Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutE-COMMENTS - CLOSED SESSION ITEM 6BRegular Meeting of the City Council/Closed Session-5:30 pm/Regular Meeting-7:00 pm 02-20-24 19:00 Agenda Namr Comments Support Oppose Neutral PUBLIC INPUT - Members of the public may provide comments in writing, 13 0 0 in person or in real time via Zoom to address the City Council on items on the Closed Session Agenda. B. Property Address/Description: APN 430-391-03, 27-29, 56, 58, 60-65, 62 0 0 79-81 Agency: City of Tustin City Negotiators: Nicole Bernard, Acting City Manager and Ryan Swiontek Acting Economic Development Deputy Director Negotiating Parties: Brookfield Homes Southern California LLC, Lennar Homes of California, LLC, New Home Company Southern California Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment Sentiments for All Agenda Items The following graphs display sentiments for comments that have location data. Only locations of users who have commented will be shown. Overall Sentiment ■ Support(0%) ■ Oppose(9%) ■ N"ral(8%) No Response(100%) Agenda Item: eComments for PUBLIC INPUT - Members of the public may provide comments in writing, in person or in real time via Zoom to address the City Council on items on the Closed Session Agenda. Overall Sentiment ■ Support(o%) ■ OPP-803%1 ■ Nautral[0%y No Respwse(100%) Guest User Location: Submitted At: 10:15pm 02-19-24 I've been a Greenwood Tustin Legacy resident for the past 4 years. I moved to this neighborhood from Irvine specifically because of its similar master planned low density community. I value safety, pride of ownership, strong home values, a sense of community, abundant street parking, ample green space and parks for people to enjoy, numerous and large sidewalks for walking, and other aspects of Greenwood that come in a low density community. Just walk around the Greenwood neighborhood during the holidays, and you'll see how festive and tight knit the community is. Our community is known for how often family and friends get together. You'll also notice that there are Greenwood "lifers" who love this community so much that they plan on retiring here. This does not happen in high density neighborhoods that also statistically bring higher crime rates, lack of strong relationship bonds between neighbors, and also congestion on our resources. Too many parked cars is dangerous for our neighborhood and causes stress in many ways. We urge Tustin city council to create a neighborhood similar to Greenwood and prioritize sidewalks, pedestrian bridges, green space, and other elements that you would find in Irvine master planned communities that have undergone extensive research and the reason why it's one of the most sought after cities in all of the USA. Guest User Location: Submitted At: 4:44pm 02-19-24 I am writing to urge City Council to plan and vote for a project in the 38 acre area north of Moffett Drive that has a density compatible with Greenwood in Tustin Legacy. In addition, I would like the project to provide more than sufficient parking to accommodate all the new residents in that area. As a resident of Tustin Legacy, I hope to see the area grow and prosper. In order for that to happen, I strongly believe there is a desire for single family residences that are similar to Greenwood to be built on the land north of Moffet Drive. Thank you for your time and consideration. Guest User Location: Submitted At: 2:45pm 02-19-24 Please select a project that has a density compatible with Greenwood and that the project provide adequate parking. Costin Tuculescu Location: Submitted At: 2:40pm 02-19-24 Dear Tustin City Council: To protect our quality of life, resident safety, traffic impact, environmental quality impact, and home values, my family and other Greenwood residents ask the City Council that for the project with Property Address/Description: APN 430-391-03, 27-29, 56, 58, 60-65, 79-81 to select a project that has a density similar to Greenwood and that the project provide adequate parking. As you may know, the Greenwood community is already experiencing issues with overflow parking and any project with inadequate parking adjacent to Greenwood would potentially have negative impacts. Thank you for your support in this matter. Guest User Location: Submitted At: 1:22pm 02-19-24 Please approve single family homes for the open lot on moffett Guest User Location: Submitted At: 11:51am 02-19-24 In regards to the closed session discussion regarding the 3 housing projects up for bid for the 38 acres immediately North of our Greenwood housing community (across Moffett Drive), I kindly ask that whatever plan the counsel decides on, that you please take into consideration our Greenwood community. We have already experienced issues with the addition of Levity community, just across from our community, with parking. Levity guests and homeowners have been parking in our community due to lack of parking space in their own community. We have had to make changes to our parking in our community due to this issue. In addition to the parking, we have seen an increase in crime and incidents because of the additional traffic. With the possible addition of a new community across Moffett Drive, please take into consideration a community plan that incorporates plenty of parking so that it will not impact Greenwood. Also, with new open areas of Legacy being built out, we have seen a lot of high density housing surrounding Greenwood that could have negative effects on our home values. As we have been here already since 2015, 1 kindly ask that we be taking into consideration when approving new communities that may affect us. I hope you value us as your own Tustin residents in making these decisions that could affect us greatly. Guest User Location: Submitted At: 11:35am 02-19-24 Please select a project that has a density compatible with Greenwood and that the project provide adequate parking. We have overflow of parking from other communities adjacent to our community. Thank you, Jimmy M, Greenwood Resident. Guest User Location: Submitted At: 11:27am 02-19-24 I am a Greenwood resident and am requesting that you only approve a project that has similar housing density as Greenwood and ample parking. Parking is already an issue here, and a neighboring development with too many cars will add to the congestion and negatively impact our community. Thank you. Guest User Location: Submitted At: 11:25am 02-19-24 I'm writing to address the 3 housing projects on the 38 acres of land across from Moffett. Can you please ensure the projects have density compatible to Greenwood and proper parking spaces for the communities. Guest User Location: Submitted At: 11:23am 02-19-24 City Council - please select a housing project that will bring value to the Tustin Legacy Community and protect our home values. We are surrounded by townhomes and apartments and I would like to see more single family homes that would give opportunity to people wanting to live in this area and grow a family. Guest User Location: Submitted At: 11:23am 02-19-24 To safeguard the value of our homes and preserve our quality of life, we urge the City Council to choose a project that aligns with Greenwood's density and ensures sufficient parking. Given the existing challenges of overflow parking in our community, any development lacking adequate parking near Greenwood could pose detrimental effects. Guest User Location: Submitted At: 11:10am 02-19-24 We do not want high density housing near Greenwood. We already have issues with parking, theft, community security amongst other things. Please stay away from high density housing projects. Guest User Location: Submitted At: 10:51am 02-19-24 Select a project that has a density compatible with Greenwood and that the project provide adequate parking Agenda Item: eComments for B. Property Address/Description: APN 430-391-03, 27-29, 56, 58, 60-65, 79-81 Agency: City of Tustin City Negotiators: Nicole Bernard, Acting City Manager and Ryan Swiontek Acting Economic Development Deputy Director Negotiating Parties: Brookfield Homes Southern California LLC, Lennar Homes of California, LLC, New Home Company Southern California Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment Overall Sentiment Support(4%) ■ OPP-8(0%) Neutral(W%) No Respwss(l00%) Guest User Location: Submitted At: 4:16pm 02-20-24 I am writing to express my concerns regarding the upcoming decision on the development of the next Tustin Legacy neighborhoods. As a resident who deeply cares about the future of our community, I urge you to prioritize less dense communities. Levity, Anton legacy, and the new Landing have impacted Greenwood in so many negative ways. I miss the feeling to driving south on tustin ranch and being able to see the sunset. It's all blocked by 3 story buildings. Greenwood is already facing challenges related to congestion, strained infrastructure, and overcrowded schools. The decision to select the highest density project for the next phase of development would only exacerbate these issues and have detrimental effects on the quality of life. Please preserve what makes Tustin unique- open space, beautiful homes with trees, driveways and character. Guest User Location: Submitted At: 3:02pm 02-20-24 Please select a project that has a density compatible with Greenwood and that the project provide adequate parking. Guest User Location: Submitted At: 2:24pm 02-20-24 As a resident of the Greenwood community, I ask that our City officials place quality above quantity when developing plans for the land on Moffett and Tustin Ranch Rd. We understand the need for housing but we ask that the plans be compatible and comparable to our adjacent communities. We also ask that consideration be given to traffic and parking as those items are already under strain in our community and surrounding areas. We love living in the city of Tustin and we love our community and support the growth of our both in a thoughtful manner. Thank you for your time, Anita & Suchit Mathur Guest User Location: Submitted At: 2:22pm 02-20-24 Please DO NOT put in housing without adequate parking in place. Many homes have multiple generations with grandparents, parents, and young children. 4 drivers and up to 4 cars. Then the kids grow up and they drive also. More cars. No place to park. Fines if you park anywhere. What are you thinking?!?!?! Please only have single family homes. Housing is so expensive. Guest User Location: Submitted At: 1:24pm 02-20-24 Dear Tustin City Council, As a resident of Greenwood and an active member of the community, I am writing to express my concerns regarding the upcoming decision on the housing project options at the 38 acres north of Greenwood. It is crucial that the City Council selects a project to ensure adequate parking provisions for any new housing development. Insufficient parking can lead to overflow parking issues, exacerbating traffic congestion and safety concerns in our area. I urge the City Council to carefully consider these factors when making their decision and to prioritize the well- being and interests of the community. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Greenwood Resident Guest User Location: Submitted At: 1:16pm 02-20-24 Please select a project that has a density compatible with Greenwood and that the project provide adequate parking. Guest User Location: Submitted At: 12:56pm 02-20-24 As Greenwood residents, our wish is that the council or committee select a project with a housing density compatible with the Greenwood neighborhood and that the project provides adequate parking. Additionally, we'd like to request that it be a project that favors single-family homes near the Greenwood neighborhood/Moffett Drive area. Guest User Location: Submitted At: 12:56pm 02-20-24 As Greenwood residents, our wish is that the council or committee select a project with a housing density compatible with the Greenwood neighborhood and that the project provides adequate parking. Additionally, we'd like to request that it be a project that favors single-family homes near the Greenwood neighborhood/Moffett Drive area. Guest User Location: Submitted At: 12:28pm 02-20-24 To the members of the Tustin City Council, With regard to your closed meeting discussion on Tuesday Feb 20th regarding the housing project options for the land immediately north of the Greenwood community, I kindly and respectfully ask that you select a project that has a density compatible with Greenwood and that the project provide adequate parking. We love our community and ask that the Council consider the impacts that its decision may have on it. Thank you for your attention, Eric Mui, Greenwood homewoner and resident Guest User Location: Submitted At: 11:53am 02-20-24 Please don't build high density buildings and condos like levity. Only build single homes like Greenwood with ample parking. Guest User Location: Submitted At: 11:41am 02-20-24 Dear Council Members, as a resident of the Greenwood community, I am writing to ask you during your closed door session today to consider selecting a housing project on the 38 acres directly across from our community that is appropriate for the area. By appropriate, I mean selecting a project that is compatible with Greenwood both in density and in parking, and not a project that would potentially create a negative impact on our community and our real estate values. Thank you for your consideration. Tibor Kelemen - Guest User Location: Submitted At: 10:59am 02-20-24 Hello, my name is Amelia Willson and I live in Greenwood, the community across from the proposed site. Our neighborhood is already starting to be impacted by overflow parking from nearby Victory Park. Whatever you choose for this lot, please select a project that has a density compatible with Greenwood and that provides adequate parking. My family loves living in Tustin Legacy and we are excited for the future as this area continues to develop -- our only wish is that it develops in a way that minimizes congestion and improves quality of life for all. Guest User Location: Submitted At: 10:55am 02-20-24 Hello, As a homeowner in Greenwood at Tustin Legacy, I would request members of the City Council to select a housing project that will match with the current density of existing neighborhoods and provide ample parking. We are already seeing the problems that can occur (e.g., constantly filled street parking) when surrounding communities do not incorporate enough parking into their plan. I request the City Council to think of the existing community members in the area and what will be important to all that call Tustin Legacy home. Thank you, Charul Mody Guest User Location: Submitted At: 10:37am 02-20-24 Will you be selecting a project that has a density compatible with Greenwood and a project that will provide adequate parking more than Greenwood? Guest User Location: Submitted At: 10:25am 02-20-24 Hello, as a greenwood resident, i hope yoi pick a project that has a density compatible with Greenwood and that the project provide adequate parking. Our community is already experiencing issues with overflow parking and any project with inadequate parking adjacent to Greenwood would potentially have negative impacts. Thank yoi for your consideration, Heather Williams Guest User Location: Submitted At: 9:55am 02-20-24 Dear Members of the Tustin City Council, I am writing to express my concerns regarding the upcoming decision on the development of the next Tustin Legacy neighborhoods. As a resident who deeply cares about the future of our community, I urge you to prioritize smart and less dense designs over those with the highest density. Tustin is already facing challenges related to congestion, strained infrastructure, and overcrowded schools. The decision to select the highest density project for the next phase of development would only exacerbate these issues and have detrimental effects on the quality of life for current and future residents. Here are a few reasons why I believe selecting a smart and less dense design is crucial: Traffic Congestion: The current level of traffic congestion in Tustin is a major concern for residents. High -density developments would only add more vehicles to our already congested streets, leading to longer commute times, increased pollution, and heightened safety risks for pedestrians and cyclists. Strain on Infrastructure: Our city's infrastructure, including roads, utilities, and public services, is already under strain. Introducing high -density developments without adequate infrastructure upgrades would put additional pressure on our resources and diminish the overall livability of our community. School Overcrowding: Our schools are already operating at or above capacity. Introducing high -density developments without sufficient provisions for new schools or expansions would exacerbate the problem, compromising the quality of education for our children and putting additional strain on teachers and staff. Preservation of Community Character: Tustin has a unique character and charm that residents value deeply. High -density developments risk altering the character of our neighborhoods, leading to loss of green space, increased urbanization, and a decline in overall community well-being. Given these challenges, I urge the City Council to prioritize thoughtful planning and select a smart and less dense design for the next phase of Tustin Legacy development. This approach will not only address existing concerns but also ensure a more sustainable and prosperous future for our community. Thank you for considering my perspective on this important matter. I trust that you will make the decision that best serves the long-term interests of Tustin and its residents. Sincerely, Minh Tan Guest User Location: Submitted At: 9:34am 02-20-24 Dear Members of the Tustin City Council, I am writing to express my deep concerns regarding the proposed housing development in Tustin Legacy. As a resident invested in the well-being of our community, I believe it is crucial to prioritize the quality of life for Tustin Legacy residents over simply choosing the option with the highest number of homes. While I understand the need for development and growth, it is essential to consider the potential negative impacts that an excessively large housing development can have on our city. Awarding the project to a company proposing too many homes could exacerbate existing issues such as traffic congestion, overcrowded schools, and strain on local infrastructure. Increased traffic congestion not only affects commute times but also poses safety hazards for pedestrians and cyclists. Overcrowded schools can lead to decreased quality of education and resources for students. Furthermore, excessive development can diminish the overall quality of life for residents by placing undue strain on community resources and amenities. Instead of prioritizing sheer quantity, I urge the City Council to carefully consider the long-term implications of each proposal and select the option that is best suited to enhance the quality of life for Tustin Legacy residents. This may involve choosing a developer who proposes a more balanced and sustainable approach to housing development, taking into account factors such as traffic management, school capacity, and preservation of green spaces. As representatives of our community, I trust that you will weigh these concerns thoughtfully and prioritize the well- being of Tustin Legacy residents in your decision -making process. Thank you for considering my input on this important matter. Sincerely, Rachel Le Guest User Location: Submitted At: 9:31am 02-20-24 Dear Tustin Council Members. Thank you for your work and dedication. For your consideration and in regards to Neighborhood G plots by Greenwood, please vote for a density compatible with Greenwood and that the project provide adequate parking. Thank You! Dat Nguyen Guest User Location: Submitted At: 9:26am 02-20-24 Hello - as a local resident in the Greenwood neighborhood community, our family encourages the Tustin City Council to select a project that has a density compatible with the Greenwood neighborhood and that the project provide adequate parking. Our neighborhood has had its challenges with parking and we cannot afford to have any neighboring communities use the Greenwood neighborhood as a parking area for overflow. Thank you for considering our concerns. Guest User Location: Submitted At: 9:06am 02-20-24 I ask that the City Council select a project that has a density compatible with Greenwood and that the project provide adequate parking. As we all know, our community is already experiencing issues with overflow parking Guest User Location: Submitted At: 9:05am 02-20-24 Hi, I would like to strongly urge you to select a project that has a density compatible with Greenwood and that the project provide adequate parking. Guest User Location: Submitted At: 9:OOam 02-20-24 Request for City Council select a project that has a density compatible with Greenwood and that the project provide adequate parking. Thank you for your help. Guest User Location: Submitted At: 7:37am 02-20-24 I would respectfully request that the City Council select a project that has a density compatible with the Greenwood community, and that the project provide adequate parking. Our community is already experiencing serious issues with overflow parking and any project with inadequate parking adjacent to Greenwood would potentially have negative impacts to this community. Thank you. Guest User Location: Submitted At: 7:35am 02-20-24 Low density, single family homes only! Guest User Location: Submitted At: 5:50am 02-20-24 As a resident of the Greenwood neighborhood in Tustin Legacy, I write to request that the City Council make an informed decision regarding any future housing developments just north of the Greenwood community, across Moffett Drive. Selecting a project that has the same or less density than Greenwood is imperative. Choosing another project with higher density could negatively impact the present property values, add unnecessary congestion to an already challenging area, risk the rate of crime, and negatively impact our school districts. Please do not select any housing project that has a density that is higher than Greenwood, such as some of the neighboring communities. Guest User Location: Submitted At: 12:25am 02-20-24 Please select a project that has a density compatible with Greenwood and that the project provides adequate parking. Our Greenwood community is already experiencing issues with overflow parking from adjacent properties and any project with inadequate parking adjacent to Greenwood would potentially have negative impacts. My name is William Netro and I live at Guest User Location: Submitted At: 10:48pm 02-19-24 Please select a project that has a density compatible with Greenwood and that the project provide adequate parking. We are being impacted with current parking overflow from surrounding apartments and townhomes as they don't have enough parking Guest User Location: Submitted At: 10:31 pm 02-19-24 I'm a resident at neighboring Greenwood community. Our community is currently experiencing issues with overflow parking. I'm asking city council, please select a project that has a density compatible with Greenwood and that the project provides adequate parking. Thank you for your attention. Guest User Location: Submitted At: 10:08pm 02-19-24 Dear Members of the Tustin City Council, I am writing to express my concerns regarding the upcoming decision on the development of the next Tustin Legacy neighborhoods. As a resident who deeply cares about the future of our community, I urge you to prioritize smart and less dense designs over those with the highest density. Tustin is already facing challenges related to congestion, strained infrastructure, and overcrowded schools. The decision to select the highest density project for the next phase of development would only exacerbate these issues and have detrimental effects on the quality of life for current and future residents. Here are a few reasons why I believe selecting a smart and less dense design is crucial: Traffic Congestion: The current level of traffic congestion in Tustin is a major concern for residents. High -density developments would only add more vehicles to our already congested streets, leading to longer commute times, increased pollution, and heightened safety risks for pedestrians and cyclists. Strain on Infrastructure: Our city's infrastructure, including roads, utilities, and public services, is already under strain. Introducing high -density developments without adequate infrastructure upgrades would put additional pressure on our resources and diminish the overall livability of our community. School Overcrowding: Our schools are already operating at or above capacity. Introducing high -density developments without sufficient provisions for new schools or expansions would exacerbate the problem, compromising the quality of education for our children and putting additional strain on teachers and staff. Preservation of Community Character: Tustin has a unique character and charm that residents value deeply. High -density developments risk altering the character of our neighborhoods, leading to loss of green space, increased urbanization, and a decline in overall community well-being. Given these challenges, I urge the City Council to prioritize thoughtful planning and select a smart and less dense design for the next phase of Tustin Legacy development. This approach will not only address existing concerns but also ensure a more sustainable and prosperous future for our community. Thank you for considering my perspective on this important matter. I trust that you will make the decision that best serves the long-term interests of Tustin and its residents. Sincerely, ►A-rr.M:..my* Guest User Location: Submitted At: 9:54pm 02-19-24 I am a resident of Greenwood and concerned about the potential addition of high density properties at Moffett and Tustin Ranch. We need density compatible homes with Greenwood. It's disappointing to see homes being crammed into this area and this is the very reason we moved away from Irvine. Levity townhomes and Anton legacy adjacent to us are causing major traffic and parking issues. Please consider single family homes, with no more than 2 levels, to preserve what's left of this open space. Guest User Location: Submitted At: 9:53pm 02-19-24 Dear Members of the Tustin City Council, I am writing to express my concerns regarding the upcoming decision on the development of the next Tustin Legacy neighborhoods. As a resident who deeply cares about the future of our community, I urge you to prioritize smart and less dense designs over those with the highest density. Tustin is already facing challenges related to congestion, strained infrastructure, and overcrowded schools. The decision to select the highest density project for the next phase of development would only exacerbate these issues and have detrimental effects on the quality of life for current and future residents. Here are a few reasons why I believe selecting a smart and less dense design is crucial: Traffic Congestion: The current level of traffic congestion in Tustin is a major concern for residents. High -density developments would only add more vehicles to our already congested streets, leading to longer commute times, increased pollution, and heightened safety risks for pedestrians and cyclists. Strain on Infrastructure: Our city's infrastructure, including roads, utilities, and public services, is already under strain. Introducing high -density developments without adequate infrastructure upgrades would put additional pressure on our resources and diminish the overall livability of our community. School Overcrowding: Our schools are already operating at or above capacity. Introducing high -density developments without sufficient provisions for new schools or expansions would exacerbate the problem, compromising the quality of education for our children and putting additional strain on teachers and staff. Preservation of Community Character: Tustin has a unique character and charm that residents value deeply. High -density developments risk altering the character of our neighborhoods, leading to loss of green space, increased urbanization, and a decline in overall community well-being. Given these challenges, I urge the City Council to prioritize thoughtful planning and select a smart and less dense design for the next phase of Tustin Legacy development. This approach will not only address existing concerns but also ensure a more sustainable and prosperous future for our community. Thank you for considering my perspective on this important matter. I trust that you will make the decision that best serves the long-term interests of Tustin and its residents. Sincerely, Lance Kim Guest User Location: Submitted At: 9:49pm 02-19-24 Dear Members of the Tustin City Council, I am writing to express my concerns regarding the upcoming decision on the development of the next Tustin Legacy neighborhoods. As a resident who deeply cares about the future of our community, I urge you to prioritize smart and less dense designs over those with the highest density. Tustin is already facing challenges related to congestion, strained infrastructure, and overcrowded schools. The decision to select the highest density project for the next phase of development would only exacerbate these issues and have detrimental effects on the quality of life for current and future residents. Here are a few reasons why I believe selecting a smart and less dense design is crucial: Traffic Congestion: The current level of traffic congestion in Tustin is a major concern for residents. High -density developments would only add more vehicles to our already congested streets, leading to longer commute times, increased pollution, and heightened safety risks for pedestrians and cyclists. Strain on Infrastructure: Our city's infrastructure, including roads, utilities, and public services, is already under strain. Introducing high -density developments without adequate infrastructure upgrades would put additional pressure on our resources and diminish the overall livability of our community. School Overcrowding: Our schools are already operating at or above capacity. Introducing high -density developments without sufficient provisions for new schools or expansions would exacerbate the problem, compromising the quality of education for our children and putting additional strain on teachers and staff. Preservation of Community Character: Tustin has a unique character and charm that residents value deeply. High -density developments risk altering the character of our neighborhoods, leading to loss of green space, increased urbanization, and a decline in overall community well-being. Given these challenges, I urge the City Council to prioritize thoughtful planning and select a smart and less dense design for the next phase of Tustin Legacy development. This approach will not only address existing concerns but also ensure a more sustainable and prosperous future for our community. Thank you for considering my perspective on this important matter. I trust that you will make the decision that best serves the long-term interests of Tustin and its residents. Sincerely, Julie Kim Guest User Location: Submitted At: 9:48pm 02-19-24 This comment is regarding the 38 acre development opportunity in Tustin Legacy. We are requesting that the Council select a project that is similar in density to Greenwood with ample parking. This will be critical in ensuring that our community continues to thrive. Certain parts of Greenwood (i.e. Barnes Rd) are already experiencing congested street parking. There can be poor visibility turning out onto Barnes Rd, and we are concerned for the safety of our children and families. Guest User Location: Submitted At: 9:22pm 02-19-24 Dear Members of the Tustin City Council, I am writing to express my concerns regarding the upcoming decision on the development of the next Tustin Legacy neighborhoods. As a resident who deeply cares about the future of our community, I urge you to prioritize smart and less dense designs over those with the highest density. Tustin is already facing challenges related to congestion, strained infrastructure, and overcrowded schools. The decision to select the highest density project for the next phase of development would only exacerbate these issues and have detrimental effects on the quality of life for current and future residents. Here are a few reasons why I believe selecting a smart and less dense design is crucial: Traffic Congestion: The current level of traffic congestion in Tustin is a major concern for residents. High -density developments would only add more vehicles to our already congested streets, leading to longer commute times, increased pollution, and heightened safety risks for pedestrians and cyclists. Strain on Infrastructure: Our city's infrastructure, including roads, utilities, and public services, is already under strain. Introducing high -density developments without adequate infrastructure upgrades would put additional pressure on our resources and diminish the overall livability of our community. School Overcrowding: Our schools are already operating at or above capacity. Introducing high -density developments without sufficient provisions for new schools or expansions would exacerbate the problem, compromising the quality of education for our children and putting additional strain on teachers and staff. Preservation of Community Character: Tustin has a unique character and charm that residents value deeply. High -density developments risk altering the character of our neighborhoods, leading to loss of green space, increased urbanization, and a decline in overall community well-being. Given these challenges, I urge the City Council to prioritize thoughtful planning and select a smart and less dense design for the next phase of Tustin Legacy development. This approach will not only address existing concerns but also ensure a more sustainable and prosperous future for our community. Thank you for considering my perspective on this important matter. I trust that you will make the decision that best serves the long-term interests of Tustin and its residents. Sincerely, Catherine Tang Greenwood Resident Guest User Location: Submitted At: 9:04pm 02-19-24 Dear Members of the Tustin City Council, I am writing to express my concerns regarding the upcoming decision on the development of the next Tustin Legacy neighborhoods. As a resident who deeply cares about the future of our community, I urge you to prioritize smart and less dense designs over those with the highest density. Tustin is already facing challenges related to congestion, strained infrastructure, and overcrowded schools. The decision to select the highest density project for the next phase of development would only exacerbate these issues and have detrimental effects on the quality of life for current and future residents. Here are a few reasons why I believe selecting a smart and less dense design is crucial: Traffic Congestion: The current level of traffic congestion in Tustin is a major concern for residents. High -density developments would only add more vehicles to our already congested streets, leading to longer commute times, increased pollution, and heightened safety risks for pedestrians and cyclists. Strain on Infrastructure: Our city's infrastructure, including roads, utilities, and public services, is already under strain. Introducing high -density developments without adequate infrastructure upgrades would put additional pressure on our resources and diminish the overall livability of our community. School Overcrowding: Our schools are already operating at or above capacity. Introducing high -density developments without sufficient provisions for new schools or expansions would exacerbate the problem, compromising the quality of education for our children and putting additional strain on teachers and staff. Preservation of Community Character: Tustin has a unique character and charm that residents value deeply. High -density developments risk altering the character of our neighborhoods, leading to loss of green space, increased urbanization, and a decline in overall community well-being. Given these challenges, I urge the City Council to prioritize thoughtful planning and select a smart and less dense design for the next phase of Tustin Legacy development. This approach will not only address existing concerns but also ensure a more sustainable and prosperous future for our community. Thank you for considering my perspective on this important matter. I trust that you will make the decision that best serves the long-term interests of Tustin and its residents. Sincerely, Crystal and Chris Mamoulelis Guest User Location: Submitted At: 8:55pm 02-19-24 Please select a project that has a density compatible with Greenwood and that the project provide adequate parking. As we all know, our community is already experiencing issues with overflow parking and any project with inadequate parking adjacent to Greenwood would potentially have negative impacts. Guest User Location: Submitted At: 8:37pm 02-19-24 Dear Tustin City Council Members, I understand that the City Council Meeting (Tuesday, 2/20) will include a closed session agenda item to select one of three housing project options for the 38 acres immediately north of Greenwood (across Moffett Drive). Previously the land use plan for Legacy lot 19 (now the Levity development) was changed from 70 single-family detached homes to 218 mixed townhomes, flats, and single-family detached homes; a change which, regardless of impact reports filed at the time, had a negative impact on the community. The negative effects on the neighborhood include overall density, air quality, parking, and use of roads, open spaces, local parks etc. As a current homeowner and resident in Greenwood at Tustin Legacy I would strongly urge the City Council to select the plan that has a density comparable to the existing Greenwood homes and would minimize negative impacts (such as air quality and traffic), and would be harmonious with the aesthetic of the current community. William McKinnies Guest User Location: Submitted At: 8:31 pm 02-19-24 Hello, my name is Christina and I am resident of Greenwood in Tustin. I would like to request that the new development near us (just across Moffit Dr) be developed into a neighbor hood similar in density to our neighborhood. We already have an apartment complex on the other side of Greenwood where those renters use our neighborhood to park their cars. This is extremely frustrating, especially on the weekends. Thank you for your time. Christina Guest User Location: Submitted At: 8:20pm 02-19-24 Dear Tustin Mayor and City Council Members, I am writing to express my concerns regarding the proposed potential new project development near our community on Moffett. While I understand the importance of growth and development, I urge the council to consider a development that aligns more closely with the preferences and needs of the current residents in Greenwood and Tustin Legacy. Specifically, I am apprehensive about the possible inclusion of low-income housing or high -density projects in the proposed development. I believe that introducing such elements could potentially strain our infrastructure, impact property values, increase crime, and alter the character of our neighborhood in ways that may not be favorable. Instead, I would like to advocate for potential options that could enhance our community in a more sustainable manner. This could include prioritizing the development of businesses, shopping areas, establishing green spaces or parks with exercise equipment or running field, a community garden with lush greenery, a dog park, a community gathering space/office, YMCA -like space for children and teens with volunteer opportunities, office space, a community clubhouse that is rentable, Tustin Police Department Legacy office (TPD sub station), and encouraging the construction of single-family homes rather than high density high rises. By focusing on these types of developments, we can maintain the integrity of our neighborhood while also attracting residents and businesses that contribute positively to our community. I appreciate the council's dedication to improving our city and trust that you will carefully consider the concerns and preferences of the residents as you move forward with the decision -making process. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Tina Diep * Greenwood HOA President * Greenwood Neighborhood Watch Founder and Chairperson Guest User Location: Submitted At: 8:16pm 02-19-24 Hello Councilmembers, I am a resident in Greenwood and would like to see the land in the adjacent neighborhood be used for single family homes in a similar density to Greenwood. Part of the issue is there are often too many cars already in our neighborhood that are spilling from adjacent neighborhoods. This creates a lot of traffic and unsafe visibility for driving especially when there are a lot of children around. The problem is rampart that signs had to be put up in neighborhood to say not to parking there if they are from other neighborhoods -but obviously it goes unignored. Thank you for this consideration. Guest User Location: Submitted At: 8:16pm 02-19-24 Dear City Council Members, I am a resident of Tustin and the Greenwood neighborhood. I feel that it is important that the property being discussed should be developed in to something similar to Greenwood rather than a multipurpose or densely populated housing area. Having apartments, condos or anything similar would create so much traffic and a parking issue, especially with schools near by. Having single family homes would create a better community, allow access to first time home buyers with better property value without the urban density, which is already available near by. Please consider developing single family homes in the area. Thank you Van N u en Guest User Location: Submitted At: 7:51 pm 02-19-24 You should build regular style homes like Greenwood. Not the box homes u all keep building Guest User Location: Submitted At: 7:50pm 02-19-24 Hello Tustin City Councils, Please select a project that has a density compatible with Greenwood and that the project provide adequate parking. Thank you Guest User Location: Submitted At: 6:57pm 02-19-24 As a homeowner in Greenwood Tustin Legacy for over 6 years, the planned development of the property across Moffett is extremely important to our community. The original plans when we moved in to have additional single family homes and mixed urban development was very appealing. As we all know, plans halted and many of the developments never occurred (i.e. bridge to our school (LMA) was started, lakes and parks but never finished). The opportunity for Tustin to continue enticing families and possibly commuters with the proximity to the metro link will grow our schools, community and parks. I urge all council members to be vigilant and vote to keep the focus on growing Tustin in a planned and intentional way. Please select a project that has a density compatible with Greenwood and that the project provide adequate parking as our neighborhood already faces overflow issues that cause us distress. Thank you. Janel and Vinod Bommaiah Guest User Location: Submitted At: 6:41 pm 02-19-24 Please select a project that has a density compatible with Greenwood and ensure that there is adequate parking space. Thank you. Guest User Location: Submitted At: 5:45pm 02-19-24 Hello. I am a resident of greenwood and I wanted to provide feedback on the planning of the city. This is in regards to the development near moffett. I understand there are a few options but I would like to make a strong push for request for single family homes, shopping, parks, or businesses, etc and not high density or low income housing built. Being adjacent to Irvine it's important we maintain and keep up our standards in Tustin legacy otherwise the quality and value of our city will diminish. The priority should not just be more dense housing. We have plenty of that around Greenwood already. Let's please maintain some standards and quality as a city. We are putting our trust and faith in you to make the right decisions for the long term and for our residents. Thank you. Guest User Location: Submitted At: 5:30pm 02-19-24 Dear Tustin City Council, My name is Albert Yee. I live in the Tustin Greenwood development. I had some thoughts regarding the development proposals for the 38 acres north of Greenwood: 1) The street parking around the "carriage court" style homes is always crowded. I recommend that the new development avoid this style of high density housing. It might be because people just have too many cars, but I also suspect that people use their garage space for purposes other than parking. I know our HOA has a rule against this type of use for the garage space, but there really isn't a practical way to enforce the rule, so I think it's better to avoid building carriage courts (shared driveways) in the first place. 2) Some people in the neighborhood drive too fast, given the poor visibility and tight quarters around all the parked cars on the streets. I'm concerned for the children in our neighborhood. I'm not sure if safety can be "designed in" to the street layout, but I thought I'd mention it. 3) Is there a way for some of the proceeds from the development proposals to go towards additional police patrols in the area? Our neighborhood has had to hire private security because of thieves coming in. I heard from the neighborhood chat group (but have not confirmed for myself) that some thefts originated from the apartments across Park Ave -- I must admit that having another apartment complex to our north would concern me. Thanks for considering my input. I'm sure there are many competing demands and factors that weigh in on your decision. Thanks for serving our community. Best regards, Albert Yee Guest User Location: Submitted At: 5:01 pm 02-19-24 I understand that the city council is considering several bids for the following parcels. APN 430-391-03, 27-29, 56, 58, 60-65, 79-81. As a citizen of Greenwood I hope that the neighboring developments would be similar to Greenwood models (3000-4000 SF on 6,000-10,OOOSF lots) as initially laid out in the Specific Plan where lower density homes are built near Moffett. Overflow parking is already a problem in Greenwood from Levity and the apartments so denser housing adjacent to Greenwood would only make parking worse. Guest User Location: Submitted At: 4:37pm 02-19-24 Dear Tustin City Council, As a resident of the Greenwood community in Tustin Legacy, I am writing to express my thoughts on the proposed housing projects for the open lot next to our neighborhood. I urge you to consider selecting a project that aligns with the density, parking adequency, and well-being of overall Tustin Legacy and Tustin residents. As you deliberate on the three options, please keep in mind the impact the project will have on the overall community traffic, density, open space preservation, and public grounds and trails that contribute to the well-being of Tustin residents. As our city grows, it is crucial to balance development with preserving the qualities that make Tustin a desirable place to live. Greenwood and the surrounding areas already face challenges with overflow parking, and students commuting to nearby schools experience heavy traffic flow and safety concerns. A highly dense housing project with inadequate parking could exacerbate these issues and negatively impact the quality of life for residents of all communities in the area. As we look to the future, let's strive to make Tustin an innovative city that thoughtfully integrates new developments with existing communities. Please consider the needs and overall quality of life and property values of Greenwood residents, Tustin Legacy residents, and the broader Tustin community benefiting from the elevated status the Tustin Legacy development is already bringing to the name of Tustin when selecting a project for the open lot. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Supattra Maganis Resident and the Greenwood Community In addition to this comment, I recommend attending city council meetings and voicing your concerns in person. You can also encourage other Greenwood residents to do the same and submit their own comments to the city council. By actively participating in the decision -making process, you can help ensure that your community's needs are taken into account. Guest User Location: Submitted At: 4:06pm 02-19-24 Hello. My name is Jesse Meschuk and I'm a resident of Tustin (116 Patton Way) in the Greenwood development at Tustin Legacy. I understand the Council is considering three proposals for the development of 38 acres north of Moffet Drive. I'm writing to express my request that the council consider only options that will keep the relative density compatable with the surrounding areas, specifically our home development here at Greenwood. I'm concerned a high density development near us will lower property values - my partner and I recently purchased here at Greenwood, and already have a significant mortgage payment and interest rate to consider. A decline in property value may result in my mortgage being larger than the value of the property and put me and my partner a significantly negative financial position. Additionally, without the right parking arrangement a high density area would flood our neighborhood with additional cars, of which there is already very limited space for guests visiting the current neighborhood. I'm aware that housing is at a premium these days, and there are needs to ensure sufficient options exist for all income levels and areas - but this should not be at the expense of neighbors who have significantly invested in the city, the community and are already contributing at a high level to ensure Tustin continues to be a place families and others want to grow and excel. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, the Meschuk Family. Guest User Location: Submitted At: 3:51 pm 02-19-24 I am writing as a resident of Greenwood at Tustin legacy to ask that the City Council select a project that has a density compatible with Greenwood and that the project provide adequate parking. We have already experienced issues with overflow and street parking in the neighborhood and non -compatible project close by would further add to these challenges. KEVIN PURVIS Location: Submitted At: 3:22pm 02-19-24 I am interested in the upcoming development considerations for the area north of Moffett and east of Tustin Ranch. I live in Greenwood since inception, my in-laws live in the newer Brookfield condos near Target, and my brother lives in Levity. While I have no issue in general with the seemingly singular focus on higher density projects, If that is all that will ever be build in that area (or in legacy area) then I have some concerns. First, it is incongruous with other single family neighborhoods like Greenwood (and also Levity to a slightly lesser extent). Second, it deprives other people interested in moving in from choices. For example, my friend has been looking into this area for some time now, but it not interested in being in a condo or a three story style townhome. I think it would be a shame if all that is left is for apartment buildings, condos and other high density areas, and feel it will reduce the overall feelings and value of community. We see this in Greenwood quite a bit with the higher density apartment buildings near us, which require us all to register cars and hire security at extortionate rates to ensure residents can park in their own neighborhood. Also, to this day we still have people breaking into our private pool area and trashing the place. I suspect they do this because they do not have spaces of their own living in the kind of density they do. In any case, I do agree that some should certainly be transit oriented, and that condos are good for the city and for would-be homeowners, but would be a shame to not have more single family residence areas. This would make sense to be near other single family areas such as Greenwood. Thank you for your service, Kevin Purvis Guest User Location: Submitted At: 3:03pm 02-19-24 I'm a resident of the Greenwood community, i ask that the city council would consider selecting a more compatible home density to that of Greenwood for your next home development project in the land adjacent to Greenwood. This greatly improve on our quality of living in our beautiful Tustin city. High density homes will just create more traffic and add to the never ending parking issues that already exist. Instead, we should plan for more green/outdoor space to better enhance for our quality of life not just for us but for our future generation. Thank you! Guest User Location: Submitted At: 2:50pm 02-19-24 Subject: Concerns Regarding Project Density and Parking Adequacy in Greenwood Community Dear Tustin City Council, I am writing to express my concerns regarding the ongoing discussions about selecting a project adjacent to Greenwood. As a member of this community, I value our home values and quality of life. I urge the City Council to prioritize projects with a density compatible with Greenwood, ensuring a harmonious integration into our neighborhood. Moreover, it is crucial that any chosen project addresses the existing issues with overflow parking. Inadequate parking solutions can have detrimental effects on our community's quality of life. Therefore, I respectfully request that the City Council thoroughly considers the impact of parking availability when making decisions about the upcoming project. Thank you for your attention to these matters, and I trust that the City Council will prioritize the best interests of Greenwood residents in this decision -making process. Sincerely, Sherr Sanborn Guest User Location: Submitted At: 2:50pm 02-19-24 I'm a resident of the Greenwood community. To safeguard the value of our residences and preserve our standard of living, I would like to petition the City Council for the selection of a project aligning with Greenwood's density and ensuring sufficient parking provision. Given the existing challenges of overflow parking in our community, any project lacking adequate parking near Greenwood could pose adverse consequences. Costin Tuculescu Location: Submitted At: 2:41 pm 02-19-24 Dear Tustin City Council: To protect our quality of life, resident safety, traffic impact, environmental quality impact, and home values, my family and other Greenwood residents, asks the City Council that for the project with Property Address/Description: APN 430-391-03, 27-29, 56, 58, 60-65, 79-81 to select a project that has a density similar to Greenwood and that the project provide adequate parking. As you may know, the Greenwood community is already experiencing issues with overflow parking and any project with inadequate parking adjacent to Greenwood would potentially have negative impacts. Thank you for your support in this matter. Guest User Location: Submitted At: 2:18pm 02-19-24 a project that has a density compatible with Greenwood and that the project provide adequate parking Guest User Location: Submitted At: 2:17pm 02-19-24 Our wish is that the council or committee select a project that has a housing density compatible with Greenwood and that the project provide adequate parking. Also a request that it is a project that favors single family homes towards the greenwood neighborhood/Moffett Drive. Thank you for your consideration. QD Do Location: Submitted At: 1:23pm 02-19-24 We need to have LESS high -density housing. I'm requesting that we consider developing single-family housing with walkable commercial centers. Guest User Location: Submitted At: 1:11 pm 02-19-24 In regards to the City Council discussing housing alternatives in the space north of Greenwood, please select a project that has a density compatible with Greenwood and that provides adequate parking. Guest User Location: Submitted At: 1:08pm 02-19-24 we need to pick the one with ample parking! Wee Nguyen Location: Submitted At: 12:37pm 02-19-24 Dear Members of the City Council, I am a homeowner in the Greenwood community and would like to express my strong support for high -quality development initiatives that contribute to the enhancement of our community, particularly in the Tustin Legacy area. As you convene to deliberate on housing project options, I urge you to prioritize intentional and well -planned growth strategies that will not only benefit our residents but also enrich the overall appeal and functionality of our city. The Tustin Legacy holds tremendous potential for development, and it is essential that we approach this opportunity with foresight and careful consideration. High -quality development not only stimulates economic growth but also provides the means to invest in vital infrastructure and amenities that enhance our quality of life. I am particularly enthusiastic about several projects that are currently in various stages of planning and development within the Tustin Legacy area. These projects, including a proposed dog park, new parks and bridges, additional pickleball courts, senior housing initiatives, and new placemaking entertainment opportunities, have the potential to significantly enhance the vibrancy and inclusivity of our community. A well -designed dog park would not only cater to the needs of pet owners but also serve as a gathering place for residents, fostering a sense of community and social interaction. Similarly, the addition of new parks, bridges, and pickleball courts would promote an active lifestyle while providing recreational opportunities for individuals of all ages. Moreover, the implementation of senior housing initiatives is of paramount importance as we strive to create a city that is accessible and accommodating to individuals of all demographics. By prioritizing senior housing, we can ensure that our aging population has access to safe and affordable living options within close proximity to essential amenities and services. Furthermore, the introduction of new placemaking entertainment opportunities will further enrich the cultural landscape of our city, fostering a vibrant and dynamic environment that attracts visitors and residents alike. In conclusion, I implore you to prioritize high -quality development initiatives in the Tustin Legacy area, ensuring that growth is intentional, well -planned, one that has adequate parking and aligned with the long-term interests of our community. By doing so, we can unlock the full potential of our city while preserving its unique character and charm. Thank you for your attention to this matter, and I look forward to seeing the positive impact of your decisions on our community. Huy Nguyen Eric Higuchi February 20, 2023 Tustin City Council 300 Centennial Way Tustin, CA 92780 To the Members of the Tustin City Council: The intent of this letter is to express my concern related to Item No. 6 of the February 20, 2024 Tustin City Council Closed Session related to Real Property Negotiations of APN 430A81-02, 430481-03, 430481-04, 430-481-05 and APN 430-391-03, 27-29, 56, 58, 60-652 79-81 and request that the Tustin City Council consider the following policy changes related to the continuing implementation of the Tustin Legacy Specific Plan (the "TLSP"): • Formation of a Tustin Legacy Citizen Ad Hoc Advisory Committee; • Significant increase in public participation and transparency related to the disposition of surplus land within the TLSP; and • Facilitate TLSP site plan and architectural public input via workshops facilitated by Planning Commission. Tustin Legacy Citizen Ad Hoc Advisory Committee I would request that the Tustin City Council strongly consider the formation and funding of a Tustin Legacy Citizen Ad Hoc Advisory Committee for the purposes of. (i) providing a forum for public input on land use matters related to the TLSP; (n) recommend the prioritization of certain development or planning areas; (iii) research potential economically viable adaptive uses for the remaining historic structures; (iv) lead the efforts to plan Planning Area 6 where Hangar 28 (the northern hangar) was formerly located; (v) lead curation of the historic resources; and (vi) lead the documentation of former and existing historic resources. TLSP Mitigation Measure Hist -3 states, "a substantive effort will be made to determine whether there is an economically viable adaptive use of Hangar 28 and Hangar 29. " The TLSP is over two decades old and any effort to determine any use (economically viable or not) of Hangar 28, Hangar 29, or any other structure has not been undertaken. The residents of Tustin and the County are extremely interested in the future use of the historic structures within the TLSP, however the City and the County do not appear to share the same level of interest. Accordingly, it is long overdue for a committee of stakeholders to be engaged to direct the City's efforts to preserve what is remaining of Tustin Legacy. To be frank, government disengagement and lack of interest is one of the primary causes of the destruction of Hangar 28. While we understand the area where Hangar 28 is owned by the US Dept of the Navy and had been previously contemplated to be dedicated to the County as a regional park, the City should not continue to remain disengaged even though it is unclear which agency will ultimately own PA 6. In order to move forward, the City should proactively put forth its own vision and plan for PA 6 with the goals of. (i) preservation and adaptive reuse of the control tower; (ii) drafting a concept design of a park plan; and (iii) drafting a concept design of a memorial for Hanger 28. The Sale of Surplus Land within TLSP The disposition of surplus land within the TLSP should be subject to much greater public review and input than currently provided. Item 6 of the Closed Session is a discussion related to the disposition of land within TLSP. The community should be allowed to provide input on design prior to the selection of a project and a developer. It is not common, nor advisable, for a government agency to take on the responsibility of the entitlement and physical development of a master planned community. Accordingly, because of the city's extraordinary role, heightened transparency and community involvement should have been a priority. However, current information on how much revenue is generated by land sales or leases on TLSP and what direct costs are associated with the development of TLSP is not readily available. There is a concern that the net revenue generated by TLSP should be substantial but the beneficial impacts to the entire City or how these revenues are prioritized are unclear. By way of example, the Tustin War Memorial Building, a City owned property within the Downtown, has remained untouched for years in spite of its excellent location and significance to the community. Site Plan and Architectural Review I would request that the Tustin City Council strongly consider directing TLSP land use oversight to the Planning Commission. Pursuant to Section 4.1 of the TLSP which states: "The Planning Commission and Zoning Administrator, as defined by the applicable City Code, shall be responsible for approving Variances and Conditional Use Permits; subdivision maps; recommending Specific Plan Amendments and Development Agreements to the City Council; and acting on appeals from decisions by the Community Development Director or Zoning Administrator. " Based on my experience serving on the Tustin Planning Commission, TLSP land use matters are not reviewed by the Planning Commission nor the Planning Department. Rather, TLSP land use matters are siloed within the Economic Development Department, which appears to be counter to Section 4.1 of the TLSP. Site plan and architectural review and input appears to be the sole at the direction of the Economic Development Department. I would request that City Council strongly consider requiring any proposed site plan design or architectural design be subject to public input and review through workshops facilitated by Planning Commission. In my opinion, the previously approved architecture is not in alignment with the character of the City. Further, the previously implemented "modem" architecture costs significantly more to construct and maintain relative to than "traditional" architecture thereby decreasing the economic return to the City. The tradeoff of a "modem" architectural design for less money should not be left to the personal preferences of one department. Thank on for our consideration of the olicy changes detailed above. I can be reached at Regards, Eric Higuchi Cc: Pete Beatty, 2014 Tustin Man of the Year Brian Delahunt, Colonel USMC (Ret.) From: Yasuda, Erica To: Woodward, Carrie Subject: FW: City council meeting comment for tomorrow Date: Tuesday, February 20, 2024 10:01:42 AM From: Yvette Benson Sent: Monday, February 19, 2024 2:15 PM To: Yasuda, Erica <EYasuda@tustinca.org> Subject: City council meeting comment for tomorrow Hello - I'm trying to comment on the city council agenda but the comments are not operational. Please share this comment with the council regarding the development proposals for the land north of Mofett at tomorrow's meeting. B. Property Address/Description: APN 430-391-03, 27-29, 56, 58, 60-65, 79-81 Agency: City of Tustin City Negotiators: Nicole Bernard, Acting City Manager and Ryan Swiontek Acting Economic Development Deputy Director Negotiating Parties: Brookfield Homes Southern California LLC, Lennar Homes of California, LLC, New Home Company Southern California Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment: First, I want to thank all the city council members for their time and dedicated service to our community. I live in Greenwood and am requesting the city council consider selecting a development proposal that accommodates single family housing with a density at most matching Greenwood along with adequate parking in the land North of Moffet. We have had issues with non - Greenwood residents parking in our neighborhood due to the lack of parking at Levity and Victory Park. I also believe a lower density may reduce crime which has increased over the past few years in our area. Thank you very much for your time, Yvette Benson Sent from my iPhone