HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC MINUTES 2006 09 05
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY COUNCIL
TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA
SEPTEMBER 5, 2006
CALL TO ORDER - 5:01 P.M.
ATTENDANCE
Present: Mayor Doug Davert; Mayor Pro Tem Tracy Worley Hagen;
Councilmembers Jerry Amante, Lou Bone, and Tony Kawashima
Absent: None
City Clerk: Maria R. Huizar, Chief Deputy City Clerk
Others Present: William A. Huston, City Manager and Douglas C. Holland, City
Attorney
PUBLIC INPUT - None
CLOSED SESSION ITEMS
A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL--ANTICIPATED LITIGATION pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956.9 (c), because City is considering whether to
initiate litigation in 1 case.
B. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR pursuant to Government
Code Section 54956.8
Property: 275 Centennial Way, Suites 140 & 140A
Negotiators: Assistant City Manager Christine Shingleton
Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment
RECESS - At 5:01 p.m. City Council recessed to closed session to discuss matters listed
under Closed Session.
RECONVENE - At 7:00 p.m. City Council reconvened in public session.
REGULAR MEETING
CALL TO ORDER - 7:01 p.m.
City Council Meeting
Minutes
September 5,2006
Page 1 of 14
INVOCATION - Father John Block, St. Cecilia's Church
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Mayor Pro Tem Hagen
ROLL CALL
Present: Mayor Doug Davert; Mayor Pro Tem Tracy Worley Hagen;
Councilmembers Jerry Amante, Lou Bone, and Tony Kawashima
Absent: None
City Clerk: Pamela Stoker
Others Present: William A. Huston, City Manager and Douglas C. Holland, City Attorney
CLOSED SESSION REPORT - Nothing to report
PRESENTATION
· Certificate of Recognition presented by Mayor Davert to Tustin Police Officer Shonn Rojas
for dedicated service to the Tustin Police Department's Canine Program and outstanding
handling and adoption of recently retired "Elko"
· Special Thank You certificate presented by Mayor Davert to Linda Indell for
monetary contribution to the Police Department's K-9 Progr am
FIRST PUBLIC INPUT
Audrey Swearengen, Billy Hall, Gary Rolph, Gabriel Canto, Bob Mab, Charles Murphy, Cindy
Murphy, spoke in support of establishing rent stabilization at the Tustin Village Mobile Home
Park
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES FUND (SLESF)
In 1996, AB 3229 established the Citizen's Option for Public Safety (COPS) grant
program. Proceeds from the program can only be used for front line law
enforcement services that may include the purchase of new equipment, hiring of
additional personnel and increasing the opportunity for training of safety
personnel. This year, we have been notified that the Police Department is to
receive no less than $102,000 and no more than $110,000 in SLESF funding. This
year, the allocation for SLESF/COPS grant funds for all law enforcement agencies
is being coordinated through the Orange County Sheriffs Department and all
agencies have been directed to move forward with expenditure authorization while
City Council Meeting
Minutes
September 5,2006
Page 2 of 14
waiting for the final grant amounts to be determined.
We are proposing that this year's entire allocation be used to create a new position
of Crime Analyst and equip this position with related hardware and software. This
bill requires both a public hearing and a special fund established for these monies.
Staff report presentation by Police Chief Scott Jordan.
The public hearing opened at 7:21 p.m. There were no public speakers and the
hearing closed at 7:22 p.m.
Motion: It was moved by Council member Amante, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem
Hagen, to authorize usage of the funds as recommended by the Police
Department. Motion carried 5-0.
2. URBAN AREA SECURITY INITIATIVE (UASI) GRANT
The City of Tustin, acting through the City of Santa Ana Police Department in its
capacity as the Core City for the Santa Ana Urban Area under the FY-05 Urban
Areas Security Initiative, has applied for, received and accepted a federal
homeland security grant. The grant is entitled the "FY05 Urban Areas Security
Initiative." The grant is from the Federal Department of Homeland Security, Office
of Domestic Preparedness, through the State of California Office of Homeland
Security, and is intended to enhance countywide emergency preparedness.
The terms of the grant require that the City of Tustin use certain grant funds for the
hardening of specific identifiable targets within the City of Tustin. The Tustin Police
Department has identified the City Hall/Police Department parking structure as an
area of security concern and recommends the installation of both vehicle and
pedestrian access-controlled gates to control the public access to areas housing
critical equipment and resources, as well as provide a safe and controlled
employee parking area.
Staff report presentation by Police Chief Scott Jordan.
The public hearing opened at 7:24 p.m. There were no public speakers and the
hearing closed at 7:25 p.m.
Motion: It was moved by Councilmember Bone, seconded by Councilmember
Amante, to authorize usage of the funds as recommended by the Police
Department. Motion carried 5-0.
3. CODE AMENDMENT 06-004: OFFICE USE PROVISION
Code Amendment 06-004 would restrict and regulate the installation and
establishment of office uses only to those parcels fronting onto Main Street and EI
City Council Meeting
Minutes
September 5,2006
Page 3 of 14
Camino Real and provide criteria for approving office uses when fronting onto
Main Street and EI Camino Real. On August 14, 2006, the Planning Commission
considered Code Amendment 06-004 and adopted Resolution No. 4032
recommending that the City Council approve Code Amendment 06-004.
Applicant: City of Tustin Community Development Department
Staff report presentation by Community Development Director Elizabeth Binsack:
Background
· Office Use provision was adopted in 1983. The intent and purpose of the office
use provision was to encourage retail establishment on ground floor particularly
in Old Town.
· Code Amendment 02-002 adopted in May 2002 clarified the process and
criteria for considering office uses within C-2 zone.
· On June 14, 2004, and June 26, 2006 the Planning Commission conducted
workshops, discussed issues related to implementation of the Office Use
provision, and provided staff with directions on possible amendments to the
office use provisions.
Current Code Requirements
· An office use is permitted to locate within the C-2 zoning district if:
· the use is located on any floor above the ground floor; and,
· occupies less than fifty (50) percent of the total floor area.
· An office use may also be permitted anywhere in a building where a Conditional
Use Permit was granted.
· An office use can be conditionallv permitted if :
· it is located on the ground floor or in more than fifty (50) percent of the total
floor area of a building; and,
· the Planning Commission determines that the office use would be more
beneficial than a retail establishment.
· These provisions apply to construction of new office buildings and new office
occupancies in existing buildings.
Issues with Current Ordinance
· Location of Office Uses
· While most of the C-2 zoning districts are concentrated in the Old Town Tustin
area, there are a number of properties zoned C-2 located outside of Old Town
Tustin.
· These areas are freestanding developments that are not particularly conducive
to pedestrian activity.
· The majority of inquiries to establish offices on ground floors have been in
areas outside of Old Town Tustin.
· There are a number of properties located in Old Town but do not contribute to
pedestrian activities. These properties do not front onto Main Street or EI
Camino Real.
Configuration of Existing Office Buildings
City Council Meeting
Minutes
September 5,2006
Page 4 of 14
· Some buildings built as office buildings are not configured to accommodate
retailing activity (without traditional retail storefronts).
· While some of these buildings may be easily converted to retail space, some
would require more significant modifications.
Quasi-Office and Incompatible Uses
· Quasi-office uses are classified as either "retail businesses" or "service
businesses" and are outright permitted.
· Types of retail businesses that are outright permitted include a variety of retail
shops as well as real estate offices.
· Examples of service businesses that are permitted include barber shops,
beauty parlors, interior decorators, restaurants, photograph galleries, travel
agencies, telephone answering services, etc.
· There has been some confusion about why certain uses that appear to be
office uses are permitted. In addition, upon studying the office use provision,
the Planning Commission identified uses contained in the C-1 and C-2 District
regulations that are not compatible with the intended retail environment
Proposed Amendment
Permitted Office Uses
· Professional and general offices that are not fronting onto Main Street or EI
Camino Real or located outside the Old Town Commercial General Plan land
use designation would be outright permitted.
Conditionallv Permitted Office Uses
· Professional and general offices that are fronting onto Main Street or EI Camino
Real would be conditionally permitted provided that:
· Professional and general offices proposed at the ground floor level or that are
greater than fifty (50) percent of the total building floor area shall not be
approved unless the approving authority finds, based on supporting
documentation and evidence that an office use would be more compatible with
the existing and planned uses in the vicinity than a retail commercial use on the
subject property and that an office use would be more beneficial in
implementing applicable land use policies such as the Tustin General Plan,
Tustin City Code, and any Tustin Community Redevelopment Agency Project
Area Redevelopment Plan than a retail commercial use on the subject property.
Approval of professional and general office uses shall meet one or more of the
following criterion:
· The proposed use is to be located in an existing building originally designed,
built, and occupied as offices or converted to office use pursuant to an
approved building permit.
· The proposed use is to be located in an existing building that because of its
design and orientation is impractical to modify or alter to accommodate retail
establishments.
· The proposed use is to be located in an existing building requiring significant
reconstruction that is not economically feasible or practical to accommodate
retail establishments.
City Council Meeting
Minutes
September 5, 2006
Page 5 of 14
· The proposed use is to be located in a multi-tenant retail center and is ancillary
but complimentary to the remaining mixed uses with respect to type of use,
hours of operation, convenience, and parking demand.
· The proposed use is determined to be beneficial, complementary, and
compatible with surrounding neighborhood and nearby retail establishments.
Proposed Amendment
The following uses are proposed to be removed from the district regulations:
· Business School
· Interior Decorator
· Job Printing
· Telephone Answering Service
· Typing and Addressing Service
Proposed Amendment
Approvinq Authoritv
· Section 9299.b(3)(k) of the Tustin City Code would be added to authorize the
Zoning Administrator to approve, conditionally approve, or deny a Conditional
Use Permit application for professional and general office uses fronting onto
Main Street and EI Camino Real.
· In addition, Section 9232a and Section 9233a of the Tustin City Code would be
amended to authorize the Community Development Director and/or the
Planning Commission to determine if certain unlisted uses are considered to be
similar to those listed uses and would be allowed in the commercial districts.
Recommendation
· Staff recommends that the City Council conduct a public hearing; introduce and
have the first reading of Ordinance No. 1317 approving Code Amendment 06-
004; and, set for second reading at the Council's next scheduled meeting.
The public hearing opened at 7:31 p.m. There were no public speakers and the
hearing closed at 7:32 p.m.
Motion: It was moved by Mayor Pro Tern Hagen, seconded by Councilmember
Kawasima, to introduce and have first reading by title only of the following ordinance:
ORDINANCE NO. 1317 - An ordinance of the City Council of the City of
Tustin, California, approving Code Amendment 06-004 amending the Tustin
City Code relating to Office Use Provisions within Commercial Districts
Motion carried 5-0.
4. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF MINOR ADJUSTMENT 06-
001 (2650 DAVIS DRIVE, PRESIDIO TRACT)
On July 10, 2006, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 4029,
denying Minor Adjustment 06-001 to authorize the height extension up to twenty
City Council Meeting
Minutes
September 5,2006
Page 6 of 14
percent (200/0) above the maximum permitted height of the perimeter fence around
the Presidio Tract pool located at 2650 Davis Drive. The Planning Commission
found that the applicant did not provide the necessary findings to approve a minor
adjustment. On July 17, 2006, the applicant appealed the Planning Commission's
decision.
Applicant/Appellant: John Tkach, President Presidio HOA
Staff report presentation by Community Development Director Elizabeth Binsack:
Background
· The Presidio Tract Home Owner's Association (HOA) operates and maintains
the common area pool within the community.
· In response to repeated trespassing and vandalism complaints, the HOA has
increased the height of the existing perimeter pool fence above the maximum
allowable height limitations in the zoning district without the benefit of permits.
· The HOA is now requesting to permit the fence extension with a minor
adjustment which would allow for a fence height extension of not more than
20%.
Minor Adjustment
· California Government Code Section 65906 and the Tustin City Code require
the City to make two positive findings to approve a minor adjustment.
· There would need to be a special circumstance unique to the land based on
hardship where the strict literal interpretation of the zoning code deprives the
property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the area.
· It must also be determined that any granting of a minor adjustment would not
constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations placed on
other properties in the area.
Findings
· The applicant has identified trespassing as the major justification for the fence
height extension, however the Tustin Police Department has no records of
police reports filed at the subject address.
· Various residents of the Presidio Community are in opposition of the fence
height extension and have submitted complaints to the City's Code
Enforcement Division.
· The proposed minor adjustment does not identify any special circumstance
unique to the site based on hardship. The varying topography of the site is not
a special circumstance since the height of the fence is measured from grade
level and would allow for the same height limitations as flat land.
· The project site is not deprived of any of the privileges enjoyed by other
properties in the vicinity and a granting of the minor adjustment would
constitute a special privilege. Surrounding properties experience the same
limitations and will have to comply with the zoning code.
Planning Commission Meeting
· On July 10, 2006, the City of Tustin Planning Commission adopted Resolution
City Council Meeting
Minutes
September 5, 2006
Page 7 of 14
No. 4029 denying Minor Adjustment 06-001. The Planning Commission came
to this conclusion upon consideration of the staff report and after reviewing
public testimony from the applicant and other members of the audience.
Then on July 17, 2006 the Planning Commission's decision was appealed by the
applicant.
Recommendation
· Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 06-109 upholding
the Planning Commission's action denying Minor Adjustment 06-001 to extend
the height of an existing perimeter pool fence located in the Presidio Tract at
2650 Davis Drive by up to 200/0 above the maximum allowable height.
The public hearing opened at 7:36 p.m. The following people spoke in support of
Minor Adjustment: John Tkach, Dr. Lynda Randall, Frank Lindquist, and Bob
Stock. Council discussion ensued.
The hearing closed at 7:50 p.m.
Motion: It was moved by Councilmember Bone, seconded by Councilmember
Amante, to adopt resolution. Motion carried 5-0.
RESOLUTION NO. 06-109 - A resolution of the City Council of the City of
Tustin, denying Minor Adjustment 06-001 to authorize the height extension
up to twenty percent above the maximum permitted height of the perimeter
fence around the Presidio Tract Pool located at 2650 Davis Drive
5. ORDERING THE VACATION AND ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION OF
PREBLE DRIVE BETWEEN EAST MAIN STREET AND EAST THIRD STREET
Order the vacation and abandonment of a portion of Preble Drive between East
Main Street and East Third Street. This portion of Preble Drive is necessary to
construct the Tustin Library Project.
The public hearing opened at 7:58 p.m. There were no public speakers and the
hearing closed at 7:58 p.m.
Motion: It was moved by Councilmember Amante, seconded by Councilmember
Bone, to adopt resolution. Motion carried 5-0.
RESOLUTION NO. 06-102 - A resolution of the City Council of the City of
Tustin, California, ordering the Vacation and Abandonment of a portion of
Preble Drive between East Main Street and East Third Street
CONSENT CALENDAR - Mayor Davert pulled item 17, and Councilmember Amante pulled
item 19 for separate discussion. It was moved by Councilmember Amante, seconded by
City Council Meeting
Minutes
September 5, 2006
Page 8 of 14
Mayor Pro Tem Hagen, to approve items 6 through 16, and 18, and 20 through 24. Motion
carried 5-0.
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: SPECIAL AND REGULAR MEETING MINUTES OF
AUGUST 7,2006 AND SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF AUGUST 22,2006
Motion: Approve the Special and Regular Meeting Minutes of August 7, 2006 and
Special Meeting Minutes of August 22, 2006.
7. APPROVAL OF DEMANDS AND RATIFICATION OF PAYROLL
Motion: Approve Demands in the amounts of $1,148,607.22; $1,796,023.57;
$2,276,104.91; $3,022,883.73; and Payroll in the amount of $604,856.87;
$584,392.51; and $598,453.46.
8. PLANNING ACTION AGENDA - AUGUST 14 AND 28,2006
All actions of the Planning Commission become final unless appealed by the City
Councilor member of the public.
Motion: Ratify the Planning Commission Action Agendas of August 14 and 28, 2006.
9. REVISION TO THE CITY'S CLASSIFICATION & COMPENSATION PLAN
Motion: Approve the addition of one full-time position in the classification of
Communications Manager and add this position to the Classification and
Compensation plan.
10. AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF DESIGNATED CITY RECORDS -
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Motion: Adopt resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. 06-103 - A resolution of the City Council of the City of
Tustin, California, authorizing the destruction of certain city records and
papers in the possession of the Finance Department of the City of Tustin no
longer required for the conduct of city business, pursuant to the authority
granted by the City of Tustin Records Retention Schedule
11. CONSIDERATION OF CLAIM OF BRITT JOHANSSON, CLAIM NO. 06-14
Motion: That the City Council deny Claim Number 06-14, Britt Johansson, and
direct Staff to send notice thereof to the Claimant.
City Council Meeting
Minutes
September 5,2006
Page 9 of 14
12. CONSIDERATION OF CLAIM OF ERUM KOLSY, CLAIM NO. 06-24
Motion: That the City Council deny Claim Number 06-24, Erum Kolsy, and direct
Staff to send notice thereof to the Claimant.
13. CONSIDERATION OF CLAIM OF DIANNA LYNN PERRONE, CLAIM NO. 06-18
Motion: That the City Council deny Claim Number 06-18, Dianna Lynn Perrone,
and direct Staff to send notice thereof to the Claimant.
14. CONSIDERATION OF CLAIM OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON, CLAIM
NO. 06-23
Motion: That the City Council deny Claim Number 06-23, Southern California
Edison, and direct Staff to send notice thereof to the Claimant.
15. CONSIDERATION OF CLAIM OF FRAN STRICKLIN, CLAIM NO. 06-16
Motion: That the City Council deny Claim Number 06-16, Fran Stricklin, and direct
Staff to send notice thereof to the Claimant.
16. CONSIDERATION OF CLAIM OF LEGAL EASE, INC., CLAIM NO. 06-21
Motion: That the City Council deny Claim Number 06-21, Legal Ease, Inc., and
direct Staff to send notice thereof to the Claimant.
17. DONATION OF SURPLUS POLICE EQUIPMENT - GOLDEN WEST COLLEGE
FOUNDATION
Presentation by Chief of Academy Ron Lowenberg.
Motion: It was moved by Councilmember Amante, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem
Hagen, to authorize donation of one (1) surplus Tustin Police Unit to the Golden
West College Foundation for use at the Criminal Justice Training Center / Police
Academy.
18. JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT (JAG) PROGRAM
On April 17, 2006, the Tustin City Council approved the acceptance of funding for
the 2006 Byrne Justice Assistance Grant program. The Police Department
City Council Meeting
Minutes
September 5, 2006
Page 10 of 14
purchased Motorola radios. The purchase of the radios has been completed and
paid for by the City of Tustin.
The County of Orange, which oversees the administration of this grant is holding
these funds in trust. Administrative requirements of the grant now require the City
of Tustin to authorize the County to release the balance of the funds to pay for the
Motorola radio purchase.
Motion: Authorize reimbursement from the County of Orange to the City of Tustin
for the purchase of Motorola radios, and authorize the Chief of Police to sign any
grant related paperwork on behalf of the City.
Councilmember Amante applauded efforts to buy American made products.
Motion: It was moved by Councilmember Amante, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem
Hagen, to authorize the purchase of two (2) 2007 Harley Davidson FLHTP Police
Motorcycles from Laidlaws Harley Davidson in Baldwin Park, CA in the amount of
$40,934.22 (including tax). Motion carried 5-0.
20. LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 2006-08: 14001 NEWPORT AVENUE AND 750 EL
CAMINO REAL (MAKENA GREAT AMERICAN NEWPORT COMPAr'-JY, LLC.
AND TUSTIN MOTOR LODGE)
The proposed lot line adjustment is being requested by Makena Great American
Newport Company, LLC and the Tustin Motor Lodge to move existing lot lines to
adjust the size of two separate parcels for development purposes.
Motion: Adopt resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. 06-104 - A resolution of the City Council of the City of
Tustin, California, approving Lot Line Adjustment No. 2006-08
21. APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZATION TO
ADVERTISE FOR BIDS FOR ANNUAL LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
SERVICES FOR THE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT AREAS (DECEMBER 1, 2006 -
JUNE 30, 2007)
Motion: Adopt resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. 06-87 - A resolution of the City Council of the City of
Tustin, California approving Plans and Specifications for the Annual
Landscape Maintenance Services for the Assessment District Areas from
December 1,2006 - June 30, 2007, and authorizing advertisement for bids
City Council Meeting
Minutes
September 5,2006
Page 11 of 14
22. APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZATION TO
ADVERTISE FOR BIDS FOR ANNUAL LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
SERVICES FOR THE GENERAL FUND AREAS (DECEMBER 1, 2006 - JUNE 30,
2007)
Motion: Adopt resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. 06-107 - A resolution of the City Council of the City of
Tustin, California approving Plans and Specifications for the Annual
Landscape Maintenance Services for the General Fund Areas from
December 1, 2006 - June 30, 2007, and authorizing advertisement for bids
23. VEHICLE PURCHASE - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Report on the purchase of a vehicle for the Redevelopment Agency in accordance
with City Code Section 1624.
Motion: Receive and file report.
24. AUTHORIZATION FOR THE STATE TO PURCHASE ONE EXTRA CAB PICKUP
TRUCK - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Motion: Adopt resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. 06-108 - A resolution of the City Council of the City of
Tustin, California authorizing the Department of General Services of the
State of California to purchase certain items
REGULAR BUSINESS
25. ORDINANCE NO. 1314 SECOND READING: CODE AMENDMENT 06-003
RELATED TO LOT LINE ADJUSTMENTS
Motion: It was moved by Councilmember Bone, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem
Hagen, to have second reading by title only and adoption of Ordinance No. 1314
(roll call vote).
ORDINANCE NO. 1314 - An ordinance of the City Council of the City of
Tustin, California, approving Code Amendment 06-003 amending Tustin
City Code Section 9322 relating to Lot Line Adjustment Regulations
Motion carried 5-0.
City Council Meeting
Minutes
September 5, 2006
Page 12 of 14
26. AGREEMENT WITH PACIFIC BELL D.B.A. AT&T CALIFORNIA REGARDING
VIDEO SERVICES (PROJECT L1GHTSPEED)
Motion: Item withdrawn by AT&T.
27. CONSIDERATION OF SOLICITING REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS TO DEVELOP
A CITY WIDE WIRELESS MASTER PLAN FOR CELL PHONE TOWERS AND
COVERAGE
The City recently received a proposal to conduct a wireless master plan for cell
phone towers and facilities on City owned land and rights-of-way. The primary
purpose of soliciting proposals for a City wide cellular tower master plan would be
to develop a uniform approach on the visual impact of cell phone towers and how
these facilities can best be integrated into our City.
Council discussion ensued.
Council directed staff to go forth with soliciting requests for proposals. City
Manger Huston indicated staff would also research negotiable fees.
28. REQUIREMENTS TO ADOPT EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT POLICIES;
ETHICS TRAINING; COMPENSATION FOR SERVICE (AB1234)
Continued consideration of item to next regularly scheduled meeting of the City
Council.
29. CITY COUNCIL - LEGISLATIVE UPDATES
Councilmember Bone discussed AB2987 Telecommunications Bill .
SECOND PUBLIC INPUT - Billy Hall stated that the American Legion will be hosting Veteran's
Day Stationary Parade on Sunday, November 12, 2006, invited community to attend planning
meeting on September 14th at 4pm in the Senior Center.
William Riess, requested assistance with overgrown vegetation on property at Quint and
Mitchell.
Anna Marie, Tustin Village Mobile Home owner, spoke on rising costs to lease land.
OTHER BUSINESS I COMMITTEE REPORTS
Councilmember Amante:
City Council Meeting
Minutes
September 5,2006
Page 13 of 14
· Congratulated Police Chief Jordan on Community Policing as well as Officers recently
promoted; and
· Reminded community of 5th anniversary of September 11 terrorist attacks next Monday.
Councilmember Kawashima:
· Attended meeting where ProLogis CEO discussed top priority of company which is energy
efficiency.
Councilmember Bone:
· Orange County Council of Governments separated from Orange County League of Cities;
· Tustin Sports Park parking issue caused by apartment tenants; and
· Requested Police monitor vehicles driving onto park.
Mayor Pro Tem Hagen:
· Will be attending League of Conference in San Diego;
· Recently visited Denver, beautiful renovation of downtown area with public art displays and
hybrid buses; and
· Son Dane and partner Casey won State Beach Volleyball Championships.
Mayor Davert:
· Attended August 20th CHOC Ride at Tustin Legacy;
· Engaged in discussion with Airport Working Group on increased air traffic, noise and
pollution;
· Attended Senior Citizen's Picnic last week;
· Mentioned possibly forming task force to discuss on-street parking issues;
· Welcomed new Tustin School Superintendent Dick Gray; and
· Adjourned in memory of Patti Eby and Maureen Layton.
ADJOURNMENT - 8:48 p.m. - The next regular meeting of the City Council is scheduled for
September 18, 2006 at 5:30 p.m. for Closed Session and 7:00 p.m. for the Regular Meeting
in the Council Chamber, 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, California
Adjourn in memory of
Maureen Layton
and
Patti Eby
DOUG DAVERT
Mayor
PAMELA STOKER
City Clerk
City Council Meeting
Minutes
September 5,2006
Page 14 of 14