Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02 HOUSING ELEMENT REZONE PROJECT AGENDA REPORT ITEM #2 AGENDA REPORT MEETING DATE: SEPTEMBER 24, 2024 TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: HOUSING ELEMENT REZONE PROJECT IMPLEMENTING PROGRAMS 1.1A, 1.1 B, AND 1.1 F OF THE 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN SUMMARY: The Housing Element Rezone Project is a City-initiated proposal to increase the number of properties in the City that are zoned for residential development, pursuant to the programs within the City's adopted General Plan Housing Element. The rezone project is needed to bring the City into compliance with its housing obligations. As mandated by the State's Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA), the City must be able to accommodate the construction of 6,782 dwelling units on vacant or underutilized properties that are zoned for residential use. The City's current zoning can only accommodate 2,992 new dwellings, resulting in a shortfall of 3,790 units. The City's Housing Element contains an Implementation Program to resolve the shortfall. Specifically, programs 1.1(a), 1.1(b) and 1.1(f) of the Housing Implementation Program outline the steps needed to meet the City's obligations. This includes increasing the development capacity within the Tustin Legacy area and rezoning the commercial property in the Enderle Center and Tustin Market Place. The proposed rezone project will require multiple actions by the City Council, including amendments to the General Plan Land Use Element, Tustin Legacy Specific Plan, East Tustin Specific Plan, Zoning Code and the City's Zoning Map. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been prepared for each of the three Rezone Project locations, in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)Article 6 of California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3. Planning Commission Agenda Report Housing Element Rezone Project September 24, 2024 Page 2 PROJECT SITES: (A) TUSTIN LEGACY SPECIFIC PLAN (TLSP) — HOUSING ELEMENT SITES 1A, 1113 & 2 GENERAL PLAN: TUSTIN LEGACY SPECIFIC PLAN (TLSP) CURRENT ZONING: TUSTIN LEGACY SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-1), NEIGHBORHOODS D AND G PROPERTY OWNER: CITY OF TUSTIN 300 CENTENNIAL WAY TUSTIN, CA 92780 (B) ENDERLE CENTER— HOUSING ELEMENT SITE 17 GENERAL PLAN: PLANNED COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL/BUSINESS (PCCB) CURRENT ZONING: PLANNED COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (PC COM) PROPERTY OWNER: EMS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 14081 YORBA STREET TUSTIN, CA 92780-2010 (C) THE MARKET PLACE — HOUSING ELEMENT SITE 18 GENERAL PLAN: PLANNED COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL/BUSINESS (PCCB) CURRENT ZONING: EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN MIXED-USE (SP-8-MU) PROPERTY OWNER: THE IRVINE COMPANY 500 NEWPORT CENTER DRIVE NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission adopt the following resolutions, all of which recommend that the City Council approve the applications necessary to implement Housing Element Program 1.1 and meet the City's RHNA obligation: Tustin Legacy — Sites 1A, 1 B and 2 1. Adopt Resolution No. 4494, recommending that the City Council find the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for Tustin Legacy Specific Plan (TLSP) Amendment 2024-0002 is adequate. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 4495, recommending that the City Council adopt Ordinance No. 1547 for Specific Plan Amendment (SPA) 2024-0002 to allow for additional high density residential development on three sites in the TLSP, Housing Element Sites 1 a, 1 b, and 2, with a minimum density of 20 units per acre (du/acre) on the selected sites. Amendment to the TLSP would to be consistent with existing State housing law, including the provision for State density bonus. Planning Commission Agenda Report Housing Element Rezone Project September 24, 2024 Page 3 Enderle Center— Site 17 3. Adopt Resolution No. 4496, recommending that the City Council find the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for General Plan Amendment (GPA) 2024-0001, Code Amendment (CA) 2024-0003, and Zone Change (ZC) 2024-0001 is adequate. 4. Adopt Resolution No. 4498, recommending that the City Council adopt Ordinance No. 1549 for CA 2024-0003 to establish a Housing Overlay (HO) district (overlay zone) in conjunction with the planned community commercial district (base zone) to implement the housing implementation program of the 6th Cycle 2021-2029 housing element of the general plan. 5. Adopt Resolution No. 4499, recommending that the City Council adopt Ordinance No. 1550 for ZC 2024-0001 to amend the City's zoning map to apply the Housing Overlay (HO) district to the Enderle Center Rezone Project area. Tustin Market Place — Site 18 6. Adopt Resolution No. 4500, recommending that the City Council find the FEIR for GPA 2024-0001 and East Tustin Specific Plan (ETSP)Amendment 2024-0001 is adequate. 7. Adopt Resolution No. 4501, recommending that the City Council adopt Ordinance No. 1551 for SPA 2024-0001 to accommodate residential development on 18 acres of the Market Place Rezone Project site and create a new high density residential land use category to implement the Housing Implementation Program of the 6th Cycle Housing Element of the General Plan. General Plan Consistency (Enderle Center & Market Place) 8. Adopt Resolution No. 4497, recommending that the City Council adopt Ordinance No. 1548 for GPA 2024-0001 for minor text amendments to ensure consistency with the proposed ZC 2024-0001 (Housing Element Site 17 - Enderle Center) and SPA 2024- 0001 (Housing Element Site 18 — Market Place). APPROVAL AUTHORITY: The following identifies the legislative authority for the City to adopt the proposed Housing Element Rezone Project. California Government Code Section 65300 requires each city to prepare and adopt a comprehensive, long-term general plan for the physical development of the city; and Government Code Section 65800 authorizes cities to adopt zoning regulations. Pursuant to Government Code Sections 65353 through 65355, the City shall adopt and amend a General Plan as follows: Planning Commission Agenda Report Housing Element Rezone Project September 24, 2024 Page 4 • The Planning Commission shall hold at least one public hearing before approving a recommendation on the amendment to the General Plan. • The Planning Commission shall make a written recommendation on an amendment to the General Plan. A recommendation for approval shall be made by affirmative vote of not less than a majority of the total membership of the Commission. The Planning Commission shall send its recommendation to the legislative body (the City Council). • The City Council shall hold at least one public hearing prior to amending a General Plan. A General Plan shall be amended by resolution upon an affirmative vote of no less than a majority of the affirmative vote of total membership of the legislative body. Government Code Section 65453 requires that a SPA be prepared, adopted and amended in the same manner as a general plan, except that a specific plan may be adopted by resolution or ordinance. Consistent with the Government Code, Tustin City Code (TCC) Section 9295f authorizes the Planning Commission to make a recommendation to the City Council on a proposed GPA, SPA, CA, and ZC. Such amendments may be initiated by the City in accordance with TCC Section 9295. If approved, the Ordinance would go into effect 30 days following adoption by the Tustin City Council. BACKGROUND: The City's 2021-2029 6th Cycle Housing Element of the General Plan (Housing Element) was certified by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) on September 12, 2022, and subsequently adopted by the City Council in October 2022. The Housing Element contains the goals and policies the City intends to implement to address housing-related issues. Prior to its certification by the State and adoption by the City Council, the Housing Element underwent a multi-year preparation effort, which included two public workshops (November 20, 2020 and May 11, 2021), and the creation of a Community Engagement Plan that included a community online survey, social media posts, social media paid advertising, newspaper advertisements, and mailings to all City residents and stakeholders. The City also held City Council meetings on August 17, 2021 and September 7, 2021, which provided additional opportunities for public input. At the August 17, 2021 meeting the City Council, based on public comments, added two additional housing sites (Enderle Center and Market Place)to the City's Sites Inventory; and on September 7, 2021 the City Council confirmed the revision to the Sites Inventory and subsequent allocation of units within the different planning areas, based upon comments from HCD. The Housing Element sets forth a Housing Implementation Program that provides for specific actions to achieve the City's housing goals and policies. The Implementation Planning Commission Agenda Report Housing Element Rezone Project September 24, 2024 Page 5 Program describes specific actions (programs) that will be undertaken during the planning period. A significant consideration within the City's Housing Element is the City's obligation under State Housing Law to accommodate its fair share of regional housing over an eight year period (2021-2029). The fair share of housing is not only a total number of units, but also a distribution of units among four household incomes levels (very low, low, moderate and above moderate incomes). Known as the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA), the fair share of housing for the region is determined by the State, and the State's determination is distributed by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) to each of the 197 jurisdictions within the region. For the 2021-2029 planning period, the City of Tustin was allocated 6,782 total housing units. This represents the number of new housing units that the City needs to accommodate during the planning period. To meet this obligation, the City's Housing Element includes a city-wide evaluation of available vacant and underutilized land that is zoned for residential development and can accommodate new housing. This evaluation of sites is reflected in the Housing Element's "Sites Inventory" (Housing Element Appendix B, Table B-2). Currently, the City's capacity for new development is only 2,992 dwelling units. As a result, the Housing Element identifies sites with vacant and underutilized land that can be rezoned to meet the 3,790 units shortfall. Additionally, because the City is obligated to continuously maintain its RHNA obligation, the Housing Element proposes an additional 1,356 units that will serve as a "buffer", in case Site Inventory properties are developed below their capacity, or with less units than those allocated by income category. The rezoning of sites to meet the City's RHNA obligation is covered in Housing Element Implementation Programs 1.1(a), 1.1(b) and 1.1(f). These programs are summarized as follows.. • Program 1.1(a) — Requires the rezoning of properties identified within General Plan Housing Element Appendix B, Table B-2 (Site Inventory Assessment) to accommodate additional residential development within the TLSP. Development standards will allow no less than 30 dwelling units per acre and requires a minimum density of 20 units per acre for development. • Program 1.1(b) — Utilizes Planned Community Districts, Overlay Districts, and/or Specific Plan amendments to facilitate mixed-use developments, to encourage the development of new affordable ownership and rental housing. • Program 1.1(f) — Add a residential overlay zone and amend the General Plan for "rezone" properties identified in General Plan Housing Element Appendix B, Table B- 2 (Site Inventory Assessment), including the Enderle Center and Market Place. Development standards will allow no less than 30 dwelling units per acre and requires a minimum density of 20 units per acre for development. The 2021-2029 Housing Element states that the City will implement rezoning programs 1.1(a), 1.1(b) and 1.1(f) by October 2024. Failure to implement the rezoning by the deadlines in the Housing Element, or timelines established by State housing law, could Planning Commission Agenda Report Housing Element Rezone Project September 24, 2024 Page 6 result in a decertification of the Housing Element. Decertification could subject the City to lawsuits from private parties and housing advocates. More importantly, a decertification of the Housing Element would suspend the City authority to apply zoning regulations upon housing developers and would disqualify the City from obtaining a number of State grants. DISCUSSION: Project Summary To implement Rezone Program 1.1, as specified in the City's 2021-2029 Housing Element, and to accommodate the RHNA allocation, the City has prepared draft revisions to the TLSP, The East Tustin Specific Plan, and Tustin's Zoning Code. These revisions accommodate additional housing capacity in three areas of the City. Specifically, these revisions will authorize additional housing capacity in Neighborhoods D and G of the Tustin Legacy area; add a High Density Residential (HDR) zone at the Tustin Market Place's existing parking lot; and apply a new Housing Overlay (HO) district to the Enderle Center. The City is also proposing an amendment to the General Plan's Land Use Element to clarify that additional density is permitted in PCCB land use designations, to ensure the rezoning of The Market Place and Enderle Center are consistent with the General Plan. The following provides additional details on the three areas that are to be rezoned. • Tustin Legacy: The Tustin Legacy (Housing Element Sites 1 A, 1 B and 2) is identified by Housing Element Program 1.1(a) as having its residential capacity increased in Neighborhoods D South, D North, and G. To accommodate State Housing Law (RHNA), the rezoning program adds a total of 855 additional residential units to these three neighborhoods. The Housing Element also included 1,356 buffer units, which are intended to accommodate Housing Element sites that get developed with less than their specified capacity. Therefore, the total number of dwelling units to be added to the TLSP under the rezoning program is 2,211 (885 RHNA + 1,356 buffer). No development is proposed as part of the City's proposal. A SPA is required to increase the capacity of housing in neighborhoods G and D. Table 1 provides a comparison between approved specific plan and proposed amendment. The amendment also includes minor revisions to the specific plan to resolve known ambiguities, which are not Housing Element related. Exhibit 4B provides redlined changes to the TLSP. Planning Commission Agenda Report Housing Element Rezone Project September 24, 2024 Page 7 Table 1 — Specific Plan Amendment Summary Neighborhood Existing Proposed Buffer Revised Remaining SPA Units Remaining Capacity (20% of Capacity RHNA) with SPA D North 0 555 Units 1,356 Units 1,911 Units D South 896 Units 100 Units 996 Units G 2,029 Units 200 Units 2,229 Units TOTAL UNIT 2,925 Units 2,211 Units 5,136 Units • Enderle Center: The Enderle Center (Housing Element Site 17) is identified by Housing Element Program 1.1(f) as a location that will allow high density residential/mixed-use development. The Enderle Center consists of approximately 11.80 acres of privately-owned property, currently developed as a commercial center and office uses. Of the site area, at least seven (7) acres are currently paved parking areas, and have been identified as suitable for housing development. The Rezoning Program requires a General Plan Amendment (GPA) to establish that higher density residential uses are allowed in the Planned Community Commercial Business (PCCB) land use designation when prescribed by a Housing Overlay (HO) district or a Specific Plan (SP); a Code Amendment (CA) to create Section 9253, establishing a Housing Overlay District (overlay zone) in conjunction with the Planned Community Commercial Districts (base zone); and a Zone Change (ZC) to amend the City's zoning map to apply a Housing Overlay (HO) district to the Project site. Based on the proposed overlay zone, redevelopment of up to seven (7) acres of the site would accommodate up to 413 housing units. No development is proposed as part of the City's proposal. • The Market Place: The Tustin Market Place (Housing Element Site 18) is identified under Housing Element Program 1.1(b) and 1.1(f) as being rezoned to allow for high density residential development. The Market Place is an approximate 76.9-acre shopping center, and 18 acres of the site, currently used as surface parking, have been identified as being suitable for housing development. Per the adopted City General Plan 2021-2029 Housing Element, redevelopment of up to 18 acres would accommodate up to 900 housing units. The Rezoning Program requires a GPA to establish that higher density residential uses are allowed in the PCCB land use designation when prescribed by a HO district or a SP. It also requires a SPA to identify "High Density Residential" as a new residential density category available within the plan. Additionally, the SPA would Planning Commission Agenda Report Housing Element Rezone Project September 24, 2024 Page 8 identify "High Density Residential" as an allowable use within Sector 12 of the ETSP. Exhibit 11 B provides redlined changes to the ETSP. No development is proposed as part of the City's proposal. Consistency with the Housing Element of the Tustin General Plan The Housing Element Rezone Project is consistent with the City's General Plan, including the Housing Element, by addressing the regional housing needs and ensuring the provision of diverse housing types. This project aligns with the General Plan's vision of balanced land use and community development. Specifically, it supports the following Housing Element goals and policies: • Goal 1: Provide for a well balanced land use pattern that accommodates existing and future needs for housing, commercial and industrial land, open space and community facilities and services, while maintaining a healthy, diversified economy adequate to provide future City services. o Policy 1.3: Facilitate the development of vacant and underutilized freeway parcels with commercial uses where appropriate and compatible with surrounding uses to capitalize on their freeway access and visibility. o Policy 1.5: Encourage compatible and complementary infill of previously by- passed parcels in areas already predominately developed. o Policy 1.6: Ensure an adequate supply of commercial and industrial land within the City of Tustin for potential commercial and industrial expansion and development. o Policy 1.7: As part of the City's attraction to business and industry, provide adequate sites to house future employees. o Policy 1.10: Ensure that the distribution and intensity of land uses are consistent with the Land Use Plan and classification system. • Goal 2: Ensure that future land use decisions are the result of sound and comprehensive planning. o Policy 2.2: Maintain consistency between the Land Use Element, Zoning Ordinances, and other City ordinances, regulations and standards. Development Applications To implement the proposed Housing Element Rezone Project, formal applications have been filed by the City, for approval by the City Council. The following summarizes the individual applications: Planning Commission Agenda Report Housing Element Rezone Project September 24, 2024 Page 9 • General Plan Amendment 2024-0001 General Plan Amendment (GPA) 2024-0001 proposes to establish that higher density residential uses are allowed in the Planned Community Commercial/Business (PCCB) land use designation when prescribed by a housing overlay or a specific plan. Exhibit 7B provides redlined changes to the General Plan. • Code Amendment 2024-0003 Code Amendment (CA) 2024-0003 proposes to establish a Housing Overlay (HO) District (overlay zone) in conjunction with the planned community commercial district (base zone) to implement the housing implementation program of the 6t" Cycle 2021- 2029 Housing Element of the General Plan. Exhibit 7B provides redlined changes to Chapter 2 of Article 9 of the Tustin City Code (TCC). • Zone Change 2024-0001 Zone Change (ZC) 2024-0001 proposes to amend the City's zoning map to apply the Housing Overlay (HO) District to the Enderle Center. Exhibit 8A identifies existing and proposed zoning for the Enderle Center, and associated development standards. The zoning and development standards are also shown in Figure 1 , Table 3 and Table 4 below. Figure 1 — Existing and Proposed Zoning, Enderle Center t PC 1 ! Y Pr: • S b ---------------- V. PCR1 Existing Zoning — PC COM Proposed Zoning — PC COM & HO Planning Commission Agenda Report Housing Element Rezone Project September 24, 2024 Page 10 Table 3 — Enderle Center HO Development Standards TYPE MIN. MAX. Site Lot Size— Residential & Mixed-Use None None Lot Width 35 sf None Density Residential Density 20 du/ac None Dwelling Units 0 413 Housing Development Area 0 7 ac Building Height Single & Multi-Family Residential None 75 ft Mixed-Use 2 stories 75 ft Building Setback Seventeenth Street loft None Yorba Street loft None Local Road loft None Private Street or Drive 5 ft None Alley 3 ft None Rear Yard' 10 ft5 None Interior Side Yard 3 ft6 None Landscape Setback' Seventeenth Street loft None Yorba Street loft None Local Road 5 ft None Private Street or Drive 5 ft None Applies only to single family detached dwelling units,attached dwelling units,and duplexes. z Interior side yard setbacks shall maintain an aggregate 10 feet distance between buildings 3 Minimum landscaped areas are required within building setback areas.Building setbacks from streets are measured from back of rights-of-way. Planning Commission Agenda Report Housing Element Rezone Project September 24, 2024 Page 11 Table 4 — Enderle Center HO Open Space Standards TYPE STANDARD PROVISIONS Private Private open space shall be provided at a minimum depth of four 5 100 sf per unit feet in the form of balconies, patios, or other similar private open space acceptable to the Community Development Director. Shared facilities designated as recreational areas. May include Common 300 sf per unit pedestrian paths, common area balconies, common area rooftop L- decks, recreation buildings, etc. • Specific Plan Amendment 2024-0001 — East Tustin Specific Plan Amendment (SPA) 2024-0001 proposes to identify "High Density Residential' (HDR) as a new residential density category available within the East Tustin Specific Plan (ETSP), and to rezone a portion of The Market Place Shopping Center as HDR to accommodate the development of high density residential. Exhibit 11 B provides redlined changes to the ETSP. Figure 2 below reflects the areas of The Market Place that will be rezoned to HDR. Figure 2 — High Density Residential Zone, Tustin Market Place T • i I I' f M Ay° a .r[' 500.491.45 lit r 51 a Q 2024 CEQA Sludy Area Parcel Boundary Hieh Qensdy Residential(NOR(Zone C a Private attached ground level patios may be credited if open on three sides.Areas not available for open space credit include all streets,driveways, landscaped building setback areas,and parking lots. Private open space may include balconies,patios,courtyards,roof decks,etc. Planning Commission Agenda Report Housing Element Rezone Project September 24, 2024 Page 12 • Specific Plan Amendment 2024-0002 —Tustin Legacy SPA 2024-0002 proposes to amend Neighborhood D South, D North, and G to increase the allowed residential capacity, to be consistent with the certified Housing Element. Exhibit 4B provides redlined changes to the TLSP. To accommodate specific requirements within Government Code Section 65583.2(h) and HE Program 1.1, which requires a percentage of the City's rezoning sites to be zoned exclusively for residential use, the City has identified two parcels in the TLSP area that would accommodate the State requirement, in conjunction with the rezoning of the 18 acres in The Tustin Market Place. These parcels are reflected in Exhibit 4B redline changes and are shown in Figure 3 below. Figure 3 — High Density Residential, Tustin Legacy i -`� = LEGEND High Density Residential Only Parcel Lines(2024) AR 4AIFMd111YEM4F 430381 91 YAIENCIA,RI�I�" 430381 41 APO :JI PA 81 13A 14 F i e 4 __ i Planning Commission Agenda Report Housing Element Rezone Project September 24, 2024 Page 13 Native American Tribal Consultation Pursuant to California Government Code Sections 65352.3 and 65352.4 (Senate Bill 18) and Public Resources Code Section 21080.3.1 (Assembly Bill 52), the City followed the statutory Native American Tribal Consultation requirements by obtaining a tribal consultation list from the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) and notifying representatives of the 15 identified Native American Tribes of proposed rezoning, including the TLSP Amendment (SPA 2022-0001), Enderle Center Rezone Project (GPA 2024-0001, CA 2024-0003 and ZC 2024-0001), and The Market Place Rezone Project (GPA 2024-0001 and SPA 2024-0002). The City circulated letters, via certified mail, on August 28, 2023 to request comments and input on the proposed project and the potential effect to Tribal and Cultural Resources. The City had received one request for consultation from the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians - Kizh Nation. As a result of the consultation, Mitigation Measures have been included in the Environmental Impact Reports to require the monitoring of future ground disturbing activities by a Native American monitor, and that future developers follow specified procedures should Native American remains and objects be discovered. The drafted Mitigation Measures have been provided to the Kizh Nation, and no concerns have been expressed at the time of this staff report's preparation. PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE: A one-eighth (1/8) page public notice was published in the Tustin News on September 12, 2024, informing the public of the Planning Commission public hearing for proposed Housing Element Rezone Project. In addition, the public notice was posted at Tustin City Hall, the Tustin Library, and the Tustin Area Senior Center and the Community Development Department mailed a notice of public hearing to each of the property owners, within 300 feet of the project site, inclusive of the project itself. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been prepared for each project location in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)Article 6 of California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3. Tustin Legacy Specific Plan Amendment— Sites 1A, 1B, and 2 • Prior Environmental Documents A FEIS/EIR was prepared for the disposal and reuse of the MCAS Tustin and certified by the Tustin City Council on January 16, 2001 (Resolution 00-90). Since certification of the 2001 FEIS/EIR, the City has prepared two supplements and two addenda to the 2001 FEIS/EIR, and has certified or adopted multiple CEQA documents for amendments to the MCAS Tustin Specific Plan and development projects in the Tustin Planning Commission Agenda Report Housing Element Rezone Project September 24, 2024 Page 14 Legacy area. The purpose and applications of the supplement and addenda are summarized in the SEIR (Exhibit 3A and 3B). • Draft Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Prior to the preparation of the DSEIR, incorporated herein by this reference and available for review at the link provided within report attachments, the City of Tustin circulated a Notice of Preparation (NOP) and held an EIR scoping meeting on March 20, 2024 to determine the concerns of interested parties regarding environmental analysis of the proposed project. Commentors raised questions relating to traffic impacts and methodology and a summary of requirements for the SB 18 and AB 52 process, and noise. Table 2-1 of the DSEIR summarizes issues identified by respondents to the NOP. The table also provides references to the sections of the DSEIR in which these issues are evaluated. Following the scoping meeting, the City of Tustin completed the DSEIR for the proposed Tustin Legacy SPA. The Draft SEIR analyzed impacts to 10 environmental topical areas: • Air Quality Population and Housing • Energy Public Services • Greenhouse Gas Emissions Transportation • Land Use and Planning Tribal Cultural Resources • Noise Utilities and Service Systems Table 1-1 of the DSEIR (Exhibit 3B) summarizes the conclusions of the environmental analysis. Impacts are identified as significant and unavoidable, less than significant, or no impact, and for all significant impacts, mitigation measures are identified. The level of significance after imposition of the mitigation measures is also presented. The DSEIR concluded that the project would have significant and unavoidable impacts regarding air quality and greenhouse gas emissions. Table 3- 2 of the DSEIR also provides a comparison of the Adopted Specific Plan and the proposed Specific Plan. As State Density Bonus Law allows affordable housing projects to exceed zoning limits, and affordable housing is a TLSP requirement under the Surplus Land Act, the impacts of 2,759 additional units have been evaluated in the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (DSEIR). Therefore, a total of 4,970 additional units (2,211 rezoning + 2,759 density bonus) have been evaluated for the environmental impacts, pursuant to CEQA. On June 27, 2024, the City issued a Notice of Availability of the DSEIR and provided the public with a 45-day review period beginning on June 28, 2024, and ending on August 12, 2024. In response, the City received seven correspondences from affected agencies. These correspondences and responses are summarized in Draft Final Supplemental EIR (FSEIR). On September 13, 2024, the responses to Planning Commission Agenda Report Housing Element Rezone Project September 24, 2024 Page 15 comments were distributed to those persons or agencies that commented on the DSEIR (Exhibit 3A). Enderle Center Rezone— Site 17 • Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Prior to the preparation of the DEIR incorporated herein by this reference and available for review at the link provided within report attachments, the City of Tustin circulated a Notice of Preparation (NOP) and held an EIR scoping meeting on February 26, 2024 to determine the concerns of interested parties regarding environmental analysis of the proposed project. Commentors raised questions relating to air quality, traffic impacts and methodology, and a summary of requirements for the SIB 18 and AB 52 process. Table 2-1 of the DSEIR summarizes issues identified by respondents to the NOR The table also provides references to the sections of the DEIR in which these issues are evaluated. No other areas of controversy are known to the Lead Agency. Following the scoping meeting, the City of Tustin completed the DEIR for the proposed Enderle Center Rezone Project. The Draft EIR analyzed impacts to 11 environmental topical areas: • Air Quality Public Services • Energy Recreation • Greenhouse Gas Emissions Transportation • Land Use and Planning Tribal Cultural Resources • Noise Utilities and Service Systems • Population and Housing Table 1-1 of the DEIR (Exhibit 6B) summarizes the conclusions of the environmental analysis. Impacts are identified as significant and unavoidable, less than significant, or no impact, and for all significant impacts, mitigation measures are identified. The level of significance, after imposition of the mitigation measures, is also presented. The DEIR concluded that the project would have significant and unavoidable impacts regarding air quality and greenhouse gas emissions. Table 3-2 of the DEIR provides a comparison of the existing and proposed project site characteristics. On June 6, 2024, the City issued a Notice of Availability of the DEIR and provided the public with a 45-day review period beginning on June 6, 2024, and ending on July 22, 2024. In response, the City received seven correspondences from affected agencies. These correspondences and responses are summarized in Draft Final EIR (FEIR). On September 13, 2024, the responses to comments were distributed to those persons or agencies that commented on the DEIR (Exhibit 6A). Planning Commission Agenda Report Housing Element Rezone Project September 24, 2024 Page 16 Market Place Rezone— Site 18 • Draft Final Environmental Impact Report Prior to the preparation of the DEIR, incorporated herein by this reference and available for review at the link provided within report attachments, the City of Tustin circulated a NOP and held an EIR scoping meeting on February 26, 2024 to determine the concerns of interested parties regarding environmental analysis of the proposed project. Commentors raised questions relating to traffic impacts and methodology and a summary of requirements for the SIB 18 and AB 52 process. Table 2-1 of the DSEIR summarizes issues identified by respondents to the NOR The table also provides references to the sections of the DEIR in which these issues are evaluated. No other areas of controversy are known to the Lead Agency. Following the scoping meeting, the City of Tustin completed the DEIR for the proposed Enderle Center Rezone Project. The Draft EIR analyzed impacts to 11 environmental topical areas: • Air Quality Public Services • Energy Recreation • Greenhouse Gas Emissions Transportation • Land Use and Planning Tribal Cultural Resources • Noise Utilities and Service Systems • Population and Housing Table 1-1 of the DEIR (Exhibit 10B) summarizes the conclusions of the environmental analysis. Impacts are identified as significant and unavoidable, less than significant, or no impact, and for all significant impacts, mitigation measures are identified. The level of significance after imposition of the mitigation measures is also presented. The DEIR concluded that the project would have significant and unavoidable impacts regarding air quality and greenhouse gas emissions. Table 3-2 of the DEIR provides a comparison of the existing and proposed project site characteristics. In addition to analyzing 900 future residential units on the 18-acre rezone site, the EIR analyzes the remaining development potential of The Market Place, which is 13,032 square feet of non-residential land uses (i.e. retail, restaurant, office, etc.). This square footage is residual development capacity that has been previously entitled but not constructed. On June 6, 2024, the City issued a Notice of Availability of the DEIR and provided the public with a 45-day review period beginning on June 6, 2024, and ending on July 22, 2024. In response, the City received five correspondences from affected agencies. These correspondences and responses are summarized in Draft Final Supplemental EIR (FSEIR). On September 13, 2024, the responses to comments were distributed to those persons or agencies that commented on the DEIR (Exhibit 10A). Planning Commission Agenda Report Housing Element Rezone Project September 24, 2024 Page 17 CONCLUSION: The City's adopted Housing Element was prepared in compliance with State housing law and has been certified by the California Department of Housing and Community Development. The adopted Housing Element clearly identifies the City's shortfall of housing sites and establishes a program to ensure the City rezones properties to remain in compliance with State mandates. The proposed Housing Element Rezone Project implements the adopted Housing Element and must be adopted by the Housing Element rezoning deadline of October 2024. Although the rezoning project is anticipated to have unavoidable adverse environmental effects related to air quality and GHG emissions, for the reasons described in Exhibits 3C, 6C, and 10C, the benefits of the proposed Housing Element Rezone Project outweigh effects, and consequently, the adverse environmental effects are considered "acceptable" in accordance with Section 15093 (c) of the State CEQA Guidelines. Accordingly, staff is recommending that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve the Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations for each respective environmental impact report, and the proposed project as described herein. Prepared by:. �iTl'zca�t. Samantha Beier, Senior Planner Approved by: f Jay Eas tm n, Assistant Director - Planning r rb J uls l L. illkom, Director Planning Commission Agenda Report Housing Element Rezone Project September 24, 2024 Page 18 Attachments: *Materials denoted with an "* "are available via the links provided due to their size. 1. Housing Element Rezone Project Map Tustin Legacy (Housing Element Sites 1A, 1B, 2) 2. Location / Radius Map 3. Resolution No. 4494 — Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (EIR) • Exhibit 3A— Final Supplemental EIR* o Errata o Response to Comments o Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program • Exhibit 3B - Draft Supplemental EIR* o Notice of Preparation, Scoping Comments, And Initial Study o Air Quality, Energy, And Greenhouse Gas Report o Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis o Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis o Water Supply Assessment • Exhibit 3C — Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations* 4. Resolution No. 4495 — Specific Plan Amendment (SPA) 2024-0002 • Exhibit 4A— Draft Ordinance No. 1547 • Exhibit 4B — Specific Plan Amendment — Tustin Legacy with Redlined Changes* Enderle Center (Housing Element Site 17) 5. Location / Radius Map 6. Resolution No. 4496 — Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) • Exhibit 6A— Final EIR* o Errata o Response to Comments o Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program • Exhibit 6B - Draft EIR* o Notice of Preparation, Scoping Comments, And Initial Study o Air Quality, Energy, And Greenhouse Gas Report o Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis o Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis o Archaeological Resources Records Search o Water Supply Assessment • Exhibit 6C — Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations* 7. Resolution No. 4498 — CA 2024-0003 • Exhibit 7A— Draft Ordinance No. 1549 • Exhibit 7B — Chapter 2 of Article 9 of the TCC with redlined changes 8. Resolution No. 4499 —Zone Change (ZC) 2024-0001 Planning Commission Agenda Report Housing Element Rezone Project September 24, 2024 Page 19 • Exhibit 8A— Draft Ordinance No. 1550 o Existing and Proposed Zoning - Exhibit A of Ordinance 1550 (8A) o Development Standards - Exhibit B of Ordinance 1550 (8A) Market Place (Housing Element Site 18) 9. Location / Radius Map 10. Resolution No. 4500 — Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) • Exhibit 10A— Final EIR* o Errata o Response to Comments o Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program • Exhibit 10B — Draft EIR* o Notice of Preparation, Scoping Comments, And Initial Study o Air Quality, Energy, And Greenhouse Gas Report o Noise and Vibration Impact Analysis o Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis o Archaeological Resources Records Search o Water Supply Assessment • Exhibit 10C - Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations* 11. Resolution No. 4501 — Specific Plan Amendment (SPA) 2024-0001 • Exhibit 11A— Draft Ordinance No. 1551 • Exhibit 11 B — Specific Plan Amendment - East Tustin with Redlined Changes* General Plan Amendment (Enderle Center & Market Place Consistency) 12. Resolution No. 4497 — General Plan Amendment (GPA) 2024-0001 • Exhibit 12A— Draft Ordinance No. 1548 • Exhibit 12B — Text Amendment General 13. Public Comments and Related Feedback • Exhibit 13A— Petition Regarding Enderle Center • Exhibit 13B — Correspondence from V. Tran Additional Resources: Where can I watch informational videos to understand the purpose of the Housing Element? "Housing for All" informational videos are provided below: • What is RHNA? (Part 1) English I Spanish • Players and Their Roles in Meeting RHNA's Objectives (Part 2) English I Spanish • The Housing Element (Part 3) English I Spanish ATTACHMENT 1 HOUSING ELEMENT RHNA REZONE PROJECT MAP Attachment 1 Housing Element Rezone Project Map III f ; g .w I Site 17 — Enderle Center , X �w 1y F - pF� �Y 4' �*tip"^.. �: I _,•_ �_. T. yX T A 1 � ,fin YiA _ I " I ... �r•W.rll .. i' '-.. sue,. a1 .�.5 .��.f,l s Site 1A7 1 B, 2 —Tustin Legacy Site 18 —The Market Place Legend }= Housing Element �_-�-1 gin;;•• Rezone Project Sites ATTACHMENT 2 TUSTIN LEGACY (SITES 1A, LOCATION / RADIUS MAP Attachment 2 Location/ Radius Map Tustin Legacy Housing Element Sites 1A, 1 B and 2 T: Legend 4� �°�, 9-6 Q Buffer.1000 ft ^ar _ ^,F c Buffer-500 ft Q Buffer-300ft Q Tustin Legacy Tustin City Boundary Parcels-300 ft Buffer 3 ,J Modified Project Boundary 5t �v. a in 'o t Ha d a[M r s 47(t 4 Von rm Pl— T stm l.e_a2y' d 5 Paa rthstonY CuN �9 P �d 9'P Esd Community MaPs Contributo :o Canty of Los Angeles,California State Parks sri. O TomTom.Garmin,.SafeGraph,GeoT ge I ni}*4ETVNASA,U.SGS,Bureau of Land Manag EPA,NPS,US Census Bureau,USDA,US WSF f 1` ATTACHMENT 3 RESOLUTION NO. 4494 FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL EIR • EXHIBIT 3A: FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL EIR • EXHIBIT 313: DRAFT SUPPLEMENTAL EIR • EXHIBIT 3C: FINDINGS & STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS RESOLUTION NO. 4494 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL CERTIFY SUPPLEMENTAL #3 TO THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT/ ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE DISPOSAL AND REUSE OF MCAS TUSTIN ("FEIS/EIR") AND ADOPT ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS, A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND ERRATA FOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 2024-0002 TO IMPLEMENT THE HOUSING IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM OF THE 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN — HOUSING ELEMENT SITES 1A, 1 B, AND 2 (TUSTIN LEGACY). The Planning Commission does hereby resolve as follows: I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: A. That the City's 2021-2029 6th Cycle Housing Element of the General Plan (Housing Element) was certified by the California Department of Housing and Community Development in October 2022. The Housing Element contains the goals and policies the City intends to implement to address several housing-related issues. B. That the Housing Element sets forth a Housing Implementation Program that provides for specific actions the City intends to undertake to achieve the goals and policies of the Housing Element. C. That pursuant to Housing Element Program 1.1(a) and 1.1(b), the City is proposing to allow for additional high density residential development on three sites in the Tustin Legacy Specific Plan (TLSP), Housing Element Sites 1A, 1 B, and 2 (Modified Project site), with a minimum density of 20 units per acre (du/acre) on the selected sites with no maximum density prescribed. Amendment to the TLSP would to be consistent with existing State housing law, including the provision for State density bonus. D. That upon approval of the Modified Project, the proposed "upzoning," or "cap" increase, would add 855 residential units to the existing residential capacity of the Modified Project site (Neighborhoods D North, D South and G). The capacity increase would also include 1,356 buffer units that were assigned in the City's Housing Element and are intended to make up for any potential units that are not developed as assumed under the Housing Element on other housing sites. Thus, a total of 2,211 units have been added to the existing residential cap of the TLSP within Neighborhoods D North, D South and G. E. That the provision for State density bonus is applicable to the TLSP area. Therefore, an additional 2,759 units have been conservatively included in this analysis to anticipate the potential application of density bonuses in future residential development projects. F. That the City proposes the following actions (Modified Project): • SPA 2024-0002 — A request for a Specific Plan Amendment (SPA) to amend Neighborhood D South, D North, and G to increase the allowed residential capacity, to be consistent with the certified Housing Element. G. That on January 16, 2001, the City of Tustin certified the program Final Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (FEIS/EIR) for the reuse and disposal of MCAS Tustin. On December 6, 2004, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 04-76 approving a Supplement #1 to the FEIS/EIR for the extension of Tustin Ranch Road between Walnut Avenue and the future alignment of Valencia north loop road. On April 3, 2006, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 06-43 approving an Addendum to the FEIS/EIR and, on May 13, 2013, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 13-32 approving a second Addendum to the FEIS/EIR. On July 5, 2017, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 17-23 approving a Supplement #2 to the FEIS/EIR to facilitate the development, conveyance, and implementation of the Tustin Legacy New Vision Concept. The FEIS/EIR, along with its Addenda and Supplement, is a program EIR under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The FEIS/EIR, Addenda and Supplement considered the potential environmental impacts associated with development on the former Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS), Tustin. H. That the City determined that a Supplemental EIR pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15163 is required for the Modified Project, circulated a Notice of Preparation (NOP) and held an EIR scoping meeting on March 20, 2024, to determine the scope of the environmental issues to be addressed in the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report #3 (DSEIR). Comments received during the 30-day public review period, from March 5, 2024, to April 3, 2024, are included in the DSEIR as Appendix A of the DSEIR. I. That the DSEIR for SPA-2024-0002 analyzed impacts to ten environmental topical areas: air quality, energy, greenhouse gas emissions, land use and planning, noise, population and housing, public services, transportation, tribal cultural resources, and utilities and service systems. J. That on June 27, 2024, the City issued a Notice of Availability/Completion of the DSEIR and provided the public with 45 days review period beginning on June 28, 2024, and ending on August 12, 2024. K. On September 13, 2024, Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report#3 (FSEIR)was released for public review and comment. The Final SEIR provides the required written responses to each comment received on the DSEIR pursuant to CEQA. On September 13, 2024, the responses to comments were distributed to those persons or agencies that commented on the DSEIR. L. That the program FEIS/EIR for MCAS Tustin along with its Supplemental and Addenda are incorporated herein by reference. M. In accordance with Section 15132 of the State CEQA Guidelines, FSEIR consists of the following which are incorporated herein by reference: 1. The Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (DSEIR) or a revision of the Draft; 2. Comments and recommendations received on the DSEIR; 3. A list of persons, organizations, and public agencies comments on the DSEIR; 4. The responses to significant environmental points raised in the review and consultation process. N. That the Planning Commission has considered the FSEIR, prior to making recommendation to the City Council on SPA-2024-0002. O. That SPA-2024-0002 constitutes a "project" that is subject to the terms of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") (Pub. Resources Code §21000 et. seq.). P. That on June 27, 2024, the City initiated the 45-day public review period on the Draft SEIR by filing a Notice of Availability with the State Office of Planning and Research, publishing the Notice in the Tustin News, and releasing the Draft SEIR (State Clearinghouse [SCH] No. 1994071005) for public review and comment. Resolution No. 4494 SPA 2024-0002 Page 4 Q. That pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15086, the City consulted with and requested comments from all responsible and trustee agencies, other regulatory agencies, and other interested parties during the 45-day comment period, which spanned from June 28, 2024 to August 12, 2024. R. That during the public review period, copies of the Draft SEIR were provided online on the City's website, were available for public review in printed form at City Hall and the Tustin Library. S. That the City received seven (7) written comments on the Draft SEIR during the public review period for the Draft EIR. T. That following the close of the public comment period and after review of the comments received on the Draft SEIR, the City prepared a Final SEIR, consisting of comments received on the Draft SEIR, written responses to those comments, and revisions and errata to the Draft SEIR. For purposes of this Resolution, the SEIR shall refer to the Draft SEIR, including all technical studies and appendices to the Draft SEIR, as revised by the Final SEIR's errata section, together with the other sections of the Final SEIR, including all the technical studies and appendices to the Final SEIR, and the Errata to the Final SEIR. The Draft SEIR, the Final SEIR, and all technical studies and appendices to the Final SEIR are hereby incorporated herein by reference to this Resolution and are on file with the City Clerk. The Errata to the Final SEIR, which is attached hereto as Exhibit 3A and incorporated herein, reflects changes made to mitigation measures and text within the SEIR sections. U. That the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations, attached hereto as Exhibit 3C, and incorporated herein, set forth the environmental impacts identified in the Final SEIR that the City finds are less than significant and do not require mitigation, the environmental impacts identified in the Final SEIR as potentially significant but which the City finds can be mitigated to a less than significant level through the implementation of all feasible mitigation measures, the environmental impacts identified in the Final SEIR as potentially significant but which the City finds cannot be fully mitigated to a less than significant level despite the imposition of all feasible mitigation measures, the cumulative environmental impacts resulting from the Modified Project, the significant and irreversible environmental changes that would result from the Modified Project, but which would be mitigated, the existence of any growth-inducing impacts resulting from the Modified Project identified in the Final SEIR, and a statement supporting the Modified Project notwithstanding the potentially significant environmental impacts which could not feasibly be mitigated. Resolution No. 4494 SPA 2024-0002 Page 5 V. That alternatives to the Modified Project that might eliminate or reduce significant environmental impacts are described in Exhibit 3C, Finding of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations, pursuant to CEQA, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. W. That the City has endeavored in good faith to set forth the basis for its decision on the Modified Project in the Findings of Fact as well as to explain why the benefits of the Modified Project outweigh the environmental impacts the SEIR determines are significant and unavoidable. X. That all of the requirements of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines have been satisfied by the City of Tustin in the SEIR, which is sufficiently detailed so that all of the potentially significant environmental effects of the Modified Project have been adequately evaluated. Y. That the SEIR prepared in connection with the Modified Project sufficiently analyzes both the feasible mitigation measures necessary to avoid or substantially lessen the Modified Project's potential environmental impacts and a range of feasible alternatives capable of eliminating or reducing these effects in accordance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. Z. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed, and held on said application on September 24, 2024, by the Planning Commission. AA. That on September 24, 2024, the Planning Commission was presented with, reviewed, and considered all the information and data in the administrative record, including the Final SEIR, and all oral and written evidence presented to it during all meetings and hearings, all of which are incorporated herein by reference. BB. That the City has not received any comments or additional information that produced substantial new information requiring recirculation or additional environmental review under Public Resources Code Sections 21166 and 21092.1 or State CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5. CC. That all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. ll. The Modified Project would have significant and unavoidable impacts related to the following environmental issue areas: air quality and greenhouse gas emissions.; III. Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations. In accordance with State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15091, 15092, and 15093, the Planning Commission recommends the Tustin City Council adopt the CEQA Findings of Fact and the Statement of Overriding Considerations pursuant to CEQA, Resolution No. 4494 SPA 2024-0002 Page 6 attached hereto as Exhibit 3C, and incorporated herein by reference as is fully set forth herein. IV. Certification of Final SEIR. In accordance with State CEQA Guidelines Section 15090, the Planning Commission recommends the Tustin City Council certify that: • The Final SEIR is an accurate and objective statement that has been completed in compliance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines, and that together with the errata, attached hereto as Exhibit 3A and incorporated herein by reference as is fully set forth herein, includes all the environmental impacts of the Modified Project and mitigation measures; • The Planning Commission and City Council have been presented with and have reviewed and considered the information contained in the SEIR, prior to the Tustin City Council approving the Modified Project; and • The EIR reflects the City Council's independent judgment and analysis. V. Recirculation Not Required. The Planning Commission recommends that the Tustin City Council declare that the City has not received evidence of new significant impacts, as defined by the State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15088.5, after circulation of the Draft SEIR that would require recirculation, which is further set forth in the Findings (Exhibit 3C), nor have any of the conditions requiring a subsequent or supplemental EIR listed in Public Resources Code Section 21166 occurred. VI. Notice of Determination. The Planning Commission recommends that the Tustin City Council direct staff to file a Notice of Determination with the Orange County Clerk Recorder within five (5) working days of final approval of the Modified Project. VI I. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, then such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Resolution. The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin hereby declares that the Planning Commission would have adopted this Resolution, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that anyone or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective. Resolution No. 4494 SPA 2024-0002 Page 7 NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby recommend City Council certification of the Final SEIR and adoption of the Findings of Fact, Statement of Overriding Considerations, and Errata for SPA 2024- 0002. ERIC HIGUCHI Chairperson JUSTINA L. WILLKOM Planning Commission Secretary STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) CITY OF TUSTIN ) I, Justina L. Willkom, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Tustin, California; that Resolution No. 4494 was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission, held on the 24t" day of September 2024. PLANNING COMMISSIONER AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONER NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONER ABSTAINED: PLANNING COMMISSIONER ABSENT: JUSTINA L. WILLKOM Planning Commission Secretary EXHIBIT 3A FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL EIR (Click link provided on Pages 18 & 19 of the Agenda Report.) EXHIBIT 3B DRAFT SUPPLEMENTAL EIR (Click link provided on Pages 18 & 19 of the Agenda Report.) EXHIBIT 3C FINDINGS & STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS (Click link provided on Pages 18 & 19 of the Agenda Report.) ATTACHMENT 4 RESOLUTION NO. 4495 SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT (SPA) 2024-0002 • EXHIBIT 4A: DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 1547 • EXHIBIT 413: SPA - TUSTIN LEGACY WITH REDLINED CHANGES RESOLUTION NO. 4495 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT (SPA) 2024-0002 TO AMEND THE TUSTIN LEGACY SPECIFIC PLAN (TLSP; SP-1) TO INCREASE RESIDENTIAL CAPACITY WITHIN NEIGHBORHOODS D NORTH, D SOUTH, AND G, CONSISTENT WITH THE CERTIFIED HOUSING ELEMENT, TO IMPLEMENT THE HOUSING IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM OF THE 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN — HOUSING ELEMENT SITES 1A, 1 B, AND 2. The Planning Commission does hereby resolve as follows: I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: A. That the City's 2021-2029 6th Cycle Housing Element of the General Plan (Housing Element) was certified by the California Department of Housing and Community Development in October 2022. The Housing Element contains the goals and policies the City intends to implement to address several housing-related issues. B. That the Housing Element sets forth a Housing Implementation Program that provides for specific actions the City intends to undertake to achieve the goals and policies of the Housing Element. C. That pursuant to Housing Element Program 1.1(a) and 1.1(b), a Specific Plan Amendment 2024-0002 was initiated by the City to amend the Tustin Legacy Specific Plan (TLSP; SP-1) to allow for additional high density residential development on three sites in the Tustin Legacy Specific Plan (TLSP), Housing Element Sites 1A, 1 B, and 2, with a minimum density of 20 units per acre (du/acre) on the selected sites. Amendment to the TLSP would to be consistent with existing State housing law, including the provision for State density bonus. D. That upon approval of the project, the proposed "upzoning," or "cap" increase, would add 855 residential units to the existing residential capacity of the Modified Project site (Neighborhoods D North, D South, and G). The capacity increase would also include 1,356 buffer units that were assigned in the City's Housing Element and are intended to make up for any potential units that are not developed as assumed under the Housing Element on other housing sites. Thus, a total of 2,211 units have been added to the existing residential cap of the TLSP. Resolution No. 4495 Page 2 E. That the provision for State density bonus is applicable to the TLSP area. Therefore, an additional 2,759 units have been conservatively included in this analysis to anticipate the potential application of density bonuses in future residential development projects. F. That SPA-2024-0002 (Ordinance No. 1547) complies with the Tustin General Plan in that they comply with the following goals and policies: 1. Land Use Goal 1: Provide for a well-balanced land use pattern that accommodates existing and future needs for housing, commercial and industrial land, open space and community facilities and services, while maintaining a healthy, diversified economy adequate to provide future City services. 2. Policy 1.7: As part of the City's attraction to business and industry, provide adequate sites to house future employees. 3. Policy 1.10: Ensure that the distribution and intensity of land uses are consistent with the Land Use Plan and classification system. 4. Land Use Goal 2: Ensure that future land use decisions are the result of sound and comprehensive planning. 5. Policy 2.2: Maintain consistency between the Land Use Element, Zoning Ordinances, and other City ordinances, regulations and standards. G. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed, and held on said application on September 24, 2024, by the Planning Commission. H. That on January 16, 2001, the City of Tustin certified the program Final Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (FEIS/EIR) for the reuse and disposal of MCAS Tustin. On December 6, 2004, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 04-76 approving a Supplement #1 to the FEIS/EIR for the extension of Tustin Ranch Road between Walnut Avenue and the future alignment of Valencia north loop road. On April 3, 2006, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 06-43 approving an Addendum to the FEIS/EIR and, on May 13, 2013, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 13-32 approving a second Addendum to the FEIS/EIR. On July 5, 2017, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 17-23 approving a Supplement #2 to the FEIS/EIR to facilitate the development, conveyance, and implementation of the Tustin Legacy New Vision Concept. The FEIS/EIR, along with its Addenda and Supplement, is a program EIR under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The FEIS/EIR, Addenda and Supplement considered the potential environmental impacts associated with development on the former Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS), Tustin. A Final Supplemental #3 EIR (FSEIR) for SPA 2024-02 has been completed. Resolution No. 4495 Page 3 I. That the proposed SPA 2024-0002 is consistent with the General Plan Housing Element Goal 1, in that, SPA 2024-0002 would facilitate the provision of an adequate supply of housing to meet the need for a variety of housing types and the diverse socio-economic needs of all community residents and supports State Housing Law as implemented by the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA). The Modified Project provides for 2,211 dwelling units. J. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed, and held on said application on September 24, 2024, by the Planning Commission. K. That pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.), the City of Tustin, as lead agency, determined that a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) should be prepared to analyze all potential adverse environmental impacts of the Modified Project. L. That all of the requirements of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines have been satisfied by the City of Tustin in the SEIR, which is sufficiently detailed so that all of the potentially significant environmental effects of the Modified Project have been adequately evaluated. M. That the SEIR prepared in connection with the Modified Project sufficiently analyzes both the feasible mitigation measures necessary to avoid or substantially lessen the proposed project's potential environmental impacts and a range of feasible alternatives capable of eliminating or reducing these effects in accordance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. N. That the Planning Commission has considered the SEIR along with its MMRP in its recommendation that the City Council approve SPA 2024-0002. II. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt Ordinance No. 1482 approving Specific Plan Amendment 2024-02 attached hereto as Exhibit A. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin held on the 24t" day of September 2024. ERIC HIGUCHI Chairperson JUSTINA L. WILLKOM Planning Commission Secretary Resolution No. 4495 Page 4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) CITY OF TUSTIN ) I, Justina L. Willkom, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Tustin, California; that Resolution No. 4495 was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission, held on the 24t" day of September 2024. PLANNING COMMISSIONER AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONER NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONER ABSTAINED: PLANNING COMMISSIONER ABSENT: JUSTINA L. WILLKOM Planning Commission Secretary Exhibit A - Draft Ordinance 1547 EXHIBIT 4A DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 1547 ORDINANCE NO. 1547 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, APPROVING SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT (SPA) 2024-0002 TO INCREASE RESIDENTIAL CAPACITY WITHIN NEIGHBORHOODS D AND G OF THE TUSTIN LEGACY SPECIFIC PLAN TO IMPLEMENT THE HOUSING IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM OF THE 6T" CYCLE 2021- 2029 HOUSING ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN — HOUSING ELEMENT SITES 1A, 1 B, AND 2. The City Council of the City of Tustin does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1. The City Council finds and determines as follows: A. That the City's 2021-2029 6th Cycle Housing Element of the General Plan (Housing Element) was certified by the California Department of Housing and Community Development in October 2022. The Housing Element contains the goals and policies the City intends to implement to address several housing-related issues. B. That pursuant to Housing Element Program 1.1 a, the City is proposing to allow for additional high density residential development on three sites in the Tustin Legacy Specific Plan (TLSP), Housing Element Sites 1A, 1 B, and 2, with a minimum density of 20 units per acre (du/acre) on the selected sites. Amendment to the TLSP would to be consistent with existing State housing law, including the provision for State density bonus. C. That upon approval of the project, the proposed "upzoning," or "cap" increase, would add 855 residential units to the existing residential capacity of the Modified Project site (Neighborhoods D North, D South and G). The capacity increase would also include 1,356 "buffer units" that were assigned in the City's Housing Element and are intended to make up for any potential units that are not developed as assumed under the Housing Element on other housing sites. Thus, a total of 2,211 units have been added to the existing residential cap of the TLSP within Neighborhoods D North, D South and G. D. That the provision for State density bonus is applicable to the TLSP area. Therefore, an additional 2,759 units have been conservatively included in this analysis to anticipate the potential application of density bonuses in future residential development projects. E. That SPA-2024-0002 (Ordinance No. 1547) comply with the Tustin General Plan in that they comply with the following goals and policies: Ordinance No. 1547 SPA 2024-0002 Page 2 1. Land Use Goal 1: Provide for a well-balanced land use pattern that accommodates existing and future needs for housing, commercial and industrial land, open space and community facilities and services, while maintaining a healthy, diversified economy adequate to provide future City services. 2. Policy 1.7: As part of the City's attraction to business and industry, provide adequate sites to house future employees. 3. Policy 1.10: Ensure that the distribution and intensity of land uses are consistent with the Land Use Plan and classification system. 4. Land Use Goal 2: Ensure that future land use decisions are the result of sound and comprehensive planning. 5. Policy 2.2: Maintain consistency between the Land Use Element, Zoning Ordinances, and other City ordinances, regulations and standards. F. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed, and held on said application on September 24, 2024, by the Planning Commission. Following the public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 4495 recommending that the Tustin City Council approve SPA 2024-0002 by adopting Ordinance No. 1547. G. That on September 24, 2024, a public hearing was duly noticed, called, and held before the City Council concerning SPA 2024-0002 (Ordinance No. 1547). H. That on January 16, 2001, the City of Tustin certified the program Final Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (FEIS/EIR) for the reuse and disposal of MCAS Tustin. On December 6, 2004, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 04-76 approving a Supplement #1 to the FEIS/EIR for the extension of Tustin Ranch Road between Walnut Avenue and the future alignment of Valencia north loop road. On April 3, 2006, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 06-43 approving an Addendum to the FEIS/EIR and, on May 13, 2013, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 13-32 approving a second Addendum to the FEIS/EIR. On July 5, 2017, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 17-23 approving a Supplement #2 to the FEIS/EIR to facilitate the development, conveyance, and implementation of the Tustin Legacy New Vision Concept. The FEIS/EIR, along with its Addenda and Supplement, is a program EIR under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The FEIS/EIR, Addenda and Supplement considered the potential environmental impacts associated with development on the former Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS), Tustin. Ordinance No. 1547 SPA 2024-0002 Page 3 I. A Final Supplemental #3 EIR (FSEIR) for SPA 2024-0002 has been completed. That pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.), the City of Tustin, as lead agency, determined that a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) should be prepared to analyze all potential adverse environmental impacts of the Modified Project. J. That all of the requirements of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines have been satisfied by the City of Tustin in the SEIR, which is sufficiently detailed so that all of the potentially significant environmental effects of the Modified Project have been adequately evaluated. K. That the SEIR prepared in connection with the Modified Project sufficiently analyzes both the feasible mitigation measures necessary to avoid or substantially lessen the proposed project's potential environmental impacts and a range of feasible alternatives capable of eliminating or reducing these effects in accordance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. SECTION 2. The MCAS Tustin Specific Plan is hereby amended to read as provided for in Exhibit A. SECTION 3. Severability If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council of the City of Tustin hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. PASSED AND ADOPTED, at a regular meeting of the City Council for the City of Tustin on this _t" day of MONTH, 2024. AUSTIN LUMBARD, MAYOR Ordinance No. 1547 SPA 2024-0002 Page 4 ATTEST: ERICA N. YASUDA, CITY CLERK Exhibit A - Specific Plan Amendment— Tustin Legacy STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF TUSTIN ) CERTIFICATION FOR ORDINANCE NO. 1547 Erica N. Yasuda, City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, does hereby certify that the whole number of the members of the City Council of the City of Tustin is five; that the above and foregoing Ordinance No. 1547 was duly passed, and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin City Council held on the_t" day of MONTH, 2024, by the following vote: COUNCILPERSONS AYES: COUNCILPERSONS NOES: COUNCILPERSONS ABSTAINED: COUNCILPERSONS ABSENT: Erica N. Yasuda, City Clerk Published: EXHIBIT 4B SPA - TUSTIN LEGACY WITH REDLINED CHANGES (Click link provided on Pages 18 & 19 of the Agenda Report.) ATTACHMENT 5 ENDERLE CENTER (SITE 17) LOCATION / RADIUS MAP Attachment 5 Location/ Radius Map Enderle Center Housing Element Site 17 Legend 0 Enderle Center Q Buffer-1000 n Q Buffer-500 ft Q Huffer-300 ft ®Tustin City Boundary Parcels-300 It Buffer Ri E 17tl St l S[ E 17th Citibark California C nk&Trust CV5 Pharmacy 55 z Z � d Arbolad, I ymcarand'aue r 1 I 0 N I n I Esri Com`{t unity Maps Contributors,City of Irvine,Count as AngeVas,California State Par OpenStr-W.p,Micra-ft,Esri,TomTom,Garmi eGraph,.G-Technologies,Inc,ME Bement,EPA,NPS,US Census Bureau,USDA,USWS ATTACHMENT 6 RESOLUTION NO. 4496 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR • EXHIBIT 6A: FINAL EIR • EXHIBIT 613: DRAFT EIR • EXHIBIT 6C: FINDINGS & STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS RESOLUTION NO. 4496 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL CERTIFY THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND ADOPT ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS, A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND ERRATA FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2024-0001, ZONE CHANGE 2024-0001, AND CODE AMENDMENT 2024-0003 (HOUSING ELEMENT SITE 17 — ENDERLE CENTER) The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows: I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: A. That the City's 2021-2029 6th Cycle Housing Element of the General Plan (Housing Element)was certified by the California Department of Housing and Community Development in October 2022. The Housing Element contains the goals and policies the City intends to implement to address several housing- related issues. B. That pursuant to Housing Element Program 1.1(b) and 1.1(f), the City is proposing an overlay zone ("overlay district")for the Enderle Center, Housing Element Site 17 ("Project Site"). Residential uses are currently not allowed on the Project Site. Upon approval of the Proposed Project, the Project Site could accommodate 413 units over approximately 7 acres of developable land within the existing 11.8-acre site. The anticipated development over 7 acres may take place on underutilized asphalt parking lot areas, and not require demolition of any existing buildings. Parking displaced as a result of redevelopment would be accommodated by vertical parking structures located within the proposed development. C. That the City proposes the following actions ("Proposed Project"): • GPA 2024-0001 — A request for a General Plan Amendment (GPA) to establish that higher density residential uses are allowed in the Planned Community Commercial/Business (PCCB) land use designation when prescribed by a Housing Overlay (HO) or a Specific Plan (SP); • CA 2024-0003 — A request to establish a Housing Overlay (HO) District (overlay zone) in conjunction with the Planned Community Commercial District (base zone); and • ZA 2024-0001 —A request to amend the City's zoning map to apply the Housing Overlay (HO) District to the Project Site. Resolution No. 4496 Page 2 D. That pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.), the City of Tustin, as lead agency, determined that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) should be prepared to analyze all potential adverse environmental impacts of the Project and corresponding General Plan Amendment, Code Amendment, and zone change, which together are referred to as the "Proposed Project." E. That the City sent a Notice of Preparation (NOP) of a Draft EIR to the Office of Planning and Research, responsible and trustee agencies, and other interested parties on or about February 15, 2024; and F. That the NOP was circulated for 30 days pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines sections 15082 and 15083, until March 20, 2024, to invite comments from responsible and trustee agencies, the public, and other interested parties regarding the scope of the EIR. G. That the City received written comments in response to the NOP, which assisted the City in the scope and analysis for the Draft EIR, and also held a series of public meetings and workshops regarding the scope of the Proposed Project. H. That the City received four (4) comments from interested parties and responsible and trustee agencies in response to the NOP. I. That on June 6, 2024, the City initiated the 45-day public review period on the Draft EIR by filing a Notice of Availability with the State Office of Planning and Research, publishing the Notice in the Tustin News, and releasing the Draft EIR (State Clearinghouse [SCH] No. 2024020747) for public review and comment. J. That pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15086, the City consulted with and requested comments from all responsible and trustee agencies, other regulatory agencies, and other interested parties during the 45-day comment period, which ran from June 6, 2024 to July 22, 2024. K. That during the public review period, copies of the Draft EIR were provided online on the City's website, were available for public review in printed form at City Hall and the Tustin Library. L. That the City received written comments on the Draft EIR during the public review period for the Draft EIR. M. That following the close of the public comment period and after review of the comments received on the Draft EIR, the City prepared a Final EIR, consisting of comments received on the Draft EIR, written responses to those comments, and revisions and errata to the Draft EIR. For purposes of this Resolution, the EIR shall refer to the Draft EIR, including all technical studies and appendices to the Draft EIR, as revised by the Final EIR's errata section, Resolution No. 4496 Page 3 together with the other sections of the Final EIR, including all the technical studies and appendices to the Final EIR, and the Errata to the Final EIR. The Draft EIR, the Final EIR, and all technical studies and appendices to the Final EIR are hereby incorporated herein by reference to this Resolution and are on file with the City Clerk. The Errata to the Final EIR, which is attached hereto as Exhibit 6C of Attachment 6 and incorporated herein, reflects changes made to mitigation measures and text within the EIR sections. N. That the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations, attached hereto as Exhibit 6C of Attachment 6, and incorporated herein, set forth the environmental impacts identified in the Final EIR that the City finds are less than significant and do not require mitigation, the environmental impacts identified in the Final EIR as potentially significant but which the City finds can be mitigated to a less than significant level through the implementation of all feasible mitigation measures, the environmental impacts identified in the Final EIR as potentially significant but which the City finds cannot be fully mitigated to a less than significant level despite the imposition of all feasible mitigation measures, the cumulative environmental impacts resulting from the Proposed Project, the significant and irreversible environmental changes that would result from the Proposed Project, but which would be mitigated, the existence of any growth-inducing impacts resulting from the Proposed Project identified in the Final EIR, and a statement supporting the Proposed Project notwithstanding the potentially significant environmental impacts which could not feasibly be mitigated. O. That alternatives to the Proposed Project that might eliminate or reduce significant environmental impacts are described in Exhibit 6C of Attachment 6, Statement of Overriding Considerations, pursuant to CEQA, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. P. That the City has endeavored in good faith to set forth the basis for its decision on the Proposed Project in the Findings of Fact as well as to explain why the benefits of the Proposed Project outweigh the environmental impacts the EIR determines are significant and unavoidable. Q. That all of the requirements of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines have been satisfied by the City of Tustin in the EIR, which is sufficiently detailed so that all of the potentially significant environmental effects of the Proposed Project have been adequately evaluated. R. That the EIR prepared in connection with the Proposed Project sufficiently analyzes both the feasible mitigation measures necessary to avoid or substantially lessen the Proposed Project's potential environmental impacts and a range of feasible alternatives capable of eliminating or reducing these effects in accordance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. S. That on September 13, 2024, the Planning Commission public hearing was posted at designated City boards and published in the Tustin News. Resolution No. 4496 Page 4 T. That on September 13, 2024, the Planning Commission was presented with, reviewed, and considered all the information and data in the administrative record, including the Final EIR, and all oral and written evidence presented to it during all meetings and hearings, all of which are incorporated herein by reference. U. That the City has not received any comments or additional information that produced substantial new information requiring recirculation or additional environmental review under Public Resources Code Sections 21166 and 21092.1 or State CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5. V. That all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. II. The Proposed Project would have significant and unavoidable impacts related to the following environmental issue areas: air quality and greenhouse gas emissions. III. Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations. In accordance with State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15091, 15092, and 15093, the Planning Commission recommends the Tustin City Council adopt the CEQA Findings of Fact and the Statement of Overriding Considerations pursuant to CEQA, attached hereto as Exhibit 6C of Attachment 6, and incorporated herein by reference as is fully set forth herein. IV. Certification of Final EIR. In accordance with State CEQA Guidelines Section 15090, the Planning Commission recommends the Tustin City Council certify that: • The Final EIR is an accurate and objective statement that has been completed in compliance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines, and that together with the errata, attached hereto as Exhibit 6A of Attachment 6 and incorporated herein by reference as is fully set forth herein, includes all the environmental impacts of the Proposed Project and mitigation measures; • The Planning Commission and City Council have been presented with and have reviewed and considered the information contained in the EIR, prior to the Tustin City Council approving the Proposed Project; and • The EIR reflects the City Council's independent judgment and analysis. V. Recirculation Not Required. The Planning Commission recommends that the Tustin City Council declare that the City has not received evidence of new significant impacts, as defined by the State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15088.5, after circulation of the Draft EIR that would require recirculation, which is further set forth in the Findings (Exhibit 6C of Attachment 6), nor have any of the Resolution No. 4496 Page 5 conditions requiring a subsequent or supplemental EIR listed in Public Resources Code Section 21166 occurred. VI. Notice of Determination. The Planning Commission recommends that the Tustin City Council direct staff to file a Notice of Determination with the Orange County Clerk Recorder within five (5) working days of final approval of the Proposed Project. VI I. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, then such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Resolution. The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin hereby declares that the Planning Commission would have adopted this Resolution, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that anyone or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective. NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby recommend City Council certification of the Final EIR and adoption of the Findings of Fact, Statement of Overriding Considerations, and Errata for GPA 2024- 0001, CA 2024-0003, ZC 2024-0001. ERIC HIGUCHI Chairperson JUSTINA L. WILLKOM Planning Commission Secretary Resolution No. 4496 Page 6 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) CITY OF TUSTIN ) I, Justina L. Willkom, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Tustin, California; that Resolution No. 4496 was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission, held on the 24 day of September, 2024. PLANNING COMMISSIONER AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONER NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONER ABSTAINED: PLANNING COMMISSIONER ABSENT: JUSTINA L. WILLKOM Planning Commission Secretary EXHIBIT 6A FINAL EIR (Click link provided on Pages 18 & 19 of the Agenda Report.) EXHIBIT 6B DRAFT EIR (Click link provided on Pages 18 & 19 of the Agenda Report.) EXHIBIT 6C FINDINGS & STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS (Click link provided on Pages 18 & 19 of the Agenda Report.) ATTACHMENT 7 RESOLUTION NO. 4498 CODE AMENDMENT (CA) 2024-0003 • EXHIBIT 7A: DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 1549 • EXHIBIT 7B: CHAPTER 2 OF ARTICLE 9 OF THE TUSTIN CITY CODE (TCC) WITH REDLINED CHANGES RESOLUTION NO. 4498 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 1549, TO ESTABLISH A HOUSING OVERLAY (HO) DISTRICT (OVERLAY ZONE) IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE PLANNED COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (BASE ZONE) TO IMPLEMENT THE HOUSING IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM OF THE 6T" CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN - (CODE AMENDMENT 2024-0003) The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows: I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: A. That the City's 2021-2029 6th Cycle Housing Element of the General Plan (Housing Element) was certified by the California Department of Housing and Community Development in October 2022. The Housing Element contains the goals and policies the City intends to implement to address several housing-related issues. B. That the Housing Element sets forth a Housing Implementation Program that provides for specific actions the City intends to undertake to achieve the goals and policies of the Housing Element. C. That the proposed amendments (CA 2024-0003) to the Tustin City Code (TCC) implement Programs 1.1(b) and 1.1(f) of the Housing Implementation Program and bring the TCC into compliance with State law. D. That residential uses are not currently permitted on the project site. The project site is designated as Planned Community Commercial / Business (PCCB), which is intended for development of planned retail commercial, office, and industrial/research and development land uses of an intensity compatible with neighboring residential land uses. The City identified the project site as a suitable commercial site for rezoning to allow higher density housing during the 2021-2019 Housing Element process. E. That the Proposed Project is in the best interest of the public, in that, it increases the diversity in available housing for existing and new residents in the City of Tustin. Resolution No. 4498 Page 2 F. That CA 2024-0003 establishes a Housing Overlay (HO) district (overlay zone) in conjunction with the Planned Community Commercial district (base zone) to implement the Housing Implementation Program of the 6th Cycle 2021-2029 Housing Element of the General Plan. G. That the proposed CA 2024-0003 is consistent with the General Plan Housing Element Goal 1, in that, CA 2024-0003 would facilitate the provision of an adequate supply of housing to meet the need for a variety of housing types and the diverse socio-economic needs of all community residents and supports State Housing Law as implemented by the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA). H. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed, and held on said application on September 24, 2024, by the Planning Commission. I. That pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.), the City of Tustin, as lead agency, determined that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) should be prepared to analyze all potential adverse environmental impacts of the project and corresponding General Plan Amendment, which together are referred to as the "Proposed Project." J. That all of the requirements of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines have been satisfied by the City of Tustin in the EIR, which is sufficiently detailed so that all of the potentially significant environmental effects of the Proposed Project have been adequately evaluated. K. That the EIR prepared in connection with the Proposed Project sufficiently analyzes both the feasible mitigation measures necessary to avoid or substantially lessen the Proposed Project's potential environmental impacts and a range of feasible alternatives capable of eliminating or reducing these effects in accordance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. L. That the Planning Commission has considered the EIR along with its MMRP in its recommendation that the City Council approve CA 2024-0003. II. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt Ordinance No. 1549, amending various sections of Article 9 (Land Use) of TCC to establish a Housing Overlay (HO) district (overlay zone) in conjunction with the Planned Community Commercial district (base zone) (CA 2024-0003), attached hereto as Exhibit A. Resolution No. 4498 Page 3 PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission held on the 24t" day of September 2024. ERIC HIGUCHI Chairperson JUSTINA L. WILLKOM Planning Commission Secretary Exhibit A: Draft Ordinance No. 1549 APPROVED AS TO FORM: MICHAEL DAUDT Assistant City Attorney Resolution No. 4498 Page 4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) CITY OF TUSTIN ) I, JUSTINA L. WILLKOM, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the Planning Commission Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, California; that Resolution No. 4498 duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission, held on the _t"day of September, 2024. PLANNING COMMISSIONER AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONER NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONER ABSTAINED: PLANNING COMMISSIONER ABSENT: JUSTINA L. WILLKOM Planning Commission Secretary EXHIBIT 7A DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 1549 ORDINANCE 1549 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN APPROVING ZONE CHANGE 2024-0003, ADOPTING ORDINANCE NO. 1549, TO ESTABLISH A HOUSING OVERLAY (HO) DISTRICT (OVERLAY ZONE) IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE PLANNED COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT TO IMPLEMENT THE HOUSING IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM OF THE 6T" CYCLE 2021- 2029 HOUSING ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN - (CODE AMENDMENT 2024-0003) The City Council of the City of Tustin does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1. The City Council finds and determines as follows A. That the City's 2021-2029 6th Cycle Housing Element of the General Plan (Housing Element) was certified by the California Department of Housing and Community Development in October 2022. The Housing Element contains the goals and policies the City intends to implement to address several housing- related issues. B. That the Housing Element sets forth a Housing Implementation Program that provides for specific actions the City intends to undertake to achieve the goals and policies of the Housing Element. C. That the proposed amendments (CA 2024-0003) to the Tustin City Code (TCC) implement Programs 1.1(b) and 1.1(f) of the Housing Implementation Program and bring the TCC into compliance with State law. D. That residential uses are not currently permitted on the Project site. The Project site is designated as Planned Community Commercial / Business (PCCB), which is intended for development of planned retail commercial, office, and industrial/research and development land uses of an intensity compatible with neighboring residential land uses. The City identified the Project site as a suitable commercial site for rezoning to allow higher density housing during the 2021-2019 Housing Element process. E. That the Proposed Project is in the best interest of the public, in that, it increases the diversity in available housing for existing and new residents in the City of Tustin. F. That CA 2024-0003 establishes a Housing Overlay (HO) district (overlay zone) in conjunction with the Planned Community Commercial district (base zone) to implement the Housing Implementation Program of the 6th Cycle 2021-2029 Housing Element of the General Plan. G. That the proposed CA 2024-0003 is consistent with the General Plan Housing Element Goal 1, in that, CA 2024-0003 would facilitate the provision of an adequate supply of housing to meet the need for a variety of housing types and the diverse socio-economic needs of all community residents and supports State Housing Law as implemented by the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA). H. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed, and held on said application on September 24, 2024, by the Planning Commission. I. That pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.), the City of Tustin, as lead agency, determined that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) should be prepared to analyze all potential adverse environmental impacts of the Project and corresponding General Plan Amendment, which together are referred to as the "Proposed Project." J. That all of the requirements of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines have been satisfied by the City of Tustin in the EIR, which is sufficiently detailed so that all of the potentially significant environmental effects of the Proposed Project have been adequately evaluated. K. That the EIR prepared in connection with the Proposed Project sufficiently analyzes both the feasible mitigation measures necessary to avoid or substantially lessen the Proposed Project's potential environmental impacts and a range of feasible alternatives capable of eliminating or reducing these effects in accordance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. L. That the Planning Commission has considered the EIR along with its MMRP in its recommendation that the City Council approve CA 2024-0003. SECTION 2: That the City Council hereby adopts Ordinance 1549 approving Code Amendment 2024-0003, to establish a Housing Overlay (HO) district (overlay zone) in conjunction with the planned community commercial district (base zone) to implement the housing implementation program of the 6th Cycle 2021-2029 housing element of the general plan, as identified in Exhibit A attached hereto. SECTION 3. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council of the City of Tustin hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Tustin on the_t" day of 2024. AUSTIN LUMBARD Mayor ATTEST: ERICA N. YASUDA City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: DAVID E. KENDIG, City Attorney STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) CITY OF TUSTIN ) I, ERICA N. YASUDA, City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of the member of the City Council of the City of Tustin is 5; that the above and foregoing Ordinance No. 1549 was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on 2024 by the following vote: COUNCILMEMBER AYES: COUNCILMEMBER NOES: COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBER ABSENT: ERICA N. YASUDA City Clerk EXHIBIT 7B CHAPTER 2 OF ARTICLE 9 OF THE TCC WITH REDLINED CHANGES EXHIBIT B ORDINANCE NO. 1549 Amendment to Chapter 2,Division 9 of the Tustin City Code 9212-PURPOSE OF CHAPTER The purpose of this Chapter is to provide for regulations for the systematic execution of the Land Use element of the General Plan n494@r P19R fr,r the phys cal deye',,.,. eRt f the C41y. 9213-DIVISIONAL DISTRICTS b o@rk Rg n Str 4 CQPRbi.,or!W th nrhor Districts In addition to the districts established,there are+s hereby established QRP�^^•b^ ^^a-444 Combining and Overlay Districts which may be combined with any of the districts set forth;sa a a str 4 to bo desi Rated as follows: 1. Combining Parking Districts or"P"Districts. 2. Cultural Resource District or"CR"District. 3. Housing Overlay District or"HO"District. 9244-PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT(PC) a Purpose To allow diversification of the relationships of various buildings, structures and open spaces in planned building groups while+ensuring substantial compliance with the district regulations and other provisions of this Chapter. The intent of this Chapter is to +ensure that adequate standards related to the public health, safety and general welfare shall be observed without unduly inhibiting the advantage of large scale planning for residential, commercial and industrial purposes.The amenities and compatibilities of PC Districts are to be+ensured through the adoption of a Development Plan and/or the approval of Conditional Use Permits, maps, diagrams, and text setting forth land use relationships and development standards. b General Requirements The following provisions shall apply in the PC District and subject to the other provisions of this Chapter. Except that where conflict in regulations occur,the regulations specified in this Section or in the Development Plan or plans approved pursuant to this section or Housing Overlay District shall apply. d In the Planned Community District (PC), the following uses (or uses which, in the opinion of the Community Development Director and/or the Planning Commission, are similar)will be allowed subject to the development standards identified in Table 1 of Section 9240,the Housing Overlay District and/or as specified in this Chapter. 1. The uses permitted in any PC District or the Housing Overlay District shall be those designated on the approved development plan. In the event that such approved usage does not conform to the General Plan of the City,the General Plan shall may be amended, pursuant to the General Plan Amendment process,to conform to the development plan.Said amendment may be processed simultaneous with the amending of the zoning ordinance classifying the area PC. 2. The continued use of land within a PC District for agricultural. 3. Grading shall be permitted within a PC District outside of an area of immediate development subject to securing a grading permit. 4. Any area designated for residential use by a PC District approved development plan may be developed at a lower residential density than is indicated on the approved development plan without requiring an amendment of the development plan. Notwithstanding,any site identified in the Cit)'s certified Housing Element Sites Inventory to Meet Regional Housing Needs Allocation(RHNA)shall not be developed with fewer housing units at the income level identified without first identifying alternative sites to accommodate the shortfall and to comply with the No-Net-Loss obligations pursuant to California Government Code Section 65863. 5. Repealed. 6. Reverse vending machines(Subject to standards contained in Section 9271 bb). 7. Sexually oriented businesses, as defined in Section 3911(a), and subject to the provisions set forth in Article 3 Chapter 9 of the Tustin City Code. 8. SADUs and JADUs(subject to the provisions set forth in Section 9279). 9253-HOUSING OVERLAY(HO)DISTRICT a Purpose The Citv's housing needs are identified in the Tustin General Plan's Housing Element,which establishes citywide goals, obiectives and policies for enhancing and preserving the community's character, and expanding housing opportunities. The Citv's Housing Element provides that housing overlay districts may be applied to non-residentially zoned properties to create mixed-use development within walking distance to commercial services,employment and public transportation. The purpose of the Housing Overlay District is to: 1. Ensure that a broad range of housing types are provided to meet the needs of existing and future residents 2 Support the development of underutilized land in order to provide the community with a diversity of housing types,affordable housing,and housing near services and public transit. 3. Support infill development or site redevelopment using smart growth principles,allowing for the construction of higher density housing, affordable housing, and mixed-use development (the vertical and horizontal integration of commercial and residential uses) in proximity to employment, community facilities, commercial services,and other amenities. 4. Foster equal housing opportunities for all persons,and promote the dispersion and integration of housing for low-very-low,and moderate-income families throughout the communit . 5. Prioritizes sustainable housing developments in proximity to services and employment centers thereby enabling the use of public transit, walking or bicycling and promoting an active lifestyle, while reducing development impacts on open space and natural habitat areas. b Applicability 1. The Housing Overlay District(HO)is an overlay zone that shall be applied in conjunction with an underlying zone (base zone)of Planned Community(PC)District as shown on the official Tustin Zoning Map. 2. The Zoning Map shall be amended to indicate the application of the Housing Overlay (HO) District. The designation HO shall be added after the underlying zoning designation. 3. The entire parcel for which an application for rezoning or pre-zoning to Housing Overlay District is filed must be in one ownership, or if there be multiple owners, the application must be made by or with the written authorization for such action on behalf of all property owners concerned, and the applicant, together with a statement signed by interested owners that they agree to be bound by the regulations and conditions which will be effective within the district. 4. The requirements of this section shall be considered in conjunction with the requirements of the underlying (base) district. If a conflict exists between the requirements of the underlying district and this section, the requirements established pursuant to this section shall apply. c Procedures Any application for a zone change to permit the establishment of a Housing Overlay District shall be made pursuant to Section 9295 of this Chapter,and shall include the following information: 1. A map defining the exterior boundaries of the Housing Overlay District, including existing development to be retained and integrated with future construction. 2. Proposed maximum number of residential units to be authorized by the Housing Overlay District. 3. Proposed maximum acreage allocated to residential development. Acreage allocated to residential development shall be used to determine densities in compliance with the Tustin General Plan Housing Element, when applicable. The residential acreage may be equal to or less than the total acreage of the Housing Overlay District. 4. Compliance with the underlying zoning, development plan, development standards, or conditions of approval established for an underlying Planned Community Commercial District,as applicable. 5. Information the Community Development Director deems necessary to determine General Plan consistency,to determine consistencywith the underlying zoning district,or to evaluate potential impacts. Additional information required by the Director may include, but is not limited to,environmental documentation and technical analysis in compliance with the California Environmental OualityAct. d Permitted Uses 1. Multiple family residential. 2. All uses authorized by the underlying zoning district shall be permitted in the Housing Overlay(HO)District. 3. The City Council may permit non-listed uses that support the purpose of the district,following a public hearing and recommendation from the Planning Commission. e Development Standards 1. The City Council may establish, promulgate and adopt by resolution, site specific development standards, design criteria and obiective design standards for development within each Housing Overlay District. 2. The multiple family residential development standards of the R-3 District of the Tustin City Code shall apply to an HO District when the Council has not adopted site specific standards for a HO site. 3. Development proposals shall comply with adopted obiective design standards. f Required Findings for Establishment of HO District For the purpose of this section,an area may be designated as an HO District by the City Council if it meets one or more of the following findings: 1. The establishment of the HO district provides diversity of housing in terms of product types, tenure and affordability. 2. The HO district provides housing in close proximity to public transit and employment opportunities. 3. The HO district is within close proximity to existing or proposed community facilities and amenities, such as parks,libraries,dining,entertainment,fitness centers,trails,etc. 4. The HO district can be adequately served by existing or proposed infrastructure, and adequate measures are applied to ensure the site's future development will not result in negative impacts on the community or create a financial burden on the City. 5. The HO district fulfills the purpose of this Chapter and will not be detrimental to the public's health, safety or welfare. ATTACHMENT 8 RESOLUTION NO. 4499 ZONE CHANGE (ZC) 2024-0001 • EXHIBIT 8A: DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 1550 RESOLUTION NO. 4499 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT ORDINANCE 1550, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE 2024-0001, AMENDING THE CITY'S ZONING MAP TO APPLY THE HOUSING OVERLAY (HO) DISTRICT TO ENDERLE CENTER AND TO ESTABLISH DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS — HOUSING ELEMENT SITE 18. The Planning Commission does hereby resolve as follows: I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: A. That the City's 2021-2029 6th Cycle Housing Element of the General Plan (Housing Element) was certified by the California Department of Housing and Community Development in October 2022. The Housing Element contains the goals and policies the City intends to implement to address several housing-related issues. B. That pursuant to Housing Element Program 1.1(b) and 1.1(f), the City is proposing an overlay zone ("overlay district") for the Enderle Center, Housing Element Site 17 (project site). Residential uses are currently not allowed on the Project site. Upon approval of the Project, the Project site could accommodate 413 units over approximately 7 acres of developable land within the existing 11.8-acre site. Development over 7 acres may to take place on underutilized asphalt parking lot areas and does not require demolition of any existing buildings. Parking displaced as a result of redevelopment would be accommodated by vertical parking structures located within the proposed development. C. That the proposed zone change is in the best interest of the public in that it increases the diversity in available housing for existing and new residents in the City of Tustin. D. That the proposed zone change is consistent with General Plan Amendment 2024-0001 and the policies of the General Plan, as evidenced by the following findings: (a) That the site has been developed with underutilized commercial complex. (b) That residential uses are complimentary and beneficial to adjacent residential uses and current commercial uses. (c) That the project is adjacent to other residential uses, particularly Resolution No. 4499 Page 2 multi-family dwellings adjacent to the project site. (d) That the Planning Commission has considered GPA 2024-0001 and recommended that the City Council approve the request to establish that higher density residential uses are allowed in the Planned Community Commercial/Business (PCCB) land use designation when prescribed by a housing overlay or a specific plan. (e) That the proposed zone change is consistent with the General Plan in that the HO meets regional housing needs and is consistent with the following goal and policies of the General Plan Land Use Element:1.1 1. Goal 1: Provide for a well balanced land use pattern that accommodates existing and future needs for housing, commercial and industrial land, open space and community facilities and services, while maintaining a healthy, diversified economy adequate to provide future City services. 2. Policy 1.3: Facilitate the development of vacant and underutilized freeway parcels with commercial uses where appropriate and compatible with surrounding uses to capitalize on their freeway access and visibility. 3. Policy 1.5: Encourage compatible and complementary infill of previously by-passed parcels in areas already predominately developed. 4. Policy 1.6: Ensure an adequate supply of commercial and industrial land within the City of Tustin for potential commercial and industrial expansion and development. 5. Policy 1.7: As part of the City's attraction to business and industry, provide adequate sites to house future employees. 6. Policy 1.10: Ensure that the distribution and intensity of land uses are consistent with the Land Use Plan and classification system. 7. Goal 2: Ensure that future land use decisions are the result of sound and comprehensive planning. 8. Policy 2.2: Maintain consistency between the Land Use Element, Zoning Ordinances, and other City ordinances, regulations and standards. Resolution No. 4499 Page 3 E. That the proposed ZC 2024-0001 is consistent with the General Plan Housing Element Goal 1 in that ZC 2024-0001 would facilitate the provision of an adequate supply of housing to meet the need for a variety of housing types and the diverse socio-economic needs of all community residents and supports State Housing Law as implemented by the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA). The project provides for 413 dwelling units. F. That the proposed project is consistent with the PCCB land use designation which would allow for residential uses when prescribed by a HO or Specific Plan. G. That pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.), the City of Tustin, as lead agency, determined that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) should be prepared to analyze all potential adverse environmental impacts of the Project and corresponding General Plan Amendment, Code Amendment, and Zone Change, which together are referred to as the "Proposed Project." H. That all of the requirements of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines have been satisfied by the City of Tustin in the EIR, which is sufficiently detailed so that all of the potentially significant environmental effects of the Proposed Project have been adequately evaluated. I. That the EIR prepared in connection with the Proposed Project sufficiently analyzes both the feasible mitigation measures necessary to avoid or substantially lessen the Proposed Project's potential environmental impacts and a range of feasible alternatives capable of eliminating or reducing these effects in accordance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. J. That the Planning Commission has considered the EIR along with its MMRP in its recommendation that the City Council approve ZC 2024- 0001. II. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt Ordinance No. 1550 approving Zone Change 2024-0001, amending the City's zoning map to apply the Housing Overlay (HO) District to Enderle Center and to establish development standards, as identified in Exhibit A attached hereto. Resolution No. 4499 Page 4 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, at a regular meeting on the 24t" day of September 2024. ERIC HIGUCHI Chairperson JUSTINA L. WILLKOM Planning Commission Secretary Exhibit A: Draft Ordinance 1550 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) CITY OF TUSTIN ) I, Justina L. Willkom, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Tustin, California; that Resolution No. 4499 was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission, held on the 24t" day of September, 2024. PLANNING COMMISSIONER AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONER NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONER ABSTAINED: PLANNING COMMISSIONER ABSENT: JUSTINA L. WILLKOM Planning Commission Secretary EXHIBIT 8A DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 1550 ORDINANCE 1550 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN APPROVING ZONE CHANGE 2024-0001, ADOPTING ORDINANCE NO. 1550, TO AMEND THE CITY'S ZONING MAP TO APPLY THE HOUSING OVERLAY (HO) DISTRICT TO THE ENDERLE CENTER REZONE PROJECT AREA TO IMPLEMENT THE HOUSING IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM OF THE 6T" CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN (ZONE CHANGE 2024- 0001) The City Council of the City of Tustin does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1. The City Council finds and determines as follows A. That the City's 2021-2029 6th Cycle Housing Element of the General Plan (Housing Element) was certified by the California Department of Housing and Community Development in October 2022. The Housing Element contains the goals and policies the City intends to implement to address several housing- related issues. B. That pursuant to Housing Element Program 1.1(b) and 1.1(f), the City is proposing an overlay zone ("overlay district") for the Enderle Center, Housing Element Site 17 (project site). Residential uses are currently not allowed on the Project site. Upon approval of the Project, the Project site could accommodate 413 units over approximately 7 acres of developable land within the existing 11.8-acre site, resulting in a density of 59 du/ac. The anticipated development over 7 acres may take place on underutilized asphalt parking lot areas, and not require demolition of any existing buildings. Parking displaced as a result of redevelopment would be accommodated by vertical parking structures located within the proposed development. C. That the subject property has been used as a commercial retail center since its completion. D. That the project, as proposed would conflict with the existing PC COM Planned Community Commercial zoning district for the site. E. That the subject property is surrounded by a range of uses including commercial, office, and residential. F. That the proposed zone change would allow for the development of high density residential development where currently none is allowed. G. That the project, as proposed, would have a maximum of 413 units on 7 acres, consistent with high density residential developments. H. That pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.), the City of Tustin, as lead agency, determined that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) should be prepared to analyze all potential adverse environmental impacts of the Project and corresponding General Plan Amendment, Code Amendment, and Zone Change, which together are referred to as the "Proposed Project;" I. That all of the requirements of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines have been satisfied by the City of Tustin in the EIR, which is sufficiently detailed so that all of the potentially significant environmental effects of the Proposed Project have been adequately evaluated; and J. That the EIR prepared in connection with the Proposed Project sufficiently analyzes both the feasible mitigation measures necessary to avoid or substantially lessen the Proposed Project's potential environmental impacts and a range of feasible alternatives capable of eliminating or reducing these effects in accordance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines; and K. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held for GPA 2024-0001, ZC 2024-0001, and CA 2024-0003 on September 24, 2024 by the Planning Commission. L. That the proposed ZC 2024-0001 is consistent with the following General Plan Land Use goals and policies: 1. Goal 1: Provide for a well-balanced land use pattern that accommodates existing and future needs for housing, commercial and industrial land, open space and community facilities and services, while maintaining a healthy, diversified economy adequate to provide future City services. 2. Policy 1.3: Facilitate the development of vacant and underutilized freeway parcels with commercial uses where appropriate and compatible with surrounding uses to capitalize on their freeway access and visibility. 3. Policy 1.5: Encourage compatible and complementary infill of previously by-passed parcels in areas already predominately developed. 4. Policy 1.6: Ensure an adequate supply of commercial and industrial land within the City of Tustin for potential commercial and industrial expansion and development. 5. Policy 1.7: As part of the City's attraction to business and industry, provide adequate sites to house future employees. 6. Policy 1.10: Ensure that the distribution and intensity of land uses are consistent with the Land Use Plan and classification system. 7. Goal 2: Ensure that future land use decisions are the result of sound and comprehensive planning. 8. Policy 2.2: Maintain consistency between the Land Use Element, Zoning Ordinances, and other City ordinances, regulations and standards. M. That the proposed ZC 2024-0001 is consistent with the General Plan Housing Element Goal 1 in that ZC 2024-0001 would facilitate the provision of an adequate supply of housing to meet the need for a variety of housing types and the diverse socio-economic needs of all community residents and supports State Housing Law as implemented by the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA). The project would provide for 413 housing units. N. That the City Council has considered the EIR along with its MMRP in its recommendation that the City Council approve CA 2024-0001. SECTION 2: That the City Council hereby adopts Ordinance 1550 approving Zone Change 2024-0001, to amend the City's zoning map to apply the Housing Overlay (HO) district to the Enderle Center Rezone Project area and to establish development standards, as identified in Exhibit A and B attached hereto. SECTION 3. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council of the City of Tustin hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Tustin on the_t" day of 2024. AUSTIN LUMBARD Mayor Exhibit A: Zoning Map Existing/Proposed Exhibit B: Development Standards ATTEST: ERICA N. YASUDA City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: DAVID E. KENDIG, City Attorney STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) CITY OF TUSTIN ) I, ERICA N. YASUDA, City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of the member of the City Council of the City of Tustin is 5; that the above and foregoing Ordinance No. 1550 was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on 2024 by the following vote: COUNCILMEMBER AYES: COUNCILMEMBER NOES: COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBER ABSENT: ERICA N. YASUDA City Clerk EXHIBIT A ORDINANCE NO. 1550 ZC-2024-0001 —Amendment to Zoning District from Planned Community Commercial (PC COM) to Planned Community Commercial (PC COM) and Housing Overlay (HO) AM& 401-251-04, -05, and -06; 401-252-05, -06, -08, -09, and -10; and 401-253-03 and -04. .i PC COM i rc-r nra rc-r ami L PCR1 PCF.: Existing Zoning — PC COM Proposed Zoning — PC COM & HO EXHIBIT B ORDINANCE NO. 1500 Housing Overlay Enderle Center Development Standards The following development standards regulate new site and building development by establishing standards for intensity, building height, open space, and other elements. Development standards include street-based frontage standards regulating buildings frontages along existing and new streets to form adequate and pedestrian-friendly building faces. Table 1- Site Development Regulations Table 2 - Open Space Regulations �ANDARD PROVISIONS Site Private open space shall be Lot Size—Residential&Mixed Use None None provided at a minimum ---------- depth of 4 feet in the form of Lot Width 35 sf None 4 5 balconies, patios,or other --- Private 100 sf per unit similar private open space Density acceptable to the Residential Density 20 du/ac None Community Development Director. Dwelling Units 0 413 --------. Shared facilities designated Housing Development Area 0 7 ac as recreational areas. May Building Height Common 300 sf per unit include pedestrian paths, common area balconies, Single&Multifamily Residential None 75 ft common area rooftop decks, recreation buildings,etc. Mixed Use 2 stories 75 ft Building Setback Seventeenth Street loft None Yorba Street loft None Local Road loft None Private Street or Drive 5 ft None Alley 3 ft None Rear Yard' 10 ft5 None Interior Side Yard 3 ft6 None Landscape Setback Seventeenth Street loft None Yorba Street loft None Local Road 5 ft None Private Street or Drive 5 ft None Applies only to single family detached dwelling units,attached dwelling 4 Private attached ground level patios may be credited if open on three units,and duplexes. sides. Areas not available for open space credit include all streets, Interior side yard setbacks shall maintain an aggregate 10 feet driveways,landscaped building setback areas,and parking lots. distance between buildings. 5 Private open space may include balconies, patios, courtyards, roof 3 Minimum landscaped areas are required within building setback areas. decks,etc. Building setbacks from streets are measured from back of rights-of- way. General Requirements A. This site is designated within the Housing Element's "Sites Inventory" (Housing Element Appendix B, Table B-2 of the Housing Element of the General Plan) and is subject to Government Code Section 65863 (No-Net-Loss Law). B. Residential development projects within the Housing Overlay (HO) District, in compliance with the 2021-2029 6th Cycle Housing Element Update, shall be permitted "by right", subject to development standards, objective design standards (ODS) and other applicable objective criteria of the Tustin City Code. C. Modifications to design due to site-specific conditions, utility conflicts, or other unforeseen factors shall require approval from the Community Development Director. D. Encroachments into setbacks are subject to the provisions outlined in the Tustin City Code, Article 9, Chapter 2. E. Parking requirements shall adhere to the standards specified in the Tustin City Code. F. For standards and procedures not specifically addressed herein, refer to the Tustin City Code. G. Interpretations of the Enderle Center Housing Overlay(HO) district provisions will be made by the Community Development Director considering factors such as consistency with previous interpretations, the General Plan, and HO District policies, vision and intent. H. The Community Development Director is authorized to review and interpret ambiguities that arises concerning the meaning or application of the provisions of the Enderle Center Housing Overlay (HO). The Director shall consider the following factors when making an interpretation: 1. The case is similar to previous interpretations of similar provisions. 2. The interpretation is supported by the vision, intent and purpose of the HO District. 3. The resulting project is consistent with the General Plan. I. The Enderle Center HO District serves as official zoning for the properties contained within its boundaries. The Enderle Center HO District and its development standards have been adopted by ordinance, which requires a recommendation by the Planning Commission and approval by the City Council. Any regulation adopted for the Enderle Center Housing Overlay that differs from the Tustin City Code (TCC) shall supersede the TCC. Where the Enderle HO District is silent, the provisions of the TCC shall prevail. The Director of Community Development is authorized to make determinations regarding conflicts or ambiguities related to the Enderle HO District and/or its relationship with the TCC. Additional Requirements A. Pedestrian pathways to Seventeenth Street and Yorba Street shall be provided to ensure access by residents and guests. Such access shall be through paseos, unobscured building corridors or courtyards adjacent to the public right of way. Such access need not be the primary access to buildings or the community. B. A solid freestanding wall greater than three (3) feet is not allowed within landscape setbacks. The Community Development Director may waive this requirement when a higher wall is integrated with the landscaping and patio design and serves a defined purpose. C. Private attached ground level patios may be credited as open space if unenclosed on three sides. Streets, driveways, landscaped building setback areas, and parking lots shall not be credited to the open space requirements. ATTACHMENT 9 TUSTIN MARKET PLACE - (SITE 18) LOCATION / RADIUS MAP Attachment 9 Location/ Radius Map Tustin Market Place Housing Element Site 18 Legend C:3 n tnx+ C:7 Lww.-'woo C:3 euaw wow t08 „1 Project Location A \k1� Wr• -CT,... t.t wPy 4' +:��:,�t+'[3 W 1GrY lhrC Cat r F;wni�MMen1'+ LaPwR:+.�h,t;sc'r,r°+rt�,a)ea,1+"LAi :,tl.*lAwtM W-t f.W1 hl'i 9!S t"xw,+...#a...r t1S(ks", w• ATTACHMENT 10 RESOLUTION NO. 4500 • EXHIBIT 10A: FINAL EIR • EXHIBIT 10B: DRAFT EIR • EXHIBIT 10C: FINDINGS & STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS RESOLUTION NO. 4500 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL CERTIFY THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND ADOPT ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS, A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND ERRATA FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2024-0001 AND SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 2024-0001 TO IMPLEMENT THE HOUSING IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM OF THE 6T" CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN — HOUSING ELEMENT SITE 18 — THE MARKET PLACE The Planning Commission does hereby resolve as follows: I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: A. That the City's 2021-2029 6th Cycle Housing Element of the General Plan (Housing Element) was certified by the California Department of Housing and Community Development in October 2022. The Housing Element contains the goals and policies the City intends to implement to address several housing-related issues. B. That the Housing Element sets forth a Housing Implementation Program that provides for specific actions the City intends to undertake to achieve the goals and policies of the Housing Element. C. That pursuant to Housing Element programs 1.1 b and 1.1f, Specific Plan Amendment 2024-0001 was initiated by the City to amend the East Tustin Specific Plan (ETSP; SP-8) to create a new High Density Residential (HDR) land use category and apply the HDR zone to 18 acres of existing surface parking in the Tustin Market Place Shopping Center. The project site is approximately 18 acres of developable land located in Sector 12 of the ETSP and is inclusive of APNs 500- 291-067 -077 -117 -12, and -25 and 500-312-03 and -10 in the parking lot of the existing 76.9-acre shopping center (The Market Place). D. That the proposed SPA 2024-0001 would allow for residential use only on the project site, with a minimum density of 20 dwelling units per acre (du/acre). The new High Density Residential land use designation would allow for up to 900 dwelling units on the project site with no maximum density prescribed. Resolution No. 4500 GPA 2024-0001 and SPA 2024-0001 Page 2 E. That the City proposes the following actions (Proposed Project): • General Plan Amendment (GPA) 2024-0001 —A request for a GPA to establish that higher density residential uses are allowed in the Planned Community Commercial/Business (PCCB) land use designation when prescribed by a Housing Overlay (HO) or a Specific Plan (SP); and • Specific Plan Amendment (SPA) 2024-0001 —A request for a SPA to identify High Density Residential (HDR) as a new residential density category available within the ETSP and designate 18 acres of existing surface parking in the Tustin Market Place Shopping Center as High Density Residential (HDR) Land Use designation of the ETSP. F. That GPA 2024-0001 and SPA-2024-0001 constitutes a "project" that is subject to the terms of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") (Pub. Resources Code §21000 et. seq.). G. That pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.), the City of Tustin, as lead agency, determined that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) should be prepared to analyze all potential adverse environmental impacts of the project and corresponding General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan Amendment, which together are referred to as the "Proposed Project;" H. That the City sent a Notice of Preparation (NOP) of a Draft EIR to the Office of Planning and Research, responsible and trustee agencies, and other interested parties on or about February 26, 2024; and I. That the NOP was circulated for 30 days pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines sections 15082 and 15083, until March 26, 2024, to invite comments from responsible and trustee agencies, the public, and other interested parties regarding the scope of the EIR; and J. That the City received written comments in response to the NOP, which assisted the City in the scope and analysis for the Draft EIR, and also held a series of public meetings and workshops regarding the scope of the Proposed Project; and K. That the City received three (3) comments from interested parties and responsible and trustee agencies in response to the NOP; and L. That on June 6, 2024, the City initiated the 45-day public review period on the Draft EIR by filing a Notice of Availability with the State Office of Resolution No. 4500 GPA 2024-0001 and SPA 2024-0001 Page 3 Planning and Research, publishing the Notice in the Tustin News, and releasing the Draft EIR (State Clearinghouse [SCH] No. 2024020969) for public review and comment; and M. That pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15086, the City consulted with and requested comments from all responsible and trustee agencies, other regulatory agencies, and other interested parties during the 45-day comment period, which spanned from June 6, 2024 to July 22, 2024; N. That during the public review period, copies of the Draft EIR were provided online on the City's website, were available for public review in printed form at City Hall and the Tustin Library; and O. That the City received five (5) written comments on the Draft EIR during the public review period for the Draft EIR; and P. That following the close of the public comment period and after review of the comments received on the Draft EIR, the City prepared a Final EIR, consisting of comments received on the Draft EIR, written responses to those comments, and revisions and errata to the Draft EIR. For purposes of this Resolution, the EIR shall refer to the Draft EIR, including all technical studies and appendices to the Draft EIR, as revised by the Final EIR's errata section, together with the other sections of the Final EIR, including all the technical studies and appendices to the Final EIR, and the Errata to the Final EIR. The Draft EIR, the Final EIR, and all technical studies and appendices to the Final EIR are hereby incorporated herein by reference to this Resolution and are on file with the City Clerk. The Errata to the Final EIR, which is attached hereto as Exhibit 11A of Attachment 11 and incorporated herein, reflects changes made to mitigation measures and text within the EIR sections; and Q. That the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations, attached hereto as Exhibit 11 C of Attachment 11, and incorporated herein, set forth the environmental impacts identified in the Final EIR that the City finds are less than significant and do not require mitigation, the environmental impacts identified in the Final EIR as potentially significant but which the City finds can be mitigated to a less than significant level through the implementation of all feasible mitigation measures, the environmental impacts identified in the Final EIR as potentially significant but which the City finds cannot be fully mitigated to a less than significant level despite the imposition of all feasible mitigation measures, the cumulative environmental impacts resulting from the Proposed Project, the significant and irreversible environmental changes that would result from the Proposed Project, but which would be mitigated, the existence of any growth-inducing impacts resulting from the Proposed Project identified in the Final EIR, and a statement Resolution No. 4500 GPA 2024-0001 and SPA 2024-0001 Page 4 supporting the Proposed Project notwithstanding the potentially significant environmental impacts which could not feasibly be mitigated; and R. That alternatives to the Proposed Project that might eliminate or reduce significant environmental impacts are described in Exhibit 11 C of Attachment 11, Statement of Overriding Considerations, pursuant to CEQA, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; and S. That the City has endeavored in good faith to set forth the basis for its decision on the Proposed Project in the Findings of Fact as well as to explain why the benefits of the Proposed Project outweigh the environmental impacts the EIR determines are significant and unavoidable; and T. That all of the requirements of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines have been satisfied by the City of Tustin in the EIR, which is sufficiently detailed so that all of the potentially significant environmental effects of the Proposed Project have been adequately evaluated; and U. That the EIR prepared in connection with the Proposed Project sufficiently analyzes both the feasible mitigation measures necessary to avoid or substantially lessen the Proposed Project's potential environmental impacts and a range of feasible alternatives capable of eliminating or reducing these effects in accordance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines; and V. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed, and held on said application on September 24, 20247 by the Planning Commission; and W. That on September 24, 2024, the Planning Commission was presented with, reviewed, and considered all the information and data in the administrative record, including the Final EIR, and all oral and written evidence presented to it during all meetings and hearings, all of which are incorporated herein by reference; and X. That the City has not received any comments or additional information that produced substantial new information requiring recirculation or additional environmental review under Public Resources Code Sections 21166 and 21092.1 or State CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5; and Y. That all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. /L The Proposed Project would have significant and unavoidable impacts related to the following environmental issue areas: greenhouse gas emissions. Resolution No. 4500 GPA 2024-0001 and SPA 2024-0001 Page 5 III. Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations. In accordance with State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15091, 15092, and 15093, the Planning Commission recommends the Tustin City Council adopt the CEQA Findings of Fact and the Statement of Overriding Considerations pursuant to CEQA, attached hereto as Exhibit 11 C of Attachment 11, and incorporated herein by reference as is fully set forth herein. IV. Certification of Final EIR. In accordance with State CEQA Guidelines Section 15090, the Planning Commission recommends the Tustin City Council certify that: • The Final EIR is an accurate and objective statement that has been completed in compliance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines, and that together with the errata, attached hereto as Exhibit 11A and incorporated herein by reference as is fully set forth herein, includes all the environmental impacts of the Proposed Project and mitigation measures; • The Planning Commission and City Council have been presented with and have reviewed and considered the information contained in the EIR, prior to the Tustin City Council approving the Proposed Project; and • The EIR reflects the City Council's independent judgment and analysis. V. Recirculation Not Required. The Planning Commission recommends that the Tustin City Council declare that the City has not received evidence of new significant impacts, as defined by the State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15088.5, after circulation of the Draft EIR that would require recirculation, which is further set forth in the Findings (Exhibit 11 C), nor have any of the conditions requiring a subsequent or supplemental EIR listed in Public Resources Code Section 21166 occurred. VI. Notice of Determination. The Planning Commission recommends that the Tustin City Council direct staff to file a Notice of Determination with the Orange County Clerk Recorder within five (5) working days of final approval of the Proposed Project. VI I. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, then such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Resolution. The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin hereby declares that the Planning Commission would have adopted this Resolution, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that anyone or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective. Resolution No. 4500 GPA 2024-0001 and SPA 2024-0001 Page 6 NOW, THEREFORE, based on the above findings, the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby recommend City Council certification of the Final EIR and adoption of the Findings of Fact, Statement of Overriding Considerations, and Errata for GPA 2024- 0001, and SPA 2024-0001. ERIC HIGUCHI Chairperson JUSTINA L. WILLKOM Planning Commission Secretary STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) CITY OF TUSTIN ) I, Justina L. Willkom, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Tustin, California; that Resolution No. 4500 was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission, held on the 24t" day of September 2024. PLANNING COMMISSIONER AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONER NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONER ABSTAINED: PLANNING COMMISSIONER ABSENT: JUSTINA L. WILLKOM Planning Commission Secretary EXHIBIT 10A FINAL EIR (Click link provided on Pages 18 & 19 of the Agenda Report.) EXHIBIT 10B DRAFT EIR (Click link provided on Pages 18 & 19 of the Agenda Report.) EXHIBIT 10C FINDINGS & STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS (Click link provided on Pages 1 B & 19 of the Agenda Report.) ATTACHMENT 11 RESOLUTION NO. 4501 SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT (SPA) 2024-0001 • EXHIBIT 11A: DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 1551 • EXHIBIT 11B: SPA - EAST TUSTIN WITH REDLINED CHANGES RESOLUTION NO. 4501 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT (SPA) 2024-0001 TO AMEND THE EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-8) TO ACCOMMODATE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ON 18 ACRES OF THE MARKET PLACE SHOPPING CENTER AND CREATE A NEW HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LAND USE CATEGORY TO IMPLEMENT THE HOUSING IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM OF THE 6TH CYCLE 2021- 2029 HOUSING ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN — HOUSING ELEMENT SITE 18 — THE MARKET PLACE. The Planning Commission does hereby resolve as follows: I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: A. That the City's 2021-2029 6th Cycle Housing Element of the General Plan (Housing Element) was certified by the California Department of Housing and Community Development in October 2022. The Housing Element contains the goals and policies the City intends to implement to address several housing-related issues. B. That the Housing Element sets forth a Housing Implementation Program that provides for specific actions the City intends to undertake to achieve the goals and policies of the Housing Element. C. That pursuant to Housing Element programs 1.1b and 1.1f, Specific Plan Amendment 2024-0001 was initiated by the City to amend the East Tustin Specific Plan (ETSP; SP-8) to create a new High Density Residential (HDR) land use category and apply the HDR zone to 18 acres of existing surface parking in the Tustin Market Place Shopping Center. The project site is approximately 18 acres of developable land located in Sector 12 of the ETSP and is inclusive of APNs 500-291-06, -077 -117 -12, and -25 and 500- 312-03 and -10 in the parking lot of the existing 76.9-acre shopping center (The Market Place). D. That the proposed SPA 2024-0001 would allow for residential use only on the project site, with a minimum density of 20 dwelling units per acre (du/acre). The new High Density Residential land use designation would allow for up to 900 dwelling units on the project site with no maximum density prescribed. E. That residential uses are not currently permitted on the project site. The project site is designated as Mixed Use (MU) land use in the East Tustin Specific Plan, which is intended for development of planned retail Resolution No. 4501 SPA 2024-0001 Page 2 commercial, office, and industrial/research and development land uses of an intensity compatible with neighboring residential and the Auto Center land uses. The City identified the project site as a suitable commercial site for rezoning to allow higher density housing during the 2021-2019 Housing Element process. F. That the remaining portion of the project site, approximately 58 acres, would remain designated as nonresidential land use within the ETSP. There is currently 13,032 square feet (SF) of remaining commercial capacity within the nonresidential-designated area of the project site. Therefore, the Proposed Project anticipates the future nonresidential capacity buildout of 13,032 SF within a portion of the project site that allows non-residential development. Future nonresidential projects proposed pursuant to the remaining development capacity would be required to comply with the existing MU development standards, and the City's plan review process. G. That the proposed amendment to the Specific Plan Amendment is in the best interest of the public, in that, it increases the diversity in available housing for existing and new residents in the City of Tustin. H. That the City proposes the following actions (Proposed Project): • General Plan Amendment (GPA) 2024-0001 — A request for a GPA to establish that higher density residential uses are allowed in the Planned Community Commercial/Business (PCCB) land use designation when prescribed by a Housing Overlay (HO) or a Specific Plan (SP); • Specific Plan Amendment (SPA) 2024-0001 — A request for a SPA to identify High Density Residential (HDR) as a new residential density category available within the ETSP and designate 18 acres of existing surface parking in the Tustin Market Place Shopping Center as High Density Residential (HDR) Land Use designation of the ETSP. I. That the proposed Specific Plan Amendment 2024-0001 is consistent with General Plan Amendment 2024-0001 and the policies of the General Plan, as evidenced by the following findings: a. That the site has been developed with underutilized commercial complex. b. That residential uses are complimentary and beneficial to adjacent residential uses and current commercial uses. c. That the Proposed Project is adjacent to other residential uses, particularly multi-family dwellings immediately adjacent to the project site. Resolution No. 4501 SPA 2024-0001 Page 3 d. That the Planning Commission has considered General Plan Amendment (GPA) 2024-0001 and recommended that the City Council approve the request to establish that higher density residential uses are allowed in the Planned Community Commercial/Business (PCCB) land use designation when prescribed by a housing overlay or a specific plan. e. That the proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan, in that, it meets regional housing needs and is consistent with the following goals and policies of the General Plan Land Use Element: 1. Goal 1: Provide for a well-balanced land use pattern that accommodates existing and future needs for housing, commercial and industrial land, open space and community facilities and services, while maintaining a healthy, diversified economy adequate to provide future City services. 2. Policy 1.3: Facilitate the development of vacant and underutilized freeway parcels with commercial uses where appropriate and compatible with surrounding uses to capitalize on their freeway access and visibility. 3. Policy 1.5: Encourage compatible and complementary infill of previously by-passed parcels in areas already predominately developed. 4. Policy 1.7: As part of the City's attraction to business and industry, provide adequate sites to house future employees. 5. Goal 2: Ensure that future land use decisions are the result of sound and comprehensive planning. 6. Policy 2.2: Maintain consistency between the Land Use Element, Zoning Ordinances and other City ordinances, regulations and standards. 7. GOAL 9: Continue to provide for a planned community in East Tustin compatible with the land use characteristics of the local area and sensitive to the natural environment. 8. Policy 9.8: Encourage clustering of residential uses to minimize impacts from noise, flooding, slope instability and other environmental hazards. J. That the proposed SPA 2024-0001 is consistent with the General Plan Housing Element Goal 1, in that, SPA 2024-0001 would facilitate the provision Resolution No. 4501 SPA 2024-0001 Page 4 of an adequate supply of housing to meet the need for a variety of housing types and the diverse socio-economic needs of all community residents and supports State Housing Law as implemented by the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA). The Proposed Project provides for 900 dwelling units. K. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed, and held on said application on September 24, 2024, by the Planning Commission. L. That pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.), the City of Tustin, as lead agency, determined that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) should be prepared to analyze all potential adverse environmental impacts of the project and corresponding General Plan Amendment, which together are referred to as the "Proposed Project." M. That all of the requirements of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines have been satisfied by the City of Tustin in the EIR, which is sufficiently detailed so that all of the potentially significant environmental effects of the Proposed Project have been adequately evaluated. N. That the EIR prepared in connection with the Proposed Project sufficiently analyzes both the feasible mitigation measures necessary to avoid or substantially lessen the Proposed Project's potential environmental impacts and a range of feasible alternatives capable of eliminating or reducing these effects in accordance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. O. That the Planning Commission has considered the EIR along with its MMRP in its recommendation that the City Council approve SPA 2024-0001. I. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt Ordinance No. 1551 approving Specific Plan Amendment 2024-0001 attached hereto as Exhibit A. Resolution No. 4501 SPA 2024-0001 Page 5 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin, at a regular meeting on the 24t" day of September 2024. ERIC HIGUCHI Chairperson JUSTINA L. WILLKOM Planning Commission Secretary Exhibit A: Draft Ordinance No. 1551 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) CITY OF TUSTIN ) I, Justina L. Willkom, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Tustin, California; that Resolution No. 4501 was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission, held on the 24t" day of September 2024. PLANNING COMMISSIONER AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONER NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONER ABSTAINED: PLANNING COMMISSIONER ABSENT: JUSTINA L. WILLKOM Planning Commission Secretary EXHIBIT 11A DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 1551 ORDINANCE 1551 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN APPROVING SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 2024-0001, ADOPTING ORDINANCE NO. 1551, TO AMEND THE EAST TUSTIN SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-8) TO CREATE A NEW HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (HDR) LAND USE CATEGORY, AND APPLY THE HDR ZONE TO 18 ACRES OF EXISTING SURFACE PARKING IN THE TUSTIN MARKET PLACE SHOPPING CENTER TO IMPLEMENT THE HOUSING IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM OF THE 6TH CYCLE 2021-2029 HOUSING ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN — HOUSING ELEMENT SITE 18 — THE MARKET PLACE. The City Council of the City of Tustin does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1. The City Council finds and determines as follows A. That the City's 2021-2029 6th Cycle Housing Element of the General Plan (Housing Element) was certified by the California Department of Housing and Community Development in October 2022. The Housing Element contains the goals and policies the City intends to implement to address a number of housing-related issues. B. That pursuant to Housing Element Program 1.1 b and 1.1f, the City is proposing Specific Plan Amendment 2024-0001 to amend the East Tustin Specific Plan (ETSP; SP-8) to create a new High Density Residential (HDR) land use category and apply the HDR zone to 18 acres of existing surface parking in the Tustin Market Place Shopping Center, Housing Element Site 18 (project site). Residential uses are currently not allowed on the Project site. Upon approval of the Project, the Project site could accommodate 900 units over approximately 18 acres of developable land within the existing 76.9-acre shopping center. The anticipated development over 18 acres may take place on underutilized asphalt parking lot areas, and not require demolition of any existing buildings. Parking displaced as a result of redevelopment would be accommodated by vertical parking structures located within the proposed development. C. That the subject property has been used as a commercial retail center since its completion. D. That the subject property is surrounded by a range of uses including commercial, office, and residential. E. That the proposed change to the General Plan land use designation would allow for the development of high density residential development where currently none is allowed. F. That the project, as proposed, would have a maximum of 900 unit upon 18 acres, consistent with high density residential developments. G. That pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.), the City of Tustin, as lead agency, determined that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) should be prepared to analyze all potential adverse environmental impacts of the Project and corresponding General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan Amendment, which together are referred to as the "Proposed Project;" H. That all of the requirements of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines have been satisfied by the City of Tustin in the EIR, which is sufficiently detailed so that all of the potentially significant environmental effects of the Proposed Project have been adequately evaluated; and I. That the EIR prepared in connection with the Proposed Project sufficiently analyzes both the feasible mitigation measures necessary to avoid or substantially lessen the Proposed Project's potential environmental impacts and a range of feasible alternatives capable of eliminating or reducing these effects in accordance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines; and J. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held for SPA 2024-0003 on September 24, 2024 by the Planning Commission. K. That the proposed SPA 2024-0001 is consistent with the following General Plan Land Use goals and policies: 1. That the Goal 1: Provide for a well-balanced land use pattern that accommodates existing and future needs for housing, commercial and industrial land, open space and community facilities and services, while maintaining a healthy, diversified economy adequate to provide future City services. 2. Policy 1.1: Permit compatible multi-family development to meet regional housing needs where best suited from a standpoint of current development, accessibility, transportation and public facilities. 3. Policy 1.7: As part of the City's attraction to business and industry, provide adequate sites to house future employees. 4. Policy 2.2: Maintain consistency between the Land Use Element, Zoning Ordinances and other City ordinances, regulations and standards. L. That the proposed SPA 2024-0001 is consistent with the General Plan Housing Element Goal 1 in that SPA 2024-0001 would facilitate the provision of an adequate supply of housing to meet the need for a variety of housing types and the diverse socio-economic needs of all community residents and supports State Housing Law as implemented by the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA). The project would provide for 900 housing units. M. That the City Council has considered the EIR along with its MMRP in its recommendation that the City Council approve SPA 2024-0001. SECTION 2: That the City Council hereby adopts Ordinance 1551 approving Specific Plan Amendment 2024-0001, amending the specific plan to create a new High Density Residential (HDR) land use category, and apply the HDR zone to 18 acres of existing surface parking in the Tustin Market Place Shopping Center, as identified in Exhibit A attached hereto. SECTION 3. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council of the City of Tustin hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Tustin on the _t" day of 2024. AUSTIN LUMBARD Mayor ATTEST: ERICA N. YASUDA City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: DAVID E. KENDIG, City Attorney STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) CITY OF TUSTIN ) I, ERICA N. YASUDA, City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of the member of the City Council of the City of Tustin is 5; that the above and foregoing Ordinance No. 1551 was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on 2024 by the following vote: COUNCILMEMBER AYES: COUNCILMEMBER NOES: COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBER ABSENT: ERICA N. YASUDA City Clerk EXHIBIT 11B SPA-EAST TUSTIN WITH REDLINED CHANGES (Click link provided on Pages 18 & 19 of the Agenda Report.) ATTACHMENT 12 RESOLUTION NO. 4497 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (GPA) 2024-0001 • EXHIBIT 12A: DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 1548 • EXHIBIT 1213: TEXT AMENDMENT RESOLUTION NO. 4497 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT ORDINANCE 1548, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2024-0001 TO ESTABLISH THAT HIGHER DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USES ARE ALLOWED IN THE PLANNED COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL/BUSINESS (PCCB) LAND USE DESIGNATION WHEN PRESCRIBED BY A HOUSING OVERLAY OR A SPECIFIC PLAN The Planning Commission of the City of Tustin does hereby resolve as follows: I. The Planning Commission finds and determines as follows: A. That the City's 2021-2029 6th Cycle Housing Element of the General Plan (Housing Element) was certified by the California Department of Housing and Community Development in October 2022. The Housing Element contains the goals and policies the City intends to implement to address a number of housing-related issues. B. That the Housing Element sets forth a Housing Implementation Program that provides for specific actions the City intends to undertake to achieve the goals and policies of the Housing Element. C. That pursuant to Housing Element programs 1.1(b) and 1.1(f), a General Plan Amendment 2024-0001 was initiated by the City to establish that higher density residential uses are allowed in the Planned Community Commercial/Business (PCCB) land use designation when prescribed by a Housing Overlay (HO) or a Specific Plan (SP). D. That the proposed change to the General Plan land use designation would allow for the development of high density residential development. E. That pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.), the City of Tustin, as lead agency, determined that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared to analyze all potential adverse environmental impacts of the General Plan Amendment; F. That all of the requirements of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines have been satisfied by the City of Tustin in the EIR, which is sufficiently detailed so that all of the potentially significant environmental effects of the proposed project have been adequately evaluated; and G. That the EIR prepared in connection with the proposed project sufficiently analyzes both the feasible mitigation measures necessary to avoid or substantially lessen the proposed project's potential environmental impacts and a range of feasible alternatives capable of eliminating or reducing these effects in accordance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. Resolution No. 4497 GPA 2024-0001 Page 2 H. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held for GPA 2024-0001 on September 24, 2024 by the Planning Commission. I. That the proposed GPA 2024-0001 is consistent with the following General Plan Land Use goals and policies: 1. That the Goal 1: Provide for a well-balanced land use pattern that accommodates existing and future needs for housing, commercial and industrial land, open space and community facilities and services, while maintaining a healthy, diversified economy adequate to provide future City services. 2. Policy 1.3: Facilitate the development of vacant and underutilized freeway parcels with commercial uses where appropriate and compatible with surrounding uses to capitalize on their freeway access and visibility. 3. Policy 1.5: Encourage compatible and complementary infill of previously by- passed parcels in areas already predominately developed. 4. Policy 1.6: Ensure an adequate supply of commercial and industrial land within the City of Tustin for potential commercial and industrial expansion and development. 5. Policy 1.7: As part of the City's attraction to business and industry, provide adequate sites to house future employees. 6. Policy 1.10: Ensure that the distribution and intensity of land uses are consistent with the Land Use Plan and classification system. 7. Goal 2: Ensure that future land use decisions are the result of sound and comprehensive planning. 8. Policy 2.2: Maintain consistency between the Land Use Element, Zoning Ordinances, and other City ordinances, regulations and standards. J. That the proposed GPA 2024-0001 is consistent with the General Plan Housing Element Goal 1 in that GPA 2024-0001 would facilitate the provision of an adequate supply of housing to meet the need for a variety of housing types and the diverse socio-economic needs of all community residents and supports State Housing Law as implemented by the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA). K. That the Planning Commission has considered the EIR along with its MMRP in its recommendation that the City Council approve GPA 2024-0001. II. That the Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City Council approve GPA 2024-0001. Resolution No. 4497 GPA 2024-0001 Page 3 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Tustin at a regular meeting on the 24t" day of September, 2024. ERIC HIGUCHI Chairperson JUSTINA L. WILLKOM Planning Commission Secretary STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) CITY OF TUSTIN ) I, Justina L. Willkom, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Tustin, California; that Resolution No. 4497 was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Tustin Planning Commission, held on the 24t" day of September, 2024. PLANNING COMMISSIONER AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONER NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONER ABSTAINED: PLANNING COMMISSIONER ABSENT: JUSTINA L. WILLKOM Planning Commission Secretary EXHIBIT 12A DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 1548 ORDINANCE 1548 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUSTIN APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2024- 0001, ADOPTING ORDINANCE NO. 1548, FOR MINOR TEXT AMENDMENTS TO ENSURE CONSISTENCY WITH THE PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE 2024-0001 (HOUSING ELEMENT SITE 17 - ENDERLE CENTER) AND SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 2024-0001 (HOUSING ELEMENT SITE 18 — MARKET PLACE) TO IMPLEMENT THE HOUSING IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM OF THE 6T" CYCLE 2021- 2029 HOUSING ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN - (GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2024-0001) The City Council of the City of Tustin does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1. The City Council finds and determines as follows A. That the City's 2021-2029 6th Cycle Housing Element of the General Plan (Housing Element) was certified by the California Department of Housing and Community Development in October 2022. The Housing Element contains the goals and policies the City intends to implement to address several housing- related issues. B. That the Housing Element sets forth a Housing Implementation Program that provides for specific actions the City intends to undertake to achieve the goals and policies of the Housing Element. C. That pursuant to Housing Element programs 1.1(b) and 1.1(f), a General Plan Amendment 2024-0001 was initiated by the City to establish that higher density residential uses are allowed in the Planned Community Commercial/Business (PCCB) land use designation when prescribed by a Housing Overlay (HO) or a Specific Plan (SP). D. That the proposed change to the General Plan land use designation would allow for the development of high density residential development. E. That pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.), the City of Tustin, as lead agency, determined that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared to analyze all potential adverse environmental impacts of the General Plan Amendment; F. That all of the requirements of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines have been satisfied by the City of Tustin in the EIR, which is sufficiently detailed so that all of the potentially significant environmental effects of the Proposed Project have been adequately evaluated; and G. That the EIR prepared in connection with the Proposed Project sufficiently analyzes both the feasible mitigation measures necessary to avoid or substantially lessen the Proposed Project's potential environmental impacts and a range of feasible alternatives capable of eliminating or reducing these effects in accordance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines; and H. That a public hearing was duly called, noticed and held for GPA 2024-0001 on September 24, 2024 by the Planning Commission. I. That the proposed GPA 2024-0001 is consistent with the following General Plan Land Use goals and policies: a. That the Goal 1: Provide for a well-balanced land use pattern that accommodates existing and future needs for housing, commercial and industrial land, open space and community facilities and services, while maintaining a healthy, diversified economy adequate to provide future City services. b. Policy 1.3: Facilitate the development of vacant and underutilized freeway parcels with commercial uses where appropriate and compatible with surrounding uses to capitalize on their freeway access and visibility. c. Policy 1.5: Encourage compatible and complementary infill of previously by- passed parcels in areas already predominately developed. d. Policy 1.6: Ensure an adequate supply of commercial and industrial land within the City of Tustin for potential commercial and industrial expansion and development. e. Policy 1.7: As part of the City's attraction to business and industry, provide adequate sites to house future employees. f. Policy 1.10: Ensure that the distribution and intensity of land uses are consistent with the Land Use Plan and classification system. g. Goal 2: Ensure that future land use decisions are the result of sound and comprehensive planning. h. Policy 2.2: Maintain consistency between the Land Use Element, Zoning Ordinances, and other City ordinances, regulations and standards. J. That the proposed GPA 2024-0001 is consistent with the General Plan Housing Element Goal 1 in that GPA 2024-0001 would facilitate the provision of an adequate supply of housing to meet the need for a variety of housing types and the diverse socio-economic needs of all community residents and supports State Housing Law as implemented by the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA). K. That the Planning Commission has considered the EIR along with its MMRP in its recommendation that the City Council approve GPA 2024-0001. SECTION 2: That the City Council hereby adopts Ordinance 1548 approving General Plan Amendment 2024-0001, for minor text amendments to ensure consistency with the proposed Zone Change 2024-0001 (Housing Element Site 17- Enderle Center) and Specific Plan Amendment 2024-0001 (Housing Element Site 18 — Market Place) to implement the housing implementation program of the 6th Cycle 2021-2029 housing element of the general plan, as identified in Exhibit A attached hereto. SECTION 3. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council of the City of Tustin hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Tustin on the_t" day of 2024. AUSTIN LUMBARD Mayor ATTEST: ERICA N. YASUDA City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: DAVID E. KENDIG, City Attorney STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) CITY OF TUSTIN ) I, ERICA N. YASUDA, City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Tustin, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of the member of the City Council of the City of Tustin is 5; that the above and foregoing Ordinance No. 1548 was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on 2024 by the following vote: COUNCILMEMBER AYES: COUNCILMEMBER NOES: COUNCILMEMBER ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBER ABSENT: ERICA N. YASUDA City Clerk EXHIBIT 12B TEXT AMENDMENT TABLE I-2 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS Amendment Name Date of Affected Amendment Description Adoption Elements 2024-0001 Housing Element Rezone XX/XX/24 Land Use Resolution No.24-XX Project 2022-0001 17802&17842 Irvine 01/17/23 Land Use Resolution No.23-02 Boulevard 2019-00001 1042&1052 San Juan Street 03/02/21 Land Use Resolution No.21-13 2016-00001 Red Hill Avenue Specific 10/16/18 Land Use Resolution No.18-74 Plan 2018-00001 Downtown Commercial 06/19/18 Land Use Resolution No.18-32 Core Specific Plan Circulation Land Use 15-002 Circulation 05 17 Conservation/0 Resolution No. 17-23 Tustin Legacy Specific Plan 07/ / penSpace/Recce Amendment 2015-01 ation Public Safety 2013-01 05/13/13 Land Use Resolution 13-33 SOCCD Amendment Circulation 01 All except t 2Geneerral Plan Amendment 11/20/12 Growth Resolution 12-103 Management 09-001 Housing Element Update 06/16/09 All Resolution 09-33 08-001 Housing Element Update 6/17/08 All Resolution 08-43 and MCAS General Plan Cleanup 07-001 12-04-07 Land Use Resolution 07-94 13841 Red Hill Avenue 06-002 14092 Browning Avenue 1002 06 Land Use Resolution 06-118 / / 02-002 Library 9-19-05 Land Use Resolution 05-101 05-001 El Camino Real Reclass. 4-18-05 Circulation Resolution 05-62 CITY OF TUSTIN INTRODUCTION GENERAL PLAN 11 TT Trim XXXXXX TABLE I-2 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS Amendment Name Date of Affected Amendment Description Adoption Elements 04-001 All,except in Columbus Grove Reorg. 2-22-05 Growthg and Resolution 05-43 Management 03-001 Newport Avenue 12-01-03 Land Use Resolution 03-131 New 02-001 Housing 2-04-02 Housing Housing Element Update g Resolution 02-09 00-001 Planning policies and programs for future MCAS Tustin Specific Plan/ All development of MCAS Tustin Reuse Plan property following base closure 99-003 17241 Irvine Boulevard 7-03-00 Land Use Resolution 00-48 99-002 1101 Sycamore Avenue 5-21-01 Land Use Resolution 01-58 99-001 Circulation 15500 Tustin Village Way 3-1-00 Land Use Resolution 99-22 98-002 Circulation Land 15580 Tustin Village Way 1-19-99 Use Resolution 99-10 96-003 Lot 27 Tract 13627; 7-21-97 Land Use Resolution 97-59 Commercial to Residential 96-002 1062-1082 Wass St;Low Density Residential to 5-6-96 Land Use Resolution 96-48 Medium Density Residential 95-001 Warner/Jamboree; 1-2-96 Land Use Resolution 96-3 Military to Industrial 94-001 Lot 6,Tract 12870;P&I to PCR Portion of Lot 27 11-20-95 Land Use Resolution 95-114 Tract 13627;PCCB to PCR CITY OF TUSTIN INTRODUCTION GENERAL PLAN 12 TT Trim XXXXXX community such as schools, churches, child care centers, transportation facilities,public buildings and facilities,public utilities, libraries, museums, art galleries, community theaters, hospitals, cultural and recreational activities,community recreational facilities, and parks. Certain public institutional uses may be permitted within other land use designations when determined appropriate. In addition, land uses which support and are specifically related to the function of the primary institutional use may also be permitted.These support uses may include residential (for purposes of housing persons related to an institutional use),retail and service commercial, and industrial uses (e.g., warehousing for a city yard facility). The standard intensity of development is a floor area ratio of 0.2:1 and the maximum intensity of development is a floor area ratio of 0.6:1. Planned Community (PC) Designations PC Residential: The PC Residential land use designation allows for the diversification in the relationships of various densities, building and open spaces.The land use designation recognizes that mixed and integrated uses can be made to be compatible and provides for the development of low, medium and high density residential development within a wide range of living accommodations. Single family dwellings and multi-family dwellings such as duplexes, condominiums, townhomes, apartments, cooperatives, community apartments and uses such as such as public/institutional facilities, churches,schools,large family day care facilities and others which are determined to be compatible with and oriented toward serving the needs of residential neighborhoods may also be allowed. The actual mechanism for defining location, density range and other building intensity standards will specifically be governed by Planned Community District provisions or adoption of a Specific Plan as authorized by the California Government Code. The average population is approximately 3.25 persons per dwelling unit for low density development representing a population density range of 2 to 23 persons per acre; 2.73 persons per dwelling unit for medium density development representing a population density range of 2 to 41 persons per acre; and 2.12 persons per dwelling unit for high density development representing a population density range of 2 to 53 persons per acre. PC Commercial/Business:The PC Commercial/Business designation provides opportunities for a mixture of all those activities permitted CITY OF TUSTIN LAND USE ELEMENT GENERAL PLAN 42 ^T Tr'T �xxxxxx within the Community Commercial, Professional Office, and Industrial land use designations.To ensure compatibility of land uses permitted within the classification,with the character of surrounding development and within a development area itself,location,land use type, density and building intensity standards will be speEifkally be governed by Planned Community District provisions or adoption of a Specific Plan as authorized by the California Government Code. The Planned Community Commercial designation may also permit other uses (such as residential uses) which support this land use designation. The standard intensity of development is a floor area ratio of 0.4:1 and the maximum intensity of development is a floor area ratio of 1.5:1.The overall population density range for residential use within the PC Business/Commercial designation is 2 to 54 persons per acre,or higher when authorized pursuant to an adopted Specific Plan or HousingOverlay verlay (HO) District. PC Public/institutional: The PC Public/Institutional designation includes a wide range of public and quasi-public uses distributed throughout the community such as schools, churches, child care centers, transportation facilities, government offices and facilities, public utilities,libraries,museums,art galleries,community theaters, hospitals, cultural and recreational activities including golf course/driving ranges, community recreational facilities, public parklands and indoor and outdoor sports/athletic facilities.To ensure compatibility of land uses permitted within the classification,with the character of surrounding development and within a development area itself, location, land use type, density and building intensity standards will be specifically be governed by Planned Community District provisions or adoption of a Specific Plan as authorized by the California Government Code. The Planned Community Public/Institutional designation may also permit other uses (such as residential for purposes of housing persons related to an institutional use)which support this land use designation. The standard intensity of development is a floor area ratio of 0.2:1 and the maximum intensity of development is a floor area ratio of O.H. The overall population density range for residential use within the PC Public/Institutional designation is 2 to 54 persons per acre. Tustin Legacy Specific Plan (formerly WAS Tustin Specific Plan) Designation CITY OF TUSTIN LAND USE ELEMENT GENERAL PLAN 43 ^T Tr'T �xxxxxx Table LU=3 Future Land Use Density/Intensity and Population Capacity of the Land Use Plan rosy woes rosy woes Gross Dwelling Dwelling Dwelling e e Population rporated Dn mated Total n�s s Fo F o s mated s mated s mated s mated a j.— aajm Area Area Plarming rpoated Una mated Total rporoated Una mated Total aeons a ,.,.on ,.,.on ,.,.on ,.,.on s mated s mated ea ea Plarming ea ea Plarming Dwdling ryorated Una mated Total rporated opnlation opnlation ajm Lvd UseGronpingsand (A) (,I) (C) (ow") (0-10 -11 Area Area Plarming C,mt, C,ml ]and Use Desgnations (N) (D) (D) (OW 4) Area ow .,b rpoated T.. (D) L(E) (E) Plarming w -NAesida�tial(t-]del) _ 32103 6, _ —98 —20 bledmn Dawty Aesidmeal(9-15ddn) _ _ - 1221 31221 t025s6 1221 4,1225 .gn Dawty Aesia—(ti25da/) _ _ 22045 , binblexome Park 1-lo anise mnm medal 114 5 00 114 5 1,596 0 1,596 Rofewonal OtSce ma sm —licMsfituaonal 3221 249 a® omm tc��la ow Aesiaavial11,192 -blalio.Dmvn A®aawal 470_3 58_2 528 5 3,690 454 4,144 273123916,773 1 Igb Dawn Aedaavid 291_7 3041 4,397 2212 9234 e] 9,321 e,992 9,696 1436e 10,945 mmadnlBoslnessea _ _9 119 1313 t3t310,845 1,197 11042 PubliNnni—.A ota 'i}91a —%3.6 ILI4141ggaxe a,xxs 31wa 12,a99 U338 13a,354 �9r�aearyMw s aammanm aoa-aadmeai.m unu�aw�aammc .a �ws s ammoa of s a r .m.�e<rm an w s y oa.mdmea� oan� [a to m,zw�.ow D.earyen ma,tc 1nnew1xammumdrree mma,w9n do,nnwt�n Dearyemdmdq umdhemdmeA3?m Dmirreevmeti.i,9.1jdanewxnbammumarr,+aa t2o done awwi=uoagjw ea ws twmnm�otmn as w e<o[mn am�;rymaunwrynadics�d�ivo€udiea mmnnn _ s Pa m�m�dmmtisa�awaeam.�.mm mn�ed�aoa4 nDr�geaadmd>vem -Al 11— m vma(br mmmU mp..ayma �edoa umdhem um:ry _ xtFsn ueah�m�clns<daatiesn�netan wgm n�mc�ud9'.w9 tc tes um:ry. am dr ma 4m p.p1e mm�mm ammmda:cnx�mum Drury m,wwvem �mmamaw,olmawmoaamnr� s>=y«y wcr nn.ana y mmn cnya - wwGdm ,ata,aa mmm�we�mny�nFcomxee v,zoo9. _ m.a(uwsnlnc evotaxnsnEw. ATTACHMENT 13 PUBLIC COMMENTS & RELATED FEEDBACK • EXHIBIT 13A: PETITION REGARDING ENDERLE CENTER • EXHIBIT 1313: CORRESPONDENCE FROM V. TRAN EXHIBIT 13A PETITION REGARDING ENDERLE CENTER STOP the Rezon of Enderle Center (17350 17 th St, Tustin) for potential, future high-density houses Due to a state mandate for more housing, the city chose Enderle as a site to rezone which could eventually become high-density units, to include affordable housing. Many residents would like the city to choose another site in Tustin that may have less community impact. Though the Enderle family hasn't decided to sell, an � . development planned, the housing site could become a reality in the fut (.� �D AUG 14 2024 Why some residents oppose the rezone project: TUSTINC"CLERKS OFFICE - More traffic,longer commute times and possibly tower property values. - Neighborhoods near Enderle are part of a "functional" community with ability to "walk"to the only upscale restaurants and retail establishments in Tustin. Rezoning would leave average strip mall dining and force residents to drive to the other side of town for stand-alone restaurants. - Everyone has worked hard to live In this neighborhood and many have lived here for decades, taking, pride in ownership. Please do not degrade the area to a lower standard, which will lower resident's "net worth" and will create a less desirable part of town to live. Residents would prefer the city to rezone another area with less local impact. There are still upcoming public meetings where you can join or make comments. The only way to stop the rezone is to be heard with continued involvement. Please pass this along to neighbors as flyers are limited Jain virtually or listen to a Planning Commission Meeting: 2"d and 41h Tuesday of each month. 7 pm. City of Tustin,/ Meetings and Agendas/ Planning Commission The city will have more rezoning discussions in September and beyond. Website Info: Go to City of Tustin/ Departments/Community Development/ Planning/ Current Projects/ Housing Element Rezone Project. Other possible sites: Key Inn Motel on El Camino Real, Red 'Hill and El Camino both sides of street, Bel Air Motel V1 St, Packers Square on Irvine/Newport, Red Hill/Santa Fe, Red Hili/McFadden, Red Hill/Mitchell, Red Hill/Walnut, 14851 empty facility Yorba/10, El Camino/Newport, El Camino Plaza,Aldi Mkt/Irvine Blvd., 15641 Red Hill STOP the IReronina of Enderle Center(1735017't1'St,Tustin)for potential,future hI h-densl 2LusAln Planning Commission: Eric Fliguchi (Chairperson) Amy Mason(Commissioner) Tan nor Douthit (Chair Pro Tem) David Mello(Commissioner) Steve Kozak(Cornmissioner) Dae to a state mandate for more housing,the city chose Enderfe as a site to rezone which could eventruaily become high- densit} units, to include affordable housing. Many residents would like the ci-y to choose I may have less community impact. Though the Enderle family hasn't decided to sell,and there i no 4 d, the housing site could become a reality in the future. AUG 14 2024 Why moray Tustin residents oppose the rezone: Possibly more traffic, longer commute times and possibly lower property values, TUSTW CITY LL RK'S OFFICE Nt�ghborhoods near Enderle are part of a "furctional"community with ability to"walk'to some of the only upscale rrstaura,sts and retiil establishments in Tkastin. Rpmning would leave average strip mall dining and farce residents to dri,rc to the othcr sicic of town for stand alone ro;tzurants. Ev(!ryurie has worked hard to live in this neii,hborhood and many have lived here for decades,, taking pride In ownersiip, Please da not degrade the area to a Power stirtiard,W-11 h will lover resident's"net worth"and will create a less desirah!e p3rtoftown to live. Residerts wruld prefer the city.o rezone another area with less local Impact. Please sipn helow If you would litre to stop vie rezone of Endede Center for high-density apartments Marne ; Address entail or hone: si nature. L,narzcc rqL,:5, c11 J � STOP the Rezonina of Endetle Center(17350 W St, Tustin)for potential,future high-idetlsipi housi =4 Planning Commission: Eric Higuchi(Chairperson) -Amy Masan(Commissioner) Tanner Douthi t(Chair Pro Tem) David Mello(Commissioner) Steve:Kozak(Commissioner) Due to a state mandate For more housing,the city chose r nderle as a site to rezone which could eventually become high. density units,to include affordable housing. Many residents would like the city to choose another site in Tustin that may have less community impact.Though the Enderle family hasn't decided to sell,and there is no development planned,the housing site could become a reality in the future. Why marry Tustin reskients oppose the rezone: - Possibly more traffic, longer commute times and possibly lover property values. - Neighborhoods near Endene are part of a "functional"community with ability to "walk"to some of the only upscale restaurants and retail establishments in Tustin Rezoning would leave average strip mall dining and force residents to drive to the other side of town for stand-alone restaurants. - Everyone has worked hard to live In this neighborhood and many have lived here for decades,taking pride in ownership. Please do not degrade the area to a lower standard,which will lower resident's "net worth"and will create a less desirable part of town to li%*. Residents would prefer the city to rezone another area with less local impact. Itlease sign below if you would like to stop the rezone of.Endede Cerrter for high-density apartments Name : Addrew/emall or phone: Signature: / ',°'p 44 ,)r1 ' NI j I n a P STOP the Rezoning of Enderle Center(1735017t'St,Tustin)for potential,future high-dense high-densky housin Planning Commissioi: Eric Higuchl(Chairperson) gray Masan(Commissioner) Tanner vourthIt(Chair Pro Tem) David Mello(Commissioner) Steve Kozak(Commissioner) Due to a state mandate for more housing,the city chose Enderle as a site to rezone which could eventually become high- density units., to Include affordable housing. Many residents would like the city to choose another site in Tustin that may have less community impact. Though the Enderle family hasn't decided to sell,and there is no development planned,the housing site could become a reality in the future. Why marry Tustin residents oppose the rezone: Possibly more traffic, longer commute times and possibly lower property values. - Neighborhoods near Enderie are part of a "functional'community with ability to"walk'to some of the only upscale restaurants and retail establishments in Tustin. Rezoning would leave average strip mali dining and force residents to drive to the other side of town for stand-alone restaurants. - Everyone has worked hard to live in this neighborhood and many have lived here for decades,taking pride in ownership. Please do not degrade the area to a lower standard, which will lower resident's"net worth"and will create a less desirable part of town to live. Residents would prefer the city to rezone another area with less local impact. Please sign below if you would like to stop the rezone of Enderle Center for high-density apartments Name : Ad+dreys /ema' o phon : Sl nature: 4Y C f4 Jeanne- Al-ekw� STOP the R gnipa of Ertr erie Center 1735017"1 St,Tustinj for potential,lure high-dens oti5In Plan r ng f srr m6slon; Eric Higu6i(Chairperson) ,Array Mason(Comm sinner) Tanner Douthit IChair Pro Tern) David Mello(Commissioner) Steve Kozak(Commissioner) Due to a state mandate fbr more housing,the city chose Enderle as a site to rezone which could eventually become higfiw density units,to include affordable housing. Many residents would like the city to choose another site In Tustin that may have less community impact.Though the Enderle family hasn't decided to sell,and there is no development planned,the housing site could become a reality in the future. Why many Tustlin resWeMs oppow the rezone: Possibly more traffic,longer commute times and possibly lower property values, - Neighborhoods near Enderle are part of a'lunctlorwr community with ability to'walk"to some of the only upscale restaurants and retail establishments In Tustin, Rezoning would leave average strip mall dining and fie residents to drive to the other side of town for stand-alone restaurants. Everyone has worked hard to live in this neighborhood and many have lived here for decades,taking pride In ownership. Please do not degra&%the area to a lower standard,which will lower residenes"net worth"and will gate a less desirable part of town to live. Residents would prefer the ft to rezone another area with ss local impact. Please sign below if you would I"to stop the rezone,of Enderle Center for high-density a meats Name : Address/email or pie: a F kv F F PAIJ- r v.t V 11 STOP the Riezonlno of l nderle Center(1735017th St,Tustin)for patenda;,future lit -den i ou5$ Manning Commission. Eric ftuchl(Chairperson) Amy Aasort Corr missfoner) Trr►rrer Douthit(Chair Pro TFem) Ind Motto(Commissioner) Stow lzrk(Commissioner) Due to a state toandate for more housing,the city chose Enderfe as a site to n one which to ufd eventually become high- density units,to include affordable housing, Many residents would like the city to choose another site in Tustin that may have less community Impact,Though the Erderle%roily hasn't bedded to self,and there is no development planned,the housing site could become a reality in the future, 'why marry°Wfln reskients o pmse the rezone,, - Possibly more train,loner commute tunes and possibly lower property dues. - Nelghborhoods near Ender'•e are part of a'functional'community with ability to'wale to some of the only upscale restaurants and retail establlthrmnts In Tustin. Rezoning would leave average strip mall dining and farce residents to drive to the rather side of town for stand-alone restaurants. Everyone has worked hard to live In this neighborhood and many have lived here for decades;taking pride in ownership, Please do not degrade the area to a lower standard,which will lower resident's"net worth"aM will create less des€rable part of town to lute. Residents would prefer the city to rezone another area with less local Impact. Please sign hataw If you would like to stop the rezone of Endede Center f6r h)gh- emity aparurfenh Name : Address email or home: SI mature: t:� LL--�q�- F I�a G.d i i t _ s F Y t fJ STOP the Rezonin- of Enderle Center (1735017`h St, Tustin) for potential,future high-dens housin Planning Commission: Eric Higuchi (Chairperson) Amy Mason (Commissioner) Tanner Douthit(Chair Fro Tern) David Mello(Commissioner) Steve Kozak(Commissioner) Due to a state mandate for more housing,the city chose Enderle as a site to rezone which could eventually become high- density units,to Include affordable housing. Marry residents would like the city to choose another site in Tustin that may have less community impact.Though the Enderle family hasn't decided to sell,and there Is no development planned,the housing site could become a reality in the future. Why many Tustin residents oppose the rezone: Possibly more tratfic, longer commute times and possibly lower property values. T Neighborhoods near Enderle are part of a "furctional"community with ability to'"walkW' to some of the only upscale restaurants and retail establishments in Tustin. Rezoning would leave average strip mall dining and farce residents to drive to the other side of town for stand-alone restaurants. Everyone has worked hard to live in this neighborhood and many have lived here for decades, taking pride In ownershlp. Please do not degrade the area to a lower standard,which will louver resident's"net worth" and will create a less desirable part of town to live. Residents would prefer the city to rezone another area with less local impact. Please sign Flow if you would like to stop the rezone of Enderle Center for high-density apartments Name : Address/email or hone: Si nature: STOP the Rezonlno of Enderle Center(17350 17k" St, Tustin) for potential,feature h!Xh-dens1nf housing Planning Commission: Erk Higuchi(Chairperson) Amy Nlason(Commissioner) Tanner Douthit(Chair Pro Tern) David Mello(Convnlssioner) Steve Kozak(Commissioner) Due to as state mandate for more housing,the city chase Enderle as a site to rezone which could eventually become high- density units,to include affordable housing. Many residents would like the city to choose another site in Tustin that many have less community Impact.Though the Enderie family hasn't decided to sell,and there is no developrwnt planned,the housing site could become o reality In the future. Why marry Tustin residents oppose the rezone: Possibly more traffic, longer commute times and possibly lower property values. Neighborhoods near Enderle are part of a "functional"community with ability to"walk` to some of the only upscale restaurants and retail establishments in TuOn Rezoning would leave average strip mail dining and force residents to drive to the other side of town for stand-alone restaurants. Everyone has worked hard to live In this nelghbonccod and many have lived here for decades,taking pride in ownership. Please do not degrade the area to a lower standard,which will lower resident's"net worth" and will create a less desirable part of town to lire. Residents would prefer the city to rezone another area with less local impact. Please sign below If you would like to stop the rezone of Endede Center for high-d*nslty apartments Name : Aaddreaa/email or phone: Signature: 644-42 rVI.i/ �-M1Z- CL�O V1 pie A(�Mes roA-�,m oc-t c' (�A qt,c Planning Commission; Eric Higuchi (Chairperson) Amy Masan(Commissioner) Tanner Douthit (Chair Pro Tem) David Mello(Commissioner) Steve Kozak(Commissioner) Due to a state mandate for more housing,the city chose Enderle as a site to rezone which could eventually become high- density units,to Include affordable housing, Many residerns would Ilke the city to choose another site in Tustin that may have less community impact.Though the Enderle family hasn't decided to sell, and there is no development panned, the housing site could became a reality in the future. Why many Tustin residents oppose the rezone: - Possibly more traffic, longer commute times and possibly lower property values. - Neighborhoods near Endete are part of a "functional"community with adility to"walk"to some of the only upscale restaurants and retail establishments in TuOn. Rezoning would leave average strip mail dining and force residents to drive to the other side of town for stand-alone restaurants. - Everyone has worked hard to live in this neighborhood and many have lived here for decades,taking pride in ownership. Please do not degrade the area to a lower standard,which will lower resident's "net worth"and will create a less desirable part of town to live. Residents would prefer the city to remne another area with less local impact. Please sign below If you would like to stop the rezone of Enderle Center for high-density apartments Name : Address/email or phone: signat r vAl0 1�- tj o STOP the Rezonino of Enderle Center(17350 17t'h St, Tustin) for potential,future high-density housing- STOP the Rezoning of Enderle Center (173501.71"St,Tustin) for potential, future hjgh-densdy housln Planning Commission:. Eric Higuchl(Chairperson) Amy Mason (Commissioner) "fanner Douthit(Chalr Prot Tem) David Mello(Commissioner) Steve Kozak(Commissioner) Due to a state mandate for more housing,the city chose Enderle as a site to rezone which could eventually become high- density units,to Include affordable housing. Many residents would like the city to choose another site in Tustin that may have less community impact.Though the Enderle family hasn't decided to sell,and there Is no development planned, the housing site could become a reality In the future. Why rrr"Tustin residents oppose the rezone: - Possibly more traffic,longer commute times and possibly lower property values. - Neighborhoods near Endede are part of a 'functional"community with ability to 'walk"to some of the only upscale restaurants and retail establishments in Tustin. Rezoning would leave average strip mall dining and force residents to drive to the other side of town for stand-alone restaurants. - Everyone has worked hard to live in this neighborhood and many have lived here for decades, taking pride in ownership. Please do not degrade the area to a lower standard,which will lower resident's"net worth"and will create a less desirable part of town to live. Residents would prefer the city to re2ona mother area with less local impact. Please sign blow If you would like to stop the rezone of Enderle Center for high-density apartments Name : ail or hone: 51 ure: J �i C���" �+C��t�►�rar��ct , STOP the Rezoning of Enderle Center(1735017'� St, Tustin)for potential,future b_*b-dqnsity housing, punning Commission: Eric Miruchl(Chairperson) Amy Mason(Commissioner) Tanner Douthit(Chair pro Tern) D3vld Mello(Commissioner) Steve Kozak(Cornmissiyrter) Due to a state mandate tctr more housing,the city chose Enderle as a site to rezone which could eventually become'high- density units,to include affordable housing. Many residents would like the city to choose another site in Tustin that may have less community Impact Though the Enderle family hasn't decidpd to sell, and there Is no development planned,the housing site could become a reality in the future. Why many Tustin residents oppose the rezone: - Possibly more trattic,',anger commute times and possibly lower property values. Neighborhoods near Endede are part of a "functional"community with ability to"walk"to some of the only upscale restaurants and retail pstablishwntc in Tustin. Rezoning would leave average strip mall dining and force residents to drive to the other side of town for stand-alone restaurants. Everyone has worked hard to live In this nelghbonccod and many have lived here for decades, taking pride in ownership. Please do not degrade the area tD a lower standard,which will lower resident's "net awortn"and will create a less desirable part of town to live. Residents would prefer the city to rezone another area with less local impact. please sign below If you wwouid like to stop the rezone of Enderle Conter for high-density apartments Name : Addrexs/ernall or phone: Signature: p j oe `1r c a. Gi C Panning Commission: Eric Higuchi(Chairperson) Amy Mason(Commissioner) Tanner Douthit(Chair Pro Fern) David Mello(Commissioner) Steve Kozak(Commksinner) Due to a state mandate for more housing,the city chose Enderle as a site to rezone which could eventually become high- density units, to Include dfrwdable housing;. Many residents would like the city to choose another site In Tustin that may have less community impact.Though the Enderle family hasn't decided to sell, and there is no development planned,the housing site could became a reality In the future. Why many Tustin residents oppose the rezone: Possibly more traffic, longer commute times and possibly lower property values. - Neighborhoods near Enderle are part of a "functional"community with ability to"walk" to some of the only upscale restaurants and retail establishments In Tustin. Rezoning would leave average strip mail dining and force residents to drive to the other side of town for stand-alone restaurants. - Everyone has worked hard to live in this neighborhood and many have lived here for decades,taking pride in ownership, Please do not degrade the area to a lower standard,which will lower resident's'net worth' and will create a less desirable part of towr to live. Residents would prefer the city to rezone another area with less local Impact. Please sign below if you would like to stop the rezone of Enderle Center for high-density apartments Flame : Address/email or phone: Signature: N,-\ 17 C r►rn. A-T Aw tj r umi 'ILits( STOP the Rexonln4 of Enderle Center(1735017u'St, Tustin)for potential,future high-dens high-densft housl Eric Higuchi(Chairperson) Amy Mason(Cornrnisslon-�r) Tanner douthit(Chair Pro Term David Mello{Commi;sioner) Steve Kozak (CornmiSslonar) i Je to a State mandate for mnre housing,the city chose E7derle as a site to re scan;- could eventually become high- density units,to inCiudB afFarci,,bie housing. Many residents would like the city t1: choose another site in Tustin that may Proavr? less :ornmunity impact. Though the tnderfe family hasn't decided to set", and there l!,nc development planned, the hou5iI i 6 ;iLe could become a reality in the future. VVhV many Tusd n residents oppose the rezone: Possibly more traffic, longer commute times and possibly lower property values. Neighoorhoods,near Endetle are pa•t of a "functional"community with abili-y to "walk" to some ref the only upscale f : taurantsand retail establishments in Tustin.Rezoning would IF-avo average strip mail dining and force residurrts:u throe to the other side of town for stand-alone restaarant;. Everyone has two-ked hard to live in this neighlror-ioad and r}Iarly gave lived here for decades,taking pride in ownership. Please do not degrade the area to a lower standard,which will lover resident's"net worth" and will create a less ccs rable pert of town to live. Residents would prefer the city to rezone another area with less local impact. Please sign below if you would like to stop the rezone of Enderle Center for high-density apartments Larne : Address/email or phanp: Si nature ar`• Cos�r- ItA ; sa T` Y• .>I 51A VW&J e U err] =- o �r JW 1 STOP the Rezon of Enderie Center(17350 17th St,Tustin)for potential,future high-density housing. s Planning Commission:ssion: Eric Wguchi{Chairperson) Amy Mason(Commissioner) Tanner Dauthitt(Chair Pro Terry) iarr d Mello(Commissioner) Stave Kozak(Commissioner) Due to a state mandate for more housing,the city chose Enderle as a site to rezone which could eventually becorne high- density units,to Include affordable housing, Many residents would If a the city to choose another site in Tbon that may have less comm pity Impact.Though the Enderle family hasWt decided to sell,and there;s no development punned,the housing site could become a reality In the future. Why rna ylustin residents oppose the rezone: Possibly more traffic,longer commute tarries and possibly lower property values. Neighborhoods near Ender^le are part of a"functional"cornmunity with ability to"waiko to some of the only upscale rasl:aurants and retail establishments In TUstim Rezoning would leave gage strip mall:dining and forme residents to drive to the other side of town for stand-alone restaurants, i=veryone has worked hard to lave in this neighborhood and marry have lied here for decades,taking pride In ownership. Please do not degrade the area to a lower standard,which will bower resident's"net worth"and will create a Iess desirable part of town to live, Residents would prefer the city to rezone another area with less local Impact. Please sign below if you would ll>lte to stop the rezone of Endede Center for high-denshy apartments Name ; Addrm/enmill or ire; Signature: uk, 3 F3 } w..w.� ..r' t f 3 r Planning Commission: Eric Higuchi(Chairperson) Amy Mason(Commissioner) Tanner Douthit (Chair Pro Tern) David Mello(Commissioner) Steve Kozak(Commissioner) Due to a state mandate for more housing,the city chose Enderle as a site to rezone which cou!d eventua ly become high- dutoity units, to include affcr-drble hQuiing. Many residents Would like Me City to choose another site in fUStil teat may have less community impact,Though the Enderle family hasn't decided to sell, and there is no development planned, -hrr housing site coAd become a reality in the future. Why many'rustin residents appose the rezone: Possibly more traffic, longer cornmute tisanes and possibly lower property values. Neighborhoods near Encere are part of a "`unetionaI"community with ability to"walk"to some of the only upscale restaurants and -tail establishments in Tustin, Rezoning would leave average strip mall dining and force residents to drive to the other side of tcwn for stand-alone restaurants. Everyone has worked hard:o live in this nei hborhood and many have lived here-or decades, taking pride in ownership.. "lease do rot degrade tl^,e area to a lower stardard,which will lower re5ident's "net worth" and will ureate a less desirable part of town to live. Residerts viculd prefer the city-o rezone anoth ur jrc d with IFiss local impact.. Please sign below if you would Ilke to stop the rezone of Endede Center for hipla-density apartments Name : Address em it i �• aweL PVL)IC"L _ r�a _ > STOP the iR xpVjM of Enderle Center(1735017th St,Tustin)for poterMal,future high-dens;ty,housing. STOP the Rezoning of Enderle Center(17350 17'h 5t,Tustin)for potential,future high-density housinix Planning Commission: Eric Higuchi(Chairperson) Amy Mason(Commissioner) Tanner Douthit(Chair Pro Term David Mello(Commissioner) Steve Kozak(Commissioner) Due to a state mandate for more housing,the city chose Enderle as a site to rezone which could eventually become h°gh- density units,to include affordable housing. Many residents would like the city to choose another site in Tustin that may have less community impact.Though the Enderle family hasn't decided to sell, and there is no development planned,the housing site could become a reality in the future. Why many Tustin residents oppose the rezone: - Possibly more traffic,longer commute times and possibly lower property values. - Neighborhoods near Enderle are part of a "functional" community with ability to"walk"to some of the only upscale restaurants and retail establisl menu in Tustin. Rezoning would leave average strip mall dining and forte residents to drive to the other sine of t6wrrfor stand-alone restaurants.. Everyone has worked hard to INe in this neighborhood and many have lined here for decades,taking pride in ownership. Please do not degra0e the area to a lower standard,which will lower resident's"net worth"and will create a less desirable part of tower to UyO. Residents would prefer the city to rezone another area with less local impact. • Please sign below If you would like to stop the rezone of Enderle Center for high-density apartments Warne : Address email or honer: Si nature: T661 I .f� J1� 1iu�1�e. �GGK�[�S �SCImafi,yeviC STOP the Rezoning of Enderle Center(17350 17°"St, Tustin) for potential,future high-densijhousin P4nning Commission: Eric HIgtxhl(Chairperson) Amy Mason(Commissioner) Tanner Uouthit(Chair Pro Tem) David Mello(Commissioner) Sterne Kozak(Commissioner) Due to a state mandate for more housing,the city chose Enclede as a site to rezone which could eventually become high- density units,to include affordable housing. Many residents would like the city to choose another site in Tustin that may have less community impact. Though the Enderle family hasn't decided to sell,and there is no development planned,the housing site could become a reality in the future. Why marry Tustin residents oppose afire mane: - Possibly more traffic, longer commute times and possibly rawer property vaium - Neighborhoods near Enderle are part of a "functional"'community with ability to"walk"to some of the only upscale restaurants and retail establishments n Tustin. Rezoning would leave average strip mall dining and force residents to drive to the other side of town for stand-alone restaurants. - Everyone has worked hard to live In this ielghborhood and many have lived here for decades, taking prlde in ownership. Please do not degrade the area to a lower standard,which will lower resident's 'net worth"and will create a less desirable part of town to live. Residents would prefer the city to rezone another area with less local Impact. Please sign bellow If you would like to stop the rezone of Endiede Center for high4ensity apartments Name : Adclress/email or Phone: Signature. Ja,: :L ti &_ . Flantrlrtg Commission, Erk Hsi Chairperso Tanner17c�� halr pro?"em ��inn t�c��ml�lt�ner� Dwhd Mello(COmrrti5sioneT) 5UVe Kozak 4Cwnlss€on r Rue to a she mandate for more housing,the city chose Enderri as a site t,_,re�ne �rh€sfi mould�r�tuaf€y a�rrie I duty t€rrl In It de�nrdable housing, Rn rsrdents would�the crt W choose a� that � rnay haw less c0mrnun t impaLt, "lough the nrer�Nrnlly hasn"k derJded to sell,,and there is no 'O1 Me Planned, the housing site could home a reality In the future, WhY manY.TUOn resW eats oppose the rare: Possibly more tmffic,longer co rnrw limes Ond possibly lower property vWues, Neighborhoods near Enderfe ae part of a•`NrIcdonalm community with ability to"walk*to some of the only upscale festauran%and retail establishments In Tustin,ftaning would leave average stwlP,,Hall difting ar'd farce residents to drive to the other side of town for stand-plane restaurants. l~verVone has worked hard to Rve In this neighborhood and many have I[Ved here for decades,ttking Pride in ownership. Please do not degrade the area to a lower standard,"lch will 10vor resident's"net worth,,"and wili create a less des€rails part Of town to lire, ReSidents would prefer the city to rMne another area with,, lest local imp&M PJ1OW9 Sign belt if u would Oke to stop the rye of merle center for enslty eparbmnts Name email or phones lgnot LUEV-, STOP the ftPAIM of m erle meter(1735017th St.TUSdn)for Potential,More h Planning commission" Eric Hlg�ll(chairperson) Amy Mam Omrrrissorrer) TaftnOr DO thit Chelr Pm Tern) Dad Mello(commissioner) Stage (Cammissioner Due tO A State mandate for more housfng,the city chase Enderle as a sits to rezone which could eventually become bfghr densfty unitsoL tea Include afftartlable losing. Many residents Would fiix-the city to shy another site in TUAn that may have less community Impact.Thougfi the Enderie Wn ly hasn't€ c1ded to sell,arW there is no developnvnt planned,the hOusingsite could become a reality In the future, dhy many TuWn Msl ents oppon the rezon*f - Possibly more traffic,longer commute times and Possibly tower propQrty values, - Neighborhoods near Enderie are part of a Ofurctloftal"cOmmur.4 with ability to Rwair to some of ft only upscale restaurants and retail est8bllshments In TUstirt,RezOnIng Woui,d leave average strip Trull dining and force-residents to drive to the other side of town for stand-alone restaurants, r Everyone has worked Lard to live in this neigh bDrhood and many have lived here for decades,taking pride in ownership. Please der not degrade the area to a lower standards which will lower residerW5 'net wortho and will mate a less desirable part of town to llve. Residents Wvtild prefer the city to rezone another area with lass local impad. please sign Wow If you would 10m tin st*P the rezone of merle Center for hth-dera lty apartments Name : Addressla"l or phorte: Am } I [8 I Planning Commission: 'Eric Higuchi(Chairperson) Amy Mason (Commissioner) Tanner Douthlt (Chair Pro Tern) David fAello(Commissioner) Steve Kozak(Commissisonar) Due to a state mandate for more h:,> 1 r) , I h^city chose Enderle as a site to rezone which could eventually become high- density units,to Inclide afford(iUle irur.: iir 00any resldents would like:he City to choose another site In Tustin that may have less community impact.Though th F ri r17-rie"arnily hasn't decided to sell, and there is no development planned, the housing s,te could becc me a reality in t i_r°.w o. Why many Tustin residents oppose thip r7(� Possibly more traffic, longc•cornMU c i rues and possibly lower property values. - Neighborhoods near Ender a are part of a "furic'icrnal'"community with ability to "walk" to some of the only upscale restaurants and retail establishments in Tustin. Rezcning,mould leave average strip mall raining and force residents to drive to the other side of town for stand-.alone restaurants. Everyone has worked ha,d to live in this neighbonccod and many have lived hers lur uec;jdes, taking pride in ownership. Plca:,c do not degrade the area to a lower standard, w,i;co will Iowcr resident's "net wu ,i r ' sand will create a less desirable,part of towrs tc live. Residents would prefer the city to 'i—onp anot -a 'r, ,i 1")1.1h less local impact. Please sign below If you would like to stop the rezone of Enderle Ctmnicr for high.tlensir.y ap2rtrnents Marne : Address/email or phone: 4i>;n`i:u e: STOP the RezonlM of Enderle Center(173SO 17th St, Tustin) for potential, future high-_densitV housln Planning Commwom., Ertc H19udff(Chairperson) Amy IOsOft(COmmissloner Tanner DoWthit C air Pro Tern ) � �rvl?�i�eitar(Cotrii'nissioner) Revs Kmk(Commissioner) Due to a state mandate for more housing,the city chose Enderie as a site to rewne which corneteventuOHY become high- have units,to include aftrdable housing, luny r lderfs would like the city to choose another site In Tustin that may have less community Impact,Though the Enderie family hasWt deeded to sell,and there Is no development planned,the housing site covtd become a reality In the future. WhY many Tus to resident O pOSe the mane; - Possibly more traffic,banger comma tiMOS and possibly rower property values. - Neighborhoods near Enderle are part of a"funct"r CornmunIty with abillty to'walk'to some Of the orrly upscale restaurants and retahl establishments In Tustin,Rezoning would leave average strip mall dlrtin ar i fc�c�residents to drive to the other We of town 1br stand-alone restaurants. Everyone has mmrked hard to live In this neighborhood and many have lived here for decades,taking pride in or ershfp. 'lease do not degrade the area to a lower standard,which will lower resident's net earth"and will create a less des!rabte part of town to live. residents woukl prefer the city to rmne another area with less local impact. use s; bOlOw if yeu woWd like to OOP the rune of Enderle C rftr for high r,s fi ap a►rtmerft Name i� i t f f STOP the li��'ironAl a of Enderle CenW r t i3 O 17'h St,' UWn for potential,future$��t�iar� hota Planning Commission! Eric Higuchi {Chdirperson` Amy lViasarr OtTmisSfanPr} Tanner Douthit(Chair Prc Tern; David WHO(Commissioner) Steve Kozak(Commissioner;� Due to a state rnandate fcr more housing,the city cfvse Em -:l el°wnslt} units,to Incf rde affordable housing. Mdn resrdert. ,' '' �, - t;- 1e/f J:lay •r»blob could eventually become hiuh- y culd like the city to choose mother site in Tustin that rray have less community impact.Though the Enderle `amily hasn't decided to sell, and thnro is nc dcvcloprrmcrrt p,annad, :he housing site could become a reality in the FutUre. Why marry Tustin residents oppose the rezone: Possihly more traffic, longer commute times :seed uossibiy joyler property vaiues. Neighbo,hoods near Enderle are part of a `"ftrnctmal"comrnulity with ability to "walk" to snrne of the only upscale res(aurants and retail estalblishments in Tustin. Rezonfrg would IPavo average strip moii dining and force rtzouaents to drive to the other side of tokvn for sand-alonp restaurants. Everyone has worked hard to I,ve in this neighborhaad and r,idny have lived here for decades, taking pride in ownership. Please do not degrade the area to a lover standard,which wiII [over resident's"net wort.i- " anc titnll create a Ipss cesiraale Part of town to live. Residents wojid prefer the city to rezone another area with less inrai impact. Please sign below if you would IIke to stop the rezone of Enderle Center for high-density apartments Name : Addres Awlir-. d reL- i be r STOP the Rezoning of Enderle Center (173SO 1.7th St,Tustin)for potentlal,future hI h-�+erii�i hoy An STOP the Re�zoninc� of Enderle Center (17350 Ir St, Tustin) for potential, future high-density housing. Planning Commission: Eric Higuchi (Chairperson) Amy Mason (Comrnissioner) Tanner Douthlt(Chair Pro Tem) David Mello(Commissiorerl Steve Kozak (Commissioner) Due to a state mandate for more housing, the city chose Enderie as a site to rezone WhiLh could eventually become high-density units,to Inclide affordable housing. Many residents would like the city to choose another site In Tustin that may have less community impact.Though the Enderle family hasn't decded to sell, and there is no development planned,the housing site could become a reality In the future. Why many Tustin residents oppose the rezone: - Possibly more traffic, longer commute times and possibly lower property values. - Neighborfioods near Enderle are part of a "functional`) community with ability to "walk" to the only upscale restaurants and retail establishments in Tustin. Rezoning would leave average strip mall dining and force residents to drive to the other side of town for stand-alone restaurants. - Everyone has worked hard to live in this neighborhood and many have lived here for decades, taking pride in ownership. Please do not degrade the area to a lower standard,which will lower resident's ""net worth"" and will create a less desirable part of town to live. Residents would prefer the city to rezone another area with less local impact. Please sign below if you would IIke to stop the rezone of Enderle Center for high-density apartments Name Address/"email or phono: Si attire: oD y 1.14 - i �--�i(r fir.t`J STOP the Rezonin of Enderle Center (1735017th St, Tustin) for potential, future high-density housing. Planning Commission: Eric Mlgtxhi(Chairperson) Amy Masson(C-imrni}signer) Tanner Dotrthit(Chair Pro Teml David Mello(Cosmm'ssioner) Steve Kozak(Commissioner) Due to a stag.mandate for more ,ntousiig,the city chosa Ends o s a site to rezone which could cvcntually become high-density units, t.7 indude affordable housing. Many resid;-nts would like the city to choose another site it Tustin that may have less community impact.Though the Enderle family hasn't decided to sell,and there is no development planned,the hnusing site could 'become a reality in the future. Why many Tustin rp,-ident,s nppn:r the rotor e: - Possibly more traffic, lc r;.'r commute tirt i .:.r d f):3,;:-iI I i. ;f i t,�-`,, :-I!7I S. - Neighborhoods near E Aerle are part of a "tu rf: k II J!F 1 e rr',i rr,nity with ability to "walk"to the Dri y upscale restaurants anc retail establishments in Tustin. Rez©nl Ig would leave average strip mall dining and force residents tc drive to the ether side of town for stand-alone restaurants. - Everyone has worked hard to live in this neighborhood ,r r ri my have lived here for decades, taking pride n o%nership. Please do not degrade the area to a lower standard, which will Icower resident's "net worth" and will create a less desirablc part of tows to li r =:dents would prefer the city to rezone another area v., l- Ir Izical impact. Please sign below if you would like ,.(,,stop the rezone of Enderle Center for hii,'ti�derk ity apartments Name Address/email or phone., tiirP: STOP the Rez®n of Enderle Center (17350 17 h St, Tustin) for potential, future hi h-densit housing. Planning Commissions Eric Higuchl(Chalrperson) Amy Mason(Commissioner) Tanner Douthit(Chair Pro Tern) David Mello(Commissioner) Steve Koxak(Commissioner) Due to a state mandate for more'housing,the city chose Enderle as a site to rezone which could eventually become high-density units,to include affordable mousing. Many residents would like the city to choose another site in Tustin that may have less community impact.Though the Enderle family hasn't decided to sell,and there is r►o development planned,the housing site could become a reality in the future. Why many Tustin residents oppose the rezone: --- Possibly more traffic, longer commute times and possibly lower property values. Neighborhoods near Enderle are part of a "functional"community with ability to"walk"to the only upscale restaurants and retail establishments in Tustin. Rezoning would learn average strip mall dining and force residents to drive to the other side of town for stand-alone restaurants. Everyone has worked hard to live in this neighborhood and.many have lived here for decades,taking pride in ownership. Please do not degrade the area to a lower standard,which will lower resident's "net worth"and will create a less desirable part of town to live. Residents would prefer the.city to rezone another area with less local impact. Please sign below if you wouid like to shop the rezone of Enderle Center for high-density apartments Name : Address/email or pi ow.- Sig tare; ar } STOFY*the Rezon na. of E der a Center 17350 Ir St, Tustin) for potential, future high-density.housing. Planning Commission: Eric Higuchl',Chairperson) Amy Dimon(Commissioner) Tanner Al t(Chair Pro Tern) David Mello(Commissioner) Steve Kozak(Commissioner) Due to a state mandate f6r more housing,the city chase Enderle as a site to rezone which mould eventuaity became high-density units,to include affordable housing, Many residents wouki like the city to choose anotimr site in Tustin that may have less community unpack.Though the Enderle family hasWt decided to sel4 and there is no development planned,the housing site could became a reality in the future, 'why ray`I"ufftia residers oppose the rezone: Possibly mare traffic, longer commute times and possibly lower property values. - Neighborhoods near Enderle are part of a'funikional„cDmmunity with ability to'ywA`to the only upscale restaurants and retaff establishments in Tustin.Rezoning would leave average strip mall dinning and forte residents to drive to the other side of town for stand-alone restaurants. - Everyone has worked hard to live in this neighborhood and marry have lived here for decades,tailing pride in ownership, please do not degrade the area to a lower standard,which will lower residerWs "net worth" and will create a less desirable part of town to We, Residents would prefer the city to rezone another area with less local impam Please sign below if you would like to stop the remne of Enderte Center for high--depis#ty apartments Name 4 S f e kr ii 4� { { t I i F STOP the Rezon es of Ender le Center 17350171h St, Tustin) for potential, future high-dens _ousIM. Planning Commission., Erk Higuci (Chairperson) Mason(Commissioner) Tanner Do that(Chair Pro'rem) DoOd Mello(Commissioner) Steve Kozak(CommiWoner) Due to a state mandate for more housing,the city chose Enderl�e as a site to rewne which could eventually become Ngh-density units,to include affbr eke housing. Many residents would like the city to choose another site in T stin that may have less communes impact.Though the Enderle faWly hasWt decided to sell,and there is no development planned,the horsing 54te could become a reality in the future. Why nvany Tusdn resided ap"the rezone: Possibly more traf,longer commute times and possibly lower property vatues> Neighborhoods near End rle are part ofa ''functional"community with abilt to "walk"to the only upscale restaurants and retail establishments In Tustin. Rezoning would leave average strip mall dining and force residents to drive to the other side of town for stand-alone restaurants. r Everyone has worked hard.to live in Ws neighborhood and many have lived here for decades, taring pride In ownership, please do not degrade the area,to a lower standard,which will lower resident's "net worth"and will create a less desirable part of town to live. R.eslderrts would prefer the city to rezone another area with less local impact. Please sign below If you would litre to map the remne df Enderle Center for high-density apartmenits Name ; Address/ornail or plane: signawre. { I f t f ` F i 3 iI! ; F ! I � f P ! i s 3 EXHIBIT 13B CORRESPONDENCE FROM V. TRAN Beier, Samantha From: Vicki Tran Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2024 9:16 PM To: Housing Element Rezone Subject: Re: Housing Element Rezone Project - Notice of Public Hearing Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged I also wanted to make a suggestion for an alternative site. My sister Betty Tran, an Irvine resident since 1995 and now Tustin resident since 2007 has mentioned that a good alternative site for the Marketplace buildout would be the center that borders Myford Rd, Bryan Ave, Tustin Ranch Rd, and El Camino Real. This plaza currently holds Costco in North Tustin, At Home Stores, McDonald's and some smaller businesses nearby in the area. Other than Costco, its gas station and maybe McDonalds [Please save these businesses. But in theory, McDonalds could be rebuilt near the Costco, so that builders would have a larger site for apartments]the other buildings surrounding it don't have as much value as the businesses at the Marketplace to the entire community, and the buildings are ACTUALLY in POOR CONDITION! I even stopped by myself today and surveyed the area. Minus the trees, it's such a large space,with lots of buildings already unoccupied! By building in this area: 1. It is already surrounding other homes and condos, which just makes more sense. 2. You are dispersing the disruption of building, away from the Marketplace. 3. New residents won't have to compete for school spots with the ones from the Irvine Marketplace. 4. New residents could take the Tustin Ranch exit, as opposed to competing with the 1200+ residents of the Irvine Marketplace apartments for Jamboree. 5. ALL residents could still enjoy the conveniences of the Marketplace. Don't be like Irvine. The Marketplace is too valuable to the community for it to be destroyed for "affordable housing," Of which, usually only 20% is actually allocated to the actual cause. There's nothing like it in the area, other than the Irvine Spectrum and maybe the District. To be clear, I AM for affordable housing. I just want it to make sense where it is allocated. Thankyou, Vicki Shin On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 4:18 PM Vicki Tran wrote: Hello, I won't be able to attend this meeting. However, I do appreciate the inclusion and have concerns over the Tustin Marketplace buildout: i 1. Will more good, reputable businesses and buildings be destroyed forth ese apartments like the Irvine counterpart? They aren't even in terrible or bad condition to consider and MANY frequent the possible businesses in question on a weekly basis! By getting rid of these businesses,we are diminishing the quality and convenience of life we have on this side of town. 2. Construction noise, air pollution from builds, and increased traffic that will affects us for months, maybe even years. We are already experiencing these issues. Adding 1,200 apartments on the Irvine side and 800 apartments to the Tustin side just doesn't make sense. Where are these 2,000+ people going to park their cars considering public transportation is virtually nonexistent? Jamboree Rd is already 4-5 lanes and is already a nightmare to drive even on the weekdays, not to mention the weekends when out of towners come to shop. 3. Where will all these children go to school? Our schools in West Irvine and North Tustin are already crowded and are lacking resources to pay for basic school supplies, maintenance, and field trips! My son's 5th grade class has 35 kids and some of the classes this year have had to do dual grades to accommodate overflow. Vicki Shih Sent from my Pad On Sep 13, 2024, at 3:33 PM, Housing Element Rezone <housingelementrezone(a)tustinca.org>wrote: Good Afternoon, As someone who has shown interest in the City of Tustin's Housing Element Rezone Project, we are reaching out to keep you informed about this project. Please see the attached notice announcing that the City of Tustin, California, will hold a public hearing before the Tustin Planning Commission, to review the Final SupplementaVFinal Environmental Impact Reports for Tustin Legacy, Enderle Center, and Tustin Market Place. Meeting Information: Date: Tuesday, September 24, 2024 Time: 7:00 p.m. 2 Location: City of Tustin Council Chamber, 300 Centennial Way Tustin, CA 92780 Virtual Participation via Zoom: https:Hzoom.us/join I Meeting ID: 884 1331 3384 1 Passcode: 363248 Document Availability: The Planning Commission meeting agenda and associated staff reports will be made available at Least 72 prior to the hearing, and are available on the City's Website: https://www.tustinca.org/282/Meetings-Agendas. Additional documentation and Housing Element Rezone project information can be found here: www.tustinca.org/housingeLementrezone. Questions, or requests for additional information, can be directed to HousingELementRezone(a)tustinca.org Thank you, <image001 Jpg> City of Tustin Planning Division 300 Centennial Way, Tustin, CA 92780 P: 714-573-3140 1 F: 714-573-3113 Tustin Planning(cbtustinca.org I tustinca.orq <PHN 09-12-24 HOUSING ELEMENT REZONE PROJECT.pdf> 3