Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC RES 97-30 I 3 RESOLUTION NO. 97-30 4 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY 5 OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA APPROVING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION FOR THE 6 MITCHELL AVENUE WIDENING PROJECT (CIP NO. 200032) 7 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows: 8 I. That the City Council finds and determines that: 9 A. Based on the initial study attached hereto as Exhibit "A", there is no substantial 10 evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. 11 ,-.. B. A proposed Finding of No Significant Impact/Negative 'Declaration was for this project and 'public notice has been given. ·: .... prepared 12 ..... """ 13 C. A public review period was provided and no public comments were received to challenge the determination. I4 NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Tustin as I5 follows: I6 1. That a Final Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI)/Negative Declaration has been completed in compliance with CEQA and state guidelines. The City Council has received 17 and considered the information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration and any public comments which may have been received prior to approving the project and found 18 that the Negative Declaration adequately discussed the environmental effects of the proposed project. 19 20 2. That afar deciding to carry out or approve the Mitchell Avenue Widening Project stuff is directed to prepare and file a Notice of Determination for the project. 21 PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Tustin held on the 21st day of April, 1997. Tracy Wills Worley, Mayor 24 25 ATTEST: 26 27 City Clerk Mitchell Avenue Widening Final Finding of No Significant Impact/Negative Declaration Initial Study: SeCtion 3 City'ofTustin April 1997 Attachment ""A" Section 1 Introduction and Background Section 1: Introduction and Background 1.1 Project-Location and Setting The proposed project will implement improvements on the north side of Mitchell Avenue between Newport Avenue and approximately .170 feet west of C Street within the City of Tustin. Surrounding land uses include commercial and residential uses. The project vicinity is shown. on Exhibit 1. 1.2 Project Description The. proposed project includes acquisition of right-of-way and construction of asphalt pavement for additional lane width, curb, gutter, sidewalk ddveway approaches, curb ramps, and catchbasin(s) along the north side of Mitchell Avenue between Newport Avenue and approximately 170 feet west of C Street. Relocation of utility poles will be required to accommodate the project. Right-of-way acquisition and construction will affect three properties, including a commercial property located at 14111 Newport and two residential properties located at 14111 and 14112 C Street. A strip of approximately 120-lineal feet by 7 feet along the south side of the commercial property and two triangular areas at the southerly comer of the two residential properties will be acquired to accommodate the proposed street improvements. No buildings will be affected, however, two sections of existing wood fencing will require i-econstruction. Depth of pavement construction will be no more than one foot. The project limits are shown in Exhibit 2. 1.3 Project Construction Schedule/Phasing Project construction is anticipated to occur in a single phase lasting approximately three months. The project is tentatively scheduled to begin in August 1997 and be completed in October 1997. ' 1.4 Project Proponent ' ' The City of Tustin Public Works Department will acquire property and construct the proposed improvements. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds were allocated for property acquisition dudrig the 1995-1996 Fiscal Year. Construction funding was allocated dudng the 1996-97 Fiscal Year. PROJECT VICINITY NORTH 'Exhibit '1 PROJECT LIMITS i' 14151 ' 14171 ~ 1 4182 ZE. !-- ~\S E 14191 _: 'T AGO 14201[ Xx U'!~' 14232 1421~ \ · ,_,._---x 14231 "15641-" ~,q'~- aA,,e 14244- ,~,- / - · ~,~)/" 15645 .. Not to NOR~ Exhibit 2- Section 2 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Section 2: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts As provided for in Section 15063 of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, the initial study/environmental assessment format and checklist prepared pursuant to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's procedures regarding implementation of the National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) is being used to evaluate potential impacts. The initial study/environmental assessment checklist is included in Section 3. 2.1 Land Development a. Conformance with Comprehensive Plans and Zoning The proposed project will implement minor street improvements consistent with the City's Standard Plans for local streets. The proposed improvements conform with the existing General Plan and Zoning Code. No changes in zoning are proposed or will be required to allow the roadway improvements. The parcel at the comer of Newport Avenue and Mitchell Avenue is zoned Planned Community-Commercial (PCC) district. No minimum lot area is prescribed by the Planned Community District document which regulates development of the site. A reduction in the lot size will not affect future entitlements at the site. The remaining two parcels impacted by the improvements are zoned Multi-Family Residential (R-3) District, but are developed with single-family residences. The minimum lot area for such uses is 7,000-square feet; however, neither parcel conforms with that standard. The portions of the parcels being purchased by the City to facilitate the street improvements will slightly decrease the land area of the parcels. However, the reductions will not alter the non-conforming status of the properties and will not create a nuisance or threaten the health, welfare, or we!l- being of City residents. Impact Category: No Impact Anticipated Source/Documentation:. Community Development Department staff;, City of Tustin General Plan and Zoning Code. b. Compatibility_ and Urban Impact The proposed improvements are similar to other street improvements that.have been made to the surrounding area. Installation of curb, gutter, and sidewalk facilities will create congruity between the unimproved areas on the project site and other improved areas along Mitchell Avenue and Newport Avenue. The project will improve the urban environment in the vicinity. Impact Category: Poten{ially Beneficial Source/Documentation: CommU. nity Development Department staff; City of Tustin General Plan and Zoning Code. Mitchell Avenue Widening Final FONSI/ND Apdl 1997 The site is relatively fiat and will be reconstructed with a minimal slope for improved drainage. The slope will eliminate the ponding of water in the unimproved areas. Impact Category: Potentially Beneficial Source/Documentation: City of Tustin Public Works Department M. J. Gestine, February 1997. ' d. .Erosion The area of construction is currently unimproved. The installation of curb, gutter, and sidewalk facilities will minimize the existing Potential for erosion of soil. Minor excavation will be necessary to install subsurface paving materials and two catchbasins. The Plans, Specifications, and Estimates document requires the contractor to clean adjacent streets of any dirt, settled dust, and excavated or removed materials. With-implementation of this requirement, no impacts are anticipated. Impact Category: Potentially Beneficial Source/Documentation: Community Development Department staff. e. The soils are suitable for the proposed projecL No soil will be imported from off- site. City engineers do not anticipate requiring a soils report. Impact Category: No Impact Anticipated Source/Documentation: City of Tustin Public Works Department M. J. Gestine, February 1997. ' f- Hazards and Nuisances !'ncluding Site Safety Construction activities may create temporary haZards or nuisances for rnotorists and pedestrians. The Plans, Specifications, and Estimates document requires the contractor. to provide safe and continuous passage for pedestrian and vehicular traffic at all times. Specific measures include use of barricades, signage, flagmen and lane closures in accordance with an approved traffic control plan. With implementation of this requirement, no impacts are anticipated. Impact Category: No Impact Anticipated Source/Documentation: City 6f Tustin Public Works Department, M. J. Gestine, February 1997. g- Mitchell Avenue Widening Final FONS!/ND April 1997 The proposed construction will not impact energy consumption. Minor quantities of energy utilized for construction can be accommodated by existing utility systems. Impact Category: No Impact Antidpated Source/Documentation: City of Tustin Community Development Department and Public Works. Department, M. J. Gestine, February 1997. 2.2 Noise a. Effects of Ambient Noise on Project and Contribution to Community'Noise Levels The property acquisition will not create any noise impacts; however, daytime · construction activities may generate temporary, intermittent noise. All con struction activities am subject to the Tustin Noise Ordinance. In addition, the Plans, Specifications, and Estimates document requires the contractor to comply with City noise standards. Compliance with those regulations will be dosely monitored by the Public Works and Community Development Departments to ensure that no negative noise impacts occur. Increased fight-of-way will allow vehicular traffic to pass approximately five (5) feet closer to the existing commercial building than the current roadway configuration. A difference of 5 feet in lane width is not expected to measureably increase long- term noise levels at the affected properties; however, an existing block wall will remain on the site to minimize potential noise impacts. Impact Category: No Impact Anticipated Source/Documentation: City of Tustin Community Development Department staff; City of Tustin Noise OrdinanceL 2.3 Air Quality a. Effects of Ambient Air Quality on Project and Contribution to Community Pollution Levels Ambient air qualib/is generally good in the City of Tustin; air quality will not adversely impact the project. Conversely, the proposal will not adversely impact air quality. Installation of additional !~ne width will improve the street to a modified local street standard. Since the street is currently a local street, the' project will not increase traffic capacity and will not result in air quality impacts typically associated with street widening projects. !n addition, the project will replace unimproved land with paved surfaces which will minimize the creation of dust and other airborne particles in the long-term. Clearing, grubbing, 'and excavating activities will result in disruptions to paved surfaces and soil thereby creating dust and debris. The Plans, Specifications, and Estimates document reqt~ires.the contractor to control air pollution by cleaning the Mitchell Avenue Widening Final FONSIIND April 1997 project site and adjacent streets of dirt, settled dust, and excavated or removed mateddals. With implementation of this requirement, no impacts are anticipated. 'Impact Category: No Impact Anticipated Source/Documentation: City of Tustin Community Development Department staff. - 2.4 Environmental Design and Historic Values a. Visual uali - Coherence Diversi Corn atible Use and Scale Construction of additional land width, curbs, gutters, and sidewalks on unimproved !and will improve visual coherenEe of the area and increase compatibility with existing land uses. Impact Category: Potentially Beneficial Source/Documentation: Visual site inspection, City of Tustin Community Development Department staff. b. Historic, Cultural and Archaeoloqical Resource:; No above-ground histodc or cultural resources are present in the project area. Excavating activities will be limited to no more than one foot in depth in previously disturbed soil. !t is unlikely that underground resources will be encountered. A ""Quick Check" prepared by the Regional Information Center of the Califomia Archaeological Inventory, University of Califomia'at los Angeles. indicates that while there are four recorded archaeological sites within a one mile radius of the project area, no archaeological work is needed prior to approval of the project. ,The Center recommends that the City halt work in the event that cultural resources are discovered during construction. in addition a Programmatic Agreement with the State Office of Historic Preservation (SHPO)'authorizes the City of Tustin to exempt from SHPO review activities for which the City can make specific findings that there will be no adverse impact to historic properties or sites. The City has found that the proposed project is exempt from further review by SHPO and that the ability to issue a halt-work order mitigates any potential adverse impacts to a level of insignificance. Impact Category: No impact Anticipated Source/Documentation: UCLA Archaeological Inventory Regional Information Center, Elizabeth Sodano 10117194; SHPO; City of Tustin Community Development Department staff. 2.5 Socioeconomic a. .Demoqraphic Character Change,~, Th~ proposed project does not affect existing or planned land uses, employment, or Population. As such, the. project will not impact or change the demographic character of the project area. Mitchell Avenue Widening Final FONSIIND April 1997 Impact Category: . Nq Impact Anticipated Source/Documentation: ' City of Tustin Community Development Department staff and City records. b. Displacement The proposed project does not affect or alter existing or planned land uses, employment, or population. IAs such, the project will not displace any residents or businesses. Impact Category: No Impact Anticipated Source/Documentation: City of Tustin Community Development Department staff and City records. c. Employment and Income Pattems The proposed project will not affect existing or projected employment or income patterns. Impact Category: No Impact Anticipated Source/Documentation: City of Tustin Community Development Department staff and City records. 2.6 Community Facilities End Services a. Educational Fadlities One commercial and two residential properties will be affected. No educational facilities will be impacted by the proposal. Impact Category: No Impact Anticipated Source/Documentation: City of Tustin Community Development Department staff and City records. b. Commerdal Facilities One of the lots impacted by the project is a commercial property. A 7' foot wide unimproved stdp of land along the south side of the property will be converted to a street lane with sidewalk with curb and gutter. The building, parking lot, and perimeter wall will not be affected.. Commercial use of the property will not be affected. ' Impact Category: No Impact Anticipated Source/Documentation: City of Tustin Community Development Department · staff and City records. Mitchell Avenue Widening Final FONSI/ND Apdl 1997 c. Health Care The street improvement project will have no impact on health care systems or facilities cu~Tently in place in the community. A hospital located in the vicinity is currently closed. No major thoroughfares providing assess to other Facilities will be impacted. No need for additional services will be generated by the proposal. Impact Category: No Impact AntiCipated Source/Documentation: City of Tustin Community Development Department staff and City records. d. Social Services The temporan/construction project will have no impact on social services. Impact Category: No Impact Anticipated Source/Documentation: City of Tustin Community Development Department staff and City records. e. Solid Waste Minor amounts of additional solid waste may be generated by construction activities. However, existing waste facilities will accommodate the temporary increase. Impact Category: No Impact Anticipated Source/Documentation: City of Tustin Community Development Department staff and City records. f. Waste Water The proposal will have no impact on waste water or the City sewer system. The Plans, Specifications, and Estimates document req.uires the contractor to control water pollution by removing stored materials, equipment, dirt, dust, and 'excavated or removed materials from the .site or adjacent streets. With implementation of this requirement, no impact is anticipated. Impact Category: No Impact Anticipated Source/Documentation: City of Tustin Community Development and Public Works Department staff. g- Storm _Water While the paving of previously unl&aved areas may minimally increase run off amounts, the project involves the .installation of catch basins which will be connected to the existing storm drain system. The proposed street improvements will improve the quality of the water entedng the storm drain system and, ultimately, discharging into the ocean. - Mitchell Avenue Widening Final FONSI/ND April 1997 For short-term construction run-off, the Plans, Specifications, and Estimates document requires the contractor to control water pollution by removing stored materials, equipment. dirt, dust, and excavated or removed materials from the site or adjacent streets. With implementation of this requirement, no impact is anticipated. Impact Category: Potentially Beneficial Source/Documentation: City of Tustin Public Works Department, M.J. Gestine, February, 1997. h. Water Supply Construction of proposed improvements may require the use of water from the munidpal supply; however. resources will not be significantly impacted. Currently available sources will accommodate any temporary increases in water use. The project will not impact the quality of the existing water supply. Impact Category: No Impact Anticipated Source/Documentation: City of Tustin Water Works, Gary Veeh, 7/24/95. i. Public Safety 1. Police Paving the shoulder of the road and the construction of curb, gutter, and sidewalk fadlities may improve public safety and allow emergency vehicles better access to the thoroughfare and adjacent properties. The project will not result in the need for additional police services. Impact Category: Potentially Beneficial Source/Documentation: Tustin Police Department 2. Fire Paving the shoulder of the road and the cOnstruction of curb, gutter, and sidewalk facilities may improve access for emergency vehicles. The project' will not result in the. need for additional fire services. Impact Category: Potentially Beneficial Source/Documentation: Orange County Fire Department, Todd Ruditas, 7~26~95. 3. Emerqency Medical :' Paving the shoulder of the road and the construction of curb, gutter, sidewalk, and handicap ramps may improve access for emergency vehicles. 'Impact Category: Potentially Beneficial Mitchell Avenue Widening Final FONSI/ND April 1997 Source/Documentation: Tustin Police Department j. Ppen Space and Recreation 1. ~ The street improvements are located with an urbanized, developed area. The project will not impact any designated open space. Impact Category: No Impact Anticipated Source/Documentation: City of Tustin Community Development Department staff and City records. 2. Recreatio____Q The project is non-residential in nature and is not located in proximity to recreational facilities. The project will not impact recreation opportunities in the community. Impact Category: No Impact Anticipated Source/Documentation: City' of Tustin Community Development Department staff. 3. ..Cultural Facilities The site of the street improvements iS not located in the City"s Cultural Resources Oveday District, nor are there any identified cultural resources or facilities identified on or in the immediate 'vicinity of the site. Impact Category: No Impact Anticipated Source/Documentation: City of Tustin, 'Community Development Department Historical Resources Survey. k. .Transportation The proposed project will implement minor street improvements consistent with the, City's Standard Plans for local streets. Mitchell Avenue, as a designated local street,. will continue to operate as a local street. No long term traffic impacts are anticipated. Construction may temporarily impact local vehicular traffic. However, the Plans, Specifications, and Estimates document requires the contractor to implement a traffic control plan to maintain saf'~'. and continuous passage for pedestrian and vehicular traffic and allow adequate access to adjacent properties at all times. impact Category: No ImPact Anticipated Source/DoCumentation: · City of, Tustin Public Works and Community Development Department. Mitchell Avenue Widening Final FONSI/ND April 1997 2.8 Natural Features a. Water Resources No water resources exist in the vicinity of the proposal; no impacts are anticipated as a result of the project. Impact,Category: No Impact Antidpated Source/Documentation: Field Observation, City of Tustin Community Development Department. b. Surface Water No surface waters are jocated on or in the vicinity of the site; no. impacts are - anticipated as a result of the project. Impact Categ.ory: No Impact Anticipated 'Source/Documentation: Field Observation, City of Tustin Community Development Department. c. Floodplains The project site is located within "Flood Zone X," an area determined to be outside the 500-year flood plain. No alteration of the floodplain will result from implementation of the project. Impact Category: No Impact Anticipated Source/Documentation: Flood Insurance Rate Map, dated 9/15/89. d. ...Wetlands · No wetlands are located on or in the vicinity Of the site. Impact Category: No Impact Antidpated Source/Documentation: Field Observation. City of Tustin Records. e. Coastal Zone The City of Tustin is approximately 10 miles from any coastal area. No impacts to such areas will result. Impact Category: No Imp. act Anticipated Source/Documentation: Field Observation, City of Tustin Maps and Records. f- .Unique Natural Features and Agricultural Lands No unique natural features or. agricultural lands are located on or in the vicinity of the project location. Mitchell Avenue Widening Final FONSI/ND Apdl 1997 Impact Category: No Impact Anticipated Source/Documentation: Field Observation, City of Tustin Maps and Records. g- Vegetation and Wildlife Construction of the roadway improvements will require the removal of minor amounts of non-irrigated vegetation and some small to mediUm-sized existing trees, hedges, and lawn areas. Due to spatial constraints of the project, no replacement landscaping is proposed. However, the loss of landscaping will 'be offset by the remaining landscaped planters along the south side of the commercial property and landscaped areas surrounding the residential properties. The loss of a minor portion of vegetation along the edge of the three properties is not considered significant. ..- -. - No indigenous or endangered species are present on the site and no wildlife has been observed on the site. Impact Category: No Impact Anticipated Source/Documentation: Field Observation, Paula Rankin, 7/25/95. Mitchell Avenue Widening Final FONSI/ND April 1997 Findings and Conclusions Summary of Findings and Conclusions: This project is located in a fully developed, urban area. No adverse findings are noted. There is no substantial evidence 'that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. Completion of the project will result in a benefit to the community. Summary of Environmental Conditions: No major adverse environmental impacts are anticipated. Temporary, minor temporary traffic and noise impacts associated with daytime construction activities will be minimized to a level of insignificance by operational requirements contained within the Plans, Specifications, and Estimates document and existing City ordinances which control hours of construction activities and decibel levels. Completion of the project will result in environmental benefits such as improved visual quality of the area and its compatibility with the urban environment, improved erosion and dust control, improved storm water runoff quality, and improved access for emergency services. Project Modifications and Alternatives Considered: No modifications to the project are necessary; no alternatives were considered. Additional Studies Performed (Attach Study or Summary) None Mitigation Measures : Needed: Standard conditions contained within the Plans, Specifications, and Estimates document reduce any potential impacts to a level of insignificance. No mitigation measures are proposed. Mitchell Avenue Widening Final FONSI/ND April 1997 1. Is project in compliance with applicable laws and regulations? z~Yes [] No 2. Is an EISIEIR required? [] Yes o 3. A Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSi)/Negative Declaration (ND) can be made. Project will not significantly affect the hum an environment. There is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. Yes [] No Prepared by: Paula Rankin, Associate Planner Karen Peterson, Assistant Planner Supervisor:. Rita Westfield Assistant Community Development Director Section 3 Environmental Assessment/Initial StUdy Checklist Environmental Assessments at the Commtm/ty Level (24 CFR 58, .Section 5836) Project Name: Mitchell Avenue Widening Project 1615 West Oljnnp~c B']v~I,' .:"' 4-os AngeleS, CA 90015-3801 ' :"' :' " Environmental Unit 7/95 ENVIRON}~2~TAL ASSESSMENT - PROJECT DATA Existing Conditions and Trends: See Introduction and Project Description in S. ection 1. Project Description: (List multi-year activities by year) See Introduction and proj.~ct Description in Sectibn 1. STATUTO---~ ,_, ~ ---.RY CHECKLIS~ T* Checklist of AppIicable Stat~tes~ Executive Orders, and Regulations ,~-~ .,_ : . . --;,=--:. Wetlands Protection ~.~~ 7, -- , Coasta~ Zone ' Sole Source Ac/uifers Endangered Species Wild and Scenic Rivers ,, ------_ P~-~and P__rotection '- BUD ENVIR0~ S~LNnARDS. ' Noise ~jDatement. and . Control (24 CFR S1B) ExPlosive and Flammable . s (24 CFR 'SlC ~PoxS, c Chemicals/ - ___ Radioactive Materials : (BUD Notice 79-33 ) " ,, Airport Clear Zones and Accident Potential Zones (24 CFR S1D) ,, 5 Fish and Wildlife Service, in accordance with procedural regulations contained in 50 CFR Pal-t 402. Wild and Scenic River., A) The project is not located within a mile of a listed Wild and scen/c River, OR the project will not have an effect on the natural, free flowing or scen/c qualities of a river in the National Wild and scenic Rivers system; B) Consult with the U.S. Depar~_menZ of InteriOr, National Park service for resolution and mitigation assistance. ~z A) The project conforms with the EPA-approved State Implementation Plan (aLP), per contact with the State A~ Quality Management District or Board; B) Negotiate suitable mitigation measures with the k~ Q~^l~ty Management District Board. -. or Farmland Protectionz A) The project site does not include prime or unique farmland, OR o~her fa_'~_lana of statewide or local importance as identified by the U.S. Depar~zne~ of Agr~e~ Soil Co=serv~ti~n Service (SCS), OR the project site includes ~rime farmland, but is located in an area c~=irted 'to-urban uses; B)' Request eva/u'ation of land type from scs using Form AD 1006, and consider the resultant rating in the project decision, as ~ei1 as potential mitigation measures (including measures to protect adverse effect on adjacent farmlands). Boise Abate-~ent ~-a Control~ A) The project does not involve development of noise sensitive uses, oR the ambier~ n~ise level is 65 LDN (or CNEL) or less, based upon th.e ~UD Noise Assessment Gu/delines (NAG) for calculating noise levels; B) Apply the noise standard to the projec~ approval decision and consider the application of the noise attenuation measures (~AG page 39-40). _Erplosive or F1-~331e Op~-'-ationsz X). The project is located at an Acceptable Separation Distance (ASD) ~ any ab6ve-gro~,~d explosive or flammable fuels or chemicals containers according =o 'siting of m-Assisted Projects Near Mazardous Facilities- (Appendix F, pp. 51-52), Oa the project will expose neither people nor buildings =o such hazards; ~) mitigate the hazard (per 24 CFR 51.205) with the construc=i~ of a barrier of adequate;size and strength to protect th~ project from the explosive or flammable hazard. Tortc Che{c~s ^.~ Rad/oactive Ma~er~1~z A) The project does not involve new develo[a~ent for habitation; o~ the project involves new development~ for habitation, but is not located within one mile of'an NFL. (-superfund=) site, within 2~000 f&et of a CERCLIS site, .nor adjacen~ to ar~ other known ~r suspected s~tes contaminated with toxic chemicals of radioactive materials, ~-!ess a Federal, State, or local authoritative source det~T~{~es it does not pose a health haxard; B) Grantees are advised 'not .to use funds for activities supporting. new devel_onmemt for habitation when a project site is affected by =c~tc chemicals or radk~c~e materia/s. Documentation includes contact with appropriate Federal, State, or local oversight agencies. . kir~or~ Cleat Zones and A~id~t Pof.,ent~'~.]_ Zone Z A) The project is D~c w~'t~ an ~F.AA-designarad civet{an s{ ~3r~ Ruzway Clear Zone (RCZ), ~r within a milital7 alrfield clear Zone (cZ)' or A=cide=t P~tential Zone (A~Z), based upon information c~ne ~a~..{."{~t-rator i~ent/~img the boundaries of''''' · ~ ~r rehabi//tation;:a) For the sale or Purchase of existing property in a RCZ ~r CZ, notify buyer of this fact and obtain buyer-s signature acknowledging receipt of this information. to provide any development assistance, subsidy or insurance It is ~D policy not /a RCZs or CZs ~n]ess the projec% will not be frequently used or occupied by people, and the a/rport operator Provides written assurances that there are no plans to purchase the project site. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT B IPA CT C, d TE G O PjES .Source Documentation ~ (Additional materials may be a_,ttached socio~con~=ic ~ ' Demographic/ Ch~ranter changes See explanation of checklisz responses.in Section 2. Displacement ~lO}~ent .cc~:~ut~y racili~iea aM service= ~-duca~iona! Facilities ' " ~oci~l Services I - NO impact is anticipated. category being evaluated: 2 - Potentially beneficial. - Potentially adverse, requires documentation only. - Requires mitigation. . - Requires project modification. 9 ENVIR ONME rrA L .: ASSESSMENT IMPACT CATEGORIES 2 : Source Documentation . (Additional' materials m~y be attached. ) Batur=l Features Water Resou_~ces See expl~n~ti0n of checklist responses.in Section 2. surface Water Unique Peatures and Agricu!t~Ira!' Lands " ~. " vegetation and ") Wildlife Other Factors to be Consi~erea* -NOTE: other factors may include 'special conditions/situations affecting the project which have not been previo~sly considered, s~ch as h4at~uric resources of ~6ate or local sigm4ficance, state-listed endangered ~pecies, traffic i.ssues, etc. :. Choose from the following list, as applicable, to each Tm~?aCt Category and enter the appropriate nx~er in the boxes beside each Sategory being evaluated: I - No {m?act is anticipated. ' 2 - Potanti.ally beneficial. 3 - Potentially adverse, req,~res documen~tion only. 4 - Req~{~es mitigation. .' S - Requires project modification. . 11 City of Tustin RESOLUTION CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF OR/LNGE ) ss CITY OF TUSTIN ) RESOLUTION NO. 97-30 Pamela S~oker, City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council'of the City of Tustin, California, does hereby certify that the whole number of the members of the City Council is five; that the above and foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 21st day of April, 1997, by the following vote: COUNCILMEMBER AYES: Worley, Thomas, Doyle, Potts, Saltarelli COUNCILMEMBER NOES: None COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAINED: None COUNCILMEMBER ABSENT: None City tlerk