HomeMy WebLinkAboutAnonymous 1 - Item 11 (e-comment)From: noreplly(a aranicusideas.com
To: Yasuda. Erica; Woodward. Carrie; E-Comments
Subject: New eComment for Regular Meeting of the City Council/Closed Session-4:30 pm/Regular Meeting-6:00 pm
Date: Tuesday, February 18, 2025 4:56:12 PM
City of Tustin. CA
New eComment for Regular Meeting of the City
Council/Closed Session-4:30 pm/Regular
Meeting-6:00 pm
Guest User submitted a new eComment.
Meeting: Regular Meeting of the City Council/Closed Session-4:30 pm/Regular Meeting-6:00 pm
Item: 11. CODE AMENDMENT 2024-0006, SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENTS 2024-0005 AND
2024-0006 - MODIFICATIONS TO THE MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PARKING & PRIVATE
STORAGE STANDARDS CITYWIDE, AND IN THE DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL CORE & RED
HILL AVENUE SPECIFIC PLANS On October 22, 2024, the Planning Commission
recommended that the City Council adopt amendments to the multi -family residential parking
and private storage requirements in the Tustin City Code, Downtown Commercial Core Specific
Plan and Red Hill Avenue Specific Plan. The subject amendments implement policy actions
addressing potential barriers to housing production identified in an assessment of the Downtown
Commercial Core Specific Plan and Red Hill Avenue Specific Plan, which were presented to the
City Council in December 2023. The proposed amendments would: 1. Implement a scalable
parking requirement for multi -family residential development based on the number of bedrooms
per unit, subject to the development standards within the Downtown Commercial Core Specific
Plan, Red Hill Avenue Specific Plan and Tustin City Code. 2. Allow tandem parking for resident
parking spaces citywide. Tandem parking would continue to be prohibited for guest parking. 3.
Remove the requirement for private storage areas within the Downtown Commercial Core
Specific Plan and Red Hill Avenue Specific Plan, and remove the citywide requirement for
private storage cabinets within carports.
eComment: Please reduce parking minimums. They kill walkability and make the city look ugly,
and they are completely contrary to the notion of freedom. What if I don't want to own a car?
Why do I HAVE to be FORCED to PAY for parking that I will NEVER USE. This is completely
against the spirit of a free country. Major cities that are even more suburban than Tustin like San
Jose have completely gotten rid of this RED TAPE and are doing just fine. Tustin can be the
same by PROMOTING WALKABILITY, FREEDOM, AESTHETICS, and the FREE MARKET by
CUTTING RED TAPE and GOVERNMENT OVERREGULATION. Parking is not free, yet this city
forces us to pay a de facto TAX.
View and Analyze eComments
This email was sent from httos:/ftustin.aranicusideas.com
Unsubscribe from future mailings