Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBIAOC Comment LetterIt 11 BUILDING INDUSTRY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC. 451-H ORANGE COUNTY CHAPTER March 5, 2024 Mayor Austin Lumbard City of Tustin 300 Centennial Way Tustin, CA 92780 Re: Item 15 — Temporary Suspension of Affordable Housing In -Lieu Fee Dear Mayor and Council, On behalf of the Building Industry Association of Southern California - Orange County Chapter (BIA/OC), I write to support amending your Inclusionary Zoning program in response to years of tangibly poor results. While there are a number of possible issues that factor into development decisions, Inclusionary Zoning stands as a clear hurdle to the production of new housing. As such, we recommend a full suspension of the existing policy as a first step in determining its impact on your development community. Under your existing structure, shockingly few units have been proposed within the two impacted Specific Plans. To spur development, it would make sense to remove barriers to development and then add back only what is needed, as development again shows signs of progress. Alternatively, if the Council is interested in an incremental option, we suggest an amendment to the Staff proposal. Clarity and flexibility are cornerstones to investment decisions. We suggest removing any "sliding scales" and instead fix a flat inclusionary rate at 5% within the two specific plans (clarity) with an in -lieu fee option remaining for meeting the 5% requirement (flexibility). In -lieu fees are a powerful option as discussed at the Costa Mesa City Council Study Session on February 27, 2024. At this hearing, Keyser Marston testified at the 1 hour, 20 minute, 54 second mark that, "as a financial consultant it would absolutely be my recommendation [to do in -lieu fees] because it's so much more financially efficient to do a 100% affordable project with the outside leveraging." Further discussion is held on the experience of Santa Ana and how their approach of leveraging in -lieu fees has resulted in far more units produced than would have otherwise occurred under an on - EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE PRESIDENT BROOKE DOI SHEA HOMES 1' VICE PRESIDENT MEGAN ELTRINGHAM THE NEW HOME COMPANY TREASURER DAVE MELLO LANDSEA HOMES SECRETARY JOE OFTILE WARMINGTON RESIDENTIAL TRADE CONTRACTOR VP ALAN BOUDREAU BOUDREAU PIPELINE ASSOCIATE MEMBER VP MARK HIMMELSTEIN NEWMEYER & DILLION, LLP MEMBER AT LARGE PETER VANEK INTREGAL COMMUNITIES MEMBER AT LARGE SEAN MATSLER COX, CASTLE, & NICHOLSON LLP IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT EPIC NELSON TRUMARK HOMES SR. VICE PRESIDENT, OC CHAPTER ADAM WOOD BIAOC 17192 MURPHY AVE #14445, IRVINE, CA92623 949-553-9500 1 BIAOC.COM site requirement provision. As Tustin looks to spur development, consider the alternative that produces the greatest amount of the desired Inclusionary product. In summation, the best option is to suspend your existing Inclusionary requirements for the proposed 36-month period as a means of eliminating a significant hurdle to development. If for any reason that is not possible, then consider an alternative that maximizes clarity and flexibility. There is no questioning that Inclusionary Zoning and related fee structures are inherently difficult to implement. Policies mandating exactions will inevitably contribute to lost housing opportunity, despite best intentions and efforts. Inclusionary Zoning is an excellent tool for giving the appearance that "something" is being done about housing affordability. The reality of Inclusionary Zoning is that it kills far more homes than it creates, ultimately fueling the growth of California's housing crisis. Thank you for your thoughtful consideration of the points raised above. Sincerely, Adam S. Wood Senior Vice President Building Industry Association of Southern California — Orange County Chapter