HomeMy WebLinkAbout02 ATTACHMENT E - EXHIBIT A - APP D ppeiim iii 1
ur eiii fl1°mouse Gas Eiinissimii a°neiii A
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment
Myford II Project
City of Tustin, California
Prepared by:
Kimley,),#Horn
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
1100 W.Town and Country Road, Suite 700
Orange, California 92868
Contact:Mr.Ace Malisos
714.939.1030
August 2022
City of Tustin Myford II Project
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Project Location .......................................................................................................................................1
1.2 Project Description...................................................................................................................................1
2 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
2.1 Greenhouse Gases and Climate Change ...................................................................................6
3 REGULATORY SETTING
3.1 Federal.......................................................................................................................................8
3.2 State of California....................................................................................................................10
3.3 Regional...................................................................................................................................17
3.4 Local.........................................................................................................................................19
4 SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGY
4.1 Thresholds and Significant Criteria..........................................................................................20
4.2 Methodology...........................................................................................................................21
5 POTENTIAL IMPACTS
5.1 Greenhouse Gas Emissions .....................................................................................................22
5.2 Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan Compliance.........................................................................27
5.3 Cumulative Setting and Impacts..............................................................................................34
6 REFERENCES
References...............................................................................................................................35
TABLES
Table 1 Description of Greenhouse Gases.............................................................................................7
Table 2 Construction-Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions..................................................................22
Table 3 Project Greenhouse Gas Emissions.........................................................................................23
Table 4 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy Consistency.....................28
Table 5 Project Consistency with Applicable CARB Scoping Plan Measures .......................................30
FIGURES
Figure1 Regional Vicinity........................................................................................................................3
Figure2 Site Vicinity................................................................................................................................4
Figure3 Site Plan.....................................................................................................................................5
APPENDIX
Appendix A: Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data
August 2022
KimleyoHorn Iii
City of Tustin Myford II Project
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment
LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS
AB Assembly Bill
CARB California Air Resource Board
CCR California Code of Regulations
CalEEMod California Emissions Estimator Model
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CALGreen Code California Green Building Standards Code
CPUC California Public Utilities Commission
CO2 carbon dioxide
CO2e carbon dioxide equivalent
CFC Chlorofluorocarbon
CPP Clean Power Plan
CCSP Climate Change Scoping Plan
cy cubic yard
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
FCAA Federal Clean Air Act
FR Federal Register
GHG greenhouse gas
HCFC Hydrochlorofluorocarbon
H FC Hydrofluorocarbon
LCFS Low Carbon Fuel Standard
CH4 Methane
MMTCO2e million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent
MTCO2e million tons of carbon dioxide equivalent
NHTSA National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
NF3 nitrogen trifluoride
N2O nitrous oxide
PFC Perfluorocarbon
RTP/SCS Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy
SB Senate Bill
SCAB South Coast Air Basin
SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District
SCAG Southern California Association of Government
Sf square foot
SF6 sulfur hexafluoride
TAC toxic air contaminants
August 2022
City of Tustin Myford II Project
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment
1 INTRODUCTION
This report documents the results of a Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Assessment completed for the
Myford II Project (Project). The purpose of this GHG Emissions Assessment is to evaluate the potential
construction and operational emissions associated with the Project and determine the level of impact the
Project would have on the environment.
1.1 Project Location
The proposed Project is located at 14321 and 14351 Myford Road in the City of Tustin (City), California,
just west of the City's border with the City of Irvine.The City is in central Orange County, bordered by the
cities of Irvine and Santa Ana to the west;the City of Orange and unincorporated County of Orange areas
to the north; and on the east by the City of Irvine and unincorporated County of Orange territory (see
Figure 1: Regional Vicinity and Figure 2: Site Vicinity).
The site is occupied by two existing industrial/office buildings totaling 136,098 square feet and is bounded
by commercial buildings to the north, west and south, and Myford Road to the east, within the Planned
Community Industrial (PC IND) zoning designation. Regional access to the site is provided by State Route
261 (SR-261) freeway, located approximately 0.3 miles east of the Project site, the Interstate 5 (1-5)
freeway, located approximately 0.7 miles north of the site, and State Route 55 (SR-55) freeway located
approximately 3 miles west of the site.
1.2 Project Description
The proposed Myford 11 Project is comprised of one warehouse distribution building totaling
approximately 148,437 square feet with office space, parking, and landscaping on approximately 7.18 net
acres as shown in Figure 3: Site Plan. Access to the site would be provided via three driveways on Myford
Road.
Warehouse Facility
The proposed Project is currently planned as a "speculative building." Therefore, the future tenant(s) or
buyer(s) of the building are not currently known. The proposed Project consists of a logistics warehouse
building of approximately 148,437-square feet on approximately 7.18 acres.The warehouse Project would
include 143,437 square feet of warehouse space and approximately 5,000-square feet of office space, in
addition to other associated facilities and improvements, such as a perimeter fencing, parking, onsite and
perimeter landscaping, lighting, and exterior sidewalks.
Site Access
Vehicular and truck site access is provided via three driveways off southbound Myford Road ranging size
from 27' to 35'. The Project driveways will only service the Project. The drive aisles located on both the
north and south of the building will be 35 feet wide.
August 2022
City of Tustin Myford II Project
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment
Parking
Parking would be located along the east and west perimeters of the site.The proposed Project goes would
provide 103 automobile parking stalls and 19 dock doors. The dock doors will be oriented to face west.
Daily activities within the Project site will include maneuvering forklifts, lift equipment, and large semi-
trucks through and around the site and backing into the loading docks, all of which emit warning (high
pitch beep beep) sounds consistent with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
requirements.
August 2022
.... .........
San Bernardino
.....................
........................Iwb�Dtu .. .......... ..........
stmo
............... Los Covina .. ...............................I.............
eles
...... Riverside
........................ ......
...........
.......... ...........
Santa Ana
Tustin ........
1111,31 1 ill si rE
Huntington
Beach
FIGURE 1: Regional Vicinity Not to Scale Kimley>*Hoirin
Myford 11,Tustin
City of Tustin
r'
Y
i
,
� f
S4, /i
r
v
rp �
FIGURE 2: Site Vicinity Not to Scale II >*Hoirin
Myford II,Tustin N
Cityof Tustin xpe=r aye-Fx�r��r�« Pnr�_
�rvx, i
xo WIDE e
--
---OF E `
„o
ol
,.P m
I a
k�
BUILDIN I�AREA _ e
148,417 S.F.
,xre��rvxn rv�rvrervsrvx� � �� � � � I j'
x�
a �
mo
o w
T T I
ce
o
- - - - - n�wL SITE LEGEND
T T �YTUNF
8 OFFM t
..:j 0 rorvcre[re[vnvrvc LT sjaxirvc
0 0
�xowuo un.once euwrve ��.—.—e-------.YOWIOE FINELANE +s—v�, P 4 ".vreevcrert6rvE �nui eznsl nrvofva�
� N
FIGURE 3: Site Plan Not to Scale �N >*Hoirin
Myford II,Tustin a
City of TustinaPnrF-
City of Tustin Myford II Project
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment
2 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
2.1 Greenhouse Gases and Climate Change
Certain gases in the earth's atmosphere classified as GHGs, play a critical role in determining the earth's
surface temperature.Solar radiation enters the earth's atmosphere from space.A portion of the radiation
is absorbed by the earth's surface and a smaller portion of this radiation is reflected back toward space.
This absorbed radiation is then emitted from the earth as low-frequency infrared radiation. The
frequencies at which bodies emit radiation are proportional to temperature. Because the earth has a
much lower temperature than the sun, it emits lower-frequency radiation. Most solar radiation passes
through GHGs; however, infrared radiation is absorbed by these gases. As a result, radiation that
otherwise would have escaped back into space is instead "trapped," resulting in a warming of the
atmosphere. This phenomenon, known as the greenhouse effect, is responsible for maintaining a
habitable climate on earth.
The primary GHGs contributing to the greenhouse effect are carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and
nitrous oxide(N20). Fluorinated gases also make up a small fraction of the GHGs that contribute to climate
change. Examples of fluorinated gases include chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs),
perfluorocarbons (PFCs),sulfur hexafluoride(SF6), and nitrogen trifluoride(NF3); however, it is noted that
these gases are not associated with typical land use development. Human-caused emissions of GHGs
exceeding natural ambient concentrations are believed to be responsible for intensifying the greenhouse
effect and leading to a trend of unnatural warming of the Earth's climate, known as global climate change
or global warming.
GHGs are global pollutants, unlike criteria air pollutants and toxic air contaminants (TACs), which are
pollutants of regional and local concern. Whereas pollutants with localized air quality effects have
relatively short atmospheric lifetimes (about one day), GHGs have long atmospheric lifetimes (one to
several thousand years). GHGs persist in the atmosphere for long enough time periods to be dispersed
around the globe. Although the exact lifetime of a GHG molecule is dependent on multiple variables and
cannot be pinpointed, more CO2 is emitted into the atmosphere than is sequestered by ocean uptake,
vegetation, or other forms of carbon sequestration. Of the total annual human-caused CO2 emissions,
approximately 55 percent is sequestered through ocean and land uptakes every year, averaged over the
last 50 years, whereas the remaining 45 percent of human-caused CO2 emissions remains stored in the
atmosphere'. Table 1: Description of Greenhouse Gases describes the primary GHGs attributed to global
climate change, including their physical properties.
1 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,Carbon and Other Biogeochemical Cycles. In:Climate Change 2013:The Physical
Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group 1 to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change,2013.http://www.climatechange2013.org/images/report/WG1AR5_ALL_FINAL.pdf.
August 2022
imley Cil"n 1 �pi:ry 1 6
City of Tustin Myford II Project
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment
Table 1: Description of Greenhouse Gases
Greenhouse Gas Description
Carbon Dioxide(CO2) CO2 is a colorless,odorless gas that is emitted naturally and through human activities.Natural sources
include decomposition of dead organic matter; respiration of bacteria, plants, animals, and fungus;
evaporation from oceans;and volcanic outgassing.Anthropogenic sources are from burning coal,oil,
natural gas,and wood.The largest source of CO2 emissions globally is the combustion of fossil fuels
such as coal, oil, and gas in power plants, automobiles, and industrial facilities. The atmospheric
lifetime of CO2 is variable because it is readily exchanged in the atmosphere.CO2 is the most widely
emitted GHG and is the reference gas (Global Warming Potential of 1) for determining Global
Warming Potentials for other GHGs.
Nitrous Oxide(N20) N20 is largely attributable to agricultural practices and soil management. Primary human-related
sources of N20 include agricultural soil management,sewage treatment, combustion of fossil fuels,
and adipic and nitric acid production. N20 is produced from biological sources in soil and water,
particularly microbial action in wet tropical forests.The atmospheric lifetime of N20 is approximately
120 years.The Global Warming Potential of N20 is 298.
Methane(CH4) CH4, a highly potent GHG, primarily results from off-gassing (the release of chemicals from
nonmetallic substances under ambient or greater pressure conditions)and is largely associated with
agricultural practices and landfills.Methane is the major component of natural gas,about 87 percent
by volume.Human-related sources include fossil fuel production,animal husbandry,rice cultivation,
biomass burning, and waste management. Natural sources of CH4 include wetlands, gas hydrates,
termites, oceans, freshwater bodies, non-wetland soils, and wildfires. The atmospheric lifetime of
CH4 is about 12 years and the Global Warming Potential is 25.
Hydrofluorocarbons HFCs are typically used as refrigerants for both stationary refrigeration and mobile air conditioning.
(HFCs) The use of HFCs for cooling and foam blowing is increasing,as the continued phase out of CFCs and
HCFCs gains momentum.The 100-year Global Warming Potential of HFCs range from 124 for HFC-
152 to 14,800 for HFC-23.
Perfluorocarbons PFCs have stable molecular structures and only break down by ultraviolet rays about 60 kilometers
(PFCs) above Earth's surface. Because of this,they have long lifetimes, between 10,000 and 50,000 years.
Two main sources of PFCs are primary aluminum production and semiconductor manufacturing.
Global Warming Potentials range from 6,500 to 9,200.
Chlorofluorocarbons CFCs are gases formed synthetically by replacing all hydrogen atoms in methane or ethane with
(CFCs) chlorine and/or fluorine atoms. They are nontoxic, nonflammable, insoluble, and chemically
unreactive in the troposphere(the level of air at the earth's surface).CFCs were synthesized in 1928
for use as refrigerants, aerosol propellants, and cleaning solvents. The Montreal Protocol on
Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer prohibited their production in 1987. Global Warming
Potentials for CFCs range from 3,800 to 14,400.
Sulfur Hexafluoride SF6 is an inorganic, odorless, colorless, and nontoxic, nonflammable gas. It has a lifetime of 3,200
(SF6) years.This gas is manmade and used for insulation in electric power transmission equipment,in the
magnesium industry, in semiconductor manufacturing, and as a tracer gas.The Global Warming
Potential of SF6 is 23,900.
Hydrochlorofluorocar HCFCs are solvents,similar in use and chemical composition to CFCs.The main uses of HCFCs are for
bons(HCFCs) refrigerant products and air conditioning systems.As part of the Montreal Protocol,HCFCs are subject
to a consumption cap and gradual phase out.The United States is scheduled to achieve a 100 percent
reduction to the cap by 2030.The 100-year Global Warming Potentials of HCFCs range from 90 for
HCFC-123 to 1,800 for HCFC-142b.
Nitrogen Trifluoride NF3 was added to Health and Safety Code section 38505(g)(7)as a GHG of concern.This gas is used
(NF3) in electronics manufacture for semiconductors and liquid crystal displays.It has a high global warming
potential of 17,200.
Source:Compiled from U.S.EPA,Overview of Greenhouse Gases,(https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/overview-greenhouse-gases),accessed
2-5-2020; U.S. EPA, Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks:1990-2016, 2018; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,
Climate Change 2007:The Physical Science Basis,2007;National Research Council,Advancing the Science of Climate Change,2010;U.S.EPA,
Methane and Nitrous Oxide Emission from Natural Sources,April 2010.
August 2022
n l o n 1 �gii:ry 1 7
City of Tustin Myford II Project
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment
3 REGULATORY SETTING
3.1 Federal
To date, national standards have not been established for nationwide GHG reduction targets, nor have
any regulations or legislation been enacted specifically to address climate change and GHG emissions
reduction at the project level. Various efforts have been promulgated at the federal level to improve fuel
economy and energy efficiency to address climate change and its associated effects.
Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007
The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (December 2007), among other key measures,
requires the following, which would aid in the reduction of national GHG emissions:
• Increase the supply of alternative fuel sources by setting a mandatory Renewable Fuel Standard
requiring fuel producers to use at least 36 billion gallons of biofuel in 2022.
• Set a target of 35 miles per gallon for the combined fleet of cars and light trucks by model year
2020 and direct the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to establish a fuel
economy program for medium- and heavy-duty trucks and create a separate fuel economy
standard for work trucks.
• Prescribe or revise standards affecting regional efficiency for heating and cooling products and
procedures for new or amended standards, energy conservation, energy efficiency labeling for
consumer electronic products, residential boiler efficiency, electric motor efficiency, and home
appliances.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Endangerment Finding
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) authority to regulate GHG emissions stems from the U.S.
Supreme Court decision in Massachusetts v. EPA (2007). The Supreme Court ruled that GHGs meet the
definition of air pollutants under the existing Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA) and must be regulated if these
gases could be reasonably anticipated to endanger public health or welfare. Responding to the Court's
ruling,the EPA finalized an endangerment finding in December 2009. Based on scientific evidence it found
that six GHGs (CO2, CH4, N20, HFCs, PFCs, and SF6) constitute a threat to public health and welfare. Thus,
it is the Supreme Court's interpretation of the existing FCAA and the EPA's assessment of the scientific
evidence that form the basis for the EPA's regulatory actions.
Federal Vehicle Standards
In response to the U.S. Supreme Court ruling discussed above, Executive Order 13432 was issued in 2007
directing the EPA, the Department of Transportation, and the Department of Energy to establish
regulations that reduce GHG emissions from motor vehicles, non-road vehicles, and non-road engines by
2008. In 2009, the NHTSA issued a final rule regulating fuel efficiency and GHG emissions from cars and
light-duty trucks for model year 2011, and in 2010, the EPA and NHTSA issued a final rule regulating cars
and light-duty trucks for model years 2012-2016.
August 2022
City of Tustin Myford II Project
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment
In 2010, an Executive Memorandum was issued directing the Department of Transportation, Department
of Energy, EPA, and NHTSA to establish additional standards regarding fuel efficiency and GHG reduction,
clean fuels, and advanced vehicle infrastructure. In response to this directive, the EPA and NHTSA
proposed stringent, coordinated federal GHG and fuel economy standards for model years 2017-2025
light-duty vehicles.The proposed standards projected to achieve 163 grams per mile of CO2 in model year
2025,on an average industry fleet-wide basis,which is equivalent to 54.5 miles per gallon if this level were
achieved solely through fuel efficiency. The final rule was adopted in 2012 for model years 2017-2021,
and NHTSA intends to set standards for model years 2022-2025 in a future rulemaking. On January 12,
2017, the EPA finalized its decision to maintain the current GHG emissions standards for model years
2022-2025 cars and light trucks. It should be noted that the U.S. EPA in 2019 proposed to freeze the
vehicle fuel efficiency standards at their planned 2020 level (37 mpg), canceling any future strengthening
(currently 54.5 mpg by 2026). However, this proposal was scrapped in December 2021, and the current
finalized rule calls for vehicles in model years 2023-2026 to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions
between 5% and 10% each year. This means that by 2026, cars will be required to achieve 40 miles per
gallon.
In addition to the regulations applicable to cars and light-duty trucks described above, in 2011, the EPA
and NHTSA announced fuel economy and GHG standards for medium- and heavy-duty trucks for model
years 2014-2018. The standards for CO2 emissions and fuel consumption are tailored to three main
vehicle categories: combination tractors, heavy-duty pickup trucks and vans, and vocational vehicles.
According to the EPA, this regulatory program will reduce GHG emissions and fuel consumption for the
affected vehicles by 6 to 23 percent over the 2010 baselines.
In August 2016, the EPA and NHTSA announced the adoption of the phase two program related to the
fuel economy and GHG standards for medium-and heavy-duty trucks.The phase two program will apply
to vehicles with model year 2018 through 2027 for certain trailers, and model years 2021 through 2027
for semi-trucks, large pickup trucks, vans, and all types and sizes of buses and work trucks. The final
standards are expected to lower CO2 emissions by approximately 1.1 billion metric tons and reduce oil
consumption by up to 2 billion barrels over the lifetime of the vehicles sold under the program.
In 2018, the President and the U.S. EPA stated their intent to halt various federal regulatory activities to
reduce GHG emission, including the phase two program. California and other states have stated their
intent to challenge federal actions that would delay or eliminate GHG reduction measures and have
committed to cooperating with other countries to implement global climate change initiatives. On
September 27, 2019, the U.S. EPA and the NHTSA published the "Safer Affordable Fuel-Efficient (SAFE)
Vehicles Rule Part One: One National Program." (84 Fed. Reg. 51,310 (Sept. 27, 2019.)The Part One Rule
revokes California's authority to set its own GHG emissions standards and set zero-emission vehicle
mandates in California. On March 31, 2020, the U.S. EPA and NHTSA finalized rulemaking for SAFE Part
Two sets CO2 emissions standards and corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) standards for passenger
vehicles and light duty trucks, covering model years 2021-2026. The current U.S. EPA administration has
repealed SAFE Rule Part One, effective January 28, 2022 and is reconsidering Part Two.
Clean Power Plan and New Source Performance Standards for Electric Generating Units
On October 23, 2015,the EPA published a final rule(effective December 22, 2015)establishing the carbon
pollution emission guidelines for existing stationary sources: electric utility generating units (80 Federal
Register [FR] 64510-64660), also known as the Clean Power Plan (CPP). These guidelines prescribe how
states must develop plans to reduce GHG emissions from existing fossil-fuel-fired electric generating units.
August 2022
City of Tustin Myford II Project
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment
The guidelines establish CO2 emission performance rates representing the best system of emission
reduction for two subcategories of existing fossil-fuel-fired electric generating units: one fossil-fuel-fired
electric utility steam-generating unit and two stationary combustion turbines. Concurrently, the EPA
published a final rule (effective October 23, 2015) establishing standards of performance for GHG
emissions from new, modified, and reconstructed stationary sources: electric utility generating units (80
FR 64661-65120). The rule prescribes CO2 emission standards for newly constructed, modified, and
reconstructed affected fossil-fuel-fired electric utility generating units. The U.S. Supreme Court stayed
implementation of the CPP pending resolution of several lawsuits.Additionally, in March 2017,the federal
government directed the EPA Administrator to review the CPP to determine whether it is consistent with
current executive policies concerning GHG emissions, climate change, and energy. On January 13, 2021
EPA finalized its revised NSPS for new power plants that abandoned the earlier proposal of increasing the
limits on CO2 emissions. However, the final rule contains a new restriction that Section 111 can only be
used to regulate greenhouse gases from stationary sources if the source category is responsible for at
least 3 percent of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions. Other sectors that are currently regulated under the
Clean Air Act(such as oil and gas facilities)could be affected, and the rule could bind the EPA from issuing
future GHG emissions on new stationary sources.
3.2 State of California
California Air Resources Board
The California Air Resources Board (CARB) is responsible for the coordination and oversight of State and
local air pollution control programs in California. Various statewide and local initiatives to reduce
California's contribution to GHG emissions have raised awareness about climate change and its potential
for severe long-term adverse environmental, social, and economic effects. California is a significant
emitter of CO2 equivalents(CO2e)in the world and produced 459 million gross metric tons of CO2e in 2013.
In the State, the transportation sector is the largest emitter of GHGs, followed by industrial operations
such as manufacturing and oil and gas extraction.
The State of California legislature has enacted a series of bills that constitute the most aggressive program
to reduce GHGs of any state in the nation. Some legislation, such as the landmark Assembly Bill (AB) 32,
California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, was specifically enacted to address GHG emissions.
Other legislation, such as Title 24 building efficiency standards and Title 20 appliance energy standards,
were originally adopted for other purposes such as energy and water conservation, but also provide GHG
reductions.This section describes the major provisions of the legislation.
Assembly Bill 32(California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006)
AB 32 instructs the CARB to develop and enforce regulations for the reporting and verification of statewide
GHG emissions.AB 32 also directed CARB to set a GHG emissions limit based on 1990 levels,to be achieved
by 2020. It set a timeline for adopting a scoping plan for achieving GHG reductions in a technologically
and economically feasible manner.
CARB Scoping Plan
CARB adopted the Scoping Plan to achieve the goals of AB 32. The Scoping Plan establishes an overall
framework for the measures that would be adopted to reduce California's GHG emissions. CARB
determined that achieving the 1990 emissions level would require a reduction of GHG emissions of
August 2022
KimleyoHorn 1 10
City of Tustin Myford II Project
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment
approximately 29 percent below what would otherwise occur in 2020 in the absence of new laws and
regulations (referred to as "business-as-usual")'. The Scoping Plan evaluates opportunities for sector-
specific reductions, integrates early actions and additional GHG reduction measures by both CARB and
the State's Climate Action Team, identifies additional measures to be pursued as regulations,and outlines
the adopted role of a cap-and-trade program'. Additional development of these measures and adoption
of the appropriate regulations occurred through the end of 2013. Key elements of the Scoping Plan
include:
• Expanding and strengthening existing energy efficiency programs, as well as building and
appliance standards.
• Achieving a statewide renewables energy mix of 33 percent by 2020.
• Developing a California cap-and-trade program that links with other programs to create a regional
market system and caps sources contributing 85 percent of California's GHG emissions (adopted
in 2011).
• Establishing targets for transportation-related GHG emissions for regions throughout California
and pursuing policies and incentives to achieve those targets (several sustainable community
strategies have been adopted).
• Adopting and implementing measures pursuant to existing State laws and policies, including
California's clean car standards, heavy-duty truck measures, the Low Carbon Fuel Standard
(amendments to the Pavley Standard adopted 2009;Advanced Clean Car standard adopted 2012),
goods movement measures, and the Low Carbon Fuel Standard (adopted 2009).
• Creating targeted fees, including a public goods charge on water use, fees on gasses with high
global warming potential, and a fee to fund the administrative costs of the State of California's
long-term commitment to AB 32 implementation.
• The California Sustainable Freight Action Plan was developed in 2016 and provides a vision for
California's transition to a more efficient, more economically competitive, and less polluting
freight transport system. This transition of California's freight transport system is essential to
supporting the State's economic development in coming decades while reducing pollution.
• CARB's Mobile Source Strategy demonstrates how the State can simultaneously meet air quality
standards, achieve GHG emission reduction targets, decrease health risk from transportation
emissions, and reduce petroleum consumption over the next fifteen years. The mobile Source
Strategy includes increasing ZEV buses and trucks.
In 2012, CARB released revised estimates of the expected 2020 emissions reductions.The revised analysis
relied on emissions projections updated in light of current economic forecasts that accounted for the
economic downturn since 2008, reduction measures already approved and put in place relating to future
fuel and energy demand, and other factors.This update reduced the projected 2020 emissions from 596
z CARB defines business-as-usual (BAU)in its Scoping Plan as emissions levels that would occur if California continued to grow
and add new GHG emissions but did not adopt any measures to reduce emissions. Projections for each emission-generating
sector were compiled and used to estimate emissions for 2020 based on 2002-2004 emissions intensities. Under CARB's
definition of BAU,new growth is assumed to have the same carbon intensities as was typical from 2002 through 2004.
3 The Climate Action Team, led by the secretary of the California Environmental Protection Agency, is a group of State agency
secretaries and heads of agencies, boards, and departments. Team members work to coordinate statewide efforts to
implement global warming emissions reduction programs and the State's Climate Adaptation Strategy.
August 2022
City of Tustin Myford II Project
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment
million metric tons of CO2e (MMTCO2e) to 545 MMTCO2e. The reduction in forecasted 2020 emissions
means that the revised business-as-usual reduction necessary to achieve AB 32's goal of reaching 1990
levels by 2020 is now 21.7 percent, down from 29 percent. CARB also provided a lower 2020 inventory
forecast that incorporated State-led GHG emissions reduction measures already in place.When this lower
forecast is considered, the necessary reduction from business-as-usual needed to achieve the goals of
AB 32 is approximately 16 percent.
CARB adopted the first major update to the Scoping Plan on May 22, 2014. The updated Scoping Plan
summarizes the most recent science related to climate change, including anticipated impacts to California
and the levels of GHG emissions reductions necessary to likely avoid risking irreparable damage. It
identifies the actions California has already taken to reduce GHG emissions and focuses on areas where
further reductions could be achieved to help meet the 2020 target established by AB 32.
In 2016, the Legislature passed Senate Bill (SB) 32, which codifies a 2030 GHG emissions reduction target
of 40 percent below 1990 levels.With SB 32,the Legislature passed companion legislation,AB 197,which
provides additional direction for developing the Scoping Plan. On December 14, 2017 CARB adopted a
second update to the Scoping Plano. The 2017 Scoping Plan details how the State will reduce GHG
emissions to meet the 2030 target set by Executive Order B-30-15 and codified by SB 32. Other objectives
listed in the 2017 Scoping plan are to provide direct GHG emissions reductions; support climate
investment in disadvantaged communities; and, support the Clean Power Plan and other Federal actions.
Senate Bill 32 (California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006: Emissions Limit)
Signed into law in September 2016, SB 32 codifies the 2030 GHG reduction target in Executive Order B-
30-15(40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030).The bill authorizes CARB to adopt an interim GHG emissions
level target to be achieved by 2030. CARB also must adopt rules and regulations in an open public process
to achieve the maximum, technologically feasible, and cost-effective GHG reductions.
SB 375 (The Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act of 2008)
Signed into law on September 30, 2008, SB 375 provides a process to coordinate land use planning,
regional transportation plans, and funding priorities to help California meet the GHG reduction goals
established by AB 32. SB 375 requires metropolitan planning organizations to include sustainable
community strategies in their regional transportation plans for reducing GHG emissions, aligns planning
for transportation and housing, and creates specified incentives for the implementation of the strategies.
AB 1493(Pavley Regulations and Fuel Efficiency Standards)
AB 1493, enacted on July 22, 2002, required CARB to develop and adopt regulations that reduce GHGs
emitted by passenger vehicles and light duty trucks. Implementation of the regulation was delayed by
lawsuits filed by automakers and by the EPA's denial of an implementation waiver.The EPA subsequently
granted the requested waiver in 2009, which was upheld by the by the U.S. District Court for the District
of Columbia in 2011.The regulations establish one set of emission standards for model years 2009-2016
and a second set of emissions standards for model years 2017 to 2025. By 2025,when all rules will be fully
implemented, new automobiles will emit 34 percent fewer CO2e emissions and 75 percent fewer smog-
forming emissions.
4 California Air Resources Board,California's 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan, November 2017.
August 2022
KimleyoHorn 1 12
City of Tustin Myford II Project
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment
SB 1368(Emission Performance Standards)
SB 1368 is the companion bill of AB 32, which directs the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC)to
adopt a performance standard for GHG emissions for the future power purchases of California utilities.
SB 1368 limits carbon emissions associated with electrical energy consumed in California by forbidding
procurement arrangements for energy longer than 5 years from resources that exceed the emissions of
a relatively clean, combined cycle natural gas power plant.The new law effectively prevents California's
utilities from investing in, otherwise financially supporting, or purchasing power from new coal plants
located in or out of the State.The CPUC adopted the regulations required by SB 1368 on August 29,
2007.The regulations implementing SB 1368 establish a standard for baseload generation owned by, or
under long-term contract to publicly owned utilities, for 1,100 pounds of CO2 per megawatt-hour.
SB 1078 and SBX1-2 (Renewable Electricity Standards)
SB 1078 requires California to generate 20 percent of its electricity from renewable energy by 2017. SB
107 changed the due date to 2010 instead of 2017. On November 17, 2008, Governor Arnold
Schwarzenegger signed Executive Order 5-14-08,which established a Renewable Portfolio Standard target
for California requiring that all retail sellers of electricity serve 33 percent of their load with renewable
energy by 2020. Executive Order 5-21-09 also directed CARB to adopt a regulation by July 31, 2010,
requiring the State's load serving entities to meet a 33 percent renewable energy target by 2020. CARB
approved the Renewable Electricity Standard on September 23, 2010 by Resolution 10-23. SBX1-2,which
codified the 33 percent by 2020 goal.
SB 350(Clean Energy and Pollution Reduction Act of 2015)
Signed into law on October 7, 2015, SB 350 implements the goals of Executive Order B-30-15. The
objectives of SB 350 are to increase the procurement of electricity from renewable sources from 33
percent to 50 percent(with interim targets of 40 percent by 2024, and 25 percent by 2027)and to double
the energy efficiency savings in electricity and natural gas end uses of retail customers through energy
efficiency and conservation. SB 350 also reorganizes the Independent System Operator to develop more
regional electricity transmission markets and improve accessibility in these markets, which will facilitate
the growth of renewable energy markets in the western United States.
AB 398(Market-Based Compliance Mechanisms)
Signed on July 25, 2017,AB 398 extended the duration of the Cap-and-Trade program from 2020 to 2030.
AB 398 required CARB to update the Scoping Plan and for all GHG rules and regulations adopted by the
State. It also designated CARB as the statewide regulatory body responsible for ensuring that California
meets its statewide carbon pollution reduction targets,while retaining local air districts' responsibility and
authority to curb toxic air contaminants and criteria pollutants from local sources that severely impact
public health.AB 398 also decreased free carbon allowances over 40 percent by 2030 and prioritized Cap-
and-Trade spending to various programs including reducing diesel emissions in impacted communities.
SB 150(Regional Transportation Plans)
Signed on October 10, 2017, SB 150 aligns local and regional GHG reduction targets with State targets
(i.e., 40 percent below their 1990 levels by 2030). SB 150 creates a process to include communities in
August 2022
KimleyoHorn 1 13
City of Tustin Myford II Project
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment
discussions on how to monitor their regions' progress on meeting these goals. The bill also requires the
CARB to regularly report on that progress, as well as on the successes and the challenges regions
experience associated with achieving their targets. SB 150 provides for accounting of climate change
efforts and GHG reductions and identify effective reduction strategies.
SB 100(California Renewables Portfolio Standard Program: Emissions of Greenhouse Gases)
Signed into Law in September 2018, SB 100 increased California's renewable electricity portfolio from 50
to 60 percent by 2030. SB 100 also established a further goal to have an electric grid that is entirely
powered by clean energy by 2045.
Executive Orders Related to GHG Emissions
California's Executive Branch has taken several actions to reduce GHGs using executive orders. Although
not regulatory,they set the tone for the State and guide the actions of state agencies.
Executive Order S-3-05
Executive Order 5-3-05 was issued on June 1, 2005, which established the following GHG emissions
reduction targets:
• By 2010, reduce GHG emissions to 2000 levels.
• By 2020, reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels.
• By 2050, reduce GHG emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels.
The 2050 reduction goal represents what some scientists believe is necessary to reach levels that will
stabilize the climate.The 2020 goal was established to be a mid-term target. Because this is an executive
order,the goals are not legally enforceable for local governments or the private sector.
Executive Order S-01-07
Issued on January 18, 2007, Executive Order S 01-07 mandates that a statewide goal shall be established
to reduce the carbon intensity of California's transportation fuels by at least 10 percent by 2020. The
executive order established a Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) and directed the Secretary for
Environmental Protection to coordinate the actions of the California Energy Commission, CARB, the
University of California,and other agencies to develop and propose protocols for measuring the"life-cycle
carbon intensity' of transportation fuels. CARB adopted the LCFS on April 23, 2009.
Executive Order S-13-08
Issued on November 14,2008, Executive Order 5-13-08 facilitated the California Natural Resources Agency
development of the 2009 California Climate Adaptation Strategy. Objectives include analyzing risks of
climate change in California, identifying and exploring strategies to adapt to climate change, and
specifying a direction for future research.
August 2022
KimleyoHorn 1 14
City of Tustin Myford II Project
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment
Executive Order S-14-08
Issued on November 17, 2008, Executive Order 5-14-08 expands the State's Renewable Energy Standard
to 33 percent renewable power by 2020.Additionally, Executive Order 5-21-09 (signed on September 15,
2009)directs CARB to adopt regulations requiring 33 percent of electricity sold in the State come from
renewable energy by 2020. CARB adopted the Renewable Electricity Standard on September 23, 2010,
which requires 33 percent renewable energy by 2020 for most publicly owned electricity retailers.
Executive Order S-21-09
Issued on July 17,2009, Executive Order 5-21-09 directs CARB to adopt regulations to increase California's
RPS to 33 percent by 2020.This builds upon SB 1078(2002),which established the California RPS program,
requiring 20 percent renewable energy by 2017, and SB 107 (2006), which advanced the 20 percent
deadline to 2010, a goal which was expanded to 33 percent by 2020 in the 2005 Energy Action Plan II.
Executive Order B-30-15
Issued on April 29, 2015, Executive Order B-30-15 established a California GHG reduction target of 40
percent below 1990 levels by 2030 and directs CARB to update the Climate Change Scoping Plan to express
the 2030 target in terms of million metric tons of CO2e (MMTCO2e). The 2030 target acts as an interim
goal on the way to achieving reductions of 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050, a goal set by Executive
Order 5-3-05. The executive order also requires the State's climate adaptation plan to be updated every
three years and for the State to continue its climate change research program, among other provisions.
With the enactment of SB 32 in 2016,the Legislature codified the goal of reducing GHG emissions by 2030
to 40 percent below 1990 levels.
Executive Order B-55-18.
Issued on September 10, 2018, Executive Order B-55-18 establishes a goal to achieve carbon neutrality as
soon as possible, and no later than 2045, and achieve and maintain net negative emissions thereafter.
This goal is in addition to the existing statewide targets of reducing GHG emissions. The executive order
requires CARB to work with relevant state agencies to develop a framework for implementing this goal. It
also requires CARB to update the Scoping Plan to identify and recommend measures to achieve carbon
neutrality.The executive order also requires state agencies to develop sequestration targets in the Natural
and Working Lands Climate Change Implementation Plan.
Executive Order N-79-20
Issued on September 23, 2020, Executive Order N-79-20 established a goal to end the sales of new internal
combustion engine vehicles in the state as soon as possible, and no later than 2035, and continue to
phaseout fossil-fueled cars and trucks. By setting a course to end sales of internal combustion passenger
vehicles by 2035, the Governor's Executive Order establishes a target for the transportation sector that
helps put the state on a path to carbon neutrality by 2045. It is important to note that the Executive Order
focuses on new vehicle sales for automakers, and therefore does not require Californians to give up the
existing cars and trucks they already own.
August 2022
City of Tustin Myford II Project
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment
California Regulations and Building Codes
California has a long history of adopting regulations to improve energy efficiency in new and remodeled
buildings. These regulations have kept California's energy consumption relatively flat even with rapid
population growth.
Title 20 Appliance Efficiency Regulations
The appliance efficiency regulations (California Code of Regulations [CCR] Title 20, Sections 1601-1608)
include standards for new appliances.Twenty-three categories of appliances are included in the scope of
these regulations. These standards include minimum levels of operating efficiency, and other cost-
effective measures, to promote the use of energy-and water-efficient appliances.
Title 24 Building Energy Efficiency Standards
California's Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings (CCR Title 24, Part 6)
was first adopted in 1978 in response to a legislative mandate to reduce California's energy consumption.
The standards are updated periodically to allow consideration and possible incorporation of new energy
efficient technologies and methods. Energy efficient buildings require less electricity;therefore, increased
energy efficiency reduces fossil fuel consumption and decreases GHG emissions.The 2016 Building Energy
Efficiency Standards approved on January 19, 2016 went into effect on January 1, 2017.The 2019 Building
Energy Efficiency Standards were adopted on May 9, 2018 and took effect on January 1, 2020. Under the
2019 standards, homes will use about 53 percent less energy and nonresidential buildings will use about
30 percent less energy than buildings under the 2016 standards.
On August 11, 2021, the CEC adopted the 2022 Energy Code. In December, it was approved by the
California Building Standards Commission for inclusion into the California Building Standards Code. The
2022 Energy Code encourages efficient electric heat pumps, establishes electric-ready requirements for
new homes,expands solar photovoltaic and battery storage standards,strengthens ventilation standards,
and more. Buildings whose permit applications are applied for on or after January 1, 2023, must comply
with the 2022 Energy Code.
Title 24 California Green Building Standards Code
The California Green Building Standards Code (CCR Title 24, Part 11 code) commonly referred to as the
CALGreen Code, is a statewide mandatory construction code developed and adopted by the California
Building Standards Commission and the Department of Housing and Community Development. The
CALGreen standards require new residential and commercial buildings to comply with mandatory
measures under the topics of planning and design, energy efficiency, water efficiency/conservation,
material conservation and resource efficiency, and environmental quality. CALGreen also provides
voluntary tiers and measures that local governments may adopt that encourage or require additional
measures in the five green building topics.The most recent update to the CALGreen Code went into effect
January 1, 2017. Updates to the 2016 CALGreen Code took effect on January 1, 2020 (2019 CALGreen).
The 2019 CALGreen standards continue to improve upon the existing standards for new construction of,
and additions and alterations to, residential and nonresidential buildings.
August 2022
KimleyoHorn 1 16
City of Tustin Myford II Project
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment
3.3 Regional
South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 2305 (Warehouse Indirect Source Rule)
Rule 2305 was adopted by the SCAQMD Governing Board on May 7, 2021 to reduce nitrogen oxide and
particulate matter emissions associated with warehouses and mobile sources attracted to warehouses.
However, Rule 2305 would also reduce GHG emissions. This rule applies to all existing and proposed
warehouses over 100,000 square feet located in the SCAQMD. Rule 2305 requires warehouse operators
to track annual vehicle miles traveled associated with truck trips to and from the warehouse. These trip
miles are used to calculate the warehouses WAIRE (Warehouse Actions and Investments to Reduce
Emissions)Points Compliance Obligation.WAIRE Points are earned based on emission reduction measures
and warehouse operators are required to submit an annual WAIRE Report which includes truck trip data
and emission reduction measures. Reduction strategies listed in the WAIRE menu include acquire zero
emission (ZE)or near zero emission (NZE)trucks; require ZE/NZE truck visits; require ZE yard trucks; install
on-site ZE charging/fueling infrastructure; install onsite energy systems; and install filtration systems in
residences, schools, and other buildings in the adjacent community. Warehouse operators that do not
earn a sufficient number of WAIRE points to satisfy the WAIRE Points Compliance Obligation would be
required to pay a mitigation fee. Funds from the mitigation fee will be used to incentivize the purchase of
cleaner trucks and charging/fueling infrastructure in communities nearby.
South Coast Air Quality Management District Thresholds
The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) formed a GHG California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) Significance Threshold Working Group to provide guidance to local lead agencies on
determining significance for GHG emissions in their CEQA documents.This working group was formed to
assist SCAQMD's efforts to develop a GHG significance threshold and is composed of a wide variety of
stakeholders including the State Office of Planning and Research, CARB, the Attorney General's Office, a
variety of city and county planning departments in the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB), various utilities such
as sanitation and power companies throughout the SCAB, industry groups, and environmental and
professional organizations. The Working Group has proposed a tiered approach to evaluating GHG
emissions for development projects where SCAQMD is not the lead agency, wherein projects are
evaluated sequentially through a series of"tiers" to determine whether the project is likely to result in a
potentially significant impact due to GHG emissions.
With the tiered approach, the Project is compared with the requirements of each tier sequentially and
would not result in a significant impact if it complies with any tier. Tier 1 excludes projects that are
specifically exempt from SB 97 from resulting in a significant impact. Tier 2 excludes projects that are
consistent with a GHG reduction plan that has a certified final CEQA document and complies with AB 32
GHG reduction goals. Tier 3 excludes projects with annual emissions lower than a screening threshold.
The SCAQMD has adopted a threshold of 10,000 metric tons of CO2e (MTCO2e) per year for industrial
projects and a 3,000 MTCO2e threshold was proposed for non-industrial projects but has not been
adopted. During Working Group Meeting #7 it was explained that this threshold was derived using a 90
percent capture rate of a large sampling of industrial facilities. During Meeting #8, the Working Group
defined industrial uses as production, manufacturing,and fabrication activities or storage and distribution
(e.g., warehouse, transfer facility, etc.). The Working Group indicated that the 10,000 MTCO2e per year
threshold applies to both emissions from construction and operational phases plus indirect emissions
(electricity, water use, etc.)The SCAQMD concluded that projects with emissions less than the screening
threshold would not result in a significant cumulative impact.
August 2022
KimleyoHorn 1 17
City of Tustin Myford II Project
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment
Tier 4 consists of three decision tree options. Under the Tier 4 first option, SCAQMD initially outlined that
a project would be excluded if design features and/or mitigation measures resulted in emissions 30
percent lower than business as usual emissions. However, the Working Group did not provide a
recommendation for this approach. The Working Group folded the Tier 4 second option into the third
option. Under the Tier 4 third option, a project would be excluded if it was below an efficiency-based
threshold of 4.8 MTCO2e per service population per year. Tier 5 would exclude projects that implement
offsite mitigation (GHG reduction projects) or purchase offsets to reduce GHG emission impacts to less
than the proposed screening level.
Tier 3 Screening Thresholds
When the tiered approach is applied to a proposed project, and the project is found not to comply with
Tier 1 or Tier 2, the project's emissions are compared against a screening threshold, as described above,
for Tier 3. The screening threshold formally adopted by SCAQMD is an "interim" screening threshold for
stationary source industrial projects where the SCAQMD is the lead agency under CEQA. The threshold
was termed "interim" because, at the time, SCAQMD anticipated that CARB would be adopting a
statewide significance threshold that would inform and provide guidance to SCAQMD in its adoption of a
final threshold. However, no statewide threshold was ever adopted, and the interim threshold remains
in effect.
For projects for which SCAQMD is not a lead agency, no screening thresholds have been formally adopted.
However, the SCAQMD Working Group has recommended a threshold of 10,000 MTCO2e/year for
industrial projects and 3,000 MTCO2e/year for residential and commercial projects. SCAQMD determined
that these thresholds would "capture" 90 percent of GHG emissions from these sectors, "capture"
meaning that 90 percent of total emissions from all new projects would be subject to some type of CEQA
analysis (i.e., found potentially significant).s
Southern California Association of Governments
On September 3, 2020, the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Regional Council
adopted Connect SoCal (2020 - 2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy
[2020 RTP/SCS]). The RTP/SCS charts a course for closely integrating land use and transportation so that
the region can grow smartly and sustainably. The strategy was prepared through a collaborative,
continuous, and comprehensive process with input from local governments, county transportation
commissions, tribal governments, non-profit organizations, businesses and local stakeholders within the
counties of Imperial, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura.The RTP/SCS is a long-
range vision plan that balances future mobility and housing needs with economic, environmental, and
public health goals. The SCAG region strives toward sustainability through integrated land use and
transportation planning. The SCAG region must achieve specific federal air quality standards and is
required by state law to lower regional GHG emissions.
5 SCAQMD, "Staff Report: Interim CEQA GHG Significance Threshold for Stationary Sources, Rules and Plans," December 5,
2008,Attachment E:"Draft Guidance Document—Interim CEQA Greenhouse Gas(GHG)Significance Threshold,"October 2008,
p.3-2.
August 2022
City of Tustin Myford II Project
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment
3.4 Local
City of Tustin General Plan
The City of Tustin General Plan contains the following goals and policies that address greenhouse gas as
part of the Conservation, Open Space, and Recreation Element:
Goal 4: Reduce emissions through reduced energy consumption.
Policy 4.1: Promote energy conservation in all sectors of the City including residential,
commercial, and industrial.
Policy 4.2: Promote local recycling of wastes and the use of recycled materials.
Goal 11: Conserve energy resources through use of available energy technology and conservation
practices.
Policy 11.1: Encourage the use of new technologies and innovative building design,site design
and orientation techniques which minimize energy use by taking advantage of
sun/shade patterns, prevailing winds, landscaping, and building materials.
Policy 11.2: Maintain local legislation to establish, update and implement energy
performance building code requirements established under State Title 24 Energy
Regulations.
August 2022
KimleyoHorn 1 19
City of Tustin Myford II Project
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment
4 SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGY
4.1 Thresholds and Significance Criteria
Addressing GHG emissions generation impacts requires an agency to determine what constitutes a
significant impact.The amendments to the CEQA Guidelines specifically allow lead agencies to determine
thresholds of significance that illustrate the extent of an impact and are a basis from which to apply
mitigation measures.This means that each agency is left to determine whether a project's GHG emissions
will have a"significant" impact on the environment.The guidelines direct that agencies are to use"careful
judgment" and "make a good-faith effort, based to the extent possible on scientific and factual data, to
describe, calculate or estimate" the project's GHG emissions6.
Based upon the criteria derived from Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, a project normally would have
a significant effect on the environment if it would:
• Generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the
environment, based on any applicable threshold of significance; or
• Conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of
reducing the emissions of GHGs.
South Coast Air Quality Management District Thresholds
On December 5, 2008, the SCAQMD Governing Board adopted a 10,000 MTCO2e industrial threshold for
projects where SCAQMD is the lead agency.The SCAQMD GHG CEQA Significance Threshold Working Group
defined industrial uses as production, manufacturing, and fabrication activities or storage and distribution
(e.g., warehouse, transfer facility, etc.) during Meeting #8. Additionally, the SCAQMD GHG Significance
Threshold Stakeholder Working Group has specified that a warehouse is considered to be an industrial
project!During the GHG CEQA Significance Threshold Working Group Meeting#15,the SCAQMD noted that
it was considering extending the industrial GHG significance threshold for use by all lead agencies.
Furthermore, the Working Group indicated that the 10,000 MTCO2e per year threshold applies to both
emissions from construction and operational phases plus indirect emissions(electricity,water use,etc.).The
SCAQMD has not announced when staff is expecting to present GHG thresholds for land use projects where
the SCAQMD is not the lead agency to the governing board.
As the Project involves the construction of new warehouse, the 10,000 MTCO2e per year industrial
screening threshold has been selected as the significance threshold, as it is most applicable to the
proposed Project. This threshold is selected because the proposed Project is analogous to an industrial
use much more closely than any other land use such as commercial or residential in terms of its expected
operating characteristics.Typical industrial zoned areas include storage facilities,warehouses, plants,and
airports, while commercial land uses are generally designated as businesses that have some kind of
interaction with the public and typically include offices, retail stores, hotels, or restaurants. Additionally,
to ensure that the threshold is conservative in its application, although the SCAQMD uses their adopted
10,000 MTCO2e threshold to determine the significance of stationary source emissions for industrial
6 14 California Code of Regulations,Section 15064.4a
South Coast Air Quality Management District, Minutes for the GHG CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group
#8,2009.
August 2022
KimleyoHorn 1 20
City of Tustin Myford II Project
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment
projects, the 10,000 MTCO2e threshold used in the analysis is conservatively applied to all sources of
project-related GHG emissions whether stationary source, mobile source, area source, or other.
4.2 Methodology
Global climate change is, by definition, a cumulative impact of GHG emissions. Therefore, there is no
project-level analysis.The baseline against which to compare potential impacts of the project includes the
natural and anthropogenic drivers of global climate change, including world-wide GHG emissions from
human activities which almost doubled between 1970 and 2010 from approximately 27 gigatonnes (Gt)
Of CO2/year to nearly 49 GtCO2/year.$ As such, the geographic extent of climate change and GHG
emissions cumulative impact discussion is worldwide.
The Project's construction and operational emissions were calculated using the California Emissions
Estimator Model version 2020.4.0(CalEEMod). Details of the modeling assumptions and emission factors
are provided in Appendix A: Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data. For construction, CalEEMod calculates
emissions from off-road equipment usage and on-road vehicle travel associated with haul, delivery, and
construction worker trips. GHG emissions during construction were forecasted based on the proposed
construction schedule and applying the mobile-source and fugitive dust emissions factors derived from
CalEEMod. The Project's construction-related GHG emissions would be generated from off-road
construction equipment, on-road hauling and vendor(material delivery)trucks, and worker vehicles.The
Project's operations-related GHG emissions would be generated by vehicular traffic, area sources (e.g.
landscaping maintenance, consumer products), electrical generation, natural gas consumption, water
supply and wastewater treatment, and solid waste.
8 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Climate Change 2014 Mitigation of Climate Change Working Group 111
Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,2014.
August 2022
KimleyoHorn 1 21
City of Tustin Myford II Project
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment
5 POTENTIAL IMPACTS
5.1 Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Threshold 5.1 Would the Project generate GHG emissions,either directly or indirectly,that could have
a significant impact on the environment?
Short-Term Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions
The Project would result in direct emissions of GHGs from construction.The approximate quantity of daily
GHG emissions generated by construction equipment utilized to build the Project is depicted in Table 2:
Construction-Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions.
Table 2:Construction-Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Category MTCOe'
Construction 469
30-Year Amortized Construction 16
Source:CalEEMod version 2020.4.0.Refer to Appendix A for model outputs.
As shown, the Project would result in the generation of approximately 469 MTCO2e over the course of
construction. Construction GHG emissions are typically summed and amortized over a 30-year period,
then added to the operational emissions9. The amortized Project construction emissions would be 16
MTCO2e per year. Once construction is complete, the generation of these GHG emissions would cease.
Long-Term Operational Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Operational or long-term emissions occur over the life of the Project. GHG emissions would result from
direct emissions such as Project generated vehicular traffic, on-site combustion of natural gas, and
operation of any landscaping equipment. Operational GHG emissions would also result from indirect
sources, such as off-site generation of electrical power, the energy required to convey water to, and
wastewater from the Project, the emissions associated with solid waste generated from the Project, and
any fugitive refrigerants from air conditioning or refrigerators.
Total GHG emissions associated with the Project are summarized in Table 3: Proiect Greenhouse Gas
Emissions. The Project is a speculative warehouse, and the modeled emissions are based on the
conservative assumption that the Project would be occupied by a High-Cube Fulfillment Center
Warehouse (ITE code 155), which has the highest trip generation rate among potential users for the site.
Per the Trip Generation and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis Memorandum, using the High-Cube
Fulfillment Center Warehouse trip generation rate,the Project would generate 956 daily vehicle trips and
approximately 28 of those trips would be trucks. However, a future tenant could have operations that
would generate fewer emissions. As shown in Table 3, using conservative trip generation assumptions,
the Project would potentially generate a net of approximately 373 MTCO2e annually from both
9 The project lifetime is based on the standard 30-year assumption of the South Coast Air Quality Management District(South
Coast Air Quality Management District, Minutes for the GHG CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group#13,
August 26,2009).
August 2022
City of Tustin Myford II Project
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment
construction and operations and the Project-related GHG emissions would not exceed the SCAQMD's
10,000 MTCO2e per year threshold.Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
Table 3: Project Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Emissions Source MTCOie per Year
Existing Conditions 1,755
Proposed Project
Construction Amortized Over 30 Years 16
Area Source <0.01
Energy 159
Mobile 1,360
Off-Road—Forklifts 124
Off-Road—Yard Trucks 252
Backup Generator 20
Waste 70
Water and Wastewater 127
Total Project Emissions 2,128
Net Emissions(Project—Existing) 373
SCAQMD Threshold 10,000
Exceeds Threshold? No
Source:CalEEMod version 2020.4.0.Refer to Appendix A for model outputs.
Below is a description of the primary sources of operational emissions:
• Area Sources. Area source emissions occur from architectural coatings, landscaping equipment,
and consumer products. Landscaping is anticipated to occur throughout the Project site.
Additionally, the primary emissions from architectural coatings are volatile organic compounds,
which are relatively insignificant as direct GHG emissions. The Project would result in <0.01
MTCO2e/yr(refer to Table 3).
• Energy Consumption. Energy consumption consists of emissions from Project consumption of
electricity and natural gas. Although the project is a speculative warehouse, the analysis
conservatively assumed a worst-case scenario that total building area of the warehouse would be
refrigerated.The Project would result in approximately 159 MTCO2e/yr from energy consumption
(refer to Table 3).
• Off-Road Equipment. Operational off-road emissions would be generated by off-road cargo
handling equipment used during operational activities. For this project it was assumed that the
warehouses would include three forklifts and one yard truck per SCAQMD data10. Based on CARB
io SCAQMD,High Cube Warehouse Truck Trip Study White PaperSummary of Business Survey Results,June 2014.
August 2022
KimleyoHorn 1 23
City of Tustin Myford II Project
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment
OFFROAD emissions data, the forklifts and yard truck would generate 124 and 252 MTCO2e/yr,
respectively.
• Emergency Backup Generators. As the Project warehouse is speculative, it is unknown whether
emergency backup generators would be used. Backup generators would only be used in the event
of a power failure and would not be part of the Project's normal daily operations. Nonetheless,
emissions associated with this equipment were included to be conservative. Emissions from an
emergency backup generator for each warehouse building were calculated separately from
CalEEMod; refer to Appendix A. However,CalEEMod default emissions rates were used. If backup
generators are required, the end user would be required to obtain a permit from the SCAQMD
prior to installation. Emergency backup generators must meet SCAQMD's Best Available Control
Technology (BACT) requirements and comply with SCAQMD Rule 1470 (Requirements for
Stationary Diesel-Fueled Internal Combustion and Other Compression Ignition Engines), which
would minimize emissions. Backup generator emissions would be 20 MTCO2e/yr.
• Mobile Sources. Mobiles sources from the Project were calculated with CalEEMod based on the
trip generation from the Transportation Analysis. As shown in Table 3, the mobile source
emissions from the Project would be approximately 1,360 MTCO2e/yr.
• Solid Waste. Solid waste releases GHG emissions in the form of methane when these materials
decompose. The Project would result in approximately 70 MTCO2e/yr from solid waste (refer to
Table 3).
• Water and Wastewater. GHG emissions from water demand would occur from electricity
consumption associated with water conveyance and treatment. The Project would result in
approximately 127 MTCO2e/yr from water and wastewater conveyance and treatment (refer to
Table 3).
Table 3 shows that operational emissions from the proposed Project would generate approximately 2,128
MTCO2e per year. However, existing operations are currently generating 1,755 MTCO2e/yr. Therefore,
operation of the Project would result in a net increase of 373 MTCO2e /yr, and would be below the
threshold of 10,000 MTCO2e/yr.
It should be noted that the operational emissions reflect Project energy consumption based on the 2019
Title 24 Part 6 (Building Energy Efficiency Standards). The standards require updated thermal envelope
standards (preventing heat transfer from the interior to exterior and vice versa), residential and
nonresidential ventilation requirements, and nonresidential lighting requirements that would cut
residential energy use by more than 50 percent(with solar) and nonresidential energy use by 30 percent.
The standards also encourage demand responsive technologies including battery storage and heat pump
water heaters and improve the building's thermal envelope through high performance attics, walls and
windows to improve comfort and energy savings.11 As noted above, the 2022 Energy Code becomes
effective on January 1, 2023 and strengthens ventilation standards, includes new electric heat pump
requirements, promotes electric-ready requirements for new homes (including the addition of circuitry
for electric appliances, battery storage panels, and dedicated infrastructure), and expands solar
ii California Energy Commission,2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards,2018.Available at:
https://www.energy.ca.gov/progra ms-a nd-topics/progra ms/bui ldi ng-energy-efficiency-sta nda rds/2019-bu ild ing-energy-
efficiency
August 2022
City of Tustin Myford II Project
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment
photovoltaic and battery storage standards. The Project would be required to comply with the latest
applicable version of the code depending on when permit applications are applied for (i.e., permit
applications on or after January 1, 2023, must comply with the 2022 Energy Code").
The Project would also comply with the appliance energy efficiency standards in Title 20 of the California
Code of Regulations. The Title 20 standards include minimum levels of operating efficiency, and other
cost-effective measures,to promote the use of energy-and water-efficient appliances.The Project would
be constructed according to the standards for high-efficiency water fixtures for indoor plumbing and
water efficient irrigation systems required in 2019 Title 24, Part 11 (CALGreen).
At the State and global level, improvements in technology, policy, and social behavior can also influence
and reduce operational emissions generated by a project.The state is currently on a pathway to achieving
the Renewable Portfolio Standards goal of 33 percent renewables by 2020 and 60 percent renewables by
2030 per SB 100. Despite these goals, the majority of the Project's emissions would still be from mobile
and energy sources. Future mobile source emissions are greatly dependent on changes in vehicle
technology, fuels, and social behavior, which can be influenced by policies to varying degrees. Taking
known future policies into account, CARB estimates that about 96 percent of future vehicles in Orange
County would still run on fossil fuels, even with increased electric vehicle mode share.13 This is assumed
to also be applicable to the project vehicle fleet, absent data that may suggest otherwise. Due to these
external factors, average emissions from transportation in 2050 would mostly still generate GHG
emissions, but the quantity is uncertain in light of potential changes in technology and policy over the
next 30 years.
The majority of Project emissions (approximately 87 percent) would occur from mobile and energy
sources. As noted above, energy and mobile sources are targeted by statewide measures such as low
carbon fuels, cleaner vehicles, strategies to promote sustainable communities and improved
transportation choices that result in reducing VMT,continued implementation of the Renewable Portfolio
Standard (the target is now set at 60 percent renewables by 2030), and extension of the Cap and Trade
program (requires reductions from industrial sources, energy generation, and fossil fuels). The Cap and
Trade program covers approximately 85 percent of California's GHG emissions as of January 2015. The
statewide cap for GHG emissions from the capped sectors (i.e., electricity generation, industrial sources,
petroleum refining, and cement production) commenced in 2013 and will decline approximately three
percent each year, achieving GHG emission reductions throughout the program's duration. The passage
of AB 398 in July 2017 extended the duration of the Cap and Trade program from 2020 to 2030. With
continued implementation of various statewide measures, the Project's operational energy and mobile
source emissions would continue to decline in the future.
Table 3 shows that GHG impacts would be less than significant. Project-related GHG emissions would not
result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to the significant cumulative impact of climate change.
z California Energy Commission,2022 Building Energy Efficiency standards,https://www.energy.ca.gov/programs-and-
topics/programs/building-energy-efficiency-standards/2022-building-energy-efficiency,accessed May 2022.
13 California Air Resources Board,EMFAC2021 Web Database.Available at: https:Harb.ca.gov/emfac
August 2022
City of Tustin Myford II Project
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment
Standard Conditions and Requirements:
Standard Conditions are existing requirements and conditions of approval that are based on local, state,
or federal regulations or laws that are frequently required independently of CEQA review. Typical
standard conditions and requirements include compliance with the provisions of the Building Code,
SCAQMD Rules, etc. The City may impose additional conditions during the approval process, as
appropriate. Because Standard Conditions are neither Project specific nor a result of development of the
Project,they are not considered to be either PDFs or Mitigation Measures.
SC AQ-1 Prior to the issuance of grading permits,the City Engineer shall confirm that the Grading Plan,
Building Plans and Specifications require all construction contractors to comply with South
Coast Air Quality Management District's (SCAQMD's) Rules 402 and 403 to minimize
construction emissions of dust and particulates.The measures include, but are not limited to,
the following:
• Portions of a construction site to remain inactive longer than a period of three months
will be seeded and watered until grass cover is grown or otherwise stabilized.
• All on-site roads will be paved as soon as feasible or watered periodically or chemically
stabilized.
• All material transported off site will be either sufficiently watered or securely covered
to prevent excessive amounts of dust.
• The area disturbed by clearing, grading, earthmoving, or excavation operations will be
minimized at all times.
• Where vehicles leave a construction site and enter adjacent public streets, the streets
will be swept daily or washed down at the end of the work day to remove soil tracked
onto the paved surface.
SC AQ-2 The applicant shall require by contract specifications that the interior and exterior
architectural coatings (paint and primer including parking lot paint) products used would
comply with SCAQMD Rule 1113 which requires building envelope coatings to have a volatile
organic compound rating of 50 grams per liter or less.
SC AQ-3 Require diesel powered construction equipment to turn off when not in use per Title 13 of
the California Code of Regulations, Section 2449.
SCAQ-4 Install water-efficient irrigation systems and devices, such as soil moisture-based irrigation
controls and sensors for landscaping according to the City's Water Efficient Landscape
requirements (Article 9, Chapter 7 of the City's Municipal Code).
SC AQ-5 The Project shall be designed in accordance with the applicable Title 24 Energy Efficiency
Standards for Nonresidential Buildings (California Code of Regulations [CCR],Title 24, Part 6).
These standards are updated, nominally every three years, to incorporate improved energy
efficiency technologies and methods. The Building Official, or designee shall ensure
compliance prior to the issuance of each building permit. The Title 24 Energy Efficiency
Standards (Section 110.10) require buildings to be designed to have 15 percent of the roof
August 2022
City of Tustin Myford II Project
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment
area "solar ready' that will structurally accommodate later installation of rooftop solar
panels. If future building operators pursue providing rooftop solar panels, they will submit
plans for solar panels prior to occupancy.
SCAQ-6 The Project shall be designed in accordance with the applicable California Green Building
Standards (CALGreen) Code (24 CCR, Part 11). The Building Official, or designee shall ensure
compliance prior to the issuance of each building permit.These requirements include, but are
not limited to:
• Design buildings to be water-efficient. Install water-efficient fixtures in accordance with
Section 5.303 (nonresidential) of the California Green Building Standards Code Part 11.
• Recycle and/or salvage for reuse a minimum of 65 percent of the nonhazardous
construction and demolition waste in accordance with Section 5.408.1 (nonresidential)
of the California Green Building Standards Code Part 11.
• Provide storage areas for recyclables and green waste and adequate recycling
containers located in readily accessible areas in accordance Section 5.410
(nonresidential) of the California Green Building Standards Code Part 11.
• Provide designated parking for any combination of low-emitting, fuel efficient and
carpool/van pool vehicles.At least eight percent of the total parking spaces are required
to be designated in accordance Section 5.106.5.2 (nonresidential), Designated Parking
for Clean Air Vehicles, of the California Green Building Standards Code Part 11.
• To facilitate future installation of electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE),
nonresidential construction shall comply with Section 5.106.5.3 (nonresidential electric
vehicle charging) of the California Green Building Standards Code Part 11.
SC AQ-7 All on-site forklifts shall be non-diesel and shall be powered by electricity,compressed natural
gas, or propane if technically feasible.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required.
Level of Significance: Less than significant impact.
5.2 Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan Compliance
Threshold 5.2 Would the Project conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation of an agency
adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions?
SCAG RTP/SCS Consistency
On September 3, 2020, the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Regional Council
adopted Connect SoCal (2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy
[RTP/SCS]). The RTP/SCS is a long-range visioning plan that balances future mobility and housing needs
with economic, environmental, and public health goals.The RTP/SCS embodies a collective vision for the
region's future and is developed with input from local governments, county transportation commissions,
August 2022
KimleyoHorn 1 27
City of Tustin Myford II Project
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment
tribal governments, nonprofit organizations, businesses, and local stakeholders in the counties of
Imperial, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura. SCAG's RTP/SCS establishes GHG
emissions goals for automobiles and light-duty trucks for 2020 and 2035 as well as an overall GHG target
for the Project region consistent with both the target date of AB 32 and the post-2020 GHG reduction
goals of Executive Orders 5-03-05 and B-30-15.
The RTP/SCS contains over 4,000 transportation projects, ranging from highway improvements, railroad
grade separations, bicycle lanes, new transit hubs and replacement bridges. These future investments
were included in county plans developed by the six county transportation commissions and seek to reduce
traffic bottlenecks, improve the efficiency of the region's network, and expand mobility choices for
everyone. The RTP/SCS is an important planning document for the region, allowing project sponsors to
qualify for federal funding.
The plan accounts for operations and maintenance costs to ensure reliability, longevity, and cost
effectiveness. The RTP/SCS is also supported by a combination of transportation and land use strategies
that help the region achieve state GHG emissions reduction goals and Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA)
requirements, preserve open space areas, improve public health and roadway safety, support our vital
goods movement industry, and utilize resources more efficiently. GHG emissions resulting from
development-related mobile sources are the most potent source of emissions, and therefore Project
comparison to the RTP/SCS is an appropriate indicator of whether the Project would inhibit the post-2020
GHG reduction goals promulgated by the state. The Project's consistency with the RTP/SCS goals is
analyzed in detail in Table 4: Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy Consistency.
Compliance with applicable State standards would ensure consistency with State and regional GHG
reduction planning efforts.The goals stated in the RTP/SCS were used to determine consistency with the
planning efforts previously stated. As shown in Table 4, the proposed Project would be consistent with
the stated goals of the RTP/SCS. Therefore, the proposed Project would not result in any significant
impacts or interfere with SCAG's ability to achieve the region's post-2020 mobile source GHG reduction
targets.
Table 4: Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy Consistency
SLAG Goals Cbmpl"fance
GOAL 1: Encourage regional economic prosperity N/A: This is not a project-specific policy and is therefore
and global competitiveness. not applicable.
GOAL 2: Improve mobility, accessibility, reliability, N/A: Although this Project is not a transportation
and travel safety for people and goods. improvement project, the Project is located near
existing transit routes on Myford Road, Walnut
Avenue,and access to 1-5.
GOAL 3: Enhance the preservation, security, and N/A: This is not a transportation improvement project and
resilience of the regional transportation is therefore not applicable.
system.
GOAL 4: Increase person and goods movement and N/A: This is not a transportation improvement project and
travel choices within the transportation is therefore not applicable.
system.
GOAL 5: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions and Consistent: The reduction of energy use, improvement of air
improve air quality. quality, and promotion of more environmentally
sustainable development are encouraged through
August 2022
City of Tustin Myford II Project
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment
Table 4: Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy Consistency
SCAG Goals Ompl"fance
the development of alternative transportation
methods,green design techniques for buildings,and
other energy-reducing techniques. This
development project is required to comply with the
provisions of the California Building Energy Efficiency
Standards and the Green Building Standards Code
(CALGreen).
GOAL 6: Support healthy and equitable N/A: This is not a project-specific policy and is therefore
communities. not applicable.
GOAL 7: Adapt to a changing climate and support N/A: This is not a project-specific policy and is therefore
an integrated regional development not applicable.
pattern and transportation network.
GOAL 8: Leverage new transportation technologies N/A: This is not a transportation improvement project and
and data-driven solutions that result in is therefore not applicable.
more efficient travel.
GOAL 9: Encourage development of diverse N/A: This is not a housing development project and is
housing types in areas that are supported therefore not applicable. However, the Project is
by multiple transportation options. located within a relatively short walking distance to
local bus routes.
GOAL 10: Promote conservation of natural and N/A: This is not a project-specific policy and is therefore
agricultural lands and restoration of not applicable.
habitats.
Source:Southern California Association of Governments,Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy,2020.
The goals stated in the RTP/SCS were used to determine consistency with the planning efforts previously
stated.As shown in Table 4,the Project would be consistent with the stated goals of the RTP/SCS and the
CARB Scoping Plan. Therefore, the Project would not result in any significant impacts or interfere with
SCAG's ability to achieve the region's post-2020 mobile source GHG reduction targets.
Consistency with the CARB Scoping Plan
The California State Legislature adopted AB 32 in 2006. AB 32 focuses on reducing GHGs (carbon dioxide,
methane, nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, and sulfur hexafluoride)to 1990 levels by
the year 2020. Pursuant to the requirements in AB 32, CARB adopted the Climate Change Scoping Plan
(Scoping Plan) in 2008, which outlines actions recommended to obtain that goal. The Scoping Plan
provides a range of GHG reduction actions that include direct regulations, alternative compliance
mechanisms,monetary and non-monetary incentives,voluntary actions, market-based mechanisms such
as the cap-and-trade program, and an AB 32 implementation fee to fund the program.
The latest CARB Climate Change Scoping Plan (2017) outlines the state's strategy to reduce state's GHG
emissions to return to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 pursuant to SB 32.The CARB Scoping Plan is
applicable to state agencies and is not directly applicable to cities/counties and individual projects.
Nonetheless, the Scoping Plan has been the primary tool that is used to develop performance-based and
efficiency-based CEQA criteria and GHG reduction targets for climate action planning efforts.
August 2022
City of Tustin Myford II Project
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment
The 2017 Scoping Plan Update identifies additional GHG reduction measures necessary to achieve the
2030 target. These measures build upon those identified in the First Update to the Climate Change
Scoping Plan (2013). Although a number of these measures are currently established as policies and
measures, some measures have not yet been formally proposed or adopted. It is expected that these
measures or similar actions to reduce GHG emissions would be adopted as required to achieve statewide
GHG emissions targets. As shown in Table 5, the Project is consistent with most of the strategies, while
others are not applicable to the Project.
Table 5: Project Consistency with Applicable CARB Scoping Plan Measures
Scoping Plan scvping Plan Implementing
Sector Measure Regulations Project Cc�nslsterrey
Consistent. The Cap-and-Trade Program applies to
large industrial sources such as power plants,
refineries, and cement manufacturers. However, the
regulation indirectly affects people who use the
products and services produced by these industrial
sources when increased cost of products or services
Regulation for the (such as electricity and fuel) are transferred to the
California Cap-and- California Cap on GHG consumers. The Cap-and-Trade Program covers the
Trade Program Emissions and Market- GHG emissions associated with electricity consumed in
Linked to Western Based Compliance California, whether generated in-state or imported.
Climate Initiative Mechanism October Accordingly, GHG emissions associated with CEQA
20,2015(CCR 95800) projects'electricity usage are covered by the Cap-and-
Trade Program. The Cap-and-Trade Program also
covers fuel suppliers (natural gas and propane fuel
providers and transportation fuel providers)to address
emissions from such fuels and from combustion of
other fossil fuels not directly covered at large sources
in the Program's first compliance period.
Pavley 12005 Consistent. This measure applies to all new vehicles
Regulations to Control starting with model year 2012.The Project would not
GHG Emissions from conflict with its implementation as it would apply to all
Motor Vehicles new passenger vehicles purchased in California.
Transportation Pavley 12005 Passenger vehicles, model year 2012 and later,
California Light-Duty Regulations to Control associated with construction and operation of the
Vehicle GHG GHG Emissions from Project would be required to comply with the Pavley
Standards Motor Vehicles emissions standards.
2012 LEV III California Consistent. The LEV III amendments provide
GHG and Criteria reductions from new vehicles sold in California
Pollutant Exhaust and between 2017 and 2025. Passenger vehicles
Evaporative Emission associated with the site would comply with LEV III
Standards standards.
2009 readopted in Consistent. This measure applies to transportation
2015.Regulations to fuels utilized by vehicles in California. The Project
Low Carbon Fuel Achieve GHG Emission would not conflict with implementation of this
Standard Reductions Subarticle measure. Motor vehicles associated with construction
7.Low Carbon Fuel and operation of the Project would utilize low carbon
Standard CCR 95480 transportation fuels as required under this measure.
Regional SB 375.Cal.Public Consistent.The Project would provide development in
Transportation- Resources Code§§ the region that is consistent with the growth
Related GHG 21155,21155.1, projections in the RTP/SCS.
Targets. 21155.2,21159.28
Goods Movement Not applicable. The Project does not propose any
Goods Movement Action Plan January changes to maritime, rail, or intermodal facilities or
2007 forms of transportation.
August 2022
City of Tustin Myford II Project
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment
Table 5: Project Consistency with Applicable CARB Scoping Plan Measures
Scoping Plan scoping Plan Implementing
Sector Measure Regulations Project Cc�nslsterrey
2010 Amendments to Consistent. This measure applies to medium and
the Truck and Bus heavy-duty vehicles that operate in the state. The
Regulation,the Project would not conflict with implementation of this
Medium/Heavy Duty Drayage Truck measure. Medium and heavy-duty vehicles associated
Vehicle Regulation and the with construction and operation of the Project would
Tractor-Trailer GHG be required to comply with the requirements of this
Regulation regulation.
Not applicable. This is a statewide measure that
High Speed Rail Funded under SB 862 cannot be implemented by a project applicant or Lead
Agency.
Title 20 Appliance
Efficiency Regulation
Title 24 Part 6 Energy
Efficiency Standards for Consistent. The Project would not conflict with
Energy Efficiency Residential and Non- implementation of this measure. The Project would
Residential Building comply with the latest energy efficiency standards.
Title 24 Part 11
California Green
Building Code
Standards
Electricity and 2010 Regulation to
Natural Gas Renewable Portfolio Implement the Consistent. The Project would obtain electricity from
Standard/Renewable Renewable Electricity the electric utility,Southern California Edison(SCE). In
Electricity Standard. 2018 SCE obtained 42 percent of its power supply from
Standard(33%2020)
SB 350 Clean Energy renewable sources, including large hydroelectric
projects. Therefore, the utility would provide power
Million Solar Roofs and Pollution when needed on site that is composed of a greater
Program Reduction Act of 2015 percentage of renewable sources.
(50%2030)
Consistent. This measure is to increase solar
Million Solar Roofs throughout California,which is being done by various
Tax Incentive Program electricity providers and existing solar programs. The
Program program provides incentives that are in place at the
time of construction.
Title 24 Part 11
California Green
Building Code Consistent. The Project would comply with the
Standards CalGreen standards, which requires a 20 percent
Water Water SBX 7-7—The Water reduction in indoor water use.The Project would also
Conservation Act of comply with the City's Water-Efficient Landscaping
2009 Regulations (Article 9, Chapter 7 of the Tustin
Model Water Efficient Municipal Code).
Landscape Ordinance
Consistent. The State is to increase the use of green
Title 24 Part 11 building practices. The Project would implement
Green Building California Green required green building strategies through existing
Green Buildings Strategy Building Code regulation that requires the Project to comply with
Standards various CalGreen requirements. The Project includes
sustainability design features that support the Green
Building Strategy.
Not applicable.The Mandatory Reporting Regulation
2010 CARB Mandatory requires facilities and entities with more than 10,000
Industry Industrial Emissions MTCO2e of combustion and process emissions, all
Reporting Regulation facilities belonging to certain industries,and all electric
power entities to submit an annual GHG emissions
August 2022
City of Tustin Myford II Project
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment
Table 5: Project Consistency with Applicable CARB Scoping Plan Measures
Scoping Plan scvping Plan Implementing
Sector Measure Regplatibris Project Cc�nslsterrey
data report directly to CARB. As shown above,
although total Project GHG emissions would exceed
10,000 MTCO2e, the majority of these emissions are
from mobile sources.Therefore,this regulation would
not apply.
Title 24 Part 11
California Green Consistent. The Project would not conflict with
Recycling and implementation of these measures. The Project is
Waste Recycling and Waste Building CodeStandards required to achieve the recycling mandates via
Management AB 341 Statewide 75 compliance with the CALGreen code. The City has
consistently achieved its state recycling mandates.
Percent Diversion Goal
Forests Sustainable Forests Cap and Trade Offset Not applicable.The Project is in an area designated for
Projects urban uses.No forested lands exist on-site.
Consistent. The regulations are applicable to
High Global High Global CARB Refrigerant refrigerants used by large air conditioning systems and
Warming Warming Potential Management Program large commercial and industrial refrigerators and cold
Potential Gases CCR 95380 storage system.The Project would not conflict with the
refrigerant management regulations adopted by CARB.
Not applicable.The Project site is designated for urban
Cap and Trade Offset development.No grazing,feedlot,or other agricultural
Agriculture Agriculture Projects for Livestock activities that generate manure occur currently exist
and Rice Cultivation on-site or are proposed to be implemented by the
Project.
Source:California Air Resources Board,California's 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan,November 2017 and CARB,Climate Change Scoping
Plan,December 2008.
As seen in Table 4 and Table 5,the Project would be consistent with all applicable plan goals. In addition,
the Project would include several sustainable design features that would help reduce GHG emissions. As
shown in Table 3, with mitigation the Project is estimated to emit approximately 2,128 MTCO2e per year
directly from on-site activities and indirectly from off-site motor vehicles (a net increase of 373 MTCO2e).
The GHG emissions caused by long-term operation of the Project would be less than significant.
Regarding goals for 2050 under Executive Order S-3-05, at this time it is not possible to quantify the
emissions savings from future regulatory measures, as they have not yet been developed; nevertheless,
it can be anticipated that operation of the Project would benefit from the implementation of current and
potential future regulations (e.g., improvements in vehicle emissions, SB 100/renewable electricity
portfolio improvements, CARB's Mobile Source Strategy, etc.) enacted to meet an 80 percent reduction
below 1990 levels by 2050.
The majority of the GHG reductions from the Scoping Plan would result from continuation of the Cap-and-
Trade regulation. Assembly Bill 398 (2017) extends the state's Cap-and-Trade program through 2030 and
the Scoping Plan provide a comprehensive plan for the state to achieve its GHG targets through a variety
of regulations enacted at the state level. Additional reductions are achieved from electricity sector
standards (i.e., utility providers to supply 60 percent renewable electricity by 2030 and 100 percent
renewable by 2045), doubling the energy efficiency savings at end uses, additional reductions from the
LCFS, implementing the short-lived GHG strategy (e.g., hydrofluorocarbons), and implementing the
Mobile Source Strategy and Sustainable Freight Action Plan.
August 2022
City of Tustin Myford II Project
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment
Several of the State's plans and policies would contribute to a reduction in mobile source emissions from
the Project.These include the following:
• CARB's Advanced Clean Truck Regulation: Adopted in June 2020, CARB's Advanced Clean Truck
Regulation requires truck manufacturers to transition from diesel trucks and vans to electric zero-
emission trucks beginning in 2024. By 2045, every new truck sold in California is required to be
zero-emission. The Advanced Clean Truck Regulation accelerates the transition of zero-emission
medium-and heavy-duty vehicles from Class 2b to Class 8.
• Executive Order N-79-20: Executive Order N-79-20 establishes the goal for all new passenger cars
and trucks, as well as all drayage/cargo trucks and off-road vehicles and equipment, sold in
California, will be zero-emission by 2035 and all medium and heavy-duty vehicles will be zero-
emission by 2045. It also directs CARB to develop and propose rulemaking for passenger vehicles
and trucks, medium-and heavy-duty fleets where feasible, drayage trucks, and off-road vehicles
and equipment "requiring increasing volumes" of new ZEVs "towards the target of 100 percent."
• CARB's Mobile Source Strategy: CARB's Mobile Source Strategy takes an integrated planning
approach to identify the level of transition to cleaner mobile source technologies needed to
achieve all of California's targets by increasing the adoption of ZEV buses and trucks.
• CARB's Sustainable Freight Action Plan: The Sustainable Freight Action Plan which improves
freight system efficiency, utilizes near-zero emissions technology, and deployment of ZEV trucks.
This Plan applies to all trucks accessing the Project site and may include existing trucks or new
trucks that are part of the statewide goods movement sector.
• CARB's Emissions Reduction Plan for Ports and Goods Movement: CARB's Emissions Reduction
Plan for Ports and Goods Movement identifies measures to improve goods movement efficiencies
such as advanced combustion strategies, friction reduction, waste heat recovery, and
electrification of accessories.
While these measures are not directly applicable to the Project, any commercial activity associated with
goods movement would be required to comply with these measures as adopted. As such, the Project
would not interfere with their implementation.
The Project would not obstruct or interfere with efforts to increase ZEVs or state efforts to improve system
efficiency.As described above,the Project would be consistent with all applicable plan goals. Compliance
with applicable State standards(e.g.,continuation of the Cap-and-Trade regulation;CARB's Mobile Source
Strategy, Sustainable Freight Action Plan, and Advanced Clean Truck Regulation; Executive Order N-79-
20; SB 100/renewable electricity portfolio improvements that require 60 percent renewable electricity by
2030 and 100 percent renewable by 2045, etc.) would ensure consistency with State and regional GHG
reduction planning efforts.
The Project does not conflict with the applicable plans that are discussed above and therefore with respect
to this particular threshold,the Project does not have a significant impact.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required.
Level of Significance: Less than significant impact.
August 2022
KimleyoHorn 1 33
City of Tustin Myford II Project
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment
5.3 Cumulative Setting and Impacts
Cumulative Setting
Climate change is a global problem. GHGs are global pollutants, unlike criteria air pollutants and TACs,
which are pollutants of regional and local concern. Whereas pollutants with localized air quality effects
have relatively short atmospheric lifetimes (about 1 day), GHGs have much longer atmospheric lifetimes
of 1 year to several thousand years that allow them to be dispersed around the globe.
Cumulative Impacts
It is generally the case that an individual project of this size and nature is of insufficient magnitude by itself
to influence climate change or result in a substantial contribution to the global GHG inventory. GHG
impacts are recognized as exclusively cumulative impacts; there are no non-cumulative GHG emission
impacts from a climate change perspective.The additive effect of project-related GHGs would not result
in a reasonably foreseeable cumulatively considerable contribution to global climate change. In addition,
the Project as well as other cumulative related projects would also be subject to all applicable regulatory
requirements, which would further reduce GHG emissions. As shown in Table 4 and Table 5, the Project
would not conflict with any applicable GHG reduction plans including the CARB Scoping Plan and the
RTP/SCS.Therefore,the Project's cumulative contribution of GHG emissions would be less than significant
and the Project's cumulative GHG impacts would also be less than cumulatively considerable.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required.
Level of Significance: Less than significant impact.
August 2022
KimleyoHorn 1 34
City of Tustin Myford II Project
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment
6 REFERENCES
1. California Air Resources Board, California's 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan, November 2017.
2. California Energy Commission, 2017 Power Content Label,July 2018.
3. City of Tustin, City of Tustin General Plan, 2018
4. HPA Architecture, DAB-A1.1 -Overall Site Plan,April 13, 2022.
5. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Climate Change 2007. The Physical Science Basis, 2007.
6. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis,
Contribution of Working Group 1 to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change, 2013.
7. National Research Council,Advancing the Science of Climate Change, 2010.
8. State of California, Code of Regulations Section 15065.5a, 2018.
9. Southern California Association of Governments, 2020 - 2045 Regional Transportation
Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy, 2020.
10. South Coast Air Quality Management District, Minutes for the GHG CEQA Significance Threshold
Stakeholder Working Group#8, 2009.
11. South Coast Air Quality Management District, Minutes for the GHG CEQA Significance Threshold
Stakeholder Working Group#13, 2009.
12. South Coast Air Quality Management District,Staff Report:Interim CEQA GHG Significance Threshold
for Stationary Sources, Rules and Plans, December 5, 2008, Attachment E: Draft Guidance Document
-Interim CEQA Greenhouse Gas(GHG)Significance Threshold, October 2008.
13. U.S. EPA, Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks:1990-2016, 2018.
14. U.S. EPA, Methane and Nitrous Oxide Emission from Natural Sources, 2010.
15. U.S. EPA, Overview of Greenhouse Gases, 2018.
August 2022
Appendix A
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data
CalEEMod Version:CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 18 Date:5/17/2022 11:20 AM
Myford Existing-Orange County,Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
Myford Existing
Orange County,Annual
1.0 Project Characteristics
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population
General Office Building 62.51 1000sqft 1.43 62,506.00 0
.......... ...............................-------------------------------
.................... i...............----------------------------------
industrial Park 20.72 1000sqft 0.48 20,720.00 0
.............................. ...............................-------------------------------4...............1------ ---------I...............
Manufacturing 22.74 1000sqft 0.52 00 0
........ ..................... .............................. ------------------------------ ...............
-----------------
...............
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 30.13 1000sqft 0.69 30,130.00 0
.............. ............... ...........................................................................................................................4-----------------------------------
Parking Lot 176.86 1000sqft 4.06 176,860.00 0
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed(m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq(Days) 30
Climate Zone 8 Operational Year 2024
Utility Company Southern California Edison
CO2 Intensity 390.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033 N20 Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr)
1.3 User Entered Comments& Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics-
Land Use-existing site area
Construction Phase-existing only
Trips and VMT-Demolished material hauled to Frank R.Bowerman Landfill,approximately 7.9 miles from site.
Demolition-
Grading-
Vehicle Trips-existing land uses/trips
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation-
CalEEMod Version:CaIEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 18 Date:5/17/2022 11:20 AM
Myford Existing-Orange County,Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
Fleet Mix-
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tbIConstDustMitigation Waterl-In paved RoadMoistureConte nt 0 12
.............................. ............................................................ ...........................
tbiConstDustMitigation Waterl-In paved RoadVe hicleSpeed 0 15
........................................................................................... ...........................
tblConstruction Phase NumDays 20.00 0.00
........................................................................................... ...........................
tblConstruction Phase PhaseEndDate 1/26/2024 12/31/2023
.............................. ............................................................ ..........................
tbil-andUse LandUseSquareFeet 62,510.00 62,506.00
.............................. ............................................................ ..........................
tbil-andUse LotAcreage 1.44 1.43
.............................. ............................................................ ..........................
tbiVehicleTrips ST TR 2.21 10.83
.............................. ............................................................ ..........................
tbiVehicleTrips ST-TR 2.54 11.10
.............................. ............................................................ ..........................
tbiVehicleTrips ST TR 6.42 4.75
.............................. ............................................................ ..........................
tbiVehicleTrips ST TR 1.74 1.69
........................................................................................... ..........................
tbiVehicleTrips SUTR 0.70 10.83
.......................................................................................................................
tbiVehicleTrips SUTR 1.24 11.10
.......................................................................................................................
tbiVehicleTrips SU TR 5.09 4.75
.......................................................................................................................
tbiVehicleTrips SU TR 1.74 1.69
.......................................................................................................................
tbiVehicleTrips WD TR 9.74 10.83
.......................................................................................................................
tbiVehicleTrips WD TR 3.37 11.10
.......................................................................................................................
tbiVehicleTrips WD TR 3.93 4.75
.....................................................................................................................................................
tbiVehicleTrips WD TR 1.74 1.69
2.0 Emissions Summary
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PMIO Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- 02 NBio-0O2 I Totall 021 CH4 I N20 CO2e
PMJ
0 PMIO Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 0.00
Reduction I I
Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG+NOX(tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG+NOX(tons/quarter)
Highest
CalEEMod Version:CaIEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 18 Date:5/17/2022 11:20 AM
Myford Existing-Orange County,Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust I PMIO I Fugitive Exhaust I PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-0O2I Total CO21 CH4 N20
PMIO I PMIO Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I
Category tons/yr I MT/yr
Area 0.5691 4.000Oe- 3.9900e- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 1.0000e- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 7.7700e- 7.7700e- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 8.2700e-
005 003 005 005 005 005 i 003 003 005 003
-------------------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ............... ------- ------- ------- ---------------
Energy 7.2400e- 0.0658 0.0553 3.9000e- 5.000Oe- 5.000Oe- 5.000Oe- 5.000Oe- 0.0000 336.9867 r 336.9867 r 0.0238 r 4.0300e- 338.7813
003 004 003 003 003 003 003
..... ----- ------- ------- ------- --------------- ....... ----------------------------------------
bile 0.5228 0.6016 5.4899 0.0129 1.4285 8.8400e- 1.4374 0.3813 8.2200e- 0.3895 0.0000 1,212.005-1,212.005- 0.0717 0.0496 1,228.583
003 003 6 : 6 : 7
............. -------........................................................................................................................ --------I.................................................... -------
Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 28.4878 0.0000 28.4878 1.6836 0.0000 70.5772
............ -------........................................................................................................................ --------I..............................................................
Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 8.9237 78.3699 87.2936 0.9232 0.0E4 "117.0607'
0991 0.6675 5.5492 0.0133 1.4285 0.0139 1.4424 0.3813 0.0132 0.3945 1 37.4114 1 1,627.3701 1,664.781 1 2.7022 1 0.0761 1 1,755.011
Total
1- 0 4 1
CalEEMod Version:CaIEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 18 Date:5/17/2022 11:20 AM
Myford Existing-Orange County,Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
2.2 Overall Operational
Mitigated Operational
ROG NOx I CO I S02 Fugitive Exhaust I PMIO I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 I NBio-CO21 Total CO2 CH4 I N20
PMIO I PMIO Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.5691 4.000Oe- 3.9900e- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 1.0000e- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 7.7700e- 7.7700e- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 8.2700e-
005 003 005 005 005 005 i 003 003 005 003
............ -------........................................................................................................................... ............................................................
Energy 7.2400e- 0.0658 0.0553 3.9000e- 5.000Oe- 5.000Oe- 5.000Oe- 5.000Oe- 0.0000 336.9867 336.9867 0.0238 4.0300e- 338.7813
003 004 003 003 003 003 i 003
.... ....................................................... .............................. .......
Mo....... -------.....................................................
bile 0.5228 0.6016 5.4899 0.0129 1.4285 8.8400e- 1.4374 0.3813 8.2200e- 0.3895 0.0000 1,212.005-1,212.005- 0.0717 0.0496 1,228.583
003 003 6 : 6 7
............. ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ............... ------- ------- ------- ----------------
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 28.4878 0.0000 28.4878 1.6836 Waste 0.0000 70.5772
............ ------- ------- ----------------------- ------- ------- ------- --------------- ....... ------------------------...............
Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 8.9237 78.3699 87.2936 0.9232 0.0224 117.0607
Total 1.0991 0.6675 5.5492 0.0133 1.4285 0.0139 1.4424 0.3813 0.0132 0.3945 37.4114 1,627.370 1,664.781 2.7022 0.0761 1,755.011
11 0 4 1
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive I Exhaust I PMIO Fugitive I Exhaust I PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
PMIO PMIO Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I
Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 0.00
Reduction I
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase I Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Dys Num Days Phase Description
Number I Week
I
1 :Demolition :Demolition :1/1/2024 :12/31/2023 5: 0
Acres of Grading(Site Preparation Phase):0
CalEEMod Version:CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 18 Date:5/17/2022 11:20 AM
Myford Existing-Orange County,Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
Acres of Grading(Grading Phase):0
Acres of Paving:4.06
Residential Indoor:0; Residential Outdoor:0; Non-Residential Indoor:0;Non-Residential Outdoor:0;Striped Parking Area:0(Architectural
Coating—sgft)
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours I Horse Power I Load Factor
Demolition •Concrete/Industrial Saws 1� 8.00i 81 0.73
............................ --------------------------+;............-----�-------------I.............................
Demolition •Excavators 3� 8.00� 158 0.38
-------- - --------- ........
Demolition •Rubber Tired Dozers-------------- -------------- 2 8.00• 247• 0.40
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip I Worker Vehicle I Vendor Hauling
Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00• 0.00• 0.00• 14.70• 6.90• 20.00•LD Mix •HDT Mix •HHDT
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
4.0 Operational Detail -Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
CalEEMod Version:CalEEMOd.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 18 Date:5/17/2022 11:20 AM
Myford Existing-Orange County,Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
ROG NOx I CO I S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust I PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tonslyr MTlyr
Mitigated 0.5228 0.6016 5.4899 0.0129 1.4285 8.8400e- 1.4374 0.3813 8.2200e- 0.3895 + 0.0000 1,212.005•1,212.005• 0.0717 0.0496 1,228.583
003 003 i 6 6 7
Unmitigated •• 0.5228 0.6016 5.4899 0.0129 1.4285 8.8400e- 1.4374 0.3813 8.2200e- 0.3895 0.0000 1,212.005•1,212.005• 0.0717 0.0496 7 1,228.583
003 003 6 6 7
4.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday I Annual VMT Annual VMT
General Office Building677.05 677.05 i 677.05 2,181,077 2,181,077
......................... ..........:............................I _..... y..........................
••••• •Industrial Park• 229.99 229.99 229.99 914,652 914,652
............:............................I------------_........... ........
•Manufacturing 107.99 107.99 i 107.99 478,189 478,189
.......... g..............................................I =..........
Parkin Lot 0.00 0.00 i 0.00
........... ......................................................I------------_.......... ....... ...... ....... ........ ...... ........
Unrefrig erated Warehouse-No Rail 50.92 50.92 50.92 218,227 218,227
Total 1,065.94 1,065.94 j 1,065.94 1 3,792,146 3,792,146
4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles Trip% Trip Purpose
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by
General Office Building 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 19 4
........ ........ i
ndustrial Park 16.60 8.40 6.90 59.00 28.00 13.00 79 19 2
i
...............9..... ....................---------- ...... ......
Manufacturin 16.60 8.40 6.90 59.00 28.00 13.00 92 5 3
............g.......... ..........................---- --- -- -- ..
Parkin Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
....... ......... -- .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .................... -- --- �-- -----................ .....
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No 16.60 8.40 6.90 59.00 0.00 41.00 92 5 3
4.4 Fleet Mix
CaIEEMod Version:CaIEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 18 Date:5/17/2022 11:20 AM
Myford Existing-Orange County,Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
Land Use LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH
General Office Building 0.546200• 0.059546i 0.185910i 0.127866i 0.024295i 0.006605i 0.014499i 0.004906i 0.000657i 0.000381i 0.024552i 0.000713i 0.003869
Industrial Park 0.546200• 0.059546: 0.185910: 0.127866: 0.024295: 0.006605: 0.014499: 0.004906: 0.000657: 0.000381: 0.024552: 0.000713: 0.003869
Manufacturing 0.546200• 0.059546: 0.185910: 0.127866: 0.024295: 0.006605: 0.014499: 0.004906: 0.000657: 0.000381: 0.024552: 0.000713: 0.003869
Parking Lot 0.546200• 0.059546: 0.185910: 0.127866: 0.024295: 0.006605: 0.014499: 0.004906: 0.000657: 0.000381: 0.024552, 0.000713: 0.003869
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No 0.546200• 0.059546• 0.185910• 0.127866• 0.024295• 0.006605• 0.014499• 0.004906• 0.000657• 0.000381• 0.024552• 0.000713• 0.003869
Rail
5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: N
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tonslyr MTlyr
Electricity 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 265.3466 265.3466 0.0224 2.7100e- 266.7155
Mitigated i 003
+ _
Electricity 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 265.3466 265.3466 0.0224 2.7100e- 266.7155
Unmitigated i 003
NaturalGas 7.2400e- 0.0658 0.0553 3.9000e- 5.000Oe- 5.000Oe- 5.000Oe- 5.000Oe- + 0.0000 71.6400 71.6400 1.3700e- 1.3100e- 72.0658
Mitigated 003 004 003 003 003 003 i 003 003
NaturalGas •• 7.2400e- 0.0658 0.0553 3.9000e- 5.000Oe- 5.000Oe- 5.000Oe- 5.000Oe- 0.0000 71.6400 71.6400 1.3700e- 1.3100e- 72.0658
Unmitigated 003 004 003 003 003 003 003 003
CalEEMod Version:CalEEMOd.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 18 Date:5/17/2022 11:20 AM
Myford Existing-Orange County,Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
5.2 Energy by Land Use-NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGa ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CN4 N20 CO2e
s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
General Office 565679 �• 3.0500e- 0.0277 0.0233 1.7000e- 2.1100e- 2.1100e- 2.1100e- 2.1100e- 1 0.0000 30.1868 30.1868 5.8000e- 5.5000e- 30.3662
Building 003 004 003 003 003 003 i 004 004
Industrial Park 187516 1.0100e- 9.1900e- 7.7200e- 6.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 0.0000 10.0066 10.0066 1.9000e- 1.8000e- 10.0660
003 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 i 004 004
__
Manufacturing 472082 2.5500e- 0.0231 0.0194 1.4000e- 1.7600e- 1.7600e- 1.7600e- 1.7600e- 0.0000 25.1921 25.1921 4.8000e- 4.6000e- 25.3418
003 004 003 003 003 003 004 004
�.
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unrefrigerated 117206 •• 6.3000e- ; 5.7500e- ; 4.8300e- ; 3.000Oe- ; ; 4.4000e- ; 4.4000e- ; ; 4.4000e- ; 4.4000e- 0.0000 6.2545 ; 6.2545 1.2000e- ; 1.1000e- ; 6.2917
Warehouse-No 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 004 004
Rail
Total 7.2400e- 0.0658 0.0553 4.000Oe- 5.0100e- 5.0100e- 5.0100e- 5.0100e- 0.0000 71.6400 71.6400 1.3700e- 1.3000e- 72.0658
003 004 003 003 003 003 003 003
CalEEMod Version:CalEEMOd.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 18 Date:5/17/2022 11:20 AM
Myford Existing-Orange County,Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
5.2 Energy by Land Use-NaturalGas
Mitigated
NaturalGa ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CN4 N20 CO2e
s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
General Office 565679 �• 3.0500e- 0.0277 0.0233 1.7000e- 2.1100e- 2.1100e- 2.1100e- 2.1100e- 1 0.0000 30.1868 30.1868 5.8000e- 5.5000e- 30.3662
Building 003 004 003 003 003 003 i 004 004
Industrial Park 187516 1.0100e- 9.1900e- 7.7200e- 6.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 0.0000 10.0066 10.0066 1.9000e- 1.8000e- 10.0660
003 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 i 004 004
__
Manufacturing 472082 2.5500e- 0.0231 0.0194 1.4000e- 1.7600e- 1.7600e- 1.7600e- 1.7600e- 0.0000 25.1921 25.1921 4.8000e- 4.6000e- 25.3418
003 004 003 003 003 003 004 004
�.
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unrefrigerated 117206 •• 6.3000e- ; 5.7500e- ; 4.8300e- ; 3.000Oe- ; ; 4.4000e- ; 4.4000e- ; ; 4.4000e- ; 4.4000e- 0.0000 6.2545 ; 6.2545 1.2000e- ; 1.1000e- ; 6.2917
Warehouse-No 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 004 004
Rail
Total 7.2400e- 0.0658 0.0553 4.000Oe- 5.0100e- 5.0100e- 5.0100e- 5.0100e- 0.0000 71.6400 71.6400 1.3700e- 1.3000e- 72.0658
003 004 003 003 003 003 003 003
CalEEMod Version:CalEEMOd.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 18 Date:5/17/2022 11:20 AM
Myford Existing-Orange County,Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
5.3 Energy by Land Use-Electricity
Unmitigated
Electricity Total CO2 I CH4 I N20 I CO2e
Use
Land Use kWhlyr MTlyr
General Office 843206 �• 149.5388 0.0126 1.5300e- 150.3103
Building 003
.... - .......
Industrial Park 279513 49.5704 4.1800e- 5.1000e- 49.8261
003 004
.;------- - .......
Manufacturing 188060 33.3516 2.8100e- 3.4000e- 33.5236
003 004
Parking Lot 61901 10.9779 r 9.3000e- r 1 1000e- 11 0345
004 004
..
Unrefrigerated 123533 �• 21.9080 1 1.8500e- i 2.2000e- 22.0211
Warehouse-No 003 004
rl��
265.3466 0.0224 2.7100e- 266.7155
003
CalEEMod Version:CalEEMOd.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 18 Date:5/17/2022 11:20 AM
Myford Existing-Orange County,Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
5.3 Energy by Land Use-Electricity
Mitigated
Electricity Total CO2 I CH4 I N20 I CO2e
Use
Land Use kWhlyr MTlyr
General Office 843206 �• 149.5388 0.0126 1.5300e- 150.3103
Building 003
.... - .......
Industrial Park 279513 49.5704 4.1800e- 5.1000e- 49.8261
003 004
.;------- - .......
Manufacturing 188060 33.3516 2.8100e- 3.4000e- 33.5236
003 004
Parking Lot 61901 10.9779 r 9.3000e- r 1 1000e- 11 0345
004 004
..
Unrefrigerated 123533 �• 21.9080 1 1.8500e- i 2.2000e- 22.0211
Warehouse-No 003 004
rl��
265.3466 0.0224 2.7100e- 266.7155
003
11 1
6.0 Area Detail
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
CalEEMod Version:CaIEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 18 Date:5/17/2022 11:20 AM
Myford Existing-Orange County,Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
ROG I NOx I CO I S02 Fugitive Exhaust PMIO Fugitive Exhaust I PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-0O2J Total CO2J CH4 N20
PMIO I PMIO Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I
Category tons/yr I MT/yr
Mitigated 0.5691 4.000Oe- 3.9900e- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 1.0000e- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 7.7700e- 7.7700e- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 8.2700e-
005 003 005 005 005 005 i 003 003 005 003
............ ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ----------------------- ------- ------- -------
Unmitigated 0.5691 4.000Oe- 3.9900e- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 1.0000e- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 7.7700e- 7.7700e- 2.000oe- 0.0000' 82706e'
005 003 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 003
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
OG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PMIO Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-0O2J Total CO2J CH4 N20
PMIO PMIO Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I
SubCategory tons/yr I MT/yr
Architectural 0.0655 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Coating
........... -------....................................................................................................................... .......
I...............................................................................Consumer 0.5032 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Products
----------------------- ------- ------- ------- ------- .......
Landscaping 3.7000e- 4.000Oe- 3.9900e- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 7.7700e- 7.7700e- 2.000Oe- 00000 8.2700e-
004 005 003 005 005 005 005 i 003 003 005 003
Total 0.5691 4.000Oe- 3.9900e- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 7.7700e- 7.7700e- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 8.2700e-
005 003 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 003
CalEEMod Version:CaIEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 18 Date:5/17/2022 11:20 AM
Myford Existing-Orange County,Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Mitigated
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
SubCategory tonslyr MTlyr
Architectural •• 0.0655 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Coating i
Consumer •• 0.5032 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 A, 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Products AA
Landscaping •• 3.7000e- 4.000Oe- 3.9900e- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 1.0000e- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 7.7700e- 7.7700e- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 8.2700e-
004 005 003 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 003
Total 0.5691 4.000Oe- 3.9900e- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 7.7700e- 7.7700e- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 8.2700e-
005 003 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 003
7.0 Water Detail
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
CalEEMod Version:CalEEMOd.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 18 Date:5/17/2022 11:20 AM
Myford Existing-Orange County,Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e
Category J MT/yr
Mitigated •• 87.2936 0.9232 0.0224 117.0607
Unmitigated 87.2936 0.9232 0.0224 117.0607
7.2 Water by Land Use
Unmitigated
Indoor/Out Total CO2 CH4 N20 I CO2e
door Use
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
General Office •11.1101/�• 42.5971 0.3653 8.9500e- 54.3967
Building 6.80944 003
...........:.......::............... .......
Industrial Park •4.7915/0:• 12.5847 0.1571 3.8000e- 17.6437
003
Manufacturing •5.25863/-- 36 13.8116 r 0.1724 r 4 1700e- 19 38
0 003
......9.... ------- ------
Parkin Lot 0/0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
...........
Unrefrigerated •6.96756/r 18.3001 0.2284 5.5300a- 2 5.6 566
Warehouse-No 0 003
Rail
Total 87.2936 0.9232 0.0225 117.0607
CalEEMod Version:CalEEMOd.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 18 Date:5/17/2022 11:20 AM
Myford Existing-Orange County,Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
7.2 Water by Land Use
Mitigated
Indoor/Out Total CO2 I CH4 I N20 I CO2e
door Use
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
General Office •11.1101/�• 42.5971 0.3653 8.9500e- 54.3967
Building 6.80944 003
...........:.......
Industrial Park •4.7915/0:• 12.5847 0.1571 3.8000e- 17.6437
003
I.
Manufacturing •5.25863 13.8116 0.1724 4.1700e- 19.3638
0 003
�.
Parkin Lot 0/0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
..
Unrefrigerated •6.9 18.3001 1 0.2284 1 5.5300e- 25.6566
Warehouse-No 0 003
Rail
Total 87.2936 0.9232 0.0225 117.0607
8.0 Waste Detail
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
CalEEMod Version:CalEEMOd.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 18 Date:5/17/2022 11:20 AM
Myford Existing-Orange County,Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
CategoryNear
Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e
MTlyr
Mitigated •• 28.4878 1.6836 0.0000 70.5772
Unmitigated •• 28.4878 1.6836 0.0000 70.5772
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Unmitigated
Waste Total CO2 CH4 N20 I CO2e
Disposed
Land Use tons MTlyr
General Office 58.13 �• 11.7999 0.6974 0.0000 29.2337
Building
...........;........:...............:...............
;............._;.......
Industrial Park 25.69 5.2148 0.3082 0.0000 12.9195
i.
-.
Manufacturing 28.2 5.7244 0.3383 0.0000 14.1818
......9....
Parkin Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
...........:..............i,_______�_______�_______---- ..
Unrefrigerated 28.32 r 5.7487 0.3397 0.0000 14.2422
Warehouse-No
Rail
Total 28.4878 1.6836 0.0000 70.5772
CalEEMod Version:CalEEMOd.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 18 Date:5/17/2022 11:20 AM
Myford Existing-Orange County,Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Mitigated
Waste Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e
Disposed
Land Use tons MT/yr
General Office 58.13 �• 11.7999 0.6974 0.0000 29.2337
Building
...........:........................;...............;.............. .......
Industrial Park 25.69 5.2148 0.3082 0.0000 12.9195
.;_______I................................................
Manufacturing 28.2 5.7244 0.3383 0.0000 14.1818
i.
�.
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
..
Unrefrigerated 5.7487 1 0.3397 i 0.0000 14.2422
Warehouse-No
Rail
Total 28.4878 1.6836 0.0000 70.5772
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type
CalEEMod Version:CaIEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 18 Date:5/17/2022 11:20 AM
Myford Existing-Orange County,Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
11.0 Vegetation
CalEEMod Version:CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 34 Date:4/29/2022 9:02 AM
Myford II-Orange County,Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
Myford II
Orange County,Annual
1.0 Project Characteristics
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population
General Office Building 5.00 1000sgft 0.11 5,000.00 0
------------------------------ill,"",,......I-------------------.....---------
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 143.44 1000sgft 3.29 143,440.00 0
........ ......... ........... .......... .................... ................... ...... .........----------------------------------
Parking
Lot 164.22 1000sgft 3.78 164,220.00 0
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed(m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq(Days) 30
Climate Zone 8 Operational Year 2024
Utility Company Southern California Edison
CO2Intensity 390.98 CH4Intensity 0.033 N20Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr)
1.3 User Entered Comments& Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics-
Land Use-building area
Construction Phase-anticipated schedule
Trips and VMT-Demolished material hauled to Frank R.Bowerman Landfill,approximately 7.9 miles from site.
Demolition-
Grading-
Vehicle Trips-Office=928 daily passenger car trips,Warehouse=28 daily truck trips
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation-SCAQMD Rule 403
Fleet Mix-office=passenger cars,warehouse=trucks
CalEEMod Version:CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 34 Date:4/29/2022 9:02 AM
Myford II-Orange County,Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstDustMitigation CleanPavedRoadPercentReduction 0 6
i
tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadMoistureContent 0 12
.............................. ..............................:.........................................................
tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15
i
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 4.00
i
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00
i
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00
i
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00
i
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00
i
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00
i
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 6.00
i
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 10.00
i
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
i
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
i
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
i
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
i
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change ; Tier 4 Final
i
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change ; Tier 4 Final
i
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change ; Tier 4 Final
i
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change ; Tier 4 Final
i
tblConstruction Phase NumDays 20.00 ; 67.00
i
tblConstruction Phase NumDays 230.00 ; 110.00
i
tblConstruction Phase NumDays 20.00 ; 61.00
i
..............................:..............................:.............2 ...............�...........4 .00 ...........
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 � .00
i
..............................:..............................:................ .............-..........................
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 7.00
..............................: ..........................
tblConstruction Phase NumDays 10.00 4.00
i
blCons .................:.........Phase PhaseEndDate
.........;...............2025...........�...........1.'202 .........
tblConstruction Phase PhaseEndDate 3/21/2025 11/12/2024
i
tblConstruction Phase PhaseEndDate 1/24/2025 10/25/2024
i
tblConstruction Phase PhaseEndDate 1/26/2024 3/25/2024
CalEEMod Version:CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 34 Date:4/29/2022 9:02 AM
Myford II-Orange County,Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
tblConstruction Phase PhaseEndDate 3/8/2024 5/24/2024
s.......... ......
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 2/21/2025 11/5/2024. .........
i
.............................. .........P-tease dDat ..........:------------2/9 -------------........... 9/2024.........
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 2/9/2024 3/29/2024
..............................: ..........................
tblConstruction Phase PhaseStartDate 2/22/2025 8/12/2024
i
blCons .................:..........haseSt ..............;................
..............�........... 5/2024.........
tblConstruction Phase PhaseStartDate 3/9/2024 5/25/2024
i
tblConstruction Phase PhaseStartDate 2/10/2024 4/1/2024
i
tblConstruction Phase PhaseStartDate 1/25/2025 10/26/2024
i
tblConstruction Phase PhaseStartDate 1/27/2024 3/26/2024
i
tblFleetMix HHD 4.9060e-003 0.50
i
tblFleetMix LDA 0.55 0.00
i
tblFleetMix LDT1 0.06 0.00
i
tblFleetMix LDT2 0.19 0.00
i
tblFleetMix LHD1 0.02 0.00
i
tblFleetMix LHD2 6.6050e-003 0.27
i
tblFleetMix MY 0.02 0.00
i
tblFleetMix MDV 0.13 0.00
i
tblFleetMix MH 3.8690e-003 ; 0.00
i
tblFleetMix MHD 0.01 ; 0.23
i
tblFleetMix OBUS 6.5700e-004 ; 0.00
i
tblFleetMix SBUS 7.1300e-004 ; 0.00
i
tblFleetMix UBUS 3.8100e-004 ; 0.00
i
tblLandUse LotAcreage 3.77 ; 3.78
i
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 ; 33.20
i
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TTP 41.00 100.00
i
tblVehicleTrips CW_TTP 59.00 0.00
..............................: ..........................
tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 5.00 0.00
i
.......Trips ........:............PB_TP ............;................
..............�..........................
tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 3.00 � 0.00
i
tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 92.00 100.00
i
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.21 185.60
CalEEMod Version:CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 34 Date:4/29/2022 9:02 AM
Myford 11-Orange County,Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
tblVehideTrips ST-TR 1.74 0.20
...........................
tbiVehideTrips SU TR 0.70 185.60
............................................................. i
tblVehicleTrips SU TR 1.74 0.20
...........
................... ..............................---------------
...........................................
tbiVehideTrips WD TR 9.74 185.60
..............................tbiVehideTrips WD TR 1.74 0.20
2.0 Emissions Summary
CalEEMod Version:CalEEMOd.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 34 Date:4/29/2022 9:02 AM
Myford II-Orange County,Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
2.1 Overall Construction
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 I NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Year tonslyr MTlyr
2024 •• 0.9409 2.0383 2.2428 5.1300e- 0.4357 0.0851 0.5209 0.1421 0.0795 0.2216 .1 0.0000 462.7667 462.7667 0.0891 0.0143 469.2517
003 i
Maximum •• 0.9409 2.0383 2.2428 5.1300e- 0.4357 0.0851 0.5209 0.1421 0.0795 0.2216 0.0000 462.7667 462.7667 0.0891 0.0143 469.2517
003
Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Year tonslyr MTlyr
2024 •• 0.8336 0.8218 2.4387 5.1300e- 0.2520 0.0266 0.2786 0.0786 0.0260 0.1046 0.0000 462.7663 462.7663 0.0891 0.0143 469.2514
003
Maximum •• 0.8336 0.8218 2.4387 5.1300e- 0.2520 0.0266 0.2786 0.0786 0.0260 0.1046 0.0000 462.7663 462.7663 0.0891 0.0143 469.2514
003
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-0O2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Percent 11.40 59.68 -8.74 0.00 42.17 68.73 46.51 44.68 67.33 52.80 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 0.00
Reduction
CalEEMod Version:CalEEMOd.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 34 Date:4/29/2022 9:02 AM
Myford II-Orange County,Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG+NOX(tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG+NOX(tons/quarter)
1 1-1-2024 3-31-2024 0.8211 0.2276
2 4-1-2024 6-30-2024 0.5904 0.1843
3 7-1-2024 9-30-2024 0.9746 0.7682
Highest 0.9746 0.7682
2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
ROG I NOx CO I S02 Fugitive Exhaust I PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tonslyr MTlyr
Area •• 0.6185 4.000Oe- 3.9800e- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 7.7600e- 7.7600e- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 8.2700e-
005 003 005 005 005 005 i 003 003 005 003
Energy •• 3.2500e- 0.0296 0.0248 1.8000e- 2.2500e- 2.2500e- 2.2500e- 2.2500e- 0.0000 158.6436 158.6436 0.0113 1.8800e- 159.4873
003 004 003 003 003 003 003
.. _ _ _ _
Mobile 0.4446 1.1323 4.6143 0.0139 1.2757 0.0119 1.2876 0.3431 0.0112 0.3543 0.0000 1,330.769 r1,330.769 r 0.0834 r 0.0922 1,360.336
0 0 3
Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 28.3132 0.0000 28.3132 1.6733 0.0000 70.1447
Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 10.8054 79.7232 90.5286 1.1166 0.0270 126.4945
r77'71
.0663 1.1620 4.6431 0.0141 1.2757 0.0141 1.2898 0.3431 0.0134 0.3565 39.1186 1,569.143 1,608.262 2.8845 0.1211 1,716.470
5 1 9
CalEEMod Version:CalEEMOd.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 34 Date:4/29/2022 9:02 AM
Myford II-Orange County,Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
2.2 Overall Operational
Mitigated Operational
ROG NOx I CO I S02 Fugitive Exhaust I PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 I NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area •• 0.6185 4.000Oe- 3.9800e- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 1.0000e- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 7.7600e- 7.7600e- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 8.2700e-
005 003 005 005 005 005 i 003 003 005 003
Energy •• 3.2500e- 0.0296 0.0248 1.8000e- 2.2500e- 2.2500e- 2.2500e- 2.2500e- 0.0000 158.6436 158.6436 0.0113 1.8800e- 159.4873
003 004 003 003 003 003 i 003
..
Mobile •• 0.4446 1.1323 4.6143 0.0139 1.2757 0.0119 1.2876 0.3431 0.0112 0.3543 0.0000 1,330.769•1,330.769• 0.0834 0.0922 1,360.336
0 0 3
Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 28.3132 0.0000 r 28.3132 r 1.6733 r 0.0000 701447
Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 10.8054 79.7232 90.5286 1.1166 0.0270 126.4945
Total 1.0663 1.1620 4.6431 0.0141 1.2757 0.0141 1.2898 0.3431 0.0134 0.3565 39.1186 ,1,569.143 1,608.262 2.8845 0.1211 ,1,716.470
11 5 1 9
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive I Exhaust I PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust I PM2.5 Bio-0O2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 0.00
Reduction
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase I Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Num Days Phase Description
Number Week
1 :Demolition :Demolition i1/1/2024 :3/25/2024 5. 61:
.................................r---------------------- ------------ .-------- ---- .........................
2 :Site Preparation :Site Preparation i3/26/2024 :3/29/2024 5: 4:
......y........................_-----------------------------------......................... -------- ---- .........................
3 •Grading :Grading •4/1/2024 •5/24/2024 5• 40•
CalEEMod Version:CalEEMOd.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 34 Date:4/29/2022 9:02 AM
Myford II-Orange County,Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
4 •-Building Construction :Building Construction 5/25/2024 10/25/2024 5• 110•
5 •Paving •Paving i10/26/2024 11/5/2024 5• 7
................................._---------------------- ------------%......................... -------- ---- .........................
6 •Architectural Coating :Architectural Coating 8/12/2024 •11/12/2024 5• 67•
Acres of Grading(Site Preparation Phase):6
Acres of Grading(Grading Phase):40
Acres of Paving:3.78
Residential Indoor:0; Residential Outdoor:0; Non-Residential Indoor:222,660; Non-Residential Outdoor:74,220;Striped Parking Area:9,853
(Architectural Coating—sgft)
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours I Horse Power I Load Factor
Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00i 81• 0.73
........................ --------------------------+;................. -------------I--------------
Demolition Excavators 3� 8.00: 158• 0.38
............................�--------------------------+;--------------------------------I-----------------------------
Demolition :Rubber Tired Dozers 2� 8.00: 247• 0.40
�------------------------------------+;................. I
Site Preparation •Rubber Tired Dozers 3: 8.00---� 247• 0.40
............................� - ---------------------------+................. --- ---------I--------------%..............
Site Preparation •Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4' 8.00, 97• 0.37
-------------I
Grading Excavators 1� 8.00: 158• 0.38
.............................-------------------------- i
Grading :Graders 1� 8.00: 187• 0.41
--------------------------+;.................I-------------I--------------
Grading :Rubber Tired Dozers 1� 8.00: 247• 0.40
............................---------------------------+;--------------------------------I--------------%..............
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3� 8.00, 97- 0.37
--------------------------+;.................I-------------I--------------
Building Construction :Cranes 1 7.00: 231: 0.29
............................;---------------------------;.................4-------------1-----------------------------
Building Construction :Forklifts 3: 8.00: 89: 0.20
--------------------------+.................i-------------I--------------
Building Construction :Generator Sets 1 8.00: 84: 0.74
Building Construction •Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 7.00, 97- 0.37
--------------------------+;.................I-------------I--------------
Building Construction •Welders 1� 8.00: 46: 0.45
.............................--------------------------
Paving •Pavers 2: 8.00: 130: 0.42
--------------------------+;.................I-------------I--------------
Paving :Paving Equipment 2: 8.00: 132: 0.36
...................... ---------------------- -------------- --------- -4----------- ........
Paving -Rollers 2• 8.00• 80• 0.38
CaIEEMod Version:CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 34 Date:4/29/2022 9:02 AM
Myford II-Orange County,Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
Architectural Coating :Air Compressors 1 6.00• 78• 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip I Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Vehicle Vendor Hauling
Count Number Number Number I Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class
Demolition 6i 15.00• 0.00 1,191.00 14.70i 6.90 — i 20.00�LID Mix HHDT Mix ;HHDT
i —
............... ---------------1 ----------I----------I-----------4----------:----------I.....
.......................I----
-----------------
Site Preparation 7: 18.00• 0.00 0.00 14.70i 6.90 20.00�LD_Mix �HDT_Mix ;HHDT
i i
................--------------!---------------------4---------- ----------4-----------I----------I............................I---------------------
Grading 6i 15.00• 0.00: 0.00 14.70: 6.90• 20.001LD_Mix iHDT_Mix ;HHDT
i i
Building Construction 9: 131.00• 51.00: 0.00 14.70i 6.90• 20.00:LD_Mix iHDT_Mix ;HHDT
i
Paving 6: 15.00• 0.00: 0.00 14.70: 6.90• 20.00iLD_Mix iHDT_Mix HHDT
--------------
Architectural Coating 1 26.00• 0.00• 0.00• 14.70• 6.90• 20.00•LD_Mix •HDT_Mix •HHDT
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment
Replace Ground Cover
Water Exposed Area
Water Unpaved Roads
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Clean Paved Roads
CalEEMod Version:CalEEMOd.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 34 Date:4/29/2022 9:02 AM
Myford II-Orange County,Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.2 Demolition -2024
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 I NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tonslyr MTlyr
Fugitive Dust 0.1289 0.0000 0.1289 0.0195 0.0000 0.0195 '1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.0684 0.6368 0.6011 1.1800e- 0.0293 0.0293 0.0272 0.0272 0.0000 103.6879 103.6879 0.0290 0.0000 104.4132
003
Total 0.0684 0.6368 0.6011 1.1800e- 0.1289 0.0293 0.1582 0.0195 0.0272 0.0467 0.0000 103.6879 103.6879 0.0290 0.0000 104.4132
003
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG I NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tonslyr MTlyr
Hauling •• 1.2000e- 0.0741 0.0250 3.3000e- 0.0102 4.8000e- 0.0107 2.8000e- 4.6000e- 3.2600e- 0.0000 34.0900 34.0900 3.5300e- 5.4700e- 35.8090
003 004 004 003 004 003 i 003 003
............... _
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker •• 1.2200e- 8.3000e- 0.0125 4.000Oe- 5.0200e- 2.000Oe- 5.0500e- 1.3300e- 2.000Oe- 1.3600e- 0.0000 3.7737 3.7737 8.000Oe- 9.000Oe- 3.8014
003 004 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 i 005 005
Total 2.4200e- ' 0.0750 0.0374 3.7000e- ' 0.0152 5.000Oe- ' 0.0158 4.1300e- ' 4.8000e- ' 4.6200e- 0.0000 37.8638 37.8638 3.6100e- ' 5.5600e- ' 39.6104
003 004 004 003 004 003 003 003
CalEEMod Version:CalEEMOd.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 34 Date:4/29/2022 9:02 AM
Myford II-Orange County,Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.2 Demolition -2024
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust I PM2.5 Bio-CO2 I NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tonslyr MTlyr
Fugitive Dust 0.0551 0.0000 0.0551 8.3500e- 0.0000 8.3500e- 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
003 003
Off-Road 0.0217 0.1265 0.7037 1.1800e- 5.000Oe- 5.000Oe- 5.000Oe- 5.000Oe- 0.0000 103.6878 103.6878 0.0290 0.0000 104.4131
003 003 003 003 003
Total 0.0217 0.1265 0.7037 1.1800e- 0.0551 5.000Oe- 0.0601 8.3500e- 5.000Oe- 0.0134 0.0000 103.6878 103.6878 0.0290 0.0000 104.4131
003 003 003 003
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG I NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tonslyr MTlyr
Hauling •• 1.2000e- 0.0741 0.0250 3.3000e- 9.7600e- 4.8000e- 0.0102 2.6900e- 4.6000e- 3.1500e- 0.0000 34.0900 34.0900 3.5300e- 5.4700e- 35.8090
003 004 003 004 003 004 003 i 003 003
............... _
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker •• 1.2200e- 8.3000e- 0.0125 4.000Oe- 4.7600e- 2.000Oe- 4.7900e- 1.2700e- 2.000Oe- 1.2900e- 0.0000 3.7737 3.7737 8.000Oe- 9.000Oe- 3.8014
003 004 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 i 005 005
Total 2.4200e- ' 0.0750 0.0374 3.7000e- ' 0.0145 5.000Oe- ' 0.0150 3.9600e- ' 4.8000e- ' 4.4400e- 0.0000 37.8638 37.8638 3.6100e- ' 5.5600e- ' 39.6104
003 004 004 003 004 003 003 003
CalEEMod Version:CalEEMOd.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 34 Date:4/29/2022 9:02 AM
Myford II-Orange County,Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.3 Site Preparation-2024
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 I NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tonslyr MTlyr
Fugitive Dust 0.0393 0.0000 0.0393 0.0202 0.0000 0.0202 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 5.3200e- 0.0544 0.0367 8.000Oe- 2.4600e- 2.4600e- 2.2600e- 2.2600e- 0.0000 6.6914 6.6914 2.1600e- 0.0000 6.7455
003 005 003 003 003 003 i 003
Total 5.3200e- 0.0544 0.0367 8.000Oe- 0.0393 2.4600e- 0.0418 0.0202 2.2600e- 0.0225 0.0000 6.6914 6.6914 2.1600e- 0.0000 6.7455
003 005 003 003 003
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx I CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tonslyr MTlyr
Hauling •• 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker •• 1.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 9.8000e- 0.0000 4.000Oe- 0.0000 4.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 1.1000e- 0.0000 0.2970 0.2970 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.2991
004 005 004 004 004 004 004 i 005 005
Total 1.000Oe- ' 7.000Oe- ' 9.S000e- ' 0.0000 ' 4.000Oe- ' 0.0000 4.000Oe- ' 1.000Oe- ' 0.0000 1.1000e- 0.0000 0.2970 0.2970 1.000Oe- ' 1.000Oe- ' 0.2991
004 005 004 004 004 004 004 005 005
CalEEMod Version:CalEEMOd.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 34 Date:4/29/2022 9:02 AM
Myford II-Orange County,Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.3 Site Preparation-2024
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive I Exhaust I PM2.5 Bio-CO2 I NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tonslyr MTlyr
Fugitive Dust 0.0168 0.0000 0.0168 8.6400e- 0.0000 8.6400e- 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
003 003
Off-Road 9.3000e- 4.0300e- 0.0417 8.000Oe- 1.2000e- 1.2000e- 1.2000e- 1.2000e- 0.0000 6.6914 6.6914 2.1600e- 0.0000 6.7455
004 003 005 004 004 004 004 i 003
Total 9.3000e- 4.0300e- 0.0417 8.000Oe- 0.0168 1.2000e- 0.0169 8.6400e- 1.2000e- 8.7600e- 0.0000 6.6914 6.6914 2.1600e- 0.0000 6.7455
004 003 005 004 003 004 003 003
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx I CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tonslyr MTlyr
Hauling •• 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker •• 1.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 9.8000e- 0.0000 3.7000e- 0.0000 3.8000e- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 0.0000 0.2970 0.2970 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.2991
004 005 004 004 004 004 004 i 005 005
Total 1.000Oe- ' 7.000Oe- ' 9.S000e- ' 0.0000 ' 3.7000e- ' 0.0000 3.8000e- ' 1.000Oe- ' 0.0000 1.000Oe- 0.0000 0.2970 0.2970 1.000Oe- ' 1.000Oe- ' 0.2991
004 005 004 004 004 004 004 005 005
CalEEMod Version:CalEEMOd.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 34 Date:4/29/2022 9:02 AM
Myford II-Orange County,Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.4 Grading -2024
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 I NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tonslyr MTlyr
Fugitive Dust 0.1417 0.0000 0.1417 0.0685 0.0000 0.0685 '1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.0332 0.3406 0.2952 5.9000e- 0.0145 0.0145 0.0133 0.0133 0.0000 52.1278 52.1278 0.0169 0.0000 52.5493
004
Total 0.0332 0.3406 0.2952 5.9000e- 0.1417 0.0145 0.1561 0.0685 0.0133 0.0818 0.0000 52.1278 52.1278 0.0169 0.0000 52.5493
004
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx I CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tonslyr MTlyr
Hauling •• 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker •• 8.000Oe- 5.4000e- 8.1600e- 3.000Oe- 3.2900e- 2.000Oe- 3.3100e- 8.7000e- 2.000Oe- 8.9000e- 0.0000 2.4746 2.4746 5.000Oe- 6.000Oe- 2.4927
004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 i 005 005
Total 8.000Oe- ' 5.4000e- ' 8.1600e- ' 3.000Oe- ' 3.2900e- ' 2.000Oe- ' 3.3100e- ' 8.7000e- ' 2.0000e- ' 8.9000e- 0.0000 2.4746 2.4746 5.000Oe- ' 6.000Oe- ' 2.4927
004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 005
CalEEMod Version:CalEEMOd.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 34 Date:4/29/2022 9:02 AM
Myford II-Orange County,Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.4 Grading -2024
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 I NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tonslyr MTlyr
Fugitive Dust 0.0606 0.0000 0.0606 0.0293 0.0000 0.0293 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 7.2600e- 0.0315 0.3551 5.9000e- 9.7000e- 9.7000e- 9.7000e- 9.7000e- 0.0000 52.1278 52.1278 0.0169 0.0000 52.5492
003 004 004 004 004 004
Total 7.2600e- 0.0315 0.3551 5.9000e- 0.0606 9.7000e- 0.0615 0.0293 9.7000e- 0.0303 0.0000 52.1278 52.1278 0.0169 0.0000 52.5492
003 004 004 004
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx I CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tonslyr MTlyr
Hauling •• 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker •• 8.000Oe- 5.4000e- 8.1600e- 3.000Oe- 3.1200e- 2.000Oe- 3.1400e- 8.3000e- 2.000Oe- 8.5000e- 0.0000 2.4746 2.4746 5.000Oe- 6.000Oe- 2.4927
004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 i 005 005
Total 8.000Oe- ' 5.4000e- ' 8.1600e- ' 3.000Oe- ' 3.1200e- ' 2.000Oe- ' 3.1400e- ' 8.3000e- ' 2.0000e- ' 8.5000e- 0.0000 2.4746 2.4746 5.000Oe- ' 6.000Oe- ' 2.4927
004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 005
CalEEMod Version:CalEEMOd.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 34 Date:4/29/2022 9:02 AM
Myford II-Orange County,Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.5 Building Construction -2024
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 I NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tonslyr MTlyr
Off-Road •• 0.0809 0.7394 0.8892 1.4800e- 0.0337 0.0337 0.0317 0.0317 .1 0.0000 127.5170 127.5170 0.0302 0.0000 128.2709
003 i
Total •, 0.0809 0.7394 0.8892 1.4800e- 0.0337 0.0337 0.0317 0.0317 0.0000 127.5170 127.5170 0.0302 0.0000 128.2709
003
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx I CO S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 I NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tonslyr MTlyr
Hauling •• 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor •• 2.7400e- 0.1027 0.0410 5.000Oe- 0.0177 5.3000e- 0.0182 5.1000e- 5.1000e- 5.6000e- 0.0000 49.4960 49.4960 3.0200e- 7.1400e- 51.6983
003 004 004 003 004 003 i 003 003
Worker 0.0192 0.0131 0.1961 6.4000e- 0.0791 3.9000e- 0.0795 0.0210 3.6000e- 0.0214 0.0000 59.4310 59.4310 1.2700e- 1.3600e- 59.8674
004 004 004 i 003 003
Total 0.0219 0.1157 0.2371 1.1400e- 0.0968 9.2000e- 0.0977 0.0261 8.7000e- 0.0270 0.0000 108.9270 108.9270 4.2900e- 8.5000e- 111.5657
003 004 004 003 003
CalEEMod Version:CalEEMOd.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 34 Date:4/29/2022 9:02 AM
Myford II-Orange County,Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.5 Building Construction -2024
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 I NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tonslyr MTlyr
Off-Road •• 0.0532 0.4218 0.9082 1.4800e- 0.0169 0.0169 0.0163 0.0163 .1 0.0000 127.5169 127.5169 0.0302 0.0000 128.2707
003 i
Total •, 0.0532 0.4218 0.9082 1.4800e- 0.0169 0.0169 0.0163 0.0163 0.0000 127.5169 127.5169 0.0302 0.0000 128.2707
003
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx I CO S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 I NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tonslyr MTlyr
Hauling •• 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor •• 2.7400e- 0.1027 0.0410 5.000Oe- 0.0169 5.3000e- 0.0175 4.9100e- 5.1000e- 5.4200e- 0.0000 49.4960 49.4960 3.0200e- 7.1400e- 51.6983
003 004 004 003 004 003 i 003 003
Worker 0.0192 0.0131 0.1961 6.4000e- 0.0750 3.9000e- 0.0754 0.0200 3.6000e- 0.0204 0.0000 59.4310 59.4310 1.2700e- 1.3600e- 59.8674
004 004 004 i 003 003
Total 0.0219 0.1157 0.2371 1.1400e- 0.0919 9.2000e- 0.0928 0.0249 8.7000e- 0.0258 0.0000 108.9270 108.9270 4.2900e- 8.5000e- 111.5657
003 004 004 003 003
CalEEMod Version:CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 34 Date:4/29/2022 9:02 AM
Myford 11-Orange County,Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.6 Paving-2024
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust I PMIO I Fugitive Exhaust I PM2.5 Bio-CO2 I NBio-CO21 Total CO2 CH4 I N20
PMIO I PMIO Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I
Category tons/yr I MT/yr
Off-Road 3.4600e- 0.0333 0.0512 8.000Oe- 1.6400e- 1.6400e- 1.5100e- 1.5100e- 1 0.0000 7.0093 7.0093 2.2700e- 0.0000 7.0660.
003 005 003 003 003 003 003
.............................. -------........................................................................... ---------------.............................. -------............... .......
Paving 4.9500e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
003
Total 8.41 OOe- 0.0333 0.0512 8.000Oe- 1.6400e- 1.6400e- 1.5100e- 1.5100e- 0.0000 7.0093 7.0093 2.2700e- 0.0000 7.0660
003 005 003 003 003 003 003
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
OG NOx I CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PMIO Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO21 Total CO21 CH4 N20
PMIO PMIO Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tons/yr I MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
............................................................ -------............................................................................... -------
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
------------ -------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------------------------------- --------------- ---------------
Worker 1.4000e- 1.000Oe- 1.4300e- 0.0000 5.8000e- 0.0000 5.8000e- 1.5000e- 0.0000 1.6000e- 0.0000 0.4331 0.4331 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.4362
004 004 003 004 004 004 004 i 005 005
Total 1.4000e- 1.00OOe-
004 1.4300e. 0.0000 5.8000e- 0.0000 5.8000e- 1.5000e- 0.0000 1.6000e- 0.0000 0.4331 0.4331 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.4362
004 003 004 004 004 004 005 005
CalEEMod Version:CalEEMOd.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 34 Date:4/29/2022 9:02 AM
Myford II-Orange County,Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.6 Paving-2024
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust I PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust I PM2.5 Bio-CO2 I NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tonslyr MTlyr
Off-Road •• 9.8000e- 4.2500e- 0.0605 8.000Oe- 1.3000e- 1.3000e- 1.3000e- 1.3000e- 1 0.0000 7.0093 7.0093 2.2700e- 0.0000 7.0660
004 003 005 004 004 004 004 i 003
Paving 4.9500e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
003
Total 5.9300e- 4.2500e- 0.0605 8.000Oe- 1.3000e- 1.3000e- 1.3000e- 1.3000e- 0.0000 7.0093 7.0093 2.2700e- 0.0000 7.0660
003 003 005 004 004 004 004 003
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx I CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tonslyr MTlyr
Hauling •• 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker •• 1.4000e- 1.000Oe- 1.4300e- 0.0000 5.5000e- 0.0000 5.5000e- 1.5000e- 0.0000 1.5000e- 0.0000 0.4331 0.4331 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.4362
004 004 003 004 004 004 004 i 005 005
Total 1.4000e- ' 1.000Oe- ' 1.4300e- ' 0.0000 ' 5.5000e- ' 0.0000 5.5000e- ' 1.5000e- ' 0.0000 1.5000e- 0.0000 0.4331 0.4331 1.000Oe- ' 1.000Oe- ' 0.4362
004 004 003 004 004 004 004 005 005
CalEEMod Version:CalEEMOd.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 34 Date:4/29/2022 9:02 AM
Myford II-Orange County,Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.7 Architectural Coating-2024
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 I NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tonslyr MTlyr
Archit.Coating •• 0.7109 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 6.0600e- 0.0408 0.0606 1.000Oe- 2.0400e- 2.0400e- 2.0400e- 2.0400e- 0.0000 8.5534 8.5534 4.8000e- 0.0000 8.5654
003 004 003 003 003 003 i 004
Total 0.7169 0.0408 0.0606 1.000Oe- 2.0400e- 2.0400e- 2.0400e- 2.0400e- 0.0000 8.5534 8.5534 4.8000e- 0.0000 8.5654
004 003 003 003 003 004
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx I CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tonslyr MTlyr
Hauling •• 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker •• 2.3200e- 1.5800e- 0.0237 8.000Oe- 9.5600e- 5.000Oe- 9.6100e- 2.5400e- 4.000Oe- 2.5800e- 0.0000 7.1845 7.1845 1.5000e- 1.6000e- 7.2373
003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 i 004 004
Total 2.3200e- ' 1.5800e- ' 0.0237 8.000Oe- ' 9.5600e- ' 5.000Oe- ' 9.6100e- ' 2.5400e- ' 4.0000e. ' 2.5800e- 0.0000 7.1845 7.1845 1.5000e- ' 1.6000e- ' 7.2373
003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 004 004
CalEEMod Version:CalEEMOd.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 34 Date:4/29/2022 9:02 AM
Myford II-Orange County,Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.7 Architectural Coating-2024
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 I NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tonslyr MTlyr
Archit.Coating •• 0.7109 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 6.0600e- 0.0408 0.0606 1.000Oe- 2.0400e- 2.0400e- 2.0400e- 2.0400e- 0.0000 8.5534 8.5534 4.8000e- 0.0000 8.5654
003 004 003 003 003 003 i 004
Total 0.7169 0.0408 0.0606 1.000Oe- 2.0400e- 2.0400e- 2.0400e- 2.0400e- 0.0000 8.5534 8.5534 4.8000e- 0.0000 8.5654
004 003 003 003 003 004
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx I CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tonslyr MTlyr
Hauling •• 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker •• 2.3200e- 1.5800e- 0.0237 8.000Oe- 9.0600e- 5.000Oe- 9.1100e- 2.4200e- 4.000Oe- 2.4600e- 0.0000 7.1845 7.1845 1.5000e- 1.6000e- 7.2373
003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 i 004 004
Total 2.3200e- ' 1.5800e- ' 0.0237 8.000Oe- ' 9.0600e- ' 5.000Oe- ' 9.1100e- ' 2.4200e- ' 4.0000e. ' 2.4600e- 0.0000 7.1845 7.1845 1.5000e- ' 1.6000e- ' 7.2373
003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 004 004
CalEEMod Version:CalEEMOd.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 34 Date:4/29/2022 9:02 AM
Myford II-Orange County,Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
4.0 Operational Detail -Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
ROG NOx CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tonslyr MTlyr
Mitigated 0.4446 1.1323 4.6143 0.0139 1.2757 0.0119 1.2876 0.3431 0.0112 0.3543 0.0000 1,330.769•1,330.769• 0.0834 0.0922 1,360.336
0 0 3
Unmitigated •• 0.4446 1.1323 4.6143 0.0139 1.2757 0.0119 1.2876 0.3431 0.0112 0.3543 0.0000 1,330.769•1,330.769• 0.0834 0.0922 1,3W:;6
0 0 3
4.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday I Annual VMT Annual VMT
•••••• General Office Building 928.00 928.00 i 928.00 2,989,516 2,989,516
.......g..............................................I ---_........ ...................... ................
Parkin Lot 0.00 0.00 i 0.00
.........g......................... .......I------------_.......... ....... ...... ....... ........ ...... ........
Unrefri erated Warehouse-No Rail 28.00 28.00 28.00 338,368 338,368
Total 956.00 956.00 1 956.00 1 3,327,884 1 3,327,884
4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles Trip% Trip Purpose
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by
General Office Building 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 19 4
...........g.......... -------�---------*........... . ..
Parkin Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
........................ ............, ........
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No 16.60 8.40 33.20 0.00 0.00 100.00 100 0 0
CaIEEMod Version:CaIEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 34 Date:4/29/2022 9:02 AM
Myford II-Orange County,Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH
General Office Building 0.546200• 0.059546i 0.185910i 0.127866i 0.024295i 0.006605i 0.014499i 0.004906i 0.000657i 0.000381i 0.024552i 0.000713i 0.003869
........................y.........;---------I---------I---------I---------I---------I---------I---------I---------I---------I---------I---------f.........
Parking Lot 0.546200• 0.059546: 0.185910: 0.127866: 0.024295: 0.006605: 0.014499: 0.004906: 0.000657: 0.000381: 0.024552: 0.000713: 0.003869
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No 0.000000• 0.000000• 0.000000• 0.000000• 0.000000• 0.270000• 0.230000• 0.500000• 0.000000• 0.000000• 0.000000• 0.000000• 0.000000
Rail
5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: N
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tonslyr MTlyr
Electricity 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 126.4529 126.4529 0.0107 1.2900e- 127.1052
Mitigated i 003
Electricity 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 126.4529 126.4529 0.0107 1.2900e- 127.1052
Unmitigated i 003
_ +
NaturalGas •• 3.2500e- 0.0296 0.0248 1.8000e- 2.2500e- 2.2500e- 2.2500e- 2.2500e- + 0.0000 32.1907 32.1907 6.2000e- 5.9000e- 32.3820
Mitigated 003 004 003 003 003 003 i 004 004
NaturalGas •• 3.2500e- 0.0296 0.0248 1.8000e- 2.2500e- 2.2500e- 2.2500e- 2.2500e- 0.0000 32.1907 32.1907 6.2000e- 5.9000e- 32.3820
Unmitigated 003 004 003 003 003 003 004 004
CalEEMod Version:CalEEMOd.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 34 Date:4/29/2022 9:02 AM
Myford II-Orange County,Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
5.2 Energy by Land Use-NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGa ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CN4 N20 CO2e
s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
General Office 45250 •• 2.4000e- 2.2200e- 1.8600e- 1.000Oe- 1.7000e- 1.7000e- 1.7000e- 1.7000e- 1 0.0000 2.4147 2.4147 5.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 2.4291
Building 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 i 005 005
Parking Lot 0 •• 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
•.
Unrefrigerated 557982 •• 3.0100e- 0.0274 0.0230 1.6000e- 2.0800e- ' 2.0800e- ' 2.0800e- 2.0800e- 0.0000 29.7760 29.7760 5.7000e- 5.5000e-- 29.9530
Warehouse-No 003 004 003 003 003 003 004 004
Rail
Total 3.2500e- 0.0296 0.0248 1.7000e- 2.2500e- 2.2500e- 2.2500e- 2.2500e- 0.0000 32.1907 32.1907 6.2000e- 5.9000e- 32.3820
003 004 003 003 003 003 004 004
CalEEMod Version:CalEEMOd.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 34 Date:4/29/2022 9:02 AM
Myford II-Orange County,Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
5.2 Energy by Land Use-NaturalGas
Mitigated
NaturalGa ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CN4 N20 CO2e
s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
General Office 45250 •• 2.4000e- 2.2200e- 1.8600e- 1.000Oe- 1.7000e- 1.7000e- 1.7000e- 1.7000e- 1 0.0000 2.4147 2.4147 5.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 2.4291
Building 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 i 005 005
Parking Lot 0 •• 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
•.
Unrefrigerated 557982 •• 3.0100e- 0.0274 0.0230 1.6000e- 2.0800e- ' 2.0800e- ' 2.0800e- 2.0800e- 0.0000 29.7760 29.7760 5.7000e- 5.5000e-- 29.9530
Warehouse-No 003 004 003 003 003 003 004 004
Rail
Total 3.2500e- 0.0296 0.0248 1.7000e- 2.2500e- 2.2500e- 2.2500e- 2.2500e- 0.0000 32.1907 32.1907 6.2000e- 5.9000e- 32.3820
003 004 003 003 003 003 004 004
CalEEMod Version:CalEEMOd.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 34 Date:4/29/2022 9:02 AM
Myford II-Orange County,Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
5.3 Energy by Land Use-Electricity
Unmitigated
Electricity Total CO2 I CH4 I N20 I CO2e
Use
Land Use kWhlyr MTlyr
General Office 67450 �• 11.9620 1.0100e- 1.2000e- 12.0237
Building 003 004
....;------- �------%---....
Parking Lot 57477 �• 10.1933 8.6000e- 1.000Oe- 10.2459
004 004
...........:..............i;------- ------ 4.......
Unrefrigerated 588104 r 104.2976; 8.8000e- 1.0700e- 104.8357
Warehouse-No 003 003
Rail
Total 126.4529 0.0107 1.2900e- 127.1052
003
CalEEMod Version:CalEEMOd.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 34 Date:4/29/2022 9:02 AM
Myford II-Orange County,Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
5.3 Energy by Land Use-Electricity
Mitigated
Electricity Total CO2 I CH4 I N20 I CO2e
Use
Land Use kWhlyr MTlyr
General Office 67450 �• 11.9620 1.0100e- 1.2000e- 12.0237
Building 003 004
....;------- �------%---....
Parking Lot 57477 �• 10.1933 8.6000e- 1.0000e- 10.2459
004 004
...........:..............i------- ------ 4.......
Unrefrigerated 588104 r 104.2976; 8.8000e- 1.0700e- 104.8357
Warehouse-No 003 003
Rail
Total 126.4529 0.0107 1.2900e- 127.1052
003
6.0 Area Detail
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
CalEEMod Version:CalEEMOd.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 34 Date:4/29/2022 9:02 AM
Myford II-Orange County,Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
ROG I NOx I CO I S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust I PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Category tonslyr MTlyr
Mitigated •• 0.6185 4.000Oe- 3.9800e- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 1.0000e- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 7.7600e- 7.7600e- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 8.2700e-
005 003 005 005 005 005 i 003 003 005 003
Unmitigated •• 0.6185 4.000Oe- 3.9800e- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 7.7600e- 7.7600e- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 8.2700e-
005 003 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 003
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
SubCategory tonslyr MTlyr
Architectural •• 0.0711 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Coating
..
Consumer •• 0.5470 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Products
Landscaping •• 3.7000e- 4.000Oe- 3.9800e- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 7.7600e- 7.7600e- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 8.2700e-
004 005 003 005 005 005 005 i 003 003 005 003
Total 0.6185 ' 4.000Oe- ' 3.9800e- ' 0.0000 1.000Oe- ' 1.000Oe- ' 1.000Oe- ' 1.000Oe- 0.0000 7.7600e- ' 7.7600e- ' 2.000Oe- ' 0.0000 8.2700e-
005 003 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 003
CalEEMod Version:CalEEMOd.2020.4.0 Page 29 of 34 Date:4/29/2022 9:02 AM
Myford II-Orange County,Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Mitigated
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e
PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
SubCategory tonslyr MTlyr
Architectural •• 0.0711 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Coating i
Consumer •• 0.5470 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 A, 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Products
.. AA
Landscaping •• 3.7000e- 4.000Oe- 3.9800e- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 1.0000e- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 7.7600e- 7.7600e- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 8.2700e-
004 005 003 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 003
Total 0.6185 4.000Oe- 3.9800e- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 7.7600e- 7.7600e- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 8.2700e-
005 003 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 003
7.0 Water Detail
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
CalEEMod Version:CalEEMOd.2020.4.0 Page 30 of 34 Date:4/29/2022 9:02 AM
Myford II-Orange County,Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e
Category J MT/yr
Mitigated •• 90.5286 1.1166 0.0270 126.4945
Unmitigated 90.5286 1.1166 0.0270 126.4945
7.2 Water by Land Use
Unmitigated
Indoor/Out Total CO2 CH4 N20 I CO2e
door Use
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
General Office •0.888669/�• 3.4072 0.0292 7.2000e- 4.3510
Building ;0.544668 004
......9.... _______-1
Parkin Lot 0/0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
i;
Unrefrigerated •33.1705/.• 87.1213 1.0873 0.0263 122.1434
Warehouse-No 0
Rail
Total 90.5286 1.1166 0.0270 126.4945
CalEEMod Version:CalEEMOd.2020.4.0 Page 31 of 34 Date:4/29/2022 9:02 AM
Myford II-Orange County,Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
7.2 Water by Land Use
Mitigated
Indoor/Out Total CO2 I CH4 I N20 I CO2e
door Use
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
General Office •0.888669/�• 3.4072 0.0292 7.2000e- 4.3510
Building ;0.544668 004
......9.... _______':..............:..............
Parkin Lot 0/0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
...........:..............i;_______�-----------------------
Unrefrigerated •33.1705/.• 87.1213 1.0873 0.0263 122.1434
Warehouse-No 0
Rail
Total 90.5286 1.1166 0.0270 126.4945
8.0 Waste Detail
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
CalEEMod Version:CalEEMOd.2020.4.0 Page 32 of 34 Date:4/29/2022 9:02 AM
Myford II-Orange County,Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
CategoryNear
Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e
MTlyr
Mitigated •• 28.3132 1.6733 0.0000 70.1447
Unmitigated •• 28.3132 1.6733 0.0000 70.1447
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Unmitigated
Waste Total CO2 CH4 N20 I CO2e
Disposed
Land Use tons MTlyr
General Office 4.65 �• 0.9439 0.0558 0.0000 2.3385
Building
......9.... _______-1
Parkin Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
i.
�.
Unrefrigerated 1:;T83 27.3693 1.61 75 0.0000 67.8062
Warehouse-No
Rail
Total 28.3132 1.6733 0.0000 70.1447
CalEEMod Version:CalEEMOd.2020.4.0 Page 33 of 34 Date:4/29/2022 9:02 AM
Myford II-Orange County,Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Mitigated
Waste Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e
Disposed
Land Use tons MT/yr
General Office 4.65 0.9439 0.0558 0.0000 2.3385
Building
......9....�_______................:..............
Parkin Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
...........
:........... .i;_______�_______�_______Y.......
Unrefrigerated 1:;T83..r 27.3693 1.61 75 0.0000 67.8062
Warehouse-No
Rail
Total 28.3132 1.6733 0.0000 70.1447
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version:CalEEMOd.2020.4.0 Page 34 of 34 Date:4/29/2022 9:02 AM
Myford II-Orange County,Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
11.0 Vegetation
Model Output:OFF ROAD2021(v1.0.2)Emissions Inventory
Region Type:Sub-Area
Region:Orange(SC)
Calendar Vear:2024
Scenario:All Adopted Rules-Exhaust
Vehicle Classification:OFFROAD2021 Equipment Types
Units:tons/day for Emissions,gallons/year for Fuel,hours/year for Activity,Horsepower-hours/year for Horsepower-hours
Region Calendar ye.Vehicle Category Model Vear Horsepower Fuel HC_tpd ROG tpd TOG tpd CO tpd NO-pd CO2 tpd PM10 tpd PM2.5 tpd SO-pd NH3 tpd FuelConsum Total_ActivitTotal_Populatim Horsepower_H ours_hhpy
Orange(SC) 2024 Industrial-Forklifts Aggregate 100 Diesel 0.0139056 0.0168258 0.0200241 0.2084938 0.1586719 30.400377 0.009074 0.0083484 0.00028 0.000248 986306.761 1152811 1479.239916 95022895.61
g/hph
HC ROG TOG CO N.. CO2 PM10 PM2_5 Sox NH3 Fuel_gphr
2024 0.0484571 0.0586331 0.0697782 0.7265422 0.5529269 105.93674 0.031622 0.0290918 0.00098 0.000865 3437000.98
Project Forklifts 3
HP 89
Hours per Day 12
Days per year 365
1 pound- 453.5924 grams
Emissions Source ROG NOX CO S02 PM10 PM2.5 CO2 Mr/yr PM10tons/yr
Forklifts 0.41 3.91 5.13 0.01 0.22 0.21 748 124 0.041
Based m aggregated emission rates obtained fi om GARB OFF ROAD Version 1.0.2.
Number of forklifts per SCAQMD High Cube Warehouse Truck Trip Study White Paper Summary of Business Survey Results,June 2014.
Model Op u1:O U21(-D.2)Emission s lmmentory
Region Type:SubFAF"'
Region:Orange(SC)
Iendar Year:2U
Adoted Rules-Exhaust
Vehncle Classi pti cati on:OFFROA-21 Equipment Types
Units.mns/day for Emissions,gallons/year for Fuel,hours/year for Activity,Horsepower-hours/year for Horsepower-hours
Region Iendar Ye�Vehicle Category Model Year Horsepower Fuel C tpd G tpd G tpdCO tpd x tpd 2 tpd U tpd 5 tpd x tpd 3 tpd uel Consumpti on Total_A otal_Popul Horsepower Hours_
Orange(SC)Ca Airport Ground Support-Aggregate esel275EOrange,SC) Airport Ground Support-Aggregate esel 2.253 .I26 8.6133 712423 7 28161 6.43413 25 % .9
Orange,SC) 2U24 Airport Ground Support-Aggregate 1I5 Nat Gas U U 3.U62E U6 U.UU25U63 U.0002]]2 U.U955617 U U U U 5161.1 558.45 3.55 86894.82
Whph
gphr
I gphr
Yard Trucks
HP
per Day
ays per Year
1 pound= 453.5924 grams
ceM%yr P ons/yr
Yard Troucksour GT4 4.69 Co32.56 U.UU U.U6 G.US 1524.96 252 U.U11
aced on aggregated emission rates obtained hom CARe OFFROAO Version 1.1.2.
Number of yard trucks/hostl ers per SCAOMO High Cube Warehouse Truck Trip Study White Paper Summary of eu sines Survey Results,June 2U14.
Emergency Backup Generator Emissions
Hours/Year Hours per HP-hr per Total hp-hr
Fuel Type Quantity HP LF per Unit Day day peryear
Standard Generator Diesel 1 750 0.74 50 1 750 37,500
Emissions Rates(g/hp-hr)
ROG NOx CO sox PM,, PM2.5 PM TOG HC
1.02058266 2.85 2.6 0.00494 0.15 0.15 0.15 1.124908885 0.14
From CaIEEMod Guide Appenix Djable 12.1
Emissions(pounds/day)
ROG NOx CO sox PM,, PM2.5 PM TOG HC
1.69 4.71 4.30 0.01 0.25 0.25 0.25 1.86 0.23
Emissions(tons/year)
ROG NOx CO sox PM,, PM2.5 PM TOG HC
0.04 0.12 0.11 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.05 0.01
GHG Emissions(metric tons) CO2
19.56