3326.
Mason Mason commended the great survey that was completed. A lot of difficult
decisions ahead of this community, but this is a great start on where we go
from here! Thanks to ARG and staff.
7:30 p.m. ADJOURNMENT:
The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission is scheduled for
Tuesday, August 24, 2021.
DocuSigned by:
uu -. O��
ED45DA2623B54A5...
JUSTINA L. WILLKOM
Planning Commission Secretary
D/o/pc_u-Signed67y:
D3273B6DS9SA43D._.
AMY MASON
Chairperson
Minutes — Planning Commission August 10, 2021 — Page 8 of 8
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
MINUTES
VIDEO CONFERENCING
TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING
JULY 27, 2021
6:04 p.m. CALL TO ORDER: 6:00 p.m.
Given. INVOCATION: Reverend Ken Suhr, Aldersgate Methodist Church
All present. ROLL CALL: Chair Mason
Chair Pro Tem Kozak
Commissioners Chu, Higuchi, and Mello
None. PUBLIC CONCERNS:
CONSENT CALENDAR:
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES —JUNE 22, 2021
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission approve the Minutes of the June 22, 2021
Planning Commission meeting, as provided.
Motion: It was moved by Higuchi, seconded by Chu, to approve the Minutes of the June
22, 2021 Planning Commission meeting. Motion carried 5-0.
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS:
Adopted Reso. 2. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2021-0010 AND SIGN CODE
No. 4434. EXCEPTION (SCE) 2021-0001
APPLICANT:
James P. Caiopoulos
Galaxy Oil Company
303 N. Placentia, Suite D
Fullerton, CA 92831
PROPERTY OWNER:
Geoff Moore
Mutual Liquid Gas & Equipment Co.,
I nc.
17117 S. Broadway
Gardena, CA 90248
LOCATION: 1001 Edinger Avenue
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS:
This project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to Section 15301 (Class 1)
of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Minutes — Planning Commission July 27, 2021 — Page 1 of 8
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
REQUEST:
A request to amend the Mutual Propane Plaza Master Sign Plan to
include changeable gas pricing copy and a Sign Code Exception (SCE)
for static wayfinding text on existing LED sign within Mutual Propane
Plaza.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 4434 approving
CUP 2021-0010 to authorize an amendment of the Master Sign Plan for
Mutual Propane Plaza for the addition of changeable gas pricing copy
on the existing LED monument sign and a SCE for the addition of static
wayfinding copy on the existing LED freeway freestanding sign.
Newton Presentation given.
Chu Chu's comments generally included: Sign Type F and the black background
versus the monument sign background being gray — could they be matching in
color (i.e. either both gray or both black).
Kozak Kozak made favorable comments on the sign and stated the sign will help the
Edinger Avenue off -ramp. He was in support of the item.
6:28 p.m. Opened the Public Hearing.
Mr. James P. In response to Chu's comments on the color of the sign background, James P.
Caiopoulos Caiopoulos, the applicant, stated that the colors of the 76 sign are the required
colors. The freeway sign background can be changed which he was considering
changing. The software engineers can re -do the sign colors if that is what the
Commission wants. Mr. Caiopoulos commended Newton on the work done on
the project. He also thanked the Commission for their support on the project. He
mentioned this site being the highest producing site and that he has received a
lot of positive comments with regards to the wayfinding portion of the site. Mr.
Caiopoulos also discussed the monument sign and the need for dual displays, or
the ability to change the sign to reflect pricing. This site is the only gas station
that has four (4) specific prices for fuel.
6:34 p.m. Closed the Public Hearing.
Mason Mason commended staff in working with the applicant on this project. She was
in support of the item.
Motion: It was moved by Kozak, seconded by Chu, to adopt Resolution No. 4434. Motion
carried 5-0.
Minutes — Planning Commission July 27, 2021 — Page 2 of 8
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Adopted Reso. 3. DESIGN REVIEW (DR) 2021-0002; DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
Nos. 4435 and (DA) 2021-0001; SUBDIVISION (SUB) 2021-0001/VESTING
4436. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 17822; 20% DENSITY BONUS;
CONCESSION/INCENTIVE FOR A REDUCTION IN PRIVATE AND
COMMON OPEN SPACE AND A WAIVER OF PARK FEES FOR
AFFORDABLE UNITS
APPLICANT:
Craig Swanson
Irvine Asset Group, LLC
4000 Mac Arthur Blvd., #600
Newport Beach, CA 92660
PROPERTY OWNER:
WASL Tustin Investors V LLC
c/o Irvine Asset Group, LLC
4000 Mac Arthur Blvd., #600
Newport Beach, CA 92660
LOCATION: 13751 & 13841 Red Hill Avenue
ENVIRONMENTAL:
An addendum to the RHASP Final Program EIR (FPEIR) has been
prepared for this project. An addendum is appropriate pursuant to State
CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 because none of the conditions
identified in Section 15162 that would trigger the need to prepare a
subsequent or supplemental EIR has occurred and because the project is
a later activity within the scope of the RHASP FPEIR pursuant to Section
15168.
REQUESTS/RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 4435,
recommending that the City Council approve the Addendum to the
FPEIR for DR 2021-0002, DA 2021-0001, SUB 2021-0001, a twenty
(20) percent Density Bonus, a concession/incentive for a reduction in
the required amounts of common and private open space, and a
waiver of the payment of required park fees for the six (6) affordable
units.
2. That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 4436,
recommending that the City Council approve:
1. DR 2021-0002 for the design and site layout of a new mixed-use
project consisting of 137 residential units including six (6)
affordable residential units, 7,000 square feet of retail commercial
space, at -grade parking containing 227 parking spaces, and
associated improvements;
2. DA 2021-0001 to facilitate the development of the site and to
provide public benefits to the City;
Minutes — Planning Commission July 27, 2021 — Page 3 of 8
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
3. SUB 2021-0001/VTTM No. 17822 for commercial condominium,
merger, and re -subdivision purposes;
4. Density Bonus of twenty (20) percent to authorize an additional
twenty-three (23) residential units;
5. Concession/incentive for a reduction of the required amounts of
common and private open space; and
6. Waiver of the payment of park fees for the six (6) affordable units.
Demkowicz Presentation given.
Chu Chu requested clarification regarding Resolution No. 4436 and the applicant
having the option to convert the property from leasing to for -sale units. Chu asked
under what circumstances would the applicant exercise the option to convert from
lease to sale.
Mr. Craig Per applicant, Mr. Swanson, the subdivision map will allow the applicant, to return
Swanson in the future and request permission to convert the project to condominium units.
He indicated that it is not contemplated to take place immediately and that it
would be in a number of years. He indicated that the legal framework
surrounding for -sale condominium units of this nature are such that it is very
difficult and that discussion on that would be postponed for approximately five (5)
to ten (10) years.
Higuchi Higuchi thanked staff for a thorough presentation.
Me//o Mello commended staff on the presentation. His comments generally included:
clarification regarding the six (6) affordable units driving the density bonus as well
as the reduction in the required parking spaces; the garage units — how are they
assigned and what are the size of the garages? If a prospective tenant has more
than one (1) car or a larger vehicle, and it did not fit in the garage, what would be
the alternative in terms of finding parking?
Swanson Swanson clarified Mello's comments regarding the density bonus and the
required parking spaces.
Huitron Huitron's response, per Mello's questions, generally included: the garages,
Huitron stated that the minimum size, per the TCC, ten (10) by twenty (20)
internal dimensions and would be verified by staff during the plan check process;
assignment of the parking spaces —the Parking Management Plan (PMP)
specifies there would be a certain limit of number of spaces that could be
assigned to individual units. The PMP would handle the tenants parking spaces
along with accommodating tenants' personal vehicles (not work vehicles). The
City would also monitor on a quarterly basis, along with the applicant per the
PMP.
Minutes — Planning Commission July 27, 2021 — Page 4 of 8
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Mason Mason mentioned the twelve (12) spaces on -street parking and asked if these
on -street parking is time limited parking? Will the parking be metered? She
asked when the street widening would take place. Mason also asked if the
commercial parking and the retail outlets were closed, would they be available
for guests and residents. Mason asked if this the highest building within the
RHASP.
Demkowicz In response to Mason's previous questions, Demkowicz stated that the time
would be limited and restricted so one would not be able to park on the street for
a long period of time.
Nishikawa Nishikawa also responded to Mason's questions related to Redhill Avenue
widening and stated that at this time there are three (3) lanes, in both directions,
on Red Hill Avenue even with the added on -street parking. At this time, the peak
volumes do not require Redhill Avenue to be widen. If in the future, there needs
to be a street widening, City staff will address it then. The capacity for three (3)
lanes is approximately 50,000 average daily trips at the average speed limit.
Even with the buildout of the Specific Plan, the average is approximately 30,000
daily trips.
Willkom Willkom also stated that this project will be the tallest building within the Red Hill
Avenue Specific Plan corridor.
7.10 p.m. Opened the Public Hearing Item.
Scott Mr. Scott Couchman spoke in favor of the mixed-use concept but opposed further
Couchman decimating Tustin High School neighborhood with more cars parked on the
streets. He was also concerned with insufficient off-street parking and the project
access from San Juan Street. Mr. Couchman indicated that he received the same
answer from the City Council that the project meets the parking requirement. Mr.
Couchman also voiced his concern that the garages would be used for storage
and not for cars. He did not agree with the proposed parking plan.
Neil Sherman Mr. Neil Sherman, lives at the south end of Red Hill Corridor, and voiced his
concern with the lack of appropriate parking, which is currently an issue with
parking coming down from Newport Avenue onto the Red Hill Avenue corridor
area. Also indicated the potential need to increase parking spaces for residents
particularly during street sweeping.
Charles Mr. Charles McKenna, Old Town resident, generally commented as follows: it is
McKenna not residents who live at the project site as their primary residence, who add to
parking and traffic problems, but will mostly come from the commuters; the staff
report addressed the parking adequately; he was in support of the project; need
new high quality development to bring improvement to the Red Hill Corridor; will
bring permanent residents to the community, vibrancy, improvement over vacant
lots and blight; and essential to improving overall what Tustin has to offer.
Minutes — Planning Commission July 27, 2021 — Page 5 of 8
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
7.25 p.m. Closed the Public Hearing.
Mason Mason asked if there will there be regulations on how the parking garages will be
used? Mason recommended garage use be shared with the City Council.
Willkom In response to all of the parking comments previously mentioned, Willkom
reminded the Commission of the reciprocal parking within the commercial and
residential uses. Although the City cannot require many more parking spaces
than what density bonus law provides, the applicant has provided assurances in
providing the parking study which encompasses a variety of uses at different
peak hours. The parking study concluded that during the weekday peak hours,
there are approximately forty-one (41) surplus spaces available and during the
weekend hours, there are forty-two (42) surplus spaces available. In addition,
the parking study did not include the twelve (12) additional spaces on -street
parking along Red Hill Avenue, which are additional spaces on top of the 227
parking spaces the project proposed. The applicant also included the parking
management plan in which the applicant will regulate how parking spaces are
assigned to each unit and the forty-one (41) and forty-two (42) surplus spaces
within the weekdays or weekends, the surplus can also be assigned to the
residents, should there be a need for more than one (1) parking space. Willkom
stated staff can add Mason's recommendation to the parking management plan.
Also, the TCC states that garages must be used for storing of vehicles, not
storage of personal items.
Swanson Swanson stated that with past projects, the garages typically will have windows
in order for the operations team to monitor the garages to ensure they are being
used for vehicle parking and not for storage. The tenants will have ample amount
of storage spaces as the project is designed with storage units.
Chu Chu's comments generally included: other cities are experiencing parking issues;
suggested building parking structures; encourage "walk -only" after certain hours
of the day to make it easier for residents to get around; and she suggested accent
colors (i.e. orange, red) to the development.
Mello Mello commended the project. He wished the City had transit systems or
alternate transportation systems and an allowance for one (1) to one and one
half (1.5) parking spaces per unit. With his past experience of developing high
density buildings, he was concerned with the parking management plan (i.e.
forcing residents to park elsewhere) and concern of the overflow onto San Juan
Street.
Higuchi Higuchi disclosed he met with Craig Swanson prior to the meeting to discuss the
project. He thanked staff for the thorough presentation and the applicant for their
high-quality project. Higuchi's final comments generally included: the property is
zoned for residential, subject to California State Density Bonus laws, did not think
there was a lot of room with respect to allowing residential project that is
leveraging density bonus laws to deny a project based on parking; he jogs around
Minutes — Planning Commission July 27, 2021 — Page 6 of 8
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Higuchi Green Valley where there is currently a parking issue and underutilization of
garage space; during a Tustin High football game, there may be an issue with
parking; most apartments in Tustin do not have a parking management program;
he mentioned regulating cars license plates; the economic benefit of this project -
low -income housing need and this project will take care of the blighted area; he
spoke of the economic benefits of the project and clarified some of the fees that
would be paid by the developer being significant; in support of the item; and he
commended staff and the applicant for the great outreach of this project item.
Daudt Daudt confirmed that due to the State law, the City is required to apply the State
mandated parking ratio to the residential units in this project. With respect to the
commercial component, staff has applied the City's own commercial parking ratio
to balance site with parking.
Nishikawa In response to Higuchi's comments, the City is currently looking at an overall
residential permit parking with Dixon Management (consultant) and one (1) Zoom
meeting has already been held with another meeting being held in September.
The City has received a lot of input already from the community with permit
parking in various areas of the city. All public streets in Tustin are being looked
at and the project is moving forward quickly.
Kozak Kozak made favorable comments for housing in this area on this vacant site. He
added that this project can be an example of what can be accomplished in other
difficult sites that need housing. He was in support of the item.
Mason Mason's final comments generally included: State mandated parking, staff and
applicant worked hard on moving this project forward; reality is, parking is already
an issue in Tustin; well thought out project; nice addition to the area; need more
housing; mixed-use is bringing a bright light to the area; making the city walk-
able; and she was in support of this project.
Mello Mello's final comments generally included: he did not necessarily agree with the
State mandate. He understands the City is going in the right direction but difficult
for him to support an item if there is going to be a problem. He was not in support
of the project.
Motion: It was moved by Higuchi, seconded by Chu to adopt Resolution Nos. 4435 and
4436. Motion carried: 4-1. Mello dissented.
Willkom Per Willkom, this item will be going to the City Council on August 17, 2021 and
will be re -noticed. The speakers will be notified via the information provided on
the Request to Speak forms.
None. REGULAR BUSINESS:
Minutes — Planning Commission July 27, 2021 — Page 7 of 8
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
STAFF CONCERNS:
Willkom Willkom reminded the Commission of the Old Town Tustin Re -Opening Event
July 29, 2021 from 4:00-9:00 p.m. and to please check emails from Elaine Dove
regarding upcoming Historic Preservation Training.
COMMISSION CONCERNS:
Higuchi Higuchi attended the Sip n' Stroll on July 17, 2021. He provided a shout out to
Arvida Books. The Chili Cook -Off takes place on August 15, 2021.
Mello Mello thanked everybody for the great dialogue and great projects. He attended
Sheriff Don Barnes briefing on July 20, 2021 who mentioned the long-term lease
in Tustin and the real time crime center coming soon to Tustin.
Chu Chu thanked staff for a wonderful job with the presentations and all of the hard
work put into the items.
Kozak Kozak thanked staff for the excellent work done on the Red Hill project and
working with the developer to bring the proposal to the Commission and the City
Council. He participated in the following events -
7/1 -
vents:
7/1: Tustin Planning Commission Briefing (virtually)
• 7/4: Fourth of July Event at Tustin High School
• Concerts in the Park (Wednesdays)
• 7/17: Old Town Sip n' Stroll
• 7/20: OCTA Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting
Mason Mason closed the meeting in honor of her Father, Phil Kavanaugh, MD, who
passed away on July 1, 2021. Many condolences to the entire Kavanaugh family.
7.54pm ADJOURNMENT:
The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission is scheduled for
Tuesday, August 10, 2021.
DocuSigned by:
uu -. O��
ED45DA2623B54A5...
JUSTINA L. WILLKOM
Planning Commission Secretary
D/o/pc_u-Signed67y:
D3273B6DS9SA43D._.
AMY MASON
Chairperson
Minutes — Planning Commission July 27, 2021 — Page 8 of 8
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
MINUTES
VIDEO CONFERENCING
TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING
JUNE 22, 2021
6:04 p.m. CALLED TO ORDER.
Given. INVOCATION: Pastor Fred Snider, Grace Harbor Church
All present. ROLL CALL: Chair Mason
Chair Pro Tem Kozak
Commissioners Chu, Higuchi, and Mello
None. PUBLIC CONCERNS:
Hurtado Hurtado confirmed no public input was received.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
Hurtado Hurtado confirmed no public input was received.
Approved the 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES —JUNE 8, 2021
Minutes of the June
8, 2021 Planning
Commission
meeting.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission approve the Minutes of the June 8,
2021 Planning Commission meeting, as provided.
Motion: It was moved by Mello, seconded by Kozak, to approve the Minutes of the
June 8, 2021 Planning Commission meeting, as provided. Motion carried
5-0.
PUBLIC HEARING:
Adopted Reso. No. 2. DESIGN REVIEW (DR) 2021-0005 & CONDITIONAL USE
4433, as amended. PERMIT (CUP) 2021-0007
APPLICANT:
PROPERTY OWNER:
Matthew Baca
Sam Kermanian
ALDI Inc., Moreno Valley Division
ICO Investment Group, Inc.
12661 Aldi Place
9301 Wilshire Blvd., #315
Moreno Valley, CA 92555
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
Minutes — Planning Commission June 22, 2021 — Page 1 of 5
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
LOCATION: 1091 Old Irvine Boulevard
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS:
This project is Categorically Exempt (Class 1) pursuant to Section
15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act.
REQUEST:
A request to remodel a vacant commercial building into a multi -
tenant commercial building, including exterior fagade renovations
and parking lot improvements; and establish joint -use parking
among tenants.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 4433 for DR
2021-0005, approving the remodel of a vacant commercial
building into a multi -tenant commercial building, including exterior
facade renovations and parking lot improvements; and CUP
2021-0007, to establish joint -use parking among shopping center
tenants.
Aguilar Presentation given.
Mello Mello's questions/comments generally included: whether the developer
would be required to underground the utilities along Old Irvine Blvd. orjust
within the project site; favorable comments regarding the design
perspective, and inquired about the difference between the mid-century
modern look to the main building and the contemporary look of the other
two (2) tenant spaces; inquired whether alternative transportation
methods for employees is required, asked about reciprocal easements for
parking during peak hours with the adjacent site; and requested that the
applicant possibly install extra bike racks.
Aguilar Aguilar stated that undergrounding of the utilities would only be required
within the property, per the standard condition that all future utilities within
the property will need to be underground and that it will not affect the
utilities outside of the property. Aguilar also stated that the intent of the
design was to provide a more contemporary look for the shopping center
as a whole, and the design is also consistent with other designs for the
ALDI chain.
Huitron Huitron's comments generally included: the design review process by
staff, indicated that the project's materials are compatible across the
building even though there might be different architectural features;
employee bike rack - alternate transportation methods are not a
Minutes — Planning Commission June 22, 2021 — Page 2 of 5
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Huitron requirement for a remodel project and the applicant can voluntarily offer
transportation services for their employees; reciprocal parking is not
required for the project and the parking study indicated that during non -
December peak hours, the applicant would be able to accommodate the
parking demand on-site.
Kozak Kozak made favorable comments regarding the landscaping plans, reuse
of the vacant lot, and that ALDI will provide shopping alternatives.
Chu Chu also made favorable comments regarding the contemporary look, the
project filling the vacant lot, ALDI's organic products, and she was also in
favor of the project.
Higuchi Higuchi's comments/questions generally included: shopping cart
collection process; concern with unsecured trash enclosures; and
questioned why the applicant is attracted to Tustin.
Mason Mason's comments/questions generally included: parking; development
on an empty lot; employee parking (alternative transportation options for
employees); and asked how shopping carts would be collected.
Applicant Mr. Matthew Baca's response to the Commission's questions/comments
generally included: bike racks (2 bike racks are being provided) at the front
elevation near the entrance, while still meeting the ADA requirements. He
indicated that they can add two (2) additional bike racks at the front of the
property to allow for customer or employee bicycle parking; with regard to
shopping cart collection — customers deposit a quarter to retrieve a cart
and get a refund upon returning the cart which results in adequate
shopping cart collection; he indicated that ALDI is excited to come to
Tustin and that the area has always been a major draw for the applicant;
in regards to parking — he indicated that the applicant feels confident that
they will provide adequate parking and that the parking analysis was
provided within the report which identified December as the peak month
for holiday shopping and they are confident there will not be a parking
shortage; if there is a need down the line for additional bike racks, ALDI
will oblige and provide more. Further, it was clarified that there are already
four (4) employee/customer bike racks shown on the site plan and he will
look to see if any additional bike racks can be added. With regards to
reciprocal parking with adjacent property owners — he indicated that the
applicant did not feel it was necessary, and further added that there was
interest from a potential sub -tenant which would have triggered a higher
parking count, and that they reached out to an adjoining property owner
but there was no interest in providing shared parking. Finally, he stated
that sufficient parking will be provided on the project site.
Minutes — Planning Commission June 22, 2021 — Page 3 of 5
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Mr. Frank Barrera Mr. Frank Barrera, KOA Corporation, conducted the parking study and his
comments generally included: the uses at the site (grocery store and retail)
are based on the demand of those uses during the day and based on the
ITE rates they used, they found that most of the year the parking supply,
proposed at 141, will be sufficient to accommodate the parking demand of
the grocery store plus the other uses; he indicated that there could be
some deficiencies during December, but overall the rest of the year, based
on the analysis, there should not be any parking issues on the site.
Willkom Willkom referred to Condition No. 3.2 of Resolution No. 4433, which
includes a provision, should there be a problem with parking in the future,
the City can bring the applicant back to review the parking analysis and to
ask for the applicant to address the problem.
Hurtado Hurtado confirmed there was no public input received.
Mello Mello thanked the applicant for clarifying the comments/concerns and he
was also in support of the project.
Motion: It was moved by Chu, seconded by Kozak, to adopt Resolution No. 4433,
as amended. Motion carried 5-0.
None. REGULAR BUSINESS.
STAFF CONCERNS:
Willkom Willkom shared a Parks and Recreation invitation with the Commission
regarding the 4t" of July event (July 4, 2021) at Tustin High School at 5:00
p.m. Upcoming Public Works Workshop for Residential Permit Parking is
scheduled for July 7, 2021 at 6:00 p.m. via Zoom and Public Works staff
will be sending emails and direct mail to all interested parties.
COMMISSION CONCERNS:
Higuchi No concerns or comments.
Mello Mello thanked Aguilar and staff for the presentation.
Chu Chu thanked staff for a wonderful job. She also attended the
groundbreaking at St. Cecilia Church on Saturday, June 20, 2021.
Kozak Kozak thanked staff and the applicant for their hard work with this project.
Mason Mason wished all of the fathers out there a HAPPY FATHER'S DAY! And
Welcome to ALDI!
Minutes — Planning Commission June 22, 2021 — Page 4 of 5
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
6:47pm ADJOURNMENT:
The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission is scheduled for
Tuesday, July 13, 2021.
D/o/pc_u-Signedby-
AMY MASON
Chairperson
DocuSigned by:
-4. O��
ED45DA2623B54A5...
JUSTINA L. WILLKOM
Planning Commission Secretary
Minutes — Planning Commission June 22, 2021 — Page 5 of 5
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
MINUTES
VIDEO CONFERENCING
TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING
JUNE 8, 2021
6:00 p.m. CALLED TO ORDER.
Given. INVOCATION: Chair Mason
All present. ROLL CALL: Chair Mason
Chair Pro Tem Kozak
Commissioners Chu, Higuchi, and Mello
None. PUBLIC CONCERNS
CONSENT CALENDAR:
Hurtado Hurtado confirmed there was no public input.
Approved the 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES —MAY 25, 2021
May 25, 2021
Minutes.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission approve the Minutes of the May 25, 2021
Planning Commission meeting, as provided.
Motion: It was moved by Chu, seconded by Mello, to approve the Minutes of the May
25, 2021 Planning Commission meeting. Motion carried 5-0.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
Adopted 2. ZONE CHANGE (ZC) 2020-0001
Reso. Nos.
4429 & 4430.
APPLICANT: PROPERTY OWNER:
Seth Hiromura Steve Benos
Steelwave LLC GVI-SW Bell Owner, LLC
3335 Susan Street, #250 900 N. Michigan Ave., #1450
Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Chicago, IL 60611
LOCATION: 1382 BELL AVENUE
Minutes — Planning Commission June 8, 2021 —III'°3 a g e 11
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
ENVIRONMENTAL:
A Negative Declaration (ND) has been prepared in accordance with the
provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Article 6 of
California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3.
REQUEST:
To rezone the property located at 1382 Bell Avenue from PC -IND
District to PC-IND/BUS Zoning District.
2. Apply the Tustin City Code parking standards for offices exceeding
25,000 square feet.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission:
1. Adopt Resolution No. 4429 recommending that the City Council
find that the Negative Declaration prepared for ZC 2020-0001 is
adequate for the proposed project.
2. Adopt Resolution No. 4430 recommending that the City Council
adopt Ordinance No. 1514 for ZC 2020-0001 to change the zoning
designation of 1382 Bell Avenue from PC -IND to PC-IND/BUS and
to apply the Tustin City Code parking standards for offices exceeding
25,000 square feet.
Beier Presentation given.
Kozak Kozak asked for clarification on the occupancy of the building and the length of
the lease with the Sheriff's Technical Division.
Beier Staff has been informed that the lease is intended to be long-term and it is a
private agreement between the property owner and the County as a tenant.
Since the lease is a separate action, it does not directly link to the zone change
presented to the Commission.
W/o Mello asked for clarification between the Traffic Analysis' level of service (LOS)
versus VMT (Vehicle Miles Traveled) and which one the City uses since the City
does not have any adopted (VMT) guidelines.
Reekstin In response to Mello's clarification question, Reekstin stated that the City uses
VMT thresholds and LOS in analyzing potential traffic impacts in the
environmental analysis for the project.
Minutes — Planning Commission June 8, 2021 —III'°3 a g e 12
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Hurtado Hurtado confirmed public input was not received regarding this item.
Motion: It was moved by Chu, seconded by Higuchi, to adopt Resolution Nos. 4429 and
4430. Motion carried 5-0.
Adopted 3. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2021-0008; DESIGN REVIEW
Reso. No. (DR) 2021-0006
4432.
APPLICANT: PROPERTY OWNER:
Dino Romeo Charlie Christensen
Smartlink Group Public Storage Properties IV, Ltd.
3300 Irvine Avenue, #300 701 Western Avenue
Newport Beach, CA 92660 Glendale, CA 91201
LOCATION: 14861 Franklin Avenue
ENVIRONMENTAL:
This project is exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) Section 15303 — New Construction or Conversion of Small
Structures.
REQUEST:
To construct and operate a stealth major wireless communication facility
consisting of a sixty (60) foot high mono -eucalyptus with associated
equipment contained within a storage unit adjacent to the mono -
eucalyptus facility.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 4432 approving
CUP 2021-0008 and DR 2021-0006, to construct and operate a sixty (60)
foot high major wireless communication facility consisting of a stealth
mono -eucalyptus and associated equipment contained within a storage
unit adjacent to the mono -eucalyptus facility.
Dove Presentation given.
Mr. Romeo The applicant, Dino Romeo, also provided a presentation.
Chu Chu asked staff about the lease terms of the existing wireless facility and the
remaining number of years on the lease. She also asked the applicant to clarify
the reasons AT&T is not able to co -locate. Chu asked for clarifications on the
following: 1) ATT&T currently does not have a master lease agreement and is it
possible for AT&T to obtain a master lease agreement now?; 2) why the mono -
Minutes — Planning Commission June 8, 2021 —III'°3 a g e 13
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
palm is not co -locatable; 3) the branches of the mono -palm only cover the top
of the antenna and why AT&T would not be able to screen new antennas; and
4) the height that would be available to AT&T and why it would not be sufficient
to fill the coverage gap. In the event AT&T is able to work out an agreement
and the current mono -palm is not able to serve the needs of AT&T, and if there
is a mono -eucalyptus facility, can AT&T accommodate another carrier?
Willkom Per Willkom, staff would need to research the information regarding the
remaining years of the lease and provide a response to the Commission.
Romeo Romeo's response to Chu's question on the master lease agreement (that is not
in place for the mono -palm) is that it would be between AT&T and SBA towers.
He further explained that Nextel is a subsidiary of Sprint and they are located on
the tower, but they do not own the tower. The tower company that owns that
tower is SBA and currently AT&T and SBA do not have a master license
agreement (on a nationwide level). They have been in communications for the
last year, but unfortunately, no agreement is in place and nothing has been
filtered down to the Los Angeles market at this time. Romeo also mentioned, in
terms of the priority of those reasons Chu mentioned as to why AT&T cannot
co -locate, it is not primarily because of the master lease agreement. The height
is not tall enough to fill the gap in coverage. The two (2) main pillars of the
zoning for his team are: (1) can it fill the gap in coverage? and (2) Is it the least
obtrusive means? For the site in question, the mono -palm is approximately sixty
(60) to sixty-five (65) feet in height and there are separation requirements such
that AT&T needs ten (10) feet below the bottom of the carrier above before they
can add their antennas. The Nextel antennas are approximately fifty (50) feet
above ground. The highest AT&T would be able to place their antennas, is at
forty (40) feet which is not high enough to fill the gap in coverage. Currently, the
height is sixty (60) feet for the mono -eucalyptus. The forty (40) feet above
ground location on the mono -palm would not work. The mono -eucalyptus is
better to co -locate on because the branches extend all the way down to fifteen
(15) feet above grade and allows another carrier to co -locate without defeating
concealment measures thus meeting the City's stealth requirements. Whereas
with the mono -palm, they would not meet the City's requirements.
Higuchi Per Higuchi, in alignment with the Strategic Plan passed by the City Council, he
stated he was supportive of communication facilities.
Mello Mello asked staff if the City currently has a tree ordinance requiring a permit prior
to removal of any trees. He also asked if there is any requirement ever to add
trees to the landscape plan to provide additional screening or does the City not
consider this normally. He commended staff and the applicant for the
presentations.
Minutes — Planning Commission June 8, 2021 —III'°3 a g e 14
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Dove In response to Mello's questions, Dove stated the following, in general: The City
does not have a tree ordinance; however, the City would not allow any type of
commercial or industrial use to remove landscaping without providing a
landscape plan ahead of time and the City would not want to see any trees
removed. The trees on Tustin Ranch Road are City trees and the only trees that
might be trimmed would be the pine trees on the site. If the applicant was going
to make changes to the landscaping, they would have to ask the City first. The
City would not be supportive of tree removal. If the mono -eucalyptus is
approved, the City would want those trees to remain. The City probably would
require adding trees to the landscape plan if there was not a decent level of tree
coverage. There is not a lot of room to add trees along the Tustin Ranch side
due to the many utilities on the elevation and some trees that are planted. Dove
said she did not feel the City would need to require the applicant provide trees
for this application, but in other situations, the City very well might.
Mason Mason asked about the maintenance of the stealth eucalyptus (i.e. how often is
it inspected to ensure that it is maintaining its stealth characteristics amidst the
building?). She also mentioned the public's concerns with radio frequency
emissions (to ensure that prior to and post installation testing is done). Mason
asked for an overview of what was learned from Commissioner Mello's question.
Romeo In response to Mason's questions, Romeo stated that AT&T typically maintains
their sites twice a month, along with a utility coordinator on-site once every six
(6) weeks to run the generator (back-up power source).
Reekstin In response to Mason's last question, Reekstin stated that Federal law does not
allow the City to regulate these types of facilities based on any types of
emissions, but there is a condition that requires testing. In general, well known
organizations have determined that radio frequency emissions are not harmful
to the public. Reekstin added that some members of the public have expressed
their concerns, but it has been determined that there are no impacts to the public
and also the distance of this facility, in particular, from many sensitive uses,
would also mitigate that.
Chu Chu referred to the eleven (11) letters mailed to residents of the Peppertree
community and if there were any responses received by City staff. She indicated
that she went to the American Cancer Society website and searched information
on radio frequencies and she felt there was not enough information to determine
there is no harm to the human body by the radio frequencies. Chu would like to
see just one (1) facility at this location, not two (2) and for the old mono -palm
facility to be terminated.
Dove Dove confirmed there were no responses received from the Peppertree
community.
Minutes — Planning Commission June 8, 2021 —III'°3 a g e 15
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Daudt In response to Chu's concerns, Daudt reiterated Reekstin's previous comments
in that the Commission is pre-empted, under Federal law, from considering any
potential health impacts from radio frequency emissions. The issue is certainly
subject to debate, but as far as what the Commission's task is, it is a land use
matter and as long as the applicant is meeting the Federal Government's
guidelines, that is the beginning and the end of the Commission's consideration
of potential impacts related to the radio frequency emissions.
Hurtado Hurtado confirmed public input was not received regarding this item.
Motion: It was moved by Mason, seconded by Higuchi, to adopt Resolution No. 4432.
Motion carried 4-1. Chu opposed the item.
None. REGULAR BUSINESS
STAFF CONCERNS:
Willkom None.
COMMISSION CONCERNS:
Chu Chu had no concerns. She thanked staff for their thorough presentations.
Mello Mello had no concerns. He thanked staff for facilitating these conversations and
helping the Commission with providing responses to issues of concern. Mello
attended the Memorial Day Remembrance at Veterans Park.
Higuchi Higuchi attended the Tustin Area Man and Woman of the Year event at the
Santa Ana Elks Lodge on June 4, 2021.
Kozak Kozak thanked staff for the meeting agenda items. He participated in the Tustin
Police Department Virtual Open House on June 5, 2021. Many thanks to all of
TPD for keeping the community safe.
Mason No concerns.
7:04 p.m. ADJOURNMENT:
The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission is scheduled for
Tuesday, June 22, 2021.
Minutes — Planning Commission June 8, 2021 —III'°3 a g e 16
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
DocuSigned by:
D327366D898A43D...
AMY MASON
Chairperson
DocuSigned by:
(�u 0 In)iQ�,c
ED45DA2623654A5...
JUSTINA L. WILLKOM
Planning Commission Secretary
Minutes — Planning Commission June 8, 2021 —III'°3 a g e 17
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
MINUTES
VIDEO CONFERENCING
TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING
MAY 25, 2021
6:01 p.m. CALLED TO ORDER.
Given. INVOCATION: Mello
All present. ROLL CALL: Chair Mason
Chair Pro Tem Kozak
Commissioners Chu, Higuchi, and Mello
None. PUBLIC CONCERNS:
CONSENT CALENDAR:
Approved the 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — MAY 11, 2021
Minutes of
the May 11,
2021
meeting, as
amended.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission approve the Minutes of the May 11, 2021
Planning Commission meeting, as provided.
Mello Mello clarified he attended the BIA meeting virtually, not in person.
Motion: It was moved by Kozak, seconded by Chu, to approve the Minutes of the May 11,
2021 Planning Commission meeting, as amended. Motion carried 5-0.
None. PUBLIC HEARING.
REGULAR BUSINESS:
Received & 2. SUMMARY OF PROJECTS
riled.
A summary of projects and activities focuses on the status of projects that
the Planning Commission, Zoning Administrator, or staff approved; major
improvement projects; Certificates of Appropriateness; Code Enforcement
activities; and, other items which may be of interest to the Commission.
Minutes — Planning Commission May 25, 2021 — Page 1 of 5
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission receive and file the report.
DiLeva Presentation given.
Kozak Kozak commended DiLeva for an excellent report. He also made favorable
comments to the City for reaching out to those in need with regards to the assistance
programs mentioned in the presentation.
Mello Mello also commended DiLeva for a great presentation. He asked if any houses of
worship took advantage of the temporary use permit program. Mello also asked
how the criteria is established for the Community Development Director to make a
determination on what constitutes a Cultural Resource and are there guidelines or
parameters set by an outside professional or legislative body.
Huitron Huitron stated, in response to Mello's question, that the only businesses that took
advantage of the temporary outdoor expansions (temporary use permit) were
fitness centers, personal services, and the majority were restaurants and further
stated that places of worship had not obtained a permit from the City.
Reekstin Reekstin added, that the Tustin City Code provides the specific criteria that needs
to be met when a Cultural Resource is designated (i.e. if the resource is identified
with a historical figure or if the resource is identified with an architectural style, it can
be designated). The Cultural Resource needs to meet one of those criteria in order
to be designated and the designation of a Cultural Resource is done by the City
Council.
Chu Chu asked staff about the Certificate of Appropriateness — she referred to the rating
5131 (local listing) S3 (national listing) and what would make a property rate as
"national". She also thanked DiLeva for her presentation and commended the City
of Tustin for the many programs available to the community. Chu voiced her
concern with the graffiti issue and what could be done to get involved with the Tustin
Police Department (TPD) to resolve the issue.
Mason Mason asked if there were particular steps being made by TPD to mitigate the graffiti
issue.
Reekstin In response to Chu's question on the rating, Reekstin stated that there are many
different criteria that are looked at when evaluating a resource to determine its
significance: 1) Integrity — and how well it conveys its significance. Some properties
may have been significant but the property may have been altered so significantly
that they lose some of their significance); 2) Uniqueness of architectural style; 3)
The builder or architect of the building; and 4) Who may have lived or worked in the
building. He added that just because it is listed on the National Register does not
Minutes — Planning Commission May 25, 2021 — Page 2 of 5
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Reekstin mean it has to have "national" significance, it may but it also might have regional or
local significance.
Willkom In response to Chu and Mason's question regarding mitigating the graffiti issue,
each graffiti incident is handled by the City's contractor who will take photos of the
graffiti and share them with the TPD and Code Enforcement staff to further
investigate. City staff does ensure the City contractor is notified immediately in
order to remove the reported graffiti. TPD believes that due to juveniles being home
during the pandemic, that it could have contributed to the rise in graffiti. City staff is
hopeful the amount of graffiti lessens once the juveniles are back to school in-
person.
Higuchi Higuchi thanked DiLeva for her presentation. Based upon the Strategic Plan
approved by the City Council, he is looking forward to a longer project list next year.
Mason Mason thanked City staff for their hard work and to the many businesses for making
our community a vibrant and thriving one. Also, for the work that has been done,
very rapidly, during the pandemic. Mason also thanked DiLeva for her presentation.
Received and filed.
Adopted 3. FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2021-2022 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Resolution (CIP) FINDING OF CONFORMANCE WITH THE GENERAL PLAN
No. 4431.
Under Section 65401 of the California Government Code, the Planning
Commission is to review the list of proposed public works projects
recommended for planning, initiation or construction during the ensuing
year and report to the City Council as to conformity with the General Plan.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 4431 finding the
proposed FY 2021-2022 CIP in conformance with the General Plan pursuant
to Section 65401 of the California Government Code.
Nishikawa Nishikawa introduced himself to the new members of the Commission. He provided
an outline of the agenda report - to ensure it is in conformity with the General Plan.
Mello Mello's comments/questions generally included: Capital Improvement Projects and
how they are determined and how they made the list; private developers (i.e.
Brookfield and SchoolsFirst) and their requirements for the CIPs since they are
required to make improvements off-site and to set up maintenance facilities for
ongoing maintenance and how that correlates with their obligation versus the City's
obligation to fund improvements associated with their work.
Minutes — Planning Commission May 25, 2021 — Page 3 of 5
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Nishikawa Nishikawa's response to Mello's question generally included: 1) many of the items
come from the City's annual maintenance review (i.e. annual roadway maintenance
project - the city is broken up into 7 zones and maintenance rotates through those
zones, which is ongoing); parks facilities; buildings - the City will have certain items
that come up for updates/upgrades; 2) projects through the Strategic Plan process
— City Council will have priorities that come up and will take precedence (i.e. Tustin
Legacy, Old Town); 3) Specific Plan areas (i.e. Downtown Commercial Core Plan —
to make the area more walkable, more pedestrian -friendly) several projects such as
Main St. improvements and parklets were derived from the DCCP; Redhill Avenue
Specific Plan (i.e. medians); 4) development projects (i.e. SchoolsFirst Credit Union
CIP project — new median, traffic signal, driveway facilities); 5) outside agencies —
new standards City staff has to address (i.e. stormwater management - CIP) certain
improvements have to be worked on; ADA accessibility issues (i.e. upgrade PED
push buttons, ramps); environmental discharge issues — groundwater pollution; CIP
projects (i.e. new well). In response to Mello's second question, SchoolsFirst — half
of the median and traffic signal is the cost responsibility of SchoolsFirst and the
other half is the City's responsibility. In terms of doing the project, the City has their
own CIP that covers the City's cost which the City has been taking care of on a
reimbursement basis with SchoolsFirst. Brookfield also has their own
responsibilities as far as infrastructure. Anything above and beyond that impacts
City facilities and/or properties or the major roadways would be a CIP for the City.
Chu Chu referred to the chart in the agenda report and the categories. What kind of
project would fall under the category of "growth management'?
Nishikawa Per Nishikawa, for Public Works, there are not too many items that would fall under
that category. Currently, Public Works is not working on anything classified as
growth management.
Willkom In response to Chu's question, growth management would be more of a planning
related project. City staff would take a look at cumulative development impacts
occurring in the City as well as adjacent cities.
Higuchi Higuchi asked Nishikawa if he was optimistic if the CIP project list would expand
based upon Federal legislation. More specifically, the South Hangar rehabilitation
Phase 1.
Nishikawa Nishikawa's response to Higuchi generally included: using Federal funding for
infrastructure is more difficult to use than State funding. Currently, City staff is trying
to improve the infrastructure of the South Hangar and are working on plans (i.e.
permanent power, upgrading the sewer), which would all help to get better capacity
for events and open the South Hangar up to more uses.
Motion: It was moved by Mello, seconded by Kozak, to adopt Resolution No. 4431. Motion
carried 5-0.
Minutes — Planning Commission May 25, 2021 — Page 4 of 5
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
STAFF CONCERNS:
Willkom No concerns.
COMMISSION CONCERNS:
Higuchi No concerns. Higuchi thanked City staff for tonight's presentations.
Mello Mello thanked staff for tonight's discussion and presentation. He would like to learn
more about the Tustin Legacy. He is hopeful, with children going back to school the
graffiti issue will lessen.
Chu Chu made favorable comments to City staff for their hard work.
Kozak Kozak also made favorable comments to City staff for tonight's presentations. On
May 11, 2021, he participated in the virtual City Council/Planning Commission
Workshop and on May 12, 2021 the City's Strategic Plan Workshop.
Mason Mason also participated in the City Council/Planning Commission Workshop and
the City's Strategic Plan Workshop.
6:51 p.m. ADJOURNMENT:
The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission is scheduled for Tuesday,
June 8, 2021.
DocuSigned by:
D327366D898A43D...
AMY MASON
Chairperson
DocuSigned by:
4.
nQ&ow�c54A5.
JUSTINA
L. WILLKOM
Planning Commission Secretary
Minutes — Planning Commission May 25, 2021 — Page 5 of 5
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
MINUTES
VIDEO CONFERENCING
TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING
MAY 11, 2021
Meeting start time delayed due to the 5:00 p.m. City Council/Planning
Commission Workshop ending at 6:50 p.m.
7:05 p.m. CALLED TO ORDER.
Given. INVOCATION: Mason
All present. ROLL CALL: Chair Mason
Chair Pro Tem Kozak
Commissioners Chu, Higuchi, and Mello
PUBLIC CONCERNS:
Ben Savill Mr. Ben Savill, founder and CEO of a local Tustin non-profit organization,
commented on the following, in general: he participated in the previous City
Council/Planning Commission Workshop, which covered the Housing Element
Update; affordable housing and ways of buying single-family homes to provide
"shared housing" vs. larger housing developments; the City should consider
small non -profits, wealthy individuals, local investors, on ways to help meet the
City's obligations on the fair housing rules, special needs, low-income and very -
low income families; the City should consider creative ways to incentivize
homeowners with ADU's and non -profits to buy houses in the City to help the
City meet its obligations; and he requested the City host a stakeholder's meeting
for these types of individuals and non -profits.
Approved the CONSENT CALENDAR:
Consent
Calendar.
Approved the 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES —APRIL 27, 2021
Minutes of
April 27,
2021.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission approve the Minutes of the April 27, 2021
Planning Commission meeting, as provided.
Motion: It was moved by Higuchi, seconded by Kozak, to approve the Minutes of the
April 27, 2021 Planning Commission meeting, as provided. Motion carried 5-0.
None. PUBLIC HEARING
Minutes — Planning Commission May 11, 2021 — Page 1 of 5
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
REGULAR BUSINESS:
Received & 2. ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS — RECENT LEGISLATION
Ned.
The City Attorney's office will provide an overview of the recent ADU state
law updates and steps the City will need to take to bring the TCC into
compliance with new state ADU requirements.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission receive and file the report.
Huitron/Daudt Huitron provided a brief description regarding the goal of the presentation, which
was to inform the Commission of the different types of ADU's, along with recent
legislation. Daudt's presentation included information regarding ADU Recent
Legislation and Huitron's presentation covered ADU (Draft) Design Guidelines.
Higuchi Higuchi asked Willkom if the Cities of Orange enacted a moratorium related to
ADUs and if there were any updates, to please provide to the Commission.
Willkom Willkom mentioned the Cities of Orange have had a temporary moratorium while
staff was preparing new ADU regulations. She and staff will check the status,
on whether or not the new ADU regulations were adopted, then she will provide
a response to the Commission at a later date.
Mello Mello asked if the JADU's have to be within the existing footprint and if they have
to have their own egress independent of the house.
Daudt In response to Mello's questions, Daudt stated "yes to both". They must be
entirely contained within the footprint of the existing single-family home with
independent exterior access.
Mello Mello reiterated the response provided by Daudt.
Chu Chu asked staff what would be considered a short-term rental. She asked
Huitron if the City will include any incentives for the ADU's and if information
would be included regarding incentives for ADU's or JADU's.
Daudt Per Daudt, a short-term rental is identified as being 30 days or less — a monthly
tenancy required at the very least.
Huitron Per Huitron, one of the major incentives is already built into the State legislation
and will be integrated into the City's Code which provide that any ADU unit 800
square feet or less and less than sixteen (16) feet in height is required to be
ministerially approved. She mentioned SCAG is also looking at ways for cities
to work together to streamline the creation of ADU's by having plans that are
ready for any homeowner to use. Staff will continue to explore that option and
Minutes — Planning Commission May 11, 2021 — Page 2 of 5
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Huitron will provide that information on our City website if that becomes an available
option.
Kozak Kozak asked about the current level of ADU requests the City is experiencing.
Reekstin In response to Kozak's question, Reekstin stated that the City has been
processing approximately ten (10) ADU's in the last two (2) years (2019-2020).
Some are still in the process but that is approximately how many were submitted
to the City in each year. Some residents take longer to construct the ADU's and
the City tracks them through the process.
Mason Mason asked about the JADU and ADUs: if a resident lives on a parking permit
street, would a resident qualify for an on -street parking permit? She wanted to
understand parking from the standpoint of multiple people living at one (1)
residence.
Daudt An ADU would be exempt from any new parking requirements as the parking
exemptions from State law apply. Under any of the City's new parking programs
it would likely open to an individual who resides in an ADU.
Willkom Willkom added that the current City permit parking is open to both single-family
and multi -family zoned homes.
Mello Mello referred to the earlier comment Huitron made regarding the 800 square
feet being ministerially processed, specifically the limitation of 750 square feet
not having to pay impact fees. If the City followed the 800 square foot
ministerially processing, would the impact fees then apply on that unit or would
they be forced to go with the 750 square feet to avoid impact fees? He also
asked about the deed restriction on the owner occupancy for the JADU's and if
the City has any mechanisms to actually enforce the deed restriction (i.e. a
person could claim they are owner occupied, then move out and have renters
renting).
Huitron In response to Mello's questions, Huitron stated that it would only apply to the
50 square feet - so they would only pay impact fees on the square footage over
750 square feet.
Daudt In response to Mello's last question, Daudt stated that it could form a basis for
an enforcement action from the City. Notifying any prospective purchasers so
they understand their expectations when they buy the property that they are
expected to live there and not turn around and rent out the JADU. There were
similar provisions included for ADU's historically. Daudt indicated that he would
not be surprised if in the future State legislation eliminated covenant
requirements for JADU's as well.
Savill Savill's comments/concerns generally included: incentives for homeowners who
do develop ADU's or JADU's to make them available to lower income residents
within the community; he would like the City to consider the possibility of non -
Minutes — Planning Commission May 11, 2021 — Page 3 of 5
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Savill profits owning single-family homes in the city, in the future, in order to provide
shelter housing or affordable housing; if the City is recommending owner
occupancy requirements, he would like the City to recommend that non-profit
owners be excluded from occupancy requirements; he requested all non-profit
organizations be exempt from any impact fees; and he asked the Commission
to look at this from the perspective of a renter or essential worker and think
creatively on how the City can incentivize more affordable housing for essential
workers and people with disabilities.
Received and filed.
Received & 3. 2021 LEGISLATIVE UPDATE
filed.
Staff will be providing an update on pertinent State legislation that was
adopted in 2020 and pending legislation related to Community
Development that is being monitored in 2021.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission receive and file the report.
Reekstin Presentation given. Reekstin expressed his appreciation to Martinez and
Maldonado for assisting with gathering information for the presentation and the
item.
Mason Mason gave kudos to Reekstin for the presentation.
Higuchi Higuchi asked about SB 1851 Religious "affiliated housing developments" and
wanted clarification if a religious institution were to move forward with the
housing development on their property, would they still be subject to zoning
requirements or if there is a "by right" entitlement to build housing on their
property.
Reekstin In response to Higuchi's question, Reekstin stated SB 1851 would allow reduced
parking requirements for housing developed on those sites but he would have
to investigate further on whether a housing development would require a zoning
amendment or not. Once more information is gathered, Reekstin will
disseminate it to the Commissioners.
Mello No comments.
Chu No concerns. Great presentation Scott!
Kozak Kozak thanked staff for the presentations.
Savill Savill's comments generally included: he mentioned hearing about low-income
tenants facing eviction when their housing was taken over by a private
developers; and with regard to mobile homes, hotels, motels in Tustin being sold
Minutes — Planning Commission May 11, 2021 — Page 4 of 5
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Savill to developers — he asked if the Commission could recommend to the City
instituting some sort of rule or ordinance (i.e. affordable housing) , that the
residents and/or local non -profits be given 60-90 days to raise the funds to match
the purchase price of the developer and thus maintain the building or the
affordable housing.
Received and filed.
STAFF CONCERNS:
Willkom Willkom reminded the Commission of the City Council's 2nd part of the Strategic
Plan Workshop tomorrow at 4:15 p.m.
COMMISSION CONCERNS:
Chu None.
Mello Thanked staff for all the information provided. He shared information from a BIA
meeting he attended (virtually) regarding Orange County Opportunities and
Lessons with the Commission, more specifically, collaboration between the City
Council and the Planning Commission with people who want to do business with
the City of Tustin. Thanked everyone for his appointment.
Higuchi Higuchi expressed his gratitude for his appointment on the Planning
Commission. Honor to serve my community!
Kozak Kozak thanked staff for tonight's items. Job well done!
Mason Mason attended the Tustin Police Officers Association's Rock n' Brews
fundraiser. She also thanked staff for working so hard on tonight's items.
8:30 p.m. ADJOURNMENT:
The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission is scheduled for
Tuesday, May 25, 2021.
DocuSigned by:
-4. O��
ED45DA2623B54A5...
JUSTINA L. WILLKOM
Planning Commission Secretary
D/o/pc_u-Signed67y:
D3273B6DS9SA43D._.
AMY MASON
Chairperson
Minutes — Planning Commission May 11, 2021 — Page 5 of 5
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
MINUTES
VIDEO CONFERENCING
TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING
APRIL 27, 2021
6:01 p.m. CALL TO ORDER:
Given. INVOCATION: Chu
SEATING OF COMMISSIONERS KOZAK, HIGUCHI AND MELLO
Mayor Clark The installation of Commissioner Kozak, Higuchi and Mello was
conducted by Mayor Clark. The Mayor congratulated the newly
appointed Commissioners and re -appointed Commissioner Kozak.
Planning 1. PLANNING COMMISSION REORGANIZATION 2021
Commission
reorganized.
In accordance with the Planning Commission Policies and Procedures
adopted on April 13, 2021, the Planning Commission reorganizes around
April of each year by appointing a new Chairperson and Chairperson Pro
Tem.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission elect a Chairperson and Chairperson Pro
Tem in accordance with the procedures outlined in Section 1, Part E of the
Planning Commission Policies and Procedures.
Motion: Chair Pro Tem Kozak nominated the re -appointment of Chair Mason
as Chairperson. Commissioner Higuchi seconded the nomination.
Hurtado conducted a roll call vote. Motion carried: 5-0.
Motion: Chu nominated the re -appointment of Kozak as Chair Pro Tem.
Commissioner Mello seconded the nomination. Hurtado conducted
a roll call vote. Motion carried: 5-0.
All present ROLL CALL: Chair Mason
Chair Pro Tem Kozak
Commissioners Chu, Higuchi, and Mello
None. PUBLIC CONCERNS:
CONSENT CALENDAR:
Minutes — Planning Commission April 27, 2021 — Page 1 of 8
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Approved 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES —APRIL 13, 2021
the Minutes
of April 13,
2021.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission approve the Minutes of April 13, 2021
Planning Commission meeting, as provided.
Motion: It was moved by Mason, seconded by Kozak, to approve the Minutes
of April 13, 2021, as provided. Commissioners Higuchi and Mello
abstained from the vote since this is their first meeting. Motion carried:
3-2.
PUBLIC HEARING:
Adopted 3. DESIGN REVIEW (DR) 2021-0004, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Reso. Nos. (CUP) 2021-0006, CUP 2021-0001, AND CUP 2020-0018
4425& 4426
APPLICANT:
Jose and Teresa Hernandez
Sol del Mexico, Inc.
12 Regents
Newport Beach, CA 92660
PROPERTY OWNER:
The District at Tustin Legacy
Vestar/Kimco Tustin L.P.
2437 Park Avenue
Tustin, CA 92782
LOCATION: 2497 Park Avenue
REQUEST:
A proposal to remodel the exterior facades and outdoor dining area,
allow painted graphics, authorize live Mariachi entertainment and on-site
alcoholic beverage sales in conjunction with a restaurant establishment.
ENVIRONMENTAL:
This project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 15301, Class 1.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission:
Minutes — Planning Commission April 27, 2021 — Page 2 of 8
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
1. Adopt Resolution No. 4425 for DR 2021-0004, CUP 2021-0006, and
CUP 2021-0001, approving the remodel of the exterior facades and
outdoor dining area, painted graphic murals and to authorize live
Mariachi entertainment, respectively, in conjunction with a restaurant.
2. Adopt Resolution No. 4426, approving CUP 2020-0018 authorizing
the establishment of on-site alcoholic beverage sales in conjunction
with a restaurant establishment.
Aguilar Presentation given.
Higuchi Higuchi asked if the applicant would be precluded from having outdoor
televisions on the outdoor patio area.
Huitron In response to Higuchi's question, the applicant would not be precluded from
having outdoor televisions, but would be required to adhere to the City's
Noise Ordinance.
Mello Mello asked staff about the outdoor canopy (i.e. size and scale) and if it
would be free-standing.
Aguilar In response to Mello's question, Aguilar stated that the outdoor canopy is
expected to be attached to the building and will cover the majority of the patio
area.
Chu Chu asked the applicant when the new restaurant would be opening. She
also thanked Aguilar for the great presentation. Chu also made favorable
comments with regards to the thought-out plan and design of the project.
She was in support of the project.
Aguilar In response to Chu's question, the applicant is hoping to open by Summer
2021.
Kozak Kozak stated it would be a welcome addition to the Tustin Legacy. He made
favorable comments regarding the report and presentation.
Hurtado No public comments received by e -Comments, email or by telephone.
Teresa The applicant, Teresa Hernandez, provided some background on her
Hernandez restaurant. She stated they are very excited to be opening up their
restaurant in Tustin. July 1St is the target opening date.
Higuchi Higuchi made favorable comments regarding the project, specifically the
CUP for the mural, and the background and history. Higuchi asked if in the
future, staff could make that application part of the Design Review versus a
separate application. He thanked staff for their hard work on the project as
well as the applicant.
Minutes — Planning Commission April 27, 2021 — Page 3 of 8
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Mello Mello also made favorable comments, and he was also in support of the item.
Kozak Kozak concurred with his fellow Commissioners and he, too, made favorable
comments regarding the project. He was also in support of the
recommended action.
Mason Mason commended staff for their hard work and to the applicant for opening
up their restaurant in Tustin, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Motion: It was moved by Mason, seconded by Higuchi, to adopt Resolution Nos.
4425 and 4426, as provided. Motion carried 5-0.
Adopted 4. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2020-0010 AND DESIGN REVIEW
Reso. No. (DR) 2020-0009
4427
APPLICANT:
Greg Borchardt/PM Design Group, Inc.
6930 Destiny Drive, Suite 100
Rocklin, CA 95677
PROPERTY OWNER:
Chang Jin Park c/o Andrew C. Lee, Asset Manager
250 East 1St Street, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90012
LOCATION: 14002 Newport Avenue
REQUEST:
A request to demolish an existing 2,280 square -foot Jack in the Box drive-
thru restaurant and construct and operate an 1,869 square -foot Jack in
the Box restaurant with a drive-thru facility and outdoor seating.
ENVIRONMENTAL:
This project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to Section 15302 (Class 2)
of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 4427 approving
CUP 2020-0010, authorizing the demolition of the 2,280 square foot
existing Jack in the Box drive-thru restaurant and the construction and
operation of an 1,869 square- foot Jack in the Box restaurant with a drive-
thru facility and outdoor seating; and DR 2020-0009, approving the site
planning and design proposed for the project located at 14002 Newport
Avenue.
Minutes — Planning Commission April 27, 2021 — Page 4 of 8
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Dove Presentation given. Staff made a recommendation to revise Condition of
Approval No. 9.5 in Resolution No. 4427, removing the requirement to
underground utilities in the public right-of-way.
Mello Mello made favorable comments regarding the presentation. He asked
about the images of off-site improvements within the presentation and any
applicable requirements. Mello also asked if the improvements would
include the off-site trees and ADA ramp at the intersection and if it is existing
or being proposed (per the image in the presentation).
Reekstin In response to Mello's question, Reekstin stated that the applicant is
proposing to relocate and create new driveways, sidewalks and some
improvements along the right-of-way, adjacent to the project site (i.e.
relocating a street light).
Dove Per Mello's question regarding the off-site trees and ADA ramp, Dove stated
that they would be modified.
Chu Chu asked about the daily operation hours requested by the applicant and if
they are currently operating during the hours listed.
Dove Per Dove, she believed the applicant is operating during the listed hours but
there is no outdoor seating at this time. The hours of operation for outdoor
seating would be pursuant to the TCC.
Kozak Kozak did not have any questions. He visited the site and he believed the
project will help with the revitalization along Newport Avenue and is hopeful
the adjacent vacant lot will be developed soon. Kozak stated he was in favor
of the recommended action.
Hurtado There was no public comment received by e -Comment, email or telephone.
Ben Eramya Ben Eramya, the business owner, thanked staff for their help along the way
and was hopeful this project will help beautify that area. He stated that the
existing hours of operation, due to COVID Guidelines, have been reduced in
the dining area, which closes at 10:00 p.m..
Mason Mason asked how long the Jack in the Box (JITB) has been operating. She
thanked staff for doing a thorough job and to ensure there are no impacts to
traffic flow.
Ben Eramya Per Mr. Eramya, JITB has been operating at the site for 45 years; he has
been in the restaurant business over 40 years; He and his partner
own/operate several JITB restaurants throughout Southern California.
Mello Mello asked the applicant about the building location and drive-thru stacking
and the concern of vehicles stacking out onto EI Camino Real. He also
asked what the thought process was behind the proposed building location.
Minutes — Planning Commission April 27, 2021 — Page 5 of 8
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
David Lundy David Lundy, PM Design Group, stated they had numerous layouts and
versions trying to get the project site to work, as far as stacking is concerned.
He added that the main goal was to get the most stacking and to keep
vehicles off of the street. The new kitchen facilities will also help get
customers in and out faster.
Mason Mason mentioned there are mitigation solutions in place with other drive-thru
restaurants and asked if they have also put a mitigation solution in place
should there be an issue with stacking to ensure that there will not be any
impacts to Newport Avenue.
Ben Eramya Mr. Eramya added that typically with the process/system, JITB has the ability
to move their guests quickly (3 minutes per guest) versus other restaurants
average speed of 8-10 minutes per guest. This project will allow them to
serve guests a lot faster.
David David Beshay, Eramya's partner, echoed everything his partner and
Beshay designer stated previously. The restaurant will look beautiful and represent
the area well. Regarding the concern with stacking, Mr. Beshay stated that
he wished they could have the stacks like other restaurants, but one reason
for those long lines is that they do not have as many restaurants as JITB
does. The outside order takers will also help shorten the line.
Higuchi Thanked staff for the comprehensive report and the applicant for reinvesting
in Tustin. Favorable comments were also made.
Motion: It was moved by Mello, seconded by Chu, to adopt Resolution No. 4427, as
amended. Motion carried: 5-0.
REGULAR BUSINESS:
Adopted 5. DESIGN REVIEW 2020-0011: COMMERCIAL REMODEL &
Reso. No. ADDITION AND PARKING EXCEPTION
4428
APPLICANT:
Scott Olsen
Procon Development Inc.
4522 Katella Ave.
Los Alamitos, CA 90720
PROPERTY OWNER:
Ayla Capital Group, LLC
Attn: Dean Azzeh
535 E. Main St., STE. A
Tustin, CA 92780
LOCATION: 535 East Main Street
Minutes — Planning Commission April 27, 2021 — Page 6 of 8
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
REQUEST:
A request to remodel an existing commercial building, construct a 3,458
square foot addition, establish outdoor seating in common area and
satisfy required on-site parking through the Parking Exception
Program.
ENVIRONMENTAL:
This project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to Section 15332 (Class
32 — In -Fill Development) of the California Environmental Quality Act.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 4428 approving
Design Review (DR) 2020-0011 to authorize the remodel of an existing
commercial building, construct a 3,458 square foot addition, establish
outdoor seating in common area and satisfy required on-site parking
(nine (9) parking stalls) through the Parking Exception Program at 535
East Main Street.
Beier Presentation given.
Mello Mello asked what the square footage of the existing patio is.
Beier In response to Mello's question, the existing square footage has not been
measured but the existing patio is larger than what is currently proposed
and is underutilized at this time.
Kozak Kozak visited the site and he stated this project will be an exciting
addition to Old Town.
Hurtado There was no public input received by e -Comment, email or telephone.
Motion: It was moved by Chu, seconded by Kozak, to adopt Resolution No. 4428.
Motion carried 4-1. Planning Commissioner Ayes: Chu, Higuchi, Kozak,
Mason. Planning Commissioner Nay: Mello.
STAFF CONCERNS:
Willkom Willkom reminded the Commission of the City Council/Planning
Commission Workshop on May 11, 2021 at 5:00 p.m. to discuss the
Housing Element Update.
COMMISSION CONCERNS:
Higuchi No concerns.
Minutes — Planning Commission April 27, 2021 — Page 7 of 8
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
rI mlrc
No concerns.
Chu Chu participated in the Strategic Plan Workshop (via Zoom) on April 14, 2021
and is looking forward to the upcoming May 11, 2021 City Council/Planning
Commission Joint Workshop.
Kozak Kozak thanked City Council for his reappointment and noted that the Oath
of Office was conducted on April 14, 2021.
Mason Mason thanked Mayor Clark for joining the meeting and for swearing in
Commissioners Higuchi and Mello. She also extended a congratulations to
Kozak on his re -appointment.
7:25 p.m. ADJOURNMENT:
The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission is scheduled for
Tuesday, May 11, 2021.
EDocuSigned by:
-�. 0"'64W C
ED45DA2623854A5...
JUSTINA L. WILLKOM
Planning Commission Secretary
DocuSigned by:
D3273B6D898A43 D...
AMY MASON
Chairperson
Minutes — Planning Commission April 27, 2021 — Page 8 of 8
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
MINUTES
VIDEO CONFERENCING
TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING
APRIL 13, 2021
6:02 p.m. CALL TO ORDER:
Given. INVOCATION: Mason
All present. ROLL CALL: Chair Mason
Chair Pro Tem Kozak
Commissioners Chu and Jha
PUBLIC CONCERNS:
Ms. Maria Ms. Maria Winger shared a brief background and slide show presentation
Winger regarding community gardens — One Seed Foundation.
The Consent CONSENT CALENDAR:
Calendar was
approved by
the
Commission.
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES— MARCH 23, 2021
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission approve the Minutes of the March 23, 2021
Planning Commission meeting, as provided.
2. GENERAL PLAN CONFORMITY DETERMINATION 2021-0003 FOR
1382 BELL AVENUE
A request for a General Plan Conformity finding for the lease agreement
by the County of Orange, Sheriff -Coroner for use of the subject property
located at 1382 Bell Avenue for its technology division.
APPLICANT: County of Orange, Sheriff -Coroner
PROPERTY
OWNER: GVI-SW Bell Avenue Owner, LLC, A Delaware Limited
Liability Company
LOCATION: 1382 Bell Avenue
ENVIRONMENTAL:
Minutes — Planning Commission April 13, 2021 — Page 1 of 5
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
General Plan Conformity Determinations required by Government Code
Section 65402 are not "projects" requiring environmental review pursuant
to the California Environmental Quality Act.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 4424 determining
that the proposed location for lease of approximately 120,000 square feet
of industrial office space for the County of Orange, Sheriff -Coroner's
Technology Division and Emergency Call Center, located at 1382 Bell
Avenue, is in conformance with the City of Tustin's General Plan.
Hurtado Hurtado confirmed there was no public input received.
Motion: It was moved by Kozak, seconded by Jha, to approve the Consent Calendar,
as presented. Motion carried 4-0.
None. PUBLIC HEARING:
REGULAR BUSINESS:
Approved the 3. TUSTIN HISTORIC REGISTER NOMINATION
nomination of
135 South A A request to nominate the property at 135 South A Street to the City's
Street to the Historic Register Plaque Program.
City's Historic
Register
Plaque
Program.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission approve the nomination of 135 South A
Street to the City's Historic Register Plaque Program and select
"McGreavy-Powell House — Circa 1903" as the most appropriate
historical name and date of construction of the property.
Dove Presentation given.
Ms. Ashley Ms. Ashley McCausland and Ms. Annie McCausland joined the webinar and
McCausland & thanked the Commission for their nomination and for all of the hard work Dove
Ms. Annie put into the nomination.
McCausland
There was a brief discussion among the Commissioners and Dove regarding
how the house was relocated in 1939 from Santa Ana to Tustin, along with the
Minutes — Planning Commission April 13, 2021 — Page 2 of 5
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
story behind the historic home. Congratulations were extended to the
applicants as well!
Motion: It was moved by Kozak, seconded by Chu, to approve the nomination of 135
South A Street to the City's Historic Register Plaque Program and select
"McGreavy-Powell House — Circa 1903" as the most appropriate historical
name and date of construction of the property. Motion carried 4-0.
Adopted 4. PLANNING COMMISSION POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
Reso. No.
4284.
The Planning Commission does not currently have City adopted policies
and procedures for conducting public meetings. The proposed Planning
Commission Policies and Procedures will contribute to the effective
operation of the Planning Commission, ensure that associated public
meetings are conducted consistently in accordance with adopted
Policies and Procedures, and that the actions of the Planning
Commission comply with State law.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 4284 to establish
Planning Commission Policies and Procedures.
Huitron/DiLeva Presentation shared and given by Huitron, DiLeva and Daudt.
/Daudt
Chu Chu mentioned she previously emailed staff with questions regarding the item,
and staff provided an email response fulfilling her questions. She did mention
the start time of the meeting remaining at 6:00 p.m., which is helpful to Chu.
Chu asked her fellow Commissioners their thoughts on the start time
remaining at 6:00 p.m.
Huitron Per Huitron, the hours are documented in the Policies and Procedures
memorializing what the official start time is per the Tustin City Code (TCC). If
it is the desire of the Commission to discuss this topic at a separate time, staff
can facilitate at a later date.
Mason Mason asked what the process would be like if the Commission collectively
wanted to pursue keeping the start time of the meetings to 6:00 p.m.
Willkom In response to Chu and Mason's comments and questions, Willkom stated that
per the TCC, the start time of the meetings states 7:00 p.m. In order for the
meeting start time to change, the TCC would need to be amended. She asked
Daudt if staff should agendize the item in order to bring to the public's attention
and to discuss further among the Commission, if it is the desire of the
Minutes — Planning Commission April 13, 2021 — Page 3 of 5
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Commission to change the start time of all future meetings. Willkom added
that the reason the meetings changed from 7:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. was due to
the Emergency Order, due to COVID-19 pandemic. Once the order is
terminated, Planning Commission meetings (2nd and 4t" Tuesday of every
month) will return to the 7:00 p.m. start time.
Kozak Kozak thanked staff and Daudt for their presentation.
Mason Mason would also like the discussion to be agendized at a future meeting for
further discussion. Mason asked Daudt about "Closed Sessions" in meetings
and the requirements that need to go back to the public.
Daudt Daudt provided clarification on Closed Session meetings limited exception to
the open public meeting requirements. There are codified exceptions for
instances where you can conduct a closed session (i.e. litigation, employment
negotiations) and typically occur at the City Council level. Daudt further
explained the process of the Closed Sessions, along with transparency, must
be reported out to the public, along with the tally of the votes, so that the public
is informed, to a certain extent, of the decision that was made in Closed
Session and the nature of what that discussion was.
Hurtado Hurtado confirmed there were no public comments received.
Kozak Kozak made favorable comments to staff for the presentation.
Motion: It was moved by Mason, seconded by Kozak, to adopt Resolution No. 4284.
Motion carried 4-0.
Mason Mason acknowledged Jha's contributions and thanked him for his service to
the City of Tustin community.
Willkom Willkom also conveyed her thanks to Jha for his years of service and thanked
him for his dedication and contributions to the Tustin community.
STAFF CONCERNS:
Willkom Willkom congratulated Kozak for his reappointment. Two new Commissioners
to be installed at the next regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting
(Eric Higuchi and Dave Mello). She reminded the Commission of the Strategic
Plan Workshop on April 14, 2021 at 4:15 p.m. She also mentioned the
upcoming Joint Planning Commission and City Council Workshop May 11,
2021 at 5:00 p.m. to discuss the Updated Housing Element Update. This
workshop is open to the public as well.
Minutes — Planning Commission April 13, 2021 — Page 4 of 5
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
COMMISSION CONCERNS:
Chu Chu thanked Jha for his years of service as a Planning Commissioner. Best
wishes! She asked her colleagues about changing the start time of the
meetings moving forward to 6:00 p.m.
Jha Jha thanked his fellow Commissioners and staff for their kind words. "Thanks
for allowing me to be a part of the City of Tustin!"
Kozak Kozak also thanked Jha for your contributions to the meetings and to the
community. "See you around town!" Kozak received his first COVID-19
vaccination. He attended the Pepper Tree Park Ribbon Cutting on April 7,
2021.
Mason Mason thanked staff for documenting and getting the policies to the
Commission.
7.31 p.m. ADJOURNMENT:
The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission is scheduled for
Tuesday, April 27, 2021.
D/o/pc_u-Signedby-
AMY MASON
Chairperson
DocuSigned by:
-4. O��
ED45DA2623B54A5...
JUSTINA L. WILLKOM
Planning Commission Secretary
Minutes — Planning Commission April 13, 2021 — Page 5 of 5
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
MINUTES
VIDEO CONFERENCING
TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING
MARCH 23, 2021
During the Statewide COVID-19 Emergency, the public is not permitted to
convene in person for this public meeting. However, the public may still
view and comment on the meeting as follows:
To watch the meeting, the public may observe the meeting via the City's
ranicus service at
Ir s:// .tustlinca.oirq/„/n0caaiii. s A endas or on
the local Cox Channel 851.
To participate and/or comment on one or more items, do the following:
1. PARTICIPATING DURING A MEETING
Community members who wish to verbally address the Planning
Commission during a public meeting should electronically submit a
Request to Speak form by clicking here. Submitting this form prior to the
meeting will allow the Planning Commission Secretary to identify who
would like to speak during the correct item on the agenda. Please note:
You are not required to provide your name, however please provide the
screen name or phone number you will use to join the meeting. By
joining the meeting, you will be able to speak but your video will not be
enabled. Please see further instructions below.
ASSISTANCE DURING THE MEETING
If you have any questions or need assistance during the meeting, please
contact the Community Development Department by calling 714-573-3106.
HOW TO CONNECT TO THE ZOOM WEB CONFERENCE BY
COMPUTER OR SMART DEVICE
Community members may provide live public comments via Zoom during
Planning Commission meetings. To join the meeting, click here and use
the passcode below. You can also join via the Zoom app on your
smartphone or tablet, or in a web browser at Ir„y Lin, by
entering the Meeting ID and Passcode below.
Meeting ID: 844 9616 2721
Passcode: 924752
Minutes — Planning Commission March 23, 2021 — Page 1 of 4
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
HOW TO CONNECT TO THE ZOOM WEB CONFERENCE BY
TELEPHONE
To join the Zoom web conference from any phone (landline or wireless), dial
669-900-6833. When prompted, use the below Meeting ID and Passcode.
Meeting ID: 844 9616 2721
Passcode: 924752
2. PROVIDE WRITTEN COMMENTS PRIOR TO AND DURING
THE MEETING
To comment on one or more items, you may send your comments to
...............................p.........'...........................................:::..::::.iipitustiiica.oirg or by accessing the City's "SpeakUp„
.........hair ireliigym,,� ol�rnI�rnii ......
.............
comment system as follows:
6:00 p.m. CALLED TO ORDER.
Given. INVOCATION: Chu
All present. ROLL CALL: Chair Mason
Chair Pro Tem Kozak
Commissioners Chu, Jha
None. PUBLIC CONCERNS:
CONSENT CALENDAR:
Approved the 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — MARCH 9, 2021
March 9, 2021
Minutes.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission approve the Minutes of the March 9,
2021 Planning Commission meeting, as provided.
Motion: It was moved by Chu, seconded by Kozak, to approve the Minutes of the
March 9, 2021 Planning Commission meeting. Motion carried 4-0.
None. PUBLIC HEARING.
Minutes — Planning Commission March 23, 2021 — Page 2 of 4
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
REGULAR BUSINESS:
Staff conducted 2. HISTORIC PRESERVATION PROGRAM WORKSHOP
workshop.
The purpose of this workshop is to highlight and provide a status update
on the City's historic preservation programs. This workshop also satisfies
the mandatory annual introductory training requirement for the Planning
Commission acting as the Historic and Cultural Resources Advisor, for
both new Commissioners and as a refresher for more seasoned
Commissioners.
Reekstin Presentation given.
The Commission did not have any questions or comments.
Hurtado Hurtado confirmed there was no input from the public.
3. 2019-2020 CERTIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENT (CLG) ANNUAL
REPORT
Directed staff to The Annual Report summarizes the City's historic preservation efforts
forward the Annual and describes how the City met all of the requirements of the CLG
Report to the State program during the 2019-2020 reporting period.
Office of Historic
Preservation.
Dove Presentation given.
Kozak Kozak made favorable comments to staff for both of the presentations.
Chu Chu also made favorable comments to staff for both of the presentations.
Hurtado Hurtado confirmed there was no input from the public.
Motion: It was moved by Kozak, seconded by Chu, to forward the Annual Report to
the State Office of Historic Preservation. Motion carried 4-0.
STAFF CONCERNS:
Willkom Willkom reminded the Commission of the upcoming Planning Commission
Academy (webinar) on March 25, 2021.
COMMISSION CONCERNS:
Jha Jha had no concerns.
Minutes — Planning Commission March 23, 2021 — Page 3 of 4
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Chu Chu had no concerns.
Kozak Kozak, again, thanked Reekstin and Dove for their presentations. He
participated in Zoom Webinar practice sessions March 18th and March 22nd
and he participated in a prospective grand jury member meeting on March
11 th
Mason Mason made favorable comments regarding staff's presentations.
ADJOURNMENT:
The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission is scheduled for
Tuesday, April 13, 2021.
DocuSign/e�dd by:
-11t
D3273B6D898A43D...
AMY MASON
Chairperson
tE
by:
"k -r , d. Oma ,
45DA2623B54A5...
JUSTINA L. WILLKOM
Planning Commission Secretary
Minutes — Planning Commission March 23, 2021 — Page 4 of 4
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
MINUTES
VIDEO CONFERENCING
TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING
MARCH 9, 2021
Mason "During the Statewide COVID-19 Emergency, the public is not permitted to
convene in person for this public meeting. However, the public may still view
and comment on the meetina as follows":
Mason To watch the meeting, the public may observe the meeting via the City's
ranicus service ,g,!aoron local
,, , ,,, �
Cox Channel 851.
Mason To comment on one or more items, you may send your comments to
1..1,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,',,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,;;;;,,,,;,loin trustrliinca.oirg or by accessing the City's "SpeakUp„
l,,,,,,llaiilii .,,, �..�ol'rrnl'rryiiss„ ,,,
,,,,,
comment system.
6:00 p.m
Given by Kozak
CALL TO ORDER-
RDER:
INVOCATION-
INVOCATION:
All
All present. ROLL CALL: Commissioners Chu, Jha
Chair Pro Tem Kozak
Chair Mason
None. PUBLIC CONCERNS:
CONSENT CALENDAR:
Approved the 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — FEBRUARY 9, 2021
February 9, 2021
Minutes.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission approve the Minutes of the February 9,
2021 Planning Commission meeting.
Motion: It was moved by Jha, seconded by Kozak, to approve the Minutes of the
February 9, 2021 Planning Commission meeting. Motion carried 4-0.
None. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
REGULAR BUSINESS:
Minutes — Planning Commission March 9, 2021 — Page 1 of 5
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Authorized staff 2. 2020 GENERAL PLAN ANNUAL REPORT (GPAR) AND ANNUAL
to forward the MITIGATION MONITORING STATUS REPORT (AMMSR) FOR FEIS/EIR
GPAR and the FOR MCAS TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN
AMMSR to the
City Council for
consideration.
California State Law requires that each city adopt a comprehensive, long-
term general plan for its physical development and any land outside its
boundaries, which bears a relationship to its planning activities. Section
65400(b) of the Government Code requires that the City's planning agency
provide an annual report to the City Council on the status of the General
Plan and progress in its implementation.
The City Council certified the Program Final Environmental Impact
Statement/Environmental Impact Report (FEIS/EIR) for the Disposal and
Reuse of MCAS Tustin along with its Supplemental and Addendum. The
FEIS/EIR evaluated the environmental impacts of the reuse and disposal
of MCAS Tustin, which included the adoption of a Mitigation Monitoring and
Report Program (MMRP) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15097.
The MMRP is a review of actions performed by the City or other responsible
agencies in implementing mitigation measures identified in the FEIS/EIR.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission review and authorize staff to forward the
General Plan Annual Report and the Annual Mitigation Monitoring Status
Report to the City Council for consideration.
Aguilar Presentation given.
Jha Jha asked about the RHNA numbers and how the City is doing compared to
surrounding cities similar in size.
Willkom In response to Jha's previous question, Willkom stated that every city is
preparing this same report; therefore, we have not yet received reports to see
how other cities are doing. Staff will research and report back to the
Commission at a later date.
Chu Chu asked about the public input received from the Kennedy Commission and
if City staff has responded with regards to the income levels.
Willkom Per Willkom, the letter received from the Kennedy Commission pertained to the
City not creating lower income housing to meet the current RHNA allocation
numbers. She added that cities are mandated to identify sites available for
residential development. The City is not obligated to construct, but the City
needs to come up with a program to incentivize housing, particularly, affordable
Minutes — Planning Commission March 9, 2021 — Page 2 of 5
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
housing. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, 2020 has been a difficult year, and
luckily, the housing production in Tustin has not stopped. City staff has not yet
reached the RHNA allocation therefore, the City is in the process of working
towards the next Housing Element Update where sites will be identified, along
with programs to incentivize the production of lower income housing.
Chu Chu also asked if there have been any proposals received to produce lower
income housing units.
Willkom Willkom explained that whenever a housing development proposal is given to
the City, many proposals take several months and even years to be brought to
the Planning Commission and the City Council. She referred to the House of
Ruth item, which was approved at the last City Council meeting. That
application started two (2) years ago. At this point, the City has received a
couple of applications, but only one (1) has been approved.
Kozak Kozak was in support of the item.
Mason Mason asked Willkom if there is a plan for a forum to have this type of
discussion with the community, and where the City is as far as a timeline. This
would be a great opportunity for a creative approach (i.e. outreach to high
school/college students).
Willkom Per Willkom, City staff is currently working on the Housing Element Update and
are in the process of organizing a second Housing Element workshop. The
plan is to report back to the Commission with the results from the Housing
Element survey, which was sent out to the entire Tustin community. City staff
will gather the information received from the survey, specifically, the housing
priorities that the City should be looking into. City staff is also looking at every
corner of Tustin to identify potential affordable housing sites, along with other
programs. There has also been collaboration with other agencies, cities and
housing advocates (i.e. Kennedy Commission) who have been very active in
providing input to the City. Willkom stated City staff should be reporting back
to the Commission at the end of April.
Kozak Kozak asked if there is a parallel track or an effort in participating at the SCAG
or regional level for these workforce housing needs.
Willkom Willkom added that the City is participating in every SCAG mandate that is
provided to the City, including the RHNA assessment, and the final allocation
was recently approved for the City. The City's upcoming allocation is 6,700
units, which is a lot of units to plan for. She stated that it is a challenge for the
City but fortunately, there is vacant land at the Tustin Legacy. It is still
challenging to identify 6,700 units within the next eight (8) years.
Minutes — Planning Commission March 9, 2021 — Page 3 of 5
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Motion: It was moved by Kozak, seconded by Jha, to forward the General Plan Annual
Report and the Annual Mitigation Monitoring Status Report to the City Council
for consideration. Motion carried 4-0.
The Commission 3. PLANNING COMMISSION 2021 TRAINING AND WORKSHOP TOPICS
provided input.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission provide input regarding future training and
workshop topics.
Huitron Presentation given.
Willkom Willkom added that many of the training/workshops Huitron mentioned were
scheduled for last year, but due to COVID-19, and due to the format, City staff
has been using virtual settings for conducting settings, which was difficult for
the public to participate. City staff thought that now that the City Council is
moving into a webinar format when conducting meetings, in order for the public
to participate in the meetings, we will also conduct our future Commission
meetings using the webinar format.
Chu Chu asked if the public would also be able to participate in these
training/workshops.
Huitron Huitron stated that all training/workshops would be held during the regular
Commission meetings or they would be noticed in advance so that the public
could watch and participate.
Jha Jha suggested workshops include covering the south part of Tustin as well as
parking, which is a current issue and the public would benefit from providing
input, and the City could respond to their concerns.
Kozak Kozak stated that the workshops will be very important for public outreach and
input so that the process is understood and the public feel they are a part of the
solution. He asked about the Housing Element Update survey results.
Huitron Per Huitron, the survey recently closed and staff is in the process of reviewing
and analyzing the results, then putting them together in a presentable format
for the Commission which will be made part of the workshop.
Mason Mason would like to know more about developing workforce housing and if
there are "best practices" or "partnering" opportunities. She also mentioned
green space and parks in Tustin and how creatively the City is looking to
develop.
Minutes — Planning Commission March 9, 2021 — Page 4 of 5
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
STAFF CONCERNS:
Willkom Willkom informed the Commission of a link she forwarded to them earlier that
day of the City Council's special meeting of February 23, 2021 which was
covered by various agencies with regards to updates on the Tustin Legacy.
The link is also posted on the City's website.
COMMISSION CONCERNS:
Chu Chu had no concerns. She made favorable comments to Aguilar and Huitron
for their presentations.
Jha Jha mentioned that the Tustin Chamber of Commerce and Families Together
will start vaccinating all restaurant employees and workers in the next week for
the COVID vaccine.
Kozak Kozak thanked staff for a great meeting.
Mason Mason had no concerns. She is looking forward to the upcoming training and
to the public input being included in the upcoming workshops.
ADJOURNMENT -
6 -44
DJOURNMENT:
6:44 p.m. The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission is scheduled for
Tuesday, March 23, 2021.
DocuSigned by:
-4. 0
It�i Q Qk s�uu
ED45DA2623B54A5...
JUSTINA L. WILLKOM
Planning Commission Secretary
D/o/pc_u-Signed67y:
D3273B6DS9SA43D._.
AMY MASON
Chairperson
Minutes — Planning Commission March 9, 2021 — Page 5 of 5
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
MINUTES
VIDEO CONFERENCING
TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING
FEBRUARY 9, 2021
Mason "During the Statewide COVID-19 Emergency, the public is not permitted to
convene in person for this public meeting. However, the public may still view
and comment on the meetina as follows.":
Mason To watch the meeting, the public may observe the meeting via the City's
Granicus service at https://www.tustinca.org/282/Meetings-Agendas or on
local Cox Channel 851.
Mason To comment on one or more items, you may send your comments to
Plan ningCommission(a-)tustinca.org or by accessing the City's "SpeakUp"
comment system as follows:
6:09 p.m
Given by Mason
CALL TO ORDER:
INVOCATION:
All present. ROLL CALL: Commissioners Chu, Jha
Chair Pro Tem Kozak— late due to technical difficulties.
Chair Mason
Distributed
emails/
eComments to
staff and
Commission.
Approved the
December 22,
2020 Minutes, as
amended.
PUBLIC CONCERNS:
CONSENT CALENDAR:
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES —DECEMBER 22, 2020
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission approve the Minutes of the December 22,
2020 Planning Commission meeting, as amended.
Motion: It was moved by Chu, seconded by Jha, to approve the Minutes of the
December 22, 2020 Planning Commission meeting, as amended. Motion
carried 3-0. Kozak was not present for this portion of the meeting, as he
entered the virtual meeting late due to technical difficulties.
Minutes — Planning Commission February 9, 2021 — Page 1 of 13
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
Adopted Reso. 2. GENERAL PLAN CONFORMITY (GPC) 2021-0001; DEVELOPMENT
Nos. 4417 & AGREEMENT (DA) 2020-0002; AND DESIGN REVIEW (DR) 2020-0011
4418.
APPLICANT: FAMILY PROMISE OF ORANGE COUNTY (FPOC)
ATTN: CYNDEE ALBERTSON
310 WEST BROADWAY AVENUE
ANAHEIM, CA 92805
PROPERTY
OWNER: CITY OF TUSTIN
300 CENTENNIAL WAY
TUSTIN, CA 92780
LOCATION: 1941 EL CAMINO REAL
ENVIRONMENTAL:
This project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to Section 15332 (Class 32)
of Title 14, Chapter 3 of the California Code of Regulations (Guidelines for
the California Environmental Quality Act) pertaining to in -fill development.
REQUESTS:
1. GPC 2021-0001 to determine that the location, purpose, and extent of
the proposed disposition of an approximate 16,790 square -foot (0.385
acre) lot for the development of a seven (7) unit multi -family apartment -
style building for short term transitional housing and services for qualified
families with children experiencing homelessness or at risk of
homelessness.
2. DA 2020-0002 to facilitate the development and conveyance of an
approximate 16,790 square foot (0.385 acre) site.
3. DR 2020-0011 for the building design and site layout for a seven (7) unit
multi -family apartment -style building for short-term transitional housing
and services for qualified families with children experiencing
homelessness or at risk of homelessness, including a resource room,
office, common areas and amenities.
4. Density Bonus to authorize two (2) additional units for a total of seven
(7) units in the R4 Zoning District.
5. Two (2) development concessions for a reduced front yard setback and
waiver of covered parking.
Minutes — Planning Commission February 9, 2021 — Page 2 of 13
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution 4417, for GPC 2021-
0001, determining that the location, purpose, and extent of the proposed
disposition of an approximately 0.385 -acre site for the development of a
seven (7) unit multi -family apartment -style building for short term
transitional housing for qualified families with children experiencing
homelessness or at risk of homelessness is in conformance with the
approved General Plan.
2. That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution 4418 recommending
that the City Council approve:
a. DA 2020-0002 to facilitate the development and conveyance of
an approximate 0.385 -acre site located at 1941 EI Camino Real
for the development of a seven (7) unit multi -family apartment -
style building for short-term transitional housing for qualified
families with children experiencing homelessness or at risk of
homelessness.
b. DR 2020-0011 for the building design and site layout of a seven
(7) unit multi -family apartment -style building for short-term
transitional housing for qualified families with children
experiencing homelessness or at risk of homelessness, a
density bonus to authorize two (2) additional units for a total of
seven (7) units in the R4 zoning district and development
concessions for a reduced front yard setback and waiver of
covered parking.
Reekstin Presentation given.
Jha Jha expressed concern with the area being poorly lit at night and asked staff if
there would be lighting and security (i.e. cameras, fencing) added to the project
site. He commented that he thought that this would also enhance the new
building and overall look of Browning and Red Hill Avenues.
Reekstin In response to Jha's concerns, Reekstin stated that lighting would be provided
to ensure the site is safe and secure for both the residents and the employees
at the project site. He added that there will be a wall on three (3) sides of the
property and a point of contact to be provided in the event of an emergency
(after hours). Reekstin was unsure if the applicant would be providing a security
camera.
Willkom Willkom addressed the comment on security. She commented that the facility
is not an emergency homeless shelter, but more of an apartment complex. The
on-site residents would be families with children who have been screened by
Minutes — Planning Commission February 9, 2021 — Page 3 of 13
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Family Promise. She did not anticipate security issues being a major concern
knowing that staff members will be on-site for eight (8) to ten (10) hours per day
and that the applicant would provide a point of contact that would be shared
with the Tustin Police Department (TPD) should the need arise. Willkom also
stated City staff will be working with the applicant to ensure the project site is
always secure and safe. This project is a partnership with Family Promise,
Home Aid, Brookfield Homes and the City, and many hours have been invested
in bringing this project forward.
Chu Chu expressed her concern with visitors, other than residents living on-site.
She asked if the proposed project was consistent with zoning since the project
is near a residential site and questioned if the facility is considered a non-profit
business. Chu asked City staff if they could ensure a security camera be
installed somewhere on the site because she felt it was a mixed-use project.
Willkom In response to Chu's comments, Willkom stated there will be a resource center
on the project site. City staff asked Family Promise to include a resource
center. The idea was to connect the families with resources. Not only will the
residents be utilizing the resource center but also the Tustin community (i.e.
veterans, low-income families, elderly). Willkom added that it is more of a
resource center versus a business, like Chu mentioned previously. The
resource center will be staffed by a Family Promise Housing Navigator and
other staff who will assist those who are in need. As for the security, City staff
can discuss further with the applicant.
Kozak Kozak added that the proposed project will be a great resource for the
community and commented that the project is a compatible land use for the site
and will provide much needed housing and services to families with children
who are in need. He was in support of the recommended action.
Mason Mason had various comments which, in general, included the following: she
asked if the action tonight would be a recommendation to the City Council, if
this is a resource center where people will be working; that the proposed project
will not necessarily be a revolving door of folks in the community; and if the
Commission agreed, and finally, could the Commission make a
recommendation to the City Council as they consider the project, considering
the additional information and conversation, along with the consideration that
the proposal is a partnership between the City and Family Promise, in order to
move the project forward.
Willkom Willkom confirmed Mason's previous comments. She informed the
Commission that the proposal includes a Development Agreement, which has
to be approved by the City Council via Ordinance. The remaining entitlement
applications would be reviewed concurrently by the City Council. Willkom
reiterated that the item presented to the Commission would be a
recommendation to the City Council, if the Commission approves the item.
Minutes — Planning Commission February 9, 2021 — Page 4 of 13
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
6:51 p.m. Hurtado confirmed there were no additional comments received by the public.
Motion: It was moved by Kozak, seconded by Chu, to adopt Resolution Nos. 4417 and
4418. Motion carried 4-0.
Adopted Reso. 3. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2020-0009 & DESIGN REVIEW 2020 -
No. 4419, as 0008
amended.
APPLICANT: CHRISTIAN DE ANDA
1029 E. 4TH STREET
SANTA ANA, CA 92701
PROPERTY
OWNER: CHRISTIAN DE ANDA
1029 E. 4TH STREET
SANTA ANA, CA 92701
LOCATION: 14232 NEWPORT AVENUE
ENVIRONMENTAL:
This project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to section 15303 (Class 3) of
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
REQUEST:
A request to construct and operate a 1,390 square foot restaurant
(Taqueria Hoy) with a drive-thru facility and outdoor seating.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 4419 approving
Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 2020-0009, authorizing the establishment of
a drive-thru facility and associated drive-thru signage, and Design Review
(DR) 2020-0008, approving the site planning and design proposed for a
new 1,390 square foot restaurant (Taqueria Hoy) and associated outdoor
seating located at 14232 Newport Avenue.
Daudt Daudt informed the Commission that Jha recused himself from the item due to
the proximity of his business and the project site.
Salman Presentation given.
Mason Mason referred to the drive-thru depiction in the site plan, specifically, the menu
board location. She also referred to the wall height being fairly low and wanted
confirmation that the height would be elevated, which Salman stated it would
Minutes — Planning Commission February 9, 2021 — Page 5 of 13
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
be elevated to six (6) feet eight (8) inches and will be a benefit to the nearby
residents. Mason also asked her fellow Commissioners to consider keeping
the drive-thru hours to 24 (on a trial basis) in order to ensure the applicant's
business succeeds.
Willkom Per Willkom, the Tustin City Code (TCC) limits the outdoor seating hours to
11:00 p.m., however, the drive-thru hours can be amended, if it is the desire of
the Commission to allow the 24-hour operation. Willkom advised the Chair to
receive input from the other Commissioners; then if they agree, amend the
Conditions of Approval within Resolution No. 4419.
Chu Chu echoed Mason's suggestion on the 24-hour drive-thru operation due to this
being the applicant's main source of income. She suggested limiting the
indoor/outdoor dining to 11:00 p.m. in order to avoid any possible noise -level
issues with the nearby residents. Chu was also concerned with cars blocking
the parking spaces along Newport Avenue during busy hours. She asked staff
if four (4) of the parking spaces could be relocated in order to avoid them from
being blocked.
Willkom In response to Chu's concerns, Willkom stated City staff has worked with the
applicant with several versions of the layout. There are many requirements the
City imposed, including the number of cars that need to be able to be stacked,
which is seven (7) cars. In addition, there is a ten (10) foot dedication that
eventually, when the City is ready, the applicant will need to provide. With the
ten (10) foot dedication and parking requirement, it is difficult to relocate the
parking spaces to the opposite side of the site. Willkom also mentioned that
City staff had worked with the Public Works Traffic Engineer and the TPD to
review the internal circulation. One of the project conditions is to have an
employee working the drive-thru area, during high peak hours, in orderto speed
up drive-thru process and keep the vehicles circulating within the site. With the
Conditions of Approval, the TPD's Traffic Division and the Public Works
Department are comfortable with the layout (i.e. parking and circulation) that
the applicant has proposed.
Mason Mason asked for further clarification with regards to the outdoor dining hours
being limited to 11:00 p.m. and staff's recommendation to extend the indoor
dining to 24 hours, and the indoor capacity.
Willkom Willkom mentioned the three (3) requests made by the applicant:
1) Indoor dining hours to be open until 3:00 a.m.;
2) Outdoor dining hours, to be open until 11:00 p.m. - the TCC limits
the outdoor dining when the business is adjacent to residential
properties; and
3) Drive-thru hours - the TCC does not limit the hours of operation,
however, due to the close proximity to the residential properties, staff is
Minutes — Planning Commission February 9, 2021 — Page 6 of 13
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
recommending hours be limited to 11:00 p.m. to be consistent with the
outdoor seating hours.
She added that the applicant has indicated that their other restaurants are well
known for their 24-hour drive-thru operation. During Covid-19, drive-thrus have
become an asset to the City since people may not dine -in. She mentioned that
after Covid-19, restaurants may change the way they operate their business.
Willkom concluded, that if it is the desire of the Commission, the Commission
can decide whether or not they want to allow extended hours for the indoor
dining and drive-thru but the hours of outdoor seating must be 11:00 p.m., per
the TCC.
Kozak Kozak thanked the applicant for the proposed project in order to better the
community. He supported staff's recommendations. The outdoor dining hours
and indoor hours made sense. Kozak suggested a six (6) month monitoring
period, if the Commission agreed on allowing the drive-thru hours to operate
24 hours, then to report back to City staff.
Chu Chu thanked the applicant for returning to the City of Tustin for their project.
She was also in support of the project.
Mason Mason asked Willkom for direction on how to allow the applicant to operate their
business, while allowing amended drive-thru hours, for a period of time.
Willkom Willkom stated that if it is the desire of the Commission to allow the 24-hour
drive-thru operation, they could do so on a trial basis for a period of six (6)
months, as long as the City does not receive many complaints. She asked the
Commission to clarify the hours of operation for the indoor dining since the
applicant is requesting hours be extended to 3:00 a.m. Again, she reiterated
the hours of operation for the outdoor seating would have to be 11:00 p.m., at
the latest.
Chu Chu requested the hours of operation for the indoor/outdoor dining be 11:00
p.m. in order to avoid any noise issues (i.e. cars, voice levels), but she was in
support of the drive-thru hours being 24 hours.
Kozak Kozak echoed comments from Chu with respect to the 11:00 p.m.
indoor/outdoor dining and 24-hour drive-thru, but would be willing to do a "test
period" during the summer months and monitor the project site with the
applicant. He was in support of the project with the added conditions.
Mason Mason thanked Chu for her comments on the 11:00 p.m. indoor/outdoor dining
hours of operation; however, staff's recommendation for the indoor dining hours
would be 3:00 a.m. She recommended allowing the 3:00 a.m. indoor dining
and the 24-hour drive-thru operation and if there are complaints, City staff can
address at that time. Or if the Commission would be in favor of allowing staff's
Minutes — Planning Commission February 9, 2021 — Page 7 of 13
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
recommendation but allowing a contingency that after the project has been
open for six (6) months, City staff review for complaints or issues. She also
asked when the project would be complete.
Salman Salman did not have a project completion date.
The Commission collectively agreed to the Chair's final recommendation.
7:26 p.m. Hurtado stated she had received an email from Mr. Bryan Elenes at 7:26 p.m.,
which she immediately emailed to City staff and the Commission.
Willkom Willkom shared the email from Mr. Elenes. His concerns were as follows: what
type of mitigation would be in place for spillover onto Newport Avenue when
the drive-thru is full — City staff is proposing a condition which would require that
an employee be at the drive-thru lane during peak hours; could the
homeowners be part of the planning and design process of the project —
following the Commission's consideration/approval of this project, there will be
a plan check process and at that time there may be minor modifications City
staff can provide or look into, and if the homeowners have any concerns, they
can contact Mary Salman and if City staff can accommodate, they will try to
facilitate in order to resolve the issue; his concern with the large trash trucks
arriving early in the morning (i.e. noise) and if the trash pick-up could be
arranged for later in the day — Willkom stated that Salman can discuss with the
business owner to make arrangements and if it is the Commission's desire,
another condition can be added to Resolution No. 4419 as well; lastly, he asked
if the residents could be provided with the six (6) month monitoring period for
public comments/input — Willkom mentioned that the Commission previously
mentioned the trial period of six (6) months to see how the business is operating
and if there are any problems, City staff can bring them back to the
Commission.
Mason Mason stated she assumed the applicant would be conducting community
outreach, with regards to Mr. Elenes' email comments. She was also in favor
of adding the trash pick-up time to the Conditions of Approval within Resolution
No. 4419.
Kozak Kozak was in support of Mason's added condition previously mentioned.
Daudt Daudt did ask for one (1) clarification to Mason's suggested amendments.
During the monitoring period, he suggested the Commission delegate the
responsibility to the Community Development Director to determine within that
time frame whether or not there have been issues with noise or nuisance
conditions which would mean that the item would not be returned to the
Commission for reconsideration. Or, the Commission could state, as an
absolute requirement, that this matter will come back to the Commission six (6)
months after commencement of business operation for a report from the
Minutes — Planning Commission February 9, 2021 — Page 8 of 13
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Director to allow the Commission to decide whether or not they want to modify
that condition.
Motion: It was moved by the Chair, to approve staff's recommendation with the following
amendments: 1) allowing the operator a six (6) month trial period for the 24-
hour drive-thru operation to be delegated to the Director; 2) indoor dining hours
to remain 24 hours; and for the business owner to arrange a later trash pick-up
time. Seconded by Kozak, to adopt Resolution No. 4419, as amended. Motion
carried 3-0-1 with Jha recusing himself from the item.
Adopted Reso. 4. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (GPA) 2019-00001 AND DESIGN
No. 4420, 4421, REVIEW (DR) 2019-00019
& 4422, as
amended.
APPLICANT: BARAY KARIM
7 DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT
188 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE, SUITE N
IRVINE, CA 92681
PROPERTY
OWNERS: CHRISTOPHER KELLSTROM
1042 SAN JUAN STREET
TUSTIN, CA 92780
RONALD C. WEBBER
17092 OLIVE GROVE LANE
SILVERADO, CA 92676-92719
R0001
LOCATION: 1042 SAN JUAN STREET
1052 SAN JUAN STREET
(GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ONLY)
ENVIRONMENTAL:
A Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with
the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Article 6
of California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3.
REQUESTS:
1. GPA 2019-00001 to amend the General Plan land use designation from
Community Commercial (CC) to High Density Residential (HDR) at 1042
and 1052 San Juan Street. 1052 San Juan Street is included in this
application for general plan consistency only.
Minutes — Planning Commission February 9, 2021 — Page 9 of 13
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
2. DR 2019-00019 for the building design and layout for construction of two
(2) duplexes and one (1) detached single-family structure and the
preservation of an existing single-family residential historic resource at
1042 San Juan Street.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 4420
recommending that the City Council find that the Mitigated Negative
Declaration is adequate for GPA 2019-00001 for 1042 and 1052 San
Juan Street and DR 2019-00019 for the proposed project at 1042 San
Juan Street.
2. That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 4421
recommending that the City Council approve GPA 2019-00001 to
change the properties' General Plan Land Use Designation from
Community Commercial (CC) to High Density Residential (HDR) at 1042
San Juan Street and 1052 San Juan Street.
3. That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 4422
recommending that the City Council approve DR 2019-00019 for
building design and site layout for two (2) duplexes and one (1) single
family residence and the preservation of an existing single-family historic
resource at 1042 San Juan Street.
Reekstin Presentation given.
Jha Jha suggested adding a condition requiring that residents renting or purchasing
the units must use their carport/garage for parking and not storage being that
there is already an issue with street parking.
Chu Chu asked if City staff knew if the applicant was intending to sell or lease the
units.
Reekstin Per Reekstin, the proposed units would all be rental units. There is no
subdivision being proposed. He was unsure if any units would be owner
occupied.
Mason Mason agreed with Jha's concerns previously mentioned and she asked if a
condition could be added to Resolution No. 4422.
Willkom Per Willkom, the TCC does require garages to be used for parking of vehicles;
however, if it is the Commission's desire to add a condition it can be specified
within the Conditions of Approval that the garage is to be used for parking of
vehicles and limited storage, provided that cars can still be parked in the
garage.
Minutes — Planning Commission February 9, 2021 — Page 10 of 13
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
8:04 p.m. Hurtado confirmed there were no additional public comments.
Chu Chu suggested parking permits be required in order to assist with the already
current parking issue.
Mason In response to Chu's previous comment, Mason stated that parking permits
could be a requirement in the future, but that it is not a requirement now.
Willkom Willkom provided further clarifications regarding carports and garages. The
TCC requires covered spaces and in the case of this project, the nature of the
proposal is a duplex. City staff encouraged the applicant to design the project
with garages as staff felt that garages would be more appropriate than a
carport. As far as parking and storage of materials inside a garage, the TCC
states garages must be used for parking of vehicles and limited storage is
acceptable provided vehicles can still be parked within the garage. If it is the
desire of the Commission, City staff can add a condition that clearly identifies
garages must be used for parking of vehicles.
Motion: It was moved by Jha, with the suggested added condition requiring vehicle
parking in the garage, seconded by Chu, to adopt Resolution Nos. 4420, 4421
and 4422, as amended. Motion carried 4-0.
REGULAR BUSINESS:
Adopted Reso. 5. 2021 HISTORIC AND CULTURAL RESOURCES ADVISOR WORK
No. 4416. PROGRAM
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission, acting as the Historic and Cultural
Resources Advisor (HCRA) to the City Council, adopt a 2021 Work
Program per Resolution No. 4416.
Reekstin Presentation given.
Chu Chu commended Reekstin for the presentation. She had no further comments.
Jha Jha asked Mason why the Commission was appointed this role and inquired as
to why there was a need for six (6) hours of training. He voiced his opinion
regarding the webinars currently being offered not being related to Tustin. Jha
would prefer having the training on Tustin's history.
Reekstin In response to Jha's previous comments, Reekstin stated that the City Council
appointed this role to the Commission because they felt the Commission was
well versed in historic preservation issues and what happens in our city. The
City Council wanted to consolidate some city functions and at one time there
Minutes — Planning Commission February 9, 2021 — Page 11 of 13
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
was a separate committee that worked on historic preservation issues and the
City Council made the decision to give the Planning Commission the
opportunity to carry out these duties. As part of that, the City Council wanted
the Commission to feel comfortable with historic preservation as a topic so they
instituted the requirement of training. The City is also required to have the
Commission trained pursuant to the requirements of the Certified Local
Government (CLG) program, which is run by the State of California and City
staff is required to encourage the Commission to provide training opportunities
related to historic preservation if the City wants to remain in the CLG program.
Reekstin further explained that the CLG program recognizes the cities
throughout the State that value historic preservation. Tustin was the first city in
Orange County to become certified, and City staff takes pride in knowing what
the City has done with historic preservation in valuing the Old Town area. He
added that there are some grants available to CLG members each year and
the City has taken advantage of those types of grants in the past (i.e. surveys,
access to expertise from the State Office of Historic Preservation). Reekstin
concluded that the CLG program is more of a recognition program that
recognizes cities that have adopted an ordinance for historic preservation and
those that have completed a survey of a property, etc.
Willkom Willkom added that with this new role, City staff plans on bringing the
Commission to the Historic District to educate the Commission directly about
the City's resources. Due to Covid-19, a lot of the programs are not taking
place. City staff is hoping, in the near future, they can provide some training
and workshops that relates more to the Tustin community.
Kozak Kozak thanked Reekstin for the presentation and for his knowledge and
passion for historic preservation.
Mason Mason asked for the total cost of a bust and also about the status of the survey
and the firm the City is working with. She also mentioned the great opportunity
to be a part of the HRC and she commended Reekstin and Dove for their part
with the entire historic preservation process.
Willkom Per Willkom, the total cost for the bust is $10,000 with donations from
individuals for the base of the bust, which is somewhat costly. Last year, the
bust program did not carry out due to lack of donations. In addition, she stated
that due to Covid-19, the survey was delayed, but the firm (ARG) is completing
all of the necessary work — ARG has visited all of the resources that may or
may not be eligible in the inclusion of the survey. Right now, ARG is writing the
narrative and context statement and they should be complete in the near future
which will be shared with the Commission.
8:28 p.m. Hurtado confirmed that there was no public input received.
Minutes — Planning Commission February 9, 2021 — Page 12 of 13
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Motion: It was moved by Chu seconded by Kozak, to adopt Resolution No. 4416.
Motion carried 4-0.
Received & filed. 6. CITY OF TUSTIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2020 YEAR IN
REVIEW
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission receive and file the report.
DiLeva Presentation given.
STAFF CONCERNS:
Willkom City staff is continuing to work on the Housing Element (HE) Update as well as
in the process of working on community outreach (i.e. email, dedicated HE web
page) and currently, there is an on-line survey for residents to complete. This
will assist City staff in obtaining input on what is important to the community (i.e.
vision, goals to be included in the HE). Willkom encouraged the viewers and
audience members to visit the City's website and complete the survey.
COMMISSION CONCERNS:
Chu Chu commended DiLeva for the Year in Review presentation and to staff for all
of their hard work.
Jha Jha had no concerns.
Kozak Kozak thanked staff for the meeting presentations and reports. On January 19,
2021, he participated in the OCTA Citizens Advisory Committee meeting and
Supervisor Wagner's Third District meeting.
Mason Welcome Irma Huitron!
8.48 p.m. ADJOURNMENT:
The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission is scheduled for
Tuesday, February 23, 2021.
_E DocuSigned by:
D3273B6D898A43D...
DocuSigned by: AMY MASON
�" ^� C Chairperson
ED45DA2623654A5...
JUSTINA L. WILLKOM
Planning Commission Secretary
Minutes — Planning Commission February 9, 2021 — Page 13 of 13
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
MINUTES
VIDEO CONFERENCING
TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING
DECEMBER 22, 2020
Mason "During the Statewide COVID-19 Emergency, the public is not permitted to
convene in person for this public meeting. However, the public may still view
and comment on the meetina as follows.":
Mason To watch the meeting, the public may observe the meeting via the City's
ranicus service at
Ir s-//www.tusfii ca.oirg/2,8„2/O�,ca�; fl s A ei das or on
local Cox Channel 851.
Mason To comment on one or more items, you may send your comments to
..............................'...........................................::::..::::.iipl ustlinca.oir or by accessing the City's "SpeakUp„
....................... „� olrrnlrrn......
comment system as follows:
6:02 p.m. CALL TO ORDER: 6:00 p.m.
Given. INVOCATION: Chu
All present. ROLL CALL: Chair Mason
Chair Pro Tem Kozak
Commissioners Chu, Jha
None. PUBLIC CONCERNS:
CONSENT CALENDAR:
Approved the 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES —DECEMBER 08, 2020
Minutes of the
December 8, 2020
Planning
Commission
meeting.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission approve the Minutes of the December
08, 2020 Planning Commission meeting, as provided.
Motion: It was moved by Chu, seconded by Jha, to approve the Minutes of the
December 08, 2020 Planning Commission meeting. Motion carried 4-0.
Minutes — Planning Commission January 26, 2021 — Page 1 of 5
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
PUBLIC HEARING:
Adopted Reso. 2. DESIGN REVIEW (DR) 2019-00016, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
No. 4414, as (CUP) 2019-00017, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2019-00018,
amended & Reso. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2020-0017, AND LOT LINE
No. 4415. ADJUSTMENT (LLA) 2020-0001
APPLICANT:
Peter Gonzalez
7 -Eleven, Inc.
330 East Lambert Road
Brea, CA 91403
PROPERTY OWNERS
Erik S. Gulfin Josh Golcheh
7 -Eleven, Inc. Golcheh Development and Investments, LLC
1722 Routh Street 1100 Glendon Avenue, Suite 1719
Dallas, TX 75201 Los Angeles, CA 90024
LOCATION: 16791 McFadden Avenue & 16801 McFadden Avenue
REQUEST:
1. DR 2019-00016 & CUP 2019-00017: demolition of an existing
commercial building and construction of a convenience store with a
six (6) island/twelve (12) pump service station.
2. CUP 2019-00018: to authorize the sale of off-site alcoholic
beverages in conjunction with a convenience store.
3. CUP 2020-00017: to authorize shared parking between lots through
joint -use parking.
4. LLA 2020-0001: to consolidate four (4) parcels into one (1) parcel.
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS:
This project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Sections 15332, Class 32.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission:
1. Adopt Resolution No. 4414, approving DR 2019-00016, CUP
2019-00017, CUP 2020-0017, and LLA 2020-0001 to consolidate
Minutes — Planning Commission January 26, 2021 — Page 2 of 5
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
four (4) parcels into one (1) parcel to establish a convenience store
with a six (6) island/twelve (12) pump service station and authorize
shared parking between lots through joint -use parking.
2. Adopt Resolution No. 4415, approving CUP 2019-00018 to
authorize the sale of off-site alcoholic beverages in conjunction
with a convenience store.
Aguilar Presentation given.
Willkom Willkom discussed the revisions staff recommended to Exhibit A of
Resolution No. 4414 with the Commission prior to the meeting. Specifically,
with Condition No. 1.7, which staff proposed removing any items related to
noise since this proposed use is not a noise generated type of use. Also,
Condition No. 4.6 related to the conflict between fueling trucks and vehicle
queuing. Staff asked the Commission to remove that condition completely
due to staff's conversation with the City's traffic engineer who did not foresee
any conflict.
Jha Jha commented on the safety cameras due to the high crime area, which
was already addressed by staff.
Chu Chu asked about the previous company at the project site, which she thought
may have been a 76 Gas station. She also asked staff for the number of
islands and service stations the 76 Gas station had as well as why they
ceased operation (i.e. land contamination?).
Aguilar In response to Chu's previous questions, Aguilar was unsure of the name of
the previous gas station, but she confirmed there was a gas station there for
many years; however, the property has been vacant since 1994. There are
currently two (2) existing gas stations on the northeast corner of McFadden
and Tustin Village Way, as well as the west corner. Per Aguilar, this would
be the third gas station at the intersection. The site was contaminated due
to the previous gas station. The contamination was resolved following the
removal of the underground tanks. Staff cannot confirm the reason why that
gas station may have ceased operation
Jha Jha added, since he is also a gas station owner, that the reason the previous
gas station shut down could have been due to the ground contamination. In
the 1980's and 1990's, several gas stations had single wall tanks and the
tanks would leak. The owners would have to excavate the tanks and provide
soil remediation on the property. Jha further explained that if the gas station
was owned by a private party, the company would not be able to afford to
remove the tanks, remediate the contaminated soil, and build a new gas
station, which led to several gas stations closing in the 1980's and 1990's.
Minutes — Planning Commission January 26, 2021 — Page 3 of 5
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Mason Mason added that the comments previously mentioned were speculation,
not factual.
Chu Chu asked for the number of notices mailed out to the neighboring
businesses and residents. She referenced the opposition letters/emails
received the day of the meeting.
Aguilar Aguilar confirmed any property owner within the 300 -foot radius of the
exterior boundary lines of the parcels received a notice with regards to this
project site.
Willkom Willkom stated that the City received a total of seven (7) emails and/or e -
Comments which came from five (5) individuals. Three (3) of the individuals
commented that the City of Tustin does not need an additional gas station
since there are many in the area. Willkom reminded the Commission that
their purview is related to land use, not the economic feasibility. She stated
that one of the individuals works for Cal Trans and his concern was related
to site distance visibility. Staff consulted with the City's Traffic Engineer and
was informed that the on-site circulation, along with traffic flow on adjacent
streets, have been fully analyzed, and no site distance issues are
anticipated. Willkom added that another one of the e -Comments came from
the applicant of the project.
Daudt Daudt touched on the consideration points for the Commission's
deliberations. The Tustin City Code (TCC) does enumerate certain criteria
that the Commission must evaluate and make findings in favor of "if" the
Commission is moving towards approval of the project. He further explained
that these consideration points are generally focused on the physical impacts
and compatibility of a project with the surrounding neighborhood, etc., but it
does not address the economic impact or the desirability of a particular use
or business in relation to other established businesses within the area.
Through the TCC, the analysis is looking at the land use components of a
project, and whether or not a project, as conditioned, can be deemed to be
a project that would not have a negative or adverse impact physically, in the
surrounding neighborhood or incompatibility issues in a physical sense, or
based on zoning conditions.
Chu Chu asked who would be operating the proposed business (i.e. 7 -Eleven
Corporation or franchisee).
Aguilar Per Aguilar, an existing franchisee will be operating the project location.
Kozak Kozak commented on the adjacent freeway and the desire to place a gas
station on the proposed site, which was previously occupied by a gas station.
He preferred an alternative use but understood that the proposed use was
probably best suited for the project site. Kozak was in support of the project.
Minutes — Planning Commission January 26, 2021 — Page 4 of 5
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Mason Mason stated she understood why the project location was selected, given
the adjacency of the freeway, and she also knew that the site has been
"abandoned" and has been an "eye sore" in a high-density area. The
proposed project would revitalize and bring new life to the area. Mason
commended the applicant for taking the time to be thoughtful about the
project. She was in favor of the item.
Motion: It was moved by Chu, seconded by Kozak, to adopt Resolution No. 4414, as
amended and Resolution No. 4415. Motion carried 4-0.
Willkom Willkom reiterated that the item is appealable to the City Council and anyone
can file an appeal within ten (10) days of this action.
None. REGULAR BUSINESS:
STAFF CONCERNS:
Willkom Willkom thanked the Commission and staff for their hard work and support
this past year. Happy holidays and see you in 2021!
COMMISSION CONCERNS:
Chu Chu had no concerns. She thanked everyone for their hard work and she
is looking forward to 2021. Stay safe and healthy!
Jha Jha thanked staff for pushing through COVID and 2020. Happy holidays
and happy New Year!
Kozak Kozak wished everyone happy holidays and a happy 2021!
Mason Mason voiced her gratitude for her fellow Commissioners and staff. She
also commended Willkom and the great work she and staff continue to do.
She wished everyone a happy and safe holiday season!
6:42 p.m. ADJOURNMENT:
The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission is scheduled for
Tuesday, January 12, 2021.
DocuSign/
e�dvq/by:�
I11t
D3273B6D898A43D...
DocuSby:
tE
d 00&AMY MASON
45DA2623B54A5_._ Chairperson
JUSTINA L. WILLKOM
Planning Commission Secretary
Minutes — Planning Commission January 26, 2021 — Page 5 of 5
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
MINUTES
VIDEO CONFERENCING
TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING
DECEMBER 8, 2020
Mason "During the Statewide COVID-19 Emergency, the public is not permitted to
convene in person for this public meeting. However, the public may still view
and comment on the meetina as follows.":
Mason To watch the meeting, the public may observe the meeting via the City's
Ir p ,,;;,// ;,,,;,u, ,iii ,.,.org/282/ eaea�liir� , ,,,, ,g,��,nd or on local
ranicus service at I, ,, i „
Cox Channel 851.
Mason To comment on one or more items, you may send your comments to
°„Ila.,irk,ir�iii.n.gC ,r�rn„r�rn,ii , ,i,;,,,,, ,iinca.oir or by accessing the City's "SpeakUp”
,� ioi �u
comment system as follows:
6:00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER: 6:00 p.m.
Given. INVOCATION: Jha
All present. ROLL CALL: Commissioners Chu, Jha, Kozak, Mason
None. PUBLIC CONCERNS:
CONSENT CALENDAR:
Approved the 1
Minutes of the
November 24,
2020
Planning
Commission
meeting.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES — NOVEMBER 24, 2020
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission approve the Minutes of the November 24,
2020 Planning Commission meeting, as provided.
Motion: It was moved by Chu, seconded by Jha, to approve the Minutes of the
November 24, 2020 Planning Commission meeting. Motion carried 4-0.
Minutes — Planning Commission December 8, 2020 — Page 1 of 6
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
PUBLIC HEARING:
Adopted 2. DESIGN REVIEW (DR) 2020-0005, SUBDIVISION (SUB) 2020-
Reso. Nos. 002/TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP (TPM) 2020-149
4411 & 4412.
APPLICANT:
B8 Myford Industrial Owner LLC
A Delaware Limited Liability Company
938 Azalea Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
LOCATION: 14451 Myford Road
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS:
A Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with
the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Article 6
of California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3.
REQUEST:
To demolish an existing industrial building and adjacent parking lot and the
construction of a 220,331 square -foot industrial warehouse facility and to
merge two (2) adjacent lots into one (1) parcel to accommodate the
proposed project.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission:
1. Adopt Resolution No. 4411 recommending that the Planning
Commission find that the Mitigated Negative Declaration is adequate
for DR 2020-0005 and SUB 2020-0002/TPM 2020-149 for the
proposed project.
2. Adopt Resolution No. 4412 recommending that the Planning
Commission approve DR 2020-0005 and SUB 2020-0002/TPM 2020-
149 to demolish the existing industrial building and adjacent parking lot
and construct a 220,331 -square -foot industrial warehouse facility and
merge two (2) adjacent lots into one (1) parcel.
Aguilar Presentation given.
Chu Chu asked about the supplemental items provided earlier that day, specifically,
the changes related to traffic and parking.
Minutes — Planning Commission December 8, 2020 — Page 2 of 6
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Aguilar In response to Chu's question, Aguilar stated that the City of Irvine had
questions concerning traffic. Originally, there were measures in place to
consider traffic at a later time in addition to queuing, however, staff felt that
through the traffic impact analysis, provided by the applicant and the City's
review, the parking and noise sections were not necessary for this project, and
it was ultimately decided to remove them from the resolutions.
Willkom Willkom further explained that the project complies with all of the development
standards (traffic, queuing. and noise) therefore the traffic and noise analysis
language was removed, per the revised Condition No. 1.7 since the applicant
had conducted all of the studies related to traffic in the MND Analysis. As per
the noise issue, there is a condition of approval that requires the applicant to
comply with the noise standard, which is why staff felt that these two (2)
categories were not necessary to be included in the Condition No. 1.7. Per the
parking, the applicant has complied with the development standard by
providing the required number of spaces. There is also an alternate site plan
which the applicant also provided, as part of the project. City staff felt that the
building now is a spec building with no tenants in mind and that the alternate
site plan would help the City in case the future tenant(s) may require additional
parking. Per Willkom, this would be an assurance the City would like to have
included in the condition of approval to avoid parking issues in the future.
Chu Chu asked Willkom what the current status of the two (2) existing buildings were
on-site. She also asked if the neighboring businesses and residents were
notified of the project.
Willkom In response to Chu's additional question, Willkom stated that the building on-
site was being utilized by AT&T, but it is now currently vacant.
Aguilar Per Aguilar, all property owners, within a 300 -foot radius, were notified of the
MND and the public hearing via public noticing.
Kozak Kozak expressed his support of the project.
Mason Mason wanted staff to further clarify some of the "unknowns" in the
infrastructure of the spec building, referring to the supplemental items. She
asked about businesses going in to the project site, based on their operations,
if they would address the Commission (i.e. request for CUP's) based on their
business. Mason wanted to ensure the Commission had full visibility of what
was going on as far as hours of operation, etc. She also asked, per the
supplementals presented to the Commission, if there are any noise or parking
issues, would the Commission be made aware of them.
Willkom In response to Mason's questions, Willkom stated some businesses are
permitted by rights and in those cases, typically, those businesses would
submit a tenant improvement plan for the City's review of their operation. At
Minutes — Planning Commission December 8, 2020 — Page 3 of 6
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Willkom that time, additional requirements or restrictions of conditions, will be handled
with the prospective tenant. Willkom added that other uses will require a CUP,
and in that case, the Commission would have the ability to consider the CUP
request. She confirmed that "yes" the Commission would be made aware if
there were any noise or parking issues.
Motion: It was moved by Kozak, seconded by Jha, to adopt Resolution Nos. 4411 and
4412. Motion carried 4-0.
Adopted 3. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2020-0019 & DESIGN REVIEW (DR)
Reso. No. 2020-0019
4413.
PROPERTY OWNER/ Steelwave LLC
APPLICANT: Attn: Jonathan Hastanan
3335 Susan Street, #250
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
LOCATION: 15771 Red Hill Avenue
ENVIRONMENTAL:
This project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to Section 15311 (Class
11) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
REQUEST:
A request to enhance the exterior fagade with painted murals and applied
graphics for the existing building.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 4413, approving
CUP 2020-0019 and DR 2020-2019, a request to enhance the exterior
facade with painted murals and applied graphics for the existing building.
Beier Presentation given.
Jha Jha asked Beier which tenant would be occupying the building.
Beier Per Beier, tenant improvements are underway for Tricon American Homes a
Real Estate and Property Management Company. The proposed project is
to enhance the building before opening up their doors.
Chu Chu made favorable comments with regards to the contemporary design of
the building.
Minutes — Planning Commission December 8, 2020 — Page 4 of 6
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Kozak Kozak also made favorable comments with regards to the facade update
which adds to the appearance of the existing building.
Mason Mason concurred with her fellow Commissioners as far as Tustin's heritage
being used to enhance the existing building.
Motion: It was moved by Mason, seconded by Jha, to adopt Resolution No. 4413.
Motion carried 4-0.
None. REGULAR BUSINESS.
STAFF CONCERNS:
Willkom Willkom had no concerns or comments.
COMMISSION CONCERNS:
Chu None.
Jha Jha wished everyone Happy Holidays and to stay safe during the
Kozak Kozak thanked outgoing Council Members Bernstein and Puckett for their
years of service to the City of Tustin and the community. He participated
• 12/1 Swearing in Ceremony of the new Tustin Mayor, Letitia Clark and
Mayor Pro Tem, Austin Lumbard
• 12/5 City of Tustin's Annual Christmas Tree Lighting
• 12/7 Pearl Harbor Memorial Service
Kozak also thanked staff for their hard work with the reports and presentations.
Mason Mason concurred with Kozak's comments on Bernstein and Puckett's years of
service and commitment to Tustin and she congratulated Mayor Clark, Mayor
Pro Tem Lumbard, Council Members Gallagher and Gomez. She thanked City
staff for their hard work on preparing for the Commission meeting. Happy
Holidays in the event there is no meeting on December 22, 2020.
6:38 p.m. ADJOURNMENT:
The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission is scheduled for
Tuesday, December 22, 2020.
Minutes — Planning Commission December 8, 2020 — Page 5 of 6
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
D/o/pc_u-Signedby-
AMY MASON
DocuSigned by: Chairperson
Cuu� � -4. ItJi,Q *'04u.
ED45DA2623B0
54A5...
JUSTINA L. WILLKOM
Planning Commission Secretary
Minutes — Planning Commission December 8, 2020 — Page 6 of 6
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
MINUTES
VIDEO CONFERENCING
TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING
NOVEMBER 24, 2020
Mason "During the Statewide COVID-19 Emergency, the public is not permitted to
convene in person for this public meeting. However, the public may still view
and comment on the meetina as follows.":
Mason To watch the meeting, the public may observe the meeting via the City's
ranicus service at
Ihttp ;;,//rn, ;;,u stii. ga..,, .!Lq , ,/n 1,ca a, iii „ s.... 1 , , or on
local Cox Channel 851.
Mason To comment on one or more items, you may send your comments to
�,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,',,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,;;;;,,,,,,loiru tustliinca.oirg or by accessing the City's "SpeakUp„
l,,,,,,llaiiiii .,,, �..�ol'rrnl'rryiiss„ ,,,
,,,,,
comment system as follows:
6:00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER: 6:00 p.m.
Given. INVOCATION: Gallagher
All present. ROLL CALL: Chair Mason
Chair Pro Tem Kozak
Commissioners Chu, Gallagher, Jha
None. PUBLIC CONCERNS:
CONSENT CALENDAR:
Approved the 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — NOVEMBER 10, 2020
Minutes of the
November 10,
2020 Planning
Commission
meeting.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission approve the Minutes of the November 10,
2020 Planning Commission meeting, as provided.
Motion. It was moved by Kozak, seconded by Gallagher, to approve the Minutes of
the November 10, 2020 Planning Commission meeting. Motion carried 5-0.
Planning Commission Minutes of November 24, 2020 - Page 1 of 5
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
PUBLIC HEARING:
Adopted 2. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2019-00016 & DESIGN REVIEW
Resolution No. (DR) 2019-00008
4409.
APPLICANT: PROPERTY OWNER:
ROMA D'ITALIA COREA PROPERTIES, LLC
611 EL CAMINO REAL PO BOX 3831
TUSTI N, CA 92780 TUSTI N, CA 92781-3831
LOCATION: 611 EL CAMINO REAL
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS:
This project is categorically exempt (Class 1, Class 3) pursuant to
Sections 15301 and 15303 of the California Environmental Quality Act.
REQUEST:
A request for exterior modifications to an outdoor patio for dining, on-site
alcoholic beverage sales within the outdoor dining patio and to satisfy the
required parking not provided on-site through the Old Town Parking
Exception Program.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 4409 approving DR
2019-00008 for architectural, site and landscape design in conjunction
with an outdoor dining patio, CUP 2019-00016 to authorize on-site
alcoholic beverage sales within the outdoor dining patio, authorize a
parking exception of twenty-one (21) parking spaces, and a waiver of the
annual parking exception fees for the property located at 611 EI Camino
Real.
Dove Presentation given.
Chu Chu asked Dove if the CUP was a temporary permit or if there was a time
limit on the permit. She also asked if the applicant would have to renew the
CUP.
Dove In response to Chu's inquiry, Dove stated that the CUP is ongoing until the
restaurant is no longer in operation. She added that once the CUP is
approved, it would remain valid with the land. If in the future, another
restaurant moved in, and they had the same operation, the CUP could remain
the same with the new restaurant.
Planning Commission Minutes of November 24, 2020 - Page 2 of 5
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Jha Jha asked for the length of time on the fee exemption.
Dove In response to Jha's question, Dove stated that the length of the fee
exemption would be ongoing.
Commission Favorable comments from the Commission which generally included:
Willkom's leadership skills in working with the applicant on obtaining the
outdoor seating, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, and a great
addition to the restaurant and the downtown area.
Motion: It was moved by Chu, seconded by Jha, to adopt Resolution No. 4409.
Motion carried 5-0.
Adopted 3. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) 2020-0013
Resolution No.
4410.
PROPERTY OWNER/
APPLICANT: SCHOOLSFIRST FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
ATTN: CHRISTINA QUINTERO
1200 EDINGER AVENUE
TUSTIN, CA 92780
LOCATION: 15332, 15336, 15432, 15442 NEWPORT
AVENUE, 15222 DEL AMO AVENUE, 1200
EDINGER AVENUE
REQUEST:
A request to establish a master sign plan for SchoolsFirst Federal
Credit Union Campus.
ENVIRONMENTAL:
This project is categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15311 (Class
11) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 4410 approving
CUP 2020-0013 to authorize the establishment of a master sign plan
for the SchoolsFirst Federal Credit Union campus.
Aguilar Presentation given.
Chu Chu asked what the purpose was of the five (5) different buildings on-site.
Planning Commission Minutes of November 24, 2020 - Page 3 of 5
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Aguilar In response to Chu's question, Aguilar stated that there were two (2)
existing office buildings and one (1) warehouse. As part of the newly
approved project, the applicant is also adding a retail branch and corporate
office building, located along Newport Avenue and Del Amo Avenue, and a
new parking structure to the rear.
Kozak Kozak added that the sign design is contemporary and compatible with the
building, and that he was also in support of the location of the sign.
Mason Mason concurred with Kozak and had favorable comments regarding the
location and the project itself. She was in support of the item.
Motion: It was moved by Gallagher, seconded by Kozak, to adopt Resolution No.
4410. Motion carried 5-0.
None. REGULAR BUSINESS:
STAFF CONCERNS:
Willkom Willkom wished everyone a "happy Thanksgiving! Be safe and stay well."
COMMISSION CONCERNS:
Gallagher Gallagher had no concerns. He informed his fellow Commissioners that this
Commission meeting may be his last meeting and that he looks forward to
working with City staff in a new role.
Chu Chu participated in the Tustin Police Department's virtual "Fall Block Captain
meeting". She also watched the "25th Annual State of the City Address".
"Have a safe and happy Thanksgiving!" Chu thanked City staff and her fellow
Commissioners for working well together during this trying time.
Jha Jha wished everyone a happy Thanksgiving as well.
Kozak Kozak visited the Veteran's Memorial at the former MCAS, Tustin. He
watched the dedication of the Veteran's Park Monument as well. Kozak also
watched the State of the City address. Congratulations to Gallagher and
happy Thanksgiving to all!
Mason Mason congratulated Gallagher for his new role as a Council Member and
she commended Jha for his participation in the City Council race. Mason was
delighted to see the Orange County Register article regarding Tustin's
Christmas decorations going up early.
Planning Commission Minutes of November 24, 2020 - Page 4 of 5
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
6:44 p.m. ADJOURNMENT:
The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission is scheduled for
Tuesday, December 8, 2020.
D/o/pc_u-Signedby-
AMY MASON
DocuSigned by: Chairperson
Cuu� � -4. It�i,Q,Q.J'Om
ED45DA2623B0
54A5...
JUSTINA L. WILLKOM
Planning Commission Secretary
Planning Commission Minutes of November 24, 2020 - Page 5 of 5
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
MINUTES
VIDEO CONFERENCING
TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING
NOVEMBER 10, 2020
Mason "During the Statewide COVID-19 Emergency, the public is not permitted to
convene in person for this public meeting. However, the public may still view
and comment on the meeting as follows.":
Mason To watch the meeting, the public may observe the meeting via the City's
Granicus service at iittps://www.tustinca.org/282/Meetings-Agendas or on
local Cox Channel 851.
Mason To comment on one or more items, you may send your comments to
Plan ningCommission(a-)tustinca.orq or by accessing the City's "SpeakUp"
comment system as follows:
6:02 p.m. CALL TO ORDER.
Given. INVOCATION: Kozak
All present. ROLL CALL: Chair Mason
Chair Pro Tem Kozak
Commissioners Chu, Gallagher, Jha
West Matt West, City Manager, announced Justina L. Willkom's appointment to the
Community Development Director role.
Willkom Willkom thanked everyone for their support in her newly appointed role.
None. PUBLIC CONCERNS:
CONSENT CALENDAR:
Approved the 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES —OCTOBER 13, 2020
Minutes of the
October 13, 2020
Planning
Commission
meeting.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission approve the Minutes of the October 13,
2020 Planning Commission meeting, as provided.
Minutes — Planning Commission November 10, 2020 — Page 1 of 6
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Motion: It was moved by Gallagher, seconded by Kozak, to approve the October 13,
2020 Planning Commission meeting minutes. Motion carried 5-0.
None. PUBLIC HEARING.
REGULAR BUSINESS:
Approved the 2. TUSTIN HISTORIC REGISTER NOMINATION — KIDD HOUSE — 124
nomination of NORTH B STREET
124 North 8
Street to the
City's Historic
Register Plaque
Program.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission approve the nomination of 124 North B
Street to the City's Historic Register Plaque Program and select "Kidd
House - 1940" as the most appropriate historical name and date of
construction of the property.
Dove Presentation given.
Commission The Commission made favorable comments to Dove for her presentation,
as well as to the property owners for their beautiful home and the history
regarding the home.
Motion: It was moved by Chu, seconded by Jha, to approve the nomination of 124
North B Street to the City's Historic Register Plaque Program.
3. 61" CYCLE HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE — STATUS AND
OVERVIEW
The City of Tustin Housing Element is a State -mandated policy
document within the Tustin General Plan that provides direction for the
implementation of various programs to meet existing and projected
future housing needs within the City of Tustin. The Housing Element
details the City's strategy for enhancing and preserving the
community's character, identifies strategies for expanding housing
opportunities and services for all household types and income groups,
and provides the primary policy guidance for local decision-making
related to housing. Staff will be presenting an initial briefing and
overview of the Housing Element Update.
Demkowicz Presentation given.
Minutes — Planning Commission November 10, 2020 — Page 2 of 6
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Willkom Willkom added the following comments, in general: staff has a lot of work
ahead in order to move forward with the Housing Element Update; the goal
of tonight's presentation was to give the Commission an overview of the
process; there will be a community roundtable (via virtual setting) in order
to be transparent and to engage the public in prioritizing housing needs and
goals; there will be a webpage dedicated for Housing Element Update and
the public is invited to check City progress and upcoming workshops and
meeting schedule; Ms. Demkowicz sent notices to over 80 various non-
profit organizations to gain community participation; and staff will be
updating the Commission on the process regularly.
Chu Chu's comments/questions generally included: she requested an update on
the letter sent to the County regarding the RHNA numbers; she asked what
the likelihood of the numbers being reduced would be; Chu asked
Demkowicz to elaborate on the types of grant/funding program the City is
qualified for; and she asked about hotels and motels as possible housing
options.
Willkom Per Chu's question regarding the RHNA numbers, Willkom explained that
the City currently has approximately 6,765 allocated housing units and the
City has filed for an appeal in order to get the RHNA allocation numbers
reduced. The appeal hearings should happen in December 2020, with a
response hopefully in February 2021. Per Willkom, it is difficult to predict
the likelihood of the numbers being reduced and that 17 out of the 34 of the
Orange County jurisdictions filed for appeals, which does not mean the
numbers will go away. Many of the numbers, whether or not the appeal is
successful, will need to be redistributed back to the cities within the State,
with the exception if the State is willing to reduce the Statewide overall
numbers.
Demkowicz Demkowicz indicated that by having a certified housing element, the City
would be eligible for State's grant funding or programs the City would like
to take advantage of. The Housing Element would then be a catalyst if the
City wants to apply for a grant or other monetary solutions to be used for
the Housing Element Program.
Willkom In addition to Demkowicz's comments, Willkom stated that the City is
currently receiving the S132 Grant monies from the State and are using that
funding to assist the City with the Housing Element Update. To be eligible
for many of the State's grant programs, a compliant Housing Element is
required. In response to Chu's question regarding hotels/motels as an
option for housing, Willkom added that one of the tasks is to identify sites
to accommodate the allocation. Many of those sites could be vacant sites,
or sites where the density/zoning could be increased, or possibly
hotels/motels being converted into affordable housing. Staff still needs to
go through the process of identifying these items and determine whether or
Minutes — Planning Commission November 10, 2020 — Page 3 of 6
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
not they are feasible, as well as whether or not there is support from the
community, the Commission and the City Council.
Mason Mason asked if the Commission would be making an assessment prior to
submitting the Housing Element; tonight's overview would help assist the
Commission with potential solutions along with the submission on these
types of items.
Willkom Willkom stated that tonight's presentation is an overview of the Housing
Element Update process. Staff will be returning to the Commission in early
2021, after the City has gathered information from the community. At that
time, staff will provide an outline to the Commission with potential sites,
programs, goals and objectives. The Commission can assess and provide
input before staff submits the draft Housing Element to the State.
Gallagher Gallagher commended staff for the work involved in this great task, but he
asked if the City considered hiring an outside company who specializes in
this type of work and who could provide innovative ideas as to what other
cities are doing. He asked if the City has a consultant to augment City staff.
Gallagher voiced his concern with the process and identified adding
density, housing (ADU's) and the potential of the public being upset when
they start to see these actions being implemented. Gallagher asked that
staff be very cognizant, since it is a very complex issue, and difficult for a
lay person to see that the City is not creating this problem but trying to solve
it. Staff needs to communicate to the public that the City is not trying to add
more housing but trying to control it. Gallagher could see that being a
potential issue down the road. He also added that the City has to be careful
how we support housing because staff mentioned the ADU's being part of
the solution, but staff should try not to rely so heavily on the ADU's because
that is what will cause the parking issues. The City is fortunate to protect
the character of Tustin, so he mentioned the Pacific Center East being a
potential site, where there is no housing (i.e. add overlay, units) or another
opportunity would be the Tustin train station industrial area. Another area
to be creative could be the Tustin Market Place. He mentioned the
Flexibility No Net Loss clause.
Willkom In response to Gallagher's previous comment, Willkom stated that the City
currently has a consultant assisting with the Housing Element Update, Lucy
Yeager. The City also has a collaboration team with other cities, in order
to help each other out since housing issues are common among Orange
County cities.
Reekstin Reekstin added that since so many cities are also working on the Housing
Element, some cities are not getting many responses to their Request for
Proposals and that some cities are having to do their own Housing Element
since there are no consultants available or they are not bidding on these
types of projects.
Minutes — Planning Commission November 10, 2020 — Page 4 of 6
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
Jha Jha asked what was in the pipeline to address the allocation (i.e. Tustin
Legacy, RHASP, DCCSP).
Willkom Willkom stated that as of now, staff has included the specific plan areas,
but that does not mean staff cannot look at other areas within the City's
jurisdiction (i.e. potential mixed-use sites). Again, this is the beginning of
the process and staff will look into all of these sites to determine if they are
feasible and can be part of the potential RHNA residential sites to achieve
the numbers that have been allocated to the City.
Kozak Kozak emphasized the importance of community outreach for the
development of the Housing Element as well as obtaining as much input as
possible so that the process can move forward.
Mason Mason mentioned innovations taking place throughout California. She
encouraged staff to look beyond Orange County and possibly the bay area
since the density is a lot higher there. This is a learning opportunity for the
City to be innovative and creative in order to lead in the area.
STAFF CONCERNS:
Willkom Willkom reminded the Commission of the upcoming Mayor's State of the City
on November 19, 2020 (virtual event).
COMMISSION CONCERNS:
Chu None.
Gallagher None.
Jha None.
Kozak Kozak attended the following:
10/14: Urban Land Institute meeting (virtual)
10/20: OCTA Citizens Advisory Committee meeting (virtual)
10/21: CPF Awards Ceremony
10/22: PDAOC Planning in 2020 (Three -Part Series — virtual)
10/29: PDAOC Part 2
11/5: PDAOC Part 3
Mason Mason congratulated Willkom on her newly appointed position as the
Community Development Director.
7:05 p.m. ADJOURNMENT:
The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission is scheduled for
Tuesday, November 24, 2020.
Minutes — Planning Commission November 10, 2020 — Page 5 of 6
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
D%o�uSign�d /by,
�
D327386D898A43D...
AMY MASON
Chairperson
DocuSigned by:
-4. Oulk-ow, 0
ED45DA2623854A5...
JUSTINA L. WILLKOM
Planning Commission Secretary
Minutes — Planning Commission November 10, 2020 — Page 6 of 6
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
MINUTES
VIDEO CONFERENCING
TUSTIN PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING
OCTOBER 13, 2020
Mason "During the Statewide COVID-19 Emergency, the public is not permitted to
convene in person for this public meeting. However, the public may still view and
comment on the meeting as follows.":
Mason To watch the meeting, the public may observe the meeting via the City's Granicus
service at htti)s://www.tustinca.org/282/Meetings-Agendas or on local Cox
Channel 851.
Mason To comment on one or more items, you may send your comments to
Plan ningCommission(a)tustinca.org or by accessing the City's "SpeakUp" comment
system as follows:
CALL TO ORDER.
Given. INVOCATION: Chu
All present. ROLL CALL: Chair Mason
Chair Pro Tem Kozak
Commissioners Chu, Gallagher, Jha
Given. READING OF EDMELYNNE NUTTER'S PROCLAMATION
None. PUBLIC CONCERNS:
CONSENT CALENDAR:
Approved the 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES —AUGUST 25, 2020
Minutes of the
August 25, RECOMMENDATION:
2020
Planning That the Planning Commission approve the Minutes of the August 25, 2020
Commission Planning Commission meeting, as provided.
meeting.
Motion: It was moved by Gallagher, seconded by Kozak, to approve the Minutes of the
August 25, 2020 Planning Commission meeting. Motion carried 5-0.
Item was PUBLIC HEARING:
withdrawn.
2. APPEAL OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S APPROVAL OF
TEMPORARY USE PERMIT (TUP) 2020-0077 FOR SWINGING DOOR
TEMPORARY OUTDOOR DINING AT THE REAR OF THE PROPERTY.
Minutes — Planning Commission October 13, 2020 — Page 1 of 3
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
APPELLANT: RICHARD J. RENGEL
333 EL CAMINO REAL
TUSTIN, CA 92780
LOCATION: 355 EL CAMINO REAL
TUSTIN, CA 92780
ENVIRONMENTAL:
This project is categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15301(e) of the
California Code of Regulations (Guidelines for California Environmental Quality
Act).
REQUEST:
Reversal of the approval of Temporary Use Permit (TUP) 2020-0077 for
extended outdoor dining related to the COVID-19 pandemic in the rear
parking lot.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Planning Commission uphold the Community
Development Director's direction to issue TUP 2020-0077 by adopting
Resolution No. 4408.
Mason Mason informed the Commission that the applicant and owner of American Grub
reached an agreement and resolved any issues the applicant had.
REGULAR BUSINESS:
Received and 3. SUMMARY OF PROJECTS
filed.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Planning Commission receive and file this item.
DiLeva Presentation given.
Favorable comments from the Commission regarding DiLeva's presentation.
Motion: It was moved by Chu, seconded by Gallagher, to receive and file the Summary
of Projects report. Motion carried 5-0.
STAFF CONCERNS:
Tiscareno Tiscareno reminded the Commission to please check their City email at least once
per day since this is City staff's primary method of communication. There may also
be urgent matters needing the Commission's attention from the City Council.
Minutes — Planning Commission October 13, 2020 — Page 2 of 3
DocuSign Envelope ID: E79FCF1F-AF68-4563-80A5-1A743A3ADD90
COMMISSION CONCERNS:
Jha No concerns.
Gallagher Gallagher had no concerns but he did have favorable comments regarding the new
ATEP sign at the Tustin Legacy.
Chu Chu had no concerns. She thanked Aguilar for her hard work regarding Item #2
and working with the applicant so diligently.
Kozak Kozak participated in the following online workshops/events:
• 8/26 California Preservation Foundation (CPF) — "Saving the 70's"
• 9/11 CPF — "CEQA Guidelines on Historic Preservation"
• 9/19 Tustin Community Foundation "Families Together" Food Drive for
Needy Families
• 9/30 CPF — "California Building Codes"
• 10/4 Virtual Tustin Tiller Days
• 10/6 Energy Efficiency and Resilience Upgrades for Historic Preservation
Projects Presentation with the Focus on Santa Rosa Junior College
Theater
Mason Mason adjourned the meeting in honor of Kevin Verdi, who passed away recently
and who was the recipient of the Tustin Meadows Man of the Year, along with
serving on the City's Building Board of Appeals Board.
6:31 p.m. ADJOURNMENT:
The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission is scheduled for Tuesday,
October 27, 2020.
DocuSigned by
C
:
�,� In�i� Qk awe
ED45DA2623B54A5...
JUSTINA L. WILLKOM
Planning Commission Secretary
DocuSigned by:
D3273B6D898A43D...
AMY MASON
Chairperson
Minutes — Planning Commission October 13, 2020 — Page 3 of 3