Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC RES 22-17 DocuSign Envelope ID:4E35E1D3-EF78-41C8-AOE8-E108B5F17BE7 RESOLUTION NO. 22-17 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THAT MATTHEW HOWARD, A LOCAL SAFETY MEMBER, IS INDUSTRIALLY DISABLED FROM HIS DUTIES AS A POLICE OFFICER WHEREAS, the City of Tustin (hereinafter referred to as "City") is a contracting agency of the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CaIPERS); and WHEREAS, the California Public Employees' Retirement Law requires that a contracting agency determine whether an employee of such agency in employment in which he/she is classified as a local safety member is disabled for purposes of the California Public Employees' Retirement Law and whether such disability is "industrial" within the meaning of such law; and WHEREAS, an application for the industrial disability retirement of Matthew Howard, employed by the City in the position of Police Officer, for orthopedic injury, has been filed with CalPERS; and WHEREAS, the City has reviewed the medical and other evidence relevant to such alleged disability. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Tustin does hereby find and determine that Matthew Howard is substantially incapacitated within the meaning of the California Public Employees' Retirement Law from performance of his duties in the position of Police Officer and does hereby certify under penalty of perjury that this determination was made on the basis of competent medical opinion and was not used as a substitute for the disciplinary process in accordance with Government Code section 21156(a)(2). Matthew Howard had filed a Workers' Compensation claim for his disabling condition. The Workers' Compensation claim was accepted. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby find and determine that such disability is a result of injury or disease arising out of and in the course of employment with the City. Neither Matthew Howard nor the City has applied to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board for a determination pursuant to Section 21166 as to whether such disability is industrial; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the last date Matthew Howard was in paid status in the position of Police Officer after expiration of his leave rights under Government Code sections 21163 and 21164 was December 16, 2021 and that no dispute as to the expiration of such leave rights is pending. His CalPERS retirement date will be December 17, 2021 . Resolution 22-17 Page 1 of 3 DocuSign Envelope ID:4E35E1D3-EF78-41C8-AOE8-E108B5F17BE7 There is not a possibility of third-party liability. Advanced Disability Pension Payments will be made. The payments will be made monthly in the amount of $4,761 .00 beginning May 31 , 2022. A retroactive payment will be made in the amount of $21 ,193.00 for the period of December 17, 2021 through April 30, 2022. The primary disabling condition is Orthopedic (back). The duration of the disabling condition is of an extended and uncertain duration, lasting more than twelve consecutive months, which is certified by competent medical opinion. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Tustin held on the 17th day of May 2022. DocuSigned by: Gori �Jcv�lv1i�R�d AUS IT IV LL7 BARB, Mayor ATTEST: DocuSigned by: aStti ERI INPA,Y0DA, City Clerk Resolution 22-17 Page 2 of 3 DocuSign Envelope ID:4E35E1D3-EF78-41C8-AOE8-E108B5F17BE7 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS CITY OF TUSTIN ) I, Erica N. Yasuda, City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of the members of the City Council of the City of Tustin is five; that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 22-17 was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin City Council, held on the 17th day of May 2022, by the following vote: COUNCILMEMBER AYES: Lumbard, Cooper, Clark, Gallagher, Gomez (5) COUNCILMEMBER NOES: (0) COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAINED: (0) COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT: (0) DocuSigned by: y'iCa q"'Saa ERIL*oWYASVDA, City Clerk Resolution 22-17 Page 3 of 3